Printed on: July 21, 2018, 9:39 am

NASSAU COUNTY - Educator Evaluation Data

2015-16 Annual Professional Performance Review (APPR) Ratings (Education Law §3012-d)

Original Overall Rating

Each classroom teacher and building principal must receive an overall rating based on the ratings received by the teacher or principal in the Student Performance and Observation/School Visit categories and determined using a State-prescribed matrix. View more detailed information about the Overall rating.

INEFFECTIVE
0
0%
DEVELOPING
12
1%
EFFECTIVE
231
26%
HIGHLY EFFECTIVE
645
73%
TOTAL EDUCATORS: 888

Original Student Performance category rating

Education Law §3012-d requires that one component of a teacher's or principal's evaluation be based on one required measure of student growth (State-provided growth scores or Student Learning Objectives (SLOs)) and one optional measure of student growth (a second State-provided growth score on a State-created or administered test or a growth score based on a State-designed supplemental assessment). All measures in the Student Performance category must measure student growth. View more detailed information about the Student Performance category rating.

INEFFECTIVE
12
1%
DEVELOPING
52
6%
EFFECTIVE
359
40%
HIGHLY EFFECTIVE
465
52%
TOTAL EDUCATORS: 888

ORIGINAL TEACHER OBSERVATION/PRINCIPAL SCHOOL VISIT category rating

Education Law §3012-d requires that teachers' and principals' evaluations be based on at least two observations (for teachers) or school visits (for principals) scored using a State-approved rubric. The Teacher Observation/Principal School Visit category includes two required subcomponents and an optional subcomponent . View more detailed information about the Teacher Observation/Principal School Visit category rating.

INEFFECTIVE
0
0%
DEVELOPING
3
0%
EFFECTIVE
453
51%
HIGHLY EFFECTIVE
432
49%
TOTAL EDUCATORS: 888

Transition Overall Rating

Each classroom teacher and building principal must receive an overall rating based on the ratings received by the teacher or principal in the Student Performance and Observation/School Visit categories and determined using a State-prescribed matrix. View more detailed information about the Overall rating or about Transition Scores/Ratings.

INEFFECTIVE
0
0%
DEVELOPING
4
1%
EFFECTIVE
157
38%
HIGHLY EFFECTIVE
257
61%
TOTAL EDUCATORS: 418

Transition Student Performance category rating

Education Law §3012-d requires that one component of a teacher's or principal's evaluation be based on one required measure of student growth (State-provided growth scores or Student Learning Objectives (SLOs)) and one optional measure of student growth (a second State-provided growth score on a State-created or administered test or a growth score based on a State-designed supplemental assessment). All measures in the Student Performance category must measure student growth. During the 2015-16 through 2018-19 school years, transition scores and ratings will also be calculated by districts/BOCES that exclude the results of the grades 3-8 ELA/math State assessments and any State-provided growth scores. During the 2015-16 through 2018-19 school years, transition scores and ratings will also be calculated by districts/BOCES that exclude the results of the grades 3-8 ELA/math State assessments and any State-provided growth scores. View more detailed information about the Student Performance category rating or about Transition Scores/Ratings.

INEFFECTIVE
2
2%
DEVELOPING
13
10%
EFFECTIVE
64
48%
HIGHLY EFFECTIVE
53
40%
TOTAL EDUCATORS: 132

Transition TEACHER OBSERVATION/PRINCIPAL SCHOOL VISIT category rating

Education Law §3012-d requires that teachers' and principals' evaluations be based on at least two observations (for teachers) or school visits (for principals) scored using a State-approved rubric. The Teacher Observation/Principal School Visit category includes two required subcomponents and an optional subcomponent. View more detailed information about the detailed information about the Teacher Observation/Principal School Visit category rating or about Transition Scores/Ratings.

INEFFECTIVE
1
0%
DEVELOPING
1
0%
EFFECTIVE
151
36%
HIGHLY EFFECTIVE
265
63%
TOTAL EDUCATORS: 418

Pursuant to Education Law §3012-c(10), viewers of this site will not be able to find personally identifiable information for any teacher or principal, including an individual educator's evaluation ratings by name anywhere on this website. However, parents or legal guardians may contact their child's district or BOCES to obtain information about their child's teacher(s) or principal(s) composite effectiveness score and/or their final overall rating.

Top