COMPARING GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

ANDOVER SCHOOL

2015

ALLEGANY COUNTY

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

34
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 124

LEVEL 1

43

35%

LEVEL 2

47

38%

LEVEL 3

20

16%

LEVEL 4

14

11%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

735
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,189

LEVEL 1

634

29%

LEVEL 2

820

37%

LEVEL 3

480

22%

LEVEL 4

255

12%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

22
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

19

31%

LEVEL 2

21

34%

LEVEL 3

15

24%

LEVEL 4

7

11%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

372
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,070

LEVEL 1

289

27%

LEVEL 2

409

38%

LEVEL 3

251

23%

LEVEL 4

121

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

12
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

24

39%

LEVEL 2

26

42%

LEVEL 3

5

8%

LEVEL 4

7

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

363
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,119

LEVEL 1

345

31%

LEVEL 2

411

37%

LEVEL 3

229

20%

LEVEL 4

134

12%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

8

44%

LEVEL 2

5

28%

LEVEL 3

2

11%

LEVEL 4

3

17%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

4
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

4

80%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

13
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

1

5%

LEVEL 2

5

26%

LEVEL 3

6

32%

LEVEL 4

7

37%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

703
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,093

LEVEL 1

606

29%

LEVEL 2

784

37%

LEVEL 3

462

22%

LEVEL 4

241

12%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

9

41%

LEVEL 2

11

50%

LEVEL 3

1

5%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

8
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

9

28%

LEVEL 2

15

47%

LEVEL 3

5

16%

LEVEL 4

3

9%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

32
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 108

LEVEL 1

32

30%

LEVEL 2

44

41%

LEVEL 3

18

17%

LEVEL 4

14

13%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

717
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,850

LEVEL 1

392

21%

LEVEL 2

741

40%

LEVEL 3

465

25%

LEVEL 4

252

14%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

11

69%

LEVEL 2

3

19%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

18
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 339

LEVEL 1

242

71%

LEVEL 2

79

23%

LEVEL 3

15

4%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

14
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

17

35%

LEVEL 2

18

37%

LEVEL 3

8

16%

LEVEL 4

6

12%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

430
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 957

LEVEL 1

185

19%

LEVEL 2

342

36%

LEVEL 3

267

28%

LEVEL 4

163

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

20
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

26

35%

LEVEL 2

29

39%

LEVEL 3

12

16%

LEVEL 4

8

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

305
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,232

LEVEL 1

449

36%

LEVEL 2

478

39%

LEVEL 3

213

17%

LEVEL 4

92

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top