Skip to Content
Main content

JHS 88 PETER ROUGET

2017

JHS 88 PETER ROUGET

2016

K-12 Enrollment: 148
K-12 Enrollment: 151

COMPARING ELL ENROLLMENT BY GENDER

MALE

82

55%

FEMALE

66

45%

MALE

80

53%

FEMALE

71

47%

COMPARING ELL ENROLLMENT BY ETHNICITY

WHITE

11

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

100

68%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

36

24%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

1

1%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

0

0%

WHITE

15

10%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

90

60%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

45

30%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

1

1%

MULTIRACIAL

0

0%

COMPARING ELL IN OTHER GROUPS

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

76

51%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

130

88%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

76

50%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

134

89%

ENROLLMENT BY GRADE

6TH GRADE

78

53%

UNGRADED ELEMENTARY

1

1%

7TH GRADE

36

24%

8TH GRADE

26

18%

UNGRADED SECONDARY

7

5%

5TH GRADE

2

1%

6TH GRADE

62

41%

UNGRADED ELEMENTARY

3

2%

7TH GRADE

37

25%

8TH GRADE

42

28%

UNGRADED SECONDARY

5

3%

COMPARING ELL 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

3
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 122

LEVEL 1

82

67%

LEVEL 2

37

30%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

35

67%

LEVEL 2

15

29%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MALE

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

47

67%

LEVEL 2

22

31%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

3
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

20

65%

LEVEL 2

8

26%

LEVEL 3

2

6%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

56

69%

LEVEL 2

25

31%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

3
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

43

62%

LEVEL 2

23

33%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

39

74%

LEVEL 2

14

26%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

12

80%

LEVEL 2

3

20%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

3
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

70

65%

LEVEL 2

34

32%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

3
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

78

62%

LEVEL 2

45

36%

LEVEL 3

3

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

40

65%

LEVEL 2

20

32%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MALE

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

38

59%

LEVEL 2

25

39%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

2
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

18

45%

LEVEL 2

20

50%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

56

74%

LEVEL 2

20

26%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

3
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

31

44%

LEVEL 2

37

52%

LEVEL 3

3

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

47

85%

LEVEL 2

8

15%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

1
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

10

77%

LEVEL 2

2

15%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

2
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 113

LEVEL 1

68

60%

LEVEL 2

43

38%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

COMPARING ELL 3-8 MATH ASSESSMENT

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

13
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 128

LEVEL 1

79

62%

LEVEL 2

36

28%

LEVEL 3

10

8%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

4
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

36

68%

LEVEL 2

13

25%

LEVEL 3

3

6%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

9
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

43

57%

LEVEL 2

23

31%

LEVEL 3

7

9%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

10
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

8

26%

LEVEL 2

13

42%

LEVEL 3

7

23%

LEVEL 4

3

10%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 84

LEVEL 1

61

73%

LEVEL 2

20

24%

LEVEL 3

3

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

13
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

31

43%

LEVEL 2

28

39%

LEVEL 3

10

14%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

48

86%

LEVEL 2

8

14%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

2
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

11

69%

LEVEL 2

3

19%

LEVEL 3

1

6%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

11
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 112

LEVEL 1

68

61%

LEVEL 2

33

29%

LEVEL 3

9

8%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

22
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 132

LEVEL 1

52

39%

LEVEL 2

58

44%

LEVEL 3

16

12%

LEVEL 4

6

5%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

10
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

25

38%

LEVEL 2

30

46%

LEVEL 3

9

14%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

12
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

27

40%

LEVEL 2

28

42%

LEVEL 3

7

10%

LEVEL 4

5

7%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

15
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

7

17%

LEVEL 2

20

48%

LEVEL 3

10

24%

LEVEL 4

5

12%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

42

55%

LEVEL 2

31

40%

LEVEL 3

3

4%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

21
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

15

20%

LEVEL 2

40

53%

LEVEL 3

15

20%

LEVEL 4

6

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

37

66%

LEVEL 2

18

32%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

2
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

6

38%

LEVEL 2

8

50%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

20
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 116

LEVEL 1

46

40%

LEVEL 2

50

43%

LEVEL 3

14

12%

LEVEL 4

6

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Enrollment Suppression

When the Total Students count equals the count in the English Language Learner Students, Students with Disabilities, and/or Economically Disadvantaged Students category, the data are suppressed.

When the count of students in either the English Language Learner Students, Students with Disabilities, and/or Economically Disadvantaged Students category is less than 5, the data are suppressed.

×
Top