Skip to Content
Main content

2015-16 PROGRESS REPORT FOR STRUGGLING SCHOOLS

This Report is Provided for Informational & Planning Purposes Only
This School is First Required to Make Demonstrable Improvement in 2016-17

For the 2015-16, this school had a demonstrable improvement index of 69%

SCHOOL MET THE PROGRESS TARGET ON 22 OUT OF THE 36 SELECTED INDICATORS.
3-8 ELA All Students MGP
PROGRESS TARGET

45.14

RESULT

52.92

INDICATOR: 33

2013 Total Cohort Passing ELA Regents (Score >=65)
PROGRESS TARGET

19

RESULT

31

INDICATOR: 69

2012 Total Cohort 4-Year Grad Rate - All Students
PROGRESS TARGET

27

RESULT

34

INDICATOR: 70

Grades 4 and 8 Science All Students Level 3 and above
PROGRESS TARGET

24

RESULT

29

INDICATOR: 85

2011 Total Cohort 5-Year Grad Rate - All Students
PROGRESS TARGET

30

RESULT

44

INDICATOR: 88

3-8 ELA All Students Level 2 & above
PROGRESS TARGET

26

RESULT

35

INDICATOR: 9

Priority School makes yearly progress
PROGRESS TARGET

Y

RESULT

N

INDICATOR: 1

3-8 Math All Students Level 2 and above
PROGRESS TARGET

35

RESULT

26

INDICATOR: 15

3-8 Math All Students MGP
PROGRESS TARGET

51.17

RESULT

48.65

INDICATOR: 39

2014 Total Cohort Passing Math Regents (Score >=65)
PROGRESS TARGET

36

RESULT

22

INDICATOR: 67

2012 Total Cohort 4-Year Grad Rate with Adv. Designation - All Students
PROGRESS TARGET

1

RESULT

0

INDICATOR: 76

2015 Total Cohort with 5 or more credits
PROGRESS TARGET

39

RESULT

—

INDICATOR: 65

3-8 ELA LEP Students Level 2 and above
PROGRESS TARGET

8

RESULT

15

INDICATOR: 13

HS ELA All Students Level 2 and above
PROGRESS TARGET

39

RESULT

57

INDICATOR: 21

HS ELA LEP Students Level 2 and above
PROGRESS TARGET

39

RESULT

51

INDICATOR: 25

HS Math All Students Level 2 and above
PROGRESS TARGET

62

RESULT

71

INDICATOR: 27

2013 Total Cohort with 5 or more credits
PROGRESS TARGET

44

RESULT

50.9

INDICATOR: 68

Student Attendance
PROGRESS TARGET

86

RESULT

83.6

INDICATOR: 3

— indicates that there were not enough students to make a determination for this indicator or, in the case of a DTSDE indicator, the visit was not done, so this indicator will not be used in determining Demonstrable Improvement.

N/A or missing value indicates that data are not yet available for this indicator.

For information on a school’s demonstrable improvement indicators, goals and progress targets for the 2015-16 school year, please visit the school receivership page

Top