BROOKLYN GENERATION SCHOOL - School Report Card Data [2015 - 16]

The New York State Report Card is an important part of the Board of Regents' effort to raise learning standards for all students. It provides information to the public on school/district enrollment and staff, student performance, and other measures of school and district performance. Knowledge gained from the report card on a school's or district's strengths and weaknesses can be used to improve instruction and services to students.
Report Card Data - Glossary of Terms | Accountability Data - Glossary of Terms | Business Rules

BROOKLYN GENERATION SCHOOL ENROLLMENT (2015 - 16)

K-12 ENROLLMENT
235

ENROLLMENT BY GENDER

MALE
FEMALE

ENROLLMENT BY ETHNICITY

GROUP
TOTAL
PERCENT

OTHER GROUPS

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

ENROLLMENT BY GRADE

GROUP
TOTAL
PERCENT

BROOKLYN GENERATION SCHOOL ENROLLMENT (2015 - 16)

K-12 Enrollment: 235

ENROLLMENT BY GENDER

MALE

133

57%

FEMALE

102

43%

ENROLLMENT BY ETHNICITY

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

3

1%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

202

86%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

21

9%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

3

1%

MULTIRACIAL

6

3%

OTHER GROUPS

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

15

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

65

28%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

174

74%

ENROLLMENT BY GRADE

8TH GRADE

2

1%

9TH GRADE

72

31%

10TH GRADE

48

20%

11TH GRADE

57

24%

12TH GRADE

55

23%

UNGRADED SECONDARY

1

0%

Free and Reduced-Price Lunch (2015 - 16)

ELIGIBLE FOR FREE LUNCH
  • 158
  • 67%
ELIGIBLE FOR REDUCED-PRICE LUNCH
  • 15
  • 6%

Free and Reduced-Price Lunch (2015 - 16)

Eligible for Free Lunch

158

67%

Eligible for Reduced-Price Lunch

15

6%

High School Completers (2015 - 16)

GROUP
  • All Students
  • General Education
  • Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
  • 60
  • 44
  • 16
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
  • 59
  • 44
  • 15
REGENTS DIPLOMA
  • 48
  • 81%
  • 44
  • 100%
  • 4
  • 27%
GROUP
  • All Students
  • General Education
  • Students with Disabilities
REGENTS WITH ADVANCED DESIGNATION
  • 2
  • 3%
  • 2
  • 5%
  • 0
  • 0%
REGENTS WITH CTE ENDORSEMENT
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
LOCAL DIPLOMAS
  • 11
  • 19%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 11
  • 73%
COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS
  • 1
  • 2%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 1
  • 6%

All Students

COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)

60

Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)

59

Regents Diploma

48

81%

of Graduates

Regents with Advanced Designation

2

3%

of Graduates

Regents with CTE Endorsement

0

0%

of Graduates

Local Diplomas

11

19%

of Graduates

Commencement Credentials

1

2%

of Completers

General Education

COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)

44

Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)

44

Regents Diploma

44

100%

of Graduates

Regents with Advanced Designation

2

5%

of Graduates

Regents with CTE Endorsement

0

0%

of Graduates

Local Diplomas

0

0%

of Graduates

Commencement Credentials

0

0%

of Completers

Students with Disabilities

COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)

16

Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)

15

Regents Diploma

4

27%

of Graduates

Regents with Advanced Designation

0

0%

of Graduates

Regents with CTE Endorsement

0

0%

of Graduates

Local Diplomas

11

73%

of Graduates

Commencement Credentials

1

6%

of Completers

High School Non-completers (2015 - 16)

GROUP
  • All Students
  • General Education
  • Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
  • 8
  • 3%
  • 6
  • 4%
  • 2
  • 3%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
  • 7
  • 3%
  • 4
  • 2%
  • 3
  • 5%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
  • 15
  • 6%
  • 10
  • 6%
  • 5
  • 8%

All Students

DROPPED OUT

8

3%

ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM

7

3%

TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS

15

6%

General Education

DROPPED OUT

6

4%

ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM

4

2%

TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS

10

6%

Students with Disabilities

DROPPED OUT

2

3%

ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM

3

5%

TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS

5

8%

Post-graduation Plans of Completers (2015 - 16)

GROUP
  • All Students
  • General Education
  • Students with Disabilities
TO FOUR-YEAR COLLEGE
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
TO TWO-YEAR COLLEGE
  • 7
  • 12%
  • 6
  • 14%
  • 1
  • 6%
TO OTHER POST-SECONDARY
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
TO THE MILITARY
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
GROUP
  • All Students
  • General Education
  • Students with Disabilities
TO EMPLOYMENT
  • 1
  • 2%
  • 1
  • 2%
  • 0
  • 0%
TO ADULT SERVICES
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
TO OTHER KNOWN PLANS
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
PLANS UNKNOWN
  • 52
  • 87%
  • 37
  • 84%
  • 15
  • 94%

All Students

To Four-Year College

0

0%

To Two-Year College

7

12%

To Other Post-Secondary

0

0%

To the Military

0

0%

To Employment

1

2%

To Adult Services

0

0%

To Other Known Plans

0

0%

Plan Unknown

52

87%

General Education

To Four-Year College

0

0%

To Two-Year College

6

14%

To Other Post-Secondary

0

0%

To the Military

0

0%

To Employment

1

2%

To Adult Services

0

0%

To Other Known Plans

0

0%

Plan Unknown

37

84%

Students with Disabilities

To Four-Year College

0

0%

To Two-Year College

1

6%

To Other Post-Secondary

0

0%

To the Military

0

0%

To Employment

0

0%

To Adult Services

0

0%

To Other Known Plans

0

0%

Plan Unknown

15

94%

Statewide Results on the National Assessment of Educational Progress: NAEP (2014 - 15)

Grade: 4

Reading

GROUP
  • All Students
  • American Indian or Alaska Native
  • Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
  • Black or African American
  • Hispanic or Latino
  • White
  • Multiracial
  • Students with Disabilities
  • English Language Learners
  • Economically Disadvantaged
BELOW BASIC
  • 32%
  • *%
  • 20%
  • 48%
  • 44%
  • 20%
  • *%
  • 70%
  • 74%
  • 43%
BASIC
  • 32%
  • *%
  • 30%
  • 34%
  • 37%
  • 31%
  • *%
  • 22%
  • 21%
  • 36%
PROFICIENT
  • 27%
  • *%
  • 33%
  • 15%
  • 17%
  • 37%
  • *%
  • 7%
  • 4%
  • 18%
ADVANCED
  • 9%
  • *%
  • 17%
  • 3%
  • 2%
  • 12%
  • *%
  • 1%
  • 1%
  • 3%
PARTICIPATION RATE
  • 98
  • 88

Reading

All Students
Percent Below Basic

32

Percent Basic

32

Percent Proficient

27

Percent Advanced

9

American Indian or Alaska Native
Percent Below Basic

*

Percent Basic

*

Percent Proficient

*

Percent Advanced

*

Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Percent Below Basic

20

Percent Basic

30

Percent Proficient

33

Percent Advanced

17

Black or African American
Percent Below Basic

48

Percent Basic

34

Percent Proficient

15

Percent Advanced

3

Hispanic or Latino
Percent Below Basic

44

Percent Basic

37

Percent Proficient

17

Percent Advanced

2

White
Percent Below Basic

20

Percent Basic

31

Percent Proficient

37

Percent Advanced

12

Multiracial
Percent Below Basic

*

Percent Basic

*

Percent Proficient

*

Percent Advanced

*

Students with Disabilities
Percent Below Basic

70

Percent Basic

22

Percent Proficient

7

Percent Advanced

1

Participation Rate

98

English Language Learners
Percent Below Basic

74

Percent Basic

21

Percent Proficient

4

Percent Advanced

1

Participation Rate

88

Economically Disadvantaged
Percent Below Basic

43

Percent Basic

36

Percent Proficient

18

Percent Advanced

3

Mathematics

GROUP
  • All Students
  • American Indian or Alaska Native
  • Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
  • Black or African American
  • Hispanic or Latino
  • White
  • Multiracial
  • Students with Disabilities
  • English Language Learners
  • Economically Disadvantaged
BELOW BASIC
  • 21%
  • *%
  • 12%
  • 40%
  • 28%
  • 12%
  • *%
  • 49%
  • 56%
  • 29%
BASIC
  • 44%
  • *%
  • 31%
  • 46%
  • 51%
  • 41%
  • *%
  • 39%
  • 35%
  • 48%
PROFICIENT
  • 30%
  • *%
  • 42%
  • 13%
  • 20%
  • 40%
  • *%
  • 10%
  • 9%
  • 21%
ADVANCED
  • 5%
  • *%
  • 15%
  • 1%
  • 1%
  • 7%
  • *%
  • 2%
  • *%
  • 2%
PARTICIPATION RATE
  • 98
  • 91

Mathematics

All Students
Percent Below Basic

21

Percent Basic

44

Percent Proficient

30

Percent Advanced

5

American Indian or Alaska Native
Percent Below Basic

*

Percent Basic

*

Percent Proficient

*

Percent Advanced

*

Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Percent Below Basic

12

Percent Basic

31

Percent Proficient

42

Percent Advanced

15

Black or African American
Percent Below Basic

40

Percent Basic

46

Percent Proficient

13

Percent Advanced

1

Hispanic or Latino
Percent Below Basic

28

Percent Basic

51

Percent Proficient

20

Percent Advanced

1

White
Percent Below Basic

12

Percent Basic

41

Percent Proficient

40

Percent Advanced

7

Multiracial
Percent Below Basic

*

Percent Basic

*

Percent Proficient

*

Percent Advanced

*

Students with Disabilities
Percent Below Basic

49

Percent Basic

39

Percent Proficient

10

Percent Advanced

2

Participation Rate

98

English Language Learners
Percent Below Basic

56

Percent Basic

35

Percent Proficient

9

Percent Advanced

*

Participation Rate

91

Economically Disadvantaged
Percent Below Basic

29

Percent Basic

48

Percent Proficient

21

Percent Advanced

2

Grade: 8

Reading

GROUP
  • All Students
  • American Indian or Alaska Native
  • Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
  • Black or African American
  • Hispanic or Latino
  • White
  • Multiracial
  • Students with Disabilities
  • English Language Learners
  • Economically Disadvantaged
BELOW BASIC
  • 27%
  • *%
  • 19%
  • 42%
  • 35%
  • 18%
  • *%
  • 59%
  • 78%
  • 36%
BASIC
  • 40%
  • *%
  • 39%
  • 41%
  • 43%
  • 39%
  • *%
  • 33%
  • 19%
  • 42%
PROFICIENT
  • 29%
  • *%
  • 34%
  • 16%
  • 20%
  • 38%
  • *%
  • 8%
  • 3%
  • 21%
ADVANCED
  • 4%
  • *%
  • 8%
  • 1%
  • 2%
  • 5%
  • *%
  • *%
  • *%
  • 1%
PARTICIPATION RATE
  • 98
  • 89

Reading

All Students
Percent Below Basic

27

Percent Basic

40

Percent Proficient

29

Percent Advanced

4

American Indian or Alaska Native
Percent Below Basic

*

Percent Basic

*

Percent Proficient

*

Percent Advanced

*

Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Percent Below Basic

19

Percent Basic

39

Percent Proficient

34

Percent Advanced

8

Black or African American
Percent Below Basic

42

Percent Basic

41

Percent Proficient

16

Percent Advanced

1

Hispanic or Latino
Percent Below Basic

35

Percent Basic

43

Percent Proficient

20

Percent Advanced

2

White
Percent Below Basic

18

Percent Basic

39

Percent Proficient

38

Percent Advanced

5

Multiracial
Percent Below Basic

*

Percent Basic

*

Percent Proficient

*

Percent Advanced

*

Students with Disabilities
Percent Below Basic

59

Percent Basic

33

Percent Proficient

8

Percent Advanced

*

Participation Rate

98

English Language Learners
Percent Below Basic

78

Percent Basic

19

Percent Proficient

3

Percent Advanced

*

Participation Rate

89

Economically Disadvantaged
Percent Below Basic

36

Percent Basic

42

Percent Proficient

21

Percent Advanced

1

Mathematics

GROUP
  • All Students
  • American Indian or Alaska Native
  • Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
  • Black or African American
  • Hispanic or Latino
  • White
  • Multiracial
  • Students with Disabilities
  • English Language Learners
  • Economically Disadvantaged
BELOW BASIC
  • 31%
  • *%
  • 18%
  • 48%
  • 41%
  • 20%
  • *%
  • 64%
  • 72%
  • 40%
BASIC
  • 38%
  • *%
  • 30%
  • 37%
  • 40%
  • 40%
  • *%
  • 27%
  • 21%
  • 39%
PROFICIENT
  • 24%
  • *%
  • 33%
  • 13%
  • 16%
  • 31%
  • *%
  • 8%
  • 6%
  • 17%
ADVANCED
  • 7%
  • *%
  • 19%
  • 2%
  • 3%
  • 9%
  • *%
  • 1%
  • 1%
  • 4%
PARTICIPATION RATE
  • 99
  • 94

Mathematics

All Students
Percent Below Basic

31

Percent Basic

38

Percent Proficient

24

Percent Advanced

7

American Indian or Alaska Native
Percent Below Basic

*

Percent Basic

*

Percent Proficient

*

Percent Advanced

*

Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Percent Below Basic

18

Percent Basic

30

Percent Proficient

33

Percent Advanced

19

Black or African American
Percent Below Basic

48

Percent Basic

37

Percent Proficient

13

Percent Advanced

2

Hispanic or Latino
Percent Below Basic

41

Percent Basic

40

Percent Proficient

16

Percent Advanced

3

White
Percent Below Basic

20

Percent Basic

40

Percent Proficient

31

Percent Advanced

9

Multiracial
Percent Below Basic

*

Percent Basic

*

Percent Proficient

*

Percent Advanced

*

Students with Disabilities
Percent Below Basic

64

Percent Basic

27

Percent Proficient

8

Percent Advanced

1

Participation Rate

99

English Language Learners
Percent Below Basic

72

Percent Basic

21

Percent Proficient

6

Percent Advanced

1

Participation Rate

94

Economically Disadvantaged
Percent Below Basic

40

Percent Basic

39

Percent Proficient

17

Percent Advanced

4

Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level English Language Arts after Four Years of Instruction

All Students

PROFICIENT

65%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

2

3%

LEVEL 2

8

12%

LEVEL 3

32

49%

LEVEL 4

10

15%

General Education

PROFICIENT

81%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

2%

LEVEL 3

29

62%

LEVEL 4

9

19%

Students with Disabilities

PROFICIENT

22%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

2

11%

LEVEL 2

7

39%

LEVEL 3

3

17%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

Black or African American

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Hispanic or Latino

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Small Group Total

PROFICIENT

65%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

2

3%

LEVEL 2

8

12%

LEVEL 3

32

49%

LEVEL 4

10

15%

Female

PROFICIENT

74%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

1

3%

LEVEL 2

4

11%

LEVEL 3

18

51%

LEVEL 4

8

23%

Male

PROFICIENT

53%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

1

3%

LEVEL 2

4

13%

LEVEL 3

14

47%

LEVEL 4

2

7%

Non-English Language Learners

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

English Language Learners

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Economically Disadvantaged

PROFICIENT

67%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

1

2%

LEVEL 2

5

12%

LEVEL 3

23

53%

LEVEL 4

6

14%

Not Economically Disadvantaged

PROFICIENT

59%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

1

5%

LEVEL 2

3

14%

LEVEL 3

9

41%

LEVEL 4

4

18%

Not Migrant

PROFICIENT

65%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

2

3%

LEVEL 2

8

12%

LEVEL 3

32

49%

LEVEL 4

10

15%

GROUP
TOTAL TESTED
  • 65
  • 47
  • 18
  • 62
  • 3
  • 65
  • 35
  • 30
  • 63
  • 2
  • 43
  • 22
  • 65
PROFICIENT
  • 65%
  • 81%
  • 22%
  • _%
  • _%
  • 65%
  • 74%
  • 53%
  • _%
  • _%
  • 67%
  • 59%
  • 65%
LEVEL 1
  • 2
  • 3%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 2
  • 11%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 2
  • 3%
  • 1
  • 3%
  • 1
  • 3%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 1
  • 2%
  • 1
  • 5%
  • 2
  • 3%
LEVEL 2
  • 8
  • 12%
  • 1
  • 2%
  • 7
  • 39%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 8
  • 12%
  • 4
  • 11%
  • 4
  • 13%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 5
  • 12%
  • 3
  • 14%
  • 8
  • 12%
LEVEL 3
  • 32
  • 49%
  • 29
  • 62%
  • 3
  • 17%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 32
  • 49%
  • 18
  • 51%
  • 14
  • 47%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 23
  • 53%
  • 9
  • 41%
  • 32
  • 49%
LEVEL 4
  • 10
  • 15%
  • 9
  • 19%
  • 1
  • 6%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 10
  • 15%
  • 8
  • 23%
  • 2
  • 7%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 6
  • 14%
  • 4
  • 18%
  • 10
  • 15%

Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level Mathematics after Four Years of Instruction

All Students

PROFICIENT

65%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

3

5%

LEVEL 2

9

14%

LEVEL 3

40

62%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

General Education

PROFICIENT

81%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

1

2%

LEVEL 2

1

2%

LEVEL 3

36

77%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

Students with Disabilities

PROFICIENT

22%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

2

11%

LEVEL 2

8

44%

LEVEL 3

4

22%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Black or African American

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Hispanic or Latino

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Small Group Total

PROFICIENT

65%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

3

5%

LEVEL 2

9

14%

LEVEL 3

40

62%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

Female

PROFICIENT

77%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

11%

LEVEL 3

25

71%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

Male

PROFICIENT

50%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

3

10%

LEVEL 2

5

17%

LEVEL 3

15

50%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Non-English Language Learners

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

English Language Learners

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Economically Disadvantaged

PROFICIENT

65%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

2

5%

LEVEL 2

6

14%

LEVEL 3

27

63%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

Not Economically Disadvantaged

PROFICIENT

64%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

1

5%

LEVEL 2

3

14%

LEVEL 3

13

59%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

Not Migrant

PROFICIENT

65%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

3

5%

LEVEL 2

9

14%

LEVEL 3

40

62%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

GROUP
TOTAL TESTED
  • 65
  • 47
  • 18
  • 62
  • 3
  • 65
  • 35
  • 30
  • 63
  • 2
  • 43
  • 22
  • 65
PROFICIENT
  • 65%
  • 81%
  • 22%
  • _%
  • _%
  • 65%
  • 77%
  • 50%
  • _%
  • _%
  • 65%
  • 64%
  • 65%
LEVEL 1
  • 3
  • 5%
  • 1
  • 2%
  • 2
  • 11%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 3
  • 5%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 3
  • 10%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 2
  • 5%
  • 1
  • 5%
  • 3
  • 5%
LEVEL 2
  • 9
  • 14%
  • 1
  • 2%
  • 8
  • 44%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 9
  • 14%
  • 4
  • 11%
  • 5
  • 17%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 6
  • 14%
  • 3
  • 14%
  • 9
  • 14%
LEVEL 3
  • 40
  • 62%
  • 36
  • 77%
  • 4
  • 22%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 40
  • 62%
  • 25
  • 71%
  • 15
  • 50%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 27
  • 63%
  • 13
  • 59%
  • 40
  • 62%
LEVEL 4
  • 2
  • 3%
  • 2
  • 4%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 2
  • 3%
  • 2
  • 6%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 1
  • 2%
  • 1
  • 5%
  • 2
  • 3%

Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level Global History and Geography after Four Years of Instruction

All Students

PROFICIENT

49%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

7

11%

LEVEL 2

7

11%

LEVEL 3

29

45%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

General Education

PROFICIENT

60%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

3

6%

LEVEL 2

1

2%

LEVEL 3

25

53%

LEVEL 4

3

6%

Students with Disabilities

PROFICIENT

22%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

4

22%

LEVEL 2

6

33%

LEVEL 3

4

22%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Black or African American

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Hispanic or Latino

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Small Group Total

PROFICIENT

49%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

7

11%

LEVEL 2

7

11%

LEVEL 3

29

45%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

Female

PROFICIENT

51%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

4

11%

LEVEL 2

4

11%

LEVEL 3

17

49%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

Male

PROFICIENT

47%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

3

10%

LEVEL 2

3

10%

LEVEL 3

12

40%

LEVEL 4

2

7%

Non-English Language Learners

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

English Language Learners

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Economically Disadvantaged

PROFICIENT

49%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

4

9%

LEVEL 2

5

12%

LEVEL 3

19

44%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

Not Economically Disadvantaged

PROFICIENT

50%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

3

14%

LEVEL 2

2

9%

LEVEL 3

10

45%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

Not Migrant

PROFICIENT

49%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

7

11%

LEVEL 2

7

11%

LEVEL 3

29

45%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

GROUP
TOTAL TESTED
  • 65
  • 47
  • 18
  • 62
  • 3
  • 65
  • 35
  • 30
  • 63
  • 2
  • 43
  • 22
  • 65
PROFICIENT
  • 49%
  • 60%
  • 22%
  • _%
  • _%
  • 49%
  • 51%
  • 47%
  • _%
  • _%
  • 49%
  • 50%
  • 49%
LEVEL 1
  • 7
  • 11%
  • 3
  • 6%
  • 4
  • 22%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 7
  • 11%
  • 4
  • 11%
  • 3
  • 10%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 4
  • 9%
  • 3
  • 14%
  • 7
  • 11%
LEVEL 2
  • 7
  • 11%
  • 1
  • 2%
  • 6
  • 33%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 7
  • 11%
  • 4
  • 11%
  • 3
  • 10%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 5
  • 12%
  • 2
  • 9%
  • 7
  • 11%
LEVEL 3
  • 29
  • 45%
  • 25
  • 53%
  • 4
  • 22%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 29
  • 45%
  • 17
  • 49%
  • 12
  • 40%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 19
  • 44%
  • 10
  • 45%
  • 29
  • 45%
LEVEL 4
  • 3
  • 5%
  • 3
  • 6%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 3
  • 5%
  • 1
  • 3%
  • 2
  • 7%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 2
  • 5%
  • 1
  • 5%
  • 3
  • 5%

Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level U.S. History and Government after Four Years of Instruction

All Students

PROFICIENT

66%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

1

2%

LEVEL 2

6

9%

LEVEL 3

29

45%

LEVEL 4

14

22%

General Education

PROFICIENT

74%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

6%

LEVEL 3

21

45%

LEVEL 4

14

30%

Students with Disabilities

PROFICIENT

44%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

1

6%

LEVEL 2

3

17%

LEVEL 3

8

44%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Black or African American

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Hispanic or Latino

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Small Group Total

PROFICIENT

66%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

1

2%

LEVEL 2

6

9%

LEVEL 3

29

45%

LEVEL 4

14

22%

Female

PROFICIENT

74%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

1

3%

LEVEL 2

2

6%

LEVEL 3

18

51%

LEVEL 4

8

23%

Male

PROFICIENT

57%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

13%

LEVEL 3

11

37%

LEVEL 4

6

20%

Non-English Language Learners

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

English Language Learners

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Economically Disadvantaged

PROFICIENT

63%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

1

2%

LEVEL 2

5

12%

LEVEL 3

18

42%

LEVEL 4

9

21%

Not Economically Disadvantaged

PROFICIENT

73%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

5%

LEVEL 3

11

50%

LEVEL 4

5

23%

Not Migrant

PROFICIENT

66%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

1

2%

LEVEL 2

6

9%

LEVEL 3

29

45%

LEVEL 4

14

22%

GROUP
TOTAL TESTED
  • 65
  • 47
  • 18
  • 62
  • 3
  • 65
  • 35
  • 30
  • 63
  • 2
  • 43
  • 22
  • 65
PROFICIENT
  • 66%
  • 74%
  • 44%
  • _%
  • _%
  • 66%
  • 74%
  • 57%
  • _%
  • _%
  • 63%
  • 73%
  • 66%
LEVEL 1
  • 1
  • 2%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 1
  • 6%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 1
  • 2%
  • 1
  • 3%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 1
  • 2%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 1
  • 2%
LEVEL 2
  • 6
  • 9%
  • 3
  • 6%
  • 3
  • 17%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 6
  • 9%
  • 2
  • 6%
  • 4
  • 13%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 5
  • 12%
  • 1
  • 5%
  • 6
  • 9%
LEVEL 3
  • 29
  • 45%
  • 21
  • 45%
  • 8
  • 44%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 29
  • 45%
  • 18
  • 51%
  • 11
  • 37%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 18
  • 42%
  • 11
  • 50%
  • 29
  • 45%
LEVEL 4
  • 14
  • 22%
  • 14
  • 30%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 14
  • 22%
  • 8
  • 23%
  • 6
  • 20%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 9
  • 21%
  • 5
  • 23%
  • 14
  • 22%

Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level Science after Four Years of Instruction

All Students

PROFICIENT

63%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

3

5%

LEVEL 2

5

8%

LEVEL 3

36

55%

LEVEL 4

5

8%

General Education

PROFICIENT

74%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

1

2%

LEVEL 2

1

2%

LEVEL 3

30

64%

LEVEL 4

5

11%

Students with Disabilities

PROFICIENT

33%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

2

11%

LEVEL 2

4

22%

LEVEL 3

6

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Black or African American

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Hispanic or Latino

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Small Group Total

PROFICIENT

63%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

3

5%

LEVEL 2

5

8%

LEVEL 3

36

55%

LEVEL 4

5

8%

Female

PROFICIENT

71%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

9%

LEVEL 3

22

63%

LEVEL 4

3

9%

Male

PROFICIENT

53%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

3

10%

LEVEL 2

2

7%

LEVEL 3

14

47%

LEVEL 4

2

7%

Non-English Language Learners

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

English Language Learners

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Economically Disadvantaged

PROFICIENT

58%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

3

7%

LEVEL 2

4

9%

LEVEL 3

22

51%

LEVEL 4

3

7%

Not Economically Disadvantaged

PROFICIENT

73%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

5%

LEVEL 3

14

64%

LEVEL 4

2

9%

Not Migrant

PROFICIENT

63%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

3

5%

LEVEL 2

5

8%

LEVEL 3

36

55%

LEVEL 4

5

8%

GROUP
TOTAL TESTED
  • 65
  • 47
  • 18
  • 62
  • 3
  • 65
  • 35
  • 30
  • 63
  • 2
  • 43
  • 22
  • 65
PROFICIENT
  • 63%
  • 74%
  • 33%
  • _%
  • _%
  • 63%
  • 71%
  • 53%
  • _%
  • _%
  • 58%
  • 73%
  • 63%
LEVEL 1
  • 3
  • 5%
  • 1
  • 2%
  • 2
  • 11%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 3
  • 5%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 3
  • 10%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 3
  • 7%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 3
  • 5%
LEVEL 2
  • 5
  • 8%
  • 1
  • 2%
  • 4
  • 22%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 5
  • 8%
  • 3
  • 9%
  • 2
  • 7%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 4
  • 9%
  • 1
  • 5%
  • 5
  • 8%
LEVEL 3
  • 36
  • 55%
  • 30
  • 64%
  • 6
  • 33%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 36
  • 55%
  • 22
  • 63%
  • 14
  • 47%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 22
  • 51%
  • 14
  • 64%
  • 36
  • 55%
LEVEL 4
  • 5
  • 8%
  • 5
  • 11%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 5
  • 8%
  • 3
  • 9%
  • 2
  • 7%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 3
  • 7%
  • 2
  • 9%
  • 5
  • 8%

Regents Examination Results (2015 - 16)

Comprehensive English

Regents Comprehensive English

GROUP
  • All Students
  • General Education
  • Students with Disabilities
  • Black or African American
  • Hispanic or Latino
  • Small Group Total
  • Female
  • Male
  • Non-English Language Learners
  • English Language Learners
  • Economically Disadvantaged
  • Not Economically Disadvantaged
  • Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
  • 18
  • 10
  • 8
  • 17
  • 1
  • 18
  • 10
  • 8
  • 17
  • 1
  • 14
  • 4
  • 18
55
  • 17
  • 94%
  • 10
  • 100%
  • 7
  • 88%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 17
  • 94%
  • 9
  • 90%
  • 8
  • 100%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 17
  • 94%
65
  • 8
  • 44%
  • 7
  • 70%
  • 1
  • 13%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 8
  • 44%
  • 6
  • 60%
  • 2
  • 25%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 8
  • 44%
85
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 0
  • 0%

All Students

TOTAL TESTED: 18
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

17

94%

65

8

44%

85

0

0%

General Education

TOTAL TESTED: 10
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

10

100%

65

7

70%

85

0

0%

Students with Disabilities

TOTAL TESTED: 8
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

7

88%

65

1

13%

85

0

0%

Black or African American

TOTAL TESTED: 17
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

_

_%

65

_

_%

85

_

_%

Hispanic or Latino

TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

_

_%

65

_

_%

85

_

_%

Small Group Total

TOTAL TESTED: 18
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

17

94%

65

8

44%

85

0

0%

Female

TOTAL TESTED: 10
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

9

90%

65

6

60%

85

0

0%

Male

TOTAL TESTED: 8
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

8

100%

65

2

25%

85

0

0%

Non-English Language Learners

TOTAL TESTED: 17
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

_

_%

65

_

_%

85

_

_%

English Language Learners

TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

_

_%

65

_

_%

85

_

_%

Economically Disadvantaged

TOTAL TESTED: 14
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

_

_%

65

_

_%

85

_

_%

Not Economically Disadvantaged

TOTAL TESTED: 4
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

_

_%

65

_

_%

85

_

_%

Not Migrant

TOTAL TESTED: 18
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

17

94%

65

8

44%

85

0

0%

English Language Arts (Common Core)

English Language Arts (Common Core)

GROUP
  • All Students
  • General Education
  • Students with Disabilities
  • Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
  • Black or African American
  • Small Group Total
  • Female
  • Male
  • Non-English Language Learners
  • English Language Learners
  • Economically Disadvantaged
  • Not Economically Disadvantaged
  • Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
  • 58
  • 49
  • 9
  • 1
  • 57
  • 58
  • 24
  • 34
  • 53
  • 5
  • 46
  • 12
  • 58
LEVEL 1
  • 6
  • 10%
  • 3
  • 6%
  • 3
  • 33%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 6
  • 10%
  • 1
  • 4%
  • 5
  • 15%
  • 5
  • 9%
  • 1
  • 20%
  • 5
  • 11%
  • 1
  • 8%
  • 6
  • 10%
LEVEL 2
  • 6
  • 10%
  • 3
  • 6%
  • 3
  • 33%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 6
  • 10%
  • 3
  • 13%
  • 3
  • 9%
  • 4
  • 8%
  • 2
  • 40%
  • 4
  • 9%
  • 2
  • 17%
  • 6
  • 10%
LEVEL 3
  • 17
  • 29%
  • 15
  • 31%
  • 2
  • 22%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 17
  • 29%
  • 4
  • 17%
  • 13
  • 38%
  • 15
  • 28%
  • 2
  • 40%
  • 15
  • 33%
  • 2
  • 17%
  • 17
  • 29%
LEVEL 4
  • 13
  • 22%
  • 12
  • 24%
  • 1
  • 11%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 13
  • 22%
  • 6
  • 25%
  • 7
  • 21%
  • 13
  • 25%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 10
  • 22%
  • 3
  • 25%
  • 13
  • 22%
LEVEL 5
  • 16
  • 28%
  • 16
  • 33%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 16
  • 28%
  • 10
  • 42%
  • 6
  • 18%
  • 16
  • 30%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 12
  • 26%
  • 4
  • 33%
  • 16
  • 28%

All Students

TOTAL TESTED: 58
Number/Percent scoring at

LEVEL 1

6

10%

LEVEL 2

6

10%

LEVEL 3

17

29%

LEVEL 4

13

22%

LEVEL 5

16

28%

General Education

TOTAL TESTED: 49
Number/Percent scoring at

LEVEL 1

3

6%

LEVEL 2

3

6%

LEVEL 3

15

31%

LEVEL 4

12

24%

LEVEL 5

16

33%

Students with Disabilities

TOTAL TESTED: 9
Number/Percent scoring at

LEVEL 1

3

33%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

LEVEL 5

0

0%

Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander

TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at

LEVEL 1

_

_%

LEVEL 2

_

_%

LEVEL 3

_

_%

LEVEL 4

_

_%

LEVEL 5

_

_%

Black or African American

TOTAL TESTED: 57
Number/Percent scoring at

LEVEL 1

_

_%

LEVEL 2

_

_%

LEVEL 3

_

_%

LEVEL 4

_

_%

LEVEL 5

_

_%

Small Group Total

TOTAL TESTED: 58
Number/Percent scoring at

LEVEL 1

6

10%

LEVEL 2

6

10%

LEVEL 3

17

29%

LEVEL 4

13

22%

LEVEL 5

16

28%

Female

TOTAL TESTED: 24
Number/Percent scoring at

LEVEL 1

1

4%

LEVEL 2

3

13%

LEVEL 3

4

17%

LEVEL 4

6

25%

LEVEL 5

10

42%

Male

TOTAL TESTED: 34
Number/Percent scoring at

LEVEL 1

5

15%

LEVEL 2

3

9%

LEVEL 3

13

38%

LEVEL 4

7

21%

LEVEL 5

6

18%

Non-English Language Learners

TOTAL TESTED: 53
Number/Percent scoring at

LEVEL 1

5

9%

LEVEL 2

4

8%

LEVEL 3

15

28%

LEVEL 4

13

25%

LEVEL 5

16

30%

English Language Learners

TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

LEVEL 5

0

0%

Economically Disadvantaged

TOTAL TESTED: 46
Number/Percent scoring at

LEVEL 1

5

11%

LEVEL 2

4

9%

LEVEL 3

15

33%

LEVEL 4

10

22%

LEVEL 5

12

26%

Not Economically Disadvantaged

TOTAL TESTED: 12
Number/Percent scoring at

LEVEL 1

1

8%

LEVEL 2

2

17%

LEVEL 3

2

17%

LEVEL 4

3

25%

LEVEL 5

4

33%

Not Migrant

TOTAL TESTED: 58
Number/Percent scoring at

LEVEL 1

6

10%

LEVEL 2

6

10%

LEVEL 3

17

29%

LEVEL 4

13

22%

LEVEL 5

16

28%

Integrated Algebra

Regents Integrated Algebra

GROUP
  • All Students
  • General Education
  • Students with Disabilities
  • Black or African American
  • Hispanic or Latino
  • Small Group Total
  • Female
  • Male
  • Non-English Language Learners
  • English Language Learners
  • Economically Disadvantaged
  • Not Economically Disadvantaged
  • Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
  • 14
  • 9
  • 5
  • 13
  • 1
  • 14
  • 8
  • 6
  • 12
  • 2
  • 13
  • 1
  • 14
55
  • 11
  • 79%
  • 7
  • 78%
  • 4
  • 80%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 11
  • 79%
  • 7
  • 88%
  • 4
  • 67%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 11
  • 79%
65
  • 9
  • 64%
  • 7
  • 78%
  • 2
  • 40%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 9
  • 64%
  • 6
  • 75%
  • 3
  • 50%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 9
  • 64%
85
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 0
  • 0%

All Students

TOTAL TESTED: 14
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

11

79%

65

9

64%

85

0

0%

General Education

TOTAL TESTED: 9
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

7

78%

65

7

78%

85

0

0%

Students with Disabilities

TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

4

80%

65

2

40%

85

0

0%

Black or African American

TOTAL TESTED: 13
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

_

_%

65

_

_%

85

_

_%

Hispanic or Latino

TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

_

_%

65

_

_%

85

_

_%

Small Group Total

TOTAL TESTED: 14
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

11

79%

65

9

64%

85

0

0%

Female

TOTAL TESTED: 8
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

7

88%

65

6

75%

85

0

0%

Male

TOTAL TESTED: 6
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

4

67%

65

3

50%

85

0

0%

Non-English Language Learners

TOTAL TESTED: 12
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

_

_%

65

_

_%

85

_

_%

English Language Learners

TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

_

_%

65

_

_%

85

_

_%

Economically Disadvantaged

TOTAL TESTED: 13
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

_

_%

65

_

_%

85

_

_%

Not Economically Disadvantaged

TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

_

_%

65

_

_%

85

_

_%

Not Migrant

TOTAL TESTED: 14
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

11

79%

65

9

64%

85

0

0%

Algebra 2/Trigonometry

Regents Algebra 2/Trigonometry

GROUP
  • All Students
  • General Education
  • Black or African American
  • Female
  • Male
  • Non-English Language Learners
  • Economically Disadvantaged
  • Not Economically Disadvantaged
  • Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
  • 19
  • 19
  • 19
  • 14
  • 5
  • 19
  • 13
  • 6
  • 19
55
  • 8
  • 42%
  • 8
  • 42%
  • 8
  • 42%
  • 8
  • 57%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 8
  • 42%
  • 5
  • 38%
  • 3
  • 50%
  • 8
  • 42%
65
  • 5
  • 26%
  • 5
  • 26%
  • 5
  • 26%
  • 5
  • 36%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 5
  • 26%
  • 4
  • 31%
  • 1
  • 17%
  • 5
  • 26%
85
  • 1
  • 5%
  • 1
  • 5%
  • 1
  • 5%
  • 1
  • 7%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 1
  • 5%
  • 1
  • 8%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 1
  • 5%

All Students

TOTAL TESTED: 19
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

8

42%

65

5

26%

85

1

5%

General Education

TOTAL TESTED: 19
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

8

42%

65

5

26%

85

1

5%

Black or African American

TOTAL TESTED: 19
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

8

42%

65

5

26%

85

1

5%

Female

TOTAL TESTED: 14
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

8

57%

65

5

36%

85

1

7%

Male

TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

0

0%

65

0

0%

85

0

0%

Non-English Language Learners

TOTAL TESTED: 19
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

8

42%

65

5

26%

85

1

5%

Economically Disadvantaged

TOTAL TESTED: 13
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

5

38%

65

4

31%

85

1

8%

Not Economically Disadvantaged

TOTAL TESTED: 6
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

3

50%

65

1

17%

85

0

0%

Not Migrant

TOTAL TESTED: 19
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

8

42%

65

5

26%

85

1

5%

Algebra I (Common Core)

Algebra I (Common Core)

GROUP
  • All Students
  • General Education
  • Students with Disabilities
  • Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
  • Black or African American
  • Hispanic or Latino
  • White
  • Multiracial
  • Small Group Total
  • Female
  • Male
  • Non-English Language Learners
  • English Language Learners
  • Economically Disadvantaged
  • Not Economically Disadvantaged
  • Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
  • 94
  • 76
  • 18
  • 3
  • 77
  • 9
  • 1
  • 4
  • 8
  • 41
  • 53
  • 86
  • 8
  • 70
  • 24
  • 94
LEVEL 1
  • 17
  • 18%
  • 7
  • 9%
  • 10
  • 56%
  • _
  • _
  • 15
  • 19%
  • 1
  • 11%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 1
  • 13%
  • 9
  • 22%
  • 8
  • 15%
  • 14
  • 16%
  • 3
  • 38%
  • 14
  • 20%
  • 3
  • 13%
  • 17
  • 18%
LEVEL 2
  • 22
  • 23%
  • 18
  • 24%
  • 4
  • 22%
  • _
  • _
  • 16
  • 21%
  • 4
  • 44%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 2
  • 25%
  • 7
  • 17%
  • 15
  • 28%
  • 19
  • 22%
  • 3
  • 38%
  • 16
  • 23%
  • 6
  • 25%
  • 22
  • 23%
LEVEL 3
  • 54
  • 57%
  • 50
  • 66%
  • 4
  • 22%
  • _
  • _
  • 45
  • 58%
  • 4
  • 44%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 5
  • 63%
  • 24
  • 59%
  • 30
  • 57%
  • 52
  • 60%
  • 2
  • 25%
  • 39
  • 56%
  • 15
  • 63%
  • 54
  • 57%
LEVEL 4
  • 1
  • 1%
  • 1
  • 1%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • _
  • _
  • 1
  • 1%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 1
  • 2%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 1
  • 1%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 1
  • 1%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 1
  • 1%
LEVEL 5
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • _
  • _
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%

All Students

TOTAL TESTED: 94
Number/Percent scoring at

LEVEL 1

17

18%

LEVEL 2

22

23%

LEVEL 3

54

57%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

LEVEL 5

0

0%

General Education

TOTAL TESTED: 76
Number/Percent scoring at

LEVEL 1

7

9%

LEVEL 2

18

24%

LEVEL 3

50

66%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

LEVEL 5

0

0%

Students with Disabilities

TOTAL TESTED: 18
Number/Percent scoring at

LEVEL 1

10

56%

LEVEL 2

4

22%

LEVEL 3

4

22%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

LEVEL 5

0

0%

Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander

TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at

LEVEL 1

_

_%

LEVEL 2

_

_%

LEVEL 3

_

_%

LEVEL 4

_

_%

LEVEL 5

_

_%

Black or African American

TOTAL TESTED: 77
Number/Percent scoring at

LEVEL 1

15

19%

LEVEL 2

16

21%

LEVEL 3

45

58%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

LEVEL 5

0

0%

Hispanic or Latino

TOTAL TESTED: 9
Number/Percent scoring at

LEVEL 1

1

11%

LEVEL 2

4

44%

LEVEL 3

4

44%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

LEVEL 5

0

0%

White

TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at

LEVEL 1

_

_%

LEVEL 2

_

_%

LEVEL 3

_

_%

LEVEL 4

_

_%

LEVEL 5

_

_%

Multiracial

TOTAL TESTED: 4
Number/Percent scoring at

LEVEL 1

_

_%

LEVEL 2

_

_%

LEVEL 3

_

_%

LEVEL 4

_

_%

LEVEL 5

_

_%

Small Group Total

TOTAL TESTED: 8
Number/Percent scoring at

LEVEL 1

1

13%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

5

63%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

LEVEL 5

0

0%

Female

TOTAL TESTED: 41
Number/Percent scoring at

LEVEL 1

9

22%

LEVEL 2

7

17%

LEVEL 3

24

59%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

LEVEL 5

0

0%

Male

TOTAL TESTED: 53
Number/Percent scoring at

LEVEL 1

8

15%

LEVEL 2

15

28%

LEVEL 3

30

57%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

LEVEL 5

0

0%

Non-English Language Learners

TOTAL TESTED: 86
Number/Percent scoring at

LEVEL 1

14

16%

LEVEL 2

19

22%

LEVEL 3

52

60%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

LEVEL 5

0

0%

English Language Learners

TOTAL TESTED: 8
Number/Percent scoring at

LEVEL 1

3

38%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

LEVEL 5

0

0%

Economically Disadvantaged

TOTAL TESTED: 70
Number/Percent scoring at

LEVEL 1

14

20%

LEVEL 2

16

23%

LEVEL 3

39

56%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

LEVEL 5

0

0%

Not Economically Disadvantaged

TOTAL TESTED: 24
Number/Percent scoring at

LEVEL 1

3

13%

LEVEL 2

6

25%

LEVEL 3

15

63%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

LEVEL 5

0

0%

Not Migrant

TOTAL TESTED: 94
Number/Percent scoring at

LEVEL 1

17

18%

LEVEL 2

22

23%

LEVEL 3

54

57%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

LEVEL 5

0

0%

Geometry (Common Core)

Geometry (Common Core)

GROUP
  • All Students
  • General Education
  • Black or African American
  • Female
  • Male
  • Non-English Language Learners
  • Economically Disadvantaged
  • Not Economically Disadvantaged
  • Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
  • 17
  • 17
  • 17
  • 11
  • 6
  • 17
  • 16
  • 1
  • 17
LEVEL 1
  • 2
  • 12%
  • 2
  • 12%
  • 2
  • 12%
  • 1
  • 9%
  • 1
  • 17%
  • 2
  • 12%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 2
  • 12%
LEVEL 2
  • 2
  • 12%
  • 2
  • 12%
  • 2
  • 12%
  • 2
  • 18%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 2
  • 12%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 2
  • 12%
LEVEL 3
  • 7
  • 41%
  • 7
  • 41%
  • 7
  • 41%
  • 4
  • 36%
  • 3
  • 50%
  • 7
  • 41%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 7
  • 41%
LEVEL 4
  • 4
  • 24%
  • 4
  • 24%
  • 4
  • 24%
  • 3
  • 27%
  • 1
  • 17%
  • 4
  • 24%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 4
  • 24%
LEVEL 5
  • 2
  • 12%
  • 2
  • 12%
  • 2
  • 12%
  • 1
  • 9%
  • 1
  • 17%
  • 2
  • 12%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 2
  • 12%

All Students

TOTAL TESTED: 17
Number/Percent scoring at

LEVEL 1

2

12%

LEVEL 2

2

12%

LEVEL 3

7

41%

LEVEL 4

4

24%

LEVEL 5

2

12%

General Education

TOTAL TESTED: 17
Number/Percent scoring at

LEVEL 1

2

12%

LEVEL 2

2

12%

LEVEL 3

7

41%

LEVEL 4

4

24%

LEVEL 5

2

12%

Black or African American

TOTAL TESTED: 17
Number/Percent scoring at

LEVEL 1

2

12%

LEVEL 2

2

12%

LEVEL 3

7

41%

LEVEL 4

4

24%

LEVEL 5

2

12%

Female

TOTAL TESTED: 11
Number/Percent scoring at

LEVEL 1

1

9%

LEVEL 2

2

18%

LEVEL 3

4

36%

LEVEL 4

3

27%

LEVEL 5

1

9%

Male

TOTAL TESTED: 6
Number/Percent scoring at

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

3

50%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

LEVEL 5

1

17%

Non-English Language Learners

TOTAL TESTED: 17
Number/Percent scoring at

LEVEL 1

2

12%

LEVEL 2

2

12%

LEVEL 3

7

41%

LEVEL 4

4

24%

LEVEL 5

2

12%

Economically Disadvantaged

TOTAL TESTED: 16
Number/Percent scoring at

LEVEL 1

_

_%

LEVEL 2

_

_%

LEVEL 3

_

_%

LEVEL 4

_

_%

LEVEL 5

_

_%

Not Economically Disadvantaged

TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at

LEVEL 1

_

_%

LEVEL 2

_

_%

LEVEL 3

_

_%

LEVEL 4

_

_%

LEVEL 5

_

_%

Not Migrant

TOTAL TESTED: 17
Number/Percent scoring at

LEVEL 1

2

12%

LEVEL 2

2

12%

LEVEL 3

7

41%

LEVEL 4

4

24%

LEVEL 5

2

12%

Global History and Geography

Regents Global History and Geography

GROUP
  • All Students
  • General Education
  • Students with Disabilities
  • Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
  • Black or African American
  • Hispanic or Latino
  • Multiracial
  • Small Group Total
  • Female
  • Male
  • Non-English Language Learners
  • English Language Learners
  • Economically Disadvantaged
  • Not Economically Disadvantaged
  • Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
  • 80
  • 60
  • 20
  • 2
  • 70
  • 5
  • 3
  • 5
  • 39
  • 41
  • 77
  • 3
  • 59
  • 21
  • 80
55
  • 60
  • 75%
  • 48
  • 80%
  • 12
  • 60%
  • _
  • _
  • 53
  • 76%
  • 5
  • 100%
  • _
  • _
  • 2
  • 40%
  • 28
  • 72%
  • 32
  • 78%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 46
  • 78%
  • 14
  • 67%
  • 60
  • 75%
65
  • 39
  • 49%
  • 34
  • 57%
  • 5
  • 25%
  • _
  • _
  • 35
  • 50%
  • 2
  • 40%
  • _
  • _
  • 2
  • 40%
  • 20
  • 51%
  • 19
  • 46%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 30
  • 51%
  • 9
  • 43%
  • 39
  • 49%
85
  • 3
  • 4%
  • 3
  • 5%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • _
  • _
  • 3
  • 4%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • _
  • _
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 3
  • 8%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 3
  • 5%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 3
  • 4%

All Students

TOTAL TESTED: 80
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

60

75%

65

39

49%

85

3

4%

General Education

TOTAL TESTED: 60
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

48

80%

65

34

57%

85

3

5%

Students with Disabilities

TOTAL TESTED: 20
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

12

60%

65

5

25%

85

0

0%

Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander

TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

_

_%

65

_

_%

85

_

_%

Black or African American

TOTAL TESTED: 70
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

53

76%

65

35

50%

85

3

4%

Hispanic or Latino

TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

5

100%

65

2

40%

85

0

0%

Multiracial

TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

_

_%

65

_

_%

85

_

_%

Small Group Total

TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

2

40%

65

2

40%

85

0

0%

Female

TOTAL TESTED: 39
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

28

72%

65

20

51%

85

3

8%

Male

TOTAL TESTED: 41
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

32

78%

65

19

46%

85

0

0%

Non-English Language Learners

TOTAL TESTED: 77
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

_

_%

65

_

_%

85

_

_%

English Language Learners

TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

_

_%

65

_

_%

85

_

_%

Economically Disadvantaged

TOTAL TESTED: 59
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

46

78%

65

30

51%

85

3

5%

Not Economically Disadvantaged

TOTAL TESTED: 21
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

14

67%

65

9

43%

85

0

0%

Not Migrant

TOTAL TESTED: 80
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

60

75%

65

39

49%

85

3

4%

U.S. History & Government

Regents U.S. History & Government

GROUP
  • All Students
  • General Education
  • Students with Disabilities
  • American Indian or Alaska Native
  • Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
  • Black or African American
  • Hispanic or Latino
  • Small Group Total
  • Female
  • Male
  • Non-English Language Learners
  • English Language Learners
  • Economically Disadvantaged
  • Not Economically Disadvantaged
  • Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
  • 68
  • 59
  • 9
  • 2
  • 1
  • 64
  • 1
  • 68
  • 34
  • 34
  • 64
  • 4
  • 53
  • 15
  • 68
55
  • 63
  • 93%
  • 56
  • 95%
  • 7
  • 78%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 63
  • 93%
  • 30
  • 88%
  • 33
  • 97%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 48
  • 91%
  • 15
  • 100%
  • 63
  • 93%
65
  • 57
  • 84%
  • 52
  • 88%
  • 5
  • 56%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 57
  • 84%
  • 27
  • 79%
  • 30
  • 88%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 43
  • 81%
  • 14
  • 93%
  • 57
  • 84%
85
  • 21
  • 31%
  • 21
  • 36%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 21
  • 31%
  • 12
  • 35%
  • 9
  • 26%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 18
  • 34%
  • 3
  • 20%
  • 21
  • 31%

All Students

TOTAL TESTED: 68
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

63

93%

65

57

84%

85

21

31%

General Education

TOTAL TESTED: 59
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

56

95%

65

52

88%

85

21

36%

Students with Disabilities

TOTAL TESTED: 9
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

7

78%

65

5

56%

85

0

0%

American Indian or Alaska Native

TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

_

_%

65

_

_%

85

_

_%

Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander

TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

_

_%

65

_

_%

85

_

_%

Black or African American

TOTAL TESTED: 64
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

_

_%

65

_

_%

85

_

_%

Hispanic or Latino

TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

_

_%

65

_

_%

85

_

_%

Small Group Total

TOTAL TESTED: 68
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

63

93%

65

57

84%

85

21

31%

Female

TOTAL TESTED: 34
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

30

88%

65

27

79%

85

12

35%

Male

TOTAL TESTED: 34
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

33

97%

65

30

88%

85

9

26%

Non-English Language Learners

TOTAL TESTED: 64
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

_

_%

65

_

_%

85

_

_%

English Language Learners

TOTAL TESTED: 4
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

_

_%

65

_

_%

85

_

_%

Economically Disadvantaged

TOTAL TESTED: 53
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

48

91%

65

43

81%

85

18

34%

Not Economically Disadvantaged

TOTAL TESTED: 15
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

15

100%

65

14

93%

85

3

20%

Not Migrant

TOTAL TESTED: 68
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

63

93%

65

57

84%

85

21

31%

Living Environment

Regents Living Environment

GROUP
  • All Students
  • General Education
  • Students with Disabilities
  • American Indian or Alaska Native
  • Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
  • Black or African American
  • Hispanic or Latino
  • Multiracial
  • Small Group Total
  • Female
  • Male
  • Non-English Language Learners
  • English Language Learners
  • Economically Disadvantaged
  • Not Economically Disadvantaged
  • Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
  • 59
  • 46
  • 13
  • 1
  • 3
  • 49
  • 5
  • 1
  • 5
  • 29
  • 30
  • 54
  • 5
  • 42
  • 17
  • 59
55
  • 47
  • 80%
  • 43
  • 93%
  • 4
  • 31%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 39
  • 80%
  • 4
  • 80%
  • _
  • _
  • 4
  • 80%
  • 24
  • 83%
  • 23
  • 77%
  • 45
  • 83%
  • 2
  • 40%
  • 33
  • 79%
  • 14
  • 82%
  • 47
  • 80%
65
  • 38
  • 64%
  • 35
  • 76%
  • 3
  • 23%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 32
  • 65%
  • 3
  • 60%
  • _
  • _
  • 3
  • 60%
  • 18
  • 62%
  • 20
  • 67%
  • 36
  • 67%
  • 2
  • 40%
  • 26
  • 62%
  • 12
  • 71%
  • 38
  • 64%
85
  • 4
  • 7%
  • 4
  • 9%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 4
  • 8%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • _
  • _
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 2
  • 7%
  • 2
  • 7%
  • 4
  • 7%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 3
  • 7%
  • 1
  • 6%
  • 4
  • 7%

All Students

TOTAL TESTED: 59
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

47

80%

65

38

64%

85

4

7%

General Education

TOTAL TESTED: 46
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

43

93%

65

35

76%

85

4

9%

Students with Disabilities

TOTAL TESTED: 13
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

4

31%

65

3

23%

85

0

0%

American Indian or Alaska Native

TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

_

_%

65

_

_%

85

_

_%

Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander

TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

_

_%

65

_

_%

85

_

_%

Black or African American

TOTAL TESTED: 49
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

39

80%

65

32

65%

85

4

8%

Hispanic or Latino

TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

4

80%

65

3

60%

85

0

0%

Multiracial

TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

_

_%

65

_

_%

85

_

_%

Small Group Total

TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

4

80%

65

3

60%

85

0

0%

Female

TOTAL TESTED: 29
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

24

83%

65

18

62%

85

2

7%

Male

TOTAL TESTED: 30
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

23

77%

65

20

67%

85

2

7%

Non-English Language Learners

TOTAL TESTED: 54
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

45

83%

65

36

67%

85

4

7%

English Language Learners

TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

2

40%

65

2

40%

85

0

0%

Economically Disadvantaged

TOTAL TESTED: 42
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

33

79%

65

26

62%

85

3

7%

Not Economically Disadvantaged

TOTAL TESTED: 17
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

14

82%

65

12

71%

85

1

6%

Not Migrant

TOTAL TESTED: 59
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

47

80%

65

38

64%

85

4

7%

Physical Setting/Earth Science

Regents Physical Setting/Earth Science

GROUP
  • All Students
  • General Education
  • Students with Disabilities
  • Black or African American
  • Hispanic or Latino
  • Multiracial
  • Small Group Total
  • Female
  • Male
  • Non-English Language Learners
  • English Language Learners
  • Economically Disadvantaged
  • Not Economically Disadvantaged
  • Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
  • 35
  • 31
  • 4
  • 31
  • 3
  • 1
  • 35
  • 11
  • 24
  • 34
  • 1
  • 25
  • 10
  • 35
55
  • 12
  • 34%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 12
  • 34%
  • 5
  • 45%
  • 7
  • 29%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 6
  • 24%
  • 6
  • 60%
  • 12
  • 34%
65
  • 9
  • 26%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 9
  • 26%
  • 4
  • 36%
  • 5
  • 21%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 4
  • 16%
  • 5
  • 50%
  • 9
  • 26%
85
  • 1
  • 3%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 1
  • 3%
  • 1
  • 9%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 1
  • 4%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 1
  • 3%

All Students

TOTAL TESTED: 35
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

12

34%

65

9

26%

85

1

3%

General Education

TOTAL TESTED: 31
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

_

_%

65

_

_%

85

_

_%

Students with Disabilities

TOTAL TESTED: 4
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

_

_%

65

_

_%

85

_

_%

Black or African American

TOTAL TESTED: 31
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

_

_%

65

_

_%

85

_

_%

Hispanic or Latino

TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

_

_%

65

_

_%

85

_

_%

Multiracial

TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

_

_%

65

_

_%

85

_

_%

Small Group Total

TOTAL TESTED: 35
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

12

34%

65

9

26%

85

1

3%

Female

TOTAL TESTED: 11
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

5

45%

65

4

36%

85

1

9%

Male

TOTAL TESTED: 24
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

7

29%

65

5

21%

85

0

0%

Non-English Language Learners

TOTAL TESTED: 34
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

_

_%

65

_

_%

85

_

_%

English Language Learners

TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

_

_%

65

_

_%

85

_

_%

Economically Disadvantaged

TOTAL TESTED: 25
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

6

24%

65

4

16%

85

1

4%

Not Economically Disadvantaged

TOTAL TESTED: 10
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

6

60%

65

5

50%

85

0

0%

Not Migrant

TOTAL TESTED: 35
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

12

34%

65

9

26%

85

1

3%

Physical Setting/Chemistry

Regents Physical Setting/Chemistry

GROUP
  • All Students
  • General Education
  • Students with Disabilities
  • Black or African American
  • Hispanic or Latino
  • Small Group Total
  • Female
  • Male
  • Non-English Language Learners
  • Economically Disadvantaged
  • Not Economically Disadvantaged
  • Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
  • 24
  • 23
  • 1
  • 23
  • 1
  • 24
  • 11
  • 13
  • 24
  • 20
  • 4
  • 24
55
  • 21
  • 88%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 21
  • 88%
  • 10
  • 91%
  • 11
  • 85%
  • 21
  • 88%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 21
  • 88%
65
  • 13
  • 54%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 13
  • 54%
  • 8
  • 73%
  • 5
  • 38%
  • 13
  • 54%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 13
  • 54%
85
  • 2
  • 8%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 2
  • 8%
  • 1
  • 9%
  • 1
  • 8%
  • 2
  • 8%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 2
  • 8%

All Students

TOTAL TESTED: 24
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

21

88%

65

13

54%

85

2

8%

General Education

TOTAL TESTED: 23
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

_

_%

65

_

_%

85

_

_%

Students with Disabilities

TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

_

_%

65

_

_%

85

_

_%

Black or African American

TOTAL TESTED: 23
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

_

_%

65

_

_%

85

_

_%

Hispanic or Latino

TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

_

_%

65

_

_%

85

_

_%

Small Group Total

TOTAL TESTED: 24
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

21

88%

65

13

54%

85

2

8%

Female

TOTAL TESTED: 11
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

10

91%

65

8

73%

85

1

9%

Male

TOTAL TESTED: 13
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

11

85%

65

5

38%

85

1

8%

Non-English Language Learners

TOTAL TESTED: 24
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

21

88%

65

13

54%

85

2

8%

Economically Disadvantaged

TOTAL TESTED: 20
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

_

_%

65

_

_%

85

_

_%

Not Economically Disadvantaged

TOTAL TESTED: 4
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

_

_%

65

_

_%

85

_

_%

Not Migrant

TOTAL TESTED: 24
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

21

88%

65

13

54%

85

2

8%

Secondary-Level English Language Arts Results for Accountability

All accountability groups made AYP: NO

GROUP
MADE AYP
Tested 95%
12th graders
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
PI
EAMO
Safe Harbor Target
All Students
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%

YES

12th Graders

65

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

100%

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

NO

2012 Accountability Cohort Members

48

PI

133

EAMO

160

Safe Harbor Target

144

American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%

12th Graders

3

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

2012 Accountability Cohort Members

0

PI

EAMO

Safe Harbor Target

Black or African American
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%

YES

12th Graders

58

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

100%

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

NO

2012 Accountability Cohort Members

47

PI

132

EAMO

144

Safe Harbor Target

144

Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%

12th Graders

4

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

2012 Accountability Cohort Members

1

PI

EAMO

Safe Harbor Target

Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%

12th Graders

0

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

2012 Accountability Cohort Members

0

PI

EAMO

Safe Harbor Target

White
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%

12th Graders

0

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

2012 Accountability Cohort Members

0

PI

EAMO

Safe Harbor Target

Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%

12th Graders

0

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

2012 Accountability Cohort Members

0

PI

EAMO

Safe Harbor Target

Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%

12th Graders

17

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

2012 Accountability Cohort Members

14

PI

EAMO

Safe Harbor Target

Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%

12th Graders

1

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

2012 Accountability Cohort Members

2

PI

EAMO

Safe Harbor Target

Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%

12th Graders

39

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

NO

2012 Accountability Cohort Members

33

PI

133

EAMO

145

Safe Harbor Target

141

Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.

GROUP
12th Graders
  • 62
  • 7
  • 61
  • 65
  • 65
  • 65
  • 48
  • 64
  • 26
  • 27
  • 38
  • 0
  • 65
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
  • 100%
  • 100%
  • 100%
  • 100%
  • 100%
  • 100%
  • 100%
  • 100%
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
  • 48
  • 1
  • 47
  • 48
  • 48
  • 48
  • 34
  • 46
  • 15
  • 21
  • 27
  • 0
  • 48
PI
  • 133
  • 132
  • 133
  • 133
  • 133
  • 168
  • 139
  • 133
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
12th Graders

62

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

100%

2012 Accountability Cohort Members

48

PI

133

Not Black or African American
12th Graders

7

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

2012 Accountability Cohort Members

1

PI

Not Hispanic or Latino
12th Graders

61

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

100%

2012 Accountability Cohort Members

47

PI

132

Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
12th Graders

65

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

100%

2012 Accountability Cohort Members

48

PI

133

Not White
12th Graders

65

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

100%

2012 Accountability Cohort Members

48

PI

133

Not Multiracial
12th Graders

65

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

100%

2012 Accountability Cohort Members

48

PI

133

General Education
12th Graders

48

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

100%

2012 Accountability Cohort Members

34

PI

168

English Proficient
12th Graders

64

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

100%

2012 Accountability Cohort Members

46

PI

139

Not Economically Disadvantaged
12th Graders

26

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

2012 Accountability Cohort Members

15

PI

Male
12th Graders

27

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

2012 Accountability Cohort Members

21

PI

Female
12th Graders

38

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

2012 Accountability Cohort Members

27

PI

Migrant
12th Graders

0

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

2012 Accountability Cohort Members

0

PI

Not Migrant
12th Graders

65

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

100%

2012 Accountability Cohort Members

48

PI

133

― There were fewer than 40 12th graders, so the Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 students in the 2012 accountability cohort, so PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed.

Secondary-Level Mathematics Results for Accountability

All accountability groups made AYP: NO

GROUP
MADE AYP
Tested 95%
12th graders
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
PI
EAMO
Safe Harbor Target
All Students
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%

YES

12th Graders

65

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

100%

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

NO

2012 Accountability Cohort Members

48

PI

88

EAMO

145

Safe Harbor Target

110

American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%

12th Graders

3

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

2012 Accountability Cohort Members

0

PI

EAMO

Safe Harbor Target

Black or African American
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%

YES

12th Graders

58

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

100%

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

NO

2012 Accountability Cohort Members

47

PI

87

EAMO

124

Safe Harbor Target

112

Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%

12th Graders

4

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

2012 Accountability Cohort Members

1

PI

EAMO

Safe Harbor Target

Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%

12th Graders

0

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

2012 Accountability Cohort Members

0

PI

EAMO

Safe Harbor Target

White
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%

12th Graders

0

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

2012 Accountability Cohort Members

0

PI

EAMO

Safe Harbor Target

Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%

12th Graders

0

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

2012 Accountability Cohort Members

0

PI

EAMO

Safe Harbor Target

Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%

12th Graders

17

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

2012 Accountability Cohort Members

14

PI

EAMO

Safe Harbor Target

Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%

12th Graders

1

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

2012 Accountability Cohort Members

2

PI

EAMO

Safe Harbor Target

Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%

12th Graders

39

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

NO

2012 Accountability Cohort Members

33

PI

88

EAMO

129

Safe Harbor Target

108

Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.

GROUP
12th Graders
  • 62
  • 7
  • 61
  • 65
  • 65
  • 65
  • 48
  • 64
  • 26
  • 27
  • 38
  • 0
  • 65
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
  • 100%
  • 100%
  • 100%
  • 100%
  • 100%
  • 100%
  • 100%
  • 100%
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
  • 48
  • 1
  • 47
  • 48
  • 48
  • 48
  • 34
  • 46
  • 15
  • 21
  • 27
  • 0
  • 48
PI
  • 88
  • 87
  • 88
  • 88
  • 88
  • 112
  • 91
  • 88
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
12th Graders

62

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

100%

2012 Accountability Cohort Members

48

PI

88

Not Black or African American
12th Graders

7

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

2012 Accountability Cohort Members

1

PI

Not Hispanic or Latino
12th Graders

61

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

100%

2012 Accountability Cohort Members

47

PI

87

Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
12th Graders

65

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

100%

2012 Accountability Cohort Members

48

PI

88

Not White
12th Graders

65

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

100%

2012 Accountability Cohort Members

48

PI

88

Not Multiracial
12th Graders

65

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

100%

2012 Accountability Cohort Members

48

PI

88

General Education
12th Graders

48

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

100%

2012 Accountability Cohort Members

34

PI

112

English Proficient
12th Graders

64

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

100%

2012 Accountability Cohort Members

46

PI

91

Not Economically Disadvantaged
12th Graders

26

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

2012 Accountability Cohort Members

15

PI

Male
12th Graders

27

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

2012 Accountability Cohort Members

21

PI

Female
12th Graders

38

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

2012 Accountability Cohort Members

27

PI

Migrant
12th Graders

0

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

2012 Accountability Cohort Members

0

PI

Not Migrant
12th Graders

65

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

100%

2012 Accountability Cohort Members

48

PI

88

― There were fewer than 40 12th graders, so the Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 students in the 2012 accountability cohort, so PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed.

Unweighted Combined ELA and Math PIs

GROUP
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
Secondary-Level ELA PI
  • 133
  • 132
  • 133
Secondary-Level MATH PI
  • 88
  • 87
  • 88
UNWEIGHTED COMBINED PI
  • 111
  • 0
  • 110
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 111
All Students
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
Secondary-Level ELA PI
133
Secondary-Level MATH PI
88
Unweighted Combined PI
111
American Indian or Alaska Native
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
Secondary-Level ELA PI
Secondary-Level MATH PI
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Black or African American
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
Secondary-Level ELA PI
132
Secondary-Level MATH PI
87
Unweighted Combined PI
110
Hispanic or Latino
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
Secondary-Level ELA PI
Secondary-Level MATH PI
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
Secondary-Level ELA PI
Secondary-Level MATH PI
Unweighted Combined PI
0
White
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
Secondary-Level ELA PI
Secondary-Level MATH PI
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Multiracial
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
Secondary-Level ELA PI
Secondary-Level MATH PI
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Students With Disabilities
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
Secondary-Level ELA PI
Secondary-Level MATH PI
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Limited English Proficient
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
Secondary-Level ELA PI
Secondary-Level MATH PI
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Economically Disadvantaged
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
Secondary-Level ELA PI
133
Secondary-Level MATH PI
88
Unweighted Combined PI
111
― There were not enough students to determine a Performance Index.

Overall Graduation Rate for Accountability

All accountability groups made AYP: YES

GROUP
MADE AYP
All Students

MADE AYP

YES

American Indian or Alaska Native

MADE AYP

Black or African American

MADE AYP

YES

Hispanic or Latino

MADE AYP

Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander

MADE AYP

White

MADE AYP

Multiracial

MADE AYP

Students With Disabilities

MADE AYP

Limited English Proficient

MADE AYP

Economically Disadvantaged

MADE AYP

YES

― There were not enough students to make an AYP determination.

Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort for Accountability

GROUP
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion:
  • YES
  • YES
  • YES
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
  • 82
  • 3
  • 69
  • 8
  • 0
  • 2
  • 0
  • 12
  • 6
  • 69
Graduation Rate
  • 70%
  • 68%
  • 68%
State Standard
  • 80%
  • 80%
  • 80%
Progress Target
  • 55%
  • 53%
  • 58%
All Students
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
82
Graduation Rate
70%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
55%
American Indian or Alaska Native
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
3
Graduation Rate
State Standard
Progress Target
Black or African American
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
69
Graduation Rate
68%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
53%
Hispanic or Latino
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
8
Graduation Rate
State Standard
Progress Target
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
State Standard
Progress Target
White
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
2
Graduation Rate
State Standard
Progress Target
Multiracial
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
State Standard
Progress Target
Students With Disabilities
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
12
Graduation Rate
State Standard
Progress Target
Limited English Proficient
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
6
Graduation Rate
State Standard
Progress Target
Economically Disadvantaged
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
69
Graduation Rate
68%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
58%

YES Graduation rate is equal to or greater than the State Standard or the group's Progress Target.
NO Graduation rate is less than the State Standard and the group's Progress Target.
― There were fewer than 30 students in the cohort.

Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort for Accountability

GROUP
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion:
  • YES
  • YES
  • YES
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
  • 85
  • 4
  • 70
  • 6
  • 1
  • 3
  • 1
  • 16
  • 6
  • 61
Graduation Rate
  • 72%
  • 71%
  • 77%
State Standard
  • 80%
  • 80%
  • 80%
Progress Target
  • 62%
  • 62%
  • 68%
All Students
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
85
Graduation Rate
72%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
62%
American Indian or Alaska Native
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
4
Graduation Rate
State Standard
Progress Target
Black or African American
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
70
Graduation Rate
71%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
62%
Hispanic or Latino
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
6
Graduation Rate
State Standard
Progress Target
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
1
Graduation Rate
State Standard
Progress Target
White
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
3
Graduation Rate
State Standard
Progress Target
Multiracial
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
1
Graduation Rate
State Standard
Progress Target
Students With Disabilities
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
16
Graduation Rate
State Standard
Progress Target
Limited English Proficient
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
6
Graduation Rate
State Standard
Progress Target
Economically Disadvantaged
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
61
Graduation Rate
77%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
68%

YES Graduation rate is equal to or greater than the State Standard or the group's Progress Target.
NO Graduation rate is less than the State Standard and the group's Progress Target.
― There were fewer than 30 students in the cohort.

Graduation Rates for Non-AYP Groups for Accountability

GROUP
Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
  • 79
  • 13
  • 74
  • 82
  • 80
  • 82
  • 70
  • 76
  • 13
  • 41
  • 41
  • 0
  • 82
Graduation Rate
  • 70%
  • 68%
  • 70%
  • 70%
  • 70%
  • 74%
  • 71%
  • 68%
  • 71%
  • 70%
Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
  • 81
  • 15
  • 79
  • 84
  • 82
  • 84
  • 69
  • 79
  • 24
  • 48
  • 37
  • 0
  • 85
Graduation Rate
  • 70%
  • 73%
  • 71%
  • 72%
  • 71%
  • 78%
  • 72%
  • 63%
  • 84%
  • 72%

Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort

Not American Indian or Alaska Native
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
79
Graduation Rate
70%
Not Black or African American
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
13
Graduation Rate
Not Hispanic or Latino
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
74
Graduation Rate
68%
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
82
Graduation Rate
70%
Not White
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
80
Graduation Rate
70%
Not Multiracial
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
82
Graduation Rate
70%
General Education
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
70
Graduation Rate
74%
English Proficient
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
76
Graduation Rate
71%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
13
Graduation Rate
Male
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
41
Graduation Rate
68%
Female
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
41
Graduation Rate
71%
Migrant
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
Not Migrant
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
82
Graduation Rate
70%

Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort

Not American Indian or Alaska Native
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
81
Graduation Rate
70%
Not Black or African American
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
15
Graduation Rate
Not Hispanic or Latino
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
79
Graduation Rate
73%
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
84
Graduation Rate
71%
Not White
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
82
Graduation Rate
72%
Not Multiracial
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
84
Graduation Rate
71%
General Education
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
69
Graduation Rate
78%
English Proficient
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
79
Graduation Rate
72%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
24
Graduation Rate
Male
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
48
Graduation Rate
63%
Female
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
37
Graduation Rate
84%
Migrant
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
Not Migrant
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
85
Graduation Rate
72%

― There were fewer than 30 students in the cohort.

Graduation Rates for Regents with Advanced Designation and CTE Endorsement for Accountability

Percentage of 2011 Graduation-Rate Total Cohort members who graduated as of August 31, 2015 with:
  • Regents Diploma with an Advanced Designation (This School)
  • 0%
  • Regents Diploma with an Advanced Designation (Statewide)
  • 32%
  • Percentage in This School Exceeded Statewide
  • NO
Regents Diploma with an Advanced Designation (This School)
0%
Regents Diploma with an Advanced Designation (Statewide)
32%
Percentage in This School Exceeded Statewide
NO
Regents Diploma with CTE Endorsement (This School)
0%
Regents Diploma with CTE Endorsement (Statewide)
5%
Percentage in This School Exceeded Statewide
NO
Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.