MASSENA SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL - School Report Card Data [2015 - 16]
The New York State Report Card is an important part of the Board of Regents' effort to raise learning standards for all students. It provides information to the public on school/district enrollment and staff, student performance, and other measures of school and district performance. Knowledge gained from the report card on a school's or district's strengths and weaknesses can be used to improve instruction and services to students. Report Card Data - Glossary of Terms | Accountability Data - Glossary of Terms | Business Rules
PERCENTAGE WITH MASTER'S DEGREEPLUS 30 HOURS OR DOCTORATE
18%
TOTAL NUMBER OF CORE CLASSES
205
Percent Not Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers in This School
0%
Total Number of Classes
305
Percent Taught by Teachers Without Appropriate Certification
2%
Teacher Qualifications (2015 - 16)
TOTAL TEACHERS: 56
Percent with No Valid Teaching Certificate
0%
Percent Teaching Out of Certification
0%
Percent with Fewer Than Three Years of Experience
2%
Percentage with Master's Degree Plus 30 Hours or Doctorate
18%
Total Number of Core Classes
205
Percent Not Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers in This School
0%
Total Number of Classes
305
Percent Taught by Teachers Without Appropriate Certification
2%
High School Completers (2015 - 16)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
198
172
26
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
193
172
21
REGENTS DIPLOMA
183
95%
170
99%
13
62%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
REGENTS WITH ADVANCED DESIGNATION
52
27%
51
30%
1
5%
REGENTS WITH CTE ENDORSEMENT
38
20%
30
17%
8
38%
LOCAL DIPLOMAS
10
5%
2
1%
8
38%
COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS
5
3%
0
0%
5
19%
All Students
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
198
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
193
Regents Diploma
183
95%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
52
27%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
38
20%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
10
5%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
5
3%
of Completers
General Education
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
172
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
172
Regents Diploma
170
99%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
51
30%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
30
17%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
2
1%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
0
0%
of Completers
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
26
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
21
Regents Diploma
13
62%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
1
5%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
8
38%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
8
38%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
5
19%
of Completers
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
198
172
26
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
193
172
21
REGENTS DIPLOMA
183
95%
170
99%
13
62%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
REGENTS WITH ADVANCED DESIGNATION
52
27%
51
30%
1
5%
REGENTS WITH CTE ENDORSEMENT
38
20%
30
17%
8
38%
LOCAL DIPLOMAS
10
5%
2
1%
8
38%
COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS
5
3%
0
0%
5
19%
All Students
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
198
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
193
Regents Diploma
183
95%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
52
27%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
38
20%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
10
5%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
5
3%
of Completers
General Education
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
172
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
172
Regents Diploma
170
99%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
51
30%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
30
17%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
2
1%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
0
0%
of Completers
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
26
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
21
Regents Diploma
13
62%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
1
5%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
8
38%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
8
38%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
5
19%
of Completers
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
198
172
26
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
193
172
21
REGENTS DIPLOMA
183
95%
170
99%
13
62%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
REGENTS WITH ADVANCED DESIGNATION
52
27%
51
30%
1
5%
REGENTS WITH CTE ENDORSEMENT
38
20%
30
17%
8
38%
LOCAL DIPLOMAS
10
5%
2
1%
8
38%
COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS
5
3%
0
0%
5
19%
All Students
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
198
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
193
Regents Diploma
183
95%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
52
27%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
38
20%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
10
5%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
5
3%
of Completers
General Education
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
172
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
172
Regents Diploma
170
99%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
51
30%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
30
17%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
2
1%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
0
0%
of Completers
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
26
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
21
Regents Diploma
13
62%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
1
5%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
8
38%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
8
38%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
5
19%
of Completers
High School Non-completers (2015 - 16)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
22
3%
_
_
_
_
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
3
0%
_
_
_
_
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
25
3%
_
_
_
_
All Students
DROPPED OUT
22
3%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
3
0%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
25
3%
General Education
DROPPED OUT
_
_%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
_
_%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
_
_%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
_
_%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
_
_%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
22
3%
_
_
_
_
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
3
0%
_
_
_
_
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
25
3%
_
_
_
_
All Students
DROPPED OUT
22
3%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
3
0%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
25
3%
General Education
DROPPED OUT
_
_%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
_
_%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
_
_%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
_
_%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
_
_%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
22
3%
_
_
_
_
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
3
0%
_
_
_
_
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
25
3%
_
_
_
_
All Students
DROPPED OUT
22
3%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
3
0%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
25
3%
General Education
DROPPED OUT
_
_%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
_
_%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
_
_%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
_
_%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
_
_%
Post-graduation Plans of Completers (2015 - 16)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO FOUR-YEAR COLLEGE
99
50%
96
56%
3
12%
TO TWO-YEAR COLLEGE
39
20%
30
17%
9
35%
TO OTHER POST-SECONDARY
2
1%
1
1%
1
4%
TO THE MILITARY
14
7%
12
7%
2
8%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO EMPLOYMENT
40
20%
29
17%
11
42%
TO ADULT SERVICES
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
TO OTHER KNOWN PLANS
2
1%
2
1%
0
0%
PLANS UNKNOWN
2
1%
2
1%
0
0%
All Students
To Four-Year College
99
50%
To Two-Year College
39
20%
To Other Post-Secondary
2
1%
To the Military
14
7%
To Employment
40
20%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
2
1%
Plan Unknown
2
1%
General Education
To Four-Year College
96
56%
To Two-Year College
30
17%
To Other Post-Secondary
1
1%
To the Military
12
7%
To Employment
29
17%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
2
1%
Plan Unknown
2
1%
Students with Disabilities
To Four-Year College
3
12%
To Two-Year College
9
35%
To Other Post-Secondary
1
4%
To the Military
2
8%
To Employment
11
42%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
0
0%
Plan Unknown
0
0%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO FOUR-YEAR COLLEGE
99
50%
96
56%
3
12%
TO TWO-YEAR COLLEGE
39
20%
30
17%
9
35%
TO OTHER POST-SECONDARY
2
1%
1
1%
1
4%
TO THE MILITARY
14
7%
12
7%
2
8%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO EMPLOYMENT
40
20%
29
17%
11
42%
TO ADULT SERVICES
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
TO OTHER KNOWN PLANS
2
1%
2
1%
0
0%
PLANS UNKNOWN
2
1%
2
1%
0
0%
All Students
To Four-Year College
99
50%
To Two-Year College
39
20%
To Other Post-Secondary
2
1%
To the Military
14
7%
To Employment
40
20%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
2
1%
Plan Unknown
2
1%
General Education
To Four-Year College
96
56%
To Two-Year College
30
17%
To Other Post-Secondary
1
1%
To the Military
12
7%
To Employment
29
17%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
2
1%
Plan Unknown
2
1%
Students with Disabilities
To Four-Year College
3
12%
To Two-Year College
9
35%
To Other Post-Secondary
1
4%
To the Military
2
8%
To Employment
11
42%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
0
0%
Plan Unknown
0
0%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO FOUR-YEAR COLLEGE
99
50%
96
56%
3
12%
TO TWO-YEAR COLLEGE
39
20%
30
17%
9
35%
TO OTHER POST-SECONDARY
2
1%
1
1%
1
4%
TO THE MILITARY
14
7%
12
7%
2
8%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO EMPLOYMENT
40
20%
29
17%
11
42%
TO ADULT SERVICES
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
TO OTHER KNOWN PLANS
2
1%
2
1%
0
0%
PLANS UNKNOWN
2
1%
2
1%
0
0%
All Students
To Four-Year College
99
50%
To Two-Year College
39
20%
To Other Post-Secondary
2
1%
To the Military
14
7%
To Employment
40
20%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
2
1%
Plan Unknown
2
1%
General Education
To Four-Year College
96
56%
To Two-Year College
30
17%
To Other Post-Secondary
1
1%
To the Military
12
7%
To Employment
29
17%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
2
1%
Plan Unknown
2
1%
Students with Disabilities
To Four-Year College
3
12%
To Two-Year College
9
35%
To Other Post-Secondary
1
4%
To the Military
2
8%
To Employment
11
42%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
0
0%
Plan Unknown
0
0%
Statewide Results on the National Assessment of Educational Progress: NAEP (2014 - 15)
Grade: 4
Reading
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Students with Disabilities
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
BELOW BASIC
32%
*%
20%
48%
44%
20%
*%
70%
74%
43%
BASIC
32%
*%
30%
34%
37%
31%
*%
22%
21%
36%
PROFICIENT
27%
*%
33%
15%
17%
37%
*%
7%
4%
18%
ADVANCED
9%
*%
17%
3%
2%
12%
*%
1%
1%
3%
PARTICIPATION RATE
98
88
Reading
All Students
Percent Below Basic
32
Percent Basic
32
Percent Proficient
27
Percent Advanced
9
American Indian or Alaska Native
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Percent Below Basic
20
Percent Basic
30
Percent Proficient
33
Percent Advanced
17
Black or African American
Percent Below Basic
48
Percent Basic
34
Percent Proficient
15
Percent Advanced
3
Hispanic or Latino
Percent Below Basic
44
Percent Basic
37
Percent Proficient
17
Percent Advanced
2
White
Percent Below Basic
20
Percent Basic
31
Percent Proficient
37
Percent Advanced
12
Multiracial
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Students with Disabilities
Percent Below Basic
70
Percent Basic
22
Percent Proficient
7
Percent Advanced
1
Participation Rate
98
English Language Learners
Percent Below Basic
74
Percent Basic
21
Percent Proficient
4
Percent Advanced
1
Participation Rate
88
Economically Disadvantaged
Percent Below Basic
43
Percent Basic
36
Percent Proficient
18
Percent Advanced
3
Mathematics
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Students with Disabilities
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
BELOW BASIC
21%
*%
12%
40%
28%
12%
*%
49%
56%
29%
BASIC
44%
*%
31%
46%
51%
41%
*%
39%
35%
48%
PROFICIENT
30%
*%
42%
13%
20%
40%
*%
10%
9%
21%
ADVANCED
5%
*%
15%
1%
1%
7%
*%
2%
*%
2%
PARTICIPATION RATE
98
91
Mathematics
All Students
Percent Below Basic
21
Percent Basic
44
Percent Proficient
30
Percent Advanced
5
American Indian or Alaska Native
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Percent Below Basic
12
Percent Basic
31
Percent Proficient
42
Percent Advanced
15
Black or African American
Percent Below Basic
40
Percent Basic
46
Percent Proficient
13
Percent Advanced
1
Hispanic or Latino
Percent Below Basic
28
Percent Basic
51
Percent Proficient
20
Percent Advanced
1
White
Percent Below Basic
12
Percent Basic
41
Percent Proficient
40
Percent Advanced
7
Multiracial
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Students with Disabilities
Percent Below Basic
49
Percent Basic
39
Percent Proficient
10
Percent Advanced
2
Participation Rate
98
English Language Learners
Percent Below Basic
56
Percent Basic
35
Percent Proficient
9
Percent Advanced
*
Participation Rate
91
Economically Disadvantaged
Percent Below Basic
29
Percent Basic
48
Percent Proficient
21
Percent Advanced
2
Grade: 8
Reading
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Students with Disabilities
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
BELOW BASIC
27%
*%
19%
42%
35%
18%
*%
59%
78%
36%
BASIC
40%
*%
39%
41%
43%
39%
*%
33%
19%
42%
PROFICIENT
29%
*%
34%
16%
20%
38%
*%
8%
3%
21%
ADVANCED
4%
*%
8%
1%
2%
5%
*%
*%
*%
1%
PARTICIPATION RATE
98
89
Reading
All Students
Percent Below Basic
27
Percent Basic
40
Percent Proficient
29
Percent Advanced
4
American Indian or Alaska Native
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Percent Below Basic
19
Percent Basic
39
Percent Proficient
34
Percent Advanced
8
Black or African American
Percent Below Basic
42
Percent Basic
41
Percent Proficient
16
Percent Advanced
1
Hispanic or Latino
Percent Below Basic
35
Percent Basic
43
Percent Proficient
20
Percent Advanced
2
White
Percent Below Basic
18
Percent Basic
39
Percent Proficient
38
Percent Advanced
5
Multiracial
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Students with Disabilities
Percent Below Basic
59
Percent Basic
33
Percent Proficient
8
Percent Advanced
*
Participation Rate
98
English Language Learners
Percent Below Basic
78
Percent Basic
19
Percent Proficient
3
Percent Advanced
*
Participation Rate
89
Economically Disadvantaged
Percent Below Basic
36
Percent Basic
42
Percent Proficient
21
Percent Advanced
1
Mathematics
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Students with Disabilities
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
BELOW BASIC
31%
*%
18%
48%
41%
20%
*%
64%
72%
40%
BASIC
38%
*%
30%
37%
40%
40%
*%
27%
21%
39%
PROFICIENT
24%
*%
33%
13%
16%
31%
*%
8%
6%
17%
ADVANCED
7%
*%
19%
2%
3%
9%
*%
1%
1%
4%
PARTICIPATION RATE
99
94
Mathematics
All Students
Percent Below Basic
31
Percent Basic
38
Percent Proficient
24
Percent Advanced
7
American Indian or Alaska Native
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Percent Below Basic
18
Percent Basic
30
Percent Proficient
33
Percent Advanced
19
Black or African American
Percent Below Basic
48
Percent Basic
37
Percent Proficient
13
Percent Advanced
2
Hispanic or Latino
Percent Below Basic
41
Percent Basic
40
Percent Proficient
16
Percent Advanced
3
White
Percent Below Basic
20
Percent Basic
40
Percent Proficient
31
Percent Advanced
9
Multiracial
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Students with Disabilities
Percent Below Basic
64
Percent Basic
27
Percent Proficient
8
Percent Advanced
1
Participation Rate
99
English Language Learners
Percent Below Basic
72
Percent Basic
21
Percent Proficient
6
Percent Advanced
1
Participation Rate
94
Economically Disadvantaged
Percent Below Basic
40
Percent Basic
39
Percent Proficient
17
Percent Advanced
4
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level English Language Arts after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 220
LEVEL 1
2
1%
LEVEL 2
9
4%
LEVEL 3
86
39%
LEVEL 4
95
43%
General Education
PROFICIENT
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 182
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
1%
LEVEL 3
74
41%
LEVEL 4
93
51%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 38
LEVEL 1
2
5%
LEVEL 2
7
18%
LEVEL 3
12
32%
LEVEL 4
2
5%
American Indian or Alaska Native
PROFICIENT
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 40
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
3%
LEVEL 3
16
40%
LEVEL 4
14
35%
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 7
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 169
LEVEL 1
2
1%
LEVEL 2
8
5%
LEVEL 3
66
39%
LEVEL 4
74
44%
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 11
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
4
36%
LEVEL 4
7
64%
Female
PROFICIENT
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 114
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
3
3%
LEVEL 3
47
41%
LEVEL 4
54
47%
Male
PROFICIENT
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 106
LEVEL 1
2
2%
LEVEL 2
6
6%
LEVEL 3
39
37%
LEVEL 4
41
39%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 220
LEVEL 1
2
1%
LEVEL 2
9
4%
LEVEL 3
86
39%
LEVEL 4
95
43%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 117
LEVEL 1
2
2%
LEVEL 2
7
6%
LEVEL 3
54
46%
LEVEL 4
31
26%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 103
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
2%
LEVEL 3
32
31%
LEVEL 4
64
62%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 220
LEVEL 1
2
1%
LEVEL 2
9
4%
LEVEL 3
86
39%
LEVEL 4
95
43%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
220
182
38
40
4
7
169
11
114
106
220
117
103
220
PROFICIENT
82%
92%
37%
75%
_%
_%
83%
100%
89%
75%
82%
73%
93%
82%
LEVEL 1
2
1%
0
0%
2
5%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
2
1%
0
0%
0
0%
2
2%
2
1%
2
2%
0
0%
2
1%
LEVEL 2
9
4%
2
1%
7
18%
1
3%
_
_
_
_
8
5%
0
0%
3
3%
6
6%
9
4%
7
6%
2
2%
9
4%
LEVEL 3
86
39%
74
41%
12
32%
16
40%
_
_
_
_
66
39%
4
36%
47
41%
39
37%
86
39%
54
46%
32
31%
86
39%
LEVEL 4
95
43%
93
51%
2
5%
14
35%
_
_
_
_
74
44%
7
64%
54
47%
41
39%
95
43%
31
26%
64
62%
95
43%
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level Mathematics after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 220
LEVEL 1
5
2%
LEVEL 2
9
4%
LEVEL 3
146
66%
LEVEL 4
42
19%
General Education
PROFICIENT
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 182
LEVEL 1
3
2%
LEVEL 2
3
2%
LEVEL 3
130
71%
LEVEL 4
40
22%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 38
LEVEL 1
2
5%
LEVEL 2
6
16%
LEVEL 3
16
42%
LEVEL 4
2
5%
American Indian or Alaska Native
PROFICIENT
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 40
LEVEL 1
2
5%
LEVEL 2
2
5%
LEVEL 3
28
70%
LEVEL 4
3
8%
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 7
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 169
LEVEL 1
2
1%
LEVEL 2
7
4%
LEVEL 3
110
65%
LEVEL 4
37
22%
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 11
LEVEL 1
1
9%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
8
73%
LEVEL 4
2
18%
Female
PROFICIENT
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 114
LEVEL 1
2
2%
LEVEL 2
4
4%
LEVEL 3
80
70%
LEVEL 4
24
21%
Male
PROFICIENT
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 106
LEVEL 1
3
3%
LEVEL 2
5
5%
LEVEL 3
66
62%
LEVEL 4
18
17%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 220
LEVEL 1
5
2%
LEVEL 2
9
4%
LEVEL 3
146
66%
LEVEL 4
42
19%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 117
LEVEL 1
5
4%
LEVEL 2
8
7%
LEVEL 3
80
68%
LEVEL 4
10
9%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 103
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
1%
LEVEL 3
66
64%
LEVEL 4
32
31%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 220
LEVEL 1
5
2%
LEVEL 2
9
4%
LEVEL 3
146
66%
LEVEL 4
42
19%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
220
182
38
40
4
7
169
11
114
106
220
117
103
220
PROFICIENT
85%
93%
47%
78%
_%
_%
87%
91%
91%
79%
85%
77%
95%
85%
LEVEL 1
5
2%
3
2%
2
5%
2
5%
_
_
_
_
2
1%
1
9%
2
2%
3
3%
5
2%
5
4%
0
0%
5
2%
LEVEL 2
9
4%
3
2%
6
16%
2
5%
_
_
_
_
7
4%
0
0%
4
4%
5
5%
9
4%
8
7%
1
1%
9
4%
LEVEL 3
146
66%
130
71%
16
42%
28
70%
_
_
_
_
110
65%
8
73%
80
70%
66
62%
146
66%
80
68%
66
64%
146
66%
LEVEL 4
42
19%
40
22%
2
5%
3
8%
_
_
_
_
37
22%
2
18%
24
21%
18
17%
42
19%
10
9%
32
31%
42
19%
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level Global History and Geography after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 220
LEVEL 1
9
4%
LEVEL 2
15
7%
LEVEL 3
103
47%
LEVEL 4
68
31%
General Education
PROFICIENT
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 182
LEVEL 1
6
3%
LEVEL 2
7
4%
LEVEL 3
90
49%
LEVEL 4
67
37%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 38
LEVEL 1
3
8%
LEVEL 2
8
21%
LEVEL 3
13
34%
LEVEL 4
1
3%
American Indian or Alaska Native
PROFICIENT
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 40
LEVEL 1
1
3%
LEVEL 2
3
8%
LEVEL 3
17
43%
LEVEL 4
12
30%
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 7
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 169
LEVEL 1
8
5%
LEVEL 2
11
7%
LEVEL 3
82
49%
LEVEL 4
52
31%
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 11
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
9%
LEVEL 3
4
36%
LEVEL 4
4
36%
Female
PROFICIENT
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 114
LEVEL 1
6
5%
LEVEL 2
7
6%
LEVEL 3
61
54%
LEVEL 4
32
28%
Male
PROFICIENT
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 106
LEVEL 1
3
3%
LEVEL 2
8
8%
LEVEL 3
42
40%
LEVEL 4
36
34%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 220
LEVEL 1
9
4%
LEVEL 2
15
7%
LEVEL 3
103
47%
LEVEL 4
68
31%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 117
LEVEL 1
7
6%
LEVEL 2
12
10%
LEVEL 3
56
48%
LEVEL 4
21
18%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 103
LEVEL 1
2
2%
LEVEL 2
3
3%
LEVEL 3
47
46%
LEVEL 4
47
46%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 220
LEVEL 1
9
4%
LEVEL 2
15
7%
LEVEL 3
103
47%
LEVEL 4
68
31%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
220
182
38
40
4
7
169
11
114
106
220
117
103
220
PROFICIENT
78%
86%
37%
73%
_%
_%
79%
73%
82%
74%
78%
66%
91%
78%
LEVEL 1
9
4%
6
3%
3
8%
1
3%
_
_
_
_
8
5%
0
0%
6
5%
3
3%
9
4%
7
6%
2
2%
9
4%
LEVEL 2
15
7%
7
4%
8
21%
3
8%
_
_
_
_
11
7%
1
9%
7
6%
8
8%
15
7%
12
10%
3
3%
15
7%
LEVEL 3
103
47%
90
49%
13
34%
17
43%
_
_
_
_
82
49%
4
36%
61
54%
42
40%
103
47%
56
48%
47
46%
103
47%
LEVEL 4
68
31%
67
37%
1
3%
12
30%
_
_
_
_
52
31%
4
36%
32
28%
36
34%
68
31%
21
18%
47
46%
68
31%
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level U.S. History and Government after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 220
LEVEL 1
1
0%
LEVEL 2
5
2%
LEVEL 3
73
33%
LEVEL 4
111
50%
General Education
PROFICIENT
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 182
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
1%
LEVEL 3
60
33%
LEVEL 4
105
58%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 38
LEVEL 1
1
3%
LEVEL 2
3
8%
LEVEL 3
13
34%
LEVEL 4
6
16%
American Indian or Alaska Native
PROFICIENT
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 40
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
15
38%
LEVEL 4
16
40%
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 7
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 169
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
4
2%
LEVEL 3
55
33%
LEVEL 4
88
52%
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 11
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
9%
LEVEL 3
3
27%
LEVEL 4
7
64%
Female
PROFICIENT
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 114
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
3
3%
LEVEL 3
43
38%
LEVEL 4
55
48%
Male
PROFICIENT
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 106
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
2
2%
LEVEL 3
30
28%
LEVEL 4
56
53%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 220
LEVEL 1
1
0%
LEVEL 2
5
2%
LEVEL 3
73
33%
LEVEL 4
111
50%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 117
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
4
3%
LEVEL 3
45
38%
LEVEL 4
43
37%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 103
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
1%
LEVEL 3
28
27%
LEVEL 4
68
66%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 220
LEVEL 1
1
0%
LEVEL 2
5
2%
LEVEL 3
73
33%
LEVEL 4
111
50%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
220
182
38
40
4
7
169
11
114
106
220
117
103
220
PROFICIENT
84%
91%
50%
78%
_%
_%
85%
91%
86%
81%
84%
75%
93%
84%
LEVEL 1
1
0%
0
0%
1
3%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
1
1%
0
0%
0
0%
1
1%
1
0%
1
1%
0
0%
1
0%
LEVEL 2
5
2%
2
1%
3
8%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
4
2%
1
9%
3
3%
2
2%
5
2%
4
3%
1
1%
5
2%
LEVEL 3
73
33%
60
33%
13
34%
15
38%
_
_
_
_
55
33%
3
27%
43
38%
30
28%
73
33%
45
38%
28
27%
73
33%
LEVEL 4
111
50%
105
58%
6
16%
16
40%
_
_
_
_
88
52%
7
64%
55
48%
56
53%
111
50%
43
37%
68
66%
111
50%
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level Science after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 220
LEVEL 1
2
1%
LEVEL 2
12
5%
LEVEL 3
116
53%
LEVEL 4
70
32%
General Education
PROFICIENT
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 182
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
3
2%
LEVEL 3
101
55%
LEVEL 4
68
37%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 38
LEVEL 1
2
5%
LEVEL 2
9
24%
LEVEL 3
15
39%
LEVEL 4
2
5%
American Indian or Alaska Native
PROFICIENT
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 40
LEVEL 1
1
3%
LEVEL 2
2
5%
LEVEL 3
20
50%
LEVEL 4
11
28%
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 7
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 169
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
10
6%
LEVEL 3
92
54%
LEVEL 4
54
32%
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 11
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
4
36%
LEVEL 4
5
45%
Female
PROFICIENT
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 114
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
7
6%
LEVEL 3
68
60%
LEVEL 4
34
30%
Male
PROFICIENT
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 106
LEVEL 1
2
2%
LEVEL 2
5
5%
LEVEL 3
48
45%
LEVEL 4
36
34%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 220
LEVEL 1
2
1%
LEVEL 2
12
5%
LEVEL 3
116
53%
LEVEL 4
70
32%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 117
LEVEL 1
2
2%
LEVEL 2
10
9%
LEVEL 3
66
56%
LEVEL 4
23
20%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 103
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
2%
LEVEL 3
50
49%
LEVEL 4
47
46%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 220
LEVEL 1
2
1%
LEVEL 2
12
5%
LEVEL 3
116
53%
LEVEL 4
70
32%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
220
182
38
40
4
7
169
11
114
106
220
117
103
220
PROFICIENT
85%
93%
45%
78%
_%
_%
86%
82%
89%
79%
85%
76%
94%
85%
LEVEL 1
2
1%
0
0%
2
5%
1
3%
_
_
_
_
1
1%
0
0%
0
0%
2
2%
2
1%
2
2%
0
0%
2
1%
LEVEL 2
12
5%
3
2%
9
24%
2
5%
_
_
_
_
10
6%
0
0%
7
6%
5
5%
12
5%
10
9%
2
2%
12
5%
LEVEL 3
116
53%
101
55%
15
39%
20
50%
_
_
_
_
92
54%
4
36%
68
60%
48
45%
116
53%
66
56%
50
49%
116
53%
LEVEL 4
70
32%
68
37%
2
5%
11
28%
_
_
_
_
54
32%
5
45%
34
30%
36
34%
70
32%
23
20%
47
46%
70
32%
Regents Examination Results (2015 - 16)
Comprehensive English
Regents Comprehensive English
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
White
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
8
3
5
8
2
6
8
6
2
8
55
5
63%
_
_
_
_
5
63%
_
_
_
_
5
63%
_
_
_
_
5
63%
65
1
13%
_
_
_
_
1
13%
_
_
_
_
1
13%
_
_
_
_
1
13%
85
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 8
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
5
63%
65
1
13%
85
0
0%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 8
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
5
63%
65
1
13%
85
0
0%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 6
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 8
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
5
63%
65
1
13%
85
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 6
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 8
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
5
63%
65
1
13%
85
0
0%
English Language Arts (Common Core)
English Language Arts (Common Core)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
187
159
28
27
1
5
3
151
9
96
91
187
83
104
187
LEVEL 1
6
3%
2
1%
4
14%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
5
3%
1
11%
0
0%
6
7%
6
3%
5
6%
1
1%
6
3%
LEVEL 2
8
4%
1
1%
7
25%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
8
5%
0
0%
6
6%
2
2%
8
4%
6
7%
2
2%
8
4%
LEVEL 3
36
19%
27
17%
9
32%
5
19%
_
_
_
_
_
_
29
19%
2
22%
13
14%
23
25%
36
19%
21
25%
15
14%
36
19%
LEVEL 4
37
20%
31
19%
6
21%
7
26%
_
_
_
_
_
_
30
20%
0
0%
17
18%
20
22%
37
20%
12
14%
25
24%
37
20%
LEVEL 5
100
53%
98
62%
2
7%
15
56%
_
_
_
_
_
_
79
52%
6
67%
60
63%
40
44%
100
53%
39
47%
61
59%
100
53%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 187
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
6
3%
LEVEL 2
8
4%
LEVEL 3
36
19%
LEVEL 4
37
20%
LEVEL 5
100
53%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 159
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
2
1%
LEVEL 2
1
1%
LEVEL 3
27
17%
LEVEL 4
31
19%
LEVEL 5
98
62%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 28
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
4
14%
LEVEL 2
7
25%
LEVEL 3
9
32%
LEVEL 4
6
21%
LEVEL 5
2
7%
American Indian or Alaska Native
TOTAL TESTED: 27
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
5
19%
LEVEL 4
7
26%
LEVEL 5
15
56%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 151
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
5
3%
LEVEL 2
8
5%
LEVEL 3
29
19%
LEVEL 4
30
20%
LEVEL 5
79
52%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 9
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
1
11%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
2
22%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
LEVEL 5
6
67%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 96
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
6
6%
LEVEL 3
13
14%
LEVEL 4
17
18%
LEVEL 5
60
63%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 91
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
6
7%
LEVEL 2
2
2%
LEVEL 3
23
25%
LEVEL 4
20
22%
LEVEL 5
40
44%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 187
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
6
3%
LEVEL 2
8
4%
LEVEL 3
36
19%
LEVEL 4
37
20%
LEVEL 5
100
53%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 83
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
5
6%
LEVEL 2
6
7%
LEVEL 3
21
25%
LEVEL 4
12
14%
LEVEL 5
39
47%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 104
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
2
2%
LEVEL 3
15
14%
LEVEL 4
25
24%
LEVEL 5
61
59%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 187
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
6
3%
LEVEL 2
8
4%
LEVEL 3
36
19%
LEVEL 4
37
20%
LEVEL 5
100
53%
Integrated Algebra
Regents Integrated Algebra
GROUP
All Students
General Education
American Indian or Alaska Native
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
3
3
1
1
1
3
2
1
3
2
1
3
55
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
65
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
85
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
American Indian or Alaska Native
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Geometry
Regents Geometry
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
White
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
21
20
1
7
14
12
9
21
7
14
21
55
19
90%
_
_
_
_
7
100%
12
86%
11
92%
8
89%
19
90%
5
71%
14
100%
19
90%
65
11
52%
_
_
_
_
2
29%
9
64%
8
67%
3
33%
11
52%
3
43%
8
57%
11
52%
85
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 21
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
19
90%
65
11
52%
85
0
0%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 20
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
American Indian or Alaska Native
TOTAL TESTED: 7
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
7
100%
65
2
29%
85
0
0%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 14
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
12
86%
65
9
64%
85
0
0%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 12
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
11
92%
65
8
67%
85
0
0%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 9
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
8
89%
65
3
33%
85
0
0%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 21
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
19
90%
65
11
52%
85
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 7
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
5
71%
65
3
43%
85
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 14
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
14
100%
65
8
57%
85
0
0%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 21
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
19
90%
65
11
52%
85
0
0%
Algebra 2/Trigonometry
Regents Algebra 2/Trigonometry
GROUP
All Students
General Education
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
88
88
15
1
2
1
69
19
53
35
88
25
63
88
55
69
78%
69
78%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
55
80%
14
74%
42
79%
27
77%
69
78%
21
84%
48
76%
69
78%
65
51
58%
51
58%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
45
65%
6
32%
29
55%
22
63%
51
58%
14
56%
37
59%
51
58%
85
10
11%
10
11%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
8
12%
2
11%
6
11%
4
11%
10
11%
2
8%
8
13%
10
11%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 88
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
69
78%
65
51
58%
85
10
11%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 88
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
69
78%
65
51
58%
85
10
11%
American Indian or Alaska Native
TOTAL TESTED: 15
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 69
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
55
80%
65
45
65%
85
8
12%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 19
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
14
74%
65
6
32%
85
2
11%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 53
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
42
79%
65
29
55%
85
6
11%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 35
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
27
77%
65
22
63%
85
4
11%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 88
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
69
78%
65
51
58%
85
10
11%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 25
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
21
84%
65
14
56%
85
2
8%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 63
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
48
76%
65
37
59%
85
8
13%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 88
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
69
78%
65
51
58%
85
10
11%
Algebra I (Common Core)
Algebra I (Common Core)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Migrant
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
193
170
23
30
1
3
4
155
8
107
86
193
100
93
1
192
LEVEL 1
16
8%
8
5%
8
35%
3
10%
_
_
_
_
_
_
12
8%
1
13%
8
7%
8
9%
16
8%
10
10%
6
6%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 2
39
20%
30
18%
9
39%
8
27%
_
_
_
_
_
_
29
19%
2
25%
23
21%
16
19%
39
20%
21
21%
18
19%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 3
81
42%
75
44%
6
26%
9
30%
_
_
_
_
_
_
70
45%
2
25%
38
36%
43
50%
81
42%
45
45%
36
39%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 4
38
20%
38
22%
0
0%
7
23%
_
_
_
_
_
_
29
19%
2
25%
25
23%
13
15%
38
20%
18
18%
20
22%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 5
19
10%
19
11%
0
0%
3
10%
_
_
_
_
_
_
15
10%
1
13%
13
12%
6
7%
19
10%
6
6%
13
14%
_
_
_
_
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 193
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
16
8%
LEVEL 2
39
20%
LEVEL 3
81
42%
LEVEL 4
38
20%
LEVEL 5
19
10%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 170
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
8
5%
LEVEL 2
30
18%
LEVEL 3
75
44%
LEVEL 4
38
22%
LEVEL 5
19
11%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 23
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
8
35%
LEVEL 2
9
39%
LEVEL 3
6
26%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
American Indian or Alaska Native
TOTAL TESTED: 30
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
3
10%
LEVEL 2
8
27%
LEVEL 3
9
30%
LEVEL 4
7
23%
LEVEL 5
3
10%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 4
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 155
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
12
8%
LEVEL 2
29
19%
LEVEL 3
70
45%
LEVEL 4
29
19%
LEVEL 5
15
10%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 8
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
1
13%
LEVEL 2
2
25%
LEVEL 3
2
25%
LEVEL 4
2
25%
LEVEL 5
1
13%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 107
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
8
7%
LEVEL 2
23
21%
LEVEL 3
38
36%
LEVEL 4
25
23%
LEVEL 5
13
12%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 86
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
8
9%
LEVEL 2
16
19%
LEVEL 3
43
50%
LEVEL 4
13
15%
LEVEL 5
6
7%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 193
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
16
8%
LEVEL 2
39
20%
LEVEL 3
81
42%
LEVEL 4
38
20%
LEVEL 5
19
10%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 100
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
10
10%
LEVEL 2
21
21%
LEVEL 3
45
45%
LEVEL 4
18
18%
LEVEL 5
6
6%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 93
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
6
6%
LEVEL 2
18
19%
LEVEL 3
36
39%
LEVEL 4
20
22%
LEVEL 5
13
14%
Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 192
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Geometry (Common Core)
Geometry (Common Core)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
98
94
4
13
2
4
79
6
56
42
98
27
71
98
LEVEL 1
8
8%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
_
_
_
_
8
10%
0
0%
4
7%
4
10%
8
8%
4
15%
4
6%
8
8%
LEVEL 2
16
16%
_
_
_
_
6
46%
_
_
_
_
9
11%
1
17%
9
16%
7
17%
16
16%
4
15%
12
17%
16
16%
LEVEL 3
49
50%
_
_
_
_
6
46%
_
_
_
_
38
48%
5
83%
29
52%
20
48%
49
50%
14
52%
35
49%
49
50%
LEVEL 4
13
13%
_
_
_
_
1
8%
_
_
_
_
12
15%
0
0%
9
16%
4
10%
13
13%
3
11%
10
14%
13
13%
LEVEL 5
12
12%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
_
_
_
_
12
15%
0
0%
5
9%
7
17%
12
12%
2
7%
10
14%
12
12%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 98
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
8
8%
LEVEL 2
16
16%
LEVEL 3
49
50%
LEVEL 4
13
13%
LEVEL 5
12
12%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 94
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 4
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
American Indian or Alaska Native
TOTAL TESTED: 13
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
6
46%
LEVEL 3
6
46%
LEVEL 4
1
8%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 4
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 79
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
8
10%
LEVEL 2
9
11%
LEVEL 3
38
48%
LEVEL 4
12
15%
LEVEL 5
12
15%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 6
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
17%
LEVEL 3
5
83%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 56
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
4
7%
LEVEL 2
9
16%
LEVEL 3
29
52%
LEVEL 4
9
16%
LEVEL 5
5
9%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 42
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
4
10%
LEVEL 2
7
17%
LEVEL 3
20
48%
LEVEL 4
4
10%
LEVEL 5
7
17%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 98
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
8
8%
LEVEL 2
16
16%
LEVEL 3
49
50%
LEVEL 4
13
13%
LEVEL 5
12
12%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 27
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
4
15%
LEVEL 2
4
15%
LEVEL 3
14
52%
LEVEL 4
3
11%
LEVEL 5
2
7%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 71
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
4
6%
LEVEL 2
12
17%
LEVEL 3
35
49%
LEVEL 4
10
14%
LEVEL 5
10
14%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 98
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
8
8%
LEVEL 2
16
16%
LEVEL 3
49
50%
LEVEL 4
13
13%
LEVEL 5
12
12%
Algebra II (Common Core)
Algebra II (Common Core)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
66
66
12
1
2
1
50
16
40
26
66
21
45
66
LEVEL 1
4
6%
4
6%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
3
6%
1
6%
2
5%
2
8%
4
6%
1
5%
3
7%
4
6%
LEVEL 2
7
11%
7
11%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
6
12%
1
6%
6
15%
1
4%
7
11%
1
5%
6
13%
7
11%
LEVEL 3
43
65%
43
65%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
30
60%
13
81%
26
65%
17
65%
43
65%
16
76%
27
60%
43
65%
LEVEL 4
10
15%
10
15%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
9
18%
1
6%
5
13%
5
19%
10
15%
3
14%
7
16%
10
15%
LEVEL 5
2
3%
2
3%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
2
4%
0
0%
1
3%
1
4%
2
3%
0
0%
2
4%
2
3%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 66
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
4
6%
LEVEL 2
7
11%
LEVEL 3
43
65%
LEVEL 4
10
15%
LEVEL 5
2
3%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 66
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
4
6%
LEVEL 2
7
11%
LEVEL 3
43
65%
LEVEL 4
10
15%
LEVEL 5
2
3%
American Indian or Alaska Native
TOTAL TESTED: 12
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 50
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
3
6%
LEVEL 2
6
12%
LEVEL 3
30
60%
LEVEL 4
9
18%
LEVEL 5
2
4%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 16
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
1
6%
LEVEL 2
1
6%
LEVEL 3
13
81%
LEVEL 4
1
6%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 40
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
2
5%
LEVEL 2
6
15%
LEVEL 3
26
65%
LEVEL 4
5
13%
LEVEL 5
1
3%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 26
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
2
8%
LEVEL 2
1
4%
LEVEL 3
17
65%
LEVEL 4
5
19%
LEVEL 5
1
4%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 66
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
4
6%
LEVEL 2
7
11%
LEVEL 3
43
65%
LEVEL 4
10
15%
LEVEL 5
2
3%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 21
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
1
5%
LEVEL 2
1
5%
LEVEL 3
16
76%
LEVEL 4
3
14%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 45
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
3
7%
LEVEL 2
6
13%
LEVEL 3
27
60%
LEVEL 4
7
16%
LEVEL 5
2
4%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 66
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
4
6%
LEVEL 2
7
11%
LEVEL 3
43
65%
LEVEL 4
10
15%
LEVEL 5
2
3%
Global History and Geography
Regents Global History and Geography
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
270
230
40
41
3
2
4
220
9
145
125
270
129
141
270
55
234
87%
206
90%
28
70%
34
83%
_
_
_
_
_
_
191
87%
9
100%
122
84%
112
90%
234
87%
106
82%
128
91%
234
87%
65
173
64%
161
70%
12
30%
24
59%
_
_
_
_
_
_
141
64%
8
89%
87
60%
86
69%
173
64%
75
58%
98
70%
173
64%
85
55
20%
53
23%
2
5%
5
12%
_
_
_
_
_
_
46
21%
4
44%
28
19%
27
22%
55
20%
18
14%
37
26%
55
20%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 270
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
234
87%
65
173
64%
85
55
20%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 230
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
206
90%
65
161
70%
85
53
23%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 40
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
28
70%
65
12
30%
85
2
5%
American Indian or Alaska Native
TOTAL TESTED: 41
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
34
83%
65
24
59%
85
5
12%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 4
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 220
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
191
87%
65
141
64%
85
46
21%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 9
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
9
100%
65
8
89%
85
4
44%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 145
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
122
84%
65
87
60%
85
28
19%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 125
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
112
90%
65
86
69%
85
27
22%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 270
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
234
87%
65
173
64%
85
55
20%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 129
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
106
82%
65
75
58%
85
18
14%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 141
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
128
91%
65
98
70%
85
37
26%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 270
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
234
87%
65
173
64%
85
55
20%
U.S. History & Government
Regents U.S. History & Government
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
181
159
22
30
1
4
4
142
9
96
85
181
79
102
181
55
176
97%
158
99%
18
82%
29
97%
_
_
_
_
_
_
138
97%
9
100%
94
98%
82
96%
176
97%
74
94%
102
100%
176
97%
65
167
92%
152
96%
15
68%
27
90%
_
_
_
_
_
_
132
93%
8
89%
90
94%
77
91%
167
92%
69
87%
98
96%
167
92%
85
100
55%
97
61%
3
14%
19
63%
_
_
_
_
_
_
76
54%
5
56%
53
55%
47
55%
100
55%
39
49%
61
60%
100
55%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 181
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
176
97%
65
167
92%
85
100
55%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 159
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
158
99%
65
152
96%
85
97
61%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 22
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
18
82%
65
15
68%
85
3
14%
American Indian or Alaska Native
TOTAL TESTED: 30
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
29
97%
65
27
90%
85
19
63%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 4
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 4
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 142
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
138
97%
65
132
93%
85
76
54%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 9
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
9
100%
65
8
89%
85
5
56%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 96
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
94
98%
65
90
94%
85
53
55%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 85
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
82
96%
65
77
91%
85
47
55%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 181
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
176
97%
65
167
92%
85
100
55%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 79
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
74
94%
65
69
87%
85
39
49%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 102
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
102
100%
65
98
96%
85
61
60%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 181
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
176
97%
65
167
92%
85
100
55%
Living Environment
Regents Living Environment
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
206
185
21
32
2
2
4
166
8
110
96
206
96
110
206
55
200
97%
180
97%
20
95%
31
97%
_
_
_
_
_
_
161
97%
8
100%
106
96%
94
98%
200
97%
90
94%
110
100%
200
97%
65
187
91%
171
92%
16
76%
26
81%
_
_
_
_
_
_
153
92%
8
100%
98
89%
89
93%
187
91%
84
88%
103
94%
187
91%
85
75
36%
75
41%
0
0%
11
34%
_
_
_
_
_
_
59
36%
5
63%
39
35%
36
38%
75
36%
19
20%
56
51%
75
36%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 206
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
200
97%
65
187
91%
85
75
36%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 185
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
180
97%
65
171
92%
85
75
41%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 21
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
20
95%
65
16
76%
85
0
0%
American Indian or Alaska Native
TOTAL TESTED: 32
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
31
97%
65
26
81%
85
11
34%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 4
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 166
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
161
97%
65
153
92%
85
59
36%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 8
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
8
100%
65
8
100%
85
5
63%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 110
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
106
96%
65
98
89%
85
39
35%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 96
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
94
98%
65
89
93%
85
36
38%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 206
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
200
97%
65
187
91%
85
75
36%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 96
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
90
94%
65
84
88%
85
19
20%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 110
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
110
100%
65
103
94%
85
56
51%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 206
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
200
97%
65
187
91%
85
75
36%
Physical Setting/Earth Science
Regents Physical Setting/Earth Science
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
127
119
8
18
2
3
104
5
72
55
127
52
75
127
55
120
94%
112
94%
8
100%
17
94%
_
_
_
_
98
94%
5
100%
66
92%
54
98%
120
94%
50
96%
70
93%
120
94%
65
97
76%
92
77%
5
63%
14
78%
_
_
_
_
78
75%
5
100%
52
72%
45
82%
97
76%
41
79%
56
75%
97
76%
85
30
24%
28
24%
2
25%
4
22%
_
_
_
_
24
23%
2
40%
12
17%
18
33%
30
24%
13
25%
17
23%
30
24%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 127
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
120
94%
65
97
76%
85
30
24%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 119
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
112
94%
65
92
77%
85
28
24%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 8
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
8
100%
65
5
63%
85
2
25%
American Indian or Alaska Native
TOTAL TESTED: 18
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
17
94%
65
14
78%
85
4
22%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 104
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
98
94%
65
78
75%
85
24
23%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
5
100%
65
5
100%
85
2
40%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 72
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
66
92%
65
52
72%
85
12
17%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 55
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
54
98%
65
45
82%
85
18
33%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 127
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
120
94%
65
97
76%
85
30
24%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 52
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
50
96%
65
41
79%
85
13
25%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 75
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
70
93%
65
56
75%
85
17
23%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 127
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
120
94%
65
97
76%
85
30
24%
Physical Setting/Chemistry
Regents Physical Setting/Chemistry
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
86
85
1
17
2
67
19
53
33
86
23
63
86
55
84
98%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
65
97%
19
100%
53
100%
31
94%
84
98%
23
100%
61
97%
84
98%
65
66
77%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
52
78%
14
74%
42
79%
24
73%
66
77%
17
74%
49
78%
66
77%
85
10
12%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
7
10%
3
16%
3
6%
7
21%
10
12%
2
9%
8
13%
10
12%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 86
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
84
98%
65
66
77%
85
10
12%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 85
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
American Indian or Alaska Native
TOTAL TESTED: 17
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 67
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
65
97%
65
52
78%
85
7
10%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 19
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
19
100%
65
14
74%
85
3
16%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 53
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
53
100%
65
42
79%
85
3
6%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 33
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
31
94%
65
24
73%
85
7
21%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 86
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
84
98%
65
66
77%
85
10
12%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 23
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
23
100%
65
17
74%
85
2
9%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 63
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
61
97%
65
49
78%
85
8
13%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 86
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
84
98%
65
66
77%
85
10
12%
Physical Setting/Physics
Regents Physical Setting/Physics
GROUP
All Students
General Education
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
52
52
4
1
2
1
44
8
27
25
52
17
35
52
55
52
100%
52
100%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
44
100%
8
100%
27
100%
25
100%
52
100%
17
100%
35
100%
52
100%
65
50
96%
50
96%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
42
95%
8
100%
25
93%
25
100%
50
96%
16
94%
34
97%
50
96%
85
19
37%
19
37%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
16
36%
3
38%
8
30%
11
44%
19
37%
5
29%
14
40%
19
37%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 52
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
52
100%
65
50
96%
85
19
37%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 52
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
52
100%
65
50
96%
85
19
37%
American Indian or Alaska Native
TOTAL TESTED: 4
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 44
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
44
100%
65
42
95%
85
16
36%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 8
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
8
100%
65
8
100%
85
3
38%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 27
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
27
100%
65
25
93%
85
8
30%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 25
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
25
100%
65
25
100%
85
11
44%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 52
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
52
100%
65
50
96%
85
19
37%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 17
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
17
100%
65
16
94%
85
5
29%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 35
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
35
100%
65
34
97%
85
14
40%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 52
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
52
100%
65
50
96%
85
19
37%
New York State Alternate Assessment (NYSAA) Results (2015 - 16)
GROUP
Secondary-Level ELA
Secondary-Level Math
Secondary-Level Science
Secondary-Level Social Studies
TOTAL TESTED
2
2
2
2
PROFICIENT
_%
_%
_%
_%
LEVEL 1
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
_
_
Secondary-Level ELA
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Secondary-Level Math
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Secondary-Level Science
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Secondary-Level Social Studies
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
New York State English as a Second Language Achievement Test (NYSESLAT) Results (2015 - 16)
Secondary-Level English Language Arts Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: NO
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
NO
YES
―
―
―
NO
―
YES
―
NO
Tested 95%
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
YES
12th graders
205
35
6
7
0
157
0
26
0
99
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
―
―
―
―
99%
―
―
―
99%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
YES
―
―
―
NO
―
YES
―
NO
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
197
34
4
7
0
152
0
31✝
0
103
PI
157
153
―
―
―
157
―
61✝
―
135
EAMO
166
147
―
―
―
175
―
117
―
152
Safe Harbor Target
166
20
―
―
―
170
―
20
―
150
All Students
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
YES
12th Graders
205
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
197
PI
157
EAMO
166
Safe Harbor Target
166
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
35
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
34
PI
153
EAMO
147
Safe Harbor Target
20
Black or African American
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
6
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
4
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
7
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
7
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
White
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
YES
12th Graders
157
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
99%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
152
PI
157
EAMO
175
Safe Harbor Target
170
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
26
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
31✝
PI
61✝
EAMO
117
Safe Harbor Target
20
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
YES
12th Graders
99
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
99%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
103
PI
135
EAMO
152
Safe Harbor Target
150
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
12th Graders
170
199
198
205
48
205
179
205
106
93
112
0
205
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
99%
100%
99%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
99%
―
100%
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
163
193
190
197
45
197
166
197
94
93
104
0
197
PI
158
157
157
157
158
157
175
157
182
146
167
―
157
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
12th Graders
170
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
99%
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
163
PI
158
Not Black or African American
12th Graders
199
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
193
PI
157
Not Hispanic or Latino
12th Graders
198
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
99%
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
190
PI
157
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
12th Graders
205
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
197
PI
157
Not White
12th Graders
48
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
45
PI
158
Not Multiracial
12th Graders
205
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
197
PI
157
General Education
12th Graders
179
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
166
PI
175
English Proficient
12th Graders
205
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
197
PI
157
Not Economically Disadvantaged
12th Graders
106
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
94
PI
182
Male
12th Graders
93
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
93
PI
146
Female
12th Graders
112
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
99%
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
104
PI
167
Migrant
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
Not Migrant
12th Graders
205
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
197
PI
157
― There were fewer than 40 12th graders, so the Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 students in the 2012 accountability cohort, so PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed. ✝ Includes former students with disabilities because the number of students with disabilities in the current year is equal to or greater than 30.
Secondary-Level Mathematics Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: NO
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
NO
YES
―
―
―
NO
―
YES
―
NO
Tested 95%
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
YES
12th graders
205
35
6
7
0
157
0
26
0
99
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
―
―
―
―
100%
―
―
―
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
YES
―
―
―
NO
―
YES
―
NO
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
197
34
4
7
0
152
0
31✝
0
103
PI
131
129
―
―
―
132
―
71✝
―
114
EAMO
151
129
―
―
―
162
―
108
―
136
Safe Harbor Target
145
20
―
―
―
146
―
20
―
125
All Students
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
YES
12th Graders
205
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
197
PI
131
EAMO
151
Safe Harbor Target
145
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
35
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
34
PI
129
EAMO
129
Safe Harbor Target
20
Black or African American
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
6
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
4
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
7
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
7
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
White
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
YES
12th Graders
157
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
152
PI
132
EAMO
162
Safe Harbor Target
146
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
26
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
31✝
PI
71✝
EAMO
108
Safe Harbor Target
20
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
YES
12th Graders
99
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
103
PI
114
EAMO
136
Safe Harbor Target
125
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
12th Graders
170
199
198
205
48
205
179
205
106
93
112
0
205
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
―
100%
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
163
193
190
197
45
197
166
197
94
93
104
0
197
PI
132
132
132
131
129
131
143
131
151
125
138
―
131
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
12th Graders
170
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
163
PI
132
Not Black or African American
12th Graders
199
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
193
PI
132
Not Hispanic or Latino
12th Graders
198
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
190
PI
132
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
12th Graders
205
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
197
PI
131
Not White
12th Graders
48
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
45
PI
129
Not Multiracial
12th Graders
205
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
197
PI
131
General Education
12th Graders
179
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
166
PI
143
English Proficient
12th Graders
205
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
197
PI
131
Not Economically Disadvantaged
12th Graders
106
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
94
PI
151
Male
12th Graders
93
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
93
PI
125
Female
12th Graders
112
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
104
PI
138
Migrant
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
Not Migrant
12th Graders
205
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
197
PI
131
― There were fewer than 40 12th graders, so the Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 students in the 2012 accountability cohort, so PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed. ✝ Includes former students with disabilities because the number of students with disabilities in the current year is equal to or greater than 30.
Unweighted Combined ELA and Math PIs
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
157
153
―
―
―
157
―
61
―
135
Secondary-Level MATH PI
131
129
―
―
―
132
―
71
―
114
UNWEIGHTED COMBINED PI
144
141
0
0
0
145
0
66
0
125
All Students
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
157
Secondary-Level MATH PI
131
Unweighted Combined PI
144
American Indian or Alaska Native
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
153
Secondary-Level MATH PI
129
Unweighted Combined PI
141
Black or African American
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Hispanic or Latino
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
White
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
157
Secondary-Level MATH PI
132
Unweighted Combined PI
145
Multiracial
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Students With Disabilities
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
61
Secondary-Level MATH PI
71
Unweighted Combined PI
66
Limited English Proficient
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Economically Disadvantaged
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
135
Secondary-Level MATH PI
114
Unweighted Combined PI
125
― There were not enough students to determine a Performance Index.
Overall Graduation Rate for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: NO
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
YES
NO
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
YES
All Students
MADE AYP
YES
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP
NO
Black or African American
MADE AYP
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP
―
White
MADE AYP
YES
Multiracial
MADE AYP
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP
―
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
YES
― There were not enough students to make an AYP determination.
Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort for Accountability
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion:
YES
NO
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
YES
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
235
34
1
1
1
198
0
23
0
113
Graduation Rate
86%
79%
―
―
―
86%
―
―
―
73%
State Standard
80%
80%
―
―
―
80%
―
―
―
80%
Progress Target
80%
80%
―
―
―
80%
―
―
―
72%
All Students
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
235
Graduation Rate
86%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%
American Indian or Alaska Native
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: NO
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
34
Graduation Rate
79%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%
Black or African American
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
1
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
1
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
1
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
White
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
198
Graduation Rate
86%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%
Multiracial
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Students With Disabilities
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
23
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Limited English Proficient
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
113
Graduation Rate
73%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
72%
YES Graduation rate is equal to or greater than the State Standard or the group's Progress Target. NO Graduation rate is less than the State Standard and the group's Progress Target.
― There were fewer than 30 students in the cohort.
Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort for Accountability
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion:
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
YES
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
217
29
1
4
4
179
0
24
0
102
Graduation Rate
84%
―
―
―
―
82%
―
―
―
75%
State Standard
80%
―
―
―
―
80%
―
―
―
80%
Progress Target
80%
―
―
―
―
80%
―
―
―
70%
All Students
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
217
Graduation Rate
84%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%
American Indian or Alaska Native
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
29
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Black or African American
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
1
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
4
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
4
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
White
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
179
Graduation Rate
82%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%
Multiracial
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Students With Disabilities
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
24
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Limited English Proficient
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
102
Graduation Rate
75%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
70%
YES Graduation rate is equal to or greater than the State Standard or the group's Progress Target. NO Graduation rate is less than the State Standard and the group's Progress Target.
― There were fewer than 30 students in the cohort.
Graduation Rates for Non-AYP Groups for Accountability
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
201
234
234
234
37
235
212
235
122
111
124
0
235
Graduation Rate
87%
85%
85%
85%
81%
86%
89%
86%
98%
86%
85%
―
86%
Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
188
216
213
213
38
217
193
217
115
112
105
0
217
Graduation Rate
83%
84%
84%
84%
92%
84%
87%
84%
91%
86%
82%
―
84%
Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
201
Graduation Rate
87%
Not Black or African American
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
234
Graduation Rate
85%
Not Hispanic or Latino
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
234
Graduation Rate
85%
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
234
Graduation Rate
85%
Not White
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
37
Graduation Rate
81%
Not Multiracial
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
235
Graduation Rate
86%
General Education
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
212
Graduation Rate
89%
English Proficient
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
235
Graduation Rate
86%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
122
Graduation Rate
98%
Male
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
111
Graduation Rate
86%
Female
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
124
Graduation Rate
85%
Migrant
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
Not Migrant
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
235
Graduation Rate
86%
Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
188
Graduation Rate
83%
Not Black or African American
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
216
Graduation Rate
84%
Not Hispanic or Latino
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
213
Graduation Rate
84%
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
213
Graduation Rate
84%
Not White
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
38
Graduation Rate
92%
Not Multiracial
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
217
Graduation Rate
84%
General Education
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
193
Graduation Rate
87%
English Proficient
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
217
Graduation Rate
84%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
115
Graduation Rate
91%
Male
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
112
Graduation Rate
86%
Female
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
105
Graduation Rate
82%
Migrant
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
Not Migrant
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
217
Graduation Rate
84%
― There were fewer than 30 students in the cohort.
Graduation Rates for Regents with Advanced Designation and CTE Endorsement for Accountability
Percentage of 2011 Graduation-Rate Total Cohort members who graduated as of August 31, 2015 with:
Regents Diploma with an Advanced Designation (This School)
30%
Regents Diploma with an Advanced Designation (Statewide)
32%
Percentage in This School Exceeded Statewide
NO
Regents Diploma with an Advanced Designation (This School)
30%
Regents Diploma with an Advanced Designation (Statewide)
32%
Percentage in This School Exceeded Statewide
NO
Regents Diploma with CTE Endorsement (This School)
2%
Regents Diploma with CTE Endorsement (Statewide)
5%
Percentage in This School Exceeded Statewide
NO
Regents Diploma with CTE Endorsement (This School)
You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.
Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.
If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.
