FONDA-FULTONVILLE CSD - School Report Card Data [2016 - 17]
The New York State Report Card is an important part of the Board of Regents' effort to raise learning standards for all students. It provides information to the public on school/district enrollment and staff, student performance, and other measures of school and district performance. Knowledge gained from the report card on a school's or district's strengths and weaknesses can be used to improve instruction and services to students. Report Card Data - Glossary of Terms | Accountability Data - Glossary of Terms | Business Rules
Turnover Rate of Teachers with Fewer Than Five Years of Experience
0%
TURNOVER RATE OF ALL TEACHERS
7%
Teacher Turnover Rate (2015-16 to 2016-17)
Turnover Rate of Teachers with Fewer Than Five Years of Experience
0%
Turnover Rate of All Teachers
7%
Staff Counts (2016 - 17)
GROUP
PRINCIPALS
ASSISTANT PRINCIPALS
OTHER PROFESSIONAL STAFF
PARAPROFESSIONALS
STAFF
3
0
6
25
Staff Counts (2016 - 17)
Principals
3
Assistant Principals
0
Other Professional Staff
6
Paraprofessionals
25
Teacher Qualifications (2016 - 17)
TOTAL TEACHERS
105
PERCENT WITH NO VALID TEACHING CERTIFICATE
0%
PERCENT TEACHING OUT OF CERTIFICATE
2%
PERCENT WITH FEWER THAN THREE YEARS OF EXPERIENCE
4%
PERCENTAGE WITH MASTER'S DEGREEPLUS 30 HOURS OR DOCTORATE
4%
Total Number of Classes
431
Percent Taught by Teachers Without Appropriate Certification
2%
Teacher Qualifications (2016 - 17)
TOTAL TEACHERS: 105
Percent with No Valid Teaching Certificate
0%
Percent Teaching Out of Certification
2%
Percent with Fewer Than Three Years of Experience
4%
Percentage with Master's Degree Plus 30 Hours or Doctorate
4%
Total Number of Classes
431
Percent Taught by Teachers Without Appropriate Certification
2%
High School Completers (2016 - 17)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
91
76
15
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
90
76
14
REGENTS DIPLOMA
84
93%
75
99%
9
64%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
REGENTS WITH ADVANCED DESIGNATION
36
40%
36
47%
0
0%
REGENTS WITH CTE ENDORSEMENT
11
12%
9
12%
2
14%
LOCAL DIPLOMAS
6
7%
1
1%
5
36%
COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS
1
1%
0
0%
1
7%
All Students
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
91
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
90
Regents Diploma
84
93%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
36
40%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
11
12%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
6
7%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
1
1%
of Completers
General Education
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
76
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
76
Regents Diploma
75
99%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
36
47%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
9
12%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
1
1%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
0
0%
of Completers
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
15
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
14
Regents Diploma
9
64%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
0
0%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
2
14%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
5
36%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
1
7%
of Completers
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
91
76
15
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
90
76
14
REGENTS DIPLOMA
84
93%
75
99%
9
64%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
REGENTS WITH ADVANCED DESIGNATION
36
40%
36
47%
0
0%
REGENTS WITH CTE ENDORSEMENT
11
12%
9
12%
2
14%
LOCAL DIPLOMAS
6
7%
1
1%
5
36%
COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS
1
1%
0
0%
1
7%
All Students
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
91
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
90
Regents Diploma
84
93%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
36
40%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
11
12%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
6
7%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
1
1%
of Completers
General Education
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
76
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
76
Regents Diploma
75
99%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
36
47%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
9
12%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
1
1%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
0
0%
of Completers
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
15
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
14
Regents Diploma
9
64%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
0
0%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
2
14%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
5
36%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
1
7%
of Completers
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
91
76
15
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
90
76
14
REGENTS DIPLOMA
84
93%
75
99%
9
64%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
REGENTS WITH ADVANCED DESIGNATION
36
40%
36
47%
0
0%
REGENTS WITH CTE ENDORSEMENT
11
12%
9
12%
2
14%
LOCAL DIPLOMAS
6
7%
1
1%
5
36%
COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS
1
1%
0
0%
1
7%
All Students
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
91
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
90
Regents Diploma
84
93%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
36
40%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
11
12%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
6
7%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
1
1%
of Completers
General Education
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
76
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
76
Regents Diploma
75
99%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
36
47%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
9
12%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
1
1%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
0
0%
of Completers
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
15
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
14
Regents Diploma
9
64%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
0
0%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
2
14%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
5
36%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
1
7%
of Completers
High School Non-completers (2016 - 17)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
_
_
_
_
_
_
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
_
_
_
_
_
_
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
_
_
_
_
_
_
All Students
DROPPED OUT
_
_%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
_
_%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
_
_%
General Education
DROPPED OUT
_
_%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
_
_%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
_
_%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
_
_%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
_
_%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
_
_
_
_
_
_
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
_
_
_
_
_
_
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
_
_
_
_
_
_
All Students
DROPPED OUT
_
_%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
_
_%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
_
_%
General Education
DROPPED OUT
_
_%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
_
_%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
_
_%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
_
_%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
_
_%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
_
_
_
_
_
_
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
_
_
_
_
_
_
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
_
_
_
_
_
_
All Students
DROPPED OUT
_
_%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
_
_%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
_
_%
General Education
DROPPED OUT
_
_%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
_
_%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
_
_%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
_
_%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
_
_%
Post-graduation Plans of Completers (2016 - 17)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO FOUR-YEAR COLLEGE
28
31%
27
36%
1
7%
TO TWO-YEAR COLLEGE
32
35%
27
36%
5
33%
TO OTHER POST-SECONDARY
3
3%
3
4%
0
0%
TO THE MILITARY
5
5%
4
5%
1
7%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO EMPLOYMENT
20
22%
14
18%
6
40%
TO ADULT SERVICES
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
TO OTHER KNOWN PLANS
3
3%
1
1%
2
13%
PLANS UNKNOWN
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
All Students
To Four-Year College
28
31%
To Two-Year College
32
35%
To Other Post-Secondary
3
3%
To the Military
5
5%
To Employment
20
22%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
3
3%
Plan Unknown
0
0%
General Education
To Four-Year College
27
36%
To Two-Year College
27
36%
To Other Post-Secondary
3
4%
To the Military
4
5%
To Employment
14
18%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
1
1%
Plan Unknown
0
0%
Students with Disabilities
To Four-Year College
1
7%
To Two-Year College
5
33%
To Other Post-Secondary
0
0%
To the Military
1
7%
To Employment
6
40%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
2
13%
Plan Unknown
0
0%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO FOUR-YEAR COLLEGE
28
31%
27
36%
1
7%
TO TWO-YEAR COLLEGE
32
35%
27
36%
5
33%
TO OTHER POST-SECONDARY
3
3%
3
4%
0
0%
TO THE MILITARY
5
5%
4
5%
1
7%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO EMPLOYMENT
20
22%
14
18%
6
40%
TO ADULT SERVICES
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
TO OTHER KNOWN PLANS
3
3%
1
1%
2
13%
PLANS UNKNOWN
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
All Students
To Four-Year College
28
31%
To Two-Year College
32
35%
To Other Post-Secondary
3
3%
To the Military
5
5%
To Employment
20
22%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
3
3%
Plan Unknown
0
0%
General Education
To Four-Year College
27
36%
To Two-Year College
27
36%
To Other Post-Secondary
3
4%
To the Military
4
5%
To Employment
14
18%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
1
1%
Plan Unknown
0
0%
Students with Disabilities
To Four-Year College
1
7%
To Two-Year College
5
33%
To Other Post-Secondary
0
0%
To the Military
1
7%
To Employment
6
40%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
2
13%
Plan Unknown
0
0%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO FOUR-YEAR COLLEGE
28
31%
27
36%
1
7%
TO TWO-YEAR COLLEGE
32
35%
27
36%
5
33%
TO OTHER POST-SECONDARY
3
3%
3
4%
0
0%
TO THE MILITARY
5
5%
4
5%
1
7%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO EMPLOYMENT
20
22%
14
18%
6
40%
TO ADULT SERVICES
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
TO OTHER KNOWN PLANS
3
3%
1
1%
2
13%
PLANS UNKNOWN
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
All Students
To Four-Year College
28
31%
To Two-Year College
32
35%
To Other Post-Secondary
3
3%
To the Military
5
5%
To Employment
20
22%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
3
3%
Plan Unknown
0
0%
General Education
To Four-Year College
27
36%
To Two-Year College
27
36%
To Other Post-Secondary
3
4%
To the Military
4
5%
To Employment
14
18%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
1
1%
Plan Unknown
0
0%
Students with Disabilities
To Four-Year College
1
7%
To Two-Year College
5
33%
To Other Post-Secondary
0
0%
To the Military
1
7%
To Employment
6
40%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
2
13%
Plan Unknown
0
0%
Grade 3 English Language Arts
MEAN SCORE: 309
All Students
PROFICIENT
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 93
LEVEL 1
22
24%
LEVEL 2
31
33%
LEVEL 3
33
35%
LEVEL 4
7
8%
General Education
PROFICIENT
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 78
LEVEL 1
13
17%
LEVEL 2
26
33%
LEVEL 3
32
41%
LEVEL 4
7
9%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 15
LEVEL 1
9
60%
LEVEL 2
5
33%
LEVEL 3
1
7%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 82
LEVEL 1
18
22%
LEVEL 2
28
34%
LEVEL 3
30
37%
LEVEL 4
6
7%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 7
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 11
LEVEL 1
4
36%
LEVEL 2
3
27%
LEVEL 3
3
27%
LEVEL 4
1
9%
Female
PROFICIENT
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 53
LEVEL 1
13
25%
LEVEL 2
17
32%
LEVEL 3
21
40%
LEVEL 4
2
4%
Male
PROFICIENT
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 40
LEVEL 1
9
23%
LEVEL 2
14
35%
LEVEL 3
12
30%
LEVEL 4
5
13%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 93
LEVEL 1
22
24%
LEVEL 2
31
33%
LEVEL 3
33
35%
LEVEL 4
7
8%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 43
LEVEL 1
17
40%
LEVEL 2
12
28%
LEVEL 3
12
28%
LEVEL 4
2
5%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 50
LEVEL 1
5
10%
LEVEL 2
19
38%
LEVEL 3
21
42%
LEVEL 4
5
10%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 93
LEVEL 1
22
24%
LEVEL 2
31
33%
LEVEL 3
33
35%
LEVEL 4
7
8%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
93
78
15
1
3
82
7
11
53
40
93
43
50
93
PROFICIENT
43%
50%
7%
_%
_%
44%
_%
36%
43%
43%
43%
33%
52%
43%
LEVEL 1
22
24%
13
17%
9
60%
_
_
_
_
18
22%
_
_
4
36%
13
25%
9
23%
22
24%
17
40%
5
10%
22
24%
LEVEL 2
31
33%
26
33%
5
33%
_
_
_
_
28
34%
_
_
3
27%
17
32%
14
35%
31
33%
12
28%
19
38%
31
33%
LEVEL 3
33
35%
32
41%
1
7%
_
_
_
_
30
37%
_
_
3
27%
21
40%
12
30%
33
35%
12
28%
21
42%
33
35%
LEVEL 4
7
8%
7
9%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
6
7%
_
_
1
9%
2
4%
5
13%
7
8%
2
5%
5
10%
7
8%
Grade 4 English Language Arts
MEAN SCORE: 302
All Students
PROFICIENT
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 100
LEVEL 1
28
28%
LEVEL 2
39
39%
LEVEL 3
28
28%
LEVEL 4
5
5%
General Education
PROFICIENT
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 87
LEVEL 1
17
20%
LEVEL 2
37
43%
LEVEL 3
28
32%
LEVEL 4
5
6%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 13
LEVEL 1
11
85%
LEVEL 2
2
15%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 97
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 100
LEVEL 1
28
28%
LEVEL 2
39
39%
LEVEL 3
28
28%
LEVEL 4
5
5%
Female
PROFICIENT
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 50
LEVEL 1
8
16%
LEVEL 2
21
42%
LEVEL 3
16
32%
LEVEL 4
5
10%
Male
PROFICIENT
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 50
LEVEL 1
20
40%
LEVEL 2
18
36%
LEVEL 3
12
24%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 100
LEVEL 1
28
28%
LEVEL 2
39
39%
LEVEL 3
28
28%
LEVEL 4
5
5%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 37
LEVEL 1
14
38%
LEVEL 2
14
38%
LEVEL 3
9
24%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 63
LEVEL 1
14
22%
LEVEL 2
25
40%
LEVEL 3
19
30%
LEVEL 4
5
8%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 100
LEVEL 1
28
28%
LEVEL 2
39
39%
LEVEL 3
28
28%
LEVEL 4
5
5%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
100
87
13
1
1
97
1
100
50
50
100
37
63
100
PROFICIENT
33%
38%
0%
_%
_%
_%
_%
33%
42%
24%
33%
24%
38%
33%
LEVEL 1
28
28%
17
20%
11
85%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
28
28%
8
16%
20
40%
28
28%
14
38%
14
22%
28
28%
LEVEL 2
39
39%
37
43%
2
15%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
39
39%
21
42%
18
36%
39
39%
14
38%
25
40%
39
39%
LEVEL 3
28
28%
28
32%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
28
28%
16
32%
12
24%
28
28%
9
24%
19
30%
28
28%
LEVEL 4
5
5%
5
6%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
5
5%
5
10%
0
0%
5
5%
0
0%
5
8%
5
5%
Grade 5 English Language Arts
MEAN SCORE: 313
All Students
PROFICIENT
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 85
LEVEL 1
22
26%
LEVEL 2
20
24%
LEVEL 3
22
26%
LEVEL 4
21
25%
General Education
PROFICIENT
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 76
LEVEL 1
17
22%
LEVEL 2
17
22%
LEVEL 3
21
28%
LEVEL 4
21
28%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
5
56%
LEVEL 2
3
33%
LEVEL 3
1
11%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 78
LEVEL 1
20
26%
LEVEL 2
19
24%
LEVEL 3
21
27%
LEVEL 4
18
23%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 7
LEVEL 1
2
29%
LEVEL 2
1
14%
LEVEL 3
1
14%
LEVEL 4
3
43%
Female
PROFICIENT
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 46
LEVEL 1
10
22%
LEVEL 2
12
26%
LEVEL 3
11
24%
LEVEL 4
13
28%
Male
PROFICIENT
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 39
LEVEL 1
12
31%
LEVEL 2
8
21%
LEVEL 3
11
28%
LEVEL 4
8
21%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 84
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 33
LEVEL 1
17
52%
LEVEL 2
8
24%
LEVEL 3
6
18%
LEVEL 4
2
6%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 52
LEVEL 1
5
10%
LEVEL 2
12
23%
LEVEL 3
16
31%
LEVEL 4
19
37%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 85
LEVEL 1
22
26%
LEVEL 2
20
24%
LEVEL 3
22
26%
LEVEL 4
21
25%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
85
76
9
2
1
3
78
1
7
46
39
84
1
33
52
85
PROFICIENT
51%
55%
11%
_%
_%
_%
50%
_%
57%
52%
49%
_%
_%
24%
67%
51%
LEVEL 1
22
26%
17
22%
5
56%
_
_
_
_
_
_
20
26%
_
_
2
29%
10
22%
12
31%
_
_
_
_
17
52%
5
10%
22
26%
LEVEL 2
20
24%
17
22%
3
33%
_
_
_
_
_
_
19
24%
_
_
1
14%
12
26%
8
21%
_
_
_
_
8
24%
12
23%
20
24%
LEVEL 3
22
26%
21
28%
1
11%
_
_
_
_
_
_
21
27%
_
_
1
14%
11
24%
11
28%
_
_
_
_
6
18%
16
31%
22
26%
LEVEL 4
21
25%
21
28%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
18
23%
_
_
3
43%
13
28%
8
21%
_
_
_
_
2
6%
19
37%
21
25%
Grade 6 English Language Arts
MEAN SCORE: 299
All Students
PROFICIENT
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 89
LEVEL 1
19
21%
LEVEL 2
47
53%
LEVEL 3
9
10%
LEVEL 4
14
16%
General Education
PROFICIENT
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 81
LEVEL 1
14
17%
LEVEL 2
44
54%
LEVEL 3
9
11%
LEVEL 4
14
17%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 8
LEVEL 1
5
63%
LEVEL 2
3
38%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 86
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 89
LEVEL 1
19
21%
LEVEL 2
47
53%
LEVEL 3
9
10%
LEVEL 4
14
16%
Female
PROFICIENT
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 43
LEVEL 1
7
16%
LEVEL 2
23
53%
LEVEL 3
6
14%
LEVEL 4
7
16%
Male
PROFICIENT
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 46
LEVEL 1
12
26%
LEVEL 2
24
52%
LEVEL 3
3
7%
LEVEL 4
7
15%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 88
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 35
LEVEL 1
12
34%
LEVEL 2
17
49%
LEVEL 3
3
9%
LEVEL 4
3
9%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 54
LEVEL 1
7
13%
LEVEL 2
30
56%
LEVEL 3
6
11%
LEVEL 4
11
20%
Migrant
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 88
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Migrant
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
89
81
8
1
1
86
1
89
43
46
88
1
35
54
1
88
PROFICIENT
26%
28%
0%
_%
_%
_%
_%
26%
30%
22%
_%
_%
17%
31%
_%
_%
LEVEL 1
19
21%
14
17%
5
63%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
19
21%
7
16%
12
26%
_
_
_
_
12
34%
7
13%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 2
47
53%
44
54%
3
38%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
47
53%
23
53%
24
52%
_
_
_
_
17
49%
30
56%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 3
9
10%
9
11%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
9
10%
6
14%
3
7%
_
_
_
_
3
9%
6
11%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 4
14
16%
14
17%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
14
16%
7
16%
7
15%
_
_
_
_
3
9%
11
20%
_
_
_
_
Grade 7 English Language Arts
MEAN SCORE: 310
All Students
PROFICIENT
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 80
LEVEL 1
14
18%
LEVEL 2
31
39%
LEVEL 3
22
28%
LEVEL 4
13
16%
General Education
PROFICIENT
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 72
LEVEL 1
9
13%
LEVEL 2
28
39%
LEVEL 3
22
31%
LEVEL 4
13
18%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 8
LEVEL 1
5
63%
LEVEL 2
3
38%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 78
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 80
LEVEL 1
14
18%
LEVEL 2
31
39%
LEVEL 3
22
28%
LEVEL 4
13
16%
Female
PROFICIENT
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 35
LEVEL 1
4
11%
LEVEL 2
11
31%
LEVEL 3
12
34%
LEVEL 4
8
23%
Male
PROFICIENT
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 45
LEVEL 1
10
22%
LEVEL 2
20
44%
LEVEL 3
10
22%
LEVEL 4
5
11%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 80
LEVEL 1
14
18%
LEVEL 2
31
39%
LEVEL 3
22
28%
LEVEL 4
13
16%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 29
LEVEL 1
7
24%
LEVEL 2
15
52%
LEVEL 3
6
21%
LEVEL 4
1
3%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 51
LEVEL 1
7
14%
LEVEL 2
16
31%
LEVEL 3
16
31%
LEVEL 4
12
24%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 80
LEVEL 1
14
18%
LEVEL 2
31
39%
LEVEL 3
22
28%
LEVEL 4
13
16%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
80
72
8
1
78
1
80
35
45
80
29
51
80
PROFICIENT
44%
49%
0%
_%
_%
_%
44%
57%
33%
44%
24%
55%
44%
LEVEL 1
14
18%
9
13%
5
63%
_
_
_
_
_
_
14
18%
4
11%
10
22%
14
18%
7
24%
7
14%
14
18%
LEVEL 2
31
39%
28
39%
3
38%
_
_
_
_
_
_
31
39%
11
31%
20
44%
31
39%
15
52%
16
31%
31
39%
LEVEL 3
22
28%
22
31%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
22
28%
12
34%
10
22%
22
28%
6
21%
16
31%
22
28%
LEVEL 4
13
16%
13
18%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
13
16%
8
23%
5
11%
13
16%
1
3%
12
24%
13
16%
Grade 8 English Language Arts
MEAN SCORE: 302
All Students
PROFICIENT
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 74
LEVEL 1
17
23%
LEVEL 2
22
30%
LEVEL 3
31
42%
LEVEL 4
4
5%
General Education
PROFICIENT
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 65
LEVEL 1
10
15%
LEVEL 2
21
32%
LEVEL 3
30
46%
LEVEL 4
4
6%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
7
78%
LEVEL 2
1
11%
LEVEL 3
1
11%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 65
LEVEL 1
13
20%
LEVEL 2
19
29%
LEVEL 3
30
46%
LEVEL 4
3
5%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
4
44%
LEVEL 2
3
33%
LEVEL 3
1
11%
LEVEL 4
1
11%
Female
PROFICIENT
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 38
LEVEL 1
4
11%
LEVEL 2
11
29%
LEVEL 3
20
53%
LEVEL 4
3
8%
Male
PROFICIENT
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 36
LEVEL 1
13
36%
LEVEL 2
11
31%
LEVEL 3
11
31%
LEVEL 4
1
3%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 72
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 25
LEVEL 1
9
36%
LEVEL 2
5
20%
LEVEL 3
11
44%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 49
LEVEL 1
8
16%
LEVEL 2
17
35%
LEVEL 3
20
41%
LEVEL 4
4
8%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 74
LEVEL 1
17
23%
LEVEL 2
22
30%
LEVEL 3
31
42%
LEVEL 4
4
5%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
74
65
9
4
1
3
65
1
9
38
36
72
2
25
49
74
PROFICIENT
47%
52%
11%
_%
_%
_%
51%
_%
22%
61%
33%
_%
_%
44%
49%
47%
LEVEL 1
17
23%
10
15%
7
78%
_
_
_
_
_
_
13
20%
_
_
4
44%
4
11%
13
36%
_
_
_
_
9
36%
8
16%
17
23%
LEVEL 2
22
30%
21
32%
1
11%
_
_
_
_
_
_
19
29%
_
_
3
33%
11
29%
11
31%
_
_
_
_
5
20%
17
35%
22
30%
LEVEL 3
31
42%
30
46%
1
11%
_
_
_
_
_
_
30
46%
_
_
1
11%
20
53%
11
31%
_
_
_
_
11
44%
20
41%
31
42%
LEVEL 4
4
5%
4
6%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
3
5%
_
_
1
11%
3
8%
1
3%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
4
8%
4
5%
Grade 3 Mathematics
MEAN SCORE: 315
All Students
PROFICIENT
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 94
LEVEL 1
14
15%
LEVEL 2
26
28%
LEVEL 3
31
33%
LEVEL 4
23
24%
General Education
PROFICIENT
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 77
LEVEL 1
6
8%
LEVEL 2
19
25%
LEVEL 3
29
38%
LEVEL 4
23
30%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 17
LEVEL 1
8
47%
LEVEL 2
7
41%
LEVEL 3
2
12%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 83
LEVEL 1
10
12%
LEVEL 2
24
29%
LEVEL 3
27
33%
LEVEL 4
22
27%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 7
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 11
LEVEL 1
4
36%
LEVEL 2
2
18%
LEVEL 3
4
36%
LEVEL 4
1
9%
Female
PROFICIENT
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 55
LEVEL 1
9
16%
LEVEL 2
17
31%
LEVEL 3
18
33%
LEVEL 4
11
20%
Male
PROFICIENT
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 39
LEVEL 1
5
13%
LEVEL 2
9
23%
LEVEL 3
13
33%
LEVEL 4
12
31%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 94
LEVEL 1
14
15%
LEVEL 2
26
28%
LEVEL 3
31
33%
LEVEL 4
23
24%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 45
LEVEL 1
10
22%
LEVEL 2
13
29%
LEVEL 3
14
31%
LEVEL 4
8
18%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 49
LEVEL 1
4
8%
LEVEL 2
13
27%
LEVEL 3
17
35%
LEVEL 4
15
31%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 94
LEVEL 1
14
15%
LEVEL 2
26
28%
LEVEL 3
31
33%
LEVEL 4
23
24%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
94
77
17
1
3
83
7
11
55
39
94
45
49
94
PROFICIENT
57%
68%
12%
_%
_%
59%
_%
45%
53%
64%
57%
49%
65%
57%
LEVEL 1
14
15%
6
8%
8
47%
_
_
_
_
10
12%
_
_
4
36%
9
16%
5
13%
14
15%
10
22%
4
8%
14
15%
LEVEL 2
26
28%
19
25%
7
41%
_
_
_
_
24
29%
_
_
2
18%
17
31%
9
23%
26
28%
13
29%
13
27%
26
28%
LEVEL 3
31
33%
29
38%
2
12%
_
_
_
_
27
33%
_
_
4
36%
18
33%
13
33%
31
33%
14
31%
17
35%
31
33%
LEVEL 4
23
24%
23
30%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
22
27%
_
_
1
9%
11
20%
12
31%
23
24%
8
18%
15
31%
23
24%
Grade 4 Mathematics
MEAN SCORE: 304
All Students
PROFICIENT
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 102
LEVEL 1
20
20%
LEVEL 2
43
42%
LEVEL 3
23
23%
LEVEL 4
16
16%
General Education
PROFICIENT
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 89
LEVEL 1
13
15%
LEVEL 2
38
43%
LEVEL 3
22
25%
LEVEL 4
16
18%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 13
LEVEL 1
7
54%
LEVEL 2
5
38%
LEVEL 3
1
8%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 99
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 102
LEVEL 1
20
20%
LEVEL 2
43
42%
LEVEL 3
23
23%
LEVEL 4
16
16%
Female
PROFICIENT
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 50
LEVEL 1
9
18%
LEVEL 2
21
42%
LEVEL 3
11
22%
LEVEL 4
9
18%
Male
PROFICIENT
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 52
LEVEL 1
11
21%
LEVEL 2
22
42%
LEVEL 3
12
23%
LEVEL 4
7
13%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 102
LEVEL 1
20
20%
LEVEL 2
43
42%
LEVEL 3
23
23%
LEVEL 4
16
16%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 37
LEVEL 1
11
30%
LEVEL 2
15
41%
LEVEL 3
7
19%
LEVEL 4
4
11%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 65
LEVEL 1
9
14%
LEVEL 2
28
43%
LEVEL 3
16
25%
LEVEL 4
12
18%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 102
LEVEL 1
20
20%
LEVEL 2
43
42%
LEVEL 3
23
23%
LEVEL 4
16
16%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
102
89
13
1
1
99
1
102
50
52
102
37
65
102
PROFICIENT
38%
43%
8%
_%
_%
_%
_%
38%
40%
37%
38%
30%
43%
38%
LEVEL 1
20
20%
13
15%
7
54%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
20
20%
9
18%
11
21%
20
20%
11
30%
9
14%
20
20%
LEVEL 2
43
42%
38
43%
5
38%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
43
42%
21
42%
22
42%
43
42%
15
41%
28
43%
43
42%
LEVEL 3
23
23%
22
25%
1
8%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
23
23%
11
22%
12
23%
23
23%
7
19%
16
25%
23
23%
LEVEL 4
16
16%
16
18%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
16
16%
9
18%
7
13%
16
16%
4
11%
12
18%
16
16%
Grade 5 Mathematics
MEAN SCORE: 320
All Students
PROFICIENT
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 82
LEVEL 1
11
13%
LEVEL 2
22
27%
LEVEL 3
34
41%
LEVEL 4
15
18%
General Education
PROFICIENT
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 74
LEVEL 1
9
12%
LEVEL 2
18
24%
LEVEL 3
32
43%
LEVEL 4
15
20%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 8
LEVEL 1
2
25%
LEVEL 2
4
50%
LEVEL 3
2
25%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 75
LEVEL 1
11
15%
LEVEL 2
20
27%
LEVEL 3
31
41%
LEVEL 4
13
17%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 7
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
29%
LEVEL 3
3
43%
LEVEL 4
2
29%
Female
PROFICIENT
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 44
LEVEL 1
7
16%
LEVEL 2
12
27%
LEVEL 3
18
41%
LEVEL 4
7
16%
Male
PROFICIENT
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 38
LEVEL 1
4
11%
LEVEL 2
10
26%
LEVEL 3
16
42%
LEVEL 4
8
21%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 81
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 31
LEVEL 1
8
26%
LEVEL 2
14
45%
LEVEL 3
9
29%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 51
LEVEL 1
3
6%
LEVEL 2
8
16%
LEVEL 3
25
49%
LEVEL 4
15
29%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 82
LEVEL 1
11
13%
LEVEL 2
22
27%
LEVEL 3
34
41%
LEVEL 4
15
18%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
82
74
8
2
1
3
75
1
7
44
38
81
1
31
51
82
PROFICIENT
60%
64%
25%
_%
_%
_%
59%
_%
71%
57%
63%
_%
_%
29%
78%
60%
LEVEL 1
11
13%
9
12%
2
25%
_
_
_
_
_
_
11
15%
_
_
0
0%
7
16%
4
11%
_
_
_
_
8
26%
3
6%
11
13%
LEVEL 2
22
27%
18
24%
4
50%
_
_
_
_
_
_
20
27%
_
_
2
29%
12
27%
10
26%
_
_
_
_
14
45%
8
16%
22
27%
LEVEL 3
34
41%
32
43%
2
25%
_
_
_
_
_
_
31
41%
_
_
3
43%
18
41%
16
42%
_
_
_
_
9
29%
25
49%
34
41%
LEVEL 4
15
18%
15
20%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
13
17%
_
_
2
29%
7
16%
8
21%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
15
29%
15
18%
Grade 6 Mathematics
MEAN SCORE: 316
All Students
PROFICIENT
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 93
LEVEL 1
9
10%
LEVEL 2
33
35%
LEVEL 3
34
37%
LEVEL 4
17
18%
General Education
PROFICIENT
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 85
LEVEL 1
3
4%
LEVEL 2
31
36%
LEVEL 3
34
40%
LEVEL 4
17
20%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 8
LEVEL 1
6
75%
LEVEL 2
2
25%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 91
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 93
LEVEL 1
9
10%
LEVEL 2
33
35%
LEVEL 3
34
37%
LEVEL 4
17
18%
Female
PROFICIENT
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 45
LEVEL 1
4
9%
LEVEL 2
16
36%
LEVEL 3
19
42%
LEVEL 4
6
13%
Male
PROFICIENT
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 48
LEVEL 1
5
10%
LEVEL 2
17
35%
LEVEL 3
15
31%
LEVEL 4
11
23%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 93
LEVEL 1
9
10%
LEVEL 2
33
35%
LEVEL 3
34
37%
LEVEL 4
17
18%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 39
LEVEL 1
7
18%
LEVEL 2
13
33%
LEVEL 3
14
36%
LEVEL 4
5
13%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 54
LEVEL 1
2
4%
LEVEL 2
20
37%
LEVEL 3
20
37%
LEVEL 4
12
22%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 93
LEVEL 1
9
10%
LEVEL 2
33
35%
LEVEL 3
34
37%
LEVEL 4
17
18%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
93
85
8
1
91
1
93
45
48
93
39
54
93
PROFICIENT
55%
60%
0%
_%
_%
_%
55%
56%
54%
55%
49%
59%
55%
LEVEL 1
9
10%
3
4%
6
75%
_
_
_
_
_
_
9
10%
4
9%
5
10%
9
10%
7
18%
2
4%
9
10%
LEVEL 2
33
35%
31
36%
2
25%
_
_
_
_
_
_
33
35%
16
36%
17
35%
33
35%
13
33%
20
37%
33
35%
LEVEL 3
34
37%
34
40%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
34
37%
19
42%
15
31%
34
37%
14
36%
20
37%
34
37%
LEVEL 4
17
18%
17
20%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
17
18%
6
13%
11
23%
17
18%
5
13%
12
22%
17
18%
Grade 7 Mathematics
Mean scores and data in the table for grade 7 math include only those for grade 7 students who took the Grade 7 New York State Testing Program Assessment (NYSTP) in Mathematics. For 2015 and forward, data in the bar charts include those for grade 7 students who took the Grade 7 NYSTP in Mathematics and grade 7 students who took a Regents math test in lieu of the NYSTP. For 2014 and earlier, data in the bar charts include only those for grade 7 students who took the Grade 7 NYSTP.
MEAN SCORE: 317
All Students
PROFICIENT
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 75
LEVEL 1
11
15%
LEVEL 2
25
33%
LEVEL 3
33
44%
LEVEL 4
6
8%
General Education
PROFICIENT
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 69
LEVEL 1
7
10%
LEVEL 2
24
35%
LEVEL 3
32
46%
LEVEL 4
6
9%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
4
67%
LEVEL 2
1
17%
LEVEL 3
1
17%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 72
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 75
LEVEL 1
11
15%
LEVEL 2
25
33%
LEVEL 3
33
44%
LEVEL 4
6
8%
Female
PROFICIENT
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 34
LEVEL 1
3
9%
LEVEL 2
13
38%
LEVEL 3
15
44%
LEVEL 4
3
9%
Male
PROFICIENT
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 41
LEVEL 1
8
20%
LEVEL 2
12
29%
LEVEL 3
18
44%
LEVEL 4
3
7%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 75
LEVEL 1
11
15%
LEVEL 2
25
33%
LEVEL 3
33
44%
LEVEL 4
6
8%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 23
LEVEL 1
4
17%
LEVEL 2
9
39%
LEVEL 3
8
35%
LEVEL 4
2
9%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 52
LEVEL 1
7
13%
LEVEL 2
16
31%
LEVEL 3
25
48%
LEVEL 4
4
8%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 75
LEVEL 1
11
15%
LEVEL 2
25
33%
LEVEL 3
33
44%
LEVEL 4
6
8%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
75
69
6
1
1
72
1
75
34
41
75
23
52
75
PROFICIENT
52%
55%
17%
_%
_%
_%
_%
52%
53%
51%
52%
43%
56%
52%
LEVEL 1
11
15%
7
10%
4
67%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
11
15%
3
9%
8
20%
11
15%
4
17%
7
13%
11
15%
LEVEL 2
25
33%
24
35%
1
17%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
25
33%
13
38%
12
29%
25
33%
9
39%
16
31%
25
33%
LEVEL 3
33
44%
32
46%
1
17%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
33
44%
15
44%
18
44%
33
44%
8
35%
25
48%
33
44%
LEVEL 4
6
8%
6
9%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
6
8%
3
9%
3
7%
6
8%
2
9%
4
8%
6
8%
Grade 8 Mathematics
Mean scores and data in the table for grade 8 math include only those for grade 8 students who took the Grade 8 New York State Testing Program Assessment (NYSTP) in Mathematics. For 2015 and forward, data in the bar charts include those for grade 8 students who took the Grade 8 NYSTP in Mathematics and grade 8 students who took a Regents math test in lieu of the NYSTP. For 2014 and earlier, data in the bar charts include only those for grade 8 students who took the Grade 8 NYSTP.
MEAN SCORE: 286
All Students
PROFICIENT
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 47
LEVEL 1
19
40%
LEVEL 2
26
55%
LEVEL 3
2
4%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
General Education
PROFICIENT
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 41
LEVEL 1
16
39%
LEVEL 2
23
56%
LEVEL 3
2
5%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
3
50%
LEVEL 2
3
50%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 40
LEVEL 1
15
38%
LEVEL 2
23
58%
LEVEL 3
2
5%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 7
LEVEL 1
4
57%
LEVEL 2
3
43%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Female
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 27
LEVEL 1
9
33%
LEVEL 2
18
67%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Male
PROFICIENT
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 20
LEVEL 1
10
50%
LEVEL 2
8
40%
LEVEL 3
2
10%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 44
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 16
LEVEL 1
7
44%
LEVEL 2
9
56%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 31
LEVEL 1
12
39%
LEVEL 2
17
55%
LEVEL 3
2
6%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 47
LEVEL 1
19
40%
LEVEL 2
26
55%
LEVEL 3
2
4%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
47
41
6
3
3
40
1
7
27
20
44
3
16
31
47
PROFICIENT
4%
5%
0%
_%
_%
5%
_%
0%
0%
10%
_%
_%
0%
6%
4%
LEVEL 1
19
40%
16
39%
3
50%
_
_
_
_
15
38%
_
_
4
57%
9
33%
10
50%
_
_
_
_
7
44%
12
39%
19
40%
LEVEL 2
26
55%
23
56%
3
50%
_
_
_
_
23
58%
_
_
3
43%
18
67%
8
40%
_
_
_
_
9
56%
17
55%
26
55%
LEVEL 3
2
4%
2
5%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
2
5%
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
2
10%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
2
6%
2
4%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
Grade 8 Students Taking a Regents Math Test
Accelerated grade 8 students who took a Regents math test in lieu of the Grade 8 NYSTP in Mathematics.
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 27
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4 AND ABOVE
27
100%
LEVEL 3 AND ABOVE
27
100%
GROUP
All Students
TOTAL TESTED
27
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
4 & ABOVE
27
100%
3 & ABOVE
27
100%
Grade 4 Science
MEAN SCORE: 86
All Students
PROFICIENT
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 106
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
4
4%
LEVEL 3
31
29%
LEVEL 4
71
67%
General Education
PROFICIENT
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 92
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
3
3%
LEVEL 3
22
24%
LEVEL 4
67
73%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 14
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
7%
LEVEL 3
9
64%
LEVEL 4
4
29%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 103
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 106
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
4
4%
LEVEL 3
31
29%
LEVEL 4
71
67%
Female
PROFICIENT
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 50
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
2%
LEVEL 3
14
28%
LEVEL 4
35
70%
Male
PROFICIENT
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 56
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
3
5%
LEVEL 3
17
30%
LEVEL 4
36
64%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 106
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
4
4%
LEVEL 3
31
29%
LEVEL 4
71
67%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 38
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
4
11%
LEVEL 3
12
32%
LEVEL 4
22
58%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 68
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
19
28%
LEVEL 4
49
72%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 106
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
4
4%
LEVEL 3
31
29%
LEVEL 4
71
67%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
106
92
14
1
1
103
1
106
50
56
106
38
68
106
PROFICIENT
96%
97%
93%
_%
_%
_%
_%
96%
98%
95%
96%
89%
100%
96%
LEVEL 1
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
LEVEL 2
4
4%
3
3%
1
7%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
4
4%
1
2%
3
5%
4
4%
4
11%
0
0%
4
4%
LEVEL 3
31
29%
22
24%
9
64%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
31
29%
14
28%
17
30%
31
29%
12
32%
19
28%
31
29%
LEVEL 4
71
67%
67
73%
4
29%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
71
67%
35
70%
36
64%
71
67%
22
58%
49
72%
71
67%
Grade 8 Science
Data in the bar charts include those for grade 8 students who took the New York State Grade 8 Science Test and grade 8 students who took a Regents science test in lieu of this test. Mean scores and data in the table for grade 8 science include only those for grade 8 students who took the New York State Grade 8 Science Test.
MEAN SCORE: 75
All Students
PROFICIENT
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 75
LEVEL 1
3
4%
LEVEL 2
13
17%
LEVEL 3
36
48%
LEVEL 4
23
31%
General Education
PROFICIENT
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 67
LEVEL 1
2
3%
LEVEL 2
9
13%
LEVEL 3
33
49%
LEVEL 4
23
34%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 8
LEVEL 1
1
13%
LEVEL 2
4
50%
LEVEL 3
3
38%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 65
LEVEL 1
3
5%
LEVEL 2
8
12%
LEVEL 3
33
51%
LEVEL 4
21
32%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 10
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
5
50%
LEVEL 3
3
30%
LEVEL 4
2
20%
Female
PROFICIENT
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 36
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
4
11%
LEVEL 3
22
61%
LEVEL 4
10
28%
Male
PROFICIENT
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 39
LEVEL 1
3
8%
LEVEL 2
9
23%
LEVEL 3
14
36%
LEVEL 4
13
33%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 73
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 24
LEVEL 1
3
13%
LEVEL 2
6
25%
LEVEL 3
10
42%
LEVEL 4
5
21%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 51
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
7
14%
LEVEL 3
26
51%
LEVEL 4
18
35%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 75
LEVEL 1
3
4%
LEVEL 2
13
17%
LEVEL 3
36
48%
LEVEL 4
23
31%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
75
67
8
4
1
4
65
1
10
36
39
73
2
24
51
75
PROFICIENT
79%
84%
38%
_%
_%
_%
83%
_%
50%
89%
69%
_%
_%
63%
86%
79%
LEVEL 1
3
4%
2
3%
1
13%
_
_
_
_
_
_
3
5%
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
3
8%
_
_
_
_
3
13%
0
0%
3
4%
LEVEL 2
13
17%
9
13%
4
50%
_
_
_
_
_
_
8
12%
_
_
5
50%
4
11%
9
23%
_
_
_
_
6
25%
7
14%
13
17%
LEVEL 3
36
48%
33
49%
3
38%
_
_
_
_
_
_
33
51%
_
_
3
30%
22
61%
14
36%
_
_
_
_
10
42%
26
51%
36
48%
LEVEL 4
23
31%
23
34%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
21
32%
_
_
2
20%
10
28%
13
33%
_
_
_
_
5
21%
18
35%
23
31%
Recently Arrived ELL Students (2016 - 17)
GRADE
Grade 8
RECENTLY ARRIVED ELL STUDENTS TAKING NYSESLAT IN LIEU OF NYSTP
1
GRADE
Grade 8
RECENTLY ARRIVED ELL STUDENTS NOT TAKING NYSESLAT IN LIEU OF NYSTP
1
Recently Arrived ELL Students (2016 - 17)
Recently Arrived ELL Students Taking NYSESLAT in Lieu of NYSTP
Grade 8
1
Recently Arrived ELL Students NOT Tested on the ELA NYSTP
Grade 8
1
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level English Language Arts after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 99
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
2%
LEVEL 3
30
30%
LEVEL 4
60
61%
General Education
PROFICIENT
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 83
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
2%
LEVEL 3
19
23%
LEVEL 4
57
69%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 16
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
11
69%
LEVEL 4
3
19%
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 91
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
2%
LEVEL 3
30
33%
LEVEL 4
53
58%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 8
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
7
88%
Female
PROFICIENT
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 44
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
14
32%
LEVEL 4
28
64%
Male
PROFICIENT
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 55
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
4%
LEVEL 3
16
29%
LEVEL 4
32
58%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 98
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 42
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
2%
LEVEL 3
15
36%
LEVEL 4
22
52%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 57
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
2%
LEVEL 3
15
26%
LEVEL 4
38
67%
Migrant
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 98
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Migrant
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
99
83
16
2
4
91
2
8
44
55
98
1
42
57
1
98
PROFICIENT
91%
92%
88%
_%
_%
91%
_%
88%
95%
87%
_%
_%
88%
93%
_%
_%
LEVEL 1
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 2
2
2%
2
2%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
2
2%
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
2
4%
_
_
_
_
1
2%
1
2%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 3
30
30%
19
23%
11
69%
_
_
_
_
30
33%
_
_
0
0%
14
32%
16
29%
_
_
_
_
15
36%
15
26%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 4
60
61%
57
69%
3
19%
_
_
_
_
53
58%
_
_
7
88%
28
64%
32
58%
_
_
_
_
22
52%
38
67%
_
_
_
_
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level Mathematics after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 99
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
3
3%
LEVEL 3
48
48%
LEVEL 4
42
42%
General Education
PROFICIENT
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 83
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
1%
LEVEL 3
36
43%
LEVEL 4
42
51%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 16
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
13%
LEVEL 3
12
75%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 91
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
3
3%
LEVEL 3
43
47%
LEVEL 4
40
44%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 8
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
5
63%
LEVEL 4
2
25%
Female
PROFICIENT
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 44
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
2%
LEVEL 3
24
55%
LEVEL 4
18
41%
Male
PROFICIENT
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 55
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
4%
LEVEL 3
24
44%
LEVEL 4
24
44%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 98
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 42
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
2%
LEVEL 3
29
69%
LEVEL 4
9
21%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 57
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
4%
LEVEL 3
19
33%
LEVEL 4
33
58%
Migrant
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 98
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Migrant
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
99
83
16
2
4
91
2
8
44
55
98
1
42
57
1
98
PROFICIENT
91%
94%
75%
_%
_%
91%
_%
88%
95%
87%
_%
_%
90%
91%
_%
_%
LEVEL 1
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 2
3
3%
1
1%
2
13%
_
_
_
_
3
3%
_
_
0
0%
1
2%
2
4%
_
_
_
_
1
2%
2
4%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 3
48
48%
36
43%
12
75%
_
_
_
_
43
47%
_
_
5
63%
24
55%
24
44%
_
_
_
_
29
69%
19
33%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 4
42
42%
42
51%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
40
44%
_
_
2
25%
18
41%
24
44%
_
_
_
_
9
21%
33
58%
_
_
_
_
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level Global History and Geography after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 99
LEVEL 1
3
3%
LEVEL 2
5
5%
LEVEL 3
54
55%
LEVEL 4
33
33%
General Education
PROFICIENT
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 83
LEVEL 1
3
4%
LEVEL 2
3
4%
LEVEL 3
42
51%
LEVEL 4
33
40%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 16
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
13%
LEVEL 3
12
75%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 91
LEVEL 1
2
2%
LEVEL 2
4
4%
LEVEL 3
50
55%
LEVEL 4
31
34%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 8
LEVEL 1
1
13%
LEVEL 2
1
13%
LEVEL 3
4
50%
LEVEL 4
2
25%
Female
PROFICIENT
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 44
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
3
7%
LEVEL 3
30
68%
LEVEL 4
10
23%
Male
PROFICIENT
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 55
LEVEL 1
3
5%
LEVEL 2
2
4%
LEVEL 3
24
44%
LEVEL 4
23
42%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 98
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 42
LEVEL 1
3
7%
LEVEL 2
2
5%
LEVEL 3
30
71%
LEVEL 4
6
14%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 57
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
3
5%
LEVEL 3
24
42%
LEVEL 4
27
47%
Migrant
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 98
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Migrant
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
99
83
16
2
4
91
2
8
44
55
98
1
42
57
1
98
PROFICIENT
88%
90%
75%
_%
_%
89%
_%
75%
91%
85%
_%
_%
86%
89%
_%
_%
LEVEL 1
3
3%
3
4%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
2
2%
_
_
1
13%
0
0%
3
5%
_
_
_
_
3
7%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 2
5
5%
3
4%
2
13%
_
_
_
_
4
4%
_
_
1
13%
3
7%
2
4%
_
_
_
_
2
5%
3
5%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 3
54
55%
42
51%
12
75%
_
_
_
_
50
55%
_
_
4
50%
30
68%
24
44%
_
_
_
_
30
71%
24
42%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 4
33
33%
33
40%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
31
34%
_
_
2
25%
10
23%
23
42%
_
_
_
_
6
14%
27
47%
_
_
_
_
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level U.S. History and Government after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 99
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
2%
LEVEL 3
25
25%
LEVEL 4
65
66%
General Education
PROFICIENT
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 83
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
1%
LEVEL 3
17
20%
LEVEL 4
60
72%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 16
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
6%
LEVEL 3
8
50%
LEVEL 4
5
31%
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 91
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
2%
LEVEL 3
23
25%
LEVEL 4
60
66%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 8
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
2
25%
LEVEL 4
5
63%
Female
PROFICIENT
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 44
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
2%
LEVEL 3
11
25%
LEVEL 4
30
68%
Male
PROFICIENT
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 55
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
2%
LEVEL 3
14
25%
LEVEL 4
35
64%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 98
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 42
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
2%
LEVEL 3
17
40%
LEVEL 4
20
48%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 57
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
2%
LEVEL 3
8
14%
LEVEL 4
45
79%
Migrant
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 98
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Migrant
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
99
83
16
2
4
91
2
8
44
55
98
1
42
57
1
98
PROFICIENT
91%
93%
81%
_%
_%
91%
_%
88%
93%
89%
_%
_%
88%
93%
_%
_%
LEVEL 1
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 2
2
2%
1
1%
1
6%
_
_
_
_
2
2%
_
_
0
0%
1
2%
1
2%
_
_
_
_
1
2%
1
2%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 3
25
25%
17
20%
8
50%
_
_
_
_
23
25%
_
_
2
25%
11
25%
14
25%
_
_
_
_
17
40%
8
14%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 4
65
66%
60
72%
5
31%
_
_
_
_
60
66%
_
_
5
63%
30
68%
35
64%
_
_
_
_
20
48%
45
79%
_
_
_
_
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level Science after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 99
LEVEL 1
3
3%
LEVEL 2
1
1%
LEVEL 3
47
47%
LEVEL 4
44
44%
General Education
PROFICIENT
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 83
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
38
46%
LEVEL 4
41
49%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 16
LEVEL 1
2
13%
LEVEL 2
1
6%
LEVEL 3
9
56%
LEVEL 4
3
19%
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 91
LEVEL 1
2
2%
LEVEL 2
1
1%
LEVEL 3
44
48%
LEVEL 4
41
45%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 8
LEVEL 1
1
13%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
3
38%
LEVEL 4
3
38%
Female
PROFICIENT
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 44
LEVEL 1
1
2%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
26
59%
LEVEL 4
16
36%
Male
PROFICIENT
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 55
LEVEL 1
2
4%
LEVEL 2
1
2%
LEVEL 3
21
38%
LEVEL 4
28
51%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 98
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 42
LEVEL 1
3
7%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
25
60%
LEVEL 4
13
31%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 57
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
2%
LEVEL 3
22
39%
LEVEL 4
31
54%
Migrant
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 98
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Migrant
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
99
83
16
2
4
91
2
8
44
55
98
1
42
57
1
98
PROFICIENT
92%
95%
75%
_%
_%
93%
_%
75%
95%
89%
_%
_%
90%
93%
_%
_%
LEVEL 1
3
3%
1
1%
2
13%
_
_
_
_
2
2%
_
_
1
13%
1
2%
2
4%
_
_
_
_
3
7%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 2
1
1%
0
0%
1
6%
_
_
_
_
1
1%
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
1
2%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
1
2%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 3
47
47%
38
46%
9
56%
_
_
_
_
44
48%
_
_
3
38%
26
59%
21
38%
_
_
_
_
25
60%
22
39%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 4
44
44%
41
49%
3
19%
_
_
_
_
41
45%
_
_
3
38%
16
36%
28
51%
_
_
_
_
13
31%
31
54%
_
_
_
_
Regents Examination Results (2016 - 17)
English Language Arts (Common Core)
English Language Arts (Common Core)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Migrant
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
128
108
20
1
4
123
5
65
63
127
1
59
69
1
127
LEVEL 1
10
8%
5
5%
5
25%
_
_
_
_
9
7%
1
20%
2
3%
8
13%
_
_
_
_
6
10%
4
6%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 2
8
6%
7
6%
1
5%
_
_
_
_
8
7%
0
0%
3
5%
5
8%
_
_
_
_
4
7%
4
6%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 3
36
28%
25
23%
11
55%
_
_
_
_
35
28%
1
20%
14
22%
22
35%
_
_
_
_
18
31%
18
26%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 4
20
16%
18
17%
2
10%
_
_
_
_
20
16%
0
0%
9
14%
11
17%
_
_
_
_
12
20%
8
12%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 5
54
42%
53
49%
1
5%
_
_
_
_
51
41%
3
60%
37
57%
17
27%
_
_
_
_
19
32%
35
51%
_
_
_
_
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 128
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
10
8%
LEVEL 2
8
6%
LEVEL 3
36
28%
LEVEL 4
20
16%
LEVEL 5
54
42%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 108
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
5
5%
LEVEL 2
7
6%
LEVEL 3
25
23%
LEVEL 4
18
17%
LEVEL 5
53
49%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 20
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
5
25%
LEVEL 2
1
5%
LEVEL 3
11
55%
LEVEL 4
2
10%
LEVEL 5
1
5%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 4
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 123
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
9
7%
LEVEL 2
8
7%
LEVEL 3
35
28%
LEVEL 4
20
16%
LEVEL 5
51
41%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
1
20%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
1
20%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
LEVEL 5
3
60%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 65
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
2
3%
LEVEL 2
3
5%
LEVEL 3
14
22%
LEVEL 4
9
14%
LEVEL 5
37
57%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 63
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
8
13%
LEVEL 2
5
8%
LEVEL 3
22
35%
LEVEL 4
11
17%
LEVEL 5
17
27%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 127
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 59
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
6
10%
LEVEL 2
4
7%
LEVEL 3
18
31%
LEVEL 4
12
20%
LEVEL 5
19
32%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 69
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
4
6%
LEVEL 2
4
6%
LEVEL 3
18
26%
LEVEL 4
8
12%
LEVEL 5
35
51%
Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 127
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Algebra I (Common Core)
Algebra I (Common Core)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Migrant
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
116
101
15
3
2
2
108
1
8
56
60
115
1
46
70
1
115
LEVEL 1
5
4%
1
1%
4
27%
_
_
_
_
_
_
5
5%
_
_
0
0%
2
4%
3
5%
_
_
_
_
5
11%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 2
5
4%
2
2%
3
20%
_
_
_
_
_
_
3
3%
_
_
2
25%
0
0%
5
8%
_
_
_
_
1
2%
4
6%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 3
20
17%
12
12%
8
53%
_
_
_
_
_
_
20
19%
_
_
0
0%
8
14%
12
20%
_
_
_
_
13
28%
7
10%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 4
41
35%
41
41%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
40
37%
_
_
1
13%
22
39%
19
32%
_
_
_
_
14
30%
27
39%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 5
45
39%
45
45%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
40
37%
_
_
5
63%
24
43%
21
35%
_
_
_
_
13
28%
32
46%
_
_
_
_
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 116
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
5
4%
LEVEL 2
5
4%
LEVEL 3
20
17%
LEVEL 4
41
35%
LEVEL 5
45
39%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 101
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
2
2%
LEVEL 3
12
12%
LEVEL 4
41
41%
LEVEL 5
45
45%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 15
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
4
27%
LEVEL 2
3
20%
LEVEL 3
8
53%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 108
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
5
5%
LEVEL 2
3
3%
LEVEL 3
20
19%
LEVEL 4
40
37%
LEVEL 5
40
37%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 8
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
25%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
1
13%
LEVEL 5
5
63%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 56
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
2
4%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
8
14%
LEVEL 4
22
39%
LEVEL 5
24
43%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 60
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
3
5%
LEVEL 2
5
8%
LEVEL 3
12
20%
LEVEL 4
19
32%
LEVEL 5
21
35%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 115
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 46
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
5
11%
LEVEL 2
1
2%
LEVEL 3
13
28%
LEVEL 4
14
30%
LEVEL 5
13
28%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 70
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
4
6%
LEVEL 3
7
10%
LEVEL 4
27
39%
LEVEL 5
32
46%
Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 115
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Common Core Geometry
Regents Common Core Geometry
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
71
66
5
1
70
71
34
37
71
17
54
71
LEVEL 1
6
8%
4
6%
2
40%
_
_
_
_
6
8%
0
0%
6
16%
6
8%
2
12%
4
7%
6
8%
LEVEL 2
4
6%
2
3%
2
40%
_
_
_
_
4
6%
3
9%
1
3%
4
6%
2
12%
2
4%
4
6%
LEVEL 3
38
54%
37
56%
1
20%
_
_
_
_
38
54%
19
56%
19
51%
38
54%
10
59%
28
52%
38
54%
LEVEL 4
16
23%
16
24%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
16
23%
9
26%
7
19%
16
23%
1
6%
15
28%
16
23%
LEVEL 5
7
10%
7
11%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
7
10%
3
9%
4
11%
7
10%
2
12%
5
9%
7
10%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 71
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
6
8%
LEVEL 2
4
6%
LEVEL 3
38
54%
LEVEL 4
16
23%
LEVEL 5
7
10%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 66
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
4
6%
LEVEL 2
2
3%
LEVEL 3
37
56%
LEVEL 4
16
24%
LEVEL 5
7
11%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
2
40%
LEVEL 2
2
40%
LEVEL 3
1
20%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 70
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 71
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
6
8%
LEVEL 2
4
6%
LEVEL 3
38
54%
LEVEL 4
16
23%
LEVEL 5
7
10%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 34
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
3
9%
LEVEL 3
19
56%
LEVEL 4
9
26%
LEVEL 5
3
9%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 37
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
6
16%
LEVEL 2
1
3%
LEVEL 3
19
51%
LEVEL 4
7
19%
LEVEL 5
4
11%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 71
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
6
8%
LEVEL 2
4
6%
LEVEL 3
38
54%
LEVEL 4
16
23%
LEVEL 5
7
10%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 17
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
2
12%
LEVEL 2
2
12%
LEVEL 3
10
59%
LEVEL 4
1
6%
LEVEL 5
2
12%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 54
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
4
7%
LEVEL 2
2
4%
LEVEL 3
28
52%
LEVEL 4
15
28%
LEVEL 5
5
9%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 71
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
6
8%
LEVEL 2
4
6%
LEVEL 3
38
54%
LEVEL 4
16
23%
LEVEL 5
7
10%
Algebra II (Common Core)
Algebra II (Common Core)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Black or African American
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
60
60
1
58
1
60
40
20
60
16
44
60
LEVEL 1
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
LEVEL 3
17
28%
17
28%
_
_
_
_
_
_
17
28%
12
30%
5
25%
17
28%
8
50%
9
20%
17
28%
LEVEL 4
27
45%
27
45%
_
_
_
_
_
_
27
45%
18
45%
9
45%
27
45%
6
38%
21
48%
27
45%
LEVEL 5
16
27%
16
27%
_
_
_
_
_
_
16
27%
10
25%
6
30%
16
27%
2
13%
14
32%
16
27%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 60
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
17
28%
LEVEL 4
27
45%
LEVEL 5
16
27%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 60
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
17
28%
LEVEL 4
27
45%
LEVEL 5
16
27%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 58
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 60
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
17
28%
LEVEL 4
27
45%
LEVEL 5
16
27%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 40
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
12
30%
LEVEL 4
18
45%
LEVEL 5
10
25%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 20
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
5
25%
LEVEL 4
9
45%
LEVEL 5
6
30%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 60
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
17
28%
LEVEL 4
27
45%
LEVEL 5
16
27%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 16
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
8
50%
LEVEL 4
6
38%
LEVEL 5
2
13%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 44
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
9
20%
LEVEL 4
21
48%
LEVEL 5
14
32%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 60
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
17
28%
LEVEL 4
27
45%
LEVEL 5
16
27%
Global History and Geography
Regents Global History and Geography
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
92
77
15
1
2
88
1
92
52
40
92
37
55
92
55
83
90%
74
96%
9
60%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
83
90%
46
88%
37
93%
83
90%
30
81%
53
96%
83
90%
65
76
83%
72
94%
4
27%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
76
83%
42
81%
34
85%
76
83%
25
68%
51
93%
76
83%
85
45
49%
44
57%
1
7%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
45
49%
24
46%
21
53%
45
49%
9
24%
36
65%
45
49%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 92
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
83
90%
65
76
83%
85
45
49%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 77
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
74
96%
65
72
94%
85
44
57%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 15
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
9
60%
65
4
27%
85
1
7%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 88
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 92
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
83
90%
65
76
83%
85
45
49%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 52
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
46
88%
65
42
81%
85
24
46%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 40
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
37
93%
65
34
85%
85
21
53%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 92
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
83
90%
65
76
83%
85
45
49%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 37
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
30
81%
65
25
68%
85
9
24%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 55
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
53
96%
65
51
93%
85
36
65%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 92
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
83
90%
65
76
83%
85
45
49%
U.S. History & Government
Regents U.S. History & Government
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Migrant
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
130
112
18
1
4
125
5
68
62
128
2
65
65
2
128
55
128
98%
111
99%
17
94%
_
_
_
_
123
98%
5
100%
67
99%
61
98%
_
_
_
_
63
97%
65
100%
_
_
_
_
65
123
95%
107
96%
16
89%
_
_
_
_
119
95%
4
80%
65
96%
58
94%
_
_
_
_
59
91%
64
98%
_
_
_
_
85
93
72%
88
79%
5
28%
_
_
_
_
91
73%
2
40%
52
76%
41
66%
_
_
_
_
36
55%
57
88%
_
_
_
_
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 130
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
128
98%
65
123
95%
85
93
72%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 112
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
111
99%
65
107
96%
85
88
79%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 18
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
17
94%
65
16
89%
85
5
28%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 4
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 125
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
123
98%
65
119
95%
85
91
73%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
5
100%
65
4
80%
85
2
40%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 68
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
67
99%
65
65
96%
85
52
76%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 62
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
61
98%
65
58
94%
85
41
66%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 128
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 65
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
63
97%
65
59
91%
85
36
55%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 65
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
65
100%
65
64
98%
85
57
88%
Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 128
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Living Environment
Regents Living Environment
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Migrant
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
95
82
13
1
1
8
84
1
11
46
49
90
5
38
57
5
90
55
90
95%
80
98%
10
77%
_
_
_
_
_
_
81
96%
_
_
9
82%
42
91%
48
98%
85
94%
5
100%
34
89%
56
98%
5
100%
85
94%
65
79
83%
74
90%
5
38%
_
_
_
_
_
_
73
87%
_
_
6
55%
39
85%
40
82%
76
84%
3
60%
25
66%
54
95%
3
60%
76
84%
85
38
40%
36
44%
2
15%
_
_
_
_
_
_
36
43%
_
_
2
18%
17
37%
21
43%
38
42%
0
0%
10
26%
28
49%
0
0%
38
42%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 95
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
90
95%
65
79
83%
85
38
40%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 82
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
80
98%
65
74
90%
85
36
44%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 13
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
10
77%
65
5
38%
85
2
15%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 8
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 84
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
81
96%
65
73
87%
85
36
43%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 11
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
9
82%
65
6
55%
85
2
18%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 46
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
42
91%
65
39
85%
85
17
37%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 49
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
48
98%
65
40
82%
85
21
43%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 90
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
85
94%
65
76
84%
85
38
42%
English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
5
100%
65
3
60%
85
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 38
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
34
89%
65
25
66%
85
10
26%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 57
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
56
98%
65
54
95%
85
28
49%
Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
5
100%
65
3
60%
85
0
0%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 90
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
85
94%
65
76
84%
85
38
42%
Physical Setting/Earth Science
Regents Physical Setting/Earth Science
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
96
90
6
2
92
2
96
48
48
96
34
62
96
55
87
91%
84
93%
3
50%
_
_
_
_
_
_
87
91%
43
90%
44
92%
87
91%
28
82%
59
95%
87
91%
65
74
77%
73
81%
1
17%
_
_
_
_
_
_
74
77%
35
73%
39
81%
74
77%
21
62%
53
85%
74
77%
85
26
27%
26
29%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
26
27%
8
17%
18
38%
26
27%
1
3%
25
40%
26
27%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 96
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
87
91%
65
74
77%
85
26
27%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 90
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
84
93%
65
73
81%
85
26
29%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 6
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
3
50%
65
1
17%
85
0
0%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 92
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 96
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
87
91%
65
74
77%
85
26
27%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 48
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
43
90%
65
35
73%
85
8
17%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 48
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
44
92%
65
39
81%
85
18
38%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 96
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
87
91%
65
74
77%
85
26
27%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 34
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
28
82%
65
21
62%
85
1
3%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 62
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
59
95%
65
53
85%
85
25
40%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 96
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
87
91%
65
74
77%
85
26
27%
Physical Setting/Chemistry
Regents Physical Setting/Chemistry
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
68
67
1
1
1
66
68
42
26
68
22
46
68
55
67
99%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
67
99%
41
98%
26
100%
67
99%
21
95%
46
100%
67
99%
65
60
88%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
60
88%
35
83%
25
96%
60
88%
18
82%
42
91%
60
88%
85
16
24%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
16
24%
7
17%
9
35%
16
24%
3
14%
13
28%
16
24%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 68
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
67
99%
65
60
88%
85
16
24%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 67
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 66
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 68
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
67
99%
65
60
88%
85
16
24%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 42
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
41
98%
65
35
83%
85
7
17%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 26
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
26
100%
65
25
96%
85
9
35%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 68
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
67
99%
65
60
88%
85
16
24%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 22
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
21
95%
65
18
82%
85
3
14%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 46
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
46
100%
65
42
91%
85
13
28%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 68
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
67
99%
65
60
88%
85
16
24%
Physical Setting/Physics
Regents Physical Setting/Physics
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
22
22
1
21
22
6
16
22
5
17
22
55
20
91%
20
91%
_
_
_
_
20
91%
5
83%
15
94%
20
91%
3
60%
17
100%
20
91%
65
20
91%
20
91%
_
_
_
_
20
91%
5
83%
15
94%
20
91%
3
60%
17
100%
20
91%
85
8
36%
8
36%
_
_
_
_
8
36%
1
17%
7
44%
8
36%
1
20%
7
41%
8
36%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 22
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
20
91%
65
20
91%
85
8
36%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 22
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
20
91%
65
20
91%
85
8
36%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 21
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 22
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
20
91%
65
20
91%
85
8
36%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 6
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
5
83%
65
5
83%
85
1
17%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 16
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
15
94%
65
15
94%
85
7
44%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 22
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
20
91%
65
20
91%
85
8
36%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
3
60%
65
3
60%
85
1
20%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 17
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
17
100%
65
17
100%
85
7
41%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 22
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
20
91%
65
20
91%
85
8
36%
New York State Alternate Assessment (NYSAA) Results (2016 - 17)
GROUP
Grade 3 ELA
Grade 3 Math
Grade 4 ELA
Grade 4 Math
Grade 4 Science
Grade 5 ELA
Grade 5 Math
Grade 6 ELA
Grade 6 Math
Grade 7 ELA
Grade 7 Math
Secondary-Level ELA
Secondary-Level Math
Secondary-Level Science
Secondary-Level Social Studies
TOTAL TESTED
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
1
1
PROFICIENT
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
LEVEL 1
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
Grade 3 ELA
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 3 Math
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 4 ELA
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 4 Math
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 4 Science
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 5 ELA
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 5 Math
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 6 ELA
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 6 Math
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 7 ELA
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 7 Math
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Secondary-Level ELA
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Secondary-Level Math
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Secondary-Level Science
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Secondary-Level Social Studies
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
New York State English as a Second Language Achievement Test (NYSESLAT) Results (2016 - 17)
Kindergarten
GROUP
All Students
General Education
TOTAL TESTED
3
3
ENTERING
_
_
EMERGING
_
_
TRANSITIONING
_
_
EXPANDING
_
_
COMMANDING
_
_
Grade 1
GROUP
All Students
General Education
TOTAL TESTED
1
1
ENTERING
_
_
EMERGING
_
_
TRANSITIONING
_
_
EXPANDING
_
_
COMMANDING
_
_
Grade 2
GROUP
All Students
General Education
TOTAL TESTED
3
3
ENTERING
_
_
EMERGING
_
_
TRANSITIONING
_
_
EXPANDING
_
_
COMMANDING
_
_
Grade 5
GROUP
All Students
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED
1
1
ENTERING
_
_
EMERGING
_
_
TRANSITIONING
_
_
EXPANDING
_
_
COMMANDING
_
_
Grade 6
GROUP
All Students
General Education
TOTAL TESTED
1
1
ENTERING
_
_
EMERGING
_
_
TRANSITIONING
_
_
EXPANDING
_
_
COMMANDING
_
_
Grade 8
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED
3
2
1
ENTERING
_
_
_
EMERGING
_
_
_
TRANSITIONING
_
_
_
EXPANDING
_
_
_
COMMANDING
_
_
_
Grade 9
GROUP
All Students
General Education
TOTAL TESTED
2
2
ENTERING
_
_
EMERGING
_
_
TRANSITIONING
_
_
EXPANDING
_
_
COMMANDING
_
_
Grade 10
GROUP
All Students
General Education
TOTAL TESTED
1
1
ENTERING
_
_
EMERGING
_
_
TRANSITIONING
_
_
EXPANDING
_
_
COMMANDING
_
_
Grade 11
GROUP
All Students
General Education
TOTAL TESTED
1
1
ENTERING
_
_
EMERGING
_
_
TRANSITIONING
_
_
EXPANDING
_
_
COMMANDING
_
_
Kindergarten
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 3
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 3
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
Grade 1
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 1
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 1
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
Grade 2
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 3
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 3
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
Grade 5
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 1
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 1
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
Grade 6
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 1
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 1
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
Grade 8
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 3
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 2
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 1
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
Grade 9
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 2
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 2
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
Grade 10
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 1
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 1
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
Grade 11
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 1
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 1
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
Elementary/Middle-Level English Language Arts Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: NO
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
NO
―
―
―
―
NO
―
NO
―
NO
Tested 95%
NO
―
―
―
―
NO
―
NO
―
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,318*
0
4
16
10
1,237*
13
186*
5
559*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
78%*
―
―
―
―
78%*
―
69%*
―
76%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
YES
―
NO
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
514
0
3
11
9
479
12
69✝
4
204
PI
118
―
―
―
―
120
―
57✝
―
93
EAMO
106
―
―
―
―
119
―
73
―
94
Safe Harbor Target
106
―
―
―
―
119
―
52
―
94
All Students
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,318*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
78%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
514
PI
118
EAMO
106
Safe Harbor Target
106
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
4
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
3
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
16
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
11
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
10
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
9
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
White
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,237*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
78%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
479
PI
120
EAMO
119
Safe Harbor Target
119
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
13
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
12
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
186*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
69%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
69✝
PI
57✝
EAMO
73
Safe Harbor Target
52
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
5
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
4
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
559*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
76%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
204
PI
93
EAMO
94
Safe Harbor Target
94
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,317*
1,310*
1,285*
1,300*
81*
1,297*
1,132*
1,310*
759*
682*
636*
1
1,315*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
78%*
78%*
79%*
78%*
84%*
78%*
80%*
78%*
80%*
77%*
80%*
―
78%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
514
511
503
505
35
502
454
510
310
255
259
1
513
PI
118
118
120
118
103
119
128
119
135
106
131
―
119
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,317*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
78%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
514
PI
118
Not Black or African American
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,310*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
78%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
511
PI
118
Not Hispanic or Latino
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,285*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
79%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
503
PI
120
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,300*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
78%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
505
PI
118
Not White
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
81*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
84%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
35
PI
103
Not Multiracial
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,297*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
78%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
502
PI
119
General Education
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,132*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
80%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
454
PI
128
English Proficient
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,310*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
78%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
510
PI
119
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
759*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
80%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
310
PI
135
Male
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
682*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
77%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
255
PI
106
Female
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
636*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
80%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
259
PI
131
Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1
PI
―
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,315*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
78%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
513
PI
119
― There were fewer than 40 students enrolled during the test administration period, so the Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 tested students enrolled on BEDS day and during the test administration period, so the PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed. *The percentage of students tested in the current year fell below 95 percent, so the numbers of enrolled and tested students in the current year and previous year were combined to provide the school/district with another opportunity to meet the participation rate criterion. ✝ Includes former students with disabilities because the number of students with disabilities in the current year is equal to or greater than 30.
Elementary/Middle-Level Mathematics Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: NO
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
NO
―
―
―
―
NO
―
NO
―
NO
Tested 95%
NO
―
―
―
―
NO
―
NO
―
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,322*
0
4
17
10
1,240*
13
186*
5
559*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
76%*
―
―
―
―
76%*
―
63%*
―
71%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
NO
―
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
511
0
3
10
9
477
12
64✝
3
201
PI
135
―
―
―
―
136
―
67✝
―
116
EAMO
104
―
―
―
―
116
―
74
―
92
Safe Harbor Target
104
―
―
―
―
116
―
69
―
92
All Students
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,322*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
76%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
511
PI
135
EAMO
104
Safe Harbor Target
104
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
4
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
3
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
17
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
10
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
10
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
9
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
White
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,240*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
76%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
477
PI
136
EAMO
116
Safe Harbor Target
116
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
13
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
12
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
186*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
63%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
64✝
PI
67✝
EAMO
74
Safe Harbor Target
69
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
5
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
3
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
559*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
71%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
201
PI
116
EAMO
92
Safe Harbor Target
92
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,321*
1,314*
1,288*
1,304*
82*
1,301*
1,136*
1,314*
763*
684*
638*
1
1,319*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
76%*
76%*
76%*
76%*
79%*
76%*
78%*
76%*
80%*
74%*
79%*
―
76%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
511
508
501
502
34
499
455
508
310
250
261
0
511
PI
135
135
136
135
124
136
144
136
148
137
134
―
135
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,321*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
76%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
511
PI
135
Not Black or African American
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,314*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
76%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
508
PI
135
Not Hispanic or Latino
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,288*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
76%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
501
PI
136
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,304*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
76%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
502
PI
135
Not White
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
82*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
79%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
34
PI
124
Not Multiracial
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,301*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
76%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
499
PI
136
General Education
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,136*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
78%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
455
PI
144
English Proficient
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,314*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
76%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
508
PI
136
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
763*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
80%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
310
PI
148
Male
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
684*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
74%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
250
PI
137
Female
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
638*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
79%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
261
PI
134
Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,319*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
76%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
511
PI
135
― There were fewer than 40 students enrolled during the test administration period, so the Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 tested students enrolled on BEDS day and during the test administration period, so the PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed. *The percentage of students tested in the current year fell below 95 percent, so the numbers of enrolled and tested students in the current year and previous year were combined to provide the school/district with another opportunity to meet the participation rate criterion. ✝ Includes former students with disabilities because the number of students with disabilities in the current year is equal to or greater than 30.
Elementary/Middle-Level Science Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: NO
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
NO
Tested 80%
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
227
0
2
5
6
212
2
34
3
164*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
80%
―
―
―
―
80%
―
―
―
70%*
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
177
0
1
5
5
164
2
20
2
62
PI
187
―
―
―
―
189
―
―
―
174
EAMO
181
―
―
―
―
187
―
―
―
171
Progress Target
181
―
―
―
―
187
―
―
―
171
All Students
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 80%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
227
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
80%
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
177
PI
187
EAMO
181
Progress Target
181
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
2
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
5
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
5
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
6
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
5
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
White
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 80%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
212
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
80%
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
164
PI
189
EAMO
187
Progress Target
187
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
2
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
2
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
34
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
20
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
3
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
2
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 80%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
164*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
70%*
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
62
PI
174
EAMO
171
Progress Target
171
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
227
225
222
221
15
225
193
224
142
114
205*
0
227
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
80%
80%
80%
80%
―
80%
82%
80%
85%
84%
77%*
―
80%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
177
176
172
172
13
175
157
175
115
92
85
0
177
PI
187
187
189
187
―
187
190
188
194
180
194
―
187
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
227
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
80%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
177
PI
187
Not Black or African American
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
225
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
80%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
176
PI
187
Not Hispanic or Latino
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
222
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
80%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
172
PI
189
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
221
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
80%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
172
PI
187
Not White
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
15
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
13
PI
―
Not Multiracial
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
225
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
80%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
175
PI
187
General Education
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
193
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
82%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
157
PI
190
English Proficient
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
224
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
80%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
175
PI
188
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
142
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
85%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
115
PI
194
Male
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
114
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
84%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
92
PI
180
Female
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
205*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
77%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
85
PI
194
Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
227
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
80%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
177
PI
187
― There were fewer than 40 students enrolled during the test administration period, so the Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 tested students enrolled on BEDS day and during the test administration period, so the PI, EAMO, and Progress Target data are suppressed. *The percentage of students tested in the current year fell below 80 percent, so the numbers of enrolled and tested students in the current year and previous year were combined to provide the school/district with another opportunity to meet the participation rate criterion.
Secondary-Level English Language Arts Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: NO
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
NO
―
―
―
―
NO
―
―
―
YES
Tested 95%
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
―
12th graders
92
0
2
3
0
85
2
15
0
38
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
―
―
―
―
100%
―
―
―
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
―
―
―
―
NO
―
―
―
YES
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
91
0
2
3
0
84
2
14
0
37
PI
166
―
―
―
―
163
―
―
―
154
EAMO
168
―
―
―
―
175
―
―
―
152
Safe Harbor Target
168
―
―
―
―
175
―
―
―
152
All Students
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
YES
12th Graders
92
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
91
PI
166
EAMO
168
Safe Harbor Target
168
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
2
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
2
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
3
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
3
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
White
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
YES
12th Graders
85
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
84
PI
163
EAMO
175
Safe Harbor Target
175
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
2
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
2
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
15
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
14
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
38
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
37
PI
154
EAMO
152
Safe Harbor Target
152
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
12th Graders
92
90
89
92
7
90
77
92
54
51
41
0
92
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
100%
100%
100%
―
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
―
100%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
91
89
88
91
7
89
77
91
54
51
40
0
91
PI
166
165
165
166
―
165
174
166
174
161
173
―
166
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
12th Graders
92
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
91
PI
166
Not Black or African American
12th Graders
90
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
89
PI
165
Not Hispanic or Latino
12th Graders
89
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
88
PI
165
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
12th Graders
92
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
91
PI
166
Not White
12th Graders
7
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
7
PI
―
Not Multiracial
12th Graders
90
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
89
PI
165
General Education
12th Graders
77
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
77
PI
174
English Proficient
12th Graders
92
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
91
PI
166
Not Economically Disadvantaged
12th Graders
54
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
54
PI
174
Male
12th Graders
51
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
51
PI
161
Female
12th Graders
41
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
40
PI
173
Migrant
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
Not Migrant
12th Graders
92
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
91
PI
166
― There were fewer than 40 12th graders, so the Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 students in the 2013 accountability cohort, so PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed.
Secondary-Level Mathematics Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: NO
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
YES
―
―
―
―
NO
―
―
―
NO
Tested 95%
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
―
12th graders
92
0
2
3
0
85
2
15
0
38
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
―
―
―
―
100%
―
―
―
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
―
―
―
―
NO
―
―
―
NO
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
91
0
2
3
0
84
2
14
0
37
PI
156
―
―
―
―
154
―
―
―
135
EAMO
155
―
―
―
―
164
―
―
―
138
Safe Harbor Target
155
―
―
―
―
164
―
―
―
138
All Students
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
YES
12th Graders
92
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
91
PI
156
EAMO
155
Safe Harbor Target
155
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
2
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
2
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
3
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
3
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
White
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
YES
12th Graders
85
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
84
PI
154
EAMO
164
Safe Harbor Target
164
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
2
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
2
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
15
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
14
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
38
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
37
PI
135
EAMO
138
Safe Harbor Target
138
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
12th Graders
92
90
89
92
7
90
77
92
54
51
41
0
92
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
100%
100%
100%
―
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
―
100%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
91
89
88
91
7
89
77
91
54
51
40
0
91
PI
156
155
156
156
―
155
169
156
170
155
158
―
156
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
12th Graders
92
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
91
PI
156
Not Black or African American
12th Graders
90
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
89
PI
155
Not Hispanic or Latino
12th Graders
89
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
88
PI
156
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
12th Graders
92
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
91
PI
156
Not White
12th Graders
7
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
7
PI
―
Not Multiracial
12th Graders
90
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
89
PI
155
General Education
12th Graders
77
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
77
PI
169
English Proficient
12th Graders
92
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
91
PI
156
Not Economically Disadvantaged
12th Graders
54
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
54
PI
170
Male
12th Graders
51
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
51
PI
155
Female
12th Graders
41
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
40
PI
158
Migrant
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
Not Migrant
12th Graders
92
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
91
PI
156
― There were fewer than 40 12th graders, so the Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 students in the 2013 accountability cohort, so PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed.
Unweighted Combined ELA and Math PIs
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
118
―
―
―
―
120
―
57
―
93
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
135
―
―
―
―
136
―
67
―
116
Secondary-Level ELA PI
166
―
―
―
―
163
―
―
―
154
Secondary-Level MATH PI
156
―
―
―
―
154
―
―
―
135
UNWEIGHTED COMBINED PI
144
0
0
0
0
143
0
62
0
125
All Students
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
118
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
135
Secondary-Level ELA PI
166
Secondary-Level MATH PI
156
Unweighted Combined PI
144
American Indian or Alaska Native
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Black or African American
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Hispanic or Latino
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
White
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
120
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
136
Secondary-Level ELA PI
163
Secondary-Level MATH PI
154
Unweighted Combined PI
143
Multiracial
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Students With Disabilities
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
57
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
67
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
62
Limited English Proficient
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Economically Disadvantaged
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
93
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
116
Secondary-Level ELA PI
154
Secondary-Level MATH PI
135
Unweighted Combined PI
125
― There were not enough students to determine a Performance Index.
Overall Graduation Rate for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: YES
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
YES
All Students
MADE AYP
YES
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP
―
White
MADE AYP
YES
Multiracial
MADE AYP
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP
―
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
YES
― There were not enough students to make an AYP determination.
Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort for Accountability
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion:
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
YES
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
108
0
2
5
1
99
1
17
1
52
Graduation Rate
88%
―
―
―
―
90%
―
―
―
83%
State Standard
80%
―
―
―
―
80%
―
―
―
80%
Progress Target
80%
―
―
―
―
80%
―
―
―
75%
All Students
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
108
Graduation Rate
88%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%
American Indian or Alaska Native
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Black or African American
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
2
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
5
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
1
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
White
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
99
Graduation Rate
90%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%
Multiracial
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
1
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Students With Disabilities
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
17
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Limited English Proficient
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
1
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
52
Graduation Rate
83%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
75%
YES Graduation rate is equal to or greater than the State Standard or the group's Progress Target. NO Graduation rate is less than the State Standard and the group's Progress Target.
― There were fewer than 30 students in the cohort.
Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort for Accountability
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion:
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
NO
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
102
1
0
2
0
99
0
15
1
37
Graduation Rate
84%
―
―
―
―
85%
―
―
―
73%
State Standard
80%
―
―
―
―
80%
―
―
―
80%
Progress Target
80%
―
―
―
―
80%
―
―
―
80%
All Students
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
102
Graduation Rate
84%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%
American Indian or Alaska Native
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
1
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Black or African American
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
2
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
White
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
99
Graduation Rate
85%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%
Multiracial
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Students With Disabilities
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
15
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Limited English Proficient
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
1
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: NO
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
37
Graduation Rate
73%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%
YES Graduation rate is equal to or greater than the State Standard or the group's Progress Target. NO Graduation rate is less than the State Standard and the group's Progress Target.
― There were fewer than 30 students in the cohort.
Graduation Rates for Non-AYP Groups for Accountability
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
108
106
103
107
9
107
91
107
56
55
53
2
106
Graduation Rate
88%
88%
89%
88%
―
89%
92%
89%
93%
85%
91%
―
89%
Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
101
102
100
102
3
102
87
101
65
53
49
1
101
Graduation Rate
84%
84%
85%
84%
―
84%
92%
85%
91%
79%
90%
―
85%
Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
108
Graduation Rate
88%
Not Black or African American
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
106
Graduation Rate
88%
Not Hispanic or Latino
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
103
Graduation Rate
89%
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
107
Graduation Rate
88%
Not White
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
9
Graduation Rate
―
Not Multiracial
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
107
Graduation Rate
89%
General Education
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
91
Graduation Rate
92%
English Proficient
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
107
Graduation Rate
89%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
56
Graduation Rate
93%
Male
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
55
Graduation Rate
85%
Female
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
53
Graduation Rate
91%
Migrant
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
2
Graduation Rate
―
Not Migrant
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
106
Graduation Rate
89%
Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
101
Graduation Rate
84%
Not Black or African American
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
102
Graduation Rate
84%
Not Hispanic or Latino
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
100
Graduation Rate
85%
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
102
Graduation Rate
84%
Not White
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
3
Graduation Rate
―
Not Multiracial
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
102
Graduation Rate
84%
General Education
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
87
Graduation Rate
92%
English Proficient
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
101
Graduation Rate
85%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
65
Graduation Rate
91%
Male
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
53
Graduation Rate
79%
Female
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
49
Graduation Rate
90%
Migrant
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
1
Graduation Rate
―
Not Migrant
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
101
Graduation Rate
85%
― There were fewer than 30 students in the cohort.
Graduation Rates for Regents with Advanced Designation and CTE Endorsement for Accountability
Percentage of 2012 Graduation-Rate Total Cohort members who graduated as of August 31, 2016 with:
Regents Diploma with an Advanced Designation (This District)
54%
Regents Diploma with an Advanced Designation (Statewide)
31%
Percentage in This District Exceeded Statewide
YES
Regents Diploma with an Advanced Designation (This District)
54%
Regents Diploma with an Advanced Designation (Statewide)
31%
Percentage in This District Exceeded Statewide
YES
Regents Diploma with CTE Endorsement (This District)
18%
Regents Diploma with CTE Endorsement (Statewide)
5%
Percentage in This District Exceeded Statewide
YES
Regents Diploma with CTE Endorsement (This District)
You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.
Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.
If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.
