EDGEMONT UFSD - School Report Card Data [2014 - 15]
The New York State Report Card is an important part of the Board of Regents' effort to raise learning standards for all students. It provides information to the public on school/district enrollment and staff, student performance, and other measures of school and district performance. Knowledge gained from the report card on a school's or district's strengths and weaknesses can be used to improve instruction and services to students. Report Card Data - Glossary of Terms | Accountability Data - Glossary of Terms | Business Rules
Turnover Rate of Teachers with Fewer Than Five Years of Experience
29%
TURNOVER RATE OF ALL TEACHERS
10%
Teacher Turnover Rate (2013-14 to 2014-15)
Turnover Rate of Teachers with Fewer Than Five Years of Experience
29%
Turnover Rate of All Teachers
10%
Staff Counts (2014 - 15)
GROUP
PRINCIPALS
ASSISTANT PRINCIPALS
OTHER PROFESSIONAL STAFF
PARAPROFESSIONALS
STAFF
3
2
16
64
Staff Counts (2014 - 15)
Principals
3
Assistant Principals
2
Other Professional Staff
16
Paraprofessionals
64
Teacher Qualifications (2014 - 15)
TOTAL TEACHERS
154
PERCENT WITH NO VALID TEACHING CERTIFICATE
0%
PERCENT TEACHING OUT OF CERTIFICATE
0%
PERCENT WITH FEWER THAN THREE YEARS OF EXPERIENCE
2%
PERCENTAGE WITH MASTER'S DEGREEPLUS 30 HOURS OR DOCTORATE
75%
TOTAL NUMBER OF CORE CLASSES
410
Percent Not Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers in This District
0%
Total Number of Classes
552
Percent Taught by Teachers Without Appropriate Certification
1%
Teacher Qualifications (2014 - 15)
TOTAL TEACHERS: 154
Percent with No Valid Teaching Certificate
0%
Percent Teaching Out of Certification
0%
Percent with Fewer Than Three Years of Experience
2%
Percentage with Master's Degree Plus 30 Hours or Doctorate
75%
Total Number of Core Classes
410
Percent Not Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers in This District
0%
Total Number of Classes
552
Percent Taught by Teachers Without Appropriate Certification
1%
High School Completers (2014 - 15)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
162
137
25
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
162
137
25
REGENTS DIPLOMA
162
100%
137
100%
25
100%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
REGENTS WITH ADVANCED DESIGNATION
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
REGENTS WITH CTE ENDORSEMENT
1
1%
0
0%
1
4%
LOCAL DIPLOMAS
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
All Students
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
162
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
162
Regents Diploma
162
100%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
0
0%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
1
1%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
0
0%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
0
0%
of Completers
General Education
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
137
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
137
Regents Diploma
137
100%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
0
0%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
0
0%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
0
0%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
0
0%
of Completers
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
25
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
25
Regents Diploma
25
100%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
0
0%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
1
4%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
0
0%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
0
0%
of Completers
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
162
137
25
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
162
137
25
REGENTS DIPLOMA
162
100%
137
100%
25
100%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
REGENTS WITH ADVANCED DESIGNATION
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
REGENTS WITH CTE ENDORSEMENT
1
1%
0
0%
1
4%
LOCAL DIPLOMAS
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
All Students
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
162
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
162
Regents Diploma
162
100%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
0
0%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
1
1%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
0
0%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
0
0%
of Completers
General Education
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
137
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
137
Regents Diploma
137
100%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
0
0%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
0
0%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
0
0%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
0
0%
of Completers
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
25
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
25
Regents Diploma
25
100%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
0
0%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
1
4%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
0
0%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
0
0%
of Completers
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
162
137
25
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
162
137
25
REGENTS DIPLOMA
162
100%
137
100%
25
100%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
REGENTS WITH ADVANCED DESIGNATION
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
REGENTS WITH CTE ENDORSEMENT
1
1%
0
0%
1
4%
LOCAL DIPLOMAS
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
All Students
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
162
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
162
Regents Diploma
162
100%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
0
0%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
1
1%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
0
0%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
0
0%
of Completers
General Education
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
137
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
137
Regents Diploma
137
100%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
0
0%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
0
0%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
0
0%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
0
0%
of Completers
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
25
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
25
Regents Diploma
25
100%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
0
0%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
1
4%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
0
0%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
0
0%
of Completers
Post-graduation Plans of Completers (2014 - 15)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO FOUR-YEAR COLLEGE
158
98%
135
99%
23
92%
TO TWO-YEAR COLLEGE
2
1%
1
1%
1
4%
TO OTHER POST-SECONDARY
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
TO THE MILITARY
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO EMPLOYMENT
2
1%
1
1%
1
4%
TO ADULT SERVICES
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
TO OTHER KNOWN PLANS
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
PLANS UNKNOWN
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
All Students
To Four-Year College
158
98%
To Two-Year College
2
1%
To Other Post-Secondary
0
0%
To the Military
0
0%
To Employment
2
1%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
0
0%
Plan Unknown
0
0%
General Education
To Four-Year College
135
99%
To Two-Year College
1
1%
To Other Post-Secondary
0
0%
To the Military
0
0%
To Employment
1
1%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
0
0%
Plan Unknown
0
0%
Students with Disabilities
To Four-Year College
23
92%
To Two-Year College
1
4%
To Other Post-Secondary
0
0%
To the Military
0
0%
To Employment
1
4%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
0
0%
Plan Unknown
0
0%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO FOUR-YEAR COLLEGE
158
98%
135
99%
23
92%
TO TWO-YEAR COLLEGE
2
1%
1
1%
1
4%
TO OTHER POST-SECONDARY
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
TO THE MILITARY
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO EMPLOYMENT
2
1%
1
1%
1
4%
TO ADULT SERVICES
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
TO OTHER KNOWN PLANS
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
PLANS UNKNOWN
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
All Students
To Four-Year College
158
98%
To Two-Year College
2
1%
To Other Post-Secondary
0
0%
To the Military
0
0%
To Employment
2
1%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
0
0%
Plan Unknown
0
0%
General Education
To Four-Year College
135
99%
To Two-Year College
1
1%
To Other Post-Secondary
0
0%
To the Military
0
0%
To Employment
1
1%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
0
0%
Plan Unknown
0
0%
Students with Disabilities
To Four-Year College
23
92%
To Two-Year College
1
4%
To Other Post-Secondary
0
0%
To the Military
0
0%
To Employment
1
4%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
0
0%
Plan Unknown
0
0%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO FOUR-YEAR COLLEGE
158
98%
135
99%
23
92%
TO TWO-YEAR COLLEGE
2
1%
1
1%
1
4%
TO OTHER POST-SECONDARY
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
TO THE MILITARY
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO EMPLOYMENT
2
1%
1
1%
1
4%
TO ADULT SERVICES
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
TO OTHER KNOWN PLANS
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
PLANS UNKNOWN
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
All Students
To Four-Year College
158
98%
To Two-Year College
2
1%
To Other Post-Secondary
0
0%
To the Military
0
0%
To Employment
2
1%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
0
0%
Plan Unknown
0
0%
General Education
To Four-Year College
135
99%
To Two-Year College
1
1%
To Other Post-Secondary
0
0%
To the Military
0
0%
To Employment
1
1%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
0
0%
Plan Unknown
0
0%
Students with Disabilities
To Four-Year College
23
92%
To Two-Year College
1
4%
To Other Post-Secondary
0
0%
To the Military
0
0%
To Employment
1
4%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
0
0%
Plan Unknown
0
0%
Grade 3 English Language Arts
MEAN SCORE: 321
All Students
PROFICIENT
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 132
LEVEL 1
17
13%
LEVEL 2
34
26%
LEVEL 3
69
52%
LEVEL 4
12
9%
General Education
PROFICIENT
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 116
LEVEL 1
10
9%
LEVEL 2
27
23%
LEVEL 3
67
58%
LEVEL 4
12
10%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 16
LEVEL 1
7
44%
LEVEL 2
7
44%
LEVEL 3
2
13%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 43
LEVEL 1
1
2%
LEVEL 2
10
23%
LEVEL 3
29
67%
LEVEL 4
3
7%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
3
33%
LEVEL 2
2
22%
LEVEL 3
4
44%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
White
PROFICIENT
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 68
LEVEL 1
10
15%
LEVEL 2
20
29%
LEVEL 3
29
43%
LEVEL 4
9
13%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 12
LEVEL 1
3
25%
LEVEL 2
2
17%
LEVEL 3
7
58%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Female
PROFICIENT
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 60
LEVEL 1
5
8%
LEVEL 2
17
28%
LEVEL 3
31
52%
LEVEL 4
7
12%
Male
PROFICIENT
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 72
LEVEL 1
12
17%
LEVEL 2
17
24%
LEVEL 3
38
53%
LEVEL 4
5
7%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 130
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 132
LEVEL 1
17
13%
LEVEL 2
34
26%
LEVEL 3
69
52%
LEVEL 4
12
9%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 132
LEVEL 1
17
13%
LEVEL 2
34
26%
LEVEL 3
69
52%
LEVEL 4
12
9%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
132
116
16
43
9
68
12
60
72
130
2
132
132
PROFICIENT
61%
68%
13%
74%
44%
56%
58%
63%
60%
_%
_%
61%
61%
LEVEL 1
17
13%
10
9%
7
44%
1
2%
3
33%
10
15%
3
25%
5
8%
12
17%
_
_
_
_
17
13%
17
13%
LEVEL 2
34
26%
27
23%
7
44%
10
23%
2
22%
20
29%
2
17%
17
28%
17
24%
_
_
_
_
34
26%
34
26%
LEVEL 3
69
52%
67
58%
2
13%
29
67%
4
44%
29
43%
7
58%
31
52%
38
53%
_
_
_
_
69
52%
69
52%
LEVEL 4
12
9%
12
10%
0
0%
3
7%
0
0%
9
13%
0
0%
7
12%
5
7%
_
_
_
_
12
9%
12
9%
Grade 4 English Language Arts
MEAN SCORE: 331
All Students
PROFICIENT
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 128
LEVEL 1
4
3%
LEVEL 2
25
20%
LEVEL 3
60
47%
LEVEL 4
39
30%
General Education
PROFICIENT
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 121
LEVEL 1
2
2%
LEVEL 2
20
17%
LEVEL 3
60
50%
LEVEL 4
39
32%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 7
LEVEL 1
2
29%
LEVEL 2
5
71%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
American Indian or Alaska Native
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 49
LEVEL 1
1
2%
LEVEL 2
6
12%
LEVEL 3
27
55%
LEVEL 4
15
31%
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 8
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
4
50%
LEVEL 3
2
25%
LEVEL 4
2
25%
White
PROFICIENT
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 65
LEVEL 1
2
3%
LEVEL 2
14
22%
LEVEL 3
28
43%
LEVEL 4
21
32%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
1
17%
LEVEL 2
1
17%
LEVEL 3
3
50%
LEVEL 4
1
17%
Female
PROFICIENT
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 58
LEVEL 1
3
5%
LEVEL 2
12
21%
LEVEL 3
29
50%
LEVEL 4
14
24%
Male
PROFICIENT
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 70
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
13
19%
LEVEL 3
31
44%
LEVEL 4
25
36%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 128
LEVEL 1
4
3%
LEVEL 2
25
20%
LEVEL 3
60
47%
LEVEL 4
39
30%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 128
LEVEL 1
4
3%
LEVEL 2
25
20%
LEVEL 3
60
47%
LEVEL 4
39
30%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 128
LEVEL 1
4
3%
LEVEL 2
25
20%
LEVEL 3
60
47%
LEVEL 4
39
30%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
128
121
7
1
49
1
8
65
4
6
58
70
128
128
128
PROFICIENT
77%
82%
0%
_%
86%
_%
50%
75%
_%
67%
74%
80%
77%
77%
77%
LEVEL 1
4
3%
2
2%
2
29%
_
_
1
2%
_
_
0
0%
2
3%
_
_
1
17%
3
5%
1
1%
4
3%
4
3%
4
3%
LEVEL 2
25
20%
20
17%
5
71%
_
_
6
12%
_
_
4
50%
14
22%
_
_
1
17%
12
21%
13
19%
25
20%
25
20%
25
20%
LEVEL 3
60
47%
60
50%
0
0%
_
_
27
55%
_
_
2
25%
28
43%
_
_
3
50%
29
50%
31
44%
60
47%
60
47%
60
47%
LEVEL 4
39
30%
39
32%
0
0%
_
_
15
31%
_
_
2
25%
21
32%
_
_
1
17%
14
24%
25
36%
39
30%
39
30%
39
30%
Grade 5 English Language Arts
MEAN SCORE: 326
All Students
PROFICIENT
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 158
LEVEL 1
10
6%
LEVEL 2
36
23%
LEVEL 3
78
49%
LEVEL 4
34
22%
General Education
PROFICIENT
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 146
LEVEL 1
6
4%
LEVEL 2
30
21%
LEVEL 3
76
52%
LEVEL 4
34
23%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 12
LEVEL 1
4
33%
LEVEL 2
6
50%
LEVEL 3
2
17%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 52
LEVEL 1
1
2%
LEVEL 2
9
17%
LEVEL 3
24
46%
LEVEL 4
18
35%
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 10
LEVEL 1
1
10%
LEVEL 2
5
50%
LEVEL 3
4
40%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
White
PROFICIENT
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 87
LEVEL 1
8
9%
LEVEL 2
17
20%
LEVEL 3
48
55%
LEVEL 4
14
16%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 8
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
5
56%
LEVEL 3
2
22%
LEVEL 4
2
22%
Female
PROFICIENT
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 79
LEVEL 1
4
5%
LEVEL 2
15
19%
LEVEL 3
37
47%
LEVEL 4
23
29%
Male
PROFICIENT
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 79
LEVEL 1
6
8%
LEVEL 2
21
27%
LEVEL 3
41
52%
LEVEL 4
11
14%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 156
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 158
LEVEL 1
10
6%
LEVEL 2
36
23%
LEVEL 3
78
49%
LEVEL 4
34
22%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 158
LEVEL 1
10
6%
LEVEL 2
36
23%
LEVEL 3
78
49%
LEVEL 4
34
22%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
158
146
12
52
1
10
87
8
9
79
79
156
2
158
158
PROFICIENT
71%
75%
17%
81%
_%
40%
71%
_%
44%
76%
66%
_%
_%
71%
71%
LEVEL 1
10
6%
6
4%
4
33%
1
2%
_
_
1
10%
8
9%
_
_
0
0%
4
5%
6
8%
_
_
_
_
10
6%
10
6%
LEVEL 2
36
23%
30
21%
6
50%
9
17%
_
_
5
50%
17
20%
_
_
5
56%
15
19%
21
27%
_
_
_
_
36
23%
36
23%
LEVEL 3
78
49%
76
52%
2
17%
24
46%
_
_
4
40%
48
55%
_
_
2
22%
37
47%
41
52%
_
_
_
_
78
49%
78
49%
LEVEL 4
34
22%
34
23%
0
0%
18
35%
_
_
0
0%
14
16%
_
_
2
22%
23
29%
11
14%
_
_
_
_
34
22%
34
22%
Grade 6 English Language Arts
MEAN SCORE: 324
All Students
PROFICIENT
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 162
LEVEL 1
11
7%
LEVEL 2
47
29%
LEVEL 3
46
28%
LEVEL 4
58
36%
General Education
PROFICIENT
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 141
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
40
28%
LEVEL 3
44
31%
LEVEL 4
57
40%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 21
LEVEL 1
11
52%
LEVEL 2
7
33%
LEVEL 3
2
10%
LEVEL 4
1
5%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 41
LEVEL 1
2
5%
LEVEL 2
10
24%
LEVEL 3
12
29%
LEVEL 4
17
41%
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
4
80%
LEVEL 3
1
20%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 8
LEVEL 1
2
25%
LEVEL 2
4
50%
LEVEL 3
2
25%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
White
PROFICIENT
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 100
LEVEL 1
7
7%
LEVEL 2
28
28%
LEVEL 3
28
28%
LEVEL 4
37
37%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 8
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
13%
LEVEL 3
3
38%
LEVEL 4
4
50%
Female
PROFICIENT
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 83
LEVEL 1
5
6%
LEVEL 2
19
23%
LEVEL 3
28
34%
LEVEL 4
31
37%
Male
PROFICIENT
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 79
LEVEL 1
6
8%
LEVEL 2
28
35%
LEVEL 3
18
23%
LEVEL 4
27
34%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 161
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 162
LEVEL 1
11
7%
LEVEL 2
47
29%
LEVEL 3
46
28%
LEVEL 4
58
36%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 162
LEVEL 1
11
7%
LEVEL 2
47
29%
LEVEL 3
46
28%
LEVEL 4
58
36%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
162
141
21
41
5
8
100
8
83
79
161
1
162
162
PROFICIENT
64%
72%
14%
71%
20%
25%
65%
88%
71%
57%
_%
_%
64%
64%
LEVEL 1
11
7%
0
0%
11
52%
2
5%
0
0%
2
25%
7
7%
0
0%
5
6%
6
8%
_
_
_
_
11
7%
11
7%
LEVEL 2
47
29%
40
28%
7
33%
10
24%
4
80%
4
50%
28
28%
1
13%
19
23%
28
35%
_
_
_
_
47
29%
47
29%
LEVEL 3
46
28%
44
31%
2
10%
12
29%
1
20%
2
25%
28
28%
3
38%
28
34%
18
23%
_
_
_
_
46
28%
46
28%
LEVEL 4
58
36%
57
40%
1
5%
17
41%
0
0%
0
0%
37
37%
4
50%
31
37%
27
34%
_
_
_
_
58
36%
58
36%
Grade 7 English Language Arts
MEAN SCORE: 323
All Students
PROFICIENT
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 132
LEVEL 1
8
6%
LEVEL 2
32
24%
LEVEL 3
71
54%
LEVEL 4
21
16%
General Education
PROFICIENT
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 125
LEVEL 1
6
5%
LEVEL 2
28
22%
LEVEL 3
70
56%
LEVEL 4
21
17%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7
LEVEL 1
2
29%
LEVEL 2
4
57%
LEVEL 3
1
14%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 49
LEVEL 1
1
2%
LEVEL 2
8
16%
LEVEL 3
28
57%
LEVEL 4
12
24%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 12
LEVEL 1
4
33%
LEVEL 2
3
25%
LEVEL 3
5
42%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
White
PROFICIENT
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 64
LEVEL 1
3
5%
LEVEL 2
19
30%
LEVEL 3
34
53%
LEVEL 4
8
13%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 7
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
29%
LEVEL 3
4
57%
LEVEL 4
1
14%
Female
PROFICIENT
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 75
LEVEL 1
4
5%
LEVEL 2
19
25%
LEVEL 3
43
57%
LEVEL 4
9
12%
Male
PROFICIENT
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 57
LEVEL 1
4
7%
LEVEL 2
13
23%
LEVEL 3
28
49%
LEVEL 4
12
21%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 131
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 132
LEVEL 1
8
6%
LEVEL 2
32
24%
LEVEL 3
71
54%
LEVEL 4
21
16%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 132
LEVEL 1
8
6%
LEVEL 2
32
24%
LEVEL 3
71
54%
LEVEL 4
21
16%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
132
125
7
49
12
64
7
75
57
131
1
132
132
PROFICIENT
70%
73%
14%
82%
42%
66%
71%
69%
70%
_%
_%
70%
70%
LEVEL 1
8
6%
6
5%
2
29%
1
2%
4
33%
3
5%
0
0%
4
5%
4
7%
_
_
_
_
8
6%
8
6%
LEVEL 2
32
24%
28
22%
4
57%
8
16%
3
25%
19
30%
2
29%
19
25%
13
23%
_
_
_
_
32
24%
32
24%
LEVEL 3
71
54%
70
56%
1
14%
28
57%
5
42%
34
53%
4
57%
43
57%
28
49%
_
_
_
_
71
54%
71
54%
LEVEL 4
21
16%
21
17%
0
0%
12
24%
0
0%
8
13%
1
14%
9
12%
12
21%
_
_
_
_
21
16%
21
16%
Grade 8 English Language Arts
MEAN SCORE: 317
All Students
PROFICIENT
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 137
LEVEL 1
16
12%
LEVEL 2
42
31%
LEVEL 3
49
36%
LEVEL 4
30
22%
General Education
PROFICIENT
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 123
LEVEL 1
8
7%
LEVEL 2
38
31%
LEVEL 3
47
38%
LEVEL 4
30
24%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 14
LEVEL 1
8
57%
LEVEL 2
4
29%
LEVEL 3
2
14%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 41
LEVEL 1
4
10%
LEVEL 2
9
22%
LEVEL 3
22
54%
LEVEL 4
6
15%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 83
LEVEL 1
11
13%
LEVEL 2
31
37%
LEVEL 3
23
28%
LEVEL 4
18
22%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 10
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 13
LEVEL 1
1
8%
LEVEL 2
2
15%
LEVEL 3
4
31%
LEVEL 4
6
46%
Female
PROFICIENT
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 62
LEVEL 1
5
8%
LEVEL 2
17
27%
LEVEL 3
24
39%
LEVEL 4
16
26%
Male
PROFICIENT
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 75
LEVEL 1
11
15%
LEVEL 2
25
33%
LEVEL 3
25
33%
LEVEL 4
14
19%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 135
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 137
LEVEL 1
16
12%
LEVEL 2
42
31%
LEVEL 3
49
36%
LEVEL 4
30
22%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 137
LEVEL 1
16
12%
LEVEL 2
42
31%
LEVEL 3
49
36%
LEVEL 4
30
22%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
137
123
14
41
3
83
10
13
62
75
135
2
137
137
PROFICIENT
58%
63%
14%
68%
_%
49%
_%
77%
65%
52%
_%
_%
58%
58%
LEVEL 1
16
12%
8
7%
8
57%
4
10%
_
_
11
13%
_
_
1
8%
5
8%
11
15%
_
_
_
_
16
12%
16
12%
LEVEL 2
42
31%
38
31%
4
29%
9
22%
_
_
31
37%
_
_
2
15%
17
27%
25
33%
_
_
_
_
42
31%
42
31%
LEVEL 3
49
36%
47
38%
2
14%
22
54%
_
_
23
28%
_
_
4
31%
24
39%
25
33%
_
_
_
_
49
36%
49
36%
LEVEL 4
30
22%
30
24%
0
0%
6
15%
_
_
18
22%
_
_
6
46%
16
26%
14
19%
_
_
_
_
30
22%
30
22%
Grade 3 Mathematics
MEAN SCORE: 334
All Students
PROFICIENT
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 130
LEVEL 1
9
7%
LEVEL 2
20
15%
LEVEL 3
41
32%
LEVEL 4
60
46%
General Education
PROFICIENT
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 114
LEVEL 1
2
2%
LEVEL 2
16
14%
LEVEL 3
39
34%
LEVEL 4
57
50%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 16
LEVEL 1
7
44%
LEVEL 2
4
25%
LEVEL 3
2
13%
LEVEL 4
3
19%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 43
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
3
7%
LEVEL 3
13
30%
LEVEL 4
27
63%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 8
LEVEL 1
2
25%
LEVEL 2
1
13%
LEVEL 3
2
25%
LEVEL 4
3
38%
White
PROFICIENT
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 68
LEVEL 1
7
10%
LEVEL 2
12
18%
LEVEL 3
24
35%
LEVEL 4
25
37%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 11
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
4
36%
LEVEL 3
2
18%
LEVEL 4
5
45%
Female
PROFICIENT
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 60
LEVEL 1
4
7%
LEVEL 2
11
18%
LEVEL 3
19
32%
LEVEL 4
26
43%
Male
PROFICIENT
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 70
LEVEL 1
5
7%
LEVEL 2
9
13%
LEVEL 3
22
31%
LEVEL 4
34
49%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 128
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 130
LEVEL 1
9
7%
LEVEL 2
20
15%
LEVEL 3
41
32%
LEVEL 4
60
46%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 130
LEVEL 1
9
7%
LEVEL 2
20
15%
LEVEL 3
41
32%
LEVEL 4
60
46%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
130
114
16
43
8
68
11
60
70
128
2
130
130
PROFICIENT
78%
84%
31%
93%
63%
72%
64%
75%
80%
_%
_%
78%
78%
LEVEL 1
9
7%
2
2%
7
44%
0
0%
2
25%
7
10%
0
0%
4
7%
5
7%
_
_
_
_
9
7%
9
7%
LEVEL 2
20
15%
16
14%
4
25%
3
7%
1
13%
12
18%
4
36%
11
18%
9
13%
_
_
_
_
20
15%
20
15%
LEVEL 3
41
32%
39
34%
2
13%
13
30%
2
25%
24
35%
2
18%
19
32%
22
31%
_
_
_
_
41
32%
41
32%
LEVEL 4
60
46%
57
50%
3
19%
27
63%
3
38%
25
37%
5
45%
26
43%
34
49%
_
_
_
_
60
46%
60
46%
Grade 4 Mathematics
MEAN SCORE: 336
All Students
PROFICIENT
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 126
LEVEL 1
4
3%
LEVEL 2
17
13%
LEVEL 3
50
40%
LEVEL 4
55
44%
General Education
PROFICIENT
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 119
LEVEL 1
2
2%
LEVEL 2
13
11%
LEVEL 3
49
41%
LEVEL 4
55
46%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7
LEVEL 1
2
29%
LEVEL 2
4
57%
LEVEL 3
1
14%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
American Indian or Alaska Native
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 50
LEVEL 1
1
2%
LEVEL 2
3
6%
LEVEL 3
16
32%
LEVEL 4
30
60%
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
33%
LEVEL 3
3
50%
LEVEL 4
1
17%
White
PROFICIENT
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 64
LEVEL 1
2
3%
LEVEL 2
11
17%
LEVEL 3
29
45%
LEVEL 4
22
34%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
1
17%
LEVEL 2
1
17%
LEVEL 3
2
33%
LEVEL 4
2
33%
Female
PROFICIENT
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 57
LEVEL 1
3
5%
LEVEL 2
10
18%
LEVEL 3
24
42%
LEVEL 4
20
35%
Male
PROFICIENT
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 69
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
7
10%
LEVEL 3
26
38%
LEVEL 4
35
51%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 125
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 126
LEVEL 1
4
3%
LEVEL 2
17
13%
LEVEL 3
50
40%
LEVEL 4
55
44%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 126
LEVEL 1
4
3%
LEVEL 2
17
13%
LEVEL 3
50
40%
LEVEL 4
55
44%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
126
119
7
1
50
1
6
64
4
6
57
69
125
1
126
126
PROFICIENT
83%
87%
14%
_%
92%
_%
67%
80%
_%
67%
77%
88%
_%
_%
83%
83%
LEVEL 1
4
3%
2
2%
2
29%
_
_
1
2%
_
_
0
0%
2
3%
_
_
1
17%
3
5%
1
1%
_
_
_
_
4
3%
4
3%
LEVEL 2
17
13%
13
11%
4
57%
_
_
3
6%
_
_
2
33%
11
17%
_
_
1
17%
10
18%
7
10%
_
_
_
_
17
13%
17
13%
LEVEL 3
50
40%
49
41%
1
14%
_
_
16
32%
_
_
3
50%
29
45%
_
_
2
33%
24
42%
26
38%
_
_
_
_
50
40%
50
40%
LEVEL 4
55
44%
55
46%
0
0%
_
_
30
60%
_
_
1
17%
22
34%
_
_
2
33%
20
35%
35
51%
_
_
_
_
55
44%
55
44%
Grade 5 Mathematics
MEAN SCORE: 330
All Students
PROFICIENT
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 156
LEVEL 1
11
7%
LEVEL 2
34
22%
LEVEL 3
71
46%
LEVEL 4
40
26%
General Education
PROFICIENT
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 144
LEVEL 1
7
5%
LEVEL 2
30
21%
LEVEL 3
67
47%
LEVEL 4
40
28%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 12
LEVEL 1
4
33%
LEVEL 2
4
33%
LEVEL 3
4
33%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 52
LEVEL 1
1
2%
LEVEL 2
5
10%
LEVEL 3
21
40%
LEVEL 4
25
48%
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 10
LEVEL 1
2
20%
LEVEL 2
2
20%
LEVEL 3
5
50%
LEVEL 4
1
10%
White
PROFICIENT
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 85
LEVEL 1
6
7%
LEVEL 2
26
31%
LEVEL 3
42
49%
LEVEL 4
11
13%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 8
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
2
22%
LEVEL 2
1
11%
LEVEL 3
3
33%
LEVEL 4
3
33%
Female
PROFICIENT
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 79
LEVEL 1
7
9%
LEVEL 2
20
25%
LEVEL 3
30
38%
LEVEL 4
22
28%
Male
PROFICIENT
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 77
LEVEL 1
4
5%
LEVEL 2
14
18%
LEVEL 3
41
53%
LEVEL 4
18
23%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 154
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 156
LEVEL 1
11
7%
LEVEL 2
34
22%
LEVEL 3
71
46%
LEVEL 4
40
26%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 156
LEVEL 1
11
7%
LEVEL 2
34
22%
LEVEL 3
71
46%
LEVEL 4
40
26%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
156
144
12
52
1
10
85
8
9
79
77
154
2
156
156
PROFICIENT
71%
74%
33%
88%
_%
60%
62%
_%
67%
66%
77%
_%
_%
71%
71%
LEVEL 1
11
7%
7
5%
4
33%
1
2%
_
_
2
20%
6
7%
_
_
2
22%
7
9%
4
5%
_
_
_
_
11
7%
11
7%
LEVEL 2
34
22%
30
21%
4
33%
5
10%
_
_
2
20%
26
31%
_
_
1
11%
20
25%
14
18%
_
_
_
_
34
22%
34
22%
LEVEL 3
71
46%
67
47%
4
33%
21
40%
_
_
5
50%
42
49%
_
_
3
33%
30
38%
41
53%
_
_
_
_
71
46%
71
46%
LEVEL 4
40
26%
40
28%
0
0%
25
48%
_
_
1
10%
11
13%
_
_
3
33%
22
28%
18
23%
_
_
_
_
40
26%
40
26%
Grade 6 Mathematics
MEAN SCORE: 340
All Students
PROFICIENT
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 162
LEVEL 1
12
7%
LEVEL 2
24
15%
LEVEL 3
34
21%
LEVEL 4
92
57%
General Education
PROFICIENT
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 142
LEVEL 1
2
1%
LEVEL 2
17
12%
LEVEL 3
33
23%
LEVEL 4
90
63%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 20
LEVEL 1
10
50%
LEVEL 2
7
35%
LEVEL 3
1
5%
LEVEL 4
2
10%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 42
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
3
7%
LEVEL 3
10
24%
LEVEL 4
29
69%
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 8
LEVEL 1
1
13%
LEVEL 2
4
50%
LEVEL 3
2
25%
LEVEL 4
1
13%
White
PROFICIENT
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 100
LEVEL 1
11
11%
LEVEL 2
14
14%
LEVEL 3
20
20%
LEVEL 4
55
55%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 8
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 12
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
3
25%
LEVEL 3
2
17%
LEVEL 4
7
58%
Female
PROFICIENT
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 83
LEVEL 1
8
10%
LEVEL 2
10
12%
LEVEL 3
17
20%
LEVEL 4
48
58%
Male
PROFICIENT
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 79
LEVEL 1
4
5%
LEVEL 2
14
18%
LEVEL 3
17
22%
LEVEL 4
44
56%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 160
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 162
LEVEL 1
12
7%
LEVEL 2
24
15%
LEVEL 3
34
21%
LEVEL 4
92
57%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 162
LEVEL 1
12
7%
LEVEL 2
24
15%
LEVEL 3
34
21%
LEVEL 4
92
57%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
162
142
20
42
4
8
100
8
12
83
79
160
2
162
162
PROFICIENT
78%
87%
15%
93%
_%
38%
75%
_%
75%
78%
77%
_%
_%
78%
78%
LEVEL 1
12
7%
2
1%
10
50%
0
0%
_
_
1
13%
11
11%
_
_
0
0%
8
10%
4
5%
_
_
_
_
12
7%
12
7%
LEVEL 2
24
15%
17
12%
7
35%
3
7%
_
_
4
50%
14
14%
_
_
3
25%
10
12%
14
18%
_
_
_
_
24
15%
24
15%
LEVEL 3
34
21%
33
23%
1
5%
10
24%
_
_
2
25%
20
20%
_
_
2
17%
17
20%
17
22%
_
_
_
_
34
21%
34
21%
LEVEL 4
92
57%
90
63%
2
10%
29
69%
_
_
1
13%
55
55%
_
_
7
58%
48
58%
44
56%
_
_
_
_
92
57%
92
57%
Grade 7 Mathematics
Mean scores and data in the table for grade 7 math include only those for grade 7 students who took the Grade 7 New York State Testing Program Assessment (NYSTP) in Mathematics. For 2015 and forward, data in the bar charts include those for grade 7 students who took the Grade 7 NYSTP in Mathematics and grade 7 students who took a Regents math test in lieu of the NYSTP. For 2014 and earlier, data in the bar charts include only those for grade 7 students who took the Grade 7 NYSTP.
MEAN SCORE: 340
All Students
PROFICIENT
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 135
LEVEL 1
6
4%
LEVEL 2
24
18%
LEVEL 3
53
39%
LEVEL 4
52
39%
General Education
PROFICIENT
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 126
LEVEL 1
4
3%
LEVEL 2
21
17%
LEVEL 3
49
39%
LEVEL 4
52
41%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
2
22%
LEVEL 2
3
33%
LEVEL 3
4
44%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 51
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
5
10%
LEVEL 3
16
31%
LEVEL 4
30
59%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 11
LEVEL 1
2
18%
LEVEL 2
4
36%
LEVEL 3
4
36%
LEVEL 4
1
9%
White
PROFICIENT
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 66
LEVEL 1
4
6%
LEVEL 2
14
21%
LEVEL 3
29
44%
LEVEL 4
19
29%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 7
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
14%
LEVEL 3
4
57%
LEVEL 4
2
29%
Female
PROFICIENT
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 75
LEVEL 1
4
5%
LEVEL 2
16
21%
LEVEL 3
29
39%
LEVEL 4
26
35%
Male
PROFICIENT
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 60
LEVEL 1
2
3%
LEVEL 2
8
13%
LEVEL 3
24
40%
LEVEL 4
26
43%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 133
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 135
LEVEL 1
6
4%
LEVEL 2
24
18%
LEVEL 3
53
39%
LEVEL 4
52
39%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 135
LEVEL 1
6
4%
LEVEL 2
24
18%
LEVEL 3
53
39%
LEVEL 4
52
39%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
135
126
9
51
11
66
7
75
60
133
2
135
135
PROFICIENT
78%
80%
44%
90%
45%
73%
86%
73%
83%
_%
_%
78%
78%
LEVEL 1
6
4%
4
3%
2
22%
0
0%
2
18%
4
6%
0
0%
4
5%
2
3%
_
_
_
_
6
4%
6
4%
LEVEL 2
24
18%
21
17%
3
33%
5
10%
4
36%
14
21%
1
14%
16
21%
8
13%
_
_
_
_
24
18%
24
18%
LEVEL 3
53
39%
49
39%
4
44%
16
31%
4
36%
29
44%
4
57%
29
39%
24
40%
_
_
_
_
53
39%
53
39%
LEVEL 4
52
39%
52
41%
0
0%
30
59%
1
9%
19
29%
2
29%
26
35%
26
43%
_
_
_
_
52
39%
52
39%
Grade 8 Mathematics
Mean scores and data in the table for grade 8 math include only those for grade 8 students who took the Grade 8 New York State Testing Program Assessment (NYSTP) in Mathematics. For 2015 and forward, data in the bar charts include those for grade 8 students who took the Grade 8 NYSTP in Mathematics and grade 8 students who took a Regents math test in lieu of the NYSTP. For 2014 and earlier, data in the bar charts include only those for grade 8 students who took the Grade 8 NYSTP.
MEAN SCORE: 331
All Students
PROFICIENT
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 125
LEVEL 1
12
10%
LEVEL 2
30
24%
LEVEL 3
37
30%
LEVEL 4
46
37%
General Education
PROFICIENT
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 114
LEVEL 1
8
7%
LEVEL 2
25
22%
LEVEL 3
36
32%
LEVEL 4
45
39%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 11
LEVEL 1
4
36%
LEVEL 2
5
45%
LEVEL 3
1
9%
LEVEL 4
1
9%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 39
LEVEL 1
4
10%
LEVEL 2
5
13%
LEVEL 3
13
33%
LEVEL 4
17
44%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 75
LEVEL 1
7
9%
LEVEL 2
24
32%
LEVEL 3
22
29%
LEVEL 4
22
29%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 8
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 11
LEVEL 1
1
9%
LEVEL 2
1
9%
LEVEL 3
2
18%
LEVEL 4
7
64%
Female
PROFICIENT
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 60
LEVEL 1
7
12%
LEVEL 2
19
32%
LEVEL 3
14
23%
LEVEL 4
20
33%
Male
PROFICIENT
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 65
LEVEL 1
5
8%
LEVEL 2
11
17%
LEVEL 3
23
35%
LEVEL 4
26
40%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 123
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 125
LEVEL 1
12
10%
LEVEL 2
30
24%
LEVEL 3
37
30%
LEVEL 4
46
37%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 125
LEVEL 1
12
10%
LEVEL 2
30
24%
LEVEL 3
37
30%
LEVEL 4
46
37%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
125
114
11
39
3
75
8
11
60
65
123
2
125
125
PROFICIENT
66%
71%
18%
77%
_%
59%
_%
82%
57%
75%
_%
_%
66%
66%
LEVEL 1
12
10%
8
7%
4
36%
4
10%
_
_
7
9%
_
_
1
9%
7
12%
5
8%
_
_
_
_
12
10%
12
10%
LEVEL 2
30
24%
25
22%
5
45%
5
13%
_
_
24
32%
_
_
1
9%
19
32%
11
17%
_
_
_
_
30
24%
30
24%
LEVEL 3
37
30%
36
32%
1
9%
13
33%
_
_
22
29%
_
_
2
18%
14
23%
23
35%
_
_
_
_
37
30%
37
30%
LEVEL 4
46
37%
45
39%
1
9%
17
44%
_
_
22
29%
_
_
7
64%
20
33%
26
40%
_
_
_
_
46
37%
46
37%
Grade 8 Students Taking a Regents Math Test
Accelerated grade 8 students who took a Regents math test in lieu of the Grade 8 NYSTP in Mathematics.
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4 AND ABOVE
_
_
LEVEL 3 AND ABOVE
_
_
GROUP
All Students
TOTAL TESTED
1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
4 & ABOVE
_
_
3 & ABOVE
_
_
Grade 4 Science
MEAN SCORE: 91
All Students
PROFICIENT
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 130
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
3
2%
LEVEL 3
10
8%
LEVEL 4
116
89%
General Education
PROFICIENT
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 123
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
1
1%
LEVEL 3
7
6%
LEVEL 4
114
93%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 7
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
29%
LEVEL 3
3
43%
LEVEL 4
2
29%
American Indian or Alaska Native
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 49
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
2%
LEVEL 3
2
4%
LEVEL 4
46
94%
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
6
100%
White
PROFICIENT
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 69
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
1
1%
LEVEL 3
8
12%
LEVEL 4
59
86%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
17%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
5
83%
Female
PROFICIENT
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 58
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
3%
LEVEL 3
7
12%
LEVEL 4
49
84%
Male
PROFICIENT
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 72
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
1
1%
LEVEL 3
3
4%
LEVEL 4
67
93%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 129
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 130
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
3
2%
LEVEL 3
10
8%
LEVEL 4
116
89%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 130
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
3
2%
LEVEL 3
10
8%
LEVEL 4
116
89%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
130
123
7
1
49
1
6
69
4
6
58
72
129
1
130
130
PROFICIENT
97%
98%
71%
_%
98%
_%
100%
97%
_%
83%
97%
97%
_%
_%
97%
97%
LEVEL 1
1
1%
1
1%
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
1
1%
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
1
1%
_
_
_
_
1
1%
1
1%
LEVEL 2
3
2%
1
1%
2
29%
_
_
1
2%
_
_
0
0%
1
1%
_
_
1
17%
2
3%
1
1%
_
_
_
_
3
2%
3
2%
LEVEL 3
10
8%
7
6%
3
43%
_
_
2
4%
_
_
0
0%
8
12%
_
_
0
0%
7
12%
3
4%
_
_
_
_
10
8%
10
8%
LEVEL 4
116
89%
114
93%
2
29%
_
_
46
94%
_
_
6
100%
59
86%
_
_
5
83%
49
84%
67
93%
_
_
_
_
116
89%
116
89%
Grade 8 Science
Data in the bar charts include those for grade 8 students who took the New York State Grade 8 Science Test and grade 8 students who took a Regents science test in lieu of this test. Mean scores and data in the table for grade 8 science include only those for grade 8 students who took the New York State Grade 8 Science Test.
MEAN SCORE: 78
All Students
PROFICIENT
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 135
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
12
9%
LEVEL 3
81
60%
LEVEL 4
41
30%
General Education
PROFICIENT
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 121
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
6
5%
LEVEL 3
75
62%
LEVEL 4
40
33%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 14
LEVEL 1
1
7%
LEVEL 2
6
43%
LEVEL 3
6
43%
LEVEL 4
1
7%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 40
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
5
13%
LEVEL 3
22
55%
LEVEL 4
13
33%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 82
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
6
7%
LEVEL 3
53
65%
LEVEL 4
22
27%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 10
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 13
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
8%
LEVEL 3
6
46%
LEVEL 4
6
46%
Female
PROFICIENT
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 62
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
6
10%
LEVEL 3
42
68%
LEVEL 4
14
23%
Male
PROFICIENT
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 73
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
6
8%
LEVEL 3
39
53%
LEVEL 4
27
37%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 133
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 135
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
12
9%
LEVEL 3
81
60%
LEVEL 4
41
30%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 135
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
12
9%
LEVEL 3
81
60%
LEVEL 4
41
30%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
135
121
14
40
3
82
10
13
62
73
133
2
135
135
PROFICIENT
90%
95%
50%
88%
_%
91%
_%
92%
90%
90%
_%
_%
90%
90%
LEVEL 1
1
1%
0
0%
1
7%
0
0%
_
_
1
1%
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
1
1%
_
_
_
_
1
1%
1
1%
LEVEL 2
12
9%
6
5%
6
43%
5
13%
_
_
6
7%
_
_
1
8%
6
10%
6
8%
_
_
_
_
12
9%
12
9%
LEVEL 3
81
60%
75
62%
6
43%
22
55%
_
_
53
65%
_
_
6
46%
42
68%
39
53%
_
_
_
_
81
60%
81
60%
LEVEL 4
41
30%
40
33%
1
7%
13
33%
_
_
22
27%
_
_
6
46%
14
23%
27
37%
_
_
_
_
41
30%
41
30%
Recently Arrived ELL Students (2014 - 15)
GRADE
Grade 4
Grade 6
Grade 7
RECENTLY ARRIVED ELL STUDENTS TAKING NYSESLAT IN LIEU OF NYSTP
1
1
1
GRADE
Grade 4
Grade 6
Grade 7
RECENTLY ARRIVED ELL STUDENTS NOT TAKING NYSESLAT IN LIEU OF NYSTP
1
1
1
Recently Arrived ELL Students (2014 - 15)
Recently Arrived ELL Students Taking NYSESLAT in Lieu of NYSTP
Grade 4
1
Grade 6
1
Grade 7
1
Recently Arrived ELL Students NOT Tested on the ELA NYSTP
Grade 4
1
Grade 6
1
Grade 7
1
Statewide Results on the National Assessment of Educational Progress: NAEP (2014 - 15)
Grade: 4
Reading
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Students with Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
BELOW BASIC
32%
*%
20%
48%
44%
20%
*%
70%
74%
43%
BASIC
32%
*%
30%
34%
37%
31%
*%
22%
21%
36%
PROFICIENT
27%
*%
33%
15%
17%
37%
*%
7%
4%
18%
ADVANCED
9%
*%
17%
3%
2%
12%
*%
1%
1%
3%
PARTICIPATION RATE
98
88
Reading
All Students
Percent Below Basic
32
Percent Basic
32
Percent Proficient
27
Percent Advanced
9
American Indian or Alaska Native
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Percent Below Basic
20
Percent Basic
30
Percent Proficient
33
Percent Advanced
17
Black or African American
Percent Below Basic
48
Percent Basic
34
Percent Proficient
15
Percent Advanced
3
Hispanic or Latino
Percent Below Basic
44
Percent Basic
37
Percent Proficient
17
Percent Advanced
2
White
Percent Below Basic
20
Percent Basic
31
Percent Proficient
37
Percent Advanced
12
Multiracial
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Students with Disabilities
Percent Below Basic
70
Percent Basic
22
Percent Proficient
7
Percent Advanced
1
Participation Rate
98
Limited English Proficient
Percent Below Basic
74
Percent Basic
21
Percent Proficient
4
Percent Advanced
1
Participation Rate
88
Economically Disadvantaged
Percent Below Basic
43
Percent Basic
36
Percent Proficient
18
Percent Advanced
3
Mathematics
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Students with Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
BELOW BASIC
21%
*%
12%
40%
28%
12%
*%
49%
56%
29%
BASIC
44%
*%
31%
46%
51%
41%
*%
39%
35%
48%
PROFICIENT
30%
*%
42%
13%
20%
40%
*%
10%
9%
21%
ADVANCED
5%
*%
15%
1%
1%
7%
*%
2%
*%
2%
PARTICIPATION RATE
98
91
Mathematics
All Students
Percent Below Basic
21
Percent Basic
44
Percent Proficient
30
Percent Advanced
5
American Indian or Alaska Native
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Percent Below Basic
12
Percent Basic
31
Percent Proficient
42
Percent Advanced
15
Black or African American
Percent Below Basic
40
Percent Basic
46
Percent Proficient
13
Percent Advanced
1
Hispanic or Latino
Percent Below Basic
28
Percent Basic
51
Percent Proficient
20
Percent Advanced
1
White
Percent Below Basic
12
Percent Basic
41
Percent Proficient
40
Percent Advanced
7
Multiracial
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Students with Disabilities
Percent Below Basic
49
Percent Basic
39
Percent Proficient
10
Percent Advanced
2
Participation Rate
98
Limited English Proficient
Percent Below Basic
56
Percent Basic
35
Percent Proficient
9
Percent Advanced
*
Participation Rate
91
Economically Disadvantaged
Percent Below Basic
29
Percent Basic
48
Percent Proficient
21
Percent Advanced
2
Grade: 8
Reading
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Students with Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
BELOW BASIC
27%
*%
19%
42%
35%
18%
*%
59%
78%
36%
BASIC
40%
*%
39%
41%
43%
39%
*%
33%
19%
42%
PROFICIENT
29%
*%
34%
16%
20%
38%
*%
8%
3%
21%
ADVANCED
4%
*%
8%
1%
2%
5%
*%
*%
*%
1%
PARTICIPATION RATE
98
89
Reading
All Students
Percent Below Basic
27
Percent Basic
40
Percent Proficient
29
Percent Advanced
4
American Indian or Alaska Native
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Percent Below Basic
19
Percent Basic
39
Percent Proficient
34
Percent Advanced
8
Black or African American
Percent Below Basic
42
Percent Basic
41
Percent Proficient
16
Percent Advanced
1
Hispanic or Latino
Percent Below Basic
35
Percent Basic
43
Percent Proficient
20
Percent Advanced
2
White
Percent Below Basic
18
Percent Basic
39
Percent Proficient
38
Percent Advanced
5
Multiracial
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Students with Disabilities
Percent Below Basic
59
Percent Basic
33
Percent Proficient
8
Percent Advanced
*
Participation Rate
98
Limited English Proficient
Percent Below Basic
78
Percent Basic
19
Percent Proficient
3
Percent Advanced
*
Participation Rate
89
Economically Disadvantaged
Percent Below Basic
36
Percent Basic
42
Percent Proficient
21
Percent Advanced
1
Mathematics
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Students with Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
BELOW BASIC
31%
*%
18%
48%
41%
20%
*%
64%
72%
40%
BASIC
38%
*%
30%
37%
40%
40%
*%
27%
21%
39%
PROFICIENT
24%
*%
33%
13%
16%
31%
*%
8%
6%
17%
ADVANCED
7%
*%
19%
2%
3%
9%
*%
1%
1%
4%
PARTICIPATION RATE
99
94
Mathematics
All Students
Percent Below Basic
31
Percent Basic
38
Percent Proficient
24
Percent Advanced
7
American Indian or Alaska Native
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Percent Below Basic
18
Percent Basic
30
Percent Proficient
33
Percent Advanced
19
Black or African American
Percent Below Basic
48
Percent Basic
37
Percent Proficient
13
Percent Advanced
2
Hispanic or Latino
Percent Below Basic
41
Percent Basic
40
Percent Proficient
16
Percent Advanced
3
White
Percent Below Basic
20
Percent Basic
40
Percent Proficient
31
Percent Advanced
9
Multiracial
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Students with Disabilities
Percent Below Basic
64
Percent Basic
27
Percent Proficient
8
Percent Advanced
1
Participation Rate
99
Limited English Proficient
Percent Below Basic
72
Percent Basic
21
Percent Proficient
6
Percent Advanced
1
Participation Rate
94
Economically Disadvantaged
Percent Below Basic
40
Percent Basic
39
Percent Proficient
17
Percent Advanced
4
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level English Language Arts after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 165
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
5
3%
LEVEL 3
54
33%
LEVEL 4
106
64%
General Education
PROFICIENT
99%
TOTAL TESTED: 139
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
1%
LEVEL 3
36
26%
LEVEL 4
102
73%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 26
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
4
15%
LEVEL 3
18
69%
LEVEL 4
4
15%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 47
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
18
38%
LEVEL 4
29
62%
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 14
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
14%
LEVEL 3
5
36%
LEVEL 4
7
50%
White
PROFICIENT
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 94
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
2%
LEVEL 3
31
33%
LEVEL 4
61
65%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 8
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 10
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
10%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
9
90%
Female
PROFICIENT
99%
TOTAL TESTED: 67
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
1%
LEVEL 3
20
30%
LEVEL 4
46
69%
Male
PROFICIENT
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 98
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
4
4%
LEVEL 3
34
35%
LEVEL 4
60
61%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 162
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 165
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
5
3%
LEVEL 3
54
33%
LEVEL 4
106
64%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 165
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
5
3%
LEVEL 3
54
33%
LEVEL 4
106
64%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
165
139
26
47
2
14
94
8
10
67
98
162
3
165
165
PROFICIENT
97%
99%
85%
100%
_%
86%
98%
_%
90%
99%
96%
_%
_%
97%
97%
LEVEL 1
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
LEVEL 2
5
3%
1
1%
4
15%
0
0%
_
_
2
14%
2
2%
_
_
1
10%
1
1%
4
4%
_
_
_
_
5
3%
5
3%
LEVEL 3
54
33%
36
26%
18
69%
18
38%
_
_
5
36%
31
33%
_
_
0
0%
20
30%
34
35%
_
_
_
_
54
33%
54
33%
LEVEL 4
106
64%
102
73%
4
15%
29
62%
_
_
7
50%
61
65%
_
_
9
90%
46
69%
60
61%
_
_
_
_
106
64%
106
64%
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level Mathematics after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 165
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
1%
LEVEL 3
56
34%
LEVEL 4
105
64%
General Education
PROFICIENT
99%
TOTAL TESTED: 139
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
37
27%
LEVEL 4
101
73%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 26
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
8%
LEVEL 3
19
73%
LEVEL 4
4
15%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 47
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
12
26%
LEVEL 4
34
72%
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 14
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
8
57%
LEVEL 4
6
43%
White
PROFICIENT
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 94
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
2%
LEVEL 3
34
36%
LEVEL 4
57
61%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 8
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 10
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
2
20%
LEVEL 4
8
80%
Female
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 67
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
20
30%
LEVEL 4
47
70%
Male
PROFICIENT
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 98
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
2%
LEVEL 3
36
37%
LEVEL 4
58
59%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 162
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 165
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
1%
LEVEL 3
56
34%
LEVEL 4
105
64%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 165
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
1%
LEVEL 3
56
34%
LEVEL 4
105
64%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
165
139
26
47
2
14
94
8
10
67
98
162
3
165
165
PROFICIENT
98%
99%
88%
98%
_%
100%
97%
_%
100%
100%
96%
_%
_%
98%
98%
LEVEL 1
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
1%
0
0%
2
8%
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
2
2%
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
2
2%
_
_
_
_
2
1%
2
1%
LEVEL 3
56
34%
37
27%
19
73%
12
26%
_
_
8
57%
34
36%
_
_
2
20%
20
30%
36
37%
_
_
_
_
56
34%
56
34%
LEVEL 4
105
64%
101
73%
4
15%
34
72%
_
_
6
43%
57
61%
_
_
8
80%
47
70%
58
59%
_
_
_
_
105
64%
105
64%
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level Global History and Geography after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 165
LEVEL 1
2
1%
LEVEL 2
6
4%
LEVEL 3
63
38%
LEVEL 4
91
55%
General Education
PROFICIENT
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 139
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
47
34%
LEVEL 4
89
64%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 26
LEVEL 1
2
8%
LEVEL 2
6
23%
LEVEL 3
16
62%
LEVEL 4
2
8%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 47
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
15
32%
LEVEL 4
30
64%
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 14
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
3
21%
LEVEL 3
5
36%
LEVEL 4
6
43%
White
PROFICIENT
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 94
LEVEL 1
2
2%
LEVEL 2
3
3%
LEVEL 3
41
44%
LEVEL 4
47
50%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 8
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 10
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
2
20%
LEVEL 4
8
80%
Female
PROFICIENT
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 67
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
2
3%
LEVEL 3
25
37%
LEVEL 4
36
54%
Male
PROFICIENT
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 98
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
4
4%
LEVEL 3
38
39%
LEVEL 4
55
56%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 162
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 165
LEVEL 1
2
1%
LEVEL 2
6
4%
LEVEL 3
63
38%
LEVEL 4
91
55%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 165
LEVEL 1
2
1%
LEVEL 2
6
4%
LEVEL 3
63
38%
LEVEL 4
91
55%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
165
139
26
47
2
14
94
8
10
67
98
162
3
165
165
PROFICIENT
93%
98%
69%
96%
_%
79%
94%
_%
100%
91%
95%
_%
_%
93%
93%
LEVEL 1
2
1%
0
0%
2
8%
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
2
2%
_
_
0
0%
1
1%
1
1%
_
_
_
_
2
1%
2
1%
LEVEL 2
6
4%
0
0%
6
23%
0
0%
_
_
3
21%
3
3%
_
_
0
0%
2
3%
4
4%
_
_
_
_
6
4%
6
4%
LEVEL 3
63
38%
47
34%
16
62%
15
32%
_
_
5
36%
41
44%
_
_
2
20%
25
37%
38
39%
_
_
_
_
63
38%
63
38%
LEVEL 4
91
55%
89
64%
2
8%
30
64%
_
_
6
43%
47
50%
_
_
8
80%
36
54%
55
56%
_
_
_
_
91
55%
91
55%
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level U.S. History and Government after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 165
LEVEL 1
2
1%
LEVEL 2
2
1%
LEVEL 3
44
27%
LEVEL 4
95
58%
General Education
PROFICIENT
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 139
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
30
22%
LEVEL 4
88
63%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 26
LEVEL 1
2
8%
LEVEL 2
2
8%
LEVEL 3
14
54%
LEVEL 4
7
27%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 47
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
10
21%
LEVEL 4
30
64%
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 14
LEVEL 1
1
7%
LEVEL 2
1
7%
LEVEL 3
3
21%
LEVEL 4
8
57%
White
PROFICIENT
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 94
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
1
1%
LEVEL 3
29
31%
LEVEL 4
51
54%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 8
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 10
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
2
20%
LEVEL 4
6
60%
Female
PROFICIENT
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 67
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
1
1%
LEVEL 3
18
27%
LEVEL 4
44
66%
Male
PROFICIENT
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 98
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
1
1%
LEVEL 3
26
27%
LEVEL 4
51
52%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 162
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 165
LEVEL 1
2
1%
LEVEL 2
2
1%
LEVEL 3
44
27%
LEVEL 4
95
58%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 165
LEVEL 1
2
1%
LEVEL 2
2
1%
LEVEL 3
44
27%
LEVEL 4
95
58%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
165
139
26
47
2
14
94
8
10
67
98
162
3
165
165
PROFICIENT
84%
85%
81%
85%
_%
79%
85%
_%
80%
93%
79%
_%
_%
84%
84%
LEVEL 1
2
1%
0
0%
2
8%
0
0%
_
_
1
7%
1
1%
_
_
0
0%
1
1%
1
1%
_
_
_
_
2
1%
2
1%
LEVEL 2
2
1%
0
0%
2
8%
0
0%
_
_
1
7%
1
1%
_
_
0
0%
1
1%
1
1%
_
_
_
_
2
1%
2
1%
LEVEL 3
44
27%
30
22%
14
54%
10
21%
_
_
3
21%
29
31%
_
_
2
20%
18
27%
26
27%
_
_
_
_
44
27%
44
27%
LEVEL 4
95
58%
88
63%
7
27%
30
64%
_
_
8
57%
51
54%
_
_
6
60%
44
66%
51
52%
_
_
_
_
95
58%
95
58%
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level Science after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
99%
TOTAL TESTED: 165
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
45
27%
LEVEL 4
119
72%
General Education
PROFICIENT
99%
TOTAL TESTED: 139
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
29
21%
LEVEL 4
109
78%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 26
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
16
62%
LEVEL 4
10
38%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 47
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
11
23%
LEVEL 4
35
74%
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 14
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
6
43%
LEVEL 4
8
57%
White
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 94
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
27
29%
LEVEL 4
67
71%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 8
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 10
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
1
10%
LEVEL 4
9
90%
Female
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 67
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
18
27%
LEVEL 4
49
73%
Male
PROFICIENT
99%
TOTAL TESTED: 98
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
27
28%
LEVEL 4
70
71%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 162
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
99%
TOTAL TESTED: 165
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
45
27%
LEVEL 4
119
72%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
99%
TOTAL TESTED: 165
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
45
27%
LEVEL 4
119
72%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
165
139
26
47
2
14
94
8
10
67
98
162
3
165
165
PROFICIENT
99%
99%
100%
98%
_%
100%
100%
_%
100%
100%
99%
_%
_%
99%
99%
LEVEL 1
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
LEVEL 3
45
27%
29
21%
16
62%
11
23%
_
_
6
43%
27
29%
_
_
1
10%
18
27%
27
28%
_
_
_
_
45
27%
45
27%
LEVEL 4
119
72%
109
78%
10
38%
35
74%
_
_
8
57%
67
71%
_
_
9
90%
49
73%
70
71%
_
_
_
_
119
72%
119
72%
Regents Examination Results (2014 - 15)
Comprehensive English
Regents Comprehensive English
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
6
3
3
2
1
3
6
2
4
4
2
6
6
55
6
100%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
6
100%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
6
100%
6
100%
65
3
50%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
3
50%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
3
50%
3
50%
85
1
17%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
1
17%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
1
17%
1
17%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 6
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
6
100%
65
3
50%
85
1
17%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 6
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
6
100%
65
3
50%
85
1
17%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 4
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 4
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 6
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
6
100%
65
3
50%
85
1
17%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 6
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
6
100%
65
3
50%
85
1
17%
English Language Arts (Common Core)
English Language Arts (Common Core)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
150
133
17
42
4
11
84
9
13
68
82
149
1
150
150
LEVEL 1
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
1%
1
1%
0
0%
1
2%
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
1
1%
_
_
_
_
1
1%
1
1%
LEVEL 3
6
4%
2
2%
4
24%
1
2%
_
_
3
27%
2
2%
_
_
0
0%
4
6%
2
2%
_
_
_
_
6
4%
6
4%
LEVEL 4
11
7%
7
5%
4
24%
1
2%
_
_
2
18%
6
7%
_
_
2
15%
7
10%
4
5%
_
_
_
_
11
7%
11
7%
LEVEL 5
132
88%
123
92%
9
53%
39
93%
_
_
6
55%
76
90%
_
_
11
85%
57
84%
75
91%
_
_
_
_
132
88%
132
88%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 150
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
1%
LEVEL 3
6
4%
LEVEL 4
11
7%
LEVEL 5
132
88%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 133
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
1%
LEVEL 3
2
2%
LEVEL 4
7
5%
LEVEL 5
123
92%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 17
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
4
24%
LEVEL 4
4
24%
LEVEL 5
9
53%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 42
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
2%
LEVEL 3
1
2%
LEVEL 4
1
2%
LEVEL 5
39
93%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 4
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 11
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
3
27%
LEVEL 4
2
18%
LEVEL 5
6
55%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 84
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
2
2%
LEVEL 4
6
7%
LEVEL 5
76
90%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 9
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 13
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
2
15%
LEVEL 5
11
85%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 68
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
4
6%
LEVEL 4
7
10%
LEVEL 5
57
84%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 82
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
1%
LEVEL 3
2
2%
LEVEL 4
4
5%
LEVEL 5
75
91%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 149
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 150
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
1%
LEVEL 3
6
4%
LEVEL 4
11
7%
LEVEL 5
132
88%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 150
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
1%
LEVEL 3
6
4%
LEVEL 4
11
7%
LEVEL 5
132
88%
Integrated Algebra
Regents Integrated Algebra
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
25
10
15
4
1
19
1
6
9
16
24
1
25
25
55
25
100%
10
100%
15
100%
_
_
_
_
19
100%
_
_
6
100%
9
100%
16
100%
_
_
_
_
25
100%
25
100%
65
25
100%
10
100%
15
100%
_
_
_
_
19
100%
_
_
6
100%
9
100%
16
100%
_
_
_
_
25
100%
25
100%
85
5
20%
1
10%
4
27%
_
_
_
_
4
21%
_
_
1
17%
2
22%
3
19%
_
_
_
_
5
20%
5
20%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 25
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
25
100%
65
25
100%
85
5
20%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 10
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
10
100%
65
10
100%
85
1
10%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 15
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
15
100%
65
15
100%
85
4
27%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 4
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 19
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
19
100%
65
19
100%
85
4
21%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 6
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
6
100%
65
6
100%
85
1
17%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 9
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
9
100%
65
9
100%
85
2
22%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 16
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
16
100%
65
16
100%
85
3
19%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 24
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 25
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
25
100%
65
25
100%
85
5
20%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 25
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
25
100%
65
25
100%
85
5
20%
Geometry
Regents Geometry
GROUP
All Students
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Small Group Total
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
55
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
65
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
85
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Algebra 2/Trigonometry
Regents Algebra 2/Trigonometry
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
2
2
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
2
2
55
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
65
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
85
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Algebra I (Common Core)
Algebra I (Common Core)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
166
145
21
47
6
6
99
8
76
90
164
2
166
166
LEVEL 1
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
LEVEL 2
4
2%
0
0%
4
19%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
3
3%
1
13%
2
3%
2
2%
_
_
_
_
4
2%
4
2%
LEVEL 3
33
20%
22
15%
11
52%
7
15%
2
33%
0
0%
24
24%
0
0%
10
13%
23
26%
_
_
_
_
33
20%
33
20%
LEVEL 4
67
40%
62
43%
5
24%
15
32%
2
33%
4
67%
43
43%
3
38%
34
45%
33
37%
_
_
_
_
67
40%
67
40%
LEVEL 5
62
37%
61
42%
1
5%
25
53%
2
33%
2
33%
29
29%
4
50%
30
39%
32
36%
_
_
_
_
62
37%
62
37%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 166
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
4
2%
LEVEL 3
33
20%
LEVEL 4
67
40%
LEVEL 5
62
37%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 145
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
22
15%
LEVEL 4
62
43%
LEVEL 5
61
42%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 21
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
4
19%
LEVEL 3
11
52%
LEVEL 4
5
24%
LEVEL 5
1
5%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 47
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
7
15%
LEVEL 4
15
32%
LEVEL 5
25
53%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 6
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
2
33%
LEVEL 4
2
33%
LEVEL 5
2
33%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 6
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
4
67%
LEVEL 5
2
33%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 99
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
3
3%
LEVEL 3
24
24%
LEVEL 4
43
43%
LEVEL 5
29
29%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 8
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
13%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
3
38%
LEVEL 5
4
50%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 76
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
3%
LEVEL 3
10
13%
LEVEL 4
34
45%
LEVEL 5
30
39%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 90
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
2%
LEVEL 3
23
26%
LEVEL 4
33
37%
LEVEL 5
32
36%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 164
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 166
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
4
2%
LEVEL 3
33
20%
LEVEL 4
67
40%
LEVEL 5
62
37%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 166
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
4
2%
LEVEL 3
33
20%
LEVEL 4
67
40%
LEVEL 5
62
37%
Geometry (Common Core)
Geometry (Common Core)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
5
5
2
3
5
1
4
5
5
5
LEVEL 1
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
LEVEL 3
1
20%
1
20%
_
_
_
_
1
20%
_
_
_
_
1
20%
1
20%
1
20%
LEVEL 4
1
20%
1
20%
_
_
_
_
1
20%
_
_
_
_
1
20%
1
20%
1
20%
LEVEL 5
3
60%
3
60%
_
_
_
_
3
60%
_
_
_
_
3
60%
3
60%
3
60%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
1
20%
LEVEL 4
1
20%
LEVEL 5
3
60%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
1
20%
LEVEL 4
1
20%
LEVEL 5
3
60%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
1
20%
LEVEL 4
1
20%
LEVEL 5
3
60%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 4
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
1
20%
LEVEL 4
1
20%
LEVEL 5
3
60%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
1
20%
LEVEL 4
1
20%
LEVEL 5
3
60%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
1
20%
LEVEL 4
1
20%
LEVEL 5
3
60%
Global History and Geography
Regents Global History and Geography
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
148
122
26
41
6
10
84
7
62
86
148
148
148
55
146
99%
122
100%
24
92%
39
95%
6
100%
10
100%
84
100%
7
100%
62
100%
84
98%
146
99%
146
99%
146
99%
65
144
97%
121
99%
23
88%
38
93%
6
100%
10
100%
83
99%
7
100%
60
97%
84
98%
144
97%
144
97%
144
97%
85
89
60%
82
67%
7
27%
30
73%
2
33%
6
60%
46
55%
5
71%
38
61%
51
59%
89
60%
89
60%
89
60%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 148
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
146
99%
65
144
97%
85
89
60%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 122
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
122
100%
65
121
99%
85
82
67%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 26
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
24
92%
65
23
88%
85
7
27%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 41
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
39
95%
65
38
93%
85
30
73%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 6
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
6
100%
65
6
100%
85
2
33%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 10
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
10
100%
65
10
100%
85
6
60%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 84
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
84
100%
65
83
99%
85
46
55%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 7
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
7
100%
65
7
100%
85
5
71%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 62
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
62
100%
65
60
97%
85
38
61%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 86
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
84
98%
65
84
98%
85
51
59%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 148
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
146
99%
65
144
97%
85
89
60%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 148
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
146
99%
65
144
97%
85
89
60%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 148
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
146
99%
65
144
97%
85
89
60%
U.S. History & Government
Regents U.S. History & Government
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
135
115
20
33
4
12
80
6
10
66
69
131
4
135
135
55
134
99%
115
100%
19
95%
33
100%
_
_
11
92%
80
100%
_
_
10
100%
65
98%
69
100%
_
_
_
_
134
99%
134
99%
65
133
99%
114
99%
19
95%
33
100%
_
_
10
83%
80
100%
_
_
10
100%
64
97%
69
100%
_
_
_
_
133
99%
133
99%
85
91
67%
83
72%
8
40%
22
67%
_
_
3
25%
58
73%
_
_
8
80%
41
62%
50
72%
_
_
_
_
91
67%
91
67%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 135
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
134
99%
65
133
99%
85
91
67%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 115
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
115
100%
65
114
99%
85
83
72%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 20
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
19
95%
65
19
95%
85
8
40%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 33
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
33
100%
65
33
100%
85
22
67%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 4
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 12
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
11
92%
65
10
83%
85
3
25%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 80
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
80
100%
65
80
100%
85
58
73%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 6
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 10
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
10
100%
65
10
100%
85
8
80%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 66
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
65
98%
65
64
97%
85
41
62%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 69
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
69
100%
65
69
100%
85
50
72%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 131
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 4
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 135
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
134
99%
65
133
99%
85
91
67%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 135
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
134
99%
65
133
99%
85
91
67%
Living Environment
Regents Living Environment
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
125
97
28
21
5
9
82
8
56
69
122
3
125
125
55
125
100%
97
100%
28
100%
21
100%
5
100%
9
100%
82
100%
8
100%
56
100%
69
100%
_
_
_
_
125
100%
125
100%
65
124
99%
97
100%
27
96%
21
100%
5
100%
9
100%
81
99%
8
100%
56
100%
68
99%
_
_
_
_
124
99%
124
99%
85
92
74%
77
79%
15
54%
16
76%
4
80%
8
89%
57
70%
7
88%
45
80%
47
68%
_
_
_
_
92
74%
92
74%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 125
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
125
100%
65
124
99%
85
92
74%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 97
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
97
100%
65
97
100%
85
77
79%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 28
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
28
100%
65
27
96%
85
15
54%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 21
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
21
100%
65
21
100%
85
16
76%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
5
100%
65
5
100%
85
4
80%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 9
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
9
100%
65
9
100%
85
8
89%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 82
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
82
100%
65
81
99%
85
57
70%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 8
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
8
100%
65
8
100%
85
7
88%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 56
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
56
100%
65
56
100%
85
45
80%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 69
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
69
100%
65
68
99%
85
47
68%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 122
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 125
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
125
100%
65
124
99%
85
92
74%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 125
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
125
100%
65
124
99%
85
92
74%
Physical Setting/Earth Science
Regents Physical Setting/Earth Science
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
29
18
11
5
3
19
2
5
13
16
29
29
29
55
29
100%
18
100%
11
100%
5
100%
_
_
19
100%
_
_
5
100%
13
100%
16
100%
29
100%
29
100%
29
100%
65
27
93%
18
100%
9
82%
4
80%
_
_
18
95%
_
_
5
100%
12
92%
15
94%
27
93%
27
93%
27
93%
85
10
34%
7
39%
3
27%
2
40%
_
_
7
37%
_
_
1
20%
4
31%
6
38%
10
34%
10
34%
10
34%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 29
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
29
100%
65
27
93%
85
10
34%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 18
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
18
100%
65
18
100%
85
7
39%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 11
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
11
100%
65
9
82%
85
3
27%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
5
100%
65
4
80%
85
2
40%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 19
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
19
100%
65
18
95%
85
7
37%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
5
100%
65
5
100%
85
1
20%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 13
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
13
100%
65
12
92%
85
4
31%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 16
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
16
100%
65
15
94%
85
6
38%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 29
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
29
100%
65
27
93%
85
10
34%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 29
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
29
100%
65
27
93%
85
10
34%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 29
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
29
100%
65
27
93%
85
10
34%
Physical Setting/Chemistry
Regents Physical Setting/Chemistry
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
109
109
43
5
4
55
2
6
55
54
108
1
109
109
55
109
100%
109
100%
43
100%
5
100%
_
_
55
100%
_
_
6
100%
55
100%
54
100%
_
_
_
_
109
100%
109
100%
65
104
95%
104
95%
41
95%
4
80%
_
_
53
96%
_
_
6
100%
53
96%
51
94%
_
_
_
_
104
95%
104
95%
85
46
42%
46
42%
20
47%
1
20%
_
_
22
40%
_
_
3
50%
19
35%
27
50%
_
_
_
_
46
42%
46
42%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 109
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
109
100%
65
104
95%
85
46
42%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 109
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
109
100%
65
104
95%
85
46
42%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 43
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
43
100%
65
41
95%
85
20
47%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
5
100%
65
4
80%
85
1
20%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 4
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 55
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
55
100%
65
53
96%
85
22
40%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 6
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
6
100%
65
6
100%
85
3
50%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 55
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
55
100%
65
53
96%
85
19
35%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 54
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
54
100%
65
51
94%
85
27
50%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 108
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 109
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
109
100%
65
104
95%
85
46
42%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 109
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
109
100%
65
104
95%
85
46
42%
Physical Setting/Physics
Regents Physical Setting/Physics
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
46
36
10
7
4
2
29
4
10
17
29
46
46
46
55
45
98%
35
97%
10
100%
7
100%
_
_
_
_
29
100%
_
_
9
90%
16
94%
29
100%
45
98%
45
98%
45
98%
65
42
91%
32
89%
10
100%
6
86%
_
_
_
_
28
97%
_
_
8
80%
16
94%
26
90%
42
91%
42
91%
42
91%
85
21
46%
16
44%
5
50%
5
71%
_
_
_
_
11
38%
_
_
5
50%
8
47%
13
45%
21
46%
21
46%
21
46%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 46
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
45
98%
65
42
91%
85
21
46%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 36
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
35
97%
65
32
89%
85
16
44%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 10
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
10
100%
65
10
100%
85
5
50%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 7
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
7
100%
65
6
86%
85
5
71%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 4
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 29
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
29
100%
65
28
97%
85
11
38%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 4
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 10
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
9
90%
65
8
80%
85
5
50%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 17
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
16
94%
65
16
94%
85
8
47%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 29
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
29
100%
65
26
90%
85
13
45%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 46
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
45
98%
65
42
91%
85
21
46%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 46
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
45
98%
65
42
91%
85
21
46%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 46
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
45
98%
65
42
91%
85
21
46%
New York State Alternate Assessment (NYSAA) Results (2014 - 15)
GROUP
Grade 3 ELA
Grade 3 Math
Grade 5 ELA
Grade 5 Math
Grade 6 ELA
Grade 6 Math
Grade 8 ELA
Grade 8 Math
Grade 8 Science
TOTAL TESTED
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
PROFICIENT
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
LEVEL 1
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
Grade 3 ELA
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 3 Math
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 5 ELA
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 5 Math
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 6 ELA
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 6 Math
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 8 ELA
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 8 Math
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 8 Science
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
New York State English as a Second Language Achievement Test (NYSESLAT) Results (2014 - 15)
Kindergarten
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED
13
11
2
ENTERING
0%
_
_
EMERGING
8%
_
_
TRANSITIONING
54%
_
_
EXPANDING
38%
_
_
COMMANDING
0%
_
_
Grade 1
GROUP
All Students
General Education
TOTAL TESTED
5
5
ENTERING
0%
0%
EMERGING
20%
20%
TRANSITIONING
20%
20%
EXPANDING
40%
40%
COMMANDING
20%
20%
Grade 2
GROUP
All Students
General Education
TOTAL TESTED
8
8
ENTERING
0%
0%
EMERGING
0%
0%
TRANSITIONING
0%
0%
EXPANDING
50%
50%
COMMANDING
50%
50%
Grade 3
GROUP
All Students
General Education
TOTAL TESTED
2
2
ENTERING
_
_
EMERGING
_
_
TRANSITIONING
_
_
EXPANDING
_
_
COMMANDING
_
_
Grade 4
GROUP
All Students
General Education
TOTAL TESTED
1
1
ENTERING
_
_
EMERGING
_
_
TRANSITIONING
_
_
EXPANDING
_
_
COMMANDING
_
_
Grade 5
GROUP
All Students
General Education
TOTAL TESTED
2
2
ENTERING
_
_
EMERGING
_
_
TRANSITIONING
_
_
EXPANDING
_
_
COMMANDING
_
_
Grade 6
GROUP
All Students
General Education
TOTAL TESTED
2
2
ENTERING
_
_
EMERGING
_
_
TRANSITIONING
_
_
EXPANDING
_
_
COMMANDING
_
_
Grade 7
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED
2
1
1
ENTERING
_
_
_
EMERGING
_
_
_
TRANSITIONING
_
_
_
EXPANDING
_
_
_
COMMANDING
_
_
_
Grade 8
GROUP
All Students
General Education
TOTAL TESTED
2
2
ENTERING
_
_
EMERGING
_
_
TRANSITIONING
_
_
EXPANDING
_
_
COMMANDING
_
_
Grade 9
GROUP
All Students
General Education
TOTAL TESTED
2
2
ENTERING
_
_
EMERGING
_
_
TRANSITIONING
_
_
EXPANDING
_
_
COMMANDING
_
_
Grade 11
GROUP
All Students
General Education
TOTAL TESTED
1
1
ENTERING
_
_
EMERGING
_
_
TRANSITIONING
_
_
EXPANDING
_
_
COMMANDING
_
_
Grade 12
GROUP
All Students
General Education
TOTAL TESTED
3
3
ENTERING
_
_
EMERGING
_
_
TRANSITIONING
_
_
EXPANDING
_
_
COMMANDING
_
_
Kindergarten
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 13
ENTERING
0%
EMERGING
8%
TRANSITIONING
54%
EXPANDING
38%
COMMANDING
0%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 11
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 2
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
Grade 1
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 5
ENTERING
0%
EMERGING
20%
TRANSITIONING
20%
EXPANDING
40%
COMMANDING
20%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 5
ENTERING
0%
EMERGING
20%
TRANSITIONING
20%
EXPANDING
40%
COMMANDING
20%
Grade 2
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 8
ENTERING
0%
EMERGING
0%
TRANSITIONING
0%
EXPANDING
50%
COMMANDING
50%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 8
ENTERING
0%
EMERGING
0%
TRANSITIONING
0%
EXPANDING
50%
COMMANDING
50%
Grade 3
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 2
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 2
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
Grade 4
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 1
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 1
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
Grade 5
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 2
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 2
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
Grade 6
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 2
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 2
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
Grade 7
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 2
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 1
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 1
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
Grade 8
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 2
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 2
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
Grade 9
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 2
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 2
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
Grade 11
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 1
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 1
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
Grade 12
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 3
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 3
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
Elementary/Middle-Level English Language Arts Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: NO
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
YES
―
―
YES
YES
YES
YES
NO
―
―
Tested 95%
YES
―
―
YES
YES
YES
YES
NO
―
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
902
1
7
52
283
1,033*
50
201*
11
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
95%
―
―
96%
99%
96%*
98%
90%*
―
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
―
―
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
―
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
833
1
7
49
265
462
49
89✝
8
0
PI
159
―
―
118
174
155
163
78✝
―
―
EAMO
93
―
―
69
116
109
83
49
―
―
Safe Harbor Target
93
―
―
69
116
109
83
49
―
―
All Students
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
902
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
95%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
833
PI
159
EAMO
93
Safe Harbor Target
93
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
7
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
7
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
52
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
96%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
49
PI
118
EAMO
69
Safe Harbor Target
69
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
283
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
99%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
265
PI
174
EAMO
116
Safe Harbor Target
116
White
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,033*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
96%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
462
PI
155
EAMO
109
Safe Harbor Target
109
Multiracial
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
50
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
49
PI
163
EAMO
83
Safe Harbor Target
83
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
201*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
90%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
89✝
PI
78✝
EAMO
49
Safe Harbor Target
49
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
11
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
8
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
901
895
850
1,249*
393
852
802
891
902
460
442
0
902
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
95%
95%
95%
96%*
98%
95%
97%
95%
95%
95%
95%
―
95%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
832
826
784
568
371
784
752
825
833
426
407
0
833
PI
159
160
162
152
164
159
169
160
159
156
163
―
159
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
901
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
95%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
832
PI
159
Not Black or African American
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
895
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
95%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
826
PI
160
Not Hispanic or Latino
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
850
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
95%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
784
PI
162
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,249*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
96%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
568
PI
152
Not White
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
393
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
371
PI
164
Not Multiracial
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
852
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
95%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
784
PI
159
General Education
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
802
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
97%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
752
PI
169
English Proficient
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
891
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
95%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
825
PI
160
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
902
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
95%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
833
PI
159
Male
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
460
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
95%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
426
PI
156
Female
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
442
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
95%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
407
PI
163
Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
902
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
95%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
833
PI
159
― There were fewer than 40 students enrolled during the test administration period, so the Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 tested students enrolled on BEDS day and during the test administration period, so the PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed. *The percentage of students tested in the current year fell below 95 percent, so the numbers of enrolled and tested students in the current year and previous year were combined to provide the school/district with another opportunity to meet the participation rate criterion. ✝ Includes former students with disabilities because the number of students with disabilities in the current year is equal to or greater than 30.
Elementary/Middle-Level Mathematics Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: NO
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
YES
―
―
NO
YES
YES
YES
NO
―
―
Tested 95%
YES
―
―
NO
YES
YES
YES
NO
―
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,810*
1
7
103*
283
1,035*
92*
201*
11
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
96%*
―
―
94%*
99%
95%*
96%*
90%*
―
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
―
―
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
―
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
817
1
6
45
266
453
46
87✝
10
0
PI
169
―
―
136
186
162
178
95✝
―
―
EAMO
90
―
―
67
130
105
75
51
―
―
Safe Harbor Target
90
―
―
67
130
105
75
51
―
―
All Students
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,810*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
96%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
817
PI
169
EAMO
90
Safe Harbor Target
90
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
7
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
6
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
103*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
94%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
45
PI
136
EAMO
67
Safe Harbor Target
67
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
283
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
99%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
266
PI
186
EAMO
130
Safe Harbor Target
130
White
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,035*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
95%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
453
PI
162
EAMO
105
Safe Harbor Target
105
Multiracial
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
92*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
96%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
46
PI
178
EAMO
75
Safe Harbor Target
75
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
201*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
90%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
87✝
PI
95✝
EAMO
51
Safe Harbor Target
51
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
11
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
10
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,808*
1,791*
1,707*
1,251*
393
1,718*
802
1,790*
1,810*
921*
889*
0
1,810*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
96%*
96%*
96%*
95%*
96%
96%*
95%
96%*
96%*
96%*
97%*
―
96%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
816
811
772
551
364
771
738
807
817
414
403
0
817
PI
169
169
171
160
177
168
177
169
169
175
162
―
169
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,808*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
96%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
816
PI
169
Not Black or African American
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,791*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
96%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
811
PI
169
Not Hispanic or Latino
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,707*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
96%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
772
PI
171
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,251*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
95%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
551
PI
160
Not White
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
393
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
96%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
364
PI
177
Not Multiracial
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,718*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
96%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
771
PI
168
General Education
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
802
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
95%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
738
PI
177
English Proficient
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,790*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
96%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
807
PI
169
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,810*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
96%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
817
PI
169
Male
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
921*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
96%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
414
PI
175
Female
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
889*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
97%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
403
PI
162
Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,810*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
96%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
817
PI
169
― There were fewer than 40 students enrolled during the test administration period, so the Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 tested students enrolled on BEDS day and during the test administration period, so the PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed. *The percentage of students tested in the current year fell below 95 percent, so the numbers of enrolled and tested students in the current year and previous year were combined to provide the school/district with another opportunity to meet the participation rate criterion. ✝ Includes former students with disabilities because the number of students with disabilities in the current year is equal to or greater than 30.
Elementary/Middle-Level Science Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: YES
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
YES
―
―
―
YES
YES
―
―
―
―
Tested 80%
YES
―
―
―
YES
YES
―
―
―
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
286
1
1
12
90
167
15
27
3
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
93%
―
―
―
99%
91%
―
―
―
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
YES
―
―
―
YES
YES
―
―
―
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
260
1
1
9
85
150
14
22
3
0
PI
193
―
―
―
193
193
―
―
―
―
EAMO
178
―
―
―
179
185
―
―
―
―
Progress Target
178
―
―
―
179
185
―
―
―
―
All Students
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 80%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
286
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
93%
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
260
PI
193
EAMO
178
Progress Target
178
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
12
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
9
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 80%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
90
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
99%
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
85
PI
193
EAMO
179
Progress Target
179
White
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 80%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
167
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
91%
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
150
PI
193
EAMO
185
Progress Target
185
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
15
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
14
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
27
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
22
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
3
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
3
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
285
285
274
196
119
271
259
283
286
157
129
0
286
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
93%
93%
94%
90%
96%
93%
94%
93%
93%
93%
93%
―
93%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
259
259
251
175
110
246
238
257
260
142
118
0
260
PI
193
193
193
193
193
193
197
193
193
193
193
―
193
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
285
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
93%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
259
PI
193
Not Black or African American
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
285
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
93%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
259
PI
193
Not Hispanic or Latino
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
274
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
94%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
251
PI
193
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
196
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
90%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
175
PI
193
Not White
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
119
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
96%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
110
PI
193
Not Multiracial
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
271
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
93%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
246
PI
193
General Education
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
259
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
94%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
238
PI
197
English Proficient
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
283
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
93%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
257
PI
193
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
286
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
93%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
260
PI
193
Male
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
157
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
93%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
142
PI
193
Female
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
129
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
93%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
118
PI
193
Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
286
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
93%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
260
PI
193
― There were fewer than 40 students enrolled during the test administration period, so the Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 tested students enrolled on BEDS day and during the test administration period, so the PI, EAMO, and Progress Target data are suppressed.
Secondary-Level English Language Arts Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: YES
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
YES
―
―
―
YES
YES
―
―
―
―
Tested 95%
YES
―
―
―
YES
YES
―
―
―
―
12th graders
165
0
2
14
47
94
8
26
3
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
―
―
―
100%
100%
―
―
―
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
―
―
―
YES
YES
―
―
―
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
165
0
2
14
47
94
8
26
3
0
PI
179
―
―
―
187
179
―
―
―
―
EAMO
162
―
―
―
166
171
―
―
―
―
Safe Harbor Target
162
―
―
―
166
171
―
―
―
―
All Students
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
YES
12th Graders
165
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
165
PI
179
EAMO
162
Safe Harbor Target
162
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
2
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
2
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
14
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
14
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
YES
12th Graders
47
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
47
PI
187
EAMO
166
Safe Harbor Target
166
White
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
YES
12th Graders
94
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
94
PI
179
EAMO
171
Safe Harbor Target
171
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
8
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
8
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
26
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
26
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
3
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
3
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
12th Graders
165
163
151
118
71
157
139
162
165
98
67
0
165
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
―
100%
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
165
163
151
118
71
157
139
162
165
98
67
0
165
PI
179
180
181
175
179
178
188
180
179
177
182
―
179
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
12th Graders
165
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
165
PI
179
Not Black or African American
12th Graders
163
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
163
PI
180
Not Hispanic or Latino
12th Graders
151
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
151
PI
181
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
12th Graders
118
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
118
PI
175
Not White
12th Graders
71
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
71
PI
179
Not Multiracial
12th Graders
157
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
157
PI
178
General Education
12th Graders
139
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
139
PI
188
English Proficient
12th Graders
162
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
162
PI
180
Not Economically Disadvantaged
12th Graders
165
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
165
PI
179
Male
12th Graders
98
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
98
PI
177
Female
12th Graders
67
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
67
PI
182
Migrant
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
Not Migrant
12th Graders
165
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
165
PI
179
― There were fewer than 40 12th graders, so the Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 students in the 2011 accountability cohort, so PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed.
Secondary-Level Mathematics Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: YES
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
YES
―
―
―
YES
YES
―
―
―
―
Tested 95%
YES
―
―
―
YES
YES
―
―
―
―
12th graders
165
0
2
14
47
94
8
26
3
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
99%
―
―
―
98%
99%
―
―
―
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
―
―
―
YES
YES
―
―
―
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
165
0
2
14
47
94
8
26
3
0
PI
184
―
―
―
194
181
―
―
―
―
EAMO
146
―
―
―
160
156
―
―
―
―
Safe Harbor Target
146
―
―
―
160
156
―
―
―
―
All Students
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
YES
12th Graders
165
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
99%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
165
PI
184
EAMO
146
Safe Harbor Target
146
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
2
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
2
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
14
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
14
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
YES
12th Graders
47
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
98%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
47
PI
194
EAMO
160
Safe Harbor Target
160
White
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
YES
12th Graders
94
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
99%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
94
PI
181
EAMO
156
Safe Harbor Target
156
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
8
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
8
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
26
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
26
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
3
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
3
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
12th Graders
165
163
151
118
71
157
139
162
165
98
67
0
165
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
99%
99%
99%
99%
99%
99%
99%
99%
99%
98%
100%
―
99%
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
165
163
151
118
71
157
139
162
165
98
67
0
165
PI
184
184
186
181
189
183
193
184
184
181
190
―
184
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
12th Graders
165
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
99%
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
165
PI
184
Not Black or African American
12th Graders
163
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
99%
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
163
PI
184
Not Hispanic or Latino
12th Graders
151
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
99%
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
151
PI
186
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
12th Graders
118
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
99%
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
118
PI
181
Not White
12th Graders
71
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
99%
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
71
PI
189
Not Multiracial
12th Graders
157
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
99%
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
157
PI
183
General Education
12th Graders
139
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
99%
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
139
PI
193
English Proficient
12th Graders
162
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
99%
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
162
PI
184
Not Economically Disadvantaged
12th Graders
165
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
99%
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
165
PI
184
Male
12th Graders
98
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
98%
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
98
PI
181
Female
12th Graders
67
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
67
PI
190
Migrant
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
Not Migrant
12th Graders
165
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
99%
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
165
PI
184
― There were fewer than 40 12th graders, so the Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 students in the 2011 accountability cohort, so PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed.
Unweighted Combined ELA and Math PIs
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
159
―
―
118
174
155
163
78
―
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
169
―
―
136
186
162
178
95
―
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
179
―
―
―
187
179
―
―
―
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
184
―
―
―
194
181
―
―
―
―
UNWEIGHTED COMBINED PI
173
0
0
127
185
169
171
87
0
0
All Students
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
159
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
169
Secondary-Level ELA PI
179
Secondary-Level MATH PI
184
Unweighted Combined PI
173
American Indian or Alaska Native
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Black or African American
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Hispanic or Latino
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
118
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
136
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
127
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
174
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
186
Secondary-Level ELA PI
187
Secondary-Level MATH PI
194
Unweighted Combined PI
185
White
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
155
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
162
Secondary-Level ELA PI
179
Secondary-Level MATH PI
181
Unweighted Combined PI
169
Multiracial
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
163
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
178
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
171
Students With Disabilities
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
78
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
95
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
87
Limited English Proficient
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Economically Disadvantaged
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
― There were not enough students to determine a Performance Index.
Overall Graduation Rate for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: YES
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
YES
―
―
―
YES
YES
―
―
―
―
All Students
MADE AYP
YES
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP
YES
White
MADE AYP
YES
Multiracial
MADE AYP
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP
―
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
―
― There were not enough students to make an AYP determination.
Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort for Accountability
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion:
YES
―
―
―
YES
YES
―
―
―
―
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
167
1
1
14
49
97
5
29
0
0
Graduation Rate
99%
―
―
―
100%
99%
―
―
―
―
State Standard
80%
―
―
―
80%
80%
―
―
―
―
Progress Target
80%
―
―
―
80%
80%
―
―
―
―
All Students
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
167
Graduation Rate
99%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%
American Indian or Alaska Native
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
1
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Black or African American
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
1
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
14
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
49
Graduation Rate
100%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%
White
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
97
Graduation Rate
99%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%
Multiracial
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
5
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Students With Disabilities
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
29
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Limited English Proficient
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
YES Graduation rate is equal to or greater than the State Standard or the group's Progress Target. NO Graduation rate is less than the State Standard and the group's Progress Target.
― There were fewer than 30 students in the cohort.
Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort for Accountability
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion:
YES
―
―
―
YES
YES
―
―
―
―
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
142
0
4
11
40
83
4
20
2
0
Graduation Rate
100%
―
―
―
100%
100%
―
―
―
―
State Standard
80%
―
―
―
80%
80%
―
―
―
―
Progress Target
80%
―
―
―
80%
80%
―
―
―
―
All Students
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
142
Graduation Rate
100%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%
American Indian or Alaska Native
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Black or African American
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
4
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
11
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
40
Graduation Rate
100%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%
White
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
83
Graduation Rate
100%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%
Multiracial
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
4
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Students With Disabilities
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
20
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Limited English Proficient
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
2
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
YES Graduation rate is equal to or greater than the State Standard or the group's Progress Target. NO Graduation rate is less than the State Standard and the group's Progress Target.
― There were fewer than 30 students in the cohort.
Graduation Rates for Non-AYP Groups for Accountability
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
166
166
153
118
70
162
138
167
167
77
90
0
167
Graduation Rate
99%
99%
99%
99%
100%
99%
99%
99%
99%
100%
99%
―
99%
Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
2009 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
142
138
131
102
59
138
122
140
142
75
67
0
142
Graduation Rate
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
―
100%
Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
166
Graduation Rate
99%
Not Black or African American
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
166
Graduation Rate
99%
Not Hispanic or Latino
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
153
Graduation Rate
99%
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
118
Graduation Rate
99%
Not White
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
70
Graduation Rate
100%
Not Multiracial
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
162
Graduation Rate
99%
General Education
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
138
Graduation Rate
99%
English Proficient
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
167
Graduation Rate
99%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
167
Graduation Rate
99%
Male
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
77
Graduation Rate
100%
Female
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
90
Graduation Rate
99%
Migrant
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
Not Migrant
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
167
Graduation Rate
99%
Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
142
Graduation Rate
100%
Not Black or African American
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
138
Graduation Rate
100%
Not Hispanic or Latino
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
131
Graduation Rate
100%
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
102
Graduation Rate
100%
Not White
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
59
Graduation Rate
100%
Not Multiracial
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
138
Graduation Rate
100%
General Education
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
122
Graduation Rate
100%
English Proficient
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
140
Graduation Rate
100%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
142
Graduation Rate
100%
Male
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
75
Graduation Rate
100%
Female
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
67
Graduation Rate
100%
Migrant
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
Not Migrant
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
142
Graduation Rate
100%
― There were fewer than 30 students in the cohort.
You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.
Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.
If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.