Skip to Content
Main content

DRYDEN CSD - School Report Card Data [2014 - 15]

The New York State Report Card is an important part of the Board of Regents' effort to raise learning standards for all students. It provides information to the public on school/district enrollment and staff, student performance, and other measures of school and district performance. Knowledge gained from the report card on a school's or district's strengths and weaknesses can be used to improve instruction and services to students.
Report Card Data - Glossary of Terms | Accountability Data - Glossary of Terms | Business Rules

Elementary/Middle-Level English Language Arts Results for Accountability

All accountability groups made AYP: NO

GROUP
MADE AYP
Tested 95%
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
PI
EAMO
Safe Harbor Target
All Students
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%

NO

Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

1,589*

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

86%*

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

NO

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

548

PI

81

EAMO

92

Safe Harbor Target

92

American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%

―

Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

3

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

―

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

―

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

2

PI

―

EAMO

―

Safe Harbor Target

―

Black or African American
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%

―

Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

5

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

―

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

―

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

4

PI

―

EAMO

―

Safe Harbor Target

―

Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%

―

Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

20

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

―

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

―

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

16

PI

―

EAMO

―

Safe Harbor Target

―

Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%

―

Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

5

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

―

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

―

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

2

PI

―

EAMO

―

Safe Harbor Target

―

White
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%

NO

Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

1,460*

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

87%*

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

NO

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

506

PI

82

EAMO

109

Safe Harbor Target

93

Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%

―

Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

30

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

―

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

―

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

18

PI

―

EAMO

―

Safe Harbor Target

―

Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%

NO

Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

292*

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

83%*

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

NO

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

99✝

PI

14✝

EAMO

50

Safe Harbor Target

37

Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%

―

Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

3

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

―

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

―

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

3

PI

―

EAMO

―

Safe Harbor Target

―

Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%

NO

Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

793*

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

84%*

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

NO

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

269

PI

50

EAMO

77

Safe Harbor Target

67

Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.

GROUP
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
  • 1,582*
  • 1,576*
  • 1,545*
  • 1,578*
  • 129*
  • 1,535*
  • 1,297*
  • 1,581*
  • 796*
  • 816*
  • 773*
  • 2
  • 1,587*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
  • 86%*
  • 86%*
  • 86%*
  • 86%*
  • 85%*
  • 87%*
  • 87%*
  • 86%*
  • 89%*
  • 86%*
  • 87%*
  • ―
  • 86%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
  • 546
  • 544
  • 532
  • 546
  • 42
  • 530
  • 450
  • 545
  • 279
  • 275
  • 273
  • 2
  • 546
PI
  • 82
  • 82
  • 82
  • 81
  • 79
  • 81
  • 96
  • 82
  • 111
  • 75
  • 88
  • ―
  • 82
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

1,582*

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

86%*

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

546

PI

82

Not Black or African American
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

1,576*

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

86%*

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

544

PI

82

Not Hispanic or Latino
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

1,545*

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

86%*

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

532

PI

82

Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

1,578*

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

86%*

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

546

PI

81

Not White
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

129*

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

85%*

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

42

PI

79

Not Multiracial
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

1,535*

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

87%*

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

530

PI

81

General Education
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

1,297*

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

87%*

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

450

PI

96

English Proficient
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

1,581*

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

86%*

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

545

PI

82

Not Economically Disadvantaged
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

796*

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

89%*

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

279

PI

111

Male
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

816*

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

86%*

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

275

PI

75

Female
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

773*

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

87%*

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

273

PI

88

Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

2

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

―

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

2

PI

―

Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

1,587*

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

86%*

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

546

PI

82

― There were fewer than 40 students enrolled during the test administration period, so the Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 tested students enrolled on BEDS day and during the test administration period, so the PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed.
*The percentage of students tested in the current year fell below 95 percent, so the numbers of enrolled and tested students in the current year and previous year were combined to provide the school/district with another opportunity to meet the participation rate criterion.
✝ Includes former students with disabilities because the number of students with disabilities in the current year is equal to or greater than 30.

Elementary/Middle-Level Mathematics Results for Accountability

All accountability groups made AYP: NO

GROUP
MADE AYP
Tested 95%
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
PI
EAMO
Safe Harbor Target
All Students
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%

NO

Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

1,586*

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

85%*

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

YES

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

530

PI

101

EAMO

89

Safe Harbor Target

89

American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%

―

Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

3

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

―

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

―

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

2

PI

―

EAMO

―

Safe Harbor Target

―

Black or African American
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%

―

Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

5

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

―

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

―

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

4

PI

―

EAMO

―

Safe Harbor Target

―

Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%

―

Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

20

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

―

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

―

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

16

PI

―

EAMO

―

Safe Harbor Target

―

Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%

―

Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

5

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

―

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

―

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

2

PI

―

EAMO

―

Safe Harbor Target

―

White
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%

NO

Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

1,457*

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

86%*

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

NO

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

490

PI

101

EAMO

105

Safe Harbor Target

105

Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%

―

Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

30

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

―

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

―

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

16

PI

―

EAMO

―

Safe Harbor Target

―

Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%

NO

Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

291*

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

81%*

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

NO

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

94✝

PI

26✝

EAMO

52

Safe Harbor Target

41

Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%

―

Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

3

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

―

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

―

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

3

PI

―

EAMO

―

Safe Harbor Target

―

Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%

NO

Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

791*

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

82%*

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

NO

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

252

PI

71

EAMO

74

Safe Harbor Target

74

Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.

GROUP
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
  • 1,579*
  • 1,573*
  • 1,542*
  • 1,575*
  • 129*
  • 1,532*
  • 1,295*
  • 1,578*
  • 795*
  • 816*
  • 770*
  • 2
  • 1,584*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
  • 85%*
  • 85%*
  • 85%*
  • 85%*
  • 83%*
  • 86%*
  • 86%*
  • 85%*
  • 89%*
  • 85%*
  • 85%*
  • ―
  • 85%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
  • 528
  • 526
  • 514
  • 528
  • 40
  • 514
  • 437
  • 527
  • 278
  • 266
  • 264
  • 2
  • 528
PI
  • 101
  • 102
  • 102
  • 101
  • 100
  • 100
  • 117
  • 102
  • 129
  • 102
  • 100
  • ―
  • 101
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

1,579*

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

85%*

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

528

PI

101

Not Black or African American
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

1,573*

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

85%*

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

526

PI

102

Not Hispanic or Latino
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

1,542*

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

85%*

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

514

PI

102

Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

1,575*

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

85%*

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

528

PI

101

Not White
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

129*

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

83%*

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

40

PI

100

Not Multiracial
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

1,532*

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

86%*

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

514

PI

100

General Education
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

1,295*

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

86%*

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

437

PI

117

English Proficient
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

1,578*

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

85%*

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

527

PI

102

Not Economically Disadvantaged
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

795*

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

89%*

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

278

PI

129

Male
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

816*

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

85%*

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

266

PI

102

Female
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

770*

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

85%*

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

264

PI

100

Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

2

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

―

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

2

PI

―

Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

1,584*

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

85%*

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

528

PI

101

― There were fewer than 40 students enrolled during the test administration period, so the Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 tested students enrolled on BEDS day and during the test administration period, so the PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed.
*The percentage of students tested in the current year fell below 95 percent, so the numbers of enrolled and tested students in the current year and previous year were combined to provide the school/district with another opportunity to meet the participation rate criterion.
✝ Includes former students with disabilities because the number of students with disabilities in the current year is equal to or greater than 30.

Secondary-Level English Language Arts Results for Accountability

All accountability groups made AYP: NO

GROUP
MADE AYP
Tested 95%
12th graders
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
PI
EAMO
Safe Harbor Target
All Students
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%

YES

12th Graders

113

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

100%

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

YES

2011 Accountability Cohort Members

107

PI

167

EAMO

160

Safe Harbor Target

160

American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%

―

12th Graders

0

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

―

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

―

2011 Accountability Cohort Members

0

PI

―

EAMO

―

Safe Harbor Target

―

Black or African American
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%

―

12th Graders

2

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

―

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

―

2011 Accountability Cohort Members

1

PI

―

EAMO

―

Safe Harbor Target

―

Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%

―

12th Graders

3

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

―

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

―

2011 Accountability Cohort Members

3

PI

―

EAMO

―

Safe Harbor Target

―

Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%

―

12th Graders

1

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

―

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

―

2011 Accountability Cohort Members

1

PI

―

EAMO

―

Safe Harbor Target

―

White
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%

YES

12th Graders

105

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

100%

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

NO

2011 Accountability Cohort Members

101

PI

166

EAMO

171

Safe Harbor Target

171

Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%

―

12th Graders

2

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

―

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

―

2011 Accountability Cohort Members

1

PI

―

EAMO

―

Safe Harbor Target

―

Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%

―

12th Graders

11

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

―

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

―

2011 Accountability Cohort Members

15

PI

―

EAMO

―

Safe Harbor Target

―

Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%

―

12th Graders

0

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

―

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

―

2011 Accountability Cohort Members

0

PI

―

EAMO

―

Safe Harbor Target

―

Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%

―

12th Graders

25

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

―

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

―

2011 Accountability Cohort Members

27

PI

―

EAMO

―

Safe Harbor Target

―

Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.

GROUP
12th Graders
  • 113
  • 111
  • 110
  • 112
  • 8
  • 111
  • 102
  • 113
  • 88
  • 54
  • 59
  • 0
  • 113
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
  • 100%
  • 100%
  • 100%
  • 100%
  • ―
  • 100%
  • 100%
  • 100%
  • 100%
  • 100%
  • 100%
  • ―
  • 100%
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
  • 107
  • 106
  • 104
  • 106
  • 6
  • 106
  • 92
  • 107
  • 80
  • 52
  • 55
  • 1
  • 106
PI
  • 167
  • 167
  • 167
  • 167
  • ―
  • 167
  • 184
  • 167
  • 179
  • 173
  • 162
  • ―
  • 169
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
12th Graders

113

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

100%

2011 Accountability Cohort Members

107

PI

167

Not Black or African American
12th Graders

111

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

100%

2011 Accountability Cohort Members

106

PI

167

Not Hispanic or Latino
12th Graders

110

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

100%

2011 Accountability Cohort Members

104

PI

167

Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
12th Graders

112

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

100%

2011 Accountability Cohort Members

106

PI

167

Not White
12th Graders

8

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

―

2011 Accountability Cohort Members

6

PI

―

Not Multiracial
12th Graders

111

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

100%

2011 Accountability Cohort Members

106

PI

167

General Education
12th Graders

102

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

100%

2011 Accountability Cohort Members

92

PI

184

English Proficient
12th Graders

113

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

100%

2011 Accountability Cohort Members

107

PI

167

Not Economically Disadvantaged
12th Graders

88

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

100%

2011 Accountability Cohort Members

80

PI

179

Male
12th Graders

54

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

100%

2011 Accountability Cohort Members

52

PI

173

Female
12th Graders

59

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

100%

2011 Accountability Cohort Members

55

PI

162

Migrant
12th Graders

0

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

―

2011 Accountability Cohort Members

1

PI

―

Not Migrant
12th Graders

113

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

100%

2011 Accountability Cohort Members

106

PI

169

― There were fewer than 40 12th graders, so the Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 students in the 2011 accountability cohort, so PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed.

Secondary-Level Mathematics Results for Accountability

All accountability groups made AYP: NO

GROUP
MADE AYP
Tested 95%
12th graders
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
PI
EAMO
Safe Harbor Target
All Students
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%

YES

12th Graders

113

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

100%

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

YES

2011 Accountability Cohort Members

107

PI

153

EAMO

144

Safe Harbor Target

144

American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%

―

12th Graders

0

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

―

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

―

2011 Accountability Cohort Members

0

PI

―

EAMO

―

Safe Harbor Target

―

Black or African American
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%

―

12th Graders

2

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

―

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

―

2011 Accountability Cohort Members

1

PI

―

EAMO

―

Safe Harbor Target

―

Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%

―

12th Graders

3

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

―

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

―

2011 Accountability Cohort Members

3

PI

―

EAMO

―

Safe Harbor Target

―

Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%

―

12th Graders

1

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

―

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

―

2011 Accountability Cohort Members

1

PI

―

EAMO

―

Safe Harbor Target

―

White
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%

YES

12th Graders

105

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

100%

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

NO

2011 Accountability Cohort Members

101

PI

154

EAMO

156

Safe Harbor Target

156

Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%

―

12th Graders

2

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

―

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

―

2011 Accountability Cohort Members

1

PI

―

EAMO

―

Safe Harbor Target

―

Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%

―

12th Graders

11

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

―

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

―

2011 Accountability Cohort Members

15

PI

―

EAMO

―

Safe Harbor Target

―

Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%

―

12th Graders

0

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

―

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

―

2011 Accountability Cohort Members

0

PI

―

EAMO

―

Safe Harbor Target

―

Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%

―

12th Graders

25

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

―

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

―

2011 Accountability Cohort Members

27

PI

―

EAMO

―

Safe Harbor Target

―

Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.

GROUP
12th Graders
  • 113
  • 111
  • 110
  • 112
  • 8
  • 111
  • 102
  • 113
  • 88
  • 54
  • 59
  • 0
  • 113
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
  • 100%
  • 100%
  • 100%
  • 100%
  • ―
  • 100%
  • 100%
  • 100%
  • 100%
  • 100%
  • 100%
  • ―
  • 100%
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
  • 107
  • 106
  • 104
  • 106
  • 6
  • 106
  • 92
  • 107
  • 80
  • 52
  • 55
  • 1
  • 106
PI
  • 153
  • 154
  • 153
  • 153
  • ―
  • 155
  • 164
  • 153
  • 165
  • 158
  • 149
  • ―
  • 155
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
12th Graders

113

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

100%

2011 Accountability Cohort Members

107

PI

153

Not Black or African American
12th Graders

111

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

100%

2011 Accountability Cohort Members

106

PI

154

Not Hispanic or Latino
12th Graders

110

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

100%

2011 Accountability Cohort Members

104

PI

153

Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
12th Graders

112

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

100%

2011 Accountability Cohort Members

106

PI

153

Not White
12th Graders

8

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

―

2011 Accountability Cohort Members

6

PI

―

Not Multiracial
12th Graders

111

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

100%

2011 Accountability Cohort Members

106

PI

155

General Education
12th Graders

102

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

100%

2011 Accountability Cohort Members

92

PI

164

English Proficient
12th Graders

113

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

100%

2011 Accountability Cohort Members

107

PI

153

Not Economically Disadvantaged
12th Graders

88

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

100%

2011 Accountability Cohort Members

80

PI

165

Male
12th Graders

54

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

100%

2011 Accountability Cohort Members

52

PI

158

Female
12th Graders

59

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

100%

2011 Accountability Cohort Members

55

PI

149

Migrant
12th Graders

0

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

―

2011 Accountability Cohort Members

1

PI

―

Not Migrant
12th Graders

113

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

100%

2011 Accountability Cohort Members

106

PI

155

― There were fewer than 40 12th graders, so the Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 students in the 2011 accountability cohort, so PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed.

Unweighted Combined ELA and Math PIs

GROUP
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
  • 81
  • ―
  • ―
  • ―
  • ―
  • 82
  • ―
  • 14
  • ―
  • 50
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
  • 101
  • ―
  • ―
  • ―
  • ―
  • 101
  • ―
  • 26
  • ―
  • 71
Secondary-Level ELA PI
  • 167
  • ―
  • ―
  • ―
  • ―
  • 166
  • ―
  • ―
  • ―
  • ―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
  • 153
  • ―
  • ―
  • ―
  • ―
  • 154
  • ―
  • ―
  • ―
  • ―
UNWEIGHTED COMBINED PI
  • 126
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 126
  • 0
  • 20
  • 0
  • 61
All Students
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
81
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
101
Secondary-Level ELA PI
167
Secondary-Level MATH PI
153
Unweighted Combined PI
126
American Indian or Alaska Native
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Black or African American
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Hispanic or Latino
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
White
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
82
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
101
Secondary-Level ELA PI
166
Secondary-Level MATH PI
154
Unweighted Combined PI
126
Multiracial
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Students With Disabilities
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
14
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
26
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
20
Limited English Proficient
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Economically Disadvantaged
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
50
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
71
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
61
― There were not enough students to determine a Performance Index.

Overall Graduation Rate for Accountability

All accountability groups made AYP: NO

GROUP
MADE AYP
All Students

MADE AYP

YES

American Indian or Alaska Native

MADE AYP

―

Black or African American

MADE AYP

―

Hispanic or Latino

MADE AYP

―

Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander

MADE AYP

―

White

MADE AYP

YES

Multiracial

MADE AYP

―

Students With Disabilities

MADE AYP

―

Limited English Proficient

MADE AYP

―

Economically Disadvantaged

MADE AYP

NO

― There were not enough students to make an AYP determination.

Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort for Accountability

GROUP
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion:
  • YES
  • ―
  • ―
  • ―
  • ―
  • YES
  • ―
  • ―
  • ―
  • NO
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
  • 134
  • 0
  • 5
  • 4
  • 1
  • 122
  • 2
  • 18
  • 0
  • 31
Graduation Rate
  • 85%
  • ―
  • ―
  • ―
  • ―
  • 86%
  • ―
  • ―
  • ―
  • 68%
State Standard
  • 80%
  • ―
  • ―
  • ―
  • ―
  • 80%
  • ―
  • ―
  • ―
  • 80%
Progress Target
  • 77%
  • ―
  • ―
  • ―
  • ―
  • 78%
  • ―
  • ―
  • ―
  • 70%
All Students
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
134
Graduation Rate
85%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
77%
American Indian or Alaska Native
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Black or African American
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
5
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
4
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
1
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
White
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
122
Graduation Rate
86%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
78%
Multiracial
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
2
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Students With Disabilities
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
18
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Limited English Proficient
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: NO
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
31
Graduation Rate
68%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
70%

YES Graduation rate is equal to or greater than the State Standard or the group's Progress Target.
NO Graduation rate is less than the State Standard and the group's Progress Target.
― There were fewer than 30 students in the cohort.

Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort for Accountability

GROUP
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion:
  • NO
  • ―
  • ―
  • ―
  • ―
  • NO
  • ―
  • ―
  • ―
  • NO
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
  • 152
  • 0
  • 4
  • 2
  • 2
  • 140
  • 4
  • 29
  • 0
  • 59
Graduation Rate
  • 78%
  • ―
  • ―
  • ―
  • ―
  • 78%
  • ―
  • ―
  • ―
  • 73%
State Standard
  • 80%
  • ―
  • ―
  • ―
  • ―
  • 80%
  • ―
  • ―
  • ―
  • 80%
Progress Target
  • 80%
  • ―
  • ―
  • ―
  • ―
  • 80%
  • ―
  • ―
  • ―
  • 80%
All Students
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: NO
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
152
Graduation Rate
78%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%
American Indian or Alaska Native
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Black or African American
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
4
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
2
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
2
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
White
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: NO
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
140
Graduation Rate
78%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%
Multiracial
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
4
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Students With Disabilities
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
29
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Limited English Proficient
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: NO
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
59
Graduation Rate
73%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%

YES Graduation rate is equal to or greater than the State Standard or the group's Progress Target.
NO Graduation rate is less than the State Standard and the group's Progress Target.
― There were fewer than 30 students in the cohort.

Graduation Rates for Non-AYP Groups for Accountability

GROUP
Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
  • 134
  • 129
  • 130
  • 133
  • 12
  • 132
  • 116
  • 134
  • 103
  • 77
  • 57
  • 0
  • 134
Graduation Rate
  • 85%
  • 85%
  • 85%
  • 85%
  • ―
  • 86%
  • 92%
  • 85%
  • 90%
  • 83%
  • 88%
  • ―
  • 85%
Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
2009 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
  • 152
  • 148
  • 150
  • 150
  • 12
  • 148
  • 123
  • 152
  • 93
  • 83
  • 69
  • 0
  • 152
Graduation Rate
  • 78%
  • 78%
  • 78%
  • 77%
  • ―
  • 78%
  • 88%
  • 78%
  • 81%
  • 80%
  • 75%
  • ―
  • 78%

Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort

Not American Indian or Alaska Native
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
134
Graduation Rate
85%
Not Black or African American
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
129
Graduation Rate
85%
Not Hispanic or Latino
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
130
Graduation Rate
85%
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
133
Graduation Rate
85%
Not White
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
12
Graduation Rate
―
Not Multiracial
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
132
Graduation Rate
86%
General Education
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
116
Graduation Rate
92%
English Proficient
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
134
Graduation Rate
85%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
103
Graduation Rate
90%
Male
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
77
Graduation Rate
83%
Female
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
57
Graduation Rate
88%
Migrant
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
Not Migrant
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
134
Graduation Rate
85%

Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort

Not American Indian or Alaska Native
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
152
Graduation Rate
78%
Not Black or African American
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
148
Graduation Rate
78%
Not Hispanic or Latino
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
150
Graduation Rate
78%
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
150
Graduation Rate
77%
Not White
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
12
Graduation Rate
―
Not Multiracial
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
148
Graduation Rate
78%
General Education
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
123
Graduation Rate
88%
English Proficient
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
152
Graduation Rate
78%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
93
Graduation Rate
81%
Male
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
83
Graduation Rate
80%
Female
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
69
Graduation Rate
75%
Migrant
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
Not Migrant
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
152
Graduation Rate
78%

― There were fewer than 30 students in the cohort.

Graduation Rates for Regents with Advanced Designation and CTE Endorsement for Accountability

Percentage of 2010 Graduation-Rate Total Cohort members who graduated as of August 31, 2014 with:
  • Regents Diploma with an Advanced Designation (This District)
  • 47%
  • Regents Diploma with an Advanced Designation (Statewide)
  • 31%
  • Percentage in This District Exceeded Statewide
  • YES
Regents Diploma with an Advanced Designation (This District)
47%
Regents Diploma with an Advanced Designation (Statewide)
31%
Percentage in This District Exceeded Statewide
YES
Regents Diploma with CTE Endorsement (This District)
9%
Regents Diploma with CTE Endorsement (Statewide)
4%
Percentage in This District Exceeded Statewide
YES
Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.