Skip to Content
MY COMPARISONS
2019: ORVILLE A TODD MIDDLE SCHOOL
2019: DUTCHESS COUNTY
VIEW COMPARISON
Close Menu
COUNTIES
BOCES
DISTRICTS
SCHOOLS
HIGHER EDUCATION
DOWNLOADS
PARENTS
COUNTIES
BOCES
DISTRICTS
SCHOOLS
HIGHER EDUCATION
DOWNLOADS
PARENTS
Main content
COMPARING GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA
Filter this data
Gender
Female
Male
Ethnicity
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian...
White
Multiracial
Grades
3
4
5
6
7
8
Proficiency Levels
Proficient at 2-4
Proficient at 3-4
ORVILLE A TODD MIDDLE SCHOOL
2019
DUTCHESS COUNTY
2019
ALL STUDENTS
PROFICIENT
112
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 247
LEVEL 1
67
27%
LEVEL 2
68
28%
LEVEL 3
66
27%
LEVEL 4
46
19%
ALL STUDENTS
PROFICIENT
5,340
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 12,987
LEVEL 1
4,024
31%
LEVEL 2
3,623
28%
LEVEL 3
3,123
24%
LEVEL 4
2,217
17%
BY GENDER
FEMALE
PROFICIENT
50
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 111
LEVEL 1
29
26%
LEVEL 2
32
29%
LEVEL 3
31
28%
LEVEL 4
19
17%
FEMALE
PROFICIENT
2,577
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 6,254
LEVEL 1
1,860
30%
LEVEL 2
1,817
29%
LEVEL 3
1,528
24%
LEVEL 4
1,049
17%
MALE
PROFICIENT
62
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 136
LEVEL 1
38
28%
LEVEL 2
36
26%
LEVEL 3
35
26%
LEVEL 4
27
20%
MALE
PROFICIENT
2,763
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 6,733
LEVEL 1
2,164
32%
LEVEL 2
1,806
27%
LEVEL 3
1,595
24%
LEVEL 4
1,168
17%
BY ETHNICITY
MULTIRACIAL
PROFICIENT
—
TOTAL TESTED: —
LEVEL 1
—
—
LEVEL 2
—
—
LEVEL 3
—
—
LEVEL 4
—
—
MULTIRACIAL
PROFICIENT
227
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 595
LEVEL 1
210
35%
LEVEL 2
158
27%
LEVEL 3
127
21%
LEVEL 4
100
17%
AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE
PROFICIENT
—
TOTAL TESTED: —
LEVEL 1
—
—
LEVEL 2
—
—
LEVEL 3
—
—
LEVEL 4
—
—
AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE
PROFICIENT
2
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 10
LEVEL 1
6
60%
LEVEL 2
2
20%
LEVEL 3
1
10%
LEVEL 4
1
10%
ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER
PROFICIENT
22
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 31
LEVEL 1
3
10%
LEVEL 2
6
19%
LEVEL 3
7
23%
LEVEL 4
15
48%
ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER
PROFICIENT
316
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 462
LEVEL 1
61
13%
LEVEL 2
85
18%
LEVEL 3
115
25%
LEVEL 4
201
44%
WHITE
PROFICIENT
65
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 117
LEVEL 1
19
16%
LEVEL 2
33
28%
LEVEL 3
41
35%
LEVEL 4
24
21%
WHITE
PROFICIENT
3,562
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 7,194
LEVEL 1
1,579
22%
LEVEL 2
2,053
29%
LEVEL 3
2,047
28%
LEVEL 4
1,515
21%
BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN
PROFICIENT
9
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 47
LEVEL 1
25
53%
LEVEL 2
13
28%
LEVEL 3
6
13%
LEVEL 4
3
6%
BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN
PROFICIENT
357
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,719
LEVEL 1
907
53%
LEVEL 2
455
26%
LEVEL 3
232
13%
LEVEL 4
125
7%
HISPANIC OR LATINO
PROFICIENT
13
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 43
LEVEL 1
14
33%
LEVEL 2
16
37%
LEVEL 3
11
26%
LEVEL 4
2
5%
HISPANIC OR LATINO
PROFICIENT
876
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,007
LEVEL 1
1,261
42%
LEVEL 2
870
29%
LEVEL 3
601
20%
LEVEL 4
275
9%
OTHER GROUPS
GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS
PROFICIENT
109
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 216
LEVEL 1
42
19%
LEVEL 2
65
30%
LEVEL 3
64
30%
LEVEL 4
45
21%
GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS
PROFICIENT
5,188
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 10,986
LEVEL 1
2,557
23%
LEVEL 2
3,241
30%
LEVEL 3
3,013
27%
LEVEL 4
2,175
20%
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
PROFICIENT
3
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 31
LEVEL 1
25
81%
LEVEL 2
3
10%
LEVEL 3
2
6%
LEVEL 4
1
3%
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
PROFICIENT
152
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,001
LEVEL 1
1,467
73%
LEVEL 2
382
19%
LEVEL 3
110
5%
LEVEL 4
42
2%
NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER
PROFICIENT
—
TOTAL TESTED: —
LEVEL 1
—
—
LEVEL 2
—
—
LEVEL 3
—
—
LEVEL 4
—
—
NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER
PROFICIENT
5,281
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 12,375
LEVEL 1
3,585
29%
LEVEL 2
3,509
28%
LEVEL 3
3,076
25%
LEVEL 4
2,205
18%
ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER
PROFICIENT
—
TOTAL TESTED: —
LEVEL 1
—
—
LEVEL 2
—
—
LEVEL 3
—
—
LEVEL 4
—
—
ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER
PROFICIENT
59
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 612
LEVEL 1
439
72%
LEVEL 2
114
19%
LEVEL 3
47
8%
LEVEL 4
12
2%
NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
PROFICIENT
97
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 181
LEVEL 1
33
18%
LEVEL 2
51
28%
LEVEL 3
55
30%
LEVEL 4
42
23%
NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
PROFICIENT
3,871
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 7,621
LEVEL 1
1,616
21%
LEVEL 2
2,134
28%
LEVEL 3
2,118
28%
LEVEL 4
1,753
23%
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
PROFICIENT
15
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 66
LEVEL 1
34
52%
LEVEL 2
17
26%
LEVEL 3
11
17%
LEVEL 4
4
6%
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
PROFICIENT
1,469
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,366
LEVEL 1
2,408
45%
LEVEL 2
1,489
28%
LEVEL 3
1,005
19%
LEVEL 4
464
9%
NOT MIGRANT
PROFICIENT
—
TOTAL TESTED: —
LEVEL 1
—
—
LEVEL 2
—
—
LEVEL 3
—
—
LEVEL 4
—
—
NOT MIGRANT
PROFICIENT
5,336
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 12,957
LEVEL 1
4,004
31%
LEVEL 2
3,617
28%
LEVEL 3
3,121
24%
LEVEL 4
2,215
17%
MIGRANT
PROFICIENT
—
TOTAL TESTED: —
LEVEL 1
—
—
LEVEL 2
—
—
LEVEL 3
—
—
LEVEL 4
—
—
MIGRANT
PROFICIENT
4
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 30
LEVEL 1
20
67%
LEVEL 2
6
20%
LEVEL 3
2
7%
LEVEL 4
2
7%
NOT IN FOSTER CARE
PROFICIENT
—
TOTAL TESTED: —
LEVEL 1
—
—
LEVEL 2
—
—
LEVEL 3
—
—
LEVEL 4
—
—
NOT IN FOSTER CARE
PROFICIENT
5,336
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 12,952
LEVEL 1
4,002
31%
LEVEL 2
3,614
28%
LEVEL 3
3,122
24%
LEVEL 4
2,214
17%
IN FOSTER CARE
PROFICIENT
—
TOTAL TESTED: —
LEVEL 1
—
—
LEVEL 2
—
—
LEVEL 3
—
—
LEVEL 4
—
—
IN FOSTER CARE
PROFICIENT
4
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 35
LEVEL 1
22
63%
LEVEL 2
9
26%
LEVEL 3
1
3%
LEVEL 4
3
9%
PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES
PROFICIENT
—
TOTAL TESTED: —
LEVEL 1
—
—
LEVEL 2
—
—
LEVEL 3
—
—
LEVEL 4
—
—
PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES
PROFICIENT
5,329
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 12,957
LEVEL 1
4,014
31%
LEVEL 2
3,614
28%
LEVEL 3
3,118
24%
LEVEL 4
2,211
17%
PARENT IN ARMED FORCES
PROFICIENT
—
TOTAL TESTED: —
LEVEL 1
—
—
LEVEL 2
—
—
LEVEL 3
—
—
LEVEL 4
—
—
PARENT IN ARMED FORCES
PROFICIENT
11
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 30
LEVEL 1
10
33%
LEVEL 2
9
30%
LEVEL 3
5
17%
LEVEL 4
6
20%
NOT HOMELESS
PROFICIENT
—
TOTAL TESTED: —
LEVEL 1
—
—
LEVEL 2
—
—
LEVEL 3
—
—
LEVEL 4
—
—
NOT HOMELESS
PROFICIENT
5,312
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 12,738
LEVEL 1
3,854
30%
LEVEL 2
3,572
28%
LEVEL 3
3,103
24%
LEVEL 4
2,209
17%
HOMELESS
PROFICIENT
—
TOTAL TESTED: —
LEVEL 1
—
—
LEVEL 2
—
—
LEVEL 3
—
—
LEVEL 4
—
—
HOMELESS
PROFICIENT
28
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 249
LEVEL 1
170
68%
LEVEL 2
51
20%
LEVEL 3
20
8%
LEVEL 4
8
3%
Top
