Skip to Content
Main content

NYC CHARTER HS - AECI - School Report Card Data [2016 - 17]

The New York State Report Card is an important part of the Board of Regents' effort to raise learning standards for all students. It provides information to the public on school/district enrollment and staff, student performance, and other measures of school and district performance. Knowledge gained from the report card on a school's or district's strengths and weaknesses can be used to improve instruction and services to students.
Report Card Data - Glossary of Terms | Accountability Data - Glossary of Terms | Business Rules

NYC CHARTER HS - AECI ENROLLMENT (2016 - 17)

K-12 ENROLLMENT
426

ENROLLMENT BY GENDER

MALE
FEMALE

ENROLLMENT BY ETHNICITY

GROUP
TOTAL
PERCENT

OTHER GROUPS

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

ENROLLMENT BY GRADE

GROUP
TOTAL
PERCENT

NYC CHARTER HS - AECI ENROLLMENT (2016 - 17)

K-12 Enrollment: 426

ENROLLMENT BY GENDER

MALE

292

69%

FEMALE

134

31%

ENROLLMENT BY ETHNICITY

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

2

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

155

36%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

265

62%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

2

0%

WHITE

1

0%

MULTIRACIAL

1

0%

OTHER GROUPS

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

52

12%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

99

23%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

397

93%

ENROLLMENT BY GRADE

9TH GRADE

136

32%

10TH GRADE

116

27%

11TH GRADE

89

21%

12TH GRADE

84

20%

UNGRADED SECONDARY

1

0%

Average Class Size (2016 - 17)

GROUP
  • Grade 10 Mathematics
  • Grade 10 Social Studies
CLASS SIZE
  • 21
  • 26

Average Class Size (2016 - 17)

Grade 10 Mathematics
21
Grade 10 Social Studies
26

Free and Reduced-Price Lunch (2016 - 17)

ELIGIBLE FOR FREE LUNCH
  • 349
  • 82%
ELIGIBLE FOR REDUCED-PRICE LUNCH
  • 30
  • 7%

Free and Reduced-Price Lunch (2016 - 17)

Eligible for Free Lunch

349

82%

Eligible for Reduced-Price Lunch

30

7%

ATTENDANCE (2015 - 16)

  • ANNUAL ATTENDANCE RATE
  • 93%

Attendance (2015 - 16)

Annual Attendance Rate

93%

STUDENT SUSPENSIONS (2015 - 16)

  • 24
  • 6%

Student Suspensions (2015 - 16)

Student Suspensions

24

6%

Teacher Turnover Rate (2015-16 to 2016-17)

Turnover Rate of Teachers with Fewer Than Five Years of Experience
  • 61%
TURNOVER RATE OF ALL TEACHERS
  • 50%

Teacher Turnover Rate (2015-16 to 2016-17)

Turnover Rate of Teachers with Fewer Than Five Years of Experience

61%

Turnover Rate of All Teachers

50%

Staff Counts (2016 - 17)

GROUP
  • PRINCIPALS
  • ASSISTANT PRINCIPALS
  • OTHER PROFESSIONAL STAFF
  • PARAPROFESSIONALS
STAFF
  • 1
  • 2
  • 26
  • 0

Staff Counts (2016 - 17)

Principals
1
Assistant Principals
2
Other Professional Staff
26
Paraprofessionals
0

Teacher Qualifications (2016 - 17)

Teacher Qualifications (2016 - 17)

TOTAL TEACHERS: 33
Percent with No Valid Teaching Certificate
30%
Percent Teaching Out of Certification
30%
Percent with Fewer Than Three Years of Experience
24%
Percentage with Master's Degree Plus 30 Hours or Doctorate
12%
Total Number of Classes
176
Percent Taught by Teachers Without Appropriate Certification
36%

High School Completers (2016 - 17)

GROUP
  • All Students
  • General Education
  • Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
  • 85
  • 69
  • 16
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
  • 85
  • 69
  • 16
REGENTS DIPLOMA
  • 79
  • 93%
  • 66
  • 96%
  • 13
  • 81%
GROUP
  • All Students
  • General Education
  • Students with Disabilities
REGENTS WITH ADVANCED DESIGNATION
  • 4
  • 5%
  • 3
  • 4%
  • 1
  • 6%
REGENTS WITH CTE ENDORSEMENT
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
LOCAL DIPLOMAS
  • 6
  • 7%
  • 3
  • 4%
  • 3
  • 19%
COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%

All Students

COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)

85

Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)

85

Regents Diploma

79

93%

of Graduates

Regents with Advanced Designation

4

5%

of Graduates

Regents with CTE Endorsement

0

0%

of Graduates

Local Diplomas

6

7%

of Graduates

Commencement Credentials

0

0%

of Completers

General Education

COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)

69

Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)

69

Regents Diploma

66

96%

of Graduates

Regents with Advanced Designation

3

4%

of Graduates

Regents with CTE Endorsement

0

0%

of Graduates

Local Diplomas

3

4%

of Graduates

Commencement Credentials

0

0%

of Completers

Students with Disabilities

COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)

16

Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)

16

Regents Diploma

13

81%

of Graduates

Regents with Advanced Designation

1

6%

of Graduates

Regents with CTE Endorsement

0

0%

of Graduates

Local Diplomas

3

19%

of Graduates

Commencement Credentials

0

0%

of Completers

Post-graduation Plans of Completers (2016 - 17)

GROUP
  • All Students
  • General Education
  • Students with Disabilities
TO FOUR-YEAR COLLEGE
  • 44
  • 52%
  • 40
  • 58%
  • 4
  • 25%
TO TWO-YEAR COLLEGE
  • 36
  • 42%
  • 26
  • 38%
  • 10
  • 63%
TO OTHER POST-SECONDARY
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
TO THE MILITARY
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
GROUP
  • All Students
  • General Education
  • Students with Disabilities
TO EMPLOYMENT
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
TO ADULT SERVICES
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
TO OTHER KNOWN PLANS
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
PLANS UNKNOWN
  • 5
  • 6%
  • 3
  • 4%
  • 2
  • 13%

All Students

To Four-Year College

44

52%

To Two-Year College

36

42%

To Other Post-Secondary

0

0%

To the Military

0

0%

To Employment

0

0%

To Adult Services

0

0%

To Other Known Plans

0

0%

Plan Unknown

5

6%

General Education

To Four-Year College

40

58%

To Two-Year College

26

38%

To Other Post-Secondary

0

0%

To the Military

0

0%

To Employment

0

0%

To Adult Services

0

0%

To Other Known Plans

0

0%

Plan Unknown

3

4%

Students with Disabilities

To Four-Year College

4

25%

To Two-Year College

10

63%

To Other Post-Secondary

0

0%

To the Military

0

0%

To Employment

0

0%

To Adult Services

0

0%

To Other Known Plans

0

0%

Plan Unknown

2

13%

Statewide Results on the National Assessment of Educational Progress: NAEP (2016 - 17)

Grade: 4

Reading

GROUP
  • All Students
  • Students with Disabilities
  • American Indian or Alaska Native
  • Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
  • Black or African American
  • Hispanic or Latino
  • White
  • Multiracial
  • Limited English Proficient
  • Economically Disadvantaged
BELOW BASIC
  • 32%
  • 68%
  • *%
  • 18%
  • 48%
  • 45%
  • 22%
  • *%
  • 74%
  • 44%
BASIC
  • 32%
  • 22%
  • *%
  • 30%
  • 34%
  • 33%
  • 31%
  • *%
  • 21%
  • 33%
PROFICIENT
  • 27%
  • 9%
  • *%
  • 33%
  • 16%
  • 18%
  • 35%
  • *%
  • 5%
  • 19%
ADVANCED
  • 9%
  • 2%
  • *%
  • 19%
  • 3%
  • 4%
  • 13%
  • *%
  • *%
  • 4%
PARTICIPATION RATE
  • 98
  • 93
  • 88

Reading

All Students
Percent Below Basic

32

Percent Basic

32

Percent Proficient

27

Percent Advanced

9

Participation Rate

98

Students with Disabilities
Percent Below Basic

68

Percent Basic

22

Percent Proficient

9

Percent Advanced

2

Participation Rate

93

American Indian or Alaska Native
Percent Below Basic

*

Percent Basic

*

Percent Proficient

*

Percent Advanced

*

Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Percent Below Basic

18

Percent Basic

30

Percent Proficient

33

Percent Advanced

19

Black or African American
Percent Below Basic

48

Percent Basic

34

Percent Proficient

16

Percent Advanced

3

Hispanic or Latino
Percent Below Basic

45

Percent Basic

33

Percent Proficient

18

Percent Advanced

4

White
Percent Below Basic

22

Percent Basic

31

Percent Proficient

35

Percent Advanced

13

Multiracial
Percent Below Basic

*

Percent Basic

*

Percent Proficient

*

Percent Advanced

*

Limited English Proficient
Percent Below Basic

74

Percent Basic

21

Percent Proficient

5

Percent Advanced

*

Participation Rate

88

Economically Disadvantaged
Percent Below Basic

44

Percent Basic

33

Percent Proficient

19

Percent Advanced

4

Mathematics

GROUP
  • All Students
  • Students with Disabilities
  • American Indian or Alaska Native
  • Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
  • Black or African American
  • Hispanic or Latino
  • White
  • Multiracial
  • Limited English Proficient
  • Economically Disadvantaged
BELOW BASIC
  • 24%
  • 58%
  • *%
  • 11%
  • 36%
  • 36%
  • 14%
  • *%
  • 68%
  • 34%
BASIC
  • 41%
  • 31%
  • *%
  • 30%
  • 42%
  • 44%
  • 40%
  • *%
  • 29%
  • 43%
PROFICIENT
  • 30%
  • 10%
  • *%
  • 44%
  • 21%
  • 18%
  • 38%
  • *%
  • 3%
  • 21%
ADVANCED
  • 5%
  • 1%
  • *%
  • 15%
  • 2%
  • 2%
  • 7%
  • *%
  • *%
  • 2%
PARTICIPATION RATE
  • 98
  • 94
  • 91

Mathematics

All Students
Percent Below Basic

24

Percent Basic

41

Percent Proficient

30

Percent Advanced

5

Participation Rate

98

Students with Disabilities
Percent Below Basic

58

Percent Basic

31

Percent Proficient

10

Percent Advanced

1

Participation Rate

94

American Indian or Alaska Native
Percent Below Basic

*

Percent Basic

*

Percent Proficient

*

Percent Advanced

*

Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Percent Below Basic

11

Percent Basic

30

Percent Proficient

44

Percent Advanced

15

Black or African American
Percent Below Basic

36

Percent Basic

42

Percent Proficient

21

Percent Advanced

2

Hispanic or Latino
Percent Below Basic

36

Percent Basic

44

Percent Proficient

18

Percent Advanced

2

White
Percent Below Basic

14

Percent Basic

40

Percent Proficient

38

Percent Advanced

7

Multiracial
Percent Below Basic

*

Percent Basic

*

Percent Proficient

*

Percent Advanced

*

Limited English Proficient
Percent Below Basic

68

Percent Basic

29

Percent Proficient

3

Percent Advanced

*

Participation Rate

91

Economically Disadvantaged
Percent Below Basic

34

Percent Basic

43

Percent Proficient

21

Percent Advanced

2

Grade: 8

Reading

GROUP
  • All Students
  • Students with Disabilities
  • American Indian or Alaska Native
  • Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
  • Black or African American
  • Hispanic or Latino
  • White
  • Multiracial
  • Limited English Proficient
  • Economically Disadvantaged
BELOW BASIC
  • 27%
  • 58%
  • *%
  • 21%
  • 39%
  • 35%
  • 20%
  • *%
  • 81%
  • 37%
BASIC
  • 39%
  • 33%
  • *%
  • 31%
  • 41%
  • 43%
  • 38%
  • *%
  • 16%
  • 41%
PROFICIENT
  • 30%
  • 8%
  • *%
  • 37%
  • 19%
  • 21%
  • 36%
  • *%
  • 3%
  • 20%
ADVANCED
  • 5%
  • *%
  • *%
  • 12%
  • 1%
  • 1%
  • 6%
  • *%
  • *%
  • 2%
PARTICIPATION RATE
  • 98
  • 94
  • 80

Reading

All Students
Percent Below Basic

27

Percent Basic

39

Percent Proficient

30

Percent Advanced

5

Participation Rate

98

Students with Disabilities
Percent Below Basic

58

Percent Basic

33

Percent Proficient

8

Percent Advanced

*

Participation Rate

94

American Indian or Alaska Native
Percent Below Basic

*

Percent Basic

*

Percent Proficient

*

Percent Advanced

*

Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Percent Below Basic

21

Percent Basic

31

Percent Proficient

37

Percent Advanced

12

Black or African American
Percent Below Basic

39

Percent Basic

41

Percent Proficient

19

Percent Advanced

1

Hispanic or Latino
Percent Below Basic

35

Percent Basic

43

Percent Proficient

21

Percent Advanced

1

White
Percent Below Basic

20

Percent Basic

38

Percent Proficient

36

Percent Advanced

6

Multiracial
Percent Below Basic

*

Percent Basic

*

Percent Proficient

*

Percent Advanced

*

Limited English Proficient
Percent Below Basic

81

Percent Basic

16

Percent Proficient

3

Percent Advanced

*

Participation Rate

80

Economically Disadvantaged
Percent Below Basic

37

Percent Basic

41

Percent Proficient

20

Percent Advanced

2

Mathematics

GROUP
  • All Students
  • Students with Disabilities
  • American Indian or Alaska Native
  • Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
  • Black or African American
  • Hispanic or Latino
  • White
  • Multiracial
  • Limited English Proficient
  • Economically Disadvantaged
BELOW BASIC
  • 32%
  • 69%
  • *%
  • 14%
  • 53%
  • 48%
  • 21%
  • *%
  • 80%
  • 44%
BASIC
  • 34%
  • 23%
  • *%
  • 24%
  • 32%
  • 33%
  • 37%
  • *%
  • 16%
  • 34%
PROFICIENT
  • 24%
  • 6%
  • *%
  • 32%
  • 14%
  • 15%
  • 29%
  • *%
  • 4%
  • 17%
ADVANCED
  • 10%
  • 2%
  • *%
  • 30%
  • 2%
  • 4%
  • 13%
  • *%
  • 1%
  • 4%
PARTICIPATION RATE
  • 98
  • 95
  • 80

Mathematics

All Students
Percent Below Basic

32

Percent Basic

34

Percent Proficient

24

Percent Advanced

10

Participation Rate

98

Students with Disabilities
Percent Below Basic

69

Percent Basic

23

Percent Proficient

6

Percent Advanced

2

Participation Rate

95

American Indian or Alaska Native
Percent Below Basic

*

Percent Basic

*

Percent Proficient

*

Percent Advanced

*

Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Percent Below Basic

14

Percent Basic

24

Percent Proficient

32

Percent Advanced

30

Black or African American
Percent Below Basic

53

Percent Basic

32

Percent Proficient

14

Percent Advanced

2

Hispanic or Latino
Percent Below Basic

48

Percent Basic

33

Percent Proficient

15

Percent Advanced

4

White
Percent Below Basic

21

Percent Basic

37

Percent Proficient

29

Percent Advanced

13

Multiracial
Percent Below Basic

*

Percent Basic

*

Percent Proficient

*

Percent Advanced

*

Limited English Proficient
Percent Below Basic

80

Percent Basic

16

Percent Proficient

4

Percent Advanced

1

Participation Rate

80

Economically Disadvantaged
Percent Below Basic

44

Percent Basic

34

Percent Proficient

17

Percent Advanced

4

Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level English Language Arts after Four Years of Instruction

All Students

PROFICIENT

95%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

2%

LEVEL 3

32

37%

LEVEL 4

50

58%

General Education

PROFICIENT

94%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

3%

LEVEL 3

25

35%

LEVEL 4

42

59%

Students with Disabilities

PROFICIENT

100%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

7

47%

LEVEL 4

8

53%

Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Black or African American

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Hispanic or Latino

PROFICIENT

97%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

3%

LEVEL 3

23

40%

LEVEL 4

33

57%

Small Group Total

PROFICIENT

93%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

9

32%

LEVEL 4

17

61%

Female

PROFICIENT

97%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

3%

LEVEL 3

11

33%

LEVEL 4

21

64%

Male

PROFICIENT

94%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

2%

LEVEL 3

21

40%

LEVEL 4

29

55%

Non-English Language Learners

PROFICIENT

99%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

29

37%

LEVEL 4

48

62%

English Language Learners

PROFICIENT

63%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

3

38%

LEVEL 4

2

25%

Economically Disadvantaged

PROFICIENT

96%
TOTAL TESTED: 80

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

3%

LEVEL 3

29

36%

LEVEL 4

48

60%

Not Economically Disadvantaged

PROFICIENT

83%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

3

50%

LEVEL 4

2

33%

Not Migrant

PROFICIENT

95%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

2%

LEVEL 3

32

37%

LEVEL 4

50

58%

GROUP
TOTAL TESTED
  • 86
  • 71
  • 15
  • 1
  • 27
  • 58
  • 28
  • 33
  • 53
  • 78
  • 8
  • 80
  • 6
  • 86
PROFICIENT
  • 95%
  • 94%
  • 100%
  • _%
  • _%
  • 97%
  • 93%
  • 97%
  • 94%
  • 99%
  • 63%
  • 96%
  • 83%
  • 95%
LEVEL 1
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
LEVEL 2
  • 2
  • 2%
  • 2
  • 3%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 2
  • 3%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 1
  • 3%
  • 1
  • 2%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 2
  • 25%
  • 2
  • 3%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 2
  • 2%
LEVEL 3
  • 32
  • 37%
  • 25
  • 35%
  • 7
  • 47%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 23
  • 40%
  • 9
  • 32%
  • 11
  • 33%
  • 21
  • 40%
  • 29
  • 37%
  • 3
  • 38%
  • 29
  • 36%
  • 3
  • 50%
  • 32
  • 37%
LEVEL 4
  • 50
  • 58%
  • 42
  • 59%
  • 8
  • 53%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 33
  • 57%
  • 17
  • 61%
  • 21
  • 64%
  • 29
  • 55%
  • 48
  • 62%
  • 2
  • 25%
  • 48
  • 60%
  • 2
  • 33%
  • 50
  • 58%

Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level Mathematics after Four Years of Instruction

All Students

PROFICIENT

92%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

6%

LEVEL 3

73

85%

LEVEL 4

6

7%

General Education

PROFICIENT

94%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

3%

LEVEL 3

61

86%

LEVEL 4

6

8%

Students with Disabilities

PROFICIENT

80%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

20%

LEVEL 3

12

80%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Black or African American

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Hispanic or Latino

PROFICIENT

93%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

7%

LEVEL 3

50

86%

LEVEL 4

4

7%

Small Group Total

PROFICIENT

89%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

4%

LEVEL 3

23

82%

LEVEL 4

2

7%

Female

PROFICIENT

97%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

3%

LEVEL 3

28

85%

LEVEL 4

4

12%

Male

PROFICIENT

89%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

8%

LEVEL 3

45

85%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

Non-English Language Learners

PROFICIENT

94%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

5%

LEVEL 3

67

86%

LEVEL 4

6

8%

English Language Learners

PROFICIENT

75%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

13%

LEVEL 3

6

75%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Economically Disadvantaged

PROFICIENT

93%
TOTAL TESTED: 80

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

6%

LEVEL 3

68

85%

LEVEL 4

6

8%

Not Economically Disadvantaged

PROFICIENT

83%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

5

83%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Not Migrant

PROFICIENT

92%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

6%

LEVEL 3

73

85%

LEVEL 4

6

7%

GROUP
TOTAL TESTED
  • 86
  • 71
  • 15
  • 1
  • 27
  • 58
  • 28
  • 33
  • 53
  • 78
  • 8
  • 80
  • 6
  • 86
PROFICIENT
  • 92%
  • 94%
  • 80%
  • _%
  • _%
  • 93%
  • 89%
  • 97%
  • 89%
  • 94%
  • 75%
  • 93%
  • 83%
  • 92%
LEVEL 1
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
LEVEL 2
  • 5
  • 6%
  • 2
  • 3%
  • 3
  • 20%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 4
  • 7%
  • 1
  • 4%
  • 1
  • 3%
  • 4
  • 8%
  • 4
  • 5%
  • 1
  • 13%
  • 5
  • 6%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 5
  • 6%
LEVEL 3
  • 73
  • 85%
  • 61
  • 86%
  • 12
  • 80%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 50
  • 86%
  • 23
  • 82%
  • 28
  • 85%
  • 45
  • 85%
  • 67
  • 86%
  • 6
  • 75%
  • 68
  • 85%
  • 5
  • 83%
  • 73
  • 85%
LEVEL 4
  • 6
  • 7%
  • 6
  • 8%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 4
  • 7%
  • 2
  • 7%
  • 4
  • 12%
  • 2
  • 4%
  • 6
  • 8%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 6
  • 8%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 6
  • 7%

Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level Global History and Geography after Four Years of Instruction

All Students

PROFICIENT

91%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

5

6%

LEVEL 3

60

70%

LEVEL 4

18

21%

General Education

PROFICIENT

92%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

3

4%

LEVEL 3

47

66%

LEVEL 4

18

25%

Students with Disabilities

PROFICIENT

87%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

13%

LEVEL 3

13

87%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Black or African American

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Hispanic or Latino

PROFICIENT

90%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

1

2%

LEVEL 2

5

9%

LEVEL 3

42

72%

LEVEL 4

10

17%

Small Group Total

PROFICIENT

93%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

18

64%

LEVEL 4

8

29%

Female

PROFICIENT

94%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

1

3%

LEVEL 2

1

3%

LEVEL 3

22

67%

LEVEL 4

9

27%

Male

PROFICIENT

89%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

8%

LEVEL 3

38

72%

LEVEL 4

9

17%

Non-English Language Learners

PROFICIENT

94%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

5%

LEVEL 3

55

71%

LEVEL 4

18

23%

English Language Learners

PROFICIENT

63%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

1

13%

LEVEL 2

1

13%

LEVEL 3

5

63%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Economically Disadvantaged

PROFICIENT

91%
TOTAL TESTED: 80

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

5

6%

LEVEL 3

57

71%

LEVEL 4

16

20%

Not Economically Disadvantaged

PROFICIENT

83%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

3

50%

LEVEL 4

2

33%

Not Migrant

PROFICIENT

91%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

5

6%

LEVEL 3

60

70%

LEVEL 4

18

21%

GROUP
TOTAL TESTED
  • 86
  • 71
  • 15
  • 1
  • 27
  • 58
  • 28
  • 33
  • 53
  • 78
  • 8
  • 80
  • 6
  • 86
PROFICIENT
  • 91%
  • 92%
  • 87%
  • _%
  • _%
  • 90%
  • 93%
  • 94%
  • 89%
  • 94%
  • 63%
  • 91%
  • 83%
  • 91%
LEVEL 1
  • 1
  • 1%
  • 1
  • 1%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 1
  • 2%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 1
  • 3%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 1
  • 13%
  • 1
  • 1%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 1
  • 1%
LEVEL 2
  • 5
  • 6%
  • 3
  • 4%
  • 2
  • 13%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 5
  • 9%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 1
  • 3%
  • 4
  • 8%
  • 4
  • 5%
  • 1
  • 13%
  • 5
  • 6%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 5
  • 6%
LEVEL 3
  • 60
  • 70%
  • 47
  • 66%
  • 13
  • 87%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 42
  • 72%
  • 18
  • 64%
  • 22
  • 67%
  • 38
  • 72%
  • 55
  • 71%
  • 5
  • 63%
  • 57
  • 71%
  • 3
  • 50%
  • 60
  • 70%
LEVEL 4
  • 18
  • 21%
  • 18
  • 25%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 10
  • 17%
  • 8
  • 29%
  • 9
  • 27%
  • 9
  • 17%
  • 18
  • 23%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 16
  • 20%
  • 2
  • 33%
  • 18
  • 21%

Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level U.S. History and Government after Four Years of Instruction

All Students

PROFICIENT

97%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

1%

LEVEL 3

66

77%

LEVEL 4

17

20%

General Education

PROFICIENT

97%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

52

73%

LEVEL 4

17

24%

Students with Disabilities

PROFICIENT

93%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

7%

LEVEL 3

14

93%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Black or African American

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Hispanic or Latino

PROFICIENT

98%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

2%

LEVEL 3

47

81%

LEVEL 4

10

17%

Small Group Total

PROFICIENT

93%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

19

68%

LEVEL 4

7

25%

Female

PROFICIENT

100%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

25

76%

LEVEL 4

8

24%

Male

PROFICIENT

94%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

2%

LEVEL 3

41

77%

LEVEL 4

9

17%

Non-English Language Learners

PROFICIENT

97%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

1%

LEVEL 3

59

76%

LEVEL 4

17

22%

English Language Learners

PROFICIENT

88%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

7

88%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Economically Disadvantaged

PROFICIENT

98%
TOTAL TESTED: 80

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

1%

LEVEL 3

62

78%

LEVEL 4

16

20%

Not Economically Disadvantaged

PROFICIENT

83%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

4

67%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

Not Migrant

PROFICIENT

97%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

1%

LEVEL 3

66

77%

LEVEL 4

17

20%

GROUP
TOTAL TESTED
  • 86
  • 71
  • 15
  • 1
  • 27
  • 58
  • 28
  • 33
  • 53
  • 78
  • 8
  • 80
  • 6
  • 86
PROFICIENT
  • 97%
  • 97%
  • 93%
  • _%
  • _%
  • 98%
  • 93%
  • 100%
  • 94%
  • 97%
  • 88%
  • 98%
  • 83%
  • 97%
LEVEL 1
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
LEVEL 2
  • 1
  • 1%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 1
  • 7%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 1
  • 2%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 1
  • 2%
  • 1
  • 1%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 1
  • 1%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 1
  • 1%
LEVEL 3
  • 66
  • 77%
  • 52
  • 73%
  • 14
  • 93%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 47
  • 81%
  • 19
  • 68%
  • 25
  • 76%
  • 41
  • 77%
  • 59
  • 76%
  • 7
  • 88%
  • 62
  • 78%
  • 4
  • 67%
  • 66
  • 77%
LEVEL 4
  • 17
  • 20%
  • 17
  • 24%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 10
  • 17%
  • 7
  • 25%
  • 8
  • 24%
  • 9
  • 17%
  • 17
  • 22%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 16
  • 20%
  • 1
  • 17%
  • 17
  • 20%

Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level Science after Four Years of Instruction

All Students

PROFICIENT

88%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

7

8%

LEVEL 3

67

78%

LEVEL 4

9

10%

General Education

PROFICIENT

93%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

4%

LEVEL 3

58

82%

LEVEL 4

8

11%

Students with Disabilities

PROFICIENT

67%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

1

7%

LEVEL 2

4

27%

LEVEL 3

9

60%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Black or African American

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Hispanic or Latino

PROFICIENT

88%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

1

2%

LEVEL 2

6

10%

LEVEL 3

45

78%

LEVEL 4

6

10%

Small Group Total

PROFICIENT

89%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

4%

LEVEL 3

22

79%

LEVEL 4

3

11%

Female

PROFICIENT

100%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

28

85%

LEVEL 4

5

15%

Male

PROFICIENT

81%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

1

2%

LEVEL 2

7

13%

LEVEL 3

39

74%

LEVEL 4

4

8%

Non-English Language Learners

PROFICIENT

92%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

6%

LEVEL 3

63

81%

LEVEL 4

9

12%

English Language Learners

PROFICIENT

50%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

1

13%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

4

50%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Economically Disadvantaged

PROFICIENT

89%
TOTAL TESTED: 80

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

7

9%

LEVEL 3

63

79%

LEVEL 4

8

10%

Not Economically Disadvantaged

PROFICIENT

83%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

4

67%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

Not Migrant

PROFICIENT

88%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

7

8%

LEVEL 3

67

78%

LEVEL 4

9

10%

GROUP
TOTAL TESTED
  • 86
  • 71
  • 15
  • 1
  • 27
  • 58
  • 28
  • 33
  • 53
  • 78
  • 8
  • 80
  • 6
  • 86
PROFICIENT
  • 88%
  • 93%
  • 67%
  • _%
  • _%
  • 88%
  • 89%
  • 100%
  • 81%
  • 92%
  • 50%
  • 89%
  • 83%
  • 88%
LEVEL 1
  • 1
  • 1%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 1
  • 7%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 1
  • 2%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 1
  • 2%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 1
  • 13%
  • 1
  • 1%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 1
  • 1%
LEVEL 2
  • 7
  • 8%
  • 3
  • 4%
  • 4
  • 27%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 6
  • 10%
  • 1
  • 4%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 7
  • 13%
  • 5
  • 6%
  • 2
  • 25%
  • 7
  • 9%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 7
  • 8%
LEVEL 3
  • 67
  • 78%
  • 58
  • 82%
  • 9
  • 60%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 45
  • 78%
  • 22
  • 79%
  • 28
  • 85%
  • 39
  • 74%
  • 63
  • 81%
  • 4
  • 50%
  • 63
  • 79%
  • 4
  • 67%
  • 67
  • 78%
LEVEL 4
  • 9
  • 10%
  • 8
  • 11%
  • 1
  • 7%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 6
  • 10%
  • 3
  • 11%
  • 5
  • 15%
  • 4
  • 8%
  • 9
  • 12%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 8
  • 10%
  • 1
  • 17%
  • 9
  • 10%

Regents Examination Results (2016 - 17)

English Language Arts (Common Core)

English Language Arts (Common Core)

GROUP
  • All Students
  • General Education
  • Students with Disabilities
  • Black or African American
  • Hispanic or Latino
  • Female
  • Male
  • Non-English Language Learners
  • English Language Learners
  • Economically Disadvantaged
  • Not Economically Disadvantaged
  • Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
  • 115
  • 88
  • 27
  • 43
  • 72
  • 32
  • 83
  • 95
  • 20
  • 109
  • 6
  • 115
LEVEL 1
  • 16
  • 14%
  • 8
  • 9%
  • 8
  • 30%
  • 5
  • 12%
  • 11
  • 15%
  • 6
  • 19%
  • 10
  • 12%
  • 10
  • 11%
  • 6
  • 30%
  • 16
  • 15%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 16
  • 14%
LEVEL 2
  • 14
  • 12%
  • 11
  • 13%
  • 3
  • 11%
  • 4
  • 9%
  • 10
  • 14%
  • 4
  • 13%
  • 10
  • 12%
  • 11
  • 12%
  • 3
  • 15%
  • 14
  • 13%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 14
  • 12%
LEVEL 3
  • 37
  • 32%
  • 28
  • 32%
  • 9
  • 33%
  • 17
  • 40%
  • 20
  • 28%
  • 5
  • 16%
  • 32
  • 39%
  • 32
  • 34%
  • 5
  • 25%
  • 34
  • 31%
  • 3
  • 50%
  • 37
  • 32%
LEVEL 4
  • 20
  • 17%
  • 15
  • 17%
  • 5
  • 19%
  • 7
  • 16%
  • 13
  • 18%
  • 5
  • 16%
  • 15
  • 18%
  • 17
  • 18%
  • 3
  • 15%
  • 20
  • 18%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 20
  • 17%
LEVEL 5
  • 28
  • 24%
  • 26
  • 30%
  • 2
  • 7%
  • 10
  • 23%
  • 18
  • 25%
  • 12
  • 38%
  • 16
  • 19%
  • 25
  • 26%
  • 3
  • 15%
  • 25
  • 23%
  • 3
  • 50%
  • 28
  • 24%

All Students

TOTAL TESTED: 115
Number/Percent scoring at

LEVEL 1

16

14%

LEVEL 2

14

12%

LEVEL 3

37

32%

LEVEL 4

20

17%

LEVEL 5

28

24%

General Education

TOTAL TESTED: 88
Number/Percent scoring at

LEVEL 1

8

9%

LEVEL 2

11

13%

LEVEL 3

28

32%

LEVEL 4

15

17%

LEVEL 5

26

30%

Students with Disabilities

TOTAL TESTED: 27
Number/Percent scoring at

LEVEL 1

8

30%

LEVEL 2

3

11%

LEVEL 3

9

33%

LEVEL 4

5

19%

LEVEL 5

2

7%

Black or African American

TOTAL TESTED: 43
Number/Percent scoring at

LEVEL 1

5

12%

LEVEL 2

4

9%

LEVEL 3

17

40%

LEVEL 4

7

16%

LEVEL 5

10

23%

Hispanic or Latino

TOTAL TESTED: 72
Number/Percent scoring at

LEVEL 1

11

15%

LEVEL 2

10

14%

LEVEL 3

20

28%

LEVEL 4

13

18%

LEVEL 5

18

25%

Female

TOTAL TESTED: 32
Number/Percent scoring at

LEVEL 1

6

19%

LEVEL 2

4

13%

LEVEL 3

5

16%

LEVEL 4

5

16%

LEVEL 5

12

38%

Male

TOTAL TESTED: 83
Number/Percent scoring at

LEVEL 1

10

12%

LEVEL 2

10

12%

LEVEL 3

32

39%

LEVEL 4

15

18%

LEVEL 5

16

19%

Non-English Language Learners

TOTAL TESTED: 95
Number/Percent scoring at

LEVEL 1

10

11%

LEVEL 2

11

12%

LEVEL 3

32

34%

LEVEL 4

17

18%

LEVEL 5

25

26%

English Language Learners

TOTAL TESTED: 20
Number/Percent scoring at

LEVEL 1

6

30%

LEVEL 2

3

15%

LEVEL 3

5

25%

LEVEL 4

3

15%

LEVEL 5

3

15%

Economically Disadvantaged

TOTAL TESTED: 109
Number/Percent scoring at

LEVEL 1

16

15%

LEVEL 2

14

13%

LEVEL 3

34

31%

LEVEL 4

20

18%

LEVEL 5

25

23%

Not Economically Disadvantaged

TOTAL TESTED: 6
Number/Percent scoring at

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

3

50%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

LEVEL 5

3

50%

Not Migrant

TOTAL TESTED: 115
Number/Percent scoring at

LEVEL 1

16

14%

LEVEL 2

14

12%

LEVEL 3

37

32%

LEVEL 4

20

17%

LEVEL 5

28

24%

Algebra 2/Trigonometry

Regents Algebra 2/Trigonometry

GROUP
  • All Students
  • General Education
  • Hispanic or Latino
  • Small Group Total
  • Male
  • Non-English Language Learners
  • Economically Disadvantaged
  • Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
55
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
65
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
85
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _

All Students

TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

_

_%

65

_

_%

85

_

_%

General Education

TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

_

_%

65

_

_%

85

_

_%

Hispanic or Latino

TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

_

_%

65

_

_%

85

_

_%

Small Group Total

TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

_

_%

65

_

_%

85

_

_%

Male

TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

_

_%

65

_

_%

85

_

_%

Non-English Language Learners

TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

_

_%

65

_

_%

85

_

_%

Economically Disadvantaged

TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

_

_%

65

_

_%

85

_

_%

Not Migrant

TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

_

_%

65

_

_%

85

_

_%

Algebra I (Common Core)

Algebra I (Common Core)

GROUP
  • All Students
  • General Education
  • Students with Disabilities
  • American Indian or Alaska Native
  • Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
  • Black or African American
  • Hispanic or Latino
  • Small Group Total
  • Female
  • Male
  • Non-English Language Learners
  • English Language Learners
  • Economically Disadvantaged
  • Not Economically Disadvantaged
  • Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
  • 172
  • 116
  • 56
  • 1
  • 1
  • 69
  • 101
  • 71
  • 54
  • 118
  • 146
  • 26
  • 163
  • 9
  • 172
LEVEL 1
  • 14
  • 8%
  • 4
  • 3%
  • 10
  • 18%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 7
  • 7%
  • 7
  • 10%
  • 2
  • 4%
  • 12
  • 10%
  • 11
  • 8%
  • 3
  • 12%
  • 13
  • 8%
  • 1
  • 11%
  • 14
  • 8%
LEVEL 2
  • 27
  • 16%
  • 14
  • 12%
  • 13
  • 23%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 18
  • 18%
  • 9
  • 13%
  • 11
  • 20%
  • 16
  • 14%
  • 22
  • 15%
  • 5
  • 19%
  • 24
  • 15%
  • 3
  • 33%
  • 27
  • 16%
LEVEL 3
  • 103
  • 60%
  • 75
  • 65%
  • 28
  • 50%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 56
  • 55%
  • 47
  • 66%
  • 29
  • 54%
  • 74
  • 63%
  • 87
  • 60%
  • 16
  • 62%
  • 98
  • 60%
  • 5
  • 56%
  • 103
  • 60%
LEVEL 4
  • 21
  • 12%
  • 16
  • 14%
  • 5
  • 9%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 16
  • 16%
  • 5
  • 7%
  • 8
  • 15%
  • 13
  • 11%
  • 20
  • 14%
  • 1
  • 4%
  • 21
  • 13%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 21
  • 12%
LEVEL 5
  • 7
  • 4%
  • 7
  • 6%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 4
  • 4%
  • 3
  • 4%
  • 4
  • 7%
  • 3
  • 3%
  • 6
  • 4%
  • 1
  • 4%
  • 7
  • 4%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 7
  • 4%

All Students

TOTAL TESTED: 172
Number/Percent scoring at

LEVEL 1

14

8%

LEVEL 2

27

16%

LEVEL 3

103

60%

LEVEL 4

21

12%

LEVEL 5

7

4%

General Education

TOTAL TESTED: 116
Number/Percent scoring at

LEVEL 1

4

3%

LEVEL 2

14

12%

LEVEL 3

75

65%

LEVEL 4

16

14%

LEVEL 5

7

6%

Students with Disabilities

TOTAL TESTED: 56
Number/Percent scoring at

LEVEL 1

10

18%

LEVEL 2

13

23%

LEVEL 3

28

50%

LEVEL 4

5

9%

LEVEL 5

0

0%

American Indian or Alaska Native

TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at

LEVEL 1

_

_%

LEVEL 2

_

_%

LEVEL 3

_

_%

LEVEL 4

_

_%

LEVEL 5

_

_%

Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander

TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at

LEVEL 1

_

_%

LEVEL 2

_

_%

LEVEL 3

_

_%

LEVEL 4

_

_%

LEVEL 5

_

_%

Black or African American

TOTAL TESTED: 69
Number/Percent scoring at

LEVEL 1

_

_%

LEVEL 2

_

_%

LEVEL 3

_

_%

LEVEL 4

_

_%

LEVEL 5

_

_%

Hispanic or Latino

TOTAL TESTED: 101
Number/Percent scoring at

LEVEL 1

7

7%

LEVEL 2

18

18%

LEVEL 3

56

55%

LEVEL 4

16

16%

LEVEL 5

4

4%

Small Group Total

TOTAL TESTED: 71
Number/Percent scoring at

LEVEL 1

7

10%

LEVEL 2

9

13%

LEVEL 3

47

66%

LEVEL 4

5

7%

LEVEL 5

3

4%

Female

TOTAL TESTED: 54
Number/Percent scoring at

LEVEL 1

2

4%

LEVEL 2

11

20%

LEVEL 3

29

54%

LEVEL 4

8

15%

LEVEL 5

4

7%

Male

TOTAL TESTED: 118
Number/Percent scoring at

LEVEL 1

12

10%

LEVEL 2

16

14%

LEVEL 3

74

63%

LEVEL 4

13

11%

LEVEL 5

3

3%

Non-English Language Learners

TOTAL TESTED: 146
Number/Percent scoring at

LEVEL 1

11

8%

LEVEL 2

22

15%

LEVEL 3

87

60%

LEVEL 4

20

14%

LEVEL 5

6

4%

English Language Learners

TOTAL TESTED: 26
Number/Percent scoring at

LEVEL 1

3

12%

LEVEL 2

5

19%

LEVEL 3

16

62%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

LEVEL 5

1

4%

Economically Disadvantaged

TOTAL TESTED: 163
Number/Percent scoring at

LEVEL 1

13

8%

LEVEL 2

24

15%

LEVEL 3

98

60%

LEVEL 4

21

13%

LEVEL 5

7

4%

Not Economically Disadvantaged

TOTAL TESTED: 9
Number/Percent scoring at

LEVEL 1

1

11%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

5

56%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

LEVEL 5

0

0%

Not Migrant

TOTAL TESTED: 172
Number/Percent scoring at

LEVEL 1

14

8%

LEVEL 2

27

16%

LEVEL 3

103

60%

LEVEL 4

21

12%

LEVEL 5

7

4%

Common Core Geometry

Regents Common Core Geometry

GROUP
  • All Students
  • General Education
  • Students with Disabilities
  • American Indian or Alaska Native
  • Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
  • Black or African American
  • Hispanic or Latino
  • White
  • Small Group Total
  • Female
  • Male
  • Non-English Language Learners
  • English Language Learners
  • Economically Disadvantaged
  • Not Economically Disadvantaged
  • Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
  • 54
  • 49
  • 5
  • 1
  • 1
  • 16
  • 35
  • 1
  • 19
  • 14
  • 40
  • 49
  • 5
  • 49
  • 5
  • 54
LEVEL 1
  • 4
  • 7%
  • 4
  • 8%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 2
  • 6%
  • _
  • _
  • 2
  • 11%
  • 1
  • 7%
  • 3
  • 8%
  • 3
  • 6%
  • 1
  • 20%
  • 4
  • 8%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 4
  • 7%
LEVEL 2
  • 10
  • 19%
  • 8
  • 16%
  • 2
  • 40%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 5
  • 14%
  • _
  • _
  • 5
  • 26%
  • 2
  • 14%
  • 8
  • 20%
  • 8
  • 16%
  • 2
  • 40%
  • 10
  • 20%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 10
  • 19%
LEVEL 3
  • 37
  • 69%
  • 34
  • 69%
  • 3
  • 60%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 26
  • 74%
  • _
  • _
  • 11
  • 58%
  • 11
  • 79%
  • 26
  • 65%
  • 35
  • 71%
  • 2
  • 40%
  • 32
  • 65%
  • 5
  • 100%
  • 37
  • 69%
LEVEL 4
  • 3
  • 6%
  • 3
  • 6%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 2
  • 6%
  • _
  • _
  • 1
  • 5%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 3
  • 8%
  • 3
  • 6%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 3
  • 6%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 3
  • 6%
LEVEL 5
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 0
  • 0%
  • _
  • _
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%

All Students

TOTAL TESTED: 54
Number/Percent scoring at

LEVEL 1

4

7%

LEVEL 2

10

19%

LEVEL 3

37

69%

LEVEL 4

3

6%

LEVEL 5

0

0%

General Education

TOTAL TESTED: 49
Number/Percent scoring at

LEVEL 1

4

8%

LEVEL 2

8

16%

LEVEL 3

34

69%

LEVEL 4

3

6%

LEVEL 5

0

0%

Students with Disabilities

TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

3

60%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

LEVEL 5

0

0%

American Indian or Alaska Native

TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at

LEVEL 1

_

_%

LEVEL 2

_

_%

LEVEL 3

_

_%

LEVEL 4

_

_%

LEVEL 5

_

_%

Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander

TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at

LEVEL 1

_

_%

LEVEL 2

_

_%

LEVEL 3

_

_%

LEVEL 4

_

_%

LEVEL 5

_

_%

Black or African American

TOTAL TESTED: 16
Number/Percent scoring at

LEVEL 1

_

_%

LEVEL 2

_

_%

LEVEL 3

_

_%

LEVEL 4

_

_%

LEVEL 5

_

_%

Hispanic or Latino

TOTAL TESTED: 35
Number/Percent scoring at

LEVEL 1

2

6%

LEVEL 2

5

14%

LEVEL 3

26

74%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

LEVEL 5

0

0%

White

TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at

LEVEL 1

_

_%

LEVEL 2

_

_%

LEVEL 3

_

_%

LEVEL 4

_

_%

LEVEL 5

_

_%

Small Group Total

TOTAL TESTED: 19
Number/Percent scoring at

LEVEL 1

2

11%

LEVEL 2

5

26%

LEVEL 3

11

58%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

LEVEL 5

0

0%

Female

TOTAL TESTED: 14
Number/Percent scoring at

LEVEL 1

1

7%

LEVEL 2

2

14%

LEVEL 3

11

79%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

LEVEL 5

0

0%

Male

TOTAL TESTED: 40
Number/Percent scoring at

LEVEL 1

3

8%

LEVEL 2

8

20%

LEVEL 3

26

65%

LEVEL 4

3

8%

LEVEL 5

0

0%

Non-English Language Learners

TOTAL TESTED: 49
Number/Percent scoring at

LEVEL 1

3

6%

LEVEL 2

8

16%

LEVEL 3

35

71%

LEVEL 4

3

6%

LEVEL 5

0

0%

English Language Learners

TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

LEVEL 5

0

0%

Economically Disadvantaged

TOTAL TESTED: 49
Number/Percent scoring at

LEVEL 1

4

8%

LEVEL 2

10

20%

LEVEL 3

32

65%

LEVEL 4

3

6%

LEVEL 5

0

0%

Not Economically Disadvantaged

TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

5

100%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

LEVEL 5

0

0%

Not Migrant

TOTAL TESTED: 54
Number/Percent scoring at

LEVEL 1

4

7%

LEVEL 2

10

19%

LEVEL 3

37

69%

LEVEL 4

3

6%

LEVEL 5

0

0%

Algebra II (Common Core)

Algebra II (Common Core)

GROUP
  • All Students
  • General Education
  • Students with Disabilities
  • Black or African American
  • Hispanic or Latino
  • Female
  • Male
  • Non-English Language Learners
  • English Language Learners
  • Economically Disadvantaged
  • Not Economically Disadvantaged
  • Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
  • 23
  • 22
  • 1
  • 10
  • 13
  • 8
  • 15
  • 20
  • 3
  • 22
  • 1
  • 23
LEVEL 1
  • 0
  • 0%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 0
  • 0%
LEVEL 2
  • 1
  • 4%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 1
  • 8%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 1
  • 7%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 1
  • 4%
LEVEL 3
  • 13
  • 57%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 5
  • 50%
  • 8
  • 62%
  • 4
  • 50%
  • 9
  • 60%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 13
  • 57%
LEVEL 4
  • 8
  • 35%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 5
  • 50%
  • 3
  • 23%
  • 3
  • 38%
  • 5
  • 33%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 8
  • 35%
LEVEL 5
  • 1
  • 4%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 1
  • 8%
  • 1
  • 13%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 1
  • 4%

All Students

TOTAL TESTED: 23
Number/Percent scoring at

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

4%

LEVEL 3

13

57%

LEVEL 4

8

35%

LEVEL 5

1

4%

General Education

TOTAL TESTED: 22
Number/Percent scoring at

LEVEL 1

_

_%

LEVEL 2

_

_%

LEVEL 3

_

_%

LEVEL 4

_

_%

LEVEL 5

_

_%

Students with Disabilities

TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at

LEVEL 1

_

_%

LEVEL 2

_

_%

LEVEL 3

_

_%

LEVEL 4

_

_%

LEVEL 5

_

_%

Black or African American

TOTAL TESTED: 10
Number/Percent scoring at

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

5

50%

LEVEL 4

5

50%

LEVEL 5

0

0%

Hispanic or Latino

TOTAL TESTED: 13
Number/Percent scoring at

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

8%

LEVEL 3

8

62%

LEVEL 4

3

23%

LEVEL 5

1

8%

Female

TOTAL TESTED: 8
Number/Percent scoring at

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

4

50%

LEVEL 4

3

38%

LEVEL 5

1

13%

Male

TOTAL TESTED: 15
Number/Percent scoring at

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

7%

LEVEL 3

9

60%

LEVEL 4

5

33%

LEVEL 5

0

0%

Non-English Language Learners

TOTAL TESTED: 20
Number/Percent scoring at

LEVEL 1

_

_%

LEVEL 2

_

_%

LEVEL 3

_

_%

LEVEL 4

_

_%

LEVEL 5

_

_%

English Language Learners

TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at

LEVEL 1

_

_%

LEVEL 2

_

_%

LEVEL 3

_

_%

LEVEL 4

_

_%

LEVEL 5

_

_%

Economically Disadvantaged

TOTAL TESTED: 22
Number/Percent scoring at

LEVEL 1

_

_%

LEVEL 2

_

_%

LEVEL 3

_

_%

LEVEL 4

_

_%

LEVEL 5

_

_%

Not Economically Disadvantaged

TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at

LEVEL 1

_

_%

LEVEL 2

_

_%

LEVEL 3

_

_%

LEVEL 4

_

_%

LEVEL 5

_

_%

Not Migrant

TOTAL TESTED: 23
Number/Percent scoring at

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

4%

LEVEL 3

13

57%

LEVEL 4

8

35%

LEVEL 5

1

4%

Global History and Geography

Regents Global History and Geography

GROUP
  • All Students
  • General Education
  • Students with Disabilities
  • Black or African American
  • Hispanic or Latino
  • Female
  • Male
  • Non-English Language Learners
  • English Language Learners
  • Economically Disadvantaged
  • Not Economically Disadvantaged
  • Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
  • 69
  • 50
  • 19
  • 21
  • 48
  • 27
  • 42
  • 50
  • 19
  • 66
  • 3
  • 69
55
  • 40
  • 58%
  • 31
  • 62%
  • 9
  • 47%
  • 14
  • 67%
  • 26
  • 54%
  • 16
  • 59%
  • 24
  • 57%
  • 32
  • 64%
  • 8
  • 42%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 40
  • 58%
65
  • 26
  • 38%
  • 20
  • 40%
  • 6
  • 32%
  • 10
  • 48%
  • 16
  • 33%
  • 9
  • 33%
  • 17
  • 40%
  • 22
  • 44%
  • 4
  • 21%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 26
  • 38%
85
  • 1
  • 1%
  • 1
  • 2%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 1
  • 2%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 1
  • 2%
  • 1
  • 2%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 1
  • 1%

All Students

TOTAL TESTED: 69
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

40

58%

65

26

38%

85

1

1%

General Education

TOTAL TESTED: 50
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

31

62%

65

20

40%

85

1

2%

Students with Disabilities

TOTAL TESTED: 19
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

9

47%

65

6

32%

85

0

0%

Black or African American

TOTAL TESTED: 21
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

14

67%

65

10

48%

85

0

0%

Hispanic or Latino

TOTAL TESTED: 48
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

26

54%

65

16

33%

85

1

2%

Female

TOTAL TESTED: 27
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

16

59%

65

9

33%

85

0

0%

Male

TOTAL TESTED: 42
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

24

57%

65

17

40%

85

1

2%

Non-English Language Learners

TOTAL TESTED: 50
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

32

64%

65

22

44%

85

1

2%

English Language Learners

TOTAL TESTED: 19
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

8

42%

65

4

21%

85

0

0%

Economically Disadvantaged

TOTAL TESTED: 66
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

_

_%

65

_

_%

85

_

_%

Not Economically Disadvantaged

TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

_

_%

65

_

_%

85

_

_%

Not Migrant

TOTAL TESTED: 69
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

40

58%

65

26

38%

85

1

1%

U.S. History & Government

Regents U.S. History & Government

GROUP
  • All Students
  • General Education
  • Students with Disabilities
  • American Indian or Alaska Native
  • Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
  • Black or African American
  • Hispanic or Latino
  • White
  • Small Group Total
  • Female
  • Male
  • Non-English Language Learners
  • English Language Learners
  • Economically Disadvantaged
  • Not Economically Disadvantaged
  • Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
  • 152
  • 110
  • 42
  • 1
  • 1
  • 48
  • 101
  • 1
  • 51
  • 49
  • 103
  • 125
  • 27
  • 145
  • 7
  • 152
55
  • 120
  • 79%
  • 91
  • 83%
  • 29
  • 69%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 79
  • 78%
  • _
  • _
  • 41
  • 80%
  • 38
  • 78%
  • 82
  • 80%
  • 102
  • 82%
  • 18
  • 67%
  • 114
  • 79%
  • 6
  • 86%
  • 120
  • 79%
65
  • 102
  • 67%
  • 81
  • 74%
  • 21
  • 50%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 70
  • 69%
  • _
  • _
  • 32
  • 63%
  • 31
  • 63%
  • 71
  • 69%
  • 90
  • 72%
  • 12
  • 44%
  • 96
  • 66%
  • 6
  • 86%
  • 102
  • 67%
85
  • 33
  • 22%
  • 31
  • 28%
  • 2
  • 5%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 25
  • 25%
  • _
  • _
  • 8
  • 16%
  • 10
  • 20%
  • 23
  • 22%
  • 30
  • 24%
  • 3
  • 11%
  • 31
  • 21%
  • 2
  • 29%
  • 33
  • 22%

All Students

TOTAL TESTED: 152
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

120

79%

65

102

67%

85

33

22%

General Education

TOTAL TESTED: 110
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

91

83%

65

81

74%

85

31

28%

Students with Disabilities

TOTAL TESTED: 42
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

29

69%

65

21

50%

85

2

5%

American Indian or Alaska Native

TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

_

_%

65

_

_%

85

_

_%

Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander

TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

_

_%

65

_

_%

85

_

_%

Black or African American

TOTAL TESTED: 48
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

_

_%

65

_

_%

85

_

_%

Hispanic or Latino

TOTAL TESTED: 101
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

79

78%

65

70

69%

85

25

25%

White

TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

_

_%

65

_

_%

85

_

_%

Small Group Total

TOTAL TESTED: 51
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

41

80%

65

32

63%

85

8

16%

Female

TOTAL TESTED: 49
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

38

78%

65

31

63%

85

10

20%

Male

TOTAL TESTED: 103
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

82

80%

65

71

69%

85

23

22%

Non-English Language Learners

TOTAL TESTED: 125
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

102

82%

65

90

72%

85

30

24%

English Language Learners

TOTAL TESTED: 27
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

18

67%

65

12

44%

85

3

11%

Economically Disadvantaged

TOTAL TESTED: 145
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

114

79%

65

96

66%

85

31

21%

Not Economically Disadvantaged

TOTAL TESTED: 7
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

6

86%

65

6

86%

85

2

29%

Not Migrant

TOTAL TESTED: 152
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

120

79%

65

102

67%

85

33

22%

Living Environment

Regents Living Environment

GROUP
  • All Students
  • General Education
  • Students with Disabilities
  • Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
  • Black or African American
  • Hispanic or Latino
  • Small Group Total
  • Female
  • Male
  • Non-English Language Learners
  • English Language Learners
  • Economically Disadvantaged
  • Not Economically Disadvantaged
  • Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
  • 72
  • 53
  • 19
  • 1
  • 27
  • 44
  • 28
  • 22
  • 50
  • 52
  • 20
  • 68
  • 4
  • 72
55
  • 56
  • 78%
  • 45
  • 85%
  • 11
  • 58%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 34
  • 77%
  • 22
  • 79%
  • 15
  • 68%
  • 41
  • 82%
  • 43
  • 83%
  • 13
  • 65%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 56
  • 78%
65
  • 36
  • 50%
  • 31
  • 58%
  • 5
  • 26%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 20
  • 45%
  • 16
  • 57%
  • 10
  • 45%
  • 26
  • 52%
  • 28
  • 54%
  • 8
  • 40%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 36
  • 50%
85
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 0
  • 0%

All Students

TOTAL TESTED: 72
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

56

78%

65

36

50%

85

0

0%

General Education

TOTAL TESTED: 53
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

45

85%

65

31

58%

85

0

0%

Students with Disabilities

TOTAL TESTED: 19
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

11

58%

65

5

26%

85

0

0%

Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander

TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

_

_%

65

_

_%

85

_

_%

Black or African American

TOTAL TESTED: 27
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

_

_%

65

_

_%

85

_

_%

Hispanic or Latino

TOTAL TESTED: 44
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

34

77%

65

20

45%

85

0

0%

Small Group Total

TOTAL TESTED: 28
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

22

79%

65

16

57%

85

0

0%

Female

TOTAL TESTED: 22
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

15

68%

65

10

45%

85

0

0%

Male

TOTAL TESTED: 50
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

41

82%

65

26

52%

85

0

0%

Non-English Language Learners

TOTAL TESTED: 52
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

43

83%

65

28

54%

85

0

0%

English Language Learners

TOTAL TESTED: 20
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

13

65%

65

8

40%

85

0

0%

Economically Disadvantaged

TOTAL TESTED: 68
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

_

_%

65

_

_%

85

_

_%

Not Economically Disadvantaged

TOTAL TESTED: 4
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

_

_%

65

_

_%

85

_

_%

Not Migrant

TOTAL TESTED: 72
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

56

78%

65

36

50%

85

0

0%

Physical Setting/Earth Science

Regents Physical Setting/Earth Science

GROUP
  • All Students
  • General Education
  • Students with Disabilities
  • American Indian or Alaska Native
  • Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
  • Black or African American
  • Hispanic or Latino
  • White
  • Small Group Total
  • Female
  • Male
  • Non-English Language Learners
  • English Language Learners
  • Economically Disadvantaged
  • Not Economically Disadvantaged
  • Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
  • 60
  • 52
  • 8
  • 1
  • 1
  • 17
  • 40
  • 1
  • 20
  • 18
  • 42
  • 53
  • 7
  • 57
  • 3
  • 60
55
  • 54
  • 90%
  • 46
  • 88%
  • 8
  • 100%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 38
  • 95%
  • _
  • _
  • 16
  • 80%
  • 13
  • 72%
  • 41
  • 98%
  • 49
  • 92%
  • 5
  • 71%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 54
  • 90%
65
  • 38
  • 63%
  • 34
  • 65%
  • 4
  • 50%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 27
  • 68%
  • _
  • _
  • 11
  • 55%
  • 9
  • 50%
  • 29
  • 69%
  • 35
  • 66%
  • 3
  • 43%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 38
  • 63%
85
  • 7
  • 12%
  • 7
  • 13%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 6
  • 15%
  • _
  • _
  • 1
  • 5%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 7
  • 17%
  • 7
  • 13%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 7
  • 12%

All Students

TOTAL TESTED: 60
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

54

90%

65

38

63%

85

7

12%

General Education

TOTAL TESTED: 52
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

46

88%

65

34

65%

85

7

13%

Students with Disabilities

TOTAL TESTED: 8
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

8

100%

65

4

50%

85

0

0%

American Indian or Alaska Native

TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

_

_%

65

_

_%

85

_

_%

Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander

TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

_

_%

65

_

_%

85

_

_%

Black or African American

TOTAL TESTED: 17
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

_

_%

65

_

_%

85

_

_%

Hispanic or Latino

TOTAL TESTED: 40
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

38

95%

65

27

68%

85

6

15%

White

TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

_

_%

65

_

_%

85

_

_%

Small Group Total

TOTAL TESTED: 20
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

16

80%

65

11

55%

85

1

5%

Female

TOTAL TESTED: 18
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

13

72%

65

9

50%

85

0

0%

Male

TOTAL TESTED: 42
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

41

98%

65

29

69%

85

7

17%

Non-English Language Learners

TOTAL TESTED: 53
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

49

92%

65

35

66%

85

7

13%

English Language Learners

TOTAL TESTED: 7
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

5

71%

65

3

43%

85

0

0%

Economically Disadvantaged

TOTAL TESTED: 57
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

_

_%

65

_

_%

85

_

_%

Not Economically Disadvantaged

TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

_

_%

65

_

_%

85

_

_%

Not Migrant

TOTAL TESTED: 60
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

54

90%

65

38

63%

85

7

12%

Physical Setting/Chemistry

Regents Physical Setting/Chemistry

GROUP
  • All Students
  • General Education
  • Black or African American
  • Hispanic or Latino
  • Female
  • Male
  • Non-English Language Learners
  • English Language Learners
  • Economically Disadvantaged
  • Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
  • 19
  • 19
  • 6
  • 13
  • 7
  • 12
  • 17
  • 2
  • 19
  • 19
55
  • 19
  • 100%
  • 19
  • 100%
  • 6
  • 100%
  • 13
  • 100%
  • 7
  • 100%
  • 12
  • 100%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 19
  • 100%
  • 19
  • 100%
65
  • 15
  • 79%
  • 15
  • 79%
  • 6
  • 100%
  • 9
  • 69%
  • 6
  • 86%
  • 9
  • 75%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 15
  • 79%
  • 15
  • 79%
85
  • 1
  • 5%
  • 1
  • 5%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 1
  • 8%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 1
  • 8%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 1
  • 5%
  • 1
  • 5%

All Students

TOTAL TESTED: 19
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

19

100%

65

15

79%

85

1

5%

General Education

TOTAL TESTED: 19
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

19

100%

65

15

79%

85

1

5%

Black or African American

TOTAL TESTED: 6
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

6

100%

65

6

100%

85

0

0%

Hispanic or Latino

TOTAL TESTED: 13
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

13

100%

65

9

69%

85

1

8%

Female

TOTAL TESTED: 7
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

7

100%

65

6

86%

85

0

0%

Male

TOTAL TESTED: 12
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

12

100%

65

9

75%

85

1

8%

Non-English Language Learners

TOTAL TESTED: 17
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

_

_%

65

_

_%

85

_

_%

English Language Learners

TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

_

_%

65

_

_%

85

_

_%

Economically Disadvantaged

TOTAL TESTED: 19
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

19

100%

65

15

79%

85

1

5%

Not Migrant

TOTAL TESTED: 19
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

19

100%

65

15

79%

85

1

5%

New York State English as a Second Language Achievement Test (NYSESLAT) Results (2016 - 17)

Grade 9

GROUP
TOTAL TESTED
  • 11
  • 6
  • 5
ENTERING
  • 0%
  • 0%
  • 0%
EMERGING
  • 0%
  • 0%
  • 0%
TRANSITIONING
  • 18%
  • 17%
  • 20%
EXPANDING
  • 73%
  • 67%
  • 80%
COMMANDING
  • 9%
  • 17%
  • 0%

Grade 10

GROUP
TOTAL TESTED
  • 19
  • 14
  • 5
ENTERING
  • 0%
  • 0%
  • 0%
EMERGING
  • 0%
  • 0%
  • 0%
TRANSITIONING
  • 26%
  • 21%
  • 40%
EXPANDING
  • 42%
  • 43%
  • 40%
COMMANDING
  • 32%
  • 36%
  • 20%

Grade 11

GROUP
TOTAL TESTED
  • 12
  • 11
  • 1
ENTERING
  • 0%
  • _
  • _
EMERGING
  • 0%
  • _
  • _
TRANSITIONING
  • 17%
  • _
  • _
EXPANDING
  • 42%
  • _
  • _
COMMANDING
  • 42%
  • _
  • _

Grade 12

GROUP
TOTAL TESTED
  • 5
  • 5
ENTERING
  • 0%
  • 0%
EMERGING
  • 0%
  • 0%
TRANSITIONING
  • 20%
  • 20%
EXPANDING
  • 40%
  • 40%
COMMANDING
  • 40%
  • 40%

Grade 9

All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 11
ENTERING

0%

EMERGING

0%

TRANSITIONING

18%

EXPANDING

73%

COMMANDING

9%

General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 6
ENTERING

0%

EMERGING

0%

TRANSITIONING

17%

EXPANDING

67%

COMMANDING

17%

Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 5
ENTERING

0%

EMERGING

0%

TRANSITIONING

20%

EXPANDING

80%

COMMANDING

0%

Grade 10

All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 19
ENTERING

0%

EMERGING

0%

TRANSITIONING

26%

EXPANDING

42%

COMMANDING

32%

General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 14
ENTERING

0%

EMERGING

0%

TRANSITIONING

21%

EXPANDING

43%

COMMANDING

36%

Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 5
ENTERING

0%

EMERGING

0%

TRANSITIONING

40%

EXPANDING

40%

COMMANDING

20%

Grade 11

All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 12
ENTERING

0%

EMERGING

0%

TRANSITIONING

17%

EXPANDING

42%

COMMANDING

42%

General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 11
ENTERING

_

EMERGING

_

TRANSITIONING

_

EXPANDING

_

COMMANDING

_

Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 1
ENTERING

_

EMERGING

_

TRANSITIONING

_

EXPANDING

_

COMMANDING

_

Grade 12

All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 5
ENTERING

0%

EMERGING

0%

TRANSITIONING

20%

EXPANDING

40%

COMMANDING

40%

General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 5
ENTERING

0%

EMERGING

0%

TRANSITIONING

20%

EXPANDING

40%

COMMANDING

40%

Secondary-Level English Language Arts Results for Accountability

All accountability groups made AYP: YES

GROUP
MADE AYP
Tested 95%
12th graders
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
PI
EAMO
Safe Harbor Target
All Students
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%

YES

12th Graders

85

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

100%

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

NO

2013 Accountability Cohort Members

84

PI

158

EAMO

167

Safe Harbor Target

167

American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%

12th Graders

0

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

2013 Accountability Cohort Members

0

PI

EAMO

Safe Harbor Target

Black or African American
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%

12th Graders

27

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

2013 Accountability Cohort Members

27

PI

EAMO

Safe Harbor Target

Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%

YES

12th Graders

58

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

100%

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

YES

2013 Accountability Cohort Members

57

PI

154

EAMO

153

Safe Harbor Target

153

Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%

12th Graders

0

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

2013 Accountability Cohort Members

0

PI

EAMO

Safe Harbor Target

White
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%

12th Graders

0

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

2013 Accountability Cohort Members

0

PI

EAMO

Safe Harbor Target

Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%

12th Graders

0

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

2013 Accountability Cohort Members

0

PI

EAMO

Safe Harbor Target

Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%

12th Graders

14

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

2013 Accountability Cohort Members

15

PI

EAMO

Safe Harbor Target

Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%

12th Graders

7

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

2013 Accountability Cohort Members

7

PI

EAMO

Safe Harbor Target

Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%

YES

12th Graders

79

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

100%

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

YES

2013 Accountability Cohort Members

78

PI

162

EAMO

157

Safe Harbor Target

157

Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.

GROUP
12th Graders
  • 85
  • 58
  • 27
  • 85
  • 85
  • 85
  • 71
  • 78
  • 6
  • 52
  • 33
  • 0
  • 85
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
  • 100%
  • 100%
  • 100%
  • 100%
  • 100%
  • 100%
  • 100%
  • 100%
  • 100%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
  • 84
  • 57
  • 27
  • 84
  • 84
  • 84
  • 69
  • 77
  • 6
  • 51
  • 33
  • 0
  • 84
PI
  • 158
  • 154
  • 158
  • 158
  • 158
  • 159
  • 164
  • 151
  • 170
  • 158
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
12th Graders

85

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

100%

2013 Accountability Cohort Members

84

PI

158

Not Black or African American
12th Graders

58

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

100%

2013 Accountability Cohort Members

57

PI

154

Not Hispanic or Latino
12th Graders

27

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

2013 Accountability Cohort Members

27

PI

Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
12th Graders

85

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

100%

2013 Accountability Cohort Members

84

PI

158

Not White
12th Graders

85

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

100%

2013 Accountability Cohort Members

84

PI

158

Not Multiracial
12th Graders

85

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

100%

2013 Accountability Cohort Members

84

PI

158

General Education
12th Graders

71

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

100%

2013 Accountability Cohort Members

69

PI

159

English Proficient
12th Graders

78

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

100%

2013 Accountability Cohort Members

77

PI

164

Not Economically Disadvantaged
12th Graders

6

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

2013 Accountability Cohort Members

6

PI

Male
12th Graders

52

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

100%

2013 Accountability Cohort Members

51

PI

151

Female
12th Graders

33

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

2013 Accountability Cohort Members

33

PI

170

Migrant
12th Graders

0

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

2013 Accountability Cohort Members

0

PI

Not Migrant
12th Graders

85

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

100%

2013 Accountability Cohort Members

84

PI

158

― There were fewer than 40 12th graders, so the Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 students in the 2013 accountability cohort, so PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed.
⁂ All accountability groups except All Students for which the district/school was accountable met the performance criterion, so the All Students group is considered to have met the performance criterion.

Secondary-Level Mathematics Results for Accountability

All accountability groups made AYP: NO

GROUP
MADE AYP
Tested 95%
12th graders
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
PI
EAMO
Safe Harbor Target
All Students
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%

YES

12th Graders

85

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

100%

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

NO

2013 Accountability Cohort Members

84

PI

112

EAMO

154

Safe Harbor Target

154

American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%

12th Graders

0

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

2013 Accountability Cohort Members

0

PI

EAMO

Safe Harbor Target

Black or African American
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%

12th Graders

27

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

2013 Accountability Cohort Members

27

PI

EAMO

Safe Harbor Target

Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%

YES

12th Graders

58

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

100%

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

NO

2013 Accountability Cohort Members

57

PI

111

EAMO

137

Safe Harbor Target

137

Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%

12th Graders

0

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

2013 Accountability Cohort Members

0

PI

EAMO

Safe Harbor Target

White
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%

12th Graders

0

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

2013 Accountability Cohort Members

0

PI

EAMO

Safe Harbor Target

Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%

12th Graders

0

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

2013 Accountability Cohort Members

0

PI

EAMO

Safe Harbor Target

Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%

12th Graders

14

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

2013 Accountability Cohort Members

15

PI

EAMO

Safe Harbor Target

Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%

12th Graders

7

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

2013 Accountability Cohort Members

7

PI

EAMO

Safe Harbor Target

Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%

YES

12th Graders

79

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

100%

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

NO

2013 Accountability Cohort Members

78

PI

114

EAMO

143

Safe Harbor Target

143

Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.

GROUP
12th Graders
  • 85
  • 58
  • 27
  • 85
  • 85
  • 85
  • 71
  • 78
  • 6
  • 52
  • 33
  • 0
  • 85
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
  • 100%
  • 100%
  • 100%
  • 100%
  • 100%
  • 100%
  • 100%
  • 100%
  • 100%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
  • 84
  • 57
  • 27
  • 84
  • 84
  • 84
  • 69
  • 77
  • 6
  • 51
  • 33
  • 0
  • 84
PI
  • 112
  • 111
  • 112
  • 112
  • 112
  • 117
  • 114
  • 102
  • 127
  • 112
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
12th Graders

85

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

100%

2013 Accountability Cohort Members

84

PI

112

Not Black or African American
12th Graders

58

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

100%

2013 Accountability Cohort Members

57

PI

111

Not Hispanic or Latino
12th Graders

27

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

2013 Accountability Cohort Members

27

PI

Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
12th Graders

85

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

100%

2013 Accountability Cohort Members

84

PI

112

Not White
12th Graders

85

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

100%

2013 Accountability Cohort Members

84

PI

112

Not Multiracial
12th Graders

85

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

100%

2013 Accountability Cohort Members

84

PI

112

General Education
12th Graders

71

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

100%

2013 Accountability Cohort Members

69

PI

117

English Proficient
12th Graders

78

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

100%

2013 Accountability Cohort Members

77

PI

114

Not Economically Disadvantaged
12th Graders

6

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

2013 Accountability Cohort Members

6

PI

Male
12th Graders

52

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

100%

2013 Accountability Cohort Members

51

PI

102

Female
12th Graders

33

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

2013 Accountability Cohort Members

33

PI

127

Migrant
12th Graders

0

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

2013 Accountability Cohort Members

0

PI

Not Migrant
12th Graders

85

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

100%

2013 Accountability Cohort Members

84

PI

112

― There were fewer than 40 12th graders, so the Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 students in the 2013 accountability cohort, so PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed.

Unweighted Combined ELA and Math PIs

GROUP
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
Secondary-Level ELA PI
  • 158
  • 154
  • 162
Secondary-Level MATH PI
  • 112
  • 111
  • 114
UNWEIGHTED COMBINED PI
  • 135
  • 0
  • 0
  • 133
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 138
All Students
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
Secondary-Level ELA PI
158
Secondary-Level MATH PI
112
Unweighted Combined PI
135
American Indian or Alaska Native
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
Secondary-Level ELA PI
Secondary-Level MATH PI
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Black or African American
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
Secondary-Level ELA PI
Secondary-Level MATH PI
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Hispanic or Latino
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
Secondary-Level ELA PI
154
Secondary-Level MATH PI
111
Unweighted Combined PI
133
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
Secondary-Level ELA PI
Secondary-Level MATH PI
Unweighted Combined PI
0
White
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
Secondary-Level ELA PI
Secondary-Level MATH PI
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Multiracial
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
Secondary-Level ELA PI
Secondary-Level MATH PI
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Students With Disabilities
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
Secondary-Level ELA PI
Secondary-Level MATH PI
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Limited English Proficient
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
Secondary-Level ELA PI
Secondary-Level MATH PI
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Economically Disadvantaged
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
Secondary-Level ELA PI
162
Secondary-Level MATH PI
114
Unweighted Combined PI
138
― There were not enough students to determine a Performance Index.

Overall Graduation Rate for Accountability

All accountability groups made AYP: YES

GROUP
MADE AYP
All Students

MADE AYP

YES

American Indian or Alaska Native

MADE AYP

Black or African American

MADE AYP

YES

Hispanic or Latino

MADE AYP

YES

Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander

MADE AYP

White

MADE AYP

Multiracial

MADE AYP

Students With Disabilities

MADE AYP

Limited English Proficient

MADE AYP

Economically Disadvantaged

MADE AYP

YES

― There were not enough students to make an AYP determination.

Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort for Accountability

GROUP
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion:
  • YES
  • YES
  • YES
  • YES
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
  • 80
  • 0
  • 30
  • 50
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 10
  • 7
  • 69
Graduation Rate
  • 93%
  • 97%
  • 90%
  • 96%
State Standard
  • 80%
  • 80%
  • 80%
  • 80%
Progress Target
  • 80%
  • 80%
  • 80%
  • 80%
All Students
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
80
Graduation Rate
93%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%
American Indian or Alaska Native
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
State Standard
Progress Target
Black or African American
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
30
Graduation Rate
97%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%
Hispanic or Latino
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
50
Graduation Rate
90%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
State Standard
Progress Target
White
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
State Standard
Progress Target
Multiracial
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
State Standard
Progress Target
Students With Disabilities
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
10
Graduation Rate
State Standard
Progress Target
Limited English Proficient
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
7
Graduation Rate
State Standard
Progress Target
Economically Disadvantaged
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
69
Graduation Rate
96%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%

YES Graduation rate is equal to or greater than the State Standard or the group's Progress Target.
NO Graduation rate is less than the State Standard and the group's Progress Target.
― There were fewer than 30 students in the cohort.

Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort for Accountability

GROUP
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion:
  • YES
  • YES
  • YES
  • YES
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
  • 91
  • 0
  • 34
  • 57
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 17
  • 7
  • 79
Graduation Rate
  • 96%
  • 100%
  • 93%
  • 96%
State Standard
  • 80%
  • 80%
  • 80%
  • 80%
Progress Target
  • 80%
  • 80%
  • 80%
  • 80%
All Students
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
91
Graduation Rate
96%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%
American Indian or Alaska Native
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
State Standard
Progress Target
Black or African American
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
34
Graduation Rate
100%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%
Hispanic or Latino
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
57
Graduation Rate
93%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
State Standard
Progress Target
White
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
State Standard
Progress Target
Multiracial
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
State Standard
Progress Target
Students With Disabilities
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
17
Graduation Rate
State Standard
Progress Target
Limited English Proficient
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
7
Graduation Rate
State Standard
Progress Target
Economically Disadvantaged
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
79
Graduation Rate
96%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%

YES Graduation rate is equal to or greater than the State Standard or the group's Progress Target.
NO Graduation rate is less than the State Standard and the group's Progress Target.
― There were fewer than 30 students in the cohort.

Graduation Rates for Non-AYP Groups for Accountability

GROUP
Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
  • 80
  • 50
  • 30
  • 80
  • 80
  • 80
  • 70
  • 73
  • 11
  • 49
  • 31
  • 0
  • 80
Graduation Rate
  • 93%
  • 90%
  • 97%
  • 93%
  • 93%
  • 93%
  • 93%
  • 95%
  • 88%
  • 100%
  • 93%
Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
  • 91
  • 57
  • 34
  • 91
  • 91
  • 91
  • 74
  • 84
  • 12
  • 55
  • 36
  • 0
  • 91
Graduation Rate
  • 96%
  • 93%
  • 100%
  • 96%
  • 96%
  • 96%
  • 95%
  • 95%
  • 95%
  • 97%
  • 96%

Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort

Not American Indian or Alaska Native
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
80
Graduation Rate
93%
Not Black or African American
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
50
Graduation Rate
90%
Not Hispanic or Latino
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
30
Graduation Rate
97%
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
80
Graduation Rate
93%
Not White
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
80
Graduation Rate
93%
Not Multiracial
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
80
Graduation Rate
93%
General Education
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
70
Graduation Rate
93%
English Proficient
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
73
Graduation Rate
95%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
11
Graduation Rate
Male
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
49
Graduation Rate
88%
Female
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
31
Graduation Rate
100%
Migrant
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
Not Migrant
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
80
Graduation Rate
93%

Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort

Not American Indian or Alaska Native
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
91
Graduation Rate
96%
Not Black or African American
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
57
Graduation Rate
93%
Not Hispanic or Latino
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
34
Graduation Rate
100%
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
91
Graduation Rate
96%
Not White
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
91
Graduation Rate
96%
Not Multiracial
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
91
Graduation Rate
96%
General Education
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
74
Graduation Rate
95%
English Proficient
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
84
Graduation Rate
95%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
12
Graduation Rate
Male
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
55
Graduation Rate
95%
Female
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
36
Graduation Rate
97%
Migrant
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
Not Migrant
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
91
Graduation Rate
96%

― There were fewer than 30 students in the cohort.

Graduation Rates for Regents with Advanced Designation and CTE Endorsement for Accountability

Percentage of 2012 Graduation-Rate Total Cohort members who graduated as of August 31, 2016 with:
  • Regents Diploma with an Advanced Designation (NY State)
  • 9%
  • Regents Diploma with an Advanced Designation (Statewide)
  • 31%
  • Percentage in NY State Exceeded Statewide
  • NO
Regents Diploma with an Advanced Designation (NY State)
9%
Regents Diploma with an Advanced Designation (Statewide)
31%
Percentage in NY State Exceeded Statewide
NO
Regents Diploma with CTE Endorsement (NY State)
0%
Regents Diploma with CTE Endorsement (Statewide)
5%
Percentage in NY State Exceeded Statewide
NO
Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.