Printed on: November 18, 2017, 1:23 am

HUDSON CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT - Educator Evaluation Data

2015-16 Annual Professional Performance Review (APPR) Ratings (Education Law §3012-c)

Original Overall Composite Rating Display Last Year's Data

Each classroom teacher and building principal must receive an overall rating based on a single composite effectiveness score that is calculated based on the scores received by the teacher or principal in each of the three subcomponents. View more detailed information about the Overall Composite Rating.

INEFFECTIVE
0
0%
DEVELOPING
5
3%
EFFECTIVE
67
41%
HIGHLY EFFECTIVE
91
56%
TOTAL EDUCATORS: 163

Original State Growth or Other Comparable Measures Rating Display Last Year's Data

Education Law §3012-c requires that 20% of a teacher's or principal's evaluation be based on State Growth or Other Comparable Measures (State-provided growth scores or Student Learning Objectives (SLOs)). A State Growth or Other Comparable Measure must measure student growth. View more detailed information about the State Growth or Other Comparable Measures Rating.

INEFFECTIVE
2
1%
DEVELOPING
19
12%
EFFECTIVE
63
39%
HIGHLY EFFECTIVE
79
48%
TOTAL EDUCATORS: 163

Original Locally-Selected Measures Rating

Education Law §3012-c requires that 20% of a teacher's or principal's evaluation be based on Locally-Selected Measures. A Locally-Selected Measure may either measure growth or achievement from a selection of available assessment options. View more detailed information about the Locally-Selected Measures.

INEFFECTIVE
0
0%
DEVELOPING
6
4%
EFFECTIVE
53
33%
HIGHLY EFFECTIVE
104
64%
TOTAL EDUCATORS: 163

Original Other Measures of Educator Effectiveness Rating

Education Law §3012-c requires that 60% of teacher and principal evaluations be based on multiple measures of teacher/principal effectiveness consistent with standards prescribed by the Commissioner in regulation. This will include the extent to which the educator demonstrates proficiency in meeting New York State's teaching or leadership standards. View more detailed information about the Other Measures of Educator Effectiveness Rating.

INEFFECTIVE
0
0%
DEVELOPING
0
0%
EFFECTIVE
127
78%
HIGHLY EFFECTIVE
36
22%
TOTAL EDUCATORS: 163

Transition Overall Composite Rating

Each classroom teacher and building principal must receive an overall rating based on a single composite effectiveness score that is calculated based on the scores received by the teacher or principal in each of the three subcomponents, excluding measures based on the grades 3-8 ELA/math State assessments and any State-provided growth scores. View more detailed information about the Overall Composite Rating or about Transition Scores/Ratings.

INEFFECTIVE
0
0%
DEVELOPING
0
0%
EFFECTIVE
34
61%
HIGHLY EFFECTIVE
22
39%
TOTAL EDUCATORS: 56

Pursuant to Education Law §3012-c(10), viewers of this site will not be able to find personally identifiable information for any teacher or principal, including an individual educator's evaluation ratings by name anywhere on this website. However, parents or legal guardians may contact their child's district or BOCES to obtain information about their child's teacher(s) or principal(s) composite effectiveness score and/or their final overall rating.

Top