HUNTER-TANNERSVILLE CSD - School Report Card Data [2016 - 17]
The New York State Report Card is an important part of the Board of Regents' effort to raise learning standards for all students. It provides information to the public on school/district enrollment and staff, student performance, and other measures of school and district performance. Knowledge gained from the report card on a school's or district's strengths and weaknesses can be used to improve instruction and services to students. Report Card Data - Glossary of Terms | Accountability Data - Glossary of Terms | Business Rules
Mean scores and data in the table for grade 7 math include only those for grade 7 students who took the Grade 7 New York State Testing Program Assessment (NYSTP) in Mathematics. For 2015 and forward, data in the bar charts include those for grade 7 students who took the Grade 7 NYSTP in Mathematics and grade 7 students who took a Regents math test in lieu of the NYSTP. For 2014 and earlier, data in the bar charts include only those for grade 7 students who took the Grade 7 NYSTP.
MEAN SCORE: 313
All Students
PROFICIENT
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 10
LEVEL 1
2
20%
LEVEL 2
4
40%
LEVEL 3
3
30%
LEVEL 4
1
10%
General Education
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 7
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 10
LEVEL 1
2
20%
LEVEL 2
4
40%
LEVEL 3
3
30%
LEVEL 4
1
10%
Female
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Male
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 7
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 10
LEVEL 1
2
20%
LEVEL 2
4
40%
LEVEL 3
3
30%
LEVEL 4
1
10%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 7
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 10
LEVEL 1
2
20%
LEVEL 2
4
40%
LEVEL 3
3
30%
LEVEL 4
1
10%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
10
7
3
1
3
6
10
3
7
10
7
3
10
PROFICIENT
40%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
40%
_%
_%
40%
_%
_%
40%
LEVEL 1
2
20%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
2
20%
_
_
_
_
2
20%
_
_
_
_
2
20%
LEVEL 2
4
40%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
4
40%
_
_
_
_
4
40%
_
_
_
_
4
40%
LEVEL 3
3
30%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
3
30%
_
_
_
_
3
30%
_
_
_
_
3
30%
LEVEL 4
1
10%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
1
10%
_
_
_
_
1
10%
_
_
_
_
1
10%
Grade 8 Mathematics
Mean scores and data in the table for grade 8 math include only those for grade 8 students who took the Grade 8 New York State Testing Program Assessment (NYSTP) in Mathematics. For 2015 and forward, data in the bar charts include those for grade 8 students who took the Grade 8 NYSTP in Mathematics and grade 8 students who took a Regents math test in lieu of the NYSTP. For 2014 and earlier, data in the bar charts include only those for grade 8 students who took the Grade 8 NYSTP.
MEAN SCORE: 307
All Students
PROFICIENT
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 13
LEVEL 1
3
23%
LEVEL 2
6
46%
LEVEL 3
4
31%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
General Education
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 10
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 11
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 13
LEVEL 1
3
23%
LEVEL 2
6
46%
LEVEL 3
4
31%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Female
PROFICIENT
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 8
LEVEL 1
2
25%
LEVEL 2
4
50%
LEVEL 3
2
25%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Male
PROFICIENT
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
1
20%
LEVEL 2
2
40%
LEVEL 3
2
40%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 13
LEVEL 1
3
23%
LEVEL 2
6
46%
LEVEL 3
4
31%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
2
33%
LEVEL 2
2
33%
LEVEL 3
2
33%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7
LEVEL 1
1
14%
LEVEL 2
4
57%
LEVEL 3
2
29%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 13
LEVEL 1
3
23%
LEVEL 2
6
46%
LEVEL 3
4
31%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
13
10
3
2
11
13
8
5
13
6
7
13
PROFICIENT
31%
_%
_%
_%
_%
31%
25%
40%
31%
33%
29%
31%
LEVEL 1
3
23%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
3
23%
2
25%
1
20%
3
23%
2
33%
1
14%
3
23%
LEVEL 2
6
46%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
6
46%
4
50%
2
40%
6
46%
2
33%
4
57%
6
46%
LEVEL 3
4
31%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
4
31%
2
25%
2
40%
4
31%
2
33%
2
29%
4
31%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
Grade 8 Students Taking a Regents Math Test
Accelerated grade 8 students who took a Regents math test in lieu of the Grade 8 NYSTP in Mathematics.
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4 AND ABOVE
6
100%
LEVEL 3 AND ABOVE
6
100%
GROUP
All Students
TOTAL TESTED
6
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
4 & ABOVE
6
100%
3 & ABOVE
6
100%
Grade 4 Science
MEAN SCORE: 82
All Students
PROFICIENT
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 24
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
4%
LEVEL 3
11
46%
LEVEL 4
12
50%
General Education
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 20
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 20
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 24
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
4%
LEVEL 3
11
46%
LEVEL 4
12
50%
Female
PROFICIENT
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 14
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
7%
LEVEL 3
5
36%
LEVEL 4
8
57%
Male
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 10
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
6
60%
LEVEL 4
4
40%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 24
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
4%
LEVEL 3
11
46%
LEVEL 4
12
50%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 17
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
6%
LEVEL 3
10
59%
LEVEL 4
6
35%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 7
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
1
14%
LEVEL 4
6
86%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 24
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
4%
LEVEL 3
11
46%
LEVEL 4
12
50%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
24
20
4
3
20
1
24
14
10
24
17
7
24
PROFICIENT
96%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
96%
93%
100%
96%
94%
100%
96%
LEVEL 1
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
4%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
1
4%
1
7%
0
0%
1
4%
1
6%
0
0%
1
4%
LEVEL 3
11
46%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
11
46%
5
36%
6
60%
11
46%
10
59%
1
14%
11
46%
LEVEL 4
12
50%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
12
50%
8
57%
4
40%
12
50%
6
35%
6
86%
12
50%
Grade 8 Science
Data in the bar charts include those for grade 8 students who took the New York State Grade 8 Science Test and grade 8 students who took a Regents science test in lieu of this test. Mean scores and data in the table for grade 8 science include only those for grade 8 students who took the New York State Grade 8 Science Test.
MEAN SCORE: 69
All Students
PROFICIENT
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 22
LEVEL 1
4
18%
LEVEL 2
1
5%
LEVEL 3
13
59%
LEVEL 4
4
18%
General Education
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 18
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 20
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 22
LEVEL 1
4
18%
LEVEL 2
1
5%
LEVEL 3
13
59%
LEVEL 4
4
18%
Female
PROFICIENT
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 15
LEVEL 1
2
13%
LEVEL 2
1
7%
LEVEL 3
8
53%
LEVEL 4
4
27%
Male
PROFICIENT
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 7
LEVEL 1
2
29%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
5
71%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 22
LEVEL 1
4
18%
LEVEL 2
1
5%
LEVEL 3
13
59%
LEVEL 4
4
18%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 8
LEVEL 1
2
25%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
5
63%
LEVEL 4
1
13%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 14
LEVEL 1
2
14%
LEVEL 2
1
7%
LEVEL 3
8
57%
LEVEL 4
3
21%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 22
LEVEL 1
4
18%
LEVEL 2
1
5%
LEVEL 3
13
59%
LEVEL 4
4
18%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
22
18
4
2
20
22
15
7
22
8
14
22
PROFICIENT
77%
_%
_%
_%
_%
77%
80%
71%
77%
75%
79%
77%
LEVEL 1
4
18%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
4
18%
2
13%
2
29%
4
18%
2
25%
2
14%
4
18%
LEVEL 2
1
5%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
1
5%
1
7%
0
0%
1
5%
0
0%
1
7%
1
5%
LEVEL 3
13
59%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
13
59%
8
53%
5
71%
13
59%
5
63%
8
57%
13
59%
LEVEL 4
4
18%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
4
18%
4
27%
0
0%
4
18%
1
13%
3
21%
4
18%
Regents Examination Results (2016 - 17)
English Language Arts (Common Core)
English Language Arts (Common Core)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
21
16
5
1
1
19
21
9
12
21
11
10
21
LEVEL 1
4
19%
0
0%
4
80%
_
_
_
_
_
_
4
19%
2
22%
2
17%
4
19%
3
27%
1
10%
4
19%
LEVEL 2
1
5%
1
6%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
1
5%
0
0%
1
8%
1
5%
1
9%
0
0%
1
5%
LEVEL 3
5
24%
4
25%
1
20%
_
_
_
_
_
_
5
24%
3
33%
2
17%
5
24%
3
27%
2
20%
5
24%
LEVEL 4
4
19%
4
25%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
4
19%
0
0%
4
33%
4
19%
1
9%
3
30%
4
19%
LEVEL 5
7
33%
7
44%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
7
33%
4
44%
3
25%
7
33%
3
27%
4
40%
7
33%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 21
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
4
19%
LEVEL 2
1
5%
LEVEL 3
5
24%
LEVEL 4
4
19%
LEVEL 5
7
33%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 16
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
6%
LEVEL 3
4
25%
LEVEL 4
4
25%
LEVEL 5
7
44%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
4
80%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
1
20%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 19
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 21
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
4
19%
LEVEL 2
1
5%
LEVEL 3
5
24%
LEVEL 4
4
19%
LEVEL 5
7
33%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 9
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
2
22%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
3
33%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
LEVEL 5
4
44%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 12
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
2
17%
LEVEL 2
1
8%
LEVEL 3
2
17%
LEVEL 4
4
33%
LEVEL 5
3
25%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 21
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
4
19%
LEVEL 2
1
5%
LEVEL 3
5
24%
LEVEL 4
4
19%
LEVEL 5
7
33%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 11
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
3
27%
LEVEL 2
1
9%
LEVEL 3
3
27%
LEVEL 4
1
9%
LEVEL 5
3
27%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 10
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
1
10%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
2
20%
LEVEL 4
3
30%
LEVEL 5
4
40%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 21
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
4
19%
LEVEL 2
1
5%
LEVEL 3
5
24%
LEVEL 4
4
19%
LEVEL 5
7
33%
Algebra 2/Trigonometry
Regents Algebra 2/Trigonometry
GROUP
All Students
General Education
White
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
5
5
5
2
3
5
2
3
5
55
2
40%
2
40%
2
40%
_
_
_
_
2
40%
_
_
_
_
2
40%
65
1
20%
1
20%
1
20%
_
_
_
_
1
20%
_
_
_
_
1
20%
85
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
2
40%
65
1
20%
85
0
0%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
2
40%
65
1
20%
85
0
0%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
2
40%
65
1
20%
85
0
0%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
2
40%
65
1
20%
85
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
2
40%
65
1
20%
85
0
0%
Algebra I (Common Core)
Algebra I (Common Core)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
33
27
6
2
2
29
33
22
11
33
15
18
33
LEVEL 1
1
3%
0
0%
1
17%
_
_
_
_
_
_
1
3%
0
0%
1
9%
1
3%
1
7%
0
0%
1
3%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
LEVEL 3
6
18%
4
15%
2
33%
_
_
_
_
_
_
6
18%
3
14%
3
27%
6
18%
3
20%
3
17%
6
18%
LEVEL 4
19
58%
17
63%
2
33%
_
_
_
_
_
_
19
58%
13
59%
6
55%
19
58%
7
47%
12
67%
19
58%
LEVEL 5
7
21%
6
22%
1
17%
_
_
_
_
_
_
7
21%
6
27%
1
9%
7
21%
4
27%
3
17%
7
21%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 33
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
1
3%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
6
18%
LEVEL 4
19
58%
LEVEL 5
7
21%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 27
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
4
15%
LEVEL 4
17
63%
LEVEL 5
6
22%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 6
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
1
17%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
2
33%
LEVEL 4
2
33%
LEVEL 5
1
17%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 29
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 33
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
1
3%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
6
18%
LEVEL 4
19
58%
LEVEL 5
7
21%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 22
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
3
14%
LEVEL 4
13
59%
LEVEL 5
6
27%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 11
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
1
9%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
3
27%
LEVEL 4
6
55%
LEVEL 5
1
9%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 33
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
1
3%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
6
18%
LEVEL 4
19
58%
LEVEL 5
7
21%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 15
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
1
7%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
3
20%
LEVEL 4
7
47%
LEVEL 5
4
27%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 18
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
3
17%
LEVEL 4
12
67%
LEVEL 5
3
17%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 33
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
1
3%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
6
18%
LEVEL 4
19
58%
LEVEL 5
7
21%
Common Core Geometry
Regents Common Core Geometry
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
18
17
1
2
4
12
6
9
9
17
1
8
10
18
LEVEL 1
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
LEVEL 3
10
56%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
7
58%
3
50%
6
67%
4
44%
_
_
_
_
5
63%
5
50%
10
56%
LEVEL 4
7
39%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
4
33%
3
50%
3
33%
4
44%
_
_
_
_
3
38%
4
40%
7
39%
LEVEL 5
1
6%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
1
8%
0
0%
0
0%
1
11%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
1
10%
1
6%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 18
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
10
56%
LEVEL 4
7
39%
LEVEL 5
1
6%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 17
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 4
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 12
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
7
58%
LEVEL 4
4
33%
LEVEL 5
1
8%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 6
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
3
50%
LEVEL 4
3
50%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 9
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
6
67%
LEVEL 4
3
33%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 9
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
4
44%
LEVEL 4
4
44%
LEVEL 5
1
11%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 17
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 8
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
5
63%
LEVEL 4
3
38%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 10
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
5
50%
LEVEL 4
4
40%
LEVEL 5
1
10%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 18
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
10
56%
LEVEL 4
7
39%
LEVEL 5
1
6%
Algebra II (Common Core)
Algebra II (Common Core)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
16
16
1
15
16
10
6
16
8
8
16
LEVEL 1
1
6%
1
6%
_
_
_
_
1
6%
0
0%
1
17%
1
6%
0
0%
1
13%
1
6%
LEVEL 2
3
19%
3
19%
_
_
_
_
3
19%
3
30%
0
0%
3
19%
2
25%
1
13%
3
19%
LEVEL 3
8
50%
8
50%
_
_
_
_
8
50%
4
40%
4
67%
8
50%
4
50%
4
50%
8
50%
LEVEL 4
3
19%
3
19%
_
_
_
_
3
19%
2
20%
1
17%
3
19%
2
25%
1
13%
3
19%
LEVEL 5
1
6%
1
6%
_
_
_
_
1
6%
1
10%
0
0%
1
6%
0
0%
1
13%
1
6%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 16
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
1
6%
LEVEL 2
3
19%
LEVEL 3
8
50%
LEVEL 4
3
19%
LEVEL 5
1
6%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 16
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
1
6%
LEVEL 2
3
19%
LEVEL 3
8
50%
LEVEL 4
3
19%
LEVEL 5
1
6%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 15
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 16
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
1
6%
LEVEL 2
3
19%
LEVEL 3
8
50%
LEVEL 4
3
19%
LEVEL 5
1
6%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 10
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
3
30%
LEVEL 3
4
40%
LEVEL 4
2
20%
LEVEL 5
1
10%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 6
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
1
17%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
4
67%
LEVEL 4
1
17%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 16
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
1
6%
LEVEL 2
3
19%
LEVEL 3
8
50%
LEVEL 4
3
19%
LEVEL 5
1
6%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 8
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
25%
LEVEL 3
4
50%
LEVEL 4
2
25%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 8
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
1
13%
LEVEL 2
1
13%
LEVEL 3
4
50%
LEVEL 4
1
13%
LEVEL 5
1
13%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 16
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
1
6%
LEVEL 2
3
19%
LEVEL 3
8
50%
LEVEL 4
3
19%
LEVEL 5
1
6%
Global History and Geography
Regents Global History and Geography
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
34
27
7
2
3
29
5
21
13
33
1
20
14
34
55
33
97%
27
100%
6
86%
_
_
_
_
28
97%
5
100%
20
95%
13
100%
_
_
_
_
19
95%
14
100%
33
97%
65
30
88%
25
93%
5
71%
_
_
_
_
25
86%
5
100%
19
90%
11
85%
_
_
_
_
16
80%
14
100%
30
88%
85
10
29%
10
37%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
6
21%
4
80%
8
38%
2
15%
_
_
_
_
5
25%
5
36%
10
29%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 34
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
33
97%
65
30
88%
85
10
29%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 27
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
27
100%
65
25
93%
85
10
37%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 7
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
6
86%
65
5
71%
85
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 29
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
28
97%
65
25
86%
85
6
21%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
5
100%
65
5
100%
85
4
80%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 21
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
20
95%
65
19
90%
85
8
38%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 13
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
13
100%
65
11
85%
85
2
15%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 33
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 20
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
19
95%
65
16
80%
85
5
25%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 14
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
14
100%
65
14
100%
85
5
36%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 34
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
33
97%
65
30
88%
85
10
29%
U.S. History & Government
Regents U.S. History & Government
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
20
16
4
1
1
18
20
8
12
20
10
10
20
55
19
95%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
19
95%
8
100%
11
92%
19
95%
9
90%
10
100%
19
95%
65
17
85%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
17
85%
7
88%
10
83%
17
85%
8
80%
9
90%
17
85%
85
13
65%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
13
65%
5
63%
8
67%
13
65%
6
60%
7
70%
13
65%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 20
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
19
95%
65
17
85%
85
13
65%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 16
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 4
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 18
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 20
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
19
95%
65
17
85%
85
13
65%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 8
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
8
100%
65
7
88%
85
5
63%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 12
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
11
92%
65
10
83%
85
8
67%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 20
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
19
95%
65
17
85%
85
13
65%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 10
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
9
90%
65
8
80%
85
6
60%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 10
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
10
100%
65
9
90%
85
7
70%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 20
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
19
95%
65
17
85%
85
13
65%
Living Environment
Regents Living Environment
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
29
24
5
2
3
24
5
19
10
28
1
16
13
29
55
29
100%
24
100%
5
100%
_
_
_
_
24
100%
5
100%
19
100%
10
100%
_
_
_
_
16
100%
13
100%
29
100%
65
29
100%
24
100%
5
100%
_
_
_
_
24
100%
5
100%
19
100%
10
100%
_
_
_
_
16
100%
13
100%
29
100%
85
11
38%
9
38%
2
40%
_
_
_
_
8
33%
3
60%
11
58%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
6
38%
5
38%
11
38%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 29
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
29
100%
65
29
100%
85
11
38%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 24
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
24
100%
65
24
100%
85
9
38%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
5
100%
65
5
100%
85
2
40%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 24
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
24
100%
65
24
100%
85
8
33%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
5
100%
65
5
100%
85
3
60%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 19
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
19
100%
65
19
100%
85
11
58%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 10
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
10
100%
65
10
100%
85
0
0%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 28
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 16
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
16
100%
65
16
100%
85
6
38%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 13
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
13
100%
65
13
100%
85
5
38%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 29
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
29
100%
65
29
100%
85
11
38%
Physical Setting/Earth Science
Regents Physical Setting/Earth Science
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
30
24
6
3
5
21
1
9
14
16
30
17
13
30
55
27
90%
24
100%
3
50%
_
_
_
_
19
90%
_
_
8
89%
12
86%
15
94%
27
90%
14
82%
13
100%
27
90%
65
22
73%
21
88%
1
17%
_
_
_
_
14
67%
_
_
8
89%
12
86%
10
63%
22
73%
11
65%
11
85%
22
73%
85
7
23%
7
29%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
4
19%
_
_
3
33%
2
14%
5
31%
7
23%
3
18%
4
31%
7
23%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 30
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
27
90%
65
22
73%
85
7
23%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 24
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
24
100%
65
21
88%
85
7
29%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 6
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
3
50%
65
1
17%
85
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 21
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
19
90%
65
14
67%
85
4
19%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 9
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
8
89%
65
8
89%
85
3
33%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 14
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
12
86%
65
12
86%
85
2
14%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 16
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
15
94%
65
10
63%
85
5
31%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 30
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
27
90%
65
22
73%
85
7
23%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 17
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
14
82%
65
11
65%
85
3
18%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 13
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
13
100%
65
11
85%
85
4
31%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 30
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
27
90%
65
22
73%
85
7
23%
Physical Setting/Chemistry
Regents Physical Setting/Chemistry
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
12
12
1
11
12
6
6
12
4
8
12
55
12
100%
12
100%
_
_
_
_
12
100%
6
100%
6
100%
12
100%
_
_
_
_
12
100%
65
12
100%
12
100%
_
_
_
_
12
100%
6
100%
6
100%
12
100%
_
_
_
_
12
100%
85
4
33%
4
33%
_
_
_
_
4
33%
2
33%
2
33%
4
33%
_
_
_
_
4
33%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 12
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
12
100%
65
12
100%
85
4
33%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 12
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
12
100%
65
12
100%
85
4
33%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 11
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 12
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
12
100%
65
12
100%
85
4
33%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 6
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
6
100%
65
6
100%
85
2
33%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 6
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
6
100%
65
6
100%
85
2
33%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 12
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
12
100%
65
12
100%
85
4
33%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 4
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 8
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 12
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
12
100%
65
12
100%
85
4
33%
Physical Setting/Physics
Regents Physical Setting/Physics
GROUP
All Students
General Education
White
Small Group Total
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
55
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
65
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
85
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Overall Graduation Rate for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: YES
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
YES
All Students
MADE AYP
YES
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP
―
White
MADE AYP
YES
Multiracial
MADE AYP
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP
―
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
YES
― There were not enough students to make an AYP determination.
Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort for Accountability
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion:
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
―
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
52*
0
0
1
0
51*
0
10
0
21
Graduation Rate
87%*
―
―
―
―
88%*
―
―
―
―
State Standard
80%
―
―
―
―
80%
―
―
―
―
Progress Target
80%
―
―
―
―
80%
―
―
―
―
All Students
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
52*
Graduation Rate
87%*
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%
American Indian or Alaska Native
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Black or African American
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
1
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
White
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
51*
Graduation Rate
88%*
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%
Multiracial
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Students With Disabilities
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
10
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Limited English Proficient
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
21
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
YES Graduation rate is equal to or greater than the State Standard or the group's Progress Target. NO Graduation rate is less than the State Standard and the group's Progress Target.
― There were fewer than 30 students in the cohort. * The number of students in the 2012 four-year graduation-rate total cohort in the school/district is less than 30, so data for the 2012 four-year graduation-rate total cohort and the 2011 four-year graduation-rate total cohort were combined to determine graduation rates.
Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort for Accountability
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion:
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
YES
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
58*
0
0
1
0
56*
1
13
0
31*
Graduation Rate
97%*
―
―
―
―
96%*
―
―
―
94%*
State Standard
80%
―
―
―
―
80%
―
―
―
80%
Progress Target
80%
―
―
―
―
80%
―
―
―
80%
All Students
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
58*
Graduation Rate
97%*
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%
American Indian or Alaska Native
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Black or African American
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
1
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
White
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
56*
Graduation Rate
96%*
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%
Multiracial
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
1
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Students With Disabilities
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
13
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Limited English Proficient
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
31*
Graduation Rate
94%*
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%
YES Graduation rate is equal to or greater than the State Standard or the group's Progress Target. NO Graduation rate is less than the State Standard and the group's Progress Target.
― There were fewer than 30 students in the cohort. * The number of students in the 2011 five-year graduation-rate total cohort in the school/district is less than 30, so data for the 2011 five-year graduation-rate total cohort and the 2010 five-year graduation-rate total cohort were combined to determine graduation rates.
Graduation Rates for Non-AYP Groups for Accountability
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
52*
52*
51*
52*
1
52*
42*
52*
31*
20
32*
0
52*
Graduation Rate
87%
87%
88%
87%
―
87%
95%
87%
84%
―
91%
―
87%
Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
58**
58**
57**
58**
0
57**
45**
58**
27
34**
24
0
58**
Graduation Rate
97%
97%
96%
97%
―
96%
100%
97%
―
94%
―
―
97%
Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
52*
Graduation Rate
87%
Not Black or African American
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
52*
Graduation Rate
87%
Not Hispanic or Latino
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
51*
Graduation Rate
88%
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
52*
Graduation Rate
87%
Not White
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
1
Graduation Rate
―
Not Multiracial
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
52*
Graduation Rate
87%
General Education
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
42*
Graduation Rate
95%
English Proficient
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
52*
Graduation Rate
87%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
31*
Graduation Rate
84%
Male
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
20
Graduation Rate
―
Female
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
32*
Graduation Rate
91%
Migrant
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
Not Migrant
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
52*
Graduation Rate
87%
Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
58**
Graduation Rate
97%
Not Black or African American
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
58**
Graduation Rate
97%
Not Hispanic or Latino
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
57**
Graduation Rate
96%
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
58**
Graduation Rate
97%
Not White
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
Not Multiracial
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
57**
Graduation Rate
96%
General Education
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
45**
Graduation Rate
100%
English Proficient
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
58**
Graduation Rate
97%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
27
Graduation Rate
―
Male
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
34**
Graduation Rate
94%
Female
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
24
Graduation Rate
―
Migrant
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
Not Migrant
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
58**
Graduation Rate
97%
― There were fewer than 30 students in the cohort. * The number of 2012 four-year graduation-rate total cohort members is less than 30, so the number of 2012 and 2011 four-year graduation-rate total cohort members were combined to determine graduation rates. ** The number of 2011 five-year graduation-rate total cohort members is less than 30, so the number of 2011 and 2010 five-year graduation-rate total cohort members were combined to determine graduation rates.
Graduation Rates for Regents with Advanced Designation and CTE Endorsement for Accountability
Percentage of 2012 Graduation-Rate Total Cohort members who graduated as of August 31, 2016 with:
Regents Diploma with an Advanced Designation (This District)
33%
Regents Diploma with an Advanced Designation (Statewide)
31%
Percentage in This District Exceeded Statewide
YES
Regents Diploma with an Advanced Designation (This District)
33%
Regents Diploma with an Advanced Designation (Statewide)
31%
Percentage in This District Exceeded Statewide
YES
Regents Diploma with CTE Endorsement (This District)
19%
Regents Diploma with CTE Endorsement (Statewide)
5%
Percentage in This District Exceeded Statewide
YES
Regents Diploma with CTE Endorsement (This District)
You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.
Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.
If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.