VAN HORNESVILLE-OWEN D YOUNG CSD - School Report Card Data [2015 - 16]
The New York State Report Card is an important part of the Board of Regents' effort to raise learning standards for all students. It provides information to the public on school/district enrollment and staff, student performance, and other measures of school and district performance. Knowledge gained from the report card on a school's or district's strengths and weaknesses can be used to improve instruction and services to students. Report Card Data - Glossary of Terms | Accountability Data - Glossary of Terms | Business Rules
VAN HORNESVILLE-OWEN D YOUNG CSD ENROLLMENT (2015 - 16)
K-12 ENROLLMENT
176
ENROLLMENT BY GENDER
MALE
89
51%
FEMALE
87
49%
ENROLLMENT BY ETHNICITY
GROUP
BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN
HISPANIC OR LATINO
WHITE
MULTIRACIAL
TOTAL
1
4
170
1
PERCENT
1%
2%
97%
1%
OTHER GROUPS
ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
—
—
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
14
8%
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
69
39%
ENROLLMENT BY GRADE
GROUP
K (FULL DAY)
1ST GRADE
2ND GRADE
3RD GRADE
4TH GRADE
5TH GRADE
6TH GRADE
7TH GRADE
8TH GRADE
9TH GRADE
10TH GRADE
11TH GRADE
12TH GRADE
TOTAL
15
15
7
14
9
8
14
16
15
20
15
17
11
PERCENT
9%
9%
4%
8%
5%
5%
8%
9%
9%
11%
9%
10%
6%
VAN HORNESVILLE-OWEN D YOUNG CSD ENROLLMENT (2015 - 16)
K-12 Enrollment: 176
ENROLLMENT BY GENDER
MALE
89
51%
FEMALE
87
49%
ENROLLMENT BY ETHNICITY
BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN
1
1%
HISPANIC OR LATINO
4
2%
WHITE
170
97%
MULTIRACIAL
1
1%
OTHER GROUPS
ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
—
—
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
14
8%
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
69
39%
ENROLLMENT BY GRADE
K (FULL DAY)
15
9%
1ST GRADE
15
9%
2ND GRADE
7
4%
3RD GRADE
14
8%
4TH GRADE
9
5%
5TH GRADE
8
5%
6TH GRADE
14
8%
7TH GRADE
16
9%
8TH GRADE
15
9%
9TH GRADE
20
11%
10TH GRADE
15
9%
11TH GRADE
17
10%
12TH GRADE
11
6%
Average Class Size (2015 - 16)
GROUP
Common Branch
Grade 8 English
Grade 8 Mathematics
Grade 8 Science
Grade 8 Social Studies
Grade 10 English
Grade 10 Mathematics
Grade 10 Science
Grade 10 Social Studies
CLASS SIZE
11
15
10
15
15
16
3
7
16
Average Class Size (2015 - 16)
Common Branch
11
Grade 8 English
15
Grade 8 Mathematics
10
Grade 8 Science
15
Grade 8 Social Studies
15
Grade 10 English
16
Grade 10 Mathematics
3
Grade 10 Science
7
Grade 10 Social Studies
16
Average Class Size (2015 - 16)
GROUP
Common Branch
Grade 8 English
Grade 8 Mathematics
Grade 8 Science
Grade 8 Social Studies
Grade 10 English
Grade 10 Mathematics
Grade 10 Science
Grade 10 Social Studies
CLASS SIZE
11
15
10
15
15
16
3
7
16
Average Class Size (2015 - 16)
Common Branch
11
Grade 8 English
15
Grade 8 Mathematics
10
Grade 8 Science
15
Grade 8 Social Studies
15
Grade 10 English
16
Grade 10 Mathematics
3
Grade 10 Science
7
Grade 10 Social Studies
16
Average Class Size (2015 - 16)
GROUP
Common Branch
Grade 8 English
Grade 8 Mathematics
Grade 8 Science
Grade 8 Social Studies
Grade 10 English
Grade 10 Mathematics
Grade 10 Science
Grade 10 Social Studies
CLASS SIZE
11
15
10
15
15
16
3
7
16
Average Class Size (2015 - 16)
Common Branch
11
Grade 8 English
15
Grade 8 Mathematics
10
Grade 8 Science
15
Grade 8 Social Studies
15
Grade 10 English
16
Grade 10 Mathematics
3
Grade 10 Science
7
Grade 10 Social Studies
16
Average Class Size (2015 - 16)
GROUP
Common Branch
Grade 8 English
Grade 8 Mathematics
Grade 8 Science
Grade 8 Social Studies
Grade 10 English
Grade 10 Mathematics
Grade 10 Science
Grade 10 Social Studies
CLASS SIZE
11
15
10
15
15
16
3
7
16
Average Class Size (2015 - 16)
Common Branch
11
Grade 8 English
15
Grade 8 Mathematics
10
Grade 8 Science
15
Grade 8 Social Studies
15
Grade 10 English
16
Grade 10 Mathematics
3
Grade 10 Science
7
Grade 10 Social Studies
16
Average Class Size (2015 - 16)
GROUP
Common Branch
Grade 8 English
Grade 8 Mathematics
Grade 8 Science
Grade 8 Social Studies
Grade 10 English
Grade 10 Mathematics
Grade 10 Science
Grade 10 Social Studies
CLASS SIZE
11
15
10
15
15
16
3
7
16
Average Class Size (2015 - 16)
Common Branch
11
Grade 8 English
15
Grade 8 Mathematics
10
Grade 8 Science
15
Grade 8 Social Studies
15
Grade 10 English
16
Grade 10 Mathematics
3
Grade 10 Science
7
Grade 10 Social Studies
16
Average Class Size (2015 - 16)
GROUP
Common Branch
Grade 8 English
Grade 8 Mathematics
Grade 8 Science
Grade 8 Social Studies
Grade 10 English
Grade 10 Mathematics
Grade 10 Science
Grade 10 Social Studies
CLASS SIZE
11
15
10
15
15
16
3
7
16
Average Class Size (2015 - 16)
Common Branch
11
Grade 8 English
15
Grade 8 Mathematics
10
Grade 8 Science
15
Grade 8 Social Studies
15
Grade 10 English
16
Grade 10 Mathematics
3
Grade 10 Science
7
Grade 10 Social Studies
16
Average Class Size (2015 - 16)
GROUP
Common Branch
Grade 8 English
Grade 8 Mathematics
Grade 8 Science
Grade 8 Social Studies
Grade 10 English
Grade 10 Mathematics
Grade 10 Science
Grade 10 Social Studies
CLASS SIZE
11
15
10
15
15
16
3
7
16
Average Class Size (2015 - 16)
Common Branch
11
Grade 8 English
15
Grade 8 Mathematics
10
Grade 8 Science
15
Grade 8 Social Studies
15
Grade 10 English
16
Grade 10 Mathematics
3
Grade 10 Science
7
Grade 10 Social Studies
16
Average Class Size (2015 - 16)
GROUP
Common Branch
Grade 8 English
Grade 8 Mathematics
Grade 8 Science
Grade 8 Social Studies
Grade 10 English
Grade 10 Mathematics
Grade 10 Science
Grade 10 Social Studies
CLASS SIZE
11
15
10
15
15
16
3
7
16
Average Class Size (2015 - 16)
Common Branch
11
Grade 8 English
15
Grade 8 Mathematics
10
Grade 8 Science
15
Grade 8 Social Studies
15
Grade 10 English
16
Grade 10 Mathematics
3
Grade 10 Science
7
Grade 10 Social Studies
16
Average Class Size (2015 - 16)
GROUP
Common Branch
Grade 8 English
Grade 8 Mathematics
Grade 8 Science
Grade 8 Social Studies
Grade 10 English
Grade 10 Mathematics
Grade 10 Science
Grade 10 Social Studies
CLASS SIZE
11
15
10
15
15
16
3
7
16
Average Class Size (2015 - 16)
Common Branch
11
Grade 8 English
15
Grade 8 Mathematics
10
Grade 8 Science
15
Grade 8 Social Studies
15
Grade 10 English
16
Grade 10 Mathematics
3
Grade 10 Science
7
Grade 10 Social Studies
16
Free and Reduced-Price Lunch (2015 - 16)
ELIGIBLE FOR FREE LUNCH
71
40%
ELIGIBLE FOR REDUCED-PRICE LUNCH
17
10%
Free and Reduced-Price Lunch (2015 - 16)
Eligible for Free Lunch
71
40%
Eligible for Reduced-Price Lunch
17
10%
STUDENT SUSPENSIONS (2014 - 15)
6
3%
Student Suspensions (2014 - 15)
Student Suspensions
6
3%
Teacher Turnover Rate (2014-15 to 2015-16)
Turnover Rate of Teachers with Fewer Than Five Years of Experience
0%
TURNOVER RATE OF ALL TEACHERS
23%
Teacher Turnover Rate (2014-15 to 2015-16)
Turnover Rate of Teachers with Fewer Than Five Years of Experience
0%
Turnover Rate of All Teachers
23%
Teacher Qualifications (2015 - 16)
TOTAL TEACHERS
20
PERCENT WITH NO VALID TEACHING CERTIFICATE
0%
PERCENT TEACHING OUT OF CERTIFICATE
5%
PERCENT WITH FEWER THAN THREE YEARS OF EXPERIENCE
0%
PERCENTAGE WITH MASTER'S DEGREEPLUS 30 HOURS OR DOCTORATE
15%
TOTAL NUMBER OF CORE CLASSES
46
Percent Not Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers in This District
2%
Total Number of Classes
74
Percent Taught by Teachers Without Appropriate Certification
5%
Teacher Qualifications (2015 - 16)
TOTAL TEACHERS: 20
Percent with No Valid Teaching Certificate
0%
Percent Teaching Out of Certification
5%
Percent with Fewer Than Three Years of Experience
0%
Percentage with Master's Degree Plus 30 Hours or Doctorate
15%
Total Number of Core Classes
46
Percent Not Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers in This District
2%
Total Number of Classes
74
Percent Taught by Teachers Without Appropriate Certification
5%
High School Completers (2015 - 16)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
14
9
5
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
12
9
3
REGENTS DIPLOMA
12
100%
9
100%
3
100%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
REGENTS WITH ADVANCED DESIGNATION
1
8%
1
11%
0
0%
REGENTS WITH CTE ENDORSEMENT
3
25%
2
22%
1
33%
LOCAL DIPLOMAS
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS
2
14%
0
0%
2
40%
All Students
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
14
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
12
Regents Diploma
12
100%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
1
8%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
3
25%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
0
0%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
2
14%
of Completers
General Education
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
9
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
9
Regents Diploma
9
100%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
1
11%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
2
22%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
0
0%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
0
0%
of Completers
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
5
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
3
Regents Diploma
3
100%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
0
0%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
1
33%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
0
0%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
2
40%
of Completers
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
14
9
5
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
12
9
3
REGENTS DIPLOMA
12
100%
9
100%
3
100%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
REGENTS WITH ADVANCED DESIGNATION
1
8%
1
11%
0
0%
REGENTS WITH CTE ENDORSEMENT
3
25%
2
22%
1
33%
LOCAL DIPLOMAS
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS
2
14%
0
0%
2
40%
All Students
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
14
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
12
Regents Diploma
12
100%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
1
8%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
3
25%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
0
0%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
2
14%
of Completers
General Education
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
9
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
9
Regents Diploma
9
100%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
1
11%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
2
22%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
0
0%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
0
0%
of Completers
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
5
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
3
Regents Diploma
3
100%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
0
0%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
1
33%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
0
0%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
2
40%
of Completers
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
14
9
5
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
12
9
3
REGENTS DIPLOMA
12
100%
9
100%
3
100%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
REGENTS WITH ADVANCED DESIGNATION
1
8%
1
11%
0
0%
REGENTS WITH CTE ENDORSEMENT
3
25%
2
22%
1
33%
LOCAL DIPLOMAS
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS
2
14%
0
0%
2
40%
All Students
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
14
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
12
Regents Diploma
12
100%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
1
8%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
3
25%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
0
0%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
2
14%
of Completers
General Education
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
9
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
9
Regents Diploma
9
100%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
1
11%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
2
22%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
0
0%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
0
0%
of Completers
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
5
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
3
Regents Diploma
3
100%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
0
0%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
1
33%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
0
0%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
2
40%
of Completers
High School Non-completers (2015 - 16)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
DROPPED OUT
_
_
_
_
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
_
_
_
_
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
_
_
_
_
All Students
DROPPED OUT
_
_%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
_
_%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
_
_%
General Education
DROPPED OUT
_
_%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
_
_%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
_
_%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
DROPPED OUT
_
_
_
_
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
_
_
_
_
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
_
_
_
_
All Students
DROPPED OUT
_
_%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
_
_%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
_
_%
General Education
DROPPED OUT
_
_%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
_
_%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
_
_%
Post-graduation Plans of Completers (2015 - 16)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO FOUR-YEAR COLLEGE
7
50%
7
78%
0
0%
TO TWO-YEAR COLLEGE
2
14%
1
11%
1
20%
TO OTHER POST-SECONDARY
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
TO THE MILITARY
1
7%
0
0%
1
20%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO EMPLOYMENT
3
21%
1
11%
2
40%
TO ADULT SERVICES
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
TO OTHER KNOWN PLANS
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
PLANS UNKNOWN
1
7%
0
0%
1
20%
All Students
To Four-Year College
7
50%
To Two-Year College
2
14%
To Other Post-Secondary
0
0%
To the Military
1
7%
To Employment
3
21%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
0
0%
Plan Unknown
1
7%
General Education
To Four-Year College
7
78%
To Two-Year College
1
11%
To Other Post-Secondary
0
0%
To the Military
0
0%
To Employment
1
11%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
0
0%
Plan Unknown
0
0%
Students with Disabilities
To Four-Year College
0
0%
To Two-Year College
1
20%
To Other Post-Secondary
0
0%
To the Military
1
20%
To Employment
2
40%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
0
0%
Plan Unknown
1
20%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO FOUR-YEAR COLLEGE
7
50%
7
78%
0
0%
TO TWO-YEAR COLLEGE
2
14%
1
11%
1
20%
TO OTHER POST-SECONDARY
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
TO THE MILITARY
1
7%
0
0%
1
20%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO EMPLOYMENT
3
21%
1
11%
2
40%
TO ADULT SERVICES
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
TO OTHER KNOWN PLANS
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
PLANS UNKNOWN
1
7%
0
0%
1
20%
All Students
To Four-Year College
7
50%
To Two-Year College
2
14%
To Other Post-Secondary
0
0%
To the Military
1
7%
To Employment
3
21%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
0
0%
Plan Unknown
1
7%
General Education
To Four-Year College
7
78%
To Two-Year College
1
11%
To Other Post-Secondary
0
0%
To the Military
0
0%
To Employment
1
11%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
0
0%
Plan Unknown
0
0%
Students with Disabilities
To Four-Year College
0
0%
To Two-Year College
1
20%
To Other Post-Secondary
0
0%
To the Military
1
20%
To Employment
2
40%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
0
0%
Plan Unknown
1
20%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO FOUR-YEAR COLLEGE
7
50%
7
78%
0
0%
TO TWO-YEAR COLLEGE
2
14%
1
11%
1
20%
TO OTHER POST-SECONDARY
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
TO THE MILITARY
1
7%
0
0%
1
20%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO EMPLOYMENT
3
21%
1
11%
2
40%
TO ADULT SERVICES
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
TO OTHER KNOWN PLANS
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
PLANS UNKNOWN
1
7%
0
0%
1
20%
All Students
To Four-Year College
7
50%
To Two-Year College
2
14%
To Other Post-Secondary
0
0%
To the Military
1
7%
To Employment
3
21%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
0
0%
Plan Unknown
1
7%
General Education
To Four-Year College
7
78%
To Two-Year College
1
11%
To Other Post-Secondary
0
0%
To the Military
0
0%
To Employment
1
11%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
0
0%
Plan Unknown
0
0%
Students with Disabilities
To Four-Year College
0
0%
To Two-Year College
1
20%
To Other Post-Secondary
0
0%
To the Military
1
20%
To Employment
2
40%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
0
0%
Plan Unknown
1
20%
Grade 3 English Language Arts
Due to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 proficiency rates.
MEAN SCORE: 314
All Students
PROFICIENT
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 14
LEVEL 1
4
29%
LEVEL 2
4
29%
LEVEL 3
4
29%
LEVEL 4
2
14%
General Education
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 13
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 14
LEVEL 1
4
29%
LEVEL 2
4
29%
LEVEL 3
4
29%
LEVEL 4
2
14%
Female
PROFICIENT
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
3
50%
LEVEL 3
1
17%
LEVEL 4
2
33%
Male
PROFICIENT
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 8
LEVEL 1
4
50%
LEVEL 2
1
13%
LEVEL 3
3
38%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 14
LEVEL 1
4
29%
LEVEL 2
4
29%
LEVEL 3
4
29%
LEVEL 4
2
14%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 8
LEVEL 1
3
38%
LEVEL 2
3
38%
LEVEL 3
2
25%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
1
17%
LEVEL 2
1
17%
LEVEL 3
2
33%
LEVEL 4
2
33%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 14
LEVEL 1
4
29%
LEVEL 2
4
29%
LEVEL 3
4
29%
LEVEL 4
2
14%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
White
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
14
13
1
14
6
8
14
8
6
14
PROFICIENT
43%
_%
_%
43%
50%
38%
43%
25%
67%
43%
LEVEL 1
4
29%
_
_
_
_
4
29%
0
0%
4
50%
4
29%
3
38%
1
17%
4
29%
LEVEL 2
4
29%
_
_
_
_
4
29%
3
50%
1
13%
4
29%
3
38%
1
17%
4
29%
LEVEL 3
4
29%
_
_
_
_
4
29%
1
17%
3
38%
4
29%
2
25%
2
33%
4
29%
LEVEL 4
2
14%
_
_
_
_
2
14%
2
33%
0
0%
2
14%
0
0%
2
33%
2
14%
Grade 4 English Language Arts
Due to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 proficiency rates.
MEAN SCORE: 308
All Students
PROFICIENT
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
1
11%
LEVEL 2
4
44%
LEVEL 3
2
22%
LEVEL 4
2
22%
General Education
PROFICIENT
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
1
11%
LEVEL 2
4
44%
LEVEL 3
2
22%
LEVEL 4
2
22%
White
PROFICIENT
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
1
11%
LEVEL 2
4
44%
LEVEL 3
2
22%
LEVEL 4
2
22%
Female
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Male
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
1
11%
LEVEL 2
4
44%
LEVEL 3
2
22%
LEVEL 4
2
22%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
1
11%
LEVEL 2
4
44%
LEVEL 3
2
22%
LEVEL 4
2
22%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
White
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
9
9
9
6
3
9
4
5
9
PROFICIENT
44%
44%
44%
_%
_%
44%
_%
_%
44%
LEVEL 1
1
11%
1
11%
1
11%
_
_
_
_
1
11%
_
_
_
_
1
11%
LEVEL 2
4
44%
4
44%
4
44%
_
_
_
_
4
44%
_
_
_
_
4
44%
LEVEL 3
2
22%
2
22%
2
22%
_
_
_
_
2
22%
_
_
_
_
2
22%
LEVEL 4
2
22%
2
22%
2
22%
_
_
_
_
2
22%
_
_
_
_
2
22%
Grade 5 English Language Arts
Due to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 proficiency rates.
MEAN SCORE: 300
All Students
PROFICIENT
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7
LEVEL 1
2
29%
LEVEL 2
4
57%
LEVEL 3
1
14%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
General Education
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7
LEVEL 1
2
29%
LEVEL 2
4
57%
LEVEL 3
1
14%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Female
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Male
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7
LEVEL 1
2
29%
LEVEL 2
4
57%
LEVEL 3
1
14%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7
LEVEL 1
2
29%
LEVEL 2
4
57%
LEVEL 3
1
14%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7
LEVEL 1
2
29%
LEVEL 2
4
57%
LEVEL 3
1
14%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
White
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
7
6
1
7
2
5
7
7
7
PROFICIENT
14%
_%
_%
14%
_%
_%
14%
14%
14%
LEVEL 1
2
29%
_
_
_
_
2
29%
_
_
_
_
2
29%
2
29%
2
29%
LEVEL 2
4
57%
_
_
_
_
4
57%
_
_
_
_
4
57%
4
57%
4
57%
LEVEL 3
1
14%
_
_
_
_
1
14%
_
_
_
_
1
14%
1
14%
1
14%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
Grade 6 English Language Arts
Due to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 proficiency rates.
MEAN SCORE: 303
All Students
PROFICIENT
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 12
LEVEL 1
2
17%
LEVEL 2
6
50%
LEVEL 3
1
8%
LEVEL 4
3
25%
General Education
PROFICIENT
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 12
LEVEL 1
2
17%
LEVEL 2
6
50%
LEVEL 3
1
8%
LEVEL 4
3
25%
White
PROFICIENT
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 12
LEVEL 1
2
17%
LEVEL 2
6
50%
LEVEL 3
1
8%
LEVEL 4
3
25%
Female
PROFICIENT
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
40%
LEVEL 3
1
20%
LEVEL 4
2
40%
Male
PROFICIENT
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7
LEVEL 1
2
29%
LEVEL 2
4
57%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
1
14%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 12
LEVEL 1
2
17%
LEVEL 2
6
50%
LEVEL 3
1
8%
LEVEL 4
3
25%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 8
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 12
LEVEL 1
2
17%
LEVEL 2
6
50%
LEVEL 3
1
8%
LEVEL 4
3
25%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
White
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
12
12
12
5
7
12
4
8
12
PROFICIENT
33%
33%
33%
60%
14%
33%
_%
_%
33%
LEVEL 1
2
17%
2
17%
2
17%
0
0%
2
29%
2
17%
_
_
_
_
2
17%
LEVEL 2
6
50%
6
50%
6
50%
2
40%
4
57%
6
50%
_
_
_
_
6
50%
LEVEL 3
1
8%
1
8%
1
8%
1
20%
0
0%
1
8%
_
_
_
_
1
8%
LEVEL 4
3
25%
3
25%
3
25%
2
40%
1
14%
3
25%
_
_
_
_
3
25%
Grade 7 English Language Arts
Due to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 proficiency rates.
MEAN SCORE: 286
All Students
PROFICIENT
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 13
LEVEL 1
6
46%
LEVEL 2
5
38%
LEVEL 3
2
15%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
General Education
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 12
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 13
LEVEL 1
6
46%
LEVEL 2
5
38%
LEVEL 3
2
15%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Female
PROFICIENT
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
2
40%
LEVEL 2
1
20%
LEVEL 3
2
40%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Male
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 8
LEVEL 1
4
50%
LEVEL 2
4
50%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 13
LEVEL 1
6
46%
LEVEL 2
5
38%
LEVEL 3
2
15%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 13
LEVEL 1
6
46%
LEVEL 2
5
38%
LEVEL 3
2
15%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
White
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
13
12
1
13
5
8
13
9
4
13
PROFICIENT
15%
_%
_%
15%
40%
0%
15%
_%
_%
15%
LEVEL 1
6
46%
_
_
_
_
6
46%
2
40%
4
50%
6
46%
_
_
_
_
6
46%
LEVEL 2
5
38%
_
_
_
_
5
38%
1
20%
4
50%
5
38%
_
_
_
_
5
38%
LEVEL 3
2
15%
_
_
_
_
2
15%
2
40%
0
0%
2
15%
_
_
_
_
2
15%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
Grade 8 English Language Arts
Due to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 proficiency rates.
MEAN SCORE: 289
All Students
PROFICIENT
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 14
LEVEL 1
6
43%
LEVEL 2
5
36%
LEVEL 3
3
21%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
General Education
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 12
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 14
LEVEL 1
6
43%
LEVEL 2
5
36%
LEVEL 3
3
21%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Female
PROFICIENT
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
1
11%
LEVEL 2
5
56%
LEVEL 3
3
33%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Male
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
5
100%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 14
LEVEL 1
6
43%
LEVEL 2
5
36%
LEVEL 3
3
21%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 11
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 14
LEVEL 1
6
43%
LEVEL 2
5
36%
LEVEL 3
3
21%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
White
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
14
12
2
14
9
5
14
3
11
14
PROFICIENT
21%
_%
_%
21%
33%
0%
21%
_%
_%
21%
LEVEL 1
6
43%
_
_
_
_
6
43%
1
11%
5
100%
6
43%
_
_
_
_
6
43%
LEVEL 2
5
36%
_
_
_
_
5
36%
5
56%
0
0%
5
36%
_
_
_
_
5
36%
LEVEL 3
3
21%
_
_
_
_
3
21%
3
33%
0
0%
3
21%
_
_
_
_
3
21%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
Grade 3 Mathematics
Due to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 proficiency rates.
MEAN SCORE: 301
All Students
PROFICIENT
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 14
LEVEL 1
3
21%
LEVEL 2
6
43%
LEVEL 3
3
21%
LEVEL 4
2
14%
General Education
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 13
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 14
LEVEL 1
3
21%
LEVEL 2
6
43%
LEVEL 3
3
21%
LEVEL 4
2
14%
Female
PROFICIENT
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
33%
LEVEL 3
3
50%
LEVEL 4
1
17%
Male
PROFICIENT
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 8
LEVEL 1
3
38%
LEVEL 2
4
50%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
1
13%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 14
LEVEL 1
3
21%
LEVEL 2
6
43%
LEVEL 3
3
21%
LEVEL 4
2
14%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 8
LEVEL 1
3
38%
LEVEL 2
4
50%
LEVEL 3
1
13%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
33%
LEVEL 3
2
33%
LEVEL 4
2
33%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 14
LEVEL 1
3
21%
LEVEL 2
6
43%
LEVEL 3
3
21%
LEVEL 4
2
14%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
White
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
14
13
1
14
6
8
14
8
6
14
PROFICIENT
36%
_%
_%
36%
67%
13%
36%
13%
67%
36%
LEVEL 1
3
21%
_
_
_
_
3
21%
0
0%
3
38%
3
21%
3
38%
0
0%
3
21%
LEVEL 2
6
43%
_
_
_
_
6
43%
2
33%
4
50%
6
43%
4
50%
2
33%
6
43%
LEVEL 3
3
21%
_
_
_
_
3
21%
3
50%
0
0%
3
21%
1
13%
2
33%
3
21%
LEVEL 4
2
14%
_
_
_
_
2
14%
1
17%
1
13%
2
14%
0
0%
2
33%
2
14%
Grade 4 Mathematics
Due to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 proficiency rates.
MEAN SCORE: 302
All Students
PROFICIENT
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
2
22%
LEVEL 2
3
33%
LEVEL 3
3
33%
LEVEL 4
1
11%
General Education
PROFICIENT
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
2
22%
LEVEL 2
3
33%
LEVEL 3
3
33%
LEVEL 4
1
11%
White
PROFICIENT
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
2
22%
LEVEL 2
3
33%
LEVEL 3
3
33%
LEVEL 4
1
11%
Female
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Male
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
2
22%
LEVEL 2
3
33%
LEVEL 3
3
33%
LEVEL 4
1
11%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
2
22%
LEVEL 2
3
33%
LEVEL 3
3
33%
LEVEL 4
1
11%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
White
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
9
9
9
6
3
9
4
5
9
PROFICIENT
44%
44%
44%
_%
_%
44%
_%
_%
44%
LEVEL 1
2
22%
2
22%
2
22%
_
_
_
_
2
22%
_
_
_
_
2
22%
LEVEL 2
3
33%
3
33%
3
33%
_
_
_
_
3
33%
_
_
_
_
3
33%
LEVEL 3
3
33%
3
33%
3
33%
_
_
_
_
3
33%
_
_
_
_
3
33%
LEVEL 4
1
11%
1
11%
1
11%
_
_
_
_
1
11%
_
_
_
_
1
11%
Grade 5 Mathematics
Due to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 proficiency rates.
MEAN SCORE: 296
All Students
PROFICIENT
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7
LEVEL 1
4
57%
LEVEL 2
2
29%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
1
14%
General Education
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7
LEVEL 1
4
57%
LEVEL 2
2
29%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
1
14%
Female
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Male
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7
LEVEL 1
4
57%
LEVEL 2
2
29%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
1
14%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7
LEVEL 1
4
57%
LEVEL 2
2
29%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
1
14%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7
LEVEL 1
4
57%
LEVEL 2
2
29%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
1
14%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
White
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
7
6
1
7
2
5
7
7
7
PROFICIENT
14%
_%
_%
14%
_%
_%
14%
14%
14%
LEVEL 1
4
57%
_
_
_
_
4
57%
_
_
_
_
4
57%
4
57%
4
57%
LEVEL 2
2
29%
_
_
_
_
2
29%
_
_
_
_
2
29%
2
29%
2
29%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
LEVEL 4
1
14%
_
_
_
_
1
14%
_
_
_
_
1
14%
1
14%
1
14%
Grade 6 Mathematics
Due to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 proficiency rates.
MEAN SCORE: 297
All Students
PROFICIENT
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 12
LEVEL 1
2
17%
LEVEL 2
9
75%
LEVEL 3
1
8%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
General Education
PROFICIENT
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 12
LEVEL 1
2
17%
LEVEL 2
9
75%
LEVEL 3
1
8%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
White
PROFICIENT
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 12
LEVEL 1
2
17%
LEVEL 2
9
75%
LEVEL 3
1
8%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Female
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
5
100%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Male
PROFICIENT
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7
LEVEL 1
2
29%
LEVEL 2
4
57%
LEVEL 3
1
14%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 12
LEVEL 1
2
17%
LEVEL 2
9
75%
LEVEL 3
1
8%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 8
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 12
LEVEL 1
2
17%
LEVEL 2
9
75%
LEVEL 3
1
8%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
White
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
12
12
12
5
7
12
4
8
12
PROFICIENT
8%
8%
8%
0%
14%
8%
_%
_%
8%
LEVEL 1
2
17%
2
17%
2
17%
0
0%
2
29%
2
17%
_
_
_
_
2
17%
LEVEL 2
9
75%
9
75%
9
75%
5
100%
4
57%
9
75%
_
_
_
_
9
75%
LEVEL 3
1
8%
1
8%
1
8%
0
0%
1
14%
1
8%
_
_
_
_
1
8%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
Grade 7 Mathematics
Due to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 proficiency rates.
Mean scores and data in the table for grade 7 math include only those for grade 7 students who took the Grade 7 New York State Testing Program Assessment (NYSTP) in Mathematics. For 2015 and forward, data in the bar charts include those for grade 7 students who took the Grade 7 NYSTP in Mathematics and grade 7 students who took a Regents math test in lieu of the NYSTP. For 2014 and earlier, data in the bar charts include only those for grade 7 students who took the Grade 7 NYSTP.
MEAN SCORE: 307
All Students
PROFICIENT
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 13
LEVEL 1
3
23%
LEVEL 2
6
46%
LEVEL 3
4
31%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
General Education
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 12
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 13
LEVEL 1
3
23%
LEVEL 2
6
46%
LEVEL 3
4
31%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Female
PROFICIENT
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
1
20%
LEVEL 2
3
60%
LEVEL 3
1
20%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Male
PROFICIENT
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 8
LEVEL 1
2
25%
LEVEL 2
3
38%
LEVEL 3
3
38%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 13
LEVEL 1
3
23%
LEVEL 2
6
46%
LEVEL 3
4
31%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 13
LEVEL 1
3
23%
LEVEL 2
6
46%
LEVEL 3
4
31%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
White
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
13
12
1
13
5
8
13
9
4
13
PROFICIENT
31%
_%
_%
31%
20%
38%
31%
_%
_%
31%
LEVEL 1
3
23%
_
_
_
_
3
23%
1
20%
2
25%
3
23%
_
_
_
_
3
23%
LEVEL 2
6
46%
_
_
_
_
6
46%
3
60%
3
38%
6
46%
_
_
_
_
6
46%
LEVEL 3
4
31%
_
_
_
_
4
31%
1
20%
3
38%
4
31%
_
_
_
_
4
31%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
Grade 8 Mathematics
Due to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 proficiency rates.
Mean scores and data in the table for grade 8 math include only those for grade 8 students who took the Grade 8 New York State Testing Program Assessment (NYSTP) in Mathematics. For 2015 and forward, data in the bar charts include those for grade 8 students who took the Grade 8 NYSTP in Mathematics and grade 8 students who took a Regents math test in lieu of the NYSTP. For 2014 and earlier, data in the bar charts include only those for grade 8 students who took the Grade 8 NYSTP.
MEAN SCORE: 259
All Students
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
7
78%
LEVEL 2
2
22%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
General Education
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 8
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
7
78%
LEVEL 2
2
22%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Female
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Male
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
7
78%
LEVEL 2
2
22%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 7
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
7
78%
LEVEL 2
2
22%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
White
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
9
8
1
9
5
4
9
2
7
9
PROFICIENT
0%
_%
_%
0%
_%
_%
0%
_%
_%
0%
LEVEL 1
7
78%
_
_
_
_
7
78%
_
_
_
_
7
78%
_
_
_
_
7
78%
LEVEL 2
2
22%
_
_
_
_
2
22%
_
_
_
_
2
22%
_
_
_
_
2
22%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
Grade 8 Students Taking a Regents Math Test
Accelerated grade 8 students who took a Regents math test in lieu of the Grade 8 NYSTP in Mathematics.
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
2
40%
LEVEL 4 AND ABOVE
3
60%
LEVEL 3 AND ABOVE
5
100%
GROUP
All Students
TOTAL TESTED
5
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
2
40%
4 & ABOVE
3
60%
3 & ABOVE
5
100%
Grade 4 Science
Due to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 proficiency rates.
MEAN SCORE: 86
All Students
PROFICIENT
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
11%
LEVEL 3
2
22%
LEVEL 4
6
67%
General Education
PROFICIENT
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
11%
LEVEL 3
2
22%
LEVEL 4
6
67%
White
PROFICIENT
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
11%
LEVEL 3
2
22%
LEVEL 4
6
67%
Female
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Male
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
11%
LEVEL 3
2
22%
LEVEL 4
6
67%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
11%
LEVEL 3
2
22%
LEVEL 4
6
67%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
White
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
9
9
9
6
3
9
4
5
9
PROFICIENT
89%
89%
89%
_%
_%
89%
_%
_%
89%
LEVEL 1
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
11%
1
11%
1
11%
_
_
_
_
1
11%
_
_
_
_
1
11%
LEVEL 3
2
22%
2
22%
2
22%
_
_
_
_
2
22%
_
_
_
_
2
22%
LEVEL 4
6
67%
6
67%
6
67%
_
_
_
_
6
67%
_
_
_
_
6
67%
Grade 8 Science
Due to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 proficiency rates.
Data in the bar charts include those for grade 8 students who took the New York State Grade 8 Science Test and grade 8 students who took a Regents science test in lieu of this test. Mean scores and data in the table for grade 8 science include only those for grade 8 students who took the New York State Grade 8 Science Test.
MEAN SCORE: 65
All Students
PROFICIENT
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 14
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
7
50%
LEVEL 3
6
43%
LEVEL 4
1
7%
General Education
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 13
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 14
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
7
50%
LEVEL 3
6
43%
LEVEL 4
1
7%
Female
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 10
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Male
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 14
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
7
50%
LEVEL 3
6
43%
LEVEL 4
1
7%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 10
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 14
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
7
50%
LEVEL 3
6
43%
LEVEL 4
1
7%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
White
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
14
13
1
14
10
4
14
4
10
14
PROFICIENT
50%
_%
_%
50%
_%
_%
50%
_%
_%
50%
LEVEL 1
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
LEVEL 2
7
50%
_
_
_
_
7
50%
_
_
_
_
7
50%
_
_
_
_
7
50%
LEVEL 3
6
43%
_
_
_
_
6
43%
_
_
_
_
6
43%
_
_
_
_
6
43%
LEVEL 4
1
7%
_
_
_
_
1
7%
_
_
_
_
1
7%
_
_
_
_
1
7%
Statewide Results on the National Assessment of Educational Progress: NAEP (2014 - 15)
Grade: 4
Reading
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Students with Disabilities
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
BELOW BASIC
32%
*%
20%
48%
44%
20%
*%
70%
74%
43%
BASIC
32%
*%
30%
34%
37%
31%
*%
22%
21%
36%
PROFICIENT
27%
*%
33%
15%
17%
37%
*%
7%
4%
18%
ADVANCED
9%
*%
17%
3%
2%
12%
*%
1%
1%
3%
PARTICIPATION RATE
98
88
Reading
All Students
Percent Below Basic
32
Percent Basic
32
Percent Proficient
27
Percent Advanced
9
American Indian or Alaska Native
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Percent Below Basic
20
Percent Basic
30
Percent Proficient
33
Percent Advanced
17
Black or African American
Percent Below Basic
48
Percent Basic
34
Percent Proficient
15
Percent Advanced
3
Hispanic or Latino
Percent Below Basic
44
Percent Basic
37
Percent Proficient
17
Percent Advanced
2
White
Percent Below Basic
20
Percent Basic
31
Percent Proficient
37
Percent Advanced
12
Multiracial
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Students with Disabilities
Percent Below Basic
70
Percent Basic
22
Percent Proficient
7
Percent Advanced
1
Participation Rate
98
English Language Learners
Percent Below Basic
74
Percent Basic
21
Percent Proficient
4
Percent Advanced
1
Participation Rate
88
Economically Disadvantaged
Percent Below Basic
43
Percent Basic
36
Percent Proficient
18
Percent Advanced
3
Mathematics
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Students with Disabilities
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
BELOW BASIC
21%
*%
12%
40%
28%
12%
*%
49%
56%
29%
BASIC
44%
*%
31%
46%
51%
41%
*%
39%
35%
48%
PROFICIENT
30%
*%
42%
13%
20%
40%
*%
10%
9%
21%
ADVANCED
5%
*%
15%
1%
1%
7%
*%
2%
*%
2%
PARTICIPATION RATE
98
91
Mathematics
All Students
Percent Below Basic
21
Percent Basic
44
Percent Proficient
30
Percent Advanced
5
American Indian or Alaska Native
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Percent Below Basic
12
Percent Basic
31
Percent Proficient
42
Percent Advanced
15
Black or African American
Percent Below Basic
40
Percent Basic
46
Percent Proficient
13
Percent Advanced
1
Hispanic or Latino
Percent Below Basic
28
Percent Basic
51
Percent Proficient
20
Percent Advanced
1
White
Percent Below Basic
12
Percent Basic
41
Percent Proficient
40
Percent Advanced
7
Multiracial
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Students with Disabilities
Percent Below Basic
49
Percent Basic
39
Percent Proficient
10
Percent Advanced
2
Participation Rate
98
English Language Learners
Percent Below Basic
56
Percent Basic
35
Percent Proficient
9
Percent Advanced
*
Participation Rate
91
Economically Disadvantaged
Percent Below Basic
29
Percent Basic
48
Percent Proficient
21
Percent Advanced
2
Grade: 8
Reading
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Students with Disabilities
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
BELOW BASIC
27%
*%
19%
42%
35%
18%
*%
59%
78%
36%
BASIC
40%
*%
39%
41%
43%
39%
*%
33%
19%
42%
PROFICIENT
29%
*%
34%
16%
20%
38%
*%
8%
3%
21%
ADVANCED
4%
*%
8%
1%
2%
5%
*%
*%
*%
1%
PARTICIPATION RATE
98
89
Reading
All Students
Percent Below Basic
27
Percent Basic
40
Percent Proficient
29
Percent Advanced
4
American Indian or Alaska Native
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Percent Below Basic
19
Percent Basic
39
Percent Proficient
34
Percent Advanced
8
Black or African American
Percent Below Basic
42
Percent Basic
41
Percent Proficient
16
Percent Advanced
1
Hispanic or Latino
Percent Below Basic
35
Percent Basic
43
Percent Proficient
20
Percent Advanced
2
White
Percent Below Basic
18
Percent Basic
39
Percent Proficient
38
Percent Advanced
5
Multiracial
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Students with Disabilities
Percent Below Basic
59
Percent Basic
33
Percent Proficient
8
Percent Advanced
*
Participation Rate
98
English Language Learners
Percent Below Basic
78
Percent Basic
19
Percent Proficient
3
Percent Advanced
*
Participation Rate
89
Economically Disadvantaged
Percent Below Basic
36
Percent Basic
42
Percent Proficient
21
Percent Advanced
1
Mathematics
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Students with Disabilities
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
BELOW BASIC
31%
*%
18%
48%
41%
20%
*%
64%
72%
40%
BASIC
38%
*%
30%
37%
40%
40%
*%
27%
21%
39%
PROFICIENT
24%
*%
33%
13%
16%
31%
*%
8%
6%
17%
ADVANCED
7%
*%
19%
2%
3%
9%
*%
1%
1%
4%
PARTICIPATION RATE
99
94
Mathematics
All Students
Percent Below Basic
31
Percent Basic
38
Percent Proficient
24
Percent Advanced
7
American Indian or Alaska Native
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Percent Below Basic
18
Percent Basic
30
Percent Proficient
33
Percent Advanced
19
Black or African American
Percent Below Basic
48
Percent Basic
37
Percent Proficient
13
Percent Advanced
2
Hispanic or Latino
Percent Below Basic
41
Percent Basic
40
Percent Proficient
16
Percent Advanced
3
White
Percent Below Basic
20
Percent Basic
40
Percent Proficient
31
Percent Advanced
9
Multiracial
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Students with Disabilities
Percent Below Basic
64
Percent Basic
27
Percent Proficient
8
Percent Advanced
1
Participation Rate
99
English Language Learners
Percent Below Basic
72
Percent Basic
21
Percent Proficient
6
Percent Advanced
1
Participation Rate
94
Economically Disadvantaged
Percent Below Basic
40
Percent Basic
39
Percent Proficient
17
Percent Advanced
4
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level English Language Arts after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 14
LEVEL 1
2
14%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
5
36%
LEVEL 4
6
43%
General Education
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 8
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
2
25%
LEVEL 4
6
75%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
2
33%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
3
50%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 13
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 14
LEVEL 1
2
14%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
5
36%
LEVEL 4
6
43%
Female
PROFICIENT
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 7
LEVEL 1
1
14%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
2
29%
LEVEL 4
4
57%
Male
PROFICIENT
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 7
LEVEL 1
1
14%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
3
43%
LEVEL 4
2
29%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 14
LEVEL 1
2
14%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
5
36%
LEVEL 4
6
43%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
2
40%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
1
20%
LEVEL 4
1
20%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
4
44%
LEVEL 4
5
56%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 14
LEVEL 1
2
14%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
5
36%
LEVEL 4
6
43%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
14
8
6
1
13
14
7
7
14
5
9
14
PROFICIENT
79%
100%
50%
_%
_%
79%
86%
71%
79%
40%
100%
79%
LEVEL 1
2
14%
0
0%
2
33%
_
_
_
_
2
14%
1
14%
1
14%
2
14%
2
40%
0
0%
2
14%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
LEVEL 3
5
36%
2
25%
3
50%
_
_
_
_
5
36%
2
29%
3
43%
5
36%
1
20%
4
44%
5
36%
LEVEL 4
6
43%
6
75%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
6
43%
4
57%
2
29%
6
43%
1
20%
5
56%
6
43%
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level Mathematics after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 14
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
14%
LEVEL 3
10
71%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
General Education
PROFICIENT
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 8
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
7
88%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
33%
LEVEL 3
3
50%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 13
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 14
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
14%
LEVEL 3
10
71%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Female
PROFICIENT
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 7
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
14%
LEVEL 3
5
71%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Male
PROFICIENT
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 7
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
14%
LEVEL 3
5
71%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 14
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
14%
LEVEL 3
10
71%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
40%
LEVEL 3
2
40%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
8
89%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 14
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
14%
LEVEL 3
10
71%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
14
8
6
1
13
14
7
7
14
5
9
14
PROFICIENT
71%
88%
50%
_%
_%
71%
71%
71%
71%
40%
89%
71%
LEVEL 1
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
14%
0
0%
2
33%
_
_
_
_
2
14%
1
14%
1
14%
2
14%
2
40%
0
0%
2
14%
LEVEL 3
10
71%
7
88%
3
50%
_
_
_
_
10
71%
5
71%
5
71%
10
71%
2
40%
8
89%
10
71%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level Global History and Geography after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 14
LEVEL 1
2
14%
LEVEL 2
2
14%
LEVEL 3
7
50%
LEVEL 4
1
7%
General Education
PROFICIENT
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 8
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
13%
LEVEL 3
5
63%
LEVEL 4
1
13%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
2
33%
LEVEL 2
1
17%
LEVEL 3
2
33%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 13
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 14
LEVEL 1
2
14%
LEVEL 2
2
14%
LEVEL 3
7
50%
LEVEL 4
1
7%
Female
PROFICIENT
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 7
LEVEL 1
1
14%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
5
71%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Male
PROFICIENT
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 7
LEVEL 1
1
14%
LEVEL 2
2
29%
LEVEL 3
2
29%
LEVEL 4
1
14%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 14
LEVEL 1
2
14%
LEVEL 2
2
14%
LEVEL 3
7
50%
LEVEL 4
1
7%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
2
40%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
2
40%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
22%
LEVEL 3
5
56%
LEVEL 4
1
11%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 14
LEVEL 1
2
14%
LEVEL 2
2
14%
LEVEL 3
7
50%
LEVEL 4
1
7%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
14
8
6
1
13
14
7
7
14
5
9
14
PROFICIENT
57%
75%
33%
_%
_%
57%
71%
43%
57%
40%
67%
57%
LEVEL 1
2
14%
0
0%
2
33%
_
_
_
_
2
14%
1
14%
1
14%
2
14%
2
40%
0
0%
2
14%
LEVEL 2
2
14%
1
13%
1
17%
_
_
_
_
2
14%
0
0%
2
29%
2
14%
0
0%
2
22%
2
14%
LEVEL 3
7
50%
5
63%
2
33%
_
_
_
_
7
50%
5
71%
2
29%
7
50%
2
40%
5
56%
7
50%
LEVEL 4
1
7%
1
13%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
1
7%
0
0%
1
14%
1
7%
0
0%
1
11%
1
7%
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level U.S. History and Government after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 14
LEVEL 1
2
14%
LEVEL 2
2
14%
LEVEL 3
7
50%
LEVEL 4
2
14%
General Education
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 8
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
6
75%
LEVEL 4
2
25%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
2
33%
LEVEL 2
2
33%
LEVEL 3
1
17%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 13
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 14
LEVEL 1
2
14%
LEVEL 2
2
14%
LEVEL 3
7
50%
LEVEL 4
2
14%
Female
PROFICIENT
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 7
LEVEL 1
1
14%
LEVEL 2
1
14%
LEVEL 3
4
57%
LEVEL 4
1
14%
Male
PROFICIENT
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 7
LEVEL 1
1
14%
LEVEL 2
1
14%
LEVEL 3
3
43%
LEVEL 4
1
14%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 14
LEVEL 1
2
14%
LEVEL 2
2
14%
LEVEL 3
7
50%
LEVEL 4
2
14%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
2
40%
LEVEL 2
1
20%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
1
20%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
11%
LEVEL 3
7
78%
LEVEL 4
1
11%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 14
LEVEL 1
2
14%
LEVEL 2
2
14%
LEVEL 3
7
50%
LEVEL 4
2
14%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
14
8
6
1
13
14
7
7
14
5
9
14
PROFICIENT
64%
100%
17%
_%
_%
64%
71%
57%
64%
20%
89%
64%
LEVEL 1
2
14%
0
0%
2
33%
_
_
_
_
2
14%
1
14%
1
14%
2
14%
2
40%
0
0%
2
14%
LEVEL 2
2
14%
0
0%
2
33%
_
_
_
_
2
14%
1
14%
1
14%
2
14%
1
20%
1
11%
2
14%
LEVEL 3
7
50%
6
75%
1
17%
_
_
_
_
7
50%
4
57%
3
43%
7
50%
0
0%
7
78%
7
50%
LEVEL 4
2
14%
2
25%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
2
14%
1
14%
1
14%
2
14%
1
20%
1
11%
2
14%
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level Science after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 14
LEVEL 1
1
7%
LEVEL 2
1
7%
LEVEL 3
10
71%
LEVEL 4
1
7%
General Education
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 8
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
7
88%
LEVEL 4
1
13%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
1
17%
LEVEL 2
1
17%
LEVEL 3
3
50%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 13
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 14
LEVEL 1
1
7%
LEVEL 2
1
7%
LEVEL 3
10
71%
LEVEL 4
1
7%
Female
PROFICIENT
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 7
LEVEL 1
1
14%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
6
86%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Male
PROFICIENT
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 7
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
14%
LEVEL 3
4
57%
LEVEL 4
1
14%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 14
LEVEL 1
1
7%
LEVEL 2
1
7%
LEVEL 3
10
71%
LEVEL 4
1
7%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
1
20%
LEVEL 2
1
20%
LEVEL 3
2
40%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
8
89%
LEVEL 4
1
11%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 14
LEVEL 1
1
7%
LEVEL 2
1
7%
LEVEL 3
10
71%
LEVEL 4
1
7%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
14
8
6
1
13
14
7
7
14
5
9
14
PROFICIENT
79%
100%
50%
_%
_%
79%
86%
71%
79%
40%
100%
79%
LEVEL 1
1
7%
0
0%
1
17%
_
_
_
_
1
7%
1
14%
0
0%
1
7%
1
20%
0
0%
1
7%
LEVEL 2
1
7%
0
0%
1
17%
_
_
_
_
1
7%
0
0%
1
14%
1
7%
1
20%
0
0%
1
7%
LEVEL 3
10
71%
7
88%
3
50%
_
_
_
_
10
71%
6
86%
4
57%
10
71%
2
40%
8
89%
10
71%
LEVEL 4
1
7%
1
13%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
1
7%
0
0%
1
14%
1
7%
0
0%
1
11%
1
7%
Regents Examination Results (2015 - 16)
Comprehensive English
Regents Comprehensive English
GROUP
All Students
Students with Disabilities
White
Small Group Total
Female
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
55
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
65
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
85
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
English Language Arts (Common Core)
English Language Arts (Common Core)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
White
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
18
16
2
18
5
13
18
6
12
18
LEVEL 1
1
6%
_
_
_
_
1
6%
1
20%
0
0%
1
6%
1
17%
0
0%
1
6%
LEVEL 2
2
11%
_
_
_
_
2
11%
0
0%
2
15%
2
11%
1
17%
1
8%
2
11%
LEVEL 3
4
22%
_
_
_
_
4
22%
1
20%
3
23%
4
22%
1
17%
3
25%
4
22%
LEVEL 4
1
6%
_
_
_
_
1
6%
0
0%
1
8%
1
6%
0
0%
1
8%
1
6%
LEVEL 5
10
56%
_
_
_
_
10
56%
3
60%
7
54%
10
56%
3
50%
7
58%
10
56%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 18
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
1
6%
LEVEL 2
2
11%
LEVEL 3
4
22%
LEVEL 4
1
6%
LEVEL 5
10
56%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 16
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 18
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
1
6%
LEVEL 2
2
11%
LEVEL 3
4
22%
LEVEL 4
1
6%
LEVEL 5
10
56%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
1
20%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
1
20%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
LEVEL 5
3
60%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 13
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
15%
LEVEL 3
3
23%
LEVEL 4
1
8%
LEVEL 5
7
54%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 18
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
1
6%
LEVEL 2
2
11%
LEVEL 3
4
22%
LEVEL 4
1
6%
LEVEL 5
10
56%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 6
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
1
17%
LEVEL 2
1
17%
LEVEL 3
1
17%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
LEVEL 5
3
50%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 12
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
8%
LEVEL 3
3
25%
LEVEL 4
1
8%
LEVEL 5
7
58%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 18
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
1
6%
LEVEL 2
2
11%
LEVEL 3
4
22%
LEVEL 4
1
6%
LEVEL 5
10
56%
Geometry
Regents Geometry
GROUP
All Students
General Education
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
2
2
2
2
1
1
2
2
2
55
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
65
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
85
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Algebra I (Common Core)
Algebra I (Common Core)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
36
30
6
1
35
36
19
17
36
12
24
36
LEVEL 1
5
14%
2
7%
3
50%
_
_
_
_
5
14%
2
11%
3
18%
5
14%
3
25%
2
8%
5
14%
LEVEL 2
9
25%
7
23%
2
33%
_
_
_
_
9
25%
2
11%
7
41%
9
25%
4
33%
5
21%
9
25%
LEVEL 3
13
36%
12
40%
1
17%
_
_
_
_
13
36%
11
58%
2
12%
13
36%
4
33%
9
38%
13
36%
LEVEL 4
9
25%
9
30%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
9
25%
4
21%
5
29%
9
25%
1
8%
8
33%
9
25%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 36
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
5
14%
LEVEL 2
9
25%
LEVEL 3
13
36%
LEVEL 4
9
25%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 30
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
2
7%
LEVEL 2
7
23%
LEVEL 3
12
40%
LEVEL 4
9
30%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 6
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
3
50%
LEVEL 2
2
33%
LEVEL 3
1
17%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 35
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 36
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
5
14%
LEVEL 2
9
25%
LEVEL 3
13
36%
LEVEL 4
9
25%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 19
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
2
11%
LEVEL 2
2
11%
LEVEL 3
11
58%
LEVEL 4
4
21%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 17
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
3
18%
LEVEL 2
7
41%
LEVEL 3
2
12%
LEVEL 4
5
29%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 36
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
5
14%
LEVEL 2
9
25%
LEVEL 3
13
36%
LEVEL 4
9
25%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 12
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
3
25%
LEVEL 2
4
33%
LEVEL 3
4
33%
LEVEL 4
1
8%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 24
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
2
8%
LEVEL 2
5
21%
LEVEL 3
9
38%
LEVEL 4
8
33%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 36
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
5
14%
LEVEL 2
9
25%
LEVEL 3
13
36%
LEVEL 4
9
25%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Geometry (Common Core)
Geometry (Common Core)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
19
18
1
1
18
19
8
11
19
4
15
19
LEVEL 1
5
26%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
5
26%
1
13%
4
36%
5
26%
_
_
_
_
5
26%
LEVEL 2
5
26%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
5
26%
3
38%
2
18%
5
26%
_
_
_
_
5
26%
LEVEL 3
8
42%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
8
42%
4
50%
4
36%
8
42%
_
_
_
_
8
42%
LEVEL 4
1
5%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
1
5%
0
0%
1
9%
1
5%
_
_
_
_
1
5%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 19
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
5
26%
LEVEL 2
5
26%
LEVEL 3
8
42%
LEVEL 4
1
5%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 18
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 18
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 19
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
5
26%
LEVEL 2
5
26%
LEVEL 3
8
42%
LEVEL 4
1
5%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 8
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
1
13%
LEVEL 2
3
38%
LEVEL 3
4
50%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 11
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
4
36%
LEVEL 2
2
18%
LEVEL 3
4
36%
LEVEL 4
1
9%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 19
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
5
26%
LEVEL 2
5
26%
LEVEL 3
8
42%
LEVEL 4
1
5%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 4
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 15
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 19
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
5
26%
LEVEL 2
5
26%
LEVEL 3
8
42%
LEVEL 4
1
5%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Algebra II (Common Core)
Algebra II (Common Core)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
White
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
14
14
14
4
10
14
4
10
14
LEVEL 1
1
7%
1
7%
1
7%
_
_
_
_
1
7%
_
_
_
_
1
7%
LEVEL 2
6
43%
6
43%
6
43%
_
_
_
_
6
43%
_
_
_
_
6
43%
LEVEL 3
7
50%
7
50%
7
50%
_
_
_
_
7
50%
_
_
_
_
7
50%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 14
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
1
7%
LEVEL 2
6
43%
LEVEL 3
7
50%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 14
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
1
7%
LEVEL 2
6
43%
LEVEL 3
7
50%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 14
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
1
7%
LEVEL 2
6
43%
LEVEL 3
7
50%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 4
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 10
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 14
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
1
7%
LEVEL 2
6
43%
LEVEL 3
7
50%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 4
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 10
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 14
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
1
7%
LEVEL 2
6
43%
LEVEL 3
7
50%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Global History and Geography
Regents Global History and Geography
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
21
15
6
1
20
21
10
11
21
7
14
21
55
14
67%
12
80%
2
33%
_
_
_
_
14
67%
8
80%
6
55%
14
67%
5
71%
9
64%
14
67%
65
6
29%
5
33%
1
17%
_
_
_
_
6
29%
4
40%
2
18%
6
29%
2
29%
4
29%
6
29%
85
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 21
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
14
67%
65
6
29%
85
0
0%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 15
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
12
80%
65
5
33%
85
0
0%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 6
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
2
33%
65
1
17%
85
0
0%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 20
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 21
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
14
67%
65
6
29%
85
0
0%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 10
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
8
80%
65
4
40%
85
0
0%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 11
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
6
55%
65
2
18%
85
0
0%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 21
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
14
67%
65
6
29%
85
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 7
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
5
71%
65
2
29%
85
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 14
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
9
64%
65
4
29%
85
0
0%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 21
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
14
67%
65
6
29%
85
0
0%
U.S. History & Government
Regents U.S. History & Government
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
20
17
3
1
19
20
7
13
20
6
14
20
55
17
85%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
17
85%
5
71%
12
92%
17
85%
5
83%
12
86%
17
85%
65
15
75%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
15
75%
4
57%
11
85%
15
75%
5
83%
10
71%
15
75%
85
9
45%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
9
45%
3
43%
6
46%
9
45%
2
33%
7
50%
9
45%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 20
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
17
85%
65
15
75%
85
9
45%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 17
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 19
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 20
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
17
85%
65
15
75%
85
9
45%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 7
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
5
71%
65
4
57%
85
3
43%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 13
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
12
92%
65
11
85%
85
6
46%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 20
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
17
85%
65
15
75%
85
9
45%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 6
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
5
83%
65
5
83%
85
2
33%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 14
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
12
86%
65
10
71%
85
7
50%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 20
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
17
85%
65
15
75%
85
9
45%
Living Environment
Regents Living Environment
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
White
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
25
21
4
25
11
14
25
7
18
25
55
22
88%
_
_
_
_
22
88%
10
91%
12
86%
22
88%
4
57%
18
100%
22
88%
65
20
80%
_
_
_
_
20
80%
10
91%
10
71%
20
80%
3
43%
17
94%
20
80%
85
9
36%
_
_
_
_
9
36%
3
27%
6
43%
9
36%
1
14%
8
44%
9
36%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 25
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
22
88%
65
20
80%
85
9
36%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 21
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 4
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 25
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
22
88%
65
20
80%
85
9
36%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 11
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
10
91%
65
10
91%
85
3
27%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 14
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
12
86%
65
10
71%
85
6
43%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 25
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
22
88%
65
20
80%
85
9
36%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 7
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
4
57%
65
3
43%
85
1
14%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 18
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
18
100%
65
17
94%
85
8
44%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 25
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
22
88%
65
20
80%
85
9
36%
Physical Setting/Earth Science
Regents Physical Setting/Earth Science
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
18
12
6
1
17
18
8
10
18
9
9
18
55
12
67%
9
75%
3
50%
_
_
_
_
12
67%
6
75%
6
60%
12
67%
6
67%
6
67%
12
67%
65
6
33%
5
42%
1
17%
_
_
_
_
6
33%
3
38%
3
30%
6
33%
4
44%
2
22%
6
33%
85
1
6%
1
8%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
1
6%
0
0%
1
10%
1
6%
0
0%
1
11%
1
6%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 18
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
12
67%
65
6
33%
85
1
6%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 12
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
9
75%
65
5
42%
85
1
8%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 6
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
3
50%
65
1
17%
85
0
0%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 17
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 18
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
12
67%
65
6
33%
85
1
6%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 8
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
6
75%
65
3
38%
85
0
0%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 10
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
6
60%
65
3
30%
85
1
10%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 18
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
12
67%
65
6
33%
85
1
6%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 9
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
6
67%
65
4
44%
85
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 9
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
6
67%
65
2
22%
85
1
11%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 18
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
12
67%
65
6
33%
85
1
6%
Physical Setting/Chemistry
Regents Physical Setting/Chemistry
GROUP
All Students
General Education
White
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
13
13
13
5
8
13
4
9
13
55
13
100%
13
100%
13
100%
5
100%
8
100%
13
100%
_
_
_
_
13
100%
65
10
77%
10
77%
10
77%
4
80%
6
75%
10
77%
_
_
_
_
10
77%
85
1
8%
1
8%
1
8%
0
0%
1
13%
1
8%
_
_
_
_
1
8%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 13
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
13
100%
65
10
77%
85
1
8%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 13
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
13
100%
65
10
77%
85
1
8%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 13
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
13
100%
65
10
77%
85
1
8%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
5
100%
65
4
80%
85
0
0%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 8
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
8
100%
65
6
75%
85
1
13%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 13
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
13
100%
65
10
77%
85
1
8%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 4
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 9
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 13
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
13
100%
65
10
77%
85
1
8%
New York State Alternate Assessment (NYSAA) Results (2015 - 16)
GROUP
Grade 6 ELA
Grade 6 Math
Secondary-Level ELA
Secondary-Level Math
Secondary-Level Science
Secondary-Level Social Studies
TOTAL TESTED
1
1
1
1
1
1
PROFICIENT
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
LEVEL 1
_
_
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
_
_
_
_
Grade 6 ELA
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 6 Math
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Secondary-Level ELA
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Secondary-Level Math
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Secondary-Level Science
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Secondary-Level Social Studies
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
New York State English as a Second Language Achievement Test (NYSESLAT) Results (2015 - 16)
Grade 1
GROUP
All Students
General Education
TOTAL TESTED
2
2
ENTERING
_
_
EMERGING
_
_
TRANSITIONING
_
_
EXPANDING
_
_
COMMANDING
_
_
Grade 1
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 2
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 2
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
Elementary/Middle-Level English Language Arts Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: NO
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
NO
―
―
―
―
NO
―
―
―
―
Tested 95%
NO
―
―
―
―
NO
―
―
―
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
168*
0
0
0
0
168*
0
6
0
32
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
90%*
―
―
―
―
90%*
―
―
―
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
―
―
―
―
NO
―
―
―
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
70
0
0
0
0
70
0
6
0
28
PI
100
―
―
―
―
100
―
―
―
―
EAMO
93
―
―
―
―
108
―
―
―
―
Safe Harbor Target
93
―
―
―
―
105
―
―
―
―
All Students
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
168*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
90%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
70
PI
100
EAMO
93
Safe Harbor Target
93
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
White
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
168*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
90%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
70
PI
100
EAMO
108
Safe Harbor Target
105
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
6
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
6
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
32
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
28
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
168*
168*
168*
168*
0
168*
153*
168*
102*
39
38
0
168*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
90%*
90%*
90%*
90%*
―
90%*
91%*
90%*
89%*
―
―
―
90%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
70
70
70
70
0
70
64
70
42
36
34
0
70
PI
100
100
100
100
―
100
105
100
102
75
126
―
100
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
168*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
90%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
70
PI
100
Not Black or African American
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
168*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
90%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
70
PI
100
Not Hispanic or Latino
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
168*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
90%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
70
PI
100
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
168*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
90%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
70
PI
100
Not White
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
Not Multiracial
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
168*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
90%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
70
PI
100
General Education
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
153*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
91%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
64
PI
105
English Proficient
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
168*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
90%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
70
PI
100
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
102*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
89%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
42
PI
102
Male
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
39
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
36
PI
75
Female
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
38
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
34
PI
126
Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
168*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
90%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
70
PI
100
― There were fewer than 40 students enrolled during the test administration period, so the Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 tested students enrolled on BEDS day and during the test administration period, so the PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed. *The percentage of students tested in the current year fell below 95 percent, so the numbers of enrolled and tested students in the current year and previous year were combined to provide the school/district with another opportunity to meet the participation rate criterion.
Elementary/Middle-Level Mathematics Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: NO
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
NO
―
―
―
―
NO
―
―
―
―
Tested 95%
NO
―
―
―
―
NO
―
―
―
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
168*
0
0
0
0
168*
0
6
0
32
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
89%*
―
―
―
―
89%*
―
―
―
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
―
―
―
―
NO
―
―
―
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
70
0
0
0
0
70
0
5
0
28
PI
100
―
―
―
―
100
―
―
―
―
EAMO
90
―
―
―
―
104
―
―
―
―
Safe Harbor Target
90
―
―
―
―
102
―
―
―
―
All Students
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
168*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
89%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
70
PI
100
EAMO
90
Safe Harbor Target
90
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
White
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
168*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
89%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
70
PI
100
EAMO
104
Safe Harbor Target
102
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
6
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
5
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
32
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
28
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
168*
168*
168*
168*
0
168*
153*
168*
102*
39
38
0
168*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
89%*
89%*
89%*
89%*
―
89%*
90%*
89%*
89%*
―
―
―
89%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
70
70
70
70
0
70
65
70
42
35
35
0
70
PI
100
100
100
100
―
100
103
100
110
80
120
―
100
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
168*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
89%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
70
PI
100
Not Black or African American
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
168*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
89%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
70
PI
100
Not Hispanic or Latino
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
168*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
89%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
70
PI
100
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
168*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
89%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
70
PI
100
Not White
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
Not Multiracial
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
168*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
89%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
70
PI
100
General Education
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
153*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
90%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
65
PI
103
English Proficient
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
168*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
89%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
70
PI
100
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
102*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
89%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
42
PI
110
Male
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
39
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
35
PI
80
Female
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
38
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
35
PI
120
Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
168*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
89%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
70
PI
100
― There were fewer than 40 students enrolled during the test administration period, so the Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 tested students enrolled on BEDS day and during the test administration period, so the PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed. *The percentage of students tested in the current year fell below 95 percent, so the numbers of enrolled and tested students in the current year and previous year were combined to provide the school/district with another opportunity to meet the participation rate criterion.
Elementary/Middle-Level Science Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: NO
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
YES
―
―
―
―
NO
―
―
―
―
Tested 80%
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
25
0
0
0
0
25
0
2
0
8
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
YES
―
―
―
―
NO
―
―
―
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
51**
0
0
0
0
51**
0
4
0
18
PI
176**
―
―
―
―
176**
―
―
―
―
EAMO
174
―
―
―
―
181
―
―
―
―
Progress Target
174
―
―
―
―
181
―
―
―
―
All Students
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
25
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
51**
PI
176**
EAMO
174
Progress Target
174
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
White
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
25
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
NO
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
51**
PI
176**
EAMO
181
Progress Target
181
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
2
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
4
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
8
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
18
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
25
25
25
25
0
25
23
25
17
8
17
0
25
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
51**
51**
51**
51**
0
51**
47**
51**
33**
24
27
0
51**
PI
176**
176**
176**
176**
―
176**
183**
176**
182**
―
―
―
176**
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
25
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
51**
PI
176**
Not Black or African American
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
25
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
51**
PI
176**
Not Hispanic or Latino
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
25
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
51**
PI
176**
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
25
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
51**
PI
176**
Not White
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
Not Multiracial
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
25
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
51**
PI
176**
General Education
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
23
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
47**
PI
183**
English Proficient
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
25
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
51**
PI
176**
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
17
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
33**
PI
182**
Male
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
8
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
24
PI
―
Female
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
17
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
27
PI
―
Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
25
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
51**
PI
176**
― There were fewer than 40 students enrolled during the test administration period, so the Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 tested students enrolled on BEDS day and during the test administration period, so the PI, EAMO, and Progress Target data are suppressed. **The number of tested students enrolled on BEDS day and during the test period in the school/district in the current year is less than 30, so the numbers in the current year and previous year were combined to determine a Performance Index.
Secondary-Level English Language Arts Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: YES
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
―
Tested 95%
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
12th graders
13
0
0
1
0
12
0
4
0
3
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
32**
0
0
2
0
30**
0
6
0
7
PI
166**
―
―
―
―
163**
―
―
―
―
EAMO
157
―
―
―
―
166
―
―
―
―
Safe Harbor Target
157
―
―
―
―
160
―
―
―
―
All Students
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
13
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
32**
PI
166**
EAMO
157
Safe Harbor Target
157
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
1
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
2
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
White
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
12
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
30**
PI
163**
EAMO
166
Safe Harbor Target
160
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
4
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
6
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
3
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
7
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
12th Graders
13
13
12
13
1
13
9
13
10
6
7
0
13
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
32**
32**
30**
32**
2
32**
26
32**
25
19
13
0
32**
PI
166**
166**
163**
166**
―
166**
―
166**
―
―
―
―
166**
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
12th Graders
13
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
32**
PI
166**
Not Black or African American
12th Graders
13
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
32**
PI
166**
Not Hispanic or Latino
12th Graders
12
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
30**
PI
163**
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
12th Graders
13
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
32**
PI
166**
Not White
12th Graders
1
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
2
PI
―
Not Multiracial
12th Graders
13
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
32**
PI
166**
General Education
12th Graders
9
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
26
PI
―
English Proficient
12th Graders
13
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
32**
PI
166**
Not Economically Disadvantaged
12th Graders
10
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
25
PI
―
Male
12th Graders
6
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
19
PI
―
Female
12th Graders
7
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
13
PI
―
Migrant
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
Not Migrant
12th Graders
13
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
32**
PI
166**
― There were fewer than 40 12th graders, so the Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 students in the 2012 accountability cohort, so PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed. **The number of 2012 accountability cohort members is less than 30, so the number of 2012 and 2011 accountability cohort members were combined to determine a Performance Index.
Secondary-Level Mathematics Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: NO
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
NO
―
―
―
―
NO
―
―
―
―
Tested 95%
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
12th graders
13
0
0
1
0
12
0
4
0
3
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
―
―
―
―
NO
―
―
―
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
32**
0
0
2
0
30**
0
6
0
7
PI
116**
―
―
―
―
120**
―
―
―
―
EAMO
142
―
―
―
―
153
―
―
―
―
Safe Harbor Target
142
―
―
―
―
142
―
―
―
―
All Students
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
13
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
32**
PI
116**
EAMO
142
Safe Harbor Target
142
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
1
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
2
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
White
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
12
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
30**
PI
120**
EAMO
153
Safe Harbor Target
142
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
4
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
6
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
3
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
7
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
12th Graders
13
13
12
13
1
13
9
13
10
6
7
0
13
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
32**
32**
30**
32**
2
32**
26
32**
25
19
13
0
32**
PI
116**
116**
120**
116**
―
116**
―
116**
―
―
―
―
116**
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
12th Graders
13
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
32**
PI
116**
Not Black or African American
12th Graders
13
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
32**
PI
116**
Not Hispanic or Latino
12th Graders
12
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
30**
PI
120**
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
12th Graders
13
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
32**
PI
116**
Not White
12th Graders
1
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
2
PI
―
Not Multiracial
12th Graders
13
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
32**
PI
116**
General Education
12th Graders
9
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
26
PI
―
English Proficient
12th Graders
13
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
32**
PI
116**
Not Economically Disadvantaged
12th Graders
10
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
25
PI
―
Male
12th Graders
6
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
19
PI
―
Female
12th Graders
7
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
13
PI
―
Migrant
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
Not Migrant
12th Graders
13
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
32**
PI
116**
― There were fewer than 40 12th graders, so the Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 students in the 2012 accountability cohort, so PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed. **The number of 2012 accountability cohort members is less than 30, so the number of 2012 and 2011 accountability cohort members were combined to determine a Performance Index.
Unweighted Combined ELA and Math PIs
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
100
―
―
―
―
100
―
―
―
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
100
―
―
―
―
100
―
―
―
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
UNWEIGHTED COMBINED PI
100
0
0
0
0
100
0
0
0
0
All Students
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
100
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
100
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
100
American Indian or Alaska Native
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Black or African American
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Hispanic or Latino
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
White
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
100
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
100
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
100
Multiracial
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Students With Disabilities
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Limited English Proficient
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Economically Disadvantaged
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
― There were not enough students to determine a Performance Index.
Overall Graduation Rate for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: YES
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
―
All Students
MADE AYP
YES
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP
―
White
MADE AYP
YES
Multiracial
MADE AYP
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP
―
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
―
― There were not enough students to make an AYP determination.
Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort for Accountability
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion:
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
―
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
36*
1
0
1
0
34*
0
3
0
7
Graduation Rate
81%*
―
―
―
―
82%*
―
―
―
―
State Standard
80%
―
―
―
―
80%
―
―
―
―
Progress Target
79%
―
―
―
―
79%
―
―
―
―
All Students
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
36*
Graduation Rate
81%*
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
79%
American Indian or Alaska Native
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
1
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Black or African American
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
1
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
White
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
34*
Graduation Rate
82%*
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
79%
Multiracial
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Students With Disabilities
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
3
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Limited English Proficient
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
7
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
YES Graduation rate is equal to or greater than the State Standard or the group's Progress Target. NO Graduation rate is less than the State Standard and the group's Progress Target.
― There were fewer than 30 students in the cohort. * The number of students in the 2011 four-year graduation-rate total cohort in the school/district is less than 30, so data for the 2011 four-year graduation-rate total cohort and the 2010 four-year graduation-rate total cohort were combined to determine graduation rates.
Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort for Accountability
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion:
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
27
0
0
0
0
27
0
4
0
8
Graduation Rate
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
State Standard
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
Progress Target
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
All Students
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
27
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
American Indian or Alaska Native
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Black or African American
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
White
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
27
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Multiracial
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Students With Disabilities
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
4
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Limited English Proficient
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
8
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
YES Graduation rate is equal to or greater than the State Standard or the group's Progress Target. NO Graduation rate is less than the State Standard and the group's Progress Target.
― There were fewer than 30 students in the cohort.
Graduation Rates for Non-AYP Groups for Accountability
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
35*
36*
35*
36*
2
36*
33*
36*
29
17
19
0
36*
Graduation Rate
83%
81%
80%
81%
―
81%
82%
81%
―
―
―
―
81%
Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
27
27
27
27
0
27
23
27
19
10
17
0
27
Graduation Rate
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
35*
Graduation Rate
83%
Not Black or African American
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
36*
Graduation Rate
81%
Not Hispanic or Latino
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
35*
Graduation Rate
80%
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
36*
Graduation Rate
81%
Not White
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
2
Graduation Rate
―
Not Multiracial
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
36*
Graduation Rate
81%
General Education
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
33*
Graduation Rate
82%
English Proficient
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
36*
Graduation Rate
81%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
29
Graduation Rate
―
Male
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
17
Graduation Rate
―
Female
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
19
Graduation Rate
―
Migrant
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
Not Migrant
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
36*
Graduation Rate
81%
Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
27
Graduation Rate
―
Not Black or African American
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
27
Graduation Rate
―
Not Hispanic or Latino
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
27
Graduation Rate
―
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
27
Graduation Rate
―
Not White
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
Not Multiracial
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
27
Graduation Rate
―
General Education
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
23
Graduation Rate
―
English Proficient
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
27
Graduation Rate
―
Not Economically Disadvantaged
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
19
Graduation Rate
―
Male
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
10
Graduation Rate
―
Female
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
17
Graduation Rate
―
Migrant
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
Not Migrant
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
27
Graduation Rate
―
― There were fewer than 30 students in the cohort. * The number of 2011 four-year graduation-rate total cohort members is less than 30, so the number of 2011 and 2010 four-year graduation-rate total cohort members were combined to determine graduation rates.
Graduation Rates for Regents with Advanced Designation and CTE Endorsement for Accountability
Percentage of 2011 Graduation-Rate Total Cohort members who graduated as of August 31, 2015 with:
Regents Diploma with an Advanced Designation (This District)
5%
Regents Diploma with an Advanced Designation (Statewide)
32%
Percentage in This District Exceeded Statewide
NO
Regents Diploma with an Advanced Designation (This District)
5%
Regents Diploma with an Advanced Designation (Statewide)
32%
Percentage in This District Exceeded Statewide
NO
Regents Diploma with CTE Endorsement (This District)
5%
Regents Diploma with CTE Endorsement (Statewide)
5%
Percentage in This District Exceeded Statewide
NO
Regents Diploma with CTE Endorsement (This District)
You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.
Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.
If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.
