RECEIVERSHIP STATUS

DID NOT MEET PROGRESS TARGET
MET PROGRESS TARGET

OVERALL STATUS

FINAL DETERMINATION

MADE DEMONSTRABLE IMPROVEMENT

DEMONSTRABLE IMPROVEMENT INDEX

83%

THIS VALUE IS BASED ONLY ON INDICATORS THAT MET THE PROGRESS TARGET.

SCHOOL MET THE PROGRESS TARGET ON 20 OUT OF THE 24 SELECTED INDICATORS.
SCHOOL DID NOT MEET THE PROGRESS TARGET ON 4 OUT OF THE 24 SELECTED INDICATORS.
Priority School makes yearly progress
PROGRESS TARGET

Y

RESULT

Y

INDICATOR: 1

2015 Total Cohort Passing Math Regents (Score >=65)
PROGRESS TARGET

27

RESULT

39

INDICATOR: 67

2014 Total Cohort Passing ELA Regents (Score >=65)
PROGRESS TARGET

31

RESULT

60

INDICATOR: 69

2013 Total Cohort 4-Year Grad Rate - All Students
PROGRESS TARGET

42

RESULT

63

INDICATOR: 70

College Readiness Index Metric
PROGRESS TARGET

8.6

RESULT

19.8

INDICATOR: c1

School Climate Survey Metric
PROGRESS TARGET

20

RESULT

47

INDICATOR: h

2012 Total Cohort 5-Year Grad Rate - All Students
PROGRESS TARGET

56

RESULT

51

INDICATOR: 88

Plan for and implement quality Community School Model
PROGRESS TARGET

Y

RESULT

Y

INDICATOR: 2

Providing 200 Hours of quality Extended Day Learning Time (ELT)
PROGRESS TARGET

Y

RESULT

Y

INDICATOR: 94

Collaborative Teachers
PROGRESS TARGET

41, D+

RESULT

73, D+

INDICATOR: k

Regents Completion Rate
PROGRESS TARGET

20.8

RESULT

36.5

INDICATOR: q

Rigorous Instruction
PROGRESS TARGET

55, D+

RESULT

50, D+

INDICATOR: j

For information on a school’s demonstrable improvement indicators, goals and progress targets for the 2016-17 school year, please visit the school receivership page

Top