Printed on: March 30, 2017, 2:51 am

HILTON CSD - Educator Evaluation Data

2014-15 Annual Professional Performance Review (APPR) Ratings

Overall Composite Rating Display Last Year's Data

Each classroom teacher and building principal must receive an overall rating based on a single composite effectiveness score that is calculated based on the scores received by the teacher or principal in each of the three subcomponents. View more detailed information about the Overall Composite Rating.

INEFFECTIVE
0
0%
DEVELOPING
34
10%
EFFECTIVE
103
31%
HIGHLY EFFECTIVE
199
59%
TOTAL EDUCATORS: 336

State Growth or Other Comparable Measures Rating Display Last Year's Data

Education Law §3012-c requires that 20% of a teacher's or principal's evaluation be based on State Growth or Other Comparable Measures (State-provided growth scores or Student Learning Objectives (SLOs)). A State Growth or Other Comparable Measure must measure student growth. View more detailed information about the State Growth or Other Comparable Measures Rating.

INEFFECTIVE
12
4%
DEVELOPING
42
13%
EFFECTIVE
109
32%
HIGHLY EFFECTIVE
173
51%
TOTAL EDUCATORS: 336

Locally-Selected Measures

Education Law §3012-c requires that 20% of a teacher's or principal's evaluation be based on Locally-Selected Measures. A Locally-Selected Measure may either measure growth or achievement from a selection of available assessment options. View more detailed information about the Locally-Selected Measures.

INEFFECTIVE
12
4%
DEVELOPING
52
15%
EFFECTIVE
51
15%
HIGHLY EFFECTIVE
221
66%
TOTAL EDUCATORS: 336

Other Measures of Educator Effectiveness Rating

Education Law §3012-c requires that 60% of teacher and principal evaluations be based on multiple measures of teacher/principal effectiveness consistent with standards prescribed by the Commissioner in regulation. This will include the extent to which the educator demonstrates proficiency in meeting New York State's teaching or leadership standards. View more detailed information about the Other Measures of Educator Effectiveness Rating.

INEFFECTIVE
0
0%
DEVELOPING
3
1%
EFFECTIVE
112
33%
HIGHLY EFFECTIVE
221
66%
TOTAL EDUCATORS: 336

Pursuant to Education Law §3012-c(10), viewers of this site will not be able to find personally identifiable information for any teacher or principal, including an individual educator's evaluation ratings by name anywhere on this website. However, parents or legal guardians may contact their child's district or BOCES to obtain information about their child's teacher(s) or principal(s) composite effectiveness score and/or their final overall rating.

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.