Skip to Content
Main content

RECEIVERSHIP STATUS

DID NOT MEET PROGRESS TARGET
MET PROGRESS TARGET

OVERALL STATUS

FINAL DETERMINATION

MADE DEMONSTRABLE IMPROVEMENT

DEMONSTRABLE IMPROVEMENT INDEX

83%

THIS VALUE IS BASED ONLY ON INDICATORS THAT MET THE PROGRESS TARGET.

SCHOOL MET THE PROGRESS TARGET ON 20 OUT OF THE 24 SELECTED INDICATORS.
SCHOOL DID NOT MEET THE PROGRESS TARGET ON 4 OUT OF THE 24 SELECTED INDICATORS.
Priority School makes yearly progress
PROGRESS TARGET

Y

RESULT

Y

INDICATOR: 1

2015 Total Cohort Passing Math Regents (Score >=65)
PROGRESS TARGET

42

RESULT

44

INDICATOR: 67

2014 Total Cohort Passing ELA Regents (Score >=65)
PROGRESS TARGET

37

RESULT

37

INDICATOR: 69

2013 Total Cohort 4-Year Grad Rate - All Students
PROGRESS TARGET

46

RESULT

69

INDICATOR: 70

2012 Total Cohort 5-Year Grad Rate - All Students
PROGRESS TARGET

59

RESULT

63

INDICATOR: 88

College Readiness Index Metric
PROGRESS TARGET

10.5

RESULT

37

INDICATOR: c1

School Climate Survey Metric
PROGRESS TARGET

32

RESULT

25

INDICATOR: h

Plan for and implement quality Community School Model
PROGRESS TARGET

Y

RESULT

Y

INDICATOR: 2

Providing 200 Hours of quality Extended Day Learning Time (ELT)
PROGRESS TARGET

Y

RESULT

Y

INDICATOR: 94

Rigorous Instruction
PROGRESS TARGET

37, D+

RESULT

48, D+

INDICATOR: j

Collaborative Teachers
PROGRESS TARGET

26, D+

RESULT

36, D+

INDICATOR: k

Regents Completion Rate
PROGRESS TARGET

31

RESULT

28.3

INDICATOR: q

For information on a school’s demonstrable improvement indicators, goals and progress targets for the 2016-17 school year, please visit the school receivership page

Top