GENERAL BROWN CSD - School Report Card Data [2016 - 17]
The New York State Report Card is an important part of the Board of Regents' effort to raise learning standards for all students. It provides information to the public on school/district enrollment and staff, student performance, and other measures of school and district performance. Knowledge gained from the report card on a school's or district's strengths and weaknesses can be used to improve instruction and services to students. Report Card Data - Glossary of Terms | Accountability Data - Glossary of Terms | Business Rules
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
0
0%
_
_
_
_
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
9
2%
_
_
_
_
All Students
DROPPED OUT
9
2%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
0
0%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
9
2%
General Education
DROPPED OUT
_
_%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
_
_%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
_
_%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
_
_%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
_
_%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
9
2%
_
_
_
_
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
0
0%
_
_
_
_
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
9
2%
_
_
_
_
All Students
DROPPED OUT
9
2%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
0
0%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
9
2%
General Education
DROPPED OUT
_
_%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
_
_%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
_
_%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
_
_%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
_
_%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
9
2%
_
_
_
_
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
0
0%
_
_
_
_
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
9
2%
_
_
_
_
All Students
DROPPED OUT
9
2%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
0
0%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
9
2%
General Education
DROPPED OUT
_
_%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
_
_%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
_
_%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
_
_%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
_
_%
Post-graduation Plans of Completers (2016 - 17)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO FOUR-YEAR COLLEGE
31
28%
29
30%
2
14%
TO TWO-YEAR COLLEGE
49
45%
43
45%
6
43%
TO OTHER POST-SECONDARY
1
1%
1
1%
0
0%
TO THE MILITARY
4
4%
4
4%
0
0%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO EMPLOYMENT
13
12%
10
10%
3
21%
TO ADULT SERVICES
1
1%
0
0%
1
7%
TO OTHER KNOWN PLANS
3
3%
3
3%
0
0%
PLANS UNKNOWN
8
7%
6
6%
2
14%
All Students
To Four-Year College
31
28%
To Two-Year College
49
45%
To Other Post-Secondary
1
1%
To the Military
4
4%
To Employment
13
12%
To Adult Services
1
1%
To Other Known Plans
3
3%
Plan Unknown
8
7%
General Education
To Four-Year College
29
30%
To Two-Year College
43
45%
To Other Post-Secondary
1
1%
To the Military
4
4%
To Employment
10
10%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
3
3%
Plan Unknown
6
6%
Students with Disabilities
To Four-Year College
2
14%
To Two-Year College
6
43%
To Other Post-Secondary
0
0%
To the Military
0
0%
To Employment
3
21%
To Adult Services
1
7%
To Other Known Plans
0
0%
Plan Unknown
2
14%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO FOUR-YEAR COLLEGE
31
28%
29
30%
2
14%
TO TWO-YEAR COLLEGE
49
45%
43
45%
6
43%
TO OTHER POST-SECONDARY
1
1%
1
1%
0
0%
TO THE MILITARY
4
4%
4
4%
0
0%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO EMPLOYMENT
13
12%
10
10%
3
21%
TO ADULT SERVICES
1
1%
0
0%
1
7%
TO OTHER KNOWN PLANS
3
3%
3
3%
0
0%
PLANS UNKNOWN
8
7%
6
6%
2
14%
All Students
To Four-Year College
31
28%
To Two-Year College
49
45%
To Other Post-Secondary
1
1%
To the Military
4
4%
To Employment
13
12%
To Adult Services
1
1%
To Other Known Plans
3
3%
Plan Unknown
8
7%
General Education
To Four-Year College
29
30%
To Two-Year College
43
45%
To Other Post-Secondary
1
1%
To the Military
4
4%
To Employment
10
10%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
3
3%
Plan Unknown
6
6%
Students with Disabilities
To Four-Year College
2
14%
To Two-Year College
6
43%
To Other Post-Secondary
0
0%
To the Military
0
0%
To Employment
3
21%
To Adult Services
1
7%
To Other Known Plans
0
0%
Plan Unknown
2
14%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO FOUR-YEAR COLLEGE
31
28%
29
30%
2
14%
TO TWO-YEAR COLLEGE
49
45%
43
45%
6
43%
TO OTHER POST-SECONDARY
1
1%
1
1%
0
0%
TO THE MILITARY
4
4%
4
4%
0
0%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO EMPLOYMENT
13
12%
10
10%
3
21%
TO ADULT SERVICES
1
1%
0
0%
1
7%
TO OTHER KNOWN PLANS
3
3%
3
3%
0
0%
PLANS UNKNOWN
8
7%
6
6%
2
14%
All Students
To Four-Year College
31
28%
To Two-Year College
49
45%
To Other Post-Secondary
1
1%
To the Military
4
4%
To Employment
13
12%
To Adult Services
1
1%
To Other Known Plans
3
3%
Plan Unknown
8
7%
General Education
To Four-Year College
29
30%
To Two-Year College
43
45%
To Other Post-Secondary
1
1%
To the Military
4
4%
To Employment
10
10%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
3
3%
Plan Unknown
6
6%
Students with Disabilities
To Four-Year College
2
14%
To Two-Year College
6
43%
To Other Post-Secondary
0
0%
To the Military
0
0%
To Employment
3
21%
To Adult Services
1
7%
To Other Known Plans
0
0%
Plan Unknown
2
14%
Grade 3 English Language Arts
MEAN SCORE: 309
All Students
PROFICIENT
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 114
LEVEL 1
27
24%
LEVEL 2
34
30%
LEVEL 3
47
41%
LEVEL 4
6
5%
General Education
PROFICIENT
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 89
LEVEL 1
16
18%
LEVEL 2
24
27%
LEVEL 3
43
48%
LEVEL 4
6
7%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 25
LEVEL 1
11
44%
LEVEL 2
10
40%
LEVEL 3
4
16%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 111
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 114
LEVEL 1
27
24%
LEVEL 2
34
30%
LEVEL 3
47
41%
LEVEL 4
6
5%
Female
PROFICIENT
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 58
LEVEL 1
12
21%
LEVEL 2
12
21%
LEVEL 3
29
50%
LEVEL 4
5
9%
Male
PROFICIENT
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 56
LEVEL 1
15
27%
LEVEL 2
22
39%
LEVEL 3
18
32%
LEVEL 4
1
2%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 114
LEVEL 1
27
24%
LEVEL 2
34
30%
LEVEL 3
47
41%
LEVEL 4
6
5%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 50
LEVEL 1
19
38%
LEVEL 2
17
34%
LEVEL 3
13
26%
LEVEL 4
1
2%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 64
LEVEL 1
8
13%
LEVEL 2
17
27%
LEVEL 3
34
53%
LEVEL 4
5
8%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 114
LEVEL 1
27
24%
LEVEL 2
34
30%
LEVEL 3
47
41%
LEVEL 4
6
5%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
114
89
25
2
1
111
114
58
56
114
50
64
114
PROFICIENT
46%
55%
16%
_%
_%
_%
46%
59%
34%
46%
28%
61%
46%
LEVEL 1
27
24%
16
18%
11
44%
_
_
_
_
_
_
27
24%
12
21%
15
27%
27
24%
19
38%
8
13%
27
24%
LEVEL 2
34
30%
24
27%
10
40%
_
_
_
_
_
_
34
30%
12
21%
22
39%
34
30%
17
34%
17
27%
34
30%
LEVEL 3
47
41%
43
48%
4
16%
_
_
_
_
_
_
47
41%
29
50%
18
32%
47
41%
13
26%
34
53%
47
41%
LEVEL 4
6
5%
6
7%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
6
5%
5
9%
1
2%
6
5%
1
2%
5
8%
6
5%
Grade 4 English Language Arts
MEAN SCORE: 307
All Students
PROFICIENT
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 116
LEVEL 1
26
22%
LEVEL 2
41
35%
LEVEL 3
30
26%
LEVEL 4
19
16%
General Education
PROFICIENT
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 94
LEVEL 1
12
13%
LEVEL 2
35
37%
LEVEL 3
29
31%
LEVEL 4
18
19%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 22
LEVEL 1
14
64%
LEVEL 2
6
27%
LEVEL 3
1
5%
LEVEL 4
1
5%
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 109
LEVEL 1
26
24%
LEVEL 2
37
34%
LEVEL 3
28
26%
LEVEL 4
18
17%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 7
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
4
57%
LEVEL 3
2
29%
LEVEL 4
1
14%
Female
PROFICIENT
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 61
LEVEL 1
10
16%
LEVEL 2
19
31%
LEVEL 3
21
34%
LEVEL 4
11
18%
Male
PROFICIENT
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 55
LEVEL 1
16
29%
LEVEL 2
22
40%
LEVEL 3
9
16%
LEVEL 4
8
15%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 116
LEVEL 1
26
22%
LEVEL 2
41
35%
LEVEL 3
30
26%
LEVEL 4
19
16%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 45
LEVEL 1
13
29%
LEVEL 2
19
42%
LEVEL 3
10
22%
LEVEL 4
3
7%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 71
LEVEL 1
13
18%
LEVEL 2
22
31%
LEVEL 3
20
28%
LEVEL 4
16
23%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 116
LEVEL 1
26
22%
LEVEL 2
41
35%
LEVEL 3
30
26%
LEVEL 4
19
16%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
116
94
22
3
1
109
3
7
61
55
116
45
71
116
PROFICIENT
42%
50%
9%
_%
_%
42%
_%
43%
52%
31%
42%
29%
51%
42%
LEVEL 1
26
22%
12
13%
14
64%
_
_
_
_
26
24%
_
_
0
0%
10
16%
16
29%
26
22%
13
29%
13
18%
26
22%
LEVEL 2
41
35%
35
37%
6
27%
_
_
_
_
37
34%
_
_
4
57%
19
31%
22
40%
41
35%
19
42%
22
31%
41
35%
LEVEL 3
30
26%
29
31%
1
5%
_
_
_
_
28
26%
_
_
2
29%
21
34%
9
16%
30
26%
10
22%
20
28%
30
26%
LEVEL 4
19
16%
18
19%
1
5%
_
_
_
_
18
17%
_
_
1
14%
11
18%
8
15%
19
16%
3
7%
16
23%
19
16%
Grade 5 English Language Arts
MEAN SCORE: 297
All Students
PROFICIENT
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 114
LEVEL 1
45
39%
LEVEL 2
41
36%
LEVEL 3
21
18%
LEVEL 4
7
6%
General Education
PROFICIENT
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 91
LEVEL 1
29
32%
LEVEL 2
35
38%
LEVEL 3
21
23%
LEVEL 4
6
7%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 23
LEVEL 1
16
70%
LEVEL 2
6
26%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
1
4%
American Indian or Alaska Native
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 103
LEVEL 1
41
40%
LEVEL 2
38
37%
LEVEL 3
19
18%
LEVEL 4
5
5%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 11
LEVEL 1
4
36%
LEVEL 2
3
27%
LEVEL 3
2
18%
LEVEL 4
2
18%
Female
PROFICIENT
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 52
LEVEL 1
15
29%
LEVEL 2
17
33%
LEVEL 3
13
25%
LEVEL 4
7
13%
Male
PROFICIENT
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 62
LEVEL 1
30
48%
LEVEL 2
24
39%
LEVEL 3
8
13%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 114
LEVEL 1
45
39%
LEVEL 2
41
36%
LEVEL 3
21
18%
LEVEL 4
7
6%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 44
LEVEL 1
25
57%
LEVEL 2
12
27%
LEVEL 3
6
14%
LEVEL 4
1
2%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 70
LEVEL 1
20
29%
LEVEL 2
29
41%
LEVEL 3
15
21%
LEVEL 4
6
9%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 114
LEVEL 1
45
39%
LEVEL 2
41
36%
LEVEL 3
21
18%
LEVEL 4
7
6%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
114
91
23
2
2
4
103
3
11
52
62
114
44
70
114
PROFICIENT
25%
30%
4%
_%
_%
_%
23%
_%
36%
38%
13%
25%
16%
30%
25%
LEVEL 1
45
39%
29
32%
16
70%
_
_
_
_
_
_
41
40%
_
_
4
36%
15
29%
30
48%
45
39%
25
57%
20
29%
45
39%
LEVEL 2
41
36%
35
38%
6
26%
_
_
_
_
_
_
38
37%
_
_
3
27%
17
33%
24
39%
41
36%
12
27%
29
41%
41
36%
LEVEL 3
21
18%
21
23%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
19
18%
_
_
2
18%
13
25%
8
13%
21
18%
6
14%
15
21%
21
18%
LEVEL 4
7
6%
6
7%
1
4%
_
_
_
_
_
_
5
5%
_
_
2
18%
7
13%
0
0%
7
6%
1
2%
6
9%
7
6%
Grade 6 English Language Arts
MEAN SCORE: 311
All Students
PROFICIENT
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 96
LEVEL 1
14
15%
LEVEL 2
41
43%
LEVEL 3
19
20%
LEVEL 4
22
23%
General Education
PROFICIENT
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 82
LEVEL 1
9
11%
LEVEL 2
35
43%
LEVEL 3
17
21%
LEVEL 4
21
26%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 14
LEVEL 1
5
36%
LEVEL 2
6
43%
LEVEL 3
2
14%
LEVEL 4
1
7%
American Indian or Alaska Native
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 90
LEVEL 1
14
16%
LEVEL 2
37
41%
LEVEL 3
17
19%
LEVEL 4
22
24%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
4
67%
LEVEL 3
2
33%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Female
PROFICIENT
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 41
LEVEL 1
1
2%
LEVEL 2
16
39%
LEVEL 3
13
32%
LEVEL 4
11
27%
Male
PROFICIENT
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 55
LEVEL 1
13
24%
LEVEL 2
25
45%
LEVEL 3
6
11%
LEVEL 4
11
20%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 95
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 45
LEVEL 1
9
20%
LEVEL 2
23
51%
LEVEL 3
5
11%
LEVEL 4
8
18%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 51
LEVEL 1
5
10%
LEVEL 2
18
35%
LEVEL 3
14
27%
LEVEL 4
14
27%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 96
LEVEL 1
14
15%
LEVEL 2
41
43%
LEVEL 3
19
20%
LEVEL 4
22
23%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
96
82
14
1
1
2
90
2
6
41
55
95
1
45
51
96
PROFICIENT
43%
46%
21%
_%
_%
_%
43%
_%
33%
59%
31%
_%
_%
29%
55%
43%
LEVEL 1
14
15%
9
11%
5
36%
_
_
_
_
_
_
14
16%
_
_
0
0%
1
2%
13
24%
_
_
_
_
9
20%
5
10%
14
15%
LEVEL 2
41
43%
35
43%
6
43%
_
_
_
_
_
_
37
41%
_
_
4
67%
16
39%
25
45%
_
_
_
_
23
51%
18
35%
41
43%
LEVEL 3
19
20%
17
21%
2
14%
_
_
_
_
_
_
17
19%
_
_
2
33%
13
32%
6
11%
_
_
_
_
5
11%
14
27%
19
20%
LEVEL 4
22
23%
21
26%
1
7%
_
_
_
_
_
_
22
24%
_
_
0
0%
11
27%
11
20%
_
_
_
_
8
18%
14
27%
22
23%
Grade 7 English Language Arts
MEAN SCORE: 309
All Students
PROFICIENT
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 96
LEVEL 1
19
20%
LEVEL 2
35
36%
LEVEL 3
33
34%
LEVEL 4
9
9%
General Education
PROFICIENT
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 82
LEVEL 1
9
11%
LEVEL 2
31
38%
LEVEL 3
33
40%
LEVEL 4
9
11%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 14
LEVEL 1
10
71%
LEVEL 2
4
29%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 91
LEVEL 1
18
20%
LEVEL 2
32
35%
LEVEL 3
32
35%
LEVEL 4
9
10%
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
1
20%
LEVEL 2
3
60%
LEVEL 3
1
20%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Female
PROFICIENT
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 38
LEVEL 1
3
8%
LEVEL 2
16
42%
LEVEL 3
17
45%
LEVEL 4
2
5%
Male
PROFICIENT
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 58
LEVEL 1
16
28%
LEVEL 2
19
33%
LEVEL 3
16
28%
LEVEL 4
7
12%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 96
LEVEL 1
19
20%
LEVEL 2
35
36%
LEVEL 3
33
34%
LEVEL 4
9
9%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 44
LEVEL 1
17
39%
LEVEL 2
18
41%
LEVEL 3
6
14%
LEVEL 4
3
7%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 52
LEVEL 1
2
4%
LEVEL 2
17
33%
LEVEL 3
27
52%
LEVEL 4
6
12%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 96
LEVEL 1
19
20%
LEVEL 2
35
36%
LEVEL 3
33
34%
LEVEL 4
9
9%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
96
82
14
1
3
1
91
5
38
58
96
44
52
96
PROFICIENT
44%
51%
0%
_%
_%
_%
45%
20%
50%
40%
44%
20%
63%
44%
LEVEL 1
19
20%
9
11%
10
71%
_
_
_
_
_
_
18
20%
1
20%
3
8%
16
28%
19
20%
17
39%
2
4%
19
20%
LEVEL 2
35
36%
31
38%
4
29%
_
_
_
_
_
_
32
35%
3
60%
16
42%
19
33%
35
36%
18
41%
17
33%
35
36%
LEVEL 3
33
34%
33
40%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
32
35%
1
20%
17
45%
16
28%
33
34%
6
14%
27
52%
33
34%
LEVEL 4
9
9%
9
11%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
9
10%
0
0%
2
5%
7
12%
9
9%
3
7%
6
12%
9
9%
Grade 8 English Language Arts
MEAN SCORE: 313
All Students
PROFICIENT
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 89
LEVEL 1
9
10%
LEVEL 2
35
39%
LEVEL 3
31
35%
LEVEL 4
14
16%
General Education
PROFICIENT
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 76
LEVEL 1
6
8%
LEVEL 2
26
34%
LEVEL 3
30
39%
LEVEL 4
14
18%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 13
LEVEL 1
3
23%
LEVEL 2
9
69%
LEVEL 3
1
8%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
American Indian or Alaska Native
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 83
LEVEL 1
7
8%
LEVEL 2
33
40%
LEVEL 3
29
35%
LEVEL 4
14
17%
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
2
33%
LEVEL 2
2
33%
LEVEL 3
2
33%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Female
PROFICIENT
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 42
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
18
43%
LEVEL 3
17
40%
LEVEL 4
7
17%
Male
PROFICIENT
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 47
LEVEL 1
9
19%
LEVEL 2
17
36%
LEVEL 3
14
30%
LEVEL 4
7
15%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 87
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 35
LEVEL 1
5
14%
LEVEL 2
16
46%
LEVEL 3
10
29%
LEVEL 4
4
11%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 54
LEVEL 1
4
7%
LEVEL 2
19
35%
LEVEL 3
21
39%
LEVEL 4
10
19%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 89
LEVEL 1
9
10%
LEVEL 2
35
39%
LEVEL 3
31
35%
LEVEL 4
14
16%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
89
76
13
1
2
3
83
6
42
47
87
2
35
54
89
PROFICIENT
51%
58%
8%
_%
_%
_%
52%
33%
57%
45%
_%
_%
40%
57%
51%
LEVEL 1
9
10%
6
8%
3
23%
_
_
_
_
_
_
7
8%
2
33%
0
0%
9
19%
_
_
_
_
5
14%
4
7%
9
10%
LEVEL 2
35
39%
26
34%
9
69%
_
_
_
_
_
_
33
40%
2
33%
18
43%
17
36%
_
_
_
_
16
46%
19
35%
35
39%
LEVEL 3
31
35%
30
39%
1
8%
_
_
_
_
_
_
29
35%
2
33%
17
40%
14
30%
_
_
_
_
10
29%
21
39%
31
35%
LEVEL 4
14
16%
14
18%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
14
17%
0
0%
7
17%
7
15%
_
_
_
_
4
11%
10
19%
14
16%
Grade 3 Mathematics
MEAN SCORE: 314
All Students
PROFICIENT
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 112
LEVEL 1
19
17%
LEVEL 2
35
31%
LEVEL 3
31
28%
LEVEL 4
27
24%
General Education
PROFICIENT
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 88
LEVEL 1
9
10%
LEVEL 2
26
30%
LEVEL 3
28
32%
LEVEL 4
25
28%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 24
LEVEL 1
10
42%
LEVEL 2
9
38%
LEVEL 3
3
13%
LEVEL 4
2
8%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 109
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 112
LEVEL 1
19
17%
LEVEL 2
35
31%
LEVEL 3
31
28%
LEVEL 4
27
24%
Female
PROFICIENT
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 57
LEVEL 1
10
18%
LEVEL 2
13
23%
LEVEL 3
20
35%
LEVEL 4
14
25%
Male
PROFICIENT
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 55
LEVEL 1
9
16%
LEVEL 2
22
40%
LEVEL 3
11
20%
LEVEL 4
13
24%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 112
LEVEL 1
19
17%
LEVEL 2
35
31%
LEVEL 3
31
28%
LEVEL 4
27
24%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 48
LEVEL 1
11
23%
LEVEL 2
17
35%
LEVEL 3
15
31%
LEVEL 4
5
10%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 64
LEVEL 1
8
13%
LEVEL 2
18
28%
LEVEL 3
16
25%
LEVEL 4
22
34%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 112
LEVEL 1
19
17%
LEVEL 2
35
31%
LEVEL 3
31
28%
LEVEL 4
27
24%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
112
88
24
2
1
109
112
57
55
112
48
64
112
PROFICIENT
52%
60%
21%
_%
_%
_%
52%
60%
44%
52%
42%
59%
52%
LEVEL 1
19
17%
9
10%
10
42%
_
_
_
_
_
_
19
17%
10
18%
9
16%
19
17%
11
23%
8
13%
19
17%
LEVEL 2
35
31%
26
30%
9
38%
_
_
_
_
_
_
35
31%
13
23%
22
40%
35
31%
17
35%
18
28%
35
31%
LEVEL 3
31
28%
28
32%
3
13%
_
_
_
_
_
_
31
28%
20
35%
11
20%
31
28%
15
31%
16
25%
31
28%
LEVEL 4
27
24%
25
28%
2
8%
_
_
_
_
_
_
27
24%
14
25%
13
24%
27
24%
5
10%
22
34%
27
24%
Grade 4 Mathematics
MEAN SCORE: 312
All Students
PROFICIENT
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 117
LEVEL 1
20
17%
LEVEL 2
35
30%
LEVEL 3
34
29%
LEVEL 4
28
24%
General Education
PROFICIENT
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 95
LEVEL 1
7
7%
LEVEL 2
28
29%
LEVEL 3
34
36%
LEVEL 4
26
27%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 22
LEVEL 1
13
59%
LEVEL 2
7
32%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
2
9%
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 111
LEVEL 1
20
18%
LEVEL 2
32
29%
LEVEL 3
32
29%
LEVEL 4
27
24%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
3
50%
LEVEL 3
2
33%
LEVEL 4
1
17%
Female
PROFICIENT
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 62
LEVEL 1
10
16%
LEVEL 2
20
32%
LEVEL 3
20
32%
LEVEL 4
12
19%
Male
PROFICIENT
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 55
LEVEL 1
10
18%
LEVEL 2
15
27%
LEVEL 3
14
25%
LEVEL 4
16
29%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 117
LEVEL 1
20
17%
LEVEL 2
35
30%
LEVEL 3
34
29%
LEVEL 4
28
24%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 45
LEVEL 1
12
27%
LEVEL 2
16
36%
LEVEL 3
13
29%
LEVEL 4
4
9%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 72
LEVEL 1
8
11%
LEVEL 2
19
26%
LEVEL 3
21
29%
LEVEL 4
24
33%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 117
LEVEL 1
20
17%
LEVEL 2
35
30%
LEVEL 3
34
29%
LEVEL 4
28
24%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
117
95
22
3
1
111
2
6
62
55
117
45
72
117
PROFICIENT
53%
63%
9%
_%
_%
53%
_%
50%
52%
55%
53%
38%
63%
53%
LEVEL 1
20
17%
7
7%
13
59%
_
_
_
_
20
18%
_
_
0
0%
10
16%
10
18%
20
17%
12
27%
8
11%
20
17%
LEVEL 2
35
30%
28
29%
7
32%
_
_
_
_
32
29%
_
_
3
50%
20
32%
15
27%
35
30%
16
36%
19
26%
35
30%
LEVEL 3
34
29%
34
36%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
32
29%
_
_
2
33%
20
32%
14
25%
34
29%
13
29%
21
29%
34
29%
LEVEL 4
28
24%
26
27%
2
9%
_
_
_
_
27
24%
_
_
1
17%
12
19%
16
29%
28
24%
4
9%
24
33%
28
24%
Grade 5 Mathematics
MEAN SCORE: 306
All Students
PROFICIENT
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 119
LEVEL 1
36
30%
LEVEL 2
30
25%
LEVEL 3
48
40%
LEVEL 4
5
4%
General Education
PROFICIENT
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 95
LEVEL 1
20
21%
LEVEL 2
25
26%
LEVEL 3
45
47%
LEVEL 4
5
5%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 24
LEVEL 1
16
67%
LEVEL 2
5
21%
LEVEL 3
3
13%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
American Indian or Alaska Native
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 108
LEVEL 1
32
30%
LEVEL 2
30
28%
LEVEL 3
42
39%
LEVEL 4
4
4%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 11
LEVEL 1
4
36%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
6
55%
LEVEL 4
1
9%
Female
PROFICIENT
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 56
LEVEL 1
14
25%
LEVEL 2
14
25%
LEVEL 3
23
41%
LEVEL 4
5
9%
Male
PROFICIENT
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 63
LEVEL 1
22
35%
LEVEL 2
16
25%
LEVEL 3
25
40%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 119
LEVEL 1
36
30%
LEVEL 2
30
25%
LEVEL 3
48
40%
LEVEL 4
5
4%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 46
LEVEL 1
14
30%
LEVEL 2
13
28%
LEVEL 3
19
41%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 73
LEVEL 1
22
30%
LEVEL 2
17
23%
LEVEL 3
29
40%
LEVEL 4
5
7%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 119
LEVEL 1
36
30%
LEVEL 2
30
25%
LEVEL 3
48
40%
LEVEL 4
5
4%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
119
95
24
2
2
4
108
3
11
56
63
119
46
73
119
PROFICIENT
45%
53%
13%
_%
_%
_%
43%
_%
64%
50%
40%
45%
41%
47%
45%
LEVEL 1
36
30%
20
21%
16
67%
_
_
_
_
_
_
32
30%
_
_
4
36%
14
25%
22
35%
36
30%
14
30%
22
30%
36
30%
LEVEL 2
30
25%
25
26%
5
21%
_
_
_
_
_
_
30
28%
_
_
0
0%
14
25%
16
25%
30
25%
13
28%
17
23%
30
25%
LEVEL 3
48
40%
45
47%
3
13%
_
_
_
_
_
_
42
39%
_
_
6
55%
23
41%
25
40%
48
40%
19
41%
29
40%
48
40%
LEVEL 4
5
4%
5
5%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
4
4%
_
_
1
9%
5
9%
0
0%
5
4%
0
0%
5
7%
5
4%
Grade 6 Mathematics
MEAN SCORE: 314
All Students
PROFICIENT
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 96
LEVEL 1
11
11%
LEVEL 2
42
44%
LEVEL 3
23
24%
LEVEL 4
20
21%
General Education
PROFICIENT
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 82
LEVEL 1
6
7%
LEVEL 2
35
43%
LEVEL 3
21
26%
LEVEL 4
20
24%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 14
LEVEL 1
5
36%
LEVEL 2
7
50%
LEVEL 3
2
14%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
American Indian or Alaska Native
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 91
LEVEL 1
11
12%
LEVEL 2
39
43%
LEVEL 3
21
23%
LEVEL 4
20
22%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
3
60%
LEVEL 3
2
40%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Female
PROFICIENT
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 42
LEVEL 1
7
17%
LEVEL 2
14
33%
LEVEL 3
9
21%
LEVEL 4
12
29%
Male
PROFICIENT
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 54
LEVEL 1
4
7%
LEVEL 2
28
52%
LEVEL 3
14
26%
LEVEL 4
8
15%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 95
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 45
LEVEL 1
9
20%
LEVEL 2
20
44%
LEVEL 3
8
18%
LEVEL 4
8
18%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 51
LEVEL 1
2
4%
LEVEL 2
22
43%
LEVEL 3
15
29%
LEVEL 4
12
24%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 96
LEVEL 1
11
11%
LEVEL 2
42
44%
LEVEL 3
23
24%
LEVEL 4
20
21%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
96
82
14
1
1
2
91
1
5
42
54
95
1
45
51
96
PROFICIENT
45%
50%
14%
_%
_%
_%
45%
_%
40%
50%
41%
_%
_%
36%
53%
45%
LEVEL 1
11
11%
6
7%
5
36%
_
_
_
_
_
_
11
12%
_
_
0
0%
7
17%
4
7%
_
_
_
_
9
20%
2
4%
11
11%
LEVEL 2
42
44%
35
43%
7
50%
_
_
_
_
_
_
39
43%
_
_
3
60%
14
33%
28
52%
_
_
_
_
20
44%
22
43%
42
44%
LEVEL 3
23
24%
21
26%
2
14%
_
_
_
_
_
_
21
23%
_
_
2
40%
9
21%
14
26%
_
_
_
_
8
18%
15
29%
23
24%
LEVEL 4
20
21%
20
24%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
20
22%
_
_
0
0%
12
29%
8
15%
_
_
_
_
8
18%
12
24%
20
21%
Grade 7 Mathematics
Mean scores and data in the table for grade 7 math include only those for grade 7 students who took the Grade 7 New York State Testing Program Assessment (NYSTP) in Mathematics. For 2015 and forward, data in the bar charts include those for grade 7 students who took the Grade 7 NYSTP in Mathematics and grade 7 students who took a Regents math test in lieu of the NYSTP. For 2014 and earlier, data in the bar charts include only those for grade 7 students who took the Grade 7 NYSTP.
MEAN SCORE: 307
All Students
PROFICIENT
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 96
LEVEL 1
26
27%
LEVEL 2
37
39%
LEVEL 3
25
26%
LEVEL 4
8
8%
General Education
PROFICIENT
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 84
LEVEL 1
14
17%
LEVEL 2
37
44%
LEVEL 3
25
30%
LEVEL 4
8
10%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 12
LEVEL 1
12
100%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 91
LEVEL 1
25
27%
LEVEL 2
35
38%
LEVEL 3
23
25%
LEVEL 4
8
9%
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
1
20%
LEVEL 2
2
40%
LEVEL 3
2
40%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Female
PROFICIENT
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 38
LEVEL 1
10
26%
LEVEL 2
17
45%
LEVEL 3
11
29%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Male
PROFICIENT
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 58
LEVEL 1
16
28%
LEVEL 2
20
34%
LEVEL 3
14
24%
LEVEL 4
8
14%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 96
LEVEL 1
26
27%
LEVEL 2
37
39%
LEVEL 3
25
26%
LEVEL 4
8
8%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 41
LEVEL 1
16
39%
LEVEL 2
18
44%
LEVEL 3
6
15%
LEVEL 4
1
2%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 55
LEVEL 1
10
18%
LEVEL 2
19
35%
LEVEL 3
19
35%
LEVEL 4
7
13%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 96
LEVEL 1
26
27%
LEVEL 2
37
39%
LEVEL 3
25
26%
LEVEL 4
8
8%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
96
84
12
1
3
1
91
5
38
58
96
41
55
96
PROFICIENT
34%
39%
0%
_%
_%
_%
34%
40%
29%
38%
34%
17%
47%
34%
LEVEL 1
26
27%
14
17%
12
100%
_
_
_
_
_
_
25
27%
1
20%
10
26%
16
28%
26
27%
16
39%
10
18%
26
27%
LEVEL 2
37
39%
37
44%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
35
38%
2
40%
17
45%
20
34%
37
39%
18
44%
19
35%
37
39%
LEVEL 3
25
26%
25
30%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
23
25%
2
40%
11
29%
14
24%
25
26%
6
15%
19
35%
25
26%
LEVEL 4
8
8%
8
10%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
8
9%
0
0%
0
0%
8
14%
8
8%
1
2%
7
13%
8
8%
Grade 8 Mathematics
Mean scores and data in the table for grade 8 math include only those for grade 8 students who took the Grade 8 New York State Testing Program Assessment (NYSTP) in Mathematics. For 2015 and forward, data in the bar charts include those for grade 8 students who took the Grade 8 NYSTP in Mathematics and grade 8 students who took a Regents math test in lieu of the NYSTP. For 2014 and earlier, data in the bar charts include only those for grade 8 students who took the Grade 8 NYSTP.
MEAN SCORE: 305
All Students
PROFICIENT
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 74
LEVEL 1
13
18%
LEVEL 2
42
57%
LEVEL 3
19
26%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
General Education
PROFICIENT
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 64
LEVEL 1
11
17%
LEVEL 2
35
55%
LEVEL 3
18
28%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 10
LEVEL 1
2
20%
LEVEL 2
7
70%
LEVEL 3
1
10%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
American Indian or Alaska Native
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 68
LEVEL 1
11
16%
LEVEL 2
39
57%
LEVEL 3
18
26%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
2
33%
LEVEL 2
3
50%
LEVEL 3
1
17%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Female
PROFICIENT
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 36
LEVEL 1
8
22%
LEVEL 2
19
53%
LEVEL 3
9
25%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Male
PROFICIENT
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 38
LEVEL 1
5
13%
LEVEL 2
23
61%
LEVEL 3
10
26%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 72
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 27
LEVEL 1
8
30%
LEVEL 2
15
56%
LEVEL 3
4
15%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 47
LEVEL 1
5
11%
LEVEL 2
27
57%
LEVEL 3
15
32%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 74
LEVEL 1
13
18%
LEVEL 2
42
57%
LEVEL 3
19
26%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
74
64
10
1
2
3
68
6
36
38
72
2
27
47
74
PROFICIENT
26%
28%
10%
_%
_%
_%
26%
17%
25%
26%
_%
_%
15%
32%
26%
LEVEL 1
13
18%
11
17%
2
20%
_
_
_
_
_
_
11
16%
2
33%
8
22%
5
13%
_
_
_
_
8
30%
5
11%
13
18%
LEVEL 2
42
57%
35
55%
7
70%
_
_
_
_
_
_
39
57%
3
50%
19
53%
23
61%
_
_
_
_
15
56%
27
57%
42
57%
LEVEL 3
19
26%
18
28%
1
10%
_
_
_
_
_
_
18
26%
1
17%
9
25%
10
26%
_
_
_
_
4
15%
15
32%
19
26%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
Grade 8 Students Taking a Regents Math Test
Accelerated grade 8 students who took a Regents math test in lieu of the Grade 8 NYSTP in Mathematics.
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 15
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4 AND ABOVE
15
100%
LEVEL 3 AND ABOVE
15
100%
GROUP
All Students
TOTAL TESTED
15
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
4 & ABOVE
15
100%
3 & ABOVE
15
100%
Grade 4 Science
MEAN SCORE: 86
All Students
PROFICIENT
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 120
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
3
3%
LEVEL 3
41
34%
LEVEL 4
76
63%
General Education
PROFICIENT
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 98
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
2%
LEVEL 3
27
28%
LEVEL 4
69
70%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 22
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
5%
LEVEL 3
14
64%
LEVEL 4
7
32%
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 113
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
3
3%
LEVEL 3
40
35%
LEVEL 4
70
62%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 7
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
1
14%
LEVEL 4
6
86%
Female
PROFICIENT
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 62
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
3%
LEVEL 3
24
39%
LEVEL 4
36
58%
Male
PROFICIENT
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 58
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
2%
LEVEL 3
17
29%
LEVEL 4
40
69%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 120
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
3
3%
LEVEL 3
41
34%
LEVEL 4
76
63%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 45
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
26
58%
LEVEL 4
19
42%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 75
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
3
4%
LEVEL 3
15
20%
LEVEL 4
57
76%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 120
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
3
3%
LEVEL 3
41
34%
LEVEL 4
76
63%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
120
98
22
3
1
113
3
7
62
58
120
45
75
120
PROFICIENT
98%
98%
95%
_%
_%
97%
_%
100%
97%
98%
98%
100%
96%
98%
LEVEL 1
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
LEVEL 2
3
3%
2
2%
1
5%
_
_
_
_
3
3%
_
_
0
0%
2
3%
1
2%
3
3%
0
0%
3
4%
3
3%
LEVEL 3
41
34%
27
28%
14
64%
_
_
_
_
40
35%
_
_
1
14%
24
39%
17
29%
41
34%
26
58%
15
20%
41
34%
LEVEL 4
76
63%
69
70%
7
32%
_
_
_
_
70
62%
_
_
6
86%
36
58%
40
69%
76
63%
19
42%
57
76%
76
63%
Grade 8 Science
Data in the bar charts include those for grade 8 students who took the New York State Grade 8 Science Test and grade 8 students who took a Regents science test in lieu of this test. Mean scores and data in the table for grade 8 science include only those for grade 8 students who took the New York State Grade 8 Science Test.
MEAN SCORE: 74
All Students
PROFICIENT
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 89
LEVEL 1
2
2%
LEVEL 2
15
17%
LEVEL 3
55
62%
LEVEL 4
17
19%
General Education
PROFICIENT
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 78
LEVEL 1
2
3%
LEVEL 2
11
14%
LEVEL 3
48
62%
LEVEL 4
17
22%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 11
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
4
36%
LEVEL 3
7
64%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
American Indian or Alaska Native
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 83
LEVEL 1
2
2%
LEVEL 2
13
16%
LEVEL 3
53
64%
LEVEL 4
15
18%
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
33%
LEVEL 3
2
33%
LEVEL 4
2
33%
Female
PROFICIENT
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 44
LEVEL 1
1
2%
LEVEL 2
7
16%
LEVEL 3
31
70%
LEVEL 4
5
11%
Male
PROFICIENT
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 45
LEVEL 1
1
2%
LEVEL 2
8
18%
LEVEL 3
24
53%
LEVEL 4
12
27%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 87
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 35
LEVEL 1
2
6%
LEVEL 2
10
29%
LEVEL 3
20
57%
LEVEL 4
3
9%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 54
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
5
9%
LEVEL 3
35
65%
LEVEL 4
14
26%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 89
LEVEL 1
2
2%
LEVEL 2
15
17%
LEVEL 3
55
62%
LEVEL 4
17
19%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
89
78
11
1
2
3
83
6
44
45
87
2
35
54
89
PROFICIENT
81%
83%
64%
_%
_%
_%
82%
67%
82%
80%
_%
_%
66%
91%
81%
LEVEL 1
2
2%
2
3%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
2
2%
0
0%
1
2%
1
2%
_
_
_
_
2
6%
0
0%
2
2%
LEVEL 2
15
17%
11
14%
4
36%
_
_
_
_
_
_
13
16%
2
33%
7
16%
8
18%
_
_
_
_
10
29%
5
9%
15
17%
LEVEL 3
55
62%
48
62%
7
64%
_
_
_
_
_
_
53
64%
2
33%
31
70%
24
53%
_
_
_
_
20
57%
35
65%
55
62%
LEVEL 4
17
19%
17
22%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
15
18%
2
33%
5
11%
12
27%
_
_
_
_
3
9%
14
26%
17
19%
Grade 8 Students Taking a Regents Science Test
Accelerated grade 8 students who take a Regents science test in lieu of the New York State Grade 8 Science Test.
All Students
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 15
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
5
33%
LEVEL 4
10
67%
GROUP
All Students
TOTAL TESTED
15
PROFICIENT
100%
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
5
33%
LEVEL 4
10
67%
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level English Language Arts after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 116
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
1
1%
LEVEL 3
28
24%
LEVEL 4
78
67%
General Education
PROFICIENT
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 101
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
20
20%
LEVEL 4
75
74%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 15
LEVEL 1
1
7%
LEVEL 2
1
7%
LEVEL 3
8
53%
LEVEL 4
3
20%
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 113
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 116
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
1
1%
LEVEL 3
28
24%
LEVEL 4
78
67%
Female
PROFICIENT
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 52
LEVEL 1
1
2%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
15
29%
LEVEL 4
33
63%
Male
PROFICIENT
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 64
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
2%
LEVEL 3
13
20%
LEVEL 4
45
70%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 116
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
1
1%
LEVEL 3
28
24%
LEVEL 4
78
67%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 47
LEVEL 1
1
2%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
17
36%
LEVEL 4
26
55%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 69
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
1%
LEVEL 3
11
16%
LEVEL 4
52
75%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 116
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
1
1%
LEVEL 3
28
24%
LEVEL 4
78
67%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
116
101
15
3
113
116
52
64
116
47
69
116
PROFICIENT
91%
94%
73%
_%
_%
91%
92%
91%
91%
91%
91%
91%
LEVEL 1
1
1%
0
0%
1
7%
_
_
_
_
1
1%
1
2%
0
0%
1
1%
1
2%
0
0%
1
1%
LEVEL 2
1
1%
0
0%
1
7%
_
_
_
_
1
1%
0
0%
1
2%
1
1%
0
0%
1
1%
1
1%
LEVEL 3
28
24%
20
20%
8
53%
_
_
_
_
28
24%
15
29%
13
20%
28
24%
17
36%
11
16%
28
24%
LEVEL 4
78
67%
75
74%
3
20%
_
_
_
_
78
67%
33
63%
45
70%
78
67%
26
55%
52
75%
78
67%
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level Mathematics after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 116
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
3
3%
LEVEL 3
63
54%
LEVEL 4
46
40%
General Education
PROFICIENT
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 101
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
1
1%
LEVEL 3
54
53%
LEVEL 4
44
44%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 15
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
13%
LEVEL 3
9
60%
LEVEL 4
2
13%
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 113
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 116
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
3
3%
LEVEL 3
63
54%
LEVEL 4
46
40%
Female
PROFICIENT
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 52
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
2%
LEVEL 3
28
54%
LEVEL 4
22
42%
Male
PROFICIENT
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 64
LEVEL 1
1
2%
LEVEL 2
2
3%
LEVEL 3
35
55%
LEVEL 4
24
38%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 116
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
3
3%
LEVEL 3
63
54%
LEVEL 4
46
40%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 47
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
4%
LEVEL 3
31
66%
LEVEL 4
13
28%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 69
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
1
1%
LEVEL 3
32
46%
LEVEL 4
33
48%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 116
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
3
3%
LEVEL 3
63
54%
LEVEL 4
46
40%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
116
101
15
3
113
116
52
64
116
47
69
116
PROFICIENT
94%
97%
73%
_%
_%
94%
96%
92%
94%
94%
94%
94%
LEVEL 1
1
1%
1
1%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
1
1%
0
0%
1
2%
1
1%
0
0%
1
1%
1
1%
LEVEL 2
3
3%
1
1%
2
13%
_
_
_
_
3
3%
1
2%
2
3%
3
3%
2
4%
1
1%
3
3%
LEVEL 3
63
54%
54
53%
9
60%
_
_
_
_
63
54%
28
54%
35
55%
63
54%
31
66%
32
46%
63
54%
LEVEL 4
46
40%
44
44%
2
13%
_
_
_
_
46
40%
22
42%
24
38%
46
40%
13
28%
33
48%
46
40%
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level Global History and Geography after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 116
LEVEL 1
3
3%
LEVEL 2
3
3%
LEVEL 3
57
49%
LEVEL 4
46
40%
General Education
PROFICIENT
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 101
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
2
2%
LEVEL 3
50
50%
LEVEL 4
44
44%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 15
LEVEL 1
2
13%
LEVEL 2
1
7%
LEVEL 3
7
47%
LEVEL 4
2
13%
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 113
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 116
LEVEL 1
3
3%
LEVEL 2
3
3%
LEVEL 3
57
49%
LEVEL 4
46
40%
Female
PROFICIENT
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 52
LEVEL 1
1
2%
LEVEL 2
2
4%
LEVEL 3
26
50%
LEVEL 4
21
40%
Male
PROFICIENT
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 64
LEVEL 1
2
3%
LEVEL 2
1
2%
LEVEL 3
31
48%
LEVEL 4
25
39%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 116
LEVEL 1
3
3%
LEVEL 2
3
3%
LEVEL 3
57
49%
LEVEL 4
46
40%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 47
LEVEL 1
1
2%
LEVEL 2
1
2%
LEVEL 3
27
57%
LEVEL 4
16
34%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 69
LEVEL 1
2
3%
LEVEL 2
2
3%
LEVEL 3
30
43%
LEVEL 4
30
43%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 116
LEVEL 1
3
3%
LEVEL 2
3
3%
LEVEL 3
57
49%
LEVEL 4
46
40%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
116
101
15
3
113
116
52
64
116
47
69
116
PROFICIENT
89%
93%
60%
_%
_%
89%
90%
88%
89%
91%
87%
89%
LEVEL 1
3
3%
1
1%
2
13%
_
_
_
_
3
3%
1
2%
2
3%
3
3%
1
2%
2
3%
3
3%
LEVEL 2
3
3%
2
2%
1
7%
_
_
_
_
3
3%
2
4%
1
2%
3
3%
1
2%
2
3%
3
3%
LEVEL 3
57
49%
50
50%
7
47%
_
_
_
_
57
49%
26
50%
31
48%
57
49%
27
57%
30
43%
57
49%
LEVEL 4
46
40%
44
44%
2
13%
_
_
_
_
46
40%
21
40%
25
39%
46
40%
16
34%
30
43%
46
40%
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level U.S. History and Government after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 116
LEVEL 1
3
3%
LEVEL 2
1
1%
LEVEL 3
42
36%
LEVEL 4
61
53%
General Education
PROFICIENT
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 101
LEVEL 1
2
2%
LEVEL 2
1
1%
LEVEL 3
33
33%
LEVEL 4
59
58%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 15
LEVEL 1
1
7%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
9
60%
LEVEL 4
2
13%
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 113
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 116
LEVEL 1
3
3%
LEVEL 2
1
1%
LEVEL 3
42
36%
LEVEL 4
61
53%
Female
PROFICIENT
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 52
LEVEL 1
3
6%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
18
35%
LEVEL 4
28
54%
Male
PROFICIENT
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 64
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
2%
LEVEL 3
24
38%
LEVEL 4
33
52%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 116
LEVEL 1
3
3%
LEVEL 2
1
1%
LEVEL 3
42
36%
LEVEL 4
61
53%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 47
LEVEL 1
2
4%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
20
43%
LEVEL 4
22
47%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 69
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
1
1%
LEVEL 3
22
32%
LEVEL 4
39
57%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 116
LEVEL 1
3
3%
LEVEL 2
1
1%
LEVEL 3
42
36%
LEVEL 4
61
53%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
116
101
15
3
113
116
52
64
116
47
69
116
PROFICIENT
89%
91%
73%
_%
_%
89%
88%
89%
89%
89%
88%
89%
LEVEL 1
3
3%
2
2%
1
7%
_
_
_
_
3
3%
3
6%
0
0%
3
3%
2
4%
1
1%
3
3%
LEVEL 2
1
1%
1
1%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
1
1%
0
0%
1
2%
1
1%
0
0%
1
1%
1
1%
LEVEL 3
42
36%
33
33%
9
60%
_
_
_
_
42
36%
18
35%
24
38%
42
36%
20
43%
22
32%
42
36%
LEVEL 4
61
53%
59
58%
2
13%
_
_
_
_
61
53%
28
54%
33
52%
61
53%
22
47%
39
57%
61
53%
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level Science after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 116
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
2%
LEVEL 3
51
44%
LEVEL 4
56
48%
General Education
PROFICIENT
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 101
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
1%
LEVEL 3
41
41%
LEVEL 4
55
54%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 15
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
7%
LEVEL 3
10
67%
LEVEL 4
1
7%
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 113
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 116
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
2%
LEVEL 3
51
44%
LEVEL 4
56
48%
Female
PROFICIENT
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 52
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
4%
LEVEL 3
24
46%
LEVEL 4
25
48%
Male
PROFICIENT
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 64
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
27
42%
LEVEL 4
31
48%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 116
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
2%
LEVEL 3
51
44%
LEVEL 4
56
48%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 47
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
2%
LEVEL 3
22
47%
LEVEL 4
21
45%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 69
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
1%
LEVEL 3
29
42%
LEVEL 4
35
51%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 116
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
2%
LEVEL 3
51
44%
LEVEL 4
56
48%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
116
101
15
3
113
116
52
64
116
47
69
116
PROFICIENT
92%
95%
73%
_%
_%
92%
94%
91%
92%
91%
93%
92%
LEVEL 1
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
2%
1
1%
1
7%
_
_
_
_
2
2%
2
4%
0
0%
2
2%
1
2%
1
1%
2
2%
LEVEL 3
51
44%
41
41%
10
67%
_
_
_
_
51
44%
24
46%
27
42%
51
44%
22
47%
29
42%
51
44%
LEVEL 4
56
48%
55
54%
1
7%
_
_
_
_
56
48%
25
48%
31
48%
56
48%
21
45%
35
51%
56
48%
Regents Examination Results (2016 - 17)
English Language Arts (Common Core)
English Language Arts (Common Core)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
107
99
8
1
3
1
101
1
6
48
59
106
1
43
64
107
LEVEL 1
1
1%
0
0%
1
13%
_
_
_
_
_
_
1
1%
_
_
0
0%
1
2%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
1
2%
0
0%
1
1%
LEVEL 2
4
4%
3
3%
1
13%
_
_
_
_
_
_
4
4%
_
_
0
0%
2
4%
2
3%
_
_
_
_
1
2%
3
5%
4
4%
LEVEL 3
20
19%
15
15%
5
63%
_
_
_
_
_
_
18
18%
_
_
2
33%
8
17%
12
20%
_
_
_
_
13
30%
7
11%
20
19%
LEVEL 4
8
7%
8
8%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
8
8%
_
_
0
0%
4
8%
4
7%
_
_
_
_
6
14%
2
3%
8
7%
LEVEL 5
74
69%
73
74%
1
13%
_
_
_
_
_
_
70
69%
_
_
4
67%
33
69%
41
69%
_
_
_
_
22
51%
52
81%
74
69%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 107
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
4
4%
LEVEL 3
20
19%
LEVEL 4
8
7%
LEVEL 5
74
69%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 99
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
3
3%
LEVEL 3
15
15%
LEVEL 4
8
8%
LEVEL 5
73
74%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 8
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
1
13%
LEVEL 2
1
13%
LEVEL 3
5
63%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
LEVEL 5
1
13%
American Indian or Alaska Native
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 101
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
4
4%
LEVEL 3
18
18%
LEVEL 4
8
8%
LEVEL 5
70
69%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 6
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
2
33%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
LEVEL 5
4
67%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 48
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
1
2%
LEVEL 2
2
4%
LEVEL 3
8
17%
LEVEL 4
4
8%
LEVEL 5
33
69%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 59
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
3%
LEVEL 3
12
20%
LEVEL 4
4
7%
LEVEL 5
41
69%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 106
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 43
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
1
2%
LEVEL 2
1
2%
LEVEL 3
13
30%
LEVEL 4
6
14%
LEVEL 5
22
51%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 64
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
3
5%
LEVEL 3
7
11%
LEVEL 4
2
3%
LEVEL 5
52
81%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 107
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
4
4%
LEVEL 3
20
19%
LEVEL 4
8
7%
LEVEL 5
74
69%
Algebra 2/Trigonometry
Regents Algebra 2/Trigonometry
GROUP
All Students
General Education
White
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
19
19
19
11
8
19
2
17
19
55
17
89%
17
89%
17
89%
11
100%
6
75%
17
89%
_
_
_
_
17
89%
65
16
84%
16
84%
16
84%
10
91%
6
75%
16
84%
_
_
_
_
16
84%
85
5
26%
5
26%
5
26%
0
0%
5
63%
5
26%
_
_
_
_
5
26%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 19
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
17
89%
65
16
84%
85
5
26%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 19
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
17
89%
65
16
84%
85
5
26%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 19
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
17
89%
65
16
84%
85
5
26%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 11
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
11
100%
65
10
91%
85
0
0%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 8
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
6
75%
65
6
75%
85
5
63%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 19
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
17
89%
65
16
84%
85
5
26%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 17
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 19
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
17
89%
65
16
84%
85
5
26%
Algebra I (Common Core)
Algebra I (Common Core)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
114
98
16
4
3
107
7
51
63
113
1
44
70
114
LEVEL 1
2
2%
1
1%
1
6%
_
_
_
_
1
1%
1
14%
0
0%
2
3%
_
_
_
_
1
2%
1
1%
2
2%
LEVEL 2
2
2%
2
2%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
2
2%
0
0%
1
2%
1
2%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
2
3%
2
2%
LEVEL 3
26
23%
17
17%
9
56%
_
_
_
_
25
23%
1
14%
12
24%
14
22%
_
_
_
_
16
36%
10
14%
26
23%
LEVEL 4
44
39%
40
41%
4
25%
_
_
_
_
40
37%
4
57%
21
41%
23
37%
_
_
_
_
17
39%
27
39%
44
39%
LEVEL 5
40
35%
38
39%
2
13%
_
_
_
_
39
36%
1
14%
17
33%
23
37%
_
_
_
_
10
23%
30
43%
40
35%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 114
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
2
2%
LEVEL 2
2
2%
LEVEL 3
26
23%
LEVEL 4
44
39%
LEVEL 5
40
35%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 98
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
2
2%
LEVEL 3
17
17%
LEVEL 4
40
41%
LEVEL 5
38
39%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 16
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
1
6%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
9
56%
LEVEL 4
4
25%
LEVEL 5
2
13%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 4
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 107
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
2
2%
LEVEL 3
25
23%
LEVEL 4
40
37%
LEVEL 5
39
36%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 7
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
1
14%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
1
14%
LEVEL 4
4
57%
LEVEL 5
1
14%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 51
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
2%
LEVEL 3
12
24%
LEVEL 4
21
41%
LEVEL 5
17
33%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 63
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
2
3%
LEVEL 2
1
2%
LEVEL 3
14
22%
LEVEL 4
23
37%
LEVEL 5
23
37%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 113
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 44
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
1
2%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
16
36%
LEVEL 4
17
39%
LEVEL 5
10
23%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 70
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
2
3%
LEVEL 3
10
14%
LEVEL 4
27
39%
LEVEL 5
30
43%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 114
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
2
2%
LEVEL 2
2
2%
LEVEL 3
26
23%
LEVEL 4
44
39%
LEVEL 5
40
35%
Common Core Geometry
Regents Common Core Geometry
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
88
87
1
1
3
84
88
44
44
88
31
57
88
LEVEL 1
7
8%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
7
8%
3
7%
4
9%
7
8%
2
6%
5
9%
7
8%
LEVEL 2
19
22%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
19
22%
10
23%
9
20%
19
22%
11
35%
8
14%
19
22%
LEVEL 3
46
52%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
46
52%
25
57%
21
48%
46
52%
15
48%
31
54%
46
52%
LEVEL 4
9
10%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
9
10%
4
9%
5
11%
9
10%
1
3%
8
14%
9
10%
LEVEL 5
7
8%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
7
8%
2
5%
5
11%
7
8%
2
6%
5
9%
7
8%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 88
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
7
8%
LEVEL 2
19
22%
LEVEL 3
46
52%
LEVEL 4
9
10%
LEVEL 5
7
8%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 87
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
American Indian or Alaska Native
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 84
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 88
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
7
8%
LEVEL 2
19
22%
LEVEL 3
46
52%
LEVEL 4
9
10%
LEVEL 5
7
8%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 44
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
3
7%
LEVEL 2
10
23%
LEVEL 3
25
57%
LEVEL 4
4
9%
LEVEL 5
2
5%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 44
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
4
9%
LEVEL 2
9
20%
LEVEL 3
21
48%
LEVEL 4
5
11%
LEVEL 5
5
11%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 88
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
7
8%
LEVEL 2
19
22%
LEVEL 3
46
52%
LEVEL 4
9
10%
LEVEL 5
7
8%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 31
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
2
6%
LEVEL 2
11
35%
LEVEL 3
15
48%
LEVEL 4
1
3%
LEVEL 5
2
6%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 57
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
5
9%
LEVEL 2
8
14%
LEVEL 3
31
54%
LEVEL 4
8
14%
LEVEL 5
5
9%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 88
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
7
8%
LEVEL 2
19
22%
LEVEL 3
46
52%
LEVEL 4
9
10%
LEVEL 5
7
8%
Algebra II (Common Core)
Algebra II (Common Core)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
59
57
2
2
1
56
59
30
29
59
17
42
59
LEVEL 1
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
LEVEL 2
3
5%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
3
5%
1
3%
2
7%
3
5%
1
6%
2
5%
3
5%
LEVEL 3
23
39%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
23
39%
16
53%
7
24%
23
39%
6
35%
17
40%
23
39%
LEVEL 4
26
44%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
26
44%
11
37%
15
52%
26
44%
7
41%
19
45%
26
44%
LEVEL 5
7
12%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
7
12%
2
7%
5
17%
7
12%
3
18%
4
10%
7
12%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 59
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
3
5%
LEVEL 3
23
39%
LEVEL 4
26
44%
LEVEL 5
7
12%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 57
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 56
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 59
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
3
5%
LEVEL 3
23
39%
LEVEL 4
26
44%
LEVEL 5
7
12%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 30
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
3%
LEVEL 3
16
53%
LEVEL 4
11
37%
LEVEL 5
2
7%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 29
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
7%
LEVEL 3
7
24%
LEVEL 4
15
52%
LEVEL 5
5
17%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 59
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
3
5%
LEVEL 3
23
39%
LEVEL 4
26
44%
LEVEL 5
7
12%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 17
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
6%
LEVEL 3
6
35%
LEVEL 4
7
41%
LEVEL 5
3
18%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 42
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
5%
LEVEL 3
17
40%
LEVEL 4
19
45%
LEVEL 5
4
10%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 59
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
3
5%
LEVEL 3
23
39%
LEVEL 4
26
44%
LEVEL 5
7
12%
Global History and Geography
Regents Global History and Geography
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
117
103
14
1
3
113
117
49
68
117
50
67
117
55
108
92%
98
95%
10
71%
_
_
_
_
_
_
108
92%
46
94%
62
91%
108
92%
44
88%
64
96%
108
92%
65
103
88%
94
91%
9
64%
_
_
_
_
_
_
103
88%
44
90%
59
87%
103
88%
41
82%
62
93%
103
88%
85
49
42%
46
45%
3
21%
_
_
_
_
_
_
49
42%
20
41%
29
43%
49
42%
17
34%
32
48%
49
42%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 117
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
108
92%
65
103
88%
85
49
42%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 103
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
98
95%
65
94
91%
85
46
45%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 14
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
10
71%
65
9
64%
85
3
21%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 113
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 117
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
108
92%
65
103
88%
85
49
42%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 49
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
46
94%
65
44
90%
85
20
41%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 68
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
62
91%
65
59
87%
85
29
43%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 117
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
108
92%
65
103
88%
85
49
42%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 50
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
44
88%
65
41
82%
85
17
34%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 67
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
64
96%
65
62
93%
85
32
48%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 117
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
108
92%
65
103
88%
85
49
42%
U.S. History & Government
Regents U.S. History & Government
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
102
96
6
1
3
1
96
1
6
47
55
101
1
40
62
102
55
99
97%
93
97%
6
100%
_
_
_
_
_
_
94
98%
_
_
5
83%
45
96%
54
98%
_
_
_
_
38
95%
61
98%
99
97%
65
95
93%
89
93%
6
100%
_
_
_
_
_
_
91
95%
_
_
4
67%
43
91%
52
95%
_
_
_
_
37
93%
58
94%
95
93%
85
64
63%
63
66%
1
17%
_
_
_
_
_
_
61
64%
_
_
3
50%
26
55%
38
69%
_
_
_
_
21
53%
43
69%
64
63%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 102
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
99
97%
65
95
93%
85
64
63%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 96
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
93
97%
65
89
93%
85
63
66%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 6
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
6
100%
65
6
100%
85
1
17%
American Indian or Alaska Native
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 96
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
94
98%
65
91
95%
85
61
64%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 6
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
5
83%
65
4
67%
85
3
50%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 47
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
45
96%
65
43
91%
85
26
55%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 55
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
54
98%
65
52
95%
85
38
69%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 101
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 40
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
38
95%
65
37
93%
85
21
53%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 62
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
61
98%
65
58
94%
85
43
69%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 102
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
99
97%
65
95
93%
85
64
63%
Living Environment
Regents Living Environment
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
105
90
15
4
3
98
7
51
54
104
1
43
62
105
55
103
98%
89
99%
14
93%
_
_
_
_
96
98%
7
100%
49
96%
54
100%
_
_
_
_
41
95%
62
100%
103
98%
65
98
93%
86
96%
12
80%
_
_
_
_
92
94%
6
86%
48
94%
50
93%
_
_
_
_
38
88%
60
97%
98
93%
85
35
33%
32
36%
3
20%
_
_
_
_
31
32%
4
57%
16
31%
19
35%
_
_
_
_
11
26%
24
39%
35
33%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 105
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
103
98%
65
98
93%
85
35
33%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 90
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
89
99%
65
86
96%
85
32
36%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 15
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
14
93%
65
12
80%
85
3
20%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 4
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 98
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
96
98%
65
92
94%
85
31
32%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 7
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
7
100%
65
6
86%
85
4
57%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 51
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
49
96%
65
48
94%
85
16
31%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 54
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
54
100%
65
50
93%
85
19
35%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 104
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 43
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
41
95%
65
38
88%
85
11
26%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 62
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
62
100%
65
60
97%
85
24
39%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 105
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
103
98%
65
98
93%
85
35
33%
Physical Setting/Earth Science
Regents Physical Setting/Earth Science
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
102
91
11
3
99
102
48
54
102
41
61
102
55
91
89%
83
91%
8
73%
_
_
_
_
91
89%
44
92%
47
87%
91
89%
36
88%
55
90%
91
89%
65
82
80%
77
85%
5
45%
_
_
_
_
82
80%
39
81%
43
80%
82
80%
32
78%
50
82%
82
80%
85
38
37%
36
40%
2
18%
_
_
_
_
38
37%
19
40%
19
35%
38
37%
11
27%
27
44%
38
37%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 102
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
91
89%
65
82
80%
85
38
37%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 91
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
83
91%
65
77
85%
85
36
40%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 11
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
8
73%
65
5
45%
85
2
18%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 99
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 102
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
91
89%
65
82
80%
85
38
37%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 48
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
44
92%
65
39
81%
85
19
40%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 54
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
47
87%
65
43
80%
85
19
35%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 102
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
91
89%
65
82
80%
85
38
37%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 41
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
36
88%
65
32
78%
85
11
27%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 61
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
55
90%
65
50
82%
85
27
44%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 102
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
91
89%
65
82
80%
85
38
37%
Physical Setting/Chemistry
Regents Physical Setting/Chemistry
GROUP
All Students
General Education
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
53
53
1
2
50
53
27
26
53
10
43
53
55
49
92%
49
92%
_
_
_
_
_
_
49
92%
25
93%
24
92%
49
92%
9
90%
40
93%
49
92%
65
43
81%
43
81%
_
_
_
_
_
_
43
81%
20
74%
23
88%
43
81%
8
80%
35
81%
43
81%
85
10
19%
10
19%
_
_
_
_
_
_
10
19%
2
7%
8
31%
10
19%
1
10%
9
21%
10
19%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 53
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
49
92%
65
43
81%
85
10
19%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 53
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
49
92%
65
43
81%
85
10
19%
American Indian or Alaska Native
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 50
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 53
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
49
92%
65
43
81%
85
10
19%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 27
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
25
93%
65
20
74%
85
2
7%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 26
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
24
92%
65
23
88%
85
8
31%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 53
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
49
92%
65
43
81%
85
10
19%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 10
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
9
90%
65
8
80%
85
1
10%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 43
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
40
93%
65
35
81%
85
9
21%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 53
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
49
92%
65
43
81%
85
10
19%
Physical Setting/Physics
Regents Physical Setting/Physics
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
28
26
2
2
25
1
28
14
14
28
7
21
28
55
25
89%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
25
89%
12
86%
13
93%
25
89%
5
71%
20
95%
25
89%
65
23
82%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
23
82%
11
79%
12
86%
23
82%
4
57%
19
90%
23
82%
85
3
11%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
3
11%
0
0%
3
21%
3
11%
0
0%
3
14%
3
11%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 28
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
25
89%
65
23
82%
85
3
11%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 26
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 25
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 28
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
25
89%
65
23
82%
85
3
11%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 14
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
12
86%
65
11
79%
85
0
0%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 14
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
13
93%
65
12
86%
85
3
21%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 28
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
25
89%
65
23
82%
85
3
11%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 7
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
5
71%
65
4
57%
85
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 21
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
20
95%
65
19
90%
85
3
14%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 28
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
25
89%
65
23
82%
85
3
11%
New York State Alternate Assessment (NYSAA) Results (2016 - 17)
GROUP
Grade 6 ELA
Grade 6 Math
Grade 7 ELA
Grade 7 Math
Secondary-Level ELA
Secondary-Level Math
Secondary-Level Science
Secondary-Level Social Studies
TOTAL TESTED
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
PROFICIENT
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
LEVEL 1
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
Grade 6 ELA
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 6 Math
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 7 ELA
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 7 Math
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Secondary-Level ELA
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Secondary-Level Math
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Secondary-Level Science
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Secondary-Level Social Studies
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
New York State English as a Second Language Achievement Test (NYSESLAT) Results (2016 - 17)
Grade 1
GROUP
All Students
General Education
TOTAL TESTED
1
1
ENTERING
_
_
EMERGING
_
_
TRANSITIONING
_
_
EXPANDING
_
_
COMMANDING
_
_
Grade 6
GROUP
All Students
General Education
TOTAL TESTED
1
1
ENTERING
_
_
EMERGING
_
_
TRANSITIONING
_
_
EXPANDING
_
_
COMMANDING
_
_
Grade 8
GROUP
All Students
General Education
TOTAL TESTED
2
2
ENTERING
_
_
EMERGING
_
_
TRANSITIONING
_
_
EXPANDING
_
_
COMMANDING
_
_
Grade 11
GROUP
All Students
General Education
TOTAL TESTED
1
1
ENTERING
_
_
EMERGING
_
_
TRANSITIONING
_
_
EXPANDING
_
_
COMMANDING
_
_
Grade 1
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 1
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 1
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
Grade 6
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 1
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 1
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
Grade 8
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 2
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 2
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
Grade 11
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 1
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 1
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
Elementary/Middle-Level English Language Arts Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: NO
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
NO
―
―
―
―
NO
―
NO
―
NO
Tested 95%
NO
―
―
―
―
NO
―
NO
―
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,356*
4
9
12
6
1,278*
9
253*
3
577*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
92%*
―
―
―
―
91%*
―
89%*
―
90%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
YES
―
NO
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
606
4
9
9
5
571
8
131✝
1
259
PI
120
―
―
―
―
120
―
67✝
―
93
EAMO
107
―
―
―
―
119
―
76
―
95
Safe Harbor Target
107
―
―
―
―
119
―
67
―
95
All Students
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,356*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
92%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
606
PI
120
EAMO
107
Safe Harbor Target
107
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
4
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
4
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
9
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
9
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
12
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
9
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
6
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
5
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
White
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,278*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
91%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
571
PI
120
EAMO
119
Safe Harbor Target
119
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
9
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
8
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
253*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
89%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
131✝
PI
67✝
EAMO
76
Safe Harbor Target
67
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
3
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
577*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
90%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
259
PI
93
EAMO
95
Safe Harbor Target
95
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,348*
1,336*
1,331*
1,346*
40
1,341*
1,103*
1,352*
779*
716*
640*
0
1,356*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
91%*
91%*
91%*
92%*
95%
92%*
92%*
91%*
92%*
92%*
91%*
―
92%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
602
597
597
601
35
598
497
605
347
320
286
0
606
PI
120
120
120
120
117
120
133
120
140
103
138
―
120
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,348*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
91%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
602
PI
120
Not Black or African American
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,336*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
91%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
597
PI
120
Not Hispanic or Latino
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,331*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
91%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
597
PI
120
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,346*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
92%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
601
PI
120
Not White
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
40
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
95%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
35
PI
117
Not Multiracial
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,341*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
92%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
598
PI
120
General Education
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,103*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
92%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
497
PI
133
English Proficient
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,352*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
91%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
605
PI
120
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
779*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
92%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
347
PI
140
Male
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
716*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
92%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
320
PI
103
Female
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
640*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
91%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
286
PI
138
Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,356*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
92%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
606
PI
120
― There were fewer than 40 students enrolled during the test administration period, so the Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 tested students enrolled on BEDS day and during the test administration period, so the PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed. *The percentage of students tested in the current year fell below 95 percent, so the numbers of enrolled and tested students in the current year and previous year were combined to provide the school/district with another opportunity to meet the participation rate criterion. ✝ Includes former students with disabilities because the number of students with disabilities in the current year is equal to or greater than 30.
Elementary/Middle-Level Mathematics Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: NO
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
NO
―
―
―
―
NO
―
NO
―
NO
Tested 95%
NO
―
―
―
―
NO
―
NO
―
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,354*
4
9
12
6
1,279*
8
249*
3
573*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
92%*
―
―
―
―
92%*
―
87%*
―
90%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
NO
―
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
606
4
9
9
5
573
6
124✝
1
252
PI
126
―
―
―
―
126
―
68✝
―
107
EAMO
105
―
―
―
―
116
―
77
―
93
Safe Harbor Target
105
―
―
―
―
116
―
77
―
93
All Students
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,354*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
92%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
606
PI
126
EAMO
105
Safe Harbor Target
105
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
4
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
4
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
9
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
9
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
12
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
9
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
6
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
5
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
White
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,279*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
92%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
573
PI
126
EAMO
116
Safe Harbor Target
116
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
8
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
6
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
249*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
87%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
124✝
PI
68✝
EAMO
77
Safe Harbor Target
77
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
3
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
573*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
90%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
252
PI
107
EAMO
93
Safe Harbor Target
93
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,346*
1,334*
1,331*
1,344*
39
1,340*
1,105*
1,350*
781*
717*
637*
0
1,354*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
92%*
91%*
92%*
92%*
―
92%*
93%*
92%*
93%*
91%*
92%*
―
92%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
602
597
597
601
33
600
502
605
354
318
288
0
606
PI
126
126
126
126
133
126
140
126
140
123
130
―
126
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,346*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
92%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
602
PI
126
Not Black or African American
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,334*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
91%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
597
PI
126
Not Hispanic or Latino
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,331*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
92%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
597
PI
126
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,344*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
92%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
601
PI
126
Not White
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
39
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
33
PI
133
Not Multiracial
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,340*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
92%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
600
PI
126
General Education
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,105*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
93%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
502
PI
140
English Proficient
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,350*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
92%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
605
PI
126
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
781*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
93%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
354
PI
140
Male
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
717*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
91%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
318
PI
123
Female
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
637*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
92%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
288
PI
130
Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,354*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
92%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
606
PI
126
― There were fewer than 40 students enrolled during the test administration period, so the Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 tested students enrolled on BEDS day and during the test administration period, so the PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed. *The percentage of students tested in the current year fell below 95 percent, so the numbers of enrolled and tested students in the current year and previous year were combined to provide the school/district with another opportunity to meet the participation rate criterion. ✝ Includes former students with disabilities because the number of students with disabilities in the current year is equal to or greater than 30.
Elementary/Middle-Level Science Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: YES
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
YES
―
YES
Tested 80%
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
229
1
5
4
0
216
3
36
2
87
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
―
―
―
―
98%
―
―
―
98%
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
YES
―
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
218
1
5
3
0
206
3
33✝
1
84
PI
191
―
―
―
―
191
―
188✝
―
183
EAMO
181
―
―
―
―
187
―
158
―
172
Progress Target
181
―
―
―
―
187
―
158
―
172
All Students
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 80%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
229
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
218
PI
191
EAMO
181
Progress Target
181
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
5
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
5
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
4
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
3
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
White
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 80%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
216
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
206
PI
191
EAMO
187
Progress Target
187
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
3
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
3
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
36
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
33✝
PI
188✝
EAMO
158
Progress Target
158
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
2
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 80%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
87
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
84
PI
183
EAMO
172
Progress Target
172
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
228
224
225
229
13
226
193
227
142
115
114
0
229
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
98%
98%
98%
―
98%
99%
98%
98%
97%
98%
―
98%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
217
213
215
218
12
215
187
217
134
109
109
0
218
PI
191
191
191
191
―
191
191
191
196
192
190
―
191
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
228
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
217
PI
191
Not Black or African American
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
224
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
213
PI
191
Not Hispanic or Latino
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
225
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
215
PI
191
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
229
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
218
PI
191
Not White
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
13
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
12
PI
―
Not Multiracial
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
226
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
215
PI
191
General Education
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
193
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
99%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
187
PI
191
English Proficient
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
227
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
217
PI
191
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
142
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
134
PI
196
Male
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
115
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
97%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
109
PI
192
Female
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
114
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
109
PI
190
Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
229
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
218
PI
191
― There were fewer than 40 students enrolled during the test administration period, so the Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 tested students enrolled on BEDS day and during the test administration period, so the PI, EAMO, and Progress Target data are suppressed. ✝ Includes former students with disabilities because the number of students with disabilities in the current year is equal to or greater than 30.
Secondary-Level English Language Arts Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: NO
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
YES
―
―
―
―
NO
―
―
―
YES
Tested 95%
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
YES
12th graders
109
0
3
0
0
106
0
12
0
44
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
―
―
―
―
100%
―
―
―
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
―
―
―
―
NO
―
―
―
YES
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
105
0
3
0
0
102
0
14
0
44
PI
169
―
―
―
―
169
―
―
―
152
EAMO
168
―
―
―
―
176
―
―
―
153
Safe Harbor Target
168
―
―
―
―
172
―
―
―
135
All Students
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
YES
12th Graders
109
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
105
PI
169
EAMO
168
Safe Harbor Target
168
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
3
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
3
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
White
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
YES
12th Graders
106
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
102
PI
169
EAMO
176
Safe Harbor Target
172
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
12
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
14
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
YES
12th Graders
44
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
44
PI
152
EAMO
153
Safe Harbor Target
135
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
12th Graders
109
106
109
109
3
109
97
109
65
62
47
0
109
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
100%
100%
100%
―
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
―
100%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
105
102
105
105
3
105
91
105
61
57
48
0
105
PI
169
169
169
169
―
169
178
169
180
174
163
―
169
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
12th Graders
109
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
105
PI
169
Not Black or African American
12th Graders
106
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
102
PI
169
Not Hispanic or Latino
12th Graders
109
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
105
PI
169
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
12th Graders
109
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
105
PI
169
Not White
12th Graders
3
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
3
PI
―
Not Multiracial
12th Graders
109
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
105
PI
169
General Education
12th Graders
97
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
91
PI
178
English Proficient
12th Graders
109
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
105
PI
169
Not Economically Disadvantaged
12th Graders
65
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
61
PI
180
Male
12th Graders
62
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
57
PI
174
Female
12th Graders
47
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
48
PI
163
Migrant
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
Not Migrant
12th Graders
109
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
105
PI
169
― There were fewer than 40 12th graders, so the Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 students in the 2013 accountability cohort, so PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed.
Secondary-Level Mathematics Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: YES
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
YES
Tested 95%
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
YES
12th graders
109
0
3
0
0
106
0
12
0
44
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
―
―
―
―
100%
―
―
―
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
YES
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
105
0
3
0
0
102
0
14
0
44
PI
168
―
―
―
―
168
―
―
―
155
EAMO
155
―
―
―
―
165
―
―
―
139
Safe Harbor Target
155
―
―
―
―
165
―
―
―
130
All Students
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
YES
12th Graders
109
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
105
PI
168
EAMO
155
Safe Harbor Target
155
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
3
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
3
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
White
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
YES
12th Graders
106
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
102
PI
168
EAMO
165
Safe Harbor Target
165
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
12
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
14
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
YES
12th Graders
44
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
44
PI
155
EAMO
139
Safe Harbor Target
130
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
12th Graders
109
106
109
109
3
109
97
109
65
62
47
0
109
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
100%
100%
100%
―
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
―
100%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
105
102
105
105
3
105
91
105
61
57
48
0
105
PI
168
168
168
168
―
168
175
168
177
161
175
―
168
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
12th Graders
109
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
105
PI
168
Not Black or African American
12th Graders
106
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
102
PI
168
Not Hispanic or Latino
12th Graders
109
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
105
PI
168
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
12th Graders
109
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
105
PI
168
Not White
12th Graders
3
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
3
PI
―
Not Multiracial
12th Graders
109
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
105
PI
168
General Education
12th Graders
97
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
91
PI
175
English Proficient
12th Graders
109
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
105
PI
168
Not Economically Disadvantaged
12th Graders
65
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
61
PI
177
Male
12th Graders
62
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
57
PI
161
Female
12th Graders
47
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
48
PI
175
Migrant
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
Not Migrant
12th Graders
109
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
105
PI
168
― There were fewer than 40 12th graders, so the Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 students in the 2013 accountability cohort, so PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed.
Unweighted Combined ELA and Math PIs
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
120
―
―
―
―
120
―
67
―
93
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
126
―
―
―
―
126
―
68
―
107
Secondary-Level ELA PI
169
―
―
―
―
169
―
―
―
152
Secondary-Level MATH PI
168
―
―
―
―
168
―
―
―
155
UNWEIGHTED COMBINED PI
146
0
0
0
0
146
0
68
0
127
All Students
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
120
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
126
Secondary-Level ELA PI
169
Secondary-Level MATH PI
168
Unweighted Combined PI
146
American Indian or Alaska Native
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Black or African American
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Hispanic or Latino
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
White
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
120
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
126
Secondary-Level ELA PI
169
Secondary-Level MATH PI
168
Unweighted Combined PI
146
Multiracial
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Students With Disabilities
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
67
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
68
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
68
Limited English Proficient
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Economically Disadvantaged
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
93
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
107
Secondary-Level ELA PI
152
Secondary-Level MATH PI
155
Unweighted Combined PI
127
― There were not enough students to determine a Performance Index.
Overall Graduation Rate for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: YES
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
YES
All Students
MADE AYP
YES
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP
―
White
MADE AYP
YES
Multiracial
MADE AYP
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP
―
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
YES
― There were not enough students to make an AYP determination.
Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort for Accountability
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion:
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
NO
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
127
1
1
2
3
120
0
16
0
40
Graduation Rate
91%
―
―
―
―
90%
―
―
―
75%
State Standard
80%
―
―
―
―
80%
―
―
―
80%
Progress Target
80%
―
―
―
―
80%
―
―
―
80%
All Students
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
127
Graduation Rate
91%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%
American Indian or Alaska Native
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
1
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Black or African American
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
1
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
2
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
3
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
White
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
120
Graduation Rate
90%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%
Multiracial
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Students With Disabilities
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
16
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Limited English Proficient
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: NO
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
40
Graduation Rate
75%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%
YES Graduation rate is equal to or greater than the State Standard or the group's Progress Target. NO Graduation rate is less than the State Standard and the group's Progress Target.
― There were fewer than 30 students in the cohort.
Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort for Accountability
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion:
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
YES
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
99
1
0
3
1
93
1
14
0
31
Graduation Rate
92%
―
―
―
―
91%
―
―
―
94%
State Standard
80%
―
―
―
―
80%
―
―
―
80%
Progress Target
80%
―
―
―
―
80%
―
―
―
80%
All Students
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
99
Graduation Rate
92%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%
American Indian or Alaska Native
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
1
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Black or African American
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
3
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
1
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
White
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
93
Graduation Rate
91%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%
Multiracial
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
1
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Students With Disabilities
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
14
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Limited English Proficient
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
31
Graduation Rate
94%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%
YES Graduation rate is equal to or greater than the State Standard or the group's Progress Target. NO Graduation rate is less than the State Standard and the group's Progress Target.
― There were fewer than 30 students in the cohort.
Graduation Rates for Non-AYP Groups for Accountability
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
126
126
125
124
7
127
111
127
87
67
60
0
127
Graduation Rate
90%
90%
90%
90%
―
91%
94%
91%
98%
88%
93%
―
91%
Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
98
99
96
98
6
98
85
99
68
58
41
0
99
Graduation Rate
92%
92%
92%
92%
―
92%
96%
92%
91%
93%
90%
―
92%
Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
126
Graduation Rate
90%
Not Black or African American
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
126
Graduation Rate
90%
Not Hispanic or Latino
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
125
Graduation Rate
90%
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
124
Graduation Rate
90%
Not White
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
7
Graduation Rate
―
Not Multiracial
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
127
Graduation Rate
91%
General Education
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
111
Graduation Rate
94%
English Proficient
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
127
Graduation Rate
91%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
87
Graduation Rate
98%
Male
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
67
Graduation Rate
88%
Female
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
60
Graduation Rate
93%
Migrant
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
Not Migrant
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
127
Graduation Rate
91%
Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
98
Graduation Rate
92%
Not Black or African American
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
99
Graduation Rate
92%
Not Hispanic or Latino
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
96
Graduation Rate
92%
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
98
Graduation Rate
92%
Not White
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
6
Graduation Rate
―
Not Multiracial
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
98
Graduation Rate
92%
General Education
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
85
Graduation Rate
96%
English Proficient
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
99
Graduation Rate
92%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
68
Graduation Rate
91%
Male
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
58
Graduation Rate
93%
Female
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
41
Graduation Rate
90%
Migrant
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
Not Migrant
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
99
Graduation Rate
92%
― There were fewer than 30 students in the cohort.
Graduation Rates for Regents with Advanced Designation and CTE Endorsement for Accountability
Percentage of 2012 Graduation-Rate Total Cohort members who graduated as of August 31, 2016 with:
Regents Diploma with an Advanced Designation (This District)
46%
Regents Diploma with an Advanced Designation (Statewide)
31%
Percentage in This District Exceeded Statewide
YES
Regents Diploma with an Advanced Designation (This District)
46%
Regents Diploma with an Advanced Designation (Statewide)
31%
Percentage in This District Exceeded Statewide
YES
Regents Diploma with CTE Endorsement (This District)
0%
Regents Diploma with CTE Endorsement (Statewide)
5%
Percentage in This District Exceeded Statewide
NO
Regents Diploma with CTE Endorsement (This District)
You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.
Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.
If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.
