Skip to Content
Main content

Printed on: December 2, 2024, 2:34 am

NYC GEOG DIST #28 - QUEENS - Educator Evaluation Data

2013-14 Annual Professional Performance Review (APPR) Ratings (Education Law §3012-c)

Overall Composite Rating Display Last Year's Data

Each classroom teacher and building principal must receive an overall rating based on a single composite effectiveness score that is calculated based on the scores received by the teacher or principal in each of the three subcomponents. View more detailed information about the Overall Composite Rating.

INEFFECTIVE
25
1%
DEVELOPING
130
6%
EFFECTIVE
1,867
82%
HIGHLY EFFECTIVE
260
11%
TOTAL EDUCATORS: 2,282

State Growth or Other Comparable Measures Rating Display Last Year's Data

Education Law §3012-c requires that 20% of a teacher's or principal's evaluation be based on State Growth or Other Comparable Measures (State-provided growth scores or Student Learning Objectives (SLOs)). A State Growth or Other Comparable Measure must measure student growth. View more detailed information about the State Growth or Other Comparable Measures Rating.

INEFFECTIVE
66
3%
DEVELOPING
107
5%
EFFECTIVE
1,904
83%
HIGHLY EFFECTIVE
205
9%
TOTAL EDUCATORS: 2,282

Locally-Selected Measures Rating

Education Law §3012-c requires that 20% of a teacher's or principal's evaluation be based on Locally-Selected Measures. A Locally-Selected Measure may either measure growth or achievement from a selection of available assessment options. View more detailed information about the Locally-Selected Measures.

INEFFECTIVE
57
2%
DEVELOPING
119
5%
EFFECTIVE
1,899
83%
HIGHLY EFFECTIVE
207
9%
TOTAL EDUCATORS: 2,282

Other Measures of Educator Effectiveness Rating

Education Law §3012-c requires that 60% of teacher and principal evaluations be based on multiple measures of teacher/principal effectiveness consistent with standards prescribed by the Commissioner in regulation. This will include the extent to which the educator demonstrates proficiency in meeting New York State's teaching or leadership standards. View more detailed information about the Other Measures of Educator Effectiveness Rating.

INEFFECTIVE
20
1%
DEVELOPING
155
7%
EFFECTIVE
1,341
59%
HIGHLY EFFECTIVE
766
34%
TOTAL EDUCATORS: 2,282

Pursuant to Education Law §3012-c(10), viewers of this site will not be able to find personally identifiable information for any teacher or principal, including an individual educator's evaluation ratings by name anywhere on this website. However, parents or legal guardians may contact their child's district or BOCES to obtain information about their child's teacher(s) or principal(s) composite effectiveness score and/or their final overall rating.

Top