SPRINGS UFSD - School Report Card Data [2015 - 16]
The New York State Report Card is an important part of the Board of Regents' effort to raise learning standards for all students. It provides information to the public on school/district enrollment and staff, student performance, and other measures of school and district performance. Knowledge gained from the report card on a school's or district's strengths and weaknesses can be used to improve instruction and services to students. Report Card Data - Glossary of Terms | Accountability Data - Glossary of Terms | Business Rules
Turnover Rate of Teachers with Fewer Than Five Years of Experience
18%
TURNOVER RATE OF ALL TEACHERS
9%
Teacher Turnover Rate (2014-15 to 2015-16)
Turnover Rate of Teachers with Fewer Than Five Years of Experience
18%
Turnover Rate of All Teachers
9%
Staff Counts (2015 - 16)
GROUP
PRINCIPALS
ASSISTANT PRINCIPALS
OTHER PROFESSIONAL STAFF
PARAPROFESSIONALS
STAFF
1
1
27
28
Staff Counts (2015 - 16)
Principals
1
Assistant Principals
1
Other Professional Staff
27
Paraprofessionals
28
Teacher Qualifications (2015 - 16)
TOTAL TEACHERS
65
PERCENT WITH NO VALID TEACHING CERTIFICATE
2%
PERCENT TEACHING OUT OF CERTIFICATE
3%
PERCENT WITH FEWER THAN THREE YEARS OF EXPERIENCE
9%
PERCENTAGE WITH MASTER'S DEGREEPLUS 30 HOURS OR DOCTORATE
48%
TOTAL NUMBER OF CORE CLASSES
139
Percent Not Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers in This District
0%
Total Number of Classes
203
Percent Taught by Teachers Without Appropriate Certification
4%
Teacher Qualifications (2015 - 16)
TOTAL TEACHERS: 65
Percent with No Valid Teaching Certificate
2%
Percent Teaching Out of Certification
3%
Percent with Fewer Than Three Years of Experience
9%
Percentage with Master's Degree Plus 30 Hours or Doctorate
48%
Total Number of Core Classes
139
Percent Not Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers in This District
0%
Total Number of Classes
203
Percent Taught by Teachers Without Appropriate Certification
4%
Grade 3 English Language Arts
Due to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 proficiency rates.
MEAN SCORE: 300
All Students
PROFICIENT
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 69
LEVEL 1
29
42%
LEVEL 2
22
32%
LEVEL 3
14
20%
LEVEL 4
4
6%
General Education
PROFICIENT
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 62
LEVEL 1
22
35%
LEVEL 2
22
35%
LEVEL 3
14
23%
LEVEL 4
4
6%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 7
LEVEL 1
7
100%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 38
LEVEL 1
18
47%
LEVEL 2
13
34%
LEVEL 3
6
16%
LEVEL 4
1
3%
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 29
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 31
LEVEL 1
11
35%
LEVEL 2
9
29%
LEVEL 3
8
26%
LEVEL 4
3
10%
Female
PROFICIENT
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 33
LEVEL 1
11
33%
LEVEL 2
15
45%
LEVEL 3
7
21%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Male
PROFICIENT
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 36
LEVEL 1
18
50%
LEVEL 2
7
19%
LEVEL 3
7
19%
LEVEL 4
4
11%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 59
LEVEL 1
21
36%
LEVEL 2
20
34%
LEVEL 3
14
24%
LEVEL 4
4
7%
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 10
LEVEL 1
8
80%
LEVEL 2
2
20%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 8
LEVEL 1
4
50%
LEVEL 2
3
38%
LEVEL 3
1
13%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 61
LEVEL 1
25
41%
LEVEL 2
19
31%
LEVEL 3
13
21%
LEVEL 4
4
7%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 69
LEVEL 1
29
42%
LEVEL 2
22
32%
LEVEL 3
14
20%
LEVEL 4
4
6%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
69
62
7
2
38
29
31
33
36
59
10
8
61
69
PROFICIENT
26%
29%
0%
_%
18%
_%
35%
21%
31%
31%
0%
13%
28%
26%
LEVEL 1
29
42%
22
35%
7
100%
_
_
18
47%
_
_
11
35%
11
33%
18
50%
21
36%
8
80%
4
50%
25
41%
29
42%
LEVEL 2
22
32%
22
35%
0
0%
_
_
13
34%
_
_
9
29%
15
45%
7
19%
20
34%
2
20%
3
38%
19
31%
22
32%
LEVEL 3
14
20%
14
23%
0
0%
_
_
6
16%
_
_
8
26%
7
21%
7
19%
14
24%
0
0%
1
13%
13
21%
14
20%
LEVEL 4
4
6%
4
6%
0
0%
_
_
1
3%
_
_
3
10%
0
0%
4
11%
4
7%
0
0%
0
0%
4
7%
4
6%
Grade 4 English Language Arts
Due to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 proficiency rates.
MEAN SCORE: 301
All Students
PROFICIENT
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 85
LEVEL 1
26
31%
LEVEL 2
27
32%
LEVEL 3
27
32%
LEVEL 4
5
6%
General Education
PROFICIENT
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 74
LEVEL 1
16
22%
LEVEL 2
26
35%
LEVEL 3
27
36%
LEVEL 4
5
7%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 11
LEVEL 1
10
91%
LEVEL 2
1
9%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 53
LEVEL 1
19
36%
LEVEL 2
18
34%
LEVEL 3
14
26%
LEVEL 4
2
4%
White
PROFICIENT
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 32
LEVEL 1
7
22%
LEVEL 2
9
28%
LEVEL 3
13
41%
LEVEL 4
3
9%
Female
PROFICIENT
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 35
LEVEL 1
12
34%
LEVEL 2
10
29%
LEVEL 3
9
26%
LEVEL 4
4
11%
Male
PROFICIENT
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 50
LEVEL 1
14
28%
LEVEL 2
17
34%
LEVEL 3
18
36%
LEVEL 4
1
2%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 75
LEVEL 1
17
23%
LEVEL 2
26
35%
LEVEL 3
27
36%
LEVEL 4
5
7%
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 10
LEVEL 1
9
90%
LEVEL 2
1
10%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 10
LEVEL 1
5
50%
LEVEL 2
4
40%
LEVEL 3
1
10%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 75
LEVEL 1
21
28%
LEVEL 2
23
31%
LEVEL 3
26
35%
LEVEL 4
5
7%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 85
LEVEL 1
26
31%
LEVEL 2
27
32%
LEVEL 3
27
32%
LEVEL 4
5
6%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Hispanic or Latino
White
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
85
74
11
53
32
35
50
75
10
10
75
85
PROFICIENT
38%
43%
0%
30%
50%
37%
38%
43%
0%
10%
41%
38%
LEVEL 1
26
31%
16
22%
10
91%
19
36%
7
22%
12
34%
14
28%
17
23%
9
90%
5
50%
21
28%
26
31%
LEVEL 2
27
32%
26
35%
1
9%
18
34%
9
28%
10
29%
17
34%
26
35%
1
10%
4
40%
23
31%
27
32%
LEVEL 3
27
32%
27
36%
0
0%
14
26%
13
41%
9
26%
18
36%
27
36%
0
0%
1
10%
26
35%
27
32%
LEVEL 4
5
6%
5
7%
0
0%
2
4%
3
9%
4
11%
1
2%
5
7%
0
0%
0
0%
5
7%
5
6%
Grade 5 English Language Arts
Due to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 proficiency rates.
MEAN SCORE: 292
All Students
PROFICIENT
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 59
LEVEL 1
24
41%
LEVEL 2
27
46%
LEVEL 3
6
10%
LEVEL 4
2
3%
General Education
PROFICIENT
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 50
LEVEL 1
16
32%
LEVEL 2
26
52%
LEVEL 3
6
12%
LEVEL 4
2
4%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
8
89%
LEVEL 2
1
11%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 35
LEVEL 1
16
46%
LEVEL 2
15
43%
LEVEL 3
4
11%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
White
PROFICIENT
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 24
LEVEL 1
8
33%
LEVEL 2
12
50%
LEVEL 3
2
8%
LEVEL 4
2
8%
Female
PROFICIENT
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 39
LEVEL 1
12
31%
LEVEL 2
19
49%
LEVEL 3
6
15%
LEVEL 4
2
5%
Male
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 20
LEVEL 1
12
60%
LEVEL 2
8
40%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 56
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
3
50%
LEVEL 2
3
50%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 53
LEVEL 1
21
40%
LEVEL 2
24
45%
LEVEL 3
6
11%
LEVEL 4
2
4%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 59
LEVEL 1
24
41%
LEVEL 2
27
46%
LEVEL 3
6
10%
LEVEL 4
2
3%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Hispanic or Latino
White
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
59
50
9
35
24
39
20
56
3
6
53
59
PROFICIENT
14%
16%
0%
11%
17%
21%
0%
_%
_%
0%
15%
14%
LEVEL 1
24
41%
16
32%
8
89%
16
46%
8
33%
12
31%
12
60%
_
_
_
_
3
50%
21
40%
24
41%
LEVEL 2
27
46%
26
52%
1
11%
15
43%
12
50%
19
49%
8
40%
_
_
_
_
3
50%
24
45%
27
46%
LEVEL 3
6
10%
6
12%
0
0%
4
11%
2
8%
6
15%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
6
11%
6
10%
LEVEL 4
2
3%
2
4%
0
0%
0
0%
2
8%
2
5%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
2
4%
2
3%
Grade 6 English Language Arts
Due to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 proficiency rates.
MEAN SCORE: 308
All Students
PROFICIENT
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 44
LEVEL 1
7
16%
LEVEL 2
21
48%
LEVEL 3
9
20%
LEVEL 4
7
16%
General Education
PROFICIENT
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 37
LEVEL 1
1
3%
LEVEL 2
20
54%
LEVEL 3
9
24%
LEVEL 4
7
19%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 7
LEVEL 1
6
86%
LEVEL 2
1
14%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 27
LEVEL 1
6
22%
LEVEL 2
12
44%
LEVEL 3
7
26%
LEVEL 4
2
7%
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 15
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 17
LEVEL 1
1
6%
LEVEL 2
9
53%
LEVEL 3
2
12%
LEVEL 4
5
29%
Female
PROFICIENT
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 21
LEVEL 1
4
19%
LEVEL 2
8
38%
LEVEL 3
5
24%
LEVEL 4
4
19%
Male
PROFICIENT
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 23
LEVEL 1
3
13%
LEVEL 2
13
57%
LEVEL 3
4
17%
LEVEL 4
3
13%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 42
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
2
22%
LEVEL 2
5
56%
LEVEL 3
1
11%
LEVEL 4
1
11%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 35
LEVEL 1
5
14%
LEVEL 2
16
46%
LEVEL 3
8
23%
LEVEL 4
6
17%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 44
LEVEL 1
7
16%
LEVEL 2
21
48%
LEVEL 3
9
20%
LEVEL 4
7
16%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
44
37
7
1
27
15
1
17
21
23
42
2
9
35
44
PROFICIENT
36%
43%
0%
_%
33%
_%
_%
41%
43%
30%
_%
_%
22%
40%
36%
LEVEL 1
7
16%
1
3%
6
86%
_
_
6
22%
_
_
_
_
1
6%
4
19%
3
13%
_
_
_
_
2
22%
5
14%
7
16%
LEVEL 2
21
48%
20
54%
1
14%
_
_
12
44%
_
_
_
_
9
53%
8
38%
13
57%
_
_
_
_
5
56%
16
46%
21
48%
LEVEL 3
9
20%
9
24%
0
0%
_
_
7
26%
_
_
_
_
2
12%
5
24%
4
17%
_
_
_
_
1
11%
8
23%
9
20%
LEVEL 4
7
16%
7
19%
0
0%
_
_
2
7%
_
_
_
_
5
29%
4
19%
3
13%
_
_
_
_
1
11%
6
17%
7
16%
Grade 7 English Language Arts
Due to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 proficiency rates.
MEAN SCORE: 302
All Students
PROFICIENT
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 71
LEVEL 1
18
25%
LEVEL 2
34
48%
LEVEL 3
16
23%
LEVEL 4
3
4%
General Education
PROFICIENT
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 64
LEVEL 1
12
19%
LEVEL 2
33
52%
LEVEL 3
16
25%
LEVEL 4
3
5%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 7
LEVEL 1
6
86%
LEVEL 2
1
14%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 38
LEVEL 1
9
24%
LEVEL 2
24
63%
LEVEL 3
4
11%
LEVEL 4
1
3%
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 32
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 33
LEVEL 1
9
27%
LEVEL 2
10
30%
LEVEL 3
12
36%
LEVEL 4
2
6%
Female
PROFICIENT
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 37
LEVEL 1
6
16%
LEVEL 2
17
46%
LEVEL 3
11
30%
LEVEL 4
3
8%
Male
PROFICIENT
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 34
LEVEL 1
12
35%
LEVEL 2
17
50%
LEVEL 3
5
15%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 68
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 11
LEVEL 1
5
45%
LEVEL 2
5
45%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
1
9%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 60
LEVEL 1
13
22%
LEVEL 2
29
48%
LEVEL 3
16
27%
LEVEL 4
2
3%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 71
LEVEL 1
18
25%
LEVEL 2
34
48%
LEVEL 3
16
23%
LEVEL 4
3
4%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
71
64
7
1
38
32
33
37
34
68
3
11
60
71
PROFICIENT
27%
30%
0%
_%
13%
_%
42%
38%
15%
_%
_%
9%
30%
27%
LEVEL 1
18
25%
12
19%
6
86%
_
_
9
24%
_
_
9
27%
6
16%
12
35%
_
_
_
_
5
45%
13
22%
18
25%
LEVEL 2
34
48%
33
52%
1
14%
_
_
24
63%
_
_
10
30%
17
46%
17
50%
_
_
_
_
5
45%
29
48%
34
48%
LEVEL 3
16
23%
16
25%
0
0%
_
_
4
11%
_
_
12
36%
11
30%
5
15%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
16
27%
16
23%
LEVEL 4
3
4%
3
5%
0
0%
_
_
1
3%
_
_
2
6%
3
8%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
1
9%
2
3%
3
4%
Grade 8 English Language Arts
Due to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 proficiency rates.
MEAN SCORE: 317
All Students
PROFICIENT
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 28
LEVEL 1
5
18%
LEVEL 2
5
18%
LEVEL 3
8
29%
LEVEL 4
10
36%
General Education
PROFICIENT
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 23
LEVEL 1
2
9%
LEVEL 2
4
17%
LEVEL 3
8
35%
LEVEL 4
9
39%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
3
60%
LEVEL 2
1
20%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
1
20%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 15
LEVEL 1
5
33%
LEVEL 2
4
27%
LEVEL 3
4
27%
LEVEL 4
2
13%
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 10
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 13
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
8%
LEVEL 3
4
31%
LEVEL 4
8
62%
Female
PROFICIENT
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 13
LEVEL 1
1
8%
LEVEL 2
2
15%
LEVEL 3
3
23%
LEVEL 4
7
54%
Male
PROFICIENT
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 15
LEVEL 1
4
27%
LEVEL 2
3
20%
LEVEL 3
5
33%
LEVEL 4
3
20%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 25
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 24
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 28
LEVEL 1
5
18%
LEVEL 2
5
18%
LEVEL 3
8
29%
LEVEL 4
10
36%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
28
23
5
1
1
15
10
1
13
13
15
25
3
4
24
28
PROFICIENT
64%
74%
20%
_%
_%
40%
_%
_%
92%
77%
53%
_%
_%
_%
_%
64%
LEVEL 1
5
18%
2
9%
3
60%
_
_
_
_
5
33%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
1
8%
4
27%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
5
18%
LEVEL 2
5
18%
4
17%
1
20%
_
_
_
_
4
27%
_
_
_
_
1
8%
2
15%
3
20%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
5
18%
LEVEL 3
8
29%
8
35%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
4
27%
_
_
_
_
4
31%
3
23%
5
33%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
8
29%
LEVEL 4
10
36%
9
39%
1
20%
_
_
_
_
2
13%
_
_
_
_
8
62%
7
54%
3
20%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
10
36%
Grade 3 Mathematics
Due to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 proficiency rates.
MEAN SCORE: 286
All Students
PROFICIENT
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 70
LEVEL 1
30
43%
LEVEL 2
33
47%
LEVEL 3
5
7%
LEVEL 4
2
3%
General Education
PROFICIENT
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 63
LEVEL 1
25
40%
LEVEL 2
31
49%
LEVEL 3
5
8%
LEVEL 4
2
3%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 7
LEVEL 1
5
71%
LEVEL 2
2
29%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 39
LEVEL 1
18
46%
LEVEL 2
17
44%
LEVEL 3
3
8%
LEVEL 4
1
3%
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 29
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 31
LEVEL 1
12
39%
LEVEL 2
16
52%
LEVEL 3
2
6%
LEVEL 4
1
3%
Female
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 33
LEVEL 1
16
48%
LEVEL 2
17
52%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Male
PROFICIENT
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 37
LEVEL 1
14
38%
LEVEL 2
16
43%
LEVEL 3
5
14%
LEVEL 4
2
5%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 59
LEVEL 1
24
41%
LEVEL 2
28
47%
LEVEL 3
5
8%
LEVEL 4
2
3%
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 11
LEVEL 1
6
55%
LEVEL 2
5
45%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 8
LEVEL 1
5
63%
LEVEL 2
3
38%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 62
LEVEL 1
25
40%
LEVEL 2
30
48%
LEVEL 3
5
8%
LEVEL 4
2
3%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 70
LEVEL 1
30
43%
LEVEL 2
33
47%
LEVEL 3
5
7%
LEVEL 4
2
3%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
70
63
7
2
39
29
31
33
37
59
11
8
62
70
PROFICIENT
10%
11%
0%
_%
10%
_%
10%
0%
19%
12%
0%
0%
11%
10%
LEVEL 1
30
43%
25
40%
5
71%
_
_
18
46%
_
_
12
39%
16
48%
14
38%
24
41%
6
55%
5
63%
25
40%
30
43%
LEVEL 2
33
47%
31
49%
2
29%
_
_
17
44%
_
_
16
52%
17
52%
16
43%
28
47%
5
45%
3
38%
30
48%
33
47%
LEVEL 3
5
7%
5
8%
0
0%
_
_
3
8%
_
_
2
6%
0
0%
5
14%
5
8%
0
0%
0
0%
5
8%
5
7%
LEVEL 4
2
3%
2
3%
0
0%
_
_
1
3%
_
_
1
3%
0
0%
2
5%
2
3%
0
0%
0
0%
2
3%
2
3%
Grade 4 Mathematics
Due to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 proficiency rates.
MEAN SCORE: 294
All Students
PROFICIENT
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 85
LEVEL 1
32
38%
LEVEL 2
24
28%
LEVEL 3
20
24%
LEVEL 4
9
11%
General Education
PROFICIENT
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 75
LEVEL 1
24
32%
LEVEL 2
23
31%
LEVEL 3
20
27%
LEVEL 4
8
11%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 10
LEVEL 1
8
80%
LEVEL 2
1
10%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
1
10%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 56
LEVEL 1
23
41%
LEVEL 2
17
30%
LEVEL 3
15
27%
LEVEL 4
1
2%
White
PROFICIENT
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 29
LEVEL 1
9
31%
LEVEL 2
7
24%
LEVEL 3
5
17%
LEVEL 4
8
28%
Female
PROFICIENT
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 36
LEVEL 1
17
47%
LEVEL 2
11
31%
LEVEL 3
5
14%
LEVEL 4
3
8%
Male
PROFICIENT
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 49
LEVEL 1
15
31%
LEVEL 2
13
27%
LEVEL 3
15
31%
LEVEL 4
6
12%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 73
LEVEL 1
22
30%
LEVEL 2
22
30%
LEVEL 3
20
27%
LEVEL 4
9
12%
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 12
LEVEL 1
10
83%
LEVEL 2
2
17%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
4
44%
LEVEL 2
4
44%
LEVEL 3
1
11%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 76
LEVEL 1
28
37%
LEVEL 2
20
26%
LEVEL 3
19
25%
LEVEL 4
9
12%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 85
LEVEL 1
32
38%
LEVEL 2
24
28%
LEVEL 3
20
24%
LEVEL 4
9
11%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Hispanic or Latino
White
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
85
75
10
56
29
36
49
73
12
9
76
85
PROFICIENT
34%
37%
10%
29%
45%
22%
43%
40%
0%
11%
37%
34%
LEVEL 1
32
38%
24
32%
8
80%
23
41%
9
31%
17
47%
15
31%
22
30%
10
83%
4
44%
28
37%
32
38%
LEVEL 2
24
28%
23
31%
1
10%
17
30%
7
24%
11
31%
13
27%
22
30%
2
17%
4
44%
20
26%
24
28%
LEVEL 3
20
24%
20
27%
0
0%
15
27%
5
17%
5
14%
15
31%
20
27%
0
0%
1
11%
19
25%
20
24%
LEVEL 4
9
11%
8
11%
1
10%
1
2%
8
28%
3
8%
6
12%
9
12%
0
0%
0
0%
9
12%
9
11%
Grade 5 Mathematics
Due to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 proficiency rates.
MEAN SCORE: 298
All Students
PROFICIENT
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 59
LEVEL 1
23
39%
LEVEL 2
19
32%
LEVEL 3
13
22%
LEVEL 4
4
7%
General Education
PROFICIENT
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 51
LEVEL 1
16
31%
LEVEL 2
19
37%
LEVEL 3
12
24%
LEVEL 4
4
8%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 8
LEVEL 1
7
88%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
1
13%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 35
LEVEL 1
16
46%
LEVEL 2
11
31%
LEVEL 3
8
23%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
White
PROFICIENT
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 24
LEVEL 1
7
29%
LEVEL 2
8
33%
LEVEL 3
5
21%
LEVEL 4
4
17%
Female
PROFICIENT
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 39
LEVEL 1
15
38%
LEVEL 2
12
31%
LEVEL 3
9
23%
LEVEL 4
3
8%
Male
PROFICIENT
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 20
LEVEL 1
8
40%
LEVEL 2
7
35%
LEVEL 3
4
20%
LEVEL 4
1
5%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 55
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
3
50%
LEVEL 2
2
33%
LEVEL 3
1
17%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 53
LEVEL 1
20
38%
LEVEL 2
17
32%
LEVEL 3
12
23%
LEVEL 4
4
8%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 59
LEVEL 1
23
39%
LEVEL 2
19
32%
LEVEL 3
13
22%
LEVEL 4
4
7%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Hispanic or Latino
White
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
59
51
8
35
24
39
20
55
4
6
53
59
PROFICIENT
29%
31%
13%
23%
38%
31%
25%
_%
_%
17%
30%
29%
LEVEL 1
23
39%
16
31%
7
88%
16
46%
7
29%
15
38%
8
40%
_
_
_
_
3
50%
20
38%
23
39%
LEVEL 2
19
32%
19
37%
0
0%
11
31%
8
33%
12
31%
7
35%
_
_
_
_
2
33%
17
32%
19
32%
LEVEL 3
13
22%
12
24%
1
13%
8
23%
5
21%
9
23%
4
20%
_
_
_
_
1
17%
12
23%
13
22%
LEVEL 4
4
7%
4
8%
0
0%
0
0%
4
17%
3
8%
1
5%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
4
8%
4
7%
Grade 6 Mathematics
Due to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 proficiency rates.
MEAN SCORE: 317
All Students
PROFICIENT
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 44
LEVEL 1
5
11%
LEVEL 2
12
27%
LEVEL 3
12
27%
LEVEL 4
15
34%
General Education
PROFICIENT
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 37
LEVEL 1
1
3%
LEVEL 2
10
27%
LEVEL 3
12
32%
LEVEL 4
14
38%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7
LEVEL 1
4
57%
LEVEL 2
2
29%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
1
14%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 28
LEVEL 1
5
18%
LEVEL 2
9
32%
LEVEL 3
7
25%
LEVEL 4
7
25%
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 15
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 16
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
3
19%
LEVEL 3
5
31%
LEVEL 4
8
50%
Female
PROFICIENT
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 21
LEVEL 1
2
10%
LEVEL 2
7
33%
LEVEL 3
4
19%
LEVEL 4
8
38%
Male
PROFICIENT
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 23
LEVEL 1
3
13%
LEVEL 2
5
22%
LEVEL 3
8
35%
LEVEL 4
7
30%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 40
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 8
LEVEL 1
2
25%
LEVEL 2
1
13%
LEVEL 3
3
38%
LEVEL 4
2
25%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 36
LEVEL 1
3
8%
LEVEL 2
11
31%
LEVEL 3
9
25%
LEVEL 4
13
36%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 44
LEVEL 1
5
11%
LEVEL 2
12
27%
LEVEL 3
12
27%
LEVEL 4
15
34%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
44
37
7
28
15
1
16
21
23
40
4
8
36
44
PROFICIENT
61%
70%
14%
50%
_%
_%
81%
57%
65%
_%
_%
63%
61%
61%
LEVEL 1
5
11%
1
3%
4
57%
5
18%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
2
10%
3
13%
_
_
_
_
2
25%
3
8%
5
11%
LEVEL 2
12
27%
10
27%
2
29%
9
32%
_
_
_
_
3
19%
7
33%
5
22%
_
_
_
_
1
13%
11
31%
12
27%
LEVEL 3
12
27%
12
32%
0
0%
7
25%
_
_
_
_
5
31%
4
19%
8
35%
_
_
_
_
3
38%
9
25%
12
27%
LEVEL 4
15
34%
14
38%
1
14%
7
25%
_
_
_
_
8
50%
8
38%
7
30%
_
_
_
_
2
25%
13
36%
15
34%
Grade 7 Mathematics
Due to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 proficiency rates.
Mean scores and data in the table for grade 7 math include only those for grade 7 students who took the Grade 7 New York State Testing Program Assessment (NYSTP) in Mathematics. For 2015 and forward, data in the bar charts include those for grade 7 students who took the Grade 7 NYSTP in Mathematics and grade 7 students who took a Regents math test in lieu of the NYSTP. For 2014 and earlier, data in the bar charts include only those for grade 7 students who took the Grade 7 NYSTP.
MEAN SCORE: 303
All Students
PROFICIENT
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 67
LEVEL 1
23
34%
LEVEL 2
24
36%
LEVEL 3
15
22%
LEVEL 4
5
7%
General Education
PROFICIENT
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 60
LEVEL 1
17
28%
LEVEL 2
23
38%
LEVEL 3
15
25%
LEVEL 4
5
8%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 7
LEVEL 1
6
86%
LEVEL 2
1
14%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 40
LEVEL 1
16
40%
LEVEL 2
18
45%
LEVEL 3
6
15%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
White
PROFICIENT
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 27
LEVEL 1
7
26%
LEVEL 2
6
22%
LEVEL 3
9
33%
LEVEL 4
5
19%
Female
PROFICIENT
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 34
LEVEL 1
12
35%
LEVEL 2
10
29%
LEVEL 3
9
26%
LEVEL 4
3
9%
Male
PROFICIENT
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 33
LEVEL 1
11
33%
LEVEL 2
14
42%
LEVEL 3
6
18%
LEVEL 4
2
6%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 60
LEVEL 1
18
30%
LEVEL 2
23
38%
LEVEL 3
14
23%
LEVEL 4
5
8%
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7
LEVEL 1
5
71%
LEVEL 2
1
14%
LEVEL 3
1
14%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 10
LEVEL 1
4
40%
LEVEL 2
5
50%
LEVEL 3
1
10%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 57
LEVEL 1
19
33%
LEVEL 2
19
33%
LEVEL 3
14
25%
LEVEL 4
5
9%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 67
LEVEL 1
23
34%
LEVEL 2
24
36%
LEVEL 3
15
22%
LEVEL 4
5
7%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Hispanic or Latino
White
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
67
60
7
40
27
34
33
60
7
10
57
67
PROFICIENT
30%
33%
0%
15%
52%
35%
24%
32%
14%
10%
33%
30%
LEVEL 1
23
34%
17
28%
6
86%
16
40%
7
26%
12
35%
11
33%
18
30%
5
71%
4
40%
19
33%
23
34%
LEVEL 2
24
36%
23
38%
1
14%
18
45%
6
22%
10
29%
14
42%
23
38%
1
14%
5
50%
19
33%
24
36%
LEVEL 3
15
22%
15
25%
0
0%
6
15%
9
33%
9
26%
6
18%
14
23%
1
14%
1
10%
14
25%
15
22%
LEVEL 4
5
7%
5
8%
0
0%
0
0%
5
19%
3
9%
2
6%
5
8%
0
0%
0
0%
5
9%
5
7%
Grade 8 Mathematics
Due to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 proficiency rates.
Mean scores and data in the table for grade 8 math include only those for grade 8 students who took the Grade 8 New York State Testing Program Assessment (NYSTP) in Mathematics. For 2015 and forward, data in the bar charts include those for grade 8 students who took the Grade 8 NYSTP in Mathematics and grade 8 students who took a Regents math test in lieu of the NYSTP. For 2014 and earlier, data in the bar charts include only those for grade 8 students who took the Grade 8 NYSTP.
MEAN SCORE: 303
All Students
PROFICIENT
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 21
LEVEL 1
5
24%
LEVEL 2
6
29%
LEVEL 3
9
43%
LEVEL 4
1
5%
General Education
PROFICIENT
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 16
LEVEL 1
3
19%
LEVEL 2
4
25%
LEVEL 3
8
50%
LEVEL 4
1
6%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
2
40%
LEVEL 2
2
40%
LEVEL 3
1
20%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 17
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 21
LEVEL 1
5
24%
LEVEL 2
6
29%
LEVEL 3
9
43%
LEVEL 4
1
5%
Female
PROFICIENT
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 8
LEVEL 1
1
13%
LEVEL 2
2
25%
LEVEL 3
4
50%
LEVEL 4
1
13%
Male
PROFICIENT
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 13
LEVEL 1
4
31%
LEVEL 2
4
31%
LEVEL 3
5
38%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 17
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 17
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 21
LEVEL 1
5
24%
LEVEL 2
6
29%
LEVEL 3
9
43%
LEVEL 4
1
5%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
21
16
5
1
17
2
1
21
8
13
17
4
4
17
21
PROFICIENT
48%
56%
20%
_%
_%
_%
_%
48%
63%
38%
_%
_%
_%
_%
48%
LEVEL 1
5
24%
3
19%
2
40%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
5
24%
1
13%
4
31%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
5
24%
LEVEL 2
6
29%
4
25%
2
40%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
6
29%
2
25%
4
31%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
6
29%
LEVEL 3
9
43%
8
50%
1
20%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
9
43%
4
50%
5
38%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
9
43%
LEVEL 4
1
5%
1
6%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
1
5%
1
13%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
1
5%
Grade 8 Students Taking a Regents Math Test
Accelerated grade 8 students who took a Regents math test in lieu of the Grade 8 NYSTP in Mathematics.
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 18
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4 AND ABOVE
18
100%
LEVEL 3 AND ABOVE
18
100%
GROUP
All Students
TOTAL TESTED
18
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
4 & ABOVE
18
100%
3 & ABOVE
18
100%
Grade 4 Science
Due to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 proficiency rates.
MEAN SCORE: 83
All Students
PROFICIENT
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 87
LEVEL 1
2
2%
LEVEL 2
7
8%
LEVEL 3
25
29%
LEVEL 4
53
61%
General Education
PROFICIENT
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 76
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
7
9%
LEVEL 3
20
26%
LEVEL 4
49
64%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 11
LEVEL 1
2
18%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
5
45%
LEVEL 4
4
36%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 52
LEVEL 1
2
4%
LEVEL 2
6
12%
LEVEL 3
17
33%
LEVEL 4
27
52%
White
PROFICIENT
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 35
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
3%
LEVEL 3
8
23%
LEVEL 4
26
74%
Female
PROFICIENT
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 36
LEVEL 1
1
3%
LEVEL 2
4
11%
LEVEL 3
13
36%
LEVEL 4
18
50%
Male
PROFICIENT
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 51
LEVEL 1
1
2%
LEVEL 2
3
6%
LEVEL 3
12
24%
LEVEL 4
35
69%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 76
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
2
3%
LEVEL 3
21
28%
LEVEL 4
52
68%
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 11
LEVEL 1
1
9%
LEVEL 2
5
45%
LEVEL 3
4
36%
LEVEL 4
1
9%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 8
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
13%
LEVEL 3
6
75%
LEVEL 4
1
13%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 79
LEVEL 1
2
3%
LEVEL 2
6
8%
LEVEL 3
19
24%
LEVEL 4
52
66%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 87
LEVEL 1
2
2%
LEVEL 2
7
8%
LEVEL 3
25
29%
LEVEL 4
53
61%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Hispanic or Latino
White
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
87
76
11
52
35
36
51
76
11
8
79
87
PROFICIENT
90%
91%
82%
85%
97%
86%
92%
96%
45%
88%
90%
90%
LEVEL 1
2
2%
0
0%
2
18%
2
4%
0
0%
1
3%
1
2%
1
1%
1
9%
0
0%
2
3%
2
2%
LEVEL 2
7
8%
7
9%
0
0%
6
12%
1
3%
4
11%
3
6%
2
3%
5
45%
1
13%
6
8%
7
8%
LEVEL 3
25
29%
20
26%
5
45%
17
33%
8
23%
13
36%
12
24%
21
28%
4
36%
6
75%
19
24%
25
29%
LEVEL 4
53
61%
49
64%
4
36%
27
52%
26
74%
18
50%
35
69%
52
68%
1
9%
1
13%
52
66%
53
61%
Grade 8 Science
Due to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 proficiency rates.
Data in the bar charts include those for grade 8 students who took the New York State Grade 8 Science Test and grade 8 students who took a Regents science test in lieu of this test. Mean scores and data in the table for grade 8 science include only those for grade 8 students who took the New York State Grade 8 Science Test.
MEAN SCORE: 76
All Students
PROFICIENT
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 57
LEVEL 1
3
5%
LEVEL 2
4
7%
LEVEL 3
32
56%
LEVEL 4
18
32%
General Education
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 53
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 28
LEVEL 1
3
11%
LEVEL 2
4
14%
LEVEL 3
17
61%
LEVEL 4
4
14%
White
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 23
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
11
48%
LEVEL 4
12
52%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
4
67%
LEVEL 4
2
33%
Female
PROFICIENT
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 26
LEVEL 1
1
4%
LEVEL 2
1
4%
LEVEL 3
13
50%
LEVEL 4
11
42%
Male
PROFICIENT
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 31
LEVEL 1
2
6%
LEVEL 2
3
10%
LEVEL 3
19
61%
LEVEL 4
7
23%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 52
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
4%
LEVEL 3
32
62%
LEVEL 4
18
35%
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
3
60%
LEVEL 2
2
40%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 53
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 57
LEVEL 1
3
5%
LEVEL 2
4
7%
LEVEL 3
32
56%
LEVEL 4
18
32%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
57
53
4
3
2
28
23
1
6
26
31
52
5
4
53
57
PROFICIENT
88%
_%
_%
_%
_%
75%
100%
_%
100%
92%
84%
96%
0%
_%
_%
88%
LEVEL 1
3
5%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
3
11%
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
1
4%
2
6%
0
0%
3
60%
_
_
_
_
3
5%
LEVEL 2
4
7%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
4
14%
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
1
4%
3
10%
2
4%
2
40%
_
_
_
_
4
7%
LEVEL 3
32
56%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
17
61%
11
48%
_
_
4
67%
13
50%
19
61%
32
62%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
32
56%
LEVEL 4
18
32%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
4
14%
12
52%
_
_
2
33%
11
42%
7
23%
18
35%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
18
32%
Recently Arrived ELL Students (2015 - 16)
GRADE
Grade 3
Grade 4
Grade 5
Grade 6
Grade 7
Grade 8
RECENTLY ARRIVED ELL STUDENTS TAKING NYSESLAT IN LIEU OF NYSTP
2
1
1
2
5
2
GRADE
Grade 3
Grade 4
Grade 5
Grade 6
Grade 7
Grade 8
RECENTLY ARRIVED ELL STUDENTS NOT TAKING NYSESLAT IN LIEU OF NYSTP
2
1
1
2
5
2
Recently Arrived ELL Students (2015 - 16)
Recently Arrived ELL Students Taking NYSESLAT in Lieu of NYSTP
Grade 3
2
Grade 4
1
Grade 5
1
Grade 6
2
Grade 7
5
Grade 8
2
Recently Arrived ELL Students NOT Tested on the ELA NYSTP
Grade 3
2
Grade 4
1
Grade 5
1
Grade 6
2
Grade 7
5
Grade 8
2
Statewide Results on the National Assessment of Educational Progress: NAEP (2014 - 15)
Grade: 4
Reading
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Students with Disabilities
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
BELOW BASIC
32%
*%
20%
48%
44%
20%
*%
70%
74%
43%
BASIC
32%
*%
30%
34%
37%
31%
*%
22%
21%
36%
PROFICIENT
27%
*%
33%
15%
17%
37%
*%
7%
4%
18%
ADVANCED
9%
*%
17%
3%
2%
12%
*%
1%
1%
3%
PARTICIPATION RATE
98
88
Reading
All Students
Percent Below Basic
32
Percent Basic
32
Percent Proficient
27
Percent Advanced
9
American Indian or Alaska Native
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Percent Below Basic
20
Percent Basic
30
Percent Proficient
33
Percent Advanced
17
Black or African American
Percent Below Basic
48
Percent Basic
34
Percent Proficient
15
Percent Advanced
3
Hispanic or Latino
Percent Below Basic
44
Percent Basic
37
Percent Proficient
17
Percent Advanced
2
White
Percent Below Basic
20
Percent Basic
31
Percent Proficient
37
Percent Advanced
12
Multiracial
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Students with Disabilities
Percent Below Basic
70
Percent Basic
22
Percent Proficient
7
Percent Advanced
1
Participation Rate
98
English Language Learners
Percent Below Basic
74
Percent Basic
21
Percent Proficient
4
Percent Advanced
1
Participation Rate
88
Economically Disadvantaged
Percent Below Basic
43
Percent Basic
36
Percent Proficient
18
Percent Advanced
3
Mathematics
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Students with Disabilities
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
BELOW BASIC
21%
*%
12%
40%
28%
12%
*%
49%
56%
29%
BASIC
44%
*%
31%
46%
51%
41%
*%
39%
35%
48%
PROFICIENT
30%
*%
42%
13%
20%
40%
*%
10%
9%
21%
ADVANCED
5%
*%
15%
1%
1%
7%
*%
2%
*%
2%
PARTICIPATION RATE
98
91
Mathematics
All Students
Percent Below Basic
21
Percent Basic
44
Percent Proficient
30
Percent Advanced
5
American Indian or Alaska Native
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Percent Below Basic
12
Percent Basic
31
Percent Proficient
42
Percent Advanced
15
Black or African American
Percent Below Basic
40
Percent Basic
46
Percent Proficient
13
Percent Advanced
1
Hispanic or Latino
Percent Below Basic
28
Percent Basic
51
Percent Proficient
20
Percent Advanced
1
White
Percent Below Basic
12
Percent Basic
41
Percent Proficient
40
Percent Advanced
7
Multiracial
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Students with Disabilities
Percent Below Basic
49
Percent Basic
39
Percent Proficient
10
Percent Advanced
2
Participation Rate
98
English Language Learners
Percent Below Basic
56
Percent Basic
35
Percent Proficient
9
Percent Advanced
*
Participation Rate
91
Economically Disadvantaged
Percent Below Basic
29
Percent Basic
48
Percent Proficient
21
Percent Advanced
2
Grade: 8
Reading
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Students with Disabilities
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
BELOW BASIC
27%
*%
19%
42%
35%
18%
*%
59%
78%
36%
BASIC
40%
*%
39%
41%
43%
39%
*%
33%
19%
42%
PROFICIENT
29%
*%
34%
16%
20%
38%
*%
8%
3%
21%
ADVANCED
4%
*%
8%
1%
2%
5%
*%
*%
*%
1%
PARTICIPATION RATE
98
89
Reading
All Students
Percent Below Basic
27
Percent Basic
40
Percent Proficient
29
Percent Advanced
4
American Indian or Alaska Native
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Percent Below Basic
19
Percent Basic
39
Percent Proficient
34
Percent Advanced
8
Black or African American
Percent Below Basic
42
Percent Basic
41
Percent Proficient
16
Percent Advanced
1
Hispanic or Latino
Percent Below Basic
35
Percent Basic
43
Percent Proficient
20
Percent Advanced
2
White
Percent Below Basic
18
Percent Basic
39
Percent Proficient
38
Percent Advanced
5
Multiracial
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Students with Disabilities
Percent Below Basic
59
Percent Basic
33
Percent Proficient
8
Percent Advanced
*
Participation Rate
98
English Language Learners
Percent Below Basic
78
Percent Basic
19
Percent Proficient
3
Percent Advanced
*
Participation Rate
89
Economically Disadvantaged
Percent Below Basic
36
Percent Basic
42
Percent Proficient
21
Percent Advanced
1
Mathematics
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Students with Disabilities
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
BELOW BASIC
31%
*%
18%
48%
41%
20%
*%
64%
72%
40%
BASIC
38%
*%
30%
37%
40%
40%
*%
27%
21%
39%
PROFICIENT
24%
*%
33%
13%
16%
31%
*%
8%
6%
17%
ADVANCED
7%
*%
19%
2%
3%
9%
*%
1%
1%
4%
PARTICIPATION RATE
99
94
Mathematics
All Students
Percent Below Basic
31
Percent Basic
38
Percent Proficient
24
Percent Advanced
7
American Indian or Alaska Native
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Percent Below Basic
18
Percent Basic
30
Percent Proficient
33
Percent Advanced
19
Black or African American
Percent Below Basic
48
Percent Basic
37
Percent Proficient
13
Percent Advanced
2
Hispanic or Latino
Percent Below Basic
41
Percent Basic
40
Percent Proficient
16
Percent Advanced
3
White
Percent Below Basic
20
Percent Basic
40
Percent Proficient
31
Percent Advanced
9
Multiracial
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Students with Disabilities
Percent Below Basic
64
Percent Basic
27
Percent Proficient
8
Percent Advanced
1
Participation Rate
99
English Language Learners
Percent Below Basic
72
Percent Basic
21
Percent Proficient
6
Percent Advanced
1
Participation Rate
94
Economically Disadvantaged
Percent Below Basic
40
Percent Basic
39
Percent Proficient
17
Percent Advanced
4
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level English Language Arts after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
General Education
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Female
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
GROUP
All Students
General Education
White
Small Group Total
Female
Non-English Language Learners
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
PROFICIENT
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
LEVEL 1
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level Mathematics after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
General Education
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Female
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
GROUP
All Students
General Education
White
Small Group Total
Female
Non-English Language Learners
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
PROFICIENT
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
LEVEL 1
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level Global History and Geography after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
General Education
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Female
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
GROUP
All Students
General Education
White
Small Group Total
Female
Non-English Language Learners
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
PROFICIENT
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
LEVEL 1
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level U.S. History and Government after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
General Education
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Female
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
GROUP
All Students
General Education
White
Small Group Total
Female
Non-English Language Learners
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
PROFICIENT
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
LEVEL 1
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level Science after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
General Education
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Female
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
GROUP
All Students
General Education
White
Small Group Total
Female
Non-English Language Learners
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
PROFICIENT
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
LEVEL 1
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
Regents Examination Results (2015 - 16)
Algebra I (Common Core)
Algebra I (Common Core)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
18
18
2
6
10
8
11
7
18
1
17
18
LEVEL 1
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
LEVEL 4
1
6%
1
6%
_
_
_
_
1
10%
0
0%
0
0%
1
14%
1
6%
_
_
_
_
1
6%
LEVEL 5
17
94%
17
94%
_
_
_
_
9
90%
8
100%
11
100%
6
86%
17
94%
_
_
_
_
17
94%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 18
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
1
6%
LEVEL 5
17
94%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 18
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
1
6%
LEVEL 5
17
94%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 6
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 10
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
1
10%
LEVEL 5
9
90%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 8
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
LEVEL 5
8
100%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 11
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
LEVEL 5
11
100%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 7
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
1
14%
LEVEL 5
6
86%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 18
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
1
6%
LEVEL 5
17
94%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 17
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 18
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
1
6%
LEVEL 5
17
94%
Physical Setting/Earth Science
Regents Physical Setting/Earth Science
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
20
20
2
7
11
9
13
7
20
20
20
55
19
95%
19
95%
_
_
_
_
11
100%
8
89%
12
92%
7
100%
19
95%
19
95%
19
95%
65
19
95%
19
95%
_
_
_
_
11
100%
8
89%
12
92%
7
100%
19
95%
19
95%
19
95%
85
18
90%
18
90%
_
_
_
_
10
91%
8
89%
12
92%
6
86%
18
90%
18
90%
18
90%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 20
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
19
95%
65
19
95%
85
18
90%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 20
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
19
95%
65
19
95%
85
18
90%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 7
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 11
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
11
100%
65
11
100%
85
10
91%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 9
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
8
89%
65
8
89%
85
8
89%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 13
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
12
92%
65
12
92%
85
12
92%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 7
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
7
100%
65
7
100%
85
6
86%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 20
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
19
95%
65
19
95%
85
18
90%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 20
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
19
95%
65
19
95%
85
18
90%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 20
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
19
95%
65
19
95%
85
18
90%
New York State Alternate Assessment (NYSAA) Results (2015 - 16)
GROUP
Grade 3 ELA
Grade 3 Math
Grade 4 ELA
Grade 4 Math
Grade 4 Science
Grade 5 ELA
Grade 5 Math
Grade 6 ELA
Grade 6 Math
Grade 7 ELA
Grade 7 Math
Grade 8 ELA
Grade 8 Math
Grade 8 Science
TOTAL TESTED
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
PROFICIENT
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
LEVEL 1
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
Grade 3 ELA
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 3 Math
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 4 ELA
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 4 Math
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 4 Science
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 5 ELA
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 5 Math
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 6 ELA
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 6 Math
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 7 ELA
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 7 Math
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 8 ELA
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 8 Math
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 8 Science
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
New York State English as a Second Language Achievement Test (NYSESLAT) Results (2015 - 16)
Kindergarten
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED
18
16
2
ENTERING
0%
_
_
EMERGING
17%
_
_
TRANSITIONING
17%
_
_
EXPANDING
61%
_
_
COMMANDING
6%
_
_
Grade 1
GROUP
All Students
General Education
TOTAL TESTED
23
23
ENTERING
13%
13%
EMERGING
17%
17%
TRANSITIONING
17%
17%
EXPANDING
39%
39%
COMMANDING
13%
13%
Grade 2
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED
8
7
1
ENTERING
0%
_
_
EMERGING
0%
_
_
TRANSITIONING
13%
_
_
EXPANDING
88%
_
_
COMMANDING
0%
_
_
Grade 3
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED
11
10
1
ENTERING
0%
_
_
EMERGING
9%
_
_
TRANSITIONING
9%
_
_
EXPANDING
73%
_
_
COMMANDING
9%
_
_
Grade 4
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED
12
8
4
ENTERING
0%
_
_
EMERGING
17%
_
_
TRANSITIONING
25%
_
_
EXPANDING
58%
_
_
COMMANDING
0%
_
_
Grade 5
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED
4
1
3
ENTERING
_
_
_
EMERGING
_
_
_
TRANSITIONING
_
_
_
EXPANDING
_
_
_
COMMANDING
_
_
_
Grade 6
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED
5
3
2
ENTERING
0%
_
_
EMERGING
20%
_
_
TRANSITIONING
0%
_
_
EXPANDING
80%
_
_
COMMANDING
0%
_
_
Grade 7
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED
8
7
1
ENTERING
13%
_
_
EMERGING
25%
_
_
TRANSITIONING
13%
_
_
EXPANDING
0%
_
_
COMMANDING
50%
_
_
Grade 8
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED
7
5
2
ENTERING
0%
_
_
EMERGING
57%
_
_
TRANSITIONING
14%
_
_
EXPANDING
14%
_
_
COMMANDING
14%
_
_
Kindergarten
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 18
ENTERING
0%
EMERGING
17%
TRANSITIONING
17%
EXPANDING
61%
COMMANDING
6%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 16
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 2
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
Grade 1
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 23
ENTERING
13%
EMERGING
17%
TRANSITIONING
17%
EXPANDING
39%
COMMANDING
13%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 23
ENTERING
13%
EMERGING
17%
TRANSITIONING
17%
EXPANDING
39%
COMMANDING
13%
Grade 2
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 8
ENTERING
0%
EMERGING
0%
TRANSITIONING
13%
EXPANDING
88%
COMMANDING
0%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 7
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 1
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
Grade 3
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 11
ENTERING
0%
EMERGING
9%
TRANSITIONING
9%
EXPANDING
73%
COMMANDING
9%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 10
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 1
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
Grade 4
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 12
ENTERING
0%
EMERGING
17%
TRANSITIONING
25%
EXPANDING
58%
COMMANDING
0%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 8
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 4
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
Grade 5
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 4
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 1
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 3
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
Grade 6
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 5
ENTERING
0%
EMERGING
20%
TRANSITIONING
0%
EXPANDING
80%
COMMANDING
0%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 3
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 2
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
Grade 7
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 8
ENTERING
13%
EMERGING
25%
TRANSITIONING
13%
EXPANDING
0%
COMMANDING
50%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 7
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 1
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
Grade 8
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 7
ENTERING
0%
EMERGING
57%
TRANSITIONING
14%
EXPANDING
14%
COMMANDING
14%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 5
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 2
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
Elementary/Middle-Level English Language Arts Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: NO
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
NO
―
―
NO
―
NO
―
NO
NO
NO
Tested 95%
NO
―
―
NO
―
NO
―
NO
NO
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
960*
0
4
521*
6
413*
2
99*
102*
134*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
81%*
―
―
89%*
―
71%*
―
81%*
92%*
84%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
―
―
YES
―
YES
―
YES
NO
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
354
0
2
202
4
144
2
52✝
65⁰
48
PI
102
―
―
89
―
117
―
33✝
35
79
EAMO
98
―
―
84
―
110
―
60
63
79
Safe Harbor Target
98
―
―
84
―
110
―
20
63
79
All Students
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
960*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
81%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
354
PI
102
EAMO
98
Safe Harbor Target
98
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
4
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
2
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
521*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
89%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
202
PI
89
EAMO
84
Safe Harbor Target
84
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
6
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
4
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
White
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
413*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
71%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
144
PI
117
EAMO
110
Safe Harbor Target
110
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
2
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
2
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
99*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
81%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
52✝
PI
33✝
EAMO
60
Safe Harbor Target
20
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
102*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
92%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
65⁰
PI
35
EAMO
63
Safe Harbor Target
63
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
134*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
84%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
48
PI
79
EAMO
79
Safe Harbor Target
79
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
960*
949*
439*
950*
547*
955*
861*
858*
826*
485*
475*
0
960*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
81%*
81%*
71%*
81%*
89%*
81%*
81%*
80%*
81%*
81%*
81%*
―
81%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
354
352
152
350
210
352
302
325
306
177
177
0
354
PI
102
101
119
102
91
102
114
108
106
95
109
―
102
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
960*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
81%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
354
PI
102
Not Black or African American
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
949*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
81%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
352
PI
101
Not Hispanic or Latino
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
439*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
71%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
152
PI
119
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
950*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
81%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
350
PI
102
Not White
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
547*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
89%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
210
PI
91
Not Multiracial
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
955*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
81%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
352
PI
102
General Education
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
861*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
81%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
302
PI
114
English Proficient
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
858*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
80%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
325
PI
108
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
826*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
81%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
306
PI
106
Male
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
485*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
81%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
177
PI
95
Female
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
475*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
81%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
177
PI
109
Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
960*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
81%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
354
PI
102
― There were fewer than 40 students enrolled during the test administration period, so the Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 tested students enrolled on BEDS day and during the test administration period, so the PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed. *The percentage of students tested in the current year fell below 95 percent, so the numbers of enrolled and tested students in the current year and previous year were combined to provide the school/district with another opportunity to meet the participation rate criterion. ✝ Includes former students with disabilities because the number of students with disabilities in the current year is equal to or greater than 30. ⁰ This group failed to meet the participation criterion and had fewer than 30 tested students enrolled on BEDS day and during the test administration period, so data for the current and previous year were combined to determine a Performance Index.
Elementary/Middle-Level Mathematics Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: NO
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
NO
―
―
NO
―
NO
―
NO
NO
NO
Tested 95%
NO
―
―
NO
―
NO
―
NO
NO
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
959*
0
4
520*
6
413*
2
99*
102*
134*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
76%*
―
―
85%*
―
64%*
―
78%*
86%*
75%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
―
―
YES
―
YES
―
YES
NO
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
364
0
1
218
4
139
2
51✝
47‡
48
PI
104
―
―
93
―
120
―
51✝
47‡
85
EAMO
95
―
―
83
―
106
―
61
63
77
Safe Harbor Target
95
―
―
83
―
106
―
20
63
77
All Students
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
959*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
76%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
364
PI
104
EAMO
95
Safe Harbor Target
95
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
4
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
520*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
85%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
218
PI
93
EAMO
83
Safe Harbor Target
83
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
6
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
4
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
White
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
413*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
64%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
139
PI
120
EAMO
106
Safe Harbor Target
106
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
2
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
2
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
99*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
78%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
51✝
PI
51✝
EAMO
61
Safe Harbor Target
20
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
102*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
86%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
47‡
PI
47‡
EAMO
63
Safe Harbor Target
63
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
134*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
75%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
48
PI
85
EAMO
77
Safe Harbor Target
77
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
959*
948*
439*
949*
546*
954*
860*
857*
825*
483*
476*
0
959*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
76%*
76%*
64%*
76%*
85%*
76%*
76%*
75%*
76%*
77%*
75%*
―
76%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
364
363
146
360
225
362
313
324
316
183
181
0
364
PI
104
104
121
104
94
104
113
112
107
108
100
―
104
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
959*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
76%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
364
PI
104
Not Black or African American
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
948*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
76%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
363
PI
104
Not Hispanic or Latino
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
439*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
64%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
146
PI
121
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
949*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
76%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
360
PI
104
Not White
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
546*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
85%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
225
PI
94
Not Multiracial
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
954*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
76%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
362
PI
104
General Education
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
860*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
76%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
313
PI
113
English Proficient
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
857*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
75%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
324
PI
112
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
825*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
76%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
316
PI
107
Male
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
483*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
77%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
183
PI
108
Female
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
476*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
75%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
181
PI
100
Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
959*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
76%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
364
PI
104
― There were fewer than 40 students enrolled during the test administration period, so the Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 tested students enrolled on BEDS day and during the test administration period, so the PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed. *The percentage of students tested in the current year fell below 95 percent, so the numbers of enrolled and tested students in the current year and previous year were combined to provide the school/district with another opportunity to meet the participation rate criterion. ✝ Includes former students with disabilities because the number of students with disabilities in the current year is equal to or greater than 30. ‡ Includes former english language learner students because the number of english language learner students in the current year is equal to or greater than 30.
Elementary/Middle-Level Science Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: YES
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
YES
―
―
YES
―
YES
―
―
―
―
Tested 80%
YES
―
―
YES
―
YES
―
―
―
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
168
0
3
95
3
66
1
23
20
20
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
87%
―
―
86%
―
88%
―
―
―
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
YES
―
―
YES
―
YES
―
―
―
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
144
0
2
81
3
57
1
17
17
14
PI
185
―
―
174
―
198
―
―
―
―
EAMO
178
―
―
167
―
181
―
―
―
―
Progress Target
178
―
―
167
―
181
―
―
―
―
All Students
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 80%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
168
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
87%
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
144
PI
185
EAMO
178
Progress Target
178
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
3
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
2
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 80%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
95
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
86%
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
81
PI
174
EAMO
167
Progress Target
167
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
3
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
3
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
White
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 80%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
66
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
88%
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
57
PI
198
EAMO
181
Progress Target
181
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
23
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
17
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
20
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
17
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
20
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
14
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
168
165
73
165
102
167
145
148
148
94
74
0
168
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
87%
87%
88%
87%
86%
87%
89%
86%
89%
88%
85%
―
87%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
144
142
63
141
87
143
127
127
130
81
63
0
144
PI
185
185
198
184
176
185
187
194
185
186
183
―
185
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
168
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
87%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
144
PI
185
Not Black or African American
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
165
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
87%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
142
PI
185
Not Hispanic or Latino
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
73
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
88%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
63
PI
198
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
165
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
87%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
141
PI
184
Not White
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
102
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
86%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
87
PI
176
Not Multiracial
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
167
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
87%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
143
PI
185
General Education
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
145
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
89%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
127
PI
187
English Proficient
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
148
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
86%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
127
PI
194
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
148
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
89%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
130
PI
185
Male
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
94
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
88%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
81
PI
186
Female
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
74
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
85%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
63
PI
183
Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
168
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
87%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
144
PI
185
― There were fewer than 40 students enrolled during the test administration period, so the Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 tested students enrolled on BEDS day and during the test administration period, so the PI, EAMO, and Progress Target data are suppressed.
Secondary-Level English Language Arts Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP:
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
Tested 95%
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
12th graders
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
PI
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
EAMO
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
All Students
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
1
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
White
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
1
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
12th Graders
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
1
1
0
1
0
1
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
PI
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
12th Graders
1
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
Not Black or African American
12th Graders
1
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
Not Hispanic or Latino
12th Graders
1
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
12th Graders
1
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
Not White
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
Not Multiracial
12th Graders
1
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
General Education
12th Graders
1
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
English Proficient
12th Graders
1
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
Not Economically Disadvantaged
12th Graders
1
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
Male
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
Female
12th Graders
1
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
Migrant
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
Not Migrant
12th Graders
1
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
― There were fewer than 40 12th graders, so the Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 students in the 2012 accountability cohort, so PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed.
Secondary-Level Mathematics Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP:
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
Tested 95%
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
12th graders
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
PI
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
EAMO
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
All Students
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
1
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
White
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
1
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
12th Graders
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
1
1
0
1
0
1
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
PI
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
12th Graders
1
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
Not Black or African American
12th Graders
1
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
Not Hispanic or Latino
12th Graders
1
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
12th Graders
1
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
Not White
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
Not Multiracial
12th Graders
1
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
General Education
12th Graders
1
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
English Proficient
12th Graders
1
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
Not Economically Disadvantaged
12th Graders
1
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
Male
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
Female
12th Graders
1
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
Migrant
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
Not Migrant
12th Graders
1
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
― There were fewer than 40 12th graders, so the Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 students in the 2012 accountability cohort, so PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed.
Unweighted Combined ELA and Math PIs
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
102
―
―
89
―
117
―
33
―
79
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
104
―
―
93
―
120
―
51
47
85
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
UNWEIGHTED COMBINED PI
103
0
0
91
0
119
0
42
47
82
All Students
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
102
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
104
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
103
American Indian or Alaska Native
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Black or African American
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Hispanic or Latino
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
89
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
93
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
91
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
White
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
117
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
120
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
119
Multiracial
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Students With Disabilities
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
33
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
51
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
42
Limited English Proficient
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
47
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
47
Economically Disadvantaged
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
79
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
85
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
82
― There were not enough students to determine a Performance Index.
You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.
Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.
If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.
