Skip to Content
Main content

COMPARING STAFF EVALUATIONS

Since Education Law §3012-c requires a number of decisions within APPR plans to be collectively bargained, APPR results across school districts and BOCES may not be based on the exact same measures, assessments, or scales for every classroom teacher or building principal. Thus, caution should be exercised when attempting to compare results across school districts and BOCES.

NORTH SALEM CSD

2015

WESTCHESTER COUNTY

2015

OVERALL COMPOSITE RATING

Each classroom teacher and building principal must receive an overall rating based on a single composite effectiveness score that is calculated based on the scores received by the teacher or principal in each of the three subcomponents. View more detailed information about the Overall Composite Rating.

INEFFECTIVE
1
1%
DEVELOPING
0
0%
EFFECTIVE
12
10%
HIGHLY EFFECTIVE
105
89%
TOTAL EDUCATORS: 118
INEFFECTIVE
39
0%
DEVELOPING
151
1%
EFFECTIVE
3,942
35%
HIGHLY EFFECTIVE
7,024
63%
TOTAL EDUCATORS: 11,156

STATE GROWTH OR OTHER COMPARABLE MEASURES RATING

Education Law §3012-c requires that 20% of a teacher's or principal's evaluation be based on State Growth or Other Comparable Measures (State-provided growth scores or Student Learning Objectives (SLOs)). A State Growth or Other Comparable Measure must measure student growth. View more detailed information about the State Growth or Other Comparable Measures Rating.

INEFFECTIVE
3
3%
DEVELOPING
7
6%
EFFECTIVE
16
14%
HIGHLY EFFECTIVE
92
78%
TOTAL EDUCATORS: 118
INEFFECTIVE
288
3%
DEVELOPING
667
6%
EFFECTIVE
4,588
41%
HIGHLY EFFECTIVE
5,613
50%
TOTAL EDUCATORS: 11,156

LOCALLY-SELECTED MEASURES

Education Law §3012-c requires that 20% of a teacher's or principal's evaluation be based on Locally-Selected Measures. A Locally-Selected Measure may either measure growth or achievement from a selection of available assessment options. View more detailed information about the Locally-Selected Measures.

INEFFECTIVE
0
0%
DEVELOPING
1
1%
EFFECTIVE
2
2%
HIGHLY EFFECTIVE
115
97%
TOTAL EDUCATORS: 118
INEFFECTIVE
54
0%
DEVELOPING
197
2%
EFFECTIVE
3,825
34%
HIGHLY EFFECTIVE
7,081
63%
TOTAL EDUCATORS: 11,157

OTHER MEASURES OF EDUCATOR EFFECTIVENESS RATING

Education Law §3012-c requires that 60% of teacher and principal evaluations be based on multiple measures of teacher/principal effectiveness consistent with standards prescribed by the Commissioner in regulation. This will include the extent to which the educator demonstrates proficiency in meeting New York State's teaching or leadership standards. View more detailed information about the Other Measures of Educator Effectiveness Rating.

INEFFECTIVE
1
1%
DEVELOPING
0
0%
EFFECTIVE
3
3%
HIGHLY EFFECTIVE
114
97%
TOTAL EDUCATORS: 118
INEFFECTIVE
35
0%
DEVELOPING
176
2%
EFFECTIVE
4,078
37%
HIGHLY EFFECTIVE
6,868
62%
TOTAL EDUCATORS: 11,157
Top