BROOKLYN COMMUNITY HS-EXCEL-EQUITY - School Report Card Data [2015 - 16]
The New York State Report Card is an important part of the Board of Regents' effort to raise learning standards for all students. It provides information to the public on school/district enrollment and staff, student performance, and other measures of school and district performance. Knowledge gained from the report card on a school's or district's strengths and weaknesses can be used to improve instruction and services to students. Report Card Data - Glossary of Terms | Accountability Data - Glossary of Terms | Business Rules
BROOKLYN COMMUNITY HS-EXCEL-EQUITY ENROLLMENT (2015 - 16)
K-12 ENROLLMENT
235
ENROLLMENT BY GENDER
MALE
133
57%
FEMALE
102
43%
ENROLLMENT BY ETHNICITY
GROUP
AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE
BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN
HISPANIC OR LATINO
ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER
MULTIRACIAL
TOTAL
3
202
21
3
6
PERCENT
1%
86%
9%
1%
3%
OTHER GROUPS
ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
15
6%
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
65
28%
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
174
74%
ENROLLMENT BY GRADE
GROUP
8TH GRADE
9TH GRADE
10TH GRADE
11TH GRADE
12TH GRADE
UNGRADED SECONDARY
TOTAL
2
72
48
57
55
1
PERCENT
1%
31%
20%
24%
23%
0%
BROOKLYN COMMUNITY HS-EXCEL-EQUITY ENROLLMENT (2015 - 16)
K-12 Enrollment: 235
ENROLLMENT BY GENDER
MALE
133
57%
FEMALE
102
43%
ENROLLMENT BY ETHNICITY
AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE
3
1%
BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN
202
86%
HISPANIC OR LATINO
21
9%
ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER
3
1%
MULTIRACIAL
6
3%
OTHER GROUPS
ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
15
6%
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
65
28%
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
174
74%
ENROLLMENT BY GRADE
8TH GRADE
2
1%
9TH GRADE
72
31%
10TH GRADE
48
20%
11TH GRADE
57
24%
12TH GRADE
55
23%
UNGRADED SECONDARY
1
0%
Free and Reduced-Price Lunch (2015 - 16)
ELIGIBLE FOR FREE LUNCH
158
67%
ELIGIBLE FOR REDUCED-PRICE LUNCH
15
6%
Free and Reduced-Price Lunch (2015 - 16)
Eligible for Free Lunch
158
67%
Eligible for Reduced-Price Lunch
15
6%
High School Completers (2015 - 16)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
60
44
16
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
59
44
15
REGENTS DIPLOMA
48
81%
44
100%
4
27%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
REGENTS WITH ADVANCED DESIGNATION
2
3%
2
5%
0
0%
REGENTS WITH CTE ENDORSEMENT
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
LOCAL DIPLOMAS
11
19%
0
0%
11
73%
COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS
1
2%
0
0%
1
6%
All Students
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
60
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
59
Regents Diploma
48
81%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
2
3%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
0
0%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
11
19%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
1
2%
of Completers
General Education
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
44
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
44
Regents Diploma
44
100%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
2
5%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
0
0%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
0
0%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
0
0%
of Completers
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
16
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
15
Regents Diploma
4
27%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
0
0%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
0
0%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
11
73%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
1
6%
of Completers
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
60
44
16
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
59
44
15
REGENTS DIPLOMA
48
81%
44
100%
4
27%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
REGENTS WITH ADVANCED DESIGNATION
2
3%
2
5%
0
0%
REGENTS WITH CTE ENDORSEMENT
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
LOCAL DIPLOMAS
11
19%
0
0%
11
73%
COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS
1
2%
0
0%
1
6%
All Students
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
60
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
59
Regents Diploma
48
81%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
2
3%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
0
0%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
11
19%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
1
2%
of Completers
General Education
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
44
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
44
Regents Diploma
44
100%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
2
5%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
0
0%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
0
0%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
0
0%
of Completers
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
16
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
15
Regents Diploma
4
27%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
0
0%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
0
0%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
11
73%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
1
6%
of Completers
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
60
44
16
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
59
44
15
REGENTS DIPLOMA
48
81%
44
100%
4
27%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
REGENTS WITH ADVANCED DESIGNATION
2
3%
2
5%
0
0%
REGENTS WITH CTE ENDORSEMENT
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
LOCAL DIPLOMAS
11
19%
0
0%
11
73%
COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS
1
2%
0
0%
1
6%
All Students
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
60
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
59
Regents Diploma
48
81%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
2
3%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
0
0%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
11
19%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
1
2%
of Completers
General Education
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
44
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
44
Regents Diploma
44
100%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
2
5%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
0
0%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
0
0%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
0
0%
of Completers
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
16
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
15
Regents Diploma
4
27%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
0
0%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
0
0%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
11
73%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
1
6%
of Completers
High School Non-completers (2015 - 16)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
8
3%
6
4%
2
3%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
7
3%
4
2%
3
5%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
15
6%
10
6%
5
8%
All Students
DROPPED OUT
8
3%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
7
3%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
15
6%
General Education
DROPPED OUT
6
4%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
4
2%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
10
6%
Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
2
3%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
3
5%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
5
8%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
8
3%
6
4%
2
3%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
7
3%
4
2%
3
5%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
15
6%
10
6%
5
8%
All Students
DROPPED OUT
8
3%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
7
3%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
15
6%
General Education
DROPPED OUT
6
4%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
4
2%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
10
6%
Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
2
3%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
3
5%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
5
8%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
8
3%
6
4%
2
3%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
7
3%
4
2%
3
5%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
15
6%
10
6%
5
8%
All Students
DROPPED OUT
8
3%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
7
3%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
15
6%
General Education
DROPPED OUT
6
4%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
4
2%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
10
6%
Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
2
3%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
3
5%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
5
8%
Post-graduation Plans of Completers (2015 - 16)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO FOUR-YEAR COLLEGE
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
TO TWO-YEAR COLLEGE
7
12%
6
14%
1
6%
TO OTHER POST-SECONDARY
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
TO THE MILITARY
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO EMPLOYMENT
1
2%
1
2%
0
0%
TO ADULT SERVICES
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
TO OTHER KNOWN PLANS
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
PLANS UNKNOWN
52
87%
37
84%
15
94%
All Students
To Four-Year College
0
0%
To Two-Year College
7
12%
To Other Post-Secondary
0
0%
To the Military
0
0%
To Employment
1
2%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
0
0%
Plan Unknown
52
87%
General Education
To Four-Year College
0
0%
To Two-Year College
6
14%
To Other Post-Secondary
0
0%
To the Military
0
0%
To Employment
1
2%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
0
0%
Plan Unknown
37
84%
Students with Disabilities
To Four-Year College
0
0%
To Two-Year College
1
6%
To Other Post-Secondary
0
0%
To the Military
0
0%
To Employment
0
0%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
0
0%
Plan Unknown
15
94%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO FOUR-YEAR COLLEGE
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
TO TWO-YEAR COLLEGE
7
12%
6
14%
1
6%
TO OTHER POST-SECONDARY
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
TO THE MILITARY
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO EMPLOYMENT
1
2%
1
2%
0
0%
TO ADULT SERVICES
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
TO OTHER KNOWN PLANS
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
PLANS UNKNOWN
52
87%
37
84%
15
94%
All Students
To Four-Year College
0
0%
To Two-Year College
7
12%
To Other Post-Secondary
0
0%
To the Military
0
0%
To Employment
1
2%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
0
0%
Plan Unknown
52
87%
General Education
To Four-Year College
0
0%
To Two-Year College
6
14%
To Other Post-Secondary
0
0%
To the Military
0
0%
To Employment
1
2%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
0
0%
Plan Unknown
37
84%
Students with Disabilities
To Four-Year College
0
0%
To Two-Year College
1
6%
To Other Post-Secondary
0
0%
To the Military
0
0%
To Employment
0
0%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
0
0%
Plan Unknown
15
94%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO FOUR-YEAR COLLEGE
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
TO TWO-YEAR COLLEGE
7
12%
6
14%
1
6%
TO OTHER POST-SECONDARY
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
TO THE MILITARY
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO EMPLOYMENT
1
2%
1
2%
0
0%
TO ADULT SERVICES
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
TO OTHER KNOWN PLANS
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
PLANS UNKNOWN
52
87%
37
84%
15
94%
All Students
To Four-Year College
0
0%
To Two-Year College
7
12%
To Other Post-Secondary
0
0%
To the Military
0
0%
To Employment
1
2%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
0
0%
Plan Unknown
52
87%
General Education
To Four-Year College
0
0%
To Two-Year College
6
14%
To Other Post-Secondary
0
0%
To the Military
0
0%
To Employment
1
2%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
0
0%
Plan Unknown
37
84%
Students with Disabilities
To Four-Year College
0
0%
To Two-Year College
1
6%
To Other Post-Secondary
0
0%
To the Military
0
0%
To Employment
0
0%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
0
0%
Plan Unknown
15
94%
Statewide Results on the National Assessment of Educational Progress: NAEP (2014 - 15)
Grade: 4
Reading
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Students with Disabilities
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
BELOW BASIC
32%
*%
20%
48%
44%
20%
*%
70%
74%
43%
BASIC
32%
*%
30%
34%
37%
31%
*%
22%
21%
36%
PROFICIENT
27%
*%
33%
15%
17%
37%
*%
7%
4%
18%
ADVANCED
9%
*%
17%
3%
2%
12%
*%
1%
1%
3%
PARTICIPATION RATE
98
88
Reading
All Students
Percent Below Basic
32
Percent Basic
32
Percent Proficient
27
Percent Advanced
9
American Indian or Alaska Native
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Percent Below Basic
20
Percent Basic
30
Percent Proficient
33
Percent Advanced
17
Black or African American
Percent Below Basic
48
Percent Basic
34
Percent Proficient
15
Percent Advanced
3
Hispanic or Latino
Percent Below Basic
44
Percent Basic
37
Percent Proficient
17
Percent Advanced
2
White
Percent Below Basic
20
Percent Basic
31
Percent Proficient
37
Percent Advanced
12
Multiracial
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Students with Disabilities
Percent Below Basic
70
Percent Basic
22
Percent Proficient
7
Percent Advanced
1
Participation Rate
98
English Language Learners
Percent Below Basic
74
Percent Basic
21
Percent Proficient
4
Percent Advanced
1
Participation Rate
88
Economically Disadvantaged
Percent Below Basic
43
Percent Basic
36
Percent Proficient
18
Percent Advanced
3
Mathematics
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Students with Disabilities
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
BELOW BASIC
21%
*%
12%
40%
28%
12%
*%
49%
56%
29%
BASIC
44%
*%
31%
46%
51%
41%
*%
39%
35%
48%
PROFICIENT
30%
*%
42%
13%
20%
40%
*%
10%
9%
21%
ADVANCED
5%
*%
15%
1%
1%
7%
*%
2%
*%
2%
PARTICIPATION RATE
98
91
Mathematics
All Students
Percent Below Basic
21
Percent Basic
44
Percent Proficient
30
Percent Advanced
5
American Indian or Alaska Native
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Percent Below Basic
12
Percent Basic
31
Percent Proficient
42
Percent Advanced
15
Black or African American
Percent Below Basic
40
Percent Basic
46
Percent Proficient
13
Percent Advanced
1
Hispanic or Latino
Percent Below Basic
28
Percent Basic
51
Percent Proficient
20
Percent Advanced
1
White
Percent Below Basic
12
Percent Basic
41
Percent Proficient
40
Percent Advanced
7
Multiracial
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Students with Disabilities
Percent Below Basic
49
Percent Basic
39
Percent Proficient
10
Percent Advanced
2
Participation Rate
98
English Language Learners
Percent Below Basic
56
Percent Basic
35
Percent Proficient
9
Percent Advanced
*
Participation Rate
91
Economically Disadvantaged
Percent Below Basic
29
Percent Basic
48
Percent Proficient
21
Percent Advanced
2
Grade: 8
Reading
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Students with Disabilities
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
BELOW BASIC
27%
*%
19%
42%
35%
18%
*%
59%
78%
36%
BASIC
40%
*%
39%
41%
43%
39%
*%
33%
19%
42%
PROFICIENT
29%
*%
34%
16%
20%
38%
*%
8%
3%
21%
ADVANCED
4%
*%
8%
1%
2%
5%
*%
*%
*%
1%
PARTICIPATION RATE
98
89
Reading
All Students
Percent Below Basic
27
Percent Basic
40
Percent Proficient
29
Percent Advanced
4
American Indian or Alaska Native
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Percent Below Basic
19
Percent Basic
39
Percent Proficient
34
Percent Advanced
8
Black or African American
Percent Below Basic
42
Percent Basic
41
Percent Proficient
16
Percent Advanced
1
Hispanic or Latino
Percent Below Basic
35
Percent Basic
43
Percent Proficient
20
Percent Advanced
2
White
Percent Below Basic
18
Percent Basic
39
Percent Proficient
38
Percent Advanced
5
Multiracial
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Students with Disabilities
Percent Below Basic
59
Percent Basic
33
Percent Proficient
8
Percent Advanced
*
Participation Rate
98
English Language Learners
Percent Below Basic
78
Percent Basic
19
Percent Proficient
3
Percent Advanced
*
Participation Rate
89
Economically Disadvantaged
Percent Below Basic
36
Percent Basic
42
Percent Proficient
21
Percent Advanced
1
Mathematics
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Students with Disabilities
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
BELOW BASIC
31%
*%
18%
48%
41%
20%
*%
64%
72%
40%
BASIC
38%
*%
30%
37%
40%
40%
*%
27%
21%
39%
PROFICIENT
24%
*%
33%
13%
16%
31%
*%
8%
6%
17%
ADVANCED
7%
*%
19%
2%
3%
9%
*%
1%
1%
4%
PARTICIPATION RATE
99
94
Mathematics
All Students
Percent Below Basic
31
Percent Basic
38
Percent Proficient
24
Percent Advanced
7
American Indian or Alaska Native
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Percent Below Basic
18
Percent Basic
30
Percent Proficient
33
Percent Advanced
19
Black or African American
Percent Below Basic
48
Percent Basic
37
Percent Proficient
13
Percent Advanced
2
Hispanic or Latino
Percent Below Basic
41
Percent Basic
40
Percent Proficient
16
Percent Advanced
3
White
Percent Below Basic
20
Percent Basic
40
Percent Proficient
31
Percent Advanced
9
Multiracial
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Students with Disabilities
Percent Below Basic
64
Percent Basic
27
Percent Proficient
8
Percent Advanced
1
Participation Rate
99
English Language Learners
Percent Below Basic
72
Percent Basic
21
Percent Proficient
6
Percent Advanced
1
Participation Rate
94
Economically Disadvantaged
Percent Below Basic
40
Percent Basic
39
Percent Proficient
17
Percent Advanced
4
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level English Language Arts after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 65
LEVEL 1
2
3%
LEVEL 2
8
12%
LEVEL 3
32
49%
LEVEL 4
10
15%
General Education
PROFICIENT
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 47
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
2%
LEVEL 3
29
62%
LEVEL 4
9
19%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 18
LEVEL 1
2
11%
LEVEL 2
7
39%
LEVEL 3
3
17%
LEVEL 4
1
6%
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 62
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 65
LEVEL 1
2
3%
LEVEL 2
8
12%
LEVEL 3
32
49%
LEVEL 4
10
15%
Female
PROFICIENT
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 35
LEVEL 1
1
3%
LEVEL 2
4
11%
LEVEL 3
18
51%
LEVEL 4
8
23%
Male
PROFICIENT
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 30
LEVEL 1
1
3%
LEVEL 2
4
13%
LEVEL 3
14
47%
LEVEL 4
2
7%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 63
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 43
LEVEL 1
1
2%
LEVEL 2
5
12%
LEVEL 3
23
53%
LEVEL 4
6
14%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 22
LEVEL 1
1
5%
LEVEL 2
3
14%
LEVEL 3
9
41%
LEVEL 4
4
18%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 65
LEVEL 1
2
3%
LEVEL 2
8
12%
LEVEL 3
32
49%
LEVEL 4
10
15%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
65
47
18
62
3
65
35
30
63
2
43
22
65
PROFICIENT
65%
81%
22%
_%
_%
65%
74%
53%
_%
_%
67%
59%
65%
LEVEL 1
2
3%
0
0%
2
11%
_
_
_
_
2
3%
1
3%
1
3%
_
_
_
_
1
2%
1
5%
2
3%
LEVEL 2
8
12%
1
2%
7
39%
_
_
_
_
8
12%
4
11%
4
13%
_
_
_
_
5
12%
3
14%
8
12%
LEVEL 3
32
49%
29
62%
3
17%
_
_
_
_
32
49%
18
51%
14
47%
_
_
_
_
23
53%
9
41%
32
49%
LEVEL 4
10
15%
9
19%
1
6%
_
_
_
_
10
15%
8
23%
2
7%
_
_
_
_
6
14%
4
18%
10
15%
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level Mathematics after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 65
LEVEL 1
3
5%
LEVEL 2
9
14%
LEVEL 3
40
62%
LEVEL 4
2
3%
General Education
PROFICIENT
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 47
LEVEL 1
1
2%
LEVEL 2
1
2%
LEVEL 3
36
77%
LEVEL 4
2
4%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 18
LEVEL 1
2
11%
LEVEL 2
8
44%
LEVEL 3
4
22%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 62
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 65
LEVEL 1
3
5%
LEVEL 2
9
14%
LEVEL 3
40
62%
LEVEL 4
2
3%
Female
PROFICIENT
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 35
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
4
11%
LEVEL 3
25
71%
LEVEL 4
2
6%
Male
PROFICIENT
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 30
LEVEL 1
3
10%
LEVEL 2
5
17%
LEVEL 3
15
50%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 63
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 43
LEVEL 1
2
5%
LEVEL 2
6
14%
LEVEL 3
27
63%
LEVEL 4
1
2%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 22
LEVEL 1
1
5%
LEVEL 2
3
14%
LEVEL 3
13
59%
LEVEL 4
1
5%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 65
LEVEL 1
3
5%
LEVEL 2
9
14%
LEVEL 3
40
62%
LEVEL 4
2
3%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
65
47
18
62
3
65
35
30
63
2
43
22
65
PROFICIENT
65%
81%
22%
_%
_%
65%
77%
50%
_%
_%
65%
64%
65%
LEVEL 1
3
5%
1
2%
2
11%
_
_
_
_
3
5%
0
0%
3
10%
_
_
_
_
2
5%
1
5%
3
5%
LEVEL 2
9
14%
1
2%
8
44%
_
_
_
_
9
14%
4
11%
5
17%
_
_
_
_
6
14%
3
14%
9
14%
LEVEL 3
40
62%
36
77%
4
22%
_
_
_
_
40
62%
25
71%
15
50%
_
_
_
_
27
63%
13
59%
40
62%
LEVEL 4
2
3%
2
4%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
2
3%
2
6%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
1
2%
1
5%
2
3%
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level Global History and Geography after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 65
LEVEL 1
7
11%
LEVEL 2
7
11%
LEVEL 3
29
45%
LEVEL 4
3
5%
General Education
PROFICIENT
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 47
LEVEL 1
3
6%
LEVEL 2
1
2%
LEVEL 3
25
53%
LEVEL 4
3
6%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 18
LEVEL 1
4
22%
LEVEL 2
6
33%
LEVEL 3
4
22%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 62
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 65
LEVEL 1
7
11%
LEVEL 2
7
11%
LEVEL 3
29
45%
LEVEL 4
3
5%
Female
PROFICIENT
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 35
LEVEL 1
4
11%
LEVEL 2
4
11%
LEVEL 3
17
49%
LEVEL 4
1
3%
Male
PROFICIENT
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 30
LEVEL 1
3
10%
LEVEL 2
3
10%
LEVEL 3
12
40%
LEVEL 4
2
7%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 63
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 43
LEVEL 1
4
9%
LEVEL 2
5
12%
LEVEL 3
19
44%
LEVEL 4
2
5%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 22
LEVEL 1
3
14%
LEVEL 2
2
9%
LEVEL 3
10
45%
LEVEL 4
1
5%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 65
LEVEL 1
7
11%
LEVEL 2
7
11%
LEVEL 3
29
45%
LEVEL 4
3
5%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
65
47
18
62
3
65
35
30
63
2
43
22
65
PROFICIENT
49%
60%
22%
_%
_%
49%
51%
47%
_%
_%
49%
50%
49%
LEVEL 1
7
11%
3
6%
4
22%
_
_
_
_
7
11%
4
11%
3
10%
_
_
_
_
4
9%
3
14%
7
11%
LEVEL 2
7
11%
1
2%
6
33%
_
_
_
_
7
11%
4
11%
3
10%
_
_
_
_
5
12%
2
9%
7
11%
LEVEL 3
29
45%
25
53%
4
22%
_
_
_
_
29
45%
17
49%
12
40%
_
_
_
_
19
44%
10
45%
29
45%
LEVEL 4
3
5%
3
6%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
3
5%
1
3%
2
7%
_
_
_
_
2
5%
1
5%
3
5%
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level U.S. History and Government after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 65
LEVEL 1
1
2%
LEVEL 2
6
9%
LEVEL 3
29
45%
LEVEL 4
14
22%
General Education
PROFICIENT
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 47
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
3
6%
LEVEL 3
21
45%
LEVEL 4
14
30%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 18
LEVEL 1
1
6%
LEVEL 2
3
17%
LEVEL 3
8
44%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 62
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 65
LEVEL 1
1
2%
LEVEL 2
6
9%
LEVEL 3
29
45%
LEVEL 4
14
22%
Female
PROFICIENT
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 35
LEVEL 1
1
3%
LEVEL 2
2
6%
LEVEL 3
18
51%
LEVEL 4
8
23%
Male
PROFICIENT
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 30
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
4
13%
LEVEL 3
11
37%
LEVEL 4
6
20%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 63
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 43
LEVEL 1
1
2%
LEVEL 2
5
12%
LEVEL 3
18
42%
LEVEL 4
9
21%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 22
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
5%
LEVEL 3
11
50%
LEVEL 4
5
23%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 65
LEVEL 1
1
2%
LEVEL 2
6
9%
LEVEL 3
29
45%
LEVEL 4
14
22%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
65
47
18
62
3
65
35
30
63
2
43
22
65
PROFICIENT
66%
74%
44%
_%
_%
66%
74%
57%
_%
_%
63%
73%
66%
LEVEL 1
1
2%
0
0%
1
6%
_
_
_
_
1
2%
1
3%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
1
2%
0
0%
1
2%
LEVEL 2
6
9%
3
6%
3
17%
_
_
_
_
6
9%
2
6%
4
13%
_
_
_
_
5
12%
1
5%
6
9%
LEVEL 3
29
45%
21
45%
8
44%
_
_
_
_
29
45%
18
51%
11
37%
_
_
_
_
18
42%
11
50%
29
45%
LEVEL 4
14
22%
14
30%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
14
22%
8
23%
6
20%
_
_
_
_
9
21%
5
23%
14
22%
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level Science after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 65
LEVEL 1
3
5%
LEVEL 2
5
8%
LEVEL 3
36
55%
LEVEL 4
5
8%
General Education
PROFICIENT
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 47
LEVEL 1
1
2%
LEVEL 2
1
2%
LEVEL 3
30
64%
LEVEL 4
5
11%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 18
LEVEL 1
2
11%
LEVEL 2
4
22%
LEVEL 3
6
33%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 62
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 65
LEVEL 1
3
5%
LEVEL 2
5
8%
LEVEL 3
36
55%
LEVEL 4
5
8%
Female
PROFICIENT
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 35
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
3
9%
LEVEL 3
22
63%
LEVEL 4
3
9%
Male
PROFICIENT
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 30
LEVEL 1
3
10%
LEVEL 2
2
7%
LEVEL 3
14
47%
LEVEL 4
2
7%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 63
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 43
LEVEL 1
3
7%
LEVEL 2
4
9%
LEVEL 3
22
51%
LEVEL 4
3
7%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 22
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
5%
LEVEL 3
14
64%
LEVEL 4
2
9%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 65
LEVEL 1
3
5%
LEVEL 2
5
8%
LEVEL 3
36
55%
LEVEL 4
5
8%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
65
47
18
62
3
65
35
30
63
2
43
22
65
PROFICIENT
63%
74%
33%
_%
_%
63%
71%
53%
_%
_%
58%
73%
63%
LEVEL 1
3
5%
1
2%
2
11%
_
_
_
_
3
5%
0
0%
3
10%
_
_
_
_
3
7%
0
0%
3
5%
LEVEL 2
5
8%
1
2%
4
22%
_
_
_
_
5
8%
3
9%
2
7%
_
_
_
_
4
9%
1
5%
5
8%
LEVEL 3
36
55%
30
64%
6
33%
_
_
_
_
36
55%
22
63%
14
47%
_
_
_
_
22
51%
14
64%
36
55%
LEVEL 4
5
8%
5
11%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
5
8%
3
9%
2
7%
_
_
_
_
3
7%
2
9%
5
8%
Regents Examination Results (2015 - 16)
Comprehensive English
Regents Comprehensive English
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
18
10
8
17
1
18
10
8
17
1
14
4
18
55
17
94%
10
100%
7
88%
_
_
_
_
17
94%
9
90%
8
100%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
17
94%
65
8
44%
7
70%
1
13%
_
_
_
_
8
44%
6
60%
2
25%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
8
44%
85
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
0%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 18
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
17
94%
65
8
44%
85
0
0%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 10
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
10
100%
65
7
70%
85
0
0%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 8
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
7
88%
65
1
13%
85
0
0%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 17
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 18
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
17
94%
65
8
44%
85
0
0%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 10
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
9
90%
65
6
60%
85
0
0%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 8
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
8
100%
65
2
25%
85
0
0%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 17
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 14
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 4
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 18
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
17
94%
65
8
44%
85
0
0%
English Language Arts (Common Core)
English Language Arts (Common Core)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
58
49
9
1
57
58
24
34
53
5
46
12
58
LEVEL 1
6
10%
3
6%
3
33%
_
_
_
_
6
10%
1
4%
5
15%
5
9%
1
20%
5
11%
1
8%
6
10%
LEVEL 2
6
10%
3
6%
3
33%
_
_
_
_
6
10%
3
13%
3
9%
4
8%
2
40%
4
9%
2
17%
6
10%
LEVEL 3
17
29%
15
31%
2
22%
_
_
_
_
17
29%
4
17%
13
38%
15
28%
2
40%
15
33%
2
17%
17
29%
LEVEL 4
13
22%
12
24%
1
11%
_
_
_
_
13
22%
6
25%
7
21%
13
25%
0
0%
10
22%
3
25%
13
22%
LEVEL 5
16
28%
16
33%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
16
28%
10
42%
6
18%
16
30%
0
0%
12
26%
4
33%
16
28%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 58
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
6
10%
LEVEL 2
6
10%
LEVEL 3
17
29%
LEVEL 4
13
22%
LEVEL 5
16
28%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 49
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
3
6%
LEVEL 2
3
6%
LEVEL 3
15
31%
LEVEL 4
12
24%
LEVEL 5
16
33%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 9
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
3
33%
LEVEL 2
3
33%
LEVEL 3
2
22%
LEVEL 4
1
11%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 57
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 58
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
6
10%
LEVEL 2
6
10%
LEVEL 3
17
29%
LEVEL 4
13
22%
LEVEL 5
16
28%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 24
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
1
4%
LEVEL 2
3
13%
LEVEL 3
4
17%
LEVEL 4
6
25%
LEVEL 5
10
42%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 34
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
5
15%
LEVEL 2
3
9%
LEVEL 3
13
38%
LEVEL 4
7
21%
LEVEL 5
6
18%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 53
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
5
9%
LEVEL 2
4
8%
LEVEL 3
15
28%
LEVEL 4
13
25%
LEVEL 5
16
30%
English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
1
20%
LEVEL 2
2
40%
LEVEL 3
2
40%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 46
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
5
11%
LEVEL 2
4
9%
LEVEL 3
15
33%
LEVEL 4
10
22%
LEVEL 5
12
26%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 12
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
1
8%
LEVEL 2
2
17%
LEVEL 3
2
17%
LEVEL 4
3
25%
LEVEL 5
4
33%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 58
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
6
10%
LEVEL 2
6
10%
LEVEL 3
17
29%
LEVEL 4
13
22%
LEVEL 5
16
28%
Integrated Algebra
Regents Integrated Algebra
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
14
9
5
13
1
14
8
6
12
2
13
1
14
55
11
79%
7
78%
4
80%
_
_
_
_
11
79%
7
88%
4
67%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
11
79%
65
9
64%
7
78%
2
40%
_
_
_
_
9
64%
6
75%
3
50%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
9
64%
85
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
0%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 14
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
11
79%
65
9
64%
85
0
0%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 9
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
7
78%
65
7
78%
85
0
0%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
4
80%
65
2
40%
85
0
0%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 13
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 14
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
11
79%
65
9
64%
85
0
0%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 8
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
7
88%
65
6
75%
85
0
0%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 6
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
4
67%
65
3
50%
85
0
0%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 12
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 13
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 14
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
11
79%
65
9
64%
85
0
0%
Algebra 2/Trigonometry
Regents Algebra 2/Trigonometry
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Black or African American
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
19
19
19
14
5
19
13
6
19
55
8
42%
8
42%
8
42%
8
57%
0
0%
8
42%
5
38%
3
50%
8
42%
65
5
26%
5
26%
5
26%
5
36%
0
0%
5
26%
4
31%
1
17%
5
26%
85
1
5%
1
5%
1
5%
1
7%
0
0%
1
5%
1
8%
0
0%
1
5%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 19
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
8
42%
65
5
26%
85
1
5%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 19
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
8
42%
65
5
26%
85
1
5%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 19
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
8
42%
65
5
26%
85
1
5%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 14
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
8
57%
65
5
36%
85
1
7%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 19
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
8
42%
65
5
26%
85
1
5%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 13
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
5
38%
65
4
31%
85
1
8%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 6
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
3
50%
65
1
17%
85
0
0%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 19
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
8
42%
65
5
26%
85
1
5%
Algebra I (Common Core)
Algebra I (Common Core)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
94
76
18
3
77
9
1
4
8
41
53
86
8
70
24
94
LEVEL 1
17
18%
7
9%
10
56%
_
_
15
19%
1
11%
_
_
_
_
1
13%
9
22%
8
15%
14
16%
3
38%
14
20%
3
13%
17
18%
LEVEL 2
22
23%
18
24%
4
22%
_
_
16
21%
4
44%
_
_
_
_
2
25%
7
17%
15
28%
19
22%
3
38%
16
23%
6
25%
22
23%
LEVEL 3
54
57%
50
66%
4
22%
_
_
45
58%
4
44%
_
_
_
_
5
63%
24
59%
30
57%
52
60%
2
25%
39
56%
15
63%
54
57%
LEVEL 4
1
1%
1
1%
0
0%
_
_
1
1%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
1
2%
0
0%
1
1%
0
0%
1
1%
0
0%
1
1%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 94
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
17
18%
LEVEL 2
22
23%
LEVEL 3
54
57%
LEVEL 4
1
1%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 76
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
7
9%
LEVEL 2
18
24%
LEVEL 3
50
66%
LEVEL 4
1
1%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 18
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
10
56%
LEVEL 2
4
22%
LEVEL 3
4
22%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 77
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
15
19%
LEVEL 2
16
21%
LEVEL 3
45
58%
LEVEL 4
1
1%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 9
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
1
11%
LEVEL 2
4
44%
LEVEL 3
4
44%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 4
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 8
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
1
13%
LEVEL 2
2
25%
LEVEL 3
5
63%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 41
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
9
22%
LEVEL 2
7
17%
LEVEL 3
24
59%
LEVEL 4
1
2%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 53
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
8
15%
LEVEL 2
15
28%
LEVEL 3
30
57%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 86
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
14
16%
LEVEL 2
19
22%
LEVEL 3
52
60%
LEVEL 4
1
1%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 8
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
3
38%
LEVEL 2
3
38%
LEVEL 3
2
25%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 70
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
14
20%
LEVEL 2
16
23%
LEVEL 3
39
56%
LEVEL 4
1
1%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 24
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
3
13%
LEVEL 2
6
25%
LEVEL 3
15
63%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 94
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
17
18%
LEVEL 2
22
23%
LEVEL 3
54
57%
LEVEL 4
1
1%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Geometry (Common Core)
Geometry (Common Core)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Black or African American
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
17
17
17
11
6
17
16
1
17
LEVEL 1
2
12%
2
12%
2
12%
1
9%
1
17%
2
12%
_
_
_
_
2
12%
LEVEL 2
2
12%
2
12%
2
12%
2
18%
0
0%
2
12%
_
_
_
_
2
12%
LEVEL 3
7
41%
7
41%
7
41%
4
36%
3
50%
7
41%
_
_
_
_
7
41%
LEVEL 4
4
24%
4
24%
4
24%
3
27%
1
17%
4
24%
_
_
_
_
4
24%
LEVEL 5
2
12%
2
12%
2
12%
1
9%
1
17%
2
12%
_
_
_
_
2
12%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 17
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
2
12%
LEVEL 2
2
12%
LEVEL 3
7
41%
LEVEL 4
4
24%
LEVEL 5
2
12%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 17
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
2
12%
LEVEL 2
2
12%
LEVEL 3
7
41%
LEVEL 4
4
24%
LEVEL 5
2
12%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 17
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
2
12%
LEVEL 2
2
12%
LEVEL 3
7
41%
LEVEL 4
4
24%
LEVEL 5
2
12%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 11
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
1
9%
LEVEL 2
2
18%
LEVEL 3
4
36%
LEVEL 4
3
27%
LEVEL 5
1
9%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 6
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
1
17%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
3
50%
LEVEL 4
1
17%
LEVEL 5
1
17%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 17
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
2
12%
LEVEL 2
2
12%
LEVEL 3
7
41%
LEVEL 4
4
24%
LEVEL 5
2
12%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 16
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 17
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
2
12%
LEVEL 2
2
12%
LEVEL 3
7
41%
LEVEL 4
4
24%
LEVEL 5
2
12%
Global History and Geography
Regents Global History and Geography
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
80
60
20
2
70
5
3
5
39
41
77
3
59
21
80
55
60
75%
48
80%
12
60%
_
_
53
76%
5
100%
_
_
2
40%
28
72%
32
78%
_
_
_
_
46
78%
14
67%
60
75%
65
39
49%
34
57%
5
25%
_
_
35
50%
2
40%
_
_
2
40%
20
51%
19
46%
_
_
_
_
30
51%
9
43%
39
49%
85
3
4%
3
5%
0
0%
_
_
3
4%
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
3
8%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
3
5%
0
0%
3
4%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 80
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
60
75%
65
39
49%
85
3
4%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 60
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
48
80%
65
34
57%
85
3
5%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 20
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
12
60%
65
5
25%
85
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 70
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
53
76%
65
35
50%
85
3
4%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
5
100%
65
2
40%
85
0
0%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
2
40%
65
2
40%
85
0
0%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 39
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
28
72%
65
20
51%
85
3
8%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 41
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
32
78%
65
19
46%
85
0
0%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 77
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 59
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
46
78%
65
30
51%
85
3
5%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 21
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
14
67%
65
9
43%
85
0
0%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 80
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
60
75%
65
39
49%
85
3
4%
U.S. History & Government
Regents U.S. History & Government
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
68
59
9
2
1
64
1
68
34
34
64
4
53
15
68
55
63
93%
56
95%
7
78%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
63
93%
30
88%
33
97%
_
_
_
_
48
91%
15
100%
63
93%
65
57
84%
52
88%
5
56%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
57
84%
27
79%
30
88%
_
_
_
_
43
81%
14
93%
57
84%
85
21
31%
21
36%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
21
31%
12
35%
9
26%
_
_
_
_
18
34%
3
20%
21
31%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 68
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
63
93%
65
57
84%
85
21
31%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 59
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
56
95%
65
52
88%
85
21
36%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 9
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
7
78%
65
5
56%
85
0
0%
American Indian or Alaska Native
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 64
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 68
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
63
93%
65
57
84%
85
21
31%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 34
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
30
88%
65
27
79%
85
12
35%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 34
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
33
97%
65
30
88%
85
9
26%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 64
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 4
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 53
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
48
91%
65
43
81%
85
18
34%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 15
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
15
100%
65
14
93%
85
3
20%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 68
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
63
93%
65
57
84%
85
21
31%
Living Environment
Regents Living Environment
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
59
46
13
1
3
49
5
1
5
29
30
54
5
42
17
59
55
47
80%
43
93%
4
31%
_
_
_
_
39
80%
4
80%
_
_
4
80%
24
83%
23
77%
45
83%
2
40%
33
79%
14
82%
47
80%
65
38
64%
35
76%
3
23%
_
_
_
_
32
65%
3
60%
_
_
3
60%
18
62%
20
67%
36
67%
2
40%
26
62%
12
71%
38
64%
85
4
7%
4
9%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
4
8%
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
2
7%
2
7%
4
7%
0
0%
3
7%
1
6%
4
7%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 59
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
47
80%
65
38
64%
85
4
7%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 46
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
43
93%
65
35
76%
85
4
9%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 13
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
4
31%
65
3
23%
85
0
0%
American Indian or Alaska Native
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 49
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
39
80%
65
32
65%
85
4
8%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
4
80%
65
3
60%
85
0
0%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
4
80%
65
3
60%
85
0
0%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 29
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
24
83%
65
18
62%
85
2
7%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 30
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
23
77%
65
20
67%
85
2
7%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 54
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
45
83%
65
36
67%
85
4
7%
English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
2
40%
65
2
40%
85
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 42
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
33
79%
65
26
62%
85
3
7%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 17
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
14
82%
65
12
71%
85
1
6%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 59
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
47
80%
65
38
64%
85
4
7%
Physical Setting/Earth Science
Regents Physical Setting/Earth Science
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
35
31
4
31
3
1
35
11
24
34
1
25
10
35
55
12
34%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
12
34%
5
45%
7
29%
_
_
_
_
6
24%
6
60%
12
34%
65
9
26%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
9
26%
4
36%
5
21%
_
_
_
_
4
16%
5
50%
9
26%
85
1
3%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
1
3%
1
9%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
1
4%
0
0%
1
3%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 35
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
12
34%
65
9
26%
85
1
3%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 31
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 4
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 31
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 35
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
12
34%
65
9
26%
85
1
3%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 11
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
5
45%
65
4
36%
85
1
9%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 24
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
7
29%
65
5
21%
85
0
0%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 34
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 25
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
6
24%
65
4
16%
85
1
4%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 10
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
6
60%
65
5
50%
85
0
0%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 35
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
12
34%
65
9
26%
85
1
3%
Physical Setting/Chemistry
Regents Physical Setting/Chemistry
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
24
23
1
23
1
24
11
13
24
20
4
24
55
21
88%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
21
88%
10
91%
11
85%
21
88%
_
_
_
_
21
88%
65
13
54%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
13
54%
8
73%
5
38%
13
54%
_
_
_
_
13
54%
85
2
8%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
2
8%
1
9%
1
8%
2
8%
_
_
_
_
2
8%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 24
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
21
88%
65
13
54%
85
2
8%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 23
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 23
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 24
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
21
88%
65
13
54%
85
2
8%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 11
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
10
91%
65
8
73%
85
1
9%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 13
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
11
85%
65
5
38%
85
1
8%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 24
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
21
88%
65
13
54%
85
2
8%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 20
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 4
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 24
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
21
88%
65
13
54%
85
2
8%
Secondary-Level English Language Arts Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: NO
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
NO
―
NO
―
―
―
―
―
―
NO
Tested 95%
YES
―
YES
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
12th graders
65
3
58
4
0
0
0
17
1
39
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
―
100%
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
―
NO
―
―
―
―
―
―
NO
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
48
0
47
1
0
0
0
14
2
33
PI
133
―
132
―
―
―
―
―
―
133
EAMO
160
―
144
―
―
―
―
―
―
145
Safe Harbor Target
144
―
144
―
―
―
―
―
―
141
All Students
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
YES
12th Graders
65
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
48
PI
133
EAMO
160
Safe Harbor Target
144
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
3
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
YES
12th Graders
58
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
47
PI
132
EAMO
144
Safe Harbor Target
144
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
4
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
1
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
White
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
17
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
14
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
1
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
2
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
39
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
33
PI
133
EAMO
145
Safe Harbor Target
141
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
12th Graders
62
7
61
65
65
65
48
64
26
27
38
0
65
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
―
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
―
―
―
―
100%
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
48
1
47
48
48
48
34
46
15
21
27
0
48
PI
133
―
132
133
133
133
168
139
―
―
―
―
133
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
12th Graders
62
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
48
PI
133
Not Black or African American
12th Graders
7
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
1
PI
―
Not Hispanic or Latino
12th Graders
61
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
47
PI
132
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
12th Graders
65
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
48
PI
133
Not White
12th Graders
65
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
48
PI
133
Not Multiracial
12th Graders
65
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
48
PI
133
General Education
12th Graders
48
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
34
PI
168
English Proficient
12th Graders
64
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
46
PI
139
Not Economically Disadvantaged
12th Graders
26
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
15
PI
―
Male
12th Graders
27
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
21
PI
―
Female
12th Graders
38
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
27
PI
―
Migrant
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
Not Migrant
12th Graders
65
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
48
PI
133
― There were fewer than 40 12th graders, so the Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 students in the 2012 accountability cohort, so PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed.
Secondary-Level Mathematics Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: NO
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
NO
―
NO
―
―
―
―
―
―
NO
Tested 95%
YES
―
YES
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
12th graders
65
3
58
4
0
0
0
17
1
39
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
―
100%
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
―
NO
―
―
―
―
―
―
NO
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
48
0
47
1
0
0
0
14
2
33
PI
88
―
87
―
―
―
―
―
―
88
EAMO
145
―
124
―
―
―
―
―
―
129
Safe Harbor Target
110
―
112
―
―
―
―
―
―
108
All Students
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
YES
12th Graders
65
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
48
PI
88
EAMO
145
Safe Harbor Target
110
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
3
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
YES
12th Graders
58
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
47
PI
87
EAMO
124
Safe Harbor Target
112
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
4
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
1
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
White
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
17
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
14
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
1
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
2
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
39
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
33
PI
88
EAMO
129
Safe Harbor Target
108
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
12th Graders
62
7
61
65
65
65
48
64
26
27
38
0
65
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
―
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
―
―
―
―
100%
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
48
1
47
48
48
48
34
46
15
21
27
0
48
PI
88
―
87
88
88
88
112
91
―
―
―
―
88
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
12th Graders
62
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
48
PI
88
Not Black or African American
12th Graders
7
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
1
PI
―
Not Hispanic or Latino
12th Graders
61
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
47
PI
87
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
12th Graders
65
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
48
PI
88
Not White
12th Graders
65
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
48
PI
88
Not Multiracial
12th Graders
65
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
48
PI
88
General Education
12th Graders
48
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
34
PI
112
English Proficient
12th Graders
64
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
46
PI
91
Not Economically Disadvantaged
12th Graders
26
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
15
PI
―
Male
12th Graders
27
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
21
PI
―
Female
12th Graders
38
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
27
PI
―
Migrant
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
Not Migrant
12th Graders
65
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
48
PI
88
― There were fewer than 40 12th graders, so the Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 students in the 2012 accountability cohort, so PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed.
Unweighted Combined ELA and Math PIs
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
133
―
132
―
―
―
―
―
―
133
Secondary-Level MATH PI
88
―
87
―
―
―
―
―
―
88
UNWEIGHTED COMBINED PI
111
0
110
0
0
0
0
0
0
111
All Students
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
133
Secondary-Level MATH PI
88
Unweighted Combined PI
111
American Indian or Alaska Native
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Black or African American
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
132
Secondary-Level MATH PI
87
Unweighted Combined PI
110
Hispanic or Latino
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
White
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Multiracial
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Students With Disabilities
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Limited English Proficient
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Economically Disadvantaged
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
133
Secondary-Level MATH PI
88
Unweighted Combined PI
111
― There were not enough students to determine a Performance Index.
Overall Graduation Rate for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: YES
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
YES
―
YES
―
―
―
―
―
―
YES
All Students
MADE AYP
YES
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP
YES
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP
―
White
MADE AYP
―
Multiracial
MADE AYP
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP
―
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
YES
― There were not enough students to make an AYP determination.
Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort for Accountability
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion:
YES
―
YES
―
―
―
―
―
―
YES
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
82
3
69
8
0
2
0
12
6
69
Graduation Rate
70%
―
68%
―
―
―
―
―
―
68%
State Standard
80%
―
80%
―
―
―
―
―
―
80%
Progress Target
55%
―
53%
―
―
―
―
―
―
58%
All Students
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
82
Graduation Rate
70%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
55%
American Indian or Alaska Native
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
3
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Black or African American
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
69
Graduation Rate
68%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
53%
Hispanic or Latino
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
8
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
White
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
2
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Multiracial
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Students With Disabilities
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
12
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Limited English Proficient
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
6
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
69
Graduation Rate
68%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
58%
YES Graduation rate is equal to or greater than the State Standard or the group's Progress Target. NO Graduation rate is less than the State Standard and the group's Progress Target.
― There were fewer than 30 students in the cohort.
Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort for Accountability
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion:
YES
―
YES
―
―
―
―
―
―
YES
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
85
4
70
6
1
3
1
16
6
61
Graduation Rate
72%
―
71%
―
―
―
―
―
―
77%
State Standard
80%
―
80%
―
―
―
―
―
―
80%
Progress Target
62%
―
62%
―
―
―
―
―
―
68%
All Students
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
85
Graduation Rate
72%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
62%
American Indian or Alaska Native
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
4
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Black or African American
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
70
Graduation Rate
71%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
62%
Hispanic or Latino
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
6
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
1
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
White
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
3
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Multiracial
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
1
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Students With Disabilities
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
16
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Limited English Proficient
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
6
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
61
Graduation Rate
77%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
68%
YES Graduation rate is equal to or greater than the State Standard or the group's Progress Target. NO Graduation rate is less than the State Standard and the group's Progress Target.
― There were fewer than 30 students in the cohort.
Graduation Rates for Non-AYP Groups for Accountability
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
79
13
74
82
80
82
70
76
13
41
41
0
82
Graduation Rate
70%
―
68%
70%
70%
70%
74%
71%
―
68%
71%
―
70%
Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
81
15
79
84
82
84
69
79
24
48
37
0
85
Graduation Rate
70%
―
73%
71%
72%
71%
78%
72%
―
63%
84%
―
72%
Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
79
Graduation Rate
70%
Not Black or African American
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
13
Graduation Rate
―
Not Hispanic or Latino
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
74
Graduation Rate
68%
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
82
Graduation Rate
70%
Not White
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
80
Graduation Rate
70%
Not Multiracial
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
82
Graduation Rate
70%
General Education
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
70
Graduation Rate
74%
English Proficient
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
76
Graduation Rate
71%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
13
Graduation Rate
―
Male
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
41
Graduation Rate
68%
Female
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
41
Graduation Rate
71%
Migrant
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
Not Migrant
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
82
Graduation Rate
70%
Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
81
Graduation Rate
70%
Not Black or African American
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
15
Graduation Rate
―
Not Hispanic or Latino
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
79
Graduation Rate
73%
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
84
Graduation Rate
71%
Not White
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
82
Graduation Rate
72%
Not Multiracial
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
84
Graduation Rate
71%
General Education
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
69
Graduation Rate
78%
English Proficient
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
79
Graduation Rate
72%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
24
Graduation Rate
―
Male
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
48
Graduation Rate
63%
Female
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
37
Graduation Rate
84%
Migrant
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
Not Migrant
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
85
Graduation Rate
72%
― There were fewer than 30 students in the cohort.
Graduation Rates for Regents with Advanced Designation and CTE Endorsement for Accountability
Percentage of 2011 Graduation-Rate Total Cohort members who graduated as of August 31, 2015 with:
Regents Diploma with an Advanced Designation (This School)
0%
Regents Diploma with an Advanced Designation (Statewide)
32%
Percentage in This School Exceeded Statewide
NO
Regents Diploma with an Advanced Designation (This School)
0%
Regents Diploma with an Advanced Designation (Statewide)
32%
Percentage in This School Exceeded Statewide
NO
Regents Diploma with CTE Endorsement (This School)
0%
Regents Diploma with CTE Endorsement (Statewide)
5%
Percentage in This School Exceeded Statewide
NO
Regents Diploma with CTE Endorsement (This School)
You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.
Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.
If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.
