CHENANGO VALLEY CSD - School Report Card Data [2015 - 16]
The New York State Report Card is an important part of the Board of Regents' effort to raise learning standards for all students. It provides information to the public on school/district enrollment and staff, student performance, and other measures of school and district performance. Knowledge gained from the report card on a school's or district's strengths and weaknesses can be used to improve instruction and services to students. Report Card Data - Glossary of Terms | Accountability Data - Glossary of Terms | Business Rules
Turnover Rate of Teachers with Fewer Than Five Years of Experience
0%
TURNOVER RATE OF ALL TEACHERS
5%
Teacher Turnover Rate (2014-15 to 2015-16)
Turnover Rate of Teachers with Fewer Than Five Years of Experience
0%
Turnover Rate of All Teachers
5%
Teacher Qualifications (2015 - 16)
TOTAL TEACHERS
136
PERCENT WITH NO VALID TEACHING CERTIFICATE
0%
PERCENT TEACHING OUT OF CERTIFICATE
1%
PERCENT WITH FEWER THAN THREE YEARS OF EXPERIENCE
9%
PERCENTAGE WITH MASTER'S DEGREEPLUS 30 HOURS OR DOCTORATE
12%
TOTAL NUMBER OF CORE CLASSES
350
Percent Not Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers in This District
0%
Total Number of Classes
499
Percent Taught by Teachers Without Appropriate Certification
1%
Teacher Qualifications (2015 - 16)
TOTAL TEACHERS: 136
Percent with No Valid Teaching Certificate
0%
Percent Teaching Out of Certification
1%
Percent with Fewer Than Three Years of Experience
9%
Percentage with Master's Degree Plus 30 Hours or Doctorate
12%
Total Number of Core Classes
350
Percent Not Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers in This District
0%
Total Number of Classes
499
Percent Taught by Teachers Without Appropriate Certification
1%
High School Completers (2015 - 16)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
113
95
18
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
108
95
13
REGENTS DIPLOMA
96
89%
92
97%
4
31%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
REGENTS WITH ADVANCED DESIGNATION
35
32%
35
37%
0
0%
REGENTS WITH CTE ENDORSEMENT
8
7%
7
7%
1
8%
LOCAL DIPLOMAS
12
11%
3
3%
9
69%
COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS
5
4%
0
0%
5
28%
All Students
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
113
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
108
Regents Diploma
96
89%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
35
32%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
8
7%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
12
11%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
5
4%
of Completers
General Education
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
95
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
95
Regents Diploma
92
97%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
35
37%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
7
7%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
3
3%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
0
0%
of Completers
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
18
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
13
Regents Diploma
4
31%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
0
0%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
1
8%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
9
69%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
5
28%
of Completers
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
113
95
18
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
108
95
13
REGENTS DIPLOMA
96
89%
92
97%
4
31%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
REGENTS WITH ADVANCED DESIGNATION
35
32%
35
37%
0
0%
REGENTS WITH CTE ENDORSEMENT
8
7%
7
7%
1
8%
LOCAL DIPLOMAS
12
11%
3
3%
9
69%
COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS
5
4%
0
0%
5
28%
All Students
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
113
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
108
Regents Diploma
96
89%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
35
32%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
8
7%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
12
11%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
5
4%
of Completers
General Education
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
95
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
95
Regents Diploma
92
97%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
35
37%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
7
7%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
3
3%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
0
0%
of Completers
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
18
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
13
Regents Diploma
4
31%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
0
0%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
1
8%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
9
69%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
5
28%
of Completers
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
113
95
18
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
108
95
13
REGENTS DIPLOMA
96
89%
92
97%
4
31%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
REGENTS WITH ADVANCED DESIGNATION
35
32%
35
37%
0
0%
REGENTS WITH CTE ENDORSEMENT
8
7%
7
7%
1
8%
LOCAL DIPLOMAS
12
11%
3
3%
9
69%
COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS
5
4%
0
0%
5
28%
All Students
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
113
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
108
Regents Diploma
96
89%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
35
32%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
8
7%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
12
11%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
5
4%
of Completers
General Education
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
95
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
95
Regents Diploma
92
97%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
35
37%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
7
7%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
3
3%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
0
0%
of Completers
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
18
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
13
Regents Diploma
4
31%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
0
0%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
1
8%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
9
69%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
5
28%
of Completers
High School Non-completers (2015 - 16)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
5
1%
_
_
_
_
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
7
1%
_
_
_
_
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
12
2%
_
_
_
_
All Students
DROPPED OUT
5
1%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
7
1%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
12
2%
General Education
DROPPED OUT
_
_%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
_
_%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
_
_%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
_
_%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
_
_%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
5
1%
_
_
_
_
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
7
1%
_
_
_
_
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
12
2%
_
_
_
_
All Students
DROPPED OUT
5
1%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
7
1%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
12
2%
General Education
DROPPED OUT
_
_%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
_
_%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
_
_%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
_
_%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
_
_%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
5
1%
_
_
_
_
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
7
1%
_
_
_
_
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
12
2%
_
_
_
_
All Students
DROPPED OUT
5
1%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
7
1%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
12
2%
General Education
DROPPED OUT
_
_%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
_
_%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
_
_%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
_
_%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
_
_%
Post-graduation Plans of Completers (2015 - 16)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO FOUR-YEAR COLLEGE
38
34%
37
39%
1
6%
TO TWO-YEAR COLLEGE
53
47%
47
49%
6
33%
TO OTHER POST-SECONDARY
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
TO THE MILITARY
6
5%
5
5%
1
6%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO EMPLOYMENT
16
14%
6
6%
10
56%
TO ADULT SERVICES
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
TO OTHER KNOWN PLANS
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
PLANS UNKNOWN
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
All Students
To Four-Year College
38
34%
To Two-Year College
53
47%
To Other Post-Secondary
0
0%
To the Military
6
5%
To Employment
16
14%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
0
0%
Plan Unknown
0
0%
General Education
To Four-Year College
37
39%
To Two-Year College
47
49%
To Other Post-Secondary
0
0%
To the Military
5
5%
To Employment
6
6%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
0
0%
Plan Unknown
0
0%
Students with Disabilities
To Four-Year College
1
6%
To Two-Year College
6
33%
To Other Post-Secondary
0
0%
To the Military
1
6%
To Employment
10
56%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
0
0%
Plan Unknown
0
0%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO FOUR-YEAR COLLEGE
38
34%
37
39%
1
6%
TO TWO-YEAR COLLEGE
53
47%
47
49%
6
33%
TO OTHER POST-SECONDARY
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
TO THE MILITARY
6
5%
5
5%
1
6%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO EMPLOYMENT
16
14%
6
6%
10
56%
TO ADULT SERVICES
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
TO OTHER KNOWN PLANS
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
PLANS UNKNOWN
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
All Students
To Four-Year College
38
34%
To Two-Year College
53
47%
To Other Post-Secondary
0
0%
To the Military
6
5%
To Employment
16
14%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
0
0%
Plan Unknown
0
0%
General Education
To Four-Year College
37
39%
To Two-Year College
47
49%
To Other Post-Secondary
0
0%
To the Military
5
5%
To Employment
6
6%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
0
0%
Plan Unknown
0
0%
Students with Disabilities
To Four-Year College
1
6%
To Two-Year College
6
33%
To Other Post-Secondary
0
0%
To the Military
1
6%
To Employment
10
56%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
0
0%
Plan Unknown
0
0%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO FOUR-YEAR COLLEGE
38
34%
37
39%
1
6%
TO TWO-YEAR COLLEGE
53
47%
47
49%
6
33%
TO OTHER POST-SECONDARY
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
TO THE MILITARY
6
5%
5
5%
1
6%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO EMPLOYMENT
16
14%
6
6%
10
56%
TO ADULT SERVICES
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
TO OTHER KNOWN PLANS
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
PLANS UNKNOWN
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
All Students
To Four-Year College
38
34%
To Two-Year College
53
47%
To Other Post-Secondary
0
0%
To the Military
6
5%
To Employment
16
14%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
0
0%
Plan Unknown
0
0%
General Education
To Four-Year College
37
39%
To Two-Year College
47
49%
To Other Post-Secondary
0
0%
To the Military
5
5%
To Employment
6
6%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
0
0%
Plan Unknown
0
0%
Students with Disabilities
To Four-Year College
1
6%
To Two-Year College
6
33%
To Other Post-Secondary
0
0%
To the Military
1
6%
To Employment
10
56%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
0
0%
Plan Unknown
0
0%
Grade 3 English Language Arts
Due to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 proficiency rates.
MEAN SCORE: 307
All Students
PROFICIENT
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 133
LEVEL 1
35
26%
LEVEL 2
40
30%
LEVEL 3
50
38%
LEVEL 4
8
6%
General Education
PROFICIENT
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 107
LEVEL 1
14
13%
LEVEL 2
36
34%
LEVEL 3
49
46%
LEVEL 4
8
7%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 26
LEVEL 1
21
81%
LEVEL 2
4
15%
LEVEL 3
1
4%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
American Indian or Alaska Native
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 119
LEVEL 1
28
24%
LEVEL 2
38
32%
LEVEL 3
47
39%
LEVEL 4
6
5%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
4
67%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
2
33%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 8
LEVEL 1
3
38%
LEVEL 2
2
25%
LEVEL 3
1
13%
LEVEL 4
2
25%
Female
PROFICIENT
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 62
LEVEL 1
15
24%
LEVEL 2
16
26%
LEVEL 3
26
42%
LEVEL 4
5
8%
Male
PROFICIENT
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 71
LEVEL 1
20
28%
LEVEL 2
24
34%
LEVEL 3
24
34%
LEVEL 4
3
4%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 132
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 67
LEVEL 1
23
34%
LEVEL 2
22
33%
LEVEL 3
20
30%
LEVEL 4
2
3%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 66
LEVEL 1
12
18%
LEVEL 2
18
27%
LEVEL 3
30
45%
LEVEL 4
6
9%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 133
LEVEL 1
35
26%
LEVEL 2
40
30%
LEVEL 3
50
38%
LEVEL 4
8
6%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
133
107
26
1
2
1
4
119
6
8
62
71
132
1
67
66
133
PROFICIENT
44%
53%
4%
_%
_%
_%
_%
45%
33%
38%
50%
38%
_%
_%
33%
55%
44%
LEVEL 1
35
26%
14
13%
21
81%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
28
24%
4
67%
3
38%
15
24%
20
28%
_
_
_
_
23
34%
12
18%
35
26%
LEVEL 2
40
30%
36
34%
4
15%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
38
32%
0
0%
2
25%
16
26%
24
34%
_
_
_
_
22
33%
18
27%
40
30%
LEVEL 3
50
38%
49
46%
1
4%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
47
39%
2
33%
1
13%
26
42%
24
34%
_
_
_
_
20
30%
30
45%
50
38%
LEVEL 4
8
6%
8
7%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
6
5%
0
0%
2
25%
5
8%
3
4%
_
_
_
_
2
3%
6
9%
8
6%
Grade 4 English Language Arts
Due to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 proficiency rates.
MEAN SCORE: 297
All Students
PROFICIENT
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 102
LEVEL 1
31
30%
LEVEL 2
42
41%
LEVEL 3
20
20%
LEVEL 4
9
9%
General Education
PROFICIENT
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 82
LEVEL 1
14
17%
LEVEL 2
39
48%
LEVEL 3
20
24%
LEVEL 4
9
11%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 20
LEVEL 1
17
85%
LEVEL 2
3
15%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 93
LEVEL 1
28
30%
LEVEL 2
36
39%
LEVEL 3
20
22%
LEVEL 4
9
10%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
3
33%
LEVEL 2
6
67%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Female
PROFICIENT
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 49
LEVEL 1
13
27%
LEVEL 2
14
29%
LEVEL 3
14
29%
LEVEL 4
8
16%
Male
PROFICIENT
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 53
LEVEL 1
18
34%
LEVEL 2
28
53%
LEVEL 3
6
11%
LEVEL 4
1
2%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 102
LEVEL 1
31
30%
LEVEL 2
42
41%
LEVEL 3
20
20%
LEVEL 4
9
9%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 49
LEVEL 1
21
43%
LEVEL 2
20
41%
LEVEL 3
7
14%
LEVEL 4
1
2%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 53
LEVEL 1
10
19%
LEVEL 2
22
42%
LEVEL 3
13
25%
LEVEL 4
8
15%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 102
LEVEL 1
31
30%
LEVEL 2
42
41%
LEVEL 3
20
20%
LEVEL 4
9
9%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
102
82
20
1
5
93
3
9
49
53
102
49
53
102
PROFICIENT
28%
35%
0%
_%
_%
31%
_%
0%
45%
13%
28%
16%
40%
28%
LEVEL 1
31
30%
14
17%
17
85%
_
_
_
_
28
30%
_
_
3
33%
13
27%
18
34%
31
30%
21
43%
10
19%
31
30%
LEVEL 2
42
41%
39
48%
3
15%
_
_
_
_
36
39%
_
_
6
67%
14
29%
28
53%
42
41%
20
41%
22
42%
42
41%
LEVEL 3
20
20%
20
24%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
20
22%
_
_
0
0%
14
29%
6
11%
20
20%
7
14%
13
25%
20
20%
LEVEL 4
9
9%
9
11%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
9
10%
_
_
0
0%
8
16%
1
2%
9
9%
1
2%
8
15%
9
9%
Grade 5 English Language Arts
Due to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 proficiency rates.
MEAN SCORE: 310
All Students
PROFICIENT
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 95
LEVEL 1
25
26%
LEVEL 2
28
29%
LEVEL 3
32
34%
LEVEL 4
10
11%
General Education
PROFICIENT
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 82
LEVEL 1
16
20%
LEVEL 2
26
32%
LEVEL 3
31
38%
LEVEL 4
9
11%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 13
LEVEL 1
9
69%
LEVEL 2
2
15%
LEVEL 3
1
8%
LEVEL 4
1
8%
American Indian or Alaska Native
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 83
LEVEL 1
20
24%
LEVEL 2
27
33%
LEVEL 3
28
34%
LEVEL 4
8
10%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
2
40%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
1
20%
LEVEL 4
2
40%
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 7
LEVEL 1
3
43%
LEVEL 2
1
14%
LEVEL 3
3
43%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Female
PROFICIENT
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 43
LEVEL 1
11
26%
LEVEL 2
8
19%
LEVEL 3
18
42%
LEVEL 4
6
14%
Male
PROFICIENT
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 52
LEVEL 1
14
27%
LEVEL 2
20
38%
LEVEL 3
14
27%
LEVEL 4
4
8%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 95
LEVEL 1
25
26%
LEVEL 2
28
29%
LEVEL 3
32
34%
LEVEL 4
10
11%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 36
LEVEL 1
14
39%
LEVEL 2
11
31%
LEVEL 3
9
25%
LEVEL 4
2
6%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 59
LEVEL 1
11
19%
LEVEL 2
17
29%
LEVEL 3
23
39%
LEVEL 4
8
14%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 95
LEVEL 1
25
26%
LEVEL 2
28
29%
LEVEL 3
32
34%
LEVEL 4
10
11%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
95
82
13
1
2
4
83
5
7
43
52
95
36
59
95
PROFICIENT
44%
49%
15%
_%
_%
_%
43%
60%
43%
56%
35%
44%
31%
53%
44%
LEVEL 1
25
26%
16
20%
9
69%
_
_
_
_
_
_
20
24%
2
40%
3
43%
11
26%
14
27%
25
26%
14
39%
11
19%
25
26%
LEVEL 2
28
29%
26
32%
2
15%
_
_
_
_
_
_
27
33%
0
0%
1
14%
8
19%
20
38%
28
29%
11
31%
17
29%
28
29%
LEVEL 3
32
34%
31
38%
1
8%
_
_
_
_
_
_
28
34%
1
20%
3
43%
18
42%
14
27%
32
34%
9
25%
23
39%
32
34%
LEVEL 4
10
11%
9
11%
1
8%
_
_
_
_
_
_
8
10%
2
40%
0
0%
6
14%
4
8%
10
11%
2
6%
8
14%
10
11%
Grade 6 English Language Arts
Due to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 proficiency rates.
MEAN SCORE: 295
All Students
PROFICIENT
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 101
LEVEL 1
29
29%
LEVEL 2
43
43%
LEVEL 3
18
18%
LEVEL 4
11
11%
General Education
PROFICIENT
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 79
LEVEL 1
10
13%
LEVEL 2
40
51%
LEVEL 3
18
23%
LEVEL 4
11
14%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 22
LEVEL 1
19
86%
LEVEL 2
3
14%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 95
LEVEL 1
26
27%
LEVEL 2
41
43%
LEVEL 3
17
18%
LEVEL 4
11
12%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
3
50%
LEVEL 2
2
33%
LEVEL 3
1
17%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Female
PROFICIENT
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 44
LEVEL 1
12
27%
LEVEL 2
20
45%
LEVEL 3
6
14%
LEVEL 4
6
14%
Male
PROFICIENT
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 57
LEVEL 1
17
30%
LEVEL 2
23
40%
LEVEL 3
12
21%
LEVEL 4
5
9%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 101
LEVEL 1
29
29%
LEVEL 2
43
43%
LEVEL 3
18
18%
LEVEL 4
11
11%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 42
LEVEL 1
19
45%
LEVEL 2
19
45%
LEVEL 3
3
7%
LEVEL 4
1
2%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 59
LEVEL 1
10
17%
LEVEL 2
24
41%
LEVEL 3
15
25%
LEVEL 4
10
17%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 101
LEVEL 1
29
29%
LEVEL 2
43
43%
LEVEL 3
18
18%
LEVEL 4
11
11%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
101
79
22
1
2
95
3
6
44
57
101
42
59
101
PROFICIENT
29%
37%
0%
_%
_%
29%
_%
17%
27%
30%
29%
10%
42%
29%
LEVEL 1
29
29%
10
13%
19
86%
_
_
_
_
26
27%
_
_
3
50%
12
27%
17
30%
29
29%
19
45%
10
17%
29
29%
LEVEL 2
43
43%
40
51%
3
14%
_
_
_
_
41
43%
_
_
2
33%
20
45%
23
40%
43
43%
19
45%
24
41%
43
43%
LEVEL 3
18
18%
18
23%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
17
18%
_
_
1
17%
6
14%
12
21%
18
18%
3
7%
15
25%
18
18%
LEVEL 4
11
11%
11
14%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
11
12%
_
_
0
0%
6
14%
5
9%
11
11%
1
2%
10
17%
11
11%
Grade 7 English Language Arts
Due to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 proficiency rates.
MEAN SCORE: 305
All Students
PROFICIENT
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 124
LEVEL 1
28
23%
LEVEL 2
48
39%
LEVEL 3
30
24%
LEVEL 4
18
15%
General Education
PROFICIENT
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 95
LEVEL 1
7
7%
LEVEL 2
41
43%
LEVEL 3
29
31%
LEVEL 4
18
19%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 29
LEVEL 1
21
72%
LEVEL 2
7
24%
LEVEL 3
1
3%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
American Indian or Alaska Native
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 113
LEVEL 1
25
22%
LEVEL 2
43
38%
LEVEL 3
29
26%
LEVEL 4
16
14%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 11
LEVEL 1
3
27%
LEVEL 2
5
45%
LEVEL 3
1
9%
LEVEL 4
2
18%
Female
PROFICIENT
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 51
LEVEL 1
7
14%
LEVEL 2
17
33%
LEVEL 3
18
35%
LEVEL 4
9
18%
Male
PROFICIENT
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 73
LEVEL 1
21
29%
LEVEL 2
31
42%
LEVEL 3
12
16%
LEVEL 4
9
12%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 123
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 44
LEVEL 1
18
41%
LEVEL 2
16
36%
LEVEL 3
10
23%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 80
LEVEL 1
10
13%
LEVEL 2
32
40%
LEVEL 3
20
25%
LEVEL 4
18
23%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 124
LEVEL 1
28
23%
LEVEL 2
48
39%
LEVEL 3
30
24%
LEVEL 4
18
15%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
124
95
29
1
3
2
2
113
3
11
51
73
123
1
44
80
124
PROFICIENT
39%
49%
3%
_%
_%
_%
_%
40%
_%
27%
53%
29%
_%
_%
23%
48%
39%
LEVEL 1
28
23%
7
7%
21
72%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
25
22%
_
_
3
27%
7
14%
21
29%
_
_
_
_
18
41%
10
13%
28
23%
LEVEL 2
48
39%
41
43%
7
24%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
43
38%
_
_
5
45%
17
33%
31
42%
_
_
_
_
16
36%
32
40%
48
39%
LEVEL 3
30
24%
29
31%
1
3%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
29
26%
_
_
1
9%
18
35%
12
16%
_
_
_
_
10
23%
20
25%
30
24%
LEVEL 4
18
15%
18
19%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
16
14%
_
_
2
18%
9
18%
9
12%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
18
23%
18
15%
Grade 8 English Language Arts
Due to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 proficiency rates.
MEAN SCORE: 299
All Students
PROFICIENT
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 83
LEVEL 1
26
31%
LEVEL 2
26
31%
LEVEL 3
19
23%
LEVEL 4
12
14%
General Education
PROFICIENT
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 65
LEVEL 1
13
20%
LEVEL 2
21
32%
LEVEL 3
19
29%
LEVEL 4
12
18%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 18
LEVEL 1
13
72%
LEVEL 2
5
28%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 78
LEVEL 1
25
32%
LEVEL 2
24
31%
LEVEL 3
17
22%
LEVEL 4
12
15%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
1
20%
LEVEL 2
2
40%
LEVEL 3
2
40%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Female
PROFICIENT
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 41
LEVEL 1
8
20%
LEVEL 2
11
27%
LEVEL 3
12
29%
LEVEL 4
10
24%
Male
PROFICIENT
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 42
LEVEL 1
18
43%
LEVEL 2
15
36%
LEVEL 3
7
17%
LEVEL 4
2
5%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 83
LEVEL 1
26
31%
LEVEL 2
26
31%
LEVEL 3
19
23%
LEVEL 4
12
14%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 24
LEVEL 1
12
50%
LEVEL 2
7
29%
LEVEL 3
4
17%
LEVEL 4
1
4%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 59
LEVEL 1
14
24%
LEVEL 2
19
32%
LEVEL 3
15
25%
LEVEL 4
11
19%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 83
LEVEL 1
26
31%
LEVEL 2
26
31%
LEVEL 3
19
23%
LEVEL 4
12
14%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
83
65
18
1
3
78
1
5
41
42
83
24
59
83
PROFICIENT
37%
48%
0%
_%
_%
37%
_%
40%
54%
21%
37%
21%
44%
37%
LEVEL 1
26
31%
13
20%
13
72%
_
_
_
_
25
32%
_
_
1
20%
8
20%
18
43%
26
31%
12
50%
14
24%
26
31%
LEVEL 2
26
31%
21
32%
5
28%
_
_
_
_
24
31%
_
_
2
40%
11
27%
15
36%
26
31%
7
29%
19
32%
26
31%
LEVEL 3
19
23%
19
29%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
17
22%
_
_
2
40%
12
29%
7
17%
19
23%
4
17%
15
25%
19
23%
LEVEL 4
12
14%
12
18%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
12
15%
_
_
0
0%
10
24%
2
5%
12
14%
1
4%
11
19%
12
14%
Grade 3 Mathematics
Due to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 proficiency rates.
MEAN SCORE: 309
All Students
PROFICIENT
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 129
LEVEL 1
25
19%
LEVEL 2
40
31%
LEVEL 3
38
29%
LEVEL 4
26
20%
General Education
PROFICIENT
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 104
LEVEL 1
11
11%
LEVEL 2
32
31%
LEVEL 3
35
34%
LEVEL 4
26
25%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 25
LEVEL 1
14
56%
LEVEL 2
8
32%
LEVEL 3
3
12%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
American Indian or Alaska Native
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 115
LEVEL 1
21
18%
LEVEL 2
37
32%
LEVEL 3
33
29%
LEVEL 4
24
21%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
3
50%
LEVEL 2
1
17%
LEVEL 3
2
33%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 8
LEVEL 1
1
13%
LEVEL 2
2
25%
LEVEL 3
3
38%
LEVEL 4
2
25%
Female
PROFICIENT
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 60
LEVEL 1
16
27%
LEVEL 2
18
30%
LEVEL 3
15
25%
LEVEL 4
11
18%
Male
PROFICIENT
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 69
LEVEL 1
9
13%
LEVEL 2
22
32%
LEVEL 3
23
33%
LEVEL 4
15
22%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 128
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 63
LEVEL 1
19
30%
LEVEL 2
19
30%
LEVEL 3
18
29%
LEVEL 4
7
11%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 66
LEVEL 1
6
9%
LEVEL 2
21
32%
LEVEL 3
20
30%
LEVEL 4
19
29%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 129
LEVEL 1
25
19%
LEVEL 2
40
31%
LEVEL 3
38
29%
LEVEL 4
26
20%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
129
104
25
1
2
1
4
115
6
8
60
69
128
1
63
66
129
PROFICIENT
50%
59%
12%
_%
_%
_%
_%
50%
33%
63%
43%
55%
_%
_%
40%
59%
50%
LEVEL 1
25
19%
11
11%
14
56%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
21
18%
3
50%
1
13%
16
27%
9
13%
_
_
_
_
19
30%
6
9%
25
19%
LEVEL 2
40
31%
32
31%
8
32%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
37
32%
1
17%
2
25%
18
30%
22
32%
_
_
_
_
19
30%
21
32%
40
31%
LEVEL 3
38
29%
35
34%
3
12%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
33
29%
2
33%
3
38%
15
25%
23
33%
_
_
_
_
18
29%
20
30%
38
29%
LEVEL 4
26
20%
26
25%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
24
21%
0
0%
2
25%
11
18%
15
22%
_
_
_
_
7
11%
19
29%
26
20%
Grade 4 Mathematics
Due to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 proficiency rates.
MEAN SCORE: 304
All Students
PROFICIENT
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 101
LEVEL 1
24
24%
LEVEL 2
34
34%
LEVEL 3
28
28%
LEVEL 4
15
15%
General Education
PROFICIENT
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 84
LEVEL 1
14
17%
LEVEL 2
29
35%
LEVEL 3
26
31%
LEVEL 4
15
18%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 17
LEVEL 1
10
59%
LEVEL 2
5
29%
LEVEL 3
2
12%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 92
LEVEL 1
21
23%
LEVEL 2
29
32%
LEVEL 3
27
29%
LEVEL 4
15
16%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
3
33%
LEVEL 2
5
56%
LEVEL 3
1
11%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Female
PROFICIENT
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 50
LEVEL 1
12
24%
LEVEL 2
14
28%
LEVEL 3
13
26%
LEVEL 4
11
22%
Male
PROFICIENT
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 51
LEVEL 1
12
24%
LEVEL 2
20
39%
LEVEL 3
15
29%
LEVEL 4
4
8%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 100
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 48
LEVEL 1
17
35%
LEVEL 2
21
44%
LEVEL 3
8
17%
LEVEL 4
2
4%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 53
LEVEL 1
7
13%
LEVEL 2
13
25%
LEVEL 3
20
38%
LEVEL 4
13
25%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 101
LEVEL 1
24
24%
LEVEL 2
34
34%
LEVEL 3
28
28%
LEVEL 4
15
15%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
101
84
17
1
5
92
3
9
50
51
100
1
48
53
101
PROFICIENT
43%
49%
12%
_%
_%
46%
_%
11%
48%
37%
_%
_%
21%
62%
43%
LEVEL 1
24
24%
14
17%
10
59%
_
_
_
_
21
23%
_
_
3
33%
12
24%
12
24%
_
_
_
_
17
35%
7
13%
24
24%
LEVEL 2
34
34%
29
35%
5
29%
_
_
_
_
29
32%
_
_
5
56%
14
28%
20
39%
_
_
_
_
21
44%
13
25%
34
34%
LEVEL 3
28
28%
26
31%
2
12%
_
_
_
_
27
29%
_
_
1
11%
13
26%
15
29%
_
_
_
_
8
17%
20
38%
28
28%
LEVEL 4
15
15%
15
18%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
15
16%
_
_
0
0%
11
22%
4
8%
_
_
_
_
2
4%
13
25%
15
15%
Grade 5 Mathematics
Due to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 proficiency rates.
MEAN SCORE: 312
All Students
PROFICIENT
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 91
LEVEL 1
20
22%
LEVEL 2
30
33%
LEVEL 3
27
30%
LEVEL 4
14
15%
General Education
PROFICIENT
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 79
LEVEL 1
12
15%
LEVEL 2
28
35%
LEVEL 3
25
32%
LEVEL 4
14
18%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 12
LEVEL 1
8
67%
LEVEL 2
2
17%
LEVEL 3
2
17%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
American Indian or Alaska Native
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 80
LEVEL 1
17
21%
LEVEL 2
25
31%
LEVEL 3
25
31%
LEVEL 4
13
16%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
2
40%
LEVEL 2
1
20%
LEVEL 3
1
20%
LEVEL 4
1
20%
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
1
17%
LEVEL 2
4
67%
LEVEL 3
1
17%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Female
PROFICIENT
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 40
LEVEL 1
9
23%
LEVEL 2
14
35%
LEVEL 3
13
33%
LEVEL 4
4
10%
Male
PROFICIENT
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 51
LEVEL 1
11
22%
LEVEL 2
16
31%
LEVEL 3
14
27%
LEVEL 4
10
20%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 91
LEVEL 1
20
22%
LEVEL 2
30
33%
LEVEL 3
27
30%
LEVEL 4
14
15%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 33
LEVEL 1
13
39%
LEVEL 2
10
30%
LEVEL 3
5
15%
LEVEL 4
5
15%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 58
LEVEL 1
7
12%
LEVEL 2
20
34%
LEVEL 3
22
38%
LEVEL 4
9
16%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 91
LEVEL 1
20
22%
LEVEL 2
30
33%
LEVEL 3
27
30%
LEVEL 4
14
15%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
91
79
12
1
2
3
80
5
6
40
51
91
33
58
91
PROFICIENT
45%
49%
17%
_%
_%
_%
48%
40%
17%
43%
47%
45%
30%
53%
45%
LEVEL 1
20
22%
12
15%
8
67%
_
_
_
_
_
_
17
21%
2
40%
1
17%
9
23%
11
22%
20
22%
13
39%
7
12%
20
22%
LEVEL 2
30
33%
28
35%
2
17%
_
_
_
_
_
_
25
31%
1
20%
4
67%
14
35%
16
31%
30
33%
10
30%
20
34%
30
33%
LEVEL 3
27
30%
25
32%
2
17%
_
_
_
_
_
_
25
31%
1
20%
1
17%
13
33%
14
27%
27
30%
5
15%
22
38%
27
30%
LEVEL 4
14
15%
14
18%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
13
16%
1
20%
0
0%
4
10%
10
20%
14
15%
5
15%
9
16%
14
15%
Grade 6 Mathematics
Due to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 proficiency rates.
MEAN SCORE: 313
All Students
PROFICIENT
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 99
LEVEL 1
17
17%
LEVEL 2
32
32%
LEVEL 3
24
24%
LEVEL 4
26
26%
General Education
PROFICIENT
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 80
LEVEL 1
4
5%
LEVEL 2
28
35%
LEVEL 3
22
28%
LEVEL 4
26
33%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 19
LEVEL 1
13
68%
LEVEL 2
4
21%
LEVEL 3
2
11%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 94
LEVEL 1
14
15%
LEVEL 2
31
33%
LEVEL 3
23
24%
LEVEL 4
26
28%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
3
60%
LEVEL 2
1
20%
LEVEL 3
1
20%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Female
PROFICIENT
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 42
LEVEL 1
6
14%
LEVEL 2
12
29%
LEVEL 3
15
36%
LEVEL 4
9
21%
Male
PROFICIENT
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 57
LEVEL 1
11
19%
LEVEL 2
20
35%
LEVEL 3
9
16%
LEVEL 4
17
30%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 99
LEVEL 1
17
17%
LEVEL 2
32
32%
LEVEL 3
24
24%
LEVEL 4
26
26%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 41
LEVEL 1
10
24%
LEVEL 2
14
34%
LEVEL 3
12
29%
LEVEL 4
5
12%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 58
LEVEL 1
7
12%
LEVEL 2
18
31%
LEVEL 3
12
21%
LEVEL 4
21
36%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 99
LEVEL 1
17
17%
LEVEL 2
32
32%
LEVEL 3
24
24%
LEVEL 4
26
26%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
99
80
19
1
1
94
3
5
42
57
99
41
58
99
PROFICIENT
51%
60%
11%
_%
_%
52%
_%
20%
57%
46%
51%
41%
57%
51%
LEVEL 1
17
17%
4
5%
13
68%
_
_
_
_
14
15%
_
_
3
60%
6
14%
11
19%
17
17%
10
24%
7
12%
17
17%
LEVEL 2
32
32%
28
35%
4
21%
_
_
_
_
31
33%
_
_
1
20%
12
29%
20
35%
32
32%
14
34%
18
31%
32
32%
LEVEL 3
24
24%
22
28%
2
11%
_
_
_
_
23
24%
_
_
1
20%
15
36%
9
16%
24
24%
12
29%
12
21%
24
24%
LEVEL 4
26
26%
26
33%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
26
28%
_
_
0
0%
9
21%
17
30%
26
26%
5
12%
21
36%
26
26%
Grade 7 Mathematics
Due to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 proficiency rates.
Mean scores and data in the table for grade 7 math include only those for grade 7 students who took the Grade 7 New York State Testing Program Assessment (NYSTP) in Mathematics. For 2015 and forward, data in the bar charts include those for grade 7 students who took the Grade 7 NYSTP in Mathematics and grade 7 students who took a Regents math test in lieu of the NYSTP. For 2014 and earlier, data in the bar charts include only those for grade 7 students who took the Grade 7 NYSTP.
MEAN SCORE: 306
All Students
PROFICIENT
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 120
LEVEL 1
34
28%
LEVEL 2
42
35%
LEVEL 3
29
24%
LEVEL 4
15
13%
General Education
PROFICIENT
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 95
LEVEL 1
12
13%
LEVEL 2
39
41%
LEVEL 3
29
31%
LEVEL 4
15
16%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 25
LEVEL 1
22
88%
LEVEL 2
3
12%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 110
LEVEL 1
30
27%
LEVEL 2
37
34%
LEVEL 3
29
26%
LEVEL 4
14
13%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 10
LEVEL 1
4
40%
LEVEL 2
5
50%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
1
10%
Female
PROFICIENT
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 49
LEVEL 1
10
20%
LEVEL 2
23
47%
LEVEL 3
11
22%
LEVEL 4
5
10%
Male
PROFICIENT
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 71
LEVEL 1
24
34%
LEVEL 2
19
27%
LEVEL 3
18
25%
LEVEL 4
10
14%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 119
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 41
LEVEL 1
20
49%
LEVEL 2
14
34%
LEVEL 3
4
10%
LEVEL 4
3
7%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 79
LEVEL 1
14
18%
LEVEL 2
28
35%
LEVEL 3
25
32%
LEVEL 4
12
15%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 120
LEVEL 1
34
28%
LEVEL 2
42
35%
LEVEL 3
29
24%
LEVEL 4
15
13%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
120
95
25
3
2
2
110
3
10
49
71
119
1
41
79
120
PROFICIENT
37%
46%
0%
_%
_%
_%
39%
_%
10%
33%
39%
_%
_%
17%
47%
37%
LEVEL 1
34
28%
12
13%
22
88%
_
_
_
_
_
_
30
27%
_
_
4
40%
10
20%
24
34%
_
_
_
_
20
49%
14
18%
34
28%
LEVEL 2
42
35%
39
41%
3
12%
_
_
_
_
_
_
37
34%
_
_
5
50%
23
47%
19
27%
_
_
_
_
14
34%
28
35%
42
35%
LEVEL 3
29
24%
29
31%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
29
26%
_
_
0
0%
11
22%
18
25%
_
_
_
_
4
10%
25
32%
29
24%
LEVEL 4
15
13%
15
16%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
14
13%
_
_
1
10%
5
10%
10
14%
_
_
_
_
3
7%
12
15%
15
13%
Grade 8 Mathematics
Due to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 proficiency rates.
Mean scores and data in the table for grade 8 math include only those for grade 8 students who took the Grade 8 New York State Testing Program Assessment (NYSTP) in Mathematics. For 2015 and forward, data in the bar charts include those for grade 8 students who took the Grade 8 NYSTP in Mathematics and grade 8 students who took a Regents math test in lieu of the NYSTP. For 2014 and earlier, data in the bar charts include only those for grade 8 students who took the Grade 8 NYSTP.
MEAN SCORE: 295
All Students
PROFICIENT
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 66
LEVEL 1
14
21%
LEVEL 2
44
67%
LEVEL 3
7
11%
LEVEL 4
1
2%
General Education
PROFICIENT
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 50
LEVEL 1
8
16%
LEVEL 2
34
68%
LEVEL 3
7
14%
LEVEL 4
1
2%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 16
LEVEL 1
6
38%
LEVEL 2
10
63%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 63
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 66
LEVEL 1
14
21%
LEVEL 2
44
67%
LEVEL 3
7
11%
LEVEL 4
1
2%
Female
PROFICIENT
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 32
LEVEL 1
7
22%
LEVEL 2
20
63%
LEVEL 3
5
16%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Male
PROFICIENT
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 34
LEVEL 1
7
21%
LEVEL 2
24
71%
LEVEL 3
2
6%
LEVEL 4
1
3%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 66
LEVEL 1
14
21%
LEVEL 2
44
67%
LEVEL 3
7
11%
LEVEL 4
1
2%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 21
LEVEL 1
7
33%
LEVEL 2
12
57%
LEVEL 3
1
5%
LEVEL 4
1
5%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 45
LEVEL 1
7
16%
LEVEL 2
32
71%
LEVEL 3
6
13%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 66
LEVEL 1
14
21%
LEVEL 2
44
67%
LEVEL 3
7
11%
LEVEL 4
1
2%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
66
50
16
1
63
2
66
32
34
66
21
45
66
PROFICIENT
12%
16%
0%
_%
_%
_%
12%
16%
9%
12%
10%
13%
12%
LEVEL 1
14
21%
8
16%
6
38%
_
_
_
_
_
_
14
21%
7
22%
7
21%
14
21%
7
33%
7
16%
14
21%
LEVEL 2
44
67%
34
68%
10
63%
_
_
_
_
_
_
44
67%
20
63%
24
71%
44
67%
12
57%
32
71%
44
67%
LEVEL 3
7
11%
7
14%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
7
11%
5
16%
2
6%
7
11%
1
5%
6
13%
7
11%
LEVEL 4
1
2%
1
2%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
1
2%
0
0%
1
3%
1
2%
1
5%
0
0%
1
2%
Grade 8 Students Taking a Regents Math Test
Accelerated grade 8 students who took a Regents math test in lieu of the Grade 8 NYSTP in Mathematics.
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 22
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
10
45%
LEVEL 4 AND ABOVE
12
55%
LEVEL 3 AND ABOVE
22
100%
GROUP
All Students
TOTAL TESTED
22
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
10
45%
4 & ABOVE
12
55%
3 & ABOVE
22
100%
Grade 4 Science
Due to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 proficiency rates.
MEAN SCORE: 82
All Students
PROFICIENT
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 104
LEVEL 1
3
3%
LEVEL 2
8
8%
LEVEL 3
48
46%
LEVEL 4
45
43%
General Education
PROFICIENT
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 86
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
5
6%
LEVEL 3
38
44%
LEVEL 4
43
50%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 18
LEVEL 1
3
17%
LEVEL 2
3
17%
LEVEL 3
10
56%
LEVEL 4
2
11%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 96
LEVEL 1
3
3%
LEVEL 2
8
8%
LEVEL 3
44
46%
LEVEL 4
41
43%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 8
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
4
50%
LEVEL 4
4
50%
Female
PROFICIENT
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 50
LEVEL 1
1
2%
LEVEL 2
4
8%
LEVEL 3
19
38%
LEVEL 4
26
52%
Male
PROFICIENT
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 54
LEVEL 1
2
4%
LEVEL 2
4
7%
LEVEL 3
29
54%
LEVEL 4
19
35%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 103
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 48
LEVEL 1
3
6%
LEVEL 2
7
15%
LEVEL 3
26
54%
LEVEL 4
12
25%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 56
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
2%
LEVEL 3
22
39%
LEVEL 4
33
59%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 104
LEVEL 1
3
3%
LEVEL 2
8
8%
LEVEL 3
48
46%
LEVEL 4
45
43%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
104
86
18
1
5
96
2
8
50
54
103
1
48
56
104
PROFICIENT
89%
94%
67%
_%
_%
89%
_%
100%
90%
89%
_%
_%
79%
98%
89%
LEVEL 1
3
3%
0
0%
3
17%
_
_
_
_
3
3%
_
_
0
0%
1
2%
2
4%
_
_
_
_
3
6%
0
0%
3
3%
LEVEL 2
8
8%
5
6%
3
17%
_
_
_
_
8
8%
_
_
0
0%
4
8%
4
7%
_
_
_
_
7
15%
1
2%
8
8%
LEVEL 3
48
46%
38
44%
10
56%
_
_
_
_
44
46%
_
_
4
50%
19
38%
29
54%
_
_
_
_
26
54%
22
39%
48
46%
LEVEL 4
45
43%
43
50%
2
11%
_
_
_
_
41
43%
_
_
4
50%
26
52%
19
35%
_
_
_
_
12
25%
33
59%
45
43%
Grade 8 Science
Due to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 proficiency rates.
Data in the bar charts include those for grade 8 students who took the New York State Grade 8 Science Test and grade 8 students who took a Regents science test in lieu of this test. Mean scores and data in the table for grade 8 science include only those for grade 8 students who took the New York State Grade 8 Science Test.
MEAN SCORE: 74
All Students
PROFICIENT
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 87
LEVEL 1
3
3%
LEVEL 2
18
21%
LEVEL 3
42
48%
LEVEL 4
24
28%
General Education
PROFICIENT
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 70
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
9
13%
LEVEL 3
36
51%
LEVEL 4
24
34%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 17
LEVEL 1
2
12%
LEVEL 2
9
53%
LEVEL 3
6
35%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 83
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 87
LEVEL 1
3
3%
LEVEL 2
18
21%
LEVEL 3
42
48%
LEVEL 4
24
28%
Female
PROFICIENT
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 48
LEVEL 1
1
2%
LEVEL 2
8
17%
LEVEL 3
23
48%
LEVEL 4
16
33%
Male
PROFICIENT
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 39
LEVEL 1
2
5%
LEVEL 2
10
26%
LEVEL 3
19
49%
LEVEL 4
8
21%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 87
LEVEL 1
3
3%
LEVEL 2
18
21%
LEVEL 3
42
48%
LEVEL 4
24
28%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 20
LEVEL 1
3
15%
LEVEL 2
7
35%
LEVEL 3
6
30%
LEVEL 4
4
20%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 67
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
11
16%
LEVEL 3
36
54%
LEVEL 4
20
30%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 87
LEVEL 1
3
3%
LEVEL 2
18
21%
LEVEL 3
42
48%
LEVEL 4
24
28%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
87
70
17
1
1
83
2
87
48
39
87
20
67
87
PROFICIENT
76%
86%
35%
_%
_%
_%
_%
76%
81%
69%
76%
50%
84%
76%
LEVEL 1
3
3%
1
1%
2
12%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
3
3%
1
2%
2
5%
3
3%
3
15%
0
0%
3
3%
LEVEL 2
18
21%
9
13%
9
53%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
18
21%
8
17%
10
26%
18
21%
7
35%
11
16%
18
21%
LEVEL 3
42
48%
36
51%
6
35%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
42
48%
23
48%
19
49%
42
48%
6
30%
36
54%
42
48%
LEVEL 4
24
28%
24
34%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
24
28%
16
33%
8
21%
24
28%
4
20%
20
30%
24
28%
Grade 8 Students Taking a Regents Science Test
Accelerated grade 8 students who take a Regents science test in lieu of the New York State Grade 8 Science Test.
All Students
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
GROUP
All Students
TOTAL TESTED
1
PROFICIENT
_%
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Recently Arrived ELL Students (2015 - 16)
GRADE
Grade 4
RECENTLY ARRIVED ELL STUDENTS TAKING NYSESLAT IN LIEU OF NYSTP
1
GRADE
Grade 4
RECENTLY ARRIVED ELL STUDENTS NOT TAKING NYSESLAT IN LIEU OF NYSTP
1
Recently Arrived ELL Students (2015 - 16)
Recently Arrived ELL Students Taking NYSESLAT in Lieu of NYSTP
Grade 4
1
Recently Arrived ELL Students NOT Tested on the ELA NYSTP
Grade 4
1
Statewide Results on the National Assessment of Educational Progress: NAEP (2014 - 15)
Grade: 4
Reading
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Students with Disabilities
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
BELOW BASIC
32%
*%
20%
48%
44%
20%
*%
70%
74%
43%
BASIC
32%
*%
30%
34%
37%
31%
*%
22%
21%
36%
PROFICIENT
27%
*%
33%
15%
17%
37%
*%
7%
4%
18%
ADVANCED
9%
*%
17%
3%
2%
12%
*%
1%
1%
3%
PARTICIPATION RATE
98
88
Reading
All Students
Percent Below Basic
32
Percent Basic
32
Percent Proficient
27
Percent Advanced
9
American Indian or Alaska Native
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Percent Below Basic
20
Percent Basic
30
Percent Proficient
33
Percent Advanced
17
Black or African American
Percent Below Basic
48
Percent Basic
34
Percent Proficient
15
Percent Advanced
3
Hispanic or Latino
Percent Below Basic
44
Percent Basic
37
Percent Proficient
17
Percent Advanced
2
White
Percent Below Basic
20
Percent Basic
31
Percent Proficient
37
Percent Advanced
12
Multiracial
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Students with Disabilities
Percent Below Basic
70
Percent Basic
22
Percent Proficient
7
Percent Advanced
1
Participation Rate
98
English Language Learners
Percent Below Basic
74
Percent Basic
21
Percent Proficient
4
Percent Advanced
1
Participation Rate
88
Economically Disadvantaged
Percent Below Basic
43
Percent Basic
36
Percent Proficient
18
Percent Advanced
3
Mathematics
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Students with Disabilities
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
BELOW BASIC
21%
*%
12%
40%
28%
12%
*%
49%
56%
29%
BASIC
44%
*%
31%
46%
51%
41%
*%
39%
35%
48%
PROFICIENT
30%
*%
42%
13%
20%
40%
*%
10%
9%
21%
ADVANCED
5%
*%
15%
1%
1%
7%
*%
2%
*%
2%
PARTICIPATION RATE
98
91
Mathematics
All Students
Percent Below Basic
21
Percent Basic
44
Percent Proficient
30
Percent Advanced
5
American Indian or Alaska Native
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Percent Below Basic
12
Percent Basic
31
Percent Proficient
42
Percent Advanced
15
Black or African American
Percent Below Basic
40
Percent Basic
46
Percent Proficient
13
Percent Advanced
1
Hispanic or Latino
Percent Below Basic
28
Percent Basic
51
Percent Proficient
20
Percent Advanced
1
White
Percent Below Basic
12
Percent Basic
41
Percent Proficient
40
Percent Advanced
7
Multiracial
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Students with Disabilities
Percent Below Basic
49
Percent Basic
39
Percent Proficient
10
Percent Advanced
2
Participation Rate
98
English Language Learners
Percent Below Basic
56
Percent Basic
35
Percent Proficient
9
Percent Advanced
*
Participation Rate
91
Economically Disadvantaged
Percent Below Basic
29
Percent Basic
48
Percent Proficient
21
Percent Advanced
2
Grade: 8
Reading
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Students with Disabilities
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
BELOW BASIC
27%
*%
19%
42%
35%
18%
*%
59%
78%
36%
BASIC
40%
*%
39%
41%
43%
39%
*%
33%
19%
42%
PROFICIENT
29%
*%
34%
16%
20%
38%
*%
8%
3%
21%
ADVANCED
4%
*%
8%
1%
2%
5%
*%
*%
*%
1%
PARTICIPATION RATE
98
89
Reading
All Students
Percent Below Basic
27
Percent Basic
40
Percent Proficient
29
Percent Advanced
4
American Indian or Alaska Native
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Percent Below Basic
19
Percent Basic
39
Percent Proficient
34
Percent Advanced
8
Black or African American
Percent Below Basic
42
Percent Basic
41
Percent Proficient
16
Percent Advanced
1
Hispanic or Latino
Percent Below Basic
35
Percent Basic
43
Percent Proficient
20
Percent Advanced
2
White
Percent Below Basic
18
Percent Basic
39
Percent Proficient
38
Percent Advanced
5
Multiracial
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Students with Disabilities
Percent Below Basic
59
Percent Basic
33
Percent Proficient
8
Percent Advanced
*
Participation Rate
98
English Language Learners
Percent Below Basic
78
Percent Basic
19
Percent Proficient
3
Percent Advanced
*
Participation Rate
89
Economically Disadvantaged
Percent Below Basic
36
Percent Basic
42
Percent Proficient
21
Percent Advanced
1
Mathematics
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Students with Disabilities
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
BELOW BASIC
31%
*%
18%
48%
41%
20%
*%
64%
72%
40%
BASIC
38%
*%
30%
37%
40%
40%
*%
27%
21%
39%
PROFICIENT
24%
*%
33%
13%
16%
31%
*%
8%
6%
17%
ADVANCED
7%
*%
19%
2%
3%
9%
*%
1%
1%
4%
PARTICIPATION RATE
99
94
Mathematics
All Students
Percent Below Basic
31
Percent Basic
38
Percent Proficient
24
Percent Advanced
7
American Indian or Alaska Native
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Percent Below Basic
18
Percent Basic
30
Percent Proficient
33
Percent Advanced
19
Black or African American
Percent Below Basic
48
Percent Basic
37
Percent Proficient
13
Percent Advanced
2
Hispanic or Latino
Percent Below Basic
41
Percent Basic
40
Percent Proficient
16
Percent Advanced
3
White
Percent Below Basic
20
Percent Basic
40
Percent Proficient
31
Percent Advanced
9
Multiracial
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Students with Disabilities
Percent Below Basic
64
Percent Basic
27
Percent Proficient
8
Percent Advanced
1
Participation Rate
99
English Language Learners
Percent Below Basic
72
Percent Basic
21
Percent Proficient
6
Percent Advanced
1
Participation Rate
94
Economically Disadvantaged
Percent Below Basic
40
Percent Basic
39
Percent Proficient
17
Percent Advanced
4
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level English Language Arts after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 123
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
5
4%
LEVEL 3
21
17%
LEVEL 4
83
67%
General Education
PROFICIENT
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 103
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
16
16%
LEVEL 4
80
78%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 20
LEVEL 1
1
5%
LEVEL 2
5
25%
LEVEL 3
5
25%
LEVEL 4
3
15%
American Indian or Alaska Native
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
1
20%
LEVEL 4
4
80%
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 109
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
5
5%
LEVEL 3
16
15%
LEVEL 4
75
69%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
4
44%
LEVEL 4
4
44%
Female
PROFICIENT
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 66
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
3%
LEVEL 3
9
14%
LEVEL 4
48
73%
Male
PROFICIENT
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 57
LEVEL 1
1
2%
LEVEL 2
3
5%
LEVEL 3
12
21%
LEVEL 4
35
61%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 123
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
5
4%
LEVEL 3
21
17%
LEVEL 4
83
67%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 44
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
5
11%
LEVEL 3
12
27%
LEVEL 4
22
50%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 79
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
9
11%
LEVEL 4
61
77%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 123
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
5
4%
LEVEL 3
21
17%
LEVEL 4
83
67%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
123
103
20
2
5
2
3
109
2
9
66
57
123
44
79
123
PROFICIENT
85%
93%
40%
_%
100%
_%
_%
83%
_%
89%
86%
82%
85%
77%
89%
85%
LEVEL 1
1
1%
0
0%
1
5%
_
_
0
0%
_
_
_
_
1
1%
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
1
2%
1
1%
0
0%
1
1%
1
1%
LEVEL 2
5
4%
0
0%
5
25%
_
_
0
0%
_
_
_
_
5
5%
_
_
0
0%
2
3%
3
5%
5
4%
5
11%
0
0%
5
4%
LEVEL 3
21
17%
16
16%
5
25%
_
_
1
20%
_
_
_
_
16
15%
_
_
4
44%
9
14%
12
21%
21
17%
12
27%
9
11%
21
17%
LEVEL 4
83
67%
80
78%
3
15%
_
_
4
80%
_
_
_
_
75
69%
_
_
4
44%
48
73%
35
61%
83
67%
22
50%
61
77%
83
67%
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level Mathematics after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 123
LEVEL 1
3
2%
LEVEL 2
4
3%
LEVEL 3
77
63%
LEVEL 4
33
27%
General Education
PROFICIENT
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 103
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
65
63%
LEVEL 4
33
32%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 20
LEVEL 1
2
10%
LEVEL 2
4
20%
LEVEL 3
12
60%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
American Indian or Alaska Native
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
3
60%
LEVEL 4
2
40%
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 109
LEVEL 1
2
2%
LEVEL 2
4
4%
LEVEL 3
67
61%
LEVEL 4
30
28%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
1
11%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
7
78%
LEVEL 4
1
11%
Female
PROFICIENT
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 66
LEVEL 1
2
3%
LEVEL 2
2
3%
LEVEL 3
40
61%
LEVEL 4
20
30%
Male
PROFICIENT
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 57
LEVEL 1
1
2%
LEVEL 2
2
4%
LEVEL 3
37
65%
LEVEL 4
13
23%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 123
LEVEL 1
3
2%
LEVEL 2
4
3%
LEVEL 3
77
63%
LEVEL 4
33
27%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 44
LEVEL 1
2
5%
LEVEL 2
3
7%
LEVEL 3
32
73%
LEVEL 4
6
14%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 79
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
1
1%
LEVEL 3
45
57%
LEVEL 4
27
34%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 123
LEVEL 1
3
2%
LEVEL 2
4
3%
LEVEL 3
77
63%
LEVEL 4
33
27%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
123
103
20
2
5
2
3
109
2
9
66
57
123
44
79
123
PROFICIENT
89%
95%
60%
_%
100%
_%
_%
89%
_%
89%
91%
88%
89%
86%
91%
89%
LEVEL 1
3
2%
1
1%
2
10%
_
_
0
0%
_
_
_
_
2
2%
_
_
1
11%
2
3%
1
2%
3
2%
2
5%
1
1%
3
2%
LEVEL 2
4
3%
0
0%
4
20%
_
_
0
0%
_
_
_
_
4
4%
_
_
0
0%
2
3%
2
4%
4
3%
3
7%
1
1%
4
3%
LEVEL 3
77
63%
65
63%
12
60%
_
_
3
60%
_
_
_
_
67
61%
_
_
7
78%
40
61%
37
65%
77
63%
32
73%
45
57%
77
63%
LEVEL 4
33
27%
33
32%
0
0%
_
_
2
40%
_
_
_
_
30
28%
_
_
1
11%
20
30%
13
23%
33
27%
6
14%
27
34%
33
27%
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level Global History and Geography after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 123
LEVEL 1
7
6%
LEVEL 2
8
7%
LEVEL 3
38
31%
LEVEL 4
61
50%
General Education
PROFICIENT
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 103
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
3
3%
LEVEL 3
35
34%
LEVEL 4
59
57%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 20
LEVEL 1
6
30%
LEVEL 2
5
25%
LEVEL 3
3
15%
LEVEL 4
2
10%
American Indian or Alaska Native
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
2
40%
LEVEL 4
3
60%
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 109
LEVEL 1
6
6%
LEVEL 2
8
7%
LEVEL 3
32
29%
LEVEL 4
55
50%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
1
11%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
4
44%
LEVEL 4
3
33%
Female
PROFICIENT
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 66
LEVEL 1
2
3%
LEVEL 2
4
6%
LEVEL 3
25
38%
LEVEL 4
31
47%
Male
PROFICIENT
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 57
LEVEL 1
5
9%
LEVEL 2
4
7%
LEVEL 3
13
23%
LEVEL 4
30
53%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 123
LEVEL 1
7
6%
LEVEL 2
8
7%
LEVEL 3
38
31%
LEVEL 4
61
50%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 44
LEVEL 1
6
14%
LEVEL 2
5
11%
LEVEL 3
15
34%
LEVEL 4
17
39%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 79
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
3
4%
LEVEL 3
23
29%
LEVEL 4
44
56%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 123
LEVEL 1
7
6%
LEVEL 2
8
7%
LEVEL 3
38
31%
LEVEL 4
61
50%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
123
103
20
2
5
2
3
109
2
9
66
57
123
44
79
123
PROFICIENT
80%
91%
25%
_%
100%
_%
_%
80%
_%
78%
85%
75%
80%
73%
85%
80%
LEVEL 1
7
6%
1
1%
6
30%
_
_
0
0%
_
_
_
_
6
6%
_
_
1
11%
2
3%
5
9%
7
6%
6
14%
1
1%
7
6%
LEVEL 2
8
7%
3
3%
5
25%
_
_
0
0%
_
_
_
_
8
7%
_
_
0
0%
4
6%
4
7%
8
7%
5
11%
3
4%
8
7%
LEVEL 3
38
31%
35
34%
3
15%
_
_
2
40%
_
_
_
_
32
29%
_
_
4
44%
25
38%
13
23%
38
31%
15
34%
23
29%
38
31%
LEVEL 4
61
50%
59
57%
2
10%
_
_
3
60%
_
_
_
_
55
50%
_
_
3
33%
31
47%
30
53%
61
50%
17
39%
44
56%
61
50%
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level U.S. History and Government after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 123
LEVEL 1
2
2%
LEVEL 2
3
2%
LEVEL 3
15
12%
LEVEL 4
90
73%
General Education
PROFICIENT
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 103
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
1%
LEVEL 3
8
8%
LEVEL 4
87
84%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 20
LEVEL 1
2
10%
LEVEL 2
2
10%
LEVEL 3
7
35%
LEVEL 4
3
15%
American Indian or Alaska Native
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
1
20%
LEVEL 4
4
80%
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 109
LEVEL 1
2
2%
LEVEL 2
3
3%
LEVEL 3
13
12%
LEVEL 4
79
72%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
1
11%
LEVEL 4
7
78%
Female
PROFICIENT
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 66
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
2%
LEVEL 3
9
14%
LEVEL 4
49
74%
Male
PROFICIENT
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 57
LEVEL 1
2
4%
LEVEL 2
2
4%
LEVEL 3
6
11%
LEVEL 4
41
72%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 123
LEVEL 1
2
2%
LEVEL 2
3
2%
LEVEL 3
15
12%
LEVEL 4
90
73%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 44
LEVEL 1
1
2%
LEVEL 2
2
5%
LEVEL 3
9
20%
LEVEL 4
27
61%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 79
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
1
1%
LEVEL 3
6
8%
LEVEL 4
63
80%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 123
LEVEL 1
2
2%
LEVEL 2
3
2%
LEVEL 3
15
12%
LEVEL 4
90
73%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
123
103
20
2
5
2
3
109
2
9
66
57
123
44
79
123
PROFICIENT
85%
92%
50%
_%
100%
_%
_%
84%
_%
89%
88%
82%
85%
82%
87%
85%
LEVEL 1
2
2%
0
0%
2
10%
_
_
0
0%
_
_
_
_
2
2%
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
2
4%
2
2%
1
2%
1
1%
2
2%
LEVEL 2
3
2%
1
1%
2
10%
_
_
0
0%
_
_
_
_
3
3%
_
_
0
0%
1
2%
2
4%
3
2%
2
5%
1
1%
3
2%
LEVEL 3
15
12%
8
8%
7
35%
_
_
1
20%
_
_
_
_
13
12%
_
_
1
11%
9
14%
6
11%
15
12%
9
20%
6
8%
15
12%
LEVEL 4
90
73%
87
84%
3
15%
_
_
4
80%
_
_
_
_
79
72%
_
_
7
78%
49
74%
41
72%
90
73%
27
61%
63
80%
90
73%
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level Science after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 123
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
5
4%
LEVEL 3
63
51%
LEVEL 4
46
37%
General Education
PROFICIENT
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 103
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
1%
LEVEL 3
52
50%
LEVEL 4
46
45%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 20
LEVEL 1
1
5%
LEVEL 2
4
20%
LEVEL 3
11
55%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
American Indian or Alaska Native
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
4
80%
LEVEL 4
1
20%
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 109
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
5
5%
LEVEL 3
53
49%
LEVEL 4
43
39%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
6
67%
LEVEL 4
2
22%
Female
PROFICIENT
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 66
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
37
56%
LEVEL 4
26
39%
Male
PROFICIENT
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 57
LEVEL 1
1
2%
LEVEL 2
5
9%
LEVEL 3
26
46%
LEVEL 4
20
35%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 123
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
5
4%
LEVEL 3
63
51%
LEVEL 4
46
37%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 44
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
4
9%
LEVEL 3
27
61%
LEVEL 4
11
25%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 79
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
1
1%
LEVEL 3
36
46%
LEVEL 4
35
44%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 123
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
5
4%
LEVEL 3
63
51%
LEVEL 4
46
37%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
123
103
20
2
5
2
3
109
2
9
66
57
123
44
79
123
PROFICIENT
89%
95%
55%
_%
100%
_%
_%
88%
_%
89%
95%
81%
89%
86%
90%
89%
LEVEL 1
1
1%
0
0%
1
5%
_
_
0
0%
_
_
_
_
1
1%
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
1
2%
1
1%
0
0%
1
1%
1
1%
LEVEL 2
5
4%
1
1%
4
20%
_
_
0
0%
_
_
_
_
5
5%
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
5
9%
5
4%
4
9%
1
1%
5
4%
LEVEL 3
63
51%
52
50%
11
55%
_
_
4
80%
_
_
_
_
53
49%
_
_
6
67%
37
56%
26
46%
63
51%
27
61%
36
46%
63
51%
LEVEL 4
46
37%
46
45%
0
0%
_
_
1
20%
_
_
_
_
43
39%
_
_
2
22%
26
39%
20
35%
46
37%
11
25%
35
44%
46
37%
Regents Examination Results (2015 - 16)
Comprehensive English
Regents Comprehensive English
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
White
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
6
2
4
6
2
4
6
5
1
6
55
6
100%
_
_
_
_
6
100%
_
_
_
_
6
100%
_
_
_
_
6
100%
65
3
50%
_
_
_
_
3
50%
_
_
_
_
3
50%
_
_
_
_
3
50%
85
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 6
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
6
100%
65
3
50%
85
0
0%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 4
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 6
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
6
100%
65
3
50%
85
0
0%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 4
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 6
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
6
100%
65
3
50%
85
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 6
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
6
100%
65
3
50%
85
0
0%
English Language Arts (Common Core)
English Language Arts (Common Core)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
149
122
27
2
3
1
142
1
7
58
91
149
47
102
149
LEVEL 1
5
3%
1
1%
4
15%
_
_
_
_
_
_
5
4%
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
5
5%
5
3%
3
6%
2
2%
5
3%
LEVEL 2
7
5%
1
1%
6
22%
_
_
_
_
_
_
7
5%
_
_
0
0%
2
3%
5
5%
7
5%
3
6%
4
4%
7
5%
LEVEL 3
25
17%
17
14%
8
30%
_
_
_
_
_
_
22
15%
_
_
3
43%
12
21%
13
14%
25
17%
15
32%
10
10%
25
17%
LEVEL 4
34
23%
28
23%
6
22%
_
_
_
_
_
_
33
23%
_
_
1
14%
13
22%
21
23%
34
23%
12
26%
22
22%
34
23%
LEVEL 5
78
52%
75
61%
3
11%
_
_
_
_
_
_
75
53%
_
_
3
43%
31
53%
47
52%
78
52%
14
30%
64
63%
78
52%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 149
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
5
3%
LEVEL 2
7
5%
LEVEL 3
25
17%
LEVEL 4
34
23%
LEVEL 5
78
52%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 122
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
1
1%
LEVEL 3
17
14%
LEVEL 4
28
23%
LEVEL 5
75
61%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 27
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
4
15%
LEVEL 2
6
22%
LEVEL 3
8
30%
LEVEL 4
6
22%
LEVEL 5
3
11%
American Indian or Alaska Native
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 142
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
5
4%
LEVEL 2
7
5%
LEVEL 3
22
15%
LEVEL 4
33
23%
LEVEL 5
75
53%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 7
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
3
43%
LEVEL 4
1
14%
LEVEL 5
3
43%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 58
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
3%
LEVEL 3
12
21%
LEVEL 4
13
22%
LEVEL 5
31
53%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 91
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
5
5%
LEVEL 2
5
5%
LEVEL 3
13
14%
LEVEL 4
21
23%
LEVEL 5
47
52%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 149
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
5
3%
LEVEL 2
7
5%
LEVEL 3
25
17%
LEVEL 4
34
23%
LEVEL 5
78
52%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 47
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
3
6%
LEVEL 2
3
6%
LEVEL 3
15
32%
LEVEL 4
12
26%
LEVEL 5
14
30%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 102
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
2
2%
LEVEL 2
4
4%
LEVEL 3
10
10%
LEVEL 4
22
22%
LEVEL 5
64
63%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 149
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
5
3%
LEVEL 2
7
5%
LEVEL 3
25
17%
LEVEL 4
34
23%
LEVEL 5
78
52%
Geometry
Regents Geometry
GROUP
All Students
General Education
White
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
5
5
5
3
2
5
5
5
55
5
100%
5
100%
5
100%
_
_
_
_
5
100%
5
100%
5
100%
65
5
100%
5
100%
5
100%
_
_
_
_
5
100%
5
100%
5
100%
85
3
60%
3
60%
3
60%
_
_
_
_
3
60%
3
60%
3
60%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
5
100%
65
5
100%
85
3
60%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
5
100%
65
5
100%
85
3
60%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
5
100%
65
5
100%
85
3
60%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
5
100%
65
5
100%
85
3
60%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
5
100%
65
5
100%
85
3
60%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
5
100%
65
5
100%
85
3
60%
Algebra 2/Trigonometry
Regents Algebra 2/Trigonometry
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
68
66
2
1
1
1
2
62
1
6
29
39
68
9
59
68
55
65
96%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
59
95%
_
_
6
100%
26
90%
39
100%
65
96%
9
100%
56
95%
65
96%
65
62
91%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
56
90%
_
_
6
100%
25
86%
37
95%
62
91%
9
100%
53
90%
62
91%
85
26
38%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
25
40%
_
_
1
17%
11
38%
15
38%
26
38%
4
44%
22
37%
26
38%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 68
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
65
96%
65
62
91%
85
26
38%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 66
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
American Indian or Alaska Native
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 62
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
59
95%
65
56
90%
85
25
40%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 6
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
6
100%
65
6
100%
85
1
17%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 29
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
26
90%
65
25
86%
85
11
38%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 39
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
39
100%
65
37
95%
85
15
38%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 68
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
65
96%
65
62
91%
85
26
38%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 9
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
9
100%
65
9
100%
85
4
44%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 59
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
56
95%
65
53
90%
85
22
37%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 68
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
65
96%
65
62
91%
85
26
38%
Algebra I (Common Core)
Algebra I (Common Core)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
150
126
24
1
2
4
135
8
7
82
68
150
49
101
150
LEVEL 1
4
3%
1
1%
3
13%
_
_
_
_
_
_
3
2%
1
13%
0
0%
3
4%
1
1%
4
3%
2
4%
2
2%
4
3%
LEVEL 2
12
8%
5
4%
7
29%
_
_
_
_
_
_
10
7%
1
13%
1
14%
6
7%
6
9%
12
8%
4
8%
8
8%
12
8%
LEVEL 3
81
54%
68
54%
13
54%
_
_
_
_
_
_
73
54%
4
50%
4
57%
41
50%
40
59%
81
54%
33
67%
48
48%
81
54%
LEVEL 4
29
19%
28
22%
1
4%
_
_
_
_
_
_
28
21%
1
13%
0
0%
19
23%
10
15%
29
19%
9
18%
20
20%
29
19%
LEVEL 5
24
16%
24
19%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
21
16%
1
13%
2
29%
13
16%
11
16%
24
16%
1
2%
23
23%
24
16%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 150
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
4
3%
LEVEL 2
12
8%
LEVEL 3
81
54%
LEVEL 4
29
19%
LEVEL 5
24
16%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 126
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
5
4%
LEVEL 3
68
54%
LEVEL 4
28
22%
LEVEL 5
24
19%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 24
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
3
13%
LEVEL 2
7
29%
LEVEL 3
13
54%
LEVEL 4
1
4%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
American Indian or Alaska Native
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 4
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 135
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
3
2%
LEVEL 2
10
7%
LEVEL 3
73
54%
LEVEL 4
28
21%
LEVEL 5
21
16%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 8
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
1
13%
LEVEL 2
1
13%
LEVEL 3
4
50%
LEVEL 4
1
13%
LEVEL 5
1
13%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 7
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
14%
LEVEL 3
4
57%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
LEVEL 5
2
29%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 82
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
3
4%
LEVEL 2
6
7%
LEVEL 3
41
50%
LEVEL 4
19
23%
LEVEL 5
13
16%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 68
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
6
9%
LEVEL 3
40
59%
LEVEL 4
10
15%
LEVEL 5
11
16%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 150
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
4
3%
LEVEL 2
12
8%
LEVEL 3
81
54%
LEVEL 4
29
19%
LEVEL 5
24
16%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 49
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
2
4%
LEVEL 2
4
8%
LEVEL 3
33
67%
LEVEL 4
9
18%
LEVEL 5
1
2%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 101
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
2
2%
LEVEL 2
8
8%
LEVEL 3
48
48%
LEVEL 4
20
20%
LEVEL 5
23
23%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 150
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
4
3%
LEVEL 2
12
8%
LEVEL 3
81
54%
LEVEL 4
29
19%
LEVEL 5
24
16%
Geometry (Common Core)
Geometry (Common Core)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
80
77
3
1
2
1
73
3
7
44
36
80
17
63
80
LEVEL 1
3
4%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
3
4%
_
_
0
0%
2
5%
1
3%
3
4%
0
0%
3
5%
3
4%
LEVEL 2
12
15%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
11
15%
_
_
1
14%
7
16%
5
14%
12
15%
4
24%
8
13%
12
15%
LEVEL 3
46
58%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
42
58%
_
_
4
57%
24
55%
22
61%
46
58%
11
65%
35
56%
46
58%
LEVEL 4
11
14%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
9
12%
_
_
2
29%
5
11%
6
17%
11
14%
1
6%
10
16%
11
14%
LEVEL 5
8
10%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
8
11%
_
_
0
0%
6
14%
2
6%
8
10%
1
6%
7
11%
8
10%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 80
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
3
4%
LEVEL 2
12
15%
LEVEL 3
46
58%
LEVEL 4
11
14%
LEVEL 5
8
10%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 77
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
American Indian or Alaska Native
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 73
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
3
4%
LEVEL 2
11
15%
LEVEL 3
42
58%
LEVEL 4
9
12%
LEVEL 5
8
11%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 7
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
14%
LEVEL 3
4
57%
LEVEL 4
2
29%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 44
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
2
5%
LEVEL 2
7
16%
LEVEL 3
24
55%
LEVEL 4
5
11%
LEVEL 5
6
14%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 36
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
1
3%
LEVEL 2
5
14%
LEVEL 3
22
61%
LEVEL 4
6
17%
LEVEL 5
2
6%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 80
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
3
4%
LEVEL 2
12
15%
LEVEL 3
46
58%
LEVEL 4
11
14%
LEVEL 5
8
10%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 17
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
4
24%
LEVEL 3
11
65%
LEVEL 4
1
6%
LEVEL 5
1
6%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 63
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
3
5%
LEVEL 2
8
13%
LEVEL 3
35
56%
LEVEL 4
10
16%
LEVEL 5
7
11%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 80
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
3
4%
LEVEL 2
12
15%
LEVEL 3
46
58%
LEVEL 4
11
14%
LEVEL 5
8
10%
Algebra II (Common Core)
Algebra II (Common Core)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
67
65
2
1
1
1
2
61
1
6
28
39
67
9
58
67
LEVEL 1
3
4%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
2
3%
_
_
1
17%
2
7%
1
3%
3
4%
1
11%
2
3%
3
4%
LEVEL 2
15
22%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
13
21%
_
_
2
33%
7
25%
8
21%
15
22%
0
0%
15
26%
15
22%
LEVEL 3
40
60%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
37
61%
_
_
3
50%
18
64%
22
56%
40
60%
7
78%
33
57%
40
60%
LEVEL 4
9
13%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
9
15%
_
_
0
0%
1
4%
8
21%
9
13%
1
11%
8
14%
9
13%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 67
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
3
4%
LEVEL 2
15
22%
LEVEL 3
40
60%
LEVEL 4
9
13%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 65
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
American Indian or Alaska Native
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 61
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
2
3%
LEVEL 2
13
21%
LEVEL 3
37
61%
LEVEL 4
9
15%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 6
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
1
17%
LEVEL 2
2
33%
LEVEL 3
3
50%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 28
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
2
7%
LEVEL 2
7
25%
LEVEL 3
18
64%
LEVEL 4
1
4%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 39
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
1
3%
LEVEL 2
8
21%
LEVEL 3
22
56%
LEVEL 4
8
21%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 67
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
3
4%
LEVEL 2
15
22%
LEVEL 3
40
60%
LEVEL 4
9
13%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 9
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
1
11%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
7
78%
LEVEL 4
1
11%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 58
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
2
3%
LEVEL 2
15
26%
LEVEL 3
33
57%
LEVEL 4
8
14%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 67
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
3
4%
LEVEL 2
15
22%
LEVEL 3
40
60%
LEVEL 4
9
13%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Global History and Geography
Regents Global History and Geography
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
142
116
26
2
4
1
126
9
7
78
64
142
52
90
142
55
134
94%
114
98%
20
77%
_
_
_
_
_
_
119
94%
8
89%
7
100%
74
95%
60
94%
134
94%
49
94%
85
94%
134
94%
65
125
88%
110
95%
15
58%
_
_
_
_
_
_
111
88%
7
78%
7
100%
68
87%
57
89%
125
88%
45
87%
80
89%
125
88%
85
72
51%
70
60%
2
8%
_
_
_
_
_
_
65
52%
4
44%
3
43%
38
49%
34
53%
72
51%
13
25%
59
66%
72
51%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 142
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
134
94%
65
125
88%
85
72
51%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 116
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
114
98%
65
110
95%
85
70
60%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 26
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
20
77%
65
15
58%
85
2
8%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 4
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 126
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
119
94%
65
111
88%
85
65
52%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 9
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
8
89%
65
7
78%
85
4
44%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 7
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
7
100%
65
7
100%
85
3
43%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 78
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
74
95%
65
68
87%
85
38
49%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 64
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
60
94%
65
57
89%
85
34
53%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 142
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
134
94%
65
125
88%
85
72
51%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 52
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
49
94%
65
45
87%
85
13
25%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 90
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
85
94%
65
80
89%
85
59
66%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 142
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
134
94%
65
125
88%
85
72
51%
U.S. History & Government
Regents U.S. History & Government
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
147
120
27
2
3
141
1
6
57
90
147
46
101
147
55
141
96%
119
99%
22
81%
_
_
_
_
135
96%
_
_
6
100%
54
95%
87
97%
141
96%
43
93%
98
97%
141
96%
65
138
94%
119
99%
19
70%
_
_
_
_
132
94%
_
_
6
100%
53
93%
85
94%
138
94%
41
89%
97
96%
138
94%
85
106
72%
96
80%
10
37%
_
_
_
_
102
72%
_
_
4
67%
36
63%
70
78%
106
72%
24
52%
82
81%
106
72%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 147
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
141
96%
65
138
94%
85
106
72%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 120
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
119
99%
65
119
99%
85
96
80%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 27
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
22
81%
65
19
70%
85
10
37%
American Indian or Alaska Native
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 141
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
135
96%
65
132
94%
85
102
72%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 6
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
6
100%
65
6
100%
85
4
67%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 57
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
54
95%
65
53
93%
85
36
63%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 90
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
87
97%
65
85
94%
85
70
78%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 147
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
141
96%
65
138
94%
85
106
72%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 46
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
43
93%
65
41
89%
85
24
52%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 101
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
98
97%
65
97
96%
85
82
81%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 147
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
141
96%
65
138
94%
85
106
72%
Living Environment
Regents Living Environment
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
155
123
32
3
4
1
141
6
8
86
69
155
59
96
155
55
151
97%
121
98%
30
94%
_
_
_
_
_
_
137
97%
6
100%
8
100%
85
99%
66
96%
151
97%
57
97%
94
98%
151
97%
65
144
93%
119
97%
25
78%
_
_
_
_
_
_
132
94%
5
83%
7
88%
80
93%
64
93%
144
93%
55
93%
89
93%
144
93%
85
48
31%
48
39%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
44
31%
1
17%
3
38%
27
31%
21
30%
48
31%
9
15%
39
41%
48
31%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 155
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
151
97%
65
144
93%
85
48
31%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 123
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
121
98%
65
119
97%
85
48
39%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 32
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
30
94%
65
25
78%
85
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 4
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 141
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
137
97%
65
132
94%
85
44
31%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 6
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
6
100%
65
5
83%
85
1
17%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 8
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
8
100%
65
7
88%
85
3
38%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 86
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
85
99%
65
80
93%
85
27
31%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 69
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
66
96%
65
64
93%
85
21
30%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 155
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
151
97%
65
144
93%
85
48
31%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 59
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
57
97%
65
55
93%
85
9
15%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 96
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
94
98%
65
89
93%
85
39
41%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 155
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
151
97%
65
144
93%
85
48
31%
Physical Setting/Earth Science
Regents Physical Setting/Earth Science
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
123
113
10
1
3
1
110
8
5
65
58
123
46
77
123
55
117
95%
107
95%
10
100%
_
_
_
_
_
_
106
96%
7
88%
4
80%
61
94%
56
97%
117
95%
43
93%
74
96%
117
95%
65
102
83%
93
82%
9
90%
_
_
_
_
_
_
93
85%
7
88%
2
40%
51
78%
51
88%
102
83%
32
70%
70
91%
102
83%
85
50
41%
50
44%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
46
42%
4
50%
0
0%
26
40%
24
41%
50
41%
8
17%
42
55%
50
41%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 123
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
117
95%
65
102
83%
85
50
41%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 113
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
107
95%
65
93
82%
85
50
44%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 10
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
10
100%
65
9
90%
85
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 110
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
106
96%
65
93
85%
85
46
42%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 8
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
7
88%
65
7
88%
85
4
50%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
4
80%
65
2
40%
85
0
0%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 65
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
61
94%
65
51
78%
85
26
40%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 58
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
56
97%
65
51
88%
85
24
41%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 123
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
117
95%
65
102
83%
85
50
41%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 46
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
43
93%
65
32
70%
85
8
17%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 77
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
74
96%
65
70
91%
85
42
55%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 123
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
117
95%
65
102
83%
85
50
41%
Physical Setting/Chemistry
Regents Physical Setting/Chemistry
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
92
90
2
1
1
1
88
1
92
37
55
92
18
74
92
55
91
99%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
91
99%
37
100%
54
98%
91
99%
18
100%
73
99%
91
99%
65
85
92%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
85
92%
35
95%
50
91%
85
92%
16
89%
69
93%
85
92%
85
26
28%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
26
28%
12
32%
14
25%
26
28%
4
22%
22
30%
26
28%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 92
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
91
99%
65
85
92%
85
26
28%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 90
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
American Indian or Alaska Native
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 88
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 92
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
91
99%
65
85
92%
85
26
28%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 37
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
37
100%
65
35
95%
85
12
32%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 55
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
54
98%
65
50
91%
85
14
25%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 92
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
91
99%
65
85
92%
85
26
28%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 18
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
18
100%
65
16
89%
85
4
22%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 74
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
73
99%
65
69
93%
85
22
30%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 92
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
91
99%
65
85
92%
85
26
28%
Physical Setting/Physics
Regents Physical Setting/Physics
GROUP
All Students
General Education
White
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
7
7
7
3
4
7
1
6
7
55
7
100%
7
100%
7
100%
_
_
_
_
7
100%
_
_
_
_
7
100%
65
7
100%
7
100%
7
100%
_
_
_
_
7
100%
_
_
_
_
7
100%
85
4
57%
4
57%
4
57%
_
_
_
_
4
57%
_
_
_
_
4
57%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 7
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
7
100%
65
7
100%
85
4
57%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 7
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
7
100%
65
7
100%
85
4
57%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 7
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
7
100%
65
7
100%
85
4
57%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 4
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 7
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
7
100%
65
7
100%
85
4
57%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 6
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 7
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
7
100%
65
7
100%
85
4
57%
New York State Alternate Assessment (NYSAA) Results (2015 - 16)
GROUP
Grade 3 ELA
Grade 3 Math
Grade 6 ELA
Grade 6 Math
Grade 7 ELA
Grade 7 Math
Grade 8 ELA
Grade 8 Math
Grade 8 Science
Secondary-Level ELA
Secondary-Level Math
Secondary-Level Science
Secondary-Level Social Studies
TOTAL TESTED
1
1
4
4
1
1
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
PROFICIENT
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
LEVEL 1
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
Grade 3 ELA
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 3 Math
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 6 ELA
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 6 Math
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 7 ELA
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 7 Math
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 8 ELA
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 8 Math
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 8 Science
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Secondary-Level ELA
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Secondary-Level Math
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Secondary-Level Science
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Secondary-Level Social Studies
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
New York State English as a Second Language Achievement Test (NYSESLAT) Results (2015 - 16)
Kindergarten
GROUP
All Students
General Education
TOTAL TESTED
3
3
ENTERING
_
_
EMERGING
_
_
TRANSITIONING
_
_
EXPANDING
_
_
COMMANDING
_
_
Grade 1
GROUP
All Students
General Education
TOTAL TESTED
1
1
ENTERING
_
_
EMERGING
_
_
TRANSITIONING
_
_
EXPANDING
_
_
COMMANDING
_
_
Grade 3
GROUP
All Students
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED
1
1
ENTERING
_
_
EMERGING
_
_
TRANSITIONING
_
_
EXPANDING
_
_
COMMANDING
_
_
Grade 4
GROUP
All Students
General Education
TOTAL TESTED
1
1
ENTERING
_
_
EMERGING
_
_
TRANSITIONING
_
_
EXPANDING
_
_
COMMANDING
_
_
Grade 7
GROUP
All Students
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED
1
1
ENTERING
_
_
EMERGING
_
_
TRANSITIONING
_
_
EXPANDING
_
_
COMMANDING
_
_
Kindergarten
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 3
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 3
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
Grade 1
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 1
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 1
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
Grade 3
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 1
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 1
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
Grade 4
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 1
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 1
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
Grade 7
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 1
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 1
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
Elementary/Middle-Level English Language Arts Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: NO
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
NO
―
―
―
―
NO
―
NO
―
NO
Tested 95%
NO
―
―
―
―
NO
―
NO
―
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,518*
3
8
22
7
1,389*
27
303*
3
617*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
85%*
―
―
―
―
85%*
―
83%*
―
84%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
―
―
―
―
NO
―
NO
―
NO
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
634
3
6
17
7
582
19
131✝
2
254
PI
112
―
―
―
―
113
―
35✝
―
85
EAMO
100
―
―
―
―
114
―
64
―
86
Safe Harbor Target
100
―
―
―
―
114
―
50
―
86
All Students
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,518*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
85%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
634
PI
112
EAMO
100
Safe Harbor Target
100
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
3
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
3
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
8
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
6
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
22
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
17
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
7
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
7
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
White
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,389*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
85%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
582
PI
113
EAMO
114
Safe Harbor Target
114
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
27
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
19
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
303*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
83%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
131✝
PI
35✝
EAMO
64
Safe Harbor Target
50
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
3
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
2
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
617*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
84%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
254
PI
85
EAMO
86
Safe Harbor Target
86
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,514*
1,499*
1,475*
1,504*
129*
1,469*
1,215*
1,513*
901*
797*
721*
0
1,518*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
85%*
85%*
85%*
85%*
88%*
85%*
86%*
85%*
86%*
88%*
82%*
―
85%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
631
628
617
627
52
615
503
632
380
350
284
0
634
PI
112
112
112
111
98
113
132
112
130
100
126
―
112
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,514*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
85%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
631
PI
112
Not Black or African American
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,499*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
85%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
628
PI
112
Not Hispanic or Latino
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,475*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
85%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
617
PI
112
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,504*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
85%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
627
PI
111
Not White
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
129*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
88%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
52
PI
98
Not Multiracial
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,469*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
85%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
615
PI
113
General Education
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,215*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
86%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
503
PI
132
English Proficient
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,513*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
85%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
632
PI
112
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
901*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
86%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
380
PI
130
Male
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
797*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
88%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
350
PI
100
Female
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
721*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
82%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
284
PI
126
Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,518*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
85%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
634
PI
112
― There were fewer than 40 students enrolled during the test administration period, so the Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 tested students enrolled on BEDS day and during the test administration period, so the PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed. *The percentage of students tested in the current year fell below 95 percent, so the numbers of enrolled and tested students in the current year and previous year were combined to provide the school/district with another opportunity to meet the participation rate criterion. ✝ Includes former students with disabilities because the number of students with disabilities in the current year is equal to or greater than 30.
Elementary/Middle-Level Mathematics Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: NO
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
NO
―
―
―
―
NO
―
NO
―
NO
Tested 95%
NO
―
―
―
―
NO
―
NO
―
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,516*
3
8
22
7
1,388*
27
302*
3
619*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
81%*
―
―
―
―
81%*
―
74%*
―
76%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
NO
―
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
623
2
6
16
7
572
20
118✝
3
241
PI
124
―
―
―
―
127
―
53✝
―
98
EAMO
97
―
―
―
―
110
―
64
―
84
Safe Harbor Target
97
―
―
―
―
110
―
64
―
84
All Students
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,516*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
81%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
623
PI
124
EAMO
97
Safe Harbor Target
97
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
3
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
2
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
8
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
6
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
22
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
16
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
7
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
7
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
White
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,388*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
81%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
572
PI
127
EAMO
110
Safe Harbor Target
110
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
27
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
20
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
302*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
74%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
118✝
PI
53✝
EAMO
64
Safe Harbor Target
64
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
3
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
3
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
619*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
76%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
241
PI
98
EAMO
84
Safe Harbor Target
84
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,512*
1,498*
1,473*
1,502*
128*
1,467*
1,214*
1,511*
897*
795*
721*
0
1,516*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
81%*
81%*
81%*
80%*
80%*
81%*
82%*
81%*
84%*
84%*
77%*
―
81%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
621
617
607
616
51
603
505
620
382
344
279
0
623
PI
124
124
124
124
92
126
140
124
140
124
124
―
124
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,512*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
81%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
621
PI
124
Not Black or African American
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,498*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
81%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
617
PI
124
Not Hispanic or Latino
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,473*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
81%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
607
PI
124
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,502*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
80%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
616
PI
124
Not White
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
128*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
80%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
51
PI
92
Not Multiracial
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,467*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
81%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
603
PI
126
General Education
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,214*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
82%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
505
PI
140
English Proficient
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,511*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
81%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
620
PI
124
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
897*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
84%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
382
PI
140
Male
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
795*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
84%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
344
PI
124
Female
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
721*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
77%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
279
PI
124
Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,516*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
81%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
623
PI
124
― There were fewer than 40 students enrolled during the test administration period, so the Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 tested students enrolled on BEDS day and during the test administration period, so the PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed. *The percentage of students tested in the current year fell below 95 percent, so the numbers of enrolled and tested students in the current year and previous year were combined to provide the school/district with another opportunity to meet the participation rate criterion. ✝ Includes former students with disabilities because the number of students with disabilities in the current year is equal to or greater than 30.
Elementary/Middle-Level Science Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: NO
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
YES
―
―
―
―
NO
―
NO
―
NO
Tested 80%
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
NO
―
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
232
0
0
8
2
217
5
100*
1
206*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
84%
―
―
―
―
84%
―
70%*
―
72%*
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
YES
―
―
―
―
NO
―
NO
―
NO
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
192
0
0
6
2
180
4
36✝
1
66
PI
182
―
―
―
―
182
―
144✝
―
165
EAMO
179
―
―
―
―
186
―
155
―
168
Progress Target
179
―
―
―
―
186
―
155
―
168
All Students
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 80%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
232
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
84%
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
192
PI
182
EAMO
179
Progress Target
179
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
8
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
6
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
2
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
2
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
White
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 80%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
217
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
84%
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
NO
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
180
PI
182
EAMO
186
Progress Target
186
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
5
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
4
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 80%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
100*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
70%*
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
NO
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
36✝
PI
144✝
EAMO
155
Progress Target
155
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 80%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
206*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
72%*
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
NO
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
66
PI
165
EAMO
168
Progress Target
168
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
232
232
224
230
15
227
183
231
142
114
118
0
232
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
84%
84%
84%
83%
―
84%
86%
84%
89%
84%
83%
―
84%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
192
192
186
190
12
188
156
191
126
95
97
0
192
PI
182
182
182
182
―
181
190
182
190
179
185
―
182
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
232
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
84%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
192
PI
182
Not Black or African American
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
232
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
84%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
192
PI
182
Not Hispanic or Latino
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
224
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
84%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
186
PI
182
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
230
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
83%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
190
PI
182
Not White
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
15
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
12
PI
―
Not Multiracial
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
227
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
84%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
188
PI
181
General Education
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
183
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
86%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
156
PI
190
English Proficient
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
231
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
84%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
191
PI
182
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
142
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
89%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
126
PI
190
Male
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
114
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
84%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
95
PI
179
Female
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
118
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
83%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
97
PI
185
Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
232
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
84%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
192
PI
182
― There were fewer than 40 students enrolled during the test administration period, so the Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 tested students enrolled on BEDS day and during the test administration period, so the PI, EAMO, and Progress Target data are suppressed. *The percentage of students tested in the current year fell below 80 percent, so the numbers of enrolled and tested students in the current year and previous year were combined to provide the school/district with another opportunity to meet the participation rate criterion. ✝ Includes former students with disabilities because the number of students with disabilities in the current year is equal to or greater than 30.
Secondary-Level English Language Arts Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: YES
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
YES
Tested 95%
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
―
12th graders
110
2
1
3
5
97
2
14
0
39
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
―
―
―
―
100%
―
―
―
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
YES
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
109
2
0
3
5
97
2
15
0
38
PI
172
―
―
―
―
173
―
―
―
145
EAMO
164
―
―
―
―
173
―
―
―
146
Safe Harbor Target
153
―
―
―
―
155
―
―
―
140
All Students
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
YES
12th Graders
110
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
109
PI
172
EAMO
164
Safe Harbor Target
153
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
2
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
2
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
1
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
3
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
3
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
5
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
5
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
White
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
YES
12th Graders
97
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
97
PI
173
EAMO
173
Safe Harbor Target
155
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
2
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
2
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
14
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
15
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
39
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
38
PI
145
EAMO
146
Safe Harbor Target
140
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
12th Graders
108
109
107
105
13
108
96
110
71
51
59
0
110
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
100%
100%
100%
―
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
―
100%
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
107
109
106
104
12
107
94
109
71
49
60
0
109
PI
172
172
174
172
―
173
185
172
187
167
177
―
172
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
12th Graders
108
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
107
PI
172
Not Black or African American
12th Graders
109
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
109
PI
172
Not Hispanic or Latino
12th Graders
107
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
106
PI
174
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
12th Graders
105
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
104
PI
172
Not White
12th Graders
13
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
12
PI
―
Not Multiracial
12th Graders
108
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
107
PI
173
General Education
12th Graders
96
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
94
PI
185
English Proficient
12th Graders
110
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
109
PI
172
Not Economically Disadvantaged
12th Graders
71
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
71
PI
187
Male
12th Graders
51
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
49
PI
167
Female
12th Graders
59
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
60
PI
177
Migrant
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
Not Migrant
12th Graders
110
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
109
PI
172
― There were fewer than 40 12th graders, so the Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 students in the 2012 accountability cohort, so PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed.
Secondary-Level Mathematics Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: NO
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
NO
―
―
―
―
NO
―
―
―
NO
Tested 95%
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
―
12th graders
110
2
1
3
5
97
2
14
0
39
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
―
―
―
―
100%
―
―
―
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
―
―
―
―
NO
―
―
―
NO
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
109
2
0
3
5
97
2
15
0
38
PI
145
―
―
―
―
144
―
―
―
121
EAMO
149
―
―
―
―
160
―
―
―
130
Safe Harbor Target
149
―
―
―
―
151
―
―
―
130
All Students
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
YES
12th Graders
110
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
109
PI
145
EAMO
149
Safe Harbor Target
149
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
2
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
2
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
1
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
3
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
3
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
5
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
5
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
White
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
YES
12th Graders
97
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
97
PI
144
EAMO
160
Safe Harbor Target
151
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
2
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
2
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
14
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
15
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
39
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
38
PI
121
EAMO
130
Safe Harbor Target
130
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
12th Graders
108
109
107
105
13
108
96
110
71
51
59
0
110
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
100%
100%
100%
―
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
―
100%
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
107
109
106
104
12
107
94
109
71
49
60
0
109
PI
145
145
144
144
―
146
154
145
158
147
143
―
145
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
12th Graders
108
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
107
PI
145
Not Black or African American
12th Graders
109
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
109
PI
145
Not Hispanic or Latino
12th Graders
107
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
106
PI
144
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
12th Graders
105
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
104
PI
144
Not White
12th Graders
13
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
12
PI
―
Not Multiracial
12th Graders
108
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
107
PI
146
General Education
12th Graders
96
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
94
PI
154
English Proficient
12th Graders
110
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
109
PI
145
Not Economically Disadvantaged
12th Graders
71
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
71
PI
158
Male
12th Graders
51
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
49
PI
147
Female
12th Graders
59
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
60
PI
143
Migrant
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
Not Migrant
12th Graders
110
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
109
PI
145
― There were fewer than 40 12th graders, so the Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 students in the 2012 accountability cohort, so PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed.
Unweighted Combined ELA and Math PIs
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
112
―
―
―
―
113
―
35
―
85
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
124
―
―
―
―
127
―
53
―
98
Secondary-Level ELA PI
172
―
―
―
―
173
―
―
―
145
Secondary-Level MATH PI
145
―
―
―
―
144
―
―
―
121
UNWEIGHTED COMBINED PI
138
0
0
0
0
139
0
44
0
112
All Students
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
112
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
124
Secondary-Level ELA PI
172
Secondary-Level MATH PI
145
Unweighted Combined PI
138
American Indian or Alaska Native
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Black or African American
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Hispanic or Latino
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
White
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
113
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
127
Secondary-Level ELA PI
173
Secondary-Level MATH PI
144
Unweighted Combined PI
139
Multiracial
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Students With Disabilities
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
35
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
53
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
44
Limited English Proficient
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Economically Disadvantaged
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
85
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
98
Secondary-Level ELA PI
145
Secondary-Level MATH PI
121
Unweighted Combined PI
112
― There were not enough students to determine a Performance Index.
Overall Graduation Rate for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: YES
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
YES
All Students
MADE AYP
YES
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP
―
White
MADE AYP
YES
Multiracial
MADE AYP
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP
―
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
YES
― There were not enough students to make an AYP determination.
Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort for Accountability
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion:
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
NO
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
139
0
2
1
2
133
1
28
0
39
Graduation Rate
88%
―
―
―
―
88%
―
―
―
77%
State Standard
80%
―
―
―
―
80%
―
―
―
80%
Progress Target
80%
―
―
―
―
80%
―
―
―
80%
All Students
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
139
Graduation Rate
88%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%
American Indian or Alaska Native
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Black or African American
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
2
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
1
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
2
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
White
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
133
Graduation Rate
88%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%
Multiracial
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
1
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Students With Disabilities
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
28
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Limited English Proficient
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: NO
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
39
Graduation Rate
77%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%
YES Graduation rate is equal to or greater than the State Standard or the group's Progress Target. NO Graduation rate is less than the State Standard and the group's Progress Target.
― There were fewer than 30 students in the cohort.
Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort for Accountability
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion:
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
YES
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
140
0
6
0
3
126
5
28
0
51
Graduation Rate
86%
―
―
―
―
88%
―
―
―
86%
State Standard
80%
―
―
―
―
80%
―
―
―
80%
Progress Target
80%
―
―
―
―
80%
―
―
―
78%
All Students
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
140
Graduation Rate
86%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%
American Indian or Alaska Native
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Black or African American
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
6
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
3
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
White
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
126
Graduation Rate
88%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%
Multiracial
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
5
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Students With Disabilities
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
28
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Limited English Proficient
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
51
Graduation Rate
86%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
78%
YES Graduation rate is equal to or greater than the State Standard or the group's Progress Target. NO Graduation rate is less than the State Standard and the group's Progress Target.
― There were fewer than 30 students in the cohort.
Graduation Rates for Non-AYP Groups for Accountability
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
139
137
138
137
6
138
111
139
100
73
66
0
139
Graduation Rate
88%
88%
88%
88%
―
88%
89%
88%
92%
85%
91%
―
88%
Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
140
134
140
137
14
135
112
140
89
71
69
0
140
Graduation Rate
86%
87%
86%
87%
―
87%
90%
86%
87%
83%
90%
―
86%
Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
139
Graduation Rate
88%
Not Black or African American
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
137
Graduation Rate
88%
Not Hispanic or Latino
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
138
Graduation Rate
88%
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
137
Graduation Rate
88%
Not White
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
6
Graduation Rate
―
Not Multiracial
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
138
Graduation Rate
88%
General Education
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
111
Graduation Rate
89%
English Proficient
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
139
Graduation Rate
88%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
100
Graduation Rate
92%
Male
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
73
Graduation Rate
85%
Female
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
66
Graduation Rate
91%
Migrant
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
Not Migrant
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
139
Graduation Rate
88%
Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
140
Graduation Rate
86%
Not Black or African American
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
134
Graduation Rate
87%
Not Hispanic or Latino
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
140
Graduation Rate
86%
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
137
Graduation Rate
87%
Not White
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
14
Graduation Rate
―
Not Multiracial
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
135
Graduation Rate
87%
General Education
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
112
Graduation Rate
90%
English Proficient
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
140
Graduation Rate
86%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
89
Graduation Rate
87%
Male
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
71
Graduation Rate
83%
Female
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
69
Graduation Rate
90%
Migrant
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
Not Migrant
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
140
Graduation Rate
86%
― There were fewer than 30 students in the cohort.
Graduation Rates for Regents with Advanced Designation and CTE Endorsement for Accountability
Percentage of 2011 Graduation-Rate Total Cohort members who graduated as of August 31, 2015 with:
Regents Diploma with an Advanced Designation (This District)
37%
Regents Diploma with an Advanced Designation (Statewide)
32%
Percentage in This District Exceeded Statewide
YES
Regents Diploma with an Advanced Designation (This District)
37%
Regents Diploma with an Advanced Designation (Statewide)
32%
Percentage in This District Exceeded Statewide
YES
Regents Diploma with CTE Endorsement (This District)
3%
Regents Diploma with CTE Endorsement (Statewide)
5%
Percentage in This District Exceeded Statewide
NO
Regents Diploma with CTE Endorsement (This District)
You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.
Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.
If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.
