Skip to Content
MY COMPARISONS
2019: GERALDINE J MANN SCHOOL
2019: NIAGARA COUNTY
VIEW COMPARISON
Close Menu
COUNTIES
BOCES
DISTRICTS
SCHOOLS
HIGHER EDUCATION
DOWNLOADS
PARENTS
COUNTIES
BOCES
DISTRICTS
SCHOOLS
HIGHER EDUCATION
DOWNLOADS
PARENTS
Main content
COMPARING GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA
Filter this data
Gender
Female
Male
Ethnicity
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian...
White
Multiracial
Grades
3
4
5
6
7
8
Proficiency Levels
Proficient at 2-4
Proficient at 3-4
GERALDINE J MANN SCHOOL
2019
NIAGARA COUNTY
2019
ALL STUDENTS
PROFICIENT
127
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 240
LEVEL 1
53
22%
LEVEL 2
60
25%
LEVEL 3
59
25%
LEVEL 4
68
28%
ALL STUDENTS
PROFICIENT
4,080
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 9,368
LEVEL 1
2,676
29%
LEVEL 2
2,612
28%
LEVEL 3
2,425
26%
LEVEL 4
1,655
18%
BY GENDER
FEMALE
PROFICIENT
63
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 123
LEVEL 1
33
27%
LEVEL 2
27
22%
LEVEL 3
24
20%
LEVEL 4
39
32%
FEMALE
PROFICIENT
1,976
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 4,553
LEVEL 1
1,291
28%
LEVEL 2
1,286
28%
LEVEL 3
1,188
26%
LEVEL 4
788
17%
MALE
PROFICIENT
64
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 117
LEVEL 1
20
17%
LEVEL 2
33
28%
LEVEL 3
35
30%
LEVEL 4
29
25%
MALE
PROFICIENT
2,104
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 4,815
LEVEL 1
1,385
29%
LEVEL 2
1,326
28%
LEVEL 3
1,237
26%
LEVEL 4
867
18%
BY ETHNICITY
MULTIRACIAL
PROFICIENT
11
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 25
LEVEL 1
7
28%
LEVEL 2
7
28%
LEVEL 3
6
24%
LEVEL 4
5
20%
MULTIRACIAL
PROFICIENT
256
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 825
LEVEL 1
324
39%
LEVEL 2
245
30%
LEVEL 3
181
22%
LEVEL 4
75
9%
AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE
PROFICIENT
—
TOTAL TESTED: —
LEVEL 1
—
—
LEVEL 2
—
—
LEVEL 3
—
—
LEVEL 4
—
—
AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE
PROFICIENT
42
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 126
LEVEL 1
43
34%
LEVEL 2
41
33%
LEVEL 3
22
17%
LEVEL 4
20
16%
ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER
PROFICIENT
17
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 26
LEVEL 1
4
15%
LEVEL 2
5
19%
LEVEL 3
6
23%
LEVEL 4
11
42%
ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER
PROFICIENT
84
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 131
LEVEL 1
22
17%
LEVEL 2
25
19%
LEVEL 3
36
27%
LEVEL 4
48
37%
WHITE
PROFICIENT
86
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 144
LEVEL 1
21
15%
LEVEL 2
37
26%
LEVEL 3
38
26%
LEVEL 4
48
33%
WHITE
PROFICIENT
3,258
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 6,358
LEVEL 1
1,342
21%
LEVEL 2
1,758
28%
LEVEL 3
1,870
29%
LEVEL 4
1,388
22%
BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN
PROFICIENT
—
TOTAL TESTED: —
LEVEL 1
—
—
LEVEL 2
—
—
LEVEL 3
—
—
LEVEL 4
—
—
BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN
PROFICIENT
265
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,335
LEVEL 1
712
53%
LEVEL 2
358
27%
LEVEL 3
188
14%
LEVEL 4
77
6%
HISPANIC OR LATINO
PROFICIENT
6
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 22
LEVEL 1
13
59%
LEVEL 2
3
14%
LEVEL 3
4
18%
LEVEL 4
2
9%
HISPANIC OR LATINO
PROFICIENT
175
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 593
LEVEL 1
233
39%
LEVEL 2
185
31%
LEVEL 3
128
22%
LEVEL 4
47
8%
OTHER GROUPS
GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS
PROFICIENT
124
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 216
LEVEL 1
40
19%
LEVEL 2
52
24%
LEVEL 3
57
26%
LEVEL 4
67
31%
GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS
PROFICIENT
3,899
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 7,798
LEVEL 1
1,620
21%
LEVEL 2
2,279
29%
LEVEL 3
2,285
29%
LEVEL 4
1,614
21%
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
PROFICIENT
3
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 24
LEVEL 1
13
54%
LEVEL 2
8
33%
LEVEL 3
2
8%
LEVEL 4
1
4%
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
PROFICIENT
181
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,570
LEVEL 1
1,056
67%
LEVEL 2
333
21%
LEVEL 3
140
9%
LEVEL 4
41
3%
NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER
PROFICIENT
121
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 212
LEVEL 1
38
18%
LEVEL 2
53
25%
LEVEL 3
57
27%
LEVEL 4
64
30%
NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER
PROFICIENT
4,063
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 9,241
LEVEL 1
2,592
28%
LEVEL 2
2,586
28%
LEVEL 3
2,417
26%
LEVEL 4
1,646
18%
ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER
PROFICIENT
6
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 28
LEVEL 1
15
54%
LEVEL 2
7
25%
LEVEL 3
2
7%
LEVEL 4
4
14%
ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER
PROFICIENT
17
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 127
LEVEL 1
84
66%
LEVEL 2
26
20%
LEVEL 3
8
6%
LEVEL 4
9
7%
NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
PROFICIENT
60
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 85
LEVEL 1
10
12%
LEVEL 2
15
18%
LEVEL 3
25
29%
LEVEL 4
35
41%
NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
PROFICIENT
2,421
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 4,087
LEVEL 1
598
15%
LEVEL 2
1,068
26%
LEVEL 3
1,313
32%
LEVEL 4
1,108
27%
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
PROFICIENT
67
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 155
LEVEL 1
43
28%
LEVEL 2
45
29%
LEVEL 3
34
22%
LEVEL 4
33
21%
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
PROFICIENT
1,659
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,281
LEVEL 1
2,078
39%
LEVEL 2
1,544
29%
LEVEL 3
1,112
21%
LEVEL 4
547
10%
NOT MIGRANT
PROFICIENT
—
TOTAL TESTED: —
LEVEL 1
—
—
LEVEL 2
—
—
LEVEL 3
—
—
LEVEL 4
—
—
NOT MIGRANT
PROFICIENT
4,075
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 9,341
LEVEL 1
2,662
28%
LEVEL 2
2,604
28%
LEVEL 3
2,422
26%
LEVEL 4
1,653
18%
MIGRANT
PROFICIENT
—
TOTAL TESTED: —
LEVEL 1
—
—
LEVEL 2
—
—
LEVEL 3
—
—
LEVEL 4
—
—
MIGRANT
PROFICIENT
5
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 27
LEVEL 1
14
52%
LEVEL 2
8
30%
LEVEL 3
3
11%
LEVEL 4
2
7%
NOT IN FOSTER CARE
PROFICIENT
—
TOTAL TESTED: —
LEVEL 1
—
—
LEVEL 2
—
—
LEVEL 3
—
—
LEVEL 4
—
—
NOT IN FOSTER CARE
PROFICIENT
4,068
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 9,340
LEVEL 1
2,670
29%
LEVEL 2
2,602
28%
LEVEL 3
2,416
26%
LEVEL 4
1,652
18%
IN FOSTER CARE
PROFICIENT
—
TOTAL TESTED: —
LEVEL 1
—
—
LEVEL 2
—
—
LEVEL 3
—
—
LEVEL 4
—
—
IN FOSTER CARE
PROFICIENT
12
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 28
LEVEL 1
6
21%
LEVEL 2
10
36%
LEVEL 3
9
32%
LEVEL 4
3
11%
PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES
PROFICIENT
—
TOTAL TESTED: —
LEVEL 1
—
—
LEVEL 2
—
—
LEVEL 3
—
—
LEVEL 4
—
—
PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES
PROFICIENT
4,070
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 9,349
LEVEL 1
2,671
29%
LEVEL 2
2,608
28%
LEVEL 3
2,421
26%
LEVEL 4
1,649
18%
PARENT IN ARMED FORCES
PROFICIENT
—
TOTAL TESTED: —
LEVEL 1
—
—
LEVEL 2
—
—
LEVEL 3
—
—
LEVEL 4
—
—
PARENT IN ARMED FORCES
PROFICIENT
10
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 19
LEVEL 1
5
26%
LEVEL 2
4
21%
LEVEL 3
4
21%
LEVEL 4
6
32%
NOT HOMELESS
PROFICIENT
123
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 233
LEVEL 1
50
21%
LEVEL 2
60
26%
LEVEL 3
57
24%
LEVEL 4
66
28%
NOT HOMELESS
PROFICIENT
4,054
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 9,241
LEVEL 1
2,609
28%
LEVEL 2
2,578
28%
LEVEL 3
2,409
26%
LEVEL 4
1,645
18%
HOMELESS
PROFICIENT
4
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 7
LEVEL 1
3
43%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
2
29%
LEVEL 4
2
29%
HOMELESS
PROFICIENT
26
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 127
LEVEL 1
67
53%
LEVEL 2
34
27%
LEVEL 3
16
13%
LEVEL 4
10
8%
Top
