STILLWATER CSD - School Report Card Data [2016 - 17]
The New York State Report Card is an important part of the Board of Regents' effort to raise learning standards for all students. It provides information to the public on school/district enrollment and staff, student performance, and other measures of school and district performance. Knowledge gained from the report card on a school's or district's strengths and weaknesses can be used to improve instruction and services to students. Report Card Data - Glossary of Terms | Accountability Data - Glossary of Terms | Business Rules
Turnover Rate of Teachers with Fewer Than Five Years of Experience
0%
TURNOVER RATE OF ALL TEACHERS
2%
Teacher Turnover Rate (2015-16 to 2016-17)
Turnover Rate of Teachers with Fewer Than Five Years of Experience
0%
Turnover Rate of All Teachers
2%
Staff Counts (2016 - 17)
GROUP
PRINCIPALS
ASSISTANT PRINCIPALS
OTHER PROFESSIONAL STAFF
PARAPROFESSIONALS
STAFF
3
0
21
27
Staff Counts (2016 - 17)
Principals
3
Assistant Principals
0
Other Professional Staff
21
Paraprofessionals
27
Teacher Qualifications (2016 - 17)
TOTAL TEACHERS
110
PERCENT WITH NO VALID TEACHING CERTIFICATE
0%
PERCENT TEACHING OUT OF CERTIFICATE
3%
PERCENT WITH FEWER THAN THREE YEARS OF EXPERIENCE
7%
PERCENTAGE WITH MASTER'S DEGREEPLUS 30 HOURS OR DOCTORATE
71%
Total Number of Classes
377
Percent Taught by Teachers Without Appropriate Certification
3%
Teacher Qualifications (2016 - 17)
TOTAL TEACHERS: 110
Percent with No Valid Teaching Certificate
0%
Percent Teaching Out of Certification
3%
Percent with Fewer Than Three Years of Experience
7%
Percentage with Master's Degree Plus 30 Hours or Doctorate
71%
Total Number of Classes
377
Percent Taught by Teachers Without Appropriate Certification
3%
High School Completers (2016 - 17)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
85
_
_
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
84
_
_
REGENTS DIPLOMA
81
96%
_
_
_
_
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
REGENTS WITH ADVANCED DESIGNATION
52
62%
_
_
_
_
REGENTS WITH CTE ENDORSEMENT
2
2%
_
_
_
_
LOCAL DIPLOMAS
3
4%
_
_
_
_
COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS
1
1%
_
_
_
_
All Students
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
85
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
84
Regents Diploma
81
96%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
52
62%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
2
2%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
3
4%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
1
1%
of Completers
General Education
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
_
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
_
Regents Diploma
_
_%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
_
_%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
_
_%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
_
_%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
_
_%
of Completers
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
_
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
_
Regents Diploma
_
_%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
_
_%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
_
_%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
_
_%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
_
_%
of Completers
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
85
_
_
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
84
_
_
REGENTS DIPLOMA
81
96%
_
_
_
_
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
REGENTS WITH ADVANCED DESIGNATION
52
62%
_
_
_
_
REGENTS WITH CTE ENDORSEMENT
2
2%
_
_
_
_
LOCAL DIPLOMAS
3
4%
_
_
_
_
COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS
1
1%
_
_
_
_
All Students
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
85
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
84
Regents Diploma
81
96%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
52
62%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
2
2%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
3
4%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
1
1%
of Completers
General Education
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
_
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
_
Regents Diploma
_
_%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
_
_%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
_
_%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
_
_%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
_
_%
of Completers
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
_
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
_
Regents Diploma
_
_%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
_
_%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
_
_%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
_
_%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
_
_%
of Completers
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
85
_
_
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
84
_
_
REGENTS DIPLOMA
81
96%
_
_
_
_
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
REGENTS WITH ADVANCED DESIGNATION
52
62%
_
_
_
_
REGENTS WITH CTE ENDORSEMENT
2
2%
_
_
_
_
LOCAL DIPLOMAS
3
4%
_
_
_
_
COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS
1
1%
_
_
_
_
All Students
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
85
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
84
Regents Diploma
81
96%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
52
62%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
2
2%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
3
4%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
1
1%
of Completers
General Education
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
_
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
_
Regents Diploma
_
_%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
_
_%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
_
_%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
_
_%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
_
_%
of Completers
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
_
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
_
Regents Diploma
_
_%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
_
_%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
_
_%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
_
_%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
_
_%
of Completers
High School Non-completers (2016 - 17)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
9
2%
_
_
_
_
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
0
0%
_
_
_
_
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
9
2%
_
_
_
_
All Students
DROPPED OUT
9
2%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
0
0%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
9
2%
General Education
DROPPED OUT
_
_%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
_
_%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
_
_%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
_
_%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
_
_%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
9
2%
_
_
_
_
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
0
0%
_
_
_
_
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
9
2%
_
_
_
_
All Students
DROPPED OUT
9
2%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
0
0%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
9
2%
General Education
DROPPED OUT
_
_%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
_
_%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
_
_%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
_
_%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
_
_%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
9
2%
_
_
_
_
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
0
0%
_
_
_
_
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
9
2%
_
_
_
_
All Students
DROPPED OUT
9
2%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
0
0%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
9
2%
General Education
DROPPED OUT
_
_%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
_
_%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
_
_%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
_
_%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
_
_%
Post-graduation Plans of Completers (2016 - 17)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO FOUR-YEAR COLLEGE
44
52%
_
_
_
_
TO TWO-YEAR COLLEGE
21
25%
_
_
_
_
TO OTHER POST-SECONDARY
0
0%
_
_
_
_
TO THE MILITARY
1
1%
_
_
_
_
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO EMPLOYMENT
18
21%
_
_
_
_
TO ADULT SERVICES
0
0%
_
_
_
_
TO OTHER KNOWN PLANS
0
0%
_
_
_
_
PLANS UNKNOWN
1
1%
_
_
_
_
All Students
To Four-Year College
44
52%
To Two-Year College
21
25%
To Other Post-Secondary
0
0%
To the Military
1
1%
To Employment
18
21%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
0
0%
Plan Unknown
1
1%
General Education
To Four-Year College
_
_
To Two-Year College
_
_
To Other Post-Secondary
_
_
To the Military
_
_
To Employment
_
_
To Adult Services
_
_
To Other Known Plans
_
_
Plan Unknown
_
_
Students with Disabilities
To Four-Year College
_
_
To Two-Year College
_
_
To Other Post-Secondary
_
_
To the Military
_
_
To Employment
_
_
To Adult Services
_
_
To Other Known Plans
_
_
Plan Unknown
_
_
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO FOUR-YEAR COLLEGE
44
52%
_
_
_
_
TO TWO-YEAR COLLEGE
21
25%
_
_
_
_
TO OTHER POST-SECONDARY
0
0%
_
_
_
_
TO THE MILITARY
1
1%
_
_
_
_
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO EMPLOYMENT
18
21%
_
_
_
_
TO ADULT SERVICES
0
0%
_
_
_
_
TO OTHER KNOWN PLANS
0
0%
_
_
_
_
PLANS UNKNOWN
1
1%
_
_
_
_
All Students
To Four-Year College
44
52%
To Two-Year College
21
25%
To Other Post-Secondary
0
0%
To the Military
1
1%
To Employment
18
21%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
0
0%
Plan Unknown
1
1%
General Education
To Four-Year College
_
_
To Two-Year College
_
_
To Other Post-Secondary
_
_
To the Military
_
_
To Employment
_
_
To Adult Services
_
_
To Other Known Plans
_
_
Plan Unknown
_
_
Students with Disabilities
To Four-Year College
_
_
To Two-Year College
_
_
To Other Post-Secondary
_
_
To the Military
_
_
To Employment
_
_
To Adult Services
_
_
To Other Known Plans
_
_
Plan Unknown
_
_
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO FOUR-YEAR COLLEGE
44
52%
_
_
_
_
TO TWO-YEAR COLLEGE
21
25%
_
_
_
_
TO OTHER POST-SECONDARY
0
0%
_
_
_
_
TO THE MILITARY
1
1%
_
_
_
_
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO EMPLOYMENT
18
21%
_
_
_
_
TO ADULT SERVICES
0
0%
_
_
_
_
TO OTHER KNOWN PLANS
0
0%
_
_
_
_
PLANS UNKNOWN
1
1%
_
_
_
_
All Students
To Four-Year College
44
52%
To Two-Year College
21
25%
To Other Post-Secondary
0
0%
To the Military
1
1%
To Employment
18
21%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
0
0%
Plan Unknown
1
1%
General Education
To Four-Year College
_
_
To Two-Year College
_
_
To Other Post-Secondary
_
_
To the Military
_
_
To Employment
_
_
To Adult Services
_
_
To Other Known Plans
_
_
Plan Unknown
_
_
Students with Disabilities
To Four-Year College
_
_
To Two-Year College
_
_
To Other Post-Secondary
_
_
To the Military
_
_
To Employment
_
_
To Adult Services
_
_
To Other Known Plans
_
_
Plan Unknown
_
_
Grade 3 English Language Arts
MEAN SCORE: 302
All Students
PROFICIENT
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 65
LEVEL 1
19
29%
LEVEL 2
24
37%
LEVEL 3
21
32%
LEVEL 4
1
2%
General Education
PROFICIENT
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 58
LEVEL 1
14
24%
LEVEL 2
23
40%
LEVEL 3
20
34%
LEVEL 4
1
2%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7
LEVEL 1
5
71%
LEVEL 2
1
14%
LEVEL 3
1
14%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 64
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 65
LEVEL 1
19
29%
LEVEL 2
24
37%
LEVEL 3
21
32%
LEVEL 4
1
2%
Female
PROFICIENT
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 31
LEVEL 1
10
32%
LEVEL 2
9
29%
LEVEL 3
12
39%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Male
PROFICIENT
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 34
LEVEL 1
9
26%
LEVEL 2
15
44%
LEVEL 3
9
26%
LEVEL 4
1
3%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 65
LEVEL 1
19
29%
LEVEL 2
24
37%
LEVEL 3
21
32%
LEVEL 4
1
2%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 23
LEVEL 1
13
57%
LEVEL 2
4
17%
LEVEL 3
6
26%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 42
LEVEL 1
6
14%
LEVEL 2
20
48%
LEVEL 3
15
36%
LEVEL 4
1
2%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 65
LEVEL 1
19
29%
LEVEL 2
24
37%
LEVEL 3
21
32%
LEVEL 4
1
2%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
65
58
7
1
64
65
31
34
65
23
42
65
PROFICIENT
34%
36%
14%
_%
_%
34%
39%
29%
34%
26%
38%
34%
LEVEL 1
19
29%
14
24%
5
71%
_
_
_
_
19
29%
10
32%
9
26%
19
29%
13
57%
6
14%
19
29%
LEVEL 2
24
37%
23
40%
1
14%
_
_
_
_
24
37%
9
29%
15
44%
24
37%
4
17%
20
48%
24
37%
LEVEL 3
21
32%
20
34%
1
14%
_
_
_
_
21
32%
12
39%
9
26%
21
32%
6
26%
15
36%
21
32%
LEVEL 4
1
2%
1
2%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
1
2%
0
0%
1
3%
1
2%
0
0%
1
2%
1
2%
Grade 4 English Language Arts
MEAN SCORE: 320
All Students
PROFICIENT
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 68
LEVEL 1
9
13%
LEVEL 2
19
28%
LEVEL 3
25
37%
LEVEL 4
15
22%
General Education
PROFICIENT
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 59
LEVEL 1
2
3%
LEVEL 2
17
29%
LEVEL 3
25
42%
LEVEL 4
15
25%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
7
78%
LEVEL 2
2
22%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 7
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 59
LEVEL 1
6
10%
LEVEL 2
18
31%
LEVEL 3
21
36%
LEVEL 4
14
24%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
3
33%
LEVEL 2
1
11%
LEVEL 3
4
44%
LEVEL 4
1
11%
Female
PROFICIENT
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 41
LEVEL 1
4
10%
LEVEL 2
11
27%
LEVEL 3
18
44%
LEVEL 4
8
20%
Male
PROFICIENT
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 27
LEVEL 1
5
19%
LEVEL 2
8
30%
LEVEL 3
7
26%
LEVEL 4
7
26%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 67
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 19
LEVEL 1
6
32%
LEVEL 2
4
21%
LEVEL 3
5
26%
LEVEL 4
4
21%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 49
LEVEL 1
3
6%
LEVEL 2
15
31%
LEVEL 3
20
41%
LEVEL 4
11
22%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 68
LEVEL 1
9
13%
LEVEL 2
19
28%
LEVEL 3
25
37%
LEVEL 4
15
22%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
68
59
9
1
7
59
1
9
41
27
67
1
19
49
68
PROFICIENT
59%
68%
0%
_%
_%
59%
_%
56%
63%
52%
_%
_%
47%
63%
59%
LEVEL 1
9
13%
2
3%
7
78%
_
_
_
_
6
10%
_
_
3
33%
4
10%
5
19%
_
_
_
_
6
32%
3
6%
9
13%
LEVEL 2
19
28%
17
29%
2
22%
_
_
_
_
18
31%
_
_
1
11%
11
27%
8
30%
_
_
_
_
4
21%
15
31%
19
28%
LEVEL 3
25
37%
25
42%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
21
36%
_
_
4
44%
18
44%
7
26%
_
_
_
_
5
26%
20
41%
25
37%
LEVEL 4
15
22%
15
25%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
14
24%
_
_
1
11%
8
20%
7
26%
_
_
_
_
4
21%
11
22%
15
22%
Grade 5 English Language Arts
MEAN SCORE: 304
All Students
PROFICIENT
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 68
LEVEL 1
22
32%
LEVEL 2
20
29%
LEVEL 3
20
29%
LEVEL 4
6
9%
General Education
PROFICIENT
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 62
LEVEL 1
17
27%
LEVEL 2
19
31%
LEVEL 3
20
32%
LEVEL 4
6
10%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
5
83%
LEVEL 2
1
17%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 65
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 68
LEVEL 1
22
32%
LEVEL 2
20
29%
LEVEL 3
20
29%
LEVEL 4
6
9%
Female
PROFICIENT
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 29
LEVEL 1
9
31%
LEVEL 2
5
17%
LEVEL 3
10
34%
LEVEL 4
5
17%
Male
PROFICIENT
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 39
LEVEL 1
13
33%
LEVEL 2
15
38%
LEVEL 3
10
26%
LEVEL 4
1
3%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 68
LEVEL 1
22
32%
LEVEL 2
20
29%
LEVEL 3
20
29%
LEVEL 4
6
9%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 19
LEVEL 1
9
47%
LEVEL 2
4
21%
LEVEL 3
6
32%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 49
LEVEL 1
13
27%
LEVEL 2
16
33%
LEVEL 3
14
29%
LEVEL 4
6
12%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 68
LEVEL 1
22
32%
LEVEL 2
20
29%
LEVEL 3
20
29%
LEVEL 4
6
9%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
68
62
6
2
1
65
68
29
39
68
19
49
68
PROFICIENT
38%
42%
0%
_%
_%
_%
38%
52%
28%
38%
32%
41%
38%
LEVEL 1
22
32%
17
27%
5
83%
_
_
_
_
_
_
22
32%
9
31%
13
33%
22
32%
9
47%
13
27%
22
32%
LEVEL 2
20
29%
19
31%
1
17%
_
_
_
_
_
_
20
29%
5
17%
15
38%
20
29%
4
21%
16
33%
20
29%
LEVEL 3
20
29%
20
32%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
20
29%
10
34%
10
26%
20
29%
6
32%
14
29%
20
29%
LEVEL 4
6
9%
6
10%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
6
9%
5
17%
1
3%
6
9%
0
0%
6
12%
6
9%
Grade 6 English Language Arts
MEAN SCORE: 301
All Students
PROFICIENT
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 72
LEVEL 1
23
32%
LEVEL 2
27
38%
LEVEL 3
10
14%
LEVEL 4
12
17%
General Education
PROFICIENT
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 62
LEVEL 1
14
23%
LEVEL 2
26
42%
LEVEL 3
10
16%
LEVEL 4
12
19%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 10
LEVEL 1
9
90%
LEVEL 2
1
10%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 68
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 72
LEVEL 1
23
32%
LEVEL 2
27
38%
LEVEL 3
10
14%
LEVEL 4
12
17%
Female
PROFICIENT
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 36
LEVEL 1
8
22%
LEVEL 2
13
36%
LEVEL 3
6
17%
LEVEL 4
9
25%
Male
PROFICIENT
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 36
LEVEL 1
15
42%
LEVEL 2
14
39%
LEVEL 3
4
11%
LEVEL 4
3
8%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 72
LEVEL 1
23
32%
LEVEL 2
27
38%
LEVEL 3
10
14%
LEVEL 4
12
17%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 20
LEVEL 1
10
50%
LEVEL 2
7
35%
LEVEL 3
2
10%
LEVEL 4
1
5%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 52
LEVEL 1
13
25%
LEVEL 2
20
38%
LEVEL 3
8
15%
LEVEL 4
11
21%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 72
LEVEL 1
23
32%
LEVEL 2
27
38%
LEVEL 3
10
14%
LEVEL 4
12
17%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
72
62
10
1
2
68
1
72
36
36
72
20
52
72
PROFICIENT
31%
35%
0%
_%
_%
_%
_%
31%
42%
19%
31%
15%
37%
31%
LEVEL 1
23
32%
14
23%
9
90%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
23
32%
8
22%
15
42%
23
32%
10
50%
13
25%
23
32%
LEVEL 2
27
38%
26
42%
1
10%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
27
38%
13
36%
14
39%
27
38%
7
35%
20
38%
27
38%
LEVEL 3
10
14%
10
16%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
10
14%
6
17%
4
11%
10
14%
2
10%
8
15%
10
14%
LEVEL 4
12
17%
12
19%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
12
17%
9
25%
3
8%
12
17%
1
5%
11
21%
12
17%
Grade 7 English Language Arts
MEAN SCORE: 320
All Students
PROFICIENT
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 76
LEVEL 1
6
8%
LEVEL 2
25
33%
LEVEL 3
32
42%
LEVEL 4
13
17%
General Education
PROFICIENT
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 63
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
18
29%
LEVEL 3
32
51%
LEVEL 4
13
21%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 13
LEVEL 1
6
46%
LEVEL 2
7
54%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 71
LEVEL 1
5
7%
LEVEL 2
25
35%
LEVEL 3
29
41%
LEVEL 4
12
17%
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
1
20%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
3
60%
LEVEL 4
1
20%
Female
PROFICIENT
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 40
LEVEL 1
1
3%
LEVEL 2
11
28%
LEVEL 3
19
48%
LEVEL 4
9
23%
Male
PROFICIENT
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 36
LEVEL 1
5
14%
LEVEL 2
14
39%
LEVEL 3
13
36%
LEVEL 4
4
11%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 76
LEVEL 1
6
8%
LEVEL 2
25
33%
LEVEL 3
32
42%
LEVEL 4
13
17%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 18
LEVEL 1
3
17%
LEVEL 2
7
39%
LEVEL 3
8
44%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 58
LEVEL 1
3
5%
LEVEL 2
18
31%
LEVEL 3
24
41%
LEVEL 4
13
22%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 76
LEVEL 1
6
8%
LEVEL 2
25
33%
LEVEL 3
32
42%
LEVEL 4
13
17%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
76
63
13
2
3
71
5
40
36
76
18
58
76
PROFICIENT
59%
71%
0%
_%
_%
58%
80%
70%
47%
59%
44%
64%
59%
LEVEL 1
6
8%
0
0%
6
46%
_
_
_
_
5
7%
1
20%
1
3%
5
14%
6
8%
3
17%
3
5%
6
8%
LEVEL 2
25
33%
18
29%
7
54%
_
_
_
_
25
35%
0
0%
11
28%
14
39%
25
33%
7
39%
18
31%
25
33%
LEVEL 3
32
42%
32
51%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
29
41%
3
60%
19
48%
13
36%
32
42%
8
44%
24
41%
32
42%
LEVEL 4
13
17%
13
21%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
12
17%
1
20%
9
23%
4
11%
13
17%
0
0%
13
22%
13
17%
Grade 8 English Language Arts
MEAN SCORE: 310
All Students
PROFICIENT
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 53
LEVEL 1
10
19%
LEVEL 2
20
38%
LEVEL 3
13
25%
LEVEL 4
10
19%
General Education
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 49
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 48
LEVEL 1
9
19%
LEVEL 2
18
38%
LEVEL 3
11
23%
LEVEL 4
10
21%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
1
20%
LEVEL 2
2
40%
LEVEL 3
2
40%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Female
PROFICIENT
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 29
LEVEL 1
2
7%
LEVEL 2
16
55%
LEVEL 3
5
17%
LEVEL 4
6
21%
Male
PROFICIENT
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 24
LEVEL 1
8
33%
LEVEL 2
4
17%
LEVEL 3
8
33%
LEVEL 4
4
17%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 53
LEVEL 1
10
19%
LEVEL 2
20
38%
LEVEL 3
13
25%
LEVEL 4
10
19%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 14
LEVEL 1
6
43%
LEVEL 2
7
50%
LEVEL 3
1
7%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 39
LEVEL 1
4
10%
LEVEL 2
13
33%
LEVEL 3
12
31%
LEVEL 4
10
26%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 53
LEVEL 1
10
19%
LEVEL 2
20
38%
LEVEL 3
13
25%
LEVEL 4
10
19%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
53
49
4
1
48
4
5
29
24
53
14
39
53
PROFICIENT
43%
_%
_%
_%
44%
_%
40%
38%
50%
43%
7%
56%
43%
LEVEL 1
10
19%
_
_
_
_
_
_
9
19%
_
_
1
20%
2
7%
8
33%
10
19%
6
43%
4
10%
10
19%
LEVEL 2
20
38%
_
_
_
_
_
_
18
38%
_
_
2
40%
16
55%
4
17%
20
38%
7
50%
13
33%
20
38%
LEVEL 3
13
25%
_
_
_
_
_
_
11
23%
_
_
2
40%
5
17%
8
33%
13
25%
1
7%
12
31%
13
25%
LEVEL 4
10
19%
_
_
_
_
_
_
10
21%
_
_
0
0%
6
21%
4
17%
10
19%
0
0%
10
26%
10
19%
Grade 3 Mathematics
MEAN SCORE: 311
All Students
PROFICIENT
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 65
LEVEL 1
14
22%
LEVEL 2
16
25%
LEVEL 3
19
29%
LEVEL 4
16
25%
General Education
PROFICIENT
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 58
LEVEL 1
9
16%
LEVEL 2
15
26%
LEVEL 3
19
33%
LEVEL 4
15
26%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7
LEVEL 1
5
71%
LEVEL 2
1
14%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
1
14%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 64
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 65
LEVEL 1
14
22%
LEVEL 2
16
25%
LEVEL 3
19
29%
LEVEL 4
16
25%
Female
PROFICIENT
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 31
LEVEL 1
6
19%
LEVEL 2
10
32%
LEVEL 3
10
32%
LEVEL 4
5
16%
Male
PROFICIENT
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 34
LEVEL 1
8
24%
LEVEL 2
6
18%
LEVEL 3
9
26%
LEVEL 4
11
32%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 65
LEVEL 1
14
22%
LEVEL 2
16
25%
LEVEL 3
19
29%
LEVEL 4
16
25%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 24
LEVEL 1
10
42%
LEVEL 2
8
33%
LEVEL 3
2
8%
LEVEL 4
4
17%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 41
LEVEL 1
4
10%
LEVEL 2
8
20%
LEVEL 3
17
41%
LEVEL 4
12
29%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 65
LEVEL 1
14
22%
LEVEL 2
16
25%
LEVEL 3
19
29%
LEVEL 4
16
25%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
65
58
7
1
64
65
31
34
65
24
41
65
PROFICIENT
54%
59%
14%
_%
_%
54%
48%
59%
54%
25%
71%
54%
LEVEL 1
14
22%
9
16%
5
71%
_
_
_
_
14
22%
6
19%
8
24%
14
22%
10
42%
4
10%
14
22%
LEVEL 2
16
25%
15
26%
1
14%
_
_
_
_
16
25%
10
32%
6
18%
16
25%
8
33%
8
20%
16
25%
LEVEL 3
19
29%
19
33%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
19
29%
10
32%
9
26%
19
29%
2
8%
17
41%
19
29%
LEVEL 4
16
25%
15
26%
1
14%
_
_
_
_
16
25%
5
16%
11
32%
16
25%
4
17%
12
29%
16
25%
Grade 4 Mathematics
MEAN SCORE: 320
All Students
PROFICIENT
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 70
LEVEL 1
8
11%
LEVEL 2
18
26%
LEVEL 3
22
31%
LEVEL 4
22
31%
General Education
PROFICIENT
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 60
LEVEL 1
1
2%
LEVEL 2
16
27%
LEVEL 3
21
35%
LEVEL 4
22
37%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 10
LEVEL 1
7
70%
LEVEL 2
2
20%
LEVEL 3
1
10%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 7
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 61
LEVEL 1
5
8%
LEVEL 2
17
28%
LEVEL 3
19
31%
LEVEL 4
20
33%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
3
33%
LEVEL 2
1
11%
LEVEL 3
3
33%
LEVEL 4
2
22%
Female
PROFICIENT
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 42
LEVEL 1
5
12%
LEVEL 2
10
24%
LEVEL 3
16
38%
LEVEL 4
11
26%
Male
PROFICIENT
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 28
LEVEL 1
3
11%
LEVEL 2
8
29%
LEVEL 3
6
21%
LEVEL 4
11
39%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 69
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 20
LEVEL 1
4
20%
LEVEL 2
6
30%
LEVEL 3
5
25%
LEVEL 4
5
25%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 50
LEVEL 1
4
8%
LEVEL 2
12
24%
LEVEL 3
17
34%
LEVEL 4
17
34%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 70
LEVEL 1
8
11%
LEVEL 2
18
26%
LEVEL 3
22
31%
LEVEL 4
22
31%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
70
60
10
1
7
61
1
9
42
28
69
1
20
50
70
PROFICIENT
63%
72%
10%
_%
_%
64%
_%
56%
64%
61%
_%
_%
50%
68%
63%
LEVEL 1
8
11%
1
2%
7
70%
_
_
_
_
5
8%
_
_
3
33%
5
12%
3
11%
_
_
_
_
4
20%
4
8%
8
11%
LEVEL 2
18
26%
16
27%
2
20%
_
_
_
_
17
28%
_
_
1
11%
10
24%
8
29%
_
_
_
_
6
30%
12
24%
18
26%
LEVEL 3
22
31%
21
35%
1
10%
_
_
_
_
19
31%
_
_
3
33%
16
38%
6
21%
_
_
_
_
5
25%
17
34%
22
31%
LEVEL 4
22
31%
22
37%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
20
33%
_
_
2
22%
11
26%
11
39%
_
_
_
_
5
25%
17
34%
22
31%
Grade 5 Mathematics
MEAN SCORE: 317
All Students
PROFICIENT
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 69
LEVEL 1
11
16%
LEVEL 2
18
26%
LEVEL 3
32
46%
LEVEL 4
8
12%
General Education
PROFICIENT
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 63
LEVEL 1
6
10%
LEVEL 2
17
27%
LEVEL 3
32
51%
LEVEL 4
8
13%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
5
83%
LEVEL 2
1
17%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 66
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 69
LEVEL 1
11
16%
LEVEL 2
18
26%
LEVEL 3
32
46%
LEVEL 4
8
12%
Female
PROFICIENT
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 30
LEVEL 1
4
13%
LEVEL 2
7
23%
LEVEL 3
15
50%
LEVEL 4
4
13%
Male
PROFICIENT
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 39
LEVEL 1
7
18%
LEVEL 2
11
28%
LEVEL 3
17
44%
LEVEL 4
4
10%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 69
LEVEL 1
11
16%
LEVEL 2
18
26%
LEVEL 3
32
46%
LEVEL 4
8
12%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 19
LEVEL 1
7
37%
LEVEL 2
4
21%
LEVEL 3
7
37%
LEVEL 4
1
5%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 50
LEVEL 1
4
8%
LEVEL 2
14
28%
LEVEL 3
25
50%
LEVEL 4
7
14%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 69
LEVEL 1
11
16%
LEVEL 2
18
26%
LEVEL 3
32
46%
LEVEL 4
8
12%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
69
63
6
2
1
66
69
30
39
69
19
50
69
PROFICIENT
58%
63%
0%
_%
_%
_%
58%
63%
54%
58%
42%
64%
58%
LEVEL 1
11
16%
6
10%
5
83%
_
_
_
_
_
_
11
16%
4
13%
7
18%
11
16%
7
37%
4
8%
11
16%
LEVEL 2
18
26%
17
27%
1
17%
_
_
_
_
_
_
18
26%
7
23%
11
28%
18
26%
4
21%
14
28%
18
26%
LEVEL 3
32
46%
32
51%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
32
46%
15
50%
17
44%
32
46%
7
37%
25
50%
32
46%
LEVEL 4
8
12%
8
13%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
8
12%
4
13%
4
10%
8
12%
1
5%
7
14%
8
12%
Grade 6 Mathematics
MEAN SCORE: 320
All Students
PROFICIENT
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 69
LEVEL 1
9
13%
LEVEL 2
23
33%
LEVEL 3
18
26%
LEVEL 4
19
28%
General Education
PROFICIENT
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 60
LEVEL 1
5
8%
LEVEL 2
18
30%
LEVEL 3
18
30%
LEVEL 4
19
32%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
4
44%
LEVEL 2
5
56%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 65
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 69
LEVEL 1
9
13%
LEVEL 2
23
33%
LEVEL 3
18
26%
LEVEL 4
19
28%
Female
PROFICIENT
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 34
LEVEL 1
4
12%
LEVEL 2
10
29%
LEVEL 3
11
32%
LEVEL 4
9
26%
Male
PROFICIENT
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 35
LEVEL 1
5
14%
LEVEL 2
13
37%
LEVEL 3
7
20%
LEVEL 4
10
29%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 69
LEVEL 1
9
13%
LEVEL 2
23
33%
LEVEL 3
18
26%
LEVEL 4
19
28%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 16
LEVEL 1
3
19%
LEVEL 2
6
38%
LEVEL 3
5
31%
LEVEL 4
2
13%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 53
LEVEL 1
6
11%
LEVEL 2
17
32%
LEVEL 3
13
25%
LEVEL 4
17
32%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 69
LEVEL 1
9
13%
LEVEL 2
23
33%
LEVEL 3
18
26%
LEVEL 4
19
28%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
69
60
9
1
2
65
1
69
34
35
69
16
53
69
PROFICIENT
54%
62%
0%
_%
_%
_%
_%
54%
59%
49%
54%
44%
57%
54%
LEVEL 1
9
13%
5
8%
4
44%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
9
13%
4
12%
5
14%
9
13%
3
19%
6
11%
9
13%
LEVEL 2
23
33%
18
30%
5
56%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
23
33%
10
29%
13
37%
23
33%
6
38%
17
32%
23
33%
LEVEL 3
18
26%
18
30%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
18
26%
11
32%
7
20%
18
26%
5
31%
13
25%
18
26%
LEVEL 4
19
28%
19
32%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
19
28%
9
26%
10
29%
19
28%
2
13%
17
32%
19
28%
Grade 7 Mathematics
Mean scores and data in the table for grade 7 math include only those for grade 7 students who took the Grade 7 New York State Testing Program Assessment (NYSTP) in Mathematics. For 2015 and forward, data in the bar charts include those for grade 7 students who took the Grade 7 NYSTP in Mathematics and grade 7 students who took a Regents math test in lieu of the NYSTP. For 2014 and earlier, data in the bar charts include only those for grade 7 students who took the Grade 7 NYSTP.
MEAN SCORE: 317
All Students
PROFICIENT
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 73
LEVEL 1
13
18%
LEVEL 2
23
32%
LEVEL 3
27
37%
LEVEL 4
10
14%
General Education
PROFICIENT
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 60
LEVEL 1
4
7%
LEVEL 2
19
32%
LEVEL 3
27
45%
LEVEL 4
10
17%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 13
LEVEL 1
9
69%
LEVEL 2
4
31%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 68
LEVEL 1
12
18%
LEVEL 2
23
34%
LEVEL 3
23
34%
LEVEL 4
10
15%
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
1
20%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
4
80%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Female
PROFICIENT
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 37
LEVEL 1
4
11%
LEVEL 2
12
32%
LEVEL 3
17
46%
LEVEL 4
4
11%
Male
PROFICIENT
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 36
LEVEL 1
9
25%
LEVEL 2
11
31%
LEVEL 3
10
28%
LEVEL 4
6
17%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 73
LEVEL 1
13
18%
LEVEL 2
23
32%
LEVEL 3
27
37%
LEVEL 4
10
14%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 16
LEVEL 1
3
19%
LEVEL 2
9
56%
LEVEL 3
3
19%
LEVEL 4
1
6%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 57
LEVEL 1
10
18%
LEVEL 2
14
25%
LEVEL 3
24
42%
LEVEL 4
9
16%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 73
LEVEL 1
13
18%
LEVEL 2
23
32%
LEVEL 3
27
37%
LEVEL 4
10
14%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
73
60
13
2
3
68
5
37
36
73
16
57
73
PROFICIENT
51%
62%
0%
_%
_%
49%
80%
57%
44%
51%
25%
58%
51%
LEVEL 1
13
18%
4
7%
9
69%
_
_
_
_
12
18%
1
20%
4
11%
9
25%
13
18%
3
19%
10
18%
13
18%
LEVEL 2
23
32%
19
32%
4
31%
_
_
_
_
23
34%
0
0%
12
32%
11
31%
23
32%
9
56%
14
25%
23
32%
LEVEL 3
27
37%
27
45%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
23
34%
4
80%
17
46%
10
28%
27
37%
3
19%
24
42%
27
37%
LEVEL 4
10
14%
10
17%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
10
15%
0
0%
4
11%
6
17%
10
14%
1
6%
9
16%
10
14%
Grade 8 Mathematics
Mean scores and data in the table for grade 8 math include only those for grade 8 students who took the Grade 8 New York State Testing Program Assessment (NYSTP) in Mathematics. For 2015 and forward, data in the bar charts include those for grade 8 students who took the Grade 8 NYSTP in Mathematics and grade 8 students who took a Regents math test in lieu of the NYSTP. For 2014 and earlier, data in the bar charts include only those for grade 8 students who took the Grade 8 NYSTP.
MEAN SCORE: 305
All Students
PROFICIENT
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 33
LEVEL 1
4
12%
LEVEL 2
23
70%
LEVEL 3
6
18%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
General Education
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 31
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 30
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 33
LEVEL 1
4
12%
LEVEL 2
23
70%
LEVEL 3
6
18%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Female
PROFICIENT
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 19
LEVEL 1
1
5%
LEVEL 2
15
79%
LEVEL 3
3
16%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Male
PROFICIENT
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 14
LEVEL 1
3
21%
LEVEL 2
8
57%
LEVEL 3
3
21%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 33
LEVEL 1
4
12%
LEVEL 2
23
70%
LEVEL 3
6
18%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 11
LEVEL 1
3
27%
LEVEL 2
6
55%
LEVEL 3
2
18%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 22
LEVEL 1
1
5%
LEVEL 2
17
77%
LEVEL 3
4
18%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 33
LEVEL 1
4
12%
LEVEL 2
23
70%
LEVEL 3
6
18%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
33
31
2
30
3
33
19
14
33
11
22
33
PROFICIENT
18%
_%
_%
_%
_%
18%
16%
21%
18%
18%
18%
18%
LEVEL 1
4
12%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
4
12%
1
5%
3
21%
4
12%
3
27%
1
5%
4
12%
LEVEL 2
23
70%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
23
70%
15
79%
8
57%
23
70%
6
55%
17
77%
23
70%
LEVEL 3
6
18%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
6
18%
3
16%
3
21%
6
18%
2
18%
4
18%
6
18%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
Grade 8 Students Taking a Regents Math Test
Accelerated grade 8 students who took a Regents math test in lieu of the Grade 8 NYSTP in Mathematics.
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 21
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4 AND ABOVE
21
100%
LEVEL 3 AND ABOVE
21
100%
GROUP
All Students
TOTAL TESTED
21
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
4 & ABOVE
21
100%
3 & ABOVE
21
100%
Grade 4 Science
MEAN SCORE: 87
All Students
PROFICIENT
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 68
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
3
4%
LEVEL 3
11
16%
LEVEL 4
53
78%
General Education
PROFICIENT
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 59
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
2%
LEVEL 3
8
14%
LEVEL 4
50
85%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
1
11%
LEVEL 2
2
22%
LEVEL 3
3
33%
LEVEL 4
3
33%
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 60
LEVEL 1
1
2%
LEVEL 2
2
3%
LEVEL 3
11
18%
LEVEL 4
46
77%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 8
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
13%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
7
88%
Female
PROFICIENT
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 40
LEVEL 1
1
3%
LEVEL 2
2
5%
LEVEL 3
6
15%
LEVEL 4
31
78%
Male
PROFICIENT
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 28
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
4%
LEVEL 3
5
18%
LEVEL 4
22
79%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 67
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 18
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
11%
LEVEL 3
4
22%
LEVEL 4
12
67%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 50
LEVEL 1
1
2%
LEVEL 2
1
2%
LEVEL 3
7
14%
LEVEL 4
41
82%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 68
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
3
4%
LEVEL 3
11
16%
LEVEL 4
53
78%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
68
59
9
1
6
60
1
8
40
28
67
1
18
50
68
PROFICIENT
94%
98%
67%
_%
_%
95%
_%
88%
93%
96%
_%
_%
89%
96%
94%
LEVEL 1
1
1%
0
0%
1
11%
_
_
_
_
1
2%
_
_
0
0%
1
3%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
1
2%
1
1%
LEVEL 2
3
4%
1
2%
2
22%
_
_
_
_
2
3%
_
_
1
13%
2
5%
1
4%
_
_
_
_
2
11%
1
2%
3
4%
LEVEL 3
11
16%
8
14%
3
33%
_
_
_
_
11
18%
_
_
0
0%
6
15%
5
18%
_
_
_
_
4
22%
7
14%
11
16%
LEVEL 4
53
78%
50
85%
3
33%
_
_
_
_
46
77%
_
_
7
88%
31
78%
22
79%
_
_
_
_
12
67%
41
82%
53
78%
Grade 8 Science
Data in the bar charts include those for grade 8 students who took the New York State Grade 8 Science Test and grade 8 students who took a Regents science test in lieu of this test. Mean scores and data in the table for grade 8 science include only those for grade 8 students who took the New York State Grade 8 Science Test.
MEAN SCORE: 73
All Students
PROFICIENT
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 39
LEVEL 1
1
3%
LEVEL 2
9
23%
LEVEL 3
23
59%
LEVEL 4
6
15%
General Education
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 36
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 35
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 39
LEVEL 1
1
3%
LEVEL 2
9
23%
LEVEL 3
23
59%
LEVEL 4
6
15%
Female
PROFICIENT
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 23
LEVEL 1
1
4%
LEVEL 2
5
22%
LEVEL 3
14
61%
LEVEL 4
3
13%
Male
PROFICIENT
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 16
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
4
25%
LEVEL 3
9
56%
LEVEL 4
3
19%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 39
LEVEL 1
1
3%
LEVEL 2
9
23%
LEVEL 3
23
59%
LEVEL 4
6
15%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 13
LEVEL 1
1
8%
LEVEL 2
4
31%
LEVEL 3
6
46%
LEVEL 4
2
15%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 26
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
5
19%
LEVEL 3
17
65%
LEVEL 4
4
15%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 39
LEVEL 1
1
3%
LEVEL 2
9
23%
LEVEL 3
23
59%
LEVEL 4
6
15%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
39
36
3
1
35
3
39
23
16
39
13
26
39
PROFICIENT
74%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
74%
74%
75%
74%
62%
81%
74%
LEVEL 1
1
3%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
1
3%
1
4%
0
0%
1
3%
1
8%
0
0%
1
3%
LEVEL 2
9
23%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
9
23%
5
22%
4
25%
9
23%
4
31%
5
19%
9
23%
LEVEL 3
23
59%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
23
59%
14
61%
9
56%
23
59%
6
46%
17
65%
23
59%
LEVEL 4
6
15%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
6
15%
3
13%
3
19%
6
15%
2
15%
4
15%
6
15%
Grade 8 Students Taking a Regents Science Test
Accelerated grade 8 students who take a Regents science test in lieu of the New York State Grade 8 Science Test.
All Students
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 20
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
20
100%
GROUP
All Students
TOTAL TESTED
20
PROFICIENT
100%
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
20
100%
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level English Language Arts after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 82
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
2%
LEVEL 3
15
18%
LEVEL 4
60
73%
General Education
PROFICIENT
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 76
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
14
18%
LEVEL 4
60
79%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
33%
LEVEL 3
1
17%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 72
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
3%
LEVEL 3
12
17%
LEVEL 4
54
75%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 10
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
3
30%
LEVEL 4
6
60%
Female
PROFICIENT
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 41
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
2%
LEVEL 3
6
15%
LEVEL 4
34
83%
Male
PROFICIENT
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 41
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
2%
LEVEL 3
9
22%
LEVEL 4
26
63%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 82
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
2%
LEVEL 3
15
18%
LEVEL 4
60
73%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 15
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
7%
LEVEL 3
2
13%
LEVEL 4
10
67%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 67
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
1%
LEVEL 3
13
19%
LEVEL 4
50
75%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 82
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
2%
LEVEL 3
15
18%
LEVEL 4
60
73%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
82
76
6
1
2
3
72
4
10
41
41
82
15
67
82
PROFICIENT
91%
97%
17%
_%
_%
_%
92%
_%
90%
98%
85%
91%
80%
94%
91%
LEVEL 1
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
2%
0
0%
2
33%
_
_
_
_
_
_
2
3%
_
_
0
0%
1
2%
1
2%
2
2%
1
7%
1
1%
2
2%
LEVEL 3
15
18%
14
18%
1
17%
_
_
_
_
_
_
12
17%
_
_
3
30%
6
15%
9
22%
15
18%
2
13%
13
19%
15
18%
LEVEL 4
60
73%
60
79%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
54
75%
_
_
6
60%
34
83%
26
63%
60
73%
10
67%
50
75%
60
73%
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level Mathematics after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 82
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
3
4%
LEVEL 3
36
44%
LEVEL 4
40
49%
General Education
PROFICIENT
99%
TOTAL TESTED: 76
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
1%
LEVEL 3
35
46%
LEVEL 4
40
53%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
1
17%
LEVEL 2
2
33%
LEVEL 3
1
17%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 72
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
2
3%
LEVEL 3
32
44%
LEVEL 4
35
49%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 10
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
10%
LEVEL 3
4
40%
LEVEL 4
5
50%
Female
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 41
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
20
49%
LEVEL 4
21
51%
Male
PROFICIENT
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 41
LEVEL 1
1
2%
LEVEL 2
3
7%
LEVEL 3
16
39%
LEVEL 4
19
46%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 82
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
3
4%
LEVEL 3
36
44%
LEVEL 4
40
49%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 15
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
11
73%
LEVEL 4
3
20%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 67
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
3
4%
LEVEL 3
25
37%
LEVEL 4
37
55%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 82
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
3
4%
LEVEL 3
36
44%
LEVEL 4
40
49%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
82
76
6
1
2
3
72
4
10
41
41
82
15
67
82
PROFICIENT
93%
99%
17%
_%
_%
_%
93%
_%
90%
100%
85%
93%
93%
93%
93%
LEVEL 1
1
1%
0
0%
1
17%
_
_
_
_
_
_
1
1%
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
1
2%
1
1%
0
0%
1
1%
1
1%
LEVEL 2
3
4%
1
1%
2
33%
_
_
_
_
_
_
2
3%
_
_
1
10%
0
0%
3
7%
3
4%
0
0%
3
4%
3
4%
LEVEL 3
36
44%
35
46%
1
17%
_
_
_
_
_
_
32
44%
_
_
4
40%
20
49%
16
39%
36
44%
11
73%
25
37%
36
44%
LEVEL 4
40
49%
40
53%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
35
49%
_
_
5
50%
21
51%
19
46%
40
49%
3
20%
37
55%
40
49%
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level Global History and Geography after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 82
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
2
2%
LEVEL 3
35
43%
LEVEL 4
39
48%
General Education
PROFICIENT
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 76
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
1%
LEVEL 3
34
45%
LEVEL 4
39
51%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
1
17%
LEVEL 2
1
17%
LEVEL 3
1
17%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 72
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
1
1%
LEVEL 3
30
42%
LEVEL 4
36
50%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 10
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
10%
LEVEL 3
5
50%
LEVEL 4
3
30%
Female
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 41
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
21
51%
LEVEL 4
20
49%
Male
PROFICIENT
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 41
LEVEL 1
1
2%
LEVEL 2
2
5%
LEVEL 3
14
34%
LEVEL 4
19
46%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 82
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
2
2%
LEVEL 3
35
43%
LEVEL 4
39
48%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 15
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
10
67%
LEVEL 4
3
20%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 67
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
2
3%
LEVEL 3
25
37%
LEVEL 4
36
54%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 82
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
2
2%
LEVEL 3
35
43%
LEVEL 4
39
48%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
82
76
6
1
2
3
72
4
10
41
41
82
15
67
82
PROFICIENT
90%
96%
17%
_%
_%
_%
92%
_%
80%
100%
80%
90%
87%
91%
90%
LEVEL 1
1
1%
0
0%
1
17%
_
_
_
_
_
_
1
1%
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
1
2%
1
1%
0
0%
1
1%
1
1%
LEVEL 2
2
2%
1
1%
1
17%
_
_
_
_
_
_
1
1%
_
_
1
10%
0
0%
2
5%
2
2%
0
0%
2
3%
2
2%
LEVEL 3
35
43%
34
45%
1
17%
_
_
_
_
_
_
30
42%
_
_
5
50%
21
51%
14
34%
35
43%
10
67%
25
37%
35
43%
LEVEL 4
39
48%
39
51%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
36
50%
_
_
3
30%
20
49%
19
46%
39
48%
3
20%
36
54%
39
48%
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level U.S. History and Government after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 82
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
1%
LEVEL 3
14
17%
LEVEL 4
62
76%
General Education
PROFICIENT
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 76
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
12
16%
LEVEL 4
62
82%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
17%
LEVEL 3
2
33%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 72
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
1%
LEVEL 3
12
17%
LEVEL 4
55
76%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 10
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
2
20%
LEVEL 4
7
70%
Female
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 41
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
10
24%
LEVEL 4
31
76%
Male
PROFICIENT
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 41
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
2%
LEVEL 3
4
10%
LEVEL 4
31
76%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 82
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
1%
LEVEL 3
14
17%
LEVEL 4
62
76%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 15
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
4
27%
LEVEL 4
9
60%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 67
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
1%
LEVEL 3
10
15%
LEVEL 4
53
79%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 82
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
1%
LEVEL 3
14
17%
LEVEL 4
62
76%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
82
76
6
1
2
3
72
4
10
41
41
82
15
67
82
PROFICIENT
93%
97%
33%
_%
_%
_%
93%
_%
90%
100%
85%
93%
87%
94%
93%
LEVEL 1
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
1%
0
0%
1
17%
_
_
_
_
_
_
1
1%
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
1
2%
1
1%
0
0%
1
1%
1
1%
LEVEL 3
14
17%
12
16%
2
33%
_
_
_
_
_
_
12
17%
_
_
2
20%
10
24%
4
10%
14
17%
4
27%
10
15%
14
17%
LEVEL 4
62
76%
62
82%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
55
76%
_
_
7
70%
31
76%
31
76%
62
76%
9
60%
53
79%
62
76%
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level Science after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 82
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
1%
LEVEL 3
32
39%
LEVEL 4
47
57%
General Education
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 76
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
29
38%
LEVEL 4
47
62%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
17%
LEVEL 3
3
50%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 72
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
1%
LEVEL 3
26
36%
LEVEL 4
43
60%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 10
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
6
60%
LEVEL 4
4
40%
Female
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 41
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
16
39%
LEVEL 4
25
61%
Male
PROFICIENT
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 41
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
2%
LEVEL 3
16
39%
LEVEL 4
22
54%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 82
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
1%
LEVEL 3
32
39%
LEVEL 4
47
57%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 15
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
10
67%
LEVEL 4
5
33%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 67
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
1%
LEVEL 3
22
33%
LEVEL 4
42
63%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 82
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
1%
LEVEL 3
32
39%
LEVEL 4
47
57%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
82
76
6
1
2
3
72
4
10
41
41
82
15
67
82
PROFICIENT
96%
100%
50%
_%
_%
_%
96%
_%
100%
100%
93%
96%
100%
96%
96%
LEVEL 1
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
1%
0
0%
1
17%
_
_
_
_
_
_
1
1%
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
1
2%
1
1%
0
0%
1
1%
1
1%
LEVEL 3
32
39%
29
38%
3
50%
_
_
_
_
_
_
26
36%
_
_
6
60%
16
39%
16
39%
32
39%
10
67%
22
33%
32
39%
LEVEL 4
47
57%
47
62%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
43
60%
_
_
4
40%
25
61%
22
54%
47
57%
5
33%
42
63%
47
57%
Regents Examination Results (2016 - 17)
English Language Arts (Common Core)
English Language Arts (Common Core)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
104
85
19
2
1
99
2
5
58
46
104
29
75
104
LEVEL 1
11
11%
5
6%
6
32%
_
_
_
_
11
11%
_
_
0
0%
3
5%
8
17%
11
11%
9
31%
2
3%
11
11%
LEVEL 2
8
8%
4
5%
4
21%
_
_
_
_
8
8%
_
_
0
0%
1
2%
7
15%
8
8%
3
10%
5
7%
8
8%
LEVEL 3
19
18%
10
12%
9
47%
_
_
_
_
17
17%
_
_
2
40%
9
16%
10
22%
19
18%
5
17%
14
19%
19
18%
LEVEL 4
18
17%
18
21%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
17
17%
_
_
1
20%
10
17%
8
17%
18
17%
8
28%
10
13%
18
17%
LEVEL 5
48
46%
48
56%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
46
46%
_
_
2
40%
35
60%
13
28%
48
46%
4
14%
44
59%
48
46%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 104
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
11
11%
LEVEL 2
8
8%
LEVEL 3
19
18%
LEVEL 4
18
17%
LEVEL 5
48
46%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 85
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
5
6%
LEVEL 2
4
5%
LEVEL 3
10
12%
LEVEL 4
18
21%
LEVEL 5
48
56%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 19
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
6
32%
LEVEL 2
4
21%
LEVEL 3
9
47%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 99
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
11
11%
LEVEL 2
8
8%
LEVEL 3
17
17%
LEVEL 4
17
17%
LEVEL 5
46
46%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
2
40%
LEVEL 4
1
20%
LEVEL 5
2
40%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 58
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
3
5%
LEVEL 2
1
2%
LEVEL 3
9
16%
LEVEL 4
10
17%
LEVEL 5
35
60%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 46
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
8
17%
LEVEL 2
7
15%
LEVEL 3
10
22%
LEVEL 4
8
17%
LEVEL 5
13
28%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 104
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
11
11%
LEVEL 2
8
8%
LEVEL 3
19
18%
LEVEL 4
18
17%
LEVEL 5
48
46%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 29
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
9
31%
LEVEL 2
3
10%
LEVEL 3
5
17%
LEVEL 4
8
28%
LEVEL 5
4
14%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 75
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
2
3%
LEVEL 2
5
7%
LEVEL 3
14
19%
LEVEL 4
10
13%
LEVEL 5
44
59%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 104
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
11
11%
LEVEL 2
8
8%
LEVEL 3
19
18%
LEVEL 4
18
17%
LEVEL 5
48
46%
Algebra 2/Trigonometry
Regents Algebra 2/Trigonometry
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
9
9
1
8
9
7
2
9
1
8
9
55
9
100%
9
100%
_
_
_
_
9
100%
_
_
_
_
9
100%
_
_
_
_
9
100%
65
8
89%
8
89%
_
_
_
_
8
89%
_
_
_
_
8
89%
_
_
_
_
8
89%
85
3
33%
3
33%
_
_
_
_
3
33%
_
_
_
_
3
33%
_
_
_
_
3
33%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 9
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
9
100%
65
8
89%
85
3
33%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 9
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
9
100%
65
8
89%
85
3
33%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 8
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 9
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
9
100%
65
8
89%
85
3
33%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 7
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 9
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
9
100%
65
8
89%
85
3
33%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 8
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 9
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
9
100%
65
8
89%
85
3
33%
Algebra I (Common Core)
Algebra I (Common Core)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
94
84
10
1
2
1
89
1
5
42
52
94
18
76
94
LEVEL 1
7
7%
2
2%
5
50%
_
_
_
_
_
_
7
8%
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
7
13%
7
7%
3
17%
4
5%
7
7%
LEVEL 2
4
4%
4
5%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
4
4%
_
_
0
0%
3
7%
1
2%
4
4%
2
11%
2
3%
4
4%
LEVEL 3
37
39%
32
38%
5
50%
_
_
_
_
_
_
35
39%
_
_
2
40%
15
36%
22
42%
37
39%
10
56%
27
36%
37
39%
LEVEL 4
24
26%
24
29%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
22
25%
_
_
2
40%
12
29%
12
23%
24
26%
3
17%
21
28%
24
26%
LEVEL 5
22
23%
22
26%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
21
24%
_
_
1
20%
12
29%
10
19%
22
23%
0
0%
22
29%
22
23%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 94
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
7
7%
LEVEL 2
4
4%
LEVEL 3
37
39%
LEVEL 4
24
26%
LEVEL 5
22
23%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 84
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
2
2%
LEVEL 2
4
5%
LEVEL 3
32
38%
LEVEL 4
24
29%
LEVEL 5
22
26%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 10
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
5
50%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
5
50%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 89
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
7
8%
LEVEL 2
4
4%
LEVEL 3
35
39%
LEVEL 4
22
25%
LEVEL 5
21
24%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
2
40%
LEVEL 4
2
40%
LEVEL 5
1
20%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 42
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
3
7%
LEVEL 3
15
36%
LEVEL 4
12
29%
LEVEL 5
12
29%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 52
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
7
13%
LEVEL 2
1
2%
LEVEL 3
22
42%
LEVEL 4
12
23%
LEVEL 5
10
19%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 94
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
7
7%
LEVEL 2
4
4%
LEVEL 3
37
39%
LEVEL 4
24
26%
LEVEL 5
22
23%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 18
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
3
17%
LEVEL 2
2
11%
LEVEL 3
10
56%
LEVEL 4
3
17%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 76
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
4
5%
LEVEL 2
2
3%
LEVEL 3
27
36%
LEVEL 4
21
28%
LEVEL 5
22
29%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 94
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
7
7%
LEVEL 2
4
4%
LEVEL 3
37
39%
LEVEL 4
24
26%
LEVEL 5
22
23%
Common Core Geometry
Regents Common Core Geometry
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
70
70
2
1
66
1
70
39
31
70
9
61
70
LEVEL 1
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
LEVEL 2
7
10%
7
10%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
7
10%
6
15%
1
3%
7
10%
1
11%
6
10%
7
10%
LEVEL 3
29
41%
29
41%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
29
41%
18
46%
11
35%
29
41%
5
56%
24
39%
29
41%
LEVEL 4
15
21%
15
21%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
15
21%
7
18%
8
26%
15
21%
1
11%
14
23%
15
21%
LEVEL 5
19
27%
19
27%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
19
27%
8
21%
11
35%
19
27%
2
22%
17
28%
19
27%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 70
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
7
10%
LEVEL 3
29
41%
LEVEL 4
15
21%
LEVEL 5
19
27%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 70
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
7
10%
LEVEL 3
29
41%
LEVEL 4
15
21%
LEVEL 5
19
27%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 66
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 70
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
7
10%
LEVEL 3
29
41%
LEVEL 4
15
21%
LEVEL 5
19
27%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 39
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
6
15%
LEVEL 3
18
46%
LEVEL 4
7
18%
LEVEL 5
8
21%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 31
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
3%
LEVEL 3
11
35%
LEVEL 4
8
26%
LEVEL 5
11
35%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 70
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
7
10%
LEVEL 3
29
41%
LEVEL 4
15
21%
LEVEL 5
19
27%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 9
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
11%
LEVEL 3
5
56%
LEVEL 4
1
11%
LEVEL 5
2
22%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 61
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
6
10%
LEVEL 3
24
39%
LEVEL 4
14
23%
LEVEL 5
17
28%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 70
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
7
10%
LEVEL 3
29
41%
LEVEL 4
15
21%
LEVEL 5
19
27%
Algebra II (Common Core)
Algebra II (Common Core)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
44
44
1
1
41
1
44
33
11
44
4
40
44
LEVEL 1
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
LEVEL 3
25
57%
25
57%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
25
57%
20
61%
5
45%
25
57%
_
_
_
_
25
57%
LEVEL 4
15
34%
15
34%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
15
34%
11
33%
4
36%
15
34%
_
_
_
_
15
34%
LEVEL 5
4
9%
4
9%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
4
9%
2
6%
2
18%
4
9%
_
_
_
_
4
9%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 44
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
25
57%
LEVEL 4
15
34%
LEVEL 5
4
9%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 44
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
25
57%
LEVEL 4
15
34%
LEVEL 5
4
9%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 41
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 44
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
25
57%
LEVEL 4
15
34%
LEVEL 5
4
9%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 33
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
20
61%
LEVEL 4
11
33%
LEVEL 5
2
6%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 11
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
5
45%
LEVEL 4
4
36%
LEVEL 5
2
18%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 44
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
25
57%
LEVEL 4
15
34%
LEVEL 5
4
9%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 4
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 40
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 44
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
25
57%
LEVEL 4
15
34%
LEVEL 5
4
9%
Global History and Geography
Regents Global History and Geography
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
96
79
17
1
1
2
92
96
48
48
96
18
78
96
55
86
90%
76
96%
10
59%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
86
90%
45
94%
41
85%
86
90%
13
72%
73
94%
86
90%
65
74
77%
69
87%
5
29%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
74
77%
40
83%
34
71%
74
77%
7
39%
67
86%
74
77%
85
42
44%
42
53%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
42
44%
21
44%
21
44%
42
44%
2
11%
40
51%
42
44%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 96
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
86
90%
65
74
77%
85
42
44%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 79
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
76
96%
65
69
87%
85
42
53%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 17
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
10
59%
65
5
29%
85
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 92
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 96
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
86
90%
65
74
77%
85
42
44%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 48
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
45
94%
65
40
83%
85
21
44%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 48
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
41
85%
65
34
71%
85
21
44%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 96
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
86
90%
65
74
77%
85
42
44%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 18
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
13
72%
65
7
39%
85
2
11%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 78
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
73
94%
65
67
86%
85
40
51%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 96
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
86
90%
65
74
77%
85
42
44%
U.S. History & Government
Regents U.S. History & Government
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
108
87
21
2
1
103
2
5
58
50
108
29
79
108
55
101
94%
85
98%
16
76%
_
_
_
_
97
94%
_
_
4
80%
55
95%
46
92%
101
94%
23
79%
78
99%
101
94%
65
97
90%
84
97%
13
62%
_
_
_
_
93
90%
_
_
4
80%
54
93%
43
86%
97
90%
22
76%
75
95%
97
90%
85
66
61%
65
75%
1
5%
_
_
_
_
63
61%
_
_
3
60%
40
69%
26
52%
66
61%
13
45%
53
67%
66
61%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 108
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
101
94%
65
97
90%
85
66
61%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 87
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
85
98%
65
84
97%
85
65
75%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 21
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
16
76%
65
13
62%
85
1
5%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 103
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
97
94%
65
93
90%
85
63
61%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
4
80%
65
4
80%
85
3
60%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 58
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
55
95%
65
54
93%
85
40
69%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 50
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
46
92%
65
43
86%
85
26
52%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 108
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
101
94%
65
97
90%
85
66
61%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 29
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
23
79%
65
22
76%
85
13
45%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 79
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
78
99%
65
75
95%
85
53
67%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 108
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
101
94%
65
97
90%
85
66
61%
Living Environment
Regents Living Environment
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
92
76
16
1
3
86
2
6
43
49
91
1
22
70
92
55
88
96%
75
99%
13
81%
_
_
_
_
83
97%
_
_
5
83%
41
95%
47
96%
_
_
_
_
19
86%
69
99%
88
96%
65
79
86%
70
92%
9
56%
_
_
_
_
74
86%
_
_
5
83%
38
88%
41
84%
_
_
_
_
17
77%
62
89%
79
86%
85
38
41%
37
49%
1
6%
_
_
_
_
35
41%
_
_
3
50%
20
47%
18
37%
_
_
_
_
3
14%
35
50%
38
41%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 92
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
88
96%
65
79
86%
85
38
41%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 76
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
75
99%
65
70
92%
85
37
49%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 16
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
13
81%
65
9
56%
85
1
6%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 86
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
83
97%
65
74
86%
85
35
41%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 6
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
5
83%
65
5
83%
85
3
50%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 43
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
41
95%
65
38
88%
85
20
47%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 49
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
47
96%
65
41
84%
85
18
37%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 91
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 22
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
19
86%
65
17
77%
85
3
14%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 70
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
69
99%
65
62
89%
85
35
50%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 92
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
88
96%
65
79
86%
85
38
41%
Physical Setting/Earth Science
Regents Physical Setting/Earth Science
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
67
66
1
1
1
65
67
34
33
67
7
60
67
55
67
100%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
67
100%
34
100%
33
100%
67
100%
7
100%
60
100%
67
100%
65
66
99%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
66
99%
33
97%
33
100%
66
99%
6
86%
60
100%
66
99%
85
42
63%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
42
63%
18
53%
24
73%
42
63%
4
57%
38
63%
42
63%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 67
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
67
100%
65
66
99%
85
42
63%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 66
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 65
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 67
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
67
100%
65
66
99%
85
42
63%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 34
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
34
100%
65
33
97%
85
18
53%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 33
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
33
100%
65
33
100%
85
24
73%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 67
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
67
100%
65
66
99%
85
42
63%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 7
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
7
100%
65
6
86%
85
4
57%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 60
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
60
100%
65
60
100%
85
38
63%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 67
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
67
100%
65
66
99%
85
42
63%
Physical Setting/Chemistry
Regents Physical Setting/Chemistry
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
62
62
1
1
59
1
62
44
18
62
6
56
62
55
62
100%
62
100%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
62
100%
44
100%
18
100%
62
100%
6
100%
56
100%
62
100%
65
57
92%
57
92%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
57
92%
41
93%
16
89%
57
92%
6
100%
51
91%
57
92%
85
27
44%
27
44%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
27
44%
16
36%
11
61%
27
44%
1
17%
26
46%
27
44%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 62
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
62
100%
65
57
92%
85
27
44%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 62
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
62
100%
65
57
92%
85
27
44%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 59
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 62
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
62
100%
65
57
92%
85
27
44%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 44
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
44
100%
65
41
93%
85
16
36%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 18
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
18
100%
65
16
89%
85
11
61%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 62
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
62
100%
65
57
92%
85
27
44%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 6
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
6
100%
65
6
100%
85
1
17%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 56
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
56
100%
65
51
91%
85
26
46%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 62
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
62
100%
65
57
92%
85
27
44%
Physical Setting/Physics
Regents Physical Setting/Physics
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
27
27
1
2
24
27
11
16
27
3
24
27
55
19
70%
19
70%
_
_
_
_
_
_
19
70%
8
73%
11
69%
19
70%
_
_
_
_
19
70%
65
15
56%
15
56%
_
_
_
_
_
_
15
56%
8
73%
7
44%
15
56%
_
_
_
_
15
56%
85
3
11%
3
11%
_
_
_
_
_
_
3
11%
0
0%
3
19%
3
11%
_
_
_
_
3
11%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 27
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
19
70%
65
15
56%
85
3
11%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 27
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
19
70%
65
15
56%
85
3
11%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 24
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 27
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
19
70%
65
15
56%
85
3
11%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 11
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
8
73%
65
8
73%
85
0
0%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 16
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
11
69%
65
7
44%
85
3
19%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 27
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
19
70%
65
15
56%
85
3
11%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 24
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 27
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
19
70%
65
15
56%
85
3
11%
New York State Alternate Assessment (NYSAA) Results (2016 - 17)
GROUP
Grade 3 ELA
Grade 3 Math
Grade 4 ELA
Grade 4 Math
Grade 4 Science
Grade 5 ELA
Grade 5 Math
Grade 7 ELA
Grade 7 Math
Grade 8 ELA
Grade 8 Math
Grade 8 Science
TOTAL TESTED
2
2
3
3
2
1
1
2
2
1
1
2
PROFICIENT
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
LEVEL 1
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
Grade 3 ELA
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 3 Math
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 4 ELA
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 4 Math
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 4 Science
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 5 ELA
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 5 Math
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 7 ELA
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 7 Math
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 8 ELA
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 8 Math
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 8 Science
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
New York State English as a Second Language Achievement Test (NYSESLAT) Results (2016 - 17)
Grade 2
GROUP
All Students
General Education
TOTAL TESTED
1
1
ENTERING
_
_
EMERGING
_
_
TRANSITIONING
_
_
EXPANDING
_
_
COMMANDING
_
_
Grade 4
GROUP
All Students
General Education
TOTAL TESTED
1
1
ENTERING
_
_
EMERGING
_
_
TRANSITIONING
_
_
EXPANDING
_
_
COMMANDING
_
_
Grade 9
GROUP
All Students
General Education
TOTAL TESTED
1
1
ENTERING
_
_
EMERGING
_
_
TRANSITIONING
_
_
EXPANDING
_
_
COMMANDING
_
_
Grade 2
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 1
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 1
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
Grade 4
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 1
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 1
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
Grade 9
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 1
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 1
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
Elementary/Middle-Level English Language Arts Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: NO
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
NO
―
―
―
―
NO
―
NO
―
NO
Tested 95%
NO
―
―
―
―
NO
―
NO
―
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,016*
0
6
17
3
950*
7
136*
1
319*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
82%*
―
―
―
―
82%*
―
82%*
―
79%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
NO
―
NO
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
410
0
4
14
3
383
6
61✝
1
121
PI
122
―
―
―
―
122
―
51✝
―
92
EAMO
106
―
―
―
―
118
―
73
―
93
Safe Harbor Target
106
―
―
―
―
118
―
61
―
93
All Students
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,016*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
82%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
410
PI
122
EAMO
106
Safe Harbor Target
106
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
6
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
4
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
17
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
14
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
3
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
3
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
White
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
950*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
82%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
383
PI
122
EAMO
118
Safe Harbor Target
118
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
7
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
6
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
136*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
82%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
61✝
PI
51✝
EAMO
73
Safe Harbor Target
61
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
319*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
79%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
121
PI
92
EAMO
93
Safe Harbor Target
93
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,016*
1,001*
983*
1,006*
33
1,008*
880*
1,013*
697*
505*
511*
0
1,016*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
82%*
82%*
82%*
82%*
―
82%*
82%*
82%*
84%*
82%*
82%*
―
82%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
410
406
396
407
27
404
352
409
289
200
210
0
410
PI
122
123
122
122
―
122
134
122
135
109
136
―
122
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,016*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
82%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
410
PI
122
Not Black or African American
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,001*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
82%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
406
PI
123
Not Hispanic or Latino
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
983*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
82%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
396
PI
122
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,006*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
82%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
407
PI
122
Not White
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
33
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
27
PI
―
Not Multiracial
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,008*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
82%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
404
PI
122
General Education
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
880*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
82%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
352
PI
134
English Proficient
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,013*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
82%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
409
PI
122
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
697*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
84%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
289
PI
135
Male
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
505*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
82%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
200
PI
109
Female
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
511*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
82%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
210
PI
136
Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,016*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
82%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
410
PI
122
― There were fewer than 40 students enrolled during the test administration period, so the Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 tested students enrolled on BEDS day and during the test administration period, so the PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed. *The percentage of students tested in the current year fell below 95 percent, so the numbers of enrolled and tested students in the current year and previous year were combined to provide the school/district with another opportunity to meet the participation rate criterion. ✝ Includes former students with disabilities because the number of students with disabilities in the current year is equal to or greater than 30.
Elementary/Middle-Level Mathematics Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: NO
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
NO
―
―
―
―
NO
―
NO
―
NO
Tested 95%
NO
―
―
―
―
NO
―
NO
―
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,013*
0
6
16
3
948*
7
136*
1
314*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
80%*
―
―
―
―
80%*
―
78%*
―
74%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
NO
―
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
406
0
4
14
3
379
6
58✝
1
114
PI
140
―
―
―
―
140
―
59✝
―
110
EAMO
104
―
―
―
―
115
―
73
―
90
Safe Harbor Target
104
―
―
―
―
115
―
73
―
90
All Students
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,013*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
80%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
406
PI
140
EAMO
104
Safe Harbor Target
104
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
6
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
4
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
16
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
14
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
3
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
3
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
White
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
948*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
80%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
379
PI
140
EAMO
115
Safe Harbor Target
115
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
7
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
6
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
136*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
78%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
58✝
PI
59✝
EAMO
73
Safe Harbor Target
73
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
314*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
74%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
114
PI
110
EAMO
90
Safe Harbor Target
90
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,013*
998*
981*
1,003*
32
1,005*
877*
1,010*
699*
503*
510*
0
1,013*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
80%*
80%*
80%*
80%*
―
80%*
81%*
80%*
83%*
80%*
80%*
―
80%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
406
402
392
403
27
400
351
405
292
200
206
0
406
PI
140
140
141
140
―
140
154
140
152
135
146
―
140
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,013*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
80%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
406
PI
140
Not Black or African American
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
998*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
80%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
402
PI
140
Not Hispanic or Latino
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
981*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
80%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
392
PI
141
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,003*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
80%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
403
PI
140
Not White
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
32
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
27
PI
―
Not Multiracial
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,005*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
80%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
400
PI
140
General Education
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
877*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
81%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
351
PI
154
English Proficient
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,010*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
80%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
405
PI
140
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
699*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
83%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
292
PI
152
Male
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
503*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
80%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
200
PI
135
Female
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
510*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
80%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
206
PI
146
Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,013*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
80%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
406
PI
140
― There were fewer than 40 students enrolled during the test administration period, so the Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 tested students enrolled on BEDS day and during the test administration period, so the PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed. *The percentage of students tested in the current year fell below 95 percent, so the numbers of enrolled and tested students in the current year and previous year were combined to provide the school/district with another opportunity to meet the participation rate criterion. ✝ Includes former students with disabilities because the number of students with disabilities in the current year is equal to or greater than 30.
Elementary/Middle-Level Science Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: NO
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
NO
Tested 80%
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
161
0
3
7
0
145
6
18
1
104*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
81%
―
―
―
―
81%
―
―
―
72%*
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
130
0
2
6
0
117
5
15
1
35
PI
189
―
―
―
―
190
―
―
―
177
EAMO
180
―
―
―
―
185
―
―
―
167
Progress Target
180
―
―
―
―
185
―
―
―
167
All Students
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 80%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
161
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
81%
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
130
PI
189
EAMO
180
Progress Target
180
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
3
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
2
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
7
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
6
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
White
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 80%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
145
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
81%
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
117
PI
190
EAMO
185
Progress Target
185
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
6
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
5
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
18
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
15
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 80%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
104*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
72%*
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
35
PI
177
EAMO
167
Progress Target
167
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
161
158
154
161
16
155
143
160
115
172*
88
0
161
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
81%
82%
81%
81%
―
81%
80%
81%
83%
77%*
84%
―
81%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
130
128
124
130
13
125
115
129
95
57
73
0
130
PI
189
189
190
189
―
190
192
189
194
191
188
―
189
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
161
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
81%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
130
PI
189
Not Black or African American
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
158
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
82%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
128
PI
189
Not Hispanic or Latino
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
154
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
81%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
124
PI
190
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
161
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
81%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
130
PI
189
Not White
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
16
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
13
PI
―
Not Multiracial
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
155
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
81%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
125
PI
190
General Education
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
143
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
80%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
115
PI
192
English Proficient
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
160
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
81%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
129
PI
189
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
115
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
83%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
95
PI
194
Male
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
172*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
77%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
57
PI
191
Female
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
88
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
84%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
73
PI
188
Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
161
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
81%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
130
PI
189
― There were fewer than 40 students enrolled during the test administration period, so the Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 tested students enrolled on BEDS day and during the test administration period, so the PI, EAMO, and Progress Target data are suppressed. *The percentage of students tested in the current year fell below 80 percent, so the numbers of enrolled and tested students in the current year and previous year were combined to provide the school/district with another opportunity to meet the participation rate criterion.
Secondary-Level English Language Arts Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: NO
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
YES
―
―
―
―
NO
―
―
―
―
Tested 95%
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
―
12th graders
84
0
2
2
1
75
4
4
0
15
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
―
―
―
―
100%
―
―
―
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
―
―
―
―
NO
―
―
―
―
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
79
0
2
2
1
70
4
5
0
14
PI
171
―
―
―
―
171
―
―
―
―
EAMO
167
―
―
―
―
175
―
―
―
―
Safe Harbor Target
167
―
―
―
―
175
―
―
―
―
All Students
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
YES
12th Graders
84
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
79
PI
171
EAMO
167
Safe Harbor Target
167
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
2
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
2
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
2
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
2
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
1
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
1
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
White
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
YES
12th Graders
75
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
70
PI
171
EAMO
175
Safe Harbor Target
175
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
4
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
4
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
4
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
5
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
15
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
14
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
12th Graders
84
82
82
83
9
80
80
84
69
40
44
0
84
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
100%
100%
100%
―
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
―
100%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
79
77
77
78
9
75
74
79
65
38
41
0
79
PI
171
170
170
172
―
172
181
171
174
161
180
―
171
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
12th Graders
84
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
79
PI
171
Not Black or African American
12th Graders
82
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
77
PI
170
Not Hispanic or Latino
12th Graders
82
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
77
PI
170
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
12th Graders
83
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
78
PI
172
Not White
12th Graders
9
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
9
PI
―
Not Multiracial
12th Graders
80
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
75
PI
172
General Education
12th Graders
80
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
74
PI
181
English Proficient
12th Graders
84
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
79
PI
171
Not Economically Disadvantaged
12th Graders
69
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
65
PI
174
Male
12th Graders
40
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
38
PI
161
Female
12th Graders
44
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
41
PI
180
Migrant
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
Not Migrant
12th Graders
84
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
79
PI
171
― There were fewer than 40 12th graders, so the Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 students in the 2013 accountability cohort, so PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed.
Secondary-Level Mathematics Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: NO
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
YES
―
―
―
―
NO
―
―
―
―
Tested 95%
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
―
12th graders
84
0
2
2
1
75
4
4
0
15
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
―
―
―
―
100%
―
―
―
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
―
―
―
―
NO
―
―
―
―
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
79
0
2
2
1
70
4
5
0
14
PI
161
―
―
―
―
161
―
―
―
―
EAMO
154
―
―
―
―
164
―
―
―
―
Safe Harbor Target
154
―
―
―
―
164
―
―
―
―
All Students
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
YES
12th Graders
84
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
79
PI
161
EAMO
154
Safe Harbor Target
154
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
2
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
2
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
2
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
2
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
1
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
1
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
White
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
YES
12th Graders
75
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
70
PI
161
EAMO
164
Safe Harbor Target
164
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
4
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
4
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
4
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
5
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
15
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
14
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
12th Graders
84
82
82
83
9
80
80
84
69
40
44
0
84
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
100%
100%
100%
―
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
―
100%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
79
77
77
78
9
75
74
79
65
38
41
0
79
PI
161
160
161
160
―
163
170
161
168
155
166
―
161
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
12th Graders
84
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
79
PI
161
Not Black or African American
12th Graders
82
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
77
PI
160
Not Hispanic or Latino
12th Graders
82
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
77
PI
161
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
12th Graders
83
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
78
PI
160
Not White
12th Graders
9
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
9
PI
―
Not Multiracial
12th Graders
80
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
75
PI
163
General Education
12th Graders
80
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
74
PI
170
English Proficient
12th Graders
84
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
79
PI
161
Not Economically Disadvantaged
12th Graders
69
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
65
PI
168
Male
12th Graders
40
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
38
PI
155
Female
12th Graders
44
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
41
PI
166
Migrant
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
Not Migrant
12th Graders
84
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
79
PI
161
― There were fewer than 40 12th graders, so the Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 students in the 2013 accountability cohort, so PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed.
Unweighted Combined ELA and Math PIs
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
122
―
―
―
―
122
―
51
―
92
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
140
―
―
―
―
140
―
59
―
110
Secondary-Level ELA PI
171
―
―
―
―
171
―
―
―
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
161
―
―
―
―
161
―
―
―
―
UNWEIGHTED COMBINED PI
149
0
0
0
0
149
0
55
0
101
All Students
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
122
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
140
Secondary-Level ELA PI
171
Secondary-Level MATH PI
161
Unweighted Combined PI
149
American Indian or Alaska Native
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Black or African American
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Hispanic or Latino
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
White
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
122
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
140
Secondary-Level ELA PI
171
Secondary-Level MATH PI
161
Unweighted Combined PI
149
Multiracial
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Students With Disabilities
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
51
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
59
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
55
Limited English Proficient
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Economically Disadvantaged
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
92
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
110
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
101
― There were not enough students to determine a Performance Index.
Overall Graduation Rate for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: YES
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
―
All Students
MADE AYP
YES
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP
―
White
MADE AYP
YES
Multiracial
MADE AYP
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP
―
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
―
― There were not enough students to make an AYP determination.
Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort for Accountability
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion:
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
―
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
100
0
0
0
1
99
0
11
0
23
Graduation Rate
85%
―
―
―
―
86%
―
―
―
―
State Standard
80%
―
―
―
―
80%
―
―
―
―
Progress Target
80%
―
―
―
―
80%
―
―
―
―
All Students
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
100
Graduation Rate
85%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%
American Indian or Alaska Native
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Black or African American
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
1
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
White
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
99
Graduation Rate
86%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%
Multiracial
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Students With Disabilities
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
11
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Limited English Proficient
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
23
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
YES Graduation rate is equal to or greater than the State Standard or the group's Progress Target. NO Graduation rate is less than the State Standard and the group's Progress Target.
― There were fewer than 30 students in the cohort.
Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort for Accountability
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion:
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
―
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
93
0
2
0
0
91
0
6
0
10
Graduation Rate
95%
―
―
―
―
95%
―
―
―
―
State Standard
80%
―
―
―
―
80%
―
―
―
―
Progress Target
80%
―
―
―
―
80%
―
―
―
―
All Students
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
93
Graduation Rate
95%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%
American Indian or Alaska Native
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Black or African American
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
2
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
White
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
91
Graduation Rate
95%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%
Multiracial
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Students With Disabilities
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
6
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Limited English Proficient
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
10
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
YES Graduation rate is equal to or greater than the State Standard or the group's Progress Target. NO Graduation rate is less than the State Standard and the group's Progress Target.
― There were fewer than 30 students in the cohort.
Graduation Rates for Non-AYP Groups for Accountability
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
100
100
100
99
1
100
89
100
77
44
56
0
100
Graduation Rate
85%
85%
85%
86%
―
85%
91%
85%
94%
84%
86%
―
85%
Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
93
91
93
93
2
93
87
93
83
49
44
0
93
Graduation Rate
95%
95%
95%
95%
―
95%
94%
95%
95%
94%
95%
―
95%
Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
100
Graduation Rate
85%
Not Black or African American
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
100
Graduation Rate
85%
Not Hispanic or Latino
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
100
Graduation Rate
85%
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
99
Graduation Rate
86%
Not White
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
1
Graduation Rate
―
Not Multiracial
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
100
Graduation Rate
85%
General Education
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
89
Graduation Rate
91%
English Proficient
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
100
Graduation Rate
85%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
77
Graduation Rate
94%
Male
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
44
Graduation Rate
84%
Female
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
56
Graduation Rate
86%
Migrant
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
Not Migrant
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
100
Graduation Rate
85%
Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
93
Graduation Rate
95%
Not Black or African American
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
91
Graduation Rate
95%
Not Hispanic or Latino
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
93
Graduation Rate
95%
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
93
Graduation Rate
95%
Not White
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
2
Graduation Rate
―
Not Multiracial
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
93
Graduation Rate
95%
General Education
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
87
Graduation Rate
94%
English Proficient
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
93
Graduation Rate
95%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
83
Graduation Rate
95%
Male
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
49
Graduation Rate
94%
Female
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
44
Graduation Rate
95%
Migrant
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
Not Migrant
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
93
Graduation Rate
95%
― There were fewer than 30 students in the cohort.
Graduation Rates for Regents with Advanced Designation and CTE Endorsement for Accountability
Percentage of 2012 Graduation-Rate Total Cohort members who graduated as of August 31, 2016 with:
Regents Diploma with an Advanced Designation (This District)
47%
Regents Diploma with an Advanced Designation (Statewide)
31%
Percentage in This District Exceeded Statewide
YES
Regents Diploma with an Advanced Designation (This District)
47%
Regents Diploma with an Advanced Designation (Statewide)
31%
Percentage in This District Exceeded Statewide
YES
Regents Diploma with CTE Endorsement (This District)
7%
Regents Diploma with CTE Endorsement (Statewide)
5%
Percentage in This District Exceeded Statewide
YES
Regents Diploma with CTE Endorsement (This District)
You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.
Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.
If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.
