WASHINGTONVILLE CSD - School Report Card Data [2016 - 17]
The New York State Report Card is an important part of the Board of Regents' effort to raise learning standards for all students. It provides information to the public on school/district enrollment and staff, student performance, and other measures of school and district performance. Knowledge gained from the report card on a school's or district's strengths and weaknesses can be used to improve instruction and services to students. Report Card Data - Glossary of Terms | Accountability Data - Glossary of Terms | Business Rules
Turnover Rate of Teachers with Fewer Than Five Years of Experience
28%
TURNOVER RATE OF ALL TEACHERS
9%
Teacher Turnover Rate (2015-16 to 2016-17)
Turnover Rate of Teachers with Fewer Than Five Years of Experience
28%
Turnover Rate of All Teachers
9%
Staff Counts (2016 - 17)
GROUP
PRINCIPALS
ASSISTANT PRINCIPALS
OTHER PROFESSIONAL STAFF
PARAPROFESSIONALS
STAFF
5
8
78
59
Staff Counts (2016 - 17)
Principals
5
Assistant Principals
8
Other Professional Staff
78
Paraprofessionals
59
Teacher Qualifications (2016 - 17)
TOTAL TEACHERS
307
PERCENT WITH NO VALID TEACHING CERTIFICATE
0%
PERCENT TEACHING OUT OF CERTIFICATE
0%
PERCENT WITH FEWER THAN THREE YEARS OF EXPERIENCE
3%
PERCENTAGE WITH MASTER'S DEGREEPLUS 30 HOURS OR DOCTORATE
28%
Total Number of Classes
1,041
Percent Taught by Teachers Without Appropriate Certification
1%
Teacher Qualifications (2016 - 17)
TOTAL TEACHERS: 307
Percent with No Valid Teaching Certificate
0%
Percent Teaching Out of Certification
0%
Percent with Fewer Than Three Years of Experience
3%
Percentage with Master's Degree Plus 30 Hours or Doctorate
28%
Total Number of Classes
1,041
Percent Taught by Teachers Without Appropriate Certification
1%
High School Completers (2016 - 17)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
337
293
44
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
336
293
43
REGENTS DIPLOMA
302
90%
286
98%
16
37%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
REGENTS WITH ADVANCED DESIGNATION
162
48%
160
55%
2
5%
REGENTS WITH CTE ENDORSEMENT
30
9%
27
9%
3
7%
LOCAL DIPLOMAS
34
10%
7
2%
27
63%
COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS
1
0%
0
0%
1
2%
All Students
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
337
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
336
Regents Diploma
302
90%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
162
48%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
30
9%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
34
10%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
1
0%
of Completers
General Education
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
293
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
293
Regents Diploma
286
98%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
160
55%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
27
9%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
7
2%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
0
0%
of Completers
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
44
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
43
Regents Diploma
16
37%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
2
5%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
3
7%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
27
63%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
1
2%
of Completers
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
337
293
44
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
336
293
43
REGENTS DIPLOMA
302
90%
286
98%
16
37%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
REGENTS WITH ADVANCED DESIGNATION
162
48%
160
55%
2
5%
REGENTS WITH CTE ENDORSEMENT
30
9%
27
9%
3
7%
LOCAL DIPLOMAS
34
10%
7
2%
27
63%
COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS
1
0%
0
0%
1
2%
All Students
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
337
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
336
Regents Diploma
302
90%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
162
48%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
30
9%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
34
10%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
1
0%
of Completers
General Education
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
293
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
293
Regents Diploma
286
98%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
160
55%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
27
9%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
7
2%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
0
0%
of Completers
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
44
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
43
Regents Diploma
16
37%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
2
5%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
3
7%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
27
63%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
1
2%
of Completers
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
337
293
44
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
336
293
43
REGENTS DIPLOMA
302
90%
286
98%
16
37%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
REGENTS WITH ADVANCED DESIGNATION
162
48%
160
55%
2
5%
REGENTS WITH CTE ENDORSEMENT
30
9%
27
9%
3
7%
LOCAL DIPLOMAS
34
10%
7
2%
27
63%
COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS
1
0%
0
0%
1
2%
All Students
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
337
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
336
Regents Diploma
302
90%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
162
48%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
30
9%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
34
10%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
1
0%
of Completers
General Education
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
293
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
293
Regents Diploma
286
98%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
160
55%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
27
9%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
7
2%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
0
0%
of Completers
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
44
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
43
Regents Diploma
16
37%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
2
5%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
3
7%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
27
63%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
1
2%
of Completers
High School Non-completers (2016 - 17)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
10
1%
_
_
_
_
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
4
0%
_
_
_
_
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
14
1%
_
_
_
_
All Students
DROPPED OUT
10
1%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
4
0%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
14
1%
General Education
DROPPED OUT
_
_%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
_
_%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
_
_%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
_
_%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
_
_%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
10
1%
_
_
_
_
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
4
0%
_
_
_
_
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
14
1%
_
_
_
_
All Students
DROPPED OUT
10
1%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
4
0%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
14
1%
General Education
DROPPED OUT
_
_%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
_
_%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
_
_%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
_
_%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
_
_%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
10
1%
_
_
_
_
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
4
0%
_
_
_
_
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
14
1%
_
_
_
_
All Students
DROPPED OUT
10
1%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
4
0%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
14
1%
General Education
DROPPED OUT
_
_%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
_
_%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
_
_%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
_
_%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
_
_%
Post-graduation Plans of Completers (2016 - 17)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO FOUR-YEAR COLLEGE
194
58%
189
65%
5
11%
TO TWO-YEAR COLLEGE
101
30%
79
27%
22
50%
TO OTHER POST-SECONDARY
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
TO THE MILITARY
13
4%
9
3%
4
9%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO EMPLOYMENT
26
8%
14
5%
12
27%
TO ADULT SERVICES
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
TO OTHER KNOWN PLANS
3
1%
2
1%
1
2%
PLANS UNKNOWN
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
All Students
To Four-Year College
194
58%
To Two-Year College
101
30%
To Other Post-Secondary
0
0%
To the Military
13
4%
To Employment
26
8%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
3
1%
Plan Unknown
0
0%
General Education
To Four-Year College
189
65%
To Two-Year College
79
27%
To Other Post-Secondary
0
0%
To the Military
9
3%
To Employment
14
5%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
2
1%
Plan Unknown
0
0%
Students with Disabilities
To Four-Year College
5
11%
To Two-Year College
22
50%
To Other Post-Secondary
0
0%
To the Military
4
9%
To Employment
12
27%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
1
2%
Plan Unknown
0
0%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO FOUR-YEAR COLLEGE
194
58%
189
65%
5
11%
TO TWO-YEAR COLLEGE
101
30%
79
27%
22
50%
TO OTHER POST-SECONDARY
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
TO THE MILITARY
13
4%
9
3%
4
9%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO EMPLOYMENT
26
8%
14
5%
12
27%
TO ADULT SERVICES
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
TO OTHER KNOWN PLANS
3
1%
2
1%
1
2%
PLANS UNKNOWN
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
All Students
To Four-Year College
194
58%
To Two-Year College
101
30%
To Other Post-Secondary
0
0%
To the Military
13
4%
To Employment
26
8%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
3
1%
Plan Unknown
0
0%
General Education
To Four-Year College
189
65%
To Two-Year College
79
27%
To Other Post-Secondary
0
0%
To the Military
9
3%
To Employment
14
5%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
2
1%
Plan Unknown
0
0%
Students with Disabilities
To Four-Year College
5
11%
To Two-Year College
22
50%
To Other Post-Secondary
0
0%
To the Military
4
9%
To Employment
12
27%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
1
2%
Plan Unknown
0
0%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO FOUR-YEAR COLLEGE
194
58%
189
65%
5
11%
TO TWO-YEAR COLLEGE
101
30%
79
27%
22
50%
TO OTHER POST-SECONDARY
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
TO THE MILITARY
13
4%
9
3%
4
9%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO EMPLOYMENT
26
8%
14
5%
12
27%
TO ADULT SERVICES
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
TO OTHER KNOWN PLANS
3
1%
2
1%
1
2%
PLANS UNKNOWN
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
All Students
To Four-Year College
194
58%
To Two-Year College
101
30%
To Other Post-Secondary
0
0%
To the Military
13
4%
To Employment
26
8%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
3
1%
Plan Unknown
0
0%
General Education
To Four-Year College
189
65%
To Two-Year College
79
27%
To Other Post-Secondary
0
0%
To the Military
9
3%
To Employment
14
5%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
2
1%
Plan Unknown
0
0%
Students with Disabilities
To Four-Year College
5
11%
To Two-Year College
22
50%
To Other Post-Secondary
0
0%
To the Military
4
9%
To Employment
12
27%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
1
2%
Plan Unknown
0
0%
Grade 3 English Language Arts
MEAN SCORE: 303
All Students
PROFICIENT
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 198
LEVEL 1
59
30%
LEVEL 2
70
35%
LEVEL 3
56
28%
LEVEL 4
13
7%
General Education
PROFICIENT
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 179
LEVEL 1
42
23%
LEVEL 2
68
38%
LEVEL 3
56
31%
LEVEL 4
13
7%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 19
LEVEL 1
17
89%
LEVEL 2
2
11%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
American Indian or Alaska Native
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 19
LEVEL 1
7
37%
LEVEL 2
6
32%
LEVEL 3
5
26%
LEVEL 4
1
5%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 48
LEVEL 1
17
35%
LEVEL 2
16
33%
LEVEL 3
14
29%
LEVEL 4
1
2%
White
PROFICIENT
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 119
LEVEL 1
28
24%
LEVEL 2
44
37%
LEVEL 3
37
31%
LEVEL 4
10
8%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 8
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 12
LEVEL 1
7
58%
LEVEL 2
4
33%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
1
8%
Female
PROFICIENT
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 101
LEVEL 1
21
21%
LEVEL 2
34
34%
LEVEL 3
38
38%
LEVEL 4
8
8%
Male
PROFICIENT
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 97
LEVEL 1
38
39%
LEVEL 2
36
37%
LEVEL 3
18
19%
LEVEL 4
5
5%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 192
LEVEL 1
54
28%
LEVEL 2
69
36%
LEVEL 3
56
29%
LEVEL 4
13
7%
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
5
83%
LEVEL 2
1
17%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 56
LEVEL 1
24
43%
LEVEL 2
18
32%
LEVEL 3
13
23%
LEVEL 4
1
2%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 142
LEVEL 1
35
25%
LEVEL 2
52
37%
LEVEL 3
43
30%
LEVEL 4
12
8%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 198
LEVEL 1
59
30%
LEVEL 2
70
35%
LEVEL 3
56
28%
LEVEL 4
13
7%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
198
179
19
1
3
19
48
119
8
12
101
97
192
6
56
142
198
PROFICIENT
35%
39%
0%
_%
_%
32%
31%
39%
_%
8%
46%
24%
36%
0%
25%
39%
35%
LEVEL 1
59
30%
42
23%
17
89%
_
_
_
_
7
37%
17
35%
28
24%
_
_
7
58%
21
21%
38
39%
54
28%
5
83%
24
43%
35
25%
59
30%
LEVEL 2
70
35%
68
38%
2
11%
_
_
_
_
6
32%
16
33%
44
37%
_
_
4
33%
34
34%
36
37%
69
36%
1
17%
18
32%
52
37%
70
35%
LEVEL 3
56
28%
56
31%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
5
26%
14
29%
37
31%
_
_
0
0%
38
38%
18
19%
56
29%
0
0%
13
23%
43
30%
56
28%
LEVEL 4
13
7%
13
7%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
1
5%
1
2%
10
8%
_
_
1
8%
8
8%
5
5%
13
7%
0
0%
1
2%
12
8%
13
7%
Grade 4 English Language Arts
MEAN SCORE: 289
All Students
PROFICIENT
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 159
LEVEL 1
66
42%
LEVEL 2
65
41%
LEVEL 3
22
14%
LEVEL 4
6
4%
General Education
PROFICIENT
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 135
LEVEL 1
45
33%
LEVEL 2
62
46%
LEVEL 3
22
16%
LEVEL 4
6
4%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 24
LEVEL 1
21
88%
LEVEL 2
3
13%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 53
LEVEL 1
23
43%
LEVEL 2
22
42%
LEVEL 3
8
15%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
White
PROFICIENT
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 84
LEVEL 1
32
38%
LEVEL 2
38
45%
LEVEL 3
11
13%
LEVEL 4
3
4%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 11
LEVEL 1
6
55%
LEVEL 2
2
18%
LEVEL 3
2
18%
LEVEL 4
1
9%
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 11
LEVEL 1
5
45%
LEVEL 2
3
27%
LEVEL 3
1
9%
LEVEL 4
2
18%
Female
PROFICIENT
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 67
LEVEL 1
15
22%
LEVEL 2
30
45%
LEVEL 3
17
25%
LEVEL 4
5
7%
Male
PROFICIENT
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 92
LEVEL 1
51
55%
LEVEL 2
35
38%
LEVEL 3
5
5%
LEVEL 4
1
1%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 155
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 46
LEVEL 1
25
54%
LEVEL 2
18
39%
LEVEL 3
2
4%
LEVEL 4
1
2%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 113
LEVEL 1
41
36%
LEVEL 2
47
42%
LEVEL 3
20
18%
LEVEL 4
5
4%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 159
LEVEL 1
66
42%
LEVEL 2
65
41%
LEVEL 3
22
14%
LEVEL 4
6
4%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
159
135
24
2
9
53
84
11
11
67
92
155
4
46
113
159
PROFICIENT
18%
21%
0%
_%
_%
15%
17%
27%
27%
33%
7%
_%
_%
7%
22%
18%
LEVEL 1
66
42%
45
33%
21
88%
_
_
_
_
23
43%
32
38%
6
55%
5
45%
15
22%
51
55%
_
_
_
_
25
54%
41
36%
66
42%
LEVEL 2
65
41%
62
46%
3
13%
_
_
_
_
22
42%
38
45%
2
18%
3
27%
30
45%
35
38%
_
_
_
_
18
39%
47
42%
65
41%
LEVEL 3
22
14%
22
16%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
8
15%
11
13%
2
18%
1
9%
17
25%
5
5%
_
_
_
_
2
4%
20
18%
22
14%
LEVEL 4
6
4%
6
4%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
3
4%
1
9%
2
18%
5
7%
1
1%
_
_
_
_
1
2%
5
4%
6
4%
Grade 5 English Language Arts
MEAN SCORE: 294
All Students
PROFICIENT
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 205
LEVEL 1
78
38%
LEVEL 2
72
35%
LEVEL 3
45
22%
LEVEL 4
10
5%
General Education
PROFICIENT
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 181
LEVEL 1
55
30%
LEVEL 2
71
39%
LEVEL 3
45
25%
LEVEL 4
10
6%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 24
LEVEL 1
23
96%
LEVEL 2
1
4%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 21
LEVEL 1
10
48%
LEVEL 2
7
33%
LEVEL 3
4
19%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 52
LEVEL 1
24
46%
LEVEL 2
16
31%
LEVEL 3
9
17%
LEVEL 4
3
6%
White
PROFICIENT
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 122
LEVEL 1
40
33%
LEVEL 2
45
37%
LEVEL 3
31
25%
LEVEL 4
6
5%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 10
LEVEL 1
4
40%
LEVEL 2
4
40%
LEVEL 3
1
10%
LEVEL 4
1
10%
Female
PROFICIENT
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 97
LEVEL 1
28
29%
LEVEL 2
36
37%
LEVEL 3
27
28%
LEVEL 4
6
6%
Male
PROFICIENT
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 108
LEVEL 1
50
46%
LEVEL 2
36
33%
LEVEL 3
18
17%
LEVEL 4
4
4%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 198
LEVEL 1
71
36%
LEVEL 2
72
36%
LEVEL 3
45
23%
LEVEL 4
10
5%
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 7
LEVEL 1
7
100%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 49
LEVEL 1
26
53%
LEVEL 2
17
35%
LEVEL 3
6
12%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 156
LEVEL 1
52
33%
LEVEL 2
55
35%
LEVEL 3
39
25%
LEVEL 4
10
6%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 205
LEVEL 1
78
38%
LEVEL 2
72
35%
LEVEL 3
45
22%
LEVEL 4
10
5%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
205
181
24
6
21
52
122
4
10
97
108
198
7
49
156
205
PROFICIENT
27%
30%
0%
_%
19%
23%
30%
_%
20%
34%
20%
28%
0%
12%
31%
27%
LEVEL 1
78
38%
55
30%
23
96%
_
_
10
48%
24
46%
40
33%
_
_
4
40%
28
29%
50
46%
71
36%
7
100%
26
53%
52
33%
78
38%
LEVEL 2
72
35%
71
39%
1
4%
_
_
7
33%
16
31%
45
37%
_
_
4
40%
36
37%
36
33%
72
36%
0
0%
17
35%
55
35%
72
35%
LEVEL 3
45
22%
45
25%
0
0%
_
_
4
19%
9
17%
31
25%
_
_
1
10%
27
28%
18
17%
45
23%
0
0%
6
12%
39
25%
45
22%
LEVEL 4
10
5%
10
6%
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
3
6%
6
5%
_
_
1
10%
6
6%
4
4%
10
5%
0
0%
0
0%
10
6%
10
5%
Grade 6 English Language Arts
MEAN SCORE: 294
All Students
PROFICIENT
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 166
LEVEL 1
54
33%
LEVEL 2
74
45%
LEVEL 3
25
15%
LEVEL 4
13
8%
General Education
PROFICIENT
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 149
LEVEL 1
41
28%
LEVEL 2
70
47%
LEVEL 3
25
17%
LEVEL 4
13
9%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 17
LEVEL 1
13
76%
LEVEL 2
4
24%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 18
LEVEL 1
9
50%
LEVEL 2
8
44%
LEVEL 3
1
6%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 40
LEVEL 1
18
45%
LEVEL 2
15
38%
LEVEL 3
4
10%
LEVEL 4
3
8%
White
PROFICIENT
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 97
LEVEL 1
24
25%
LEVEL 2
47
48%
LEVEL 3
17
18%
LEVEL 4
9
9%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 11
LEVEL 1
3
27%
LEVEL 2
4
36%
LEVEL 3
3
27%
LEVEL 4
1
9%
Female
PROFICIENT
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 85
LEVEL 1
26
31%
LEVEL 2
32
38%
LEVEL 3
18
21%
LEVEL 4
9
11%
Male
PROFICIENT
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 81
LEVEL 1
28
35%
LEVEL 2
42
52%
LEVEL 3
7
9%
LEVEL 4
4
5%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 164
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 42
LEVEL 1
18
43%
LEVEL 2
22
52%
LEVEL 3
2
5%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 124
LEVEL 1
36
29%
LEVEL 2
52
42%
LEVEL 3
23
19%
LEVEL 4
13
10%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 166
LEVEL 1
54
33%
LEVEL 2
74
45%
LEVEL 3
25
15%
LEVEL 4
13
8%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
166
149
17
9
18
40
97
2
11
85
81
164
2
42
124
166
PROFICIENT
23%
26%
0%
_%
6%
18%
27%
_%
36%
32%
14%
_%
_%
5%
29%
23%
LEVEL 1
54
33%
41
28%
13
76%
_
_
9
50%
18
45%
24
25%
_
_
3
27%
26
31%
28
35%
_
_
_
_
18
43%
36
29%
54
33%
LEVEL 2
74
45%
70
47%
4
24%
_
_
8
44%
15
38%
47
48%
_
_
4
36%
32
38%
42
52%
_
_
_
_
22
52%
52
42%
74
45%
LEVEL 3
25
15%
25
17%
0
0%
_
_
1
6%
4
10%
17
18%
_
_
3
27%
18
21%
7
9%
_
_
_
_
2
5%
23
19%
25
15%
LEVEL 4
13
8%
13
9%
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
3
8%
9
9%
_
_
1
9%
9
11%
4
5%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
13
10%
13
8%
Grade 7 English Language Arts
MEAN SCORE: 308
All Students
PROFICIENT
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 156
LEVEL 1
34
22%
LEVEL 2
48
31%
LEVEL 3
55
35%
LEVEL 4
19
12%
General Education
PROFICIENT
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 136
LEVEL 1
22
16%
LEVEL 2
43
32%
LEVEL 3
52
38%
LEVEL 4
19
14%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 20
LEVEL 1
12
60%
LEVEL 2
5
25%
LEVEL 3
3
15%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 8
LEVEL 1
3
38%
LEVEL 2
3
38%
LEVEL 3
1
13%
LEVEL 4
1
13%
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 12
LEVEL 1
1
8%
LEVEL 2
6
50%
LEVEL 3
4
33%
LEVEL 4
1
8%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 31
LEVEL 1
12
39%
LEVEL 2
10
32%
LEVEL 3
6
19%
LEVEL 4
3
10%
White
PROFICIENT
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 100
LEVEL 1
17
17%
LEVEL 2
27
27%
LEVEL 3
43
43%
LEVEL 4
13
13%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
1
20%
LEVEL 2
2
40%
LEVEL 3
1
20%
LEVEL 4
1
20%
Female
PROFICIENT
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 70
LEVEL 1
8
11%
LEVEL 2
22
31%
LEVEL 3
28
40%
LEVEL 4
12
17%
Male
PROFICIENT
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 86
LEVEL 1
26
30%
LEVEL 2
26
30%
LEVEL 3
27
31%
LEVEL 4
7
8%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 154
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 39
LEVEL 1
13
33%
LEVEL 2
14
36%
LEVEL 3
9
23%
LEVEL 4
3
8%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 117
LEVEL 1
21
18%
LEVEL 2
34
29%
LEVEL 3
46
39%
LEVEL 4
16
14%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 156
LEVEL 1
34
22%
LEVEL 2
48
31%
LEVEL 3
55
35%
LEVEL 4
19
12%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
156
136
20
8
12
31
100
5
70
86
154
2
39
117
156
PROFICIENT
47%
52%
15%
25%
42%
29%
56%
40%
57%
40%
_%
_%
31%
53%
47%
LEVEL 1
34
22%
22
16%
12
60%
3
38%
1
8%
12
39%
17
17%
1
20%
8
11%
26
30%
_
_
_
_
13
33%
21
18%
34
22%
LEVEL 2
48
31%
43
32%
5
25%
3
38%
6
50%
10
32%
27
27%
2
40%
22
31%
26
30%
_
_
_
_
14
36%
34
29%
48
31%
LEVEL 3
55
35%
52
38%
3
15%
1
13%
4
33%
6
19%
43
43%
1
20%
28
40%
27
31%
_
_
_
_
9
23%
46
39%
55
35%
LEVEL 4
19
12%
19
14%
0
0%
1
13%
1
8%
3
10%
13
13%
1
20%
12
17%
7
8%
_
_
_
_
3
8%
16
14%
19
12%
Grade 8 English Language Arts
MEAN SCORE: 300
All Students
PROFICIENT
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 131
LEVEL 1
34
26%
LEVEL 2
38
29%
LEVEL 3
47
36%
LEVEL 4
12
9%
General Education
PROFICIENT
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 109
LEVEL 1
22
20%
LEVEL 2
31
28%
LEVEL 3
44
40%
LEVEL 4
12
11%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 22
LEVEL 1
12
55%
LEVEL 2
7
32%
LEVEL 3
3
14%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 13
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 32
LEVEL 1
12
38%
LEVEL 2
10
31%
LEVEL 3
8
25%
LEVEL 4
2
6%
White
PROFICIENT
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 82
LEVEL 1
19
23%
LEVEL 2
23
28%
LEVEL 3
32
39%
LEVEL 4
8
10%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 17
LEVEL 1
3
18%
LEVEL 2
5
29%
LEVEL 3
7
41%
LEVEL 4
2
12%
Female
PROFICIENT
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 52
LEVEL 1
8
15%
LEVEL 2
15
29%
LEVEL 3
25
48%
LEVEL 4
4
8%
Male
PROFICIENT
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 79
LEVEL 1
26
33%
LEVEL 2
23
29%
LEVEL 3
22
28%
LEVEL 4
8
10%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 131
LEVEL 1
34
26%
LEVEL 2
38
29%
LEVEL 3
47
36%
LEVEL 4
12
9%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 32
LEVEL 1
10
31%
LEVEL 2
11
34%
LEVEL 3
11
34%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 99
LEVEL 1
24
24%
LEVEL 2
27
27%
LEVEL 3
36
36%
LEVEL 4
12
12%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 131
LEVEL 1
34
26%
LEVEL 2
38
29%
LEVEL 3
47
36%
LEVEL 4
12
9%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
131
109
22
3
13
32
82
1
17
52
79
131
32
99
131
PROFICIENT
45%
51%
14%
_%
_%
31%
49%
_%
53%
56%
38%
45%
34%
48%
45%
LEVEL 1
34
26%
22
20%
12
55%
_
_
_
_
12
38%
19
23%
_
_
3
18%
8
15%
26
33%
34
26%
10
31%
24
24%
34
26%
LEVEL 2
38
29%
31
28%
7
32%
_
_
_
_
10
31%
23
28%
_
_
5
29%
15
29%
23
29%
38
29%
11
34%
27
27%
38
29%
LEVEL 3
47
36%
44
40%
3
14%
_
_
_
_
8
25%
32
39%
_
_
7
41%
25
48%
22
28%
47
36%
11
34%
36
36%
47
36%
LEVEL 4
12
9%
12
11%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
2
6%
8
10%
_
_
2
12%
4
8%
8
10%
12
9%
0
0%
12
12%
12
9%
Grade 3 Mathematics
MEAN SCORE: 304
All Students
PROFICIENT
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 185
LEVEL 1
41
22%
LEVEL 2
62
34%
LEVEL 3
53
29%
LEVEL 4
29
16%
General Education
PROFICIENT
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 166
LEVEL 1
28
17%
LEVEL 2
58
35%
LEVEL 3
51
31%
LEVEL 4
29
17%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 19
LEVEL 1
13
68%
LEVEL 2
4
21%
LEVEL 3
2
11%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
American Indian or Alaska Native
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 17
LEVEL 1
5
29%
LEVEL 2
9
53%
LEVEL 3
2
12%
LEVEL 4
1
6%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 43
LEVEL 1
11
26%
LEVEL 2
15
35%
LEVEL 3
14
33%
LEVEL 4
3
7%
White
PROFICIENT
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 113
LEVEL 1
21
19%
LEVEL 2
33
29%
LEVEL 3
35
31%
LEVEL 4
24
21%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 8
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 12
LEVEL 1
4
33%
LEVEL 2
5
42%
LEVEL 3
2
17%
LEVEL 4
1
8%
Female
PROFICIENT
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 94
LEVEL 1
18
19%
LEVEL 2
34
36%
LEVEL 3
25
27%
LEVEL 4
17
18%
Male
PROFICIENT
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 91
LEVEL 1
23
25%
LEVEL 2
28
31%
LEVEL 3
28
31%
LEVEL 4
12
13%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 180
LEVEL 1
38
21%
LEVEL 2
60
33%
LEVEL 3
53
29%
LEVEL 4
29
16%
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
3
60%
LEVEL 2
2
40%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 53
LEVEL 1
16
30%
LEVEL 2
21
40%
LEVEL 3
12
23%
LEVEL 4
4
8%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 132
LEVEL 1
25
19%
LEVEL 2
41
31%
LEVEL 3
41
31%
LEVEL 4
25
19%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 185
LEVEL 1
41
22%
LEVEL 2
62
34%
LEVEL 3
53
29%
LEVEL 4
29
16%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
185
166
19
1
3
17
43
113
8
12
94
91
180
5
53
132
185
PROFICIENT
44%
48%
11%
_%
_%
18%
40%
52%
_%
25%
45%
44%
46%
0%
30%
50%
44%
LEVEL 1
41
22%
28
17%
13
68%
_
_
_
_
5
29%
11
26%
21
19%
_
_
4
33%
18
19%
23
25%
38
21%
3
60%
16
30%
25
19%
41
22%
LEVEL 2
62
34%
58
35%
4
21%
_
_
_
_
9
53%
15
35%
33
29%
_
_
5
42%
34
36%
28
31%
60
33%
2
40%
21
40%
41
31%
62
34%
LEVEL 3
53
29%
51
31%
2
11%
_
_
_
_
2
12%
14
33%
35
31%
_
_
2
17%
25
27%
28
31%
53
29%
0
0%
12
23%
41
31%
53
29%
LEVEL 4
29
16%
29
17%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
1
6%
3
7%
24
21%
_
_
1
8%
17
18%
12
13%
29
16%
0
0%
4
8%
25
19%
29
16%
Grade 4 Mathematics
MEAN SCORE: 293
All Students
PROFICIENT
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 162
LEVEL 1
47
29%
LEVEL 2
63
39%
LEVEL 3
37
23%
LEVEL 4
15
9%
General Education
PROFICIENT
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 139
LEVEL 1
29
21%
LEVEL 2
59
42%
LEVEL 3
37
27%
LEVEL 4
14
10%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 23
LEVEL 1
18
78%
LEVEL 2
4
17%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
1
4%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 11
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 55
LEVEL 1
16
29%
LEVEL 2
24
44%
LEVEL 3
12
22%
LEVEL 4
3
5%
White
PROFICIENT
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 82
LEVEL 1
22
27%
LEVEL 2
29
35%
LEVEL 3
22
27%
LEVEL 4
9
11%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 12
LEVEL 1
6
50%
LEVEL 2
3
25%
LEVEL 3
1
8%
LEVEL 4
2
17%
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 13
LEVEL 1
3
23%
LEVEL 2
7
54%
LEVEL 3
2
15%
LEVEL 4
1
8%
Female
PROFICIENT
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 71
LEVEL 1
19
27%
LEVEL 2
25
35%
LEVEL 3
19
27%
LEVEL 4
8
11%
Male
PROFICIENT
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 91
LEVEL 1
28
31%
LEVEL 2
38
42%
LEVEL 3
18
20%
LEVEL 4
7
8%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 157
LEVEL 1
45
29%
LEVEL 2
60
38%
LEVEL 3
37
24%
LEVEL 4
15
10%
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
2
40%
LEVEL 2
3
60%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 48
LEVEL 1
21
44%
LEVEL 2
16
33%
LEVEL 3
8
17%
LEVEL 4
3
6%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 114
LEVEL 1
26
23%
LEVEL 2
47
41%
LEVEL 3
29
25%
LEVEL 4
12
11%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 162
LEVEL 1
47
29%
LEVEL 2
63
39%
LEVEL 3
37
23%
LEVEL 4
15
9%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
162
139
23
2
11
55
82
12
13
71
91
157
5
48
114
162
PROFICIENT
32%
37%
4%
_%
_%
27%
38%
25%
23%
38%
27%
33%
0%
23%
36%
32%
LEVEL 1
47
29%
29
21%
18
78%
_
_
_
_
16
29%
22
27%
6
50%
3
23%
19
27%
28
31%
45
29%
2
40%
21
44%
26
23%
47
29%
LEVEL 2
63
39%
59
42%
4
17%
_
_
_
_
24
44%
29
35%
3
25%
7
54%
25
35%
38
42%
60
38%
3
60%
16
33%
47
41%
63
39%
LEVEL 3
37
23%
37
27%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
12
22%
22
27%
1
8%
2
15%
19
27%
18
20%
37
24%
0
0%
8
17%
29
25%
37
23%
LEVEL 4
15
9%
14
10%
1
4%
_
_
_
_
3
5%
9
11%
2
17%
1
8%
8
11%
7
8%
15
10%
0
0%
3
6%
12
11%
15
9%
Grade 5 Mathematics
MEAN SCORE: 309
All Students
PROFICIENT
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 197
LEVEL 1
53
27%
LEVEL 2
55
28%
LEVEL 3
71
36%
LEVEL 4
18
9%
General Education
PROFICIENT
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 178
LEVEL 1
37
21%
LEVEL 2
54
30%
LEVEL 3
69
39%
LEVEL 4
18
10%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 19
LEVEL 1
16
84%
LEVEL 2
1
5%
LEVEL 3
2
11%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 20
LEVEL 1
8
40%
LEVEL 2
4
20%
LEVEL 3
8
40%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 50
LEVEL 1
19
38%
LEVEL 2
12
24%
LEVEL 3
14
28%
LEVEL 4
5
10%
White
PROFICIENT
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 118
LEVEL 1
24
20%
LEVEL 2
36
31%
LEVEL 3
47
40%
LEVEL 4
11
9%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
2
22%
LEVEL 2
3
33%
LEVEL 3
2
22%
LEVEL 4
2
22%
Female
PROFICIENT
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 94
LEVEL 1
27
29%
LEVEL 2
26
28%
LEVEL 3
36
38%
LEVEL 4
5
5%
Male
PROFICIENT
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 103
LEVEL 1
26
25%
LEVEL 2
29
28%
LEVEL 3
35
34%
LEVEL 4
13
13%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 190
LEVEL 1
47
25%
LEVEL 2
54
28%
LEVEL 3
71
37%
LEVEL 4
18
9%
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 7
LEVEL 1
6
86%
LEVEL 2
1
14%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 45
LEVEL 1
20
44%
LEVEL 2
16
36%
LEVEL 3
8
18%
LEVEL 4
1
2%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 152
LEVEL 1
33
22%
LEVEL 2
39
26%
LEVEL 3
63
41%
LEVEL 4
17
11%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 197
LEVEL 1
53
27%
LEVEL 2
55
28%
LEVEL 3
71
36%
LEVEL 4
18
9%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
197
178
19
6
20
50
118
3
9
94
103
190
7
45
152
197
PROFICIENT
45%
49%
11%
_%
40%
38%
49%
_%
44%
44%
47%
47%
0%
20%
53%
45%
LEVEL 1
53
27%
37
21%
16
84%
_
_
8
40%
19
38%
24
20%
_
_
2
22%
27
29%
26
25%
47
25%
6
86%
20
44%
33
22%
53
27%
LEVEL 2
55
28%
54
30%
1
5%
_
_
4
20%
12
24%
36
31%
_
_
3
33%
26
28%
29
28%
54
28%
1
14%
16
36%
39
26%
55
28%
LEVEL 3
71
36%
69
39%
2
11%
_
_
8
40%
14
28%
47
40%
_
_
2
22%
36
38%
35
34%
71
37%
0
0%
8
18%
63
41%
71
36%
LEVEL 4
18
9%
18
10%
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
5
10%
11
9%
_
_
2
22%
5
5%
13
13%
18
9%
0
0%
1
2%
17
11%
18
9%
Grade 6 Mathematics
MEAN SCORE: 296
All Students
PROFICIENT
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 159
LEVEL 1
51
32%
LEVEL 2
56
35%
LEVEL 3
34
21%
LEVEL 4
18
11%
General Education
PROFICIENT
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 143
LEVEL 1
39
27%
LEVEL 2
52
36%
LEVEL 3
34
24%
LEVEL 4
18
13%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 16
LEVEL 1
12
75%
LEVEL 2
4
25%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 16
LEVEL 1
8
50%
LEVEL 2
6
38%
LEVEL 3
1
6%
LEVEL 4
1
6%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 37
LEVEL 1
14
38%
LEVEL 2
15
41%
LEVEL 3
6
16%
LEVEL 4
2
5%
White
PROFICIENT
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 95
LEVEL 1
28
29%
LEVEL 2
32
34%
LEVEL 3
22
23%
LEVEL 4
13
14%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 11
LEVEL 1
1
9%
LEVEL 2
3
27%
LEVEL 3
5
45%
LEVEL 4
2
18%
Female
PROFICIENT
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 79
LEVEL 1
30
38%
LEVEL 2
26
33%
LEVEL 3
11
14%
LEVEL 4
12
15%
Male
PROFICIENT
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 80
LEVEL 1
21
26%
LEVEL 2
30
38%
LEVEL 3
23
29%
LEVEL 4
6
8%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 157
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 35
LEVEL 1
18
51%
LEVEL 2
10
29%
LEVEL 3
6
17%
LEVEL 4
1
3%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 124
LEVEL 1
33
27%
LEVEL 2
46
37%
LEVEL 3
28
23%
LEVEL 4
17
14%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 159
LEVEL 1
51
32%
LEVEL 2
56
35%
LEVEL 3
34
21%
LEVEL 4
18
11%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
159
143
16
9
16
37
95
2
11
79
80
157
2
35
124
159
PROFICIENT
33%
36%
0%
_%
13%
22%
37%
_%
64%
29%
36%
_%
_%
20%
36%
33%
LEVEL 1
51
32%
39
27%
12
75%
_
_
8
50%
14
38%
28
29%
_
_
1
9%
30
38%
21
26%
_
_
_
_
18
51%
33
27%
51
32%
LEVEL 2
56
35%
52
36%
4
25%
_
_
6
38%
15
41%
32
34%
_
_
3
27%
26
33%
30
38%
_
_
_
_
10
29%
46
37%
56
35%
LEVEL 3
34
21%
34
24%
0
0%
_
_
1
6%
6
16%
22
23%
_
_
5
45%
11
14%
23
29%
_
_
_
_
6
17%
28
23%
34
21%
LEVEL 4
18
11%
18
13%
0
0%
_
_
1
6%
2
5%
13
14%
_
_
2
18%
12
15%
6
8%
_
_
_
_
1
3%
17
14%
18
11%
Grade 7 Mathematics
Mean scores and data in the table for grade 7 math include only those for grade 7 students who took the Grade 7 New York State Testing Program Assessment (NYSTP) in Mathematics. For 2015 and forward, data in the bar charts include those for grade 7 students who took the Grade 7 NYSTP in Mathematics and grade 7 students who took a Regents math test in lieu of the NYSTP. For 2014 and earlier, data in the bar charts include only those for grade 7 students who took the Grade 7 NYSTP.
MEAN SCORE: 305
All Students
PROFICIENT
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 146
LEVEL 1
39
27%
LEVEL 2
62
42%
LEVEL 3
34
23%
LEVEL 4
11
8%
General Education
PROFICIENT
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 129
LEVEL 1
29
22%
LEVEL 2
56
43%
LEVEL 3
34
26%
LEVEL 4
10
8%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 17
LEVEL 1
10
59%
LEVEL 2
6
35%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
1
6%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 12
LEVEL 1
3
25%
LEVEL 2
6
50%
LEVEL 3
2
17%
LEVEL 4
1
8%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 30
LEVEL 1
12
40%
LEVEL 2
16
53%
LEVEL 3
2
7%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
White
PROFICIENT
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 94
LEVEL 1
23
24%
LEVEL 2
35
37%
LEVEL 3
28
30%
LEVEL 4
8
9%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 10
LEVEL 1
1
10%
LEVEL 2
5
50%
LEVEL 3
2
20%
LEVEL 4
2
20%
Female
PROFICIENT
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 65
LEVEL 1
12
18%
LEVEL 2
33
51%
LEVEL 3
16
25%
LEVEL 4
4
6%
Male
PROFICIENT
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 81
LEVEL 1
27
33%
LEVEL 2
29
36%
LEVEL 3
18
22%
LEVEL 4
7
9%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 144
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 35
LEVEL 1
16
46%
LEVEL 2
13
37%
LEVEL 3
4
11%
LEVEL 4
2
6%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 111
LEVEL 1
23
21%
LEVEL 2
49
44%
LEVEL 3
30
27%
LEVEL 4
9
8%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 146
LEVEL 1
39
27%
LEVEL 2
62
42%
LEVEL 3
34
23%
LEVEL 4
11
8%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
146
129
17
6
12
30
94
4
10
65
81
144
2
35
111
146
PROFICIENT
31%
34%
6%
_%
25%
7%
38%
_%
40%
31%
31%
_%
_%
17%
35%
31%
LEVEL 1
39
27%
29
22%
10
59%
_
_
3
25%
12
40%
23
24%
_
_
1
10%
12
18%
27
33%
_
_
_
_
16
46%
23
21%
39
27%
LEVEL 2
62
42%
56
43%
6
35%
_
_
6
50%
16
53%
35
37%
_
_
5
50%
33
51%
29
36%
_
_
_
_
13
37%
49
44%
62
42%
LEVEL 3
34
23%
34
26%
0
0%
_
_
2
17%
2
7%
28
30%
_
_
2
20%
16
25%
18
22%
_
_
_
_
4
11%
30
27%
34
23%
LEVEL 4
11
8%
10
8%
1
6%
_
_
1
8%
0
0%
8
9%
_
_
2
20%
4
6%
7
9%
_
_
_
_
2
6%
9
8%
11
8%
Grade 8 Mathematics
Mean scores and data in the table for grade 8 math include only those for grade 8 students who took the Grade 8 New York State Testing Program Assessment (NYSTP) in Mathematics. For 2015 and forward, data in the bar charts include those for grade 8 students who took the Grade 8 NYSTP in Mathematics and grade 8 students who took a Regents math test in lieu of the NYSTP. For 2014 and earlier, data in the bar charts include only those for grade 8 students who took the Grade 8 NYSTP.
MEAN SCORE: 274
All Students
PROFICIENT
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 82
LEVEL 1
50
61%
LEVEL 2
29
35%
LEVEL 3
3
4%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
General Education
PROFICIENT
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 63
LEVEL 1
34
54%
LEVEL 2
26
41%
LEVEL 3
3
5%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 19
LEVEL 1
16
84%
LEVEL 2
3
16%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 10
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 25
LEVEL 1
16
64%
LEVEL 2
8
32%
LEVEL 3
1
4%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
White
PROFICIENT
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 45
LEVEL 1
30
67%
LEVEL 2
14
31%
LEVEL 3
1
2%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 12
LEVEL 1
4
33%
LEVEL 2
7
58%
LEVEL 3
1
8%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Female
PROFICIENT
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 26
LEVEL 1
15
58%
LEVEL 2
10
38%
LEVEL 3
1
4%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Male
PROFICIENT
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 56
LEVEL 1
35
63%
LEVEL 2
19
34%
LEVEL 3
2
4%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 82
LEVEL 1
50
61%
LEVEL 2
29
35%
LEVEL 3
3
4%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 27
LEVEL 1
18
67%
LEVEL 2
8
30%
LEVEL 3
1
4%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 55
LEVEL 1
32
58%
LEVEL 2
21
38%
LEVEL 3
2
4%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 82
LEVEL 1
50
61%
LEVEL 2
29
35%
LEVEL 3
3
4%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
82
63
19
2
10
25
45
12
26
56
82
27
55
82
PROFICIENT
4%
5%
0%
_%
_%
4%
2%
8%
4%
4%
4%
4%
4%
4%
LEVEL 1
50
61%
34
54%
16
84%
_
_
_
_
16
64%
30
67%
4
33%
15
58%
35
63%
50
61%
18
67%
32
58%
50
61%
LEVEL 2
29
35%
26
41%
3
16%
_
_
_
_
8
32%
14
31%
7
58%
10
38%
19
34%
29
35%
8
30%
21
38%
29
35%
LEVEL 3
3
4%
3
5%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
1
4%
1
2%
1
8%
1
4%
2
4%
3
4%
1
4%
2
4%
3
4%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
Grade 8 Students Taking a Regents Math Test
Accelerated grade 8 students who took a Regents math test in lieu of the Grade 8 NYSTP in Mathematics.
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 111
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
18
16%
LEVEL 4 AND ABOVE
93
84%
LEVEL 3 AND ABOVE
111
100%
GROUP
All Students
TOTAL TESTED
111
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
18
16%
4 & ABOVE
93
84%
3 & ABOVE
111
100%
Grade 4 Science
MEAN SCORE: 80
All Students
PROFICIENT
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 190
LEVEL 1
8
4%
LEVEL 2
19
10%
LEVEL 3
79
42%
LEVEL 4
84
44%
General Education
PROFICIENT
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 164
LEVEL 1
3
2%
LEVEL 2
11
7%
LEVEL 3
70
43%
LEVEL 4
80
49%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 26
LEVEL 1
5
19%
LEVEL 2
8
31%
LEVEL 3
9
35%
LEVEL 4
4
15%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 13
LEVEL 1
2
15%
LEVEL 2
2
15%
LEVEL 3
6
46%
LEVEL 4
3
23%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 59
LEVEL 1
1
2%
LEVEL 2
8
14%
LEVEL 3
28
47%
LEVEL 4
22
37%
White
PROFICIENT
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 106
LEVEL 1
3
3%
LEVEL 2
9
8%
LEVEL 3
40
38%
LEVEL 4
54
51%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 10
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 12
LEVEL 1
2
17%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
5
42%
LEVEL 4
5
42%
Female
PROFICIENT
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 83
LEVEL 1
2
2%
LEVEL 2
7
8%
LEVEL 3
36
43%
LEVEL 4
38
46%
Male
PROFICIENT
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 107
LEVEL 1
6
6%
LEVEL 2
12
11%
LEVEL 3
43
40%
LEVEL 4
46
43%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 185
LEVEL 1
7
4%
LEVEL 2
17
9%
LEVEL 3
77
42%
LEVEL 4
84
45%
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
1
20%
LEVEL 2
2
40%
LEVEL 3
2
40%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 50
LEVEL 1
3
6%
LEVEL 2
8
16%
LEVEL 3
20
40%
LEVEL 4
19
38%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 140
LEVEL 1
5
4%
LEVEL 2
11
8%
LEVEL 3
59
42%
LEVEL 4
65
46%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 190
LEVEL 1
8
4%
LEVEL 2
19
10%
LEVEL 3
79
42%
LEVEL 4
84
44%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
190
164
26
2
13
59
106
10
12
83
107
185
5
50
140
190
PROFICIENT
86%
91%
50%
_%
69%
85%
89%
_%
83%
89%
83%
87%
40%
78%
89%
86%
LEVEL 1
8
4%
3
2%
5
19%
_
_
2
15%
1
2%
3
3%
_
_
2
17%
2
2%
6
6%
7
4%
1
20%
3
6%
5
4%
8
4%
LEVEL 2
19
10%
11
7%
8
31%
_
_
2
15%
8
14%
9
8%
_
_
0
0%
7
8%
12
11%
17
9%
2
40%
8
16%
11
8%
19
10%
LEVEL 3
79
42%
70
43%
9
35%
_
_
6
46%
28
47%
40
38%
_
_
5
42%
36
43%
43
40%
77
42%
2
40%
20
40%
59
42%
79
42%
LEVEL 4
84
44%
80
49%
4
15%
_
_
3
23%
22
37%
54
51%
_
_
5
42%
38
46%
46
43%
84
45%
0
0%
19
38%
65
46%
84
44%
Grade 8 Science
Data in the bar charts include those for grade 8 students who took the New York State Grade 8 Science Test and grade 8 students who took a Regents science test in lieu of this test. Mean scores and data in the table for grade 8 science include only those for grade 8 students who took the New York State Grade 8 Science Test.
MEAN SCORE: 67
All Students
PROFICIENT
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 90
LEVEL 1
3
3%
LEVEL 2
36
40%
LEVEL 3
47
52%
LEVEL 4
4
4%
General Education
PROFICIENT
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 69
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
25
36%
LEVEL 3
39
57%
LEVEL 4
4
6%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 21
LEVEL 1
2
10%
LEVEL 2
11
52%
LEVEL 3
8
38%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 28
LEVEL 1
2
7%
LEVEL 2
12
43%
LEVEL 3
13
46%
LEVEL 4
1
4%
White
PROFICIENT
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 51
LEVEL 1
1
2%
LEVEL 2
22
43%
LEVEL 3
25
49%
LEVEL 4
3
6%
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 11
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
18%
LEVEL 3
9
82%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Female
PROFICIENT
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 30
LEVEL 1
2
7%
LEVEL 2
15
50%
LEVEL 3
13
43%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Male
PROFICIENT
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 60
LEVEL 1
1
2%
LEVEL 2
21
35%
LEVEL 3
34
57%
LEVEL 4
4
7%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 90
LEVEL 1
3
3%
LEVEL 2
36
40%
LEVEL 3
47
52%
LEVEL 4
4
4%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 30
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
14
47%
LEVEL 3
16
53%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 60
LEVEL 1
3
5%
LEVEL 2
22
37%
LEVEL 3
31
52%
LEVEL 4
4
7%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 90
LEVEL 1
3
3%
LEVEL 2
36
40%
LEVEL 3
47
52%
LEVEL 4
4
4%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
90
69
21
2
9
28
51
11
30
60
90
30
60
90
PROFICIENT
57%
62%
38%
_%
_%
50%
55%
82%
43%
63%
57%
53%
58%
57%
LEVEL 1
3
3%
1
1%
2
10%
_
_
_
_
2
7%
1
2%
0
0%
2
7%
1
2%
3
3%
0
0%
3
5%
3
3%
LEVEL 2
36
40%
25
36%
11
52%
_
_
_
_
12
43%
22
43%
2
18%
15
50%
21
35%
36
40%
14
47%
22
37%
36
40%
LEVEL 3
47
52%
39
57%
8
38%
_
_
_
_
13
46%
25
49%
9
82%
13
43%
34
57%
47
52%
16
53%
31
52%
47
52%
LEVEL 4
4
4%
4
6%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
1
4%
3
6%
0
0%
0
0%
4
7%
4
4%
0
0%
4
7%
4
4%
Grade 8 Students Taking a Regents Science Test
Accelerated grade 8 students who take a Regents science test in lieu of the New York State Grade 8 Science Test.
All Students
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 111
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
36
32%
LEVEL 4
75
68%
GROUP
All Students
TOTAL TESTED
111
PROFICIENT
100%
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
36
32%
LEVEL 4
75
68%
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level English Language Arts after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 342
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
12
4%
LEVEL 3
72
21%
LEVEL 4
253
74%
General Education
PROFICIENT
99%
TOTAL TESTED: 296
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
0%
LEVEL 3
52
18%
LEVEL 4
241
81%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 46
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
11
24%
LEVEL 3
20
43%
LEVEL 4
12
26%
American Indian or Alaska Native
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 10
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 28
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
7
25%
LEVEL 4
21
75%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 70
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
27
39%
LEVEL 4
43
61%
White
PROFICIENT
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 230
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
12
5%
LEVEL 3
36
16%
LEVEL 4
177
77%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 14
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
2
14%
LEVEL 4
12
86%
Female
PROFICIENT
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 178
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
5
3%
LEVEL 3
29
16%
LEVEL 4
142
80%
Male
PROFICIENT
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 164
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
7
4%
LEVEL 3
43
26%
LEVEL 4
111
68%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 341
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 81
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
2%
LEVEL 3
27
33%
LEVEL 4
51
63%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 261
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
10
4%
LEVEL 3
45
17%
LEVEL 4
202
77%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 342
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
12
4%
LEVEL 3
72
21%
LEVEL 4
253
74%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
342
296
46
1
10
28
70
230
3
14
178
164
341
1
81
261
342
PROFICIENT
95%
99%
70%
_%
_%
100%
100%
93%
_%
100%
96%
94%
_%
_%
96%
95%
95%
LEVEL 1
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
LEVEL 2
12
4%
1
0%
11
24%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
12
5%
_
_
0
0%
5
3%
7
4%
_
_
_
_
2
2%
10
4%
12
4%
LEVEL 3
72
21%
52
18%
20
43%
_
_
_
_
7
25%
27
39%
36
16%
_
_
2
14%
29
16%
43
26%
_
_
_
_
27
33%
45
17%
72
21%
LEVEL 4
253
74%
241
81%
12
26%
_
_
_
_
21
75%
43
61%
177
77%
_
_
12
86%
142
80%
111
68%
_
_
_
_
51
63%
202
77%
253
74%
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level Mathematics after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 342
LEVEL 1
2
1%
LEVEL 2
27
8%
LEVEL 3
180
53%
LEVEL 4
132
39%
General Education
PROFICIENT
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 296
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
6
2%
LEVEL 3
160
54%
LEVEL 4
130
44%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 46
LEVEL 1
2
4%
LEVEL 2
21
46%
LEVEL 3
20
43%
LEVEL 4
2
4%
American Indian or Alaska Native
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 10
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 28
LEVEL 1
1
4%
LEVEL 2
1
4%
LEVEL 3
17
61%
LEVEL 4
9
32%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 70
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
4
6%
LEVEL 3
48
69%
LEVEL 4
18
26%
White
PROFICIENT
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 230
LEVEL 1
1
0%
LEVEL 2
22
10%
LEVEL 3
111
48%
LEVEL 4
95
41%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 14
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
4
29%
LEVEL 4
10
71%
Female
PROFICIENT
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 178
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
10
6%
LEVEL 3
96
54%
LEVEL 4
72
40%
Male
PROFICIENT
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 164
LEVEL 1
2
1%
LEVEL 2
17
10%
LEVEL 3
84
51%
LEVEL 4
60
37%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 341
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 81
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
7
9%
LEVEL 3
49
60%
LEVEL 4
25
31%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 261
LEVEL 1
2
1%
LEVEL 2
20
8%
LEVEL 3
131
50%
LEVEL 4
107
41%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 342
LEVEL 1
2
1%
LEVEL 2
27
8%
LEVEL 3
180
53%
LEVEL 4
132
39%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
342
296
46
1
10
28
70
230
3
14
178
164
341
1
81
261
342
PROFICIENT
91%
98%
48%
_%
_%
93%
94%
90%
_%
100%
94%
88%
_%
_%
91%
91%
91%
LEVEL 1
2
1%
0
0%
2
4%
_
_
_
_
1
4%
0
0%
1
0%
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
2
1%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
2
1%
2
1%
LEVEL 2
27
8%
6
2%
21
46%
_
_
_
_
1
4%
4
6%
22
10%
_
_
0
0%
10
6%
17
10%
_
_
_
_
7
9%
20
8%
27
8%
LEVEL 3
180
53%
160
54%
20
43%
_
_
_
_
17
61%
48
69%
111
48%
_
_
4
29%
96
54%
84
51%
_
_
_
_
49
60%
131
50%
180
53%
LEVEL 4
132
39%
130
44%
2
4%
_
_
_
_
9
32%
18
26%
95
41%
_
_
10
71%
72
40%
60
37%
_
_
_
_
25
31%
107
41%
132
39%
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level Global History and Geography after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 342
LEVEL 1
11
3%
LEVEL 2
22
6%
LEVEL 3
153
45%
LEVEL 4
146
43%
General Education
PROFICIENT
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 296
LEVEL 1
1
0%
LEVEL 2
14
5%
LEVEL 3
134
45%
LEVEL 4
141
48%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 46
LEVEL 1
10
22%
LEVEL 2
8
17%
LEVEL 3
19
41%
LEVEL 4
5
11%
American Indian or Alaska Native
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 10
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 28
LEVEL 1
1
4%
LEVEL 2
1
4%
LEVEL 3
14
50%
LEVEL 4
10
36%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 70
LEVEL 1
2
3%
LEVEL 2
6
9%
LEVEL 3
42
60%
LEVEL 4
19
27%
White
PROFICIENT
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 230
LEVEL 1
8
3%
LEVEL 2
15
7%
LEVEL 3
93
40%
LEVEL 4
107
47%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 14
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
4
29%
LEVEL 4
10
71%
Female
PROFICIENT
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 178
LEVEL 1
5
3%
LEVEL 2
10
6%
LEVEL 3
83
47%
LEVEL 4
76
43%
Male
PROFICIENT
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 164
LEVEL 1
6
4%
LEVEL 2
12
7%
LEVEL 3
70
43%
LEVEL 4
70
43%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 341
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 81
LEVEL 1
2
2%
LEVEL 2
8
10%
LEVEL 3
45
56%
LEVEL 4
24
30%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 261
LEVEL 1
9
3%
LEVEL 2
14
5%
LEVEL 3
108
41%
LEVEL 4
122
47%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 342
LEVEL 1
11
3%
LEVEL 2
22
6%
LEVEL 3
153
45%
LEVEL 4
146
43%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
342
296
46
1
10
28
70
230
3
14
178
164
341
1
81
261
342
PROFICIENT
87%
93%
52%
_%
_%
86%
87%
87%
_%
100%
89%
85%
_%
_%
85%
88%
87%
LEVEL 1
11
3%
1
0%
10
22%
_
_
_
_
1
4%
2
3%
8
3%
_
_
0
0%
5
3%
6
4%
_
_
_
_
2
2%
9
3%
11
3%
LEVEL 2
22
6%
14
5%
8
17%
_
_
_
_
1
4%
6
9%
15
7%
_
_
0
0%
10
6%
12
7%
_
_
_
_
8
10%
14
5%
22
6%
LEVEL 3
153
45%
134
45%
19
41%
_
_
_
_
14
50%
42
60%
93
40%
_
_
4
29%
83
47%
70
43%
_
_
_
_
45
56%
108
41%
153
45%
LEVEL 4
146
43%
141
48%
5
11%
_
_
_
_
10
36%
19
27%
107
47%
_
_
10
71%
76
43%
70
43%
_
_
_
_
24
30%
122
47%
146
43%
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level U.S. History and Government after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 342
LEVEL 1
5
1%
LEVEL 2
22
6%
LEVEL 3
124
36%
LEVEL 4
185
54%
General Education
PROFICIENT
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 296
LEVEL 1
1
0%
LEVEL 2
10
3%
LEVEL 3
104
35%
LEVEL 4
178
60%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 46
LEVEL 1
4
9%
LEVEL 2
12
26%
LEVEL 3
20
43%
LEVEL 4
7
15%
American Indian or Alaska Native
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 10
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 28
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
7%
LEVEL 3
17
61%
LEVEL 4
9
32%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 70
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
5
7%
LEVEL 3
34
49%
LEVEL 4
30
43%
White
PROFICIENT
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 230
LEVEL 1
3
1%
LEVEL 2
15
7%
LEVEL 3
70
30%
LEVEL 4
136
59%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 14
LEVEL 1
1
7%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
3
21%
LEVEL 4
10
71%
Female
PROFICIENT
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 178
LEVEL 1
2
1%
LEVEL 2
13
7%
LEVEL 3
67
38%
LEVEL 4
93
52%
Male
PROFICIENT
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 164
LEVEL 1
3
2%
LEVEL 2
9
5%
LEVEL 3
57
35%
LEVEL 4
92
56%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 341
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 81
LEVEL 1
2
2%
LEVEL 2
10
12%
LEVEL 3
35
43%
LEVEL 4
32
40%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 261
LEVEL 1
3
1%
LEVEL 2
12
5%
LEVEL 3
89
34%
LEVEL 4
153
59%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 342
LEVEL 1
5
1%
LEVEL 2
22
6%
LEVEL 3
124
36%
LEVEL 4
185
54%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
342
296
46
1
10
28
70
230
3
14
178
164
341
1
81
261
342
PROFICIENT
90%
95%
59%
_%
_%
93%
91%
90%
_%
93%
90%
91%
_%
_%
83%
93%
90%
LEVEL 1
5
1%
1
0%
4
9%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
1
1%
3
1%
_
_
1
7%
2
1%
3
2%
_
_
_
_
2
2%
3
1%
5
1%
LEVEL 2
22
6%
10
3%
12
26%
_
_
_
_
2
7%
5
7%
15
7%
_
_
0
0%
13
7%
9
5%
_
_
_
_
10
12%
12
5%
22
6%
LEVEL 3
124
36%
104
35%
20
43%
_
_
_
_
17
61%
34
49%
70
30%
_
_
3
21%
67
38%
57
35%
_
_
_
_
35
43%
89
34%
124
36%
LEVEL 4
185
54%
178
60%
7
15%
_
_
_
_
9
32%
30
43%
136
59%
_
_
10
71%
93
52%
92
56%
_
_
_
_
32
40%
153
59%
185
54%
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level Science after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 342
LEVEL 1
5
1%
LEVEL 2
7
2%
LEVEL 3
153
45%
LEVEL 4
173
51%
General Education
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 296
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
128
43%
LEVEL 4
167
56%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 46
LEVEL 1
5
11%
LEVEL 2
7
15%
LEVEL 3
25
54%
LEVEL 4
6
13%
American Indian or Alaska Native
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 10
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 28
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
4%
LEVEL 3
15
54%
LEVEL 4
12
43%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
99%
TOTAL TESTED: 70
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
1%
LEVEL 3
44
63%
LEVEL 4
25
36%
White
PROFICIENT
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 230
LEVEL 1
5
2%
LEVEL 2
5
2%
LEVEL 3
91
40%
LEVEL 4
125
54%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 14
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
3
21%
LEVEL 4
11
79%
Female
PROFICIENT
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 178
LEVEL 1
2
1%
LEVEL 2
2
1%
LEVEL 3
80
45%
LEVEL 4
92
52%
Male
PROFICIENT
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 164
LEVEL 1
3
2%
LEVEL 2
5
3%
LEVEL 3
73
45%
LEVEL 4
81
49%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 341
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 81
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
1%
LEVEL 3
42
52%
LEVEL 4
37
46%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 261
LEVEL 1
5
2%
LEVEL 2
6
2%
LEVEL 3
111
43%
LEVEL 4
136
52%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 342
LEVEL 1
5
1%
LEVEL 2
7
2%
LEVEL 3
153
45%
LEVEL 4
173
51%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
342
296
46
1
10
28
70
230
3
14
178
164
341
1
81
261
342
PROFICIENT
95%
100%
67%
_%
_%
96%
99%
94%
_%
100%
97%
94%
_%
_%
98%
95%
95%
LEVEL 1
5
1%
0
0%
5
11%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
5
2%
_
_
0
0%
2
1%
3
2%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
5
2%
5
1%
LEVEL 2
7
2%
0
0%
7
15%
_
_
_
_
1
4%
1
1%
5
2%
_
_
0
0%
2
1%
5
3%
_
_
_
_
1
1%
6
2%
7
2%
LEVEL 3
153
45%
128
43%
25
54%
_
_
_
_
15
54%
44
63%
91
40%
_
_
3
21%
80
45%
73
45%
_
_
_
_
42
52%
111
43%
153
45%
LEVEL 4
173
51%
167
56%
6
13%
_
_
_
_
12
43%
25
36%
125
54%
_
_
11
79%
92
52%
81
49%
_
_
_
_
37
46%
136
52%
173
51%
Regents Examination Results (2016 - 17)
English Language Arts (Common Core)
English Language Arts (Common Core)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
334
292
42
14
29
64
227
157
177
331
3
77
257
334
LEVEL 1
13
4%
8
3%
5
12%
0
0%
2
7%
3
5%
8
4%
4
3%
9
5%
_
_
_
_
5
6%
8
3%
13
4%
LEVEL 2
10
3%
5
2%
5
12%
0
0%
2
7%
2
3%
6
3%
5
3%
5
3%
_
_
_
_
5
6%
5
2%
10
3%
LEVEL 3
68
20%
53
18%
15
36%
1
7%
8
28%
16
25%
43
19%
26
17%
42
24%
_
_
_
_
24
31%
44
17%
68
20%
LEVEL 4
84
25%
74
25%
10
24%
4
29%
7
24%
17
27%
56
25%
37
24%
47
27%
_
_
_
_
19
25%
65
25%
84
25%
LEVEL 5
159
48%
152
52%
7
17%
9
64%
10
34%
26
41%
114
50%
85
54%
74
42%
_
_
_
_
24
31%
135
53%
159
48%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 334
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
13
4%
LEVEL 2
10
3%
LEVEL 3
68
20%
LEVEL 4
84
25%
LEVEL 5
159
48%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 292
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
8
3%
LEVEL 2
5
2%
LEVEL 3
53
18%
LEVEL 4
74
25%
LEVEL 5
152
52%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 42
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
5
12%
LEVEL 2
5
12%
LEVEL 3
15
36%
LEVEL 4
10
24%
LEVEL 5
7
17%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 14
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
1
7%
LEVEL 4
4
29%
LEVEL 5
9
64%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 29
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
2
7%
LEVEL 2
2
7%
LEVEL 3
8
28%
LEVEL 4
7
24%
LEVEL 5
10
34%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 64
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
3
5%
LEVEL 2
2
3%
LEVEL 3
16
25%
LEVEL 4
17
27%
LEVEL 5
26
41%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 227
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
8
4%
LEVEL 2
6
3%
LEVEL 3
43
19%
LEVEL 4
56
25%
LEVEL 5
114
50%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 157
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
4
3%
LEVEL 2
5
3%
LEVEL 3
26
17%
LEVEL 4
37
24%
LEVEL 5
85
54%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 177
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
9
5%
LEVEL 2
5
3%
LEVEL 3
42
24%
LEVEL 4
47
27%
LEVEL 5
74
42%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 331
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 77
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
5
6%
LEVEL 2
5
6%
LEVEL 3
24
31%
LEVEL 4
19
25%
LEVEL 5
24
31%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 257
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
8
3%
LEVEL 2
5
2%
LEVEL 3
44
17%
LEVEL 4
65
25%
LEVEL 5
135
53%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 334
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
13
4%
LEVEL 2
10
3%
LEVEL 3
68
20%
LEVEL 4
84
25%
LEVEL 5
159
48%
Algebra 2/Trigonometry
Regents Algebra 2/Trigonometry
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
16
16
2
6
8
8
12
4
16
5
11
16
55
7
44%
7
44%
_
_
_
_
4
50%
3
38%
_
_
_
_
7
44%
3
60%
4
36%
7
44%
65
4
25%
4
25%
_
_
_
_
2
25%
2
25%
_
_
_
_
4
25%
2
40%
2
18%
4
25%
85
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 16
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
7
44%
65
4
25%
85
0
0%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 16
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
7
44%
65
4
25%
85
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 6
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 8
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
4
50%
65
2
25%
85
0
0%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 8
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
3
38%
65
2
25%
85
0
0%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 12
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 4
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 16
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
7
44%
65
4
25%
85
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
3
60%
65
2
40%
85
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 11
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
4
36%
65
2
18%
85
0
0%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 16
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
7
44%
65
4
25%
85
0
0%
Algebra I (Common Core)
Algebra I (Common Core)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Migrant
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
445
364
81
1
6
45
94
295
4
5
194
251
440
5
120
325
1
444
LEVEL 1
30
7%
9
2%
21
26%
_
_
0
0%
3
7%
8
9%
18
6%
_
_
1
20%
8
4%
22
9%
29
7%
1
20%
14
12%
16
5%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 2
29
7%
11
3%
18
22%
_
_
0
0%
5
11%
5
5%
19
6%
_
_
0
0%
11
6%
18
7%
29
7%
0
0%
16
13%
13
4%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 3
172
39%
139
38%
33
41%
_
_
1
17%
25
56%
42
45%
102
35%
_
_
2
40%
76
39%
96
38%
169
38%
3
60%
54
45%
118
36%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 4
134
30%
125
34%
9
11%
_
_
5
83%
10
22%
22
23%
95
32%
_
_
2
40%
60
31%
74
29%
134
30%
0
0%
23
19%
111
34%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 5
80
18%
80
22%
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
2
4%
17
18%
61
21%
_
_
0
0%
39
20%
41
16%
79
18%
1
20%
13
11%
67
21%
_
_
_
_
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 445
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
30
7%
LEVEL 2
29
7%
LEVEL 3
172
39%
LEVEL 4
134
30%
LEVEL 5
80
18%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 364
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
9
2%
LEVEL 2
11
3%
LEVEL 3
139
38%
LEVEL 4
125
34%
LEVEL 5
80
22%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 81
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
21
26%
LEVEL 2
18
22%
LEVEL 3
33
41%
LEVEL 4
9
11%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
American Indian or Alaska Native
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 6
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
1
17%
LEVEL 4
5
83%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 45
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
3
7%
LEVEL 2
5
11%
LEVEL 3
25
56%
LEVEL 4
10
22%
LEVEL 5
2
4%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 94
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
8
9%
LEVEL 2
5
5%
LEVEL 3
42
45%
LEVEL 4
22
23%
LEVEL 5
17
18%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 295
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
18
6%
LEVEL 2
19
6%
LEVEL 3
102
35%
LEVEL 4
95
32%
LEVEL 5
61
21%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 4
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
1
20%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
2
40%
LEVEL 4
2
40%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 194
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
8
4%
LEVEL 2
11
6%
LEVEL 3
76
39%
LEVEL 4
60
31%
LEVEL 5
39
20%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 251
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
22
9%
LEVEL 2
18
7%
LEVEL 3
96
38%
LEVEL 4
74
29%
LEVEL 5
41
16%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 440
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
29
7%
LEVEL 2
29
7%
LEVEL 3
169
38%
LEVEL 4
134
30%
LEVEL 5
79
18%
English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
1
20%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
3
60%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
LEVEL 5
1
20%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 120
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
14
12%
LEVEL 2
16
13%
LEVEL 3
54
45%
LEVEL 4
23
19%
LEVEL 5
13
11%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 325
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
16
5%
LEVEL 2
13
4%
LEVEL 3
118
36%
LEVEL 4
111
34%
LEVEL 5
67
21%
Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 444
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Common Core Geometry
Regents Common Core Geometry
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
386
367
19
6
33
75
268
4
10
198
188
384
2
88
298
386
LEVEL 1
58
15%
47
13%
11
58%
_
_
5
15%
21
28%
32
12%
_
_
0
0%
25
13%
33
18%
_
_
_
_
19
22%
39
13%
58
15%
LEVEL 2
94
24%
90
25%
4
21%
_
_
10
30%
20
27%
61
23%
_
_
3
30%
47
24%
47
25%
_
_
_
_
27
31%
67
22%
94
24%
LEVEL 3
154
40%
151
41%
3
16%
_
_
16
48%
27
36%
108
40%
_
_
3
30%
81
41%
73
39%
_
_
_
_
30
34%
124
42%
154
40%
LEVEL 4
36
9%
35
10%
1
5%
_
_
0
0%
5
7%
30
11%
_
_
1
10%
24
12%
12
6%
_
_
_
_
2
2%
34
11%
36
9%
LEVEL 5
44
11%
44
12%
0
0%
_
_
2
6%
2
3%
37
14%
_
_
3
30%
21
11%
23
12%
_
_
_
_
10
11%
34
11%
44
11%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 386
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
58
15%
LEVEL 2
94
24%
LEVEL 3
154
40%
LEVEL 4
36
9%
LEVEL 5
44
11%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 367
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
47
13%
LEVEL 2
90
25%
LEVEL 3
151
41%
LEVEL 4
35
10%
LEVEL 5
44
12%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 19
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
11
58%
LEVEL 2
4
21%
LEVEL 3
3
16%
LEVEL 4
1
5%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 6
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 33
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
5
15%
LEVEL 2
10
30%
LEVEL 3
16
48%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
LEVEL 5
2
6%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 75
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
21
28%
LEVEL 2
20
27%
LEVEL 3
27
36%
LEVEL 4
5
7%
LEVEL 5
2
3%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 268
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
32
12%
LEVEL 2
61
23%
LEVEL 3
108
40%
LEVEL 4
30
11%
LEVEL 5
37
14%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 4
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 10
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
3
30%
LEVEL 3
3
30%
LEVEL 4
1
10%
LEVEL 5
3
30%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 198
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
25
13%
LEVEL 2
47
24%
LEVEL 3
81
41%
LEVEL 4
24
12%
LEVEL 5
21
11%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 188
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
33
18%
LEVEL 2
47
25%
LEVEL 3
73
39%
LEVEL 4
12
6%
LEVEL 5
23
12%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 384
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 88
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
19
22%
LEVEL 2
27
31%
LEVEL 3
30
34%
LEVEL 4
2
2%
LEVEL 5
10
11%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 298
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
39
13%
LEVEL 2
67
22%
LEVEL 3
124
42%
LEVEL 4
34
11%
LEVEL 5
34
11%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 386
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
58
15%
LEVEL 2
94
24%
LEVEL 3
154
40%
LEVEL 4
36
9%
LEVEL 5
44
11%
Algebra II (Common Core)
Algebra II (Common Core)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
213
210
3
11
13
35
154
116
97
212
1
32
181
213
LEVEL 1
6
3%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
6
4%
2
2%
4
4%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
6
3%
6
3%
LEVEL 2
31
15%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
2
15%
9
26%
20
13%
16
14%
15
15%
_
_
_
_
7
22%
24
13%
31
15%
LEVEL 3
91
43%
_
_
_
_
4
36%
6
46%
17
49%
64
42%
54
47%
37
38%
_
_
_
_
11
34%
80
44%
91
43%
LEVEL 4
61
29%
_
_
_
_
5
45%
5
38%
8
23%
43
28%
30
26%
31
32%
_
_
_
_
8
25%
53
29%
61
29%
LEVEL 5
24
11%
_
_
_
_
2
18%
0
0%
1
3%
21
14%
14
12%
10
10%
_
_
_
_
6
19%
18
10%
24
11%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 213
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
6
3%
LEVEL 2
31
15%
LEVEL 3
91
43%
LEVEL 4
61
29%
LEVEL 5
24
11%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 210
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 11
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
4
36%
LEVEL 4
5
45%
LEVEL 5
2
18%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 13
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
15%
LEVEL 3
6
46%
LEVEL 4
5
38%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 35
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
9
26%
LEVEL 3
17
49%
LEVEL 4
8
23%
LEVEL 5
1
3%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 154
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
6
4%
LEVEL 2
20
13%
LEVEL 3
64
42%
LEVEL 4
43
28%
LEVEL 5
21
14%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 116
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
2
2%
LEVEL 2
16
14%
LEVEL 3
54
47%
LEVEL 4
30
26%
LEVEL 5
14
12%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 97
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
4
4%
LEVEL 2
15
15%
LEVEL 3
37
38%
LEVEL 4
31
32%
LEVEL 5
10
10%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 212
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 32
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
7
22%
LEVEL 3
11
34%
LEVEL 4
8
25%
LEVEL 5
6
19%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 181
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
6
3%
LEVEL 2
24
13%
LEVEL 3
80
44%
LEVEL 4
53
29%
LEVEL 5
18
10%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 213
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
6
3%
LEVEL 2
31
15%
LEVEL 3
91
43%
LEVEL 4
61
29%
LEVEL 5
24
11%
Global History and Geography
Regents Global History and Geography
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
406
341
65
9
43
87
263
4
13
193
213
403
3
122
284
406
55
363
89%
326
96%
37
57%
_
_
36
84%
75
86%
240
91%
_
_
12
92%
170
88%
193
91%
_
_
_
_
100
82%
263
93%
363
89%
65
309
76%
282
83%
27
42%
_
_
27
63%
54
62%
217
83%
_
_
11
85%
142
74%
167
78%
_
_
_
_
77
63%
232
82%
309
76%
85
136
33%
132
39%
4
6%
_
_
8
19%
15
17%
107
41%
_
_
6
46%
59
31%
77
36%
_
_
_
_
22
18%
114
40%
136
33%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 406
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
363
89%
65
309
76%
85
136
33%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 341
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
326
96%
65
282
83%
85
132
39%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 65
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
37
57%
65
27
42%
85
4
6%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 9
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 43
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
36
84%
65
27
63%
85
8
19%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 87
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
75
86%
65
54
62%
85
15
17%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 263
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
240
91%
65
217
83%
85
107
41%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 4
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 13
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
12
92%
65
11
85%
85
6
46%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 193
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
170
88%
65
142
74%
85
59
31%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 213
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
193
91%
65
167
78%
85
77
36%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 403
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 122
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
100
82%
65
77
63%
85
22
18%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 284
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
263
93%
65
232
82%
85
114
40%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 406
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
363
89%
65
309
76%
85
136
33%
U.S. History & Government
Regents U.S. History & Government
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
338
298
40
14
31
65
228
162
176
336
2
75
263
338
55
327
97%
291
98%
36
90%
14
100%
28
90%
64
98%
221
97%
156
96%
171
97%
_
_
_
_
70
93%
257
98%
327
97%
65
302
89%
275
92%
27
68%
14
100%
21
68%
61
94%
206
90%
143
88%
159
90%
_
_
_
_
58
77%
244
93%
302
89%
85
165
49%
158
53%
7
18%
8
57%
8
26%
31
48%
118
52%
83
51%
82
47%
_
_
_
_
23
31%
142
54%
165
49%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 338
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
327
97%
65
302
89%
85
165
49%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 298
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
291
98%
65
275
92%
85
158
53%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 40
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
36
90%
65
27
68%
85
7
18%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 14
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
14
100%
65
14
100%
85
8
57%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 31
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
28
90%
65
21
68%
85
8
26%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 65
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
64
98%
65
61
94%
85
31
48%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 228
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
221
97%
65
206
90%
85
118
52%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 162
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
156
96%
65
143
88%
85
83
51%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 176
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
171
97%
65
159
90%
85
82
47%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 336
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 75
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
70
93%
65
58
77%
85
23
31%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 263
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
257
98%
65
244
93%
85
142
54%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 338
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
327
97%
65
302
89%
85
165
49%
Living Environment
Regents Living Environment
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Migrant
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
403
338
65
1
7
37
85
269
4
5
186
217
399
4
104
299
1
402
55
381
95%
332
98%
49
75%
_
_
7
100%
35
95%
79
93%
255
95%
_
_
5
100%
177
95%
204
94%
_
_
_
_
92
88%
289
97%
_
_
_
_
65
354
88%
319
94%
35
54%
_
_
7
100%
31
84%
72
85%
239
89%
_
_
5
100%
167
90%
187
86%
_
_
_
_
82
79%
272
91%
_
_
_
_
85
136
34%
134
40%
2
3%
_
_
3
43%
5
14%
25
29%
102
38%
_
_
1
20%
59
32%
77
35%
_
_
_
_
20
19%
116
39%
_
_
_
_
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 403
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
381
95%
65
354
88%
85
136
34%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 338
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
332
98%
65
319
94%
85
134
40%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 65
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
49
75%
65
35
54%
85
2
3%
American Indian or Alaska Native
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 7
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
7
100%
65
7
100%
85
3
43%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 37
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
35
95%
65
31
84%
85
5
14%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 85
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
79
93%
65
72
85%
85
25
29%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 269
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
255
95%
65
239
89%
85
102
38%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 4
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
5
100%
65
5
100%
85
1
20%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 186
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
177
95%
65
167
90%
85
59
32%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 217
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
204
94%
65
187
86%
85
77
35%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 399
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 4
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 104
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
92
88%
65
82
79%
85
20
19%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 299
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
289
97%
65
272
91%
85
116
39%
Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 402
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Physical Setting/Earth Science
Regents Physical Setting/Earth Science
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
355
310
45
4
31
68
247
5
9
187
168
354
1
95
260
355
55
330
93%
301
97%
29
64%
_
_
29
94%
59
87%
233
94%
_
_
9
100%
171
91%
159
95%
_
_
_
_
84
88%
246
95%
330
93%
65
289
81%
272
88%
17
38%
_
_
18
58%
47
69%
216
87%
_
_
8
89%
152
81%
137
82%
_
_
_
_
67
71%
222
85%
289
81%
85
144
41%
141
45%
3
7%
_
_
4
13%
16
24%
120
49%
_
_
4
44%
74
40%
70
42%
_
_
_
_
29
31%
115
44%
144
41%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 355
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
330
93%
65
289
81%
85
144
41%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 310
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
301
97%
65
272
88%
85
141
45%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 45
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
29
64%
65
17
38%
85
3
7%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 4
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 31
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
29
94%
65
18
58%
85
4
13%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 68
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
59
87%
65
47
69%
85
16
24%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 247
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
233
94%
65
216
87%
85
120
49%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 9
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
9
100%
65
8
89%
85
4
44%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 187
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
171
91%
65
152
81%
85
74
40%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 168
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
159
95%
65
137
82%
85
70
42%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 354
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 95
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
84
88%
65
67
71%
85
29
31%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 260
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
246
95%
65
222
85%
85
115
44%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 355
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
330
93%
65
289
81%
85
144
41%
Physical Setting/Chemistry
Regents Physical Setting/Chemistry
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
220
216
4
13
16
36
155
118
102
219
1
35
185
220
55
208
95%
_
_
_
_
12
92%
15
94%
31
86%
150
97%
112
95%
96
94%
_
_
_
_
29
83%
179
97%
208
95%
65
155
70%
_
_
_
_
11
85%
9
56%
22
61%
113
73%
81
69%
74
73%
_
_
_
_
23
66%
132
71%
155
70%
85
21
10%
_
_
_
_
3
23%
1
6%
1
3%
16
10%
9
8%
12
12%
_
_
_
_
5
14%
16
9%
21
10%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 220
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
208
95%
65
155
70%
85
21
10%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 216
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 4
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 13
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
12
92%
65
11
85%
85
3
23%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 16
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
15
94%
65
9
56%
85
1
6%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 36
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
31
86%
65
22
61%
85
1
3%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 155
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
150
97%
65
113
73%
85
16
10%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 118
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
112
95%
65
81
69%
85
9
8%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 102
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
96
94%
65
74
73%
85
12
12%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 219
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 35
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
29
83%
65
23
66%
85
5
14%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 185
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
179
97%
65
132
71%
85
16
9%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 220
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
208
95%
65
155
70%
85
21
10%
Physical Setting/Physics
Regents Physical Setting/Physics
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
47
47
3
2
7
35
5
18
29
46
1
6
41
47
55
46
98%
46
98%
_
_
_
_
7
100%
34
97%
5
100%
18
100%
28
97%
_
_
_
_
6
100%
40
98%
46
98%
65
38
81%
38
81%
_
_
_
_
5
71%
30
86%
3
60%
17
94%
21
72%
_
_
_
_
4
67%
34
83%
38
81%
85
15
32%
15
32%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
13
37%
2
40%
5
28%
10
34%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
15
37%
15
32%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 47
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
46
98%
65
38
81%
85
15
32%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 47
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
46
98%
65
38
81%
85
15
32%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 7
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
7
100%
65
5
71%
85
0
0%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 35
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
34
97%
65
30
86%
85
13
37%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
5
100%
65
3
60%
85
2
40%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 18
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
18
100%
65
17
94%
85
5
28%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 29
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
28
97%
65
21
72%
85
10
34%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 46
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 6
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
6
100%
65
4
67%
85
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 41
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
40
98%
65
34
83%
85
15
37%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 47
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
46
98%
65
38
81%
85
15
32%
New York State Alternate Assessment (NYSAA) Results (2016 - 17)
GROUP
Grade 3 ELA
Grade 3 Math
Grade 4 ELA
Grade 4 Math
Grade 4 Science
Grade 5 ELA
Grade 5 Math
Grade 6 ELA
Grade 6 Math
Grade 7 ELA
Grade 7 Math
Grade 8 ELA
Grade 8 Math
Grade 8 Science
TOTAL TESTED
8
8
4
4
4
2
2
6
6
2
2
2
2
2
PROFICIENT
75%
75%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
83%
83%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
LEVEL 1
1
1
_
_
_
_
_
0
0
_
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 2
1
1
_
_
_
_
_
1
1
_
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 3
6
6
_
_
_
_
_
5
4
_
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 4
0
0
_
_
_
_
_
0
1
_
_
_
_
_
Grade 3 ELA
PROFICIENT
6 75%
TOTAL TESTED: 8
LEVEL 1
1
LEVEL 2
1
LEVEL 3
6
LEVEL 4
0
Grade 3 Math
PROFICIENT
6 75%
TOTAL TESTED: 8
LEVEL 1
1
LEVEL 2
1
LEVEL 3
6
LEVEL 4
0
Grade 4 ELA
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 4 Math
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 4 Science
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 5 ELA
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 5 Math
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 6 ELA
PROFICIENT
5 83%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
0
LEVEL 2
1
LEVEL 3
5
LEVEL 4
0
Grade 6 Math
PROFICIENT
5 83%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
0
LEVEL 2
1
LEVEL 3
4
LEVEL 4
1
Grade 7 ELA
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 7 Math
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 8 ELA
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 8 Math
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 8 Science
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
New York State English as a Second Language Achievement Test (NYSESLAT) Results (2016 - 17)
Kindergarten
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED
7
6
1
ENTERING
0%
_
_
EMERGING
14%
_
_
TRANSITIONING
0%
_
_
EXPANDING
71%
_
_
COMMANDING
14%
_
_
Grade 1
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED
6
5
1
ENTERING
0%
_
_
EMERGING
17%
_
_
TRANSITIONING
50%
_
_
EXPANDING
33%
_
_
COMMANDING
0%
_
_
Grade 2
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED
10
9
1
ENTERING
0%
_
_
EMERGING
10%
_
_
TRANSITIONING
20%
_
_
EXPANDING
40%
_
_
COMMANDING
30%
_
_
Grade 3
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED
6
5
1
ENTERING
0%
_
_
EMERGING
0%
_
_
TRANSITIONING
50%
_
_
EXPANDING
50%
_
_
COMMANDING
0%
_
_
Grade 4
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED
8
7
1
ENTERING
0%
_
_
EMERGING
0%
_
_
TRANSITIONING
25%
_
_
EXPANDING
75%
_
_
COMMANDING
0%
_
_
Grade 5
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED
7
6
1
ENTERING
0%
_
_
EMERGING
0%
_
_
TRANSITIONING
14%
_
_
EXPANDING
86%
_
_
COMMANDING
0%
_
_
Grade 6
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED
3
2
1
ENTERING
_
_
_
EMERGING
_
_
_
TRANSITIONING
_
_
_
EXPANDING
_
_
_
COMMANDING
_
_
_
Grade 7
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED
3
2
1
ENTERING
_
_
_
EMERGING
_
_
_
TRANSITIONING
_
_
_
EXPANDING
_
_
_
COMMANDING
_
_
_
Grade 8
GROUP
All Students
General Education
TOTAL TESTED
1
1
ENTERING
_
_
EMERGING
_
_
TRANSITIONING
_
_
EXPANDING
_
_
COMMANDING
_
_
Grade 9
GROUP
All Students
General Education
TOTAL TESTED
1
1
ENTERING
_
_
EMERGING
_
_
TRANSITIONING
_
_
EXPANDING
_
_
COMMANDING
_
_
Grade 10
GROUP
All Students
General Education
TOTAL TESTED
3
3
ENTERING
_
_
EMERGING
_
_
TRANSITIONING
_
_
EXPANDING
_
_
COMMANDING
_
_
Grade 11
GROUP
All Students
General Education
TOTAL TESTED
2
2
ENTERING
_
_
EMERGING
_
_
TRANSITIONING
_
_
EXPANDING
_
_
COMMANDING
_
_
Grade 12
GROUP
All Students
General Education
TOTAL TESTED
1
1
ENTERING
_
_
EMERGING
_
_
TRANSITIONING
_
_
EXPANDING
_
_
COMMANDING
_
_
Kindergarten
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 7
ENTERING
0%
EMERGING
14%
TRANSITIONING
0%
EXPANDING
71%
COMMANDING
14%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 6
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 1
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
Grade 1
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 6
ENTERING
0%
EMERGING
17%
TRANSITIONING
50%
EXPANDING
33%
COMMANDING
0%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 5
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 1
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
Grade 2
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 10
ENTERING
0%
EMERGING
10%
TRANSITIONING
20%
EXPANDING
40%
COMMANDING
30%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 9
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 1
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
Grade 3
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 6
ENTERING
0%
EMERGING
0%
TRANSITIONING
50%
EXPANDING
50%
COMMANDING
0%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 5
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 1
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
Grade 4
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 8
ENTERING
0%
EMERGING
0%
TRANSITIONING
25%
EXPANDING
75%
COMMANDING
0%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 7
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 1
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
Grade 5
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 7
ENTERING
0%
EMERGING
0%
TRANSITIONING
14%
EXPANDING
86%
COMMANDING
0%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 6
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 1
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
Grade 6
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 3
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 2
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 1
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
Grade 7
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 3
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 2
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 1
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
Grade 8
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 1
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 1
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
Grade 9
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 1
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 1
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
Grade 10
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 3
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 3
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
Grade 11
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 2
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 2
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
Grade 12
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 1
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 1
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
Elementary/Middle-Level English Language Arts Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: NO
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
NO
―
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
―
NO
Tested 95%
NO
―
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
―
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
3,829*
6
278*
812*
95*
2,544*
86*
537*
28
1,067*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
54%*
―
64%*
63%*
74%*
49%*
69%*
54%*
―
53%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
―
YES
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
―
NO
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1,005
0
87
248
33
606
31
162✝
18
262
PI
102
―
91
89
103
111
81
47✝
―
80
EAMO
108
―
87
95
113
120
95
77
―
95
Safe Harbor Target
108
―
87
95
110
119
95
60
―
88
All Students
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
3,829*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
54%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1,005
PI
102
EAMO
108
Safe Harbor Target
108
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
6
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
278*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
64%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
87
PI
91
EAMO
87
Safe Harbor Target
87
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
812*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
63%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
248
PI
89
EAMO
95
Safe Harbor Target
95
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
95*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
74%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
33
PI
103
EAMO
113
Safe Harbor Target
110
White
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
2,544*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
49%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
606
PI
111
EAMO
120
Safe Harbor Target
119
Multiracial
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
86*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
69%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
31
PI
81
EAMO
95
Safe Harbor Target
95
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
537*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
54%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
162✝
PI
47✝
EAMO
77
Safe Harbor Target
60
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
28
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
18
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,067*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
53%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
262
PI
80
EAMO
95
Safe Harbor Target
88
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
3,815*
3,551*
3,017*
3,734*
1,285*
3,743*
3,292*
3,779*
2,762*
2,033*
1,796*
0
3,827*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
54%*
53%*
52%*
54%*
64%*
54%*
54%*
54%*
54%*
55%*
53%*
―
54%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1,005
918
757
972
399
974
865
987
743
546
459
0
1,005
PI
102
103
107
102
90
103
112
104
110
86
122
―
102
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
3,815*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
54%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1,005
PI
102
Not Black or African American
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
3,551*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
53%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
918
PI
103
Not Hispanic or Latino
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
3,017*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
52%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
757
PI
107
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
3,734*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
54%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
972
PI
102
Not White
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,285*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
64%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
399
PI
90
Not Multiracial
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
3,743*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
54%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
974
PI
103
General Education
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
3,292*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
54%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
865
PI
112
English Proficient
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
3,779*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
54%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
987
PI
104
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
2,762*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
54%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
743
PI
110
Male
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
2,033*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
55%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
546
PI
86
Female
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,796*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
53%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
459
PI
122
Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
3,827*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
54%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1,005
PI
102
― There were fewer than 40 students enrolled during the test administration period, so the Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 tested students enrolled on BEDS day and during the test administration period, so the PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed. *The percentage of students tested in the current year fell below 95 percent, so the numbers of enrolled and tested students in the current year and previous year were combined to provide the school/district with another opportunity to meet the participation rate criterion. ✝ Includes former students with disabilities because the number of students with disabilities in the current year is equal to or greater than 30.
Elementary/Middle-Level Mathematics Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: NO
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
NO
―
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
―
NO
Tested 95%
NO
―
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
―
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
3,829*
6
279*
815*
95*
2,540*
86*
536*
29
1,068*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
55%*
―
61%*
61%*
74%*
52%*
67%*
51%*
―
51%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
―
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
NO
―
NO
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1,033
0
83
246
32
642
30
149✝
17
252
PI
117
―
93
101
134
126
97
56✝
―
87
EAMO
106
―
83
93
123
117
89
77
―
93
Safe Harbor Target
106
―
83
93
123
117
89
69
―
93
All Students
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
3,829*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
55%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1,033
PI
117
EAMO
106
Safe Harbor Target
106
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
6
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
279*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
61%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
83
PI
93
EAMO
83
Safe Harbor Target
83
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
815*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
61%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
246
PI
101
EAMO
93
Safe Harbor Target
93
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
95*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
74%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
32
PI
134
EAMO
123
Safe Harbor Target
123
White
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
2,540*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
52%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
642
PI
126
EAMO
117
Safe Harbor Target
117
Multiracial
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
86*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
67%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
30
PI
97
EAMO
89
Safe Harbor Target
89
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
536*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
51%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
149✝
PI
56✝
EAMO
77
Safe Harbor Target
69
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
29
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
17
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,068*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
51%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
252
PI
87
EAMO
93
Safe Harbor Target
93
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
3,815*
3,550*
3,014*
3,734*
1,289*
3,743*
3,293*
3,778*
2,761*
2,033*
1,796*
0
3,827*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
55%*
55%*
54%*
55%*
62%*
55%*
56%*
55%*
57%*
55%*
55%*
―
55%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1,033
950
787
1,001
391
1,003
906
1,016
781
554
479
0
1,033
PI
117
119
122
116
102
117
126
118
127
113
121
―
117
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
3,815*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
55%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1,033
PI
117
Not Black or African American
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
3,550*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
55%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
950
PI
119
Not Hispanic or Latino
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
3,014*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
54%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
787
PI
122
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
3,734*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
55%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1,001
PI
116
Not White
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,289*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
62%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
391
PI
102
Not Multiracial
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
3,743*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
55%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1,003
PI
117
General Education
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
3,293*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
56%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
906
PI
126
English Proficient
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
3,778*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
55%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1,016
PI
118
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
2,761*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
57%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
781
PI
127
Male
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
2,033*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
55%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
554
PI
113
Female
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,796*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
55%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
479
PI
121
Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
3,827*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
55%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1,033
PI
117
― There were fewer than 40 students enrolled during the test administration period, so the Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 tested students enrolled on BEDS day and during the test administration period, so the PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed. *The percentage of students tested in the current year fell below 95 percent, so the numbers of enrolled and tested students in the current year and previous year were combined to provide the school/district with another opportunity to meet the participation rate criterion. ✝ Includes former students with disabilities because the number of students with disabilities in the current year is equal to or greater than 30.
Elementary/Middle-Level Science Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: NO
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
NO
―
NO
NO
―
NO
―
NO
―
NO
Tested 80%
NO
―
NO
NO
―
NO
―
NO
―
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,336*
2
103*
283*
10
889*
13
207*
9
368*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
63%*
―
59%*
65%*
―
63%*
―
50%*
―
57%*
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
NO
―
YES
YES
―
NO
―
YES
―
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
386
0
55⁰
96
8
247
11
55✝
3
91
PI
181
―
175
176
―
185
―
140✝
―
173
EAMO
183
―
166
171
―
188
―
162
―
173
Progress Target
183
―
166
171
―
186
―
126
―
173
All Students
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 80%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,336*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
63%*
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
NO
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
386
PI
181
EAMO
183
Progress Target
183
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
2
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 80%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
103*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
59%*
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
55⁰
PI
175
EAMO
166
Progress Target
166
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 80%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
283*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
65%*
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
96
PI
176
EAMO
171
Progress Target
171
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
10
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
8
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
White
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 80%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
889*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
63%*
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
NO
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
247
PI
185
EAMO
188
Progress Target
186
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
13
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
11
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 80%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
207*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
50%*
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
55✝
PI
140✝
EAMO
162
Progress Target
126
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
9
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
3
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 80%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
368*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
57%*
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
91
PI
173
EAMO
173
Progress Target
173
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,329*
1,233*
1,053*
1,311*
447*
1,307*
1,129*
1,320*
968*
719*
617*
0
1,335*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
64%*
64%*
63%*
63%*
64%*
63%*
66%*
63%*
66%*
64%*
62%*
―
63%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
386
362
290
378
139
375
338
383
295
215
171
0
386
PI
181
181
182
181
173
181
188
181
183
179
182
―
181
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,329*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
64%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
386
PI
181
Not Black or African American
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,233*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
64%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
362
PI
181
Not Hispanic or Latino
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,053*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
63%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
290
PI
182
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,311*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
63%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
378
PI
181
Not White
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
447*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
64%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
139
PI
173
Not Multiracial
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,307*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
63%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
375
PI
181
General Education
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,129*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
66%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
338
PI
188
English Proficient
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,320*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
63%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
383
PI
181
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
968*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
66%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
295
PI
183
Male
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
719*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
64%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
215
PI
179
Female
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
617*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
62%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
171
PI
182
Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,335*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
63%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
386
PI
181
― There were fewer than 40 students enrolled during the test administration period, so the Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 tested students enrolled on BEDS day and during the test administration period, so the PI, EAMO, and Progress Target data are suppressed. *The percentage of students tested in the current year fell below 80 percent, so the numbers of enrolled and tested students in the current year and previous year were combined to provide the school/district with another opportunity to meet the participation rate criterion. ✝ Includes former students with disabilities because the number of students with disabilities in the current year is equal to or greater than 30. ⁰ This group failed to meet the participation criterion and had fewer than 30 tested students enrolled on BEDS day and during the test administration period, so data for the current and previous year were combined to determine a Performance Index.
Secondary-Level English Language Arts Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: NO
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
YES
―
―
YES
―
NO
―
NO
―
YES
Tested 95%
YES
―
―
YES
―
YES
―
YES
―
YES
12th graders
339
1
31
69
10
226
2
45
1
79
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
―
―
100%
―
100%
―
100%
―
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
―
―
YES
―
NO
―
NO
―
YES
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
338
1
28
69
10
227
3
50✝
1
81
PI
172
―
―
161
―
174
―
112✝
―
162
EAMO
172
―
―
154
―
179
―
131
―
157
Safe Harbor Target
172
―
―
154
―
178
―
113
―
157
All Students
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
YES
12th Graders
339
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
338
PI
172
EAMO
172
Safe Harbor Target
172
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
1
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
1
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
31
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
28
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
YES
12th Graders
69
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
69
PI
161
EAMO
154
Safe Harbor Target
154
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
10
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
10
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
White
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
YES
12th Graders
226
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
227
PI
174
EAMO
179
Safe Harbor Target
178
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
2
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
3
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
YES
12th Graders
45
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
50✝
PI
112✝
EAMO
131
Safe Harbor Target
113
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
1
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
1
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
YES
12th Graders
79
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
81
PI
162
EAMO
157
Safe Harbor Target
157
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
12th Graders
338
308
270
329
113
337
294
338
260
158
181
0
339
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
―
100%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
337
310
269
328
111
335
293
337
257
162
176
0
338
PI
172
171
174
171
168
172
182
172
175
165
178
―
172
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
12th Graders
338
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
337
PI
172
Not Black or African American
12th Graders
308
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
310
PI
171
Not Hispanic or Latino
12th Graders
270
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
269
PI
174
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
12th Graders
329
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
328
PI
171
Not White
12th Graders
113
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
111
PI
168
Not Multiracial
12th Graders
337
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
335
PI
172
General Education
12th Graders
294
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
293
PI
182
English Proficient
12th Graders
338
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
337
PI
172
Not Economically Disadvantaged
12th Graders
260
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
257
PI
175
Male
12th Graders
158
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
162
PI
165
Female
12th Graders
181
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
176
PI
178
Migrant
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
Not Migrant
12th Graders
339
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
338
PI
172
― There were fewer than 40 12th graders, so the Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 students in the 2013 accountability cohort, so PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed. ✝ Includes former students with disabilities because the number of students with disabilities in the current year is equal to or greater than 30.
Secondary-Level Mathematics Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: NO
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
NO
―
―
YES
―
NO
―
NO
―
YES
Tested 95%
YES
―
―
YES
―
YES
―
YES
―
YES
12th graders
339
1
31
69
10
226
2
45
1
79
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
―
―
100%
―
100%
―
100%
―
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
―
―
YES
―
NO
―
NO
―
YES
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
338
1
28
69
10
227
3
50✝
1
81
PI
153
―
―
141
―
156
―
66✝
―
141
EAMO
159
―
―
138
―
168
―
123
―
143
Safe Harbor Target
154
―
―
138
―
159
―
82
―
139
All Students
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
YES
12th Graders
339
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
338
PI
153
EAMO
159
Safe Harbor Target
154
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
1
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
1
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
31
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
28
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
YES
12th Graders
69
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
69
PI
141
EAMO
138
Safe Harbor Target
138
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
10
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
10
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
White
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
YES
12th Graders
226
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
227
PI
156
EAMO
168
Safe Harbor Target
159
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
2
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
3
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
YES
12th Graders
45
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
50✝
PI
66✝
EAMO
123
Safe Harbor Target
82
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
1
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
1
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
YES
12th Graders
79
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
81
PI
141
EAMO
143
Safe Harbor Target
139
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
12th Graders
338
308
270
329
113
337
294
338
260
158
181
0
339
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
―
100%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
337
310
269
328
111
335
293
337
257
162
176
0
338
PI
153
154
156
152
147
153
166
153
157
145
160
―
153
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
12th Graders
338
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
337
PI
153
Not Black or African American
12th Graders
308
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
310
PI
154
Not Hispanic or Latino
12th Graders
270
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
269
PI
156
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
12th Graders
329
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
328
PI
152
Not White
12th Graders
113
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
111
PI
147
Not Multiracial
12th Graders
337
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
335
PI
153
General Education
12th Graders
294
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
293
PI
166
English Proficient
12th Graders
338
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
337
PI
153
Not Economically Disadvantaged
12th Graders
260
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
257
PI
157
Male
12th Graders
158
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
162
PI
145
Female
12th Graders
181
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
176
PI
160
Migrant
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
Not Migrant
12th Graders
339
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
338
PI
153
― There were fewer than 40 12th graders, so the Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 students in the 2013 accountability cohort, so PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed. ✝ Includes former students with disabilities because the number of students with disabilities in the current year is equal to or greater than 30.
Unweighted Combined ELA and Math PIs
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
102
―
91
89
103
111
81
47
―
80
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
117
―
93
101
134
126
97
56
―
87
Secondary-Level ELA PI
172
―
―
161
―
174
―
112
―
162
Secondary-Level MATH PI
153
―
―
141
―
156
―
66
―
141
UNWEIGHTED COMBINED PI
136
0
92
123
119
142
89
70
0
118
All Students
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
102
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
117
Secondary-Level ELA PI
172
Secondary-Level MATH PI
153
Unweighted Combined PI
136
American Indian or Alaska Native
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Black or African American
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
91
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
93
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
92
Hispanic or Latino
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
89
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
101
Secondary-Level ELA PI
161
Secondary-Level MATH PI
141
Unweighted Combined PI
123
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
103
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
134
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
119
White
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
111
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
126
Secondary-Level ELA PI
174
Secondary-Level MATH PI
156
Unweighted Combined PI
142
Multiracial
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
81
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
97
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
89
Students With Disabilities
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
47
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
56
Secondary-Level ELA PI
112
Secondary-Level MATH PI
66
Unweighted Combined PI
70
Limited English Proficient
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Economically Disadvantaged
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
80
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
87
Secondary-Level ELA PI
162
Secondary-Level MATH PI
141
Unweighted Combined PI
118
― There were not enough students to determine a Performance Index.
Overall Graduation Rate for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: YES
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
YES
―
YES
YES
―
YES
―
YES
―
YES
All Students
MADE AYP
YES
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP
YES
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP
YES
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP
―
White
MADE AYP
YES
Multiracial
MADE AYP
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP
YES
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
YES
― There were not enough students to make an AYP determination.
Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort for Accountability
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion:
YES
―
YES
YES
―
YES
―
YES
―
YES
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
387
0
37
76
10
263
1
46✝
0
99
Graduation Rate
95%
―
100%
87%
―
96%
―
83%✝
―
89%
State Standard
80%
―
80%
80%
―
80%
―
80%
―
80%
Progress Target
80%
―
80%
80%
―
80%
―
74%
―
80%
All Students
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
387
Graduation Rate
95%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%
American Indian or Alaska Native
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Black or African American
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
37
Graduation Rate
100%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%
Hispanic or Latino
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
76
Graduation Rate
87%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
10
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
White
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
263
Graduation Rate
96%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%
Multiracial
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
1
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Students With Disabilities
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
46✝
Graduation Rate
83%✝
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
74%
Limited English Proficient
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
99
Graduation Rate
89%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%
YES Graduation rate is equal to or greater than the State Standard or the group's Progress Target. NO Graduation rate is less than the State Standard and the group's Progress Target.
― There were fewer than 30 students in the cohort. ✝ Includes former students with disabilities because the number of students with disabilities in the current year is equal to or greater than 30.
Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort for Accountability
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion:
YES
―
YES
YES
―
YES
―
NO
―
YES
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
373
2
31
61
11
266
2
43✝
0
111
Graduation Rate
95%
―
87%
92%
―
97%
―
74%✝
―
89%
State Standard
80%
―
80%
80%
―
80%
―
80%
―
80%
Progress Target
80%
―
80%
80%
―
80%
―
80%
―
80%
All Students
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
373
Graduation Rate
95%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%
American Indian or Alaska Native
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
2
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Black or African American
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
31
Graduation Rate
87%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%
Hispanic or Latino
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
61
Graduation Rate
92%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
11
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
White
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
266
Graduation Rate
97%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%
Multiracial
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
2
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Students With Disabilities
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: NO
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
43✝
Graduation Rate
74%✝
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%
Limited English Proficient
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
111
Graduation Rate
89%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%
YES Graduation rate is equal to or greater than the State Standard or the group's Progress Target. NO Graduation rate is less than the State Standard and the group's Progress Target.
― There were fewer than 30 students in the cohort. ✝ Includes former students with disabilities because the number of students with disabilities in the current year is equal to or greater than 30.
Graduation Rates for Non-AYP Groups for Accountability
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
387
350
311
377
124
386
343
387
288
193
194
0
387
Graduation Rate
95%
94%
97%
95%
92%
95%
97%
95%
97%
94%
95%
―
95%
Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
371
342
312
362
107
371
332
373
262
202
171
1
372
Graduation Rate
95%
96%
96%
95%
92%
95%
98%
95%
98%
92%
99%
―
95%
Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
387
Graduation Rate
95%
Not Black or African American
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
350
Graduation Rate
94%
Not Hispanic or Latino
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
311
Graduation Rate
97%
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
377
Graduation Rate
95%
Not White
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
124
Graduation Rate
92%
Not Multiracial
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
386
Graduation Rate
95%
General Education
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
343
Graduation Rate
97%
English Proficient
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
387
Graduation Rate
95%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
288
Graduation Rate
97%
Male
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
193
Graduation Rate
94%
Female
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
194
Graduation Rate
95%
Migrant
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
Not Migrant
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
387
Graduation Rate
95%
Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
371
Graduation Rate
95%
Not Black or African American
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
342
Graduation Rate
96%
Not Hispanic or Latino
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
312
Graduation Rate
96%
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
362
Graduation Rate
95%
Not White
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
107
Graduation Rate
92%
Not Multiracial
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
371
Graduation Rate
95%
General Education
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
332
Graduation Rate
98%
English Proficient
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
373
Graduation Rate
95%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
262
Graduation Rate
98%
Male
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
202
Graduation Rate
92%
Female
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
171
Graduation Rate
99%
Migrant
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
1
Graduation Rate
―
Not Migrant
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
372
Graduation Rate
95%
― There were fewer than 30 students in the cohort.
Graduation Rates for Regents with Advanced Designation and CTE Endorsement for Accountability
Percentage of 2012 Graduation-Rate Total Cohort members who graduated as of August 31, 2016 with:
Regents Diploma with an Advanced Designation (This District)
40%
Regents Diploma with an Advanced Designation (Statewide)
31%
Percentage in This District Exceeded Statewide
YES
Regents Diploma with an Advanced Designation (This District)
40%
Regents Diploma with an Advanced Designation (Statewide)
31%
Percentage in This District Exceeded Statewide
YES
Regents Diploma with CTE Endorsement (This District)
7%
Regents Diploma with CTE Endorsement (Statewide)
5%
Percentage in This District Exceeded Statewide
YES
Regents Diploma with CTE Endorsement (This District)
You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.
Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.
If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.
