Skip to Content
Main content

COMPARING GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

GRAND AVENUE MIDDLE SCHOOL

2016

BELLMORE-MERRICK CENTRAL HS DISTRICT

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

85
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 169

LEVEL 1

23

14%

LEVEL 2

61

36%

LEVEL 3

46

27%

LEVEL 4

39

23%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

178
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 359

LEVEL 1

59

16%

LEVEL 2

122

34%

LEVEL 3

113

31%

LEVEL 4

65

18%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

45
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

11

14%

LEVEL 2

23

29%

LEVEL 3

27

34%

LEVEL 4

18

23%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

93
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

25

15%

LEVEL 2

54

31%

LEVEL 3

63

37%

LEVEL 4

30

17%

MALE

PROFICIENT

40
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 90

LEVEL 1

12

13%

LEVEL 2

38

42%

LEVEL 3

19

21%

LEVEL 4

21

23%

MALE

PROFICIENT

85
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 187

LEVEL 1

34

18%

LEVEL 2

68

36%

LEVEL 3

50

27%

LEVEL 4

35

19%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

17
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

3

12%

LEVEL 2

5

20%

LEVEL 3

7

28%

LEVEL 4

10

40%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

25
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

8

19%

LEVEL 2

10

23%

LEVEL 3

12

28%

LEVEL 4

13

30%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

60
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 118

LEVEL 1

16

14%

LEVEL 2

42

36%

LEVEL 3

36

31%

LEVEL 4

24

20%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

134
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 254

LEVEL 1

33

13%

LEVEL 2

87

34%

LEVEL 3

91

36%

LEVEL 4

43

17%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

4

29%

LEVEL 2

6

43%

LEVEL 3

2

14%

LEVEL 4

2

14%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

1

6%

LEVEL 2

10

56%

LEVEL 3

3

17%

LEVEL 4

4

22%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

10
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

12

31%

LEVEL 2

17

44%

LEVEL 3

6

15%

LEVEL 4

4

10%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

84
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 154

LEVEL 1

14

9%

LEVEL 2

56

36%

LEVEL 3

45

29%

LEVEL 4

39

25%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

174
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 317

LEVEL 1

31

10%

LEVEL 2

112

35%

LEVEL 3

109

34%

LEVEL 4

65

21%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

9

60%

LEVEL 2

5

33%

LEVEL 3

1

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

28

67%

LEVEL 2

10

24%

LEVEL 3

4

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

78
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

21

14%

LEVEL 2

54

35%

LEVEL 3

41

27%

LEVEL 4

37

24%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

170
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 333

LEVEL 1

53

16%

LEVEL 2

110

33%

LEVEL 3

108

32%

LEVEL 4

62

19%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

7
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

2

13%

LEVEL 2

7

44%

LEVEL 3

5

31%

LEVEL 4

2

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

8
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

6

23%

LEVEL 2

12

46%

LEVEL 3

5

19%

LEVEL 4

3

12%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top