The New York State Report Card is an important part of the Board of Regents' effort to raise learning standards for all students. It provides information to the public on school/district enrollment and staff, student performance, and other measures of school and district performance. Knowledge gained from the report card on a school's or district's strengths and weaknesses can be used to improve instruction and services to students. Report Card Data - Glossary of Terms | Accountability Data - Glossary of Terms | Business Rules
Turnover Rate of Teachers with Fewer Than Five Years of Experience
0%
TURNOVER RATE OF ALL TEACHERS
8%
Teacher Turnover Rate (2014-15 to 2015-16)
Turnover Rate of Teachers with Fewer Than Five Years of Experience
0%
Turnover Rate of All Teachers
8%
Teacher Qualifications (2015 - 16)
TOTAL TEACHERS
50
PERCENT WITH NO VALID TEACHING CERTIFICATE
0%
PERCENT TEACHING OUT OF CERTIFICATE
6%
PERCENT WITH FEWER THAN THREE YEARS OF EXPERIENCE
6%
PERCENTAGE WITH MASTER'S DEGREEPLUS 30 HOURS OR DOCTORATE
20%
TOTAL NUMBER OF CORE CLASSES
131
Percent Not Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers in This District
8%
Total Number of Classes
181
Percent Taught by Teachers Without Appropriate Certification
8%
Teacher Qualifications (2015 - 16)
TOTAL TEACHERS: 50
Percent with No Valid Teaching Certificate
0%
Percent Teaching Out of Certification
6%
Percent with Fewer Than Three Years of Experience
6%
Percentage with Master's Degree Plus 30 Hours or Doctorate
20%
Total Number of Core Classes
131
Percent Not Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers in This District
8%
Total Number of Classes
181
Percent Taught by Teachers Without Appropriate Certification
8%
High School Completers (2015 - 16)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
53
_
_
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
53
_
_
REGENTS DIPLOMA
48
91%
_
_
_
_
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
REGENTS WITH ADVANCED DESIGNATION
16
30%
_
_
_
_
REGENTS WITH CTE ENDORSEMENT
6
11%
_
_
_
_
LOCAL DIPLOMAS
5
9%
_
_
_
_
COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS
0
0%
_
_
_
_
All Students
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
53
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
53
Regents Diploma
48
91%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
16
30%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
6
11%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
5
9%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
0
0%
of Completers
General Education
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
_
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
_
Regents Diploma
_
_%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
_
_%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
_
_%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
_
_%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
_
_%
of Completers
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
_
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
_
Regents Diploma
_
_%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
_
_%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
_
_%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
_
_%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
_
_%
of Completers
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
53
_
_
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
53
_
_
REGENTS DIPLOMA
48
91%
_
_
_
_
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
REGENTS WITH ADVANCED DESIGNATION
16
30%
_
_
_
_
REGENTS WITH CTE ENDORSEMENT
6
11%
_
_
_
_
LOCAL DIPLOMAS
5
9%
_
_
_
_
COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS
0
0%
_
_
_
_
All Students
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
53
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
53
Regents Diploma
48
91%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
16
30%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
6
11%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
5
9%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
0
0%
of Completers
General Education
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
_
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
_
Regents Diploma
_
_%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
_
_%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
_
_%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
_
_%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
_
_%
of Completers
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
_
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
_
Regents Diploma
_
_%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
_
_%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
_
_%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
_
_%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
_
_%
of Completers
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
53
_
_
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
53
_
_
REGENTS DIPLOMA
48
91%
_
_
_
_
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
REGENTS WITH ADVANCED DESIGNATION
16
30%
_
_
_
_
REGENTS WITH CTE ENDORSEMENT
6
11%
_
_
_
_
LOCAL DIPLOMAS
5
9%
_
_
_
_
COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS
0
0%
_
_
_
_
All Students
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
53
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
53
Regents Diploma
48
91%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
16
30%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
6
11%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
5
9%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
0
0%
of Completers
General Education
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
_
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
_
Regents Diploma
_
_%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
_
_%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
_
_%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
_
_%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
_
_%
of Completers
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
_
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
_
Regents Diploma
_
_%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
_
_%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
_
_%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
_
_%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
_
_%
of Completers
High School Non-completers (2015 - 16)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
3
2%
_
_
_
_
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
6
3%
_
_
_
_
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
9
5%
_
_
_
_
All Students
DROPPED OUT
3
2%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
6
3%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
9
5%
General Education
DROPPED OUT
_
_%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
_
_%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
_
_%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
_
_%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
_
_%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
3
2%
_
_
_
_
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
6
3%
_
_
_
_
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
9
5%
_
_
_
_
All Students
DROPPED OUT
3
2%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
6
3%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
9
5%
General Education
DROPPED OUT
_
_%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
_
_%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
_
_%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
_
_%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
_
_%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
3
2%
_
_
_
_
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
6
3%
_
_
_
_
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
9
5%
_
_
_
_
All Students
DROPPED OUT
3
2%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
6
3%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
9
5%
General Education
DROPPED OUT
_
_%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
_
_%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
_
_%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
_
_%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
_
_%
Post-graduation Plans of Completers (2015 - 16)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO FOUR-YEAR COLLEGE
21
40%
_
_
_
_
TO TWO-YEAR COLLEGE
24
45%
_
_
_
_
TO OTHER POST-SECONDARY
0
0%
_
_
_
_
TO THE MILITARY
2
4%
_
_
_
_
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO EMPLOYMENT
6
11%
_
_
_
_
TO ADULT SERVICES
0
0%
_
_
_
_
TO OTHER KNOWN PLANS
0
0%
_
_
_
_
PLANS UNKNOWN
0
0%
_
_
_
_
All Students
To Four-Year College
21
40%
To Two-Year College
24
45%
To Other Post-Secondary
0
0%
To the Military
2
4%
To Employment
6
11%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
0
0%
Plan Unknown
0
0%
General Education
To Four-Year College
_
_
To Two-Year College
_
_
To Other Post-Secondary
_
_
To the Military
_
_
To Employment
_
_
To Adult Services
_
_
To Other Known Plans
_
_
Plan Unknown
_
_
Students with Disabilities
To Four-Year College
_
_
To Two-Year College
_
_
To Other Post-Secondary
_
_
To the Military
_
_
To Employment
_
_
To Adult Services
_
_
To Other Known Plans
_
_
Plan Unknown
_
_
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO FOUR-YEAR COLLEGE
21
40%
_
_
_
_
TO TWO-YEAR COLLEGE
24
45%
_
_
_
_
TO OTHER POST-SECONDARY
0
0%
_
_
_
_
TO THE MILITARY
2
4%
_
_
_
_
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO EMPLOYMENT
6
11%
_
_
_
_
TO ADULT SERVICES
0
0%
_
_
_
_
TO OTHER KNOWN PLANS
0
0%
_
_
_
_
PLANS UNKNOWN
0
0%
_
_
_
_
All Students
To Four-Year College
21
40%
To Two-Year College
24
45%
To Other Post-Secondary
0
0%
To the Military
2
4%
To Employment
6
11%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
0
0%
Plan Unknown
0
0%
General Education
To Four-Year College
_
_
To Two-Year College
_
_
To Other Post-Secondary
_
_
To the Military
_
_
To Employment
_
_
To Adult Services
_
_
To Other Known Plans
_
_
Plan Unknown
_
_
Students with Disabilities
To Four-Year College
_
_
To Two-Year College
_
_
To Other Post-Secondary
_
_
To the Military
_
_
To Employment
_
_
To Adult Services
_
_
To Other Known Plans
_
_
Plan Unknown
_
_
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO FOUR-YEAR COLLEGE
21
40%
_
_
_
_
TO TWO-YEAR COLLEGE
24
45%
_
_
_
_
TO OTHER POST-SECONDARY
0
0%
_
_
_
_
TO THE MILITARY
2
4%
_
_
_
_
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO EMPLOYMENT
6
11%
_
_
_
_
TO ADULT SERVICES
0
0%
_
_
_
_
TO OTHER KNOWN PLANS
0
0%
_
_
_
_
PLANS UNKNOWN
0
0%
_
_
_
_
All Students
To Four-Year College
21
40%
To Two-Year College
24
45%
To Other Post-Secondary
0
0%
To the Military
2
4%
To Employment
6
11%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
0
0%
Plan Unknown
0
0%
General Education
To Four-Year College
_
_
To Two-Year College
_
_
To Other Post-Secondary
_
_
To the Military
_
_
To Employment
_
_
To Adult Services
_
_
To Other Known Plans
_
_
Plan Unknown
_
_
Students with Disabilities
To Four-Year College
_
_
To Two-Year College
_
_
To Other Post-Secondary
_
_
To the Military
_
_
To Employment
_
_
To Adult Services
_
_
To Other Known Plans
_
_
Plan Unknown
_
_
Grade 3 English Language Arts
Due to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 proficiency rates.
MEAN SCORE: 302
All Students
PROFICIENT
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 30
LEVEL 1
8
27%
LEVEL 2
12
40%
LEVEL 3
7
23%
LEVEL 4
3
10%
General Education
PROFICIENT
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 25
LEVEL 1
3
12%
LEVEL 2
12
48%
LEVEL 3
7
28%
LEVEL 4
3
12%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
5
100%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
American Indian or Alaska Native
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 27
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 30
LEVEL 1
8
27%
LEVEL 2
12
40%
LEVEL 3
7
23%
LEVEL 4
3
10%
Female
PROFICIENT
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
1
11%
LEVEL 2
4
44%
LEVEL 3
3
33%
LEVEL 4
1
11%
Male
PROFICIENT
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 21
LEVEL 1
7
33%
LEVEL 2
8
38%
LEVEL 3
4
19%
LEVEL 4
2
10%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 30
LEVEL 1
8
27%
LEVEL 2
12
40%
LEVEL 3
7
23%
LEVEL 4
3
10%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7
LEVEL 1
3
43%
LEVEL 2
3
43%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
1
14%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 23
LEVEL 1
5
22%
LEVEL 2
9
39%
LEVEL 3
7
30%
LEVEL 4
2
9%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 30
LEVEL 1
8
27%
LEVEL 2
12
40%
LEVEL 3
7
23%
LEVEL 4
3
10%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
30
25
5
1
1
1
27
30
9
21
30
7
23
30
PROFICIENT
33%
40%
0%
_%
_%
_%
_%
33%
44%
29%
33%
14%
39%
33%
LEVEL 1
8
27%
3
12%
5
100%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
8
27%
1
11%
7
33%
8
27%
3
43%
5
22%
8
27%
LEVEL 2
12
40%
12
48%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
12
40%
4
44%
8
38%
12
40%
3
43%
9
39%
12
40%
LEVEL 3
7
23%
7
28%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
7
23%
3
33%
4
19%
7
23%
0
0%
7
30%
7
23%
LEVEL 4
3
10%
3
12%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
3
10%
1
11%
2
10%
3
10%
1
14%
2
9%
3
10%
Grade 4 English Language Arts
Due to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 proficiency rates.
MEAN SCORE: 295
All Students
PROFICIENT
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 26
LEVEL 1
10
38%
LEVEL 2
10
38%
LEVEL 3
5
19%
LEVEL 4
1
4%
General Education
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 25
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 24
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 26
LEVEL 1
10
38%
LEVEL 2
10
38%
LEVEL 3
5
19%
LEVEL 4
1
4%
Female
PROFICIENT
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 12
LEVEL 1
5
42%
LEVEL 2
4
33%
LEVEL 3
3
25%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Male
PROFICIENT
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 14
LEVEL 1
5
36%
LEVEL 2
6
43%
LEVEL 3
2
14%
LEVEL 4
1
7%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 26
LEVEL 1
10
38%
LEVEL 2
10
38%
LEVEL 3
5
19%
LEVEL 4
1
4%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 12
LEVEL 1
7
58%
LEVEL 2
4
33%
LEVEL 3
1
8%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 14
LEVEL 1
3
21%
LEVEL 2
6
43%
LEVEL 3
4
29%
LEVEL 4
1
7%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 26
LEVEL 1
10
38%
LEVEL 2
10
38%
LEVEL 3
5
19%
LEVEL 4
1
4%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
26
25
1
1
1
24
26
12
14
26
12
14
26
PROFICIENT
23%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
23%
25%
21%
23%
8%
36%
23%
LEVEL 1
10
38%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
10
38%
5
42%
5
36%
10
38%
7
58%
3
21%
10
38%
LEVEL 2
10
38%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
10
38%
4
33%
6
43%
10
38%
4
33%
6
43%
10
38%
LEVEL 3
5
19%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
5
19%
3
25%
2
14%
5
19%
1
8%
4
29%
5
19%
LEVEL 4
1
4%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
1
4%
0
0%
1
7%
1
4%
0
0%
1
7%
1
4%
Grade 5 English Language Arts
Due to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 proficiency rates.
MEAN SCORE: 277
All Students
PROFICIENT
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 29
LEVEL 1
17
59%
LEVEL 2
8
28%
LEVEL 3
4
14%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
General Education
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 26
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 28
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 29
LEVEL 1
17
59%
LEVEL 2
8
28%
LEVEL 3
4
14%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Female
PROFICIENT
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 18
LEVEL 1
9
50%
LEVEL 2
7
39%
LEVEL 3
2
11%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Male
PROFICIENT
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 11
LEVEL 1
8
73%
LEVEL 2
1
9%
LEVEL 3
2
18%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 29
LEVEL 1
17
59%
LEVEL 2
8
28%
LEVEL 3
4
14%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 14
LEVEL 1
11
79%
LEVEL 2
2
14%
LEVEL 3
1
7%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 15
LEVEL 1
6
40%
LEVEL 2
6
40%
LEVEL 3
3
20%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 29
LEVEL 1
17
59%
LEVEL 2
8
28%
LEVEL 3
4
14%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
29
26
3
1
28
29
18
11
29
14
15
29
PROFICIENT
14%
_%
_%
_%
_%
14%
11%
18%
14%
7%
20%
14%
LEVEL 1
17
59%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
17
59%
9
50%
8
73%
17
59%
11
79%
6
40%
17
59%
LEVEL 2
8
28%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
8
28%
7
39%
1
9%
8
28%
2
14%
6
40%
8
28%
LEVEL 3
4
14%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
4
14%
2
11%
2
18%
4
14%
1
7%
3
20%
4
14%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
Grade 6 English Language Arts
Due to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 proficiency rates.
MEAN SCORE: 301
All Students
PROFICIENT
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 26
LEVEL 1
7
27%
LEVEL 2
10
38%
LEVEL 3
6
23%
LEVEL 4
3
12%
General Education
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 24
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 19
LEVEL 1
5
26%
LEVEL 2
7
37%
LEVEL 3
5
26%
LEVEL 4
2
11%
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7
LEVEL 1
2
29%
LEVEL 2
3
43%
LEVEL 3
1
14%
LEVEL 4
1
14%
Female
PROFICIENT
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 14
LEVEL 1
2
14%
LEVEL 2
8
57%
LEVEL 3
2
14%
LEVEL 4
2
14%
Male
PROFICIENT
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 12
LEVEL 1
5
42%
LEVEL 2
2
17%
LEVEL 3
4
33%
LEVEL 4
1
8%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 26
LEVEL 1
7
27%
LEVEL 2
10
38%
LEVEL 3
6
23%
LEVEL 4
3
12%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 7
LEVEL 1
2
29%
LEVEL 2
1
14%
LEVEL 3
2
29%
LEVEL 4
2
29%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 19
LEVEL 1
5
26%
LEVEL 2
9
47%
LEVEL 3
4
21%
LEVEL 4
1
5%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 26
LEVEL 1
7
27%
LEVEL 2
10
38%
LEVEL 3
6
23%
LEVEL 4
3
12%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
26
24
2
2
5
19
7
14
12
26
7
19
26
PROFICIENT
35%
_%
_%
_%
_%
37%
29%
29%
42%
35%
57%
26%
35%
LEVEL 1
7
27%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
5
26%
2
29%
2
14%
5
42%
7
27%
2
29%
5
26%
7
27%
LEVEL 2
10
38%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
7
37%
3
43%
8
57%
2
17%
10
38%
1
14%
9
47%
10
38%
LEVEL 3
6
23%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
5
26%
1
14%
2
14%
4
33%
6
23%
2
29%
4
21%
6
23%
LEVEL 4
3
12%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
2
11%
1
14%
2
14%
1
8%
3
12%
2
29%
1
5%
3
12%
Grade 7 English Language Arts
Due to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 proficiency rates.
MEAN SCORE: 297
All Students
PROFICIENT
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 30
LEVEL 1
8
27%
LEVEL 2
13
43%
LEVEL 3
8
27%
LEVEL 4
1
3%
General Education
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 27
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 26
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 30
LEVEL 1
8
27%
LEVEL 2
13
43%
LEVEL 3
8
27%
LEVEL 4
1
3%
Female
PROFICIENT
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 16
LEVEL 1
3
19%
LEVEL 2
8
50%
LEVEL 3
4
25%
LEVEL 4
1
6%
Male
PROFICIENT
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 14
LEVEL 1
5
36%
LEVEL 2
5
36%
LEVEL 3
4
29%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 30
LEVEL 1
8
27%
LEVEL 2
13
43%
LEVEL 3
8
27%
LEVEL 4
1
3%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 8
LEVEL 1
2
25%
LEVEL 2
5
63%
LEVEL 3
1
13%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 22
LEVEL 1
6
27%
LEVEL 2
8
36%
LEVEL 3
7
32%
LEVEL 4
1
5%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 30
LEVEL 1
8
27%
LEVEL 2
13
43%
LEVEL 3
8
27%
LEVEL 4
1
3%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
30
27
3
2
1
1
26
30
16
14
30
8
22
30
PROFICIENT
30%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
30%
31%
29%
30%
13%
36%
30%
LEVEL 1
8
27%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
8
27%
3
19%
5
36%
8
27%
2
25%
6
27%
8
27%
LEVEL 2
13
43%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
13
43%
8
50%
5
36%
13
43%
5
63%
8
36%
13
43%
LEVEL 3
8
27%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
8
27%
4
25%
4
29%
8
27%
1
13%
7
32%
8
27%
LEVEL 4
1
3%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
1
3%
1
6%
0
0%
1
3%
0
0%
1
5%
1
3%
Grade 8 English Language Arts
Due to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 proficiency rates.
MEAN SCORE: 289
All Students
PROFICIENT
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 25
LEVEL 1
12
48%
LEVEL 2
7
28%
LEVEL 3
5
20%
LEVEL 4
1
4%
General Education
PROFICIENT
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 20
LEVEL 1
7
35%
LEVEL 2
7
35%
LEVEL 3
5
25%
LEVEL 4
1
5%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
5
100%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 21
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 25
LEVEL 1
12
48%
LEVEL 2
7
28%
LEVEL 3
5
20%
LEVEL 4
1
4%
Female
PROFICIENT
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 11
LEVEL 1
5
45%
LEVEL 2
3
27%
LEVEL 3
2
18%
LEVEL 4
1
9%
Male
PROFICIENT
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 14
LEVEL 1
7
50%
LEVEL 2
4
29%
LEVEL 3
3
21%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 25
LEVEL 1
12
48%
LEVEL 2
7
28%
LEVEL 3
5
20%
LEVEL 4
1
4%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
5
56%
LEVEL 2
1
11%
LEVEL 3
2
22%
LEVEL 4
1
11%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 16
LEVEL 1
7
44%
LEVEL 2
6
38%
LEVEL 3
3
19%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 25
LEVEL 1
12
48%
LEVEL 2
7
28%
LEVEL 3
5
20%
LEVEL 4
1
4%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
25
20
5
4
21
25
11
14
25
9
16
25
PROFICIENT
24%
30%
0%
_%
_%
24%
27%
21%
24%
33%
19%
24%
LEVEL 1
12
48%
7
35%
5
100%
_
_
_
_
12
48%
5
45%
7
50%
12
48%
5
56%
7
44%
12
48%
LEVEL 2
7
28%
7
35%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
7
28%
3
27%
4
29%
7
28%
1
11%
6
38%
7
28%
LEVEL 3
5
20%
5
25%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
5
20%
2
18%
3
21%
5
20%
2
22%
3
19%
5
20%
LEVEL 4
1
4%
1
5%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
1
4%
1
9%
0
0%
1
4%
1
11%
0
0%
1
4%
Grade 3 Mathematics
Due to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 proficiency rates.
MEAN SCORE: 296
All Students
PROFICIENT
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 28
LEVEL 1
8
29%
LEVEL 2
10
36%
LEVEL 3
6
21%
LEVEL 4
4
14%
General Education
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 24
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
American Indian or Alaska Native
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 25
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 28
LEVEL 1
8
29%
LEVEL 2
10
36%
LEVEL 3
6
21%
LEVEL 4
4
14%
Female
PROFICIENT
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 8
LEVEL 1
1
13%
LEVEL 2
4
50%
LEVEL 3
3
38%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Male
PROFICIENT
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 20
LEVEL 1
7
35%
LEVEL 2
6
30%
LEVEL 3
3
15%
LEVEL 4
4
20%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 28
LEVEL 1
8
29%
LEVEL 2
10
36%
LEVEL 3
6
21%
LEVEL 4
4
14%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
3
50%
LEVEL 2
1
17%
LEVEL 3
1
17%
LEVEL 4
1
17%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 22
LEVEL 1
5
23%
LEVEL 2
9
41%
LEVEL 3
5
23%
LEVEL 4
3
14%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 28
LEVEL 1
8
29%
LEVEL 2
10
36%
LEVEL 3
6
21%
LEVEL 4
4
14%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
28
24
4
1
1
1
25
28
8
20
28
6
22
28
PROFICIENT
36%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
36%
38%
35%
36%
33%
36%
36%
LEVEL 1
8
29%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
8
29%
1
13%
7
35%
8
29%
3
50%
5
23%
8
29%
LEVEL 2
10
36%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
10
36%
4
50%
6
30%
10
36%
1
17%
9
41%
10
36%
LEVEL 3
6
21%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
6
21%
3
38%
3
15%
6
21%
1
17%
5
23%
6
21%
LEVEL 4
4
14%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
4
14%
0
0%
4
20%
4
14%
1
17%
3
14%
4
14%
Grade 4 Mathematics
Due to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 proficiency rates.
MEAN SCORE: 307
All Students
PROFICIENT
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 22
LEVEL 1
4
18%
LEVEL 2
6
27%
LEVEL 3
8
36%
LEVEL 4
4
18%
General Education
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 21
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 20
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 22
LEVEL 1
4
18%
LEVEL 2
6
27%
LEVEL 3
8
36%
LEVEL 4
4
18%
Female
PROFICIENT
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 11
LEVEL 1
3
27%
LEVEL 2
3
27%
LEVEL 3
3
27%
LEVEL 4
2
18%
Male
PROFICIENT
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 11
LEVEL 1
1
9%
LEVEL 2
3
27%
LEVEL 3
5
45%
LEVEL 4
2
18%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 22
LEVEL 1
4
18%
LEVEL 2
6
27%
LEVEL 3
8
36%
LEVEL 4
4
18%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
2
22%
LEVEL 2
3
33%
LEVEL 3
3
33%
LEVEL 4
1
11%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 13
LEVEL 1
2
15%
LEVEL 2
3
23%
LEVEL 3
5
38%
LEVEL 4
3
23%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 22
LEVEL 1
4
18%
LEVEL 2
6
27%
LEVEL 3
8
36%
LEVEL 4
4
18%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
22
21
1
1
1
20
22
11
11
22
9
13
22
PROFICIENT
55%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
55%
45%
64%
55%
44%
62%
55%
LEVEL 1
4
18%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
4
18%
3
27%
1
9%
4
18%
2
22%
2
15%
4
18%
LEVEL 2
6
27%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
6
27%
3
27%
3
27%
6
27%
3
33%
3
23%
6
27%
LEVEL 3
8
36%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
8
36%
3
27%
5
45%
8
36%
3
33%
5
38%
8
36%
LEVEL 4
4
18%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
4
18%
2
18%
2
18%
4
18%
1
11%
3
23%
4
18%
Grade 5 Mathematics
Due to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 proficiency rates.
MEAN SCORE: 299
All Students
PROFICIENT
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 27
LEVEL 1
9
33%
LEVEL 2
11
41%
LEVEL 3
6
22%
LEVEL 4
1
4%
General Education
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 24
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 26
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 27
LEVEL 1
9
33%
LEVEL 2
11
41%
LEVEL 3
6
22%
LEVEL 4
1
4%
Female
PROFICIENT
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 16
LEVEL 1
5
31%
LEVEL 2
7
44%
LEVEL 3
4
25%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Male
PROFICIENT
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 11
LEVEL 1
4
36%
LEVEL 2
4
36%
LEVEL 3
2
18%
LEVEL 4
1
9%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 27
LEVEL 1
9
33%
LEVEL 2
11
41%
LEVEL 3
6
22%
LEVEL 4
1
4%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 12
LEVEL 1
5
42%
LEVEL 2
4
33%
LEVEL 3
3
25%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 15
LEVEL 1
4
27%
LEVEL 2
7
47%
LEVEL 3
3
20%
LEVEL 4
1
7%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 27
LEVEL 1
9
33%
LEVEL 2
11
41%
LEVEL 3
6
22%
LEVEL 4
1
4%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
27
24
3
1
26
27
16
11
27
12
15
27
PROFICIENT
26%
_%
_%
_%
_%
26%
25%
27%
26%
25%
27%
26%
LEVEL 1
9
33%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
9
33%
5
31%
4
36%
9
33%
5
42%
4
27%
9
33%
LEVEL 2
11
41%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
11
41%
7
44%
4
36%
11
41%
4
33%
7
47%
11
41%
LEVEL 3
6
22%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
6
22%
4
25%
2
18%
6
22%
3
25%
3
20%
6
22%
LEVEL 4
1
4%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
1
4%
0
0%
1
9%
1
4%
0
0%
1
7%
1
4%
Grade 6 Mathematics
Due to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 proficiency rates.
MEAN SCORE: 316
All Students
PROFICIENT
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 24
LEVEL 1
3
13%
LEVEL 2
10
42%
LEVEL 3
3
13%
LEVEL 4
8
33%
General Education
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 23
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 17
LEVEL 1
1
6%
LEVEL 2
8
47%
LEVEL 3
3
18%
LEVEL 4
5
29%
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 7
LEVEL 1
2
29%
LEVEL 2
2
29%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
3
43%
Female
PROFICIENT
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 12
LEVEL 1
2
17%
LEVEL 2
6
50%
LEVEL 3
1
8%
LEVEL 4
3
25%
Male
PROFICIENT
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 12
LEVEL 1
1
8%
LEVEL 2
4
33%
LEVEL 3
2
17%
LEVEL 4
5
42%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 24
LEVEL 1
3
13%
LEVEL 2
10
42%
LEVEL 3
3
13%
LEVEL 4
8
33%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
40%
LEVEL 3
1
20%
LEVEL 4
2
40%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 19
LEVEL 1
3
16%
LEVEL 2
8
42%
LEVEL 3
2
11%
LEVEL 4
6
32%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 24
LEVEL 1
3
13%
LEVEL 2
10
42%
LEVEL 3
3
13%
LEVEL 4
8
33%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
24
23
1
2
5
17
7
12
12
24
5
19
24
PROFICIENT
46%
_%
_%
_%
_%
47%
43%
33%
58%
46%
60%
42%
46%
LEVEL 1
3
13%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
1
6%
2
29%
2
17%
1
8%
3
13%
0
0%
3
16%
3
13%
LEVEL 2
10
42%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
8
47%
2
29%
6
50%
4
33%
10
42%
2
40%
8
42%
10
42%
LEVEL 3
3
13%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
3
18%
0
0%
1
8%
2
17%
3
13%
1
20%
2
11%
3
13%
LEVEL 4
8
33%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
5
29%
3
43%
3
25%
5
42%
8
33%
2
40%
6
32%
8
33%
Grade 7 Mathematics
Due to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 proficiency rates.
Mean scores and data in the table for grade 7 math include only those for grade 7 students who took the Grade 7 New York State Testing Program Assessment (NYSTP) in Mathematics. For 2015 and forward, data in the bar charts include those for grade 7 students who took the Grade 7 NYSTP in Mathematics and grade 7 students who took a Regents math test in lieu of the NYSTP. For 2014 and earlier, data in the bar charts include only those for grade 7 students who took the Grade 7 NYSTP.
MEAN SCORE: 299
All Students
PROFICIENT
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 30
LEVEL 1
9
30%
LEVEL 2
14
47%
LEVEL 3
5
17%
LEVEL 4
2
7%
General Education
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 27
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 26
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 30
LEVEL 1
9
30%
LEVEL 2
14
47%
LEVEL 3
5
17%
LEVEL 4
2
7%
Female
PROFICIENT
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 15
LEVEL 1
5
33%
LEVEL 2
7
47%
LEVEL 3
2
13%
LEVEL 4
1
7%
Male
PROFICIENT
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 15
LEVEL 1
4
27%
LEVEL 2
7
47%
LEVEL 3
3
20%
LEVEL 4
1
7%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 30
LEVEL 1
9
30%
LEVEL 2
14
47%
LEVEL 3
5
17%
LEVEL 4
2
7%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 8
LEVEL 1
5
63%
LEVEL 2
1
13%
LEVEL 3
2
25%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 22
LEVEL 1
4
18%
LEVEL 2
13
59%
LEVEL 3
3
14%
LEVEL 4
2
9%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 30
LEVEL 1
9
30%
LEVEL 2
14
47%
LEVEL 3
5
17%
LEVEL 4
2
7%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
30
27
3
2
1
1
26
30
15
15
30
8
22
30
PROFICIENT
23%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
23%
20%
27%
23%
25%
23%
23%
LEVEL 1
9
30%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
9
30%
5
33%
4
27%
9
30%
5
63%
4
18%
9
30%
LEVEL 2
14
47%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
14
47%
7
47%
7
47%
14
47%
1
13%
13
59%
14
47%
LEVEL 3
5
17%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
5
17%
2
13%
3
20%
5
17%
2
25%
3
14%
5
17%
LEVEL 4
2
7%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
2
7%
1
7%
1
7%
2
7%
0
0%
2
9%
2
7%
Grade 8 Mathematics
Due to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 proficiency rates.
Mean scores and data in the table for grade 8 math include only those for grade 8 students who took the Grade 8 New York State Testing Program Assessment (NYSTP) in Mathematics. For 2015 and forward, data in the bar charts include those for grade 8 students who took the Grade 8 NYSTP in Mathematics and grade 8 students who took a Regents math test in lieu of the NYSTP. For 2014 and earlier, data in the bar charts include only those for grade 8 students who took the Grade 8 NYSTP.
MEAN SCORE: 272
All Students
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 16
LEVEL 1
8
50%
LEVEL 2
8
50%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
General Education
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 12
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 13
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 16
LEVEL 1
8
50%
LEVEL 2
8
50%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Female
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
4
67%
LEVEL 2
2
33%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Male
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 10
LEVEL 1
4
40%
LEVEL 2
6
60%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 16
LEVEL 1
8
50%
LEVEL 2
8
50%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 13
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 16
LEVEL 1
8
50%
LEVEL 2
8
50%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
16
12
4
3
13
16
6
10
16
3
13
16
PROFICIENT
0%
_%
_%
_%
_%
0%
0%
0%
0%
_%
_%
0%
LEVEL 1
8
50%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
8
50%
4
67%
4
40%
8
50%
_
_
_
_
8
50%
LEVEL 2
8
50%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
8
50%
2
33%
6
60%
8
50%
_
_
_
_
8
50%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
Grade 8 Students Taking a Regents Math Test
Accelerated grade 8 students who took a Regents math test in lieu of the Grade 8 NYSTP in Mathematics.
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 8
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
3
38%
LEVEL 4 AND ABOVE
5
63%
LEVEL 3 AND ABOVE
8
100%
GROUP
All Students
TOTAL TESTED
8
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
3
38%
4 & ABOVE
5
63%
3 & ABOVE
8
100%
Grade 4 Science
Due to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 proficiency rates.
MEAN SCORE: 79
All Students
PROFICIENT
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 23
LEVEL 1
1
4%
LEVEL 2
2
9%
LEVEL 3
9
39%
LEVEL 4
11
48%
General Education
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 22
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 21
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 23
LEVEL 1
1
4%
LEVEL 2
2
9%
LEVEL 3
9
39%
LEVEL 4
11
48%
Female
PROFICIENT
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 11
LEVEL 1
1
9%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
5
45%
LEVEL 4
5
45%
Male
PROFICIENT
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 12
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
17%
LEVEL 3
4
33%
LEVEL 4
6
50%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 23
LEVEL 1
1
4%
LEVEL 2
2
9%
LEVEL 3
9
39%
LEVEL 4
11
48%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 10
LEVEL 1
1
10%
LEVEL 2
1
10%
LEVEL 3
5
50%
LEVEL 4
3
30%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 13
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
8%
LEVEL 3
4
31%
LEVEL 4
8
62%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 23
LEVEL 1
1
4%
LEVEL 2
2
9%
LEVEL 3
9
39%
LEVEL 4
11
48%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
23
22
1
1
1
21
23
11
12
23
10
13
23
PROFICIENT
87%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
87%
91%
83%
87%
80%
92%
87%
LEVEL 1
1
4%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
1
4%
1
9%
0
0%
1
4%
1
10%
0
0%
1
4%
LEVEL 2
2
9%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
2
9%
0
0%
2
17%
2
9%
1
10%
1
8%
2
9%
LEVEL 3
9
39%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
9
39%
5
45%
4
33%
9
39%
5
50%
4
31%
9
39%
LEVEL 4
11
48%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
11
48%
5
45%
6
50%
11
48%
3
30%
8
62%
11
48%
Grade 8 Science
Due to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 proficiency rates.
Data in the bar charts include those for grade 8 students who took the New York State Grade 8 Science Test and grade 8 students who took a Regents science test in lieu of this test. Mean scores and data in the table for grade 8 science include only those for grade 8 students who took the New York State Grade 8 Science Test.
MEAN SCORE: 64
All Students
PROFICIENT
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 18
LEVEL 1
2
11%
LEVEL 2
7
39%
LEVEL 3
9
50%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
General Education
PROFICIENT
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 12
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
4
33%
LEVEL 3
8
67%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
2
33%
LEVEL 2
3
50%
LEVEL 3
1
17%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 16
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 18
LEVEL 1
2
11%
LEVEL 2
7
39%
LEVEL 3
9
50%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Female
PROFICIENT
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
1
17%
LEVEL 2
3
50%
LEVEL 3
2
33%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Male
PROFICIENT
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 12
LEVEL 1
1
8%
LEVEL 2
4
33%
LEVEL 3
7
58%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 18
LEVEL 1
2
11%
LEVEL 2
7
39%
LEVEL 3
9
50%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 15
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 18
LEVEL 1
2
11%
LEVEL 2
7
39%
LEVEL 3
9
50%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
18
12
6
2
16
18
6
12
18
3
15
18
PROFICIENT
50%
67%
17%
_%
_%
50%
33%
58%
50%
_%
_%
50%
LEVEL 1
2
11%
0
0%
2
33%
_
_
_
_
2
11%
1
17%
1
8%
2
11%
_
_
_
_
2
11%
LEVEL 2
7
39%
4
33%
3
50%
_
_
_
_
7
39%
3
50%
4
33%
7
39%
_
_
_
_
7
39%
LEVEL 3
9
50%
8
67%
1
17%
_
_
_
_
9
50%
2
33%
7
58%
9
50%
_
_
_
_
9
50%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
Grade 8 Students Taking a Regents Science Test
Accelerated grade 8 students who take a Regents science test in lieu of the New York State Grade 8 Science Test.
All Students
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 8
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
3
38%
LEVEL 4
5
63%
GROUP
All Students
TOTAL TESTED
8
PROFICIENT
100%
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
3
38%
LEVEL 4
5
63%
Statewide Results on the National Assessment of Educational Progress: NAEP (2014 - 15)
Grade: 4
Reading
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Students with Disabilities
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
BELOW BASIC
32%
*%
20%
48%
44%
20%
*%
70%
74%
43%
BASIC
32%
*%
30%
34%
37%
31%
*%
22%
21%
36%
PROFICIENT
27%
*%
33%
15%
17%
37%
*%
7%
4%
18%
ADVANCED
9%
*%
17%
3%
2%
12%
*%
1%
1%
3%
PARTICIPATION RATE
98
88
Reading
All Students
Percent Below Basic
32
Percent Basic
32
Percent Proficient
27
Percent Advanced
9
American Indian or Alaska Native
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Percent Below Basic
20
Percent Basic
30
Percent Proficient
33
Percent Advanced
17
Black or African American
Percent Below Basic
48
Percent Basic
34
Percent Proficient
15
Percent Advanced
3
Hispanic or Latino
Percent Below Basic
44
Percent Basic
37
Percent Proficient
17
Percent Advanced
2
White
Percent Below Basic
20
Percent Basic
31
Percent Proficient
37
Percent Advanced
12
Multiracial
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Students with Disabilities
Percent Below Basic
70
Percent Basic
22
Percent Proficient
7
Percent Advanced
1
Participation Rate
98
English Language Learners
Percent Below Basic
74
Percent Basic
21
Percent Proficient
4
Percent Advanced
1
Participation Rate
88
Economically Disadvantaged
Percent Below Basic
43
Percent Basic
36
Percent Proficient
18
Percent Advanced
3
Mathematics
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Students with Disabilities
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
BELOW BASIC
21%
*%
12%
40%
28%
12%
*%
49%
56%
29%
BASIC
44%
*%
31%
46%
51%
41%
*%
39%
35%
48%
PROFICIENT
30%
*%
42%
13%
20%
40%
*%
10%
9%
21%
ADVANCED
5%
*%
15%
1%
1%
7%
*%
2%
*%
2%
PARTICIPATION RATE
98
91
Mathematics
All Students
Percent Below Basic
21
Percent Basic
44
Percent Proficient
30
Percent Advanced
5
American Indian or Alaska Native
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Percent Below Basic
12
Percent Basic
31
Percent Proficient
42
Percent Advanced
15
Black or African American
Percent Below Basic
40
Percent Basic
46
Percent Proficient
13
Percent Advanced
1
Hispanic or Latino
Percent Below Basic
28
Percent Basic
51
Percent Proficient
20
Percent Advanced
1
White
Percent Below Basic
12
Percent Basic
41
Percent Proficient
40
Percent Advanced
7
Multiracial
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Students with Disabilities
Percent Below Basic
49
Percent Basic
39
Percent Proficient
10
Percent Advanced
2
Participation Rate
98
English Language Learners
Percent Below Basic
56
Percent Basic
35
Percent Proficient
9
Percent Advanced
*
Participation Rate
91
Economically Disadvantaged
Percent Below Basic
29
Percent Basic
48
Percent Proficient
21
Percent Advanced
2
Grade: 8
Reading
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Students with Disabilities
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
BELOW BASIC
27%
*%
19%
42%
35%
18%
*%
59%
78%
36%
BASIC
40%
*%
39%
41%
43%
39%
*%
33%
19%
42%
PROFICIENT
29%
*%
34%
16%
20%
38%
*%
8%
3%
21%
ADVANCED
4%
*%
8%
1%
2%
5%
*%
*%
*%
1%
PARTICIPATION RATE
98
89
Reading
All Students
Percent Below Basic
27
Percent Basic
40
Percent Proficient
29
Percent Advanced
4
American Indian or Alaska Native
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Percent Below Basic
19
Percent Basic
39
Percent Proficient
34
Percent Advanced
8
Black or African American
Percent Below Basic
42
Percent Basic
41
Percent Proficient
16
Percent Advanced
1
Hispanic or Latino
Percent Below Basic
35
Percent Basic
43
Percent Proficient
20
Percent Advanced
2
White
Percent Below Basic
18
Percent Basic
39
Percent Proficient
38
Percent Advanced
5
Multiracial
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Students with Disabilities
Percent Below Basic
59
Percent Basic
33
Percent Proficient
8
Percent Advanced
*
Participation Rate
98
English Language Learners
Percent Below Basic
78
Percent Basic
19
Percent Proficient
3
Percent Advanced
*
Participation Rate
89
Economically Disadvantaged
Percent Below Basic
36
Percent Basic
42
Percent Proficient
21
Percent Advanced
1
Mathematics
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Students with Disabilities
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
BELOW BASIC
31%
*%
18%
48%
41%
20%
*%
64%
72%
40%
BASIC
38%
*%
30%
37%
40%
40%
*%
27%
21%
39%
PROFICIENT
24%
*%
33%
13%
16%
31%
*%
8%
6%
17%
ADVANCED
7%
*%
19%
2%
3%
9%
*%
1%
1%
4%
PARTICIPATION RATE
99
94
Mathematics
All Students
Percent Below Basic
31
Percent Basic
38
Percent Proficient
24
Percent Advanced
7
American Indian or Alaska Native
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Percent Below Basic
18
Percent Basic
30
Percent Proficient
33
Percent Advanced
19
Black or African American
Percent Below Basic
48
Percent Basic
37
Percent Proficient
13
Percent Advanced
2
Hispanic or Latino
Percent Below Basic
41
Percent Basic
40
Percent Proficient
16
Percent Advanced
3
White
Percent Below Basic
20
Percent Basic
40
Percent Proficient
31
Percent Advanced
9
Multiracial
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Students with Disabilities
Percent Below Basic
64
Percent Basic
27
Percent Proficient
8
Percent Advanced
1
Participation Rate
99
English Language Learners
Percent Below Basic
72
Percent Basic
21
Percent Proficient
6
Percent Advanced
1
Participation Rate
94
Economically Disadvantaged
Percent Below Basic
40
Percent Basic
39
Percent Proficient
17
Percent Advanced
4
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level English Language Arts after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 59
LEVEL 1
2
3%
LEVEL 2
3
5%
LEVEL 3
17
29%
LEVEL 4
34
58%
General Education
PROFICIENT
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 54
LEVEL 1
1
2%
LEVEL 2
1
2%
LEVEL 3
17
31%
LEVEL 4
33
61%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
1
20%
LEVEL 2
2
40%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
1
20%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 7
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 49
LEVEL 1
1
2%
LEVEL 2
2
4%
LEVEL 3
14
29%
LEVEL 4
30
61%
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 10
LEVEL 1
1
10%
LEVEL 2
1
10%
LEVEL 3
3
30%
LEVEL 4
4
40%
Female
PROFICIENT
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 26
LEVEL 1
1
4%
LEVEL 2
2
8%
LEVEL 3
5
19%
LEVEL 4
16
62%
Male
PROFICIENT
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 33
LEVEL 1
1
3%
LEVEL 2
1
3%
LEVEL 3
12
36%
LEVEL 4
18
55%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 59
LEVEL 1
2
3%
LEVEL 2
3
5%
LEVEL 3
17
29%
LEVEL 4
34
58%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 17
LEVEL 1
1
6%
LEVEL 2
3
18%
LEVEL 3
5
29%
LEVEL 4
8
47%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 42
LEVEL 1
1
2%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
12
29%
LEVEL 4
26
62%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 59
LEVEL 1
2
3%
LEVEL 2
3
5%
LEVEL 3
17
29%
LEVEL 4
34
58%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
59
54
5
2
1
7
49
10
26
33
59
17
42
59
PROFICIENT
86%
93%
20%
_%
_%
_%
90%
70%
81%
91%
86%
76%
90%
86%
LEVEL 1
2
3%
1
2%
1
20%
_
_
_
_
_
_
1
2%
1
10%
1
4%
1
3%
2
3%
1
6%
1
2%
2
3%
LEVEL 2
3
5%
1
2%
2
40%
_
_
_
_
_
_
2
4%
1
10%
2
8%
1
3%
3
5%
3
18%
0
0%
3
5%
LEVEL 3
17
29%
17
31%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
14
29%
3
30%
5
19%
12
36%
17
29%
5
29%
12
29%
17
29%
LEVEL 4
34
58%
33
61%
1
20%
_
_
_
_
_
_
30
61%
4
40%
16
62%
18
55%
34
58%
8
47%
26
62%
34
58%
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level Mathematics after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 59
LEVEL 1
3
5%
LEVEL 2
4
7%
LEVEL 3
39
66%
LEVEL 4
12
20%
General Education
PROFICIENT
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 54
LEVEL 1
1
2%
LEVEL 2
2
4%
LEVEL 3
38
70%
LEVEL 4
12
22%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
2
40%
LEVEL 2
2
40%
LEVEL 3
1
20%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 7
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 49
LEVEL 1
1
2%
LEVEL 2
4
8%
LEVEL 3
32
65%
LEVEL 4
11
22%
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 10
LEVEL 1
2
20%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
7
70%
LEVEL 4
1
10%
Female
PROFICIENT
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 26
LEVEL 1
2
8%
LEVEL 2
2
8%
LEVEL 3
17
65%
LEVEL 4
4
15%
Male
PROFICIENT
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 33
LEVEL 1
1
3%
LEVEL 2
2
6%
LEVEL 3
22
67%
LEVEL 4
8
24%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 59
LEVEL 1
3
5%
LEVEL 2
4
7%
LEVEL 3
39
66%
LEVEL 4
12
20%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 17
LEVEL 1
1
6%
LEVEL 2
2
12%
LEVEL 3
11
65%
LEVEL 4
3
18%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 42
LEVEL 1
2
5%
LEVEL 2
2
5%
LEVEL 3
28
67%
LEVEL 4
9
21%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 59
LEVEL 1
3
5%
LEVEL 2
4
7%
LEVEL 3
39
66%
LEVEL 4
12
20%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
59
54
5
2
1
7
49
10
26
33
59
17
42
59
PROFICIENT
86%
93%
20%
_%
_%
_%
88%
80%
81%
91%
86%
82%
88%
86%
LEVEL 1
3
5%
1
2%
2
40%
_
_
_
_
_
_
1
2%
2
20%
2
8%
1
3%
3
5%
1
6%
2
5%
3
5%
LEVEL 2
4
7%
2
4%
2
40%
_
_
_
_
_
_
4
8%
0
0%
2
8%
2
6%
4
7%
2
12%
2
5%
4
7%
LEVEL 3
39
66%
38
70%
1
20%
_
_
_
_
_
_
32
65%
7
70%
17
65%
22
67%
39
66%
11
65%
28
67%
39
66%
LEVEL 4
12
20%
12
22%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
11
22%
1
10%
4
15%
8
24%
12
20%
3
18%
9
21%
12
20%
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level Global History and Geography after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 59
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
5
8%
LEVEL 3
24
41%
LEVEL 4
28
47%
General Education
PROFICIENT
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 54
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
4%
LEVEL 3
23
43%
LEVEL 4
28
52%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
3
60%
LEVEL 3
1
20%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 7
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 49
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
4%
LEVEL 3
18
37%
LEVEL 4
27
55%
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 10
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
3
30%
LEVEL 3
6
60%
LEVEL 4
1
10%
Female
PROFICIENT
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 26
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
3
12%
LEVEL 3
11
42%
LEVEL 4
10
38%
Male
PROFICIENT
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 33
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
6%
LEVEL 3
13
39%
LEVEL 4
18
55%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 59
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
5
8%
LEVEL 3
24
41%
LEVEL 4
28
47%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 17
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
12%
LEVEL 3
8
47%
LEVEL 4
6
35%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 42
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
3
7%
LEVEL 3
16
38%
LEVEL 4
22
52%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 59
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
5
8%
LEVEL 3
24
41%
LEVEL 4
28
47%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
59
54
5
2
1
7
49
10
26
33
59
17
42
59
PROFICIENT
88%
94%
20%
_%
_%
_%
92%
70%
81%
94%
88%
82%
90%
88%
LEVEL 1
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
LEVEL 2
5
8%
2
4%
3
60%
_
_
_
_
_
_
2
4%
3
30%
3
12%
2
6%
5
8%
2
12%
3
7%
5
8%
LEVEL 3
24
41%
23
43%
1
20%
_
_
_
_
_
_
18
37%
6
60%
11
42%
13
39%
24
41%
8
47%
16
38%
24
41%
LEVEL 4
28
47%
28
52%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
27
55%
1
10%
10
38%
18
55%
28
47%
6
35%
22
52%
28
47%
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level U.S. History and Government after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 59
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
2%
LEVEL 3
28
47%
LEVEL 4
27
46%
General Education
PROFICIENT
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 54
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
26
48%
LEVEL 4
27
50%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
20%
LEVEL 3
2
40%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 7
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 49
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
2%
LEVEL 3
21
43%
LEVEL 4
25
51%
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 10
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
7
70%
LEVEL 4
2
20%
Female
PROFICIENT
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 26
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
4%
LEVEL 3
13
50%
LEVEL 4
9
35%
Male
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 33
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
15
45%
LEVEL 4
18
55%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 59
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
2%
LEVEL 3
28
47%
LEVEL 4
27
46%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 17
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
6%
LEVEL 3
11
65%
LEVEL 4
4
24%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 42
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
17
40%
LEVEL 4
23
55%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 59
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
2%
LEVEL 3
28
47%
LEVEL 4
27
46%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
59
54
5
2
1
7
49
10
26
33
59
17
42
59
PROFICIENT
93%
98%
40%
_%
_%
_%
94%
90%
85%
100%
93%
88%
95%
93%
LEVEL 1
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
2%
0
0%
1
20%
_
_
_
_
_
_
1
2%
0
0%
1
4%
0
0%
1
2%
1
6%
0
0%
1
2%
LEVEL 3
28
47%
26
48%
2
40%
_
_
_
_
_
_
21
43%
7
70%
13
50%
15
45%
28
47%
11
65%
17
40%
28
47%
LEVEL 4
27
46%
27
50%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
25
51%
2
20%
9
35%
18
55%
27
46%
4
24%
23
55%
27
46%
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level Science after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 59
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
4
7%
LEVEL 3
25
42%
LEVEL 4
27
46%
General Education
PROFICIENT
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 54
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
4%
LEVEL 3
24
44%
LEVEL 4
27
50%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
40%
LEVEL 3
1
20%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 7
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 49
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
4
8%
LEVEL 3
18
37%
LEVEL 4
25
51%
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 10
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
7
70%
LEVEL 4
2
20%
Female
PROFICIENT
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 26
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
3
12%
LEVEL 3
7
27%
LEVEL 4
13
50%
Male
PROFICIENT
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 33
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
3%
LEVEL 3
18
55%
LEVEL 4
14
42%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 59
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
4
7%
LEVEL 3
25
42%
LEVEL 4
27
46%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 17
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
6%
LEVEL 3
9
53%
LEVEL 4
6
35%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 42
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
3
7%
LEVEL 3
16
38%
LEVEL 4
21
50%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 59
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
4
7%
LEVEL 3
25
42%
LEVEL 4
27
46%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
59
54
5
2
1
7
49
10
26
33
59
17
42
59
PROFICIENT
88%
94%
20%
_%
_%
_%
88%
90%
77%
97%
88%
88%
88%
88%
LEVEL 1
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
LEVEL 2
4
7%
2
4%
2
40%
_
_
_
_
_
_
4
8%
0
0%
3
12%
1
3%
4
7%
1
6%
3
7%
4
7%
LEVEL 3
25
42%
24
44%
1
20%
_
_
_
_
_
_
18
37%
7
70%
7
27%
18
55%
25
42%
9
53%
16
38%
25
42%
LEVEL 4
27
46%
27
50%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
25
51%
2
20%
13
50%
14
42%
27
46%
6
35%
21
50%
27
46%
Regents Examination Results (2015 - 16)
Comprehensive English
Regents Comprehensive English
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
6
5
1
1
1
4
6
2
4
6
2
4
6
55
6
100%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
6
100%
_
_
_
_
6
100%
_
_
_
_
6
100%
65
4
67%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
4
67%
_
_
_
_
4
67%
_
_
_
_
4
67%
85
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 6
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
6
100%
65
4
67%
85
0
0%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 4
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 6
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
6
100%
65
4
67%
85
0
0%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 4
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 6
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
6
100%
65
4
67%
85
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 4
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 6
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
6
100%
65
4
67%
85
0
0%
English Language Arts (Common Core)
English Language Arts (Common Core)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
51
47
4
2
2
5
42
9
29
22
51
11
40
51
LEVEL 1
3
6%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
2
5%
1
11%
1
3%
2
9%
3
6%
1
9%
2
5%
3
6%
LEVEL 2
3
6%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
3
7%
0
0%
1
3%
2
9%
3
6%
3
27%
0
0%
3
6%
LEVEL 3
8
16%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
5
12%
3
33%
3
10%
5
23%
8
16%
2
18%
6
15%
8
16%
LEVEL 4
6
12%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
6
14%
0
0%
3
10%
3
14%
6
12%
1
9%
5
13%
6
12%
LEVEL 5
31
61%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
26
62%
5
56%
21
72%
10
45%
31
61%
4
36%
27
68%
31
61%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 51
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
3
6%
LEVEL 2
3
6%
LEVEL 3
8
16%
LEVEL 4
6
12%
LEVEL 5
31
61%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 47
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 4
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 42
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
2
5%
LEVEL 2
3
7%
LEVEL 3
5
12%
LEVEL 4
6
14%
LEVEL 5
26
62%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 9
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
1
11%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
3
33%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
LEVEL 5
5
56%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 29
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
1
3%
LEVEL 2
1
3%
LEVEL 3
3
10%
LEVEL 4
3
10%
LEVEL 5
21
72%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 22
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
2
9%
LEVEL 2
2
9%
LEVEL 3
5
23%
LEVEL 4
3
14%
LEVEL 5
10
45%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 51
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
3
6%
LEVEL 2
3
6%
LEVEL 3
8
16%
LEVEL 4
6
12%
LEVEL 5
31
61%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 11
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
1
9%
LEVEL 2
3
27%
LEVEL 3
2
18%
LEVEL 4
1
9%
LEVEL 5
4
36%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 40
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
2
5%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
6
15%
LEVEL 4
5
13%
LEVEL 5
27
68%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 51
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
3
6%
LEVEL 2
3
6%
LEVEL 3
8
16%
LEVEL 4
6
12%
LEVEL 5
31
61%
Integrated Algebra
Regents Integrated Algebra
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Hispanic or Latino
Small Group Total
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
55
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
65
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
85
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Geometry
Regents Geometry
GROUP
All Students
General Education
White
Small Group Total
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
4
4
4
4
4
4
3
1
4
55
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
65
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
85
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 4
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 4
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 4
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 4
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 4
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 4
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 4
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Algebra 2/Trigonometry
Regents Algebra 2/Trigonometry
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
25
25
1
1
1
22
25
14
11
25
3
22
25
55
14
56%
14
56%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
14
56%
9
64%
5
45%
14
56%
_
_
_
_
14
56%
65
3
12%
3
12%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
3
12%
0
0%
3
27%
3
12%
_
_
_
_
3
12%
85
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 25
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
14
56%
65
3
12%
85
0
0%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 25
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
14
56%
65
3
12%
85
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 22
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 25
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
14
56%
65
3
12%
85
0
0%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 14
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
9
64%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 11
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
5
45%
65
3
27%
85
0
0%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 25
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
14
56%
65
3
12%
85
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 22
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 25
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
14
56%
65
3
12%
85
0
0%
Algebra I (Common Core)
Algebra I (Common Core)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
78
69
9
1
5
72
6
34
44
78
27
51
78
LEVEL 1
11
14%
8
12%
3
33%
_
_
_
_
10
14%
1
17%
3
9%
8
18%
11
14%
4
15%
7
14%
11
14%
LEVEL 2
16
21%
11
16%
5
56%
_
_
_
_
14
19%
2
33%
6
18%
10
23%
16
21%
5
19%
11
22%
16
21%
LEVEL 3
40
51%
39
57%
1
11%
_
_
_
_
37
51%
3
50%
20
59%
20
45%
40
51%
13
48%
27
53%
40
51%
LEVEL 4
9
12%
9
13%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
9
13%
0
0%
4
12%
5
11%
9
12%
5
19%
4
8%
9
12%
LEVEL 5
2
3%
2
3%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
2
3%
0
0%
1
3%
1
2%
2
3%
0
0%
2
4%
2
3%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 78
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
11
14%
LEVEL 2
16
21%
LEVEL 3
40
51%
LEVEL 4
9
12%
LEVEL 5
2
3%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 69
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
8
12%
LEVEL 2
11
16%
LEVEL 3
39
57%
LEVEL 4
9
13%
LEVEL 5
2
3%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 9
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
3
33%
LEVEL 2
5
56%
LEVEL 3
1
11%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 72
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
10
14%
LEVEL 2
14
19%
LEVEL 3
37
51%
LEVEL 4
9
13%
LEVEL 5
2
3%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 6
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
1
17%
LEVEL 2
2
33%
LEVEL 3
3
50%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 34
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
3
9%
LEVEL 2
6
18%
LEVEL 3
20
59%
LEVEL 4
4
12%
LEVEL 5
1
3%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 44
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
8
18%
LEVEL 2
10
23%
LEVEL 3
20
45%
LEVEL 4
5
11%
LEVEL 5
1
2%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 78
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
11
14%
LEVEL 2
16
21%
LEVEL 3
40
51%
LEVEL 4
9
12%
LEVEL 5
2
3%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 27
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
4
15%
LEVEL 2
5
19%
LEVEL 3
13
48%
LEVEL 4
5
19%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 51
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
7
14%
LEVEL 2
11
22%
LEVEL 3
27
53%
LEVEL 4
4
8%
LEVEL 5
2
4%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 78
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
11
14%
LEVEL 2
16
21%
LEVEL 3
40
51%
LEVEL 4
9
12%
LEVEL 5
2
3%
Geometry (Common Core)
Geometry (Common Core)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
27
27
1
2
24
27
13
14
27
9
18
27
LEVEL 1
2
7%
2
7%
_
_
_
_
_
_
2
7%
0
0%
2
14%
2
7%
1
11%
1
6%
2
7%
LEVEL 2
3
11%
3
11%
_
_
_
_
_
_
3
11%
1
8%
2
14%
3
11%
1
11%
2
11%
3
11%
LEVEL 3
17
63%
17
63%
_
_
_
_
_
_
17
63%
11
85%
6
43%
17
63%
5
56%
12
67%
17
63%
LEVEL 4
3
11%
3
11%
_
_
_
_
_
_
3
11%
1
8%
2
14%
3
11%
2
22%
1
6%
3
11%
LEVEL 5
2
7%
2
7%
_
_
_
_
_
_
2
7%
0
0%
2
14%
2
7%
0
0%
2
11%
2
7%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 27
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
2
7%
LEVEL 2
3
11%
LEVEL 3
17
63%
LEVEL 4
3
11%
LEVEL 5
2
7%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 27
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
2
7%
LEVEL 2
3
11%
LEVEL 3
17
63%
LEVEL 4
3
11%
LEVEL 5
2
7%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 24
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 27
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
2
7%
LEVEL 2
3
11%
LEVEL 3
17
63%
LEVEL 4
3
11%
LEVEL 5
2
7%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 13
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
8%
LEVEL 3
11
85%
LEVEL 4
1
8%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 14
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
2
14%
LEVEL 2
2
14%
LEVEL 3
6
43%
LEVEL 4
2
14%
LEVEL 5
2
14%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 27
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
2
7%
LEVEL 2
3
11%
LEVEL 3
17
63%
LEVEL 4
3
11%
LEVEL 5
2
7%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 9
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
1
11%
LEVEL 2
1
11%
LEVEL 3
5
56%
LEVEL 4
2
22%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 18
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
1
6%
LEVEL 2
2
11%
LEVEL 3
12
67%
LEVEL 4
1
6%
LEVEL 5
2
11%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 27
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
2
7%
LEVEL 2
3
11%
LEVEL 3
17
63%
LEVEL 4
3
11%
LEVEL 5
2
7%
Algebra II (Common Core)
Algebra II (Common Core)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
18
18
1
1
1
15
18
10
8
18
3
15
18
LEVEL 1
7
39%
7
39%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
7
39%
3
30%
4
50%
7
39%
_
_
_
_
7
39%
LEVEL 2
3
17%
3
17%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
3
17%
2
20%
1
13%
3
17%
_
_
_
_
3
17%
LEVEL 3
8
44%
8
44%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
8
44%
5
50%
3
38%
8
44%
_
_
_
_
8
44%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 18
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
7
39%
LEVEL 2
3
17%
LEVEL 3
8
44%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 18
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
7
39%
LEVEL 2
3
17%
LEVEL 3
8
44%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 15
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 18
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
7
39%
LEVEL 2
3
17%
LEVEL 3
8
44%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 10
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
3
30%
LEVEL 2
2
20%
LEVEL 3
5
50%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 8
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
4
50%
LEVEL 2
1
13%
LEVEL 3
3
38%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 18
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
7
39%
LEVEL 2
3
17%
LEVEL 3
8
44%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 15
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 18
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
7
39%
LEVEL 2
3
17%
LEVEL 3
8
44%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Global History and Geography
Regents Global History and Geography
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
54
45
9
1
6
47
7
29
25
54
20
34
54
55
42
78%
38
84%
4
44%
_
_
_
_
35
74%
7
100%
24
83%
18
72%
42
78%
12
60%
30
88%
42
78%
65
34
63%
30
67%
4
44%
_
_
_
_
30
64%
4
57%
20
69%
14
56%
34
63%
9
45%
25
74%
34
63%
85
10
19%
10
22%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
8
17%
2
29%
8
28%
2
8%
10
19%
3
15%
7
21%
10
19%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 54
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
42
78%
65
34
63%
85
10
19%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 45
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
38
84%
65
30
67%
85
10
22%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 9
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
4
44%
65
4
44%
85
0
0%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 6
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 47
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
35
74%
65
30
64%
85
8
17%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 7
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
7
100%
65
4
57%
85
2
29%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 29
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
24
83%
65
20
69%
85
8
28%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 25
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
18
72%
65
14
56%
85
2
8%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 54
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
42
78%
65
34
63%
85
10
19%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 20
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
12
60%
65
9
45%
85
3
15%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 34
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
30
88%
65
25
74%
85
7
21%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 54
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
42
78%
65
34
63%
85
10
19%
U.S. History & Government
Regents U.S. History & Government
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
51
47
4
2
1
7
41
10
28
23
51
12
39
51
55
50
98%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
40
98%
10
100%
27
96%
23
100%
50
98%
12
100%
38
97%
50
98%
65
47
92%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
37
90%
10
100%
25
89%
22
96%
47
92%
10
83%
37
95%
47
92%
85
28
55%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
24
59%
4
40%
14
50%
14
61%
28
55%
3
25%
25
64%
28
55%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 51
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
50
98%
65
47
92%
85
28
55%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 47
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 4
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 7
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 41
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
40
98%
65
37
90%
85
24
59%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 10
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
10
100%
65
10
100%
85
4
40%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 28
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
27
96%
65
25
89%
85
14
50%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 23
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
23
100%
65
22
96%
85
14
61%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 51
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
50
98%
65
47
92%
85
28
55%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 12
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
12
100%
65
10
83%
85
3
25%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 39
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
38
97%
65
37
95%
85
25
64%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 51
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
50
98%
65
47
92%
85
28
55%
Living Environment
Regents Living Environment
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Hispanic or Latino
White
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
59
53
6
5
54
30
29
59
25
34
59
55
55
93%
50
94%
5
83%
5
100%
50
93%
27
90%
28
97%
55
93%
22
88%
33
97%
55
93%
65
46
78%
43
81%
3
50%
4
80%
42
78%
21
70%
25
86%
46
78%
17
68%
29
85%
46
78%
85
21
36%
21
40%
0
0%
1
20%
20
37%
11
37%
10
34%
21
36%
7
28%
14
41%
21
36%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 59
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
55
93%
65
46
78%
85
21
36%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 53
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
50
94%
65
43
81%
85
21
40%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 6
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
5
83%
65
3
50%
85
0
0%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
5
100%
65
4
80%
85
1
20%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 54
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
50
93%
65
42
78%
85
20
37%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 30
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
27
90%
65
21
70%
85
11
37%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 29
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
28
97%
65
25
86%
85
10
34%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 59
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
55
93%
65
46
78%
85
21
36%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 25
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
22
88%
65
17
68%
85
7
28%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 34
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
33
97%
65
29
85%
85
14
41%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 59
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
55
93%
65
46
78%
85
21
36%
Physical Setting/Earth Science
Regents Physical Setting/Earth Science
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
47
43
4
1
1
3
42
5
20
27
47
11
36
47
55
42
89%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
37
88%
5
100%
18
90%
24
89%
42
89%
10
91%
32
89%
42
89%
65
34
72%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
30
71%
4
80%
15
75%
19
70%
34
72%
8
73%
26
72%
34
72%
85
15
32%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
14
33%
1
20%
4
20%
11
41%
15
32%
4
36%
11
31%
15
32%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 47
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
42
89%
65
34
72%
85
15
32%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 43
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 4
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 42
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
37
88%
65
30
71%
85
14
33%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
5
100%
65
4
80%
85
1
20%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 20
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
18
90%
65
15
75%
85
4
20%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 27
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
24
89%
65
19
70%
85
11
41%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 47
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
42
89%
65
34
72%
85
15
32%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 11
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
10
91%
65
8
73%
85
4
36%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 36
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
32
89%
65
26
72%
85
11
31%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 47
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
42
89%
65
34
72%
85
15
32%
Physical Setting/Chemistry
Regents Physical Setting/Chemistry
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
19
19
1
1
1
16
19
12
7
19
3
16
19
55
16
84%
16
84%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
16
84%
11
92%
5
71%
16
84%
_
_
_
_
16
84%
65
11
58%
11
58%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
11
58%
8
67%
3
43%
11
58%
_
_
_
_
11
58%
85
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 19
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
16
84%
65
11
58%
85
0
0%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 19
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
16
84%
65
11
58%
85
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 16
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 19
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
16
84%
65
11
58%
85
0
0%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 12
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
11
92%
65
8
67%
85
0
0%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 7
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
5
71%
65
3
43%
85
0
0%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 19
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
16
84%
65
11
58%
85
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 16
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 19
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
16
84%
65
11
58%
85
0
0%
Physical Setting/Physics
Regents Physical Setting/Physics
GROUP
All Students
General Education
White
Small Group Total
Female
Non-English Language Learners
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
55
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
65
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
85
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
New York State Alternate Assessment (NYSAA) Results (2015 - 16)
You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.
Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.
If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.