AMSTERDAM CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT - School Report Card Data [2016 - 17]
The New York State Report Card is an important part of the Board of Regents' effort to raise learning standards for all students. It provides information to the public on school/district enrollment and staff, student performance, and other measures of school and district performance. Knowledge gained from the report card on a school's or district's strengths and weaknesses can be used to improve instruction and services to students. Report Card Data - Glossary of Terms | Accountability Data - Glossary of Terms | Business Rules
AMSTERDAM CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT ENROLLMENT (2016 - 17)
K-12 ENROLLMENT
3,574
ENROLLMENT BY GENDER
MALE
1,833
51%
FEMALE
1,741
49%
ENROLLMENT BY ETHNICITY
GROUP
AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE
BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN
HISPANIC OR LATINO
ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER
WHITE
MULTIRACIAL
TOTAL
8
180
1,654
36
1,581
115
PERCENT
0%
5%
46%
1%
44%
3%
OTHER GROUPS
ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
203
6%
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
588
16%
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
2,354
66%
ENROLLMENT BY GRADE
GROUP
K (FULL DAY)
1ST GRADE
2ND GRADE
3RD GRADE
4TH GRADE
5TH GRADE
6TH GRADE
UNGRADED ELEMENTARY
7TH GRADE
8TH GRADE
9TH GRADE
10TH GRADE
11TH GRADE
12TH GRADE
UNGRADED SECONDARY
TOTAL
281
285
271
285
270
260
279
27
267
265
257
312
237
238
40
PERCENT
7%
7%
7%
7%
7%
7%
7%
1%
7%
7%
7%
8%
6%
6%
1%
AMSTERDAM CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT ENROLLMENT (2016 - 17)
K-12 Enrollment: 3,574
ENROLLMENT BY GENDER
MALE
1,833
51%
FEMALE
1,741
49%
ENROLLMENT BY ETHNICITY
AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE
8
0%
BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN
180
5%
HISPANIC OR LATINO
1,654
46%
ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER
36
1%
WHITE
1,581
44%
MULTIRACIAL
115
3%
OTHER GROUPS
ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
203
6%
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
588
16%
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
2,354
66%
ENROLLMENT BY GRADE
K (FULL DAY)
281
7%
1ST GRADE
285
7%
2ND GRADE
271
7%
3RD GRADE
285
7%
4TH GRADE
270
7%
5TH GRADE
260
7%
6TH GRADE
279
7%
UNGRADED ELEMENTARY
27
1%
7TH GRADE
267
7%
8TH GRADE
265
7%
9TH GRADE
257
7%
10TH GRADE
312
8%
11TH GRADE
237
6%
12TH GRADE
238
6%
UNGRADED SECONDARY
40
1%
Average Class Size (2016 - 17)
GROUP
Common Branch
Grade 8 English
Grade 8 Mathematics
Grade 8 Science
Grade 8 Social Studies
Grade 10 English
Grade 10 Mathematics
Grade 10 Social Studies
CLASS SIZE
22
17
17
17
19
22
16
20
Average Class Size (2016 - 17)
Common Branch
22
Grade 8 English
17
Grade 8 Mathematics
17
Grade 8 Science
17
Grade 8 Social Studies
19
Grade 10 English
22
Grade 10 Mathematics
16
Grade 10 Social Studies
20
Average Class Size (2016 - 17)
GROUP
Common Branch
Grade 8 English
Grade 8 Mathematics
Grade 8 Science
Grade 8 Social Studies
Grade 10 English
Grade 10 Mathematics
Grade 10 Social Studies
CLASS SIZE
22
17
17
17
19
22
16
20
Average Class Size (2016 - 17)
Common Branch
22
Grade 8 English
17
Grade 8 Mathematics
17
Grade 8 Science
17
Grade 8 Social Studies
19
Grade 10 English
22
Grade 10 Mathematics
16
Grade 10 Social Studies
20
Average Class Size (2016 - 17)
GROUP
Common Branch
Grade 8 English
Grade 8 Mathematics
Grade 8 Science
Grade 8 Social Studies
Grade 10 English
Grade 10 Mathematics
Grade 10 Social Studies
CLASS SIZE
22
17
17
17
19
22
16
20
Average Class Size (2016 - 17)
Common Branch
22
Grade 8 English
17
Grade 8 Mathematics
17
Grade 8 Science
17
Grade 8 Social Studies
19
Grade 10 English
22
Grade 10 Mathematics
16
Grade 10 Social Studies
20
Average Class Size (2016 - 17)
GROUP
Common Branch
Grade 8 English
Grade 8 Mathematics
Grade 8 Science
Grade 8 Social Studies
Grade 10 English
Grade 10 Mathematics
Grade 10 Social Studies
CLASS SIZE
22
17
17
17
19
22
16
20
Average Class Size (2016 - 17)
Common Branch
22
Grade 8 English
17
Grade 8 Mathematics
17
Grade 8 Science
17
Grade 8 Social Studies
19
Grade 10 English
22
Grade 10 Mathematics
16
Grade 10 Social Studies
20
Average Class Size (2016 - 17)
GROUP
Common Branch
Grade 8 English
Grade 8 Mathematics
Grade 8 Science
Grade 8 Social Studies
Grade 10 English
Grade 10 Mathematics
Grade 10 Social Studies
CLASS SIZE
22
17
17
17
19
22
16
20
Average Class Size (2016 - 17)
Common Branch
22
Grade 8 English
17
Grade 8 Mathematics
17
Grade 8 Science
17
Grade 8 Social Studies
19
Grade 10 English
22
Grade 10 Mathematics
16
Grade 10 Social Studies
20
Average Class Size (2016 - 17)
GROUP
Common Branch
Grade 8 English
Grade 8 Mathematics
Grade 8 Science
Grade 8 Social Studies
Grade 10 English
Grade 10 Mathematics
Grade 10 Social Studies
CLASS SIZE
22
17
17
17
19
22
16
20
Average Class Size (2016 - 17)
Common Branch
22
Grade 8 English
17
Grade 8 Mathematics
17
Grade 8 Science
17
Grade 8 Social Studies
19
Grade 10 English
22
Grade 10 Mathematics
16
Grade 10 Social Studies
20
Average Class Size (2016 - 17)
GROUP
Common Branch
Grade 8 English
Grade 8 Mathematics
Grade 8 Science
Grade 8 Social Studies
Grade 10 English
Grade 10 Mathematics
Grade 10 Social Studies
CLASS SIZE
22
17
17
17
19
22
16
20
Average Class Size (2016 - 17)
Common Branch
22
Grade 8 English
17
Grade 8 Mathematics
17
Grade 8 Science
17
Grade 8 Social Studies
19
Grade 10 English
22
Grade 10 Mathematics
16
Grade 10 Social Studies
20
Average Class Size (2016 - 17)
GROUP
Common Branch
Grade 8 English
Grade 8 Mathematics
Grade 8 Science
Grade 8 Social Studies
Grade 10 English
Grade 10 Mathematics
Grade 10 Social Studies
CLASS SIZE
22
17
17
17
19
22
16
20
Average Class Size (2016 - 17)
Common Branch
22
Grade 8 English
17
Grade 8 Mathematics
17
Grade 8 Science
17
Grade 8 Social Studies
19
Grade 10 English
22
Grade 10 Mathematics
16
Grade 10 Social Studies
20
Free and Reduced-Price Lunch (2016 - 17)
ELIGIBLE FOR FREE LUNCH
2,242
63%
ELIGIBLE FOR REDUCED-PRICE LUNCH
110
3%
Free and Reduced-Price Lunch (2016 - 17)
Eligible for Free Lunch
2,242
63%
Eligible for Reduced-Price Lunch
110
3%
ATTENDANCE (2015 - 16)
ANNUAL ATTENDANCE RATE
90%
Attendance (2015 - 16)
Annual Attendance Rate
90%
STUDENT SUSPENSIONS (2015 - 16)
319
9%
Student Suspensions (2015 - 16)
Student Suspensions
319
9%
Teacher Turnover Rate (2015-16 to 2016-17)
Turnover Rate of Teachers with Fewer Than Five Years of Experience
19%
TURNOVER RATE OF ALL TEACHERS
15%
Teacher Turnover Rate (2015-16 to 2016-17)
Turnover Rate of Teachers with Fewer Than Five Years of Experience
19%
Turnover Rate of All Teachers
15%
Staff Counts (2016 - 17)
GROUP
PRINCIPALS
ASSISTANT PRINCIPALS
OTHER PROFESSIONAL STAFF
PARAPROFESSIONALS
STAFF
6
8
34
89
Staff Counts (2016 - 17)
Principals
6
Assistant Principals
8
Other Professional Staff
34
Paraprofessionals
89
Teacher Qualifications (2016 - 17)
TOTAL TEACHERS
291
PERCENT WITH NO VALID TEACHING CERTIFICATE
0%
PERCENT TEACHING OUT OF CERTIFICATE
2%
PERCENT WITH FEWER THAN THREE YEARS OF EXPERIENCE
11%
PERCENTAGE WITH MASTER'S DEGREEPLUS 30 HOURS OR DOCTORATE
10%
Total Number of Classes
993
Percent Taught by Teachers Without Appropriate Certification
3%
Teacher Qualifications (2016 - 17)
TOTAL TEACHERS: 291
Percent with No Valid Teaching Certificate
0%
Percent Teaching Out of Certification
2%
Percent with Fewer Than Three Years of Experience
11%
Percentage with Master's Degree Plus 30 Hours or Doctorate
10%
Total Number of Classes
993
Percent Taught by Teachers Without Appropriate Certification
3%
High School Completers (2016 - 17)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
230
190
40
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
211
190
21
REGENTS DIPLOMA
186
88%
180
95%
6
29%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
REGENTS WITH ADVANCED DESIGNATION
48
23%
47
25%
1
5%
REGENTS WITH CTE ENDORSEMENT
22
10%
22
12%
0
0%
LOCAL DIPLOMAS
25
12%
10
5%
15
71%
COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS
19
8%
0
0%
19
48%
All Students
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
230
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
211
Regents Diploma
186
88%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
48
23%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
22
10%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
25
12%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
19
8%
of Completers
General Education
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
190
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
190
Regents Diploma
180
95%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
47
25%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
22
12%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
10
5%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
0
0%
of Completers
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
40
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
21
Regents Diploma
6
29%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
1
5%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
0
0%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
15
71%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
19
48%
of Completers
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
230
190
40
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
211
190
21
REGENTS DIPLOMA
186
88%
180
95%
6
29%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
REGENTS WITH ADVANCED DESIGNATION
48
23%
47
25%
1
5%
REGENTS WITH CTE ENDORSEMENT
22
10%
22
12%
0
0%
LOCAL DIPLOMAS
25
12%
10
5%
15
71%
COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS
19
8%
0
0%
19
48%
All Students
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
230
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
211
Regents Diploma
186
88%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
48
23%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
22
10%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
25
12%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
19
8%
of Completers
General Education
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
190
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
190
Regents Diploma
180
95%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
47
25%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
22
12%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
10
5%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
0
0%
of Completers
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
40
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
21
Regents Diploma
6
29%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
1
5%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
0
0%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
15
71%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
19
48%
of Completers
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
230
190
40
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
211
190
21
REGENTS DIPLOMA
186
88%
180
95%
6
29%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
REGENTS WITH ADVANCED DESIGNATION
48
23%
47
25%
1
5%
REGENTS WITH CTE ENDORSEMENT
22
10%
22
12%
0
0%
LOCAL DIPLOMAS
25
12%
10
5%
15
71%
COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS
19
8%
0
0%
19
48%
All Students
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
230
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
211
Regents Diploma
186
88%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
48
23%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
22
10%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
25
12%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
19
8%
of Completers
General Education
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
190
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
190
Regents Diploma
180
95%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
47
25%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
22
12%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
10
5%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
0
0%
of Completers
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
40
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
21
Regents Diploma
6
29%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
1
5%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
0
0%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
15
71%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
19
48%
of Completers
High School Non-completers (2016 - 17)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
83
8%
53
6%
30
15%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
3
0%
3
0%
0
0%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
86
8%
56
6%
30
15%
All Students
DROPPED OUT
83
8%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
3
0%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
86
8%
General Education
DROPPED OUT
53
6%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
3
0%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
56
6%
Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
30
15%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
0
0%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
30
15%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
83
8%
53
6%
30
15%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
3
0%
3
0%
0
0%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
86
8%
56
6%
30
15%
All Students
DROPPED OUT
83
8%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
3
0%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
86
8%
General Education
DROPPED OUT
53
6%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
3
0%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
56
6%
Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
30
15%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
0
0%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
30
15%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
83
8%
53
6%
30
15%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
3
0%
3
0%
0
0%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
86
8%
56
6%
30
15%
All Students
DROPPED OUT
83
8%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
3
0%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
86
8%
General Education
DROPPED OUT
53
6%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
3
0%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
56
6%
Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
30
15%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
0
0%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
30
15%
Post-graduation Plans of Completers (2016 - 17)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO FOUR-YEAR COLLEGE
60
26%
59
31%
1
3%
TO TWO-YEAR COLLEGE
127
55%
114
60%
13
33%
TO OTHER POST-SECONDARY
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
TO THE MILITARY
4
2%
4
2%
0
0%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO EMPLOYMENT
9
4%
5
3%
4
10%
TO ADULT SERVICES
5
2%
0
0%
5
13%
TO OTHER KNOWN PLANS
4
2%
2
1%
2
5%
PLANS UNKNOWN
21
9%
6
3%
15
38%
All Students
To Four-Year College
60
26%
To Two-Year College
127
55%
To Other Post-Secondary
0
0%
To the Military
4
2%
To Employment
9
4%
To Adult Services
5
2%
To Other Known Plans
4
2%
Plan Unknown
21
9%
General Education
To Four-Year College
59
31%
To Two-Year College
114
60%
To Other Post-Secondary
0
0%
To the Military
4
2%
To Employment
5
3%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
2
1%
Plan Unknown
6
3%
Students with Disabilities
To Four-Year College
1
3%
To Two-Year College
13
33%
To Other Post-Secondary
0
0%
To the Military
0
0%
To Employment
4
10%
To Adult Services
5
13%
To Other Known Plans
2
5%
Plan Unknown
15
38%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO FOUR-YEAR COLLEGE
60
26%
59
31%
1
3%
TO TWO-YEAR COLLEGE
127
55%
114
60%
13
33%
TO OTHER POST-SECONDARY
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
TO THE MILITARY
4
2%
4
2%
0
0%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO EMPLOYMENT
9
4%
5
3%
4
10%
TO ADULT SERVICES
5
2%
0
0%
5
13%
TO OTHER KNOWN PLANS
4
2%
2
1%
2
5%
PLANS UNKNOWN
21
9%
6
3%
15
38%
All Students
To Four-Year College
60
26%
To Two-Year College
127
55%
To Other Post-Secondary
0
0%
To the Military
4
2%
To Employment
9
4%
To Adult Services
5
2%
To Other Known Plans
4
2%
Plan Unknown
21
9%
General Education
To Four-Year College
59
31%
To Two-Year College
114
60%
To Other Post-Secondary
0
0%
To the Military
4
2%
To Employment
5
3%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
2
1%
Plan Unknown
6
3%
Students with Disabilities
To Four-Year College
1
3%
To Two-Year College
13
33%
To Other Post-Secondary
0
0%
To the Military
0
0%
To Employment
4
10%
To Adult Services
5
13%
To Other Known Plans
2
5%
Plan Unknown
15
38%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO FOUR-YEAR COLLEGE
60
26%
59
31%
1
3%
TO TWO-YEAR COLLEGE
127
55%
114
60%
13
33%
TO OTHER POST-SECONDARY
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
TO THE MILITARY
4
2%
4
2%
0
0%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO EMPLOYMENT
9
4%
5
3%
4
10%
TO ADULT SERVICES
5
2%
0
0%
5
13%
TO OTHER KNOWN PLANS
4
2%
2
1%
2
5%
PLANS UNKNOWN
21
9%
6
3%
15
38%
All Students
To Four-Year College
60
26%
To Two-Year College
127
55%
To Other Post-Secondary
0
0%
To the Military
4
2%
To Employment
9
4%
To Adult Services
5
2%
To Other Known Plans
4
2%
Plan Unknown
21
9%
General Education
To Four-Year College
59
31%
To Two-Year College
114
60%
To Other Post-Secondary
0
0%
To the Military
4
2%
To Employment
5
3%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
2
1%
Plan Unknown
6
3%
Students with Disabilities
To Four-Year College
1
3%
To Two-Year College
13
33%
To Other Post-Secondary
0
0%
To the Military
0
0%
To Employment
4
10%
To Adult Services
5
13%
To Other Known Plans
2
5%
Plan Unknown
15
38%
Grade 3 English Language Arts
MEAN SCORE: 287
All Students
PROFICIENT
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 261
LEVEL 1
136
52%
LEVEL 2
63
24%
LEVEL 3
58
22%
LEVEL 4
4
2%
General Education
PROFICIENT
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 224
LEVEL 1
105
47%
LEVEL 2
61
27%
LEVEL 3
54
24%
LEVEL 4
4
2%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 37
LEVEL 1
31
84%
LEVEL 2
2
5%
LEVEL 3
4
11%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 11
LEVEL 1
6
55%
LEVEL 2
3
27%
LEVEL 3
2
18%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 141
LEVEL 1
79
56%
LEVEL 2
34
24%
LEVEL 3
25
18%
LEVEL 4
3
2%
White
PROFICIENT
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 96
LEVEL 1
45
47%
LEVEL 2
21
22%
LEVEL 3
29
30%
LEVEL 4
1
1%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 11
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 13
LEVEL 1
6
46%
LEVEL 2
5
38%
LEVEL 3
2
15%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Female
PROFICIENT
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 128
LEVEL 1
62
48%
LEVEL 2
33
26%
LEVEL 3
30
23%
LEVEL 4
3
2%
Male
PROFICIENT
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 133
LEVEL 1
74
56%
LEVEL 2
30
23%
LEVEL 3
28
21%
LEVEL 4
1
1%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 253
LEVEL 1
130
51%
LEVEL 2
62
25%
LEVEL 3
57
23%
LEVEL 4
4
2%
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 8
LEVEL 1
6
75%
LEVEL 2
1
13%
LEVEL 3
1
13%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 194
LEVEL 1
116
60%
LEVEL 2
47
24%
LEVEL 3
31
16%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 67
LEVEL 1
20
30%
LEVEL 2
16
24%
LEVEL 3
27
40%
LEVEL 4
4
6%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 261
LEVEL 1
136
52%
LEVEL 2
63
24%
LEVEL 3
58
22%
LEVEL 4
4
2%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
261
224
37
2
11
141
96
11
13
128
133
253
8
194
67
261
PROFICIENT
24%
26%
11%
_%
18%
20%
31%
_%
15%
26%
22%
24%
13%
16%
46%
24%
LEVEL 1
136
52%
105
47%
31
84%
_
_
6
55%
79
56%
45
47%
_
_
6
46%
62
48%
74
56%
130
51%
6
75%
116
60%
20
30%
136
52%
LEVEL 2
63
24%
61
27%
2
5%
_
_
3
27%
34
24%
21
22%
_
_
5
38%
33
26%
30
23%
62
25%
1
13%
47
24%
16
24%
63
24%
LEVEL 3
58
22%
54
24%
4
11%
_
_
2
18%
25
18%
29
30%
_
_
2
15%
30
23%
28
21%
57
23%
1
13%
31
16%
27
40%
58
22%
LEVEL 4
4
2%
4
2%
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
3
2%
1
1%
_
_
0
0%
3
2%
1
1%
4
2%
0
0%
0
0%
4
6%
4
2%
Grade 4 English Language Arts
MEAN SCORE: 279
All Students
PROFICIENT
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 246
LEVEL 1
126
51%
LEVEL 2
86
35%
LEVEL 3
29
12%
LEVEL 4
5
2%
General Education
PROFICIENT
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 211
LEVEL 1
98
46%
LEVEL 2
80
38%
LEVEL 3
28
13%
LEVEL 4
5
2%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 35
LEVEL 1
28
80%
LEVEL 2
6
17%
LEVEL 3
1
3%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 14
LEVEL 1
7
50%
LEVEL 2
7
50%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 113
LEVEL 1
62
55%
LEVEL 2
42
37%
LEVEL 3
9
8%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
White
PROFICIENT
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 106
LEVEL 1
49
46%
LEVEL 2
35
33%
LEVEL 3
17
16%
LEVEL 4
5
5%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 10
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 13
LEVEL 1
8
62%
LEVEL 2
2
15%
LEVEL 3
3
23%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Female
PROFICIENT
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 119
LEVEL 1
58
49%
LEVEL 2
44
37%
LEVEL 3
15
13%
LEVEL 4
2
2%
Male
PROFICIENT
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 127
LEVEL 1
68
54%
LEVEL 2
42
33%
LEVEL 3
14
11%
LEVEL 4
3
2%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 235
LEVEL 1
116
49%
LEVEL 2
85
36%
LEVEL 3
29
12%
LEVEL 4
5
2%
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 11
LEVEL 1
10
91%
LEVEL 2
1
9%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 193
LEVEL 1
108
56%
LEVEL 2
68
35%
LEVEL 3
16
8%
LEVEL 4
1
1%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 53
LEVEL 1
18
34%
LEVEL 2
18
34%
LEVEL 3
13
25%
LEVEL 4
4
8%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 246
LEVEL 1
126
51%
LEVEL 2
86
35%
LEVEL 3
29
12%
LEVEL 4
5
2%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
246
211
35
3
14
113
106
10
13
119
127
235
11
193
53
246
PROFICIENT
14%
16%
3%
_%
0%
8%
21%
_%
23%
14%
13%
14%
0%
9%
32%
14%
LEVEL 1
126
51%
98
46%
28
80%
_
_
7
50%
62
55%
49
46%
_
_
8
62%
58
49%
68
54%
116
49%
10
91%
108
56%
18
34%
126
51%
LEVEL 2
86
35%
80
38%
6
17%
_
_
7
50%
42
37%
35
33%
_
_
2
15%
44
37%
42
33%
85
36%
1
9%
68
35%
18
34%
86
35%
LEVEL 3
29
12%
28
13%
1
3%
_
_
0
0%
9
8%
17
16%
_
_
3
23%
15
13%
14
11%
29
12%
0
0%
16
8%
13
25%
29
12%
LEVEL 4
5
2%
5
2%
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
5
5%
_
_
0
0%
2
2%
3
2%
5
2%
0
0%
1
1%
4
8%
5
2%
Grade 5 English Language Arts
MEAN SCORE: 278
All Students
PROFICIENT
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 227
LEVEL 1
131
58%
LEVEL 2
66
29%
LEVEL 3
22
10%
LEVEL 4
8
4%
General Education
PROFICIENT
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 173
LEVEL 1
82
47%
LEVEL 2
61
35%
LEVEL 3
22
13%
LEVEL 4
8
5%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 54
LEVEL 1
49
91%
LEVEL 2
5
9%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 7
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 107
LEVEL 1
71
66%
LEVEL 2
28
26%
LEVEL 3
7
7%
LEVEL 4
1
1%
White
PROFICIENT
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 99
LEVEL 1
51
52%
LEVEL 2
28
28%
LEVEL 3
13
13%
LEVEL 4
7
7%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 12
LEVEL 1
4
33%
LEVEL 2
8
67%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
5
56%
LEVEL 2
2
22%
LEVEL 3
2
22%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Female
PROFICIENT
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 91
LEVEL 1
46
51%
LEVEL 2
30
33%
LEVEL 3
10
11%
LEVEL 4
5
5%
Male
PROFICIENT
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 136
LEVEL 1
85
63%
LEVEL 2
36
26%
LEVEL 3
12
9%
LEVEL 4
3
2%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 212
LEVEL 1
117
55%
LEVEL 2
65
31%
LEVEL 3
22
10%
LEVEL 4
8
4%
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 15
LEVEL 1
14
93%
LEVEL 2
1
7%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 163
LEVEL 1
107
66%
LEVEL 2
43
26%
LEVEL 3
11
7%
LEVEL 4
2
1%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 64
LEVEL 1
24
38%
LEVEL 2
23
36%
LEVEL 3
11
17%
LEVEL 4
6
9%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 227
LEVEL 1
131
58%
LEVEL 2
66
29%
LEVEL 3
22
10%
LEVEL 4
8
4%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
227
173
54
2
7
107
99
12
9
91
136
212
15
163
64
227
PROFICIENT
13%
17%
0%
_%
_%
7%
20%
0%
22%
16%
11%
14%
0%
8%
27%
13%
LEVEL 1
131
58%
82
47%
49
91%
_
_
_
_
71
66%
51
52%
4
33%
5
56%
46
51%
85
63%
117
55%
14
93%
107
66%
24
38%
131
58%
LEVEL 2
66
29%
61
35%
5
9%
_
_
_
_
28
26%
28
28%
8
67%
2
22%
30
33%
36
26%
65
31%
1
7%
43
26%
23
36%
66
29%
LEVEL 3
22
10%
22
13%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
7
7%
13
13%
0
0%
2
22%
10
11%
12
9%
22
10%
0
0%
11
7%
11
17%
22
10%
LEVEL 4
8
4%
8
5%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
1
1%
7
7%
0
0%
0
0%
5
5%
3
2%
8
4%
0
0%
2
1%
6
9%
8
4%
Grade 6 English Language Arts
MEAN SCORE: 280
All Students
PROFICIENT
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 216
LEVEL 1
104
48%
LEVEL 2
87
40%
LEVEL 3
18
8%
LEVEL 4
7
3%
General Education
PROFICIENT
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 178
LEVEL 1
75
42%
LEVEL 2
81
46%
LEVEL 3
15
8%
LEVEL 4
7
4%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 38
LEVEL 1
29
76%
LEVEL 2
6
16%
LEVEL 3
3
8%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
American Indian or Alaska Native
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 19
LEVEL 1
12
63%
LEVEL 2
6
32%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
1
5%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 99
LEVEL 1
60
61%
LEVEL 2
30
30%
LEVEL 3
7
7%
LEVEL 4
2
2%
White
PROFICIENT
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 89
LEVEL 1
27
30%
LEVEL 2
50
56%
LEVEL 3
9
10%
LEVEL 4
3
3%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
5
56%
LEVEL 2
1
11%
LEVEL 3
2
22%
LEVEL 4
1
11%
Female
PROFICIENT
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 111
LEVEL 1
46
41%
LEVEL 2
49
44%
LEVEL 3
12
11%
LEVEL 4
4
4%
Male
PROFICIENT
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 105
LEVEL 1
58
55%
LEVEL 2
38
36%
LEVEL 3
6
6%
LEVEL 4
3
3%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 204
LEVEL 1
94
46%
LEVEL 2
85
42%
LEVEL 3
18
9%
LEVEL 4
7
3%
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 12
LEVEL 1
10
83%
LEVEL 2
2
17%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 143
LEVEL 1
76
53%
LEVEL 2
56
39%
LEVEL 3
7
5%
LEVEL 4
4
3%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 73
LEVEL 1
28
38%
LEVEL 2
31
42%
LEVEL 3
11
15%
LEVEL 4
3
4%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 216
LEVEL 1
104
48%
LEVEL 2
87
40%
LEVEL 3
18
8%
LEVEL 4
7
3%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
216
178
38
2
2
19
99
89
5
9
111
105
204
12
143
73
216
PROFICIENT
12%
12%
8%
_%
_%
5%
9%
13%
_%
33%
14%
9%
12%
0%
8%
19%
12%
LEVEL 1
104
48%
75
42%
29
76%
_
_
_
_
12
63%
60
61%
27
30%
_
_
5
56%
46
41%
58
55%
94
46%
10
83%
76
53%
28
38%
104
48%
LEVEL 2
87
40%
81
46%
6
16%
_
_
_
_
6
32%
30
30%
50
56%
_
_
1
11%
49
44%
38
36%
85
42%
2
17%
56
39%
31
42%
87
40%
LEVEL 3
18
8%
15
8%
3
8%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
7
7%
9
10%
_
_
2
22%
12
11%
6
6%
18
9%
0
0%
7
5%
11
15%
18
8%
LEVEL 4
7
3%
7
4%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
1
5%
2
2%
3
3%
_
_
1
11%
4
4%
3
3%
7
3%
0
0%
4
3%
3
4%
7
3%
Grade 7 English Language Arts
MEAN SCORE: 281
All Students
PROFICIENT
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 171
LEVEL 1
87
51%
LEVEL 2
59
35%
LEVEL 3
17
10%
LEVEL 4
8
5%
General Education
PROFICIENT
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 136
LEVEL 1
57
42%
LEVEL 2
54
40%
LEVEL 3
17
13%
LEVEL 4
8
6%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 35
LEVEL 1
30
86%
LEVEL 2
5
14%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
American Indian or Alaska Native
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 10
LEVEL 1
4
40%
LEVEL 2
5
50%
LEVEL 3
1
10%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 73
LEVEL 1
46
63%
LEVEL 2
21
29%
LEVEL 3
5
7%
LEVEL 4
1
1%
White
PROFICIENT
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 76
LEVEL 1
34
45%
LEVEL 2
27
36%
LEVEL 3
10
13%
LEVEL 4
5
7%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 8
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 12
LEVEL 1
3
25%
LEVEL 2
6
50%
LEVEL 3
1
8%
LEVEL 4
2
17%
Female
PROFICIENT
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 72
LEVEL 1
28
39%
LEVEL 2
33
46%
LEVEL 3
9
13%
LEVEL 4
2
3%
Male
PROFICIENT
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 99
LEVEL 1
59
60%
LEVEL 2
26
26%
LEVEL 3
8
8%
LEVEL 4
6
6%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 161
LEVEL 1
77
48%
LEVEL 2
59
37%
LEVEL 3
17
11%
LEVEL 4
8
5%
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 10
LEVEL 1
10
100%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 109
LEVEL 1
66
61%
LEVEL 2
32
29%
LEVEL 3
8
7%
LEVEL 4
3
3%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 62
LEVEL 1
21
34%
LEVEL 2
27
44%
LEVEL 3
9
15%
LEVEL 4
5
8%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 171
LEVEL 1
87
51%
LEVEL 2
59
35%
LEVEL 3
17
10%
LEVEL 4
8
5%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
171
136
35
1
3
10
73
76
8
12
72
99
161
10
109
62
171
PROFICIENT
15%
18%
0%
_%
_%
10%
8%
20%
_%
25%
15%
14%
16%
0%
10%
23%
15%
LEVEL 1
87
51%
57
42%
30
86%
_
_
_
_
4
40%
46
63%
34
45%
_
_
3
25%
28
39%
59
60%
77
48%
10
100%
66
61%
21
34%
87
51%
LEVEL 2
59
35%
54
40%
5
14%
_
_
_
_
5
50%
21
29%
27
36%
_
_
6
50%
33
46%
26
26%
59
37%
0
0%
32
29%
27
44%
59
35%
LEVEL 3
17
10%
17
13%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
1
10%
5
7%
10
13%
_
_
1
8%
9
13%
8
8%
17
11%
0
0%
8
7%
9
15%
17
10%
LEVEL 4
8
5%
8
6%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
1
1%
5
7%
_
_
2
17%
2
3%
6
6%
8
5%
0
0%
3
3%
5
8%
8
5%
Grade 8 English Language Arts
MEAN SCORE: 283
All Students
PROFICIENT
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 138
LEVEL 1
67
49%
LEVEL 2
45
33%
LEVEL 3
23
17%
LEVEL 4
3
2%
General Education
PROFICIENT
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 110
LEVEL 1
48
44%
LEVEL 2
38
35%
LEVEL 3
21
19%
LEVEL 4
3
3%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 28
LEVEL 1
19
68%
LEVEL 2
7
25%
LEVEL 3
2
7%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
American Indian or Alaska Native
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 61
LEVEL 1
38
62%
LEVEL 2
17
28%
LEVEL 3
6
10%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
White
PROFICIENT
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 71
LEVEL 1
26
37%
LEVEL 2
26
37%
LEVEL 3
16
23%
LEVEL 4
3
4%
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
3
50%
LEVEL 2
2
33%
LEVEL 3
1
17%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Female
PROFICIENT
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 50
LEVEL 1
20
40%
LEVEL 2
17
34%
LEVEL 3
11
22%
LEVEL 4
2
4%
Male
PROFICIENT
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 88
LEVEL 1
47
53%
LEVEL 2
28
32%
LEVEL 3
12
14%
LEVEL 4
1
1%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 129
LEVEL 1
58
45%
LEVEL 2
45
35%
LEVEL 3
23
18%
LEVEL 4
3
2%
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
9
100%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 84
LEVEL 1
48
57%
LEVEL 2
26
31%
LEVEL 3
10
12%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 54
LEVEL 1
19
35%
LEVEL 2
19
35%
LEVEL 3
13
24%
LEVEL 4
3
6%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 138
LEVEL 1
67
49%
LEVEL 2
45
33%
LEVEL 3
23
17%
LEVEL 4
3
2%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
138
110
28
1
5
61
71
6
50
88
129
9
84
54
138
PROFICIENT
19%
22%
7%
_%
_%
10%
27%
17%
26%
15%
20%
0%
12%
30%
19%
LEVEL 1
67
49%
48
44%
19
68%
_
_
_
_
38
62%
26
37%
3
50%
20
40%
47
53%
58
45%
9
100%
48
57%
19
35%
67
49%
LEVEL 2
45
33%
38
35%
7
25%
_
_
_
_
17
28%
26
37%
2
33%
17
34%
28
32%
45
35%
0
0%
26
31%
19
35%
45
33%
LEVEL 3
23
17%
21
19%
2
7%
_
_
_
_
6
10%
16
23%
1
17%
11
22%
12
14%
23
18%
0
0%
10
12%
13
24%
23
17%
LEVEL 4
3
2%
3
3%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
3
4%
0
0%
2
4%
1
1%
3
2%
0
0%
0
0%
3
6%
3
2%
Grade 3 Mathematics
MEAN SCORE: 280
All Students
PROFICIENT
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 265
LEVEL 1
141
53%
LEVEL 2
67
25%
LEVEL 3
36
14%
LEVEL 4
21
8%
General Education
PROFICIENT
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 227
LEVEL 1
108
48%
LEVEL 2
64
28%
LEVEL 3
34
15%
LEVEL 4
21
9%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 38
LEVEL 1
33
87%
LEVEL 2
3
8%
LEVEL 3
2
5%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 10
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 145
LEVEL 1
88
61%
LEVEL 2
36
25%
LEVEL 3
13
9%
LEVEL 4
8
6%
White
PROFICIENT
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 97
LEVEL 1
40
41%
LEVEL 2
25
26%
LEVEL 3
20
21%
LEVEL 4
12
12%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 11
LEVEL 1
7
64%
LEVEL 2
3
27%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
1
9%
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 12
LEVEL 1
6
50%
LEVEL 2
3
25%
LEVEL 3
3
25%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Female
PROFICIENT
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 131
LEVEL 1
70
53%
LEVEL 2
36
27%
LEVEL 3
17
13%
LEVEL 4
8
6%
Male
PROFICIENT
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 134
LEVEL 1
71
53%
LEVEL 2
31
23%
LEVEL 3
19
14%
LEVEL 4
13
10%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 252
LEVEL 1
129
51%
LEVEL 2
67
27%
LEVEL 3
35
14%
LEVEL 4
21
8%
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 13
LEVEL 1
12
92%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
1
8%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 197
LEVEL 1
124
63%
LEVEL 2
50
25%
LEVEL 3
18
9%
LEVEL 4
5
3%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 68
LEVEL 1
17
25%
LEVEL 2
17
25%
LEVEL 3
18
26%
LEVEL 4
16
24%
Migrant
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 264
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Migrant
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
265
227
38
2
10
145
97
11
12
131
134
252
13
197
68
1
264
PROFICIENT
22%
24%
5%
_%
_%
14%
33%
9%
25%
19%
24%
22%
8%
12%
50%
_%
_%
LEVEL 1
141
53%
108
48%
33
87%
_
_
_
_
88
61%
40
41%
7
64%
6
50%
70
53%
71
53%
129
51%
12
92%
124
63%
17
25%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 2
67
25%
64
28%
3
8%
_
_
_
_
36
25%
25
26%
3
27%
3
25%
36
27%
31
23%
67
27%
0
0%
50
25%
17
25%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 3
36
14%
34
15%
2
5%
_
_
_
_
13
9%
20
21%
0
0%
3
25%
17
13%
19
14%
35
14%
1
8%
18
9%
18
26%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 4
21
8%
21
9%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
8
6%
12
12%
1
9%
0
0%
8
6%
13
10%
21
8%
0
0%
5
3%
16
24%
_
_
_
_
Grade 4 Mathematics
MEAN SCORE: 282
All Students
PROFICIENT
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 249
LEVEL 1
119
48%
LEVEL 2
78
31%
LEVEL 3
37
15%
LEVEL 4
15
6%
General Education
PROFICIENT
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 212
LEVEL 1
90
42%
LEVEL 2
70
33%
LEVEL 3
37
17%
LEVEL 4
15
7%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 37
LEVEL 1
29
78%
LEVEL 2
8
22%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 15
LEVEL 1
9
60%
LEVEL 2
5
33%
LEVEL 3
1
7%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 118
LEVEL 1
62
53%
LEVEL 2
41
35%
LEVEL 3
13
11%
LEVEL 4
2
2%
White
PROFICIENT
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 103
LEVEL 1
40
39%
LEVEL 2
31
30%
LEVEL 3
21
20%
LEVEL 4
11
11%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 10
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 13
LEVEL 1
8
62%
LEVEL 2
1
8%
LEVEL 3
2
15%
LEVEL 4
2
15%
Female
PROFICIENT
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 117
LEVEL 1
59
50%
LEVEL 2
38
32%
LEVEL 3
16
14%
LEVEL 4
4
3%
Male
PROFICIENT
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 132
LEVEL 1
60
45%
LEVEL 2
40
30%
LEVEL 3
21
16%
LEVEL 4
11
8%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 237
LEVEL 1
109
46%
LEVEL 2
76
32%
LEVEL 3
37
16%
LEVEL 4
15
6%
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 12
LEVEL 1
10
83%
LEVEL 2
2
17%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 196
LEVEL 1
106
54%
LEVEL 2
61
31%
LEVEL 3
23
12%
LEVEL 4
6
3%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 53
LEVEL 1
13
25%
LEVEL 2
17
32%
LEVEL 3
14
26%
LEVEL 4
9
17%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 249
LEVEL 1
119
48%
LEVEL 2
78
31%
LEVEL 3
37
15%
LEVEL 4
15
6%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
249
212
37
3
15
118
103
10
13
117
132
237
12
196
53
249
PROFICIENT
21%
25%
0%
_%
7%
13%
31%
_%
31%
17%
24%
22%
0%
15%
43%
21%
LEVEL 1
119
48%
90
42%
29
78%
_
_
9
60%
62
53%
40
39%
_
_
8
62%
59
50%
60
45%
109
46%
10
83%
106
54%
13
25%
119
48%
LEVEL 2
78
31%
70
33%
8
22%
_
_
5
33%
41
35%
31
30%
_
_
1
8%
38
32%
40
30%
76
32%
2
17%
61
31%
17
32%
78
31%
LEVEL 3
37
15%
37
17%
0
0%
_
_
1
7%
13
11%
21
20%
_
_
2
15%
16
14%
21
16%
37
16%
0
0%
23
12%
14
26%
37
15%
LEVEL 4
15
6%
15
7%
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
2
2%
11
11%
_
_
2
15%
4
3%
11
8%
15
6%
0
0%
6
3%
9
17%
15
6%
Grade 5 Mathematics
MEAN SCORE: 280
All Students
PROFICIENT
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 232
LEVEL 1
142
61%
LEVEL 2
53
23%
LEVEL 3
31
13%
LEVEL 4
6
3%
General Education
PROFICIENT
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 177
LEVEL 1
91
51%
LEVEL 2
49
28%
LEVEL 3
31
18%
LEVEL 4
6
3%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 55
LEVEL 1
51
93%
LEVEL 2
4
7%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 7
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 112
LEVEL 1
81
72%
LEVEL 2
20
18%
LEVEL 3
10
9%
LEVEL 4
1
1%
White
PROFICIENT
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 99
LEVEL 1
51
52%
LEVEL 2
25
25%
LEVEL 3
19
19%
LEVEL 4
4
4%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 12
LEVEL 1
5
42%
LEVEL 2
6
50%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
1
8%
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
5
56%
LEVEL 2
2
22%
LEVEL 3
2
22%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Female
PROFICIENT
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 93
LEVEL 1
53
57%
LEVEL 2
25
27%
LEVEL 3
11
12%
LEVEL 4
4
4%
Male
PROFICIENT
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 139
LEVEL 1
89
64%
LEVEL 2
28
20%
LEVEL 3
20
14%
LEVEL 4
2
1%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 213
LEVEL 1
124
58%
LEVEL 2
52
24%
LEVEL 3
31
15%
LEVEL 4
6
3%
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 19
LEVEL 1
18
95%
LEVEL 2
1
5%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 165
LEVEL 1
113
68%
LEVEL 2
35
21%
LEVEL 3
16
10%
LEVEL 4
1
1%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 67
LEVEL 1
29
43%
LEVEL 2
18
27%
LEVEL 3
15
22%
LEVEL 4
5
7%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 232
LEVEL 1
142
61%
LEVEL 2
53
23%
LEVEL 3
31
13%
LEVEL 4
6
3%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
232
177
55
2
7
112
99
12
9
93
139
213
19
165
67
232
PROFICIENT
16%
21%
0%
_%
_%
10%
23%
8%
22%
16%
16%
17%
0%
10%
30%
16%
LEVEL 1
142
61%
91
51%
51
93%
_
_
_
_
81
72%
51
52%
5
42%
5
56%
53
57%
89
64%
124
58%
18
95%
113
68%
29
43%
142
61%
LEVEL 2
53
23%
49
28%
4
7%
_
_
_
_
20
18%
25
25%
6
50%
2
22%
25
27%
28
20%
52
24%
1
5%
35
21%
18
27%
53
23%
LEVEL 3
31
13%
31
18%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
10
9%
19
19%
0
0%
2
22%
11
12%
20
14%
31
15%
0
0%
16
10%
15
22%
31
13%
LEVEL 4
6
3%
6
3%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
1
1%
4
4%
1
8%
0
0%
4
4%
2
1%
6
3%
0
0%
1
1%
5
7%
6
3%
Grade 6 Mathematics
MEAN SCORE: 279
All Students
PROFICIENT
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 209
LEVEL 1
104
50%
LEVEL 2
69
33%
LEVEL 3
25
12%
LEVEL 4
11
5%
General Education
PROFICIENT
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 171
LEVEL 1
71
42%
LEVEL 2
66
39%
LEVEL 3
25
15%
LEVEL 4
9
5%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 38
LEVEL 1
33
87%
LEVEL 2
3
8%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
2
5%
American Indian or Alaska Native
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 18
LEVEL 1
13
72%
LEVEL 2
4
22%
LEVEL 3
1
6%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 93
LEVEL 1
59
63%
LEVEL 2
29
31%
LEVEL 3
4
4%
LEVEL 4
1
1%
White
PROFICIENT
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 89
LEVEL 1
27
30%
LEVEL 2
35
39%
LEVEL 3
17
19%
LEVEL 4
10
11%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
5
56%
LEVEL 2
1
11%
LEVEL 3
3
33%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Female
PROFICIENT
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 112
LEVEL 1
51
46%
LEVEL 2
42
38%
LEVEL 3
13
12%
LEVEL 4
6
5%
Male
PROFICIENT
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 97
LEVEL 1
53
55%
LEVEL 2
27
28%
LEVEL 3
12
12%
LEVEL 4
5
5%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 193
LEVEL 1
88
46%
LEVEL 2
69
36%
LEVEL 3
25
13%
LEVEL 4
11
6%
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 16
LEVEL 1
16
100%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 132
LEVEL 1
73
55%
LEVEL 2
45
34%
LEVEL 3
13
10%
LEVEL 4
1
1%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 77
LEVEL 1
31
40%
LEVEL 2
24
31%
LEVEL 3
12
16%
LEVEL 4
10
13%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 209
LEVEL 1
104
50%
LEVEL 2
69
33%
LEVEL 3
25
12%
LEVEL 4
11
5%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
209
171
38
2
2
18
93
89
5
9
112
97
193
16
132
77
209
PROFICIENT
17%
20%
5%
_%
_%
6%
5%
30%
_%
33%
17%
18%
19%
0%
11%
29%
17%
LEVEL 1
104
50%
71
42%
33
87%
_
_
_
_
13
72%
59
63%
27
30%
_
_
5
56%
51
46%
53
55%
88
46%
16
100%
73
55%
31
40%
104
50%
LEVEL 2
69
33%
66
39%
3
8%
_
_
_
_
4
22%
29
31%
35
39%
_
_
1
11%
42
38%
27
28%
69
36%
0
0%
45
34%
24
31%
69
33%
LEVEL 3
25
12%
25
15%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
1
6%
4
4%
17
19%
_
_
3
33%
13
12%
12
12%
25
13%
0
0%
13
10%
12
16%
25
12%
LEVEL 4
11
5%
9
5%
2
5%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
1
1%
10
11%
_
_
0
0%
6
5%
5
5%
11
6%
0
0%
1
1%
10
13%
11
5%
Grade 7 Mathematics
Mean scores and data in the table for grade 7 math include only those for grade 7 students who took the Grade 7 New York State Testing Program Assessment (NYSTP) in Mathematics. For 2015 and forward, data in the bar charts include those for grade 7 students who took the Grade 7 NYSTP in Mathematics and grade 7 students who took a Regents math test in lieu of the NYSTP. For 2014 and earlier, data in the bar charts include only those for grade 7 students who took the Grade 7 NYSTP.
MEAN SCORE: 275
All Students
PROFICIENT
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 164
LEVEL 1
114
70%
LEVEL 2
36
22%
LEVEL 3
13
8%
LEVEL 4
1
1%
General Education
PROFICIENT
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 131
LEVEL 1
84
64%
LEVEL 2
33
25%
LEVEL 3
13
10%
LEVEL 4
1
1%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 33
LEVEL 1
30
91%
LEVEL 2
3
9%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
American Indian or Alaska Native
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
8
89%
LEVEL 2
1
11%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 73
LEVEL 1
58
79%
LEVEL 2
12
16%
LEVEL 3
3
4%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
White
PROFICIENT
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 70
LEVEL 1
43
61%
LEVEL 2
19
27%
LEVEL 3
7
10%
LEVEL 4
1
1%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 12
LEVEL 1
5
42%
LEVEL 2
4
33%
LEVEL 3
3
25%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Female
PROFICIENT
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 71
LEVEL 1
49
69%
LEVEL 2
20
28%
LEVEL 3
2
3%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Male
PROFICIENT
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 93
LEVEL 1
65
70%
LEVEL 2
16
17%
LEVEL 3
11
12%
LEVEL 4
1
1%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 150
LEVEL 1
100
67%
LEVEL 2
36
24%
LEVEL 3
13
9%
LEVEL 4
1
1%
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 14
LEVEL 1
14
100%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 106
LEVEL 1
82
77%
LEVEL 2
18
17%
LEVEL 3
6
6%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 58
LEVEL 1
32
55%
LEVEL 2
18
31%
LEVEL 3
7
12%
LEVEL 4
1
2%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 164
LEVEL 1
114
70%
LEVEL 2
36
22%
LEVEL 3
13
8%
LEVEL 4
1
1%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
164
131
33
1
2
9
73
70
9
12
71
93
150
14
106
58
164
PROFICIENT
9%
11%
0%
_%
_%
0%
4%
11%
_%
25%
3%
13%
9%
0%
6%
14%
9%
LEVEL 1
114
70%
84
64%
30
91%
_
_
_
_
8
89%
58
79%
43
61%
_
_
5
42%
49
69%
65
70%
100
67%
14
100%
82
77%
32
55%
114
70%
LEVEL 2
36
22%
33
25%
3
9%
_
_
_
_
1
11%
12
16%
19
27%
_
_
4
33%
20
28%
16
17%
36
24%
0
0%
18
17%
18
31%
36
22%
LEVEL 3
13
8%
13
10%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
3
4%
7
10%
_
_
3
25%
2
3%
11
12%
13
9%
0
0%
6
6%
7
12%
13
8%
LEVEL 4
1
1%
1
1%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
1
1%
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
1
1%
1
1%
0
0%
0
0%
1
2%
1
1%
Grade 8 Mathematics
Mean scores and data in the table for grade 8 math include only those for grade 8 students who took the Grade 8 New York State Testing Program Assessment (NYSTP) in Mathematics. For 2015 and forward, data in the bar charts include those for grade 8 students who took the Grade 8 NYSTP in Mathematics and grade 8 students who took a Regents math test in lieu of the NYSTP. For 2014 and earlier, data in the bar charts include only those for grade 8 students who took the Grade 8 NYSTP.
MEAN SCORE: 250
All Students
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 104
LEVEL 1
86
83%
LEVEL 2
18
17%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
General Education
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 77
LEVEL 1
61
79%
LEVEL 2
16
21%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 27
LEVEL 1
25
93%
LEVEL 2
2
7%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
American Indian or Alaska Native
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 54
LEVEL 1
49
91%
LEVEL 2
5
9%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
White
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 44
LEVEL 1
33
75%
LEVEL 2
11
25%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
4
67%
LEVEL 2
2
33%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Female
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 37
LEVEL 1
33
89%
LEVEL 2
4
11%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Male
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 67
LEVEL 1
53
79%
LEVEL 2
14
21%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 94
LEVEL 1
76
81%
LEVEL 2
18
19%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 10
LEVEL 1
10
100%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 72
LEVEL 1
63
88%
LEVEL 2
9
13%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 32
LEVEL 1
23
72%
LEVEL 2
9
28%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 104
LEVEL 1
86
83%
LEVEL 2
18
17%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
104
77
27
1
4
54
44
1
6
37
67
94
10
72
32
104
PROFICIENT
0%
0%
0%
_%
_%
0%
0%
_%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
LEVEL 1
86
83%
61
79%
25
93%
_
_
_
_
49
91%
33
75%
_
_
4
67%
33
89%
53
79%
76
81%
10
100%
63
88%
23
72%
86
83%
LEVEL 2
18
17%
16
21%
2
7%
_
_
_
_
5
9%
11
25%
_
_
2
33%
4
11%
14
21%
18
19%
0
0%
9
13%
9
28%
18
17%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
Grade 8 Students Taking a Regents Math Test
Accelerated grade 8 students who took a Regents math test in lieu of the Grade 8 NYSTP in Mathematics.
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 41
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
2%
LEVEL 3
11
27%
LEVEL 4 AND ABOVE
29
71%
LEVEL 3 AND ABOVE
40
98%
GROUP
All Students
TOTAL TESTED
41
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
2%
LEVEL 3
11
27%
4 & ABOVE
29
71%
3 & ABOVE
40
98%
Grade 4 Science
MEAN SCORE: 71
All Students
PROFICIENT
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 253
LEVEL 1
30
12%
LEVEL 2
46
18%
LEVEL 3
111
44%
LEVEL 4
66
26%
General Education
PROFICIENT
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 217
LEVEL 1
21
10%
LEVEL 2
37
17%
LEVEL 3
94
43%
LEVEL 4
65
30%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 36
LEVEL 1
9
25%
LEVEL 2
9
25%
LEVEL 3
17
47%
LEVEL 4
1
3%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 16
LEVEL 1
2
13%
LEVEL 2
3
19%
LEVEL 3
8
50%
LEVEL 4
3
19%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 118
LEVEL 1
16
14%
LEVEL 2
26
22%
LEVEL 3
55
47%
LEVEL 4
21
18%
White
PROFICIENT
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 106
LEVEL 1
10
9%
LEVEL 2
15
14%
LEVEL 3
43
41%
LEVEL 4
38
36%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 10
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 13
LEVEL 1
2
15%
LEVEL 2
2
15%
LEVEL 3
5
38%
LEVEL 4
4
31%
Female
PROFICIENT
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 118
LEVEL 1
11
9%
LEVEL 2
24
20%
LEVEL 3
60
51%
LEVEL 4
23
19%
Male
PROFICIENT
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 135
LEVEL 1
19
14%
LEVEL 2
22
16%
LEVEL 3
51
38%
LEVEL 4
43
32%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 243
LEVEL 1
26
11%
LEVEL 2
42
17%
LEVEL 3
109
45%
LEVEL 4
66
27%
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 10
LEVEL 1
4
40%
LEVEL 2
4
40%
LEVEL 3
2
20%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 197
LEVEL 1
26
13%
LEVEL 2
42
21%
LEVEL 3
87
44%
LEVEL 4
42
21%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 56
LEVEL 1
4
7%
LEVEL 2
4
7%
LEVEL 3
24
43%
LEVEL 4
24
43%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 253
LEVEL 1
30
12%
LEVEL 2
46
18%
LEVEL 3
111
44%
LEVEL 4
66
26%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
253
217
36
3
16
118
106
10
13
118
135
243
10
197
56
253
PROFICIENT
70%
73%
50%
_%
69%
64%
76%
_%
69%
70%
70%
72%
20%
65%
86%
70%
LEVEL 1
30
12%
21
10%
9
25%
_
_
2
13%
16
14%
10
9%
_
_
2
15%
11
9%
19
14%
26
11%
4
40%
26
13%
4
7%
30
12%
LEVEL 2
46
18%
37
17%
9
25%
_
_
3
19%
26
22%
15
14%
_
_
2
15%
24
20%
22
16%
42
17%
4
40%
42
21%
4
7%
46
18%
LEVEL 3
111
44%
94
43%
17
47%
_
_
8
50%
55
47%
43
41%
_
_
5
38%
60
51%
51
38%
109
45%
2
20%
87
44%
24
43%
111
44%
LEVEL 4
66
26%
65
30%
1
3%
_
_
3
19%
21
18%
38
36%
_
_
4
31%
23
19%
43
32%
66
27%
0
0%
42
21%
24
43%
66
26%
Grade 8 Science
Data in the bar charts include those for grade 8 students who took the New York State Grade 8 Science Test and grade 8 students who took a Regents science test in lieu of this test. Mean scores and data in the table for grade 8 science include only those for grade 8 students who took the New York State Grade 8 Science Test.
MEAN SCORE: 55
All Students
PROFICIENT
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 132
LEVEL 1
38
29%
LEVEL 2
53
40%
LEVEL 3
35
27%
LEVEL 4
6
5%
General Education
PROFICIENT
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 102
LEVEL 1
24
24%
LEVEL 2
43
42%
LEVEL 3
29
28%
LEVEL 4
6
6%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 30
LEVEL 1
14
47%
LEVEL 2
10
33%
LEVEL 3
6
20%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
American Indian or Alaska Native
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 8
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 60
LEVEL 1
23
38%
LEVEL 2
28
47%
LEVEL 3
7
12%
LEVEL 4
2
3%
White
PROFICIENT
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 62
LEVEL 1
13
21%
LEVEL 2
20
32%
LEVEL 3
25
40%
LEVEL 4
4
6%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 10
LEVEL 1
2
20%
LEVEL 2
5
50%
LEVEL 3
3
30%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Female
PROFICIENT
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 53
LEVEL 1
17
32%
LEVEL 2
19
36%
LEVEL 3
15
28%
LEVEL 4
2
4%
Male
PROFICIENT
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 79
LEVEL 1
21
27%
LEVEL 2
34
43%
LEVEL 3
20
25%
LEVEL 4
4
5%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 126
LEVEL 1
34
27%
LEVEL 2
52
41%
LEVEL 3
34
27%
LEVEL 4
6
5%
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
4
67%
LEVEL 2
1
17%
LEVEL 3
1
17%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 83
LEVEL 1
30
36%
LEVEL 2
36
43%
LEVEL 3
14
17%
LEVEL 4
3
4%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 49
LEVEL 1
8
16%
LEVEL 2
17
35%
LEVEL 3
21
43%
LEVEL 4
3
6%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 132
LEVEL 1
38
29%
LEVEL 2
53
40%
LEVEL 3
35
27%
LEVEL 4
6
5%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
132
102
30
1
8
60
62
1
10
53
79
126
6
83
49
132
PROFICIENT
31%
34%
20%
_%
_%
15%
47%
_%
30%
32%
30%
32%
17%
20%
49%
31%
LEVEL 1
38
29%
24
24%
14
47%
_
_
_
_
23
38%
13
21%
_
_
2
20%
17
32%
21
27%
34
27%
4
67%
30
36%
8
16%
38
29%
LEVEL 2
53
40%
43
42%
10
33%
_
_
_
_
28
47%
20
32%
_
_
5
50%
19
36%
34
43%
52
41%
1
17%
36
43%
17
35%
53
40%
LEVEL 3
35
27%
29
28%
6
20%
_
_
_
_
7
12%
25
40%
_
_
3
30%
15
28%
20
25%
34
27%
1
17%
14
17%
21
43%
35
27%
LEVEL 4
6
5%
6
6%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
2
3%
4
6%
_
_
0
0%
2
4%
4
5%
6
5%
0
0%
3
4%
3
6%
6
5%
Grade 8 Students Taking a Regents Science Test
Accelerated grade 8 students who take a Regents science test in lieu of the New York State Grade 8 Science Test.
All Students
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 34
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
19
56%
LEVEL 4
15
44%
GROUP
All Students
TOTAL TESTED
34
PROFICIENT
100%
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
19
56%
LEVEL 4
15
44%
Recently Arrived ELL Students (2016 - 17)
GRADE
Grade 3
Grade 4
Grade 5
Grade 6
Grade 7
Grade 8
RECENTLY ARRIVED ELL STUDENTS TAKING NYSESLAT IN LIEU OF NYSTP
4
1
3
5
5
2
GRADE
Grade 3
Grade 4
Grade 5
Grade 6
Grade 7
Grade 8
RECENTLY ARRIVED ELL STUDENTS NOT TAKING NYSESLAT IN LIEU OF NYSTP
4
1
4
5
5
2
Recently Arrived ELL Students (2016 - 17)
Recently Arrived ELL Students Taking NYSESLAT in Lieu of NYSTP
Grade 3
4
Grade 4
1
Grade 5
3
Grade 6
5
Grade 7
5
Grade 8
2
Recently Arrived ELL Students NOT Tested on the ELA NYSTP
Grade 3
4
Grade 4
1
Grade 5
4
Grade 6
5
Grade 7
5
Grade 8
2
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level English Language Arts after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 299
LEVEL 1
19
6%
LEVEL 2
9
3%
LEVEL 3
77
26%
LEVEL 4
139
46%
General Education
PROFICIENT
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 245
LEVEL 1
7
3%
LEVEL 2
2
1%
LEVEL 3
67
27%
LEVEL 4
135
55%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 54
LEVEL 1
12
22%
LEVEL 2
7
13%
LEVEL 3
10
19%
LEVEL 4
4
7%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 16
LEVEL 1
1
6%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
4
25%
LEVEL 4
8
50%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 125
LEVEL 1
15
12%
LEVEL 2
3
2%
LEVEL 3
34
27%
LEVEL 4
44
35%
White
PROFICIENT
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 149
LEVEL 1
3
2%
LEVEL 2
6
4%
LEVEL 3
38
26%
LEVEL 4
81
54%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
1
11%
LEVEL 4
6
67%
Female
PROFICIENT
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 144
LEVEL 1
8
6%
LEVEL 2
3
2%
LEVEL 3
30
21%
LEVEL 4
82
57%
Male
PROFICIENT
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 155
LEVEL 1
11
7%
LEVEL 2
6
4%
LEVEL 3
47
30%
LEVEL 4
57
37%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 288
LEVEL 1
16
6%
LEVEL 2
9
3%
LEVEL 3
77
27%
LEVEL 4
139
48%
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 11
LEVEL 1
3
27%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 133
LEVEL 1
11
8%
LEVEL 2
7
5%
LEVEL 3
38
29%
LEVEL 4
46
35%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 166
LEVEL 1
8
5%
LEVEL 2
2
1%
LEVEL 3
39
23%
LEVEL 4
93
56%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 299
LEVEL 1
19
6%
LEVEL 2
9
3%
LEVEL 3
77
26%
LEVEL 4
139
46%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
299
245
54
3
16
125
149
6
9
144
155
288
11
133
166
299
PROFICIENT
72%
82%
26%
_%
75%
62%
80%
_%
78%
78%
67%
75%
0%
63%
80%
72%
LEVEL 1
19
6%
7
3%
12
22%
_
_
1
6%
15
12%
3
2%
_
_
0
0%
8
6%
11
7%
16
6%
3
27%
11
8%
8
5%
19
6%
LEVEL 2
9
3%
2
1%
7
13%
_
_
0
0%
3
2%
6
4%
_
_
0
0%
3
2%
6
4%
9
3%
0
0%
7
5%
2
1%
9
3%
LEVEL 3
77
26%
67
27%
10
19%
_
_
4
25%
34
27%
38
26%
_
_
1
11%
30
21%
47
30%
77
27%
0
0%
38
29%
39
23%
77
26%
LEVEL 4
139
46%
135
55%
4
7%
_
_
8
50%
44
35%
81
54%
_
_
6
67%
82
57%
57
37%
139
48%
0
0%
46
35%
93
56%
139
46%
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level Mathematics after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 299
LEVEL 1
23
8%
LEVEL 2
29
10%
LEVEL 3
179
60%
LEVEL 4
35
12%
General Education
PROFICIENT
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 245
LEVEL 1
13
5%
LEVEL 2
14
6%
LEVEL 3
167
68%
LEVEL 4
34
14%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 54
LEVEL 1
10
19%
LEVEL 2
15
28%
LEVEL 3
12
22%
LEVEL 4
1
2%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 16
LEVEL 1
1
6%
LEVEL 2
1
6%
LEVEL 3
9
56%
LEVEL 4
2
13%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 125
LEVEL 1
11
9%
LEVEL 2
18
14%
LEVEL 3
67
54%
LEVEL 4
9
7%
White
PROFICIENT
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 149
LEVEL 1
11
7%
LEVEL 2
10
7%
LEVEL 3
98
66%
LEVEL 4
22
15%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
5
56%
LEVEL 4
2
22%
Female
PROFICIENT
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 144
LEVEL 1
9
6%
LEVEL 2
13
9%
LEVEL 3
90
63%
LEVEL 4
20
14%
Male
PROFICIENT
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 155
LEVEL 1
14
9%
LEVEL 2
16
10%
LEVEL 3
89
57%
LEVEL 4
15
10%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 288
LEVEL 1
20
7%
LEVEL 2
28
10%
LEVEL 3
178
62%
LEVEL 4
35
12%
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 11
LEVEL 1
3
27%
LEVEL 2
1
9%
LEVEL 3
1
9%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 133
LEVEL 1
16
12%
LEVEL 2
20
15%
LEVEL 3
76
57%
LEVEL 4
7
5%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 166
LEVEL 1
7
4%
LEVEL 2
9
5%
LEVEL 3
103
62%
LEVEL 4
28
17%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 299
LEVEL 1
23
8%
LEVEL 2
29
10%
LEVEL 3
179
60%
LEVEL 4
35
12%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
299
245
54
3
16
125
149
6
9
144
155
288
11
133
166
299
PROFICIENT
72%
82%
24%
_%
69%
61%
81%
_%
78%
76%
67%
74%
9%
62%
79%
72%
LEVEL 1
23
8%
13
5%
10
19%
_
_
1
6%
11
9%
11
7%
_
_
0
0%
9
6%
14
9%
20
7%
3
27%
16
12%
7
4%
23
8%
LEVEL 2
29
10%
14
6%
15
28%
_
_
1
6%
18
14%
10
7%
_
_
0
0%
13
9%
16
10%
28
10%
1
9%
20
15%
9
5%
29
10%
LEVEL 3
179
60%
167
68%
12
22%
_
_
9
56%
67
54%
98
66%
_
_
5
56%
90
63%
89
57%
178
62%
1
9%
76
57%
103
62%
179
60%
LEVEL 4
35
12%
34
14%
1
2%
_
_
2
13%
9
7%
22
15%
_
_
2
22%
20
14%
15
10%
35
12%
0
0%
7
5%
28
17%
35
12%
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level Global History and Geography after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 299
LEVEL 1
36
12%
LEVEL 2
26
9%
LEVEL 3
131
44%
LEVEL 4
66
22%
General Education
PROFICIENT
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 245
LEVEL 1
18
7%
LEVEL 2
16
7%
LEVEL 3
122
50%
LEVEL 4
65
27%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 54
LEVEL 1
18
33%
LEVEL 2
10
19%
LEVEL 3
9
17%
LEVEL 4
1
2%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 16
LEVEL 1
2
13%
LEVEL 2
1
6%
LEVEL 3
8
50%
LEVEL 4
3
19%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 125
LEVEL 1
20
16%
LEVEL 2
11
9%
LEVEL 3
52
42%
LEVEL 4
16
13%
White
PROFICIENT
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 149
LEVEL 1
14
9%
LEVEL 2
14
9%
LEVEL 3
67
45%
LEVEL 4
44
30%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
4
44%
LEVEL 4
3
33%
Female
PROFICIENT
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 144
LEVEL 1
18
13%
LEVEL 2
14
10%
LEVEL 3
68
47%
LEVEL 4
30
21%
Male
PROFICIENT
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 155
LEVEL 1
18
12%
LEVEL 2
12
8%
LEVEL 3
63
41%
LEVEL 4
36
23%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 288
LEVEL 1
34
12%
LEVEL 2
26
9%
LEVEL 3
131
45%
LEVEL 4
66
23%
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 11
LEVEL 1
2
18%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 133
LEVEL 1
25
19%
LEVEL 2
11
8%
LEVEL 3
57
43%
LEVEL 4
21
16%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 166
LEVEL 1
11
7%
LEVEL 2
15
9%
LEVEL 3
74
45%
LEVEL 4
45
27%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 299
LEVEL 1
36
12%
LEVEL 2
26
9%
LEVEL 3
131
44%
LEVEL 4
66
22%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
299
245
54
3
16
125
149
6
9
144
155
288
11
133
166
299
PROFICIENT
66%
76%
19%
_%
69%
54%
74%
_%
78%
68%
64%
68%
0%
59%
72%
66%
LEVEL 1
36
12%
18
7%
18
33%
_
_
2
13%
20
16%
14
9%
_
_
0
0%
18
13%
18
12%
34
12%
2
18%
25
19%
11
7%
36
12%
LEVEL 2
26
9%
16
7%
10
19%
_
_
1
6%
11
9%
14
9%
_
_
0
0%
14
10%
12
8%
26
9%
0
0%
11
8%
15
9%
26
9%
LEVEL 3
131
44%
122
50%
9
17%
_
_
8
50%
52
42%
67
45%
_
_
4
44%
68
47%
63
41%
131
45%
0
0%
57
43%
74
45%
131
44%
LEVEL 4
66
22%
65
27%
1
2%
_
_
3
19%
16
13%
44
30%
_
_
3
33%
30
21%
36
23%
66
23%
0
0%
21
16%
45
27%
66
22%
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level U.S. History and Government after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 299
LEVEL 1
15
5%
LEVEL 2
19
6%
LEVEL 3
89
30%
LEVEL 4
112
37%
General Education
PROFICIENT
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 245
LEVEL 1
5
2%
LEVEL 2
10
4%
LEVEL 3
79
32%
LEVEL 4
111
45%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 54
LEVEL 1
10
19%
LEVEL 2
9
17%
LEVEL 3
10
19%
LEVEL 4
1
2%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 16
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
7
44%
LEVEL 4
4
25%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 125
LEVEL 1
9
7%
LEVEL 2
9
7%
LEVEL 3
35
28%
LEVEL 4
35
28%
White
PROFICIENT
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 149
LEVEL 1
6
4%
LEVEL 2
10
7%
LEVEL 3
43
29%
LEVEL 4
70
47%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
4
44%
LEVEL 4
3
33%
Female
PROFICIENT
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 144
LEVEL 1
8
6%
LEVEL 2
9
6%
LEVEL 3
49
34%
LEVEL 4
54
38%
Male
PROFICIENT
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 155
LEVEL 1
7
5%
LEVEL 2
10
6%
LEVEL 3
40
26%
LEVEL 4
58
37%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 288
LEVEL 1
14
5%
LEVEL 2
18
6%
LEVEL 3
89
31%
LEVEL 4
112
39%
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 11
LEVEL 1
1
9%
LEVEL 2
1
9%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 133
LEVEL 1
11
8%
LEVEL 2
9
7%
LEVEL 3
45
34%
LEVEL 4
33
25%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 166
LEVEL 1
4
2%
LEVEL 2
10
6%
LEVEL 3
44
27%
LEVEL 4
79
48%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 299
LEVEL 1
15
5%
LEVEL 2
19
6%
LEVEL 3
89
30%
LEVEL 4
112
37%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
299
245
54
3
16
125
149
6
9
144
155
288
11
133
166
299
PROFICIENT
67%
78%
20%
_%
69%
56%
76%
_%
78%
72%
63%
70%
0%
59%
74%
67%
LEVEL 1
15
5%
5
2%
10
19%
_
_
0
0%
9
7%
6
4%
_
_
0
0%
8
6%
7
5%
14
5%
1
9%
11
8%
4
2%
15
5%
LEVEL 2
19
6%
10
4%
9
17%
_
_
0
0%
9
7%
10
7%
_
_
0
0%
9
6%
10
6%
18
6%
1
9%
9
7%
10
6%
19
6%
LEVEL 3
89
30%
79
32%
10
19%
_
_
7
44%
35
28%
43
29%
_
_
4
44%
49
34%
40
26%
89
31%
0
0%
45
34%
44
27%
89
30%
LEVEL 4
112
37%
111
45%
1
2%
_
_
4
25%
35
28%
70
47%
_
_
3
33%
54
38%
58
37%
112
39%
0
0%
33
25%
79
48%
112
37%
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level Science after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 299
LEVEL 1
19
6%
LEVEL 2
31
10%
LEVEL 3
139
46%
LEVEL 4
60
20%
General Education
PROFICIENT
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 245
LEVEL 1
11
4%
LEVEL 2
20
8%
LEVEL 3
129
53%
LEVEL 4
58
24%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 54
LEVEL 1
8
15%
LEVEL 2
11
20%
LEVEL 3
10
19%
LEVEL 4
2
4%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 16
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
3
19%
LEVEL 3
8
50%
LEVEL 4
2
13%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 125
LEVEL 1
10
8%
LEVEL 2
22
18%
LEVEL 3
50
40%
LEVEL 4
16
13%
White
PROFICIENT
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 149
LEVEL 1
9
6%
LEVEL 2
6
4%
LEVEL 3
77
52%
LEVEL 4
39
26%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
4
44%
LEVEL 4
3
33%
Female
PROFICIENT
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 144
LEVEL 1
9
6%
LEVEL 2
13
9%
LEVEL 3
76
53%
LEVEL 4
26
18%
Male
PROFICIENT
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 155
LEVEL 1
10
6%
LEVEL 2
18
12%
LEVEL 3
63
41%
LEVEL 4
34
22%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 288
LEVEL 1
19
7%
LEVEL 2
30
10%
LEVEL 3
139
48%
LEVEL 4
60
21%
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 11
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
9%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 133
LEVEL 1
13
10%
LEVEL 2
21
16%
LEVEL 3
61
46%
LEVEL 4
15
11%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 166
LEVEL 1
6
4%
LEVEL 2
10
6%
LEVEL 3
78
47%
LEVEL 4
45
27%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 299
LEVEL 1
19
6%
LEVEL 2
31
10%
LEVEL 3
139
46%
LEVEL 4
60
20%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
299
245
54
3
16
125
149
6
9
144
155
288
11
133
166
299
PROFICIENT
67%
76%
22%
_%
63%
53%
78%
_%
78%
71%
63%
69%
0%
57%
74%
67%
LEVEL 1
19
6%
11
4%
8
15%
_
_
0
0%
10
8%
9
6%
_
_
0
0%
9
6%
10
6%
19
7%
0
0%
13
10%
6
4%
19
6%
LEVEL 2
31
10%
20
8%
11
20%
_
_
3
19%
22
18%
6
4%
_
_
0
0%
13
9%
18
12%
30
10%
1
9%
21
16%
10
6%
31
10%
LEVEL 3
139
46%
129
53%
10
19%
_
_
8
50%
50
40%
77
52%
_
_
4
44%
76
53%
63
41%
139
48%
0
0%
61
46%
78
47%
139
46%
LEVEL 4
60
20%
58
24%
2
4%
_
_
2
13%
16
13%
39
26%
_
_
3
33%
26
18%
34
22%
60
21%
0
0%
15
11%
45
27%
60
20%
Regents Examination Results (2016 - 17)
English Language Arts (Common Core)
English Language Arts (Common Core)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
248
211
37
4
21
93
126
4
8
129
119
239
9
116
132
248
LEVEL 1
38
15%
17
8%
21
57%
_
_
0
0%
24
26%
14
11%
_
_
0
0%
16
12%
22
18%
30
13%
8
89%
29
25%
9
7%
38
15%
LEVEL 2
11
4%
9
4%
2
5%
_
_
2
10%
2
2%
7
6%
_
_
0
0%
4
3%
7
6%
11
5%
0
0%
4
3%
7
5%
11
4%
LEVEL 3
60
24%
51
24%
9
24%
_
_
10
48%
26
28%
23
18%
_
_
1
13%
32
25%
28
24%
59
25%
1
11%
35
30%
25
19%
60
24%
LEVEL 4
46
19%
43
20%
3
8%
_
_
3
14%
15
16%
25
20%
_
_
3
38%
29
22%
17
14%
46
19%
0
0%
14
12%
32
24%
46
19%
LEVEL 5
93
38%
91
43%
2
5%
_
_
6
29%
26
28%
57
45%
_
_
4
50%
48
37%
45
38%
93
39%
0
0%
34
29%
59
45%
93
38%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 248
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
38
15%
LEVEL 2
11
4%
LEVEL 3
60
24%
LEVEL 4
46
19%
LEVEL 5
93
38%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 211
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
17
8%
LEVEL 2
9
4%
LEVEL 3
51
24%
LEVEL 4
43
20%
LEVEL 5
91
43%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 37
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
21
57%
LEVEL 2
2
5%
LEVEL 3
9
24%
LEVEL 4
3
8%
LEVEL 5
2
5%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 4
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 21
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
10%
LEVEL 3
10
48%
LEVEL 4
3
14%
LEVEL 5
6
29%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 93
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
24
26%
LEVEL 2
2
2%
LEVEL 3
26
28%
LEVEL 4
15
16%
LEVEL 5
26
28%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 126
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
14
11%
LEVEL 2
7
6%
LEVEL 3
23
18%
LEVEL 4
25
20%
LEVEL 5
57
45%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 4
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 8
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
1
13%
LEVEL 4
3
38%
LEVEL 5
4
50%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 129
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
16
12%
LEVEL 2
4
3%
LEVEL 3
32
25%
LEVEL 4
29
22%
LEVEL 5
48
37%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 119
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
22
18%
LEVEL 2
7
6%
LEVEL 3
28
24%
LEVEL 4
17
14%
LEVEL 5
45
38%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 239
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
30
13%
LEVEL 2
11
5%
LEVEL 3
59
25%
LEVEL 4
46
19%
LEVEL 5
93
39%
English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 9
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
8
89%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
1
11%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 116
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
29
25%
LEVEL 2
4
3%
LEVEL 3
35
30%
LEVEL 4
14
12%
LEVEL 5
34
29%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 132
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
9
7%
LEVEL 2
7
5%
LEVEL 3
25
19%
LEVEL 4
32
24%
LEVEL 5
59
45%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 248
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
38
15%
LEVEL 2
11
4%
LEVEL 3
60
24%
LEVEL 4
46
19%
LEVEL 5
93
38%
Algebra 2/Trigonometry
Regents Algebra 2/Trigonometry
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
2
2
1
1
2
2
2
1
1
2
55
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
65
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
85
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Algebra I (Common Core)
Algebra I (Common Core)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Migrant
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
375
300
75
2
3
22
152
192
4
9
191
184
356
19
216
159
1
374
LEVEL 1
75
20%
43
14%
32
43%
_
_
_
_
4
18%
42
28%
29
15%
_
_
0
0%
33
17%
42
23%
66
19%
9
47%
57
26%
18
11%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 2
79
21%
58
19%
21
28%
_
_
_
_
5
23%
39
26%
35
18%
_
_
0
0%
44
23%
35
19%
73
21%
6
32%
58
27%
21
13%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 3
170
45%
148
49%
22
29%
_
_
_
_
12
55%
60
39%
90
47%
_
_
8
89%
94
49%
76
41%
166
47%
4
21%
84
39%
86
54%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 4
43
11%
43
14%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
1
5%
9
6%
32
17%
_
_
1
11%
18
9%
25
14%
43
12%
0
0%
16
7%
27
17%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 5
8
2%
8
3%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
2
1%
6
3%
_
_
0
0%
2
1%
6
3%
8
2%
0
0%
1
0%
7
4%
_
_
_
_
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 375
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
75
20%
LEVEL 2
79
21%
LEVEL 3
170
45%
LEVEL 4
43
11%
LEVEL 5
8
2%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 300
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
43
14%
LEVEL 2
58
19%
LEVEL 3
148
49%
LEVEL 4
43
14%
LEVEL 5
8
3%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 75
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
32
43%
LEVEL 2
21
28%
LEVEL 3
22
29%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
American Indian or Alaska Native
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 22
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
4
18%
LEVEL 2
5
23%
LEVEL 3
12
55%
LEVEL 4
1
5%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 152
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
42
28%
LEVEL 2
39
26%
LEVEL 3
60
39%
LEVEL 4
9
6%
LEVEL 5
2
1%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 192
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
29
15%
LEVEL 2
35
18%
LEVEL 3
90
47%
LEVEL 4
32
17%
LEVEL 5
6
3%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 4
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 9
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
8
89%
LEVEL 4
1
11%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 191
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
33
17%
LEVEL 2
44
23%
LEVEL 3
94
49%
LEVEL 4
18
9%
LEVEL 5
2
1%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 184
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
42
23%
LEVEL 2
35
19%
LEVEL 3
76
41%
LEVEL 4
25
14%
LEVEL 5
6
3%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 356
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
66
19%
LEVEL 2
73
21%
LEVEL 3
166
47%
LEVEL 4
43
12%
LEVEL 5
8
2%
English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 19
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
9
47%
LEVEL 2
6
32%
LEVEL 3
4
21%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 216
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
57
26%
LEVEL 2
58
27%
LEVEL 3
84
39%
LEVEL 4
16
7%
LEVEL 5
1
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 159
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
18
11%
LEVEL 2
21
13%
LEVEL 3
86
54%
LEVEL 4
27
17%
LEVEL 5
7
4%
Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 374
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Common Core Geometry
Regents Common Core Geometry
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
157
153
4
3
9
45
98
2
5
81
76
157
55
102
157
LEVEL 1
32
20%
_
_
_
_
_
_
2
22%
12
27%
17
17%
_
_
1
20%
19
23%
13
17%
32
20%
13
24%
19
19%
32
20%
LEVEL 2
48
31%
_
_
_
_
_
_
3
33%
20
44%
23
23%
_
_
2
40%
23
28%
25
33%
48
31%
19
35%
29
28%
48
31%
LEVEL 3
61
39%
_
_
_
_
_
_
3
33%
13
29%
43
44%
_
_
2
40%
33
41%
28
37%
61
39%
18
33%
43
42%
61
39%
LEVEL 4
10
6%
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
10
10%
_
_
0
0%
5
6%
5
7%
10
6%
1
2%
9
9%
10
6%
LEVEL 5
6
4%
_
_
_
_
_
_
1
11%
0
0%
5
5%
_
_
0
0%
1
1%
5
7%
6
4%
4
7%
2
2%
6
4%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 157
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
32
20%
LEVEL 2
48
31%
LEVEL 3
61
39%
LEVEL 4
10
6%
LEVEL 5
6
4%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 153
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 4
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 9
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
2
22%
LEVEL 2
3
33%
LEVEL 3
3
33%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
LEVEL 5
1
11%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 45
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
12
27%
LEVEL 2
20
44%
LEVEL 3
13
29%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 98
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
17
17%
LEVEL 2
23
23%
LEVEL 3
43
44%
LEVEL 4
10
10%
LEVEL 5
5
5%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
1
20%
LEVEL 2
2
40%
LEVEL 3
2
40%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 81
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
19
23%
LEVEL 2
23
28%
LEVEL 3
33
41%
LEVEL 4
5
6%
LEVEL 5
1
1%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 76
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
13
17%
LEVEL 2
25
33%
LEVEL 3
28
37%
LEVEL 4
5
7%
LEVEL 5
5
7%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 157
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
32
20%
LEVEL 2
48
31%
LEVEL 3
61
39%
LEVEL 4
10
6%
LEVEL 5
6
4%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 55
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
13
24%
LEVEL 2
19
35%
LEVEL 3
18
33%
LEVEL 4
1
2%
LEVEL 5
4
7%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 102
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
19
19%
LEVEL 2
29
28%
LEVEL 3
43
42%
LEVEL 4
9
9%
LEVEL 5
2
2%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 157
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
32
20%
LEVEL 2
48
31%
LEVEL 3
61
39%
LEVEL 4
10
6%
LEVEL 5
6
4%
Algebra II (Common Core)
Algebra II (Common Core)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
69
67
2
2
3
20
44
5
42
27
69
26
43
69
LEVEL 1
1
1%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
1
5%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
1
4%
1
1%
0
0%
1
2%
1
1%
LEVEL 2
8
12%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
3
15%
5
11%
0
0%
7
17%
1
4%
8
12%
3
12%
5
12%
8
12%
LEVEL 3
41
59%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
11
55%
26
59%
4
80%
27
64%
14
52%
41
59%
16
62%
25
58%
41
59%
LEVEL 4
15
22%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
5
25%
9
20%
1
20%
8
19%
7
26%
15
22%
6
23%
9
21%
15
22%
LEVEL 5
4
6%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
0%
4
9%
0
0%
0
0%
4
15%
4
6%
1
4%
3
7%
4
6%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 69
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
8
12%
LEVEL 3
41
59%
LEVEL 4
15
22%
LEVEL 5
4
6%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 67
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 20
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
1
5%
LEVEL 2
3
15%
LEVEL 3
11
55%
LEVEL 4
5
25%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 44
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
5
11%
LEVEL 3
26
59%
LEVEL 4
9
20%
LEVEL 5
4
9%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
4
80%
LEVEL 4
1
20%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 42
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
7
17%
LEVEL 3
27
64%
LEVEL 4
8
19%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 27
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
1
4%
LEVEL 2
1
4%
LEVEL 3
14
52%
LEVEL 4
7
26%
LEVEL 5
4
15%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 69
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
8
12%
LEVEL 3
41
59%
LEVEL 4
15
22%
LEVEL 5
4
6%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 26
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
3
12%
LEVEL 3
16
62%
LEVEL 4
6
23%
LEVEL 5
1
4%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 43
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
1
2%
LEVEL 2
5
12%
LEVEL 3
25
58%
LEVEL 4
9
21%
LEVEL 5
3
7%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 69
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
8
12%
LEVEL 3
41
59%
LEVEL 4
15
22%
LEVEL 5
4
6%
Global History and Geography
Regents Global History and Geography
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
360
291
69
4
21
157
173
5
9
168
192
345
15
208
152
360
55
264
73%
230
79%
34
49%
_
_
15
71%
104
66%
136
79%
_
_
9
100%
125
74%
139
72%
259
75%
5
33%
132
63%
132
87%
264
73%
65
210
58%
188
65%
22
32%
_
_
12
57%
80
51%
112
65%
_
_
6
67%
91
54%
119
62%
206
60%
4
27%
107
51%
103
68%
210
58%
85
56
16%
55
19%
1
1%
_
_
5
24%
10
6%
40
23%
_
_
1
11%
19
11%
37
19%
56
16%
0
0%
27
13%
29
19%
56
16%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 360
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
264
73%
65
210
58%
85
56
16%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 291
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
230
79%
65
188
65%
85
55
19%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 69
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
34
49%
65
22
32%
85
1
1%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 4
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 21
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
15
71%
65
12
57%
85
5
24%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 157
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
104
66%
65
80
51%
85
10
6%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 173
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
136
79%
65
112
65%
85
40
23%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 9
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
9
100%
65
6
67%
85
1
11%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 168
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
125
74%
65
91
54%
85
19
11%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 192
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
139
72%
65
119
62%
85
37
19%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 345
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
259
75%
65
206
60%
85
56
16%
English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 15
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
5
33%
65
4
27%
85
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 208
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
132
63%
65
107
51%
85
27
13%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 152
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
132
87%
65
103
68%
85
29
19%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 360
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
264
73%
65
210
58%
85
56
16%
U.S. History & Government
Regents U.S. History & Government
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
247
201
46
1
3
17
91
130
5
9
132
115
241
6
109
138
247
55
216
87%
188
94%
28
61%
_
_
_
_
16
94%
75
82%
116
89%
_
_
9
100%
114
86%
102
89%
215
89%
1
17%
86
79%
130
94%
216
87%
65
185
75%
170
85%
15
33%
_
_
_
_
15
88%
57
63%
104
80%
_
_
9
100%
98
74%
87
76%
185
77%
0
0%
72
66%
113
82%
185
75%
85
109
44%
103
51%
6
13%
_
_
_
_
5
29%
31
34%
69
53%
_
_
4
44%
55
42%
54
47%
109
45%
0
0%
38
35%
71
51%
109
44%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 247
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
216
87%
65
185
75%
85
109
44%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 201
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
188
94%
65
170
85%
85
103
51%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 46
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
28
61%
65
15
33%
85
6
13%
American Indian or Alaska Native
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 17
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
16
94%
65
15
88%
85
5
29%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 91
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
75
82%
65
57
63%
85
31
34%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 130
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
116
89%
65
104
80%
85
69
53%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 9
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
9
100%
65
9
100%
85
4
44%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 132
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
114
86%
65
98
74%
85
55
42%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 115
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
102
89%
65
87
76%
85
54
47%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 241
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
215
89%
65
185
77%
85
109
45%
English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 6
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
1
17%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 109
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
86
79%
65
72
66%
85
38
35%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 138
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
130
94%
65
113
82%
85
71
51%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 247
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
216
87%
65
185
75%
85
109
44%
Living Environment
Regents Living Environment
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
340
291
49
1
4
20
147
165
3
8
164
176
334
6
207
133
340
55
278
82%
247
85%
31
63%
_
_
_
_
16
80%
116
79%
140
85%
_
_
6
75%
135
82%
143
81%
274
82%
4
67%
158
76%
120
90%
278
82%
65
201
59%
183
63%
18
37%
_
_
_
_
11
55%
68
46%
117
71%
_
_
5
63%
95
58%
106
60%
201
60%
0
0%
104
50%
97
73%
201
59%
85
25
7%
25
9%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
1
5%
3
2%
21
13%
_
_
0
0%
9
5%
16
9%
25
7%
0
0%
6
3%
19
14%
25
7%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 340
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
278
82%
65
201
59%
85
25
7%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 291
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
247
85%
65
183
63%
85
25
9%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 49
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
31
63%
65
18
37%
85
0
0%
American Indian or Alaska Native
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 4
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 20
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
16
80%
65
11
55%
85
1
5%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 147
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
116
79%
65
68
46%
85
3
2%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 165
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
140
85%
65
117
71%
85
21
13%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 8
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
6
75%
65
5
63%
85
0
0%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 164
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
135
82%
65
95
58%
85
9
5%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 176
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
143
81%
65
106
60%
85
16
9%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 334
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
274
82%
65
201
60%
85
25
7%
English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 6
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
4
67%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 207
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
158
76%
65
104
50%
85
6
3%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 133
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
120
90%
65
97
73%
85
19
14%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 340
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
278
82%
65
201
59%
85
25
7%
Physical Setting/Earth Science
Regents Physical Setting/Earth Science
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
195
173
22
3
13
78
100
1
17
94
101
190
5
97
98
195
55
163
84%
151
87%
12
55%
_
_
_
_
59
76%
89
89%
_
_
15
88%
75
80%
88
87%
162
85%
1
20%
76
78%
87
89%
163
84%
65
133
68%
127
73%
6
27%
_
_
_
_
44
56%
78
78%
_
_
11
65%
55
59%
78
77%
133
70%
0
0%
58
60%
75
77%
133
68%
85
45
23%
45
26%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
5
6%
35
35%
_
_
5
29%
20
21%
25
25%
45
24%
0
0%
15
15%
30
31%
45
23%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 195
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
163
84%
65
133
68%
85
45
23%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 173
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
151
87%
65
127
73%
85
45
26%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 22
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
12
55%
65
6
27%
85
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 13
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 78
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
59
76%
65
44
56%
85
5
6%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 100
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
89
89%
65
78
78%
85
35
35%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 17
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
15
88%
65
11
65%
85
5
29%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 94
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
75
80%
65
55
59%
85
20
21%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 101
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
88
87%
65
78
77%
85
25
25%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 190
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
162
85%
65
133
70%
85
45
24%
English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
1
20%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 97
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
76
78%
65
58
60%
85
15
15%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 98
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
87
89%
65
75
77%
85
30
31%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 195
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
163
84%
65
133
68%
85
45
23%
Physical Setting/Chemistry
Regents Physical Setting/Chemistry
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
85
84
1
2
6
26
50
1
9
55
30
85
28
57
85
55
82
96%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
26
100%
48
96%
_
_
8
89%
52
95%
30
100%
82
96%
27
96%
55
96%
82
96%
65
71
84%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
25
96%
40
80%
_
_
6
67%
45
82%
26
87%
71
84%
27
96%
44
77%
71
84%
85
13
15%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
5
19%
6
12%
_
_
2
22%
7
13%
6
20%
13
15%
4
14%
9
16%
13
15%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 85
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
82
96%
65
71
84%
85
13
15%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 84
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 6
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 26
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
26
100%
65
25
96%
85
5
19%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 50
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
48
96%
65
40
80%
85
6
12%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 9
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
8
89%
65
6
67%
85
2
22%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 55
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
52
95%
65
45
82%
85
7
13%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 30
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
30
100%
65
26
87%
85
6
20%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 85
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
82
96%
65
71
84%
85
13
15%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 28
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
27
96%
65
27
96%
85
4
14%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 57
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
55
96%
65
44
77%
85
9
16%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 85
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
82
96%
65
71
84%
85
13
15%
Physical Setting/Physics
Regents Physical Setting/Physics
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
36
36
2
1
8
25
11
23
13
36
11
25
36
55
36
100%
36
100%
_
_
_
_
_
_
25
100%
11
100%
23
100%
13
100%
36
100%
11
100%
25
100%
36
100%
65
36
100%
36
100%
_
_
_
_
_
_
25
100%
11
100%
23
100%
13
100%
36
100%
11
100%
25
100%
36
100%
85
14
39%
14
39%
_
_
_
_
_
_
12
48%
2
18%
7
30%
7
54%
14
39%
1
9%
13
52%
14
39%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 36
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
36
100%
65
36
100%
85
14
39%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 36
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
36
100%
65
36
100%
85
14
39%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 8
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 25
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
25
100%
65
25
100%
85
12
48%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 11
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
11
100%
65
11
100%
85
2
18%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 23
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
23
100%
65
23
100%
85
7
30%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 13
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
13
100%
65
13
100%
85
7
54%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 36
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
36
100%
65
36
100%
85
14
39%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 11
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
11
100%
65
11
100%
85
1
9%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 25
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
25
100%
65
25
100%
85
13
52%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 36
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
36
100%
65
36
100%
85
14
39%
New York State Alternate Assessment (NYSAA) Results (2016 - 17)
GROUP
Grade 3 ELA
Grade 3 Math
Grade 4 ELA
Grade 4 Math
Grade 4 Science
Grade 5 ELA
Grade 5 Math
Grade 6 ELA
Grade 6 Math
Grade 7 ELA
Grade 7 Math
Grade 8 ELA
Grade 8 Math
Grade 8 Science
Secondary-Level ELA
Secondary-Level Math
Secondary-Level Science
Secondary-Level Social Studies
TOTAL TESTED
3
3
7
7
7
10
10
9
9
3
3
7
7
7
6
6
6
6
PROFICIENT
_%
_%
71%
71%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
_%
_%
57%
57%
71%
100%
100%
100%
100%
LEVEL 1
_
_
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
_
_
3
3
0
0
0
0
0
LEVEL 2
_
_
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
_
_
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
LEVEL 3
_
_
5
5
5
8
8
9
8
_
_
4
4
4
4
2
2
4
LEVEL 4
_
_
0
0
2
2
2
0
1
_
_
0
0
1
2
4
4
2
Grade 3 ELA
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 3 Math
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 4 ELA
PROFICIENT
5 71%
TOTAL TESTED: 7
LEVEL 1
1
LEVEL 2
1
LEVEL 3
5
LEVEL 4
0
Grade 4 Math
PROFICIENT
5 71%
TOTAL TESTED: 7
LEVEL 1
1
LEVEL 2
1
LEVEL 3
5
LEVEL 4
0
Grade 4 Science
PROFICIENT
7 100%
TOTAL TESTED: 7
LEVEL 1
0
LEVEL 2
0
LEVEL 3
5
LEVEL 4
2
Grade 5 ELA
PROFICIENT
10 100%
TOTAL TESTED: 10
LEVEL 1
0
LEVEL 2
0
LEVEL 3
8
LEVEL 4
2
Grade 5 Math
PROFICIENT
10 100%
TOTAL TESTED: 10
LEVEL 1
0
LEVEL 2
0
LEVEL 3
8
LEVEL 4
2
Grade 6 ELA
PROFICIENT
9 100%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
0
LEVEL 2
0
LEVEL 3
9
LEVEL 4
0
Grade 6 Math
PROFICIENT
9 100%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
0
LEVEL 2
0
LEVEL 3
8
LEVEL 4
1
Grade 7 ELA
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 7 Math
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 8 ELA
PROFICIENT
4 57%
TOTAL TESTED: 7
LEVEL 1
3
LEVEL 2
0
LEVEL 3
4
LEVEL 4
0
Grade 8 Math
PROFICIENT
4 57%
TOTAL TESTED: 7
LEVEL 1
3
LEVEL 2
0
LEVEL 3
4
LEVEL 4
0
Grade 8 Science
PROFICIENT
5 71%
TOTAL TESTED: 7
LEVEL 1
0
LEVEL 2
2
LEVEL 3
4
LEVEL 4
1
Secondary-Level ELA
PROFICIENT
6 100%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
0
LEVEL 2
0
LEVEL 3
4
LEVEL 4
2
Secondary-Level Math
PROFICIENT
6 100%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
0
LEVEL 2
0
LEVEL 3
2
LEVEL 4
4
Secondary-Level Science
PROFICIENT
6 100%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
0
LEVEL 2
0
LEVEL 3
2
LEVEL 4
4
Secondary-Level Social Studies
PROFICIENT
6 100%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
0
LEVEL 2
0
LEVEL 3
4
LEVEL 4
2
New York State English as a Second Language Achievement Test (NYSESLAT) Results (2016 - 17)
Kindergarten
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED
16
11
5
ENTERING
25%
9%
60%
EMERGING
25%
36%
0%
TRANSITIONING
25%
18%
40%
EXPANDING
25%
36%
0%
COMMANDING
0%
0%
0%
Grade 1
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED
17
14
3
ENTERING
12%
_
_
EMERGING
29%
_
_
TRANSITIONING
24%
_
_
EXPANDING
35%
_
_
COMMANDING
0%
_
_
Grade 2
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED
20
15
5
ENTERING
0%
0%
0%
EMERGING
35%
27%
60%
TRANSITIONING
20%
13%
40%
EXPANDING
35%
47%
0%
COMMANDING
10%
13%
0%
Grade 3
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED
13
11
2
ENTERING
0%
_
_
EMERGING
46%
_
_
TRANSITIONING
46%
_
_
EXPANDING
8%
_
_
COMMANDING
0%
_
_
Grade 4
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED
15
8
7
ENTERING
0%
0%
0%
EMERGING
40%
50%
29%
TRANSITIONING
20%
0%
43%
EXPANDING
33%
38%
29%
COMMANDING
7%
13%
0%
Grade 5
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED
23
16
7
ENTERING
4%
0%
14%
EMERGING
4%
0%
14%
TRANSITIONING
26%
19%
43%
EXPANDING
61%
75%
29%
COMMANDING
4%
6%
0%
Grade 6
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED
20
15
5
ENTERING
0%
0%
0%
EMERGING
25%
27%
20%
TRANSITIONING
30%
13%
80%
EXPANDING
40%
53%
0%
COMMANDING
5%
7%
0%
Grade 7
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED
17
14
3
ENTERING
0%
_
_
EMERGING
12%
_
_
TRANSITIONING
53%
_
_
EXPANDING
35%
_
_
COMMANDING
0%
_
_
Grade 8
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED
15
9
6
ENTERING
7%
11%
0%
EMERGING
20%
0%
50%
TRANSITIONING
27%
22%
33%
EXPANDING
47%
67%
17%
COMMANDING
0%
0%
0%
Grade 9
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED
8
5
3
ENTERING
13%
_
_
EMERGING
63%
_
_
TRANSITIONING
0%
_
_
EXPANDING
25%
_
_
COMMANDING
0%
_
_
Grade 10
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED
24
12
12
ENTERING
13%
0%
25%
EMERGING
21%
8%
33%
TRANSITIONING
42%
58%
25%
EXPANDING
25%
33%
17%
COMMANDING
0%
0%
0%
Grade 11
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED
6
3
3
ENTERING
17%
_
_
EMERGING
50%
_
_
TRANSITIONING
17%
_
_
EXPANDING
17%
_
_
COMMANDING
0%
_
_
Grade 12
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED
5
2
3
ENTERING
20%
_
_
EMERGING
40%
_
_
TRANSITIONING
40%
_
_
EXPANDING
0%
_
_
COMMANDING
0%
_
_
Kindergarten
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 16
ENTERING
25%
EMERGING
25%
TRANSITIONING
25%
EXPANDING
25%
COMMANDING
0%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 11
ENTERING
9%
EMERGING
36%
TRANSITIONING
18%
EXPANDING
36%
COMMANDING
0%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 5
ENTERING
60%
EMERGING
0%
TRANSITIONING
40%
EXPANDING
0%
COMMANDING
0%
Grade 1
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 17
ENTERING
12%
EMERGING
29%
TRANSITIONING
24%
EXPANDING
35%
COMMANDING
0%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 14
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 3
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
Grade 2
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 20
ENTERING
0%
EMERGING
35%
TRANSITIONING
20%
EXPANDING
35%
COMMANDING
10%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 15
ENTERING
0%
EMERGING
27%
TRANSITIONING
13%
EXPANDING
47%
COMMANDING
13%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 5
ENTERING
0%
EMERGING
60%
TRANSITIONING
40%
EXPANDING
0%
COMMANDING
0%
Grade 3
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 13
ENTERING
0%
EMERGING
46%
TRANSITIONING
46%
EXPANDING
8%
COMMANDING
0%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 11
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 2
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
Grade 4
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 15
ENTERING
0%
EMERGING
40%
TRANSITIONING
20%
EXPANDING
33%
COMMANDING
7%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 8
ENTERING
0%
EMERGING
50%
TRANSITIONING
0%
EXPANDING
38%
COMMANDING
13%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 7
ENTERING
0%
EMERGING
29%
TRANSITIONING
43%
EXPANDING
29%
COMMANDING
0%
Grade 5
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 23
ENTERING
4%
EMERGING
4%
TRANSITIONING
26%
EXPANDING
61%
COMMANDING
4%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 16
ENTERING
0%
EMERGING
0%
TRANSITIONING
19%
EXPANDING
75%
COMMANDING
6%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 7
ENTERING
14%
EMERGING
14%
TRANSITIONING
43%
EXPANDING
29%
COMMANDING
0%
Grade 6
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 20
ENTERING
0%
EMERGING
25%
TRANSITIONING
30%
EXPANDING
40%
COMMANDING
5%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 15
ENTERING
0%
EMERGING
27%
TRANSITIONING
13%
EXPANDING
53%
COMMANDING
7%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 5
ENTERING
0%
EMERGING
20%
TRANSITIONING
80%
EXPANDING
0%
COMMANDING
0%
Grade 7
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 17
ENTERING
0%
EMERGING
12%
TRANSITIONING
53%
EXPANDING
35%
COMMANDING
0%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 14
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 3
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
Grade 8
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 15
ENTERING
7%
EMERGING
20%
TRANSITIONING
27%
EXPANDING
47%
COMMANDING
0%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 9
ENTERING
11%
EMERGING
0%
TRANSITIONING
22%
EXPANDING
67%
COMMANDING
0%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 6
ENTERING
0%
EMERGING
50%
TRANSITIONING
33%
EXPANDING
17%
COMMANDING
0%
Grade 9
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 8
ENTERING
13%
EMERGING
63%
TRANSITIONING
0%
EXPANDING
25%
COMMANDING
0%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 5
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 3
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
Grade 10
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 24
ENTERING
13%
EMERGING
21%
TRANSITIONING
42%
EXPANDING
25%
COMMANDING
0%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 12
ENTERING
0%
EMERGING
8%
TRANSITIONING
58%
EXPANDING
33%
COMMANDING
0%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 12
ENTERING
25%
EMERGING
33%
TRANSITIONING
25%
EXPANDING
17%
COMMANDING
0%
Grade 11
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 6
ENTERING
17%
EMERGING
50%
TRANSITIONING
17%
EXPANDING
17%
COMMANDING
0%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 3
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 3
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
Grade 12
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 5
ENTERING
20%
EMERGING
40%
TRANSITIONING
40%
EXPANDING
0%
COMMANDING
0%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 2
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 3
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
Elementary/Middle-Level English Language Arts Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: NO
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
NO
―
NO
NO
―
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
Tested 95%
NO
―
NO
NO
―
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
3,370*
5
183*
1,559*
15
1,482*
106*
597*
196*
2,123*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
71%*
―
71%*
72%*
―
69%*
78%*
79%*
76%*
74%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
―
NO
NO
―
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1,249
4
64
584
13
538
46
263✝
78‡
881
PI
66
―
53
52
―
81
63
38✝
15‡
53
EAMO
108
―
86
97
―
119
98
78
76
98
Safe Harbor Target
75
―
65
61
―
88
90
45
27
67
All Students
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
3,370*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
71%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1,249
PI
66
EAMO
108
Safe Harbor Target
75
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
5
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
4
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
183*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
71%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
64
PI
53
EAMO
86
Safe Harbor Target
65
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,559*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
72%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
584
PI
52
EAMO
97
Safe Harbor Target
61
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
15
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
13
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
White
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,482*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
69%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
538
PI
81
EAMO
119
Safe Harbor Target
88
Multiracial
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
106*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
78%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
46
PI
63
EAMO
98
Safe Harbor Target
90
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
597*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
79%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
263✝
PI
38✝
EAMO
78
Safe Harbor Target
45
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
196*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
76%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
78‡
PI
15‡
EAMO
76
Safe Harbor Target
27
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
2,123*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
74%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
881
PI
53
EAMO
98
Safe Harbor Target
67
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
3,361*
3,187*
1,811*
3,339*
1,888*
3,264*
2,773*
3,174*
1,247*
1,793*
1,577*
1
3,369*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
71%*
71%*
70%*
71%*
73%*
71%*
69%*
71%*
67%*
74%*
68%*
―
71%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1,245
1,185
665
1,236
711
1,203
988
1,186
368
687
562
0
1,249
PI
66
66
78
65
54
66
73
68
96
58
75
―
66
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
3,361*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
71%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1,245
PI
66
Not Black or African American
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
3,187*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
71%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1,185
PI
66
Not Hispanic or Latino
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,811*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
70%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
665
PI
78
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
3,339*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
71%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1,236
PI
65
Not White
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,888*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
73%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
711
PI
54
Not Multiracial
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
3,264*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
71%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1,203
PI
66
General Education
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
2,773*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
69%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
988
PI
73
English Proficient
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
3,174*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
71%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1,186
PI
68
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,247*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
67%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
368
PI
96
Male
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,793*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
74%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
687
PI
58
Female
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,577*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
68%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
562
PI
75
Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
3,369*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
71%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1,249
PI
66
― There were fewer than 40 students enrolled during the test administration period, so the Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 tested students enrolled on BEDS day and during the test administration period, so the PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed. *The percentage of students tested in the current year fell below 95 percent, so the numbers of enrolled and tested students in the current year and previous year were combined to provide the school/district with another opportunity to meet the participation rate criterion. ✝ Includes former students with disabilities because the number of students with disabilities in the current year is equal to or greater than 30. ‡ Includes former english language learner students because the number of english language learner students in the current year is equal to or greater than 30.
Elementary/Middle-Level Mathematics Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: NO
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
NO
―
NO
NO
―
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
Tested 95%
NO
―
NO
NO
―
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
3,366*
5
182*
1,556*
15
1,481*
107*
596*
194*
2,111*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
69%*
―
68%*
69%*
―
68%*
76%*
75%*
75%*
71%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
―
NO
NO
―
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1,249
4
65
585
13
535
47
259✝
91‡
875
PI
65
―
49
45
―
87
62
30✝
10‡
49
EAMO
106
―
82
95
―
116
92
79
79
96
Safe Harbor Target
87
―
61
66
―
107
92
57
34
74
All Students
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
3,366*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
69%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1,249
PI
65
EAMO
106
Safe Harbor Target
87
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
5
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
4
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
182*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
68%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
65
PI
49
EAMO
82
Safe Harbor Target
61
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,556*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
69%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
585
PI
45
EAMO
95
Safe Harbor Target
66
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
15
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
13
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
White
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,481*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
68%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
535
PI
87
EAMO
116
Safe Harbor Target
107
Multiracial
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
107*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
76%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
47
PI
62
EAMO
92
Safe Harbor Target
92
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
596*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
75%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
259✝
PI
30✝
EAMO
79
Safe Harbor Target
57
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
194*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
75%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
91‡
PI
10‡
EAMO
79
Safe Harbor Target
34
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
2,111*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
71%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
875
PI
49
EAMO
96
Safe Harbor Target
74
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
3,357*
3,184*
1,810*
3,335*
1,885*
3,259*
2,770*
3,172*
1,255*
1,787*
1,579*
1
3,365*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
69%*
69%*
69%*
69%*
69%*
69%*
67%*
68%*
66%*
71%*
66%*
―
69%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1,245
1,184
664
1,236
714
1,202
992
1,170
374
682
567
1
1,248
PI
65
66
83
64
48
65
74
69
102
65
65
―
65
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
3,357*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
69%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1,245
PI
65
Not Black or African American
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
3,184*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
69%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1,184
PI
66
Not Hispanic or Latino
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,810*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
69%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
664
PI
83
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
3,335*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
69%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1,236
PI
64
Not White
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,885*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
69%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
714
PI
48
Not Multiracial
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
3,259*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
69%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1,202
PI
65
General Education
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
2,770*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
67%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
992
PI
74
English Proficient
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
3,172*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
68%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1,170
PI
69
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,255*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
66%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
374
PI
102
Male
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,787*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
71%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
682
PI
65
Female
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,579*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
66%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
567
PI
65
Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1
PI
―
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
3,365*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
69%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1,248
PI
65
― There were fewer than 40 students enrolled during the test administration period, so the Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 tested students enrolled on BEDS day and during the test administration period, so the PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed. *The percentage of students tested in the current year fell below 95 percent, so the numbers of enrolled and tested students in the current year and previous year were combined to provide the school/district with another opportunity to meet the participation rate criterion. ✝ Includes former students with disabilities because the number of students with disabilities in the current year is equal to or greater than 30. ‡ Includes former english language learner students because the number of english language learner students in the current year is equal to or greater than 30.
Elementary/Middle-Level Science Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: NO
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
NO
―
NO
NO
―
NO
―
NO
―
NO
Tested 80%
NO
―
NO
NO
―
YES
―
YES
―
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,103*
1
62*
494*
4
248
14
93
30
701*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
78%*
―
76%*
75%*
―
82%
―
86%
―
78%*
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
NO
―
YES
NO
―
NO
―
NO
―
NO
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
419
1
46⁰
180
3
197
11
76✝
17
292
PI
145
―
128
127
―
160
―
114✝
―
135
EAMO
184
―
165
173
―
187
―
164
―
177
Progress Target
160
―
1
142
―
178
―
141
―
153
All Students
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 80%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,103*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
78%*
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
NO
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
419
PI
145
EAMO
184
Progress Target
160
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 80%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
62*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
76%*
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
46⁰
PI
128
EAMO
165
Progress Target
1
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 80%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
494*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
75%*
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
NO
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
180
PI
127
EAMO
173
Progress Target
142
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
4
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
3
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
White
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 80%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
248
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
82%
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
NO
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
197
PI
160
EAMO
187
Progress Target
178
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
14
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
11
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 80%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
93
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
86%
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
NO
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
76✝
PI
114✝
EAMO
164
Progress Target
141
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
30
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
17
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 80%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
701*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
78%*
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
NO
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
292
PI
135
EAMO
177
Progress Target
153
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,100*
1,041*
307
1,095*
596*
1,074*
900*
1,048*
402*
596*
507*
0
1,103*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
78%*
78%*
80%
78%*
76%*
78%*
77%*
79%*
79%*
80%*
76%*
―
78%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
418
392
239
416
222
408
343
402
127
235
184
0
419
PI
145
144
158
145
131
144
151
148
167
143
147
―
145
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,100*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
78%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
418
PI
145
Not Black or African American
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,041*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
78%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
392
PI
144
Not Hispanic or Latino
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
307
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
80%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
239
PI
158
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,095*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
78%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
416
PI
145
Not White
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
596*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
76%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
222
PI
131
Not Multiracial
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,074*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
78%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
408
PI
144
General Education
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
900*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
77%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
343
PI
151
English Proficient
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,048*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
79%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
402
PI
148
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
402*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
79%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
127
PI
167
Male
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
596*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
80%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
235
PI
143
Female
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
507*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
76%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
184
PI
147
Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,103*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
78%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
419
PI
145
― There were fewer than 40 students enrolled during the test administration period, so the Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 tested students enrolled on BEDS day and during the test administration period, so the PI, EAMO, and Progress Target data are suppressed. *The percentage of students tested in the current year fell below 80 percent, so the numbers of enrolled and tested students in the current year and previous year were combined to provide the school/district with another opportunity to meet the participation rate criterion. ✝ Includes former students with disabilities because the number of students with disabilities in the current year is equal to or greater than 30. ⁰ This group failed to meet the participation criterion and had fewer than 30 tested students enrolled on BEDS day and during the test administration period, so data for the current and previous year were combined to determine a Performance Index.
Secondary-Level English Language Arts Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: NO
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
NO
―
―
YES
―
NO
―
NO
―
NO
Tested 95%
YES
―
―
YES
―
YES
―
―
―
YES
12th graders
242
0
14
92
3
129
4
30
3
95
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
98%
―
―
97%
―
98%
―
―
―
97%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
―
―
YES
―
NO
―
NO
―
NO
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
260
0
16
106
3
132
3
43✝
6
121
PI
129
―
―
111
―
142
―
53✝
―
110
EAMO
171
―
―
156
―
177
―
129
―
159
Safe Harbor Target
139
―
―
110
―
154
―
64
―
123
All Students
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
YES
12th Graders
242
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
98%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
260
PI
129
EAMO
171
Safe Harbor Target
139
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
14
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
16
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
YES
12th Graders
92
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
97%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
106
PI
111
EAMO
156
Safe Harbor Target
110
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
3
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
3
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
White
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
YES
12th Graders
129
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
98%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
132
PI
142
EAMO
177
Safe Harbor Target
154
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
4
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
3
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
30
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
43✝
PI
53✝
EAMO
129
Safe Harbor Target
64
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
3
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
6
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
YES
12th Graders
95
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
97%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
121
PI
110
EAMO
159
Safe Harbor Target
123
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
12th Graders
242
228
150
239
113
238
212
239
147
122
120
0
242
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
98%
97%
98%
97%
97%
97%
99%
97%
98%
96%
99%
―
98%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
260
244
154
257
128
257
217
254
139
135
125
0
260
PI
129
130
142
128
116
129
144
131
146
113
147
―
129
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
12th Graders
242
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
98%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
260
PI
129
Not Black or African American
12th Graders
228
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
97%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
244
PI
130
Not Hispanic or Latino
12th Graders
150
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
98%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
154
PI
142
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
12th Graders
239
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
97%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
257
PI
128
Not White
12th Graders
113
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
97%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
128
PI
116
Not Multiracial
12th Graders
238
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
97%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
257
PI
129
General Education
12th Graders
212
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
99%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
217
PI
144
English Proficient
12th Graders
239
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
97%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
254
PI
131
Not Economically Disadvantaged
12th Graders
147
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
98%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
139
PI
146
Male
12th Graders
122
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
96%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
135
PI
113
Female
12th Graders
120
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
99%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
125
PI
147
Migrant
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
Not Migrant
12th Graders
242
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
98%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
260
PI
129
― There were fewer than 40 12th graders, so the Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 students in the 2013 accountability cohort, so PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed. ✝ Includes former students with disabilities because the number of students with disabilities in the current year is equal to or greater than 30.
Secondary-Level Mathematics Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: NO
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
NO
―
―
YES
―
NO
―
NO
―
NO
Tested 95%
YES
―
―
YES
―
YES
―
―
―
YES
12th graders
242
0
14
92
3
129
4
30
3
95
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
98%
―
―
99%
―
98%
―
―
―
98%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
―
―
YES
―
NO
―
NO
―
NO
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
260
0
16
106
3
132
3
43✝
6
121
PI
105
―
―
88
―
118
―
47✝
―
89
EAMO
158
―
―
140
―
166
―
121
―
145
Safe Harbor Target
114
―
―
88
―
125
―
51
―
97
All Students
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
YES
12th Graders
242
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
98%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
260
PI
105
EAMO
158
Safe Harbor Target
114
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
14
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
16
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
YES
12th Graders
92
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
99%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
106
PI
88
EAMO
140
Safe Harbor Target
88
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
3
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
3
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
White
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
YES
12th Graders
129
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
98%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
132
PI
118
EAMO
166
Safe Harbor Target
125
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
4
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
3
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
30
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
43✝
PI
47✝
EAMO
121
Safe Harbor Target
51
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
3
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
6
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
YES
12th Graders
95
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
98%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
121
PI
89
EAMO
145
Safe Harbor Target
97
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
12th Graders
242
228
150
239
113
238
212
239
147
122
120
0
242
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
98%
99%
98%
98%
98%
98%
100%
98%
99%
97%
100%
―
98%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
260
244
154
257
128
257
217
254
139
135
125
0
260
PI
105
106
117
105
91
104
117
106
119
98
113
―
105
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
12th Graders
242
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
98%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
260
PI
105
Not Black or African American
12th Graders
228
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
99%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
244
PI
106
Not Hispanic or Latino
12th Graders
150
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
98%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
154
PI
117
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
12th Graders
239
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
98%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
257
PI
105
Not White
12th Graders
113
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
98%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
128
PI
91
Not Multiracial
12th Graders
238
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
98%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
257
PI
104
General Education
12th Graders
212
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
217
PI
117
English Proficient
12th Graders
239
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
98%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
254
PI
106
Not Economically Disadvantaged
12th Graders
147
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
99%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
139
PI
119
Male
12th Graders
122
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
97%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
135
PI
98
Female
12th Graders
120
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
125
PI
113
Migrant
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
Not Migrant
12th Graders
242
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
98%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
260
PI
105
― There were fewer than 40 12th graders, so the Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 students in the 2013 accountability cohort, so PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed. ✝ Includes former students with disabilities because the number of students with disabilities in the current year is equal to or greater than 30.
Unweighted Combined ELA and Math PIs
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
66
―
53
52
―
81
63
38
15
53
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
65
―
49
45
―
87
62
30
10
49
Secondary-Level ELA PI
129
―
―
111
―
142
―
53
―
110
Secondary-Level MATH PI
105
―
―
88
―
118
―
47
―
89
UNWEIGHTED COMBINED PI
91
0
51
74
0
107
63
42
13
75
All Students
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
66
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
65
Secondary-Level ELA PI
129
Secondary-Level MATH PI
105
Unweighted Combined PI
91
American Indian or Alaska Native
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Black or African American
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
53
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
49
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
51
Hispanic or Latino
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
52
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
45
Secondary-Level ELA PI
111
Secondary-Level MATH PI
88
Unweighted Combined PI
74
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
White
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
81
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
87
Secondary-Level ELA PI
142
Secondary-Level MATH PI
118
Unweighted Combined PI
107
Multiracial
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
63
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
62
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
63
Students With Disabilities
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
38
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
30
Secondary-Level ELA PI
53
Secondary-Level MATH PI
47
Unweighted Combined PI
42
Limited English Proficient
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
15
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
10
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
13
Economically Disadvantaged
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
53
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
49
Secondary-Level ELA PI
110
Secondary-Level MATH PI
89
Unweighted Combined PI
75
― There were not enough students to determine a Performance Index.
Overall Graduation Rate for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: YES
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
YES
―
―
YES
―
YES
―
YES
―
YES
All Students
MADE AYP
YES
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP
YES
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP
―
White
MADE AYP
YES
Multiracial
MADE AYP
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP
YES
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
YES
― There were not enough students to make an AYP determination.
Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort for Accountability
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion:
YES
―
―
YES
―
YES
―
YES
―
YES
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
280
0
18
88
2
168
4
60✝
8
132
Graduation Rate
75%
―
―
60%
―
81%
―
42%✝
―
69%
State Standard
80%
―
―
80%
―
80%
―
80%
―
80%
Progress Target
67%
―
―
57%
―
77%
―
40%
―
56%
All Students
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
280
Graduation Rate
75%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
67%
American Indian or Alaska Native
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Black or African American
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
18
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
88
Graduation Rate
60%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
57%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
2
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
White
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
168
Graduation Rate
81%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
77%
Multiracial
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
4
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Students With Disabilities
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
60✝
Graduation Rate
42%✝
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
40%
Limited English Proficient
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
8
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
132
Graduation Rate
69%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
56%
YES Graduation rate is equal to or greater than the State Standard or the group's Progress Target. NO Graduation rate is less than the State Standard and the group's Progress Target.
― There were fewer than 30 students in the cohort. ✝ Includes former students with disabilities because the number of students with disabilities in the current year is equal to or greater than 30.
Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort for Accountability
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion:
NO
―
―
YES
―
NO
―
NO
―
NO
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
286
0
22
107
1
156
0
64✝
6
119
Graduation Rate
68%
―
―
59%
―
76%
―
38%✝
―
55%
State Standard
80%
―
―
80%
―
80%
―
80%
―
80%
Progress Target
72%
―
―
57%
―
80%
―
50%
―
67%
All Students
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: NO
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
286
Graduation Rate
68%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
72%
American Indian or Alaska Native
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Black or African American
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
22
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
107
Graduation Rate
59%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
57%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
1
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
White
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: NO
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
156
Graduation Rate
76%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%
Multiracial
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Students With Disabilities
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: NO
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
64✝
Graduation Rate
38%✝
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
50%
Limited English Proficient
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
6
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: NO
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
119
Graduation Rate
55%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
67%
YES Graduation rate is equal to or greater than the State Standard or the group's Progress Target. NO Graduation rate is less than the State Standard and the group's Progress Target.
― There were fewer than 30 students in the cohort. ✝ Includes former students with disabilities because the number of students with disabilities in the current year is equal to or greater than 30.
Graduation Rates for Non-AYP Groups for Accountability
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
280
262
192
278
112
276
221
272
148
134
146
0
280
Graduation Rate
75%
74%
82%
75%
67%
75%
85%
77%
81%
72%
78%
―
75%
Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
286
264
179
285
130
286
223
280
167
139
147
0
286
Graduation Rate
68%
69%
73%
68%
58%
68%
77%
69%
77%
65%
70%
―
68%
Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
280
Graduation Rate
75%
Not Black or African American
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
262
Graduation Rate
74%
Not Hispanic or Latino
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
192
Graduation Rate
82%
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
278
Graduation Rate
75%
Not White
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
112
Graduation Rate
67%
Not Multiracial
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
276
Graduation Rate
75%
General Education
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
221
Graduation Rate
85%
English Proficient
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
272
Graduation Rate
77%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
148
Graduation Rate
81%
Male
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
134
Graduation Rate
72%
Female
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
146
Graduation Rate
78%
Migrant
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
Not Migrant
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
280
Graduation Rate
75%
Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
286
Graduation Rate
68%
Not Black or African American
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
264
Graduation Rate
69%
Not Hispanic or Latino
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
179
Graduation Rate
73%
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
285
Graduation Rate
68%
Not White
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
130
Graduation Rate
58%
Not Multiracial
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
286
Graduation Rate
68%
General Education
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
223
Graduation Rate
77%
English Proficient
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
280
Graduation Rate
69%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
167
Graduation Rate
77%
Male
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
139
Graduation Rate
65%
Female
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
147
Graduation Rate
70%
Migrant
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
Not Migrant
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
286
Graduation Rate
68%
― There were fewer than 30 students in the cohort.
Graduation Rates for Regents with Advanced Designation and CTE Endorsement for Accountability
Percentage of 2012 Graduation-Rate Total Cohort members who graduated as of August 31, 2016 with:
Regents Diploma with an Advanced Designation (This District)
18%
Regents Diploma with an Advanced Designation (Statewide)
31%
Percentage in This District Exceeded Statewide
NO
Regents Diploma with an Advanced Designation (This District)
18%
Regents Diploma with an Advanced Designation (Statewide)
31%
Percentage in This District Exceeded Statewide
NO
Regents Diploma with CTE Endorsement (This District)
5%
Regents Diploma with CTE Endorsement (Statewide)
5%
Percentage in This District Exceeded Statewide
NO
Regents Diploma with CTE Endorsement (This District)
You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.
Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.
If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.
