Skip to Content
Main content

COMPARING STAFF EVALUATIONS

Since Education Law §3012-c requires a number of decisions within APPR plans to be collectively bargained, APPR results across school districts and BOCES may not be based on the exact same measures, assessments, or scales for every classroom teacher or building principal. Thus, caution should be exercised when attempting to compare results across school districts and BOCES.

HUDSON CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT

2015

NY STATE

2015

OVERALL COMPOSITE RATING

Each classroom teacher and building principal must receive an overall rating based on a single composite effectiveness score that is calculated based on the scores received by the teacher or principal in each of the three subcomponents. View more detailed information about the Overall Composite Rating.

INEFFECTIVE
1
1%
DEVELOPING
6
4%
EFFECTIVE
57
36%
HIGHLY EFFECTIVE
95
60%
TOTAL EDUCATORS: 159
INEFFECTIVE
1,099
1%
DEVELOPING
6,261
3%
EFFECTIVE
101,675
53%
HIGHLY EFFECTIVE
84,592
44%
TOTAL EDUCATORS: 193,627

STATE GROWTH OR OTHER COMPARABLE MEASURES RATING

Education Law §3012-c requires that 20% of a teacher's or principal's evaluation be based on State Growth or Other Comparable Measures (State-provided growth scores or Student Learning Objectives (SLOs)). A State Growth or Other Comparable Measure must measure student growth. View more detailed information about the State Growth or Other Comparable Measures Rating.

INEFFECTIVE
6
4%
DEVELOPING
16
10%
EFFECTIVE
59
37%
HIGHLY EFFECTIVE
78
49%
TOTAL EDUCATORS: 159
INEFFECTIVE
4,573
2%
DEVELOPING
12,418
6%
EFFECTIVE
110,482
57%
HIGHLY EFFECTIVE
66,152
34%
TOTAL EDUCATORS: 193,625

LOCALLY-SELECTED MEASURES

Education Law §3012-c requires that 20% of a teacher's or principal's evaluation be based on Locally-Selected Measures. A Locally-Selected Measure may either measure growth or achievement from a selection of available assessment options. View more detailed information about the Locally-Selected Measures.

INEFFECTIVE
3
2%
DEVELOPING
6
4%
EFFECTIVE
44
28%
HIGHLY EFFECTIVE
106
67%
TOTAL EDUCATORS: 159
INEFFECTIVE
1,859
1%
DEVELOPING
7,481
4%
EFFECTIVE
101,472
52%
HIGHLY EFFECTIVE
82,815
43%
TOTAL EDUCATORS: 193,627

OTHER MEASURES OF EDUCATOR EFFECTIVENESS RATING

Education Law §3012-c requires that 60% of teacher and principal evaluations be based on multiple measures of teacher/principal effectiveness consistent with standards prescribed by the Commissioner in regulation. This will include the extent to which the educator demonstrates proficiency in meeting New York State's teaching or leadership standards. View more detailed information about the Other Measures of Educator Effectiveness Rating.

INEFFECTIVE
0
0%
DEVELOPING
1
1%
EFFECTIVE
126
79%
HIGHLY EFFECTIVE
32
20%
TOTAL EDUCATORS: 159
INEFFECTIVE
955
0%
DEVELOPING
7,994
4%
EFFECTIVE
77,722
40%
HIGHLY EFFECTIVE
106,955
55%
TOTAL EDUCATORS: 193,626
Top