The New York State Report Card is an important part of the Board of Regents' effort to raise learning standards for all students. It provides information to the public on school/district enrollment and staff, student performance, and other measures of school and district performance. Knowledge gained from the report card on a school's or district's strengths and weaknesses can be used to improve instruction and services to students. Report Card Data - Glossary of Terms | Accountability Data - Glossary of Terms | Business Rules
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
0
0%
_
_
_
_
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
9
2%
_
_
_
_
All Students
DROPPED OUT
9
2%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
0
0%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
9
2%
General Education
DROPPED OUT
_
_%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
_
_%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
_
_%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
_
_%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
_
_%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
9
2%
_
_
_
_
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
0
0%
_
_
_
_
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
9
2%
_
_
_
_
All Students
DROPPED OUT
9
2%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
0
0%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
9
2%
General Education
DROPPED OUT
_
_%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
_
_%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
_
_%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
_
_%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
_
_%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
9
2%
_
_
_
_
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
0
0%
_
_
_
_
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
9
2%
_
_
_
_
All Students
DROPPED OUT
9
2%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
0
0%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
9
2%
General Education
DROPPED OUT
_
_%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
_
_%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
_
_%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
_
_%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
_
_%
Post-graduation Plans of Completers (2016 - 17)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO FOUR-YEAR COLLEGE
38
39%
38
46%
0
0%
TO TWO-YEAR COLLEGE
34
35%
30
37%
4
25%
TO OTHER POST-SECONDARY
1
1%
0
0%
1
6%
TO THE MILITARY
3
3%
3
4%
0
0%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO EMPLOYMENT
22
22%
11
13%
11
69%
TO ADULT SERVICES
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
TO OTHER KNOWN PLANS
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
PLANS UNKNOWN
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
All Students
To Four-Year College
38
39%
To Two-Year College
34
35%
To Other Post-Secondary
1
1%
To the Military
3
3%
To Employment
22
22%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
0
0%
Plan Unknown
0
0%
General Education
To Four-Year College
38
46%
To Two-Year College
30
37%
To Other Post-Secondary
0
0%
To the Military
3
4%
To Employment
11
13%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
0
0%
Plan Unknown
0
0%
Students with Disabilities
To Four-Year College
0
0%
To Two-Year College
4
25%
To Other Post-Secondary
1
6%
To the Military
0
0%
To Employment
11
69%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
0
0%
Plan Unknown
0
0%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO FOUR-YEAR COLLEGE
38
39%
38
46%
0
0%
TO TWO-YEAR COLLEGE
34
35%
30
37%
4
25%
TO OTHER POST-SECONDARY
1
1%
0
0%
1
6%
TO THE MILITARY
3
3%
3
4%
0
0%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO EMPLOYMENT
22
22%
11
13%
11
69%
TO ADULT SERVICES
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
TO OTHER KNOWN PLANS
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
PLANS UNKNOWN
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
All Students
To Four-Year College
38
39%
To Two-Year College
34
35%
To Other Post-Secondary
1
1%
To the Military
3
3%
To Employment
22
22%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
0
0%
Plan Unknown
0
0%
General Education
To Four-Year College
38
46%
To Two-Year College
30
37%
To Other Post-Secondary
0
0%
To the Military
3
4%
To Employment
11
13%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
0
0%
Plan Unknown
0
0%
Students with Disabilities
To Four-Year College
0
0%
To Two-Year College
4
25%
To Other Post-Secondary
1
6%
To the Military
0
0%
To Employment
11
69%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
0
0%
Plan Unknown
0
0%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO FOUR-YEAR COLLEGE
38
39%
38
46%
0
0%
TO TWO-YEAR COLLEGE
34
35%
30
37%
4
25%
TO OTHER POST-SECONDARY
1
1%
0
0%
1
6%
TO THE MILITARY
3
3%
3
4%
0
0%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO EMPLOYMENT
22
22%
11
13%
11
69%
TO ADULT SERVICES
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
TO OTHER KNOWN PLANS
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
PLANS UNKNOWN
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
All Students
To Four-Year College
38
39%
To Two-Year College
34
35%
To Other Post-Secondary
1
1%
To the Military
3
3%
To Employment
22
22%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
0
0%
Plan Unknown
0
0%
General Education
To Four-Year College
38
46%
To Two-Year College
30
37%
To Other Post-Secondary
0
0%
To the Military
3
4%
To Employment
11
13%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
0
0%
Plan Unknown
0
0%
Students with Disabilities
To Four-Year College
0
0%
To Two-Year College
4
25%
To Other Post-Secondary
1
6%
To the Military
0
0%
To Employment
11
69%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
0
0%
Plan Unknown
0
0%
Grade 3 English Language Arts
MEAN SCORE: 308
All Students
PROFICIENT
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 81
LEVEL 1
18
22%
LEVEL 2
26
32%
LEVEL 3
32
40%
LEVEL 4
5
6%
General Education
PROFICIENT
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 69
LEVEL 1
8
12%
LEVEL 2
24
35%
LEVEL 3
32
46%
LEVEL 4
5
7%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 12
LEVEL 1
10
83%
LEVEL 2
2
17%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 78
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 81
LEVEL 1
18
22%
LEVEL 2
26
32%
LEVEL 3
32
40%
LEVEL 4
5
6%
Female
PROFICIENT
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 28
LEVEL 1
3
11%
LEVEL 2
6
21%
LEVEL 3
15
54%
LEVEL 4
4
14%
Male
PROFICIENT
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 53
LEVEL 1
15
28%
LEVEL 2
20
38%
LEVEL 3
17
32%
LEVEL 4
1
2%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 81
LEVEL 1
18
22%
LEVEL 2
26
32%
LEVEL 3
32
40%
LEVEL 4
5
6%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 35
LEVEL 1
15
43%
LEVEL 2
12
34%
LEVEL 3
6
17%
LEVEL 4
2
6%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 46
LEVEL 1
3
7%
LEVEL 2
14
30%
LEVEL 3
26
57%
LEVEL 4
3
7%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 81
LEVEL 1
18
22%
LEVEL 2
26
32%
LEVEL 3
32
40%
LEVEL 4
5
6%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
81
69
12
1
2
78
81
28
53
81
35
46
81
PROFICIENT
46%
54%
0%
_%
_%
_%
46%
68%
34%
46%
23%
63%
46%
LEVEL 1
18
22%
8
12%
10
83%
_
_
_
_
_
_
18
22%
3
11%
15
28%
18
22%
15
43%
3
7%
18
22%
LEVEL 2
26
32%
24
35%
2
17%
_
_
_
_
_
_
26
32%
6
21%
20
38%
26
32%
12
34%
14
30%
26
32%
LEVEL 3
32
40%
32
46%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
32
40%
15
54%
17
32%
32
40%
6
17%
26
57%
32
40%
LEVEL 4
5
6%
5
7%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
5
6%
4
14%
1
2%
5
6%
2
6%
3
7%
5
6%
Grade 4 English Language Arts
MEAN SCORE: 299
All Students
PROFICIENT
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 82
LEVEL 1
30
37%
LEVEL 2
28
34%
LEVEL 3
16
20%
LEVEL 4
8
10%
General Education
PROFICIENT
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 69
LEVEL 1
22
32%
LEVEL 2
24
35%
LEVEL 3
16
23%
LEVEL 4
7
10%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 13
LEVEL 1
8
62%
LEVEL 2
4
31%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
1
8%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 79
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 82
LEVEL 1
30
37%
LEVEL 2
28
34%
LEVEL 3
16
20%
LEVEL 4
8
10%
Female
PROFICIENT
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 41
LEVEL 1
13
32%
LEVEL 2
14
34%
LEVEL 3
8
20%
LEVEL 4
6
15%
Male
PROFICIENT
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 41
LEVEL 1
17
41%
LEVEL 2
14
34%
LEVEL 3
8
20%
LEVEL 4
2
5%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 82
LEVEL 1
30
37%
LEVEL 2
28
34%
LEVEL 3
16
20%
LEVEL 4
8
10%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 40
LEVEL 1
18
45%
LEVEL 2
16
40%
LEVEL 3
6
15%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 42
LEVEL 1
12
29%
LEVEL 2
12
29%
LEVEL 3
10
24%
LEVEL 4
8
19%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 82
LEVEL 1
30
37%
LEVEL 2
28
34%
LEVEL 3
16
20%
LEVEL 4
8
10%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
82
69
13
2
79
1
82
41
41
82
40
42
82
PROFICIENT
29%
33%
8%
_%
_%
_%
29%
34%
24%
29%
15%
43%
29%
LEVEL 1
30
37%
22
32%
8
62%
_
_
_
_
_
_
30
37%
13
32%
17
41%
30
37%
18
45%
12
29%
30
37%
LEVEL 2
28
34%
24
35%
4
31%
_
_
_
_
_
_
28
34%
14
34%
14
34%
28
34%
16
40%
12
29%
28
34%
LEVEL 3
16
20%
16
23%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
16
20%
8
20%
8
20%
16
20%
6
15%
10
24%
16
20%
LEVEL 4
8
10%
7
10%
1
8%
_
_
_
_
_
_
8
10%
6
15%
2
5%
8
10%
0
0%
8
19%
8
10%
Grade 5 English Language Arts
MEAN SCORE: 307
All Students
PROFICIENT
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 66
LEVEL 1
12
18%
LEVEL 2
36
55%
LEVEL 3
13
20%
LEVEL 4
5
8%
General Education
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 65
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 61
LEVEL 1
12
20%
LEVEL 2
32
52%
LEVEL 3
12
20%
LEVEL 4
5
8%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
4
80%
LEVEL 3
1
20%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Female
PROFICIENT
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 35
LEVEL 1
10
29%
LEVEL 2
17
49%
LEVEL 3
7
20%
LEVEL 4
1
3%
Male
PROFICIENT
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 31
LEVEL 1
2
6%
LEVEL 2
19
61%
LEVEL 3
6
19%
LEVEL 4
4
13%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 66
LEVEL 1
12
18%
LEVEL 2
36
55%
LEVEL 3
13
20%
LEVEL 4
5
8%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 26
LEVEL 1
4
15%
LEVEL 2
18
69%
LEVEL 3
3
12%
LEVEL 4
1
4%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 40
LEVEL 1
8
20%
LEVEL 2
18
45%
LEVEL 3
10
25%
LEVEL 4
4
10%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 66
LEVEL 1
12
18%
LEVEL 2
36
55%
LEVEL 3
13
20%
LEVEL 4
5
8%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
66
65
1
1
61
4
5
35
31
66
26
40
66
PROFICIENT
27%
_%
_%
_%
28%
_%
20%
23%
32%
27%
15%
35%
27%
LEVEL 1
12
18%
_
_
_
_
_
_
12
20%
_
_
0
0%
10
29%
2
6%
12
18%
4
15%
8
20%
12
18%
LEVEL 2
36
55%
_
_
_
_
_
_
32
52%
_
_
4
80%
17
49%
19
61%
36
55%
18
69%
18
45%
36
55%
LEVEL 3
13
20%
_
_
_
_
_
_
12
20%
_
_
1
20%
7
20%
6
19%
13
20%
3
12%
10
25%
13
20%
LEVEL 4
5
8%
_
_
_
_
_
_
5
8%
_
_
0
0%
1
3%
4
13%
5
8%
1
4%
4
10%
5
8%
Grade 6 English Language Arts
MEAN SCORE: 295
All Students
PROFICIENT
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 56
LEVEL 1
28
50%
LEVEL 2
15
27%
LEVEL 3
6
11%
LEVEL 4
7
13%
General Education
PROFICIENT
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 44
LEVEL 1
18
41%
LEVEL 2
13
30%
LEVEL 3
6
14%
LEVEL 4
7
16%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 12
LEVEL 1
10
83%
LEVEL 2
2
17%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 55
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 56
LEVEL 1
28
50%
LEVEL 2
15
27%
LEVEL 3
6
11%
LEVEL 4
7
13%
Female
PROFICIENT
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 25
LEVEL 1
13
52%
LEVEL 2
5
20%
LEVEL 3
4
16%
LEVEL 4
3
12%
Male
PROFICIENT
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 31
LEVEL 1
15
48%
LEVEL 2
10
32%
LEVEL 3
2
6%
LEVEL 4
4
13%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 56
LEVEL 1
28
50%
LEVEL 2
15
27%
LEVEL 3
6
11%
LEVEL 4
7
13%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 23
LEVEL 1
13
57%
LEVEL 2
5
22%
LEVEL 3
1
4%
LEVEL 4
4
17%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 33
LEVEL 1
15
45%
LEVEL 2
10
30%
LEVEL 3
5
15%
LEVEL 4
3
9%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 56
LEVEL 1
28
50%
LEVEL 2
15
27%
LEVEL 3
6
11%
LEVEL 4
7
13%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
56
44
12
1
55
56
25
31
56
23
33
56
PROFICIENT
23%
30%
0%
_%
_%
23%
28%
19%
23%
22%
24%
23%
LEVEL 1
28
50%
18
41%
10
83%
_
_
_
_
28
50%
13
52%
15
48%
28
50%
13
57%
15
45%
28
50%
LEVEL 2
15
27%
13
30%
2
17%
_
_
_
_
15
27%
5
20%
10
32%
15
27%
5
22%
10
30%
15
27%
LEVEL 3
6
11%
6
14%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
6
11%
4
16%
2
6%
6
11%
1
4%
5
15%
6
11%
LEVEL 4
7
13%
7
16%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
7
13%
3
12%
4
13%
7
13%
4
17%
3
9%
7
13%
Grade 7 English Language Arts
MEAN SCORE: 313
All Students
PROFICIENT
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 44
LEVEL 1
6
14%
LEVEL 2
20
45%
LEVEL 3
9
20%
LEVEL 4
9
20%
General Education
PROFICIENT
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 38
LEVEL 1
3
8%
LEVEL 2
18
47%
LEVEL 3
8
21%
LEVEL 4
9
24%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
3
50%
LEVEL 2
2
33%
LEVEL 3
1
17%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 43
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 44
LEVEL 1
6
14%
LEVEL 2
20
45%
LEVEL 3
9
20%
LEVEL 4
9
20%
Female
PROFICIENT
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 19
LEVEL 1
1
5%
LEVEL 2
7
37%
LEVEL 3
4
21%
LEVEL 4
7
37%
Male
PROFICIENT
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 25
LEVEL 1
5
20%
LEVEL 2
13
52%
LEVEL 3
5
20%
LEVEL 4
2
8%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 44
LEVEL 1
6
14%
LEVEL 2
20
45%
LEVEL 3
9
20%
LEVEL 4
9
20%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 17
LEVEL 1
4
24%
LEVEL 2
11
65%
LEVEL 3
2
12%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 27
LEVEL 1
2
7%
LEVEL 2
9
33%
LEVEL 3
7
26%
LEVEL 4
9
33%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 44
LEVEL 1
6
14%
LEVEL 2
20
45%
LEVEL 3
9
20%
LEVEL 4
9
20%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
44
38
6
1
43
44
19
25
44
17
27
44
PROFICIENT
41%
45%
17%
_%
_%
41%
58%
28%
41%
12%
59%
41%
LEVEL 1
6
14%
3
8%
3
50%
_
_
_
_
6
14%
1
5%
5
20%
6
14%
4
24%
2
7%
6
14%
LEVEL 2
20
45%
18
47%
2
33%
_
_
_
_
20
45%
7
37%
13
52%
20
45%
11
65%
9
33%
20
45%
LEVEL 3
9
20%
8
21%
1
17%
_
_
_
_
9
20%
4
21%
5
20%
9
20%
2
12%
7
26%
9
20%
LEVEL 4
9
20%
9
24%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
9
20%
7
37%
2
8%
9
20%
0
0%
9
33%
9
20%
Grade 8 English Language Arts
MEAN SCORE: 310
All Students
PROFICIENT
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 51
LEVEL 1
9
18%
LEVEL 2
18
35%
LEVEL 3
15
29%
LEVEL 4
9
18%
General Education
PROFICIENT
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 44
LEVEL 1
7
16%
LEVEL 2
15
34%
LEVEL 3
14
32%
LEVEL 4
8
18%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7
LEVEL 1
2
29%
LEVEL 2
3
43%
LEVEL 3
1
14%
LEVEL 4
1
14%
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 48
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 51
LEVEL 1
9
18%
LEVEL 2
18
35%
LEVEL 3
15
29%
LEVEL 4
9
18%
Female
PROFICIENT
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 22
LEVEL 1
3
14%
LEVEL 2
7
32%
LEVEL 3
8
36%
LEVEL 4
4
18%
Male
PROFICIENT
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 29
LEVEL 1
6
21%
LEVEL 2
11
38%
LEVEL 3
7
24%
LEVEL 4
5
17%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 51
LEVEL 1
9
18%
LEVEL 2
18
35%
LEVEL 3
15
29%
LEVEL 4
9
18%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 21
LEVEL 1
9
43%
LEVEL 2
7
33%
LEVEL 3
3
14%
LEVEL 4
2
10%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 30
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
11
37%
LEVEL 3
12
40%
LEVEL 4
7
23%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 51
LEVEL 1
9
18%
LEVEL 2
18
35%
LEVEL 3
15
29%
LEVEL 4
9
18%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
51
44
7
1
2
48
51
22
29
51
21
30
51
PROFICIENT
47%
50%
29%
_%
_%
_%
47%
55%
41%
47%
24%
63%
47%
LEVEL 1
9
18%
7
16%
2
29%
_
_
_
_
_
_
9
18%
3
14%
6
21%
9
18%
9
43%
0
0%
9
18%
LEVEL 2
18
35%
15
34%
3
43%
_
_
_
_
_
_
18
35%
7
32%
11
38%
18
35%
7
33%
11
37%
18
35%
LEVEL 3
15
29%
14
32%
1
14%
_
_
_
_
_
_
15
29%
8
36%
7
24%
15
29%
3
14%
12
40%
15
29%
LEVEL 4
9
18%
8
18%
1
14%
_
_
_
_
_
_
9
18%
4
18%
5
17%
9
18%
2
10%
7
23%
9
18%
Grade 3 Mathematics
MEAN SCORE: 309
All Students
PROFICIENT
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 82
LEVEL 1
22
27%
LEVEL 2
19
23%
LEVEL 3
15
18%
LEVEL 4
26
32%
General Education
PROFICIENT
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 71
LEVEL 1
11
15%
LEVEL 2
19
27%
LEVEL 3
15
21%
LEVEL 4
26
37%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 11
LEVEL 1
11
100%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 79
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 82
LEVEL 1
22
27%
LEVEL 2
19
23%
LEVEL 3
15
18%
LEVEL 4
26
32%
Female
PROFICIENT
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 30
LEVEL 1
3
10%
LEVEL 2
10
33%
LEVEL 3
7
23%
LEVEL 4
10
33%
Male
PROFICIENT
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 52
LEVEL 1
19
37%
LEVEL 2
9
17%
LEVEL 3
8
15%
LEVEL 4
16
31%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 82
LEVEL 1
22
27%
LEVEL 2
19
23%
LEVEL 3
15
18%
LEVEL 4
26
32%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 34
LEVEL 1
16
47%
LEVEL 2
9
26%
LEVEL 3
1
3%
LEVEL 4
8
24%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 48
LEVEL 1
6
13%
LEVEL 2
10
21%
LEVEL 3
14
29%
LEVEL 4
18
38%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 82
LEVEL 1
22
27%
LEVEL 2
19
23%
LEVEL 3
15
18%
LEVEL 4
26
32%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
82
71
11
1
2
79
82
30
52
82
34
48
82
PROFICIENT
50%
58%
0%
_%
_%
_%
50%
57%
46%
50%
26%
67%
50%
LEVEL 1
22
27%
11
15%
11
100%
_
_
_
_
_
_
22
27%
3
10%
19
37%
22
27%
16
47%
6
13%
22
27%
LEVEL 2
19
23%
19
27%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
19
23%
10
33%
9
17%
19
23%
9
26%
10
21%
19
23%
LEVEL 3
15
18%
15
21%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
15
18%
7
23%
8
15%
15
18%
1
3%
14
29%
15
18%
LEVEL 4
26
32%
26
37%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
26
32%
10
33%
16
31%
26
32%
8
24%
18
38%
26
32%
Grade 4 Mathematics
MEAN SCORE: 296
All Students
PROFICIENT
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 78
LEVEL 1
23
29%
LEVEL 2
31
40%
LEVEL 3
13
17%
LEVEL 4
11
14%
General Education
PROFICIENT
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 66
LEVEL 1
15
23%
LEVEL 2
27
41%
LEVEL 3
13
20%
LEVEL 4
11
17%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 12
LEVEL 1
8
67%
LEVEL 2
4
33%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 75
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 78
LEVEL 1
23
29%
LEVEL 2
31
40%
LEVEL 3
13
17%
LEVEL 4
11
14%
Female
PROFICIENT
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 40
LEVEL 1
12
30%
LEVEL 2
19
48%
LEVEL 3
4
10%
LEVEL 4
5
13%
Male
PROFICIENT
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 38
LEVEL 1
11
29%
LEVEL 2
12
32%
LEVEL 3
9
24%
LEVEL 4
6
16%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 78
LEVEL 1
23
29%
LEVEL 2
31
40%
LEVEL 3
13
17%
LEVEL 4
11
14%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 35
LEVEL 1
14
40%
LEVEL 2
13
37%
LEVEL 3
6
17%
LEVEL 4
2
6%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 43
LEVEL 1
9
21%
LEVEL 2
18
42%
LEVEL 3
7
16%
LEVEL 4
9
21%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 78
LEVEL 1
23
29%
LEVEL 2
31
40%
LEVEL 3
13
17%
LEVEL 4
11
14%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
78
66
12
2
75
1
78
40
38
78
35
43
78
PROFICIENT
31%
36%
0%
_%
_%
_%
31%
23%
39%
31%
23%
37%
31%
LEVEL 1
23
29%
15
23%
8
67%
_
_
_
_
_
_
23
29%
12
30%
11
29%
23
29%
14
40%
9
21%
23
29%
LEVEL 2
31
40%
27
41%
4
33%
_
_
_
_
_
_
31
40%
19
48%
12
32%
31
40%
13
37%
18
42%
31
40%
LEVEL 3
13
17%
13
20%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
13
17%
4
10%
9
24%
13
17%
6
17%
7
16%
13
17%
LEVEL 4
11
14%
11
17%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
11
14%
5
13%
6
16%
11
14%
2
6%
9
21%
11
14%
Grade 5 Mathematics
MEAN SCORE: 309
All Students
PROFICIENT
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 66
LEVEL 1
13
20%
LEVEL 2
24
36%
LEVEL 3
24
36%
LEVEL 4
5
8%
General Education
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 63
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 61
LEVEL 1
11
18%
LEVEL 2
23
38%
LEVEL 3
22
36%
LEVEL 4
5
8%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
2
40%
LEVEL 2
1
20%
LEVEL 3
2
40%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Female
PROFICIENT
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 35
LEVEL 1
9
26%
LEVEL 2
14
40%
LEVEL 3
11
31%
LEVEL 4
1
3%
Male
PROFICIENT
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 31
LEVEL 1
4
13%
LEVEL 2
10
32%
LEVEL 3
13
42%
LEVEL 4
4
13%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 66
LEVEL 1
13
20%
LEVEL 2
24
36%
LEVEL 3
24
36%
LEVEL 4
5
8%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 28
LEVEL 1
6
21%
LEVEL 2
11
39%
LEVEL 3
10
36%
LEVEL 4
1
4%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 38
LEVEL 1
7
18%
LEVEL 2
13
34%
LEVEL 3
14
37%
LEVEL 4
4
11%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 66
LEVEL 1
13
20%
LEVEL 2
24
36%
LEVEL 3
24
36%
LEVEL 4
5
8%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
66
63
3
1
61
4
5
35
31
66
28
38
66
PROFICIENT
44%
_%
_%
_%
44%
_%
40%
34%
55%
44%
39%
47%
44%
LEVEL 1
13
20%
_
_
_
_
_
_
11
18%
_
_
2
40%
9
26%
4
13%
13
20%
6
21%
7
18%
13
20%
LEVEL 2
24
36%
_
_
_
_
_
_
23
38%
_
_
1
20%
14
40%
10
32%
24
36%
11
39%
13
34%
24
36%
LEVEL 3
24
36%
_
_
_
_
_
_
22
36%
_
_
2
40%
11
31%
13
42%
24
36%
10
36%
14
37%
24
36%
LEVEL 4
5
8%
_
_
_
_
_
_
5
8%
_
_
0
0%
1
3%
4
13%
5
8%
1
4%
4
11%
5
8%
Grade 6 Mathematics
MEAN SCORE: 291
All Students
PROFICIENT
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 61
LEVEL 1
20
33%
LEVEL 2
25
41%
LEVEL 3
10
16%
LEVEL 4
6
10%
General Education
PROFICIENT
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 49
LEVEL 1
9
18%
LEVEL 2
24
49%
LEVEL 3
10
20%
LEVEL 4
6
12%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 12
LEVEL 1
11
92%
LEVEL 2
1
8%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 60
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 61
LEVEL 1
20
33%
LEVEL 2
25
41%
LEVEL 3
10
16%
LEVEL 4
6
10%
Female
PROFICIENT
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 28
LEVEL 1
9
32%
LEVEL 2
13
46%
LEVEL 3
6
21%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Male
PROFICIENT
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 33
LEVEL 1
11
33%
LEVEL 2
12
36%
LEVEL 3
4
12%
LEVEL 4
6
18%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 61
LEVEL 1
20
33%
LEVEL 2
25
41%
LEVEL 3
10
16%
LEVEL 4
6
10%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 26
LEVEL 1
12
46%
LEVEL 2
9
35%
LEVEL 3
3
12%
LEVEL 4
2
8%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 35
LEVEL 1
8
23%
LEVEL 2
16
46%
LEVEL 3
7
20%
LEVEL 4
4
11%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 61
LEVEL 1
20
33%
LEVEL 2
25
41%
LEVEL 3
10
16%
LEVEL 4
6
10%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
61
49
12
1
60
61
28
33
61
26
35
61
PROFICIENT
26%
33%
0%
_%
_%
26%
21%
30%
26%
19%
31%
26%
LEVEL 1
20
33%
9
18%
11
92%
_
_
_
_
20
33%
9
32%
11
33%
20
33%
12
46%
8
23%
20
33%
LEVEL 2
25
41%
24
49%
1
8%
_
_
_
_
25
41%
13
46%
12
36%
25
41%
9
35%
16
46%
25
41%
LEVEL 3
10
16%
10
20%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
10
16%
6
21%
4
12%
10
16%
3
12%
7
20%
10
16%
LEVEL 4
6
10%
6
12%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
6
10%
0
0%
6
18%
6
10%
2
8%
4
11%
6
10%
Grade 7 Mathematics
Mean scores and data in the table for grade 7 math include only those for grade 7 students who took the Grade 7 New York State Testing Program Assessment (NYSTP) in Mathematics. For 2015 and forward, data in the bar charts include those for grade 7 students who took the Grade 7 NYSTP in Mathematics and grade 7 students who took a Regents math test in lieu of the NYSTP. For 2014 and earlier, data in the bar charts include only those for grade 7 students who took the Grade 7 NYSTP.
MEAN SCORE: 303
All Students
PROFICIENT
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 44
LEVEL 1
17
39%
LEVEL 2
11
25%
LEVEL 3
11
25%
LEVEL 4
5
11%
General Education
PROFICIENT
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 38
LEVEL 1
11
29%
LEVEL 2
11
29%
LEVEL 3
11
29%
LEVEL 4
5
13%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
6
100%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 43
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 44
LEVEL 1
17
39%
LEVEL 2
11
25%
LEVEL 3
11
25%
LEVEL 4
5
11%
Female
PROFICIENT
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 19
LEVEL 1
6
32%
LEVEL 2
4
21%
LEVEL 3
7
37%
LEVEL 4
2
11%
Male
PROFICIENT
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 25
LEVEL 1
11
44%
LEVEL 2
7
28%
LEVEL 3
4
16%
LEVEL 4
3
12%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 44
LEVEL 1
17
39%
LEVEL 2
11
25%
LEVEL 3
11
25%
LEVEL 4
5
11%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 17
LEVEL 1
10
59%
LEVEL 2
6
35%
LEVEL 3
1
6%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 27
LEVEL 1
7
26%
LEVEL 2
5
19%
LEVEL 3
10
37%
LEVEL 4
5
19%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 44
LEVEL 1
17
39%
LEVEL 2
11
25%
LEVEL 3
11
25%
LEVEL 4
5
11%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
44
38
6
1
43
44
19
25
44
17
27
44
PROFICIENT
36%
42%
0%
_%
_%
36%
47%
28%
36%
6%
56%
36%
LEVEL 1
17
39%
11
29%
6
100%
_
_
_
_
17
39%
6
32%
11
44%
17
39%
10
59%
7
26%
17
39%
LEVEL 2
11
25%
11
29%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
11
25%
4
21%
7
28%
11
25%
6
35%
5
19%
11
25%
LEVEL 3
11
25%
11
29%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
11
25%
7
37%
4
16%
11
25%
1
6%
10
37%
11
25%
LEVEL 4
5
11%
5
13%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
5
11%
2
11%
3
12%
5
11%
0
0%
5
19%
5
11%
Grade 8 Mathematics
Mean scores and data in the table for grade 8 math include only those for grade 8 students who took the Grade 8 New York State Testing Program Assessment (NYSTP) in Mathematics. For 2015 and forward, data in the bar charts include those for grade 8 students who took the Grade 8 NYSTP in Mathematics and grade 8 students who took a Regents math test in lieu of the NYSTP. For 2014 and earlier, data in the bar charts include only those for grade 8 students who took the Grade 8 NYSTP.
MEAN SCORE: 284
All Students
PROFICIENT
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 38
LEVEL 1
15
39%
LEVEL 2
22
58%
LEVEL 3
1
3%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
General Education
PROFICIENT
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 31
LEVEL 1
11
35%
LEVEL 2
19
61%
LEVEL 3
1
3%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 7
LEVEL 1
4
57%
LEVEL 2
3
43%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 36
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 38
LEVEL 1
15
39%
LEVEL 2
22
58%
LEVEL 3
1
3%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Female
PROFICIENT
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 14
LEVEL 1
6
43%
LEVEL 2
7
50%
LEVEL 3
1
7%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Male
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 24
LEVEL 1
9
38%
LEVEL 2
15
63%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 38
LEVEL 1
15
39%
LEVEL 2
22
58%
LEVEL 3
1
3%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 20
LEVEL 1
12
60%
LEVEL 2
8
40%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 18
LEVEL 1
3
17%
LEVEL 2
14
78%
LEVEL 3
1
6%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 38
LEVEL 1
15
39%
LEVEL 2
22
58%
LEVEL 3
1
3%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
38
31
7
1
1
36
38
14
24
38
20
18
38
PROFICIENT
3%
3%
0%
_%
_%
_%
3%
7%
0%
3%
0%
6%
3%
LEVEL 1
15
39%
11
35%
4
57%
_
_
_
_
_
_
15
39%
6
43%
9
38%
15
39%
12
60%
3
17%
15
39%
LEVEL 2
22
58%
19
61%
3
43%
_
_
_
_
_
_
22
58%
7
50%
15
63%
22
58%
8
40%
14
78%
22
58%
LEVEL 3
1
3%
1
3%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
1
3%
1
7%
0
0%
1
3%
0
0%
1
6%
1
3%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
Grade 8 Students Taking a Regents Math Test
Accelerated grade 8 students who took a Regents math test in lieu of the Grade 8 NYSTP in Mathematics.
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 13
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4 AND ABOVE
13
100%
LEVEL 3 AND ABOVE
13
100%
GROUP
All Students
TOTAL TESTED
13
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
4 & ABOVE
13
100%
3 & ABOVE
13
100%
Grade 4 Science
MEAN SCORE: 82
All Students
PROFICIENT
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 85
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
5
6%
LEVEL 3
40
47%
LEVEL 4
40
47%
General Education
PROFICIENT
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 73
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
3%
LEVEL 3
32
44%
LEVEL 4
39
53%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 12
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
3
25%
LEVEL 3
8
67%
LEVEL 4
1
8%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 82
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 85
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
5
6%
LEVEL 3
40
47%
LEVEL 4
40
47%
Female
PROFICIENT
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 44
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
5%
LEVEL 3
22
50%
LEVEL 4
20
45%
Male
PROFICIENT
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 41
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
3
7%
LEVEL 3
18
44%
LEVEL 4
20
49%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 85
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
5
6%
LEVEL 3
40
47%
LEVEL 4
40
47%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 40
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
5%
LEVEL 3
23
58%
LEVEL 4
15
38%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 45
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
3
7%
LEVEL 3
17
38%
LEVEL 4
25
56%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 85
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
5
6%
LEVEL 3
40
47%
LEVEL 4
40
47%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
85
73
12
2
82
1
85
44
41
85
40
45
85
PROFICIENT
94%
97%
75%
_%
_%
_%
94%
95%
93%
94%
95%
93%
94%
LEVEL 1
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
LEVEL 2
5
6%
2
3%
3
25%
_
_
_
_
_
_
5
6%
2
5%
3
7%
5
6%
2
5%
3
7%
5
6%
LEVEL 3
40
47%
32
44%
8
67%
_
_
_
_
_
_
40
47%
22
50%
18
44%
40
47%
23
58%
17
38%
40
47%
LEVEL 4
40
47%
39
53%
1
8%
_
_
_
_
_
_
40
47%
20
45%
20
49%
40
47%
15
38%
25
56%
40
47%
Grade 8 Science
Data in the bar charts include those for grade 8 students who took the New York State Grade 8 Science Test and grade 8 students who took a Regents science test in lieu of this test. Mean scores and data in the table for grade 8 science include only those for grade 8 students who took the New York State Grade 8 Science Test.
MEAN SCORE: 81
All Students
PROFICIENT
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 104
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
5
5%
LEVEL 3
54
52%
LEVEL 4
44
42%
General Education
PROFICIENT
99%
TOTAL TESTED: 87
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
1%
LEVEL 3
44
51%
LEVEL 4
42
48%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 17
LEVEL 1
1
6%
LEVEL 2
4
24%
LEVEL 3
10
59%
LEVEL 4
2
12%
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 100
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 104
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
5
5%
LEVEL 3
54
52%
LEVEL 4
44
42%
Female
PROFICIENT
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 51
LEVEL 1
1
2%
LEVEL 2
4
8%
LEVEL 3
26
51%
LEVEL 4
20
39%
Male
PROFICIENT
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 53
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
2%
LEVEL 3
28
53%
LEVEL 4
24
45%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 104
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
5
5%
LEVEL 3
54
52%
LEVEL 4
44
42%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 41
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
5
12%
LEVEL 3
23
56%
LEVEL 4
13
32%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 63
LEVEL 1
1
2%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
31
49%
LEVEL 4
31
49%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 104
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
5
5%
LEVEL 3
54
52%
LEVEL 4
44
42%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
104
87
17
2
2
100
104
51
53
104
41
63
104
PROFICIENT
94%
99%
71%
_%
_%
_%
94%
90%
98%
94%
88%
98%
94%
LEVEL 1
1
1%
0
0%
1
6%
_
_
_
_
_
_
1
1%
1
2%
0
0%
1
1%
0
0%
1
2%
1
1%
LEVEL 2
5
5%
1
1%
4
24%
_
_
_
_
_
_
5
5%
4
8%
1
2%
5
5%
5
12%
0
0%
5
5%
LEVEL 3
54
52%
44
51%
10
59%
_
_
_
_
_
_
54
52%
26
51%
28
53%
54
52%
23
56%
31
49%
54
52%
LEVEL 4
44
42%
42
48%
2
12%
_
_
_
_
_
_
44
42%
20
39%
24
45%
44
42%
13
32%
31
49%
44
42%
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level English Language Arts after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 104
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
8
8%
LEVEL 3
18
17%
LEVEL 4
67
64%
General Education
PROFICIENT
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 84
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
2%
LEVEL 3
13
15%
LEVEL 4
67
80%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 20
LEVEL 1
1
5%
LEVEL 2
6
30%
LEVEL 3
5
25%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 102
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 104
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
8
8%
LEVEL 3
18
17%
LEVEL 4
67
64%
Female
PROFICIENT
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 58
LEVEL 1
1
2%
LEVEL 2
4
7%
LEVEL 3
9
16%
LEVEL 4
40
69%
Male
PROFICIENT
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 46
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
4
9%
LEVEL 3
9
20%
LEVEL 4
27
59%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 104
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
8
8%
LEVEL 3
18
17%
LEVEL 4
67
64%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 43
LEVEL 1
1
2%
LEVEL 2
4
9%
LEVEL 3
10
23%
LEVEL 4
21
49%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 61
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
4
7%
LEVEL 3
8
13%
LEVEL 4
46
75%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 104
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
8
8%
LEVEL 3
18
17%
LEVEL 4
67
64%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
104
84
20
1
102
1
104
58
46
104
43
61
104
PROFICIENT
82%
95%
25%
_%
_%
_%
82%
84%
78%
82%
72%
89%
82%
LEVEL 1
1
1%
0
0%
1
5%
_
_
_
_
_
_
1
1%
1
2%
0
0%
1
1%
1
2%
0
0%
1
1%
LEVEL 2
8
8%
2
2%
6
30%
_
_
_
_
_
_
8
8%
4
7%
4
9%
8
8%
4
9%
4
7%
8
8%
LEVEL 3
18
17%
13
15%
5
25%
_
_
_
_
_
_
18
17%
9
16%
9
20%
18
17%
10
23%
8
13%
18
17%
LEVEL 4
67
64%
67
80%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
67
64%
40
69%
27
59%
67
64%
21
49%
46
75%
67
64%
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level Mathematics after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 104
LEVEL 1
3
3%
LEVEL 2
8
8%
LEVEL 3
45
43%
LEVEL 4
40
38%
General Education
PROFICIENT
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 84
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
1%
LEVEL 3
41
49%
LEVEL 4
40
48%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 20
LEVEL 1
3
15%
LEVEL 2
7
35%
LEVEL 3
4
20%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 102
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 104
LEVEL 1
3
3%
LEVEL 2
8
8%
LEVEL 3
45
43%
LEVEL 4
40
38%
Female
PROFICIENT
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 58
LEVEL 1
2
3%
LEVEL 2
3
5%
LEVEL 3
30
52%
LEVEL 4
20
34%
Male
PROFICIENT
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 46
LEVEL 1
1
2%
LEVEL 2
5
11%
LEVEL 3
15
33%
LEVEL 4
20
43%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 104
LEVEL 1
3
3%
LEVEL 2
8
8%
LEVEL 3
45
43%
LEVEL 4
40
38%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 43
LEVEL 1
3
7%
LEVEL 2
4
9%
LEVEL 3
19
44%
LEVEL 4
12
28%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 61
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
4
7%
LEVEL 3
26
43%
LEVEL 4
28
46%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 104
LEVEL 1
3
3%
LEVEL 2
8
8%
LEVEL 3
45
43%
LEVEL 4
40
38%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
104
84
20
1
102
1
104
58
46
104
43
61
104
PROFICIENT
82%
96%
20%
_%
_%
_%
82%
86%
76%
82%
72%
89%
82%
LEVEL 1
3
3%
0
0%
3
15%
_
_
_
_
_
_
3
3%
2
3%
1
2%
3
3%
3
7%
0
0%
3
3%
LEVEL 2
8
8%
1
1%
7
35%
_
_
_
_
_
_
8
8%
3
5%
5
11%
8
8%
4
9%
4
7%
8
8%
LEVEL 3
45
43%
41
49%
4
20%
_
_
_
_
_
_
45
43%
30
52%
15
33%
45
43%
19
44%
26
43%
45
43%
LEVEL 4
40
38%
40
48%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
40
38%
20
34%
20
43%
40
38%
12
28%
28
46%
40
38%
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level Global History and Geography after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 104
LEVEL 1
3
3%
LEVEL 2
9
9%
LEVEL 3
41
39%
LEVEL 4
46
44%
General Education
PROFICIENT
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 84
LEVEL 1
2
2%
LEVEL 2
1
1%
LEVEL 3
37
44%
LEVEL 4
43
51%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 20
LEVEL 1
1
5%
LEVEL 2
8
40%
LEVEL 3
4
20%
LEVEL 4
3
15%
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 102
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 104
LEVEL 1
3
3%
LEVEL 2
9
9%
LEVEL 3
41
39%
LEVEL 4
46
44%
Female
PROFICIENT
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 58
LEVEL 1
2
3%
LEVEL 2
6
10%
LEVEL 3
27
47%
LEVEL 4
21
36%
Male
PROFICIENT
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 46
LEVEL 1
1
2%
LEVEL 2
3
7%
LEVEL 3
14
30%
LEVEL 4
25
54%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 104
LEVEL 1
3
3%
LEVEL 2
9
9%
LEVEL 3
41
39%
LEVEL 4
46
44%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 43
LEVEL 1
2
5%
LEVEL 2
5
12%
LEVEL 3
17
40%
LEVEL 4
16
37%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 61
LEVEL 1
1
2%
LEVEL 2
4
7%
LEVEL 3
24
39%
LEVEL 4
30
49%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 104
LEVEL 1
3
3%
LEVEL 2
9
9%
LEVEL 3
41
39%
LEVEL 4
46
44%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
104
84
20
1
102
1
104
58
46
104
43
61
104
PROFICIENT
84%
95%
35%
_%
_%
_%
84%
83%
85%
84%
77%
89%
84%
LEVEL 1
3
3%
2
2%
1
5%
_
_
_
_
_
_
3
3%
2
3%
1
2%
3
3%
2
5%
1
2%
3
3%
LEVEL 2
9
9%
1
1%
8
40%
_
_
_
_
_
_
9
9%
6
10%
3
7%
9
9%
5
12%
4
7%
9
9%
LEVEL 3
41
39%
37
44%
4
20%
_
_
_
_
_
_
41
39%
27
47%
14
30%
41
39%
17
40%
24
39%
41
39%
LEVEL 4
46
44%
43
51%
3
15%
_
_
_
_
_
_
46
44%
21
36%
25
54%
46
44%
16
37%
30
49%
46
44%
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level U.S. History and Government after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 104
LEVEL 1
3
3%
LEVEL 2
6
6%
LEVEL 3
38
37%
LEVEL 4
47
45%
General Education
PROFICIENT
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 84
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
1%
LEVEL 3
35
42%
LEVEL 4
46
55%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 20
LEVEL 1
3
15%
LEVEL 2
5
25%
LEVEL 3
3
15%
LEVEL 4
1
5%
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 102
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 104
LEVEL 1
3
3%
LEVEL 2
6
6%
LEVEL 3
38
37%
LEVEL 4
47
45%
Female
PROFICIENT
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 58
LEVEL 1
1
2%
LEVEL 2
5
9%
LEVEL 3
24
41%
LEVEL 4
24
41%
Male
PROFICIENT
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 46
LEVEL 1
2
4%
LEVEL 2
1
2%
LEVEL 3
14
30%
LEVEL 4
23
50%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 104
LEVEL 1
3
3%
LEVEL 2
6
6%
LEVEL 3
38
37%
LEVEL 4
47
45%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 43
LEVEL 1
2
5%
LEVEL 2
4
9%
LEVEL 3
17
40%
LEVEL 4
13
30%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 61
LEVEL 1
1
2%
LEVEL 2
2
3%
LEVEL 3
21
34%
LEVEL 4
34
56%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 104
LEVEL 1
3
3%
LEVEL 2
6
6%
LEVEL 3
38
37%
LEVEL 4
47
45%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
104
84
20
1
102
1
104
58
46
104
43
61
104
PROFICIENT
82%
96%
20%
_%
_%
_%
82%
83%
80%
82%
70%
90%
82%
LEVEL 1
3
3%
0
0%
3
15%
_
_
_
_
_
_
3
3%
1
2%
2
4%
3
3%
2
5%
1
2%
3
3%
LEVEL 2
6
6%
1
1%
5
25%
_
_
_
_
_
_
6
6%
5
9%
1
2%
6
6%
4
9%
2
3%
6
6%
LEVEL 3
38
37%
35
42%
3
15%
_
_
_
_
_
_
38
37%
24
41%
14
30%
38
37%
17
40%
21
34%
38
37%
LEVEL 4
47
45%
46
55%
1
5%
_
_
_
_
_
_
47
45%
24
41%
23
50%
47
45%
13
30%
34
56%
47
45%
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level Science after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 104
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
7
7%
LEVEL 3
45
43%
LEVEL 4
44
42%
General Education
PROFICIENT
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 84
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
3
4%
LEVEL 3
36
43%
LEVEL 4
44
52%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 20
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
4
20%
LEVEL 3
9
45%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 102
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 104
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
7
7%
LEVEL 3
45
43%
LEVEL 4
44
42%
Female
PROFICIENT
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 58
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
4
7%
LEVEL 3
28
48%
LEVEL 4
22
38%
Male
PROFICIENT
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 46
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
3
7%
LEVEL 3
17
37%
LEVEL 4
22
48%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 104
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
7
7%
LEVEL 3
45
43%
LEVEL 4
44
42%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 43
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
5
12%
LEVEL 3
21
49%
LEVEL 4
12
28%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 61
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
3%
LEVEL 3
24
39%
LEVEL 4
32
52%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 104
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
7
7%
LEVEL 3
45
43%
LEVEL 4
44
42%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
104
84
20
1
102
1
104
58
46
104
43
61
104
PROFICIENT
86%
95%
45%
_%
_%
_%
86%
86%
85%
86%
77%
92%
86%
LEVEL 1
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
LEVEL 2
7
7%
3
4%
4
20%
_
_
_
_
_
_
7
7%
4
7%
3
7%
7
7%
5
12%
2
3%
7
7%
LEVEL 3
45
43%
36
43%
9
45%
_
_
_
_
_
_
45
43%
28
48%
17
37%
45
43%
21
49%
24
39%
45
43%
LEVEL 4
44
42%
44
52%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
44
42%
22
38%
22
48%
44
42%
12
28%
32
52%
44
42%
Regents Examination Results (2016 - 17)
English Language Arts (Common Core)
English Language Arts (Common Core)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
112
92
20
1
2
108
1
112
54
58
112
39
73
112
LEVEL 1
11
10%
1
1%
10
50%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
11
10%
2
4%
9
16%
11
10%
8
21%
3
4%
11
10%
LEVEL 2
4
4%
2
2%
2
10%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
4
4%
3
6%
1
2%
4
4%
2
5%
2
3%
4
4%
LEVEL 3
13
12%
10
11%
3
15%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
13
12%
4
7%
9
16%
13
12%
4
10%
9
12%
13
12%
LEVEL 4
19
17%
15
16%
4
20%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
19
17%
6
11%
13
22%
19
17%
10
26%
9
12%
19
17%
LEVEL 5
65
58%
64
70%
1
5%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
65
58%
39
72%
26
45%
65
58%
15
38%
50
68%
65
58%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 112
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
11
10%
LEVEL 2
4
4%
LEVEL 3
13
12%
LEVEL 4
19
17%
LEVEL 5
65
58%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 92
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
2
2%
LEVEL 3
10
11%
LEVEL 4
15
16%
LEVEL 5
64
70%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 20
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
10
50%
LEVEL 2
2
10%
LEVEL 3
3
15%
LEVEL 4
4
20%
LEVEL 5
1
5%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 108
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 112
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
11
10%
LEVEL 2
4
4%
LEVEL 3
13
12%
LEVEL 4
19
17%
LEVEL 5
65
58%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 54
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
2
4%
LEVEL 2
3
6%
LEVEL 3
4
7%
LEVEL 4
6
11%
LEVEL 5
39
72%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 58
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
9
16%
LEVEL 2
1
2%
LEVEL 3
9
16%
LEVEL 4
13
22%
LEVEL 5
26
45%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 112
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
11
10%
LEVEL 2
4
4%
LEVEL 3
13
12%
LEVEL 4
19
17%
LEVEL 5
65
58%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 39
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
8
21%
LEVEL 2
2
5%
LEVEL 3
4
10%
LEVEL 4
10
26%
LEVEL 5
15
38%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 73
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
3
4%
LEVEL 2
2
3%
LEVEL 3
9
12%
LEVEL 4
9
12%
LEVEL 5
50
68%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 112
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
11
10%
LEVEL 2
4
4%
LEVEL 3
13
12%
LEVEL 4
19
17%
LEVEL 5
65
58%
Algebra 2/Trigonometry
Regents Algebra 2/Trigonometry
GROUP
All Students
General Education
White
Small Group Total
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
55
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
65
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
85
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Algebra I (Common Core)
Algebra I (Common Core)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
121
94
27
1
1
118
1
121
55
66
121
47
74
121
LEVEL 1
9
7%
0
0%
9
33%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
9
7%
4
7%
5
8%
9
7%
7
15%
2
3%
9
7%
LEVEL 2
6
5%
0
0%
6
22%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
6
5%
1
2%
5
8%
6
5%
5
11%
1
1%
6
5%
LEVEL 3
34
28%
25
27%
9
33%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
34
28%
17
31%
17
26%
34
28%
19
40%
15
20%
34
28%
LEVEL 4
45
37%
43
46%
2
7%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
45
37%
17
31%
28
42%
45
37%
13
28%
32
43%
45
37%
LEVEL 5
27
22%
26
28%
1
4%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
27
22%
16
29%
11
17%
27
22%
3
6%
24
32%
27
22%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 121
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
9
7%
LEVEL 2
6
5%
LEVEL 3
34
28%
LEVEL 4
45
37%
LEVEL 5
27
22%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 94
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
25
27%
LEVEL 4
43
46%
LEVEL 5
26
28%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 27
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
9
33%
LEVEL 2
6
22%
LEVEL 3
9
33%
LEVEL 4
2
7%
LEVEL 5
1
4%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 118
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 121
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
9
7%
LEVEL 2
6
5%
LEVEL 3
34
28%
LEVEL 4
45
37%
LEVEL 5
27
22%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 55
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
4
7%
LEVEL 2
1
2%
LEVEL 3
17
31%
LEVEL 4
17
31%
LEVEL 5
16
29%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 66
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
5
8%
LEVEL 2
5
8%
LEVEL 3
17
26%
LEVEL 4
28
42%
LEVEL 5
11
17%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 121
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
9
7%
LEVEL 2
6
5%
LEVEL 3
34
28%
LEVEL 4
45
37%
LEVEL 5
27
22%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 47
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
7
15%
LEVEL 2
5
11%
LEVEL 3
19
40%
LEVEL 4
13
28%
LEVEL 5
3
6%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 74
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
2
3%
LEVEL 2
1
1%
LEVEL 3
15
20%
LEVEL 4
32
43%
LEVEL 5
24
32%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 121
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
9
7%
LEVEL 2
6
5%
LEVEL 3
34
28%
LEVEL 4
45
37%
LEVEL 5
27
22%
Common Core Geometry
Regents Common Core Geometry
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
39
39
1
1
37
39
23
16
39
7
32
39
LEVEL 1
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
LEVEL 3
15
38%
15
38%
_
_
_
_
_
_
15
38%
9
39%
6
38%
15
38%
4
57%
11
34%
15
38%
LEVEL 4
5
13%
5
13%
_
_
_
_
_
_
5
13%
2
9%
3
19%
5
13%
1
14%
4
13%
5
13%
LEVEL 5
19
49%
19
49%
_
_
_
_
_
_
19
49%
12
52%
7
44%
19
49%
2
29%
17
53%
19
49%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 39
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
15
38%
LEVEL 4
5
13%
LEVEL 5
19
49%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 39
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
15
38%
LEVEL 4
5
13%
LEVEL 5
19
49%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 37
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 39
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
15
38%
LEVEL 4
5
13%
LEVEL 5
19
49%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 23
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
9
39%
LEVEL 4
2
9%
LEVEL 5
12
52%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 16
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
6
38%
LEVEL 4
3
19%
LEVEL 5
7
44%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 39
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
15
38%
LEVEL 4
5
13%
LEVEL 5
19
49%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 7
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
4
57%
LEVEL 4
1
14%
LEVEL 5
2
29%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 32
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
11
34%
LEVEL 4
4
13%
LEVEL 5
17
53%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 39
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
15
38%
LEVEL 4
5
13%
LEVEL 5
19
49%
Algebra II (Common Core)
Algebra II (Common Core)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
66
65
1
1
1
64
66
46
20
66
17
49
66
LEVEL 1
2
3%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
2
3%
0
0%
2
10%
2
3%
1
6%
1
2%
2
3%
LEVEL 2
1
2%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
1
2%
1
2%
0
0%
1
2%
1
6%
0
0%
1
2%
LEVEL 3
19
29%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
19
29%
14
30%
5
25%
19
29%
5
29%
14
29%
19
29%
LEVEL 4
23
35%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
23
35%
18
39%
5
25%
23
35%
6
35%
17
35%
23
35%
LEVEL 5
21
32%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
21
32%
13
28%
8
40%
21
32%
4
24%
17
35%
21
32%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 66
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
2
3%
LEVEL 2
1
2%
LEVEL 3
19
29%
LEVEL 4
23
35%
LEVEL 5
21
32%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 65
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 64
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 66
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
2
3%
LEVEL 2
1
2%
LEVEL 3
19
29%
LEVEL 4
23
35%
LEVEL 5
21
32%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 46
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
2%
LEVEL 3
14
30%
LEVEL 4
18
39%
LEVEL 5
13
28%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 20
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
2
10%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
5
25%
LEVEL 4
5
25%
LEVEL 5
8
40%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 66
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
2
3%
LEVEL 2
1
2%
LEVEL 3
19
29%
LEVEL 4
23
35%
LEVEL 5
21
32%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 17
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
1
6%
LEVEL 2
1
6%
LEVEL 3
5
29%
LEVEL 4
6
35%
LEVEL 5
4
24%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 49
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
1
2%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
14
29%
LEVEL 4
17
35%
LEVEL 5
17
35%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 66
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
2
3%
LEVEL 2
1
2%
LEVEL 3
19
29%
LEVEL 4
23
35%
LEVEL 5
21
32%
Global History and Geography
Regents Global History and Geography
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
117
93
24
1
1
115
117
63
54
117
54
63
117
55
103
88%
90
97%
13
54%
_
_
_
_
_
_
103
88%
57
90%
46
85%
103
88%
43
80%
60
95%
103
88%
65
90
77%
82
88%
8
33%
_
_
_
_
_
_
90
77%
49
78%
41
76%
90
77%
34
63%
56
89%
90
77%
85
56
48%
53
57%
3
13%
_
_
_
_
_
_
56
48%
29
46%
27
50%
56
48%
18
33%
38
60%
56
48%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 117
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
103
88%
65
90
77%
85
56
48%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 93
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
90
97%
65
82
88%
85
53
57%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 24
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
13
54%
65
8
33%
85
3
13%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 115
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 117
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
103
88%
65
90
77%
85
56
48%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 63
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
57
90%
65
49
78%
85
29
46%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 54
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
46
85%
65
41
76%
85
27
50%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 117
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
103
88%
65
90
77%
85
56
48%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 54
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
43
80%
65
34
63%
85
18
33%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 63
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
60
95%
65
56
89%
85
38
60%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 117
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
103
88%
65
90
77%
85
56
48%
U.S. History & Government
Regents U.S. History & Government
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
114
93
21
1
1
1
110
1
114
57
57
114
40
74
114
55
109
96%
93
100%
16
76%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
109
96%
55
96%
54
95%
109
96%
37
93%
72
97%
109
96%
65
102
89%
92
99%
10
48%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
102
89%
52
91%
50
88%
102
89%
32
80%
70
95%
102
89%
85
72
63%
70
75%
2
10%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
72
63%
39
68%
33
58%
72
63%
16
40%
56
76%
72
63%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 114
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
109
96%
65
102
89%
85
72
63%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 93
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
93
100%
65
92
99%
85
70
75%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 21
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
16
76%
65
10
48%
85
2
10%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 110
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 114
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
109
96%
65
102
89%
85
72
63%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 57
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
55
96%
65
52
91%
85
39
68%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 57
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
54
95%
65
50
88%
85
33
58%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 114
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
109
96%
65
102
89%
85
72
63%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 40
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
37
93%
65
32
80%
85
16
40%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 74
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
72
97%
65
70
95%
85
56
76%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 114
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
109
96%
65
102
89%
85
72
63%
Living Environment
Regents Living Environment
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
102
89
13
1
1
100
102
55
47
102
41
61
102
55
101
99%
88
99%
13
100%
_
_
_
_
_
_
101
99%
55
100%
46
98%
101
99%
41
100%
60
98%
101
99%
65
93
91%
83
93%
10
77%
_
_
_
_
_
_
93
91%
50
91%
43
91%
93
91%
36
88%
57
93%
93
91%
85
31
30%
30
34%
1
8%
_
_
_
_
_
_
31
30%
18
33%
13
28%
31
30%
8
20%
23
38%
31
30%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 102
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
101
99%
65
93
91%
85
31
30%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 89
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
88
99%
65
83
93%
85
30
34%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 13
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
13
100%
65
10
77%
85
1
8%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 100
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 102
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
101
99%
65
93
91%
85
31
30%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 55
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
55
100%
65
50
91%
85
18
33%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 47
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
46
98%
65
43
91%
85
13
28%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 102
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
101
99%
65
93
91%
85
31
30%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 41
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
41
100%
65
36
88%
85
8
20%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 61
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
60
98%
65
57
93%
85
23
38%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 102
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
101
99%
65
93
91%
85
31
30%
Physical Setting/Earth Science
Regents Physical Setting/Earth Science
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
106
88
18
3
103
106
48
58
106
34
72
106
55
102
96%
87
99%
15
83%
_
_
_
_
102
96%
46
96%
56
97%
102
96%
32
94%
70
97%
102
96%
65
86
81%
76
86%
10
56%
_
_
_
_
86
81%
38
79%
48
83%
86
81%
24
71%
62
86%
86
81%
85
35
33%
33
38%
2
11%
_
_
_
_
35
33%
13
27%
22
38%
35
33%
4
12%
31
43%
35
33%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 106
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
102
96%
65
86
81%
85
35
33%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 88
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
87
99%
65
76
86%
85
33
38%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 18
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
15
83%
65
10
56%
85
2
11%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 103
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 106
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
102
96%
65
86
81%
85
35
33%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 48
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
46
96%
65
38
79%
85
13
27%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 58
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
56
97%
65
48
83%
85
22
38%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 106
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
102
96%
65
86
81%
85
35
33%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 34
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
32
94%
65
24
71%
85
4
12%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 72
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
70
97%
65
62
86%
85
31
43%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 106
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
102
96%
65
86
81%
85
35
33%
Physical Setting/Chemistry
Regents Physical Setting/Chemistry
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
83
82
1
1
1
81
83
56
27
83
19
64
83
55
82
99%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
82
99%
55
98%
27
100%
82
99%
18
95%
64
100%
82
99%
65
70
84%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
70
84%
46
82%
24
89%
70
84%
15
79%
55
86%
70
84%
85
24
29%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
24
29%
16
29%
8
30%
24
29%
6
32%
18
28%
24
29%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 83
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
82
99%
65
70
84%
85
24
29%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 82
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 81
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 83
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
82
99%
65
70
84%
85
24
29%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 56
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
55
98%
65
46
82%
85
16
29%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 27
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
27
100%
65
24
89%
85
8
30%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 83
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
82
99%
65
70
84%
85
24
29%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 19
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
18
95%
65
15
79%
85
6
32%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 64
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
64
100%
65
55
86%
85
18
28%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 83
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
82
99%
65
70
84%
85
24
29%
Physical Setting/Physics
Regents Physical Setting/Physics
GROUP
All Students
General Education
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
43
43
42
1
43
20
23
43
12
31
43
55
32
74%
32
74%
_
_
_
_
32
74%
15
75%
17
74%
32
74%
10
83%
22
71%
32
74%
65
26
60%
26
60%
_
_
_
_
26
60%
11
55%
15
65%
26
60%
10
83%
16
52%
26
60%
85
10
23%
10
23%
_
_
_
_
10
23%
3
15%
7
30%
10
23%
2
17%
8
26%
10
23%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 43
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
32
74%
65
26
60%
85
10
23%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 43
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
32
74%
65
26
60%
85
10
23%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 42
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 43
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
32
74%
65
26
60%
85
10
23%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 20
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
15
75%
65
11
55%
85
3
15%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 23
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
17
74%
65
15
65%
85
7
30%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 43
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
32
74%
65
26
60%
85
10
23%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 12
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
10
83%
65
10
83%
85
2
17%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 31
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
22
71%
65
16
52%
85
8
26%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 43
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
32
74%
65
26
60%
85
10
23%
New York State Alternate Assessment (NYSAA) Results (2016 - 17)
GROUP
Grade 5 ELA
Grade 5 Math
Grade 6 ELA
Grade 6 Math
Grade 7 ELA
Grade 7 Math
Grade 8 ELA
Grade 8 Math
Grade 8 Science
Secondary-Level ELA
Secondary-Level Math
Secondary-Level Science
Secondary-Level Social Studies
TOTAL TESTED
2
2
1
1
3
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
PROFICIENT
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
LEVEL 1
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
Grade 5 ELA
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 5 Math
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 6 ELA
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 6 Math
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 7 ELA
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 7 Math
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 8 ELA
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 8 Math
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 8 Science
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Secondary-Level ELA
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Secondary-Level Math
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Secondary-Level Science
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Secondary-Level Social Studies
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Elementary/Middle-Level English Language Arts Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: NO
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
NO
―
―
―
―
NO
―
NO
―
NO
Tested 95%
NO
―
―
―
―
NO
―
NO
―
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,281*
0
4
9
1
1,244*
6
217*
0
549*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
60%*
―
―
―
―
60%*
―
52%*
―
61%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
―
―
―
―
NO
―
NO
―
NO
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
384
0
1
8
1
369
5
60✝
0
164
PI
110
―
―
―
―
109
―
58✝
―
84
EAMO
105
―
―
―
―
118
―
73
―
94
Safe Harbor Target
105
―
―
―
―
118
―
70
―
94
All Students
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,281*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
60%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
384
PI
110
EAMO
105
Safe Harbor Target
105
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
4
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
9
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
8
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
White
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,244*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
60%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
369
PI
109
EAMO
118
Safe Harbor Target
118
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
6
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
5
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
217*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
52%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
60✝
PI
58✝
EAMO
73
Safe Harbor Target
70
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
549*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
61%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
164
PI
84
EAMO
94
Safe Harbor Target
94
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,281*
1,270*
1,264*
1,279*
20
1,274*
1,064*
1,281*
732*
670*
611*
0
1,281*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
60%*
61%*
60%*
60%*
―
60%*
62%*
60%*
60%*
62%*
59%*
―
60%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
384
383
376
383
15
379
325
384
220
212
172
0
384
PI
110
110
110
110
―
109
119
110
129
103
118
―
110
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,281*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
60%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
384
PI
110
Not Black or African American
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,270*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
61%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
383
PI
110
Not Hispanic or Latino
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,264*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
60%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
376
PI
110
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,279*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
60%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
383
PI
110
Not White
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
20
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
15
PI
―
Not Multiracial
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,274*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
60%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
379
PI
109
General Education
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,064*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
62%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
325
PI
119
English Proficient
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,281*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
60%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
384
PI
110
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
732*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
60%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
220
PI
129
Male
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
670*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
62%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
212
PI
103
Female
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
611*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
59%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
172
PI
118
Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,281*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
60%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
384
PI
110
― There were fewer than 40 students enrolled during the test administration period, so the Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 tested students enrolled on BEDS day and during the test administration period, so the PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed. *The percentage of students tested in the current year fell below 95 percent, so the numbers of enrolled and tested students in the current year and previous year were combined to provide the school/district with another opportunity to meet the participation rate criterion. ✝ Includes former students with disabilities because the number of students with disabilities in the current year is equal to or greater than 30.
Elementary/Middle-Level Mathematics Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: NO
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
NO
―
―
―
―
NO
―
NO
―
NO
Tested 95%
NO
―
―
―
―
NO
―
NO
―
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,281*
0
4
9
1
1,243*
7
218*
0
548*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
59%*
―
―
―
―
59%*
―
52%*
―
59%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
―
―
―
―
NO
―
NO
―
NO
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
384
0
1
7
1
370
5
59✝
0
162
PI
110
―
―
―
―
110
―
37✝
―
85
EAMO
103
―
―
―
―
115
―
73
―
92
Safe Harbor Target
103
―
―
―
―
115
―
71
―
92
All Students
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,281*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
59%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
384
PI
110
EAMO
103
Safe Harbor Target
103
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
4
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
9
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
7
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
White
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,243*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
59%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
370
PI
110
EAMO
115
Safe Harbor Target
115
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
7
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
5
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
218*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
52%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
59✝
PI
37✝
EAMO
73
Safe Harbor Target
71
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
548*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
59%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
162
PI
85
EAMO
92
Safe Harbor Target
92
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,281*
1,270*
1,264*
1,279*
21
1,273*
1,063*
1,281*
733*
668*
613*
0
1,281*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
59%*
59%*
59%*
59%*
―
59%*
61%*
59%*
59%*
61%*
57%*
―
59%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
384
383
377
383
14
379
326
384
222
212
172
0
384
PI
110
110
110
110
―
110
123
110
129
109
112
―
110
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,281*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
59%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
384
PI
110
Not Black or African American
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,270*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
59%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
383
PI
110
Not Hispanic or Latino
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,264*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
59%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
377
PI
110
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,279*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
59%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
383
PI
110
Not White
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
21
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
14
PI
―
Not Multiracial
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,273*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
59%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
379
PI
110
General Education
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,063*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
61%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
326
PI
123
English Proficient
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,281*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
59%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
384
PI
110
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
733*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
59%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
222
PI
129
Male
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
668*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
61%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
212
PI
109
Female
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
613*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
57%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
172
PI
112
Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,281*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
59%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
384
PI
110
― There were fewer than 40 students enrolled during the test administration period, so the Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 tested students enrolled on BEDS day and during the test administration period, so the PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed. *The percentage of students tested in the current year fell below 95 percent, so the numbers of enrolled and tested students in the current year and previous year were combined to provide the school/district with another opportunity to meet the participation rate criterion. ✝ Includes former students with disabilities because the number of students with disabilities in the current year is equal to or greater than 30.
Elementary/Middle-Level Science Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: YES
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
YES
―
YES
Tested 80%
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
YES
―
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
231
0
2
4
0
222
3
72*
0
102
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
83%
―
―
―
―
83%
―
82%*
―
81%
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
YES
―
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
191
0
2
4
0
184
1
31✝
0
83
PI
194
―
―
―
―
193
―
171✝
―
192
EAMO
181
―
―
―
―
187
―
158
―
172
Progress Target
181
―
―
―
―
187
―
1
―
172
All Students
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 80%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
231
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
83%
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
191
PI
194
EAMO
181
Progress Target
181
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
2
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
2
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
4
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
4
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
White
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 80%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
222
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
83%
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
184
PI
193
EAMO
187
Progress Target
187
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
3
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 80%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
72*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
82%*
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
31✝
PI
171✝
EAMO
158
Progress Target
1
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 80%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
102
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
81%
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
83
PI
192
EAMO
172
Progress Target
172
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
231
229
227
231
9
228
190
231
129
119
112
0
231
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
83%
83%
82%
83%
―
83%
84%
83%
84%
81%
85%
―
83%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
191
189
187
191
7
190
160
191
108
96
95
0
191
PI
194
194
194
194
―
194
198
194
195
196
192
―
194
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
231
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
83%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
191
PI
194
Not Black or African American
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
229
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
83%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
189
PI
194
Not Hispanic or Latino
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
227
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
82%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
187
PI
194
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
231
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
83%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
191
PI
194
Not White
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
9
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
7
PI
―
Not Multiracial
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
228
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
83%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
190
PI
194
General Education
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
190
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
84%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
160
PI
198
English Proficient
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
231
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
83%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
191
PI
194
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
129
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
84%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
108
PI
195
Male
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
119
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
81%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
96
PI
196
Female
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
112
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
85%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
95
PI
192
Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
231
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
83%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
191
PI
194
― There were fewer than 40 students enrolled during the test administration period, so the Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 tested students enrolled on BEDS day and during the test administration period, so the PI, EAMO, and Progress Target data are suppressed. *The percentage of students tested in the current year fell below 80 percent, so the numbers of enrolled and tested students in the current year and previous year were combined to provide the school/district with another opportunity to meet the participation rate criterion. ✝ Includes former students with disabilities because the number of students with disabilities in the current year is equal to or greater than 30.
Secondary-Level English Language Arts Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: NO
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
NO
―
―
―
―
NO
―
―
―
NO
Tested 95%
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
―
12th graders
98
0
1
0
0
96
1
15
0
39
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
―
―
―
―
100%
―
―
―
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
―
―
―
―
NO
―
―
―
NO
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
95
0
1
0
0
93
1
14
0
37
PI
164
―
―
―
―
163
―
―
―
143
EAMO
168
―
―
―
―
176
―
―
―
152
Safe Harbor Target
168
―
―
―
―
176
―
―
―
152
All Students
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
YES
12th Graders
98
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
95
PI
164
EAMO
168
Safe Harbor Target
168
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
1
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
1
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
White
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
YES
12th Graders
96
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
93
PI
163
EAMO
176
Safe Harbor Target
176
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
1
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
1
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
15
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
14
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
39
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
37
PI
143
EAMO
152
Safe Harbor Target
152
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
12th Graders
98
97
98
98
2
97
83
98
59
42
56
0
98
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
100%
100%
100%
―
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
―
100%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
95
94
95
95
2
94
81
95
58
40
55
0
95
PI
164
164
164
164
―
164
185
164
178
155
171
―
164
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
12th Graders
98
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
95
PI
164
Not Black or African American
12th Graders
97
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
94
PI
164
Not Hispanic or Latino
12th Graders
98
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
95
PI
164
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
12th Graders
98
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
95
PI
164
Not White
12th Graders
2
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
2
PI
―
Not Multiracial
12th Graders
97
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
94
PI
164
General Education
12th Graders
83
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
81
PI
185
English Proficient
12th Graders
98
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
95
PI
164
Not Economically Disadvantaged
12th Graders
59
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
58
PI
178
Male
12th Graders
42
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
40
PI
155
Female
12th Graders
56
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
55
PI
171
Migrant
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
Not Migrant
12th Graders
98
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
95
PI
164
― There were fewer than 40 12th graders, so the Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 students in the 2013 accountability cohort, so PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed.
Secondary-Level Mathematics Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: NO
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
NO
―
―
―
―
NO
―
―
―
NO
Tested 95%
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
―
12th graders
98
0
1
0
0
96
1
15
0
39
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
―
―
―
―
100%
―
―
―
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
―
―
―
―
NO
―
―
―
NO
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
95
0
1
0
0
93
1
14
0
37
PI
131
―
―
―
―
130
―
―
―
111
EAMO
155
―
―
―
―
165
―
―
―
138
Safe Harbor Target
155
―
―
―
―
158
―
―
―
138
All Students
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
YES
12th Graders
98
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
95
PI
131
EAMO
155
Safe Harbor Target
155
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
1
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
1
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
White
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
YES
12th Graders
96
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
93
PI
130
EAMO
165
Safe Harbor Target
158
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
1
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
1
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
15
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
14
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
39
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
37
PI
111
EAMO
138
Safe Harbor Target
138
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
12th Graders
98
97
98
98
2
97
83
98
59
42
56
0
98
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
100%
100%
100%
―
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
―
100%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
95
94
95
95
2
94
81
95
58
40
55
0
95
PI
131
131
131
131
―
130
148
131
143
133
129
―
131
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
12th Graders
98
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
95
PI
131
Not Black or African American
12th Graders
97
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
94
PI
131
Not Hispanic or Latino
12th Graders
98
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
95
PI
131
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
12th Graders
98
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
95
PI
131
Not White
12th Graders
2
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
2
PI
―
Not Multiracial
12th Graders
97
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
94
PI
130
General Education
12th Graders
83
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
81
PI
148
English Proficient
12th Graders
98
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
95
PI
131
Not Economically Disadvantaged
12th Graders
59
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
58
PI
143
Male
12th Graders
42
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
40
PI
133
Female
12th Graders
56
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
55
PI
129
Migrant
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
Not Migrant
12th Graders
98
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
95
PI
131
― There were fewer than 40 12th graders, so the Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 students in the 2013 accountability cohort, so PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed.
Unweighted Combined ELA and Math PIs
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
110
―
―
―
―
109
―
58
―
84
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
110
―
―
―
―
110
―
37
―
85
Secondary-Level ELA PI
164
―
―
―
―
163
―
―
―
143
Secondary-Level MATH PI
131
―
―
―
―
130
―
―
―
111
UNWEIGHTED COMBINED PI
129
0
0
0
0
128
0
48
0
106
All Students
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
110
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
110
Secondary-Level ELA PI
164
Secondary-Level MATH PI
131
Unweighted Combined PI
129
American Indian or Alaska Native
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Black or African American
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Hispanic or Latino
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
White
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
109
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
110
Secondary-Level ELA PI
163
Secondary-Level MATH PI
130
Unweighted Combined PI
128
Multiracial
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Students With Disabilities
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
58
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
37
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
48
Limited English Proficient
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Economically Disadvantaged
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
84
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
85
Secondary-Level ELA PI
143
Secondary-Level MATH PI
111
Unweighted Combined PI
106
― There were not enough students to determine a Performance Index.
Overall Graduation Rate for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: YES
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
YES
All Students
MADE AYP
YES
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP
―
White
MADE AYP
YES
Multiracial
MADE AYP
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP
―
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
YES
― There were not enough students to make an AYP determination.
Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort for Accountability
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion:
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
YES
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
106
1
1
0
0
104
0
18
0
36
Graduation Rate
92%
―
―
―
―
93%
―
―
―
86%
State Standard
80%
―
―
―
―
80%
―
―
―
80%
Progress Target
80%
―
―
―
―
80%
―
―
―
80%
All Students
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
106
Graduation Rate
92%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%
American Indian or Alaska Native
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
1
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Black or African American
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
1
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
White
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
104
Graduation Rate
93%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%
Multiracial
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Students With Disabilities
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
18
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Limited English Proficient
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
36
Graduation Rate
86%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%
YES Graduation rate is equal to or greater than the State Standard or the group's Progress Target. NO Graduation rate is less than the State Standard and the group's Progress Target.
― There were fewer than 30 students in the cohort.
Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort for Accountability
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion:
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
YES
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
133
0
1
1
0
131
0
25
0
40
Graduation Rate
88%
―
―
―
―
89%
―
―
―
88%
State Standard
80%
―
―
―
―
80%
―
―
―
80%
Progress Target
80%
―
―
―
―
80%
―
―
―
79%
All Students
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
133
Graduation Rate
88%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%
American Indian or Alaska Native
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Black or African American
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
1
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
1
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
White
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
131
Graduation Rate
89%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%
Multiracial
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Students With Disabilities
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
25
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Limited English Proficient
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
40
Graduation Rate
88%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
79%
YES Graduation rate is equal to or greater than the State Standard or the group's Progress Target. NO Graduation rate is less than the State Standard and the group's Progress Target.
― There were fewer than 30 students in the cohort.
Graduation Rates for Non-AYP Groups for Accountability
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
105
105
106
106
2
106
88
106
70
44
62
0
106
Graduation Rate
93%
92%
92%
92%
―
92%
95%
92%
96%
91%
94%
―
92%
Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
133
132
132
133
2
133
108
133
93
61
72
0
133
Graduation Rate
88%
89%
88%
88%
―
88%
93%
88%
88%
85%
90%
―
88%
Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
105
Graduation Rate
93%
Not Black or African American
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
105
Graduation Rate
92%
Not Hispanic or Latino
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
106
Graduation Rate
92%
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
106
Graduation Rate
92%
Not White
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
2
Graduation Rate
―
Not Multiracial
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
106
Graduation Rate
92%
General Education
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
88
Graduation Rate
95%
English Proficient
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
106
Graduation Rate
92%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
70
Graduation Rate
96%
Male
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
44
Graduation Rate
91%
Female
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
62
Graduation Rate
94%
Migrant
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
Not Migrant
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
106
Graduation Rate
92%
Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
133
Graduation Rate
88%
Not Black or African American
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
132
Graduation Rate
89%
Not Hispanic or Latino
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
132
Graduation Rate
88%
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
133
Graduation Rate
88%
Not White
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
2
Graduation Rate
―
Not Multiracial
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
133
Graduation Rate
88%
General Education
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
108
Graduation Rate
93%
English Proficient
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
133
Graduation Rate
88%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
93
Graduation Rate
88%
Male
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
61
Graduation Rate
85%
Female
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
72
Graduation Rate
90%
Migrant
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
Not Migrant
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
133
Graduation Rate
88%
― There were fewer than 30 students in the cohort.
Graduation Rates for Regents with Advanced Designation and CTE Endorsement for Accountability
Percentage of 2012 Graduation-Rate Total Cohort members who graduated as of August 31, 2016 with:
Regents Diploma with an Advanced Designation (This District)
43%
Regents Diploma with an Advanced Designation (Statewide)
31%
Percentage in This District Exceeded Statewide
YES
Regents Diploma with an Advanced Designation (This District)
43%
Regents Diploma with an Advanced Designation (Statewide)
31%
Percentage in This District Exceeded Statewide
YES
Regents Diploma with CTE Endorsement (This District)
14%
Regents Diploma with CTE Endorsement (Statewide)
5%
Percentage in This District Exceeded Statewide
YES
Regents Diploma with CTE Endorsement (This District)
You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.
Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.
If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.
