Printed on: April 21, 2018, 3:03 pm

ONEIDA COUNTY - Educator Evaluation Data

2015-16 Annual Professional Performance Review (APPR) Ratings (Education Law §3012-c)

Original Overall Composite Rating Display Last Year's Data

Each classroom teacher and building principal must receive an overall rating based on a single composite effectiveness score that is calculated based on the scores received by the teacher or principal in each of the three subcomponents. View more detailed information about the Overall Composite Rating.

INEFFECTIVE
6
0%
DEVELOPING
36
1%
EFFECTIVE
774
32%
HIGHLY EFFECTIVE
1,603
66%
TOTAL EDUCATORS: 2,419

Original State Growth or Other Comparable Measures Rating Display Last Year's Data

Education Law §3012-c requires that 20% of a teacher's or principal's evaluation be based on State Growth or Other Comparable Measures (State-provided growth scores or Student Learning Objectives (SLOs)). A State Growth or Other Comparable Measure must measure student growth. View more detailed information about the State Growth or Other Comparable Measures Rating.

INEFFECTIVE
39
2%
DEVELOPING
69
3%
EFFECTIVE
832
34%
HIGHLY EFFECTIVE
1,479
61%
TOTAL EDUCATORS: 2,419

Original Locally-Selected Measures Rating

Education Law §3012-c requires that 20% of a teacher's or principal's evaluation be based on Locally-Selected Measures. A Locally-Selected Measure may either measure growth or achievement from a selection of available assessment options. View more detailed information about the Locally-Selected Measures.

INEFFECTIVE
111
5%
DEVELOPING
122
5%
EFFECTIVE
605
25%
HIGHLY EFFECTIVE
1,581
65%
TOTAL EDUCATORS: 2,419

Original Other Measures of Educator Effectiveness Rating

Education Law §3012-c requires that 60% of teacher and principal evaluations be based on multiple measures of teacher/principal effectiveness consistent with standards prescribed by the Commissioner in regulation. This will include the extent to which the educator demonstrates proficiency in meeting New York State's teaching or leadership standards. View more detailed information about the Other Measures of Educator Effectiveness Rating.

INEFFECTIVE
6
0%
DEVELOPING
91
4%
EFFECTIVE
739
31%
HIGHLY EFFECTIVE
1,583
65%
TOTAL EDUCATORS: 2,419

Transition Overall Composite Rating

Each classroom teacher and building principal must receive an overall rating based on a single composite effectiveness score that is calculated based on the scores received by the teacher or principal in each of the three subcomponents, excluding measures based on the grades 3-8 ELA/math State assessments and any State-provided growth scores. View more detailed information about the Overall Composite Rating or about Transition Scores/Ratings.

INEFFECTIVE
1
0%
DEVELOPING
5
1%
EFFECTIVE
145
16%
HIGHLY EFFECTIVE
731
83%
TOTAL EDUCATORS: 882

Pursuant to Education Law §3012-c(10), viewers of this site will not be able to find personally identifiable information for any teacher or principal, including an individual educator's evaluation ratings by name anywhere on this website. However, parents or legal guardians may contact their child's district or BOCES to obtain information about their child's teacher(s) or principal(s) composite effectiveness score and/or their final overall rating.

Top