ENTERPRISE CHARTER SCHOOL - School Report Card Data [2015 - 16]
The New York State Report Card is an important part of the Board of Regents' effort to raise learning standards for all students. It provides information to the public on school/district enrollment and staff, student performance, and other measures of school and district performance. Knowledge gained from the report card on a school's or district's strengths and weaknesses can be used to improve instruction and services to students. Report Card Data - Glossary of Terms | Accountability Data - Glossary of Terms | Business Rules
Due to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 proficiency rates.
MEAN SCORE: 284
All Students
PROFICIENT
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 46
LEVEL 1
26
57%
LEVEL 2
15
33%
LEVEL 3
5
11%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
General Education
PROFICIENT
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 41
LEVEL 1
21
51%
LEVEL 2
15
37%
LEVEL 3
5
12%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
5
100%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 26
LEVEL 1
16
62%
LEVEL 2
7
27%
LEVEL 3
3
12%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 15
LEVEL 1
9
60%
LEVEL 2
4
27%
LEVEL 3
2
13%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
1
20%
LEVEL 2
4
80%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Female
PROFICIENT
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 31
LEVEL 1
14
45%
LEVEL 2
12
39%
LEVEL 3
5
16%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Male
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 15
LEVEL 1
12
80%
LEVEL 2
3
20%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 45
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 43
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 46
LEVEL 1
26
57%
LEVEL 2
15
33%
LEVEL 3
5
11%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
46
41
5
26
15
2
3
5
31
15
45
1
43
3
46
PROFICIENT
11%
12%
0%
12%
13%
_%
_%
0%
16%
0%
_%
_%
_%
_%
11%
LEVEL 1
26
57%
21
51%
5
100%
16
62%
9
60%
_
_
_
_
1
20%
14
45%
12
80%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
26
57%
LEVEL 2
15
33%
15
37%
0
0%
7
27%
4
27%
_
_
_
_
4
80%
12
39%
3
20%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
15
33%
LEVEL 3
5
11%
5
12%
0
0%
3
12%
2
13%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
5
16%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
5
11%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
0%
Grade 4 English Language Arts
Due to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 proficiency rates.
MEAN SCORE: 286
All Students
PROFICIENT
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 44
LEVEL 1
22
50%
LEVEL 2
19
43%
LEVEL 3
1
2%
LEVEL 4
2
5%
General Education
PROFICIENT
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 37
LEVEL 1
18
49%
LEVEL 2
16
43%
LEVEL 3
1
3%
LEVEL 4
2
5%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 7
LEVEL 1
4
57%
LEVEL 2
3
43%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 21
LEVEL 1
12
57%
LEVEL 2
8
38%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
1
5%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 23
LEVEL 1
10
43%
LEVEL 2
11
48%
LEVEL 3
1
4%
LEVEL 4
1
4%
Female
PROFICIENT
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 26
LEVEL 1
12
46%
LEVEL 2
11
42%
LEVEL 3
1
4%
LEVEL 4
2
8%
Male
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 18
LEVEL 1
10
56%
LEVEL 2
8
44%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 38
LEVEL 1
18
47%
LEVEL 2
17
45%
LEVEL 3
1
3%
LEVEL 4
2
5%
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
4
67%
LEVEL 2
2
33%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 39
LEVEL 1
20
51%
LEVEL 2
16
41%
LEVEL 3
1
3%
LEVEL 4
2
5%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
2
40%
LEVEL 2
3
60%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 44
LEVEL 1
22
50%
LEVEL 2
19
43%
LEVEL 3
1
2%
LEVEL 4
2
5%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
44
37
7
21
23
26
18
38
6
39
5
44
PROFICIENT
7%
8%
0%
5%
9%
12%
0%
8%
0%
8%
0%
7%
LEVEL 1
22
50%
18
49%
4
57%
12
57%
10
43%
12
46%
10
56%
18
47%
4
67%
20
51%
2
40%
22
50%
LEVEL 2
19
43%
16
43%
3
43%
8
38%
11
48%
11
42%
8
44%
17
45%
2
33%
16
41%
3
60%
19
43%
LEVEL 3
1
2%
1
3%
0
0%
0
0%
1
4%
1
4%
0
0%
1
3%
0
0%
1
3%
0
0%
1
2%
LEVEL 4
2
5%
2
5%
0
0%
1
5%
1
4%
2
8%
0
0%
2
5%
0
0%
2
5%
0
0%
2
5%
Grade 5 English Language Arts
Due to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 proficiency rates.
MEAN SCORE: 288
All Students
PROFICIENT
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 45
LEVEL 1
21
47%
LEVEL 2
19
42%
LEVEL 3
3
7%
LEVEL 4
2
4%
General Education
PROFICIENT
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 37
LEVEL 1
16
43%
LEVEL 2
16
43%
LEVEL 3
3
8%
LEVEL 4
2
5%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 8
LEVEL 1
5
63%
LEVEL 2
3
38%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 25
LEVEL 1
14
56%
LEVEL 2
9
36%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
2
8%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 19
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 20
LEVEL 1
7
35%
LEVEL 2
10
50%
LEVEL 3
3
15%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Female
PROFICIENT
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 30
LEVEL 1
11
37%
LEVEL 2
15
50%
LEVEL 3
3
10%
LEVEL 4
1
3%
Male
PROFICIENT
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 15
LEVEL 1
10
67%
LEVEL 2
4
27%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
1
7%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 42
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 44
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 45
LEVEL 1
21
47%
LEVEL 2
19
42%
LEVEL 3
3
7%
LEVEL 4
2
4%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
45
37
8
25
19
1
20
30
15
42
3
44
1
45
PROFICIENT
11%
14%
0%
8%
_%
_%
15%
13%
7%
_%
_%
_%
_%
11%
LEVEL 1
21
47%
16
43%
5
63%
14
56%
_
_
_
_
7
35%
11
37%
10
67%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
21
47%
LEVEL 2
19
42%
16
43%
3
38%
9
36%
_
_
_
_
10
50%
15
50%
4
27%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
19
42%
LEVEL 3
3
7%
3
8%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
3
15%
3
10%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
3
7%
LEVEL 4
2
4%
2
5%
0
0%
2
8%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
1
3%
1
7%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
2
4%
Grade 6 English Language Arts
Due to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 proficiency rates.
MEAN SCORE: 281
All Students
PROFICIENT
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 46
LEVEL 1
19
41%
LEVEL 2
22
48%
LEVEL 3
4
9%
LEVEL 4
1
2%
General Education
PROFICIENT
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 37
LEVEL 1
14
38%
LEVEL 2
19
51%
LEVEL 3
4
11%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
5
56%
LEVEL 2
3
33%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
1
11%
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 34
LEVEL 1
14
41%
LEVEL 2
18
53%
LEVEL 3
2
6%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 12
LEVEL 1
5
42%
LEVEL 2
4
33%
LEVEL 3
2
17%
LEVEL 4
1
8%
Female
PROFICIENT
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 29
LEVEL 1
10
34%
LEVEL 2
16
55%
LEVEL 3
3
10%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Male
PROFICIENT
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 17
LEVEL 1
9
53%
LEVEL 2
6
35%
LEVEL 3
1
6%
LEVEL 4
1
6%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 43
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 45
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 46
LEVEL 1
19
41%
LEVEL 2
22
48%
LEVEL 3
4
9%
LEVEL 4
1
2%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
46
37
9
34
12
29
17
43
3
45
1
46
PROFICIENT
11%
11%
11%
6%
25%
10%
12%
_%
_%
_%
_%
11%
LEVEL 1
19
41%
14
38%
5
56%
14
41%
5
42%
10
34%
9
53%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
19
41%
LEVEL 2
22
48%
19
51%
3
33%
18
53%
4
33%
16
55%
6
35%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
22
48%
LEVEL 3
4
9%
4
11%
0
0%
2
6%
2
17%
3
10%
1
6%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
4
9%
LEVEL 4
1
2%
0
0%
1
11%
0
0%
1
8%
0
0%
1
6%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
1
2%
Grade 7 English Language Arts
Due to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 proficiency rates.
MEAN SCORE: 289
All Students
PROFICIENT
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 38
LEVEL 1
16
42%
LEVEL 2
19
50%
LEVEL 3
2
5%
LEVEL 4
1
3%
General Education
PROFICIENT
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 27
LEVEL 1
9
33%
LEVEL 2
15
56%
LEVEL 3
2
7%
LEVEL 4
1
4%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 11
LEVEL 1
7
64%
LEVEL 2
4
36%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 23
LEVEL 1
10
43%
LEVEL 2
11
48%
LEVEL 3
1
4%
LEVEL 4
1
4%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 14
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 15
LEVEL 1
6
40%
LEVEL 2
8
53%
LEVEL 3
1
7%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Female
PROFICIENT
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 23
LEVEL 1
10
43%
LEVEL 2
11
48%
LEVEL 3
1
4%
LEVEL 4
1
4%
Male
PROFICIENT
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 15
LEVEL 1
6
40%
LEVEL 2
8
53%
LEVEL 3
1
7%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 35
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 34
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 38
LEVEL 1
16
42%
LEVEL 2
19
50%
LEVEL 3
2
5%
LEVEL 4
1
3%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
38
27
11
1
23
14
15
23
15
35
3
34
4
38
PROFICIENT
8%
11%
0%
_%
9%
_%
7%
9%
7%
_%
_%
_%
_%
8%
LEVEL 1
16
42%
9
33%
7
64%
_
_
10
43%
_
_
6
40%
10
43%
6
40%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
16
42%
LEVEL 2
19
50%
15
56%
4
36%
_
_
11
48%
_
_
8
53%
11
48%
8
53%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
19
50%
LEVEL 3
2
5%
2
7%
0
0%
_
_
1
4%
_
_
1
7%
1
4%
1
7%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
2
5%
LEVEL 4
1
3%
1
4%
0
0%
_
_
1
4%
_
_
0
0%
1
4%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
1
3%
Grade 8 English Language Arts
Due to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 proficiency rates.
MEAN SCORE: 291
All Students
PROFICIENT
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 41
LEVEL 1
15
37%
LEVEL 2
17
41%
LEVEL 3
9
22%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
General Education
PROFICIENT
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 35
LEVEL 1
12
34%
LEVEL 2
15
43%
LEVEL 3
8
23%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
3
50%
LEVEL 2
2
33%
LEVEL 3
1
17%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 30
LEVEL 1
10
33%
LEVEL 2
13
43%
LEVEL 3
7
23%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 10
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 11
LEVEL 1
5
45%
LEVEL 2
4
36%
LEVEL 3
2
18%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Female
PROFICIENT
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 18
LEVEL 1
4
22%
LEVEL 2
9
50%
LEVEL 3
5
28%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Male
PROFICIENT
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 23
LEVEL 1
11
48%
LEVEL 2
8
35%
LEVEL 3
4
17%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 40
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 36
LEVEL 1
14
39%
LEVEL 2
14
39%
LEVEL 3
8
22%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
1
20%
LEVEL 2
3
60%
LEVEL 3
1
20%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 41
LEVEL 1
15
37%
LEVEL 2
17
41%
LEVEL 3
9
22%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
41
35
6
30
10
1
11
18
23
40
1
36
5
41
PROFICIENT
22%
23%
17%
23%
_%
_%
18%
28%
17%
_%
_%
22%
20%
22%
LEVEL 1
15
37%
12
34%
3
50%
10
33%
_
_
_
_
5
45%
4
22%
11
48%
_
_
_
_
14
39%
1
20%
15
37%
LEVEL 2
17
41%
15
43%
2
33%
13
43%
_
_
_
_
4
36%
9
50%
8
35%
_
_
_
_
14
39%
3
60%
17
41%
LEVEL 3
9
22%
8
23%
1
17%
7
23%
_
_
_
_
2
18%
5
28%
4
17%
_
_
_
_
8
22%
1
20%
9
22%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
Grade 3 Mathematics
Due to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 proficiency rates.
MEAN SCORE: 281
All Students
PROFICIENT
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 45
LEVEL 1
24
53%
LEVEL 2
15
33%
LEVEL 3
3
7%
LEVEL 4
3
7%
General Education
PROFICIENT
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 40
LEVEL 1
19
48%
LEVEL 2
15
38%
LEVEL 3
3
8%
LEVEL 4
3
8%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
5
100%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 25
LEVEL 1
15
60%
LEVEL 2
6
24%
LEVEL 3
2
8%
LEVEL 4
2
8%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 15
LEVEL 1
8
53%
LEVEL 2
6
40%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
1
7%
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
1
20%
LEVEL 2
3
60%
LEVEL 3
1
20%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Female
PROFICIENT
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 31
LEVEL 1
16
52%
LEVEL 2
9
29%
LEVEL 3
3
10%
LEVEL 4
3
10%
Male
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 14
LEVEL 1
8
57%
LEVEL 2
6
43%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 44
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 42
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 45
LEVEL 1
24
53%
LEVEL 2
15
33%
LEVEL 3
3
7%
LEVEL 4
3
7%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
45
40
5
25
15
2
3
5
31
14
44
1
42
3
45
PROFICIENT
13%
15%
0%
16%
7%
_%
_%
20%
19%
0%
_%
_%
_%
_%
13%
LEVEL 1
24
53%
19
48%
5
100%
15
60%
8
53%
_
_
_
_
1
20%
16
52%
8
57%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
24
53%
LEVEL 2
15
33%
15
38%
0
0%
6
24%
6
40%
_
_
_
_
3
60%
9
29%
6
43%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
15
33%
LEVEL 3
3
7%
3
8%
0
0%
2
8%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
1
20%
3
10%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
3
7%
LEVEL 4
3
7%
3
8%
0
0%
2
8%
1
7%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
3
10%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
3
7%
Grade 4 Mathematics
Due to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 proficiency rates.
MEAN SCORE: 273
All Students
PROFICIENT
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 45
LEVEL 1
28
62%
LEVEL 2
13
29%
LEVEL 3
3
7%
LEVEL 4
1
2%
General Education
PROFICIENT
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 37
LEVEL 1
22
59%
LEVEL 2
11
30%
LEVEL 3
3
8%
LEVEL 4
1
3%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 8
LEVEL 1
6
75%
LEVEL 2
2
25%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 21
LEVEL 1
13
62%
LEVEL 2
6
29%
LEVEL 3
2
10%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 24
LEVEL 1
15
63%
LEVEL 2
7
29%
LEVEL 3
1
4%
LEVEL 4
1
4%
Female
PROFICIENT
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 26
LEVEL 1
14
54%
LEVEL 2
9
35%
LEVEL 3
2
8%
LEVEL 4
1
4%
Male
PROFICIENT
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 19
LEVEL 1
14
74%
LEVEL 2
4
21%
LEVEL 3
1
5%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 39
LEVEL 1
22
56%
LEVEL 2
13
33%
LEVEL 3
3
8%
LEVEL 4
1
3%
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
6
100%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 40
LEVEL 1
26
65%
LEVEL 2
10
25%
LEVEL 3
3
8%
LEVEL 4
1
3%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
2
40%
LEVEL 2
3
60%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 45
LEVEL 1
28
62%
LEVEL 2
13
29%
LEVEL 3
3
7%
LEVEL 4
1
2%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
45
37
8
21
24
26
19
39
6
40
5
45
PROFICIENT
9%
11%
0%
10%
8%
12%
5%
10%
0%
10%
0%
9%
LEVEL 1
28
62%
22
59%
6
75%
13
62%
15
63%
14
54%
14
74%
22
56%
6
100%
26
65%
2
40%
28
62%
LEVEL 2
13
29%
11
30%
2
25%
6
29%
7
29%
9
35%
4
21%
13
33%
0
0%
10
25%
3
60%
13
29%
LEVEL 3
3
7%
3
8%
0
0%
2
10%
1
4%
2
8%
1
5%
3
8%
0
0%
3
8%
0
0%
3
7%
LEVEL 4
1
2%
1
3%
0
0%
0
0%
1
4%
1
4%
0
0%
1
3%
0
0%
1
3%
0
0%
1
2%
Grade 5 Mathematics
Due to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 proficiency rates.
MEAN SCORE: 279
All Students
PROFICIENT
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 45
LEVEL 1
28
62%
LEVEL 2
13
29%
LEVEL 3
4
9%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
General Education
PROFICIENT
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 37
LEVEL 1
23
62%
LEVEL 2
11
30%
LEVEL 3
3
8%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 8
LEVEL 1
5
63%
LEVEL 2
2
25%
LEVEL 3
1
13%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 25
LEVEL 1
17
68%
LEVEL 2
7
28%
LEVEL 3
1
4%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 19
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 20
LEVEL 1
11
55%
LEVEL 2
6
30%
LEVEL 3
3
15%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Female
PROFICIENT
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 30
LEVEL 1
21
70%
LEVEL 2
8
27%
LEVEL 3
1
3%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Male
PROFICIENT
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 15
LEVEL 1
7
47%
LEVEL 2
5
33%
LEVEL 3
3
20%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 42
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 44
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 45
LEVEL 1
28
62%
LEVEL 2
13
29%
LEVEL 3
4
9%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
45
37
8
25
19
1
20
30
15
42
3
44
1
45
PROFICIENT
9%
8%
13%
4%
_%
_%
15%
3%
20%
_%
_%
_%
_%
9%
LEVEL 1
28
62%
23
62%
5
63%
17
68%
_
_
_
_
11
55%
21
70%
7
47%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
28
62%
LEVEL 2
13
29%
11
30%
2
25%
7
28%
_
_
_
_
6
30%
8
27%
5
33%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
13
29%
LEVEL 3
4
9%
3
8%
1
13%
1
4%
_
_
_
_
3
15%
1
3%
3
20%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
4
9%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
0%
Grade 6 Mathematics
Due to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 proficiency rates.
MEAN SCORE: 271
All Students
PROFICIENT
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 47
LEVEL 1
27
57%
LEVEL 2
16
34%
LEVEL 3
4
9%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
General Education
PROFICIENT
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 38
LEVEL 1
20
53%
LEVEL 2
15
39%
LEVEL 3
3
8%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
7
78%
LEVEL 2
1
11%
LEVEL 3
1
11%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 34
LEVEL 1
20
59%
LEVEL 2
12
35%
LEVEL 3
2
6%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 12
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 13
LEVEL 1
7
54%
LEVEL 2
4
31%
LEVEL 3
2
15%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Female
PROFICIENT
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 29
LEVEL 1
16
55%
LEVEL 2
11
38%
LEVEL 3
2
7%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Male
PROFICIENT
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 18
LEVEL 1
11
61%
LEVEL 2
5
28%
LEVEL 3
2
11%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 44
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 46
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 47
LEVEL 1
27
57%
LEVEL 2
16
34%
LEVEL 3
4
9%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
47
38
9
1
34
12
13
29
18
44
3
46
1
47
PROFICIENT
9%
8%
11%
_%
6%
_%
15%
7%
11%
_%
_%
_%
_%
9%
LEVEL 1
27
57%
20
53%
7
78%
_
_
20
59%
_
_
7
54%
16
55%
11
61%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
27
57%
LEVEL 2
16
34%
15
39%
1
11%
_
_
12
35%
_
_
4
31%
11
38%
5
28%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
16
34%
LEVEL 3
4
9%
3
8%
1
11%
_
_
2
6%
_
_
2
15%
2
7%
2
11%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
4
9%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
0%
Grade 7 Mathematics
Due to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 proficiency rates.
Mean scores and data in the table for grade 7 math include only those for grade 7 students who took the Grade 7 New York State Testing Program Assessment (NYSTP) in Mathematics. For 2015 and forward, data in the bar charts include those for grade 7 students who took the Grade 7 NYSTP in Mathematics and grade 7 students who took a Regents math test in lieu of the NYSTP. For 2014 and earlier, data in the bar charts include only those for grade 7 students who took the Grade 7 NYSTP.
MEAN SCORE: 272
All Students
PROFICIENT
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 38
LEVEL 1
30
79%
LEVEL 2
6
16%
LEVEL 3
2
5%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
General Education
PROFICIENT
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 27
LEVEL 1
21
78%
LEVEL 2
4
15%
LEVEL 3
2
7%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 11
LEVEL 1
9
82%
LEVEL 2
2
18%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 23
LEVEL 1
17
74%
LEVEL 2
4
17%
LEVEL 3
2
9%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 14
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 15
LEVEL 1
13
87%
LEVEL 2
2
13%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Female
PROFICIENT
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 23
LEVEL 1
19
83%
LEVEL 2
3
13%
LEVEL 3
1
4%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Male
PROFICIENT
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 15
LEVEL 1
11
73%
LEVEL 2
3
20%
LEVEL 3
1
7%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 35
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 34
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 38
LEVEL 1
30
79%
LEVEL 2
6
16%
LEVEL 3
2
5%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
38
27
11
1
23
14
15
23
15
35
3
34
4
38
PROFICIENT
5%
7%
0%
_%
9%
_%
0%
4%
7%
_%
_%
_%
_%
5%
LEVEL 1
30
79%
21
78%
9
82%
_
_
17
74%
_
_
13
87%
19
83%
11
73%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
30
79%
LEVEL 2
6
16%
4
15%
2
18%
_
_
4
17%
_
_
2
13%
3
13%
3
20%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
6
16%
LEVEL 3
2
5%
2
7%
0
0%
_
_
2
9%
_
_
0
0%
1
4%
1
7%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
2
5%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
0%
Grade 8 Mathematics
Due to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 proficiency rates.
Mean scores and data in the table for grade 8 math include only those for grade 8 students who took the Grade 8 New York State Testing Program Assessment (NYSTP) in Mathematics. For 2015 and forward, data in the bar charts include those for grade 8 students who took the Grade 8 NYSTP in Mathematics and grade 8 students who took a Regents math test in lieu of the NYSTP. For 2014 and earlier, data in the bar charts include only those for grade 8 students who took the Grade 8 NYSTP.
MEAN SCORE: 267
All Students
PROFICIENT
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 41
LEVEL 1
26
63%
LEVEL 2
14
34%
LEVEL 3
1
2%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
General Education
PROFICIENT
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 35
LEVEL 1
24
69%
LEVEL 2
10
29%
LEVEL 3
1
3%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
2
33%
LEVEL 2
4
67%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 30
LEVEL 1
19
63%
LEVEL 2
10
33%
LEVEL 3
1
3%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 10
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 11
LEVEL 1
7
64%
LEVEL 2
4
36%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Female
PROFICIENT
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 18
LEVEL 1
10
56%
LEVEL 2
7
39%
LEVEL 3
1
6%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Male
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 23
LEVEL 1
16
70%
LEVEL 2
7
30%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 40
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 36
LEVEL 1
23
64%
LEVEL 2
12
33%
LEVEL 3
1
3%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
3
60%
LEVEL 2
2
40%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 41
LEVEL 1
26
63%
LEVEL 2
14
34%
LEVEL 3
1
2%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
41
35
6
30
10
1
11
18
23
40
1
36
5
41
PROFICIENT
2%
3%
0%
3%
_%
_%
0%
6%
0%
_%
_%
3%
0%
2%
LEVEL 1
26
63%
24
69%
2
33%
19
63%
_
_
_
_
7
64%
10
56%
16
70%
_
_
_
_
23
64%
3
60%
26
63%
LEVEL 2
14
34%
10
29%
4
67%
10
33%
_
_
_
_
4
36%
7
39%
7
30%
_
_
_
_
12
33%
2
40%
14
34%
LEVEL 3
1
2%
1
3%
0
0%
1
3%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
1
6%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
1
3%
0
0%
1
2%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
Grade 4 Science
Due to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 proficiency rates.
MEAN SCORE: 69
All Students
PROFICIENT
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 45
LEVEL 1
1
2%
LEVEL 2
17
38%
LEVEL 3
23
51%
LEVEL 4
4
9%
General Education
PROFICIENT
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 37
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
13
35%
LEVEL 3
20
54%
LEVEL 4
4
11%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 8
LEVEL 1
1
13%
LEVEL 2
4
50%
LEVEL 3
3
38%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 21
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
8
38%
LEVEL 3
12
57%
LEVEL 4
1
5%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 24
LEVEL 1
1
4%
LEVEL 2
9
38%
LEVEL 3
11
46%
LEVEL 4
3
13%
Female
PROFICIENT
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 26
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
11
42%
LEVEL 3
12
46%
LEVEL 4
3
12%
Male
PROFICIENT
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 19
LEVEL 1
1
5%
LEVEL 2
6
32%
LEVEL 3
11
58%
LEVEL 4
1
5%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 39
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
12
31%
LEVEL 3
23
59%
LEVEL 4
4
10%
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
1
17%
LEVEL 2
5
83%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 40
LEVEL 1
1
3%
LEVEL 2
16
40%
LEVEL 3
19
48%
LEVEL 4
4
10%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
20%
LEVEL 3
4
80%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 45
LEVEL 1
1
2%
LEVEL 2
17
38%
LEVEL 3
23
51%
LEVEL 4
4
9%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
45
37
8
21
24
26
19
39
6
40
5
45
PROFICIENT
60%
65%
38%
62%
58%
58%
63%
69%
0%
58%
80%
60%
LEVEL 1
1
2%
0
0%
1
13%
0
0%
1
4%
0
0%
1
5%
0
0%
1
17%
1
3%
0
0%
1
2%
LEVEL 2
17
38%
13
35%
4
50%
8
38%
9
38%
11
42%
6
32%
12
31%
5
83%
16
40%
1
20%
17
38%
LEVEL 3
23
51%
20
54%
3
38%
12
57%
11
46%
12
46%
11
58%
23
59%
0
0%
19
48%
4
80%
23
51%
LEVEL 4
4
9%
4
11%
0
0%
1
5%
3
13%
3
12%
1
5%
4
10%
0
0%
4
10%
0
0%
4
9%
Grade 8 Science
Due to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 proficiency rates.
Data in the bar charts include those for grade 8 students who took the New York State Grade 8 Science Test and grade 8 students who took a Regents science test in lieu of this test. Mean scores and data in the table for grade 8 science include only those for grade 8 students who took the New York State Grade 8 Science Test.
MEAN SCORE: 62
All Students
PROFICIENT
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 39
LEVEL 1
3
8%
LEVEL 2
19
49%
LEVEL 3
16
41%
LEVEL 4
1
3%
General Education
PROFICIENT
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 34
LEVEL 1
2
6%
LEVEL 2
18
53%
LEVEL 3
14
41%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
1
20%
LEVEL 2
1
20%
LEVEL 3
2
40%
LEVEL 4
1
20%
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 28
LEVEL 1
3
11%
LEVEL 2
12
43%
LEVEL 3
12
43%
LEVEL 4
1
4%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 10
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 11
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
7
64%
LEVEL 3
4
36%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Female
PROFICIENT
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 18
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
10
56%
LEVEL 3
8
44%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Male
PROFICIENT
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 21
LEVEL 1
3
14%
LEVEL 2
9
43%
LEVEL 3
8
38%
LEVEL 4
1
5%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 38
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 34
LEVEL 1
2
6%
LEVEL 2
18
53%
LEVEL 3
13
38%
LEVEL 4
1
3%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
1
20%
LEVEL 2
1
20%
LEVEL 3
3
60%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 39
LEVEL 1
3
8%
LEVEL 2
19
49%
LEVEL 3
16
41%
LEVEL 4
1
3%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
39
34
5
28
10
1
11
18
21
38
1
34
5
39
PROFICIENT
44%
41%
60%
46%
_%
_%
36%
44%
43%
_%
_%
41%
60%
44%
LEVEL 1
3
8%
2
6%
1
20%
3
11%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
3
14%
_
_
_
_
2
6%
1
20%
3
8%
LEVEL 2
19
49%
18
53%
1
20%
12
43%
_
_
_
_
7
64%
10
56%
9
43%
_
_
_
_
18
53%
1
20%
19
49%
LEVEL 3
16
41%
14
41%
2
40%
12
43%
_
_
_
_
4
36%
8
44%
8
38%
_
_
_
_
13
38%
3
60%
16
41%
LEVEL 4
1
3%
0
0%
1
20%
1
4%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
1
5%
_
_
_
_
1
3%
0
0%
1
3%
Statewide Results on the National Assessment of Educational Progress: NAEP (2014 - 15)
Grade: 4
Reading
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Students with Disabilities
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
BELOW BASIC
32%
*%
20%
48%
44%
20%
*%
70%
74%
43%
BASIC
32%
*%
30%
34%
37%
31%
*%
22%
21%
36%
PROFICIENT
27%
*%
33%
15%
17%
37%
*%
7%
4%
18%
ADVANCED
9%
*%
17%
3%
2%
12%
*%
1%
1%
3%
PARTICIPATION RATE
98
88
Reading
All Students
Percent Below Basic
32
Percent Basic
32
Percent Proficient
27
Percent Advanced
9
American Indian or Alaska Native
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Percent Below Basic
20
Percent Basic
30
Percent Proficient
33
Percent Advanced
17
Black or African American
Percent Below Basic
48
Percent Basic
34
Percent Proficient
15
Percent Advanced
3
Hispanic or Latino
Percent Below Basic
44
Percent Basic
37
Percent Proficient
17
Percent Advanced
2
White
Percent Below Basic
20
Percent Basic
31
Percent Proficient
37
Percent Advanced
12
Multiracial
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Students with Disabilities
Percent Below Basic
70
Percent Basic
22
Percent Proficient
7
Percent Advanced
1
Participation Rate
98
English Language Learners
Percent Below Basic
74
Percent Basic
21
Percent Proficient
4
Percent Advanced
1
Participation Rate
88
Economically Disadvantaged
Percent Below Basic
43
Percent Basic
36
Percent Proficient
18
Percent Advanced
3
Mathematics
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Students with Disabilities
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
BELOW BASIC
21%
*%
12%
40%
28%
12%
*%
49%
56%
29%
BASIC
44%
*%
31%
46%
51%
41%
*%
39%
35%
48%
PROFICIENT
30%
*%
42%
13%
20%
40%
*%
10%
9%
21%
ADVANCED
5%
*%
15%
1%
1%
7%
*%
2%
*%
2%
PARTICIPATION RATE
98
91
Mathematics
All Students
Percent Below Basic
21
Percent Basic
44
Percent Proficient
30
Percent Advanced
5
American Indian or Alaska Native
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Percent Below Basic
12
Percent Basic
31
Percent Proficient
42
Percent Advanced
15
Black or African American
Percent Below Basic
40
Percent Basic
46
Percent Proficient
13
Percent Advanced
1
Hispanic or Latino
Percent Below Basic
28
Percent Basic
51
Percent Proficient
20
Percent Advanced
1
White
Percent Below Basic
12
Percent Basic
41
Percent Proficient
40
Percent Advanced
7
Multiracial
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Students with Disabilities
Percent Below Basic
49
Percent Basic
39
Percent Proficient
10
Percent Advanced
2
Participation Rate
98
English Language Learners
Percent Below Basic
56
Percent Basic
35
Percent Proficient
9
Percent Advanced
*
Participation Rate
91
Economically Disadvantaged
Percent Below Basic
29
Percent Basic
48
Percent Proficient
21
Percent Advanced
2
Grade: 8
Reading
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Students with Disabilities
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
BELOW BASIC
27%
*%
19%
42%
35%
18%
*%
59%
78%
36%
BASIC
40%
*%
39%
41%
43%
39%
*%
33%
19%
42%
PROFICIENT
29%
*%
34%
16%
20%
38%
*%
8%
3%
21%
ADVANCED
4%
*%
8%
1%
2%
5%
*%
*%
*%
1%
PARTICIPATION RATE
98
89
Reading
All Students
Percent Below Basic
27
Percent Basic
40
Percent Proficient
29
Percent Advanced
4
American Indian or Alaska Native
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Percent Below Basic
19
Percent Basic
39
Percent Proficient
34
Percent Advanced
8
Black or African American
Percent Below Basic
42
Percent Basic
41
Percent Proficient
16
Percent Advanced
1
Hispanic or Latino
Percent Below Basic
35
Percent Basic
43
Percent Proficient
20
Percent Advanced
2
White
Percent Below Basic
18
Percent Basic
39
Percent Proficient
38
Percent Advanced
5
Multiracial
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Students with Disabilities
Percent Below Basic
59
Percent Basic
33
Percent Proficient
8
Percent Advanced
*
Participation Rate
98
English Language Learners
Percent Below Basic
78
Percent Basic
19
Percent Proficient
3
Percent Advanced
*
Participation Rate
89
Economically Disadvantaged
Percent Below Basic
36
Percent Basic
42
Percent Proficient
21
Percent Advanced
1
Mathematics
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Students with Disabilities
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
BELOW BASIC
31%
*%
18%
48%
41%
20%
*%
64%
72%
40%
BASIC
38%
*%
30%
37%
40%
40%
*%
27%
21%
39%
PROFICIENT
24%
*%
33%
13%
16%
31%
*%
8%
6%
17%
ADVANCED
7%
*%
19%
2%
3%
9%
*%
1%
1%
4%
PARTICIPATION RATE
99
94
Mathematics
All Students
Percent Below Basic
31
Percent Basic
38
Percent Proficient
24
Percent Advanced
7
American Indian or Alaska Native
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Percent Below Basic
18
Percent Basic
30
Percent Proficient
33
Percent Advanced
19
Black or African American
Percent Below Basic
48
Percent Basic
37
Percent Proficient
13
Percent Advanced
2
Hispanic or Latino
Percent Below Basic
41
Percent Basic
40
Percent Proficient
16
Percent Advanced
3
White
Percent Below Basic
20
Percent Basic
40
Percent Proficient
31
Percent Advanced
9
Multiracial
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Students with Disabilities
Percent Below Basic
64
Percent Basic
27
Percent Proficient
8
Percent Advanced
1
Participation Rate
99
English Language Learners
Percent Below Basic
72
Percent Basic
21
Percent Proficient
6
Percent Advanced
1
Participation Rate
94
Economically Disadvantaged
Percent Below Basic
40
Percent Basic
39
Percent Proficient
17
Percent Advanced
4
Elementary/Middle-Level English Language Arts Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: NO
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
NO
―
YES
NO
―
―
―
NO
―
NO
Tested 95%
YES
―
YES
YES
―
―
―
YES
―
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
267
0
161
96
2
2
6
48
18
247
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
97%
―
99%
97%
―
―
―
96%
―
98%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
―
YES
NO
―
―
―
NO
―
NO
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
249
0
151
90
1
2
5
47✝
14
231
PI
67
―
64
70
―
―
―
43✝
―
67
EAMO
97
―
80
82
―
―
―
59
―
86
Safe Harbor Target
68
―
61
71
―
―
―
52
―
68
All Students
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
267
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
97%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
249
PI
67
EAMO
97
Safe Harbor Target
68
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
161
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
99%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
151
PI
64
EAMO
80
Safe Harbor Target
61
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
96
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
97%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
90
PI
70
EAMO
82
Safe Harbor Target
71
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
2
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
White
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
2
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
2
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
6
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
5
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
48
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
96%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
47✝
PI
43✝
EAMO
59
Safe Harbor Target
52
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
18
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
14
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
247
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
231
PI
67
EAMO
86
Safe Harbor Target
68
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
267
106
171
265
265
261
219
249
20
108
159
0
267
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
97%
95%
98%
98%
97%
98%
98%
98%
―
95%
99%
―
97%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
249
98
159
248
247
244
203
235
18
99
150
0
249
PI
67
71
65
67
67
66
73
70
―
52
77
―
67
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
267
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
97%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
249
PI
67
Not Black or African American
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
106
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
95%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
98
PI
71
Not Hispanic or Latino
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
171
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
159
PI
65
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
265
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
248
PI
67
Not White
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
265
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
97%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
247
PI
67
Not Multiracial
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
261
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
244
PI
66
General Education
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
219
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
203
PI
73
English Proficient
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
249
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
235
PI
70
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
20
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
18
PI
―
Male
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
108
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
95%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
99
PI
52
Female
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
159
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
99%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
150
PI
77
Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
267
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
97%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
249
PI
67
― There were fewer than 40 students enrolled during the test administration period, so the Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 tested students enrolled on BEDS day and during the test administration period, so the PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed. ✝ Includes former students with disabilities because the number of students with disabilities in the current year is equal to or greater than 30.
Elementary/Middle-Level Mathematics Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: NO
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
NO
―
NO
NO
―
―
―
NO
―
NO
Tested 95%
YES
―
YES
YES
―
―
―
YES
―
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
267
0
161
96
2
2
6
48
18
247
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
―
98%
98%
―
―
―
98%
―
98%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
―
NO
NO
―
―
―
NO
―
NO
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
251
0
150
92
2
2
5
48✝
15
233
PI
45
―
43
46
―
―
―
33✝
―
44
EAMO
94
―
75
81
―
―
―
60
―
84
Safe Harbor Target
58
―
50
66
―
―
―
53
―
60
All Students
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
267
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
251
PI
45
EAMO
94
Safe Harbor Target
58
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
161
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
150
PI
43
EAMO
75
Safe Harbor Target
50
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
96
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
92
PI
46
EAMO
81
Safe Harbor Target
66
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
2
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
2
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
White
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
2
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
2
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
6
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
5
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
48
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
48✝
PI
33✝
EAMO
60
Safe Harbor Target
53
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
18
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
15
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
247
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
233
PI
44
EAMO
84
Safe Harbor Target
60
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
267
106
171
265
265
261
219
249
20
108
159
0
267
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
97%
98%
98%
98%
98%
98%
98%
―
96%
99%
―
98%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
251
101
159
249
249
246
204
236
18
100
151
0
251
PI
45
49
45
45
45
45
49
48
―
43
47
―
45
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
267
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
251
PI
45
Not Black or African American
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
106
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
97%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
101
PI
49
Not Hispanic or Latino
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
171
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
159
PI
45
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
265
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
249
PI
45
Not White
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
265
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
249
PI
45
Not Multiracial
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
261
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
246
PI
45
General Education
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
219
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
204
PI
49
English Proficient
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
249
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
236
PI
48
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
20
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
18
PI
―
Male
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
108
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
96%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
100
PI
43
Female
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
159
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
99%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
151
PI
47
Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
267
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
251
PI
45
― There were fewer than 40 students enrolled during the test administration period, so the Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 tested students enrolled on BEDS day and during the test administration period, so the PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed. ✝ Includes former students with disabilities because the number of students with disabilities in the current year is equal to or greater than 30.
Elementary/Middle-Level Science Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: NO
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
NO
―
NO
NO
―
―
―
―
―
NO
Tested 80%
YES
―
YES
―
―
―
―
―
―
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
87
0
51
34
0
0
2
14
7
77
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
97%
―
96%
―
―
―
―
―
―
96%
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
NO
―
NO
NO
―
―
―
―
―
NO
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
81
0
47
33
0
0
1
13
6
71
PI
149
―
149
152
―
―
―
―
―
148
EAMO
176
―
161
161
―
―
―
―
―
169
Progress Target
170
―
154
161
―
―
―
―
―
169
All Students
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 80%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
87
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
97%
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
NO
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
81
PI
149
EAMO
176
Progress Target
170
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 80%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
51
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
96%
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
NO
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
47
PI
149
EAMO
161
Progress Target
154
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
34
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
NO
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
33
PI
152
EAMO
161
Progress Target
161
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
White
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
2
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
14
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
13
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
7
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
6
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 80%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
77
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
96%
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
NO
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
71
PI
148
EAMO
169
Progress Target
169
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
87
36
53
87
87
85
73
80
10
43
44
0
87
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
97%
―
94%
97%
97%
98%
97%
96%
―
93%
100%
―
97%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
81
34
48
81
81
80
68
75
10
38
43
0
81
PI
149
150
148
149
149
150
153
153
―
147
151
―
149
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
87
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
97%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
81
PI
149
Not Black or African American
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
36
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
34
PI
150
Not Hispanic or Latino
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
53
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
94%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
48
PI
148
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
87
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
97%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
81
PI
149
Not White
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
87
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
97%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
81
PI
149
Not Multiracial
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
85
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
80
PI
150
General Education
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
73
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
97%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
68
PI
153
English Proficient
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
80
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
96%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
75
PI
153
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
10
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
10
PI
―
Male
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
43
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
93%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
38
PI
147
Female
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
44
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
43
PI
151
Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
87
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
97%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
81
PI
149
― There were fewer than 40 students enrolled during the test administration period, so the Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 tested students enrolled on BEDS day and during the test administration period, so the PI, EAMO, and Progress Target data are suppressed.
Unweighted Combined ELA and Math PIs
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
67
―
64
70
―
―
―
43
―
67
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
45
―
43
46
―
―
―
33
―
44
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
UNWEIGHTED COMBINED PI
56
0
54
58
0
0
0
38
0
56
All Students
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
67
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
45
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
56
American Indian or Alaska Native
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Black or African American
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
64
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
43
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
54
Hispanic or Latino
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
70
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
46
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
58
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
White
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Multiracial
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Students With Disabilities
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
43
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
33
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
38
Limited English Proficient
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Economically Disadvantaged
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
67
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
44
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
56
― There were not enough students to determine a Performance Index.
You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.
Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.
If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.
