NYC CHARTER HS - AECI - School Report Card Data [2016 - 17]
The New York State Report Card is an important part of the Board of Regents' effort to raise learning standards for all students. It provides information to the public on school/district enrollment and staff, student performance, and other measures of school and district performance. Knowledge gained from the report card on a school's or district's strengths and weaknesses can be used to improve instruction and services to students. Report Card Data - Glossary of Terms | Accountability Data - Glossary of Terms | Business Rules
Turnover Rate of Teachers with Fewer Than Five Years of Experience
61%
TURNOVER RATE OF ALL TEACHERS
50%
Teacher Turnover Rate (2015-16 to 2016-17)
Turnover Rate of Teachers with Fewer Than Five Years of Experience
61%
Turnover Rate of All Teachers
50%
Staff Counts (2016 - 17)
GROUP
PRINCIPALS
ASSISTANT PRINCIPALS
OTHER PROFESSIONAL STAFF
PARAPROFESSIONALS
STAFF
1
2
26
0
Staff Counts (2016 - 17)
Principals
1
Assistant Principals
2
Other Professional Staff
26
Paraprofessionals
0
Teacher Qualifications (2016 - 17)
TOTAL TEACHERS
33
PERCENT WITH NO VALID TEACHING CERTIFICATE
30%
PERCENT TEACHING OUT OF CERTIFICATE
30%
PERCENT WITH FEWER THAN THREE YEARS OF EXPERIENCE
24%
PERCENTAGE WITH MASTER'S DEGREEPLUS 30 HOURS OR DOCTORATE
12%
Total Number of Classes
176
Percent Taught by Teachers Without Appropriate Certification
36%
Teacher Qualifications (2016 - 17)
TOTAL TEACHERS: 33
Percent with No Valid Teaching Certificate
30%
Percent Teaching Out of Certification
30%
Percent with Fewer Than Three Years of Experience
24%
Percentage with Master's Degree Plus 30 Hours or Doctorate
12%
Total Number of Classes
176
Percent Taught by Teachers Without Appropriate Certification
36%
High School Completers (2016 - 17)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
85
69
16
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
85
69
16
REGENTS DIPLOMA
79
93%
66
96%
13
81%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
REGENTS WITH ADVANCED DESIGNATION
4
5%
3
4%
1
6%
REGENTS WITH CTE ENDORSEMENT
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
LOCAL DIPLOMAS
6
7%
3
4%
3
19%
COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
All Students
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
85
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
85
Regents Diploma
79
93%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
4
5%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
0
0%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
6
7%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
0
0%
of Completers
General Education
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
69
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
69
Regents Diploma
66
96%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
3
4%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
0
0%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
3
4%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
0
0%
of Completers
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
16
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
16
Regents Diploma
13
81%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
1
6%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
0
0%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
3
19%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
0
0%
of Completers
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
85
69
16
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
85
69
16
REGENTS DIPLOMA
79
93%
66
96%
13
81%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
REGENTS WITH ADVANCED DESIGNATION
4
5%
3
4%
1
6%
REGENTS WITH CTE ENDORSEMENT
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
LOCAL DIPLOMAS
6
7%
3
4%
3
19%
COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
All Students
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
85
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
85
Regents Diploma
79
93%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
4
5%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
0
0%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
6
7%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
0
0%
of Completers
General Education
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
69
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
69
Regents Diploma
66
96%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
3
4%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
0
0%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
3
4%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
0
0%
of Completers
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
16
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
16
Regents Diploma
13
81%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
1
6%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
0
0%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
3
19%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
0
0%
of Completers
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
85
69
16
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
85
69
16
REGENTS DIPLOMA
79
93%
66
96%
13
81%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
REGENTS WITH ADVANCED DESIGNATION
4
5%
3
4%
1
6%
REGENTS WITH CTE ENDORSEMENT
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
LOCAL DIPLOMAS
6
7%
3
4%
3
19%
COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
All Students
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
85
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
85
Regents Diploma
79
93%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
4
5%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
0
0%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
6
7%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
0
0%
of Completers
General Education
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
69
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
69
Regents Diploma
66
96%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
3
4%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
0
0%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
3
4%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
0
0%
of Completers
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
16
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
16
Regents Diploma
13
81%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
1
6%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
0
0%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
3
19%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
0
0%
of Completers
Post-graduation Plans of Completers (2016 - 17)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO FOUR-YEAR COLLEGE
44
52%
40
58%
4
25%
TO TWO-YEAR COLLEGE
36
42%
26
38%
10
63%
TO OTHER POST-SECONDARY
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
TO THE MILITARY
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO EMPLOYMENT
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
TO ADULT SERVICES
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
TO OTHER KNOWN PLANS
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
PLANS UNKNOWN
5
6%
3
4%
2
13%
All Students
To Four-Year College
44
52%
To Two-Year College
36
42%
To Other Post-Secondary
0
0%
To the Military
0
0%
To Employment
0
0%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
0
0%
Plan Unknown
5
6%
General Education
To Four-Year College
40
58%
To Two-Year College
26
38%
To Other Post-Secondary
0
0%
To the Military
0
0%
To Employment
0
0%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
0
0%
Plan Unknown
3
4%
Students with Disabilities
To Four-Year College
4
25%
To Two-Year College
10
63%
To Other Post-Secondary
0
0%
To the Military
0
0%
To Employment
0
0%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
0
0%
Plan Unknown
2
13%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO FOUR-YEAR COLLEGE
44
52%
40
58%
4
25%
TO TWO-YEAR COLLEGE
36
42%
26
38%
10
63%
TO OTHER POST-SECONDARY
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
TO THE MILITARY
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO EMPLOYMENT
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
TO ADULT SERVICES
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
TO OTHER KNOWN PLANS
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
PLANS UNKNOWN
5
6%
3
4%
2
13%
All Students
To Four-Year College
44
52%
To Two-Year College
36
42%
To Other Post-Secondary
0
0%
To the Military
0
0%
To Employment
0
0%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
0
0%
Plan Unknown
5
6%
General Education
To Four-Year College
40
58%
To Two-Year College
26
38%
To Other Post-Secondary
0
0%
To the Military
0
0%
To Employment
0
0%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
0
0%
Plan Unknown
3
4%
Students with Disabilities
To Four-Year College
4
25%
To Two-Year College
10
63%
To Other Post-Secondary
0
0%
To the Military
0
0%
To Employment
0
0%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
0
0%
Plan Unknown
2
13%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO FOUR-YEAR COLLEGE
44
52%
40
58%
4
25%
TO TWO-YEAR COLLEGE
36
42%
26
38%
10
63%
TO OTHER POST-SECONDARY
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
TO THE MILITARY
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO EMPLOYMENT
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
TO ADULT SERVICES
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
TO OTHER KNOWN PLANS
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
PLANS UNKNOWN
5
6%
3
4%
2
13%
All Students
To Four-Year College
44
52%
To Two-Year College
36
42%
To Other Post-Secondary
0
0%
To the Military
0
0%
To Employment
0
0%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
0
0%
Plan Unknown
5
6%
General Education
To Four-Year College
40
58%
To Two-Year College
26
38%
To Other Post-Secondary
0
0%
To the Military
0
0%
To Employment
0
0%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
0
0%
Plan Unknown
3
4%
Students with Disabilities
To Four-Year College
4
25%
To Two-Year College
10
63%
To Other Post-Secondary
0
0%
To the Military
0
0%
To Employment
0
0%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
0
0%
Plan Unknown
2
13%
Statewide Results on the National Assessment of Educational Progress: NAEP (2016 - 17)
Grade: 4
Reading
GROUP
All Students
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
BELOW BASIC
32%
68%
*%
18%
48%
45%
22%
*%
74%
44%
BASIC
32%
22%
*%
30%
34%
33%
31%
*%
21%
33%
PROFICIENT
27%
9%
*%
33%
16%
18%
35%
*%
5%
19%
ADVANCED
9%
2%
*%
19%
3%
4%
13%
*%
*%
4%
PARTICIPATION RATE
98
93
88
Reading
All Students
Percent Below Basic
32
Percent Basic
32
Percent Proficient
27
Percent Advanced
9
Participation Rate
98
Students with Disabilities
Percent Below Basic
68
Percent Basic
22
Percent Proficient
9
Percent Advanced
2
Participation Rate
93
American Indian or Alaska Native
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Percent Below Basic
18
Percent Basic
30
Percent Proficient
33
Percent Advanced
19
Black or African American
Percent Below Basic
48
Percent Basic
34
Percent Proficient
16
Percent Advanced
3
Hispanic or Latino
Percent Below Basic
45
Percent Basic
33
Percent Proficient
18
Percent Advanced
4
White
Percent Below Basic
22
Percent Basic
31
Percent Proficient
35
Percent Advanced
13
Multiracial
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Limited English Proficient
Percent Below Basic
74
Percent Basic
21
Percent Proficient
5
Percent Advanced
*
Participation Rate
88
Economically Disadvantaged
Percent Below Basic
44
Percent Basic
33
Percent Proficient
19
Percent Advanced
4
Mathematics
GROUP
All Students
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
BELOW BASIC
24%
58%
*%
11%
36%
36%
14%
*%
68%
34%
BASIC
41%
31%
*%
30%
42%
44%
40%
*%
29%
43%
PROFICIENT
30%
10%
*%
44%
21%
18%
38%
*%
3%
21%
ADVANCED
5%
1%
*%
15%
2%
2%
7%
*%
*%
2%
PARTICIPATION RATE
98
94
91
Mathematics
All Students
Percent Below Basic
24
Percent Basic
41
Percent Proficient
30
Percent Advanced
5
Participation Rate
98
Students with Disabilities
Percent Below Basic
58
Percent Basic
31
Percent Proficient
10
Percent Advanced
1
Participation Rate
94
American Indian or Alaska Native
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Percent Below Basic
11
Percent Basic
30
Percent Proficient
44
Percent Advanced
15
Black or African American
Percent Below Basic
36
Percent Basic
42
Percent Proficient
21
Percent Advanced
2
Hispanic or Latino
Percent Below Basic
36
Percent Basic
44
Percent Proficient
18
Percent Advanced
2
White
Percent Below Basic
14
Percent Basic
40
Percent Proficient
38
Percent Advanced
7
Multiracial
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Limited English Proficient
Percent Below Basic
68
Percent Basic
29
Percent Proficient
3
Percent Advanced
*
Participation Rate
91
Economically Disadvantaged
Percent Below Basic
34
Percent Basic
43
Percent Proficient
21
Percent Advanced
2
Grade: 8
Reading
GROUP
All Students
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
BELOW BASIC
27%
58%
*%
21%
39%
35%
20%
*%
81%
37%
BASIC
39%
33%
*%
31%
41%
43%
38%
*%
16%
41%
PROFICIENT
30%
8%
*%
37%
19%
21%
36%
*%
3%
20%
ADVANCED
5%
*%
*%
12%
1%
1%
6%
*%
*%
2%
PARTICIPATION RATE
98
94
80
Reading
All Students
Percent Below Basic
27
Percent Basic
39
Percent Proficient
30
Percent Advanced
5
Participation Rate
98
Students with Disabilities
Percent Below Basic
58
Percent Basic
33
Percent Proficient
8
Percent Advanced
*
Participation Rate
94
American Indian or Alaska Native
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Percent Below Basic
21
Percent Basic
31
Percent Proficient
37
Percent Advanced
12
Black or African American
Percent Below Basic
39
Percent Basic
41
Percent Proficient
19
Percent Advanced
1
Hispanic or Latino
Percent Below Basic
35
Percent Basic
43
Percent Proficient
21
Percent Advanced
1
White
Percent Below Basic
20
Percent Basic
38
Percent Proficient
36
Percent Advanced
6
Multiracial
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Limited English Proficient
Percent Below Basic
81
Percent Basic
16
Percent Proficient
3
Percent Advanced
*
Participation Rate
80
Economically Disadvantaged
Percent Below Basic
37
Percent Basic
41
Percent Proficient
20
Percent Advanced
2
Mathematics
GROUP
All Students
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
BELOW BASIC
32%
69%
*%
14%
53%
48%
21%
*%
80%
44%
BASIC
34%
23%
*%
24%
32%
33%
37%
*%
16%
34%
PROFICIENT
24%
6%
*%
32%
14%
15%
29%
*%
4%
17%
ADVANCED
10%
2%
*%
30%
2%
4%
13%
*%
1%
4%
PARTICIPATION RATE
98
95
80
Mathematics
All Students
Percent Below Basic
32
Percent Basic
34
Percent Proficient
24
Percent Advanced
10
Participation Rate
98
Students with Disabilities
Percent Below Basic
69
Percent Basic
23
Percent Proficient
6
Percent Advanced
2
Participation Rate
95
American Indian or Alaska Native
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Percent Below Basic
14
Percent Basic
24
Percent Proficient
32
Percent Advanced
30
Black or African American
Percent Below Basic
53
Percent Basic
32
Percent Proficient
14
Percent Advanced
2
Hispanic or Latino
Percent Below Basic
48
Percent Basic
33
Percent Proficient
15
Percent Advanced
4
White
Percent Below Basic
21
Percent Basic
37
Percent Proficient
29
Percent Advanced
13
Multiracial
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Limited English Proficient
Percent Below Basic
80
Percent Basic
16
Percent Proficient
4
Percent Advanced
1
Participation Rate
80
Economically Disadvantaged
Percent Below Basic
44
Percent Basic
34
Percent Proficient
17
Percent Advanced
4
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level English Language Arts after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 86
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
2%
LEVEL 3
32
37%
LEVEL 4
50
58%
General Education
PROFICIENT
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 71
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
3%
LEVEL 3
25
35%
LEVEL 4
42
59%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 15
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
7
47%
LEVEL 4
8
53%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 27
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 58
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
3%
LEVEL 3
23
40%
LEVEL 4
33
57%
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 28
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
9
32%
LEVEL 4
17
61%
Female
PROFICIENT
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 33
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
3%
LEVEL 3
11
33%
LEVEL 4
21
64%
Male
PROFICIENT
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 53
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
2%
LEVEL 3
21
40%
LEVEL 4
29
55%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
99%
TOTAL TESTED: 78
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
29
37%
LEVEL 4
48
62%
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 8
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
25%
LEVEL 3
3
38%
LEVEL 4
2
25%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 80
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
3%
LEVEL 3
29
36%
LEVEL 4
48
60%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
3
50%
LEVEL 4
2
33%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 86
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
2%
LEVEL 3
32
37%
LEVEL 4
50
58%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
86
71
15
1
27
58
28
33
53
78
8
80
6
86
PROFICIENT
95%
94%
100%
_%
_%
97%
93%
97%
94%
99%
63%
96%
83%
95%
LEVEL 1
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
2%
2
3%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
2
3%
0
0%
1
3%
1
2%
0
0%
2
25%
2
3%
0
0%
2
2%
LEVEL 3
32
37%
25
35%
7
47%
_
_
_
_
23
40%
9
32%
11
33%
21
40%
29
37%
3
38%
29
36%
3
50%
32
37%
LEVEL 4
50
58%
42
59%
8
53%
_
_
_
_
33
57%
17
61%
21
64%
29
55%
48
62%
2
25%
48
60%
2
33%
50
58%
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level Mathematics after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 86
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
5
6%
LEVEL 3
73
85%
LEVEL 4
6
7%
General Education
PROFICIENT
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 71
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
3%
LEVEL 3
61
86%
LEVEL 4
6
8%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 15
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
3
20%
LEVEL 3
12
80%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 27
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 58
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
4
7%
LEVEL 3
50
86%
LEVEL 4
4
7%
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 28
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
4%
LEVEL 3
23
82%
LEVEL 4
2
7%
Female
PROFICIENT
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 33
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
3%
LEVEL 3
28
85%
LEVEL 4
4
12%
Male
PROFICIENT
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 53
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
4
8%
LEVEL 3
45
85%
LEVEL 4
2
4%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 78
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
4
5%
LEVEL 3
67
86%
LEVEL 4
6
8%
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 8
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
13%
LEVEL 3
6
75%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 80
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
5
6%
LEVEL 3
68
85%
LEVEL 4
6
8%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
5
83%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 86
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
5
6%
LEVEL 3
73
85%
LEVEL 4
6
7%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
86
71
15
1
27
58
28
33
53
78
8
80
6
86
PROFICIENT
92%
94%
80%
_%
_%
93%
89%
97%
89%
94%
75%
93%
83%
92%
LEVEL 1
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
LEVEL 2
5
6%
2
3%
3
20%
_
_
_
_
4
7%
1
4%
1
3%
4
8%
4
5%
1
13%
5
6%
0
0%
5
6%
LEVEL 3
73
85%
61
86%
12
80%
_
_
_
_
50
86%
23
82%
28
85%
45
85%
67
86%
6
75%
68
85%
5
83%
73
85%
LEVEL 4
6
7%
6
8%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
4
7%
2
7%
4
12%
2
4%
6
8%
0
0%
6
8%
0
0%
6
7%
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level Global History and Geography after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 86
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
5
6%
LEVEL 3
60
70%
LEVEL 4
18
21%
General Education
PROFICIENT
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 71
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
3
4%
LEVEL 3
47
66%
LEVEL 4
18
25%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 15
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
13%
LEVEL 3
13
87%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 27
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 58
LEVEL 1
1
2%
LEVEL 2
5
9%
LEVEL 3
42
72%
LEVEL 4
10
17%
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 28
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
18
64%
LEVEL 4
8
29%
Female
PROFICIENT
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 33
LEVEL 1
1
3%
LEVEL 2
1
3%
LEVEL 3
22
67%
LEVEL 4
9
27%
Male
PROFICIENT
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 53
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
4
8%
LEVEL 3
38
72%
LEVEL 4
9
17%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 78
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
4
5%
LEVEL 3
55
71%
LEVEL 4
18
23%
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 8
LEVEL 1
1
13%
LEVEL 2
1
13%
LEVEL 3
5
63%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 80
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
5
6%
LEVEL 3
57
71%
LEVEL 4
16
20%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
3
50%
LEVEL 4
2
33%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 86
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
5
6%
LEVEL 3
60
70%
LEVEL 4
18
21%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
86
71
15
1
27
58
28
33
53
78
8
80
6
86
PROFICIENT
91%
92%
87%
_%
_%
90%
93%
94%
89%
94%
63%
91%
83%
91%
LEVEL 1
1
1%
1
1%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
1
2%
0
0%
1
3%
0
0%
0
0%
1
13%
1
1%
0
0%
1
1%
LEVEL 2
5
6%
3
4%
2
13%
_
_
_
_
5
9%
0
0%
1
3%
4
8%
4
5%
1
13%
5
6%
0
0%
5
6%
LEVEL 3
60
70%
47
66%
13
87%
_
_
_
_
42
72%
18
64%
22
67%
38
72%
55
71%
5
63%
57
71%
3
50%
60
70%
LEVEL 4
18
21%
18
25%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
10
17%
8
29%
9
27%
9
17%
18
23%
0
0%
16
20%
2
33%
18
21%
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level U.S. History and Government after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 86
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
1%
LEVEL 3
66
77%
LEVEL 4
17
20%
General Education
PROFICIENT
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 71
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
52
73%
LEVEL 4
17
24%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 15
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
7%
LEVEL 3
14
93%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 27
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 58
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
2%
LEVEL 3
47
81%
LEVEL 4
10
17%
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 28
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
19
68%
LEVEL 4
7
25%
Female
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 33
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
25
76%
LEVEL 4
8
24%
Male
PROFICIENT
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 53
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
2%
LEVEL 3
41
77%
LEVEL 4
9
17%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 78
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
1%
LEVEL 3
59
76%
LEVEL 4
17
22%
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 8
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
7
88%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 80
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
1%
LEVEL 3
62
78%
LEVEL 4
16
20%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
4
67%
LEVEL 4
1
17%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 86
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
1%
LEVEL 3
66
77%
LEVEL 4
17
20%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
86
71
15
1
27
58
28
33
53
78
8
80
6
86
PROFICIENT
97%
97%
93%
_%
_%
98%
93%
100%
94%
97%
88%
98%
83%
97%
LEVEL 1
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
1%
0
0%
1
7%
_
_
_
_
1
2%
0
0%
0
0%
1
2%
1
1%
0
0%
1
1%
0
0%
1
1%
LEVEL 3
66
77%
52
73%
14
93%
_
_
_
_
47
81%
19
68%
25
76%
41
77%
59
76%
7
88%
62
78%
4
67%
66
77%
LEVEL 4
17
20%
17
24%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
10
17%
7
25%
8
24%
9
17%
17
22%
0
0%
16
20%
1
17%
17
20%
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level Science after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 86
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
7
8%
LEVEL 3
67
78%
LEVEL 4
9
10%
General Education
PROFICIENT
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 71
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
3
4%
LEVEL 3
58
82%
LEVEL 4
8
11%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 15
LEVEL 1
1
7%
LEVEL 2
4
27%
LEVEL 3
9
60%
LEVEL 4
1
7%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 27
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 58
LEVEL 1
1
2%
LEVEL 2
6
10%
LEVEL 3
45
78%
LEVEL 4
6
10%
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 28
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
4%
LEVEL 3
22
79%
LEVEL 4
3
11%
Female
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 33
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
28
85%
LEVEL 4
5
15%
Male
PROFICIENT
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 53
LEVEL 1
1
2%
LEVEL 2
7
13%
LEVEL 3
39
74%
LEVEL 4
4
8%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 78
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
5
6%
LEVEL 3
63
81%
LEVEL 4
9
12%
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 8
LEVEL 1
1
13%
LEVEL 2
2
25%
LEVEL 3
4
50%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 80
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
7
9%
LEVEL 3
63
79%
LEVEL 4
8
10%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
4
67%
LEVEL 4
1
17%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 86
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
7
8%
LEVEL 3
67
78%
LEVEL 4
9
10%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
86
71
15
1
27
58
28
33
53
78
8
80
6
86
PROFICIENT
88%
93%
67%
_%
_%
88%
89%
100%
81%
92%
50%
89%
83%
88%
LEVEL 1
1
1%
0
0%
1
7%
_
_
_
_
1
2%
0
0%
0
0%
1
2%
0
0%
1
13%
1
1%
0
0%
1
1%
LEVEL 2
7
8%
3
4%
4
27%
_
_
_
_
6
10%
1
4%
0
0%
7
13%
5
6%
2
25%
7
9%
0
0%
7
8%
LEVEL 3
67
78%
58
82%
9
60%
_
_
_
_
45
78%
22
79%
28
85%
39
74%
63
81%
4
50%
63
79%
4
67%
67
78%
LEVEL 4
9
10%
8
11%
1
7%
_
_
_
_
6
10%
3
11%
5
15%
4
8%
9
12%
0
0%
8
10%
1
17%
9
10%
Regents Examination Results (2016 - 17)
English Language Arts (Common Core)
English Language Arts (Common Core)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
115
88
27
43
72
32
83
95
20
109
6
115
LEVEL 1
16
14%
8
9%
8
30%
5
12%
11
15%
6
19%
10
12%
10
11%
6
30%
16
15%
0
0%
16
14%
LEVEL 2
14
12%
11
13%
3
11%
4
9%
10
14%
4
13%
10
12%
11
12%
3
15%
14
13%
0
0%
14
12%
LEVEL 3
37
32%
28
32%
9
33%
17
40%
20
28%
5
16%
32
39%
32
34%
5
25%
34
31%
3
50%
37
32%
LEVEL 4
20
17%
15
17%
5
19%
7
16%
13
18%
5
16%
15
18%
17
18%
3
15%
20
18%
0
0%
20
17%
LEVEL 5
28
24%
26
30%
2
7%
10
23%
18
25%
12
38%
16
19%
25
26%
3
15%
25
23%
3
50%
28
24%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 115
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
16
14%
LEVEL 2
14
12%
LEVEL 3
37
32%
LEVEL 4
20
17%
LEVEL 5
28
24%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 88
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
8
9%
LEVEL 2
11
13%
LEVEL 3
28
32%
LEVEL 4
15
17%
LEVEL 5
26
30%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 27
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
8
30%
LEVEL 2
3
11%
LEVEL 3
9
33%
LEVEL 4
5
19%
LEVEL 5
2
7%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 43
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
5
12%
LEVEL 2
4
9%
LEVEL 3
17
40%
LEVEL 4
7
16%
LEVEL 5
10
23%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 72
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
11
15%
LEVEL 2
10
14%
LEVEL 3
20
28%
LEVEL 4
13
18%
LEVEL 5
18
25%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 32
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
6
19%
LEVEL 2
4
13%
LEVEL 3
5
16%
LEVEL 4
5
16%
LEVEL 5
12
38%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 83
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
10
12%
LEVEL 2
10
12%
LEVEL 3
32
39%
LEVEL 4
15
18%
LEVEL 5
16
19%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 95
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
10
11%
LEVEL 2
11
12%
LEVEL 3
32
34%
LEVEL 4
17
18%
LEVEL 5
25
26%
English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 20
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
6
30%
LEVEL 2
3
15%
LEVEL 3
5
25%
LEVEL 4
3
15%
LEVEL 5
3
15%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 109
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
16
15%
LEVEL 2
14
13%
LEVEL 3
34
31%
LEVEL 4
20
18%
LEVEL 5
25
23%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 6
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
3
50%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
LEVEL 5
3
50%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 115
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
16
14%
LEVEL 2
14
12%
LEVEL 3
37
32%
LEVEL 4
20
17%
LEVEL 5
28
24%
Algebra 2/Trigonometry
Regents Algebra 2/Trigonometry
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Hispanic or Latino
Small Group Total
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
55
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
65
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
85
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Algebra I (Common Core)
Algebra I (Common Core)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
172
116
56
1
1
69
101
71
54
118
146
26
163
9
172
LEVEL 1
14
8%
4
3%
10
18%
_
_
_
_
_
_
7
7%
7
10%
2
4%
12
10%
11
8%
3
12%
13
8%
1
11%
14
8%
LEVEL 2
27
16%
14
12%
13
23%
_
_
_
_
_
_
18
18%
9
13%
11
20%
16
14%
22
15%
5
19%
24
15%
3
33%
27
16%
LEVEL 3
103
60%
75
65%
28
50%
_
_
_
_
_
_
56
55%
47
66%
29
54%
74
63%
87
60%
16
62%
98
60%
5
56%
103
60%
LEVEL 4
21
12%
16
14%
5
9%
_
_
_
_
_
_
16
16%
5
7%
8
15%
13
11%
20
14%
1
4%
21
13%
0
0%
21
12%
LEVEL 5
7
4%
7
6%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
4
4%
3
4%
4
7%
3
3%
6
4%
1
4%
7
4%
0
0%
7
4%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 172
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
14
8%
LEVEL 2
27
16%
LEVEL 3
103
60%
LEVEL 4
21
12%
LEVEL 5
7
4%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 116
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
4
3%
LEVEL 2
14
12%
LEVEL 3
75
65%
LEVEL 4
16
14%
LEVEL 5
7
6%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 56
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
10
18%
LEVEL 2
13
23%
LEVEL 3
28
50%
LEVEL 4
5
9%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
American Indian or Alaska Native
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 69
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 101
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
7
7%
LEVEL 2
18
18%
LEVEL 3
56
55%
LEVEL 4
16
16%
LEVEL 5
4
4%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 71
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
7
10%
LEVEL 2
9
13%
LEVEL 3
47
66%
LEVEL 4
5
7%
LEVEL 5
3
4%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 54
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
2
4%
LEVEL 2
11
20%
LEVEL 3
29
54%
LEVEL 4
8
15%
LEVEL 5
4
7%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 118
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
12
10%
LEVEL 2
16
14%
LEVEL 3
74
63%
LEVEL 4
13
11%
LEVEL 5
3
3%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 146
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
11
8%
LEVEL 2
22
15%
LEVEL 3
87
60%
LEVEL 4
20
14%
LEVEL 5
6
4%
English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 26
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
3
12%
LEVEL 2
5
19%
LEVEL 3
16
62%
LEVEL 4
1
4%
LEVEL 5
1
4%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 163
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
13
8%
LEVEL 2
24
15%
LEVEL 3
98
60%
LEVEL 4
21
13%
LEVEL 5
7
4%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 9
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
1
11%
LEVEL 2
3
33%
LEVEL 3
5
56%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 172
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
14
8%
LEVEL 2
27
16%
LEVEL 3
103
60%
LEVEL 4
21
12%
LEVEL 5
7
4%
Common Core Geometry
Regents Common Core Geometry
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
54
49
5
1
1
16
35
1
19
14
40
49
5
49
5
54
LEVEL 1
4
7%
4
8%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
2
6%
_
_
2
11%
1
7%
3
8%
3
6%
1
20%
4
8%
0
0%
4
7%
LEVEL 2
10
19%
8
16%
2
40%
_
_
_
_
_
_
5
14%
_
_
5
26%
2
14%
8
20%
8
16%
2
40%
10
20%
0
0%
10
19%
LEVEL 3
37
69%
34
69%
3
60%
_
_
_
_
_
_
26
74%
_
_
11
58%
11
79%
26
65%
35
71%
2
40%
32
65%
5
100%
37
69%
LEVEL 4
3
6%
3
6%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
2
6%
_
_
1
5%
0
0%
3
8%
3
6%
0
0%
3
6%
0
0%
3
6%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 54
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
4
7%
LEVEL 2
10
19%
LEVEL 3
37
69%
LEVEL 4
3
6%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 49
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
4
8%
LEVEL 2
8
16%
LEVEL 3
34
69%
LEVEL 4
3
6%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
40%
LEVEL 3
3
60%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
American Indian or Alaska Native
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 16
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 35
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
2
6%
LEVEL 2
5
14%
LEVEL 3
26
74%
LEVEL 4
2
6%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 19
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
2
11%
LEVEL 2
5
26%
LEVEL 3
11
58%
LEVEL 4
1
5%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 14
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
1
7%
LEVEL 2
2
14%
LEVEL 3
11
79%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 40
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
3
8%
LEVEL 2
8
20%
LEVEL 3
26
65%
LEVEL 4
3
8%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 49
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
3
6%
LEVEL 2
8
16%
LEVEL 3
35
71%
LEVEL 4
3
6%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
1
20%
LEVEL 2
2
40%
LEVEL 3
2
40%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 49
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
4
8%
LEVEL 2
10
20%
LEVEL 3
32
65%
LEVEL 4
3
6%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
5
100%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 54
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
4
7%
LEVEL 2
10
19%
LEVEL 3
37
69%
LEVEL 4
3
6%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Algebra II (Common Core)
Algebra II (Common Core)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
23
22
1
10
13
8
15
20
3
22
1
23
LEVEL 1
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
4%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
1
8%
0
0%
1
7%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
1
4%
LEVEL 3
13
57%
_
_
_
_
5
50%
8
62%
4
50%
9
60%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
13
57%
LEVEL 4
8
35%
_
_
_
_
5
50%
3
23%
3
38%
5
33%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
8
35%
LEVEL 5
1
4%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
1
8%
1
13%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
1
4%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 23
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
4%
LEVEL 3
13
57%
LEVEL 4
8
35%
LEVEL 5
1
4%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 22
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 10
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
5
50%
LEVEL 4
5
50%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 13
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
8%
LEVEL 3
8
62%
LEVEL 4
3
23%
LEVEL 5
1
8%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 8
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
4
50%
LEVEL 4
3
38%
LEVEL 5
1
13%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 15
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
7%
LEVEL 3
9
60%
LEVEL 4
5
33%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 20
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 22
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 23
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
4%
LEVEL 3
13
57%
LEVEL 4
8
35%
LEVEL 5
1
4%
Global History and Geography
Regents Global History and Geography
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
69
50
19
21
48
27
42
50
19
66
3
69
55
40
58%
31
62%
9
47%
14
67%
26
54%
16
59%
24
57%
32
64%
8
42%
_
_
_
_
40
58%
65
26
38%
20
40%
6
32%
10
48%
16
33%
9
33%
17
40%
22
44%
4
21%
_
_
_
_
26
38%
85
1
1%
1
2%
0
0%
0
0%
1
2%
0
0%
1
2%
1
2%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
1
1%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 69
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
40
58%
65
26
38%
85
1
1%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 50
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
31
62%
65
20
40%
85
1
2%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 19
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
9
47%
65
6
32%
85
0
0%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 21
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
14
67%
65
10
48%
85
0
0%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 48
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
26
54%
65
16
33%
85
1
2%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 27
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
16
59%
65
9
33%
85
0
0%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 42
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
24
57%
65
17
40%
85
1
2%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 50
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
32
64%
65
22
44%
85
1
2%
English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 19
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
8
42%
65
4
21%
85
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 66
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 69
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
40
58%
65
26
38%
85
1
1%
U.S. History & Government
Regents U.S. History & Government
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
152
110
42
1
1
48
101
1
51
49
103
125
27
145
7
152
55
120
79%
91
83%
29
69%
_
_
_
_
_
_
79
78%
_
_
41
80%
38
78%
82
80%
102
82%
18
67%
114
79%
6
86%
120
79%
65
102
67%
81
74%
21
50%
_
_
_
_
_
_
70
69%
_
_
32
63%
31
63%
71
69%
90
72%
12
44%
96
66%
6
86%
102
67%
85
33
22%
31
28%
2
5%
_
_
_
_
_
_
25
25%
_
_
8
16%
10
20%
23
22%
30
24%
3
11%
31
21%
2
29%
33
22%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 152
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
120
79%
65
102
67%
85
33
22%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 110
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
91
83%
65
81
74%
85
31
28%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 42
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
29
69%
65
21
50%
85
2
5%
American Indian or Alaska Native
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 48
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 101
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
79
78%
65
70
69%
85
25
25%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 51
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
41
80%
65
32
63%
85
8
16%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 49
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
38
78%
65
31
63%
85
10
20%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 103
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
82
80%
65
71
69%
85
23
22%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 125
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
102
82%
65
90
72%
85
30
24%
English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 27
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
18
67%
65
12
44%
85
3
11%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 145
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
114
79%
65
96
66%
85
31
21%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 7
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
6
86%
65
6
86%
85
2
29%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 152
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
120
79%
65
102
67%
85
33
22%
Living Environment
Regents Living Environment
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
72
53
19
1
27
44
28
22
50
52
20
68
4
72
55
56
78%
45
85%
11
58%
_
_
_
_
34
77%
22
79%
15
68%
41
82%
43
83%
13
65%
_
_
_
_
56
78%
65
36
50%
31
58%
5
26%
_
_
_
_
20
45%
16
57%
10
45%
26
52%
28
54%
8
40%
_
_
_
_
36
50%
85
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 72
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
56
78%
65
36
50%
85
0
0%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 53
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
45
85%
65
31
58%
85
0
0%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 19
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
11
58%
65
5
26%
85
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 27
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 44
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
34
77%
65
20
45%
85
0
0%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 28
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
22
79%
65
16
57%
85
0
0%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 22
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
15
68%
65
10
45%
85
0
0%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 50
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
41
82%
65
26
52%
85
0
0%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 52
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
43
83%
65
28
54%
85
0
0%
English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 20
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
13
65%
65
8
40%
85
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 68
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 4
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 72
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
56
78%
65
36
50%
85
0
0%
Physical Setting/Earth Science
Regents Physical Setting/Earth Science
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
60
52
8
1
1
17
40
1
20
18
42
53
7
57
3
60
55
54
90%
46
88%
8
100%
_
_
_
_
_
_
38
95%
_
_
16
80%
13
72%
41
98%
49
92%
5
71%
_
_
_
_
54
90%
65
38
63%
34
65%
4
50%
_
_
_
_
_
_
27
68%
_
_
11
55%
9
50%
29
69%
35
66%
3
43%
_
_
_
_
38
63%
85
7
12%
7
13%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
6
15%
_
_
1
5%
0
0%
7
17%
7
13%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
7
12%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 60
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
54
90%
65
38
63%
85
7
12%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 52
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
46
88%
65
34
65%
85
7
13%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 8
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
8
100%
65
4
50%
85
0
0%
American Indian or Alaska Native
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 17
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 40
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
38
95%
65
27
68%
85
6
15%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 20
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
16
80%
65
11
55%
85
1
5%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 18
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
13
72%
65
9
50%
85
0
0%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 42
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
41
98%
65
29
69%
85
7
17%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 53
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
49
92%
65
35
66%
85
7
13%
English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 7
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
5
71%
65
3
43%
85
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 57
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 60
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
54
90%
65
38
63%
85
7
12%
Physical Setting/Chemistry
Regents Physical Setting/Chemistry
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
19
19
6
13
7
12
17
2
19
19
55
19
100%
19
100%
6
100%
13
100%
7
100%
12
100%
_
_
_
_
19
100%
19
100%
65
15
79%
15
79%
6
100%
9
69%
6
86%
9
75%
_
_
_
_
15
79%
15
79%
85
1
5%
1
5%
0
0%
1
8%
0
0%
1
8%
_
_
_
_
1
5%
1
5%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 19
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
19
100%
65
15
79%
85
1
5%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 19
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
19
100%
65
15
79%
85
1
5%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 6
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
6
100%
65
6
100%
85
0
0%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 13
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
13
100%
65
9
69%
85
1
8%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 7
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
7
100%
65
6
86%
85
0
0%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 12
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
12
100%
65
9
75%
85
1
8%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 17
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 19
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
19
100%
65
15
79%
85
1
5%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 19
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
19
100%
65
15
79%
85
1
5%
New York State English as a Second Language Achievement Test (NYSESLAT) Results (2016 - 17)
Grade 9
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED
11
6
5
ENTERING
0%
0%
0%
EMERGING
0%
0%
0%
TRANSITIONING
18%
17%
20%
EXPANDING
73%
67%
80%
COMMANDING
9%
17%
0%
Grade 10
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED
19
14
5
ENTERING
0%
0%
0%
EMERGING
0%
0%
0%
TRANSITIONING
26%
21%
40%
EXPANDING
42%
43%
40%
COMMANDING
32%
36%
20%
Grade 11
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED
12
11
1
ENTERING
0%
_
_
EMERGING
0%
_
_
TRANSITIONING
17%
_
_
EXPANDING
42%
_
_
COMMANDING
42%
_
_
Grade 12
GROUP
All Students
General Education
TOTAL TESTED
5
5
ENTERING
0%
0%
EMERGING
0%
0%
TRANSITIONING
20%
20%
EXPANDING
40%
40%
COMMANDING
40%
40%
Grade 9
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 11
ENTERING
0%
EMERGING
0%
TRANSITIONING
18%
EXPANDING
73%
COMMANDING
9%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 6
ENTERING
0%
EMERGING
0%
TRANSITIONING
17%
EXPANDING
67%
COMMANDING
17%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 5
ENTERING
0%
EMERGING
0%
TRANSITIONING
20%
EXPANDING
80%
COMMANDING
0%
Grade 10
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 19
ENTERING
0%
EMERGING
0%
TRANSITIONING
26%
EXPANDING
42%
COMMANDING
32%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 14
ENTERING
0%
EMERGING
0%
TRANSITIONING
21%
EXPANDING
43%
COMMANDING
36%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 5
ENTERING
0%
EMERGING
0%
TRANSITIONING
40%
EXPANDING
40%
COMMANDING
20%
Grade 11
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 12
ENTERING
0%
EMERGING
0%
TRANSITIONING
17%
EXPANDING
42%
COMMANDING
42%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 11
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 1
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
Grade 12
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 5
ENTERING
0%
EMERGING
0%
TRANSITIONING
20%
EXPANDING
40%
COMMANDING
40%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 5
ENTERING
0%
EMERGING
0%
TRANSITIONING
20%
EXPANDING
40%
COMMANDING
40%
Secondary-Level English Language Arts Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: YES
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
YES⁂
―
―
YES
―
―
―
―
―
YES
Tested 95%
YES
―
―
YES
―
―
―
―
―
YES
12th graders
85
0
27
58
0
0
0
14
7
79
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
―
―
100%
―
―
―
―
―
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
―
―
YES
―
―
―
―
―
YES
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
84
0
27
57
0
0
0
15
7
78
PI
158
―
―
154
―
―
―
―
―
162
EAMO
167
―
―
153
―
―
―
―
―
157
Safe Harbor Target
167
―
―
153
―
―
―
―
―
157
All Students
MADE AYP: YES⁂
Tested 95%
YES
12th Graders
85
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
84
PI
158
EAMO
167
Safe Harbor Target
167
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
27
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
27
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
YES
12th Graders
58
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
57
PI
154
EAMO
153
Safe Harbor Target
153
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
White
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
14
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
15
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
7
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
7
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
YES
12th Graders
79
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
78
PI
162
EAMO
157
Safe Harbor Target
157
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
12th Graders
85
58
27
85
85
85
71
78
6
52
33
0
85
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
100%
―
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
―
100%
―
―
100%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
84
57
27
84
84
84
69
77
6
51
33
0
84
PI
158
154
―
158
158
158
159
164
―
151
170
―
158
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
12th Graders
85
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
84
PI
158
Not Black or African American
12th Graders
58
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
57
PI
154
Not Hispanic or Latino
12th Graders
27
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
27
PI
―
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
12th Graders
85
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
84
PI
158
Not White
12th Graders
85
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
84
PI
158
Not Multiracial
12th Graders
85
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
84
PI
158
General Education
12th Graders
71
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
69
PI
159
English Proficient
12th Graders
78
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
77
PI
164
Not Economically Disadvantaged
12th Graders
6
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
6
PI
―
Male
12th Graders
52
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
51
PI
151
Female
12th Graders
33
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
33
PI
170
Migrant
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
Not Migrant
12th Graders
85
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
84
PI
158
― There were fewer than 40 12th graders, so the Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 students in the 2013 accountability cohort, so PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed. ⁂ All accountability groups except All Students for which the district/school was accountable met the performance criterion, so the All Students group is considered to have met the performance criterion.
Secondary-Level Mathematics Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: NO
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
NO
―
―
NO
―
―
―
―
―
NO
Tested 95%
YES
―
―
YES
―
―
―
―
―
YES
12th graders
85
0
27
58
0
0
0
14
7
79
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
―
―
100%
―
―
―
―
―
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
―
―
NO
―
―
―
―
―
NO
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
84
0
27
57
0
0
0
15
7
78
PI
112
―
―
111
―
―
―
―
―
114
EAMO
154
―
―
137
―
―
―
―
―
143
Safe Harbor Target
154
―
―
137
―
―
―
―
―
143
All Students
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
YES
12th Graders
85
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
84
PI
112
EAMO
154
Safe Harbor Target
154
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
27
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
27
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
YES
12th Graders
58
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
57
PI
111
EAMO
137
Safe Harbor Target
137
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
White
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
14
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
15
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
7
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
7
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
YES
12th Graders
79
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
78
PI
114
EAMO
143
Safe Harbor Target
143
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
12th Graders
85
58
27
85
85
85
71
78
6
52
33
0
85
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
100%
―
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
―
100%
―
―
100%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
84
57
27
84
84
84
69
77
6
51
33
0
84
PI
112
111
―
112
112
112
117
114
―
102
127
―
112
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
12th Graders
85
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
84
PI
112
Not Black or African American
12th Graders
58
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
57
PI
111
Not Hispanic or Latino
12th Graders
27
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
27
PI
―
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
12th Graders
85
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
84
PI
112
Not White
12th Graders
85
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
84
PI
112
Not Multiracial
12th Graders
85
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
84
PI
112
General Education
12th Graders
71
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
69
PI
117
English Proficient
12th Graders
78
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
77
PI
114
Not Economically Disadvantaged
12th Graders
6
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
6
PI
―
Male
12th Graders
52
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
51
PI
102
Female
12th Graders
33
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
33
PI
127
Migrant
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
Not Migrant
12th Graders
85
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
84
PI
112
― There were fewer than 40 12th graders, so the Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 students in the 2013 accountability cohort, so PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed.
Unweighted Combined ELA and Math PIs
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
158
―
―
154
―
―
―
―
―
162
Secondary-Level MATH PI
112
―
―
111
―
―
―
―
―
114
UNWEIGHTED COMBINED PI
135
0
0
133
0
0
0
0
0
138
All Students
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
158
Secondary-Level MATH PI
112
Unweighted Combined PI
135
American Indian or Alaska Native
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Black or African American
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Hispanic or Latino
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
154
Secondary-Level MATH PI
111
Unweighted Combined PI
133
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
White
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Multiracial
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Students With Disabilities
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Limited English Proficient
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Economically Disadvantaged
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
162
Secondary-Level MATH PI
114
Unweighted Combined PI
138
― There were not enough students to determine a Performance Index.
Overall Graduation Rate for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: YES
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
YES
―
YES
YES
―
―
―
―
―
YES
All Students
MADE AYP
YES
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP
YES
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP
YES
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP
―
White
MADE AYP
―
Multiracial
MADE AYP
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP
―
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
YES
― There were not enough students to make an AYP determination.
Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort for Accountability
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion:
YES
―
YES
YES
―
―
―
―
―
YES
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
80
0
30
50
0
0
0
10
7
69
Graduation Rate
93%
―
97%
90%
―
―
―
―
―
96%
State Standard
80%
―
80%
80%
―
―
―
―
―
80%
Progress Target
80%
―
80%
80%
―
―
―
―
―
80%
All Students
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
80
Graduation Rate
93%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%
American Indian or Alaska Native
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Black or African American
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
30
Graduation Rate
97%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%
Hispanic or Latino
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
50
Graduation Rate
90%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
White
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Multiracial
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Students With Disabilities
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
10
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Limited English Proficient
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
7
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
69
Graduation Rate
96%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%
YES Graduation rate is equal to or greater than the State Standard or the group's Progress Target. NO Graduation rate is less than the State Standard and the group's Progress Target.
― There were fewer than 30 students in the cohort.
Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort for Accountability
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion:
YES
―
YES
YES
―
―
―
―
―
YES
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
91
0
34
57
0
0
0
17
7
79
Graduation Rate
96%
―
100%
93%
―
―
―
―
―
96%
State Standard
80%
―
80%
80%
―
―
―
―
―
80%
Progress Target
80%
―
80%
80%
―
―
―
―
―
80%
All Students
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
91
Graduation Rate
96%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%
American Indian or Alaska Native
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Black or African American
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
34
Graduation Rate
100%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%
Hispanic or Latino
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
57
Graduation Rate
93%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
White
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Multiracial
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Students With Disabilities
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
17
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Limited English Proficient
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
7
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
79
Graduation Rate
96%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%
YES Graduation rate is equal to or greater than the State Standard or the group's Progress Target. NO Graduation rate is less than the State Standard and the group's Progress Target.
― There were fewer than 30 students in the cohort.
Graduation Rates for Non-AYP Groups for Accountability
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
80
50
30
80
80
80
70
73
11
49
31
0
80
Graduation Rate
93%
90%
97%
93%
93%
93%
93%
95%
―
88%
100%
―
93%
Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
91
57
34
91
91
91
74
84
12
55
36
0
91
Graduation Rate
96%
93%
100%
96%
96%
96%
95%
95%
―
95%
97%
―
96%
Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
80
Graduation Rate
93%
Not Black or African American
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
50
Graduation Rate
90%
Not Hispanic or Latino
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
30
Graduation Rate
97%
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
80
Graduation Rate
93%
Not White
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
80
Graduation Rate
93%
Not Multiracial
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
80
Graduation Rate
93%
General Education
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
70
Graduation Rate
93%
English Proficient
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
73
Graduation Rate
95%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
11
Graduation Rate
―
Male
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
49
Graduation Rate
88%
Female
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
31
Graduation Rate
100%
Migrant
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
Not Migrant
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
80
Graduation Rate
93%
Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
91
Graduation Rate
96%
Not Black or African American
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
57
Graduation Rate
93%
Not Hispanic or Latino
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
34
Graduation Rate
100%
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
91
Graduation Rate
96%
Not White
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
91
Graduation Rate
96%
Not Multiracial
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
91
Graduation Rate
96%
General Education
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
74
Graduation Rate
95%
English Proficient
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
84
Graduation Rate
95%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
12
Graduation Rate
―
Male
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
55
Graduation Rate
95%
Female
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
36
Graduation Rate
97%
Migrant
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
Not Migrant
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
91
Graduation Rate
96%
― There were fewer than 30 students in the cohort.
Graduation Rates for Regents with Advanced Designation and CTE Endorsement for Accountability
Percentage of 2012 Graduation-Rate Total Cohort members who graduated as of August 31, 2016 with:
Regents Diploma with an Advanced Designation (NY State)
9%
Regents Diploma with an Advanced Designation (Statewide)
31%
Percentage in NY State Exceeded Statewide
NO
Regents Diploma with an Advanced Designation (NY State)
9%
Regents Diploma with an Advanced Designation (Statewide)
You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.
Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.
If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.
