Printed on: November 20, 2017, 1:56 pm

AUSABLE VALLEY CSD - Educator Evaluation Data

2015-16 Annual Professional Performance Review (APPR) Ratings (Education Law §3012-c)

Original Overall Composite Rating Display Last Year's Data

Each classroom teacher and building principal must receive an overall rating based on a single composite effectiveness score that is calculated based on the scores received by the teacher or principal in each of the three subcomponents. View more detailed information about the Overall Composite Rating.

INEFFECTIVE
0
0%
DEVELOPING
0
0%
EFFECTIVE
5
4%
HIGHLY EFFECTIVE
112
96%
TOTAL EDUCATORS: 117

Original State Growth or Other Comparable Measures Rating Display Last Year's Data

Education Law §3012-c requires that 20% of a teacher's or principal's evaluation be based on State Growth or Other Comparable Measures (State-provided growth scores or Student Learning Objectives (SLOs)). A State Growth or Other Comparable Measure must measure student growth. View more detailed information about the State Growth or Other Comparable Measures Rating.

INEFFECTIVE
1
1%
DEVELOPING
2
2%
EFFECTIVE
7
6%
HIGHLY EFFECTIVE
107
91%
TOTAL EDUCATORS: 117

Original Locally-Selected Measures Rating

Education Law §3012-c requires that 20% of a teacher's or principal's evaluation be based on Locally-Selected Measures. A Locally-Selected Measure may either measure growth or achievement from a selection of available assessment options. View more detailed information about the Locally-Selected Measures.

INEFFECTIVE

DEVELOPING

EFFECTIVE

HIGHLY EFFECTIVE

TOTAL EDUCATORS: 117

*Fields with dashes have data suppressed in order to prevent reporting personally identifiable information.

Original Other Measures of Educator Effectiveness Rating

Education Law §3012-c requires that 60% of teacher and principal evaluations be based on multiple measures of teacher/principal effectiveness consistent with standards prescribed by the Commissioner in regulation. This will include the extent to which the educator demonstrates proficiency in meeting New York State's teaching or leadership standards. View more detailed information about the Other Measures of Educator Effectiveness Rating.

INEFFECTIVE
0
0%
DEVELOPING
2
2%
EFFECTIVE
2
2%
HIGHLY EFFECTIVE
113
97%
TOTAL EDUCATORS: 117

Transition Overall Composite Rating

Each classroom teacher and building principal must receive an overall rating based on a single composite effectiveness score that is calculated based on the scores received by the teacher or principal in each of the three subcomponents, excluding measures based on the grades 3-8 ELA/math State assessments and any State-provided growth scores. View more detailed information about the Overall Composite Rating or about Transition Scores/Ratings.

INEFFECTIVE
0
0%
DEVELOPING
0
0%
EFFECTIVE
2
3%
HIGHLY EFFECTIVE
59
97%
TOTAL EDUCATORS: 61

Pursuant to Education Law §3012-c(10), viewers of this site will not be able to find personally identifiable information for any teacher or principal, including an individual educator's evaluation ratings by name anywhere on this website. However, parents or legal guardians may contact their child's district or BOCES to obtain information about their child's teacher(s) or principal(s) composite effectiveness score and/or their final overall rating.

Top