CHAZY CENTRAL RURAL JR-SR HS - School Report Card Data [2014 - 15]
The New York State Report Card is an important part of the Board of Regents' effort to raise learning standards for all students. It provides information to the public on school/district enrollment and staff, student performance, and other measures of school and district performance. Knowledge gained from the report card on a school's or district's strengths and weaknesses can be used to improve instruction and services to students. Report Card Data - Glossary of Terms | Accountability Data - Glossary of Terms | Business Rules
CHAZY CENTRAL RURAL JR-SR HS ENROLLMENT (2014 - 15)
K-12 ENROLLMENT
222
ENROLLMENT BY GENDER
MALE
118
53%
FEMALE
104
47%
ENROLLMENT BY ETHNICITY
GROUP
BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN
ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER
WHITE
TOTAL
5
2
215
PERCENT
2%
1%
97%
OTHER GROUPS
ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
—
—
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
30
14%
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
58
26%
ENROLLMENT BY GRADE
GROUP
7TH GRADE
8TH GRADE
9TH GRADE
10TH GRADE
11TH GRADE
12TH GRADE
TOTAL
33
40
35
39
36
39
PERCENT
15%
18%
16%
18%
16%
18%
CHAZY CENTRAL RURAL JR-SR HS ENROLLMENT (2014 - 15)
K-12 Enrollment: 222
ENROLLMENT BY GENDER
MALE
118
53%
FEMALE
104
47%
ENROLLMENT BY ETHNICITY
BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN
5
2%
ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER
2
1%
WHITE
215
97%
OTHER GROUPS
ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
—
—
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
30
14%
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
58
26%
ENROLLMENT BY GRADE
7TH GRADE
33
15%
8TH GRADE
40
18%
9TH GRADE
35
16%
10TH GRADE
39
18%
11TH GRADE
36
16%
12TH GRADE
39
18%
Average Class Size (2014 - 15)
GROUP
Grade 8 English
Grade 8 Mathematics
Grade 8 Science
Grade 8 Social Studies
Grade 10 English
Grade 10 Mathematics
Grade 10 Science
Grade 10 Social Studies
CLASS SIZE
20
17
20
20
20
16
20
21
Average Class Size (2014 - 15)
Grade 8 English
20
Grade 8 Mathematics
17
Grade 8 Science
20
Grade 8 Social Studies
20
Grade 10 English
20
Grade 10 Mathematics
16
Grade 10 Science
20
Grade 10 Social Studies
21
Average Class Size (2014 - 15)
GROUP
Grade 8 English
Grade 8 Mathematics
Grade 8 Science
Grade 8 Social Studies
Grade 10 English
Grade 10 Mathematics
Grade 10 Science
Grade 10 Social Studies
CLASS SIZE
20
17
20
20
20
16
20
21
Average Class Size (2014 - 15)
Grade 8 English
20
Grade 8 Mathematics
17
Grade 8 Science
20
Grade 8 Social Studies
20
Grade 10 English
20
Grade 10 Mathematics
16
Grade 10 Science
20
Grade 10 Social Studies
21
Average Class Size (2014 - 15)
GROUP
Grade 8 English
Grade 8 Mathematics
Grade 8 Science
Grade 8 Social Studies
Grade 10 English
Grade 10 Mathematics
Grade 10 Science
Grade 10 Social Studies
CLASS SIZE
20
17
20
20
20
16
20
21
Average Class Size (2014 - 15)
Grade 8 English
20
Grade 8 Mathematics
17
Grade 8 Science
20
Grade 8 Social Studies
20
Grade 10 English
20
Grade 10 Mathematics
16
Grade 10 Science
20
Grade 10 Social Studies
21
Average Class Size (2014 - 15)
GROUP
Grade 8 English
Grade 8 Mathematics
Grade 8 Science
Grade 8 Social Studies
Grade 10 English
Grade 10 Mathematics
Grade 10 Science
Grade 10 Social Studies
CLASS SIZE
20
17
20
20
20
16
20
21
Average Class Size (2014 - 15)
Grade 8 English
20
Grade 8 Mathematics
17
Grade 8 Science
20
Grade 8 Social Studies
20
Grade 10 English
20
Grade 10 Mathematics
16
Grade 10 Science
20
Grade 10 Social Studies
21
Average Class Size (2014 - 15)
GROUP
Grade 8 English
Grade 8 Mathematics
Grade 8 Science
Grade 8 Social Studies
Grade 10 English
Grade 10 Mathematics
Grade 10 Science
Grade 10 Social Studies
CLASS SIZE
20
17
20
20
20
16
20
21
Average Class Size (2014 - 15)
Grade 8 English
20
Grade 8 Mathematics
17
Grade 8 Science
20
Grade 8 Social Studies
20
Grade 10 English
20
Grade 10 Mathematics
16
Grade 10 Science
20
Grade 10 Social Studies
21
Average Class Size (2014 - 15)
GROUP
Grade 8 English
Grade 8 Mathematics
Grade 8 Science
Grade 8 Social Studies
Grade 10 English
Grade 10 Mathematics
Grade 10 Science
Grade 10 Social Studies
CLASS SIZE
20
17
20
20
20
16
20
21
Average Class Size (2014 - 15)
Grade 8 English
20
Grade 8 Mathematics
17
Grade 8 Science
20
Grade 8 Social Studies
20
Grade 10 English
20
Grade 10 Mathematics
16
Grade 10 Science
20
Grade 10 Social Studies
21
Average Class Size (2014 - 15)
GROUP
Grade 8 English
Grade 8 Mathematics
Grade 8 Science
Grade 8 Social Studies
Grade 10 English
Grade 10 Mathematics
Grade 10 Science
Grade 10 Social Studies
CLASS SIZE
20
17
20
20
20
16
20
21
Average Class Size (2014 - 15)
Grade 8 English
20
Grade 8 Mathematics
17
Grade 8 Science
20
Grade 8 Social Studies
20
Grade 10 English
20
Grade 10 Mathematics
16
Grade 10 Science
20
Grade 10 Social Studies
21
Average Class Size (2014 - 15)
GROUP
Grade 8 English
Grade 8 Mathematics
Grade 8 Science
Grade 8 Social Studies
Grade 10 English
Grade 10 Mathematics
Grade 10 Science
Grade 10 Social Studies
CLASS SIZE
20
17
20
20
20
16
20
21
Average Class Size (2014 - 15)
Grade 8 English
20
Grade 8 Mathematics
17
Grade 8 Science
20
Grade 8 Social Studies
20
Grade 10 English
20
Grade 10 Mathematics
16
Grade 10 Science
20
Grade 10 Social Studies
21
Free and Reduced-Price Lunch (2014 - 15)
ELIGIBLE FOR FREE LUNCH
43
19%
ELIGIBLE FOR REDUCED-PRICE LUNCH
12
5%
Free and Reduced-Price Lunch (2014 - 15)
Eligible for Free Lunch
43
19%
Eligible for Reduced-Price Lunch
12
5%
ATTENDANCE (2013 - 14)
ANNUAL ATTENDANCE RATE
97%
Attendance (2013 - 14)
Annual Attendance Rate
97%
STUDENT SUSPENSIONS (2013 - 14)
11
5%
Student Suspensions (2013 - 14)
Student Suspensions
11
5%
Staff Counts (2014 - 15)
GROUP
PRINCIPALS
ASSISTANT PRINCIPALS
OTHER PROFESSIONAL STAFF
PARAPROFESSIONALS
STAFF
1
0
0
0
Staff Counts (2014 - 15)
Principals
1
Assistant Principals
0
Other Professional Staff
0
Paraprofessionals
0
Teacher Qualifications (2014 - 15)
TOTAL TEACHERS
19
PERCENT WITH NO VALID TEACHING CERTIFICATE
0%
PERCENT TEACHING OUT OF CERTIFICATE
5%
PERCENT WITH FEWER THAN THREE YEARS OF EXPERIENCE
0%
PERCENTAGE WITH MASTER'S DEGREEPLUS 30 HOURS OR DOCTORATE
42%
TOTAL NUMBER OF CORE CLASSES
61
Percent Not Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers in This School
0%
Total Number of Classes
106
Percent Taught by Teachers Without Appropriate Certification
3%
Teacher Qualifications (2014 - 15)
TOTAL TEACHERS: 19
Percent with No Valid Teaching Certificate
0%
Percent Teaching Out of Certification
5%
Percent with Fewer Than Three Years of Experience
0%
Percentage with Master's Degree Plus 30 Hours or Doctorate
42%
Total Number of Core Classes
61
Percent Not Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers in This School
0%
Total Number of Classes
106
Percent Taught by Teachers Without Appropriate Certification
3%
High School Completers (2014 - 15)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
39
_
_
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
39
_
_
REGENTS DIPLOMA
39
100%
_
_
_
_
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
REGENTS WITH ADVANCED DESIGNATION
18
46%
_
_
_
_
REGENTS WITH CTE ENDORSEMENT
3
8%
_
_
_
_
LOCAL DIPLOMAS
0
0%
_
_
_
_
COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS
0
0%
_
_
_
_
All Students
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
39
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
39
Regents Diploma
39
100%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
18
46%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
3
8%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
0
0%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
0
0%
of Completers
General Education
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
_
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
_
Regents Diploma
_
_%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
_
_%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
_
_%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
_
_%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
_
_%
of Completers
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
_
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
_
Regents Diploma
_
_%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
_
_%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
_
_%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
_
_%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
_
_%
of Completers
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
39
_
_
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
39
_
_
REGENTS DIPLOMA
39
100%
_
_
_
_
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
REGENTS WITH ADVANCED DESIGNATION
18
46%
_
_
_
_
REGENTS WITH CTE ENDORSEMENT
3
8%
_
_
_
_
LOCAL DIPLOMAS
0
0%
_
_
_
_
COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS
0
0%
_
_
_
_
All Students
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
39
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
39
Regents Diploma
39
100%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
18
46%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
3
8%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
0
0%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
0
0%
of Completers
General Education
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
_
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
_
Regents Diploma
_
_%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
_
_%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
_
_%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
_
_%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
_
_%
of Completers
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
_
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
_
Regents Diploma
_
_%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
_
_%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
_
_%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
_
_%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
_
_%
of Completers
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
39
_
_
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
39
_
_
REGENTS DIPLOMA
39
100%
_
_
_
_
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
REGENTS WITH ADVANCED DESIGNATION
18
46%
_
_
_
_
REGENTS WITH CTE ENDORSEMENT
3
8%
_
_
_
_
LOCAL DIPLOMAS
0
0%
_
_
_
_
COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS
0
0%
_
_
_
_
All Students
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
39
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
39
Regents Diploma
39
100%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
18
46%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
3
8%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
0
0%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
0
0%
of Completers
General Education
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
_
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
_
Regents Diploma
_
_%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
_
_%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
_
_%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
_
_%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
_
_%
of Completers
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
_
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
_
Regents Diploma
_
_%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
_
_%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
_
_%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
_
_%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
_
_%
of Completers
High School Non-completers (2014 - 15)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
_
_
_
_
_
_
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
_
_
_
_
_
_
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
_
_
_
_
_
_
All Students
DROPPED OUT
_
_%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
_
_%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
_
_%
General Education
DROPPED OUT
_
_%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
_
_%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
_
_%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
_
_%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
_
_%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
_
_
_
_
_
_
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
_
_
_
_
_
_
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
_
_
_
_
_
_
All Students
DROPPED OUT
_
_%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
_
_%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
_
_%
General Education
DROPPED OUT
_
_%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
_
_%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
_
_%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
_
_%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
_
_%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
_
_
_
_
_
_
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
_
_
_
_
_
_
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
_
_
_
_
_
_
All Students
DROPPED OUT
_
_%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
_
_%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
_
_%
General Education
DROPPED OUT
_
_%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
_
_%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
_
_%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
_
_%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
_
_%
Post-graduation Plans of Completers (2014 - 15)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO FOUR-YEAR COLLEGE
19
49%
_
_
_
_
TO TWO-YEAR COLLEGE
13
33%
_
_
_
_
TO OTHER POST-SECONDARY
0
0%
_
_
_
_
TO THE MILITARY
1
3%
_
_
_
_
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO EMPLOYMENT
6
15%
_
_
_
_
TO ADULT SERVICES
0
0%
_
_
_
_
TO OTHER KNOWN PLANS
0
0%
_
_
_
_
PLANS UNKNOWN
0
0%
_
_
_
_
All Students
To Four-Year College
19
49%
To Two-Year College
13
33%
To Other Post-Secondary
0
0%
To the Military
1
3%
To Employment
6
15%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
0
0%
Plan Unknown
0
0%
General Education
To Four-Year College
_
_
To Two-Year College
_
_
To Other Post-Secondary
_
_
To the Military
_
_
To Employment
_
_
To Adult Services
_
_
To Other Known Plans
_
_
Plan Unknown
_
_
Students with Disabilities
To Four-Year College
_
_
To Two-Year College
_
_
To Other Post-Secondary
_
_
To the Military
_
_
To Employment
_
_
To Adult Services
_
_
To Other Known Plans
_
_
Plan Unknown
_
_
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO FOUR-YEAR COLLEGE
19
49%
_
_
_
_
TO TWO-YEAR COLLEGE
13
33%
_
_
_
_
TO OTHER POST-SECONDARY
0
0%
_
_
_
_
TO THE MILITARY
1
3%
_
_
_
_
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO EMPLOYMENT
6
15%
_
_
_
_
TO ADULT SERVICES
0
0%
_
_
_
_
TO OTHER KNOWN PLANS
0
0%
_
_
_
_
PLANS UNKNOWN
0
0%
_
_
_
_
All Students
To Four-Year College
19
49%
To Two-Year College
13
33%
To Other Post-Secondary
0
0%
To the Military
1
3%
To Employment
6
15%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
0
0%
Plan Unknown
0
0%
General Education
To Four-Year College
_
_
To Two-Year College
_
_
To Other Post-Secondary
_
_
To the Military
_
_
To Employment
_
_
To Adult Services
_
_
To Other Known Plans
_
_
Plan Unknown
_
_
Students with Disabilities
To Four-Year College
_
_
To Two-Year College
_
_
To Other Post-Secondary
_
_
To the Military
_
_
To Employment
_
_
To Adult Services
_
_
To Other Known Plans
_
_
Plan Unknown
_
_
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO FOUR-YEAR COLLEGE
19
49%
_
_
_
_
TO TWO-YEAR COLLEGE
13
33%
_
_
_
_
TO OTHER POST-SECONDARY
0
0%
_
_
_
_
TO THE MILITARY
1
3%
_
_
_
_
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO EMPLOYMENT
6
15%
_
_
_
_
TO ADULT SERVICES
0
0%
_
_
_
_
TO OTHER KNOWN PLANS
0
0%
_
_
_
_
PLANS UNKNOWN
0
0%
_
_
_
_
All Students
To Four-Year College
19
49%
To Two-Year College
13
33%
To Other Post-Secondary
0
0%
To the Military
1
3%
To Employment
6
15%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
0
0%
Plan Unknown
0
0%
General Education
To Four-Year College
_
_
To Two-Year College
_
_
To Other Post-Secondary
_
_
To the Military
_
_
To Employment
_
_
To Adult Services
_
_
To Other Known Plans
_
_
Plan Unknown
_
_
Students with Disabilities
To Four-Year College
_
_
To Two-Year College
_
_
To Other Post-Secondary
_
_
To the Military
_
_
To Employment
_
_
To Adult Services
_
_
To Other Known Plans
_
_
Plan Unknown
_
_
Grade 7 English Language Arts
MEAN SCORE: 287
All Students
PROFICIENT
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 15
LEVEL 1
6
40%
LEVEL 2
6
40%
LEVEL 3
3
20%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
General Education
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 13
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 15
LEVEL 1
6
40%
LEVEL 2
6
40%
LEVEL 3
3
20%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Female
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Male
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 11
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 15
LEVEL 1
6
40%
LEVEL 2
6
40%
LEVEL 3
3
20%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
3
60%
LEVEL 2
2
40%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 10
LEVEL 1
3
30%
LEVEL 2
4
40%
LEVEL 3
3
30%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 15
LEVEL 1
6
40%
LEVEL 2
6
40%
LEVEL 3
3
20%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
White
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
15
13
2
15
4
11
15
5
10
15
PROFICIENT
20%
_%
_%
20%
_%
_%
20%
0%
30%
20%
LEVEL 1
6
40%
_
_
_
_
6
40%
_
_
_
_
6
40%
3
60%
3
30%
6
40%
LEVEL 2
6
40%
_
_
_
_
6
40%
_
_
_
_
6
40%
2
40%
4
40%
6
40%
LEVEL 3
3
20%
_
_
_
_
3
20%
_
_
_
_
3
20%
0
0%
3
30%
3
20%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
Grade 8 English Language Arts
MEAN SCORE: 273
All Students
PROFICIENT
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 13
LEVEL 1
8
62%
LEVEL 2
4
31%
LEVEL 3
1
8%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
General Education
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 13
LEVEL 1
8
62%
LEVEL 2
4
31%
LEVEL 3
1
8%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Male
PROFICIENT
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 13
LEVEL 1
8
62%
LEVEL 2
4
31%
LEVEL 3
1
8%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 13
LEVEL 1
8
62%
LEVEL 2
4
31%
LEVEL 3
1
8%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7
LEVEL 1
6
86%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
1
14%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
2
33%
LEVEL 2
4
67%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 13
LEVEL 1
8
62%
LEVEL 2
4
31%
LEVEL 3
1
8%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
White
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
13
9
4
13
13
13
7
6
13
PROFICIENT
8%
_%
_%
8%
8%
8%
14%
0%
8%
LEVEL 1
8
62%
_
_
_
_
8
62%
8
62%
8
62%
6
86%
2
33%
8
62%
LEVEL 2
4
31%
_
_
_
_
4
31%
4
31%
4
31%
0
0%
4
67%
4
31%
LEVEL 3
1
8%
_
_
_
_
1
8%
1
8%
1
8%
1
14%
0
0%
1
8%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
Grade 7 Mathematics
Mean scores and data in the table for grade 7 math include only those for grade 7 students who took the Grade 7 New York State Testing Program Assessment (NYSTP) in Mathematics. For 2015 and forward, data in the bar charts include those for grade 7 students who took the Grade 7 NYSTP in Mathematics and grade 7 students who took a Regents math test in lieu of the NYSTP. For 2014 and earlier, data in the bar charts include only those for grade 7 students who took the Grade 7 NYSTP.
MEAN SCORE: 310
All Students
PROFICIENT
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 13
LEVEL 1
2
15%
LEVEL 2
7
54%
LEVEL 3
4
31%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
General Education
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 12
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 13
LEVEL 1
2
15%
LEVEL 2
7
54%
LEVEL 3
4
31%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Female
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Male
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 10
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 13
LEVEL 1
2
15%
LEVEL 2
7
54%
LEVEL 3
4
31%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 13
LEVEL 1
2
15%
LEVEL 2
7
54%
LEVEL 3
4
31%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
White
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
13
12
1
13
3
10
13
4
9
13
PROFICIENT
31%
_%
_%
31%
_%
_%
31%
_%
_%
31%
LEVEL 1
2
15%
_
_
_
_
2
15%
_
_
_
_
2
15%
_
_
_
_
2
15%
LEVEL 2
7
54%
_
_
_
_
7
54%
_
_
_
_
7
54%
_
_
_
_
7
54%
LEVEL 3
4
31%
_
_
_
_
4
31%
_
_
_
_
4
31%
_
_
_
_
4
31%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
Grade 8 Mathematics
Mean scores and data in the table for grade 8 math include only those for grade 8 students who took the Grade 8 New York State Testing Program Assessment (NYSTP) in Mathematics. For 2015 and forward, data in the bar charts include those for grade 8 students who took the Grade 8 NYSTP in Mathematics and grade 8 students who took a Regents math test in lieu of the NYSTP. For 2014 and earlier, data in the bar charts include only those for grade 8 students who took the Grade 8 NYSTP.
MEAN SCORE: 291
All Students
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
3
33%
LEVEL 2
6
67%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
General Education
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
3
33%
LEVEL 2
6
67%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Male
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
3
33%
LEVEL 2
6
67%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
3
33%
LEVEL 2
6
67%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
3
33%
LEVEL 2
6
67%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
White
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
9
5
4
9
9
9
4
5
9
PROFICIENT
0%
_%
_%
0%
0%
0%
_%
_%
0%
LEVEL 1
3
33%
_
_
_
_
3
33%
3
33%
3
33%
_
_
_
_
3
33%
LEVEL 2
6
67%
_
_
_
_
6
67%
6
67%
6
67%
_
_
_
_
6
67%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
Grade 8 Students Taking a Regents Math Test
Accelerated grade 8 students who took a Regents math test in lieu of the Grade 8 NYSTP in Mathematics.
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4 AND ABOVE
6
100%
LEVEL 3 AND ABOVE
6
100%
GROUP
All Students
TOTAL TESTED
6
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
4 & ABOVE
6
100%
3 & ABOVE
6
100%
Grade 8 Science
Data in the bar charts include those for grade 8 students who took the New York State Grade 8 Science Test and grade 8 students who took a Regents science test in lieu of this test. Mean scores and data in the table for grade 8 science include only those for grade 8 students who took the New York State Grade 8 Science Test.
MEAN SCORE: 68
All Students
PROFICIENT
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 16
LEVEL 1
1
6%
LEVEL 2
4
25%
LEVEL 3
9
56%
LEVEL 4
2
13%
General Education
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 12
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 16
LEVEL 1
1
6%
LEVEL 2
4
25%
LEVEL 3
9
56%
LEVEL 4
2
13%
Female
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Male
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 13
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 16
LEVEL 1
1
6%
LEVEL 2
4
25%
LEVEL 3
9
56%
LEVEL 4
2
13%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
33%
LEVEL 3
2
33%
LEVEL 4
2
33%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 10
LEVEL 1
1
10%
LEVEL 2
2
20%
LEVEL 3
7
70%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 16
LEVEL 1
1
6%
LEVEL 2
4
25%
LEVEL 3
9
56%
LEVEL 4
2
13%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
White
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
16
12
4
16
3
13
16
6
10
16
PROFICIENT
69%
_%
_%
69%
_%
_%
69%
67%
70%
69%
LEVEL 1
1
6%
_
_
_
_
1
6%
_
_
_
_
1
6%
0
0%
1
10%
1
6%
LEVEL 2
4
25%
_
_
_
_
4
25%
_
_
_
_
4
25%
2
33%
2
20%
4
25%
LEVEL 3
9
56%
_
_
_
_
9
56%
_
_
_
_
9
56%
2
33%
7
70%
9
56%
LEVEL 4
2
13%
_
_
_
_
2
13%
_
_
_
_
2
13%
2
33%
0
0%
2
13%
Statewide Results on the National Assessment of Educational Progress: NAEP (2014 - 15)
Grade: 4
Reading
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Students with Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
BELOW BASIC
32%
*%
20%
48%
44%
20%
*%
70%
74%
43%
BASIC
32%
*%
30%
34%
37%
31%
*%
22%
21%
36%
PROFICIENT
27%
*%
33%
15%
17%
37%
*%
7%
4%
18%
ADVANCED
9%
*%
17%
3%
2%
12%
*%
1%
1%
3%
PARTICIPATION RATE
98
88
Reading
All Students
Percent Below Basic
32
Percent Basic
32
Percent Proficient
27
Percent Advanced
9
American Indian or Alaska Native
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Percent Below Basic
20
Percent Basic
30
Percent Proficient
33
Percent Advanced
17
Black or African American
Percent Below Basic
48
Percent Basic
34
Percent Proficient
15
Percent Advanced
3
Hispanic or Latino
Percent Below Basic
44
Percent Basic
37
Percent Proficient
17
Percent Advanced
2
White
Percent Below Basic
20
Percent Basic
31
Percent Proficient
37
Percent Advanced
12
Multiracial
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Students with Disabilities
Percent Below Basic
70
Percent Basic
22
Percent Proficient
7
Percent Advanced
1
Participation Rate
98
Limited English Proficient
Percent Below Basic
74
Percent Basic
21
Percent Proficient
4
Percent Advanced
1
Participation Rate
88
Economically Disadvantaged
Percent Below Basic
43
Percent Basic
36
Percent Proficient
18
Percent Advanced
3
Mathematics
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Students with Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
BELOW BASIC
21%
*%
12%
40%
28%
12%
*%
49%
56%
29%
BASIC
44%
*%
31%
46%
51%
41%
*%
39%
35%
48%
PROFICIENT
30%
*%
42%
13%
20%
40%
*%
10%
9%
21%
ADVANCED
5%
*%
15%
1%
1%
7%
*%
2%
*%
2%
PARTICIPATION RATE
98
91
Mathematics
All Students
Percent Below Basic
21
Percent Basic
44
Percent Proficient
30
Percent Advanced
5
American Indian or Alaska Native
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Percent Below Basic
12
Percent Basic
31
Percent Proficient
42
Percent Advanced
15
Black or African American
Percent Below Basic
40
Percent Basic
46
Percent Proficient
13
Percent Advanced
1
Hispanic or Latino
Percent Below Basic
28
Percent Basic
51
Percent Proficient
20
Percent Advanced
1
White
Percent Below Basic
12
Percent Basic
41
Percent Proficient
40
Percent Advanced
7
Multiracial
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Students with Disabilities
Percent Below Basic
49
Percent Basic
39
Percent Proficient
10
Percent Advanced
2
Participation Rate
98
Limited English Proficient
Percent Below Basic
56
Percent Basic
35
Percent Proficient
9
Percent Advanced
*
Participation Rate
91
Economically Disadvantaged
Percent Below Basic
29
Percent Basic
48
Percent Proficient
21
Percent Advanced
2
Grade: 8
Reading
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Students with Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
BELOW BASIC
27%
*%
19%
42%
35%
18%
*%
59%
78%
36%
BASIC
40%
*%
39%
41%
43%
39%
*%
33%
19%
42%
PROFICIENT
29%
*%
34%
16%
20%
38%
*%
8%
3%
21%
ADVANCED
4%
*%
8%
1%
2%
5%
*%
*%
*%
1%
PARTICIPATION RATE
98
89
Reading
All Students
Percent Below Basic
27
Percent Basic
40
Percent Proficient
29
Percent Advanced
4
American Indian or Alaska Native
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Percent Below Basic
19
Percent Basic
39
Percent Proficient
34
Percent Advanced
8
Black or African American
Percent Below Basic
42
Percent Basic
41
Percent Proficient
16
Percent Advanced
1
Hispanic or Latino
Percent Below Basic
35
Percent Basic
43
Percent Proficient
20
Percent Advanced
2
White
Percent Below Basic
18
Percent Basic
39
Percent Proficient
38
Percent Advanced
5
Multiracial
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Students with Disabilities
Percent Below Basic
59
Percent Basic
33
Percent Proficient
8
Percent Advanced
*
Participation Rate
98
Limited English Proficient
Percent Below Basic
78
Percent Basic
19
Percent Proficient
3
Percent Advanced
*
Participation Rate
89
Economically Disadvantaged
Percent Below Basic
36
Percent Basic
42
Percent Proficient
21
Percent Advanced
1
Mathematics
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Students with Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
BELOW BASIC
31%
*%
18%
48%
41%
20%
*%
64%
72%
40%
BASIC
38%
*%
30%
37%
40%
40%
*%
27%
21%
39%
PROFICIENT
24%
*%
33%
13%
16%
31%
*%
8%
6%
17%
ADVANCED
7%
*%
19%
2%
3%
9%
*%
1%
1%
4%
PARTICIPATION RATE
99
94
Mathematics
All Students
Percent Below Basic
31
Percent Basic
38
Percent Proficient
24
Percent Advanced
7
American Indian or Alaska Native
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Percent Below Basic
18
Percent Basic
30
Percent Proficient
33
Percent Advanced
19
Black or African American
Percent Below Basic
48
Percent Basic
37
Percent Proficient
13
Percent Advanced
2
Hispanic or Latino
Percent Below Basic
41
Percent Basic
40
Percent Proficient
16
Percent Advanced
3
White
Percent Below Basic
20
Percent Basic
40
Percent Proficient
31
Percent Advanced
9
Multiracial
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Students with Disabilities
Percent Below Basic
64
Percent Basic
27
Percent Proficient
8
Percent Advanced
1
Participation Rate
99
Limited English Proficient
Percent Below Basic
72
Percent Basic
21
Percent Proficient
6
Percent Advanced
1
Participation Rate
94
Economically Disadvantaged
Percent Below Basic
40
Percent Basic
39
Percent Proficient
17
Percent Advanced
4
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level English Language Arts after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 40
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
14
35%
LEVEL 4
25
63%
General Education
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 38
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 38
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 40
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
14
35%
LEVEL 4
25
63%
Female
PROFICIENT
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 25
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
6
24%
LEVEL 4
18
72%
Male
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 15
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
8
53%
LEVEL 4
7
47%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 39
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 12
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
8
67%
LEVEL 4
3
25%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 28
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
6
21%
LEVEL 4
22
79%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 40
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
14
35%
LEVEL 4
25
63%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
40
38
2
2
38
40
25
15
39
1
12
28
40
PROFICIENT
98%
_%
_%
_%
_%
98%
96%
100%
_%
_%
92%
100%
98%
LEVEL 1
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
LEVEL 3
14
35%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
14
35%
6
24%
8
53%
_
_
_
_
8
67%
6
21%
14
35%
LEVEL 4
25
63%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
25
63%
18
72%
7
47%
_
_
_
_
3
25%
22
79%
25
63%
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level Mathematics after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 40
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
21
53%
LEVEL 4
18
45%
General Education
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 38
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 38
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 40
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
21
53%
LEVEL 4
18
45%
Female
PROFICIENT
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 25
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
9
36%
LEVEL 4
15
60%
Male
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 15
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
12
80%
LEVEL 4
3
20%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 39
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 12
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
9
75%
LEVEL 4
2
17%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 28
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
12
43%
LEVEL 4
16
57%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 40
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
21
53%
LEVEL 4
18
45%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
40
38
2
2
38
40
25
15
39
1
12
28
40
PROFICIENT
98%
_%
_%
_%
_%
98%
96%
100%
_%
_%
92%
100%
98%
LEVEL 1
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
LEVEL 3
21
53%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
21
53%
9
36%
12
80%
_
_
_
_
9
75%
12
43%
21
53%
LEVEL 4
18
45%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
18
45%
15
60%
3
20%
_
_
_
_
2
17%
16
57%
18
45%
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level Global History and Geography after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 40
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
14
35%
LEVEL 4
25
63%
General Education
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 38
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 38
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 40
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
14
35%
LEVEL 4
25
63%
Female
PROFICIENT
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 25
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
6
24%
LEVEL 4
18
72%
Male
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 15
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
8
53%
LEVEL 4
7
47%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 39
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 12
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
8
67%
LEVEL 4
3
25%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 28
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
6
21%
LEVEL 4
22
79%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 40
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
14
35%
LEVEL 4
25
63%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
40
38
2
2
38
40
25
15
39
1
12
28
40
PROFICIENT
98%
_%
_%
_%
_%
98%
96%
100%
_%
_%
92%
100%
98%
LEVEL 1
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
LEVEL 3
14
35%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
14
35%
6
24%
8
53%
_
_
_
_
8
67%
6
21%
14
35%
LEVEL 4
25
63%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
25
63%
18
72%
7
47%
_
_
_
_
3
25%
22
79%
25
63%
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level U.S. History and Government after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 40
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
3
8%
LEVEL 4
36
90%
General Education
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 38
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 38
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 40
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
3
8%
LEVEL 4
36
90%
Female
PROFICIENT
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 25
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
1
4%
LEVEL 4
23
92%
Male
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 15
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
2
13%
LEVEL 4
13
87%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 39
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 12
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
2
17%
LEVEL 4
9
75%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 28
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
1
4%
LEVEL 4
27
96%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 40
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
3
8%
LEVEL 4
36
90%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
40
38
2
2
38
40
25
15
39
1
12
28
40
PROFICIENT
98%
_%
_%
_%
_%
98%
96%
100%
_%
_%
92%
100%
98%
LEVEL 1
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
LEVEL 3
3
8%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
3
8%
1
4%
2
13%
_
_
_
_
2
17%
1
4%
3
8%
LEVEL 4
36
90%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
36
90%
23
92%
13
87%
_
_
_
_
9
75%
27
96%
36
90%
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level Science after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 40
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
11
28%
LEVEL 4
28
70%
General Education
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 38
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 38
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 40
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
11
28%
LEVEL 4
28
70%
Female
PROFICIENT
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 25
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
4
16%
LEVEL 4
20
80%
Male
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 15
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
7
47%
LEVEL 4
8
53%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 39
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 12
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
6
50%
LEVEL 4
5
42%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 28
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
5
18%
LEVEL 4
23
82%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 40
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
11
28%
LEVEL 4
28
70%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
40
38
2
2
38
40
25
15
39
1
12
28
40
PROFICIENT
98%
_%
_%
_%
_%
98%
96%
100%
_%
_%
92%
100%
98%
LEVEL 1
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
LEVEL 3
11
28%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
11
28%
4
16%
7
47%
_
_
_
_
6
50%
5
18%
11
28%
LEVEL 4
28
70%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
28
70%
20
80%
8
53%
_
_
_
_
5
42%
23
82%
28
70%
Regents Examination Results (2014 - 15)
Comprehensive English
Regents Comprehensive English
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
39
34
5
2
37
39
20
19
38
1
10
29
39
55
38
97%
34
100%
4
80%
_
_
_
_
38
97%
20
100%
18
95%
_
_
_
_
9
90%
29
100%
38
97%
65
38
97%
34
100%
4
80%
_
_
_
_
38
97%
20
100%
18
95%
_
_
_
_
9
90%
29
100%
38
97%
85
23
59%
22
65%
1
20%
_
_
_
_
23
59%
12
60%
11
58%
_
_
_
_
3
30%
20
69%
23
59%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 39
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
38
97%
65
38
97%
85
23
59%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 34
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
34
100%
65
34
100%
85
22
65%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
4
80%
65
4
80%
85
1
20%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 37
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 39
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
38
97%
65
38
97%
85
23
59%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 20
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
20
100%
65
20
100%
85
12
60%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 19
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
18
95%
65
18
95%
85
11
58%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 38
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 10
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
9
90%
65
9
90%
85
3
30%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 29
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
29
100%
65
29
100%
85
20
69%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 39
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
38
97%
65
38
97%
85
23
59%
Integrated Algebra
Regents Integrated Algebra
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
14
12
2
1
13
14
11
3
14
6
8
14
55
14
100%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
14
100%
_
_
_
_
14
100%
6
100%
8
100%
14
100%
65
12
86%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
12
86%
_
_
_
_
12
86%
5
83%
7
88%
12
86%
85
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 14
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
14
100%
65
12
86%
85
0
0%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 12
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 13
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 14
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
14
100%
65
12
86%
85
0
0%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 11
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 14
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
14
100%
65
12
86%
85
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 6
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
6
100%
65
5
83%
85
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 8
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
8
100%
65
7
88%
85
0
0%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 14
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
14
100%
65
12
86%
85
0
0%
Geometry
Regents Geometry
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
42
41
1
2
40
42
22
20
41
1
5
37
42
55
39
93%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
39
93%
20
91%
19
95%
_
_
_
_
3
60%
36
97%
39
93%
65
32
76%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
32
76%
17
77%
15
75%
_
_
_
_
2
40%
30
81%
32
76%
85
4
10%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
4
10%
3
14%
1
5%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
4
11%
4
10%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 42
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
39
93%
65
32
76%
85
4
10%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 41
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 40
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 42
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
39
93%
65
32
76%
85
4
10%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 22
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
20
91%
65
17
77%
85
3
14%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 20
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
19
95%
65
15
75%
85
1
5%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 41
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
3
60%
65
2
40%
85
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 37
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
36
97%
65
30
81%
85
4
11%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 42
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
39
93%
65
32
76%
85
4
10%
Algebra 2/Trigonometry
Regents Algebra 2/Trigonometry
GROUP
All Students
General Education
White
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
23
23
23
17
6
23
3
20
23
55
8
35%
8
35%
8
35%
7
41%
1
17%
8
35%
_
_
_
_
8
35%
65
4
17%
4
17%
4
17%
4
24%
0
0%
4
17%
_
_
_
_
4
17%
85
1
4%
1
4%
1
4%
1
6%
0
0%
1
4%
_
_
_
_
1
4%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 23
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
8
35%
65
4
17%
85
1
4%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 23
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
8
35%
65
4
17%
85
1
4%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 23
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
8
35%
65
4
17%
85
1
4%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 17
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
7
41%
65
4
24%
85
1
6%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 6
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
1
17%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 23
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
8
35%
65
4
17%
85
1
4%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 20
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 23
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
8
35%
65
4
17%
85
1
4%
Algebra I (Common Core)
Algebra I (Common Core)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
36
34
2
1
35
36
19
17
36
9
27
36
LEVEL 1
3
8%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
3
8%
2
11%
1
6%
3
8%
2
22%
1
4%
3
8%
LEVEL 2
6
17%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
6
17%
4
21%
2
12%
6
17%
2
22%
4
15%
6
17%
LEVEL 3
15
42%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
15
42%
10
53%
5
29%
15
42%
4
44%
11
41%
15
42%
LEVEL 4
10
28%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
10
28%
3
16%
7
41%
10
28%
0
0%
10
37%
10
28%
LEVEL 5
2
6%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
2
6%
0
0%
2
12%
2
6%
1
11%
1
4%
2
6%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 36
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
3
8%
LEVEL 2
6
17%
LEVEL 3
15
42%
LEVEL 4
10
28%
LEVEL 5
2
6%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 34
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 35
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 36
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
3
8%
LEVEL 2
6
17%
LEVEL 3
15
42%
LEVEL 4
10
28%
LEVEL 5
2
6%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 19
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
2
11%
LEVEL 2
4
21%
LEVEL 3
10
53%
LEVEL 4
3
16%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 17
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
1
6%
LEVEL 2
2
12%
LEVEL 3
5
29%
LEVEL 4
7
41%
LEVEL 5
2
12%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 36
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
3
8%
LEVEL 2
6
17%
LEVEL 3
15
42%
LEVEL 4
10
28%
LEVEL 5
2
6%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 9
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
2
22%
LEVEL 2
2
22%
LEVEL 3
4
44%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
LEVEL 5
1
11%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 27
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
1
4%
LEVEL 2
4
15%
LEVEL 3
11
41%
LEVEL 4
10
37%
LEVEL 5
1
4%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 36
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
3
8%
LEVEL 2
6
17%
LEVEL 3
15
42%
LEVEL 4
10
28%
LEVEL 5
2
6%
Geometry (Common Core)
Geometry (Common Core)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Black or African American
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
38
38
2
36
38
19
19
37
1
4
34
38
LEVEL 1
1
3%
1
3%
_
_
_
_
1
3%
1
5%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
1
3%
LEVEL 2
10
26%
10
26%
_
_
_
_
10
26%
7
37%
3
16%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
10
26%
LEVEL 3
23
61%
23
61%
_
_
_
_
23
61%
10
53%
13
68%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
23
61%
LEVEL 4
2
5%
2
5%
_
_
_
_
2
5%
1
5%
1
5%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
2
5%
LEVEL 5
2
5%
2
5%
_
_
_
_
2
5%
0
0%
2
11%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
2
5%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 38
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
1
3%
LEVEL 2
10
26%
LEVEL 3
23
61%
LEVEL 4
2
5%
LEVEL 5
2
5%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 38
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
1
3%
LEVEL 2
10
26%
LEVEL 3
23
61%
LEVEL 4
2
5%
LEVEL 5
2
5%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 36
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 38
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
1
3%
LEVEL 2
10
26%
LEVEL 3
23
61%
LEVEL 4
2
5%
LEVEL 5
2
5%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 19
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
1
5%
LEVEL 2
7
37%
LEVEL 3
10
53%
LEVEL 4
1
5%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 19
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
3
16%
LEVEL 3
13
68%
LEVEL 4
1
5%
LEVEL 5
2
11%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 37
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 4
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 34
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 38
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
1
3%
LEVEL 2
10
26%
LEVEL 3
23
61%
LEVEL 4
2
5%
LEVEL 5
2
5%
Global History and Geography
Regents Global History and Geography
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
42
39
3
1
41
42
27
15
42
8
34
42
55
42
100%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
42
100%
27
100%
15
100%
42
100%
8
100%
34
100%
42
100%
65
40
95%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
40
95%
25
93%
15
100%
40
95%
7
88%
33
97%
40
95%
85
31
74%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
31
74%
16
59%
15
100%
31
74%
2
25%
29
85%
31
74%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 42
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
42
100%
65
40
95%
85
31
74%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 39
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 41
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 42
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
42
100%
65
40
95%
85
31
74%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 27
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
27
100%
65
25
93%
85
16
59%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 15
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
15
100%
65
15
100%
85
15
100%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 42
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
42
100%
65
40
95%
85
31
74%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 8
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
8
100%
65
7
88%
85
2
25%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 34
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
34
100%
65
33
97%
85
29
85%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 42
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
42
100%
65
40
95%
85
31
74%
U.S. History & Government
Regents U.S. History & Government
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
37
32
5
2
35
37
20
17
36
1
8
29
37
55
37
100%
32
100%
5
100%
_
_
_
_
37
100%
20
100%
17
100%
_
_
_
_
8
100%
29
100%
37
100%
65
37
100%
32
100%
5
100%
_
_
_
_
37
100%
20
100%
17
100%
_
_
_
_
8
100%
29
100%
37
100%
85
27
73%
25
78%
2
40%
_
_
_
_
27
73%
16
80%
11
65%
_
_
_
_
4
50%
23
79%
27
73%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 37
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
37
100%
65
37
100%
85
27
73%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 32
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
32
100%
65
32
100%
85
25
78%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
5
100%
65
5
100%
85
2
40%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 35
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 37
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
37
100%
65
37
100%
85
27
73%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 20
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
20
100%
65
20
100%
85
16
80%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 17
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
17
100%
65
17
100%
85
11
65%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 36
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 8
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
8
100%
65
8
100%
85
4
50%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 29
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
29
100%
65
29
100%
85
23
79%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 37
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
37
100%
65
37
100%
85
27
73%
Living Environment
Regents Living Environment
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
White
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
39
37
2
39
25
14
39
7
32
39
55
39
100%
_
_
_
_
39
100%
25
100%
14
100%
39
100%
7
100%
32
100%
39
100%
65
39
100%
_
_
_
_
39
100%
25
100%
14
100%
39
100%
7
100%
32
100%
39
100%
85
22
56%
_
_
_
_
22
56%
9
36%
13
93%
22
56%
0
0%
22
69%
22
56%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 39
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
39
100%
65
39
100%
85
22
56%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 37
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 39
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
39
100%
65
39
100%
85
22
56%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 25
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
25
100%
65
25
100%
85
9
36%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 14
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
14
100%
65
14
100%
85
13
93%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 39
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
39
100%
65
39
100%
85
22
56%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 7
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
7
100%
65
7
100%
85
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 32
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
32
100%
65
32
100%
85
22
69%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 39
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
39
100%
65
39
100%
85
22
56%
Physical Setting/Earth Science
Regents Physical Setting/Earth Science
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
35
30
5
2
33
35
17
18
35
7
28
35
55
33
94%
29
97%
4
80%
_
_
_
_
33
94%
16
94%
17
94%
33
94%
5
71%
28
100%
33
94%
65
32
91%
29
97%
3
60%
_
_
_
_
32
91%
16
94%
16
89%
32
91%
4
57%
28
100%
32
91%
85
15
43%
15
50%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
15
43%
7
41%
8
44%
15
43%
1
14%
14
50%
15
43%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 35
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
33
94%
65
32
91%
85
15
43%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 30
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
29
97%
65
29
97%
85
15
50%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
4
80%
65
3
60%
85
0
0%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 33
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 35
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
33
94%
65
32
91%
85
15
43%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 17
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
16
94%
65
16
94%
85
7
41%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 18
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
17
94%
65
16
89%
85
8
44%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 35
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
33
94%
65
32
91%
85
15
43%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 7
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
5
71%
65
4
57%
85
1
14%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 28
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
28
100%
65
28
100%
85
14
50%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 35
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
33
94%
65
32
91%
85
15
43%
Physical Setting/Chemistry
Regents Physical Setting/Chemistry
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Black or African American
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
21
21
1
20
21
14
7
21
3
18
21
55
20
95%
20
95%
_
_
_
_
20
95%
14
100%
6
86%
20
95%
_
_
_
_
20
95%
65
18
86%
18
86%
_
_
_
_
18
86%
12
86%
6
86%
18
86%
_
_
_
_
18
86%
85
3
14%
3
14%
_
_
_
_
3
14%
0
0%
3
43%
3
14%
_
_
_
_
3
14%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 21
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
20
95%
65
18
86%
85
3
14%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 21
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
20
95%
65
18
86%
85
3
14%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 20
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 21
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
20
95%
65
18
86%
85
3
14%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 14
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
14
100%
65
12
86%
85
0
0%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 7
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
6
86%
65
6
86%
85
3
43%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 21
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
20
95%
65
18
86%
85
3
14%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 18
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 21
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
20
95%
65
18
86%
85
3
14%
Physical Setting/Physics
Regents Physical Setting/Physics
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
9
9
2
7
9
8
1
9
9
9
55
6
67%
6
67%
_
_
_
_
6
67%
_
_
_
_
6
67%
6
67%
6
67%
65
6
67%
6
67%
_
_
_
_
6
67%
_
_
_
_
6
67%
6
67%
6
67%
85
1
11%
1
11%
_
_
_
_
1
11%
_
_
_
_
1
11%
1
11%
1
11%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 9
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
6
67%
65
6
67%
85
1
11%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 9
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
6
67%
65
6
67%
85
1
11%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 7
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 9
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
6
67%
65
6
67%
85
1
11%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 8
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 9
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
6
67%
65
6
67%
85
1
11%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 9
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
6
67%
65
6
67%
85
1
11%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 9
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
6
67%
65
6
67%
85
1
11%
Elementary/Middle-Level English Language Arts Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: NO
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
NO
―
―
―
―
NO
―
―
―
―
Tested 95%
NO
―
―
―
―
NO
―
―
―
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
150*
0
0
0
0
149*
0
13
0
24
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
44%*
―
―
―
―
44%*
―
―
―
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
―
―
―
―
NO
―
―
―
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
64**⁰
0
0
0
0
64**⁰
0
14
0
23
PI
70**
―
―
―
―
70**
―
―
―
―
EAMO
85
―
―
―
―
102
―
―
―
―
Safe Harbor Target
85
―
―
―
―
86
―
―
―
―
All Students
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
150*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
44%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
64**⁰
PI
70**
EAMO
85
Safe Harbor Target
85
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
White
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
149*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
44%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
64**⁰
PI
70**
EAMO
102
Safe Harbor Target
86
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
13
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
14
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
24
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
23
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
150*
149*
150*
150*
0
150*
123*
150*
106*
102*
21
0
150*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
44%*
44%*
44%*
44%*
―
44%*
41%*
44%*
41%*
55%*
―
―
44%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
64**
64**
64**
64**
0
64**
50**
64**
41**
55**
9
0
64**
PI
70**
70**
70**
70**
―
70**
80**
70**
90**
65**
―
―
70**
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
150*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
44%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
64**
PI
70**
Not Black or African American
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
149*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
44%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
64**
PI
70**
Not Hispanic or Latino
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
150*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
44%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
64**
PI
70**
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
150*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
44%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
64**
PI
70**
Not White
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
Not Multiracial
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
150*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
44%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
64**
PI
70**
General Education
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
123*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
41%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
50**
PI
80**
English Proficient
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
150*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
44%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
64**
PI
70**
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
106*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
41%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
41**
PI
90**
Male
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
102*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
55%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
55**
PI
65**
Female
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
21
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
9
PI
―
Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
150*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
44%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
64**
PI
70**
― There were fewer than 40 students enrolled during the test administration period, so the Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 tested students enrolled on BEDS day and during the test administration period, so the PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed. *The percentage of students tested in the current year fell below 95 percent, so the numbers of enrolled and tested students in the current year and previous year were combined to provide the school/district with another opportunity to meet the participation rate criterion. **The number of tested students enrolled on BEDS day and during the test period in the school/district in the current year is less than 30, so the numbers in the current year and previous year were combined to determine a Performance Index. ⁰ This group failed to meet the participation criterion and had fewer than 30 tested students enrolled on BEDS day and during the test administration period, so data for the current and previous year were combined to determine a Performance Index.
Elementary/Middle-Level Mathematics Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: NO
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
NO
―
―
―
―
NO
―
―
―
―
Tested 95%
NO
―
―
―
―
NO
―
―
―
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
148*
0
0
0
0
147*
0
12
0
23
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
47%*
―
―
―
―
48%*
―
―
―
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
68**⁰
0
0
0
0
68**⁰
0
14
0
20
PI
115**
―
―
―
―
115**
―
―
―
―
EAMO
82
―
―
―
―
98
―
―
―
―
Safe Harbor Target
82
―
―
―
―
98
―
―
―
―
All Students
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
148*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
47%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
68**⁰
PI
115**
EAMO
82
Safe Harbor Target
82
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
White
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
147*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
48%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
68**⁰
PI
115**
EAMO
98
Safe Harbor Target
98
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
12
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
14
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
23
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
20
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
148*
147*
148*
148*
0
148*
122*
148*
106*
101*
21
0
148*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
47%*
48%*
47%*
47%*
―
47%*
45%*
47%*
47%*
54%*
―
―
47%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
68**
68**
68**
68**
0
68**
54**
68**
48**
54**
14
0
68**
PI
115**
115**
115**
115**
―
115**
130**
115**
127**
115**
―
―
115**
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
148*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
47%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
68**
PI
115**
Not Black or African American
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
147*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
48%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
68**
PI
115**
Not Hispanic or Latino
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
148*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
47%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
68**
PI
115**
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
148*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
47%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
68**
PI
115**
Not White
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
Not Multiracial
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
148*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
47%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
68**
PI
115**
General Education
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
122*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
45%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
54**
PI
130**
English Proficient
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
148*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
47%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
68**
PI
115**
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
106*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
47%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
48**
PI
127**
Male
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
101*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
54%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
54**
PI
115**
Female
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
21
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
14
PI
―
Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
148*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
47%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
68**
PI
115**
― There were fewer than 40 students enrolled during the test administration period, so the Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 tested students enrolled on BEDS day and during the test administration period, so the PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed. *The percentage of students tested in the current year fell below 95 percent, so the numbers of enrolled and tested students in the current year and previous year were combined to provide the school/district with another opportunity to meet the participation rate criterion. **The number of tested students enrolled on BEDS day and during the test period in the school/district in the current year is less than 30, so the numbers in the current year and previous year were combined to determine a Performance Index. ⁰ This group failed to meet the participation criterion and had fewer than 30 tested students enrolled on BEDS day and during the test administration period, so data for the current and previous year were combined to determine a Performance Index.
Elementary/Middle-Level Science Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: NO
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
NO
―
―
―
―
NO
―
―
―
―
Tested 80%
NO
―
―
―
―
NO
―
―
―
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
75*
0
0
0
0
74*
0
10
0
13
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
39%*
―
―
―
―
39%*
―
―
―
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
28
0
0
0
0
28
0
8
0
8
PI
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
EAMO
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
Progress Target
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
All Students
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 80%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
75*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
39%*
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
28
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
White
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 80%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
74*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
39%*
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
28
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
10
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
8
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
13
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
8
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
40
40
40
40
0
40
30
40
27
30
10
0
40
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
40%
40%
40%
40%
―
40%
―
40%
―
―
―
―
40%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
28
28
28
28
0
28
20
28
20
17
11
0
28
PI
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
40
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
40%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
28
PI
―
Not Black or African American
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
40
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
40%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
28
PI
―
Not Hispanic or Latino
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
40
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
40%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
28
PI
―
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
40
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
40%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
28
PI
―
Not White
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
Not Multiracial
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
40
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
40%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
28
PI
―
General Education
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
30
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
20
PI
―
English Proficient
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
40
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
40%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
28
PI
―
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
27
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
20
PI
―
Male
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
30
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
17
PI
―
Female
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
10
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
11
PI
―
Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
40
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
40%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
28
PI
―
― There were fewer than 40 students enrolled during the test administration period, so the Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 tested students enrolled on BEDS day and during the test administration period, so the PI, EAMO, and Progress Target data are suppressed. *The percentage of students tested in the current year fell below 80 percent, so the numbers of enrolled and tested students in the current year and previous year were combined to provide the school/district with another opportunity to meet the participation rate criterion.
Secondary-Level English Language Arts Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: YES
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
―
Tested 95%
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
12th graders
39
0
1
0
2
36
0
2
1
11
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
38
0
0
0
2
36
0
2
1
11
PI
189
―
―
―
―
189
―
―
―
―
EAMO
154
―
―
―
―
165
―
―
―
―
Safe Harbor Target
154
―
―
―
―
165
―
―
―
―
All Students
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
39
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
38
PI
189
EAMO
154
Safe Harbor Target
154
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
1
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
2
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
2
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
White
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
36
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
36
PI
189
EAMO
165
Safe Harbor Target
165
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
2
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
2
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
1
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
1
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
11
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
11
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
12th Graders
39
38
39
37
3
39
37
38
28
15
24
0
39
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
38
38
38
36
2
38
36
37
27
14
24
0
38
PI
189
189
189
189
―
189
192
189
―
―
―
―
189
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
12th Graders
39
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
38
PI
189
Not Black or African American
12th Graders
38
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
38
PI
189
Not Hispanic or Latino
12th Graders
39
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
38
PI
189
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
12th Graders
37
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
36
PI
189
Not White
12th Graders
3
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
2
PI
―
Not Multiracial
12th Graders
39
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
38
PI
189
General Education
12th Graders
37
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
36
PI
192
English Proficient
12th Graders
38
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
37
PI
189
Not Economically Disadvantaged
12th Graders
28
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
27
PI
―
Male
12th Graders
15
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
14
PI
―
Female
12th Graders
24
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
24
PI
―
Migrant
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
Not Migrant
12th Graders
39
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
38
PI
189
― There were fewer than 40 12th graders, so the Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 students in the 2011 accountability cohort, so PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed.
Secondary-Level Mathematics Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: YES
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
―
Tested 95%
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
12th graders
39
0
1
0
2
36
0
2
1
11
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
38
0
0
0
2
36
0
2
1
11
PI
176
―
―
―
―
175
―
―
―
―
EAMO
138
―
―
―
―
150
―
―
―
―
Safe Harbor Target
138
―
―
―
―
150
―
―
―
―
All Students
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
39
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
38
PI
176
EAMO
138
Safe Harbor Target
138
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
1
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
2
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
2
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
White
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
36
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
36
PI
175
EAMO
150
Safe Harbor Target
150
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
2
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
2
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
1
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
1
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
11
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
11
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
12th Graders
39
38
39
37
3
39
37
38
28
15
24
0
39
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
38
38
38
36
2
38
36
37
27
14
24
0
38
PI
176
176
176
175
―
176
178
176
―
―
―
―
176
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
12th Graders
39
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
38
PI
176
Not Black or African American
12th Graders
38
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
38
PI
176
Not Hispanic or Latino
12th Graders
39
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
38
PI
176
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
12th Graders
37
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
36
PI
175
Not White
12th Graders
3
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
2
PI
―
Not Multiracial
12th Graders
39
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
38
PI
176
General Education
12th Graders
37
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
36
PI
178
English Proficient
12th Graders
38
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
37
PI
176
Not Economically Disadvantaged
12th Graders
28
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
27
PI
―
Male
12th Graders
15
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
14
PI
―
Female
12th Graders
24
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
24
PI
―
Migrant
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
Not Migrant
12th Graders
39
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
38
PI
176
― There were fewer than 40 12th graders, so the Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 students in the 2011 accountability cohort, so PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed.
Unweighted Combined ELA and Math PIs
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
189
―
―
―
―
189
―
―
―
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
176
―
―
―
―
175
―
―
―
―
UNWEIGHTED COMBINED PI
183
0
0
0
0
182
0
0
0
0
All Students
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
189
Secondary-Level MATH PI
176
Unweighted Combined PI
183
American Indian or Alaska Native
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Black or African American
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Hispanic or Latino
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
White
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
189
Secondary-Level MATH PI
175
Unweighted Combined PI
182
Multiracial
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Students With Disabilities
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Limited English Proficient
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Economically Disadvantaged
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
― There were not enough students to determine a Performance Index.
Overall Graduation Rate for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: YES
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
―
All Students
MADE AYP
YES
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP
―
White
MADE AYP
YES
Multiracial
MADE AYP
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP
―
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
―
― There were not enough students to make an AYP determination.
Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort for Accountability
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion:
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
―
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
37
1
0
0
0
36
0
4
0
5
Graduation Rate
92%
―
―
―
―
92%
―
―
―
―
State Standard
80%
―
―
―
―
80%
―
―
―
―
Progress Target
80%
―
―
―
―
80%
―
―
―
―
All Students
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
37
Graduation Rate
92%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%
American Indian or Alaska Native
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
1
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Black or African American
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
White
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
36
Graduation Rate
92%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%
Multiracial
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Students With Disabilities
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
4
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Limited English Proficient
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
5
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
YES Graduation rate is equal to or greater than the State Standard or the group's Progress Target. NO Graduation rate is less than the State Standard and the group's Progress Target.
― There were fewer than 30 students in the cohort.
Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort for Accountability
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion:
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
―
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
39
0
0
0
0
39
0
2
0
6
Graduation Rate
92%
―
―
―
―
92%
―
―
―
―
State Standard
80%
―
―
―
―
80%
―
―
―
―
Progress Target
80%
―
―
―
―
80%
―
―
―
―
All Students
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
39
Graduation Rate
92%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%
American Indian or Alaska Native
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Black or African American
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
White
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
39
Graduation Rate
92%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%
Multiracial
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Students With Disabilities
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
2
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Limited English Proficient
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
6
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
YES Graduation rate is equal to or greater than the State Standard or the group's Progress Target. NO Graduation rate is less than the State Standard and the group's Progress Target.
― There were fewer than 30 students in the cohort.
Graduation Rates for Non-AYP Groups for Accountability
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
36
37
37
37
1
37
33
37
32
16
21
0
37
Graduation Rate
92%
92%
92%
92%
―
92%
97%
92%
94%
―
―
―
92%
Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
2009 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
39
39
39
39
0
39
37
39
33
24
15
0
39
Graduation Rate
92%
92%
92%
92%
―
92%
92%
92%
94%
―
―
―
92%
Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
36
Graduation Rate
92%
Not Black or African American
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
37
Graduation Rate
92%
Not Hispanic or Latino
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
37
Graduation Rate
92%
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
37
Graduation Rate
92%
Not White
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
1
Graduation Rate
―
Not Multiracial
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
37
Graduation Rate
92%
General Education
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
33
Graduation Rate
97%
English Proficient
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
37
Graduation Rate
92%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
32
Graduation Rate
94%
Male
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
16
Graduation Rate
―
Female
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
21
Graduation Rate
―
Migrant
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
Not Migrant
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
37
Graduation Rate
92%
Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
39
Graduation Rate
92%
Not Black or African American
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
39
Graduation Rate
92%
Not Hispanic or Latino
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
39
Graduation Rate
92%
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
39
Graduation Rate
92%
Not White
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
Not Multiracial
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
39
Graduation Rate
92%
General Education
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
37
Graduation Rate
92%
English Proficient
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
39
Graduation Rate
92%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
33
Graduation Rate
94%
Male
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
24
Graduation Rate
―
Female
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
15
Graduation Rate
―
Migrant
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
Not Migrant
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
39
Graduation Rate
92%
― There were fewer than 30 students in the cohort.
Graduation Rates for Regents with Advanced Designation and CTE Endorsement for Accountability
Percentage of 2010 Graduation-Rate Total Cohort members who graduated as of August 31, 2014 with:
Regents Diploma with an Advanced Designation (This School)
38%
Regents Diploma with an Advanced Designation (Statewide)
31%
Percentage in This School Exceeded Statewide
YES
Regents Diploma with an Advanced Designation (This School)
38%
Regents Diploma with an Advanced Designation (Statewide)
You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.
Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.
If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.