MARCELLUS CSD - School Report Card Data [2012 - 13]
The New York State Report Card is an important part of the Board of Regents' effort to raise learning standards for all students. It provides information to the public on school/district enrollment and staff, student performance, and other measures of school and district performance. Knowledge gained from the report card on a school's or district's strengths and weaknesses can be used to improve instruction and services to students. Report Card Data - Glossary of Terms | Accountability Data - Glossary of Terms | Business Rules
Turnover Rate of Teachers with Fewer Than Five Years of Experience
27%
TURNOVER RATE OF ALL TEACHERS
15%
Teacher Turnover Rate (2011-12 to 2012-13)
Turnover Rate of Teachers with Fewer Than Five Years of Experience
27%
Turnover Rate of All Teachers
15%
Staff Counts (2012 - 13)
GROUP
PRINCIPALS
ASSISTANT PRINCIPALS
OTHER PROFESSIONAL STAFF
PARAPROFESSIONALS
STAFF
3
0
21
41
Staff Counts (2012 - 13)
Principals
3
Assistant Principals
0
Other Professional Staff
21
Paraprofessionals
41
Teacher Qualifications (2012 - 13)
TOTAL TEACHERS
138
PERCENT WITH NO VALID TEACHING CERTIFICATE
0%
PERCENT TEACHING OUT OF CERTIFICATE
1%
PERCENT WITH FEWER THAN THREE YEARS OF EXPERIENCE
1%
PERCENTAGE WITH MASTER'S DEGREEPLUS 30 HOURS OR DOCTORATE
19%
TOTAL NUMBER OF CORE CLASSES
341
Percent Not Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers in This District
0%
Total Number of Classes
479
Percent Taught by Teachers Without Appropriate Certification
1%
Teacher Qualifications (2012 - 13)
TOTAL TEACHERS: 138
Percent with No Valid Teaching Certificate
0%
Percent Teaching Out of Certification
1%
Percent with Fewer Than Three Years of Experience
1%
Percentage with Master's Degree Plus 30 Hours or Doctorate
19%
Total Number of Core Classes
341
Percent Not Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers in This District
0%
Total Number of Classes
479
Percent Taught by Teachers Without Appropriate Certification
1%
High School Completers (2012 - 13)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
165
152
13
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
165
152
13
REGENTS DIPLOMA
161
98%
152
100%
9
69%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
REGENTS WITH ADVANCED DESIGNATION
96
58%
96
63%
0
0%
REGENTS WITH CTE ENDORSEMENT
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
LOCAL DIPLOMAS
4
2%
0
0%
4
31%
COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
All Students
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
165
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
165
Regents Diploma
161
98%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
96
58%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
0
0%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
4
2%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
0
0%
of Completers
General Education
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
152
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
152
Regents Diploma
152
100%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
96
63%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
0
0%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
0
0%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
0
0%
of Completers
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
13
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
13
Regents Diploma
9
69%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
0
0%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
0
0%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
4
31%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
0
0%
of Completers
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
165
152
13
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
165
152
13
REGENTS DIPLOMA
161
98%
152
100%
9
69%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
REGENTS WITH ADVANCED DESIGNATION
96
58%
96
63%
0
0%
REGENTS WITH CTE ENDORSEMENT
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
LOCAL DIPLOMAS
4
2%
0
0%
4
31%
COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
All Students
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
165
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
165
Regents Diploma
161
98%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
96
58%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
0
0%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
4
2%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
0
0%
of Completers
General Education
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
152
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
152
Regents Diploma
152
100%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
96
63%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
0
0%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
0
0%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
0
0%
of Completers
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
13
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
13
Regents Diploma
9
69%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
0
0%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
0
0%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
4
31%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
0
0%
of Completers
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
165
152
13
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
165
152
13
REGENTS DIPLOMA
161
98%
152
100%
9
69%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
REGENTS WITH ADVANCED DESIGNATION
96
58%
96
63%
0
0%
REGENTS WITH CTE ENDORSEMENT
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
LOCAL DIPLOMAS
4
2%
0
0%
4
31%
COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
All Students
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
165
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
165
Regents Diploma
161
98%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
96
58%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
0
0%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
4
2%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
0
0%
of Completers
General Education
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
152
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
152
Regents Diploma
152
100%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
96
63%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
0
0%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
0
0%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
0
0%
of Completers
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
13
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
13
Regents Diploma
9
69%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
0
0%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
0
0%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
4
31%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
0
0%
of Completers
High School Non-completers (2012 - 13)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
8
1%
6
1%
2
3%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
6
1%
2
0%
4
6%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
14
2%
8
1%
6
9%
All Students
DROPPED OUT
8
1%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
6
1%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
14
2%
General Education
DROPPED OUT
6
1%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
2
0%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
8
1%
Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
2
3%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
4
6%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
6
9%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
8
1%
6
1%
2
3%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
6
1%
2
0%
4
6%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
14
2%
8
1%
6
9%
All Students
DROPPED OUT
8
1%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
6
1%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
14
2%
General Education
DROPPED OUT
6
1%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
2
0%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
8
1%
Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
2
3%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
4
6%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
6
9%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
8
1%
6
1%
2
3%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
6
1%
2
0%
4
6%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
14
2%
8
1%
6
9%
All Students
DROPPED OUT
8
1%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
6
1%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
14
2%
General Education
DROPPED OUT
6
1%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
2
0%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
8
1%
Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
2
3%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
4
6%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
6
9%
Post-graduation Plans of Completers (2012 - 13)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO FOUR-YEAR COLLEGE
87
53%
85
56%
2
15%
TO TWO-YEAR COLLEGE
63
38%
56
37%
7
54%
TO OTHER POST-SECONDARY
2
1%
2
1%
0
0%
TO THE MILITARY
7
4%
6
4%
1
8%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO EMPLOYMENT
3
2%
1
1%
2
15%
TO ADULT SERVICES
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
TO OTHER KNOWN PLANS
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
PLANS UNKNOWN
3
2%
2
1%
1
8%
All Students
To Four-Year College
87
53%
To Two-Year College
63
38%
To Other Post-Secondary
2
1%
To the Military
7
4%
To Employment
3
2%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
0
0%
Plan Unknown
3
2%
General Education
To Four-Year College
85
56%
To Two-Year College
56
37%
To Other Post-Secondary
2
1%
To the Military
6
4%
To Employment
1
1%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
0
0%
Plan Unknown
2
1%
Students with Disabilities
To Four-Year College
2
15%
To Two-Year College
7
54%
To Other Post-Secondary
0
0%
To the Military
1
8%
To Employment
2
15%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
0
0%
Plan Unknown
1
8%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO FOUR-YEAR COLLEGE
87
53%
85
56%
2
15%
TO TWO-YEAR COLLEGE
63
38%
56
37%
7
54%
TO OTHER POST-SECONDARY
2
1%
2
1%
0
0%
TO THE MILITARY
7
4%
6
4%
1
8%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO EMPLOYMENT
3
2%
1
1%
2
15%
TO ADULT SERVICES
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
TO OTHER KNOWN PLANS
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
PLANS UNKNOWN
3
2%
2
1%
1
8%
All Students
To Four-Year College
87
53%
To Two-Year College
63
38%
To Other Post-Secondary
2
1%
To the Military
7
4%
To Employment
3
2%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
0
0%
Plan Unknown
3
2%
General Education
To Four-Year College
85
56%
To Two-Year College
56
37%
To Other Post-Secondary
2
1%
To the Military
6
4%
To Employment
1
1%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
0
0%
Plan Unknown
2
1%
Students with Disabilities
To Four-Year College
2
15%
To Two-Year College
7
54%
To Other Post-Secondary
0
0%
To the Military
1
8%
To Employment
2
15%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
0
0%
Plan Unknown
1
8%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO FOUR-YEAR COLLEGE
87
53%
85
56%
2
15%
TO TWO-YEAR COLLEGE
63
38%
56
37%
7
54%
TO OTHER POST-SECONDARY
2
1%
2
1%
0
0%
TO THE MILITARY
7
4%
6
4%
1
8%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO EMPLOYMENT
3
2%
1
1%
2
15%
TO ADULT SERVICES
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
TO OTHER KNOWN PLANS
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
PLANS UNKNOWN
3
2%
2
1%
1
8%
All Students
To Four-Year College
87
53%
To Two-Year College
63
38%
To Other Post-Secondary
2
1%
To the Military
7
4%
To Employment
3
2%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
0
0%
Plan Unknown
3
2%
General Education
To Four-Year College
85
56%
To Two-Year College
56
37%
To Other Post-Secondary
2
1%
To the Military
6
4%
To Employment
1
1%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
0
0%
Plan Unknown
2
1%
Students with Disabilities
To Four-Year College
2
15%
To Two-Year College
7
54%
To Other Post-Secondary
0
0%
To the Military
1
8%
To Employment
2
15%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
0
0%
Plan Unknown
1
8%
Grade 3 English Language Arts
MEAN SCORE: 309
All Students
PROFICIENT
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 128
LEVEL 1
34
27%
LEVEL 2
38
30%
LEVEL 3
49
38%
LEVEL 4
7
5%
General Education
PROFICIENT
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 113
LEVEL 1
23
20%
LEVEL 2
36
32%
LEVEL 3
47
42%
LEVEL 4
7
6%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 15
LEVEL 1
11
73%
LEVEL 2
2
13%
LEVEL 3
2
13%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 124
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 128
LEVEL 1
34
27%
LEVEL 2
38
30%
LEVEL 3
49
38%
LEVEL 4
7
5%
Female
PROFICIENT
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 65
LEVEL 1
10
15%
LEVEL 2
15
23%
LEVEL 3
35
54%
LEVEL 4
5
8%
Male
PROFICIENT
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 63
LEVEL 1
24
38%
LEVEL 2
23
37%
LEVEL 3
14
22%
LEVEL 4
2
3%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 128
LEVEL 1
34
27%
LEVEL 2
38
30%
LEVEL 3
49
38%
LEVEL 4
7
5%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 23
LEVEL 1
13
57%
LEVEL 2
7
30%
LEVEL 3
3
13%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 105
LEVEL 1
21
20%
LEVEL 2
31
30%
LEVEL 3
46
44%
LEVEL 4
7
7%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 128
LEVEL 1
34
27%
LEVEL 2
38
30%
LEVEL 3
49
38%
LEVEL 4
7
5%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
128
113
15
2
1
124
1
128
65
63
128
23
105
128
PROFICIENT
44%
48%
13%
_%
_%
_%
_%
44%
62%
25%
44%
13%
50%
44%
LEVEL 1
34
27%
23
20%
11
73%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
34
27%
10
15%
24
38%
34
27%
13
57%
21
20%
34
27%
LEVEL 2
38
30%
36
32%
2
13%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
38
30%
15
23%
23
37%
38
30%
7
30%
31
30%
38
30%
LEVEL 3
49
38%
47
42%
2
13%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
49
38%
35
54%
14
22%
49
38%
3
13%
46
44%
49
38%
LEVEL 4
7
5%
7
6%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
7
5%
5
8%
2
3%
7
5%
0
0%
7
7%
7
5%
Grade 4 English Language Arts
MEAN SCORE: 310
All Students
PROFICIENT
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 129
LEVEL 1
26
20%
LEVEL 2
43
33%
LEVEL 3
42
33%
LEVEL 4
18
14%
General Education
PROFICIENT
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 112
LEVEL 1
13
12%
LEVEL 2
39
35%
LEVEL 3
42
38%
LEVEL 4
18
16%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 17
LEVEL 1
13
76%
LEVEL 2
4
24%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 127
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 129
LEVEL 1
26
20%
LEVEL 2
43
33%
LEVEL 3
42
33%
LEVEL 4
18
14%
Female
PROFICIENT
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 61
LEVEL 1
9
15%
LEVEL 2
18
30%
LEVEL 3
28
46%
LEVEL 4
6
10%
Male
PROFICIENT
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 68
LEVEL 1
17
25%
LEVEL 2
25
37%
LEVEL 3
14
21%
LEVEL 4
12
18%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 129
LEVEL 1
26
20%
LEVEL 2
43
33%
LEVEL 3
42
33%
LEVEL 4
18
14%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 35
LEVEL 1
12
34%
LEVEL 2
14
40%
LEVEL 3
9
26%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 94
LEVEL 1
14
15%
LEVEL 2
29
31%
LEVEL 3
33
35%
LEVEL 4
18
19%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 129
LEVEL 1
26
20%
LEVEL 2
43
33%
LEVEL 3
42
33%
LEVEL 4
18
14%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
129
112
17
1
127
1
129
61
68
129
35
94
129
PROFICIENT
47%
54%
0%
_%
_%
_%
47%
56%
38%
47%
26%
54%
47%
LEVEL 1
26
20%
13
12%
13
76%
_
_
_
_
_
_
26
20%
9
15%
17
25%
26
20%
12
34%
14
15%
26
20%
LEVEL 2
43
33%
39
35%
4
24%
_
_
_
_
_
_
43
33%
18
30%
25
37%
43
33%
14
40%
29
31%
43
33%
LEVEL 3
42
33%
42
38%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
42
33%
28
46%
14
21%
42
33%
9
26%
33
35%
42
33%
LEVEL 4
18
14%
18
16%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
18
14%
6
10%
12
18%
18
14%
0
0%
18
19%
18
14%
Grade 5 English Language Arts
MEAN SCORE: 314
All Students
PROFICIENT
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 137
LEVEL 1
23
17%
LEVEL 2
56
41%
LEVEL 3
44
32%
LEVEL 4
14
10%
General Education
PROFICIENT
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 128
LEVEL 1
18
14%
LEVEL 2
53
41%
LEVEL 3
43
34%
LEVEL 4
14
11%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
5
56%
LEVEL 2
3
33%
LEVEL 3
1
11%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 135
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 137
LEVEL 1
23
17%
LEVEL 2
56
41%
LEVEL 3
44
32%
LEVEL 4
14
10%
Female
PROFICIENT
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 64
LEVEL 1
7
11%
LEVEL 2
28
44%
LEVEL 3
20
31%
LEVEL 4
9
14%
Male
PROFICIENT
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 73
LEVEL 1
16
22%
LEVEL 2
28
38%
LEVEL 3
24
33%
LEVEL 4
5
7%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 137
LEVEL 1
23
17%
LEVEL 2
56
41%
LEVEL 3
44
32%
LEVEL 4
14
10%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 27
LEVEL 1
12
44%
LEVEL 2
11
41%
LEVEL 3
3
11%
LEVEL 4
1
4%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 110
LEVEL 1
11
10%
LEVEL 2
45
41%
LEVEL 3
41
37%
LEVEL 4
13
12%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 137
LEVEL 1
23
17%
LEVEL 2
56
41%
LEVEL 3
44
32%
LEVEL 4
14
10%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
137
128
9
1
135
1
137
64
73
137
27
110
137
PROFICIENT
42%
45%
11%
_%
_%
_%
42%
45%
40%
42%
15%
49%
42%
LEVEL 1
23
17%
18
14%
5
56%
_
_
_
_
_
_
23
17%
7
11%
16
22%
23
17%
12
44%
11
10%
23
17%
LEVEL 2
56
41%
53
41%
3
33%
_
_
_
_
_
_
56
41%
28
44%
28
38%
56
41%
11
41%
45
41%
56
41%
LEVEL 3
44
32%
43
34%
1
11%
_
_
_
_
_
_
44
32%
20
31%
24
33%
44
32%
3
11%
41
37%
44
32%
LEVEL 4
14
10%
14
11%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
14
10%
9
14%
5
7%
14
10%
1
4%
13
12%
14
10%
Grade 6 English Language Arts
MEAN SCORE: 321
All Students
PROFICIENT
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 141
LEVEL 1
19
13%
LEVEL 2
40
28%
LEVEL 3
36
26%
LEVEL 4
46
33%
General Education
PROFICIENT
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 124
LEVEL 1
9
7%
LEVEL 2
35
28%
LEVEL 3
34
27%
LEVEL 4
46
37%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 17
LEVEL 1
10
59%
LEVEL 2
5
29%
LEVEL 3
2
12%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 136
LEVEL 1
18
13%
LEVEL 2
39
29%
LEVEL 3
35
26%
LEVEL 4
44
32%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
1
20%
LEVEL 2
1
20%
LEVEL 3
1
20%
LEVEL 4
2
40%
Female
PROFICIENT
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 61
LEVEL 1
4
7%
LEVEL 2
16
26%
LEVEL 3
14
23%
LEVEL 4
27
44%
Male
PROFICIENT
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 80
LEVEL 1
15
19%
LEVEL 2
24
30%
LEVEL 3
22
28%
LEVEL 4
19
24%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 141
LEVEL 1
19
13%
LEVEL 2
40
28%
LEVEL 3
36
26%
LEVEL 4
46
33%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 21
LEVEL 1
9
43%
LEVEL 2
8
38%
LEVEL 3
2
10%
LEVEL 4
2
10%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 120
LEVEL 1
10
8%
LEVEL 2
32
27%
LEVEL 3
34
28%
LEVEL 4
44
37%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 141
LEVEL 1
19
13%
LEVEL 2
40
28%
LEVEL 3
36
26%
LEVEL 4
46
33%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
141
124
17
3
1
136
1
5
61
80
141
21
120
141
PROFICIENT
58%
65%
12%
_%
_%
58%
_%
60%
67%
51%
58%
19%
65%
58%
LEVEL 1
19
13%
9
7%
10
59%
_
_
_
_
18
13%
_
_
1
20%
4
7%
15
19%
19
13%
9
43%
10
8%
19
13%
LEVEL 2
40
28%
35
28%
5
29%
_
_
_
_
39
29%
_
_
1
20%
16
26%
24
30%
40
28%
8
38%
32
27%
40
28%
LEVEL 3
36
26%
34
27%
2
12%
_
_
_
_
35
26%
_
_
1
20%
14
23%
22
28%
36
26%
2
10%
34
28%
36
26%
LEVEL 4
46
33%
46
37%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
44
32%
_
_
2
40%
27
44%
19
24%
46
33%
2
10%
44
37%
46
33%
Grade 7 English Language Arts
MEAN SCORE: 310
All Students
PROFICIENT
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 156
LEVEL 1
30
19%
LEVEL 2
62
40%
LEVEL 3
53
34%
LEVEL 4
11
7%
General Education
PROFICIENT
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 139
LEVEL 1
18
13%
LEVEL 2
57
41%
LEVEL 3
53
38%
LEVEL 4
11
8%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 17
LEVEL 1
12
71%
LEVEL 2
5
29%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 153
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 0
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 156
LEVEL 1
30
19%
LEVEL 2
62
40%
LEVEL 3
53
34%
LEVEL 4
11
7%
Female
PROFICIENT
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 86
LEVEL 1
12
14%
LEVEL 2
36
42%
LEVEL 3
29
34%
LEVEL 4
9
10%
Male
PROFICIENT
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 70
LEVEL 1
18
26%
LEVEL 2
26
37%
LEVEL 3
24
34%
LEVEL 4
2
3%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 155
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 30
LEVEL 1
7
23%
LEVEL 2
15
50%
LEVEL 3
7
23%
LEVEL 4
1
3%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 126
LEVEL 1
23
18%
LEVEL 2
47
37%
LEVEL 3
46
37%
LEVEL 4
10
8%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 156
LEVEL 1
30
19%
LEVEL 2
62
40%
LEVEL 3
53
34%
LEVEL 4
11
7%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
156
139
17
3
153
0
156
86
70
155
1
30
126
156
PROFICIENT
41%
46%
0%
_%
_%
0%
41%
44%
37%
_%
_%
27%
44%
41%
LEVEL 1
30
19%
18
13%
12
71%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
30
19%
12
14%
18
26%
_
_
_
_
7
23%
23
18%
30
19%
LEVEL 2
62
40%
57
41%
5
29%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
62
40%
36
42%
26
37%
_
_
_
_
15
50%
47
37%
62
40%
LEVEL 3
53
34%
53
38%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
53
34%
29
34%
24
34%
_
_
_
_
7
23%
46
37%
53
34%
LEVEL 4
11
7%
11
8%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
11
7%
9
10%
2
3%
_
_
_
_
1
3%
10
8%
11
7%
Grade 8 English Language Arts
MEAN SCORE: 310
All Students
PROFICIENT
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 162
LEVEL 1
27
17%
LEVEL 2
60
37%
LEVEL 3
52
32%
LEVEL 4
23
14%
General Education
PROFICIENT
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 141
LEVEL 1
12
9%
LEVEL 2
57
40%
LEVEL 3
49
35%
LEVEL 4
23
16%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 21
LEVEL 1
15
71%
LEVEL 2
3
14%
LEVEL 3
3
14%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
American Indian or Alaska Native
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 157
LEVEL 1
26
17%
LEVEL 2
57
36%
LEVEL 3
51
32%
LEVEL 4
23
15%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
1
20%
LEVEL 2
3
60%
LEVEL 3
1
20%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Female
PROFICIENT
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 74
LEVEL 1
6
8%
LEVEL 2
25
34%
LEVEL 3
27
36%
LEVEL 4
16
22%
Male
PROFICIENT
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 88
LEVEL 1
21
24%
LEVEL 2
35
40%
LEVEL 3
25
28%
LEVEL 4
7
8%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 162
LEVEL 1
27
17%
LEVEL 2
60
37%
LEVEL 3
52
32%
LEVEL 4
23
14%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 25
LEVEL 1
9
36%
LEVEL 2
11
44%
LEVEL 3
5
20%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 137
LEVEL 1
18
13%
LEVEL 2
49
36%
LEVEL 3
47
34%
LEVEL 4
23
17%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 162
LEVEL 1
27
17%
LEVEL 2
60
37%
LEVEL 3
52
32%
LEVEL 4
23
14%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
162
141
21
2
1
1
157
1
5
74
88
162
25
137
162
PROFICIENT
46%
51%
14%
_%
_%
_%
47%
_%
20%
58%
36%
46%
20%
51%
46%
LEVEL 1
27
17%
12
9%
15
71%
_
_
_
_
_
_
26
17%
_
_
1
20%
6
8%
21
24%
27
17%
9
36%
18
13%
27
17%
LEVEL 2
60
37%
57
40%
3
14%
_
_
_
_
_
_
57
36%
_
_
3
60%
25
34%
35
40%
60
37%
11
44%
49
36%
60
37%
LEVEL 3
52
32%
49
35%
3
14%
_
_
_
_
_
_
51
32%
_
_
1
20%
27
36%
25
28%
52
32%
5
20%
47
34%
52
32%
LEVEL 4
23
14%
23
16%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
23
15%
_
_
0
0%
16
22%
7
8%
23
14%
0
0%
23
17%
23
14%
Grade 3 Mathematics
MEAN SCORE: 319
All Students
PROFICIENT
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 128
LEVEL 1
12
9%
LEVEL 2
47
37%
LEVEL 3
37
29%
LEVEL 4
32
25%
General Education
PROFICIENT
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 113
LEVEL 1
4
4%
LEVEL 2
43
38%
LEVEL 3
36
32%
LEVEL 4
30
27%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 15
LEVEL 1
8
53%
LEVEL 2
4
27%
LEVEL 3
1
7%
LEVEL 4
2
13%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 124
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 128
LEVEL 1
12
9%
LEVEL 2
47
37%
LEVEL 3
37
29%
LEVEL 4
32
25%
Female
PROFICIENT
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 65
LEVEL 1
4
6%
LEVEL 2
20
31%
LEVEL 3
25
38%
LEVEL 4
16
25%
Male
PROFICIENT
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 63
LEVEL 1
8
13%
LEVEL 2
27
43%
LEVEL 3
12
19%
LEVEL 4
16
25%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 128
LEVEL 1
12
9%
LEVEL 2
47
37%
LEVEL 3
37
29%
LEVEL 4
32
25%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 23
LEVEL 1
5
22%
LEVEL 2
12
52%
LEVEL 3
2
9%
LEVEL 4
4
17%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 105
LEVEL 1
7
7%
LEVEL 2
35
33%
LEVEL 3
35
33%
LEVEL 4
28
27%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 128
LEVEL 1
12
9%
LEVEL 2
47
37%
LEVEL 3
37
29%
LEVEL 4
32
25%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
128
113
15
2
1
124
1
128
65
63
128
23
105
128
PROFICIENT
54%
58%
20%
_%
_%
_%
_%
54%
63%
44%
54%
26%
60%
54%
LEVEL 1
12
9%
4
4%
8
53%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
12
9%
4
6%
8
13%
12
9%
5
22%
7
7%
12
9%
LEVEL 2
47
37%
43
38%
4
27%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
47
37%
20
31%
27
43%
47
37%
12
52%
35
33%
47
37%
LEVEL 3
37
29%
36
32%
1
7%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
37
29%
25
38%
12
19%
37
29%
2
9%
35
33%
37
29%
LEVEL 4
32
25%
30
27%
2
13%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
32
25%
16
25%
16
25%
32
25%
4
17%
28
27%
32
25%
Grade 4 Mathematics
MEAN SCORE: 312
All Students
PROFICIENT
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 130
LEVEL 1
24
18%
LEVEL 2
33
25%
LEVEL 3
48
37%
LEVEL 4
25
19%
General Education
PROFICIENT
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 113
LEVEL 1
12
11%
LEVEL 2
32
28%
LEVEL 3
44
39%
LEVEL 4
25
22%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 17
LEVEL 1
12
71%
LEVEL 2
1
6%
LEVEL 3
4
24%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 128
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 130
LEVEL 1
24
18%
LEVEL 2
33
25%
LEVEL 3
48
37%
LEVEL 4
25
19%
Female
PROFICIENT
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 62
LEVEL 1
11
18%
LEVEL 2
15
24%
LEVEL 3
27
44%
LEVEL 4
9
15%
Male
PROFICIENT
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 68
LEVEL 1
13
19%
LEVEL 2
18
26%
LEVEL 3
21
31%
LEVEL 4
16
24%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 130
LEVEL 1
24
18%
LEVEL 2
33
25%
LEVEL 3
48
37%
LEVEL 4
25
19%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 35
LEVEL 1
14
40%
LEVEL 2
13
37%
LEVEL 3
5
14%
LEVEL 4
3
9%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 95
LEVEL 1
10
11%
LEVEL 2
20
21%
LEVEL 3
43
45%
LEVEL 4
22
23%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 130
LEVEL 1
24
18%
LEVEL 2
33
25%
LEVEL 3
48
37%
LEVEL 4
25
19%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
130
113
17
1
128
1
130
62
68
130
35
95
130
PROFICIENT
56%
61%
24%
_%
_%
_%
56%
58%
54%
56%
23%
68%
56%
LEVEL 1
24
18%
12
11%
12
71%
_
_
_
_
_
_
24
18%
11
18%
13
19%
24
18%
14
40%
10
11%
24
18%
LEVEL 2
33
25%
32
28%
1
6%
_
_
_
_
_
_
33
25%
15
24%
18
26%
33
25%
13
37%
20
21%
33
25%
LEVEL 3
48
37%
44
39%
4
24%
_
_
_
_
_
_
48
37%
27
44%
21
31%
48
37%
5
14%
43
45%
48
37%
LEVEL 4
25
19%
25
22%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
25
19%
9
15%
16
24%
25
19%
3
9%
22
23%
25
19%
Grade 5 Mathematics
MEAN SCORE: 312
All Students
PROFICIENT
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 137
LEVEL 1
27
20%
LEVEL 2
56
41%
LEVEL 3
47
34%
LEVEL 4
7
5%
General Education
PROFICIENT
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 128
LEVEL 1
24
19%
LEVEL 2
51
40%
LEVEL 3
46
36%
LEVEL 4
7
5%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
3
33%
LEVEL 2
5
56%
LEVEL 3
1
11%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 135
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 137
LEVEL 1
27
20%
LEVEL 2
56
41%
LEVEL 3
47
34%
LEVEL 4
7
5%
Female
PROFICIENT
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 64
LEVEL 1
14
22%
LEVEL 2
29
45%
LEVEL 3
17
27%
LEVEL 4
4
6%
Male
PROFICIENT
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 73
LEVEL 1
13
18%
LEVEL 2
27
37%
LEVEL 3
30
41%
LEVEL 4
3
4%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 137
LEVEL 1
27
20%
LEVEL 2
56
41%
LEVEL 3
47
34%
LEVEL 4
7
5%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 27
LEVEL 1
11
41%
LEVEL 2
11
41%
LEVEL 3
4
15%
LEVEL 4
1
4%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 110
LEVEL 1
16
15%
LEVEL 2
45
41%
LEVEL 3
43
39%
LEVEL 4
6
5%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 137
LEVEL 1
27
20%
LEVEL 2
56
41%
LEVEL 3
47
34%
LEVEL 4
7
5%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
137
128
9
1
135
1
137
64
73
137
27
110
137
PROFICIENT
39%
41%
11%
_%
_%
_%
39%
33%
45%
39%
19%
45%
39%
LEVEL 1
27
20%
24
19%
3
33%
_
_
_
_
_
_
27
20%
14
22%
13
18%
27
20%
11
41%
16
15%
27
20%
LEVEL 2
56
41%
51
40%
5
56%
_
_
_
_
_
_
56
41%
29
45%
27
37%
56
41%
11
41%
45
41%
56
41%
LEVEL 3
47
34%
46
36%
1
11%
_
_
_
_
_
_
47
34%
17
27%
30
41%
47
34%
4
15%
43
39%
47
34%
LEVEL 4
7
5%
7
5%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
7
5%
4
6%
3
4%
7
5%
1
4%
6
5%
7
5%
Grade 6 Mathematics
MEAN SCORE: 321
All Students
PROFICIENT
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 141
LEVEL 1
18
13%
LEVEL 2
42
30%
LEVEL 3
38
27%
LEVEL 4
43
30%
General Education
PROFICIENT
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 124
LEVEL 1
8
6%
LEVEL 2
37
30%
LEVEL 3
36
29%
LEVEL 4
43
35%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 17
LEVEL 1
10
59%
LEVEL 2
5
29%
LEVEL 3
2
12%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 136
LEVEL 1
17
13%
LEVEL 2
42
31%
LEVEL 3
38
28%
LEVEL 4
39
29%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
1
20%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
4
80%
Female
PROFICIENT
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 61
LEVEL 1
5
8%
LEVEL 2
22
36%
LEVEL 3
13
21%
LEVEL 4
21
34%
Male
PROFICIENT
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 80
LEVEL 1
13
16%
LEVEL 2
20
25%
LEVEL 3
25
31%
LEVEL 4
22
28%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 141
LEVEL 1
18
13%
LEVEL 2
42
30%
LEVEL 3
38
27%
LEVEL 4
43
30%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 21
LEVEL 1
8
38%
LEVEL 2
8
38%
LEVEL 3
3
14%
LEVEL 4
2
10%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 120
LEVEL 1
10
8%
LEVEL 2
34
28%
LEVEL 3
35
29%
LEVEL 4
41
34%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 141
LEVEL 1
18
13%
LEVEL 2
42
30%
LEVEL 3
38
27%
LEVEL 4
43
30%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
141
124
17
3
1
136
1
5
61
80
141
21
120
141
PROFICIENT
57%
64%
12%
_%
_%
57%
_%
80%
56%
59%
57%
24%
63%
57%
LEVEL 1
18
13%
8
6%
10
59%
_
_
_
_
17
13%
_
_
1
20%
5
8%
13
16%
18
13%
8
38%
10
8%
18
13%
LEVEL 2
42
30%
37
30%
5
29%
_
_
_
_
42
31%
_
_
0
0%
22
36%
20
25%
42
30%
8
38%
34
28%
42
30%
LEVEL 3
38
27%
36
29%
2
12%
_
_
_
_
38
28%
_
_
0
0%
13
21%
25
31%
38
27%
3
14%
35
29%
38
27%
LEVEL 4
43
30%
43
35%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
39
29%
_
_
4
80%
21
34%
22
28%
43
30%
2
10%
41
34%
43
30%
Grade 7 Mathematics
Mean scores and data in the table for grade 7 math include only those for grade 7 students who took the Grade 7 New York State Testing Program Assessment (NYSTP) in Mathematics. For 2015 and forward, data in the bar charts include those for grade 7 students who took the Grade 7 NYSTP in Mathematics and grade 7 students who took a Regents math test in lieu of the NYSTP. For 2014 and earlier, data in the bar charts include only those for grade 7 students who took the Grade 7 NYSTP.
MEAN SCORE: 320
All Students
PROFICIENT
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 158
LEVEL 1
21
13%
LEVEL 2
52
33%
LEVEL 3
66
42%
LEVEL 4
19
12%
General Education
PROFICIENT
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 141
LEVEL 1
10
7%
LEVEL 2
47
33%
LEVEL 3
66
47%
LEVEL 4
18
13%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 17
LEVEL 1
11
65%
LEVEL 2
5
29%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
1
6%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 153
LEVEL 1
20
13%
LEVEL 2
52
34%
LEVEL 3
64
42%
LEVEL 4
17
11%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
1
20%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
2
40%
LEVEL 4
2
40%
Female
PROFICIENT
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 87
LEVEL 1
8
9%
LEVEL 2
30
34%
LEVEL 3
39
45%
LEVEL 4
10
11%
Male
PROFICIENT
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 71
LEVEL 1
13
18%
LEVEL 2
22
31%
LEVEL 3
27
38%
LEVEL 4
9
13%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 156
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 32
LEVEL 1
7
22%
LEVEL 2
14
44%
LEVEL 3
10
31%
LEVEL 4
1
3%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 126
LEVEL 1
14
11%
LEVEL 2
38
30%
LEVEL 3
56
44%
LEVEL 4
18
14%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 158
LEVEL 1
21
13%
LEVEL 2
52
33%
LEVEL 3
66
42%
LEVEL 4
19
12%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
158
141
17
4
153
1
5
87
71
156
2
32
126
158
PROFICIENT
54%
60%
6%
_%
53%
_%
80%
56%
51%
_%
_%
34%
59%
54%
LEVEL 1
21
13%
10
7%
11
65%
_
_
20
13%
_
_
1
20%
8
9%
13
18%
_
_
_
_
7
22%
14
11%
21
13%
LEVEL 2
52
33%
47
33%
5
29%
_
_
52
34%
_
_
0
0%
30
34%
22
31%
_
_
_
_
14
44%
38
30%
52
33%
LEVEL 3
66
42%
66
47%
0
0%
_
_
64
42%
_
_
2
40%
39
45%
27
38%
_
_
_
_
10
31%
56
44%
66
42%
LEVEL 4
19
12%
18
13%
1
6%
_
_
17
11%
_
_
2
40%
10
11%
9
13%
_
_
_
_
1
3%
18
14%
19
12%
Grade 8 Mathematics
Mean scores and data in the table for grade 8 math include only those for grade 8 students who took the Grade 8 New York State Testing Program Assessment (NYSTP) in Mathematics. For 2015 and forward, data in the bar charts include those for grade 8 students who took the Grade 8 NYSTP in Mathematics and grade 8 students who took a Regents math test in lieu of the NYSTP. For 2014 and earlier, data in the bar charts include only those for grade 8 students who took the Grade 8 NYSTP.
MEAN SCORE: 316
All Students
PROFICIENT
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 162
LEVEL 1
22
14%
LEVEL 2
67
41%
LEVEL 3
47
29%
LEVEL 4
26
16%
General Education
PROFICIENT
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 141
LEVEL 1
8
6%
LEVEL 2
62
44%
LEVEL 3
45
32%
LEVEL 4
26
18%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 21
LEVEL 1
14
67%
LEVEL 2
5
24%
LEVEL 3
2
10%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
American Indian or Alaska Native
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 157
LEVEL 1
22
14%
LEVEL 2
63
40%
LEVEL 3
46
29%
LEVEL 4
26
17%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
4
80%
LEVEL 3
1
20%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Female
PROFICIENT
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 74
LEVEL 1
7
9%
LEVEL 2
34
46%
LEVEL 3
20
27%
LEVEL 4
13
18%
Male
PROFICIENT
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 88
LEVEL 1
15
17%
LEVEL 2
33
38%
LEVEL 3
27
31%
LEVEL 4
13
15%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 162
LEVEL 1
22
14%
LEVEL 2
67
41%
LEVEL 3
47
29%
LEVEL 4
26
16%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 25
LEVEL 1
7
28%
LEVEL 2
14
56%
LEVEL 3
1
4%
LEVEL 4
3
12%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 137
LEVEL 1
15
11%
LEVEL 2
53
39%
LEVEL 3
46
34%
LEVEL 4
23
17%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 162
LEVEL 1
22
14%
LEVEL 2
67
41%
LEVEL 3
47
29%
LEVEL 4
26
16%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
162
141
21
2
1
1
157
1
5
74
88
162
25
137
162
PROFICIENT
45%
50%
10%
_%
_%
_%
46%
_%
20%
45%
45%
45%
16%
50%
45%
LEVEL 1
22
14%
8
6%
14
67%
_
_
_
_
_
_
22
14%
_
_
0
0%
7
9%
15
17%
22
14%
7
28%
15
11%
22
14%
LEVEL 2
67
41%
62
44%
5
24%
_
_
_
_
_
_
63
40%
_
_
4
80%
34
46%
33
38%
67
41%
14
56%
53
39%
67
41%
LEVEL 3
47
29%
45
32%
2
10%
_
_
_
_
_
_
46
29%
_
_
1
20%
20
27%
27
31%
47
29%
1
4%
46
34%
47
29%
LEVEL 4
26
16%
26
18%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
26
17%
_
_
0
0%
13
18%
13
15%
26
16%
3
12%
23
17%
26
16%
Grade 4 Science
MEAN SCORE: 85
All Students
PROFICIENT
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 127
LEVEL 1
3
2%
LEVEL 2
5
4%
LEVEL 3
39
31%
LEVEL 4
80
63%
General Education
PROFICIENT
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 110
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
1
1%
LEVEL 3
32
29%
LEVEL 4
76
69%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 17
LEVEL 1
2
12%
LEVEL 2
4
24%
LEVEL 3
7
41%
LEVEL 4
4
24%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 125
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 127
LEVEL 1
3
2%
LEVEL 2
5
4%
LEVEL 3
39
31%
LEVEL 4
80
63%
Female
PROFICIENT
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 61
LEVEL 1
1
2%
LEVEL 2
2
3%
LEVEL 3
18
30%
LEVEL 4
40
66%
Male
PROFICIENT
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 66
LEVEL 1
2
3%
LEVEL 2
3
5%
LEVEL 3
21
32%
LEVEL 4
40
61%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 127
LEVEL 1
3
2%
LEVEL 2
5
4%
LEVEL 3
39
31%
LEVEL 4
80
63%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 33
LEVEL 1
1
3%
LEVEL 2
3
9%
LEVEL 3
19
58%
LEVEL 4
10
30%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 94
LEVEL 1
2
2%
LEVEL 2
2
2%
LEVEL 3
20
21%
LEVEL 4
70
74%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 127
LEVEL 1
3
2%
LEVEL 2
5
4%
LEVEL 3
39
31%
LEVEL 4
80
63%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
127
110
17
1
125
1
127
61
66
127
33
94
127
PROFICIENT
94%
98%
65%
_%
_%
_%
94%
95%
92%
94%
88%
96%
94%
LEVEL 1
3
2%
1
1%
2
12%
_
_
_
_
_
_
3
2%
1
2%
2
3%
3
2%
1
3%
2
2%
3
2%
LEVEL 2
5
4%
1
1%
4
24%
_
_
_
_
_
_
5
4%
2
3%
3
5%
5
4%
3
9%
2
2%
5
4%
LEVEL 3
39
31%
32
29%
7
41%
_
_
_
_
_
_
39
31%
18
30%
21
32%
39
31%
19
58%
20
21%
39
31%
LEVEL 4
80
63%
76
69%
4
24%
_
_
_
_
_
_
80
63%
40
66%
40
61%
80
63%
10
30%
70
74%
80
63%
Grade 8 Science
Data in the bar charts include those for grade 8 students who took the New York State Grade 8 Science Test and grade 8 students who took a Regents science test in lieu of this test. Mean scores and data in the table for grade 8 science include only those for grade 8 students who took the New York State Grade 8 Science Test.
MEAN SCORE: 80
All Students
PROFICIENT
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 160
LEVEL 1
3
2%
LEVEL 2
22
14%
LEVEL 3
58
36%
LEVEL 4
77
48%
General Education
PROFICIENT
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 139
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
11
8%
LEVEL 3
54
39%
LEVEL 4
74
53%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 21
LEVEL 1
3
14%
LEVEL 2
11
52%
LEVEL 3
4
19%
LEVEL 4
3
14%
American Indian or Alaska Native
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 155
LEVEL 1
3
2%
LEVEL 2
22
14%
LEVEL 3
54
35%
LEVEL 4
76
49%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
4
80%
LEVEL 4
1
20%
Female
PROFICIENT
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 72
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
11
15%
LEVEL 3
32
44%
LEVEL 4
28
39%
Male
PROFICIENT
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 88
LEVEL 1
2
2%
LEVEL 2
11
13%
LEVEL 3
26
30%
LEVEL 4
49
56%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 160
LEVEL 1
3
2%
LEVEL 2
22
14%
LEVEL 3
58
36%
LEVEL 4
77
48%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 24
LEVEL 1
1
4%
LEVEL 2
7
29%
LEVEL 3
9
38%
LEVEL 4
7
29%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 136
LEVEL 1
2
1%
LEVEL 2
15
11%
LEVEL 3
49
36%
LEVEL 4
70
51%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 160
LEVEL 1
3
2%
LEVEL 2
22
14%
LEVEL 3
58
36%
LEVEL 4
77
48%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
160
139
21
2
1
1
155
1
5
72
88
160
24
136
160
PROFICIENT
84%
92%
33%
_%
_%
_%
84%
_%
100%
83%
85%
84%
67%
88%
84%
LEVEL 1
3
2%
0
0%
3
14%
_
_
_
_
_
_
3
2%
_
_
0
0%
1
1%
2
2%
3
2%
1
4%
2
1%
3
2%
LEVEL 2
22
14%
11
8%
11
52%
_
_
_
_
_
_
22
14%
_
_
0
0%
11
15%
11
13%
22
14%
7
29%
15
11%
22
14%
LEVEL 3
58
36%
54
39%
4
19%
_
_
_
_
_
_
54
35%
_
_
4
80%
32
44%
26
30%
58
36%
9
38%
49
36%
58
36%
LEVEL 4
77
48%
74
53%
3
14%
_
_
_
_
_
_
76
49%
_
_
1
20%
28
39%
49
56%
77
48%
7
29%
70
51%
77
48%
Statewide Results on the National Assessment of Educational Progress: NAEP (2012 - 13)
Grade: 4
Reading
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Students with Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
BELOW BASIC
30%
*%
19%
45%
44%
20%
*%
69%
75%
43%
BASIC
33%
*%
27%
34%
35%
33%
*%
22%
21%
34%
PROFICIENT
28%
*%
36%
18%
17%
35%
*%
7%
4%
19%
ADVANCED
9%
*%
18%
3%
4%
12%
*%
2%
*%
4%
PARTICIPATION RATE
94
93
Reading
All Students
Percent Below Basic
30
Percent Basic
33
Percent Proficient
28
Percent Advanced
9
American Indian or Alaska Native
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Percent Below Basic
19
Percent Basic
27
Percent Proficient
36
Percent Advanced
18
Black or African American
Percent Below Basic
45
Percent Basic
34
Percent Proficient
18
Percent Advanced
3
Hispanic or Latino
Percent Below Basic
44
Percent Basic
35
Percent Proficient
17
Percent Advanced
4
White
Percent Below Basic
20
Percent Basic
33
Percent Proficient
35
Percent Advanced
12
Multiracial
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Students with Disabilities
Percent Below Basic
69
Percent Basic
22
Percent Proficient
7
Percent Advanced
2
Participation Rate
94
Limited English Proficient
Percent Below Basic
75
Percent Basic
21
Percent Proficient
4
Percent Advanced
*
Participation Rate
93
Economically Disadvantaged
Percent Below Basic
43
Percent Basic
34
Percent Proficient
19
Percent Advanced
4
Mathematics
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Students with Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
BELOW BASIC
18%
*%
6%
33%
27%
9%
*%
43%
54%
26%
BASIC
42%
*%
25%
50%
49%
41%
*%
42%
36%
48%
PROFICIENT
33%
*%
48%
16%
22%
42%
*%
14%
10%
23%
ADVANCED
7%
*%
21%
1%
2%
8%
*%
1%
*%
3%
PARTICIPATION RATE
94
93
Mathematics
All Students
Percent Below Basic
18
Percent Basic
42
Percent Proficient
33
Percent Advanced
7
American Indian or Alaska Native
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Percent Below Basic
6
Percent Basic
25
Percent Proficient
48
Percent Advanced
21
Black or African American
Percent Below Basic
33
Percent Basic
50
Percent Proficient
16
Percent Advanced
1
Hispanic or Latino
Percent Below Basic
27
Percent Basic
49
Percent Proficient
22
Percent Advanced
2
White
Percent Below Basic
9
Percent Basic
41
Percent Proficient
42
Percent Advanced
8
Multiracial
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Students with Disabilities
Percent Below Basic
43
Percent Basic
42
Percent Proficient
14
Percent Advanced
1
Participation Rate
94
Limited English Proficient
Percent Below Basic
54
Percent Basic
36
Percent Proficient
10
Percent Advanced
*
Participation Rate
93
Economically Disadvantaged
Percent Below Basic
26
Percent Basic
48
Percent Proficient
23
Percent Advanced
3
Grade: 8
Reading
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Students with Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
BELOW BASIC
24%
*%
17%
37%
36%
14%
*%
56%
80%
35%
BASIC
41%
*%
33%
45%
45%
40%
*%
36%
19%
44%
PROFICIENT
30%
*%
38%
17%
18%
40%
*%
8%
1%
20%
ADVANCED
5%
*%
12%
1%
1%
6%
*%
*%
*%
1%
PARTICIPATION RATE
97
91
Reading
All Students
Percent Below Basic
24
Percent Basic
41
Percent Proficient
30
Percent Advanced
5
American Indian or Alaska Native
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Percent Below Basic
17
Percent Basic
33
Percent Proficient
38
Percent Advanced
12
Black or African American
Percent Below Basic
37
Percent Basic
45
Percent Proficient
17
Percent Advanced
1
Hispanic or Latino
Percent Below Basic
36
Percent Basic
45
Percent Proficient
18
Percent Advanced
1
White
Percent Below Basic
14
Percent Basic
40
Percent Proficient
40
Percent Advanced
6
Multiracial
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Students with Disabilities
Percent Below Basic
56
Percent Basic
36
Percent Proficient
8
Percent Advanced
*
Participation Rate
97
Limited English Proficient
Percent Below Basic
80
Percent Basic
19
Percent Proficient
1
Percent Advanced
*
Participation Rate
91
Economically Disadvantaged
Percent Below Basic
35
Percent Basic
44
Percent Proficient
20
Percent Advanced
1
Mathematics
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Students with Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
BELOW BASIC
28%
*%
14%
50%
44%
15%
*%
66%
75%
42%
BASIC
40%
*%
27%
38%
42%
41%
*%
27%
21%
39%
PROFICIENT
24%
*%
33%
11%
12%
34%
*%
6%
3%
15%
ADVANCED
8%
*%
26%
1%
2%
10%
*%
1%
1%
4%
PARTICIPATION RATE
89
94
Mathematics
All Students
Percent Below Basic
28
Percent Basic
40
Percent Proficient
24
Percent Advanced
8
American Indian or Alaska Native
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Percent Below Basic
14
Percent Basic
27
Percent Proficient
33
Percent Advanced
26
Black or African American
Percent Below Basic
50
Percent Basic
38
Percent Proficient
11
Percent Advanced
1
Hispanic or Latino
Percent Below Basic
44
Percent Basic
42
Percent Proficient
12
Percent Advanced
2
White
Percent Below Basic
15
Percent Basic
41
Percent Proficient
34
Percent Advanced
10
Multiracial
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Students with Disabilities
Percent Below Basic
66
Percent Basic
27
Percent Proficient
6
Percent Advanced
1
Participation Rate
89
Limited English Proficient
Percent Below Basic
75
Percent Basic
21
Percent Proficient
3
Percent Advanced
1
Participation Rate
94
Economically Disadvantaged
Percent Below Basic
42
Percent Basic
39
Percent Proficient
15
Percent Advanced
4
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level English Language Arts after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 174
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
3
2%
LEVEL 3
79
45%
LEVEL 4
82
47%
General Education
PROFICIENT
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 156
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
1%
LEVEL 3
69
44%
LEVEL 4
81
52%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 18
LEVEL 1
1
6%
LEVEL 2
2
11%
LEVEL 3
10
56%
LEVEL 4
1
6%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 169
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
3
2%
LEVEL 3
76
45%
LEVEL 4
80
47%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
3
60%
LEVEL 4
2
40%
Female
PROFICIENT
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 92
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
33
36%
LEVEL 4
54
59%
Male
PROFICIENT
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 82
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
3
4%
LEVEL 3
46
56%
LEVEL 4
28
34%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 174
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
3
2%
LEVEL 3
79
45%
LEVEL 4
82
47%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 17
LEVEL 1
1
6%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
9
53%
LEVEL 4
5
29%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 157
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
3
2%
LEVEL 3
70
45%
LEVEL 4
77
49%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 174
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
3
2%
LEVEL 3
79
45%
LEVEL 4
82
47%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
174
156
18
1
3
169
1
5
92
82
174
17
157
174
PROFICIENT
93%
96%
61%
_%
_%
92%
_%
100%
95%
90%
93%
82%
94%
93%
LEVEL 1
1
1%
0
0%
1
6%
_
_
_
_
1
1%
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
1
1%
1
1%
1
6%
0
0%
1
1%
LEVEL 2
3
2%
1
1%
2
11%
_
_
_
_
3
2%
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
3
4%
3
2%
0
0%
3
2%
3
2%
LEVEL 3
79
45%
69
44%
10
56%
_
_
_
_
76
45%
_
_
3
60%
33
36%
46
56%
79
45%
9
53%
70
45%
79
45%
LEVEL 4
82
47%
81
52%
1
6%
_
_
_
_
80
47%
_
_
2
40%
54
59%
28
34%
82
47%
5
29%
77
49%
82
47%
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level Mathematics after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 174
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
5
3%
LEVEL 3
103
59%
LEVEL 4
61
35%
General Education
PROFICIENT
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 156
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
1%
LEVEL 3
93
60%
LEVEL 4
60
38%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 18
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
3
17%
LEVEL 3
10
56%
LEVEL 4
1
6%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 169
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
5
3%
LEVEL 3
100
59%
LEVEL 4
59
35%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
3
60%
LEVEL 4
2
40%
Female
PROFICIENT
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 92
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
1%
LEVEL 3
52
57%
LEVEL 4
37
40%
Male
PROFICIENT
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 82
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
4
5%
LEVEL 3
51
62%
LEVEL 4
24
29%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 174
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
5
3%
LEVEL 3
103
59%
LEVEL 4
61
35%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 17
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
6%
LEVEL 3
11
65%
LEVEL 4
3
18%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 157
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
4
3%
LEVEL 3
92
59%
LEVEL 4
58
37%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 174
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
5
3%
LEVEL 3
103
59%
LEVEL 4
61
35%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
174
156
18
1
3
169
1
5
92
82
174
17
157
174
PROFICIENT
94%
98%
61%
_%
_%
94%
_%
100%
97%
91%
94%
82%
96%
94%
LEVEL 1
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
LEVEL 2
5
3%
2
1%
3
17%
_
_
_
_
5
3%
_
_
0
0%
1
1%
4
5%
5
3%
1
6%
4
3%
5
3%
LEVEL 3
103
59%
93
60%
10
56%
_
_
_
_
100
59%
_
_
3
60%
52
57%
51
62%
103
59%
11
65%
92
59%
103
59%
LEVEL 4
61
35%
60
38%
1
6%
_
_
_
_
59
35%
_
_
2
40%
37
40%
24
29%
61
35%
3
18%
58
37%
61
35%
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level Global History and Geography after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 174
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
1%
LEVEL 3
75
43%
LEVEL 4
91
52%
General Education
PROFICIENT
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 156
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
1%
LEVEL 3
65
42%
LEVEL 4
88
56%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 18
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
6%
LEVEL 3
10
56%
LEVEL 4
3
17%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 169
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
1%
LEVEL 3
73
43%
LEVEL 4
88
52%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
2
40%
LEVEL 4
3
60%
Female
PROFICIENT
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 92
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
1%
LEVEL 3
33
36%
LEVEL 4
56
61%
Male
PROFICIENT
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 82
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
1%
LEVEL 3
42
51%
LEVEL 4
35
43%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 174
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
1%
LEVEL 3
75
43%
LEVEL 4
91
52%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 17
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
9
53%
LEVEL 4
6
35%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 157
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
1%
LEVEL 3
66
42%
LEVEL 4
85
54%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 174
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
1%
LEVEL 3
75
43%
LEVEL 4
91
52%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
174
156
18
1
3
169
1
5
92
82
174
17
157
174
PROFICIENT
95%
98%
72%
_%
_%
95%
_%
100%
97%
94%
95%
88%
96%
95%
LEVEL 1
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
1%
1
1%
1
6%
_
_
_
_
2
1%
_
_
0
0%
1
1%
1
1%
2
1%
0
0%
2
1%
2
1%
LEVEL 3
75
43%
65
42%
10
56%
_
_
_
_
73
43%
_
_
2
40%
33
36%
42
51%
75
43%
9
53%
66
42%
75
43%
LEVEL 4
91
52%
88
56%
3
17%
_
_
_
_
88
52%
_
_
3
60%
56
61%
35
43%
91
52%
6
35%
85
54%
91
52%
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level U.S. History and Government after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 174
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
3
2%
LEVEL 3
72
41%
LEVEL 4
89
51%
General Education
PROFICIENT
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 156
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
1%
LEVEL 3
62
40%
LEVEL 4
87
56%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 18
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
11%
LEVEL 3
10
56%
LEVEL 4
2
11%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 169
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
3
2%
LEVEL 3
71
42%
LEVEL 4
86
51%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
1
20%
LEVEL 4
3
60%
Female
PROFICIENT
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 92
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
1%
LEVEL 3
36
39%
LEVEL 4
50
54%
Male
PROFICIENT
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 82
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
2%
LEVEL 3
36
44%
LEVEL 4
39
48%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 174
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
3
2%
LEVEL 3
72
41%
LEVEL 4
89
51%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 17
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
6%
LEVEL 3
8
47%
LEVEL 4
5
29%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 157
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
1%
LEVEL 3
64
41%
LEVEL 4
84
54%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 174
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
3
2%
LEVEL 3
72
41%
LEVEL 4
89
51%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
174
156
18
1
3
169
1
5
92
82
174
17
157
174
PROFICIENT
93%
96%
67%
_%
_%
93%
_%
80%
93%
91%
93%
76%
94%
93%
LEVEL 1
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
LEVEL 2
3
2%
1
1%
2
11%
_
_
_
_
3
2%
_
_
0
0%
1
1%
2
2%
3
2%
1
6%
2
1%
3
2%
LEVEL 3
72
41%
62
40%
10
56%
_
_
_
_
71
42%
_
_
1
20%
36
39%
36
44%
72
41%
8
47%
64
41%
72
41%
LEVEL 4
89
51%
87
56%
2
11%
_
_
_
_
86
51%
_
_
3
60%
50
54%
39
48%
89
51%
5
29%
84
54%
89
51%
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level Science after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 174
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
51
29%
LEVEL 4
117
67%
General Education
PROFICIENT
99%
TOTAL TESTED: 156
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
41
26%
LEVEL 4
113
72%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 18
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
10
56%
LEVEL 4
4
22%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 169
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
50
30%
LEVEL 4
113
67%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
1
20%
LEVEL 4
4
80%
Female
PROFICIENT
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 92
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
25
27%
LEVEL 4
65
71%
Male
PROFICIENT
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 82
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
26
32%
LEVEL 4
52
63%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 174
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
51
29%
LEVEL 4
117
67%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 17
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
6
35%
LEVEL 4
9
53%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 157
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
45
29%
LEVEL 4
108
69%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 174
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
51
29%
LEVEL 4
117
67%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
174
156
18
1
3
169
1
5
92
82
174
17
157
174
PROFICIENT
97%
99%
78%
_%
_%
96%
_%
100%
98%
95%
97%
88%
97%
97%
LEVEL 1
1
1%
1
1%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
1
1%
_
_
0
0%
1
1%
0
0%
1
1%
0
0%
1
1%
1
1%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
LEVEL 3
51
29%
41
26%
10
56%
_
_
_
_
50
30%
_
_
1
20%
25
27%
26
32%
51
29%
6
35%
45
29%
51
29%
LEVEL 4
117
67%
113
72%
4
22%
_
_
_
_
113
67%
_
_
4
80%
65
71%
52
63%
117
67%
9
53%
108
69%
117
67%
Regents Examination Results (2012 - 13)
Comprehensive English
Regents Comprehensive English
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Migrant
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
132
115
17
1
0
0
1
130
0
132
75
57
132
0
14
118
0
132
55
127
96%
113
98%
14
82%
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
127
96%
74
99%
53
93%
127
96%
0
0%
13
93%
114
97%
0
0%
127
96%
65
122
92%
109
95%
13
76%
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
122
92%
73
97%
49
86%
122
92%
0
0%
13
93%
109
92%
0
0%
122
92%
85
52
39%
50
43%
2
12%
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
52
39%
38
51%
14
25%
52
39%
0
0%
4
29%
48
41%
0
0%
52
39%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 132
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
127
96%
65
122
92%
85
52
39%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 115
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
113
98%
65
109
95%
85
50
43%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 17
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
14
82%
65
13
76%
85
2
12%
American Indian or Alaska Native
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 130
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 132
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
127
96%
65
122
92%
85
52
39%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 75
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
74
99%
65
73
97%
85
38
51%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 57
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
53
93%
65
49
86%
85
14
25%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 132
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
127
96%
65
122
92%
85
52
39%
English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 14
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
13
93%
65
13
93%
85
4
29%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 118
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
114
97%
65
109
92%
85
48
41%
Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 132
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
127
96%
65
122
92%
85
52
39%
Integrated Algebra
Regents Integrated Algebra
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Migrant
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
192
172
20
0
0
3
2
186
1
6
103
89
192
0
28
164
0
192
55
184
96%
169
98%
15
75%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
178
96%
_
_
6
100%
100
97%
84
94%
184
96%
0
0%
26
93%
158
96%
0
0%
184
96%
65
170
89%
159
92%
11
55%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
165
89%
_
_
5
83%
95
92%
75
84%
170
89%
0
0%
22
79%
148
90%
0
0%
170
89%
85
72
38%
71
41%
1
5%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
71
38%
_
_
1
17%
42
41%
30
34%
72
38%
0
0%
7
25%
65
40%
0
0%
72
38%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 192
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
184
96%
65
170
89%
85
72
38%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 172
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
169
98%
65
159
92%
85
71
41%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 20
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
15
75%
65
11
55%
85
1
5%
American Indian or Alaska Native
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 186
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
178
96%
65
165
89%
85
71
38%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 6
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
6
100%
65
5
83%
85
1
17%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 103
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
100
97%
65
95
92%
85
42
41%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 89
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
84
94%
65
75
84%
85
30
34%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 192
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
184
96%
65
170
89%
85
72
38%
English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 28
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
26
93%
65
22
79%
85
7
25%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 164
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
158
96%
65
148
90%
85
65
40%
Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 192
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
184
96%
65
170
89%
85
72
38%
Geometry
Regents Geometry
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Migrant
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
145
138
7
0
3
0
2
140
0
5
75
70
144
1
11
134
0
145
55
144
99%
137
99%
7
100%
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
_
_
139
99%
0
0%
5
100%
74
99%
70
100%
_
_
_
_
11
100%
133
99%
0
0%
144
99%
65
139
96%
132
96%
7
100%
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
_
_
135
96%
0
0%
4
80%
72
96%
67
96%
_
_
_
_
10
91%
129
96%
0
0%
139
96%
85
61
42%
59
43%
2
29%
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
_
_
59
42%
0
0%
2
40%
34
45%
27
39%
_
_
_
_
2
18%
59
44%
0
0%
61
42%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 145
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
144
99%
65
139
96%
85
61
42%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 138
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
137
99%
65
132
96%
85
59
43%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 7
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
7
100%
65
7
100%
85
2
29%
American Indian or Alaska Native
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 140
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
139
99%
65
135
96%
85
59
42%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
5
100%
65
4
80%
85
2
40%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 75
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
74
99%
65
72
96%
85
34
45%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 70
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
70
100%
65
67
96%
85
27
39%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 144
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 11
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
11
100%
65
10
91%
85
2
18%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 134
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
133
99%
65
129
96%
85
59
44%
Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 145
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
144
99%
65
139
96%
85
61
42%
Algebra 2/Trigonometry
Regents Algebra 2/Trigonometry
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Migrant
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
112
106
6
0
1
0
1
110
0
112
64
48
112
0
9
103
0
112
55
97
87%
94
89%
3
50%
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
97
87%
56
88%
41
85%
97
87%
0
0%
8
89%
89
86%
0
0%
97
87%
65
73
65%
71
67%
2
33%
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
73
65%
44
69%
29
60%
73
65%
0
0%
7
78%
66
64%
0
0%
73
65%
85
27
24%
27
25%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
27
24%
14
22%
13
27%
27
24%
0
0%
2
22%
25
24%
0
0%
27
24%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 112
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
97
87%
65
73
65%
85
27
24%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 106
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
94
89%
65
71
67%
85
27
25%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 6
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
3
50%
65
2
33%
85
0
0%
American Indian or Alaska Native
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 110
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 112
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
97
87%
65
73
65%
85
27
24%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 64
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
56
88%
65
44
69%
85
14
22%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 48
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
41
85%
65
29
60%
85
13
27%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 112
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
97
87%
65
73
65%
85
27
24%
English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 9
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
8
89%
65
7
78%
85
2
22%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 103
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
89
86%
65
66
64%
85
25
24%
Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 112
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
97
87%
65
73
65%
85
27
24%
Global History and Geography
Regents Global History and Geography
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Migrant
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
170
156
14
1
3
0
5
161
0
9
82
88
169
1
19
151
0
170
55
168
99%
155
99%
13
93%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
_
_
159
99%
0
0%
9
100%
80
98%
88
100%
_
_
_
_
19
100%
149
99%
0
0%
168
99%
65
154
91%
146
94%
8
57%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
_
_
148
92%
0
0%
6
67%
74
90%
80
91%
_
_
_
_
16
84%
138
91%
0
0%
154
91%
85
81
48%
81
52%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
_
_
76
47%
0
0%
5
56%
37
45%
44
50%
_
_
_
_
7
37%
74
49%
0
0%
81
48%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 170
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
168
99%
65
154
91%
85
81
48%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 156
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
155
99%
65
146
94%
85
81
52%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 14
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
13
93%
65
8
57%
85
0
0%
American Indian or Alaska Native
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 161
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
159
99%
65
148
92%
85
76
47%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 9
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
9
100%
65
6
67%
85
5
56%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 82
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
80
98%
65
74
90%
85
37
45%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 88
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
88
100%
65
80
91%
85
44
50%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 169
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 19
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
19
100%
65
16
84%
85
7
37%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 151
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
149
99%
65
138
91%
85
74
49%
Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 170
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
168
99%
65
154
91%
85
81
48%
U.S. History & Government
Regents U.S. History & Government
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Migrant
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
146
126
20
1
0
0
2
143
0
146
85
61
146
0
16
130
0
146
55
141
97%
124
98%
17
85%
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
141
97%
83
98%
58
95%
141
97%
0
0%
15
94%
126
97%
0
0%
141
97%
65
135
92%
120
95%
15
75%
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
135
92%
81
95%
54
89%
135
92%
0
0%
15
94%
120
92%
0
0%
135
92%
85
88
60%
84
67%
4
20%
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
88
60%
52
61%
36
59%
88
60%
0
0%
6
38%
82
63%
0
0%
88
60%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 146
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
141
97%
65
135
92%
85
88
60%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 126
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
124
98%
65
120
95%
85
84
67%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 20
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
17
85%
65
15
75%
85
4
20%
American Indian or Alaska Native
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 143
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 146
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
141
97%
65
135
92%
85
88
60%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 85
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
83
98%
65
81
95%
85
52
61%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 61
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
58
95%
65
54
89%
85
36
59%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 146
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
141
97%
65
135
92%
85
88
60%
English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 16
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
15
94%
65
15
94%
85
6
38%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 130
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
126
97%
65
120
92%
85
82
63%
Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 146
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
141
97%
65
135
92%
85
88
60%
Living Environment
Regents Living Environment
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Migrant
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
166
151
15
1
2
0
4
159
0
7
84
82
165
1
20
146
0
166
55
162
98%
150
99%
12
80%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
_
_
155
97%
0
0%
7
100%
82
98%
80
98%
_
_
_
_
20
100%
142
97%
0
0%
162
98%
65
157
95%
147
97%
10
67%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
_
_
150
94%
0
0%
7
100%
81
96%
76
93%
_
_
_
_
18
90%
139
95%
0
0%
157
95%
85
97
58%
96
64%
1
7%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
_
_
92
58%
0
0%
5
71%
50
60%
47
57%
_
_
_
_
10
50%
87
60%
0
0%
97
58%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 166
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
162
98%
65
157
95%
85
97
58%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 151
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
150
99%
65
147
97%
85
96
64%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 15
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
12
80%
65
10
67%
85
1
7%
American Indian or Alaska Native
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 4
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 159
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
155
97%
65
150
94%
85
92
58%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 7
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
7
100%
65
7
100%
85
5
71%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 84
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
82
98%
65
81
96%
85
50
60%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 82
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
80
98%
65
76
93%
85
47
57%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 165
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 20
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
20
100%
65
18
90%
85
10
50%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 146
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
142
97%
65
139
95%
85
87
60%
Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 166
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
162
98%
65
157
95%
85
97
58%
Physical Setting/Earth Science
Regents Physical Setting/Earth Science
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Migrant
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
179
164
15
0
1
0
0
177
1
179
99
80
179
0
24
155
0
179
55
165
92%
154
94%
11
73%
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
165
92%
93
94%
72
90%
165
92%
0
0%
22
92%
143
92%
0
0%
165
92%
65
155
87%
147
90%
8
53%
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
155
87%
86
87%
69
86%
155
87%
0
0%
17
71%
138
89%
0
0%
155
87%
85
89
50%
85
52%
4
27%
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
89
50%
50
51%
39
49%
89
50%
0
0%
7
29%
82
53%
0
0%
89
50%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 179
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
165
92%
65
155
87%
85
89
50%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 164
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
154
94%
65
147
90%
85
85
52%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 15
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
11
73%
65
8
53%
85
4
27%
American Indian or Alaska Native
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 177
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 179
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
165
92%
65
155
87%
85
89
50%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 99
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
93
94%
65
86
87%
85
50
51%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 80
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
72
90%
65
69
86%
85
39
49%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 179
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
165
92%
65
155
87%
85
89
50%
English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 24
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
22
92%
65
17
71%
85
7
29%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 155
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
143
92%
65
138
89%
85
82
53%
Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 179
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
165
92%
65
155
87%
85
89
50%
Physical Setting/Chemistry
Regents Physical Setting/Chemistry
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Migrant
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
87
84
3
0
1
0
0
86
0
87
51
36
87
0
8
79
0
87
55
84
97%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
84
97%
48
94%
36
100%
84
97%
0
0%
8
100%
76
96%
0
0%
84
97%
65
71
82%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
71
82%
37
73%
34
94%
71
82%
0
0%
6
75%
65
82%
0
0%
71
82%
85
21
24%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
21
24%
10
20%
11
31%
21
24%
0
0%
1
13%
20
25%
0
0%
21
24%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 87
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
84
97%
65
71
82%
85
21
24%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 84
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
American Indian or Alaska Native
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 86
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 87
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
84
97%
65
71
82%
85
21
24%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 51
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
48
94%
65
37
73%
85
10
20%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 36
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
36
100%
65
34
94%
85
11
31%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 87
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
84
97%
65
71
82%
85
21
24%
English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 8
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
8
100%
65
6
75%
85
1
13%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 79
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
76
96%
65
65
82%
85
20
25%
Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 87
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
84
97%
65
71
82%
85
21
24%
Physical Setting/Physics
Regents Physical Setting/Physics
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Migrant
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
67
66
1
0
0
0
1
65
1
67
39
28
67
0
2
65
0
67
55
62
93%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
62
93%
37
95%
25
89%
62
93%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
62
93%
65
50
75%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
50
75%
27
69%
23
82%
50
75%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
50
75%
85
16
24%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
16
24%
6
15%
10
36%
16
24%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
16
24%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 67
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
62
93%
65
50
75%
85
16
24%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 66
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
American Indian or Alaska Native
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 65
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 67
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
62
93%
65
50
75%
85
16
24%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 39
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
37
95%
65
27
69%
85
6
15%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 28
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
25
89%
65
23
82%
85
10
36%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 67
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
62
93%
65
50
75%
85
16
24%
English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 65
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 67
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
62
93%
65
50
75%
85
16
24%
Regents Competency Test Results (2012 - 13)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Migrant
Not Migrant
Reading
3
_
Writing
2
_
Global Studies
4
_
US Hist & Gov't
3
_
Science
2
_
0
_
0
_
0
_
0
_
0
_
3
_
2
_
4
_
3
_
2
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
3
_
2
_
4
_
3
_
2
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
3
_
2
_
4
_
3
_
2
_
1
_
1
_
2
_
2
_
1
_
2
_
1
_
2
_
1
_
1
_
3
_
2
_
4
_
3
_
2
_
0
_
0
_
0
_
0
_
0
_
1
_
0
_
0
_
0
_
0
_
2
_
2
_
4
_
3
_
2
_
0
_
0
_
0
_
0
_
0
_
3
_
2
_
4
_
3
_
2
_
All Students
Reading
Number Tested
3
Percent Passing
_
Writing
Number Tested
2
Percent Passing
_
Global Studies
Number Tested
4
Percent Passing
_
US Hist & Gov't
Number Tested
3
Percent Passing
_
Science
Number Tested
2
Percent Passing
_
General Education
Reading
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
_
Writing
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
_
Global Studies
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
_
US Hist & Gov't
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
_
Science
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
_
Students with Disabilities
Reading
Number Tested
3
Percent Passing
_
Writing
Number Tested
2
Percent Passing
_
Global Studies
Number Tested
4
Percent Passing
_
US Hist & Gov't
Number Tested
3
Percent Passing
_
Science
Number Tested
2
Percent Passing
_
American Indian or Alaska Native
Reading
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
0%
Writing
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
0%
Global Studies
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
0%
US Hist & Gov't
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
0%
Science
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Reading
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
0%
Writing
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
0%
Global Studies
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
0%
US Hist & Gov't
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
0%
Science
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
0%
Black or African American
Reading
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
0%
Writing
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
0%
Global Studies
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
0%
US Hist & Gov't
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
0%
Science
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
0%
Hispanic or Latino
Reading
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
0%
Writing
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
0%
Global Studies
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
0%
US Hist & Gov't
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
0%
Science
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
0%
White
Reading
Number Tested
3
Percent Passing
_
Writing
Number Tested
2
Percent Passing
_
Global Studies
Number Tested
4
Percent Passing
_
US Hist & Gov't
Number Tested
3
Percent Passing
_
Science
Number Tested
2
Percent Passing
_
Multiracial
Reading
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
0%
Writing
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
0%
Global Studies
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
0%
US Hist & Gov't
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
0%
Science
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
0%
Small Group Total
Reading
Number Tested
3
Percent Passing
_
Writing
Number Tested
2
Percent Passing
_
Global Studies
Number Tested
4
Percent Passing
_
US Hist & Gov't
Number Tested
3
Percent Passing
_
Science
Number Tested
2
Percent Passing
_
Female
Reading
Number Tested
1
Percent Passing
_
Writing
Number Tested
1
Percent Passing
_
Global Studies
Number Tested
2
Percent Passing
_
US Hist & Gov't
Number Tested
2
Percent Passing
_
Science
Number Tested
1
Percent Passing
_
Male
Reading
Number Tested
2
Percent Passing
_
Writing
Number Tested
1
Percent Passing
_
Global Studies
Number Tested
2
Percent Passing
_
US Hist & Gov't
Number Tested
1
Percent Passing
_
Science
Number Tested
1
Percent Passing
_
Non-English Language Learners
Reading
Number Tested
3
Percent Passing
_
Writing
Number Tested
2
Percent Passing
_
Global Studies
Number Tested
4
Percent Passing
_
US Hist & Gov't
Number Tested
3
Percent Passing
_
Science
Number Tested
2
Percent Passing
_
English Language Learners
Reading
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
_
Writing
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
_
Global Studies
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
_
US Hist & Gov't
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
_
Science
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
_
Economically Disadvantaged
Reading
Number Tested
1
Percent Passing
_
Writing
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
_
Global Studies
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
_
US Hist & Gov't
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
_
Science
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
_
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Reading
Number Tested
2
Percent Passing
_
Writing
Number Tested
2
Percent Passing
_
Global Studies
Number Tested
4
Percent Passing
_
US Hist & Gov't
Number Tested
3
Percent Passing
_
Science
Number Tested
2
Percent Passing
_
Migrant
Reading
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
_
Writing
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
_
Global Studies
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
_
US Hist & Gov't
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
_
Science
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
_
Not Migrant
Reading
Number Tested
3
Percent Passing
_
Writing
Number Tested
2
Percent Passing
_
Global Studies
Number Tested
4
Percent Passing
_
US Hist & Gov't
Number Tested
3
Percent Passing
_
Science
Number Tested
2
Percent Passing
_
New York State Alternate Assessment (NYSAA) Results (2012 - 13)
GROUP
Grade 3 ELA
Grade 3 Math
Grade 4 ELA
Grade 4 Math
Grade 4 Science
Grade 5 ELA
Grade 5 Math
Grade 6 ELA
Grade 6 Math
Grade 7 ELA
Grade 7 Math
Secondary-Level ELA
Secondary-Level Math
Secondary-Level Science
Secondary-Level Social Studies
TOTAL TESTED
2
2
2
2
2
4
4
1
1
4
4
1
1
1
1
PROFICIENT
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
LEVEL 1
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
Grade 3 ELA
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 3 Math
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 4 ELA
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 4 Math
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 4 Science
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 5 ELA
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 5 Math
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 6 ELA
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 6 Math
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 7 ELA
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 7 Math
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Secondary-Level ELA
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Secondary-Level Math
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Secondary-Level Science
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Secondary-Level Social Studies
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
New York State English as a Second Language Achievement Test (NYSESLAT) Results (2012 - 13)
Kindergarten
GROUP
All Students
General Education
TOTAL TESTED
3
3
BEGINNING
_
_
INTERMEDIATE
_
_
ADVANCED
_
_
PROFICIENT
_
_
Grade 1
GROUP
All Students
General Education
TOTAL TESTED
1
1
BEGINNING
_
_
INTERMEDIATE
_
_
ADVANCED
_
_
PROFICIENT
_
_
Grade 7
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED
2
1
1
BEGINNING
_
_
_
INTERMEDIATE
_
_
_
ADVANCED
_
_
_
PROFICIENT
_
_
_
Grade 10
GROUP
All Students
General Education
TOTAL TESTED
1
1
BEGINNING
_
_
INTERMEDIATE
_
_
ADVANCED
_
_
PROFICIENT
_
_
Kindergarten
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 3
BEGINNING
_
INTERMEDIATE
_
ADVANCED
_
PROFICIENT
_
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 3
BEGINNING
_
INTERMEDIATE
_
ADVANCED
_
PROFICIENT
_
Grade 1
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 1
BEGINNING
_
INTERMEDIATE
_
ADVANCED
_
PROFICIENT
_
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 1
BEGINNING
_
INTERMEDIATE
_
ADVANCED
_
PROFICIENT
_
Grade 7
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 2
BEGINNING
_
INTERMEDIATE
_
ADVANCED
_
PROFICIENT
_
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 1
BEGINNING
_
INTERMEDIATE
_
ADVANCED
_
PROFICIENT
_
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 1
BEGINNING
_
INTERMEDIATE
_
ADVANCED
_
PROFICIENT
_
Grade 10
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 1
BEGINNING
_
INTERMEDIATE
_
ADVANCED
_
PROFICIENT
_
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 1
BEGINNING
_
INTERMEDIATE
_
ADVANCED
_
PROFICIENT
_
Elementary/Middle-Level English Language Arts Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: YES
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
YES
―
YES
Tested 95%
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
YES
―
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
869
2
3
0
12
846
6
109
2
167
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
―
―
―
―
100%
―
100%
―
99%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
YES
―
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
856
2
3
0
11
835
5
117✝
1
160
PI
133
―
―
―
―
133
―
59✝
―
87
EAMO
78
―
―
―
―
101
―
25
―
58
Safe Harbor Target
78
―
―
―
―
101
―
25
―
58
All Students
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
869
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
856
PI
133
EAMO
78
Safe Harbor Target
78
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
2
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
2
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
3
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
3
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
12
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
11
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
White
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
846
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
835
PI
133
EAMO
101
Safe Harbor Target
101
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
6
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
5
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
109
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
117✝
PI
59✝
EAMO
25
Safe Harbor Target
25
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
2
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
167
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
99%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
160
PI
87
EAMO
58
Safe Harbor Target
58
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
867
866
869
857
23
863
760
867
702
455
414
0
869
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
100%
100%
100%
―
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
―
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
854
853
856
845
21
851
749
855
696
446
410
0
856
PI
133
133
133
133
―
133
144
133
143
119
148
―
133
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
867
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
854
PI
133
Not Black or African American
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
866
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
853
PI
133
Not Hispanic or Latino
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
869
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
856
PI
133
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
857
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
845
PI
133
Not White
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
23
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
21
PI
―
Not Multiracial
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
863
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
851
PI
133
General Education
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
760
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
749
PI
144
English Proficient
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
867
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
855
PI
133
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
702
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
696
PI
143
Male
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
455
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
446
PI
119
Female
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
414
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
410
PI
148
Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
869
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
856
PI
133
― There were fewer than 40 students enrolled during the test administration period, so the Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 tested students enrolled on BEDS day and during the test administration period, so the PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed. ✝ Includes former students with disabilities because the number of students with disabilities in the current year is equal to or greater than 30.
Elementary/Middle-Level Mathematics Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: YES
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
YES
―
YES
Tested 95%
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
YES
―
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
869
2
3
0
12
846
6
109
2
167
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
―
―
―
―
100%
―
100%
―
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
YES
―
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
859
2
3
0
12
836
6
117✝
2
162
PI
138
―
―
―
―
138
―
73✝
―
94
EAMO
75
―
―
―
―
95
―
27
―
54
Safe Harbor Target
75
―
―
―
―
95
―
27
―
54
All Students
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
869
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
859
PI
138
EAMO
75
Safe Harbor Target
75
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
2
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
2
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
3
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
3
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
12
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
12
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
White
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
846
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
836
PI
138
EAMO
95
Safe Harbor Target
95
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
6
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
6
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
109
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
117✝
PI
73✝
EAMO
27
Safe Harbor Target
27
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
2
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
2
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
167
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
162
PI
94
EAMO
54
Safe Harbor Target
54
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
867
866
869
857
23
863
760
867
702
455
414
0
869
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
100%
100%
100%
―
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
―
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
857
856
859
847
23
853
752
857
697
447
412
0
859
PI
138
138
138
137
―
139
148
138
148
136
141
―
138
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
867
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
857
PI
138
Not Black or African American
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
866
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
856
PI
138
Not Hispanic or Latino
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
869
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
859
PI
138
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
857
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
847
PI
137
Not White
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
23
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
23
PI
―
Not Multiracial
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
863
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
853
PI
139
General Education
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
760
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
752
PI
148
English Proficient
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
867
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
857
PI
138
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
702
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
697
PI
148
Male
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
455
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
447
PI
136
Female
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
414
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
412
PI
141
Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
869
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
859
PI
138
― There were fewer than 40 students enrolled during the test administration period, so the Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 tested students enrolled on BEDS day and during the test administration period, so the PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed. ✝ Includes former students with disabilities because the number of students with disabilities in the current year is equal to or greater than 30.
Elementary/Middle-Level Science Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: YES
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
YES
―
YES
Tested 80%
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
YES
―
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
294
2
1
0
2
287
2
40
0
60
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
―
―
―
―
98%
―
100%
―
95%
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
YES
―
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
288
2
1
0
2
281
2
41✝
0
57
PI
187
―
―
―
―
186
―
141✝
―
175
EAMO
175
―
―
―
―
186
―
143
―
158
Progress Target
175
―
―
―
―
186
―
1
―
158
All Students
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 80%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
294
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
288
PI
187
EAMO
175
Progress Target
175
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
2
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
2
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
2
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
2
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
White
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 80%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
287
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
281
PI
186
EAMO
186
Progress Target
186
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
2
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
2
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 80%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
40
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
41✝
PI
141✝
EAMO
143
Progress Target
1
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 80%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
60
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
95%
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
57
PI
175
EAMO
158
Progress Target
158
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
292
293
294
292
7
292
254
294
234
158
136
0
294
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
98%
98%
98%
―
98%
98%
98%
99%
99%
98%
―
98%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
286
287
288
286
7
286
249
288
231
155
133
0
288
PI
187
187
187
187
―
187
194
187
190
186
187
―
187
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
292
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
286
PI
187
Not Black or African American
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
293
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
287
PI
187
Not Hispanic or Latino
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
294
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
288
PI
187
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
292
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
286
PI
187
Not White
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
7
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
7
PI
―
Not Multiracial
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
292
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
286
PI
187
General Education
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
254
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
249
PI
194
English Proficient
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
294
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
288
PI
187
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
234
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
99%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
231
PI
190
Male
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
158
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
99%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
155
PI
186
Female
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
136
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
133
PI
187
Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
294
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
288
PI
187
― There were fewer than 40 students enrolled during the test administration period, so the Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 tested students enrolled on BEDS day and during the test administration period, so the PI, EAMO, and Progress Target data are suppressed. ✝ Includes former students with disabilities because the number of students with disabilities in the current year is equal to or greater than 30.
Secondary-Level English Language Arts Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: YES
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
―
Tested 95%
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
―
12th graders
173
0
1
3
1
167
1
14
0
13
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
―
―
―
―
100%
―
―
―
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
160
0
0
3
1
155
1
14
0
14
PI
181
―
―
―
―
181
―
―
―
―
EAMO
155
―
―
―
―
168
―
―
―
―
Safe Harbor Target
155
―
―
―
―
168
―
―
―
―
All Students
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
YES
12th Graders
173
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
160
PI
181
EAMO
155
Safe Harbor Target
155
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
1
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
3
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
3
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
1
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
1
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
White
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
YES
12th Graders
167
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
155
PI
181
EAMO
168
Safe Harbor Target
168
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
1
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
1
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
14
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
14
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
13
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
14
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
12th Graders
173
172
170
172
6
172
159
173
160
85
88
0
173
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
100%
100%
100%
―
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
―
100%
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
160
160
157
159
5
159
146
160
146
76
84
0
160
PI
181
181
181
181
―
181
187
181
182
167
193
―
181
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
12th Graders
173
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
160
PI
181
Not Black or African American
12th Graders
172
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
160
PI
181
Not Hispanic or Latino
12th Graders
170
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
157
PI
181
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
12th Graders
172
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
159
PI
181
Not White
12th Graders
6
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
5
PI
―
Not Multiracial
12th Graders
172
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
159
PI
181
General Education
12th Graders
159
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
146
PI
187
English Proficient
12th Graders
173
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
160
PI
181
Not Economically Disadvantaged
12th Graders
160
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
146
PI
182
Male
12th Graders
85
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
76
PI
167
Female
12th Graders
88
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
84
PI
193
Migrant
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
Not Migrant
12th Graders
173
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
160
PI
181
― There were fewer than 40 12th graders, so the Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 students in the 2009 accountability cohort, so PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed.
Secondary-Level Mathematics Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: YES
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
―
Tested 95%
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
―
12th graders
173
0
1
3
1
167
1
14
0
13
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
―
―
―
―
100%
―
―
―
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
160
0
0
3
1
155
1
14
0
14
PI
163
―
―
―
―
163
―
―
―
―
EAMO
134
―
―
―
―
150
―
―
―
―
Safe Harbor Target
134
―
―
―
―
150
―
―
―
―
All Students
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
YES
12th Graders
173
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
160
PI
163
EAMO
134
Safe Harbor Target
134
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
1
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
3
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
3
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
1
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
1
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
White
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
YES
12th Graders
167
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
155
PI
163
EAMO
150
Safe Harbor Target
150
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
1
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
1
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
14
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
14
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
13
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
14
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
12th Graders
173
172
170
172
6
172
159
173
160
85
88
0
173
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
100%
100%
100%
―
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
―
100%
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
160
160
157
159
5
159
146
160
146
76
84
0
160
PI
163
163
163
163
―
163
170
163
165
155
170
―
163
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
12th Graders
173
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
160
PI
163
Not Black or African American
12th Graders
172
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
160
PI
163
Not Hispanic or Latino
12th Graders
170
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
157
PI
163
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
12th Graders
172
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
159
PI
163
Not White
12th Graders
6
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
5
PI
―
Not Multiracial
12th Graders
172
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
159
PI
163
General Education
12th Graders
159
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
146
PI
170
English Proficient
12th Graders
173
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
160
PI
163
Not Economically Disadvantaged
12th Graders
160
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
146
PI
165
Male
12th Graders
85
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
76
PI
155
Female
12th Graders
88
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
84
PI
170
Migrant
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
Not Migrant
12th Graders
173
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2009 Accountability Cohort Members
160
PI
163
― There were fewer than 40 12th graders, so the Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 students in the 2009 accountability cohort, so PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed.
Unweighted Combined ELA and Math PIs
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
133
―
―
―
―
133
―
59
―
87
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
138
―
―
―
―
138
―
73
―
94
Secondary-Level ELA PI
181
―
―
―
―
181
―
―
―
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
163
―
―
―
―
163
―
―
―
―
UNWEIGHTED COMBINED PI
154
0
0
0
0
154
0
66
0
91
All Students
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
133
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
138
Secondary-Level ELA PI
181
Secondary-Level MATH PI
163
Unweighted Combined PI
154
American Indian or Alaska Native
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Black or African American
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Hispanic or Latino
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
White
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
133
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
138
Secondary-Level ELA PI
181
Secondary-Level MATH PI
163
Unweighted Combined PI
154
Multiracial
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Students With Disabilities
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
59
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
73
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
66
Limited English Proficient
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Economically Disadvantaged
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
87
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
94
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
91
― There were not enough students to determine a Performance Index.
Overall Graduation Rate for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: YES
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
―
All Students
MADE AYP
YES
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP
―
White
MADE AYP
YES
Multiracial
MADE AYP
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP
―
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
―
― There were not enough students to make an AYP determination.
Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort for Accountability
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion:
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
―
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
162
2
0
1
0
158
1
14
0
21
Graduation Rate
90%
―
―
―
―
90%
―
―
―
―
State Standard
80%
―
―
―
―
80%
―
―
―
―
Progress Target
80%
―
―
―
―
80%
―
―
―
―
All Students
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
162
Graduation Rate
90%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%
American Indian or Alaska Native
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
2
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Black or African American
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
1
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
White
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
158
Graduation Rate
90%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%
Multiracial
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
1
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Students With Disabilities
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
14
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Limited English Proficient
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
21
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
YES Graduation rate is equal to or greater than the State Standard or the group's Progress Target. NO Graduation rate is less than the State Standard and the group's Progress Target.
― There were fewer than 30 students in the cohort.
Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort for Accountability
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion:
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
―
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
186
1
2
0
2
181
0
12
0
15
Graduation Rate
94%
―
―
―
―
94%
―
―
―
―
State Standard
80%
―
―
―
―
80%
―
―
―
―
Progress Target
80%
―
―
―
―
80%
―
―
―
―
All Students
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
186
Graduation Rate
94%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%
American Indian or Alaska Native
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
1
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Black or African American
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
2
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
2
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
White
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
181
Graduation Rate
94%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%
Multiracial
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Students With Disabilities
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
12
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Limited English Proficient
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
15
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
YES Graduation rate is equal to or greater than the State Standard or the group's Progress Target. NO Graduation rate is less than the State Standard and the group's Progress Target.
― There were fewer than 30 students in the cohort.
Graduation Rates for Non-AYP Groups for Accountability
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
160
162
161
162
4
161
148
162
141
92
70
0
162
Graduation Rate
90%
90%
90%
90%
―
90%
91%
90%
92%
87%
94%
―
90%
Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
2007 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
185
184
186
184
5
186
174
186
171
95
91
0
186
Graduation Rate
94%
95%
94%
94%
―
94%
97%
94%
95%
93%
96%
―
94%
Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
160
Graduation Rate
90%
Not Black or African American
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
162
Graduation Rate
90%
Not Hispanic or Latino
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
161
Graduation Rate
90%
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
162
Graduation Rate
90%
Not White
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
4
Graduation Rate
―
Not Multiracial
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
161
Graduation Rate
90%
General Education
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
148
Graduation Rate
91%
English Proficient
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
162
Graduation Rate
90%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
141
Graduation Rate
92%
Male
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
92
Graduation Rate
87%
Female
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
70
Graduation Rate
94%
Migrant
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
Not Migrant
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
162
Graduation Rate
90%
Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
185
Graduation Rate
94%
Not Black or African American
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
184
Graduation Rate
95%
Not Hispanic or Latino
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
186
Graduation Rate
94%
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
184
Graduation Rate
94%
Not White
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
5
Graduation Rate
―
Not Multiracial
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
186
Graduation Rate
94%
General Education
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
174
Graduation Rate
97%
English Proficient
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
186
Graduation Rate
94%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
171
Graduation Rate
95%
Male
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
95
Graduation Rate
93%
Female
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
91
Graduation Rate
96%
Migrant
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
Not Migrant
2007 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
186
Graduation Rate
94%
― There were fewer than 30 students in the cohort.
Graduation Rates for Regents with Advanced Designation and CTE Endorsement for Accountability
Percentage of 2008 Graduation-Rate Total Cohort members who graduated as of August 31, 2012 with:
Regents Diploma with an Advanced Designation (This District)
50%
Regents Diploma with an Advanced Designation (Statewide)
30%
Percentage in This District Exceeded Statewide
YES
Regents Diploma with an Advanced Designation (This District)
50%
Regents Diploma with an Advanced Designation (Statewide)
30%
Percentage in This District Exceeded Statewide
YES
Regents Diploma with CTE Endorsement (This District)
1%
Regents Diploma with CTE Endorsement (Statewide)
3%
Percentage in This District Exceeded Statewide
NO
Regents Diploma with CTE Endorsement (This District)
You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.
Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.
If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.
