VAN HORNESVILLE-OWEN D YOUNG CSD - School Report Card Data [2015 - 16]

The New York State Report Card is an important part of the Board of Regents' effort to raise learning standards for all students. It provides information to the public on school/district enrollment and staff, student performance, and other measures of school and district performance. Knowledge gained from the report card on a school's or district's strengths and weaknesses can be used to improve instruction and services to students.
Report Card Data - Glossary of Terms | Accountability Data - Glossary of Terms | Business Rules

VAN HORNESVILLE-OWEN D YOUNG CSD ENROLLMENT (2015 - 16)

K-12 ENROLLMENT
176

ENROLLMENT BY GENDER

MALE
FEMALE

ENROLLMENT BY ETHNICITY

GROUP
TOTAL
PERCENT

OTHER GROUPS

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

ENROLLMENT BY GRADE

GROUP
TOTAL
PERCENT

VAN HORNESVILLE-OWEN D YOUNG CSD ENROLLMENT (2015 - 16)

K-12 Enrollment: 176

ENROLLMENT BY GENDER

MALE

89

51%

FEMALE

87

49%

ENROLLMENT BY ETHNICITY

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

1

1%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

4

2%

WHITE

170

97%

MULTIRACIAL

1

1%

OTHER GROUPS

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

14

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

69

39%

ENROLLMENT BY GRADE

K (FULL DAY)

15

9%

1ST GRADE

15

9%

2ND GRADE

7

4%

3RD GRADE

14

8%

4TH GRADE

9

5%

5TH GRADE

8

5%

6TH GRADE

14

8%

7TH GRADE

16

9%

8TH GRADE

15

9%

9TH GRADE

20

11%

10TH GRADE

15

9%

11TH GRADE

17

10%

12TH GRADE

11

6%

Average Class Size (2015 - 16)

GROUP
  • Common Branch
  • Grade 8 English
  • Grade 8 Mathematics
  • Grade 8 Science
  • Grade 8 Social Studies
  • Grade 10 English
  • Grade 10 Mathematics
  • Grade 10 Science
  • Grade 10 Social Studies
CLASS SIZE
  • 11
  • 15
  • 10
  • 15
  • 15
  • 16
  • 3
  • 7
  • 16

Average Class Size (2015 - 16)

Common Branch
11
Grade 8 English
15
Grade 8 Mathematics
10
Grade 8 Science
15
Grade 8 Social Studies
15
Grade 10 English
16
Grade 10 Mathematics
3
Grade 10 Science
7
Grade 10 Social Studies
16

Free and Reduced-Price Lunch (2015 - 16)

ELIGIBLE FOR FREE LUNCH
  • 71
  • 40%
ELIGIBLE FOR REDUCED-PRICE LUNCH
  • 17
  • 10%

Free and Reduced-Price Lunch (2015 - 16)

Eligible for Free Lunch

71

40%

Eligible for Reduced-Price Lunch

17

10%

STUDENT SUSPENSIONS (2014 - 15)

  • 6
  • 3%

Student Suspensions (2014 - 15)

Student Suspensions

6

3%

Teacher Turnover Rate (2014-15 to 2015-16)

Turnover Rate of Teachers with Fewer Than Five Years of Experience
  • 0%
TURNOVER RATE OF ALL TEACHERS
  • 23%

Teacher Turnover Rate (2014-15 to 2015-16)

Turnover Rate of Teachers with Fewer Than Five Years of Experience

0%

Turnover Rate of All Teachers

23%

Teacher Qualifications (2015 - 16)

Teacher Qualifications (2015 - 16)

TOTAL TEACHERS: 20
Percent with No Valid Teaching Certificate
0%
Percent Teaching Out of Certification
5%
Percent with Fewer Than Three Years of Experience
0%
Percentage with Master's Degree Plus 30 Hours or Doctorate
15%
Total Number of Core Classes
46
Percent Not Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers in This District
2%
Total Number of Classes
74
Percent Taught by Teachers Without Appropriate Certification
5%

High School Completers (2015 - 16)

GROUP
  • All Students
  • General Education
  • Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
  • 14
  • 9
  • 5
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
  • 12
  • 9
  • 3
REGENTS DIPLOMA
  • 12
  • 100%
  • 9
  • 100%
  • 3
  • 100%
GROUP
  • All Students
  • General Education
  • Students with Disabilities
REGENTS WITH ADVANCED DESIGNATION
  • 1
  • 8%
  • 1
  • 11%
  • 0
  • 0%
REGENTS WITH CTE ENDORSEMENT
  • 3
  • 25%
  • 2
  • 22%
  • 1
  • 33%
LOCAL DIPLOMAS
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS
  • 2
  • 14%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 2
  • 40%

All Students

COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)

14

Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)

12

Regents Diploma

12

100%

of Graduates

Regents with Advanced Designation

1

8%

of Graduates

Regents with CTE Endorsement

3

25%

of Graduates

Local Diplomas

0

0%

of Graduates

Commencement Credentials

2

14%

of Completers

General Education

COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)

9

Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)

9

Regents Diploma

9

100%

of Graduates

Regents with Advanced Designation

1

11%

of Graduates

Regents with CTE Endorsement

2

22%

of Graduates

Local Diplomas

0

0%

of Graduates

Commencement Credentials

0

0%

of Completers

Students with Disabilities

COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)

5

Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)

3

Regents Diploma

3

100%

of Graduates

Regents with Advanced Designation

0

0%

of Graduates

Regents with CTE Endorsement

1

33%

of Graduates

Local Diplomas

0

0%

of Graduates

Commencement Credentials

2

40%

of Completers

High School Non-completers (2015 - 16)

GROUP
  • All Students
  • General Education
DROPPED OUT
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _

All Students

DROPPED OUT

_

_%

ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM

_

_%

TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS

_

_%

General Education

DROPPED OUT

_

_%

ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM

_

_%

TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS

_

_%

Post-graduation Plans of Completers (2015 - 16)

GROUP
  • All Students
  • General Education
  • Students with Disabilities
TO FOUR-YEAR COLLEGE
  • 7
  • 50%
  • 7
  • 78%
  • 0
  • 0%
TO TWO-YEAR COLLEGE
  • 2
  • 14%
  • 1
  • 11%
  • 1
  • 20%
TO OTHER POST-SECONDARY
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
TO THE MILITARY
  • 1
  • 7%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 1
  • 20%
GROUP
  • All Students
  • General Education
  • Students with Disabilities
TO EMPLOYMENT
  • 3
  • 21%
  • 1
  • 11%
  • 2
  • 40%
TO ADULT SERVICES
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
TO OTHER KNOWN PLANS
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
PLANS UNKNOWN
  • 1
  • 7%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 1
  • 20%

All Students

To Four-Year College

7

50%

To Two-Year College

2

14%

To Other Post-Secondary

0

0%

To the Military

1

7%

To Employment

3

21%

To Adult Services

0

0%

To Other Known Plans

0

0%

Plan Unknown

1

7%

General Education

To Four-Year College

7

78%

To Two-Year College

1

11%

To Other Post-Secondary

0

0%

To the Military

0

0%

To Employment

1

11%

To Adult Services

0

0%

To Other Known Plans

0

0%

Plan Unknown

0

0%

Students with Disabilities

To Four-Year College

0

0%

To Two-Year College

1

20%

To Other Post-Secondary

0

0%

To the Military

1

20%

To Employment

2

40%

To Adult Services

0

0%

To Other Known Plans

0

0%

Plan Unknown

1

20%

Grade 3 English Language Arts

Due to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 proficiency rates.

MEAN SCORE: 314

All Students

PROFICIENT

43%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

4

29%

LEVEL 2

4

29%

LEVEL 3

4

29%

LEVEL 4

2

14%

General Education

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Students with Disabilities

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

White

PROFICIENT

43%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

4

29%

LEVEL 2

4

29%

LEVEL 3

4

29%

LEVEL 4

2

14%

Female

PROFICIENT

50%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

2

33%

Male

PROFICIENT

38%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

4

50%

LEVEL 2

1

13%

LEVEL 3

3

38%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Non-English Language Learners

PROFICIENT

43%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

4

29%

LEVEL 2

4

29%

LEVEL 3

4

29%

LEVEL 4

2

14%

Economically Disadvantaged

PROFICIENT

25%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

3

38%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Not Economically Disadvantaged

PROFICIENT

67%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

2

33%

Not Migrant

PROFICIENT

43%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

4

29%

LEVEL 2

4

29%

LEVEL 3

4

29%

LEVEL 4

2

14%

GROUP
TOTAL TESTED
  • 14
  • 13
  • 1
  • 14
  • 6
  • 8
  • 14
  • 8
  • 6
  • 14
PROFICIENT
  • 43%
  • _%
  • _%
  • 43%
  • 50%
  • 38%
  • 43%
  • 25%
  • 67%
  • 43%
LEVEL 1
  • 4
  • 29%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 4
  • 29%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 4
  • 50%
  • 4
  • 29%
  • 3
  • 38%
  • 1
  • 17%
  • 4
  • 29%
LEVEL 2
  • 4
  • 29%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 4
  • 29%
  • 3
  • 50%
  • 1
  • 13%
  • 4
  • 29%
  • 3
  • 38%
  • 1
  • 17%
  • 4
  • 29%
LEVEL 3
  • 4
  • 29%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 4
  • 29%
  • 1
  • 17%
  • 3
  • 38%
  • 4
  • 29%
  • 2
  • 25%
  • 2
  • 33%
  • 4
  • 29%
LEVEL 4
  • 2
  • 14%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 2
  • 14%
  • 2
  • 33%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 2
  • 14%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 2
  • 33%
  • 2
  • 14%

Grade 4 English Language Arts

Due to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 proficiency rates.

MEAN SCORE: 308

All Students

PROFICIENT

44%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

1

11%

LEVEL 2

4

44%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

2

22%

General Education

PROFICIENT

44%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

1

11%

LEVEL 2

4

44%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

2

22%

White

PROFICIENT

44%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

1

11%

LEVEL 2

4

44%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

2

22%

Female

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Male

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Non-English Language Learners

PROFICIENT

44%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

1

11%

LEVEL 2

4

44%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

2

22%

Economically Disadvantaged

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Not Economically Disadvantaged

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Not Migrant

PROFICIENT

44%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

1

11%

LEVEL 2

4

44%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

2

22%

GROUP
TOTAL TESTED
  • 9
  • 9
  • 9
  • 6
  • 3
  • 9
  • 4
  • 5
  • 9
PROFICIENT
  • 44%
  • 44%
  • 44%
  • _%
  • _%
  • 44%
  • _%
  • _%
  • 44%
LEVEL 1
  • 1
  • 11%
  • 1
  • 11%
  • 1
  • 11%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 1
  • 11%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 1
  • 11%
LEVEL 2
  • 4
  • 44%
  • 4
  • 44%
  • 4
  • 44%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 4
  • 44%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 4
  • 44%
LEVEL 3
  • 2
  • 22%
  • 2
  • 22%
  • 2
  • 22%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 2
  • 22%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 2
  • 22%
LEVEL 4
  • 2
  • 22%
  • 2
  • 22%
  • 2
  • 22%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 2
  • 22%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 2
  • 22%

Grade 5 English Language Arts

Due to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 proficiency rates.

MEAN SCORE: 300

All Students

PROFICIENT

14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

2

29%

LEVEL 2

4

57%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

General Education

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Students with Disabilities

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

White

PROFICIENT

14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

2

29%

LEVEL 2

4

57%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Female

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Male

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Non-English Language Learners

PROFICIENT

14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

2

29%

LEVEL 2

4

57%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Not Economically Disadvantaged

PROFICIENT

14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

2

29%

LEVEL 2

4

57%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Not Migrant

PROFICIENT

14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

2

29%

LEVEL 2

4

57%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

GROUP
TOTAL TESTED
  • 7
  • 6
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 5
  • 7
  • 7
  • 7
PROFICIENT
  • 14%
  • _%
  • _%
  • 14%
  • _%
  • _%
  • 14%
  • 14%
  • 14%
LEVEL 1
  • 2
  • 29%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 2
  • 29%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 2
  • 29%
  • 2
  • 29%
  • 2
  • 29%
LEVEL 2
  • 4
  • 57%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 4
  • 57%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 4
  • 57%
  • 4
  • 57%
  • 4
  • 57%
LEVEL 3
  • 1
  • 14%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 1
  • 14%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 1
  • 14%
  • 1
  • 14%
  • 1
  • 14%
LEVEL 4
  • 0
  • 0%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 0
  • 0%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%

Grade 6 English Language Arts

Due to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 proficiency rates.

MEAN SCORE: 303

All Students

PROFICIENT

33%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

2

17%

LEVEL 2

6

50%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

3

25%

General Education

PROFICIENT

33%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

2

17%

LEVEL 2

6

50%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

3

25%

White

PROFICIENT

33%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

2

17%

LEVEL 2

6

50%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

3

25%

Female

PROFICIENT

60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

2

40%

Male

PROFICIENT

14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

2

29%

LEVEL 2

4

57%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

Non-English Language Learners

PROFICIENT

33%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

2

17%

LEVEL 2

6

50%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

3

25%

Economically Disadvantaged

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Not Economically Disadvantaged

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Not Migrant

PROFICIENT

33%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

2

17%

LEVEL 2

6

50%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

3

25%

GROUP
TOTAL TESTED
  • 12
  • 12
  • 12
  • 5
  • 7
  • 12
  • 4
  • 8
  • 12
PROFICIENT
  • 33%
  • 33%
  • 33%
  • 60%
  • 14%
  • 33%
  • _%
  • _%
  • 33%
LEVEL 1
  • 2
  • 17%
  • 2
  • 17%
  • 2
  • 17%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 2
  • 29%
  • 2
  • 17%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 2
  • 17%
LEVEL 2
  • 6
  • 50%
  • 6
  • 50%
  • 6
  • 50%
  • 2
  • 40%
  • 4
  • 57%
  • 6
  • 50%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 6
  • 50%
LEVEL 3
  • 1
  • 8%
  • 1
  • 8%
  • 1
  • 8%
  • 1
  • 20%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 1
  • 8%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 1
  • 8%
LEVEL 4
  • 3
  • 25%
  • 3
  • 25%
  • 3
  • 25%
  • 2
  • 40%
  • 1
  • 14%
  • 3
  • 25%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 3
  • 25%

Grade 7 English Language Arts

Due to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 proficiency rates.

MEAN SCORE: 286

All Students

PROFICIENT

15%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

6

46%

LEVEL 2

5

38%

LEVEL 3

2

15%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

General Education

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Students with Disabilities

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

White

PROFICIENT

15%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

6

46%

LEVEL 2

5

38%

LEVEL 3

2

15%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Female

PROFICIENT

40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Male

PROFICIENT

0%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

4

50%

LEVEL 2

4

50%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Non-English Language Learners

PROFICIENT

15%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

6

46%

LEVEL 2

5

38%

LEVEL 3

2

15%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Economically Disadvantaged

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Not Economically Disadvantaged

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Not Migrant

PROFICIENT

15%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

6

46%

LEVEL 2

5

38%

LEVEL 3

2

15%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

GROUP
TOTAL TESTED
  • 13
  • 12
  • 1
  • 13
  • 5
  • 8
  • 13
  • 9
  • 4
  • 13
PROFICIENT
  • 15%
  • _%
  • _%
  • 15%
  • 40%
  • 0%
  • 15%
  • _%
  • _%
  • 15%
LEVEL 1
  • 6
  • 46%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 6
  • 46%
  • 2
  • 40%
  • 4
  • 50%
  • 6
  • 46%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 6
  • 46%
LEVEL 2
  • 5
  • 38%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 5
  • 38%
  • 1
  • 20%
  • 4
  • 50%
  • 5
  • 38%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 5
  • 38%
LEVEL 3
  • 2
  • 15%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 2
  • 15%
  • 2
  • 40%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 2
  • 15%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 2
  • 15%
LEVEL 4
  • 0
  • 0%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 0
  • 0%

Grade 8 English Language Arts

Due to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 proficiency rates.

MEAN SCORE: 289

All Students

PROFICIENT

21%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

6

43%

LEVEL 2

5

36%

LEVEL 3

3

21%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

General Education

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Students with Disabilities

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

White

PROFICIENT

21%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

6

43%

LEVEL 2

5

36%

LEVEL 3

3

21%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Female

PROFICIENT

33%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

1

11%

LEVEL 2

5

56%

LEVEL 3

3

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Male

PROFICIENT

0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

5

100%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Non-English Language Learners

PROFICIENT

21%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

6

43%

LEVEL 2

5

36%

LEVEL 3

3

21%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Economically Disadvantaged

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Not Economically Disadvantaged

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Not Migrant

PROFICIENT

21%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

6

43%

LEVEL 2

5

36%

LEVEL 3

3

21%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

GROUP
TOTAL TESTED
  • 14
  • 12
  • 2
  • 14
  • 9
  • 5
  • 14
  • 3
  • 11
  • 14
PROFICIENT
  • 21%
  • _%
  • _%
  • 21%
  • 33%
  • 0%
  • 21%
  • _%
  • _%
  • 21%
LEVEL 1
  • 6
  • 43%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 6
  • 43%
  • 1
  • 11%
  • 5
  • 100%
  • 6
  • 43%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 6
  • 43%
LEVEL 2
  • 5
  • 36%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 5
  • 36%
  • 5
  • 56%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 5
  • 36%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 5
  • 36%
LEVEL 3
  • 3
  • 21%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 3
  • 21%
  • 3
  • 33%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 3
  • 21%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 3
  • 21%
LEVEL 4
  • 0
  • 0%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 0
  • 0%

Grade 3 Mathematics

Due to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 proficiency rates.

MEAN SCORE: 301

All Students

PROFICIENT

36%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

3

21%

LEVEL 2

6

43%

LEVEL 3

3

21%

LEVEL 4

2

14%

General Education

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Students with Disabilities

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

White

PROFICIENT

36%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

3

21%

LEVEL 2

6

43%

LEVEL 3

3

21%

LEVEL 4

2

14%

Female

PROFICIENT

67%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

3

50%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

Male

PROFICIENT

13%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

3

38%

LEVEL 2

4

50%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

Non-English Language Learners

PROFICIENT

36%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

3

21%

LEVEL 2

6

43%

LEVEL 3

3

21%

LEVEL 4

2

14%

Economically Disadvantaged

PROFICIENT

13%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

3

38%

LEVEL 2

4

50%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Not Economically Disadvantaged

PROFICIENT

67%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

2

33%

Not Migrant

PROFICIENT

36%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

3

21%

LEVEL 2

6

43%

LEVEL 3

3

21%

LEVEL 4

2

14%

GROUP
TOTAL TESTED
  • 14
  • 13
  • 1
  • 14
  • 6
  • 8
  • 14
  • 8
  • 6
  • 14
PROFICIENT
  • 36%
  • _%
  • _%
  • 36%
  • 67%
  • 13%
  • 36%
  • 13%
  • 67%
  • 36%
LEVEL 1
  • 3
  • 21%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 3
  • 21%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 3
  • 38%
  • 3
  • 21%
  • 3
  • 38%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 3
  • 21%
LEVEL 2
  • 6
  • 43%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 6
  • 43%
  • 2
  • 33%
  • 4
  • 50%
  • 6
  • 43%
  • 4
  • 50%
  • 2
  • 33%
  • 6
  • 43%
LEVEL 3
  • 3
  • 21%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 3
  • 21%
  • 3
  • 50%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 3
  • 21%
  • 1
  • 13%
  • 2
  • 33%
  • 3
  • 21%
LEVEL 4
  • 2
  • 14%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 2
  • 14%
  • 1
  • 17%
  • 1
  • 13%
  • 2
  • 14%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 2
  • 33%
  • 2
  • 14%

Grade 4 Mathematics

Due to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 proficiency rates.

MEAN SCORE: 302

All Students

PROFICIENT

44%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

2

22%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

3

33%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

General Education

PROFICIENT

44%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

2

22%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

3

33%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

White

PROFICIENT

44%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

2

22%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

3

33%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

Female

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Male

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Non-English Language Learners

PROFICIENT

44%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

2

22%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

3

33%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

Economically Disadvantaged

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Not Economically Disadvantaged

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Not Migrant

PROFICIENT

44%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

2

22%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

3

33%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

GROUP
TOTAL TESTED
  • 9
  • 9
  • 9
  • 6
  • 3
  • 9
  • 4
  • 5
  • 9
PROFICIENT
  • 44%
  • 44%
  • 44%
  • _%
  • _%
  • 44%
  • _%
  • _%
  • 44%
LEVEL 1
  • 2
  • 22%
  • 2
  • 22%
  • 2
  • 22%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 2
  • 22%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 2
  • 22%
LEVEL 2
  • 3
  • 33%
  • 3
  • 33%
  • 3
  • 33%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 3
  • 33%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 3
  • 33%
LEVEL 3
  • 3
  • 33%
  • 3
  • 33%
  • 3
  • 33%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 3
  • 33%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 3
  • 33%
LEVEL 4
  • 1
  • 11%
  • 1
  • 11%
  • 1
  • 11%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 1
  • 11%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 1
  • 11%

Grade 5 Mathematics

Due to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 proficiency rates.

MEAN SCORE: 296

All Students

PROFICIENT

14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

4

57%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

General Education

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Students with Disabilities

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

White

PROFICIENT

14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

4

57%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

Female

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Male

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Non-English Language Learners

PROFICIENT

14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

4

57%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

Not Economically Disadvantaged

PROFICIENT

14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

4

57%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

Not Migrant

PROFICIENT

14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

4

57%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

GROUP
TOTAL TESTED
  • 7
  • 6
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 5
  • 7
  • 7
  • 7
PROFICIENT
  • 14%
  • _%
  • _%
  • 14%
  • _%
  • _%
  • 14%
  • 14%
  • 14%
LEVEL 1
  • 4
  • 57%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 4
  • 57%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 4
  • 57%
  • 4
  • 57%
  • 4
  • 57%
LEVEL 2
  • 2
  • 29%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 2
  • 29%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 2
  • 29%
  • 2
  • 29%
  • 2
  • 29%
LEVEL 3
  • 0
  • 0%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 0
  • 0%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
LEVEL 4
  • 1
  • 14%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 1
  • 14%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 1
  • 14%
  • 1
  • 14%
  • 1
  • 14%

Grade 6 Mathematics

Due to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 proficiency rates.

MEAN SCORE: 297

All Students

PROFICIENT

8%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

2

17%

LEVEL 2

9

75%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

General Education

PROFICIENT

8%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

2

17%

LEVEL 2

9

75%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

White

PROFICIENT

8%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

2

17%

LEVEL 2

9

75%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Female

PROFICIENT

0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

100%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Male

PROFICIENT

14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

2

29%

LEVEL 2

4

57%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Non-English Language Learners

PROFICIENT

8%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

2

17%

LEVEL 2

9

75%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Economically Disadvantaged

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Not Economically Disadvantaged

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Not Migrant

PROFICIENT

8%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

2

17%

LEVEL 2

9

75%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

GROUP
TOTAL TESTED
  • 12
  • 12
  • 12
  • 5
  • 7
  • 12
  • 4
  • 8
  • 12
PROFICIENT
  • 8%
  • 8%
  • 8%
  • 0%
  • 14%
  • 8%
  • _%
  • _%
  • 8%
LEVEL 1
  • 2
  • 17%
  • 2
  • 17%
  • 2
  • 17%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 2
  • 29%
  • 2
  • 17%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 2
  • 17%
LEVEL 2
  • 9
  • 75%
  • 9
  • 75%
  • 9
  • 75%
  • 5
  • 100%
  • 4
  • 57%
  • 9
  • 75%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 9
  • 75%
LEVEL 3
  • 1
  • 8%
  • 1
  • 8%
  • 1
  • 8%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 1
  • 14%
  • 1
  • 8%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 1
  • 8%
LEVEL 4
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 0
  • 0%

Grade 7 Mathematics

Due to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 proficiency rates.

Mean scores and data in the table for grade 7 math include only those for grade 7 students who took the Grade 7 New York State Testing Program Assessment (NYSTP) in Mathematics. For 2015 and forward, data in the bar charts include those for grade 7 students who took the Grade 7 NYSTP in Mathematics and grade 7 students who took a Regents math test in lieu of the NYSTP. For 2014 and earlier, data in the bar charts include only those for grade 7 students who took the Grade 7 NYSTP.

MEAN SCORE: 307

All Students

PROFICIENT

31%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

3

23%

LEVEL 2

6

46%

LEVEL 3

4

31%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

General Education

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Students with Disabilities

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

White

PROFICIENT

31%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

3

23%

LEVEL 2

6

46%

LEVEL 3

4

31%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Female

PROFICIENT

20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Male

PROFICIENT

38%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

2

25%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

3

38%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Non-English Language Learners

PROFICIENT

31%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

3

23%

LEVEL 2

6

46%

LEVEL 3

4

31%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Economically Disadvantaged

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Not Economically Disadvantaged

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Not Migrant

PROFICIENT

31%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

3

23%

LEVEL 2

6

46%

LEVEL 3

4

31%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

GROUP
TOTAL TESTED
  • 13
  • 12
  • 1
  • 13
  • 5
  • 8
  • 13
  • 9
  • 4
  • 13
PROFICIENT
  • 31%
  • _%
  • _%
  • 31%
  • 20%
  • 38%
  • 31%
  • _%
  • _%
  • 31%
LEVEL 1
  • 3
  • 23%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 3
  • 23%
  • 1
  • 20%
  • 2
  • 25%
  • 3
  • 23%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 3
  • 23%
LEVEL 2
  • 6
  • 46%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 6
  • 46%
  • 3
  • 60%
  • 3
  • 38%
  • 6
  • 46%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 6
  • 46%
LEVEL 3
  • 4
  • 31%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 4
  • 31%
  • 1
  • 20%
  • 3
  • 38%
  • 4
  • 31%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 4
  • 31%
LEVEL 4
  • 0
  • 0%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 0
  • 0%

Grade 8 Mathematics

Due to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 proficiency rates.

Mean scores and data in the table for grade 8 math include only those for grade 8 students who took the Grade 8 New York State Testing Program Assessment (NYSTP) in Mathematics. For 2015 and forward, data in the bar charts include those for grade 8 students who took the Grade 8 NYSTP in Mathematics and grade 8 students who took a Regents math test in lieu of the NYSTP. For 2014 and earlier, data in the bar charts include only those for grade 8 students who took the Grade 8 NYSTP.

MEAN SCORE: 259

All Students

PROFICIENT

0%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

7

78%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

General Education

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Students with Disabilities

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

White

PROFICIENT

0%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

7

78%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Female

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Male

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Non-English Language Learners

PROFICIENT

0%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

7

78%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Economically Disadvantaged

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Not Economically Disadvantaged

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Not Migrant

PROFICIENT

0%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

7

78%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

GROUP
TOTAL TESTED
  • 9
  • 8
  • 1
  • 9
  • 5
  • 4
  • 9
  • 2
  • 7
  • 9
PROFICIENT
  • 0%
  • _%
  • _%
  • 0%
  • _%
  • _%
  • 0%
  • _%
  • _%
  • 0%
LEVEL 1
  • 7
  • 78%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 7
  • 78%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 7
  • 78%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 7
  • 78%
LEVEL 2
  • 2
  • 22%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 2
  • 22%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 2
  • 22%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 2
  • 22%
LEVEL 3
  • 0
  • 0%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 0
  • 0%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 0
  • 0%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 0
  • 0%
LEVEL 4
  • 0
  • 0%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 0
  • 0%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 0
  • 0%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 0
  • 0%
Grade 8 Students Taking a Regents Math Test

Accelerated grade 8 students who took a Regents math test in lieu of the Grade 8 NYSTP in Mathematics.

All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4 AND ABOVE

3

60%

LEVEL 3 AND ABOVE

5

100%

GROUP
TOTAL TESTED
  • 5
LEVEL 1
  • 0
  • 0%
LEVEL 2
  • 0
  • 0%
LEVEL 3
  • 2
  • 40%
4 & ABOVE
  • 3
  • 60%
3 & ABOVE
  • 5
  • 100%

Grade 4 Science

Due to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 proficiency rates.

MEAN SCORE: 86

All Students

PROFICIENT

89%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

11%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

6

67%

General Education

PROFICIENT

89%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

11%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

6

67%

White

PROFICIENT

89%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

11%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

6

67%

Female

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Male

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Non-English Language Learners

PROFICIENT

89%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

11%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

6

67%

Economically Disadvantaged

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Not Economically Disadvantaged

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Not Migrant

PROFICIENT

89%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

11%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

6

67%

GROUP
TOTAL TESTED
  • 9
  • 9
  • 9
  • 6
  • 3
  • 9
  • 4
  • 5
  • 9
PROFICIENT
  • 89%
  • 89%
  • 89%
  • _%
  • _%
  • 89%
  • _%
  • _%
  • 89%
LEVEL 1
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 0
  • 0%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 0
  • 0%
LEVEL 2
  • 1
  • 11%
  • 1
  • 11%
  • 1
  • 11%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 1
  • 11%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 1
  • 11%
LEVEL 3
  • 2
  • 22%
  • 2
  • 22%
  • 2
  • 22%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 2
  • 22%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 2
  • 22%
LEVEL 4
  • 6
  • 67%
  • 6
  • 67%
  • 6
  • 67%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 6
  • 67%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 6
  • 67%

Grade 8 Science

Due to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 proficiency rates.

Data in the bar charts include those for grade 8 students who took the New York State Grade 8 Science Test and grade 8 students who took a Regents science test in lieu of this test. Mean scores and data in the table for grade 8 science include only those for grade 8 students who took the New York State Grade 8 Science Test.

MEAN SCORE: 65

All Students

PROFICIENT

50%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

7

50%

LEVEL 3

6

43%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

General Education

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Students with Disabilities

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

White

PROFICIENT

50%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

7

50%

LEVEL 3

6

43%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

Female

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Male

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Non-English Language Learners

PROFICIENT

50%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

7

50%

LEVEL 3

6

43%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

Economically Disadvantaged

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Not Economically Disadvantaged

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Not Migrant

PROFICIENT

50%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

7

50%

LEVEL 3

6

43%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

GROUP
TOTAL TESTED
  • 14
  • 13
  • 1
  • 14
  • 10
  • 4
  • 14
  • 4
  • 10
  • 14
PROFICIENT
  • 50%
  • _%
  • _%
  • 50%
  • _%
  • _%
  • 50%
  • _%
  • _%
  • 50%
LEVEL 1
  • 0
  • 0%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 0
  • 0%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 0
  • 0%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 0
  • 0%
LEVEL 2
  • 7
  • 50%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 7
  • 50%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 7
  • 50%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 7
  • 50%
LEVEL 3
  • 6
  • 43%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 6
  • 43%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 6
  • 43%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 6
  • 43%
LEVEL 4
  • 1
  • 7%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 1
  • 7%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 1
  • 7%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 1
  • 7%

Statewide Results on the National Assessment of Educational Progress: NAEP (2014 - 15)

Grade: 4

Reading

GROUP
  • All Students
  • American Indian or Alaska Native
  • Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
  • Black or African American
  • Hispanic or Latino
  • White
  • Multiracial
  • Students with Disabilities
  • English Language Learners
  • Economically Disadvantaged
BELOW BASIC
  • 32%
  • *%
  • 20%
  • 48%
  • 44%
  • 20%
  • *%
  • 70%
  • 74%
  • 43%
BASIC
  • 32%
  • *%
  • 30%
  • 34%
  • 37%
  • 31%
  • *%
  • 22%
  • 21%
  • 36%
PROFICIENT
  • 27%
  • *%
  • 33%
  • 15%
  • 17%
  • 37%
  • *%
  • 7%
  • 4%
  • 18%
ADVANCED
  • 9%
  • *%
  • 17%
  • 3%
  • 2%
  • 12%
  • *%
  • 1%
  • 1%
  • 3%
PARTICIPATION RATE
  • 98
  • 88

Reading

All Students
Percent Below Basic

32

Percent Basic

32

Percent Proficient

27

Percent Advanced

9

American Indian or Alaska Native
Percent Below Basic

*

Percent Basic

*

Percent Proficient

*

Percent Advanced

*

Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Percent Below Basic

20

Percent Basic

30

Percent Proficient

33

Percent Advanced

17

Black or African American
Percent Below Basic

48

Percent Basic

34

Percent Proficient

15

Percent Advanced

3

Hispanic or Latino
Percent Below Basic

44

Percent Basic

37

Percent Proficient

17

Percent Advanced

2

White
Percent Below Basic

20

Percent Basic

31

Percent Proficient

37

Percent Advanced

12

Multiracial
Percent Below Basic

*

Percent Basic

*

Percent Proficient

*

Percent Advanced

*

Students with Disabilities
Percent Below Basic

70

Percent Basic

22

Percent Proficient

7

Percent Advanced

1

Participation Rate

98

English Language Learners
Percent Below Basic

74

Percent Basic

21

Percent Proficient

4

Percent Advanced

1

Participation Rate

88

Economically Disadvantaged
Percent Below Basic

43

Percent Basic

36

Percent Proficient

18

Percent Advanced

3

Mathematics

GROUP
  • All Students
  • American Indian or Alaska Native
  • Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
  • Black or African American
  • Hispanic or Latino
  • White
  • Multiracial
  • Students with Disabilities
  • English Language Learners
  • Economically Disadvantaged
BELOW BASIC
  • 21%
  • *%
  • 12%
  • 40%
  • 28%
  • 12%
  • *%
  • 49%
  • 56%
  • 29%
BASIC
  • 44%
  • *%
  • 31%
  • 46%
  • 51%
  • 41%
  • *%
  • 39%
  • 35%
  • 48%
PROFICIENT
  • 30%
  • *%
  • 42%
  • 13%
  • 20%
  • 40%
  • *%
  • 10%
  • 9%
  • 21%
ADVANCED
  • 5%
  • *%
  • 15%
  • 1%
  • 1%
  • 7%
  • *%
  • 2%
  • *%
  • 2%
PARTICIPATION RATE
  • 98
  • 91

Mathematics

All Students
Percent Below Basic

21

Percent Basic

44

Percent Proficient

30

Percent Advanced

5

American Indian or Alaska Native
Percent Below Basic

*

Percent Basic

*

Percent Proficient

*

Percent Advanced

*

Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Percent Below Basic

12

Percent Basic

31

Percent Proficient

42

Percent Advanced

15

Black or African American
Percent Below Basic

40

Percent Basic

46

Percent Proficient

13

Percent Advanced

1

Hispanic or Latino
Percent Below Basic

28

Percent Basic

51

Percent Proficient

20

Percent Advanced

1

White
Percent Below Basic

12

Percent Basic

41

Percent Proficient

40

Percent Advanced

7

Multiracial
Percent Below Basic

*

Percent Basic

*

Percent Proficient

*

Percent Advanced

*

Students with Disabilities
Percent Below Basic

49

Percent Basic

39

Percent Proficient

10

Percent Advanced

2

Participation Rate

98

English Language Learners
Percent Below Basic

56

Percent Basic

35

Percent Proficient

9

Percent Advanced

*

Participation Rate

91

Economically Disadvantaged
Percent Below Basic

29

Percent Basic

48

Percent Proficient

21

Percent Advanced

2

Grade: 8

Reading

GROUP
  • All Students
  • American Indian or Alaska Native
  • Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
  • Black or African American
  • Hispanic or Latino
  • White
  • Multiracial
  • Students with Disabilities
  • English Language Learners
  • Economically Disadvantaged
BELOW BASIC
  • 27%
  • *%
  • 19%
  • 42%
  • 35%
  • 18%
  • *%
  • 59%
  • 78%
  • 36%
BASIC
  • 40%
  • *%
  • 39%
  • 41%
  • 43%
  • 39%
  • *%
  • 33%
  • 19%
  • 42%
PROFICIENT
  • 29%
  • *%
  • 34%
  • 16%
  • 20%
  • 38%
  • *%
  • 8%
  • 3%
  • 21%
ADVANCED
  • 4%
  • *%
  • 8%
  • 1%
  • 2%
  • 5%
  • *%
  • *%
  • *%
  • 1%
PARTICIPATION RATE
  • 98
  • 89

Reading

All Students
Percent Below Basic

27

Percent Basic

40

Percent Proficient

29

Percent Advanced

4

American Indian or Alaska Native
Percent Below Basic

*

Percent Basic

*

Percent Proficient

*

Percent Advanced

*

Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Percent Below Basic

19

Percent Basic

39

Percent Proficient

34

Percent Advanced

8

Black or African American
Percent Below Basic

42

Percent Basic

41

Percent Proficient

16

Percent Advanced

1

Hispanic or Latino
Percent Below Basic

35

Percent Basic

43

Percent Proficient

20

Percent Advanced

2

White
Percent Below Basic

18

Percent Basic

39

Percent Proficient

38

Percent Advanced

5

Multiracial
Percent Below Basic

*

Percent Basic

*

Percent Proficient

*

Percent Advanced

*

Students with Disabilities
Percent Below Basic

59

Percent Basic

33

Percent Proficient

8

Percent Advanced

*

Participation Rate

98

English Language Learners
Percent Below Basic

78

Percent Basic

19

Percent Proficient

3

Percent Advanced

*

Participation Rate

89

Economically Disadvantaged
Percent Below Basic

36

Percent Basic

42

Percent Proficient

21

Percent Advanced

1

Mathematics

GROUP
  • All Students
  • American Indian or Alaska Native
  • Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
  • Black or African American
  • Hispanic or Latino
  • White
  • Multiracial
  • Students with Disabilities
  • English Language Learners
  • Economically Disadvantaged
BELOW BASIC
  • 31%
  • *%
  • 18%
  • 48%
  • 41%
  • 20%
  • *%
  • 64%
  • 72%
  • 40%
BASIC
  • 38%
  • *%
  • 30%
  • 37%
  • 40%
  • 40%
  • *%
  • 27%
  • 21%
  • 39%
PROFICIENT
  • 24%
  • *%
  • 33%
  • 13%
  • 16%
  • 31%
  • *%
  • 8%
  • 6%
  • 17%
ADVANCED
  • 7%
  • *%
  • 19%
  • 2%
  • 3%
  • 9%
  • *%
  • 1%
  • 1%
  • 4%
PARTICIPATION RATE
  • 99
  • 94

Mathematics

All Students
Percent Below Basic

31

Percent Basic

38

Percent Proficient

24

Percent Advanced

7

American Indian or Alaska Native
Percent Below Basic

*

Percent Basic

*

Percent Proficient

*

Percent Advanced

*

Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Percent Below Basic

18

Percent Basic

30

Percent Proficient

33

Percent Advanced

19

Black or African American
Percent Below Basic

48

Percent Basic

37

Percent Proficient

13

Percent Advanced

2

Hispanic or Latino
Percent Below Basic

41

Percent Basic

40

Percent Proficient

16

Percent Advanced

3

White
Percent Below Basic

20

Percent Basic

40

Percent Proficient

31

Percent Advanced

9

Multiracial
Percent Below Basic

*

Percent Basic

*

Percent Proficient

*

Percent Advanced

*

Students with Disabilities
Percent Below Basic

64

Percent Basic

27

Percent Proficient

8

Percent Advanced

1

Participation Rate

99

English Language Learners
Percent Below Basic

72

Percent Basic

21

Percent Proficient

6

Percent Advanced

1

Participation Rate

94

Economically Disadvantaged
Percent Below Basic

40

Percent Basic

39

Percent Proficient

17

Percent Advanced

4

Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level English Language Arts after Four Years of Instruction

All Students

PROFICIENT

79%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

2

14%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

5

36%

LEVEL 4

6

43%

General Education

PROFICIENT

100%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

6

75%

Students with Disabilities

PROFICIENT

50%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

3

50%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Hispanic or Latino

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

White

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Small Group Total

PROFICIENT

79%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

2

14%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

5

36%

LEVEL 4

6

43%

Female

PROFICIENT

86%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

4

57%

Male

PROFICIENT

71%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

3

43%

LEVEL 4

2

29%

Non-English Language Learners

PROFICIENT

79%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

2

14%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

5

36%

LEVEL 4

6

43%

Economically Disadvantaged

PROFICIENT

40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

Not Economically Disadvantaged

PROFICIENT

100%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

4

44%

LEVEL 4

5

56%

Not Migrant

PROFICIENT

79%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

2

14%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

5

36%

LEVEL 4

6

43%

GROUP
TOTAL TESTED
  • 14
  • 8
  • 6
  • 1
  • 13
  • 14
  • 7
  • 7
  • 14
  • 5
  • 9
  • 14
PROFICIENT
  • 79%
  • 100%
  • 50%
  • _%
  • _%
  • 79%
  • 86%
  • 71%
  • 79%
  • 40%
  • 100%
  • 79%
LEVEL 1
  • 2
  • 14%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 2
  • 33%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 2
  • 14%
  • 1
  • 14%
  • 1
  • 14%
  • 2
  • 14%
  • 2
  • 40%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 2
  • 14%
LEVEL 2
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
LEVEL 3
  • 5
  • 36%
  • 2
  • 25%
  • 3
  • 50%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 5
  • 36%
  • 2
  • 29%
  • 3
  • 43%
  • 5
  • 36%
  • 1
  • 20%
  • 4
  • 44%
  • 5
  • 36%
LEVEL 4
  • 6
  • 43%
  • 6
  • 75%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 6
  • 43%
  • 4
  • 57%
  • 2
  • 29%
  • 6
  • 43%
  • 1
  • 20%
  • 5
  • 56%
  • 6
  • 43%

Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level Mathematics after Four Years of Instruction

All Students

PROFICIENT

71%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

14%

LEVEL 3

10

71%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

General Education

PROFICIENT

88%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

7

88%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Students with Disabilities

PROFICIENT

50%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

3

50%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Hispanic or Latino

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

White

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Small Group Total

PROFICIENT

71%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

14%

LEVEL 3

10

71%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Female

PROFICIENT

71%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

5

71%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Male

PROFICIENT

71%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

5

71%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Non-English Language Learners

PROFICIENT

71%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

14%

LEVEL 3

10

71%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Economically Disadvantaged

PROFICIENT

40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Not Economically Disadvantaged

PROFICIENT

89%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

8

89%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Not Migrant

PROFICIENT

71%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

14%

LEVEL 3

10

71%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

GROUP
TOTAL TESTED
  • 14
  • 8
  • 6
  • 1
  • 13
  • 14
  • 7
  • 7
  • 14
  • 5
  • 9
  • 14
PROFICIENT
  • 71%
  • 88%
  • 50%
  • _%
  • _%
  • 71%
  • 71%
  • 71%
  • 71%
  • 40%
  • 89%
  • 71%
LEVEL 1
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
LEVEL 2
  • 2
  • 14%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 2
  • 33%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 2
  • 14%
  • 1
  • 14%
  • 1
  • 14%
  • 2
  • 14%
  • 2
  • 40%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 2
  • 14%
LEVEL 3
  • 10
  • 71%
  • 7
  • 88%
  • 3
  • 50%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 10
  • 71%
  • 5
  • 71%
  • 5
  • 71%
  • 10
  • 71%
  • 2
  • 40%
  • 8
  • 89%
  • 10
  • 71%
LEVEL 4
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%

Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level Global History and Geography after Four Years of Instruction

All Students

PROFICIENT

57%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

2

14%

LEVEL 2

2

14%

LEVEL 3

7

50%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

General Education

PROFICIENT

75%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

13%

LEVEL 3

5

63%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

Students with Disabilities

PROFICIENT

33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Hispanic or Latino

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

White

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Small Group Total

PROFICIENT

57%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

2

14%

LEVEL 2

2

14%

LEVEL 3

7

50%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

Female

PROFICIENT

71%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

5

71%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Male

PROFICIENT

43%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

Non-English Language Learners

PROFICIENT

57%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

2

14%

LEVEL 2

2

14%

LEVEL 3

7

50%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

Economically Disadvantaged

PROFICIENT

40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Not Economically Disadvantaged

PROFICIENT

67%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

5

56%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

Not Migrant

PROFICIENT

57%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

2

14%

LEVEL 2

2

14%

LEVEL 3

7

50%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

GROUP
TOTAL TESTED
  • 14
  • 8
  • 6
  • 1
  • 13
  • 14
  • 7
  • 7
  • 14
  • 5
  • 9
  • 14
PROFICIENT
  • 57%
  • 75%
  • 33%
  • _%
  • _%
  • 57%
  • 71%
  • 43%
  • 57%
  • 40%
  • 67%
  • 57%
LEVEL 1
  • 2
  • 14%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 2
  • 33%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 2
  • 14%
  • 1
  • 14%
  • 1
  • 14%
  • 2
  • 14%
  • 2
  • 40%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 2
  • 14%
LEVEL 2
  • 2
  • 14%
  • 1
  • 13%
  • 1
  • 17%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 2
  • 14%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 2
  • 29%
  • 2
  • 14%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 2
  • 22%
  • 2
  • 14%
LEVEL 3
  • 7
  • 50%
  • 5
  • 63%
  • 2
  • 33%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 7
  • 50%
  • 5
  • 71%
  • 2
  • 29%
  • 7
  • 50%
  • 2
  • 40%
  • 5
  • 56%
  • 7
  • 50%
LEVEL 4
  • 1
  • 7%
  • 1
  • 13%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 1
  • 7%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 1
  • 14%
  • 1
  • 7%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 1
  • 11%
  • 1
  • 7%

Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level U.S. History and Government after Four Years of Instruction

All Students

PROFICIENT

64%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

2

14%

LEVEL 2

2

14%

LEVEL 3

7

50%

LEVEL 4

2

14%

General Education

PROFICIENT

100%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

6

75%

LEVEL 4

2

25%

Students with Disabilities

PROFICIENT

17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Hispanic or Latino

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

White

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Small Group Total

PROFICIENT

64%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

2

14%

LEVEL 2

2

14%

LEVEL 3

7

50%

LEVEL 4

2

14%

Female

PROFICIENT

71%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

4

57%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

Male

PROFICIENT

57%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

3

43%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

Non-English Language Learners

PROFICIENT

64%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

2

14%

LEVEL 2

2

14%

LEVEL 3

7

50%

LEVEL 4

2

14%

Economically Disadvantaged

PROFICIENT

20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

Not Economically Disadvantaged

PROFICIENT

89%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

11%

LEVEL 3

7

78%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

Not Migrant

PROFICIENT

64%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

2

14%

LEVEL 2

2

14%

LEVEL 3

7

50%

LEVEL 4

2

14%

GROUP
TOTAL TESTED
  • 14
  • 8
  • 6
  • 1
  • 13
  • 14
  • 7
  • 7
  • 14
  • 5
  • 9
  • 14
PROFICIENT
  • 64%
  • 100%
  • 17%
  • _%
  • _%
  • 64%
  • 71%
  • 57%
  • 64%
  • 20%
  • 89%
  • 64%
LEVEL 1
  • 2
  • 14%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 2
  • 33%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 2
  • 14%
  • 1
  • 14%
  • 1
  • 14%
  • 2
  • 14%
  • 2
  • 40%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 2
  • 14%
LEVEL 2
  • 2
  • 14%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 2
  • 33%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 2
  • 14%
  • 1
  • 14%
  • 1
  • 14%
  • 2
  • 14%
  • 1
  • 20%
  • 1
  • 11%
  • 2
  • 14%
LEVEL 3
  • 7
  • 50%
  • 6
  • 75%
  • 1
  • 17%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 7
  • 50%
  • 4
  • 57%
  • 3
  • 43%
  • 7
  • 50%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 7
  • 78%
  • 7
  • 50%
LEVEL 4
  • 2
  • 14%
  • 2
  • 25%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 2
  • 14%
  • 1
  • 14%
  • 1
  • 14%
  • 2
  • 14%
  • 1
  • 20%
  • 1
  • 11%
  • 2
  • 14%

Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level Science after Four Years of Instruction

All Students

PROFICIENT

79%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

1

7%

LEVEL 2

1

7%

LEVEL 3

10

71%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

General Education

PROFICIENT

100%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

7

88%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

Students with Disabilities

PROFICIENT

50%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

3

50%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Hispanic or Latino

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

White

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Small Group Total

PROFICIENT

79%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

1

7%

LEVEL 2

1

7%

LEVEL 3

10

71%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

Female

PROFICIENT

86%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

6

86%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Male

PROFICIENT

71%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

4

57%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

Non-English Language Learners

PROFICIENT

79%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

1

7%

LEVEL 2

1

7%

LEVEL 3

10

71%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

Economically Disadvantaged

PROFICIENT

40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Not Economically Disadvantaged

PROFICIENT

100%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

8

89%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

Not Migrant

PROFICIENT

79%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

1

7%

LEVEL 2

1

7%

LEVEL 3

10

71%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

GROUP
TOTAL TESTED
  • 14
  • 8
  • 6
  • 1
  • 13
  • 14
  • 7
  • 7
  • 14
  • 5
  • 9
  • 14
PROFICIENT
  • 79%
  • 100%
  • 50%
  • _%
  • _%
  • 79%
  • 86%
  • 71%
  • 79%
  • 40%
  • 100%
  • 79%
LEVEL 1
  • 1
  • 7%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 1
  • 17%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 1
  • 7%
  • 1
  • 14%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 1
  • 7%
  • 1
  • 20%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 1
  • 7%
LEVEL 2
  • 1
  • 7%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 1
  • 17%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 1
  • 7%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 1
  • 14%
  • 1
  • 7%
  • 1
  • 20%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 1
  • 7%
LEVEL 3
  • 10
  • 71%
  • 7
  • 88%
  • 3
  • 50%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 10
  • 71%
  • 6
  • 86%
  • 4
  • 57%
  • 10
  • 71%
  • 2
  • 40%
  • 8
  • 89%
  • 10
  • 71%
LEVEL 4
  • 1
  • 7%
  • 1
  • 13%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 1
  • 7%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 1
  • 14%
  • 1
  • 7%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 1
  • 11%
  • 1
  • 7%

New York State Alternate Assessment (NYSAA) Results (2015 - 16)

GROUP
TOTAL TESTED
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
PROFICIENT
  • _%
  • _%
  • _%
  • _%
  • _%
  • _%
LEVEL 1
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
LEVEL 2
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
LEVEL 3
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
LEVEL 4
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
Grade 6 ELA

PROFICIENT


_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1

LEVEL 1

_

LEVEL 2

_

LEVEL 3

_

LEVEL 4

_

Grade 6 Math

PROFICIENT


_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1

LEVEL 1

_

LEVEL 2

_

LEVEL 3

_

LEVEL 4

_

Secondary-Level ELA

PROFICIENT


_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1

LEVEL 1

_

LEVEL 2

_

LEVEL 3

_

LEVEL 4

_

Secondary-Level Math

PROFICIENT


_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1

LEVEL 1

_

LEVEL 2

_

LEVEL 3

_

LEVEL 4

_

Secondary-Level Science

PROFICIENT


_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1

LEVEL 1

_

LEVEL 2

_

LEVEL 3

_

LEVEL 4

_

Secondary-Level Social Studies

PROFICIENT


_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1

LEVEL 1

_

LEVEL 2

_

LEVEL 3

_

LEVEL 4

_

New York State English as a Second Language Achievement Test (NYSESLAT) Results (2015 - 16)

Grade 1

GROUP
TOTAL TESTED
  • 2
  • 2
ENTERING
  • _
  • _
EMERGING
  • _
  • _
TRANSITIONING
  • _
  • _
EXPANDING
  • _
  • _
COMMANDING
  • _
  • _

Grade 1

All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 2
ENTERING

_

EMERGING

_

TRANSITIONING

_

EXPANDING

_

COMMANDING

_

General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 2
ENTERING

_

EMERGING

_

TRANSITIONING

_

EXPANDING

_

COMMANDING

_

Elementary/Middle-Level English Language Arts Results for Accountability

All accountability groups made AYP: NO

GROUP
MADE AYP
Tested 95%
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
PI
EAMO
Safe Harbor Target
All Students
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%

NO

Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

168*

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

90%*

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

YES

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

70

PI

100

EAMO

93

Safe Harbor Target

93

American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%

Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

0

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

0

PI

EAMO

Safe Harbor Target

Black or African American
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%

Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

0

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

0

PI

EAMO

Safe Harbor Target

Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%

Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

0

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

0

PI

EAMO

Safe Harbor Target

Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%

Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

0

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

0

PI

EAMO

Safe Harbor Target

White
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%

NO

Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

168*

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

90%*

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

NO

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

70

PI

100

EAMO

108

Safe Harbor Target

105

Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%

Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

0

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

0

PI

EAMO

Safe Harbor Target

Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%

Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

6

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

6

PI

EAMO

Safe Harbor Target

Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%

Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

0

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

0

PI

EAMO

Safe Harbor Target

Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%

Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

32

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

28

PI

EAMO

Safe Harbor Target

Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.

GROUP
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
  • 168*
  • 168*
  • 168*
  • 168*
  • 0
  • 168*
  • 153*
  • 168*
  • 102*
  • 39
  • 38
  • 0
  • 168*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
  • 90%*
  • 90%*
  • 90%*
  • 90%*
  • 90%*
  • 91%*
  • 90%*
  • 89%*
  • 90%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
  • 70
  • 70
  • 70
  • 70
  • 0
  • 70
  • 64
  • 70
  • 42
  • 36
  • 34
  • 0
  • 70
PI
  • 100
  • 100
  • 100
  • 100
  • 100
  • 105
  • 100
  • 102
  • 75
  • 126
  • 100
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

168*

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

90%*

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

70

PI

100

Not Black or African American
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

168*

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

90%*

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

70

PI

100

Not Hispanic or Latino
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

168*

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

90%*

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

70

PI

100

Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

168*

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

90%*

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

70

PI

100

Not White
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

0

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

0

PI

Not Multiracial
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

168*

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

90%*

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

70

PI

100

General Education
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

153*

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

91%*

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

64

PI

105

English Proficient
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

168*

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

90%*

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

70

PI

100

Not Economically Disadvantaged
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

102*

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

89%*

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

42

PI

102

Male
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

39

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

36

PI

75

Female
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

38

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

34

PI

126

Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

0

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

0

PI

Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

168*

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

90%*

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

70

PI

100

― There were fewer than 40 students enrolled during the test administration period, so the Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 tested students enrolled on BEDS day and during the test administration period, so the PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed.
*The percentage of students tested in the current year fell below 95 percent, so the numbers of enrolled and tested students in the current year and previous year were combined to provide the school/district with another opportunity to meet the participation rate criterion.

Elementary/Middle-Level Mathematics Results for Accountability

All accountability groups made AYP: NO

GROUP
MADE AYP
Tested 95%
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
PI
EAMO
Safe Harbor Target
All Students
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%

NO

Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

168*

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

89%*

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

YES

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

70

PI

100

EAMO

90

Safe Harbor Target

90

American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%

Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

0

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

0

PI

EAMO

Safe Harbor Target

Black or African American
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%

Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

0

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

0

PI

EAMO

Safe Harbor Target

Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%

Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

0

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

0

PI

EAMO

Safe Harbor Target

Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%

Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

0

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

0

PI

EAMO

Safe Harbor Target

White
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%

NO

Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

168*

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

89%*

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

NO

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

70

PI

100

EAMO

104

Safe Harbor Target

102

Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%

Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

0

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

0

PI

EAMO

Safe Harbor Target

Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%

Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

6

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

5

PI

EAMO

Safe Harbor Target

Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%

Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

0

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

0

PI

EAMO

Safe Harbor Target

Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%

Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

32

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

28

PI

EAMO

Safe Harbor Target

Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.

GROUP
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
  • 168*
  • 168*
  • 168*
  • 168*
  • 0
  • 168*
  • 153*
  • 168*
  • 102*
  • 39
  • 38
  • 0
  • 168*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
  • 89%*
  • 89%*
  • 89%*
  • 89%*
  • 89%*
  • 90%*
  • 89%*
  • 89%*
  • 89%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
  • 70
  • 70
  • 70
  • 70
  • 0
  • 70
  • 65
  • 70
  • 42
  • 35
  • 35
  • 0
  • 70
PI
  • 100
  • 100
  • 100
  • 100
  • 100
  • 103
  • 100
  • 110
  • 80
  • 120
  • 100
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

168*

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

89%*

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

70

PI

100

Not Black or African American
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

168*

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

89%*

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

70

PI

100

Not Hispanic or Latino
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

168*

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

89%*

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

70

PI

100

Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

168*

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

89%*

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

70

PI

100

Not White
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

0

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

0

PI

Not Multiracial
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

168*

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

89%*

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

70

PI

100

General Education
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

153*

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

90%*

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

65

PI

103

English Proficient
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

168*

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

89%*

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

70

PI

100

Not Economically Disadvantaged
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

102*

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

89%*

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

42

PI

110

Male
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

39

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

35

PI

80

Female
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

38

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

35

PI

120

Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

0

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

0

PI

Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

168*

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

89%*

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

70

PI

100

― There were fewer than 40 students enrolled during the test administration period, so the Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 tested students enrolled on BEDS day and during the test administration period, so the PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed.
*The percentage of students tested in the current year fell below 95 percent, so the numbers of enrolled and tested students in the current year and previous year were combined to provide the school/district with another opportunity to meet the participation rate criterion.

Elementary/Middle-Level Science Results for Accountability

All accountability groups made AYP: NO

GROUP
MADE AYP
Tested 80%
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
PI
EAMO
Progress Target
All Students
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 80%

Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

25

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

PI >= EAMO or Progress Target

YES

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

51**

PI

176**

EAMO

174

Progress Target

174

American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%

Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

0

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

PI >= EAMO or Progress Target

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

0

PI

EAMO

Progress Target

Black or African American
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%

Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

0

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

PI >= EAMO or Progress Target

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

0

PI

EAMO

Progress Target

Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%

Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

0

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

PI >= EAMO or Progress Target

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

0

PI

EAMO

Progress Target

Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%

Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

0

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

PI >= EAMO or Progress Target

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

0

PI

EAMO

Progress Target

White
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 80%

Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

25

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

PI >= EAMO or Progress Target

NO

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

51**

PI

176**

EAMO

181

Progress Target

181

Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%

Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

0

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

PI >= EAMO or Progress Target

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

0

PI

EAMO

Progress Target

Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%

Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

2

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

PI >= EAMO or Progress Target

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

4

PI

EAMO

Progress Target

Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%

Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

0

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

PI >= EAMO or Progress Target

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

0

PI

EAMO

Progress Target

Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%

Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

8

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

PI >= EAMO or Progress Target

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

18

PI

EAMO

Progress Target

Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.

GROUP
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
  • 25
  • 25
  • 25
  • 25
  • 0
  • 25
  • 23
  • 25
  • 17
  • 8
  • 17
  • 0
  • 25
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
  • 51**
  • 51**
  • 51**
  • 51**
  • 0
  • 51**
  • 47**
  • 51**
  • 33**
  • 24
  • 27
  • 0
  • 51**
PI
  • 176**
  • 176**
  • 176**
  • 176**
  • 176**
  • 183**
  • 176**
  • 182**
  • 176**
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

25

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

51**

PI

176**

Not Black or African American
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

25

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

51**

PI

176**

Not Hispanic or Latino
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

25

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

51**

PI

176**

Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

25

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

51**

PI

176**

Not White
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

0

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

0

PI

Not Multiracial
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

25

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

51**

PI

176**

General Education
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

23

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

47**

PI

183**

English Proficient
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

25

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

51**

PI

176**

Not Economically Disadvantaged
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

17

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

33**

PI

182**

Male
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

8

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

24

PI

Female
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

17

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

27

PI

Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

0

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

0

PI

Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

25

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

51**

PI

176**

― There were fewer than 40 students enrolled during the test administration period, so the Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 tested students enrolled on BEDS day and during the test administration period, so the PI, EAMO, and Progress Target data are suppressed.
**The number of tested students enrolled on BEDS day and during the test period in the school/district in the current year is less than 30, so the numbers in the current year and previous year were combined to determine a Performance Index.

Secondary-Level English Language Arts Results for Accountability

All accountability groups made AYP: YES

GROUP
MADE AYP
Tested 95%
12th graders
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
PI
EAMO
Safe Harbor Target
All Students
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%

12th Graders

13

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

YES

2012 Accountability Cohort Members

32**

PI

166**

EAMO

157

Safe Harbor Target

157

American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%

12th Graders

0

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

2012 Accountability Cohort Members

0

PI

EAMO

Safe Harbor Target

Black or African American
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%

12th Graders

0

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

2012 Accountability Cohort Members

0

PI

EAMO

Safe Harbor Target

Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%

12th Graders

1

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

2012 Accountability Cohort Members

2

PI

EAMO

Safe Harbor Target

Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%

12th Graders

0

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

2012 Accountability Cohort Members

0

PI

EAMO

Safe Harbor Target

White
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%

12th Graders

12

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

YES

2012 Accountability Cohort Members

30**

PI

163**

EAMO

166

Safe Harbor Target

160

Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%

12th Graders

0

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

2012 Accountability Cohort Members

0

PI

EAMO

Safe Harbor Target

Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%

12th Graders

4

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

2012 Accountability Cohort Members

6

PI

EAMO

Safe Harbor Target

Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%

12th Graders

0

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

2012 Accountability Cohort Members

0

PI

EAMO

Safe Harbor Target

Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%

12th Graders

3

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

2012 Accountability Cohort Members

7

PI

EAMO

Safe Harbor Target

Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.

GROUP
12th Graders
  • 13
  • 13
  • 12
  • 13
  • 1
  • 13
  • 9
  • 13
  • 10
  • 6
  • 7
  • 0
  • 13
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
  • 32**
  • 32**
  • 30**
  • 32**
  • 2
  • 32**
  • 26
  • 32**
  • 25
  • 19
  • 13
  • 0
  • 32**
PI
  • 166**
  • 166**
  • 163**
  • 166**
  • 166**
  • 166**
  • 166**
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
12th Graders

13

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

2012 Accountability Cohort Members

32**

PI

166**

Not Black or African American
12th Graders

13

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

2012 Accountability Cohort Members

32**

PI

166**

Not Hispanic or Latino
12th Graders

12

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

2012 Accountability Cohort Members

30**

PI

163**

Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
12th Graders

13

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

2012 Accountability Cohort Members

32**

PI

166**

Not White
12th Graders

1

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

2012 Accountability Cohort Members

2

PI

Not Multiracial
12th Graders

13

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

2012 Accountability Cohort Members

32**

PI

166**

General Education
12th Graders

9

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

2012 Accountability Cohort Members

26

PI

English Proficient
12th Graders

13

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

2012 Accountability Cohort Members

32**

PI

166**

Not Economically Disadvantaged
12th Graders

10

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

2012 Accountability Cohort Members

25

PI

Male
12th Graders

6

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

2012 Accountability Cohort Members

19

PI

Female
12th Graders

7

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

2012 Accountability Cohort Members

13

PI

Migrant
12th Graders

0

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

2012 Accountability Cohort Members

0

PI

Not Migrant
12th Graders

13

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

2012 Accountability Cohort Members

32**

PI

166**

― There were fewer than 40 12th graders, so the Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 students in the 2012 accountability cohort, so PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed.
**The number of 2012 accountability cohort members is less than 30, so the number of 2012 and 2011 accountability cohort members were combined to determine a Performance Index.

Secondary-Level Mathematics Results for Accountability

All accountability groups made AYP: NO

GROUP
MADE AYP
Tested 95%
12th graders
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
PI
EAMO
Safe Harbor Target
All Students
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%

12th Graders

13

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

NO

2012 Accountability Cohort Members

32**

PI

116**

EAMO

142

Safe Harbor Target

142

American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%

12th Graders

0

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

2012 Accountability Cohort Members

0

PI

EAMO

Safe Harbor Target

Black or African American
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%

12th Graders

0

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

2012 Accountability Cohort Members

0

PI

EAMO

Safe Harbor Target

Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%

12th Graders

1

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

2012 Accountability Cohort Members

2

PI

EAMO

Safe Harbor Target

Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%

12th Graders

0

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

2012 Accountability Cohort Members

0

PI

EAMO

Safe Harbor Target

White
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%

12th Graders

12

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

NO

2012 Accountability Cohort Members

30**

PI

120**

EAMO

153

Safe Harbor Target

142

Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%

12th Graders

0

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

2012 Accountability Cohort Members

0

PI

EAMO

Safe Harbor Target

Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%

12th Graders

4

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

2012 Accountability Cohort Members

6

PI

EAMO

Safe Harbor Target

Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%

12th Graders

0

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

2012 Accountability Cohort Members

0

PI

EAMO

Safe Harbor Target

Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%

12th Graders

3

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

2012 Accountability Cohort Members

7

PI

EAMO

Safe Harbor Target

Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.

GROUP
12th Graders
  • 13
  • 13
  • 12
  • 13
  • 1
  • 13
  • 9
  • 13
  • 10
  • 6
  • 7
  • 0
  • 13
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
  • 32**
  • 32**
  • 30**
  • 32**
  • 2
  • 32**
  • 26
  • 32**
  • 25
  • 19
  • 13
  • 0
  • 32**
PI
  • 116**
  • 116**
  • 120**
  • 116**
  • 116**
  • 116**
  • 116**
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
12th Graders

13

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

2012 Accountability Cohort Members

32**

PI

116**

Not Black or African American
12th Graders

13

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

2012 Accountability Cohort Members

32**

PI

116**

Not Hispanic or Latino
12th Graders

12

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

2012 Accountability Cohort Members

30**

PI

120**

Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
12th Graders

13

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

2012 Accountability Cohort Members

32**

PI

116**

Not White
12th Graders

1

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

2012 Accountability Cohort Members

2

PI

Not Multiracial
12th Graders

13

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

2012 Accountability Cohort Members

32**

PI

116**

General Education
12th Graders

9

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

2012 Accountability Cohort Members

26

PI

English Proficient
12th Graders

13

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

2012 Accountability Cohort Members

32**

PI

116**

Not Economically Disadvantaged
12th Graders

10

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

2012 Accountability Cohort Members

25

PI

Male
12th Graders

6

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

2012 Accountability Cohort Members

19

PI

Female
12th Graders

7

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

2012 Accountability Cohort Members

13

PI

Migrant
12th Graders

0

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

2012 Accountability Cohort Members

0

PI

Not Migrant
12th Graders

13

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

2012 Accountability Cohort Members

32**

PI

116**

― There were fewer than 40 12th graders, so the Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 students in the 2012 accountability cohort, so PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed.
**The number of 2012 accountability cohort members is less than 30, so the number of 2012 and 2011 accountability cohort members were combined to determine a Performance Index.

Unweighted Combined ELA and Math PIs

GROUP
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
  • 100
  • 100
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
  • 100
  • 100
Secondary-Level ELA PI
Secondary-Level MATH PI
UNWEIGHTED COMBINED PI
  • 100
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 100
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
All Students
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
100
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
100
Secondary-Level ELA PI
Secondary-Level MATH PI
Unweighted Combined PI
100
American Indian or Alaska Native
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
Secondary-Level ELA PI
Secondary-Level MATH PI
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Black or African American
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
Secondary-Level ELA PI
Secondary-Level MATH PI
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Hispanic or Latino
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
Secondary-Level ELA PI
Secondary-Level MATH PI
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
Secondary-Level ELA PI
Secondary-Level MATH PI
Unweighted Combined PI
0
White
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
100
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
100
Secondary-Level ELA PI
Secondary-Level MATH PI
Unweighted Combined PI
100
Multiracial
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
Secondary-Level ELA PI
Secondary-Level MATH PI
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Students With Disabilities
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
Secondary-Level ELA PI
Secondary-Level MATH PI
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Limited English Proficient
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
Secondary-Level ELA PI
Secondary-Level MATH PI
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Economically Disadvantaged
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
Secondary-Level ELA PI
Secondary-Level MATH PI
Unweighted Combined PI
0
― There were not enough students to determine a Performance Index.

Overall Graduation Rate for Accountability

All accountability groups made AYP: YES

GROUP
MADE AYP
All Students

MADE AYP

YES

American Indian or Alaska Native

MADE AYP

Black or African American

MADE AYP

Hispanic or Latino

MADE AYP

Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander

MADE AYP

White

MADE AYP

YES

Multiracial

MADE AYP

Students With Disabilities

MADE AYP

Limited English Proficient

MADE AYP

Economically Disadvantaged

MADE AYP

― There were not enough students to make an AYP determination.

Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort for Accountability

GROUP
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion:
  • YES
  • YES
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
  • 36*
  • 1
  • 0
  • 1
  • 0
  • 34*
  • 0
  • 3
  • 0
  • 7
Graduation Rate
  • 81%*
  • 82%*
State Standard
  • 80%
  • 80%
Progress Target
  • 79%
  • 79%
All Students
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
36*
Graduation Rate
81%*
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
79%
American Indian or Alaska Native
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
1
Graduation Rate
State Standard
Progress Target
Black or African American
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
State Standard
Progress Target
Hispanic or Latino
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
1
Graduation Rate
State Standard
Progress Target
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
State Standard
Progress Target
White
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
34*
Graduation Rate
82%*
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
79%
Multiracial
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
State Standard
Progress Target
Students With Disabilities
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
3
Graduation Rate
State Standard
Progress Target
Limited English Proficient
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
State Standard
Progress Target
Economically Disadvantaged
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
7
Graduation Rate
State Standard
Progress Target

YES Graduation rate is equal to or greater than the State Standard or the group's Progress Target.
NO Graduation rate is less than the State Standard and the group's Progress Target.
― There were fewer than 30 students in the cohort.
* The number of students in the 2011 four-year graduation-rate total cohort in the school/district is less than 30, so data for the 2011 four-year graduation-rate total cohort and the 2010 four-year graduation-rate total cohort were combined to determine graduation rates.

Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort for Accountability

GROUP
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion:
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
  • 27
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 27
  • 0
  • 4
  • 0
  • 8
Graduation Rate
State Standard
Progress Target
All Students
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
27
Graduation Rate
State Standard
Progress Target
American Indian or Alaska Native
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
State Standard
Progress Target
Black or African American
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
State Standard
Progress Target
Hispanic or Latino
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
State Standard
Progress Target
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
State Standard
Progress Target
White
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
27
Graduation Rate
State Standard
Progress Target
Multiracial
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
State Standard
Progress Target
Students With Disabilities
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
4
Graduation Rate
State Standard
Progress Target
Limited English Proficient
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
State Standard
Progress Target
Economically Disadvantaged
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
8
Graduation Rate
State Standard
Progress Target

YES Graduation rate is equal to or greater than the State Standard or the group's Progress Target.
NO Graduation rate is less than the State Standard and the group's Progress Target.
― There were fewer than 30 students in the cohort.

Graduation Rates for Non-AYP Groups for Accountability

GROUP
Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
  • 35*
  • 36*
  • 35*
  • 36*
  • 2
  • 36*
  • 33*
  • 36*
  • 29
  • 17
  • 19
  • 0
  • 36*
Graduation Rate
  • 83%
  • 81%
  • 80%
  • 81%
  • 81%
  • 82%
  • 81%
  • 81%
Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
  • 27
  • 27
  • 27
  • 27
  • 0
  • 27
  • 23
  • 27
  • 19
  • 10
  • 17
  • 0
  • 27
Graduation Rate

Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort

Not American Indian or Alaska Native
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
35*
Graduation Rate
83%
Not Black or African American
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
36*
Graduation Rate
81%
Not Hispanic or Latino
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
35*
Graduation Rate
80%
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
36*
Graduation Rate
81%
Not White
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
2
Graduation Rate
Not Multiracial
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
36*
Graduation Rate