The New York State Report Card is an important part of the Board of Regents' effort to raise learning standards for all students. It provides information to the public on school/district enrollment and staff, student performance, and other measures of school and district performance. Knowledge gained from the report card on a school's or district's strengths and weaknesses can be used to improve instruction and services to students. Report Card Data - Glossary of Terms | Accountability Data - Glossary of Terms | Business Rules
Turnover Rate of Teachers with Fewer Than Five Years of Experience
17%
TURNOVER RATE OF ALL TEACHERS
9%
Teacher Turnover Rate (2014-15 to 2015-16)
Turnover Rate of Teachers with Fewer Than Five Years of Experience
17%
Turnover Rate of All Teachers
9%
Staff Counts (2015 - 16)
GROUP
PRINCIPALS
ASSISTANT PRINCIPALS
OTHER PROFESSIONAL STAFF
PARAPROFESSIONALS
STAFF
3
1
10
60
Staff Counts (2015 - 16)
Principals
3
Assistant Principals
1
Other Professional Staff
10
Paraprofessionals
60
Teacher Qualifications (2015 - 16)
TOTAL TEACHERS
96
PERCENT WITH NO VALID TEACHING CERTIFICATE
0%
PERCENT TEACHING OUT OF CERTIFICATE
3%
PERCENT WITH FEWER THAN THREE YEARS OF EXPERIENCE
5%
PERCENTAGE WITH MASTER'S DEGREEPLUS 30 HOURS OR DOCTORATE
19%
TOTAL NUMBER OF CORE CLASSES
268
Percent Not Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers in This District
2%
Total Number of Classes
482
Percent Taught by Teachers Without Appropriate Certification
3%
Teacher Qualifications (2015 - 16)
TOTAL TEACHERS: 96
Percent with No Valid Teaching Certificate
0%
Percent Teaching Out of Certification
3%
Percent with Fewer Than Three Years of Experience
5%
Percentage with Master's Degree Plus 30 Hours or Doctorate
19%
Total Number of Core Classes
268
Percent Not Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers in This District
2%
Total Number of Classes
482
Percent Taught by Teachers Without Appropriate Certification
3%
Grade 3 English Language Arts
Due to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 proficiency rates.
MEAN SCORE: 301
All Students
PROFICIENT
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 68
LEVEL 1
22
32%
LEVEL 2
27
40%
LEVEL 3
17
25%
LEVEL 4
2
3%
General Education
PROFICIENT
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 60
LEVEL 1
16
27%
LEVEL 2
25
42%
LEVEL 3
17
28%
LEVEL 4
2
3%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 8
LEVEL 1
6
75%
LEVEL 2
2
25%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 67
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 68
LEVEL 1
22
32%
LEVEL 2
27
40%
LEVEL 3
17
25%
LEVEL 4
2
3%
Female
PROFICIENT
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 37
LEVEL 1
9
24%
LEVEL 2
16
43%
LEVEL 3
11
30%
LEVEL 4
1
3%
Male
PROFICIENT
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 31
LEVEL 1
13
42%
LEVEL 2
11
35%
LEVEL 3
6
19%
LEVEL 4
1
3%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 68
LEVEL 1
22
32%
LEVEL 2
27
40%
LEVEL 3
17
25%
LEVEL 4
2
3%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 31
LEVEL 1
15
48%
LEVEL 2
10
32%
LEVEL 3
6
19%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 37
LEVEL 1
7
19%
LEVEL 2
17
46%
LEVEL 3
11
30%
LEVEL 4
2
5%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 68
LEVEL 1
22
32%
LEVEL 2
27
40%
LEVEL 3
17
25%
LEVEL 4
2
3%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
68
60
8
1
67
68
37
31
68
31
37
68
PROFICIENT
28%
32%
0%
_%
_%
28%
32%
23%
28%
19%
35%
28%
LEVEL 1
22
32%
16
27%
6
75%
_
_
_
_
22
32%
9
24%
13
42%
22
32%
15
48%
7
19%
22
32%
LEVEL 2
27
40%
25
42%
2
25%
_
_
_
_
27
40%
16
43%
11
35%
27
40%
10
32%
17
46%
27
40%
LEVEL 3
17
25%
17
28%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
17
25%
11
30%
6
19%
17
25%
6
19%
11
30%
17
25%
LEVEL 4
2
3%
2
3%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
2
3%
1
3%
1
3%
2
3%
0
0%
2
5%
2
3%
Grade 4 English Language Arts
Due to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 proficiency rates.
MEAN SCORE: 289
All Students
PROFICIENT
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 86
LEVEL 1
31
36%
LEVEL 2
41
48%
LEVEL 3
13
15%
LEVEL 4
1
1%
General Education
PROFICIENT
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 71
LEVEL 1
20
28%
LEVEL 2
37
52%
LEVEL 3
13
18%
LEVEL 4
1
1%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 15
LEVEL 1
11
73%
LEVEL 2
4
27%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 83
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 86
LEVEL 1
31
36%
LEVEL 2
41
48%
LEVEL 3
13
15%
LEVEL 4
1
1%
Female
PROFICIENT
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 42
LEVEL 1
15
36%
LEVEL 2
18
43%
LEVEL 3
9
21%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Male
PROFICIENT
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 44
LEVEL 1
16
36%
LEVEL 2
23
52%
LEVEL 3
4
9%
LEVEL 4
1
2%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 86
LEVEL 1
31
36%
LEVEL 2
41
48%
LEVEL 3
13
15%
LEVEL 4
1
1%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 50
LEVEL 1
26
52%
LEVEL 2
20
40%
LEVEL 3
3
6%
LEVEL 4
1
2%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 36
LEVEL 1
5
14%
LEVEL 2
21
58%
LEVEL 3
10
28%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Migrant
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 85
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Migrant
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
86
71
15
1
83
2
86
42
44
86
50
36
1
85
PROFICIENT
16%
20%
0%
_%
_%
_%
16%
21%
11%
16%
8%
28%
_%
_%
LEVEL 1
31
36%
20
28%
11
73%
_
_
_
_
_
_
31
36%
15
36%
16
36%
31
36%
26
52%
5
14%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 2
41
48%
37
52%
4
27%
_
_
_
_
_
_
41
48%
18
43%
23
52%
41
48%
20
40%
21
58%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 3
13
15%
13
18%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
13
15%
9
21%
4
9%
13
15%
3
6%
10
28%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 4
1
1%
1
1%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
1
1%
0
0%
1
2%
1
1%
1
2%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
Grade 5 English Language Arts
Due to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 proficiency rates.
MEAN SCORE: 293
All Students
PROFICIENT
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 55
LEVEL 1
22
40%
LEVEL 2
23
42%
LEVEL 3
10
18%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
General Education
PROFICIENT
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 45
LEVEL 1
13
29%
LEVEL 2
22
49%
LEVEL 3
10
22%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 10
LEVEL 1
9
90%
LEVEL 2
1
10%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 53
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 55
LEVEL 1
22
40%
LEVEL 2
23
42%
LEVEL 3
10
18%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Female
PROFICIENT
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 25
LEVEL 1
7
28%
LEVEL 2
13
52%
LEVEL 3
5
20%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Male
PROFICIENT
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 30
LEVEL 1
15
50%
LEVEL 2
10
33%
LEVEL 3
5
17%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 55
LEVEL 1
22
40%
LEVEL 2
23
42%
LEVEL 3
10
18%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 24
LEVEL 1
13
54%
LEVEL 2
10
42%
LEVEL 3
1
4%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 31
LEVEL 1
9
29%
LEVEL 2
13
42%
LEVEL 3
9
29%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 55
LEVEL 1
22
40%
LEVEL 2
23
42%
LEVEL 3
10
18%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
55
45
10
1
1
53
55
25
30
55
24
31
55
PROFICIENT
18%
22%
0%
_%
_%
_%
18%
20%
17%
18%
4%
29%
18%
LEVEL 1
22
40%
13
29%
9
90%
_
_
_
_
_
_
22
40%
7
28%
15
50%
22
40%
13
54%
9
29%
22
40%
LEVEL 2
23
42%
22
49%
1
10%
_
_
_
_
_
_
23
42%
13
52%
10
33%
23
42%
10
42%
13
42%
23
42%
LEVEL 3
10
18%
10
22%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
10
18%
5
20%
5
17%
10
18%
1
4%
9
29%
10
18%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
Grade 6 English Language Arts
Due to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 proficiency rates.
MEAN SCORE: 280
All Students
PROFICIENT
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 75
LEVEL 1
34
45%
LEVEL 2
27
36%
LEVEL 3
13
17%
LEVEL 4
1
1%
General Education
PROFICIENT
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 65
LEVEL 1
26
40%
LEVEL 2
25
38%
LEVEL 3
13
20%
LEVEL 4
1
2%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 10
LEVEL 1
8
80%
LEVEL 2
2
20%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 73
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 75
LEVEL 1
34
45%
LEVEL 2
27
36%
LEVEL 3
13
17%
LEVEL 4
1
1%
Female
PROFICIENT
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 38
LEVEL 1
12
32%
LEVEL 2
18
47%
LEVEL 3
8
21%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Male
PROFICIENT
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 37
LEVEL 1
22
59%
LEVEL 2
9
24%
LEVEL 3
5
14%
LEVEL 4
1
3%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 75
LEVEL 1
34
45%
LEVEL 2
27
36%
LEVEL 3
13
17%
LEVEL 4
1
1%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 35
LEVEL 1
20
57%
LEVEL 2
12
34%
LEVEL 3
3
9%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 40
LEVEL 1
14
35%
LEVEL 2
15
38%
LEVEL 3
10
25%
LEVEL 4
1
3%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 75
LEVEL 1
34
45%
LEVEL 2
27
36%
LEVEL 3
13
17%
LEVEL 4
1
1%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
75
65
10
73
2
75
38
37
75
35
40
75
PROFICIENT
19%
22%
0%
_%
_%
19%
21%
16%
19%
9%
28%
19%
LEVEL 1
34
45%
26
40%
8
80%
_
_
_
_
34
45%
12
32%
22
59%
34
45%
20
57%
14
35%
34
45%
LEVEL 2
27
36%
25
38%
2
20%
_
_
_
_
27
36%
18
47%
9
24%
27
36%
12
34%
15
38%
27
36%
LEVEL 3
13
17%
13
20%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
13
17%
8
21%
5
14%
13
17%
3
9%
10
25%
13
17%
LEVEL 4
1
1%
1
2%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
1
1%
0
0%
1
3%
1
1%
0
0%
1
3%
1
1%
Grade 7 English Language Arts
Due to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 proficiency rates.
MEAN SCORE: 293
All Students
PROFICIENT
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 64
LEVEL 1
27
42%
LEVEL 2
24
38%
LEVEL 3
12
19%
LEVEL 4
1
2%
General Education
PROFICIENT
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 55
LEVEL 1
19
35%
LEVEL 2
23
42%
LEVEL 3
12
22%
LEVEL 4
1
2%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
8
89%
LEVEL 2
1
11%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 62
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 64
LEVEL 1
27
42%
LEVEL 2
24
38%
LEVEL 3
12
19%
LEVEL 4
1
2%
Female
PROFICIENT
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 27
LEVEL 1
9
33%
LEVEL 2
11
41%
LEVEL 3
6
22%
LEVEL 4
1
4%
Male
PROFICIENT
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 37
LEVEL 1
18
49%
LEVEL 2
13
35%
LEVEL 3
6
16%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 64
LEVEL 1
27
42%
LEVEL 2
24
38%
LEVEL 3
12
19%
LEVEL 4
1
2%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 34
LEVEL 1
19
56%
LEVEL 2
12
35%
LEVEL 3
3
9%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 30
LEVEL 1
8
27%
LEVEL 2
12
40%
LEVEL 3
9
30%
LEVEL 4
1
3%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 64
LEVEL 1
27
42%
LEVEL 2
24
38%
LEVEL 3
12
19%
LEVEL 4
1
2%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
64
55
9
1
1
62
64
27
37
64
34
30
64
PROFICIENT
20%
24%
0%
_%
_%
_%
20%
26%
16%
20%
9%
33%
20%
LEVEL 1
27
42%
19
35%
8
89%
_
_
_
_
_
_
27
42%
9
33%
18
49%
27
42%
19
56%
8
27%
27
42%
LEVEL 2
24
38%
23
42%
1
11%
_
_
_
_
_
_
24
38%
11
41%
13
35%
24
38%
12
35%
12
40%
24
38%
LEVEL 3
12
19%
12
22%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
12
19%
6
22%
6
16%
12
19%
3
9%
9
30%
12
19%
LEVEL 4
1
2%
1
2%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
1
2%
1
4%
0
0%
1
2%
0
0%
1
3%
1
2%
Grade 8 English Language Arts
Due to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 proficiency rates.
MEAN SCORE: 294
All Students
PROFICIENT
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 75
LEVEL 1
21
28%
LEVEL 2
33
44%
LEVEL 3
17
23%
LEVEL 4
4
5%
General Education
PROFICIENT
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 64
LEVEL 1
12
19%
LEVEL 2
32
50%
LEVEL 3
16
25%
LEVEL 4
4
6%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 11
LEVEL 1
9
82%
LEVEL 2
1
9%
LEVEL 3
1
9%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 72
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 75
LEVEL 1
21
28%
LEVEL 2
33
44%
LEVEL 3
17
23%
LEVEL 4
4
5%
Female
PROFICIENT
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 31
LEVEL 1
2
6%
LEVEL 2
17
55%
LEVEL 3
8
26%
LEVEL 4
4
13%
Male
PROFICIENT
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 44
LEVEL 1
19
43%
LEVEL 2
16
36%
LEVEL 3
9
20%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 75
LEVEL 1
21
28%
LEVEL 2
33
44%
LEVEL 3
17
23%
LEVEL 4
4
5%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 44
LEVEL 1
18
41%
LEVEL 2
15
34%
LEVEL 3
10
23%
LEVEL 4
1
2%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 31
LEVEL 1
3
10%
LEVEL 2
18
58%
LEVEL 3
7
23%
LEVEL 4
3
10%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 75
LEVEL 1
21
28%
LEVEL 2
33
44%
LEVEL 3
17
23%
LEVEL 4
4
5%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
75
64
11
2
1
72
75
31
44
75
44
31
75
PROFICIENT
28%
31%
9%
_%
_%
_%
28%
39%
20%
28%
25%
32%
28%
LEVEL 1
21
28%
12
19%
9
82%
_
_
_
_
_
_
21
28%
2
6%
19
43%
21
28%
18
41%
3
10%
21
28%
LEVEL 2
33
44%
32
50%
1
9%
_
_
_
_
_
_
33
44%
17
55%
16
36%
33
44%
15
34%
18
58%
33
44%
LEVEL 3
17
23%
16
25%
1
9%
_
_
_
_
_
_
17
23%
8
26%
9
20%
17
23%
10
23%
7
23%
17
23%
LEVEL 4
4
5%
4
6%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
4
5%
4
13%
0
0%
4
5%
1
2%
3
10%
4
5%
Grade 3 Mathematics
Due to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 proficiency rates.
MEAN SCORE: 308
All Students
PROFICIENT
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 68
LEVEL 1
12
18%
LEVEL 2
29
43%
LEVEL 3
14
21%
LEVEL 4
13
19%
General Education
PROFICIENT
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 60
LEVEL 1
6
10%
LEVEL 2
27
45%
LEVEL 3
14
23%
LEVEL 4
13
22%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 8
LEVEL 1
6
75%
LEVEL 2
2
25%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 67
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 68
LEVEL 1
12
18%
LEVEL 2
29
43%
LEVEL 3
14
21%
LEVEL 4
13
19%
Female
PROFICIENT
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 37
LEVEL 1
6
16%
LEVEL 2
16
43%
LEVEL 3
7
19%
LEVEL 4
8
22%
Male
PROFICIENT
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 31
LEVEL 1
6
19%
LEVEL 2
13
42%
LEVEL 3
7
23%
LEVEL 4
5
16%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 68
LEVEL 1
12
18%
LEVEL 2
29
43%
LEVEL 3
14
21%
LEVEL 4
13
19%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 31
LEVEL 1
11
35%
LEVEL 2
11
35%
LEVEL 3
7
23%
LEVEL 4
2
6%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 37
LEVEL 1
1
3%
LEVEL 2
18
49%
LEVEL 3
7
19%
LEVEL 4
11
30%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 68
LEVEL 1
12
18%
LEVEL 2
29
43%
LEVEL 3
14
21%
LEVEL 4
13
19%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
68
60
8
1
67
68
37
31
68
31
37
68
PROFICIENT
40%
45%
0%
_%
_%
40%
41%
39%
40%
29%
49%
40%
LEVEL 1
12
18%
6
10%
6
75%
_
_
_
_
12
18%
6
16%
6
19%
12
18%
11
35%
1
3%
12
18%
LEVEL 2
29
43%
27
45%
2
25%
_
_
_
_
29
43%
16
43%
13
42%
29
43%
11
35%
18
49%
29
43%
LEVEL 3
14
21%
14
23%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
14
21%
7
19%
7
23%
14
21%
7
23%
7
19%
14
21%
LEVEL 4
13
19%
13
22%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
13
19%
8
22%
5
16%
13
19%
2
6%
11
30%
13
19%
Grade 4 Mathematics
Due to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 proficiency rates.
MEAN SCORE: 305
All Students
PROFICIENT
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 86
LEVEL 1
19
22%
LEVEL 2
30
35%
LEVEL 3
24
28%
LEVEL 4
13
15%
General Education
PROFICIENT
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 71
LEVEL 1
9
13%
LEVEL 2
27
38%
LEVEL 3
23
32%
LEVEL 4
12
17%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 15
LEVEL 1
10
67%
LEVEL 2
3
20%
LEVEL 3
1
7%
LEVEL 4
1
7%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 83
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 86
LEVEL 1
19
22%
LEVEL 2
30
35%
LEVEL 3
24
28%
LEVEL 4
13
15%
Female
PROFICIENT
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 42
LEVEL 1
7
17%
LEVEL 2
15
36%
LEVEL 3
14
33%
LEVEL 4
6
14%
Male
PROFICIENT
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 44
LEVEL 1
12
27%
LEVEL 2
15
34%
LEVEL 3
10
23%
LEVEL 4
7
16%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 86
LEVEL 1
19
22%
LEVEL 2
30
35%
LEVEL 3
24
28%
LEVEL 4
13
15%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 50
LEVEL 1
15
30%
LEVEL 2
22
44%
LEVEL 3
9
18%
LEVEL 4
4
8%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 36
LEVEL 1
4
11%
LEVEL 2
8
22%
LEVEL 3
15
42%
LEVEL 4
9
25%
Migrant
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 85
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Migrant
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
86
71
15
1
83
2
86
42
44
86
50
36
1
85
PROFICIENT
43%
49%
13%
_%
_%
_%
43%
48%
39%
43%
26%
67%
_%
_%
LEVEL 1
19
22%
9
13%
10
67%
_
_
_
_
_
_
19
22%
7
17%
12
27%
19
22%
15
30%
4
11%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 2
30
35%
27
38%
3
20%
_
_
_
_
_
_
30
35%
15
36%
15
34%
30
35%
22
44%
8
22%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 3
24
28%
23
32%
1
7%
_
_
_
_
_
_
24
28%
14
33%
10
23%
24
28%
9
18%
15
42%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 4
13
15%
12
17%
1
7%
_
_
_
_
_
_
13
15%
6
14%
7
16%
13
15%
4
8%
9
25%
_
_
_
_
Grade 5 Mathematics
Due to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 proficiency rates.
MEAN SCORE: 306
All Students
PROFICIENT
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 55
LEVEL 1
15
27%
LEVEL 2
20
36%
LEVEL 3
15
27%
LEVEL 4
5
9%
General Education
PROFICIENT
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 45
LEVEL 1
8
18%
LEVEL 2
17
38%
LEVEL 3
15
33%
LEVEL 4
5
11%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 10
LEVEL 1
7
70%
LEVEL 2
3
30%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 53
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 55
LEVEL 1
15
27%
LEVEL 2
20
36%
LEVEL 3
15
27%
LEVEL 4
5
9%
Female
PROFICIENT
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 25
LEVEL 1
7
28%
LEVEL 2
9
36%
LEVEL 3
8
32%
LEVEL 4
1
4%
Male
PROFICIENT
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 30
LEVEL 1
8
27%
LEVEL 2
11
37%
LEVEL 3
7
23%
LEVEL 4
4
13%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 55
LEVEL 1
15
27%
LEVEL 2
20
36%
LEVEL 3
15
27%
LEVEL 4
5
9%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 24
LEVEL 1
11
46%
LEVEL 2
8
33%
LEVEL 3
5
21%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 31
LEVEL 1
4
13%
LEVEL 2
12
39%
LEVEL 3
10
32%
LEVEL 4
5
16%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 55
LEVEL 1
15
27%
LEVEL 2
20
36%
LEVEL 3
15
27%
LEVEL 4
5
9%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
55
45
10
1
1
53
55
25
30
55
24
31
55
PROFICIENT
36%
44%
0%
_%
_%
_%
36%
36%
37%
36%
21%
48%
36%
LEVEL 1
15
27%
8
18%
7
70%
_
_
_
_
_
_
15
27%
7
28%
8
27%
15
27%
11
46%
4
13%
15
27%
LEVEL 2
20
36%
17
38%
3
30%
_
_
_
_
_
_
20
36%
9
36%
11
37%
20
36%
8
33%
12
39%
20
36%
LEVEL 3
15
27%
15
33%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
15
27%
8
32%
7
23%
15
27%
5
21%
10
32%
15
27%
LEVEL 4
5
9%
5
11%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
5
9%
1
4%
4
13%
5
9%
0
0%
5
16%
5
9%
Grade 6 Mathematics
Due to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 proficiency rates.
MEAN SCORE: 290
All Students
PROFICIENT
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 72
LEVEL 1
24
33%
LEVEL 2
33
46%
LEVEL 3
9
13%
LEVEL 4
6
8%
General Education
PROFICIENT
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 62
LEVEL 1
15
24%
LEVEL 2
32
52%
LEVEL 3
9
15%
LEVEL 4
6
10%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 10
LEVEL 1
9
90%
LEVEL 2
1
10%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 71
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 72
LEVEL 1
24
33%
LEVEL 2
33
46%
LEVEL 3
9
13%
LEVEL 4
6
8%
Female
PROFICIENT
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 37
LEVEL 1
13
35%
LEVEL 2
17
46%
LEVEL 3
3
8%
LEVEL 4
4
11%
Male
PROFICIENT
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 35
LEVEL 1
11
31%
LEVEL 2
16
46%
LEVEL 3
6
17%
LEVEL 4
2
6%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 71
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 32
LEVEL 1
16
50%
LEVEL 2
11
34%
LEVEL 3
3
9%
LEVEL 4
2
6%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 40
LEVEL 1
8
20%
LEVEL 2
22
55%
LEVEL 3
6
15%
LEVEL 4
4
10%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 72
LEVEL 1
24
33%
LEVEL 2
33
46%
LEVEL 3
9
13%
LEVEL 4
6
8%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
72
62
10
71
1
72
37
35
71
1
32
40
72
PROFICIENT
21%
24%
0%
_%
_%
21%
19%
23%
_%
_%
16%
25%
21%
LEVEL 1
24
33%
15
24%
9
90%
_
_
_
_
24
33%
13
35%
11
31%
_
_
_
_
16
50%
8
20%
24
33%
LEVEL 2
33
46%
32
52%
1
10%
_
_
_
_
33
46%
17
46%
16
46%
_
_
_
_
11
34%
22
55%
33
46%
LEVEL 3
9
13%
9
15%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
9
13%
3
8%
6
17%
_
_
_
_
3
9%
6
15%
9
13%
LEVEL 4
6
8%
6
10%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
6
8%
4
11%
2
6%
_
_
_
_
2
6%
4
10%
6
8%
Grade 7 Mathematics
Due to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 proficiency rates.
Mean scores and data in the table for grade 7 math include only those for grade 7 students who took the Grade 7 New York State Testing Program Assessment (NYSTP) in Mathematics. For 2015 and forward, data in the bar charts include those for grade 7 students who took the Grade 7 NYSTP in Mathematics and grade 7 students who took a Regents math test in lieu of the NYSTP. For 2014 and earlier, data in the bar charts include only those for grade 7 students who took the Grade 7 NYSTP.
MEAN SCORE: 302
All Students
PROFICIENT
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 63
LEVEL 1
21
33%
LEVEL 2
24
38%
LEVEL 3
13
21%
LEVEL 4
5
8%
General Education
PROFICIENT
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 53
LEVEL 1
12
23%
LEVEL 2
23
43%
LEVEL 3
13
25%
LEVEL 4
5
9%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 10
LEVEL 1
9
90%
LEVEL 2
1
10%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 61
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 63
LEVEL 1
21
33%
LEVEL 2
24
38%
LEVEL 3
13
21%
LEVEL 4
5
8%
Female
PROFICIENT
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 26
LEVEL 1
8
31%
LEVEL 2
11
42%
LEVEL 3
7
27%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Male
PROFICIENT
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 37
LEVEL 1
13
35%
LEVEL 2
13
35%
LEVEL 3
6
16%
LEVEL 4
5
14%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 63
LEVEL 1
21
33%
LEVEL 2
24
38%
LEVEL 3
13
21%
LEVEL 4
5
8%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 34
LEVEL 1
13
38%
LEVEL 2
17
50%
LEVEL 3
2
6%
LEVEL 4
2
6%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 29
LEVEL 1
8
28%
LEVEL 2
7
24%
LEVEL 3
11
38%
LEVEL 4
3
10%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 63
LEVEL 1
21
33%
LEVEL 2
24
38%
LEVEL 3
13
21%
LEVEL 4
5
8%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
63
53
10
1
1
61
63
26
37
63
34
29
63
PROFICIENT
29%
34%
0%
_%
_%
_%
29%
27%
30%
29%
12%
48%
29%
LEVEL 1
21
33%
12
23%
9
90%
_
_
_
_
_
_
21
33%
8
31%
13
35%
21
33%
13
38%
8
28%
21
33%
LEVEL 2
24
38%
23
43%
1
10%
_
_
_
_
_
_
24
38%
11
42%
13
35%
24
38%
17
50%
7
24%
24
38%
LEVEL 3
13
21%
13
25%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
13
21%
7
27%
6
16%
13
21%
2
6%
11
38%
13
21%
LEVEL 4
5
8%
5
9%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
5
8%
0
0%
5
14%
5
8%
2
6%
3
10%
5
8%
Grade 8 Mathematics
Due to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 proficiency rates.
Mean scores and data in the table for grade 8 math include only those for grade 8 students who took the Grade 8 New York State Testing Program Assessment (NYSTP) in Mathematics. For 2015 and forward, data in the bar charts include those for grade 8 students who took the Grade 8 NYSTP in Mathematics and grade 8 students who took a Regents math test in lieu of the NYSTP. For 2014 and earlier, data in the bar charts include only those for grade 8 students who took the Grade 8 NYSTP.
MEAN SCORE: 295
All Students
PROFICIENT
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 59
LEVEL 1
16
27%
LEVEL 2
34
58%
LEVEL 3
8
14%
LEVEL 4
1
2%
General Education
PROFICIENT
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 50
LEVEL 1
10
20%
LEVEL 2
31
62%
LEVEL 3
8
16%
LEVEL 4
1
2%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
6
67%
LEVEL 2
3
33%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 57
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 59
LEVEL 1
16
27%
LEVEL 2
34
58%
LEVEL 3
8
14%
LEVEL 4
1
2%
Female
PROFICIENT
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 23
LEVEL 1
6
26%
LEVEL 2
14
61%
LEVEL 3
2
9%
LEVEL 4
1
4%
Male
PROFICIENT
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 36
LEVEL 1
10
28%
LEVEL 2
20
56%
LEVEL 3
6
17%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 59
LEVEL 1
16
27%
LEVEL 2
34
58%
LEVEL 3
8
14%
LEVEL 4
1
2%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 37
LEVEL 1
11
30%
LEVEL 2
21
57%
LEVEL 3
5
14%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 22
LEVEL 1
5
23%
LEVEL 2
13
59%
LEVEL 3
3
14%
LEVEL 4
1
5%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 59
LEVEL 1
16
27%
LEVEL 2
34
58%
LEVEL 3
8
14%
LEVEL 4
1
2%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
59
50
9
2
57
59
23
36
59
37
22
59
PROFICIENT
15%
18%
0%
_%
_%
15%
13%
17%
15%
14%
18%
15%
LEVEL 1
16
27%
10
20%
6
67%
_
_
_
_
16
27%
6
26%
10
28%
16
27%
11
30%
5
23%
16
27%
LEVEL 2
34
58%
31
62%
3
33%
_
_
_
_
34
58%
14
61%
20
56%
34
58%
21
57%
13
59%
34
58%
LEVEL 3
8
14%
8
16%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
8
14%
2
9%
6
17%
8
14%
5
14%
3
14%
8
14%
LEVEL 4
1
2%
1
2%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
1
2%
1
4%
0
0%
1
2%
0
0%
1
5%
1
2%
Grade 8 Students Taking a Regents Math Test
Accelerated grade 8 students who took a Regents math test in lieu of the Grade 8 NYSTP in Mathematics.
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 11
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
4
36%
LEVEL 4 AND ABOVE
7
64%
LEVEL 3 AND ABOVE
11
100%
GROUP
All Students
TOTAL TESTED
11
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
4
36%
4 & ABOVE
7
64%
3 & ABOVE
11
100%
Grade 4 Science
Due to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 proficiency rates.
MEAN SCORE: 81
All Students
PROFICIENT
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 88
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
6
7%
LEVEL 3
41
47%
LEVEL 4
41
47%
General Education
PROFICIENT
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 73
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
3%
LEVEL 3
32
44%
LEVEL 4
39
53%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 15
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
4
27%
LEVEL 3
9
60%
LEVEL 4
2
13%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 85
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 88
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
6
7%
LEVEL 3
41
47%
LEVEL 4
41
47%
Female
PROFICIENT
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 43
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
5%
LEVEL 3
18
42%
LEVEL 4
23
53%
Male
PROFICIENT
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 45
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
4
9%
LEVEL 3
23
51%
LEVEL 4
18
40%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 88
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
6
7%
LEVEL 3
41
47%
LEVEL 4
41
47%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 51
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
6
12%
LEVEL 3
28
55%
LEVEL 4
17
33%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 37
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
13
35%
LEVEL 4
24
65%
Migrant
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 87
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Migrant
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
88
73
15
1
85
2
88
43
45
88
51
37
1
87
PROFICIENT
93%
97%
73%
_%
_%
_%
93%
95%
91%
93%
88%
100%
_%
_%
LEVEL 1
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 2
6
7%
2
3%
4
27%
_
_
_
_
_
_
6
7%
2
5%
4
9%
6
7%
6
12%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 3
41
47%
32
44%
9
60%
_
_
_
_
_
_
41
47%
18
42%
23
51%
41
47%
28
55%
13
35%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 4
41
47%
39
53%
2
13%
_
_
_
_
_
_
41
47%
23
53%
18
40%
41
47%
17
33%
24
65%
_
_
_
_
Grade 8 Science
Due to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 proficiency rates.
Data in the bar charts include those for grade 8 students who took the New York State Grade 8 Science Test and grade 8 students who took a Regents science test in lieu of this test. Mean scores and data in the table for grade 8 science include only those for grade 8 students who took the New York State Grade 8 Science Test.
MEAN SCORE: 75
All Students
PROFICIENT
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 89
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
18
20%
LEVEL 3
47
53%
LEVEL 4
23
26%
General Education
PROFICIENT
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 74
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
8
11%
LEVEL 3
43
58%
LEVEL 4
23
31%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 15
LEVEL 1
1
7%
LEVEL 2
10
67%
LEVEL 3
4
27%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 86
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 89
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
18
20%
LEVEL 3
47
53%
LEVEL 4
23
26%
Female
PROFICIENT
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 37
LEVEL 1
1
3%
LEVEL 2
6
16%
LEVEL 3
20
54%
LEVEL 4
10
27%
Male
PROFICIENT
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 52
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
12
23%
LEVEL 3
27
52%
LEVEL 4
13
25%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 89
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
18
20%
LEVEL 3
47
53%
LEVEL 4
23
26%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 50
LEVEL 1
1
2%
LEVEL 2
10
20%
LEVEL 3
27
54%
LEVEL 4
12
24%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 39
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
8
21%
LEVEL 3
20
51%
LEVEL 4
11
28%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 89
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
18
20%
LEVEL 3
47
53%
LEVEL 4
23
26%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
89
74
15
2
1
86
89
37
52
89
50
39
89
PROFICIENT
79%
89%
27%
_%
_%
_%
79%
81%
77%
79%
78%
79%
79%
LEVEL 1
1
1%
0
0%
1
7%
_
_
_
_
_
_
1
1%
1
3%
0
0%
1
1%
1
2%
0
0%
1
1%
LEVEL 2
18
20%
8
11%
10
67%
_
_
_
_
_
_
18
20%
6
16%
12
23%
18
20%
10
20%
8
21%
18
20%
LEVEL 3
47
53%
43
58%
4
27%
_
_
_
_
_
_
47
53%
20
54%
27
52%
47
53%
27
54%
20
51%
47
53%
LEVEL 4
23
26%
23
31%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
23
26%
10
27%
13
25%
23
26%
12
24%
11
28%
23
26%
Recently Arrived ELL Students (2015 - 16)
GRADE
Grade 6
RECENTLY ARRIVED ELL STUDENTS TAKING NYSESLAT IN LIEU OF NYSTP
1
GRADE
Grade 6
RECENTLY ARRIVED ELL STUDENTS NOT TAKING NYSESLAT IN LIEU OF NYSTP
1
Recently Arrived ELL Students (2015 - 16)
Recently Arrived ELL Students Taking NYSESLAT in Lieu of NYSTP
Grade 6
1
Recently Arrived ELL Students NOT Tested on the ELA NYSTP
Grade 6
1
Statewide Results on the National Assessment of Educational Progress: NAEP (2014 - 15)
Grade: 4
Reading
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Students with Disabilities
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
BELOW BASIC
32%
*%
20%
48%
44%
20%
*%
70%
74%
43%
BASIC
32%
*%
30%
34%
37%
31%
*%
22%
21%
36%
PROFICIENT
27%
*%
33%
15%
17%
37%
*%
7%
4%
18%
ADVANCED
9%
*%
17%
3%
2%
12%
*%
1%
1%
3%
PARTICIPATION RATE
98
88
Reading
All Students
Percent Below Basic
32
Percent Basic
32
Percent Proficient
27
Percent Advanced
9
American Indian or Alaska Native
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Percent Below Basic
20
Percent Basic
30
Percent Proficient
33
Percent Advanced
17
Black or African American
Percent Below Basic
48
Percent Basic
34
Percent Proficient
15
Percent Advanced
3
Hispanic or Latino
Percent Below Basic
44
Percent Basic
37
Percent Proficient
17
Percent Advanced
2
White
Percent Below Basic
20
Percent Basic
31
Percent Proficient
37
Percent Advanced
12
Multiracial
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Students with Disabilities
Percent Below Basic
70
Percent Basic
22
Percent Proficient
7
Percent Advanced
1
Participation Rate
98
English Language Learners
Percent Below Basic
74
Percent Basic
21
Percent Proficient
4
Percent Advanced
1
Participation Rate
88
Economically Disadvantaged
Percent Below Basic
43
Percent Basic
36
Percent Proficient
18
Percent Advanced
3
Mathematics
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Students with Disabilities
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
BELOW BASIC
21%
*%
12%
40%
28%
12%
*%
49%
56%
29%
BASIC
44%
*%
31%
46%
51%
41%
*%
39%
35%
48%
PROFICIENT
30%
*%
42%
13%
20%
40%
*%
10%
9%
21%
ADVANCED
5%
*%
15%
1%
1%
7%
*%
2%
*%
2%
PARTICIPATION RATE
98
91
Mathematics
All Students
Percent Below Basic
21
Percent Basic
44
Percent Proficient
30
Percent Advanced
5
American Indian or Alaska Native
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Percent Below Basic
12
Percent Basic
31
Percent Proficient
42
Percent Advanced
15
Black or African American
Percent Below Basic
40
Percent Basic
46
Percent Proficient
13
Percent Advanced
1
Hispanic or Latino
Percent Below Basic
28
Percent Basic
51
Percent Proficient
20
Percent Advanced
1
White
Percent Below Basic
12
Percent Basic
41
Percent Proficient
40
Percent Advanced
7
Multiracial
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Students with Disabilities
Percent Below Basic
49
Percent Basic
39
Percent Proficient
10
Percent Advanced
2
Participation Rate
98
English Language Learners
Percent Below Basic
56
Percent Basic
35
Percent Proficient
9
Percent Advanced
*
Participation Rate
91
Economically Disadvantaged
Percent Below Basic
29
Percent Basic
48
Percent Proficient
21
Percent Advanced
2
Grade: 8
Reading
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Students with Disabilities
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
BELOW BASIC
27%
*%
19%
42%
35%
18%
*%
59%
78%
36%
BASIC
40%
*%
39%
41%
43%
39%
*%
33%
19%
42%
PROFICIENT
29%
*%
34%
16%
20%
38%
*%
8%
3%
21%
ADVANCED
4%
*%
8%
1%
2%
5%
*%
*%
*%
1%
PARTICIPATION RATE
98
89
Reading
All Students
Percent Below Basic
27
Percent Basic
40
Percent Proficient
29
Percent Advanced
4
American Indian or Alaska Native
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Percent Below Basic
19
Percent Basic
39
Percent Proficient
34
Percent Advanced
8
Black or African American
Percent Below Basic
42
Percent Basic
41
Percent Proficient
16
Percent Advanced
1
Hispanic or Latino
Percent Below Basic
35
Percent Basic
43
Percent Proficient
20
Percent Advanced
2
White
Percent Below Basic
18
Percent Basic
39
Percent Proficient
38
Percent Advanced
5
Multiracial
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Students with Disabilities
Percent Below Basic
59
Percent Basic
33
Percent Proficient
8
Percent Advanced
*
Participation Rate
98
English Language Learners
Percent Below Basic
78
Percent Basic
19
Percent Proficient
3
Percent Advanced
*
Participation Rate
89
Economically Disadvantaged
Percent Below Basic
36
Percent Basic
42
Percent Proficient
21
Percent Advanced
1
Mathematics
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Students with Disabilities
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
BELOW BASIC
31%
*%
18%
48%
41%
20%
*%
64%
72%
40%
BASIC
38%
*%
30%
37%
40%
40%
*%
27%
21%
39%
PROFICIENT
24%
*%
33%
13%
16%
31%
*%
8%
6%
17%
ADVANCED
7%
*%
19%
2%
3%
9%
*%
1%
1%
4%
PARTICIPATION RATE
99
94
Mathematics
All Students
Percent Below Basic
31
Percent Basic
38
Percent Proficient
24
Percent Advanced
7
American Indian or Alaska Native
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Percent Below Basic
18
Percent Basic
30
Percent Proficient
33
Percent Advanced
19
Black or African American
Percent Below Basic
48
Percent Basic
37
Percent Proficient
13
Percent Advanced
2
Hispanic or Latino
Percent Below Basic
41
Percent Basic
40
Percent Proficient
16
Percent Advanced
3
White
Percent Below Basic
20
Percent Basic
40
Percent Proficient
31
Percent Advanced
9
Multiracial
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Students with Disabilities
Percent Below Basic
64
Percent Basic
27
Percent Proficient
8
Percent Advanced
1
Participation Rate
99
English Language Learners
Percent Below Basic
72
Percent Basic
21
Percent Proficient
6
Percent Advanced
1
Participation Rate
94
Economically Disadvantaged
Percent Below Basic
40
Percent Basic
39
Percent Proficient
17
Percent Advanced
4
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level English Language Arts after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 80
LEVEL 1
2
3%
LEVEL 2
7
9%
LEVEL 3
27
34%
LEVEL 4
43
54%
General Education
PROFICIENT
99%
TOTAL TESTED: 67
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
23
34%
LEVEL 4
43
64%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 13
LEVEL 1
2
15%
LEVEL 2
7
54%
LEVEL 3
4
31%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
American Indian or Alaska Native
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 72
LEVEL 1
2
3%
LEVEL 2
7
10%
LEVEL 3
23
32%
LEVEL 4
39
54%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 8
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
4
50%
LEVEL 4
4
50%
Female
PROFICIENT
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 35
LEVEL 1
1
3%
LEVEL 2
3
9%
LEVEL 3
8
23%
LEVEL 4
22
63%
Male
PROFICIENT
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 45
LEVEL 1
1
2%
LEVEL 2
4
9%
LEVEL 3
19
42%
LEVEL 4
21
47%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 80
LEVEL 1
2
3%
LEVEL 2
7
9%
LEVEL 3
27
34%
LEVEL 4
43
54%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 46
LEVEL 1
2
4%
LEVEL 2
7
15%
LEVEL 3
15
33%
LEVEL 4
21
46%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 34
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
12
35%
LEVEL 4
22
65%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 80
LEVEL 1
2
3%
LEVEL 2
7
9%
LEVEL 3
27
34%
LEVEL 4
43
54%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
80
67
13
1
3
3
72
1
8
35
45
80
46
34
80
PROFICIENT
88%
99%
31%
_%
_%
_%
86%
_%
100%
86%
89%
88%
78%
100%
88%
LEVEL 1
2
3%
0
0%
2
15%
_
_
_
_
_
_
2
3%
_
_
0
0%
1
3%
1
2%
2
3%
2
4%
0
0%
2
3%
LEVEL 2
7
9%
0
0%
7
54%
_
_
_
_
_
_
7
10%
_
_
0
0%
3
9%
4
9%
7
9%
7
15%
0
0%
7
9%
LEVEL 3
27
34%
23
34%
4
31%
_
_
_
_
_
_
23
32%
_
_
4
50%
8
23%
19
42%
27
34%
15
33%
12
35%
27
34%
LEVEL 4
43
54%
43
64%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
39
54%
_
_
4
50%
22
63%
21
47%
43
54%
21
46%
22
65%
43
54%
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level Mathematics after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 80
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
5
6%
LEVEL 3
50
63%
LEVEL 4
23
29%
General Education
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 67
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
44
66%
LEVEL 4
23
34%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 13
LEVEL 1
1
8%
LEVEL 2
5
38%
LEVEL 3
6
46%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
American Indian or Alaska Native
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 72
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
5
7%
LEVEL 3
44
61%
LEVEL 4
21
29%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 8
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
6
75%
LEVEL 4
2
25%
Female
PROFICIENT
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 35
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
3
9%
LEVEL 3
20
57%
LEVEL 4
12
34%
Male
PROFICIENT
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 45
LEVEL 1
1
2%
LEVEL 2
2
4%
LEVEL 3
30
67%
LEVEL 4
11
24%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 80
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
5
6%
LEVEL 3
50
63%
LEVEL 4
23
29%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 46
LEVEL 1
1
2%
LEVEL 2
5
11%
LEVEL 3
33
72%
LEVEL 4
6
13%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 34
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
17
50%
LEVEL 4
17
50%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 80
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
5
6%
LEVEL 3
50
63%
LEVEL 4
23
29%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
80
67
13
1
3
3
72
1
8
35
45
80
46
34
80
PROFICIENT
91%
100%
46%
_%
_%
_%
90%
_%
100%
91%
91%
91%
85%
100%
91%
LEVEL 1
1
1%
0
0%
1
8%
_
_
_
_
_
_
1
1%
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
1
2%
1
1%
1
2%
0
0%
1
1%
LEVEL 2
5
6%
0
0%
5
38%
_
_
_
_
_
_
5
7%
_
_
0
0%
3
9%
2
4%
5
6%
5
11%
0
0%
5
6%
LEVEL 3
50
63%
44
66%
6
46%
_
_
_
_
_
_
44
61%
_
_
6
75%
20
57%
30
67%
50
63%
33
72%
17
50%
50
63%
LEVEL 4
23
29%
23
34%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
21
29%
_
_
2
25%
12
34%
11
24%
23
29%
6
13%
17
50%
23
29%
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level Global History and Geography after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 80
LEVEL 1
6
8%
LEVEL 2
8
10%
LEVEL 3
39
49%
LEVEL 4
27
34%
General Education
PROFICIENT
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 67
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
2
3%
LEVEL 3
37
55%
LEVEL 4
27
40%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 13
LEVEL 1
5
38%
LEVEL 2
6
46%
LEVEL 3
2
15%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
American Indian or Alaska Native
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 72
LEVEL 1
6
8%
LEVEL 2
8
11%
LEVEL 3
34
47%
LEVEL 4
24
33%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 8
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
5
63%
LEVEL 4
3
38%
Female
PROFICIENT
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 35
LEVEL 1
3
9%
LEVEL 2
2
6%
LEVEL 3
16
46%
LEVEL 4
14
40%
Male
PROFICIENT
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 45
LEVEL 1
3
7%
LEVEL 2
6
13%
LEVEL 3
23
51%
LEVEL 4
13
29%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 80
LEVEL 1
6
8%
LEVEL 2
8
10%
LEVEL 3
39
49%
LEVEL 4
27
34%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 46
LEVEL 1
6
13%
LEVEL 2
7
15%
LEVEL 3
23
50%
LEVEL 4
10
22%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 34
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
3%
LEVEL 3
16
47%
LEVEL 4
17
50%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 80
LEVEL 1
6
8%
LEVEL 2
8
10%
LEVEL 3
39
49%
LEVEL 4
27
34%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
80
67
13
1
3
3
72
1
8
35
45
80
46
34
80
PROFICIENT
83%
96%
15%
_%
_%
_%
81%
_%
100%
86%
80%
83%
72%
97%
83%
LEVEL 1
6
8%
1
1%
5
38%
_
_
_
_
_
_
6
8%
_
_
0
0%
3
9%
3
7%
6
8%
6
13%
0
0%
6
8%
LEVEL 2
8
10%
2
3%
6
46%
_
_
_
_
_
_
8
11%
_
_
0
0%
2
6%
6
13%
8
10%
7
15%
1
3%
8
10%
LEVEL 3
39
49%
37
55%
2
15%
_
_
_
_
_
_
34
47%
_
_
5
63%
16
46%
23
51%
39
49%
23
50%
16
47%
39
49%
LEVEL 4
27
34%
27
40%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
24
33%
_
_
3
38%
14
40%
13
29%
27
34%
10
22%
17
50%
27
34%
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level U.S. History and Government after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 80
LEVEL 1
4
5%
LEVEL 2
4
5%
LEVEL 3
28
35%
LEVEL 4
41
51%
General Education
PROFICIENT
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 67
LEVEL 1
2
3%
LEVEL 2
1
1%
LEVEL 3
22
33%
LEVEL 4
41
61%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 13
LEVEL 1
2
15%
LEVEL 2
3
23%
LEVEL 3
6
46%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
American Indian or Alaska Native
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 72
LEVEL 1
4
6%
LEVEL 2
4
6%
LEVEL 3
25
35%
LEVEL 4
36
50%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 8
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
3
38%
LEVEL 4
5
63%
Female
PROFICIENT
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 35
LEVEL 1
1
3%
LEVEL 2
1
3%
LEVEL 3
14
40%
LEVEL 4
17
49%
Male
PROFICIENT
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 45
LEVEL 1
3
7%
LEVEL 2
3
7%
LEVEL 3
14
31%
LEVEL 4
24
53%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 80
LEVEL 1
4
5%
LEVEL 2
4
5%
LEVEL 3
28
35%
LEVEL 4
41
51%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 46
LEVEL 1
3
7%
LEVEL 2
3
7%
LEVEL 3
20
43%
LEVEL 4
17
37%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 34
LEVEL 1
1
3%
LEVEL 2
1
3%
LEVEL 3
8
24%
LEVEL 4
24
71%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 80
LEVEL 1
4
5%
LEVEL 2
4
5%
LEVEL 3
28
35%
LEVEL 4
41
51%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
80
67
13
1
3
3
72
1
8
35
45
80
46
34
80
PROFICIENT
86%
94%
46%
_%
_%
_%
85%
_%
100%
89%
84%
86%
80%
94%
86%
LEVEL 1
4
5%
2
3%
2
15%
_
_
_
_
_
_
4
6%
_
_
0
0%
1
3%
3
7%
4
5%
3
7%
1
3%
4
5%
LEVEL 2
4
5%
1
1%
3
23%
_
_
_
_
_
_
4
6%
_
_
0
0%
1
3%
3
7%
4
5%
3
7%
1
3%
4
5%
LEVEL 3
28
35%
22
33%
6
46%
_
_
_
_
_
_
25
35%
_
_
3
38%
14
40%
14
31%
28
35%
20
43%
8
24%
28
35%
LEVEL 4
41
51%
41
61%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
36
50%
_
_
5
63%
17
49%
24
53%
41
51%
17
37%
24
71%
41
51%
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level Science after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 80
LEVEL 1
2
3%
LEVEL 2
4
5%
LEVEL 3
42
53%
LEVEL 4
32
40%
General Education
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 67
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
35
52%
LEVEL 4
32
48%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 13
LEVEL 1
2
15%
LEVEL 2
4
31%
LEVEL 3
7
54%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
American Indian or Alaska Native
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 72
LEVEL 1
2
3%
LEVEL 2
4
6%
LEVEL 3
37
51%
LEVEL 4
29
40%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 8
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
5
63%
LEVEL 4
3
38%
Female
PROFICIENT
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 35
LEVEL 1
1
3%
LEVEL 2
1
3%
LEVEL 3
17
49%
LEVEL 4
16
46%
Male
PROFICIENT
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 45
LEVEL 1
1
2%
LEVEL 2
3
7%
LEVEL 3
25
56%
LEVEL 4
16
36%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 80
LEVEL 1
2
3%
LEVEL 2
4
5%
LEVEL 3
42
53%
LEVEL 4
32
40%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 46
LEVEL 1
2
4%
LEVEL 2
4
9%
LEVEL 3
27
59%
LEVEL 4
13
28%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 34
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
15
44%
LEVEL 4
19
56%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 80
LEVEL 1
2
3%
LEVEL 2
4
5%
LEVEL 3
42
53%
LEVEL 4
32
40%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
80
67
13
1
3
3
72
1
8
35
45
80
46
34
80
PROFICIENT
93%
100%
54%
_%
_%
_%
92%
_%
100%
94%
91%
93%
87%
100%
93%
LEVEL 1
2
3%
0
0%
2
15%
_
_
_
_
_
_
2
3%
_
_
0
0%
1
3%
1
2%
2
3%
2
4%
0
0%
2
3%
LEVEL 2
4
5%
0
0%
4
31%
_
_
_
_
_
_
4
6%
_
_
0
0%
1
3%
3
7%
4
5%
4
9%
0
0%
4
5%
LEVEL 3
42
53%
35
52%
7
54%
_
_
_
_
_
_
37
51%
_
_
5
63%
17
49%
25
56%
42
53%
27
59%
15
44%
42
53%
LEVEL 4
32
40%
32
48%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
29
40%
_
_
3
38%
16
46%
16
36%
32
40%
13
28%
19
56%
32
40%
Regents Examination Results (2015 - 16)
Comprehensive English
Regents Comprehensive English
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
5
5
1
4
5
2
3
5
2
3
5
55
4
80%
4
80%
_
_
_
_
4
80%
_
_
_
_
4
80%
_
_
_
_
4
80%
65
4
80%
4
80%
_
_
_
_
4
80%
_
_
_
_
4
80%
_
_
_
_
4
80%
85
1
20%
1
20%
_
_
_
_
1
20%
_
_
_
_
1
20%
_
_
_
_
1
20%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
4
80%
65
4
80%
85
1
20%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
4
80%
65
4
80%
85
1
20%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 4
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
4
80%
65
4
80%
85
1
20%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
4
80%
65
4
80%
85
1
20%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
4
80%
65
4
80%
85
1
20%
English Language Arts (Common Core)
English Language Arts (Common Core)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
92
79
13
3
87
2
5
41
51
92
43
49
92
LEVEL 1
2
2%
1
1%
1
8%
_
_
2
2%
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
2
4%
2
2%
2
5%
0
0%
2
2%
LEVEL 2
5
5%
3
4%
2
15%
_
_
4
5%
_
_
1
20%
2
5%
3
6%
5
5%
2
5%
3
6%
5
5%
LEVEL 3
28
30%
22
28%
6
46%
_
_
26
30%
_
_
2
40%
12
29%
16
31%
28
30%
16
37%
12
24%
28
30%
LEVEL 4
18
20%
15
19%
3
23%
_
_
18
21%
_
_
0
0%
8
20%
10
20%
18
20%
7
16%
11
22%
18
20%
LEVEL 5
39
42%
38
48%
1
8%
_
_
37
43%
_
_
2
40%
19
46%
20
39%
39
42%
16
37%
23
47%
39
42%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 92
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
2
2%
LEVEL 2
5
5%
LEVEL 3
28
30%
LEVEL 4
18
20%
LEVEL 5
39
42%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 79
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
3
4%
LEVEL 3
22
28%
LEVEL 4
15
19%
LEVEL 5
38
48%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 13
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
1
8%
LEVEL 2
2
15%
LEVEL 3
6
46%
LEVEL 4
3
23%
LEVEL 5
1
8%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 87
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
2
2%
LEVEL 2
4
5%
LEVEL 3
26
30%
LEVEL 4
18
21%
LEVEL 5
37
43%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
20%
LEVEL 3
2
40%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
LEVEL 5
2
40%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 41
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
5%
LEVEL 3
12
29%
LEVEL 4
8
20%
LEVEL 5
19
46%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 51
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
2
4%
LEVEL 2
3
6%
LEVEL 3
16
31%
LEVEL 4
10
20%
LEVEL 5
20
39%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 92
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
2
2%
LEVEL 2
5
5%
LEVEL 3
28
30%
LEVEL 4
18
20%
LEVEL 5
39
42%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 43
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
2
5%
LEVEL 2
2
5%
LEVEL 3
16
37%
LEVEL 4
7
16%
LEVEL 5
16
37%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 49
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
3
6%
LEVEL 3
12
24%
LEVEL 4
11
22%
LEVEL 5
23
47%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 92
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
2
2%
LEVEL 2
5
5%
LEVEL 3
28
30%
LEVEL 4
18
20%
LEVEL 5
39
42%
Integrated Algebra
Regents Integrated Algebra
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
11
11
1
10
11
6
5
11
5
6
11
55
11
100%
11
100%
_
_
_
_
11
100%
6
100%
5
100%
11
100%
5
100%
6
100%
11
100%
65
11
100%
11
100%
_
_
_
_
11
100%
6
100%
5
100%
11
100%
5
100%
6
100%
11
100%
85
3
27%
3
27%
_
_
_
_
3
27%
2
33%
1
20%
3
27%
2
40%
1
17%
3
27%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 11
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
11
100%
65
11
100%
85
3
27%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 11
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
11
100%
65
11
100%
85
3
27%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 10
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 11
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
11
100%
65
11
100%
85
3
27%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 6
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
6
100%
65
6
100%
85
2
33%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
5
100%
65
5
100%
85
1
20%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 11
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
11
100%
65
11
100%
85
3
27%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
5
100%
65
5
100%
85
2
40%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 6
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
6
100%
65
6
100%
85
1
17%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 11
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
11
100%
65
11
100%
85
3
27%
Geometry
Regents Geometry
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
White
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
17
16
1
17
9
8
17
6
11
17
55
14
82%
_
_
_
_
14
82%
8
89%
6
75%
14
82%
4
67%
10
91%
14
82%
65
9
53%
_
_
_
_
9
53%
6
67%
3
38%
9
53%
3
50%
6
55%
9
53%
85
3
18%
_
_
_
_
3
18%
3
33%
0
0%
3
18%
1
17%
2
18%
3
18%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 17
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
14
82%
65
9
53%
85
3
18%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 16
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 17
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
14
82%
65
9
53%
85
3
18%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 9
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
8
89%
65
6
67%
85
3
33%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 8
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
6
75%
65
3
38%
85
0
0%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 17
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
14
82%
65
9
53%
85
3
18%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 6
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
4
67%
65
3
50%
85
1
17%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 11
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
10
91%
65
6
55%
85
2
18%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 17
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
14
82%
65
9
53%
85
3
18%
Algebra 2/Trigonometry
Regents Algebra 2/Trigonometry
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
53
52
1
1
1
2
49
53
26
27
53
18
35
53
55
41
77%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
41
77%
22
85%
19
70%
41
77%
12
67%
29
83%
41
77%
65
23
43%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
23
43%
14
54%
9
33%
23
43%
4
22%
19
54%
23
43%
85
3
6%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
3
6%
2
8%
1
4%
3
6%
0
0%
3
9%
3
6%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 53
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
41
77%
65
23
43%
85
3
6%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 52
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
American Indian or Alaska Native
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 49
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 53
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
41
77%
65
23
43%
85
3
6%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 26
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
22
85%
65
14
54%
85
2
8%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 27
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
19
70%
65
9
33%
85
1
4%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 53
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
41
77%
65
23
43%
85
3
6%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 18
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
12
67%
65
4
22%
85
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 35
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
29
83%
65
19
54%
85
3
9%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 53
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
41
77%
65
23
43%
85
3
6%
Algebra I (Common Core)
Algebra I (Common Core)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
145
133
12
3
139
3
6
69
76
145
79
66
145
LEVEL 1
7
5%
6
5%
1
8%
_
_
6
4%
_
_
1
17%
3
4%
4
5%
7
5%
6
8%
1
2%
7
5%
LEVEL 2
20
14%
13
10%
7
58%
_
_
20
14%
_
_
0
0%
10
14%
10
13%
20
14%
15
19%
5
8%
20
14%
LEVEL 3
90
62%
87
65%
3
25%
_
_
86
62%
_
_
4
67%
40
58%
50
66%
90
62%
48
61%
42
64%
90
62%
LEVEL 4
19
13%
18
14%
1
8%
_
_
19
14%
_
_
0
0%
10
14%
9
12%
19
13%
8
10%
11
17%
19
13%
LEVEL 5
9
6%
9
7%
0
0%
_
_
8
6%
_
_
1
17%
6
9%
3
4%
9
6%
2
3%
7
11%
9
6%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 145
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
7
5%
LEVEL 2
20
14%
LEVEL 3
90
62%
LEVEL 4
19
13%
LEVEL 5
9
6%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 133
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
6
5%
LEVEL 2
13
10%
LEVEL 3
87
65%
LEVEL 4
18
14%
LEVEL 5
9
7%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 12
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
1
8%
LEVEL 2
7
58%
LEVEL 3
3
25%
LEVEL 4
1
8%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 139
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
6
4%
LEVEL 2
20
14%
LEVEL 3
86
62%
LEVEL 4
19
14%
LEVEL 5
8
6%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 6
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
1
17%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
4
67%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
LEVEL 5
1
17%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 69
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
3
4%
LEVEL 2
10
14%
LEVEL 3
40
58%
LEVEL 4
10
14%
LEVEL 5
6
9%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 76
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
4
5%
LEVEL 2
10
13%
LEVEL 3
50
66%
LEVEL 4
9
12%
LEVEL 5
3
4%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 145
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
7
5%
LEVEL 2
20
14%
LEVEL 3
90
62%
LEVEL 4
19
13%
LEVEL 5
9
6%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 79
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
6
8%
LEVEL 2
15
19%
LEVEL 3
48
61%
LEVEL 4
8
10%
LEVEL 5
2
3%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 66
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
1
2%
LEVEL 2
5
8%
LEVEL 3
42
64%
LEVEL 4
11
17%
LEVEL 5
7
11%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 145
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
7
5%
LEVEL 2
20
14%
LEVEL 3
90
62%
LEVEL 4
19
13%
LEVEL 5
9
6%
Geometry (Common Core)
Geometry (Common Core)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
83
77
6
1
2
78
2
5
42
41
83
42
41
83
LEVEL 1
21
25%
15
19%
6
100%
_
_
_
_
20
26%
_
_
1
20%
8
19%
13
32%
21
25%
14
33%
7
17%
21
25%
LEVEL 2
23
28%
23
30%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
22
28%
_
_
1
20%
16
38%
7
17%
23
28%
14
33%
9
22%
23
28%
LEVEL 3
37
45%
37
48%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
34
44%
_
_
3
60%
18
43%
19
46%
37
45%
14
33%
23
56%
37
45%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
LEVEL 5
2
2%
2
3%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
2
3%
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
2
5%
2
2%
0
0%
2
5%
2
2%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 83
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
21
25%
LEVEL 2
23
28%
LEVEL 3
37
45%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
LEVEL 5
2
2%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 77
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
15
19%
LEVEL 2
23
30%
LEVEL 3
37
48%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
LEVEL 5
2
3%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 6
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
6
100%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 78
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
20
26%
LEVEL 2
22
28%
LEVEL 3
34
44%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
LEVEL 5
2
3%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
1
20%
LEVEL 2
1
20%
LEVEL 3
3
60%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 42
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
8
19%
LEVEL 2
16
38%
LEVEL 3
18
43%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 41
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
13
32%
LEVEL 2
7
17%
LEVEL 3
19
46%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
LEVEL 5
2
5%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 83
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
21
25%
LEVEL 2
23
28%
LEVEL 3
37
45%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
LEVEL 5
2
2%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 42
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
14
33%
LEVEL 2
14
33%
LEVEL 3
14
33%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 41
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
7
17%
LEVEL 2
9
22%
LEVEL 3
23
56%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
LEVEL 5
2
5%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 83
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
21
25%
LEVEL 2
23
28%
LEVEL 3
37
45%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
LEVEL 5
2
2%
Algebra II (Common Core)
Algebra II (Common Core)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
35
34
1
1
34
35
15
20
35
13
22
35
LEVEL 1
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
3%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
1
3%
0
0%
1
5%
1
3%
0
0%
1
5%
1
3%
LEVEL 3
15
43%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
15
43%
6
40%
9
45%
15
43%
8
62%
7
32%
15
43%
LEVEL 4
18
51%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
18
51%
9
60%
9
45%
18
51%
5
38%
13
59%
18
51%
LEVEL 5
1
3%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
1
3%
0
0%
1
5%
1
3%
0
0%
1
5%
1
3%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 35
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
3%
LEVEL 3
15
43%
LEVEL 4
18
51%
LEVEL 5
1
3%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 34
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 34
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 35
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
3%
LEVEL 3
15
43%
LEVEL 4
18
51%
LEVEL 5
1
3%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 15
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
6
40%
LEVEL 4
9
60%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 20
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
5%
LEVEL 3
9
45%
LEVEL 4
9
45%
LEVEL 5
1
5%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 35
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
3%
LEVEL 3
15
43%
LEVEL 4
18
51%
LEVEL 5
1
3%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 13
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
8
62%
LEVEL 4
5
38%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 22
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
5%
LEVEL 3
7
32%
LEVEL 4
13
59%
LEVEL 5
1
5%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 35
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
3%
LEVEL 3
15
43%
LEVEL 4
18
51%
LEVEL 5
1
3%
Global History and Geography
Regents Global History and Geography
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
118
100
18
1
1
113
3
5
60
58
118
70
48
118
55
106
90%
92
92%
14
78%
_
_
_
_
102
90%
_
_
4
80%
53
88%
53
91%
106
90%
62
89%
44
92%
106
90%
65
73
62%
66
66%
7
39%
_
_
_
_
69
61%
_
_
4
80%
39
65%
34
59%
73
62%
38
54%
35
73%
73
62%
85
21
18%
21
21%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
20
18%
_
_
1
20%
13
22%
8
14%
21
18%
6
9%
15
31%
21
18%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 118
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
106
90%
65
73
62%
85
21
18%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 100
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
92
92%
65
66
66%
85
21
21%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 18
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
14
78%
65
7
39%
85
0
0%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 113
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
102
90%
65
69
61%
85
20
18%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
4
80%
65
4
80%
85
1
20%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 60
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
53
88%
65
39
65%
85
13
22%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 58
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
53
91%
65
34
59%
85
8
14%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 118
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
106
90%
65
73
62%
85
21
18%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 70
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
62
89%
65
38
54%
85
6
9%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 48
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
44
92%
65
35
73%
85
15
31%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 118
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
106
90%
65
73
62%
85
21
18%
U.S. History & Government
Regents U.S. History & Government
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
90
81
9
3
85
2
5
42
48
90
45
45
90
55
84
93%
77
95%
7
78%
_
_
80
94%
_
_
4
80%
40
95%
44
92%
84
93%
41
91%
43
96%
84
93%
65
73
81%
67
83%
6
67%
_
_
70
82%
_
_
3
60%
35
83%
38
79%
73
81%
36
80%
37
82%
73
81%
85
45
50%
44
54%
1
11%
_
_
43
51%
_
_
2
40%
21
50%
24
50%
45
50%
22
49%
23
51%
45
50%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 90
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
84
93%
65
73
81%
85
45
50%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 81
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
77
95%
65
67
83%
85
44
54%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 9
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
7
78%
65
6
67%
85
1
11%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 85
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
80
94%
65
70
82%
85
43
51%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
4
80%
65
3
60%
85
2
40%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 42
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
40
95%
65
35
83%
85
21
50%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 48
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
44
92%
65
38
79%
85
24
50%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 90
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
84
93%
65
73
81%
85
45
50%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 45
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
41
91%
65
36
80%
85
22
49%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 45
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
43
96%
65
37
82%
85
23
51%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 90
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
84
93%
65
73
81%
85
45
50%
Living Environment
Regents Living Environment
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
111
94
17
1
3
103
4
8
57
54
111
60
51
111
55
105
95%
92
98%
13
76%
_
_
_
_
98
95%
_
_
7
88%
55
96%
50
93%
105
95%
56
93%
49
96%
105
95%
65
89
80%
84
89%
5
29%
_
_
_
_
84
82%
_
_
5
63%
48
84%
41
76%
89
80%
46
77%
43
84%
89
80%
85
33
30%
32
34%
1
6%
_
_
_
_
32
31%
_
_
1
13%
17
30%
16
30%
33
30%
12
20%
21
41%
33
30%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 111
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
105
95%
65
89
80%
85
33
30%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 94
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
92
98%
65
84
89%
85
32
34%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 17
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
13
76%
65
5
29%
85
1
6%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 103
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
98
95%
65
84
82%
85
32
31%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 4
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 8
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
7
88%
65
5
63%
85
1
13%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 57
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
55
96%
65
48
84%
85
17
30%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 54
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
50
93%
65
41
76%
85
16
30%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 111
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
105
95%
65
89
80%
85
33
30%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 60
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
56
93%
65
46
77%
85
12
20%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 51
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
49
96%
65
43
84%
85
21
41%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 111
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
105
95%
65
89
80%
85
33
30%
Physical Setting/Earth Science
Regents Physical Setting/Earth Science
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
77
72
5
1
75
1
77
40
37
77
36
41
77
55
70
91%
67
93%
3
60%
_
_
_
_
_
_
70
91%
36
90%
34
92%
70
91%
32
89%
38
93%
70
91%
65
60
78%
59
82%
1
20%
_
_
_
_
_
_
60
78%
32
80%
28
76%
60
78%
25
69%
35
85%
60
78%
85
23
30%
23
32%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
23
30%
14
35%
9
24%
23
30%
7
19%
16
39%
23
30%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 77
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
70
91%
65
60
78%
85
23
30%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 72
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
67
93%
65
59
82%
85
23
32%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
3
60%
65
1
20%
85
0
0%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 75
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 77
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
70
91%
65
60
78%
85
23
30%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 40
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
36
90%
65
32
80%
85
14
35%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 37
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
34
92%
65
28
76%
85
9
24%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 77
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
70
91%
65
60
78%
85
23
30%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 36
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
32
89%
65
25
69%
85
7
19%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 41
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
38
93%
65
35
85%
85
16
39%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 77
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
70
91%
65
60
78%
85
23
30%
Physical Setting/Chemistry
Regents Physical Setting/Chemistry
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
31
31
1
30
31
13
18
31
10
21
31
55
31
100%
31
100%
_
_
_
_
31
100%
13
100%
18
100%
31
100%
10
100%
21
100%
31
100%
65
25
81%
25
81%
_
_
_
_
25
81%
12
92%
13
72%
25
81%
6
60%
19
90%
25
81%
85
6
19%
6
19%
_
_
_
_
6
19%
3
23%
3
17%
6
19%
0
0%
6
29%
6
19%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 31
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
31
100%
65
25
81%
85
6
19%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 31
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
31
100%
65
25
81%
85
6
19%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 30
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 31
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
31
100%
65
25
81%
85
6
19%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 13
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
13
100%
65
12
92%
85
3
23%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 18
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
18
100%
65
13
72%
85
3
17%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 31
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
31
100%
65
25
81%
85
6
19%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 10
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
10
100%
65
6
60%
85
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 21
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
21
100%
65
19
90%
85
6
29%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 31
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
31
100%
65
25
81%
85
6
19%
Physical Setting/Physics
Regents Physical Setting/Physics
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
12
12
1
10
1
12
4
8
12
2
10
12
55
12
100%
12
100%
_
_
_
_
_
_
12
100%
_
_
_
_
12
100%
_
_
_
_
12
100%
65
11
92%
11
92%
_
_
_
_
_
_
11
92%
_
_
_
_
11
92%
_
_
_
_
11
92%
85
6
50%
6
50%
_
_
_
_
_
_
6
50%
_
_
_
_
6
50%
_
_
_
_
6
50%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 12
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
12
100%
65
11
92%
85
6
50%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 12
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
12
100%
65
11
92%
85
6
50%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 10
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 12
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
12
100%
65
11
92%
85
6
50%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 4
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 8
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 12
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
12
100%
65
11
92%
85
6
50%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 10
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 12
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
12
100%
65
11
92%
85
6
50%
New York State Alternate Assessment (NYSAA) Results (2015 - 16)
GROUP
Grade 3 ELA
Grade 3 Math
Grade 6 ELA
Grade 6 Math
TOTAL TESTED
1
1
1
1
PROFICIENT
_%
_%
_%
_%
LEVEL 1
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
_
_
Grade 3 ELA
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 3 Math
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 6 ELA
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 6 Math
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
New York State English as a Second Language Achievement Test (NYSESLAT) Results (2015 - 16)
Grade 6
GROUP
All Students
General Education
TOTAL TESTED
1
1
ENTERING
_
_
EMERGING
_
_
TRANSITIONING
_
_
EXPANDING
_
_
COMMANDING
_
_
Grade 6
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 1
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 1
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
Elementary/Middle-Level English Language Arts Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: NO
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
NO
―
―
―
―
NO
―
NO
―
NO
Tested 95%
NO
―
―
―
―
NO
―
NO
―
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,006*
0
3
4
4
973*
4
154*
1
538*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
85%*
―
―
―
―
86%*
―
81%*
―
83%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
―
―
―
―
NO
―
NO
―
NO
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
410
0
3
3
3
398
3
68✝
0
206
PI
86
―
―
―
―
85
―
32✝
―
64
EAMO
99
―
―
―
―
113
―
61
―
85
Safe Harbor Target
92
―
―
―
―
91
―
46
―
74
All Students
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,006*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
85%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
410
PI
86
EAMO
99
Safe Harbor Target
92
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
3
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
3
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
4
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
3
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
4
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
3
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
White
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
973*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
86%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
398
PI
85
EAMO
113
Safe Harbor Target
91
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
4
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
3
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
154*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
81%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
68✝
PI
32✝
EAMO
61
Safe Harbor Target
46
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
538*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
83%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
206
PI
64
EAMO
85
Safe Harbor Target
74
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,006*
999*
995*
999*
15
998*
852*
1,005*
468*
525*
481*
1
1,004*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
85%*
85%*
85%*
85%*
―
85%*
86%*
85%*
87%*
87%*
83%*
―
85%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
410
407
407
407
12
407
348
410
204
215
195
1
409
PI
86
86
86
86
―
86
97
86
109
73
101
―
87
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,006*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
85%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
410
PI
86
Not Black or African American
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
999*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
85%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
407
PI
86
Not Hispanic or Latino
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
995*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
85%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
407
PI
86
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
999*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
85%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
407
PI
86
Not White
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
15
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
12
PI
―
Not Multiracial
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
998*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
85%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
407
PI
86
General Education
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
852*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
86%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
348
PI
97
English Proficient
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,005*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
85%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
410
PI
86
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
468*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
87%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
204
PI
109
Male
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
525*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
87%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
215
PI
73
Female
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
481*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
83%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
195
PI
101
Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1
PI
―
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,004*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
85%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
409
PI
87
― There were fewer than 40 students enrolled during the test administration period, so the Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 tested students enrolled on BEDS day and during the test administration period, so the PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed. *The percentage of students tested in the current year fell below 95 percent, so the numbers of enrolled and tested students in the current year and previous year were combined to provide the school/district with another opportunity to meet the participation rate criterion. ✝ Includes former students with disabilities because the number of students with disabilities in the current year is equal to or greater than 30.
Elementary/Middle-Level Mathematics Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: NO
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
NO
―
―
―
―
NO
―
NO
―
NO
Tested 95%
NO
―
―
―
―
NO
―
NO
―
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,008*
0
3
4
4
975*
4
156*
1
539*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
82%*
―
―
―
―
82%*
―
79%*
―
80%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
NO
―
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
400
0
3
3
3
389
2
67✝
0
201
PI
110
―
―
―
―
109
―
43✝
―
88
EAMO
96
―
―
―
―
109
―
62
―
83
Safe Harbor Target
96
―
―
―
―
108
―
62
―
83
All Students
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,008*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
82%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
400
PI
110
EAMO
96
Safe Harbor Target
96
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
3
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
3
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
4
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
3
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
4
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
3
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
White
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
975*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
82%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
389
PI
109
EAMO
109
Safe Harbor Target
108
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
4
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
2
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
156*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
79%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
67✝
PI
43✝
EAMO
62
Safe Harbor Target
62
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
539*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
80%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
201
PI
88
EAMO
83
Safe Harbor Target
83
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,008*
1,001*
997*
1,001*
15
1,000*
852*
1,007*
469*
526*
482*
1
1,006*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
82%*
82%*
82%*
82%*
―
82%*
83%*
82%*
84%*
83%*
81%*
―
82%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
400
397
397
397
11
398
339
400
199
209
191
1
399
PI
110
110
109
110
―
110
123
110
132
109
111
―
110
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,008*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
82%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
400
PI
110
Not Black or African American
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,001*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
82%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
397
PI
110
Not Hispanic or Latino
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
997*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
82%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
397
PI
109
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,001*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
82%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
397
PI
110
Not White
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
15
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
11
PI
―
Not Multiracial
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,000*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
82%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
398
PI
110
General Education
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
852*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
83%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
339
PI
123
English Proficient
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,007*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
82%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
400
PI
110
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
469*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
84%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
199
PI
132
Male
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
526*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
83%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
209
PI
109
Female
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
482*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
81%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
191
PI
111
Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1
PI
―
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,006*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
82%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
399
PI
110
― There were fewer than 40 students enrolled during the test administration period, so the Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 tested students enrolled on BEDS day and during the test administration period, so the PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed. *The percentage of students tested in the current year fell below 95 percent, so the numbers of enrolled and tested students in the current year and previous year were combined to provide the school/district with another opportunity to meet the participation rate criterion. ✝ Includes former students with disabilities because the number of students with disabilities in the current year is equal to or greater than 30.
Elementary/Middle-Level Science Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: NO
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
YES
―
―
―
―
NO
―
―
―
YES
Tested 80%
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
182
0
2
1
1
176
2
30
0
104
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
97%
―
―
―
―
97%
―
―
―
97%
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
YES
―
―
―
―
NO
―
―
―
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
171
0
2
1
1
166
1
29
0
95
PI
185
―
―
―
―
185
―
―
―
182
EAMO
179
―
―
―
―
186
―
―
―
170
Progress Target
179
―
―
―
―
186
―
―
―
170
All Students
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 80%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
182
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
97%
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
171
PI
185
EAMO
179
Progress Target
179
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
2
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
2
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
White
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 80%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
176
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
97%
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
NO
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
166
PI
185
EAMO
186
Progress Target
186
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
2
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
30
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
29
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 80%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
104
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
97%
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
95
PI
182
EAMO
170
Progress Target
170
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
182
180
181
181
6
180
152
182
78
98
84
1
181
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
97%
97%
97%
97%
―
97%
97%
97%
97%
99%
95%
―
97%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
171
169
170
170
5
170
142
171
76
91
80
1
170
PI
185
185
185
185
―
185
193
185
189
184
188
―
185
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
182
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
97%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
171
PI
185
Not Black or African American
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
180
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
97%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
169
PI
185
Not Hispanic or Latino
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
181
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
97%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
170
PI
185
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
181
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
97%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
170
PI
185
Not White
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
6
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
5
PI
―
Not Multiracial
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
180
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
97%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
170
PI
185
General Education
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
152
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
97%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
142
PI
193
English Proficient
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
182
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
97%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
171
PI
185
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
78
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
97%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
76
PI
189
Male
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
98
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
99%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
91
PI
184
Female
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
84
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
95%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
80
PI
188
Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1
PI
―
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
181
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
97%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
170
PI
185
― There were fewer than 40 students enrolled during the test administration period, so the Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 tested students enrolled on BEDS day and during the test administration period, so the PI, EAMO, and Progress Target data are suppressed.
Secondary-Level English Language Arts Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: NO
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
NO
―
―
―
―
NO
―
―
―
NO
Tested 95%
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
―
12th graders
73
1
3
3
0
65
1
8
0
39
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
―
―
―
―
100%
―
―
―
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
―
―
―
―
NO
―
―
―
NO
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
76
1
3
3
0
68
1
12
0
43
PI
153
―
―
―
―
149
―
―
―
133
EAMO
163
―
―
―
―
171
―
―
―
147
Safe Harbor Target
160
―
―
―
―
160
―
―
―
144
All Students
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
YES
12th Graders
73
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
76
PI
153
EAMO
163
Safe Harbor Target
160
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
1
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
1
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
3
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
3
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
3
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
3
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
White
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
YES
12th Graders
65
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
68
PI
149
EAMO
171
Safe Harbor Target
160
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
1
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
1
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
8
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
12
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
39
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
43
PI
133
EAMO
147
Safe Harbor Target
144
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
12th Graders
72
70
70
73
8
72
65
73
34
42
31
0
73
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
100%
100%
100%
―
100%
100%
100%
―
100%
―
―
100%
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
75
73
73
76
8
75
64
76
33
45
31
0
76
PI
152
152
151
153
―
152
175
153
179
147
161
―
153
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
12th Graders
72
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
75
PI
152
Not Black or African American
12th Graders
70
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
73
PI
152
Not Hispanic or Latino
12th Graders
70
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
73
PI
151
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
12th Graders
73
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
76
PI
153
Not White
12th Graders
8
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
8
PI
―
Not Multiracial
12th Graders
72
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
75
PI
152
General Education
12th Graders
65
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
64
PI
175
English Proficient
12th Graders
73
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
76
PI
153
Not Economically Disadvantaged
12th Graders
34
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
33
PI
179
Male
12th Graders
42
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
45
PI
147
Female
12th Graders
31
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
31
PI
161
Migrant
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
Not Migrant
12th Graders
73
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
76
PI
153
― There were fewer than 40 12th graders, so the Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 students in the 2012 accountability cohort, so PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed.
Secondary-Level Mathematics Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: NO
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
NO
―
―
―
―
NO
―
―
―
NO
Tested 95%
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
―
12th graders
73
1
3
3
0
65
1
8
0
39
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
―
―
―
―
100%
―
―
―
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
―
―
―
―
NO
―
―
―
NO
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
76
1
3
3
0
68
1
12
0
43
PI
142
―
―
―
―
140
―
―
―
121
EAMO
148
―
―
―
―
158
―
―
―
131
Safe Harbor Target
148
―
―
―
―
151
―
―
―
131
All Students
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
YES
12th Graders
73
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
76
PI
142
EAMO
148
Safe Harbor Target
148
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
1
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
1
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
3
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
3
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
3
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
3
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
White
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
YES
12th Graders
65
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
68
PI
140
EAMO
158
Safe Harbor Target
151
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
1
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
1
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
8
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
12
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
39
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
43
PI
121
EAMO
131
Safe Harbor Target
131
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
12th Graders
72
70
70
73
8
72
65
73
34
42
31
0
73
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
100%
100%
100%
―
100%
100%
100%
―
100%
―
―
100%
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
75
73
73
76
8
75
64
76
33
45
31
0
76
PI
141
141
142
142
―
141
158
142
170
140
145
―
142
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
12th Graders
72
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
75
PI
141
Not Black or African American
12th Graders
70
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
73
PI
141
Not Hispanic or Latino
12th Graders
70
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
73
PI
142
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
12th Graders
73
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
76
PI
142
Not White
12th Graders
8
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
8
PI
―
Not Multiracial
12th Graders
72
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
75
PI
141
General Education
12th Graders
65
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
64
PI
158
English Proficient
12th Graders
73
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
76
PI
142
Not Economically Disadvantaged
12th Graders
34
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
33
PI
170
Male
12th Graders
42
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
45
PI
140
Female
12th Graders
31
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
31
PI
145
Migrant
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
Not Migrant
12th Graders
73
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
76
PI
142
― There were fewer than 40 12th graders, so the Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 students in the 2012 accountability cohort, so PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed.
Unweighted Combined ELA and Math PIs
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
86
―
―
―
―
85
―
32
―
64
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
110
―
―
―
―
109
―
43
―
88
Secondary-Level ELA PI
153
―
―
―
―
149
―
―
―
133
Secondary-Level MATH PI
142
―
―
―
―
140
―
―
―
121
UNWEIGHTED COMBINED PI
123
0
0
0
0
121
0
38
0
102
All Students
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
86
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
110
Secondary-Level ELA PI
153
Secondary-Level MATH PI
142
Unweighted Combined PI
123
American Indian or Alaska Native
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Black or African American
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Hispanic or Latino
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
White
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
85
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
109
Secondary-Level ELA PI
149
Secondary-Level MATH PI
140
Unweighted Combined PI
121
Multiracial
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Students With Disabilities
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
32
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
43
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
38
Limited English Proficient
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Economically Disadvantaged
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
64
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
88
Secondary-Level ELA PI
133
Secondary-Level MATH PI
121
Unweighted Combined PI
102
― There were not enough students to determine a Performance Index.
Overall Graduation Rate for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: YES
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
YES
All Students
MADE AYP
YES
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP
―
White
MADE AYP
YES
Multiracial
MADE AYP
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP
―
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
YES
― There were not enough students to make an AYP determination.
Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort for Accountability
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion:
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
YES
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
73
0
0
1
0
72
0
6
0
35
Graduation Rate
89%
―
―
―
―
89%
―
―
―
86%
State Standard
80%
―
―
―
―
80%
―
―
―
80%
Progress Target
80%
―
―
―
―
80%
―
―
―
80%
All Students
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
73
Graduation Rate
89%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%
American Indian or Alaska Native
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Black or African American
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
1
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
White
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
72
Graduation Rate
89%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%
Multiracial
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Students With Disabilities
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
6
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Limited English Proficient
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
35
Graduation Rate
86%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%
YES Graduation rate is equal to or greater than the State Standard or the group's Progress Target. NO Graduation rate is less than the State Standard and the group's Progress Target.
― There were fewer than 30 students in the cohort.
Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort for Accountability
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion:
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
YES
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
89
0
1
1
0
85
2
11
0
42
Graduation Rate
96%
―
―
―
―
95%
―
―
―
93%
State Standard
80%
―
―
―
―
80%
―
―
―
80%
Progress Target
80%
―
―
―
―
80%
―
―
―
80%
All Students
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
89
Graduation Rate
96%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%
American Indian or Alaska Native
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Black or African American
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
1
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
1
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
White
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
85
Graduation Rate
95%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%
Multiracial
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
2
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Students With Disabilities
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
11
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Limited English Proficient
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
42
Graduation Rate
93%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%
YES Graduation rate is equal to or greater than the State Standard or the group's Progress Target. NO Graduation rate is less than the State Standard and the group's Progress Target.
― There were fewer than 30 students in the cohort.
Graduation Rates for Non-AYP Groups for Accountability
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
73
73
72
73
1
73
67
73
38
34
39
0
73
Graduation Rate
89%
89%
89%
89%
―
89%
93%
89%
92%
82%
95%
―
89%
Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
89
88
88
89
4
87
78
89
47
45
44
1
88
Graduation Rate
96%
95%
95%
96%
―
95%
97%
96%
98%
96%
95%
―
95%
Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
73
Graduation Rate
89%
Not Black or African American
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
73
Graduation Rate
89%
Not Hispanic or Latino
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
72
Graduation Rate
89%
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
73
Graduation Rate
89%
Not White
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
1
Graduation Rate
―
Not Multiracial
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
73
Graduation Rate
89%
General Education
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
67
Graduation Rate
93%
English Proficient
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
73
Graduation Rate
89%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
38
Graduation Rate
92%
Male
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
34
Graduation Rate
82%
Female
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
39
Graduation Rate
95%
Migrant
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
Not Migrant
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
73
Graduation Rate
89%
Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
89
Graduation Rate
96%
Not Black or African American
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
88
Graduation Rate
95%
Not Hispanic or Latino
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
88
Graduation Rate
95%
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
89
Graduation Rate
96%
Not White
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
4
Graduation Rate
―
Not Multiracial
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
87
Graduation Rate
95%
General Education
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
78
Graduation Rate
97%
English Proficient
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
89
Graduation Rate
96%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
47
Graduation Rate
98%
Male
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
45
Graduation Rate
96%
Female
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
44
Graduation Rate
95%
Migrant
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
1
Graduation Rate
―
Not Migrant
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
88
Graduation Rate
95%
― There were fewer than 30 students in the cohort.
Graduation Rates for Regents with Advanced Designation and CTE Endorsement for Accountability
Percentage of 2011 Graduation-Rate Total Cohort members who graduated as of August 31, 2015 with:
Regents Diploma with an Advanced Designation (This District)
44%
Regents Diploma with an Advanced Designation (Statewide)
32%
Percentage in This District Exceeded Statewide
YES
Regents Diploma with an Advanced Designation (This District)
44%
Regents Diploma with an Advanced Designation (Statewide)
32%
Percentage in This District Exceeded Statewide
YES
Regents Diploma with CTE Endorsement (This District)
16%
Regents Diploma with CTE Endorsement (Statewide)
5%
Percentage in This District Exceeded Statewide
YES
Regents Diploma with CTE Endorsement (This District)
You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.
Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.
If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.
