NYC CHARTER SCHOOL OF THE ARTS - School Report Card Data [2016 - 17]
The New York State Report Card is an important part of the Board of Regents' effort to raise learning standards for all students. It provides information to the public on school/district enrollment and staff, student performance, and other measures of school and district performance. Knowledge gained from the report card on a school's or district's strengths and weaknesses can be used to improve instruction and services to students. Report Card Data - Glossary of Terms | Accountability Data - Glossary of Terms | Business Rules
NYC CHARTER SCHOOL OF THE ARTS ENROLLMENT (2016 - 17)
K-12 ENROLLMENT
99
ENROLLMENT BY GENDER
MALE
38
38%
FEMALE
61
62%
ENROLLMENT BY ETHNICITY
GROUP
AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE
BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN
HISPANIC OR LATINO
ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER
WHITE
MULTIRACIAL
TOTAL
2
29
37
4
23
4
PERCENT
2%
29%
37%
4%
23%
4%
OTHER GROUPS
ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
—
—
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
16
16%
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
45
45%
ENROLLMENT BY GRADE
GROUP
6TH GRADE
TOTAL
99
PERCENT
100%
NYC CHARTER SCHOOL OF THE ARTS ENROLLMENT (2016 - 17)
K-12 Enrollment: 99
ENROLLMENT BY GENDER
MALE
38
38%
FEMALE
61
62%
ENROLLMENT BY ETHNICITY
AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE
2
2%
BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN
29
29%
HISPANIC OR LATINO
37
37%
ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER
4
4%
WHITE
23
23%
MULTIRACIAL
4
4%
OTHER GROUPS
ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
—
—
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
16
16%
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
45
45%
ENROLLMENT BY GRADE
6TH GRADE
99
100%
Free and Reduced-Price Lunch (2016 - 17)
ELIGIBLE FOR FREE LUNCH
38
38%
ELIGIBLE FOR REDUCED-PRICE LUNCH
2
2%
Free and Reduced-Price Lunch (2016 - 17)
Eligible for Free Lunch
38
38%
Eligible for Reduced-Price Lunch
2
2%
ATTENDANCE (2015 - 16)
ANNUAL ATTENDANCE RATE
0%
Attendance (2015 - 16)
Annual Attendance Rate
0%
STUDENT SUSPENSIONS (2015 - 16)
0
0%
Student Suspensions (2015 - 16)
Student Suspensions
0
0%
Staff Counts (2016 - 17)
GROUP
PRINCIPALS
ASSISTANT PRINCIPALS
OTHER PROFESSIONAL STAFF
PARAPROFESSIONALS
STAFF
2
3
4
0
Staff Counts (2016 - 17)
Principals
2
Assistant Principals
3
Other Professional Staff
4
Paraprofessionals
0
Teacher Qualifications (2016 - 17)
TOTAL TEACHERS
0
PERCENT WITH NO VALID TEACHING CERTIFICATE
0%
PERCENT TEACHING OUT OF CERTIFICATE
0%
PERCENT WITH FEWER THAN THREE YEARS OF EXPERIENCE
0%
PERCENTAGE WITH MASTER'S DEGREEPLUS 30 HOURS OR DOCTORATE
0%
Total Number of Classes
0
Percent Taught by Teachers Without Appropriate Certification
0%
Teacher Qualifications (2016 - 17)
TOTAL TEACHERS: 0
Percent with No Valid Teaching Certificate
0%
Percent Teaching Out of Certification
0%
Percent with Fewer Than Three Years of Experience
0%
Percentage with Master's Degree Plus 30 Hours or Doctorate
0%
Total Number of Classes
0
Percent Taught by Teachers Without Appropriate Certification
0%
Grade 6 English Language Arts
MEAN SCORE: 308
All Students
PROFICIENT
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 94
LEVEL 1
14
15%
LEVEL 2
46
49%
LEVEL 3
19
20%
LEVEL 4
15
16%
General Education
PROFICIENT
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 78
LEVEL 1
8
10%
LEVEL 2
39
50%
LEVEL 3
16
21%
LEVEL 4
15
19%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 16
LEVEL 1
6
38%
LEVEL 2
7
44%
LEVEL 3
3
19%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
American Indian or Alaska Native
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 28
LEVEL 1
5
18%
LEVEL 2
11
39%
LEVEL 3
8
29%
LEVEL 4
4
14%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 37
LEVEL 1
9
24%
LEVEL 2
20
54%
LEVEL 3
5
14%
LEVEL 4
3
8%
White
PROFICIENT
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 20
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
11
55%
LEVEL 3
3
15%
LEVEL 4
6
30%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
4
44%
LEVEL 3
3
33%
LEVEL 4
2
22%
Female
PROFICIENT
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 55
LEVEL 1
9
16%
LEVEL 2
23
42%
LEVEL 3
13
24%
LEVEL 4
10
18%
Male
PROFICIENT
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 39
LEVEL 1
5
13%
LEVEL 2
23
59%
LEVEL 3
6
15%
LEVEL 4
5
13%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 92
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 40
LEVEL 1
10
25%
LEVEL 2
19
48%
LEVEL 3
7
18%
LEVEL 4
4
10%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 54
LEVEL 1
4
7%
LEVEL 2
27
50%
LEVEL 3
12
22%
LEVEL 4
11
20%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 94
LEVEL 1
14
15%
LEVEL 2
46
49%
LEVEL 3
19
20%
LEVEL 4
15
16%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
94
78
16
2
4
28
37
20
3
9
55
39
92
2
40
54
94
PROFICIENT
36%
40%
19%
_%
_%
43%
22%
45%
_%
56%
42%
28%
_%
_%
28%
43%
36%
LEVEL 1
14
15%
8
10%
6
38%
_
_
_
_
5
18%
9
24%
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
9
16%
5
13%
_
_
_
_
10
25%
4
7%
14
15%
LEVEL 2
46
49%
39
50%
7
44%
_
_
_
_
11
39%
20
54%
11
55%
_
_
4
44%
23
42%
23
59%
_
_
_
_
19
48%
27
50%
46
49%
LEVEL 3
19
20%
16
21%
3
19%
_
_
_
_
8
29%
5
14%
3
15%
_
_
3
33%
13
24%
6
15%
_
_
_
_
7
18%
12
22%
19
20%
LEVEL 4
15
16%
15
19%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
4
14%
3
8%
6
30%
_
_
2
22%
10
18%
5
13%
_
_
_
_
4
10%
11
20%
15
16%
Grade 6 Mathematics
MEAN SCORE: 305
All Students
PROFICIENT
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 89
LEVEL 1
17
19%
LEVEL 2
42
47%
LEVEL 3
22
25%
LEVEL 4
8
9%
General Education
PROFICIENT
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 76
LEVEL 1
9
12%
LEVEL 2
38
50%
LEVEL 3
21
28%
LEVEL 4
8
11%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 13
LEVEL 1
8
62%
LEVEL 2
4
31%
LEVEL 3
1
8%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
American Indian or Alaska Native
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 29
LEVEL 1
6
21%
LEVEL 2
15
52%
LEVEL 3
7
24%
LEVEL 4
1
3%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 33
LEVEL 1
9
27%
LEVEL 2
17
52%
LEVEL 3
5
15%
LEVEL 4
2
6%
White
PROFICIENT
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 19
LEVEL 1
2
11%
LEVEL 2
6
32%
LEVEL 3
7
37%
LEVEL 4
4
21%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 8
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
4
50%
LEVEL 3
3
38%
LEVEL 4
1
13%
Female
PROFICIENT
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 53
LEVEL 1
14
26%
LEVEL 2
25
47%
LEVEL 3
11
21%
LEVEL 4
3
6%
Male
PROFICIENT
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 36
LEVEL 1
3
8%
LEVEL 2
17
47%
LEVEL 3
11
31%
LEVEL 4
5
14%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 89
LEVEL 1
17
19%
LEVEL 2
42
47%
LEVEL 3
22
25%
LEVEL 4
8
9%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 38
LEVEL 1
12
32%
LEVEL 2
17
45%
LEVEL 3
7
18%
LEVEL 4
2
5%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 51
LEVEL 1
5
10%
LEVEL 2
25
49%
LEVEL 3
15
29%
LEVEL 4
6
12%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 89
LEVEL 1
17
19%
LEVEL 2
42
47%
LEVEL 3
22
25%
LEVEL 4
8
9%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
89
76
13
2
3
29
33
19
3
8
53
36
89
38
51
89
PROFICIENT
34%
38%
8%
_%
_%
28%
21%
58%
_%
50%
26%
44%
34%
24%
41%
34%
LEVEL 1
17
19%
9
12%
8
62%
_
_
_
_
6
21%
9
27%
2
11%
_
_
0
0%
14
26%
3
8%
17
19%
12
32%
5
10%
17
19%
LEVEL 2
42
47%
38
50%
4
31%
_
_
_
_
15
52%
17
52%
6
32%
_
_
4
50%
25
47%
17
47%
42
47%
17
45%
25
49%
42
47%
LEVEL 3
22
25%
21
28%
1
8%
_
_
_
_
7
24%
5
15%
7
37%
_
_
3
38%
11
21%
11
31%
22
25%
7
18%
15
29%
22
25%
LEVEL 4
8
9%
8
11%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
1
3%
2
6%
4
21%
_
_
1
13%
3
6%
5
14%
8
9%
2
5%
6
12%
8
9%
Statewide Results on the National Assessment of Educational Progress: NAEP (2016 - 17)
Grade: 4
Reading
GROUP
All Students
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
BELOW BASIC
32%
68%
*%
18%
48%
45%
22%
*%
74%
44%
BASIC
32%
22%
*%
30%
34%
33%
31%
*%
21%
33%
PROFICIENT
27%
9%
*%
33%
16%
18%
35%
*%
5%
19%
ADVANCED
9%
2%
*%
19%
3%
4%
13%
*%
*%
4%
PARTICIPATION RATE
98
93
88
Reading
All Students
Percent Below Basic
32
Percent Basic
32
Percent Proficient
27
Percent Advanced
9
Participation Rate
98
Students with Disabilities
Percent Below Basic
68
Percent Basic
22
Percent Proficient
9
Percent Advanced
2
Participation Rate
93
American Indian or Alaska Native
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Percent Below Basic
18
Percent Basic
30
Percent Proficient
33
Percent Advanced
19
Black or African American
Percent Below Basic
48
Percent Basic
34
Percent Proficient
16
Percent Advanced
3
Hispanic or Latino
Percent Below Basic
45
Percent Basic
33
Percent Proficient
18
Percent Advanced
4
White
Percent Below Basic
22
Percent Basic
31
Percent Proficient
35
Percent Advanced
13
Multiracial
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Limited English Proficient
Percent Below Basic
74
Percent Basic
21
Percent Proficient
5
Percent Advanced
*
Participation Rate
88
Economically Disadvantaged
Percent Below Basic
44
Percent Basic
33
Percent Proficient
19
Percent Advanced
4
Mathematics
GROUP
All Students
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
BELOW BASIC
24%
58%
*%
11%
36%
36%
14%
*%
68%
34%
BASIC
41%
31%
*%
30%
42%
44%
40%
*%
29%
43%
PROFICIENT
30%
10%
*%
44%
21%
18%
38%
*%
3%
21%
ADVANCED
5%
1%
*%
15%
2%
2%
7%
*%
*%
2%
PARTICIPATION RATE
98
94
91
Mathematics
All Students
Percent Below Basic
24
Percent Basic
41
Percent Proficient
30
Percent Advanced
5
Participation Rate
98
Students with Disabilities
Percent Below Basic
58
Percent Basic
31
Percent Proficient
10
Percent Advanced
1
Participation Rate
94
American Indian or Alaska Native
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Percent Below Basic
11
Percent Basic
30
Percent Proficient
44
Percent Advanced
15
Black or African American
Percent Below Basic
36
Percent Basic
42
Percent Proficient
21
Percent Advanced
2
Hispanic or Latino
Percent Below Basic
36
Percent Basic
44
Percent Proficient
18
Percent Advanced
2
White
Percent Below Basic
14
Percent Basic
40
Percent Proficient
38
Percent Advanced
7
Multiracial
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Limited English Proficient
Percent Below Basic
68
Percent Basic
29
Percent Proficient
3
Percent Advanced
*
Participation Rate
91
Economically Disadvantaged
Percent Below Basic
34
Percent Basic
43
Percent Proficient
21
Percent Advanced
2
Grade: 8
Reading
GROUP
All Students
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
BELOW BASIC
27%
58%
*%
21%
39%
35%
20%
*%
81%
37%
BASIC
39%
33%
*%
31%
41%
43%
38%
*%
16%
41%
PROFICIENT
30%
8%
*%
37%
19%
21%
36%
*%
3%
20%
ADVANCED
5%
*%
*%
12%
1%
1%
6%
*%
*%
2%
PARTICIPATION RATE
98
94
80
Reading
All Students
Percent Below Basic
27
Percent Basic
39
Percent Proficient
30
Percent Advanced
5
Participation Rate
98
Students with Disabilities
Percent Below Basic
58
Percent Basic
33
Percent Proficient
8
Percent Advanced
*
Participation Rate
94
American Indian or Alaska Native
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Percent Below Basic
21
Percent Basic
31
Percent Proficient
37
Percent Advanced
12
Black or African American
Percent Below Basic
39
Percent Basic
41
Percent Proficient
19
Percent Advanced
1
Hispanic or Latino
Percent Below Basic
35
Percent Basic
43
Percent Proficient
21
Percent Advanced
1
White
Percent Below Basic
20
Percent Basic
38
Percent Proficient
36
Percent Advanced
6
Multiracial
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Limited English Proficient
Percent Below Basic
81
Percent Basic
16
Percent Proficient
3
Percent Advanced
*
Participation Rate
80
Economically Disadvantaged
Percent Below Basic
37
Percent Basic
41
Percent Proficient
20
Percent Advanced
2
Mathematics
GROUP
All Students
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
BELOW BASIC
32%
69%
*%
14%
53%
48%
21%
*%
80%
44%
BASIC
34%
23%
*%
24%
32%
33%
37%
*%
16%
34%
PROFICIENT
24%
6%
*%
32%
14%
15%
29%
*%
4%
17%
ADVANCED
10%
2%
*%
30%
2%
4%
13%
*%
1%
4%
PARTICIPATION RATE
98
95
80
Mathematics
All Students
Percent Below Basic
32
Percent Basic
34
Percent Proficient
24
Percent Advanced
10
Participation Rate
98
Students with Disabilities
Percent Below Basic
69
Percent Basic
23
Percent Proficient
6
Percent Advanced
2
Participation Rate
95
American Indian or Alaska Native
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Percent Below Basic
14
Percent Basic
24
Percent Proficient
32
Percent Advanced
30
Black or African American
Percent Below Basic
53
Percent Basic
32
Percent Proficient
14
Percent Advanced
2
Hispanic or Latino
Percent Below Basic
48
Percent Basic
33
Percent Proficient
15
Percent Advanced
4
White
Percent Below Basic
21
Percent Basic
37
Percent Proficient
29
Percent Advanced
13
Multiracial
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Limited English Proficient
Percent Below Basic
80
Percent Basic
16
Percent Proficient
4
Percent Advanced
1
Participation Rate
80
Economically Disadvantaged
Percent Below Basic
44
Percent Basic
34
Percent Proficient
17
Percent Advanced
4
Elementary/Middle-Level English Language Arts Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: NO
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
NO
―
―
YES
―
―
―
―
―
NO
Tested 95%
NO
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
100*
2
30
38
4
22
4
17
2
44*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
94%*
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
91%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
―
―
YES
―
―
―
―
―
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
91
2
27
36
4
19
3
15
2
39
PI
121
―
―
97
―
―
―
―
―
103
EAMO
101
―
―
86
―
―
―
―
―
86
Safe Harbor Target
20
―
―
20
―
―
―
―
―
20
All Students
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
100*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
94%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
91
PI
121
EAMO
101
Safe Harbor Target
20
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
2
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
2
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
30
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
27
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
38
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
36
PI
97
EAMO
86
Safe Harbor Target
20
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
4
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
4
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
White
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
22
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
19
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
4
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
3
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
17
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
15
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
2
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
2
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
44*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
91%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
39
PI
103
EAMO
86
Safe Harbor Target
20
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
98*
70*
62*
96*
78
96
83*
98*
56
39
61*
0
100*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
94%*
94%*
92%*
94%*
95%
95%
94%*
94%*
96%
―
90%*
―
94%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
89
64
55
87
72
88
76
89
52
37
54
0
91
PI
119
119
136
121
115
119
129
122
135
116
124
―
121
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
98*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
94%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
89
PI
119
Not Black or African American
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
70*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
94%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
64
PI
119
Not Hispanic or Latino
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
62*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
92%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
55
PI
136
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
96*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
94%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
87
PI
121
Not White
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
78
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
95%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
72
PI
115
Not Multiracial
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
96
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
95%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
88
PI
119
General Education
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
83*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
94%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
76
PI
129
English Proficient
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
98*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
94%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
89
PI
122
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
56
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
96%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
52
PI
135
Male
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
39
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
37
PI
116
Female
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
61*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
90%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
54
PI
124
Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
100*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
94%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
91
PI
121
― There were fewer than 40 students enrolled during the test administration period, so the Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 tested students enrolled on BEDS day and during the test administration period, so the PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed. *The percentage of students tested in the current year fell below 95 percent, so the numbers of enrolled and tested students in the current year and previous year were combined to provide the school/district with another opportunity to meet the participation rate criterion.
Elementary/Middle-Level Mathematics Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: NO
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
NO
―
―
YES
―
―
―
―
―
NO
Tested 95%
NO
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
99*
2
30
37
4
22
4
17
1
43*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
90%*
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
88%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
―
―
YES
―
―
―
―
―
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
86
2
28
32
3
18
3
12
0
37
PI
113
―
―
94
―
―
―
―
―
89
EAMO
98
―
―
83
―
―
―
―
―
84
Safe Harbor Target
20
―
―
20
―
―
―
―
―
20
All Students
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
99*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
90%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
86
PI
113
EAMO
98
Safe Harbor Target
20
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
2
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
2
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
30
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
28
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
37
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
32
PI
94
EAMO
83
Safe Harbor Target
20
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
4
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
3
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
White
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
22
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
18
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
4
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
3
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
17
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
12
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
43*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
88%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
37
PI
89
EAMO
84
Safe Harbor Target
20
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
97*
69*
62*
95*
77*
95*
82*
98*
56*
38
61*
0
99*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
90%*
87%*
90%*
91%*
91%*
91%*
93%*
91%*
91%*
―
87%*
―
90%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
84
58
54
83
68
83
74
86
49
34
52
0
86
PI
111
117
124
113
104
111
126
113
131
135
98
―
113
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
97*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
90%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
84
PI
111
Not Black or African American
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
69*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
87%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
58
PI
117
Not Hispanic or Latino
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
62*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
90%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
54
PI
124
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
95*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
91%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
83
PI
113
Not White
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
77*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
91%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
68
PI
104
Not Multiracial
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
95*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
91%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
83
PI
111
General Education
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
82*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
93%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
74
PI
126
English Proficient
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
98*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
91%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
86
PI
113
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
56*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
91%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
49
PI
131
Male
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
38
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
34
PI
135
Female
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
61*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
87%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
52
PI
98
Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
99*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
90%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
86
PI
113
― There were fewer than 40 students enrolled during the test administration period, so the Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 tested students enrolled on BEDS day and during the test administration period, so the PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed. *The percentage of students tested in the current year fell below 95 percent, so the numbers of enrolled and tested students in the current year and previous year were combined to provide the school/district with another opportunity to meet the participation rate criterion.
Unweighted Combined ELA and Math PIs
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
121
―
―
97
―
―
―
―
―
103
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
113
―
―
94
―
―
―
―
―
89
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
UNWEIGHTED COMBINED PI
117
0
0
96
0
0
0
0
0
96
All Students
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
121
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
113
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
117
American Indian or Alaska Native
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Black or African American
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Hispanic or Latino
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
97
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
94
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
96
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
White
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Multiracial
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Students With Disabilities
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Limited English Proficient
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Economically Disadvantaged
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
103
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
89
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
96
― There were not enough students to determine a Performance Index.
You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.
Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.
If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.
