Skip to Content
Main content

COMPARING STAFF EVALUATIONS

Since Education Law §3012-c requires a number of decisions within APPR plans to be collectively bargained, APPR results across school districts and BOCES may not be based on the exact same measures, assessments, or scales for every classroom teacher or building principal. Thus, caution should be exercised when attempting to compare results across school districts and BOCES.

VALLEY STREAM 13 UFSD

2015

NASSAU COUNTY

2015

OVERALL COMPOSITE RATING

Each classroom teacher and building principal must receive an overall rating based on a single composite effectiveness score that is calculated based on the scores received by the teacher or principal in each of the three subcomponents. View more detailed information about the Overall Composite Rating.

INEFFECTIVE
0
0%
DEVELOPING
0
0%
EFFECTIVE
39
23%
HIGHLY EFFECTIVE
127
77%
TOTAL EDUCATORS: 166
INEFFECTIVE
16
0%
DEVELOPING
118
1%
EFFECTIVE
5,232
32%
HIGHLY EFFECTIVE
10,962
67%
TOTAL EDUCATORS: 16,328

STATE GROWTH OR OTHER COMPARABLE MEASURES RATING

Education Law §3012-c requires that 20% of a teacher's or principal's evaluation be based on State Growth or Other Comparable Measures (State-provided growth scores or Student Learning Objectives (SLOs)). A State Growth or Other Comparable Measure must measure student growth. View more detailed information about the State Growth or Other Comparable Measures Rating.

INEFFECTIVE
2
1%
DEVELOPING
8
5%
EFFECTIVE
70
42%
HIGHLY EFFECTIVE
86
52%
TOTAL EDUCATORS: 166
INEFFECTIVE
307
2%
DEVELOPING
752
5%
EFFECTIVE
8,060
49%
HIGHLY EFFECTIVE
7,208
44%
TOTAL EDUCATORS: 16,327

LOCALLY-SELECTED MEASURES

Education Law §3012-c requires that 20% of a teacher's or principal's evaluation be based on Locally-Selected Measures. A Locally-Selected Measure may either measure growth or achievement from a selection of available assessment options. View more detailed information about the Locally-Selected Measures.

INEFFECTIVE
0
0%
DEVELOPING
6
4%
EFFECTIVE
16
10%
HIGHLY EFFECTIVE
144
87%
TOTAL EDUCATORS: 166
INEFFECTIVE
14
0%
DEVELOPING
290
2%
EFFECTIVE
4,257
26%
HIGHLY EFFECTIVE
11,767
72%
TOTAL EDUCATORS: 16,328

OTHER MEASURES OF EDUCATOR EFFECTIVENESS RATING

Education Law §3012-c requires that 60% of teacher and principal evaluations be based on multiple measures of teacher/principal effectiveness consistent with standards prescribed by the Commissioner in regulation. This will include the extent to which the educator demonstrates proficiency in meeting New York State's teaching or leadership standards. View more detailed information about the Other Measures of Educator Effectiveness Rating.

INEFFECTIVE

DEVELOPING

EFFECTIVE

HIGHLY EFFECTIVE

TOTAL EDUCATORS: 166

*Fields with dashes have data suppressed in order to prevent reporting personally identifiable information.

INEFFECTIVE
21
0%
DEVELOPING
309
2%
EFFECTIVE
4,708
29%
HIGHLY EFFECTIVE
11,289
69%
TOTAL EDUCATORS: 16,327
Top