The New York State Report Card is an important part of the Board of Regents' effort to raise learning standards for all students. It provides information to the public on school/district enrollment and staff, student performance, and other measures of school and district performance. Knowledge gained from the report card on a school's or district's strengths and weaknesses can be used to improve instruction and services to students. Report Card Data - Glossary of Terms | Accountability Data - Glossary of Terms | Business Rules
Turnover Rate of Teachers with Fewer Than Five Years of Experience
0%
TURNOVER RATE OF ALL TEACHERS
10%
Teacher Turnover Rate (2012-13 to 2013-14)
Turnover Rate of Teachers with Fewer Than Five Years of Experience
0%
Turnover Rate of All Teachers
10%
Staff Counts (2013 - 14)
GROUP
PRINCIPALS
ASSISTANT PRINCIPALS
OTHER PROFESSIONAL STAFF
PARAPROFESSIONALS
STAFF
4
1
18
35
Staff Counts (2013 - 14)
Principals
4
Assistant Principals
1
Other Professional Staff
18
Paraprofessionals
35
Teacher Qualifications (2013 - 14)
TOTAL TEACHERS
140
PERCENT WITH NO VALID TEACHING CERTIFICATE
0%
PERCENT TEACHING OUT OF CERTIFICATE
0%
PERCENT WITH FEWER THAN THREE YEARS OF EXPERIENCE
4%
PERCENTAGE WITH MASTER'S DEGREEPLUS 30 HOURS OR DOCTORATE
62%
TOTAL NUMBER OF CORE CLASSES
298
Percent Not Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers in This District
0%
Total Number of Classes
548
Percent Taught by Teachers Without Appropriate Certification
0%
Teacher Qualifications (2013 - 14)
TOTAL TEACHERS: 140
Percent with No Valid Teaching Certificate
0%
Percent Teaching Out of Certification
0%
Percent with Fewer Than Three Years of Experience
4%
Percentage with Master's Degree Plus 30 Hours or Doctorate
62%
Total Number of Core Classes
298
Percent Not Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers in This District
0%
Total Number of Classes
548
Percent Taught by Teachers Without Appropriate Certification
0%
High School Completers (2013 - 14)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
121
96
25
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
120
96
24
REGENTS DIPLOMA
101
84%
96
100%
5
21%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
REGENTS WITH ADVANCED DESIGNATION
54
45%
53
55%
1
4%
REGENTS WITH CTE ENDORSEMENT
4
3%
4
4%
0
0%
LOCAL DIPLOMAS
19
16%
0
0%
19
79%
COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS
1
1%
0
0%
1
4%
All Students
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
121
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
120
Regents Diploma
101
84%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
54
45%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
4
3%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
19
16%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
1
1%
of Completers
General Education
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
96
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
96
Regents Diploma
96
100%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
53
55%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
4
4%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
0
0%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
0
0%
of Completers
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
25
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
24
Regents Diploma
5
21%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
1
4%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
0
0%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
19
79%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
1
4%
of Completers
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
121
96
25
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
120
96
24
REGENTS DIPLOMA
101
84%
96
100%
5
21%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
REGENTS WITH ADVANCED DESIGNATION
54
45%
53
55%
1
4%
REGENTS WITH CTE ENDORSEMENT
4
3%
4
4%
0
0%
LOCAL DIPLOMAS
19
16%
0
0%
19
79%
COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS
1
1%
0
0%
1
4%
All Students
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
121
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
120
Regents Diploma
101
84%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
54
45%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
4
3%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
19
16%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
1
1%
of Completers
General Education
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
96
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
96
Regents Diploma
96
100%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
53
55%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
4
4%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
0
0%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
0
0%
of Completers
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
25
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
24
Regents Diploma
5
21%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
1
4%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
0
0%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
19
79%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
1
4%
of Completers
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
121
96
25
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
120
96
24
REGENTS DIPLOMA
101
84%
96
100%
5
21%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
REGENTS WITH ADVANCED DESIGNATION
54
45%
53
55%
1
4%
REGENTS WITH CTE ENDORSEMENT
4
3%
4
4%
0
0%
LOCAL DIPLOMAS
19
16%
0
0%
19
79%
COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS
1
1%
0
0%
1
4%
All Students
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
121
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
120
Regents Diploma
101
84%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
54
45%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
4
3%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
19
16%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
1
1%
of Completers
General Education
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
96
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
96
Regents Diploma
96
100%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
53
55%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
4
4%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
0
0%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
0
0%
of Completers
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
25
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
24
Regents Diploma
5
21%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
1
4%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
0
0%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
19
79%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
1
4%
of Completers
High School Non-completers (2013 - 14)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
7
1%
_
_
_
_
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
1
0%
_
_
_
_
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
8
2%
_
_
_
_
All Students
DROPPED OUT
7
1%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
1
0%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
8
2%
General Education
DROPPED OUT
_
_%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
_
_%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
_
_%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
_
_%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
_
_%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
7
1%
_
_
_
_
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
1
0%
_
_
_
_
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
8
2%
_
_
_
_
All Students
DROPPED OUT
7
1%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
1
0%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
8
2%
General Education
DROPPED OUT
_
_%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
_
_%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
_
_%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
_
_%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
_
_%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
7
1%
_
_
_
_
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
1
0%
_
_
_
_
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
8
2%
_
_
_
_
All Students
DROPPED OUT
7
1%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
1
0%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
8
2%
General Education
DROPPED OUT
_
_%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
_
_%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
_
_%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
_
_%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
_
_%
Post-graduation Plans of Completers (2013 - 14)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO FOUR-YEAR COLLEGE
48
40%
46
48%
2
8%
TO TWO-YEAR COLLEGE
37
31%
31
32%
6
24%
TO OTHER POST-SECONDARY
5
4%
4
4%
1
4%
TO THE MILITARY
4
3%
3
3%
1
4%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO EMPLOYMENT
27
22%
12
13%
15
60%
TO ADULT SERVICES
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
TO OTHER KNOWN PLANS
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
PLANS UNKNOWN
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
All Students
To Four-Year College
48
40%
To Two-Year College
37
31%
To Other Post-Secondary
5
4%
To the Military
4
3%
To Employment
27
22%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
0
0%
Plan Unknown
0
0%
General Education
To Four-Year College
46
48%
To Two-Year College
31
32%
To Other Post-Secondary
4
4%
To the Military
3
3%
To Employment
12
13%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
0
0%
Plan Unknown
0
0%
Students with Disabilities
To Four-Year College
2
8%
To Two-Year College
6
24%
To Other Post-Secondary
1
4%
To the Military
1
4%
To Employment
15
60%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
0
0%
Plan Unknown
0
0%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO FOUR-YEAR COLLEGE
48
40%
46
48%
2
8%
TO TWO-YEAR COLLEGE
37
31%
31
32%
6
24%
TO OTHER POST-SECONDARY
5
4%
4
4%
1
4%
TO THE MILITARY
4
3%
3
3%
1
4%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO EMPLOYMENT
27
22%
12
13%
15
60%
TO ADULT SERVICES
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
TO OTHER KNOWN PLANS
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
PLANS UNKNOWN
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
All Students
To Four-Year College
48
40%
To Two-Year College
37
31%
To Other Post-Secondary
5
4%
To the Military
4
3%
To Employment
27
22%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
0
0%
Plan Unknown
0
0%
General Education
To Four-Year College
46
48%
To Two-Year College
31
32%
To Other Post-Secondary
4
4%
To the Military
3
3%
To Employment
12
13%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
0
0%
Plan Unknown
0
0%
Students with Disabilities
To Four-Year College
2
8%
To Two-Year College
6
24%
To Other Post-Secondary
1
4%
To the Military
1
4%
To Employment
15
60%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
0
0%
Plan Unknown
0
0%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO FOUR-YEAR COLLEGE
48
40%
46
48%
2
8%
TO TWO-YEAR COLLEGE
37
31%
31
32%
6
24%
TO OTHER POST-SECONDARY
5
4%
4
4%
1
4%
TO THE MILITARY
4
3%
3
3%
1
4%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO EMPLOYMENT
27
22%
12
13%
15
60%
TO ADULT SERVICES
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
TO OTHER KNOWN PLANS
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
PLANS UNKNOWN
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
All Students
To Four-Year College
48
40%
To Two-Year College
37
31%
To Other Post-Secondary
5
4%
To the Military
4
3%
To Employment
27
22%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
0
0%
Plan Unknown
0
0%
General Education
To Four-Year College
46
48%
To Two-Year College
31
32%
To Other Post-Secondary
4
4%
To the Military
3
3%
To Employment
12
13%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
0
0%
Plan Unknown
0
0%
Students with Disabilities
To Four-Year College
2
8%
To Two-Year College
6
24%
To Other Post-Secondary
1
4%
To the Military
1
4%
To Employment
15
60%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
0
0%
Plan Unknown
0
0%
Grade 3 English Language Arts
MEAN SCORE: 288
All Students
PROFICIENT
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 89
LEVEL 1
42
47%
LEVEL 2
30
34%
LEVEL 3
15
17%
LEVEL 4
2
2%
General Education
PROFICIENT
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 78
LEVEL 1
32
41%
LEVEL 2
29
37%
LEVEL 3
15
19%
LEVEL 4
2
3%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 11
LEVEL 1
10
91%
LEVEL 2
1
9%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 88
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 89
LEVEL 1
42
47%
LEVEL 2
30
34%
LEVEL 3
15
17%
LEVEL 4
2
2%
Female
PROFICIENT
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 44
LEVEL 1
21
48%
LEVEL 2
17
39%
LEVEL 3
6
14%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Male
PROFICIENT
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 45
LEVEL 1
21
47%
LEVEL 2
13
29%
LEVEL 3
9
20%
LEVEL 4
2
4%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 89
LEVEL 1
42
47%
LEVEL 2
30
34%
LEVEL 3
15
17%
LEVEL 4
2
2%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 23
LEVEL 1
14
61%
LEVEL 2
8
35%
LEVEL 3
1
4%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 66
LEVEL 1
28
42%
LEVEL 2
22
33%
LEVEL 3
14
21%
LEVEL 4
2
3%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 89
LEVEL 1
42
47%
LEVEL 2
30
34%
LEVEL 3
15
17%
LEVEL 4
2
2%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
89
78
11
1
88
89
44
45
89
23
66
89
PROFICIENT
19%
22%
0%
_%
_%
19%
14%
24%
19%
4%
24%
19%
LEVEL 1
42
47%
32
41%
10
91%
_
_
_
_
42
47%
21
48%
21
47%
42
47%
14
61%
28
42%
42
47%
LEVEL 2
30
34%
29
37%
1
9%
_
_
_
_
30
34%
17
39%
13
29%
30
34%
8
35%
22
33%
30
34%
LEVEL 3
15
17%
15
19%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
15
17%
6
14%
9
20%
15
17%
1
4%
14
21%
15
17%
LEVEL 4
2
2%
2
3%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
2
2%
0
0%
2
4%
2
2%
0
0%
2
3%
2
2%
Grade 4 English Language Arts
MEAN SCORE: 291
All Students
PROFICIENT
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 80
LEVEL 1
30
38%
LEVEL 2
33
41%
LEVEL 3
12
15%
LEVEL 4
5
6%
General Education
PROFICIENT
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 67
LEVEL 1
19
28%
LEVEL 2
32
48%
LEVEL 3
11
16%
LEVEL 4
5
7%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 13
LEVEL 1
11
85%
LEVEL 2
1
8%
LEVEL 3
1
8%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 77
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 80
LEVEL 1
30
38%
LEVEL 2
33
41%
LEVEL 3
12
15%
LEVEL 4
5
6%
Female
PROFICIENT
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 33
LEVEL 1
12
36%
LEVEL 2
12
36%
LEVEL 3
6
18%
LEVEL 4
3
9%
Male
PROFICIENT
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 47
LEVEL 1
18
38%
LEVEL 2
21
45%
LEVEL 3
6
13%
LEVEL 4
2
4%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 80
LEVEL 1
30
38%
LEVEL 2
33
41%
LEVEL 3
12
15%
LEVEL 4
5
6%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 20
LEVEL 1
10
50%
LEVEL 2
9
45%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
1
5%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 60
LEVEL 1
20
33%
LEVEL 2
24
40%
LEVEL 3
12
20%
LEVEL 4
4
7%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 80
LEVEL 1
30
38%
LEVEL 2
33
41%
LEVEL 3
12
15%
LEVEL 4
5
6%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
80
67
13
1
1
1
77
80
33
47
80
20
60
80
PROFICIENT
21%
24%
8%
_%
_%
_%
_%
21%
27%
17%
21%
5%
27%
21%
LEVEL 1
30
38%
19
28%
11
85%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
30
38%
12
36%
18
38%
30
38%
10
50%
20
33%
30
38%
LEVEL 2
33
41%
32
48%
1
8%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
33
41%
12
36%
21
45%
33
41%
9
45%
24
40%
33
41%
LEVEL 3
12
15%
11
16%
1
8%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
12
15%
6
18%
6
13%
12
15%
0
0%
12
20%
12
15%
LEVEL 4
5
6%
5
7%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
5
6%
3
9%
2
4%
5
6%
1
5%
4
7%
5
6%
Grade 5 English Language Arts
MEAN SCORE: 293
All Students
PROFICIENT
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 86
LEVEL 1
37
43%
LEVEL 2
33
38%
LEVEL 3
12
14%
LEVEL 4
4
5%
General Education
PROFICIENT
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 77
LEVEL 1
31
40%
LEVEL 2
31
40%
LEVEL 3
11
14%
LEVEL 4
4
5%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
6
67%
LEVEL 2
2
22%
LEVEL 3
1
11%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 82
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 86
LEVEL 1
37
43%
LEVEL 2
33
38%
LEVEL 3
12
14%
LEVEL 4
4
5%
Female
PROFICIENT
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 39
LEVEL 1
17
44%
LEVEL 2
15
38%
LEVEL 3
5
13%
LEVEL 4
2
5%
Male
PROFICIENT
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 47
LEVEL 1
20
43%
LEVEL 2
18
38%
LEVEL 3
7
15%
LEVEL 4
2
4%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 86
LEVEL 1
37
43%
LEVEL 2
33
38%
LEVEL 3
12
14%
LEVEL 4
4
5%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 16
LEVEL 1
8
50%
LEVEL 2
7
44%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
1
6%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 70
LEVEL 1
29
41%
LEVEL 2
26
37%
LEVEL 3
12
17%
LEVEL 4
3
4%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 86
LEVEL 1
37
43%
LEVEL 2
33
38%
LEVEL 3
12
14%
LEVEL 4
4
5%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
86
77
9
2
2
82
86
39
47
86
16
70
86
PROFICIENT
19%
19%
11%
_%
_%
_%
19%
18%
19%
19%
6%
21%
19%
LEVEL 1
37
43%
31
40%
6
67%
_
_
_
_
_
_
37
43%
17
44%
20
43%
37
43%
8
50%
29
41%
37
43%
LEVEL 2
33
38%
31
40%
2
22%
_
_
_
_
_
_
33
38%
15
38%
18
38%
33
38%
7
44%
26
37%
33
38%
LEVEL 3
12
14%
11
14%
1
11%
_
_
_
_
_
_
12
14%
5
13%
7
15%
12
14%
0
0%
12
17%
12
14%
LEVEL 4
4
5%
4
5%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
4
5%
2
5%
2
4%
4
5%
1
6%
3
4%
4
5%
Grade 6 English Language Arts
MEAN SCORE: 292
All Students
PROFICIENT
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 97
LEVEL 1
31
32%
LEVEL 2
47
48%
LEVEL 3
12
12%
LEVEL 4
7
7%
General Education
PROFICIENT
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 85
LEVEL 1
21
25%
LEVEL 2
45
53%
LEVEL 3
12
14%
LEVEL 4
7
8%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 12
LEVEL 1
10
83%
LEVEL 2
2
17%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 94
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 97
LEVEL 1
31
32%
LEVEL 2
47
48%
LEVEL 3
12
12%
LEVEL 4
7
7%
Female
PROFICIENT
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 45
LEVEL 1
14
31%
LEVEL 2
21
47%
LEVEL 3
7
16%
LEVEL 4
3
7%
Male
PROFICIENT
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 52
LEVEL 1
17
33%
LEVEL 2
26
50%
LEVEL 3
5
10%
LEVEL 4
4
8%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 97
LEVEL 1
31
32%
LEVEL 2
47
48%
LEVEL 3
12
12%
LEVEL 4
7
7%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 19
LEVEL 1
5
26%
LEVEL 2
12
63%
LEVEL 3
1
5%
LEVEL 4
1
5%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 78
LEVEL 1
26
33%
LEVEL 2
35
45%
LEVEL 3
11
14%
LEVEL 4
6
8%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 97
LEVEL 1
31
32%
LEVEL 2
47
48%
LEVEL 3
12
12%
LEVEL 4
7
7%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
97
85
12
1
2
94
97
45
52
97
19
78
97
PROFICIENT
20%
22%
0%
_%
_%
_%
20%
22%
17%
20%
11%
22%
20%
LEVEL 1
31
32%
21
25%
10
83%
_
_
_
_
_
_
31
32%
14
31%
17
33%
31
32%
5
26%
26
33%
31
32%
LEVEL 2
47
48%
45
53%
2
17%
_
_
_
_
_
_
47
48%
21
47%
26
50%
47
48%
12
63%
35
45%
47
48%
LEVEL 3
12
12%
12
14%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
12
12%
7
16%
5
10%
12
12%
1
5%
11
14%
12
12%
LEVEL 4
7
7%
7
8%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
7
7%
3
7%
4
8%
7
7%
1
5%
6
8%
7
7%
Grade 7 English Language Arts
MEAN SCORE: 293
All Students
PROFICIENT
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 99
LEVEL 1
39
39%
LEVEL 2
34
34%
LEVEL 3
21
21%
LEVEL 4
5
5%
General Education
PROFICIENT
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 81
LEVEL 1
25
31%
LEVEL 2
32
40%
LEVEL 3
19
23%
LEVEL 4
5
6%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 18
LEVEL 1
14
78%
LEVEL 2
2
11%
LEVEL 3
2
11%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
American Indian or Alaska Native
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 98
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 99
LEVEL 1
39
39%
LEVEL 2
34
34%
LEVEL 3
21
21%
LEVEL 4
5
5%
Female
PROFICIENT
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 54
LEVEL 1
18
33%
LEVEL 2
17
31%
LEVEL 3
16
30%
LEVEL 4
3
6%
Male
PROFICIENT
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 45
LEVEL 1
21
47%
LEVEL 2
17
38%
LEVEL 3
5
11%
LEVEL 4
2
4%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 99
LEVEL 1
39
39%
LEVEL 2
34
34%
LEVEL 3
21
21%
LEVEL 4
5
5%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 17
LEVEL 1
9
53%
LEVEL 2
6
35%
LEVEL 3
2
12%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 82
LEVEL 1
30
37%
LEVEL 2
28
34%
LEVEL 3
19
23%
LEVEL 4
5
6%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 99
LEVEL 1
39
39%
LEVEL 2
34
34%
LEVEL 3
21
21%
LEVEL 4
5
5%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
99
81
18
1
98
99
54
45
99
17
82
99
PROFICIENT
26%
30%
11%
_%
_%
26%
35%
16%
26%
12%
29%
26%
LEVEL 1
39
39%
25
31%
14
78%
_
_
_
_
39
39%
18
33%
21
47%
39
39%
9
53%
30
37%
39
39%
LEVEL 2
34
34%
32
40%
2
11%
_
_
_
_
34
34%
17
31%
17
38%
34
34%
6
35%
28
34%
34
34%
LEVEL 3
21
21%
19
23%
2
11%
_
_
_
_
21
21%
16
30%
5
11%
21
21%
2
12%
19
23%
21
21%
LEVEL 4
5
5%
5
6%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
5
5%
3
6%
2
4%
5
5%
0
0%
5
6%
5
5%
Grade 8 English Language Arts
MEAN SCORE: 295
All Students
PROFICIENT
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 97
LEVEL 1
29
30%
LEVEL 2
33
34%
LEVEL 3
27
28%
LEVEL 4
8
8%
General Education
PROFICIENT
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 74
LEVEL 1
7
9%
LEVEL 2
33
45%
LEVEL 3
26
35%
LEVEL 4
8
11%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 23
LEVEL 1
22
96%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
1
4%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 93
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 97
LEVEL 1
29
30%
LEVEL 2
33
34%
LEVEL 3
27
28%
LEVEL 4
8
8%
Female
PROFICIENT
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 39
LEVEL 1
4
10%
LEVEL 2
15
38%
LEVEL 3
17
44%
LEVEL 4
3
8%
Male
PROFICIENT
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 58
LEVEL 1
25
43%
LEVEL 2
18
31%
LEVEL 3
10
17%
LEVEL 4
5
9%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 97
LEVEL 1
29
30%
LEVEL 2
33
34%
LEVEL 3
27
28%
LEVEL 4
8
8%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 21
LEVEL 1
11
52%
LEVEL 2
5
24%
LEVEL 3
5
24%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 76
LEVEL 1
18
24%
LEVEL 2
28
37%
LEVEL 3
22
29%
LEVEL 4
8
11%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 97
LEVEL 1
29
30%
LEVEL 2
33
34%
LEVEL 3
27
28%
LEVEL 4
8
8%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
97
74
23
1
2
1
93
97
39
58
97
21
76
97
PROFICIENT
36%
46%
4%
_%
_%
_%
_%
36%
51%
26%
36%
24%
39%
36%
LEVEL 1
29
30%
7
9%
22
96%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
29
30%
4
10%
25
43%
29
30%
11
52%
18
24%
29
30%
LEVEL 2
33
34%
33
45%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
33
34%
15
38%
18
31%
33
34%
5
24%
28
37%
33
34%
LEVEL 3
27
28%
26
35%
1
4%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
27
28%
17
44%
10
17%
27
28%
5
24%
22
29%
27
28%
LEVEL 4
8
8%
8
11%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
8
8%
3
8%
5
9%
8
8%
0
0%
8
11%
8
8%
Grade 3 Mathematics
MEAN SCORE: 304
All Students
PROFICIENT
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 88
LEVEL 1
22
25%
LEVEL 2
35
40%
LEVEL 3
21
24%
LEVEL 4
10
11%
General Education
PROFICIENT
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 77
LEVEL 1
15
19%
LEVEL 2
31
40%
LEVEL 3
21
27%
LEVEL 4
10
13%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 11
LEVEL 1
7
64%
LEVEL 2
4
36%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 87
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 88
LEVEL 1
22
25%
LEVEL 2
35
40%
LEVEL 3
21
24%
LEVEL 4
10
11%
Female
PROFICIENT
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 42
LEVEL 1
13
31%
LEVEL 2
17
40%
LEVEL 3
10
24%
LEVEL 4
2
5%
Male
PROFICIENT
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 46
LEVEL 1
9
20%
LEVEL 2
18
39%
LEVEL 3
11
24%
LEVEL 4
8
17%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 88
LEVEL 1
22
25%
LEVEL 2
35
40%
LEVEL 3
21
24%
LEVEL 4
10
11%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 23
LEVEL 1
8
35%
LEVEL 2
12
52%
LEVEL 3
2
9%
LEVEL 4
1
4%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 65
LEVEL 1
14
22%
LEVEL 2
23
35%
LEVEL 3
19
29%
LEVEL 4
9
14%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 88
LEVEL 1
22
25%
LEVEL 2
35
40%
LEVEL 3
21
24%
LEVEL 4
10
11%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
88
77
11
1
87
88
42
46
88
23
65
88
PROFICIENT
35%
40%
0%
_%
_%
35%
29%
41%
35%
13%
43%
35%
LEVEL 1
22
25%
15
19%
7
64%
_
_
_
_
22
25%
13
31%
9
20%
22
25%
8
35%
14
22%
22
25%
LEVEL 2
35
40%
31
40%
4
36%
_
_
_
_
35
40%
17
40%
18
39%
35
40%
12
52%
23
35%
35
40%
LEVEL 3
21
24%
21
27%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
21
24%
10
24%
11
24%
21
24%
2
9%
19
29%
21
24%
LEVEL 4
10
11%
10
13%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
10
11%
2
5%
8
17%
10
11%
1
4%
9
14%
10
11%
Grade 4 Mathematics
MEAN SCORE: 305
All Students
PROFICIENT
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 77
LEVEL 1
17
22%
LEVEL 2
28
36%
LEVEL 3
20
26%
LEVEL 4
12
16%
General Education
PROFICIENT
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 65
LEVEL 1
9
14%
LEVEL 2
25
38%
LEVEL 3
20
31%
LEVEL 4
11
17%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 12
LEVEL 1
8
67%
LEVEL 2
3
25%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
1
8%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 74
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 77
LEVEL 1
17
22%
LEVEL 2
28
36%
LEVEL 3
20
26%
LEVEL 4
12
16%
Female
PROFICIENT
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 31
LEVEL 1
8
26%
LEVEL 2
12
39%
LEVEL 3
6
19%
LEVEL 4
5
16%
Male
PROFICIENT
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 46
LEVEL 1
9
20%
LEVEL 2
16
35%
LEVEL 3
14
30%
LEVEL 4
7
15%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 77
LEVEL 1
17
22%
LEVEL 2
28
36%
LEVEL 3
20
26%
LEVEL 4
12
16%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 19
LEVEL 1
4
21%
LEVEL 2
11
58%
LEVEL 3
4
21%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 58
LEVEL 1
13
22%
LEVEL 2
17
29%
LEVEL 3
16
28%
LEVEL 4
12
21%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 77
LEVEL 1
17
22%
LEVEL 2
28
36%
LEVEL 3
20
26%
LEVEL 4
12
16%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
77
65
12
1
1
1
74
77
31
46
77
19
58
77
PROFICIENT
42%
48%
8%
_%
_%
_%
_%
42%
35%
46%
42%
21%
48%
42%
LEVEL 1
17
22%
9
14%
8
67%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
17
22%
8
26%
9
20%
17
22%
4
21%
13
22%
17
22%
LEVEL 2
28
36%
25
38%
3
25%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
28
36%
12
39%
16
35%
28
36%
11
58%
17
29%
28
36%
LEVEL 3
20
26%
20
31%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
20
26%
6
19%
14
30%
20
26%
4
21%
16
28%
20
26%
LEVEL 4
12
16%
11
17%
1
8%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
12
16%
5
16%
7
15%
12
16%
0
0%
12
21%
12
16%
Grade 5 Mathematics
MEAN SCORE: 304
All Students
PROFICIENT
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 84
LEVEL 1
31
37%
LEVEL 2
30
36%
LEVEL 3
17
20%
LEVEL 4
6
7%
General Education
PROFICIENT
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 76
LEVEL 1
26
34%
LEVEL 2
29
38%
LEVEL 3
15
20%
LEVEL 4
6
8%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 8
LEVEL 1
5
63%
LEVEL 2
1
13%
LEVEL 3
2
25%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 80
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 84
LEVEL 1
31
37%
LEVEL 2
30
36%
LEVEL 3
17
20%
LEVEL 4
6
7%
Female
PROFICIENT
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 39
LEVEL 1
15
38%
LEVEL 2
18
46%
LEVEL 3
4
10%
LEVEL 4
2
5%
Male
PROFICIENT
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 45
LEVEL 1
16
36%
LEVEL 2
12
27%
LEVEL 3
13
29%
LEVEL 4
4
9%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 84
LEVEL 1
31
37%
LEVEL 2
30
36%
LEVEL 3
17
20%
LEVEL 4
6
7%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 16
LEVEL 1
7
44%
LEVEL 2
5
31%
LEVEL 3
3
19%
LEVEL 4
1
6%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 68
LEVEL 1
24
35%
LEVEL 2
25
37%
LEVEL 3
14
21%
LEVEL 4
5
7%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 84
LEVEL 1
31
37%
LEVEL 2
30
36%
LEVEL 3
17
20%
LEVEL 4
6
7%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
84
76
8
2
2
80
84
39
45
84
16
68
84
PROFICIENT
27%
28%
25%
_%
_%
_%
27%
15%
38%
27%
25%
28%
27%
LEVEL 1
31
37%
26
34%
5
63%
_
_
_
_
_
_
31
37%
15
38%
16
36%
31
37%
7
44%
24
35%
31
37%
LEVEL 2
30
36%
29
38%
1
13%
_
_
_
_
_
_
30
36%
18
46%
12
27%
30
36%
5
31%
25
37%
30
36%
LEVEL 3
17
20%
15
20%
2
25%
_
_
_
_
_
_
17
20%
4
10%
13
29%
17
20%
3
19%
14
21%
17
20%
LEVEL 4
6
7%
6
8%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
6
7%
2
5%
4
9%
6
7%
1
6%
5
7%
6
7%
Grade 6 Mathematics
MEAN SCORE: 300
All Students
PROFICIENT
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 95
LEVEL 1
25
26%
LEVEL 2
38
40%
LEVEL 3
22
23%
LEVEL 4
10
11%
General Education
PROFICIENT
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 83
LEVEL 1
15
18%
LEVEL 2
36
43%
LEVEL 3
22
27%
LEVEL 4
10
12%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 12
LEVEL 1
10
83%
LEVEL 2
2
17%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 92
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 95
LEVEL 1
25
26%
LEVEL 2
38
40%
LEVEL 3
22
23%
LEVEL 4
10
11%
Female
PROFICIENT
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 44
LEVEL 1
13
30%
LEVEL 2
14
32%
LEVEL 3
11
25%
LEVEL 4
6
14%
Male
PROFICIENT
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 51
LEVEL 1
12
24%
LEVEL 2
24
47%
LEVEL 3
11
22%
LEVEL 4
4
8%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 95
LEVEL 1
25
26%
LEVEL 2
38
40%
LEVEL 3
22
23%
LEVEL 4
10
11%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 17
LEVEL 1
5
29%
LEVEL 2
8
47%
LEVEL 3
3
18%
LEVEL 4
1
6%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 78
LEVEL 1
20
26%
LEVEL 2
30
38%
LEVEL 3
19
24%
LEVEL 4
9
12%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 95
LEVEL 1
25
26%
LEVEL 2
38
40%
LEVEL 3
22
23%
LEVEL 4
10
11%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
95
83
12
1
2
92
95
44
51
95
17
78
95
PROFICIENT
34%
39%
0%
_%
_%
_%
34%
39%
29%
34%
24%
36%
34%
LEVEL 1
25
26%
15
18%
10
83%
_
_
_
_
_
_
25
26%
13
30%
12
24%
25
26%
5
29%
20
26%
25
26%
LEVEL 2
38
40%
36
43%
2
17%
_
_
_
_
_
_
38
40%
14
32%
24
47%
38
40%
8
47%
30
38%
38
40%
LEVEL 3
22
23%
22
27%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
22
23%
11
25%
11
22%
22
23%
3
18%
19
24%
22
23%
LEVEL 4
10
11%
10
12%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
10
11%
6
14%
4
8%
10
11%
1
6%
9
12%
10
11%
Grade 7 Mathematics
Mean scores and data in the table for grade 7 math include only those for grade 7 students who took the Grade 7 New York State Testing Program Assessment (NYSTP) in Mathematics. For 2015 and forward, data in the bar charts include those for grade 7 students who took the Grade 7 NYSTP in Mathematics and grade 7 students who took a Regents math test in lieu of the NYSTP. For 2014 and earlier, data in the bar charts include only those for grade 7 students who took the Grade 7 NYSTP.
MEAN SCORE: 302
All Students
PROFICIENT
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 96
LEVEL 1
34
35%
LEVEL 2
39
41%
LEVEL 3
15
16%
LEVEL 4
8
8%
General Education
PROFICIENT
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 78
LEVEL 1
20
26%
LEVEL 2
35
45%
LEVEL 3
15
19%
LEVEL 4
8
10%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 18
LEVEL 1
14
78%
LEVEL 2
4
22%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
American Indian or Alaska Native
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 95
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 96
LEVEL 1
34
35%
LEVEL 2
39
41%
LEVEL 3
15
16%
LEVEL 4
8
8%
Female
PROFICIENT
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 53
LEVEL 1
21
40%
LEVEL 2
17
32%
LEVEL 3
8
15%
LEVEL 4
7
13%
Male
PROFICIENT
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 43
LEVEL 1
13
30%
LEVEL 2
22
51%
LEVEL 3
7
16%
LEVEL 4
1
2%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 96
LEVEL 1
34
35%
LEVEL 2
39
41%
LEVEL 3
15
16%
LEVEL 4
8
8%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 18
LEVEL 1
9
50%
LEVEL 2
8
44%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
1
6%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 78
LEVEL 1
25
32%
LEVEL 2
31
40%
LEVEL 3
15
19%
LEVEL 4
7
9%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 96
LEVEL 1
34
35%
LEVEL 2
39
41%
LEVEL 3
15
16%
LEVEL 4
8
8%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
96
78
18
1
95
96
53
43
96
18
78
96
PROFICIENT
24%
29%
0%
_%
_%
24%
28%
19%
24%
6%
28%
24%
LEVEL 1
34
35%
20
26%
14
78%
_
_
_
_
34
35%
21
40%
13
30%
34
35%
9
50%
25
32%
34
35%
LEVEL 2
39
41%
35
45%
4
22%
_
_
_
_
39
41%
17
32%
22
51%
39
41%
8
44%
31
40%
39
41%
LEVEL 3
15
16%
15
19%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
15
16%
8
15%
7
16%
15
16%
0
0%
15
19%
15
16%
LEVEL 4
8
8%
8
10%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
8
8%
7
13%
1
2%
8
8%
1
6%
7
9%
8
8%
Grade 8 Mathematics
Mean scores and data in the table for grade 8 math include only those for grade 8 students who took the Grade 8 New York State Testing Program Assessment (NYSTP) in Mathematics. For 2015 and forward, data in the bar charts include those for grade 8 students who took the Grade 8 NYSTP in Mathematics and grade 8 students who took a Regents math test in lieu of the NYSTP. For 2014 and earlier, data in the bar charts include only those for grade 8 students who took the Grade 8 NYSTP.
MEAN SCORE: 301
All Students
PROFICIENT
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 82
LEVEL 1
23
28%
LEVEL 2
31
38%
LEVEL 3
21
26%
LEVEL 4
7
9%
General Education
PROFICIENT
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 62
LEVEL 1
4
6%
LEVEL 2
30
48%
LEVEL 3
21
34%
LEVEL 4
7
11%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 20
LEVEL 1
19
95%
LEVEL 2
1
5%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 78
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 82
LEVEL 1
23
28%
LEVEL 2
31
38%
LEVEL 3
21
26%
LEVEL 4
7
9%
Female
PROFICIENT
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 33
LEVEL 1
5
15%
LEVEL 2
17
52%
LEVEL 3
10
30%
LEVEL 4
1
3%
Male
PROFICIENT
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 49
LEVEL 1
18
37%
LEVEL 2
14
29%
LEVEL 3
11
22%
LEVEL 4
6
12%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 82
LEVEL 1
23
28%
LEVEL 2
31
38%
LEVEL 3
21
26%
LEVEL 4
7
9%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 19
LEVEL 1
8
42%
LEVEL 2
8
42%
LEVEL 3
3
16%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 63
LEVEL 1
15
24%
LEVEL 2
23
37%
LEVEL 3
18
29%
LEVEL 4
7
11%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 82
LEVEL 1
23
28%
LEVEL 2
31
38%
LEVEL 3
21
26%
LEVEL 4
7
9%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
82
62
20
1
2
1
78
82
33
49
82
19
63
82
PROFICIENT
34%
45%
0%
_%
_%
_%
_%
34%
33%
35%
34%
16%
40%
34%
LEVEL 1
23
28%
4
6%
19
95%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
23
28%
5
15%
18
37%
23
28%
8
42%
15
24%
23
28%
LEVEL 2
31
38%
30
48%
1
5%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
31
38%
17
52%
14
29%
31
38%
8
42%
23
37%
31
38%
LEVEL 3
21
26%
21
34%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
21
26%
10
30%
11
22%
21
26%
3
16%
18
29%
21
26%
LEVEL 4
7
9%
7
11%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
7
9%
1
3%
6
12%
7
9%
0
0%
7
11%
7
9%
Grade 4 Science
MEAN SCORE: 84
All Students
PROFICIENT
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 79
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
6
8%
LEVEL 3
30
38%
LEVEL 4
43
54%
General Education
PROFICIENT
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 67
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
3%
LEVEL 3
24
36%
LEVEL 4
41
61%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 12
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
4
33%
LEVEL 3
6
50%
LEVEL 4
2
17%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 75
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 79
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
6
8%
LEVEL 3
30
38%
LEVEL 4
43
54%
Female
PROFICIENT
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 34
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
6%
LEVEL 3
14
41%
LEVEL 4
18
53%
Male
PROFICIENT
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 45
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
4
9%
LEVEL 3
16
36%
LEVEL 4
25
56%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 79
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
6
8%
LEVEL 3
30
38%
LEVEL 4
43
54%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 19
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
11%
LEVEL 3
9
47%
LEVEL 4
8
42%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 60
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
4
7%
LEVEL 3
21
35%
LEVEL 4
35
58%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 79
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
6
8%
LEVEL 3
30
38%
LEVEL 4
43
54%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
79
67
12
1
2
1
75
79
34
45
79
19
60
79
PROFICIENT
92%
97%
67%
_%
_%
_%
_%
92%
94%
91%
92%
89%
93%
92%
LEVEL 1
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
LEVEL 2
6
8%
2
3%
4
33%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
6
8%
2
6%
4
9%
6
8%
2
11%
4
7%
6
8%
LEVEL 3
30
38%
24
36%
6
50%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
30
38%
14
41%
16
36%
30
38%
9
47%
21
35%
30
38%
LEVEL 4
43
54%
41
61%
2
17%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
43
54%
18
53%
25
56%
43
54%
8
42%
35
58%
43
54%
Grade 8 Science
Data in the bar charts include those for grade 8 students who took the New York State Grade 8 Science Test and grade 8 students who took a Regents science test in lieu of this test. Mean scores and data in the table for grade 8 science include only those for grade 8 students who took the New York State Grade 8 Science Test.
MEAN SCORE: 80
All Students
PROFICIENT
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 103
LEVEL 1
4
4%
LEVEL 2
12
12%
LEVEL 3
36
35%
LEVEL 4
51
50%
General Education
PROFICIENT
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 85
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
2
2%
LEVEL 3
32
38%
LEVEL 4
50
59%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 18
LEVEL 1
3
17%
LEVEL 2
10
56%
LEVEL 3
4
22%
LEVEL 4
1
6%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 99
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 103
LEVEL 1
4
4%
LEVEL 2
12
12%
LEVEL 3
36
35%
LEVEL 4
51
50%
Female
PROFICIENT
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 49
LEVEL 1
1
2%
LEVEL 2
4
8%
LEVEL 3
20
41%
LEVEL 4
24
49%
Male
PROFICIENT
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 54
LEVEL 1
3
6%
LEVEL 2
8
15%
LEVEL 3
16
30%
LEVEL 4
27
50%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 103
LEVEL 1
4
4%
LEVEL 2
12
12%
LEVEL 3
36
35%
LEVEL 4
51
50%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 19
LEVEL 1
2
11%
LEVEL 2
5
26%
LEVEL 3
6
32%
LEVEL 4
6
32%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 84
LEVEL 1
2
2%
LEVEL 2
7
8%
LEVEL 3
30
36%
LEVEL 4
45
54%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 103
LEVEL 1
4
4%
LEVEL 2
12
12%
LEVEL 3
36
35%
LEVEL 4
51
50%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
103
85
18
1
2
1
99
103
49
54
103
19
84
103
PROFICIENT
84%
96%
28%
_%
_%
_%
_%
84%
90%
80%
84%
63%
89%
84%
LEVEL 1
4
4%
1
1%
3
17%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
4
4%
1
2%
3
6%
4
4%
2
11%
2
2%
4
4%
LEVEL 2
12
12%
2
2%
10
56%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
12
12%
4
8%
8
15%
12
12%
5
26%
7
8%
12
12%
LEVEL 3
36
35%
32
38%
4
22%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
36
35%
20
41%
16
30%
36
35%
6
32%
30
36%
36
35%
LEVEL 4
51
50%
50
59%
1
6%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
51
50%
24
49%
27
50%
51
50%
6
32%
45
54%
51
50%
Statewide Results on the National Assessment of Educational Progress: NAEP (2012 - 13)
Grade: 4
Reading
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Students with Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
BELOW BASIC
30%
*%
19%
45%
44%
20%
*%
69%
75%
43%
BASIC
33%
*%
27%
34%
35%
33%
*%
22%
21%
34%
PROFICIENT
28%
*%
36%
18%
17%
35%
*%
7%
4%
19%
ADVANCED
9%
*%
18%
3%
4%
12%
*%
2%
*%
4%
PARTICIPATION RATE
94
93
Reading
All Students
Percent Below Basic
30
Percent Basic
33
Percent Proficient
28
Percent Advanced
9
American Indian or Alaska Native
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Percent Below Basic
19
Percent Basic
27
Percent Proficient
36
Percent Advanced
18
Black or African American
Percent Below Basic
45
Percent Basic
34
Percent Proficient
18
Percent Advanced
3
Hispanic or Latino
Percent Below Basic
44
Percent Basic
35
Percent Proficient
17
Percent Advanced
4
White
Percent Below Basic
20
Percent Basic
33
Percent Proficient
35
Percent Advanced
12
Multiracial
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Students with Disabilities
Percent Below Basic
69
Percent Basic
22
Percent Proficient
7
Percent Advanced
2
Participation Rate
94
Limited English Proficient
Percent Below Basic
75
Percent Basic
21
Percent Proficient
4
Percent Advanced
*
Participation Rate
93
Economically Disadvantaged
Percent Below Basic
43
Percent Basic
34
Percent Proficient
19
Percent Advanced
4
Mathematics
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Students with Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
BELOW BASIC
18%
*%
6%
33%
27%
9%
*%
43%
54%
26%
BASIC
42%
*%
25%
50%
49%
41%
*%
42%
36%
48%
PROFICIENT
33%
*%
48%
16%
22%
42%
*%
14%
10%
23%
ADVANCED
7%
*%
21%
1%
2%
8%
*%
1%
*%
3%
PARTICIPATION RATE
94
93
Mathematics
All Students
Percent Below Basic
18
Percent Basic
42
Percent Proficient
33
Percent Advanced
7
American Indian or Alaska Native
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Percent Below Basic
6
Percent Basic
25
Percent Proficient
48
Percent Advanced
21
Black or African American
Percent Below Basic
33
Percent Basic
50
Percent Proficient
16
Percent Advanced
1
Hispanic or Latino
Percent Below Basic
27
Percent Basic
49
Percent Proficient
22
Percent Advanced
2
White
Percent Below Basic
9
Percent Basic
41
Percent Proficient
42
Percent Advanced
8
Multiracial
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Students with Disabilities
Percent Below Basic
43
Percent Basic
42
Percent Proficient
14
Percent Advanced
1
Participation Rate
94
Limited English Proficient
Percent Below Basic
54
Percent Basic
36
Percent Proficient
10
Percent Advanced
*
Participation Rate
93
Economically Disadvantaged
Percent Below Basic
26
Percent Basic
48
Percent Proficient
23
Percent Advanced
3
Grade: 8
Reading
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Students with Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
BELOW BASIC
24%
*%
17%
37%
36%
14%
*%
56%
80%
35%
BASIC
41%
*%
33%
45%
45%
40%
*%
36%
19%
44%
PROFICIENT
30%
*%
38%
17%
18%
40%
*%
8%
1%
20%
ADVANCED
5%
*%
12%
1%
1%
6%
*%
*%
*%
1%
PARTICIPATION RATE
97
91
Reading
All Students
Percent Below Basic
24
Percent Basic
41
Percent Proficient
30
Percent Advanced
5
American Indian or Alaska Native
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Percent Below Basic
17
Percent Basic
33
Percent Proficient
38
Percent Advanced
12
Black or African American
Percent Below Basic
37
Percent Basic
45
Percent Proficient
17
Percent Advanced
1
Hispanic or Latino
Percent Below Basic
36
Percent Basic
45
Percent Proficient
18
Percent Advanced
1
White
Percent Below Basic
14
Percent Basic
40
Percent Proficient
40
Percent Advanced
6
Multiracial
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Students with Disabilities
Percent Below Basic
56
Percent Basic
36
Percent Proficient
8
Percent Advanced
*
Participation Rate
97
Limited English Proficient
Percent Below Basic
80
Percent Basic
19
Percent Proficient
1
Percent Advanced
*
Participation Rate
91
Economically Disadvantaged
Percent Below Basic
35
Percent Basic
44
Percent Proficient
20
Percent Advanced
1
Mathematics
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Students with Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
BELOW BASIC
28%
*%
14%
50%
44%
15%
*%
66%
75%
42%
BASIC
40%
*%
27%
38%
42%
41%
*%
27%
21%
39%
PROFICIENT
24%
*%
33%
11%
12%
34%
*%
6%
3%
15%
ADVANCED
8%
*%
26%
1%
2%
10%
*%
1%
1%
4%
PARTICIPATION RATE
89
94
Mathematics
All Students
Percent Below Basic
28
Percent Basic
40
Percent Proficient
24
Percent Advanced
8
American Indian or Alaska Native
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Percent Below Basic
14
Percent Basic
27
Percent Proficient
33
Percent Advanced
26
Black or African American
Percent Below Basic
50
Percent Basic
38
Percent Proficient
11
Percent Advanced
1
Hispanic or Latino
Percent Below Basic
44
Percent Basic
42
Percent Proficient
12
Percent Advanced
2
White
Percent Below Basic
15
Percent Basic
41
Percent Proficient
34
Percent Advanced
10
Multiracial
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Students with Disabilities
Percent Below Basic
66
Percent Basic
27
Percent Proficient
6
Percent Advanced
1
Participation Rate
89
Limited English Proficient
Percent Below Basic
75
Percent Basic
21
Percent Proficient
3
Percent Advanced
1
Participation Rate
94
Economically Disadvantaged
Percent Below Basic
42
Percent Basic
39
Percent Proficient
15
Percent Advanced
4
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level English Language Arts after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 135
LEVEL 1
11
8%
LEVEL 2
4
3%
LEVEL 3
70
52%
LEVEL 4
35
26%
General Education
PROFICIENT
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 99
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
1%
LEVEL 3
61
62%
LEVEL 4
34
34%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 36
LEVEL 1
11
31%
LEVEL 2
3
8%
LEVEL 3
9
25%
LEVEL 4
1
3%
American Indian or Alaska Native
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 130
LEVEL 1
11
8%
LEVEL 2
4
3%
LEVEL 3
67
52%
LEVEL 4
34
26%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
3
60%
LEVEL 4
1
20%
Female
PROFICIENT
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 64
LEVEL 1
7
11%
LEVEL 2
1
2%
LEVEL 3
33
52%
LEVEL 4
18
28%
Male
PROFICIENT
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 71
LEVEL 1
4
6%
LEVEL 2
3
4%
LEVEL 3
37
52%
LEVEL 4
17
24%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 135
LEVEL 1
11
8%
LEVEL 2
4
3%
LEVEL 3
70
52%
LEVEL 4
35
26%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 15
LEVEL 1
3
20%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
9
60%
LEVEL 4
1
7%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 120
LEVEL 1
8
7%
LEVEL 2
4
3%
LEVEL 3
61
51%
LEVEL 4
34
28%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 135
LEVEL 1
11
8%
LEVEL 2
4
3%
LEVEL 3
70
52%
LEVEL 4
35
26%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
135
99
36
1
2
1
130
1
5
64
71
135
15
120
135
PROFICIENT
78%
96%
28%
_%
_%
_%
78%
_%
80%
80%
76%
78%
67%
79%
78%
LEVEL 1
11
8%
0
0%
11
31%
_
_
_
_
_
_
11
8%
_
_
0
0%
7
11%
4
6%
11
8%
3
20%
8
7%
11
8%
LEVEL 2
4
3%
1
1%
3
8%
_
_
_
_
_
_
4
3%
_
_
0
0%
1
2%
3
4%
4
3%
0
0%
4
3%
4
3%
LEVEL 3
70
52%
61
62%
9
25%
_
_
_
_
_
_
67
52%
_
_
3
60%
33
52%
37
52%
70
52%
9
60%
61
51%
70
52%
LEVEL 4
35
26%
34
34%
1
3%
_
_
_
_
_
_
34
26%
_
_
1
20%
18
28%
17
24%
35
26%
1
7%
34
28%
35
26%
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level Mathematics after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 135
LEVEL 1
4
3%
LEVEL 2
6
4%
LEVEL 3
75
56%
LEVEL 4
40
30%
General Education
PROFICIENT
99%
TOTAL TESTED: 99
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
58
59%
LEVEL 4
40
40%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 36
LEVEL 1
4
11%
LEVEL 2
6
17%
LEVEL 3
17
47%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
American Indian or Alaska Native
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 130
LEVEL 1
4
3%
LEVEL 2
6
5%
LEVEL 3
71
55%
LEVEL 4
40
31%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
4
80%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Female
PROFICIENT
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 64
LEVEL 1
2
3%
LEVEL 2
4
6%
LEVEL 3
39
61%
LEVEL 4
18
28%
Male
PROFICIENT
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 71
LEVEL 1
2
3%
LEVEL 2
2
3%
LEVEL 3
36
51%
LEVEL 4
22
31%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 135
LEVEL 1
4
3%
LEVEL 2
6
4%
LEVEL 3
75
56%
LEVEL 4
40
30%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 15
LEVEL 1
1
7%
LEVEL 2
3
20%
LEVEL 3
7
47%
LEVEL 4
3
20%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 120
LEVEL 1
3
3%
LEVEL 2
3
3%
LEVEL 3
68
57%
LEVEL 4
37
31%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 135
LEVEL 1
4
3%
LEVEL 2
6
4%
LEVEL 3
75
56%
LEVEL 4
40
30%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
135
99
36
1
2
1
130
1
5
64
71
135
15
120
135
PROFICIENT
85%
99%
47%
_%
_%
_%
85%
_%
80%
89%
82%
85%
67%
88%
85%
LEVEL 1
4
3%
0
0%
4
11%
_
_
_
_
_
_
4
3%
_
_
0
0%
2
3%
2
3%
4
3%
1
7%
3
3%
4
3%
LEVEL 2
6
4%
0
0%
6
17%
_
_
_
_
_
_
6
5%
_
_
0
0%
4
6%
2
3%
6
4%
3
20%
3
3%
6
4%
LEVEL 3
75
56%
58
59%
17
47%
_
_
_
_
_
_
71
55%
_
_
4
80%
39
61%
36
51%
75
56%
7
47%
68
57%
75
56%
LEVEL 4
40
30%
40
40%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
40
31%
_
_
0
0%
18
28%
22
31%
40
30%
3
20%
37
31%
40
30%
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level Global History and Geography after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 135
LEVEL 1
11
8%
LEVEL 2
6
4%
LEVEL 3
54
40%
LEVEL 4
55
41%
General Education
PROFICIENT
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 99
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
44
44%
LEVEL 4
53
54%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 36
LEVEL 1
10
28%
LEVEL 2
6
17%
LEVEL 3
10
28%
LEVEL 4
2
6%
American Indian or Alaska Native
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 130
LEVEL 1
11
8%
LEVEL 2
6
5%
LEVEL 3
51
39%
LEVEL 4
54
42%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
3
60%
LEVEL 4
1
20%
Female
PROFICIENT
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 64
LEVEL 1
5
8%
LEVEL 2
4
6%
LEVEL 3
33
52%
LEVEL 4
19
30%
Male
PROFICIENT
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 71
LEVEL 1
6
8%
LEVEL 2
2
3%
LEVEL 3
21
30%
LEVEL 4
36
51%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 135
LEVEL 1
11
8%
LEVEL 2
6
4%
LEVEL 3
54
40%
LEVEL 4
55
41%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 15
LEVEL 1
2
13%
LEVEL 2
3
20%
LEVEL 3
6
40%
LEVEL 4
4
27%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 120
LEVEL 1
9
8%
LEVEL 2
3
3%
LEVEL 3
48
40%
LEVEL 4
51
43%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 135
LEVEL 1
11
8%
LEVEL 2
6
4%
LEVEL 3
54
40%
LEVEL 4
55
41%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
135
99
36
1
2
1
130
1
5
64
71
135
15
120
135
PROFICIENT
81%
98%
33%
_%
_%
_%
81%
_%
80%
81%
80%
81%
67%
83%
81%
LEVEL 1
11
8%
1
1%
10
28%
_
_
_
_
_
_
11
8%
_
_
0
0%
5
8%
6
8%
11
8%
2
13%
9
8%
11
8%
LEVEL 2
6
4%
0
0%
6
17%
_
_
_
_
_
_
6
5%
_
_
0
0%
4
6%
2
3%
6
4%
3
20%
3
3%
6
4%
LEVEL 3
54
40%
44
44%
10
28%
_
_
_
_
_
_
51
39%
_
_
3
60%
33
52%
21
30%
54
40%
6
40%
48
40%
54
40%
LEVEL 4
55
41%
53
54%
2
6%
_
_
_
_
_
_
54
42%
_
_
1
20%
19
30%
36
51%
55
41%
4
27%
51
43%
55
41%
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level U.S. History and Government after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 135
LEVEL 1
5
4%
LEVEL 2
9
7%
LEVEL 3
47
35%
LEVEL 4
60
44%
General Education
PROFICIENT
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 99
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
1%
LEVEL 3
40
40%
LEVEL 4
56
57%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 36
LEVEL 1
5
14%
LEVEL 2
8
22%
LEVEL 3
7
19%
LEVEL 4
4
11%
American Indian or Alaska Native
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 130
LEVEL 1
5
4%
LEVEL 2
9
7%
LEVEL 3
45
35%
LEVEL 4
58
45%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
2
40%
LEVEL 4
2
40%
Female
PROFICIENT
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 64
LEVEL 1
5
8%
LEVEL 2
2
3%
LEVEL 3
30
47%
LEVEL 4
23
36%
Male
PROFICIENT
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 71
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
7
10%
LEVEL 3
17
24%
LEVEL 4
37
52%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 135
LEVEL 1
5
4%
LEVEL 2
9
7%
LEVEL 3
47
35%
LEVEL 4
60
44%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 15
LEVEL 1
2
13%
LEVEL 2
1
7%
LEVEL 3
5
33%
LEVEL 4
5
33%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 120
LEVEL 1
3
3%
LEVEL 2
8
7%
LEVEL 3
42
35%
LEVEL 4
55
46%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 135
LEVEL 1
5
4%
LEVEL 2
9
7%
LEVEL 3
47
35%
LEVEL 4
60
44%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
135
99
36
1
2
1
130
1
5
64
71
135
15
120
135
PROFICIENT
79%
97%
31%
_%
_%
_%
79%
_%
80%
83%
76%
79%
67%
81%
79%
LEVEL 1
5
4%
0
0%
5
14%
_
_
_
_
_
_
5
4%
_
_
0
0%
5
8%
0
0%
5
4%
2
13%
3
3%
5
4%
LEVEL 2
9
7%
1
1%
8
22%
_
_
_
_
_
_
9
7%
_
_
0
0%
2
3%
7
10%
9
7%
1
7%
8
7%
9
7%
LEVEL 3
47
35%
40
40%
7
19%
_
_
_
_
_
_
45
35%
_
_
2
40%
30
47%
17
24%
47
35%
5
33%
42
35%
47
35%
LEVEL 4
60
44%
56
57%
4
11%
_
_
_
_
_
_
58
45%
_
_
2
40%
23
36%
37
52%
60
44%
5
33%
55
46%
60
44%
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level Science after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 135
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
8
6%
LEVEL 3
53
39%
LEVEL 4
64
47%
General Education
PROFICIENT
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 99
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
1%
LEVEL 3
35
35%
LEVEL 4
62
63%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 36
LEVEL 1
1
3%
LEVEL 2
7
19%
LEVEL 3
18
50%
LEVEL 4
2
6%
American Indian or Alaska Native
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 130
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
8
6%
LEVEL 3
51
39%
LEVEL 4
62
48%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
2
40%
LEVEL 4
2
40%
Female
PROFICIENT
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 64
LEVEL 1
1
2%
LEVEL 2
4
6%
LEVEL 3
31
48%
LEVEL 4
26
41%
Male
PROFICIENT
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 71
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
4
6%
LEVEL 3
22
31%
LEVEL 4
38
54%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 135
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
8
6%
LEVEL 3
53
39%
LEVEL 4
64
47%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 15
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
13%
LEVEL 3
7
47%
LEVEL 4
5
33%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 120
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
6
5%
LEVEL 3
46
38%
LEVEL 4
59
49%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 135
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
8
6%
LEVEL 3
53
39%
LEVEL 4
64
47%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
135
99
36
1
2
1
130
1
5
64
71
135
15
120
135
PROFICIENT
87%
98%
56%
_%
_%
_%
87%
_%
80%
89%
85%
87%
80%
88%
87%
LEVEL 1
1
1%
0
0%
1
3%
_
_
_
_
_
_
1
1%
_
_
0
0%
1
2%
0
0%
1
1%
0
0%
1
1%
1
1%
LEVEL 2
8
6%
1
1%
7
19%
_
_
_
_
_
_
8
6%
_
_
0
0%
4
6%
4
6%
8
6%
2
13%
6
5%
8
6%
LEVEL 3
53
39%
35
35%
18
50%
_
_
_
_
_
_
51
39%
_
_
2
40%
31
48%
22
31%
53
39%
7
47%
46
38%
53
39%
LEVEL 4
64
47%
62
63%
2
6%
_
_
_
_
_
_
62
48%
_
_
2
40%
26
41%
38
54%
64
47%
5
33%
59
49%
64
47%
Regents Examination Results (2013 - 14)
Comprehensive English
Regents Comprehensive English
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
131
105
26
1
130
131
70
61
131
23
108
131
55
121
92%
103
98%
18
69%
_
_
_
_
121
92%
67
96%
54
89%
121
92%
18
78%
103
95%
121
92%
65
111
85%
99
94%
12
46%
_
_
_
_
111
85%
62
89%
49
80%
111
85%
16
70%
95
88%
111
85%
85
49
37%
48
46%
1
4%
_
_
_
_
49
37%
26
37%
23
38%
49
37%
8
35%
41
38%
49
37%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 131
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
121
92%
65
111
85%
85
49
37%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 105
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
103
98%
65
99
94%
85
48
46%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 26
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
18
69%
65
12
46%
85
1
4%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 130
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 131
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
121
92%
65
111
85%
85
49
37%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 70
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
67
96%
65
62
89%
85
26
37%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 61
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
54
89%
65
49
80%
85
23
38%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 131
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
121
92%
65
111
85%
85
49
37%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 23
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
18
78%
65
16
70%
85
8
35%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 108
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
103
95%
65
95
88%
85
41
38%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 131
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
121
92%
65
111
85%
85
49
37%
Integrated Algebra
Regents Integrated Algebra
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
White
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
123
91
32
123
64
59
123
25
98
123
55
115
93%
88
97%
27
84%
115
93%
62
97%
53
90%
115
93%
24
96%
91
93%
115
93%
65
103
84%
84
92%
19
59%
103
84%
60
94%
43
73%
103
84%
19
76%
84
86%
103
84%
85
16
13%
16
18%
0
0%
16
13%
4
6%
12
20%
16
13%
1
4%
15
15%
16
13%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 123
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
115
93%
65
103
84%
85
16
13%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 91
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
88
97%
65
84
92%
85
16
18%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 32
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
27
84%
65
19
59%
85
0
0%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 123
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
115
93%
65
103
84%
85
16
13%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 64
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
62
97%
65
60
94%
85
4
6%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 59
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
53
90%
65
43
73%
85
12
20%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 123
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
115
93%
65
103
84%
85
16
13%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 25
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
24
96%
65
19
76%
85
1
4%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 98
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
91
93%
65
84
86%
85
15
15%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 123
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
115
93%
65
103
84%
85
16
13%
Geometry
Regents Geometry
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
White
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
59
57
2
59
33
26
59
8
51
59
55
59
100%
_
_
_
_
59
100%
33
100%
26
100%
59
100%
8
100%
51
100%
59
100%
65
58
98%
_
_
_
_
58
98%
33
100%
25
96%
58
98%
8
100%
50
98%
58
98%
85
17
29%
_
_
_
_
17
29%
10
30%
7
27%
17
29%
1
13%
16
31%
17
29%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 59
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
59
100%
65
58
98%
85
17
29%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 57
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 59
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
59
100%
65
58
98%
85
17
29%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 33
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
33
100%
65
33
100%
85
10
30%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 26
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
26
100%
65
25
96%
85
7
27%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 59
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
59
100%
65
58
98%
85
17
29%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 8
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
8
100%
65
8
100%
85
1
13%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 51
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
51
100%
65
50
98%
85
16
31%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 59
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
59
100%
65
58
98%
85
17
29%
Algebra 2/Trigonometry
Regents Algebra 2/Trigonometry
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
59
58
1
1
58
59
29
30
59
9
50
59
55
54
92%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
54
92%
26
90%
28
93%
54
92%
8
89%
46
92%
54
92%
65
51
86%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
51
86%
24
83%
27
90%
51
86%
6
67%
45
90%
51
86%
85
24
41%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
24
41%
8
28%
16
53%
24
41%
3
33%
21
42%
24
41%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 59
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
54
92%
65
51
86%
85
24
41%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 58
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 58
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 59
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
54
92%
65
51
86%
85
24
41%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 29
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
26
90%
65
24
83%
85
8
28%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 30
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
28
93%
65
27
90%
85
16
53%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 59
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
54
92%
65
51
86%
85
24
41%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 9
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
8
89%
65
6
67%
85
3
33%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 50
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
46
92%
65
45
90%
85
21
42%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 59
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
54
92%
65
51
86%
85
24
41%
Algebra I (Common Core)
Algebra I (Common Core)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
White
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
63
62
1
63
34
29
63
11
52
63
LEVEL 1
1
2%
_
_
_
_
1
2%
0
0%
1
3%
1
2%
0
0%
1
2%
1
2%
LEVEL 2
3
5%
_
_
_
_
3
5%
3
9%
0
0%
3
5%
1
9%
2
4%
3
5%
LEVEL 3
36
57%
_
_
_
_
36
57%
23
68%
13
45%
36
57%
7
64%
29
56%
36
57%
LEVEL 4
19
30%
_
_
_
_
19
30%
8
24%
11
38%
19
30%
3
27%
16
31%
19
30%
LEVEL 5
4
6%
_
_
_
_
4
6%
0
0%
4
14%
4
6%
0
0%
4
8%
4
6%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 63
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
1
2%
LEVEL 2
3
5%
LEVEL 3
36
57%
LEVEL 4
19
30%
LEVEL 5
4
6%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 62
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 63
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
1
2%
LEVEL 2
3
5%
LEVEL 3
36
57%
LEVEL 4
19
30%
LEVEL 5
4
6%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 34
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
3
9%
LEVEL 3
23
68%
LEVEL 4
8
24%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 29
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
1
3%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
13
45%
LEVEL 4
11
38%
LEVEL 5
4
14%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 63
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
1
2%
LEVEL 2
3
5%
LEVEL 3
36
57%
LEVEL 4
19
30%
LEVEL 5
4
6%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 11
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
9%
LEVEL 3
7
64%
LEVEL 4
3
27%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 52
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
1
2%
LEVEL 2
2
4%
LEVEL 3
29
56%
LEVEL 4
16
31%
LEVEL 5
4
8%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 63
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
1
2%
LEVEL 2
3
5%
LEVEL 3
36
57%
LEVEL 4
19
30%
LEVEL 5
4
6%
Global History and Geography
Regents Global History and Geography
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
140
107
33
1
139
140
84
56
140
30
110
140
55
121
86%
98
92%
23
70%
_
_
_
_
121
86%
74
88%
47
84%
121
86%
23
77%
98
89%
121
86%
65
108
77%
89
83%
19
58%
_
_
_
_
108
77%
65
77%
43
77%
108
77%
19
63%
89
81%
108
77%
85
54
39%
50
47%
4
12%
_
_
_
_
54
39%
28
33%
26
46%
54
39%
9
30%
45
41%
54
39%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 140
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
121
86%
65
108
77%
85
54
39%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 107
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
98
92%
65
89
83%
85
50
47%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 33
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
23
70%
65
19
58%
85
4
12%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 139
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 140
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
121
86%
65
108
77%
85
54
39%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 84
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
74
88%
65
65
77%
85
28
33%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 56
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
47
84%
65
43
77%
85
26
46%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 140
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
121
86%
65
108
77%
85
54
39%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 30
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
23
77%
65
19
63%
85
9
30%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 110
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
98
89%
65
89
81%
85
45
41%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 140
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
121
86%
65
108
77%
85
54
39%
U.S. History & Government
Regents U.S. History & Government
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
130
100
30
1
129
130
72
58
130
23
107
130
55
122
94%
96
96%
26
87%
_
_
_
_
122
94%
66
92%
56
97%
122
94%
17
74%
105
98%
122
94%
65
109
84%
93
93%
16
53%
_
_
_
_
109
84%
60
83%
49
84%
109
84%
14
61%
95
89%
109
84%
85
61
47%
57
57%
4
13%
_
_
_
_
61
47%
30
42%
31
53%
61
47%
9
39%
52
49%
61
47%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 130
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
122
94%
65
109
84%
85
61
47%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 100
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
96
96%
65
93
93%
85
57
57%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 30
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
26
87%
65
16
53%
85
4
13%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 129
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 130
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
122
94%
65
109
84%
85
61
47%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 72
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
66
92%
65
60
83%
85
30
42%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 58
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
56
97%
65
49
84%
85
31
53%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 130
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
122
94%
65
109
84%
85
61
47%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 23
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
17
74%
65
14
61%
85
9
39%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 107
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
105
98%
65
95
89%
85
52
49%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 130
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
122
94%
65
109
84%
85
61
47%
Living Environment
Regents Living Environment
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
White
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
118
103
15
118
77
41
118
21
97
118
55
117
99%
102
99%
15
100%
117
99%
77
100%
40
98%
117
99%
21
100%
96
99%
117
99%
65
113
96%
99
96%
14
93%
113
96%
73
95%
40
98%
113
96%
20
95%
93
96%
113
96%
85
62
53%
56
54%
6
40%
62
53%
35
45%
27
66%
62
53%
11
52%
51
53%
62
53%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 118
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
117
99%
65
113
96%
85
62
53%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 103
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
102
99%
65
99
96%
85
56
54%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 15
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
15
100%
65
14
93%
85
6
40%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 118
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
117
99%
65
113
96%
85
62
53%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 77
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
77
100%
65
73
95%
85
35
45%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 41
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
40
98%
65
40
98%
85
27
66%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 118
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
117
99%
65
113
96%
85
62
53%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 21
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
21
100%
65
20
95%
85
11
52%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 97
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
96
99%
65
93
96%
85
51
53%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 118
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
117
99%
65
113
96%
85
62
53%
Physical Setting/Earth Science
Regents Physical Setting/Earth Science
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
118
95
23
2
116
118
64
54
118
30
88
118
55
107
91%
86
91%
21
91%
_
_
_
_
107
91%
57
89%
50
93%
107
91%
26
87%
81
92%
107
91%
65
86
73%
71
75%
15
65%
_
_
_
_
86
73%
45
70%
41
76%
86
73%
19
63%
67
76%
86
73%
85
36
31%
34
36%
2
9%
_
_
_
_
36
31%
16
25%
20
37%
36
31%
6
20%
30
34%
36
31%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 118
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
107
91%
65
86
73%
85
36
31%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 95
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
86
91%
65
71
75%
85
34
36%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 23
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
21
91%
65
15
65%
85
2
9%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 116
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 118
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
107
91%
65
86
73%
85
36
31%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 64
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
57
89%
65
45
70%
85
16
25%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 54
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
50
93%
65
41
76%
85
20
37%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 118
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
107
91%
65
86
73%
85
36
31%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 30
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
26
87%
65
19
63%
85
6
20%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 88
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
81
92%
65
67
76%
85
30
34%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 118
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
107
91%
65
86
73%
85
36
31%
Physical Setting/Chemistry
Regents Physical Setting/Chemistry
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
77
75
2
1
76
77
39
38
77
9
68
77
55
76
99%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
76
99%
39
100%
37
97%
76
99%
9
100%
67
99%
76
99%
65
62
81%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
62
81%
30
77%
32
84%
62
81%
9
100%
53
78%
62
81%
85
17
22%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
17
22%
7
18%
10
26%
17
22%
4
44%
13
19%
17
22%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 77
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
76
99%
65
62
81%
85
17
22%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 75
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 76
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 77
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
76
99%
65
62
81%
85
17
22%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 39
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
39
100%
65
30
77%
85
7
18%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 38
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
37
97%
65
32
84%
85
10
26%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 77
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
76
99%
65
62
81%
85
17
22%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 9
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
9
100%
65
9
100%
85
4
44%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 68
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
67
99%
65
53
78%
85
13
19%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 77
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
76
99%
65
62
81%
85
17
22%
Physical Setting/Physics
Regents Physical Setting/Physics
GROUP
All Students
General Education
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
27
27
26
1
27
9
18
27
1
26
27
55
23
85%
23
85%
_
_
_
_
23
85%
7
78%
16
89%
23
85%
_
_
_
_
23
85%
65
20
74%
20
74%
_
_
_
_
20
74%
5
56%
15
83%
20
74%
_
_
_
_
20
74%
85
9
33%
9
33%
_
_
_
_
9
33%
2
22%
7
39%
9
33%
_
_
_
_
9
33%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 27
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
23
85%
65
20
74%
85
9
33%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 27
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
23
85%
65
20
74%
85
9
33%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 26
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 27
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
23
85%
65
20
74%
85
9
33%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 9
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
7
78%
65
5
56%
85
2
22%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 18
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
16
89%
65
15
83%
85
7
39%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 27
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
23
85%
65
20
74%
85
9
33%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 26
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 27
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
23
85%
65
20
74%
85
9
33%
Regents Competency Test Results (2013 - 14)
GROUP
All Students
Students with Disabilities
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
Reading
6
67%
Writing
4
_
Math
2
_
Global Studies
1
_
US Hist & Gov't
10
60%
6
67%
4
_
2
_
1
_
10
60%
6
67%
4
_
2
_
1
_
10
60%
4
_
2
_
1
_
3
_
1
_
1
_
4
_
3
_
3
_
1
_
1
_
6
_
6
67%
4
_
2
_
1
_
10
60%
1
_
2
_
1
_
5
_
2
_
2
_
1
_
9
_
6
67%
4
_
2
_
1
_
10
60%
All Students
Reading
Number Tested
6
Percent Passing
67%
Writing
Number Tested
4
Percent Passing
_
Math
Number Tested
2
Percent Passing
_
Global Studies
Number Tested
1
Percent Passing
_
US Hist & Gov't
Number Tested
10
Percent Passing
60%
Students with Disabilities
Reading
Number Tested
6
Percent Passing
67%
Writing
Number Tested
4
Percent Passing
_
Math
Number Tested
2
Percent Passing
_
Global Studies
Number Tested
1
Percent Passing
_
US Hist & Gov't
Number Tested
10
Percent Passing
60%
White
Reading
Number Tested
6
Percent Passing
67%
Writing
Number Tested
4
Percent Passing
_
Math
Number Tested
2
Percent Passing
_
Global Studies
Number Tested
1
Percent Passing
_
US Hist & Gov't
Number Tested
10
Percent Passing
60%
Small Group Total
Writing
Number Tested
4
Percent Passing
_
Math
Number Tested
2
Percent Passing
_
Global Studies
Number Tested
1
Percent Passing
_
Female
Reading
Number Tested
3
Percent Passing
_
Writing
Number Tested
1
Percent Passing
_
Math
Number Tested
1
Percent Passing
_
US Hist & Gov't
Number Tested
4
Percent Passing
_
Male
Reading
Number Tested
3
Percent Passing
_
Writing
Number Tested
3
Percent Passing
_
Math
Number Tested
1
Percent Passing
_
Global Studies
Number Tested
1
Percent Passing
_
US Hist & Gov't
Number Tested
6
Percent Passing
_
Non-English Language Learners
Reading
Number Tested
6
Percent Passing
67%
Writing
Number Tested
4
Percent Passing
_
Math
Number Tested
2
Percent Passing
_
Global Studies
Number Tested
1
Percent Passing
_
US Hist & Gov't
Number Tested
10
Percent Passing
60%
Economically Disadvantaged
Reading
Number Tested
1
Percent Passing
_
Writing
Number Tested
2
Percent Passing
_
US Hist & Gov't
Number Tested
1
Percent Passing
_
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Reading
Number Tested
5
Percent Passing
_
Writing
Number Tested
2
Percent Passing
_
Math
Number Tested
2
Percent Passing
_
Global Studies
Number Tested
1
Percent Passing
_
US Hist & Gov't
Number Tested
9
Percent Passing
_
Not Migrant
Reading
Number Tested
6
Percent Passing
67%
Writing
Number Tested
4
Percent Passing
_
Math
Number Tested
2
Percent Passing
_
Global Studies
Number Tested
1
Percent Passing
_
US Hist & Gov't
Number Tested
10
Percent Passing
60%
New York State Alternate Assessment (NYSAA) Results (2013 - 14)
GROUP
Grade 3 ELA
Grade 3 Math
Grade 4 ELA
Grade 4 Math
Grade 4 Science
Grade 5 ELA
Grade 5 Math
Grade 6 ELA
Grade 6 Math
Grade 7 ELA
Grade 7 Math
Grade 8 ELA
Grade 8 Math
Grade 8 Science
Secondary-Level ELA
Secondary-Level Math
Secondary-Level Science
Secondary-Level Social Studies
TOTAL TESTED
2
2
3
3
3
4
4
5
5
1
1
1
1
1
3
3
3
3
PROFICIENT
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
20%
80%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
LEVEL 1
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
0
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
4
1
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
1
4
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
0
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
Grade 3 ELA
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 3 Math
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 4 ELA
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 4 Math
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 4 Science
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 5 ELA
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 5 Math
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 6 ELA
PROFICIENT
1 20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
0
LEVEL 2
4
LEVEL 3
1
LEVEL 4
0
Grade 6 Math
PROFICIENT
4 80%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
0
LEVEL 2
1
LEVEL 3
4
LEVEL 4
0
Grade 7 ELA
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 7 Math
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 8 ELA
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 8 Math
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 8 Science
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Secondary-Level ELA
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Secondary-Level Math
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Secondary-Level Science
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Secondary-Level Social Studies
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Elementary/Middle-Level English Language Arts Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: NO
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
NO
―
―
―
―
NO
―
NO
―
NO
Tested 95%
NO
―
―
―
―
NO
―
NO
―
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,296*
1
8
6
3
1,251*
1
228*
0
350*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
93%*
―
―
―
―
93%*
―
93%*
―
97%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
―
―
―
―
NO
―
YES
―
NO
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
551
1
7
6
3
534
0
99✝
0
119
PI
90
―
―
―
―
90
―
39✝
―
64
EAMO
84
―
―
―
―
104
―
38
―
65
Safe Harbor Target
84
―
―
―
―
104
―
38
―
65
All Students
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,296*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
93%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
551
PI
90
EAMO
84
Safe Harbor Target
84
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
8
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
7
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
6
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
6
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
3
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
3
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
White
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,251*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
93%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
534
PI
90
EAMO
104
Safe Harbor Target
104
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
228*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
93%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
99✝
PI
39✝
EAMO
38
Safe Harbor Target
38
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
350*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
97%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
119
PI
64
EAMO
65
Safe Harbor Target
65
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,293*
1,282*
1,279*
1,291*
19
1,290*
1,068*
1,296*
946*
694*
602*
0
1,296*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
93%*
93%*
93%*
93%*
―
93%*
93%*
93%*
92%*
93%*
93%*
―
93%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
550
544
545
548
17
551
453
551
432
300
251
0
551
PI
90
90
89
90
―
90
100
90
97
82
99
―
90
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,293*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
93%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
550
PI
90
Not Black or African American
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,282*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
93%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
544
PI
90
Not Hispanic or Latino
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,279*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
93%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
545
PI
89
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,291*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
93%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
548
PI
90
Not White
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
19
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
17
PI
―
Not Multiracial
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,290*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
93%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
551
PI
90
General Education
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,068*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
93%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
453
PI
100
English Proficient
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,296*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
93%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
551
PI
90
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
946*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
92%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
432
PI
97
Male
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
694*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
93%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
300
PI
82
Female
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
602*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
93%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
251
PI
99
Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,296*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
93%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
551
PI
90
― There were fewer than 40 students enrolled during the test administration period, so the Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 tested students enrolled on BEDS day and during the test administration period, so the PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed. *The percentage of students tested in the current year fell below 95 percent, so the numbers of enrolled and tested students in the current year and previous year were combined to provide the school/district with another opportunity to meet the participation rate criterion. ✝ Includes former students with disabilities because the number of students with disabilities in the current year is equal to or greater than 30.
Elementary/Middle-Level Mathematics Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: NO
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
NO
―
―
―
―
NO
―
NO
―
YES
Tested 95%
NO
―
―
―
―
NO
―
NO
―
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,295*
1
8
6
3
1,250*
1
226*
0
351*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
92%*
―
―
―
―
92%*
―
92%*
―
96%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
YES
―
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
530
1
7
6
3
513
0
94✝
0
115
PI
106
―
―
―
―
106
―
46✝
―
82
EAMO
81
―
―
―
―
100
―
39
―
62
Safe Harbor Target
81
―
―
―
―
99
―
39
―
62
All Students
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,295*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
92%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
530
PI
106
EAMO
81
Safe Harbor Target
81
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
8
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
7
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
6
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
6
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
3
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
3
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
White
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,250*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
92%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
513
PI
106
EAMO
100
Safe Harbor Target
99
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
226*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
92%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
94✝
PI
46✝
EAMO
39
Safe Harbor Target
39
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
351*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
96%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
115
PI
82
EAMO
62
Safe Harbor Target
62
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,292*
1,281*
1,278*
1,290*
19
1,289*
1,069*
1,295*
944*
691*
604*
0
1,295*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
92%*
92%*
92%*
92%*
―
92%*
92%*
92%*
91%*
92%*
92%*
―
92%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
529
523
524
527
17
530
437
530
415
289
241
0
530
PI
106
106
106
105
―
106
119
106
112
109
102
―
106
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,292*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
92%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
529
PI
106
Not Black or African American
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,281*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
92%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
523
PI
106
Not Hispanic or Latino
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,278*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
92%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
524
PI
106
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,290*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
92%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
527
PI
105
Not White
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
19
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
17
PI
―
Not Multiracial
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,289*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
92%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
530
PI
106
General Education
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,069*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
92%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
437
PI
119
English Proficient
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,295*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
92%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
530
PI
106
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
944*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
91%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
415
PI
112
Male
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
691*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
92%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
289
PI
109
Female
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
604*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
92%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
241
PI
102
Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,295*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
92%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
530
PI
106
― There were fewer than 40 students enrolled during the test administration period, so the Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 tested students enrolled on BEDS day and during the test administration period, so the PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed. *The percentage of students tested in the current year fell below 95 percent, so the numbers of enrolled and tested students in the current year and previous year were combined to provide the school/district with another opportunity to meet the participation rate criterion. ✝ Includes former students with disabilities because the number of students with disabilities in the current year is equal to or greater than 30.
Elementary/Middle-Level Science Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: NO
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
NO
―
YES
Tested 80%
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
YES
―
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
208
0
4
2
2
200
0
41
0
42
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
89%
―
―
―
―
89%
―
83%
―
93%
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
NO
―
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
182
0
4
2
2
174
0
33✝
0
38
PI
186
―
―
―
―
187
―
142✝
―
171
EAMO
175
―
―
―
―
184
―
145
―
158
Progress Target
175
―
―
―
―
184
―
145
―
158
All Students
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 80%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
208
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
89%
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
182
PI
186
EAMO
175
Progress Target
175
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
4
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
4
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
2
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
2
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
2
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
2
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
White
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 80%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
200
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
89%
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
174
PI
187
EAMO
184
Progress Target
184
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 80%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
41
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
83%
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
NO
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
33✝
PI
142✝
EAMO
145
Progress Target
145
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 80%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
42
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
93%
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
38
PI
171
EAMO
158
Progress Target
158
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
208
204
206
206
8
208
167
208
166
116
92
0
208
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
89%
89%
89%
89%
―
89%
91%
89%
89%
86%
93%
―
89%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
182
178
180
180
8
182
150
182
144
99
83
0
182
PI
186
187
187
186
―
186
196
186
190
182
192
―
186
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
208
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
89%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
182
PI
186
Not Black or African American
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
204
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
89%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
178
PI
187
Not Hispanic or Latino
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
206
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
89%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
180
PI
187
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
206
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
89%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
180
PI
186
Not White
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
8
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
8
PI
―
Not Multiracial
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
208
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
89%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
182
PI
186
General Education
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
167
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
91%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
150
PI
196
English Proficient
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
208
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
89%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
182
PI
186
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
166
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
89%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
144
PI
190
Male
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
116
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
86%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
99
PI
182
Female
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
92
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
93%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
83
PI
192
Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
208
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
89%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
182
PI
186
― There were fewer than 40 students enrolled during the test administration period, so the Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 tested students enrolled on BEDS day and during the test administration period, so the PI, EAMO, and Progress Target data are suppressed. ✝ Includes former students with disabilities because the number of students with disabilities in the current year is equal to or greater than 30.
Secondary-Level English Language Arts Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: NO
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
NO
―
―
―
―
NO
―
―
―
―
Tested 95%
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
―
12th graders
133
0
2
1
0
129
1
33
0
14
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
99%
―
―
―
―
98%
―
―
―
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
―
―
―
―
NO
―
―
―
―
2010 Accountability Cohort Members
127
0
2
1
0
123
1
29
0
14
PI
146
―
―
―
―
145
―
―
―
―
EAMO
157
―
―
―
―
169
―
―
―
―
Safe Harbor Target
157
―
―
―
―
157
―
―
―
―
All Students
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
YES
12th Graders
133
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
99%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
2010 Accountability Cohort Members
127
PI
146
EAMO
157
Safe Harbor Target
157
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2010 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
2
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2010 Accountability Cohort Members
2
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
1
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2010 Accountability Cohort Members
1
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2010 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
White
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
YES
12th Graders
129
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
98%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
2010 Accountability Cohort Members
123
PI
145
EAMO
169
Safe Harbor Target
157
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
1
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2010 Accountability Cohort Members
1
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
33
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2010 Accountability Cohort Members
29
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2010 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
14
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2010 Accountability Cohort Members
14
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
12th Graders
133
131
132
133
4
132
100
133
119
71
62
0
133
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
99%
98%
98%
99%
―
98%
100%
99%
98%
97%
100%
―
99%
2010 Accountability Cohort Members
127
125
126
127
4
126
98
127
113
67
60
0
127
PI
146
146
146
146
―
146
177
146
150
142
152
―
146
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
12th Graders
133
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
99%
2010 Accountability Cohort Members
127
PI
146
Not Black or African American
12th Graders
131
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
98%
2010 Accountability Cohort Members
125
PI
146
Not Hispanic or Latino
12th Graders
132
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
98%
2010 Accountability Cohort Members
126
PI
146
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
12th Graders
133
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
99%
2010 Accountability Cohort Members
127
PI
146
Not White
12th Graders
4
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2010 Accountability Cohort Members
4
PI
―
Not Multiracial
12th Graders
132
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
98%
2010 Accountability Cohort Members
126
PI
146
General Education
12th Graders
100
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2010 Accountability Cohort Members
98
PI
177
English Proficient
12th Graders
133
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
99%
2010 Accountability Cohort Members
127
PI
146
Not Economically Disadvantaged
12th Graders
119
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
98%
2010 Accountability Cohort Members
113
PI
150
Male
12th Graders
71
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
97%
2010 Accountability Cohort Members
67
PI
142
Female
12th Graders
62
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2010 Accountability Cohort Members
60
PI
152
Migrant
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2010 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
Not Migrant
12th Graders
133
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
99%
2010 Accountability Cohort Members
127
PI
146
― There were fewer than 40 12th graders, so the Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 students in the 2010 accountability cohort, so PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed.
Secondary-Level Mathematics Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: NO
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
YES
―
―
―
―
NO
―
―
―
―
Tested 95%
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
―
12th graders
133
0
2
1
0
129
1
33
0
14
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
99%
―
―
―
―
99%
―
―
―
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
―
―
―
―
NO
―
―
―
―
2010 Accountability Cohort Members
127
0
2
1
0
123
1
29
0
14
PI
145
―
―
―
―
144
―
―
―
―
EAMO
139
―
―
―
―
153
―
―
―
―
Safe Harbor Target
139
―
―
―
―
151
―
―
―
―
All Students
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
YES
12th Graders
133
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
99%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
2010 Accountability Cohort Members
127
PI
145
EAMO
139
Safe Harbor Target
139
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2010 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
2
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2010 Accountability Cohort Members
2
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
1
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2010 Accountability Cohort Members
1
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2010 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
White
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
YES
12th Graders
129
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
99%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
2010 Accountability Cohort Members
123
PI
144
EAMO
153
Safe Harbor Target
151
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
1
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2010 Accountability Cohort Members
1
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
33
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2010 Accountability Cohort Members
29
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2010 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
14
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2010 Accountability Cohort Members
14
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
12th Graders
133
131
132
133
4
132
100
133
119
71
62
0
133
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
99%
99%
99%
99%
―
99%
100%
99%
99%
99%
100%
―
99%
2010 Accountability Cohort Members
127
125
126
127
4
126
98
127
113
67
60
0
127
PI
145
145
144
145
―
144
171
145
150
140
150
―
145
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
12th Graders
133
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
99%
2010 Accountability Cohort Members
127
PI
145
Not Black or African American
12th Graders
131
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
99%
2010 Accountability Cohort Members
125
PI
145
Not Hispanic or Latino
12th Graders
132
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
99%
2010 Accountability Cohort Members
126
PI
144
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
12th Graders
133
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
99%
2010 Accountability Cohort Members
127
PI
145
Not White
12th Graders
4
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2010 Accountability Cohort Members
4
PI
―
Not Multiracial
12th Graders
132
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
99%
2010 Accountability Cohort Members
126
PI
144
General Education
12th Graders
100
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2010 Accountability Cohort Members
98
PI
171
English Proficient
12th Graders
133
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
99%
2010 Accountability Cohort Members
127
PI
145
Not Economically Disadvantaged
12th Graders
119
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
99%
2010 Accountability Cohort Members
113
PI
150
Male
12th Graders
71
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
99%
2010 Accountability Cohort Members
67
PI
140
Female
12th Graders
62
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2010 Accountability Cohort Members
60
PI
150
Migrant
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2010 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
Not Migrant
12th Graders
133
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
99%
2010 Accountability Cohort Members
127
PI
145
― There were fewer than 40 12th graders, so the Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 students in the 2010 accountability cohort, so PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed.
Unweighted Combined ELA and Math PIs
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
90
―
―
―
―
90
―
39
―
64
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
106
―
―
―
―
106
―
46
―
82
Secondary-Level ELA PI
146
―
―
―
―
145
―
―
―
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
145
―
―
―
―
144
―
―
―
―
UNWEIGHTED COMBINED PI
122
0
0
0
0
121
0
43
0
73
All Students
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
90
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
106
Secondary-Level ELA PI
146
Secondary-Level MATH PI
145
Unweighted Combined PI
122
American Indian or Alaska Native
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Black or African American
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Hispanic or Latino
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
White
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
90
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
106
Secondary-Level ELA PI
145
Secondary-Level MATH PI
144
Unweighted Combined PI
121
Multiracial
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Students With Disabilities
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
39
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
46
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
43
Limited English Proficient
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Economically Disadvantaged
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
64
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
82
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
73
― There were not enough students to determine a Performance Index.
Overall Graduation Rate for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: NO
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
NO
All Students
MADE AYP
YES
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP
―
White
MADE AYP
YES
Multiracial
MADE AYP
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP
―
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
NO
― There were not enough students to make an AYP determination.
Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort for Accountability
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion:
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
NO
2009 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
157
0
1
1
0
154
1
26
0
36
Graduation Rate
85%
―
―
―
―
85%
―
―
―
75%
State Standard
80%
―
―
―
―
80%
―
―
―
80%
Progress Target
80%
―
―
―
―
80%
―
―
―
80%
All Students
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2009 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
157
Graduation Rate
85%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%
American Indian or Alaska Native
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2009 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Black or African American
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2009 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
1
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2009 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
1
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2009 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
White
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2009 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
154
Graduation Rate
85%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%
Multiracial
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2009 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
1
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Students With Disabilities
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2009 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
26
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Limited English Proficient
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2009 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: NO
2009 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
36
Graduation Rate
75%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%
YES Graduation rate is equal to or greater than the State Standard or the group's Progress Target. NO Graduation rate is less than the State Standard and the group's Progress Target.
― There were fewer than 30 students in the cohort.
Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort for Accountability
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion:
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
―
2008 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
146
0
1
4
0
141
0
23
0
26
Graduation Rate
92%
―
―
―
―
92%
―
―
―
―
State Standard
80%
―
―
―
―
80%
―
―
―
―
Progress Target
80%
―
―
―
―
80%
―
―
―
―
All Students
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2008 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
146
Graduation Rate
92%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%
American Indian or Alaska Native
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2008 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Black or African American
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2008 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
1
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2008 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
4
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2008 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
White
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2008 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
141
Graduation Rate
92%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%
Multiracial
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2008 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Students With Disabilities
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2008 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
23
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Limited English Proficient
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2008 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2008 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
26
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
YES Graduation rate is equal to or greater than the State Standard or the group's Progress Target. NO Graduation rate is less than the State Standard and the group's Progress Target.
― There were fewer than 30 students in the cohort.
Graduation Rates for Non-AYP Groups for Accountability
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
2009 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
157
156
156
157
3
156
131
157
121
84
73
0
157
Graduation Rate
85%
85%
85%
85%
―
85%
90%
85%
88%
81%
89%
―
85%
Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
146
145
142
146
5
146
123
146
120
74
72
0
146
Graduation Rate
92%
92%
92%
92%
―
92%
97%
92%
93%
89%
94%
―
92%
Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
2009 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
157
Graduation Rate
85%
Not Black or African American
2009 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
156
Graduation Rate
85%
Not Hispanic or Latino
2009 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
156
Graduation Rate
85%
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
2009 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
157
Graduation Rate
85%
Not White
2009 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
3
Graduation Rate
―
Not Multiracial
2009 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
156
Graduation Rate
85%
General Education
2009 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
131
Graduation Rate
90%
English Proficient
2009 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
157
Graduation Rate
85%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
2009 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
121
Graduation Rate
88%
Male
2009 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
84
Graduation Rate
81%
Female
2009 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
73
Graduation Rate
89%
Migrant
2009 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
Not Migrant
2009 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
157
Graduation Rate
85%
Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
2008 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
146
Graduation Rate
92%
Not Black or African American
2008 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
145
Graduation Rate
92%
Not Hispanic or Latino
2008 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
142
Graduation Rate
92%
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
2008 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
146
Graduation Rate
92%
Not White
2008 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
5
Graduation Rate
―
Not Multiracial
2008 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
146
Graduation Rate
92%
General Education
2008 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
123
Graduation Rate
97%
English Proficient
2008 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
146
Graduation Rate
92%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
2008 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
120
Graduation Rate
93%
Male
2008 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
74
Graduation Rate
89%
Female
2008 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
72
Graduation Rate
94%
Migrant
2008 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
Not Migrant
2008 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
146
Graduation Rate
92%
― There were fewer than 30 students in the cohort.
Graduation Rates for Regents with Advanced Designation and CTE Endorsement for Accountability
Percentage of 2009 Graduation-Rate Total Cohort members who graduated as of August 31, 2013 with:
Regents Diploma with an Advanced Designation (This District)
38%
Regents Diploma with an Advanced Designation (Statewide)
31%
Percentage in This District Exceeded Statewide
YES
Regents Diploma with an Advanced Designation (This District)
38%
Regents Diploma with an Advanced Designation (Statewide)
31%
Percentage in This District Exceeded Statewide
YES
Regents Diploma with CTE Endorsement (This District)
4%
Regents Diploma with CTE Endorsement (Statewide)
4%
Percentage in This District Exceeded Statewide
NO
Regents Diploma with CTE Endorsement (This District)
You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.
Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.
If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.
