HEBREW LANGUAGE ACADEMY CS - School Report Card Data [2016 - 17]
The New York State Report Card is an important part of the Board of Regents' effort to raise learning standards for all students. It provides information to the public on school/district enrollment and staff, student performance, and other measures of school and district performance. Knowledge gained from the report card on a school's or district's strengths and weaknesses can be used to improve instruction and services to students. Report Card Data - Glossary of Terms | Accountability Data - Glossary of Terms | Business Rules
Turnover Rate of Teachers with Fewer Than Five Years of Experience
43%
TURNOVER RATE OF ALL TEACHERS
35%
Teacher Turnover Rate (2015-16 to 2016-17)
Turnover Rate of Teachers with Fewer Than Five Years of Experience
43%
Turnover Rate of All Teachers
35%
Staff Counts (2016 - 17)
GROUP
PRINCIPALS
ASSISTANT PRINCIPALS
OTHER PROFESSIONAL STAFF
PARAPROFESSIONALS
STAFF
1
5
11
0
Staff Counts (2016 - 17)
Principals
1
Assistant Principals
5
Other Professional Staff
11
Paraprofessionals
0
Teacher Qualifications (2016 - 17)
TOTAL TEACHERS
65
PERCENT WITH NO VALID TEACHING CERTIFICATE
42%
PERCENT TEACHING OUT OF CERTIFICATE
42%
PERCENT WITH FEWER THAN THREE YEARS OF EXPERIENCE
52%
PERCENTAGE WITH MASTER'S DEGREEPLUS 30 HOURS OR DOCTORATE
3%
Total Number of Classes
109
Percent Taught by Teachers Without Appropriate Certification
51%
Teacher Qualifications (2016 - 17)
TOTAL TEACHERS: 65
Percent with No Valid Teaching Certificate
42%
Percent Teaching Out of Certification
42%
Percent with Fewer Than Three Years of Experience
52%
Percentage with Master's Degree Plus 30 Hours or Doctorate
3%
Total Number of Classes
109
Percent Taught by Teachers Without Appropriate Certification
51%
Grade 3 English Language Arts
MEAN SCORE: 307
All Students
PROFICIENT
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 64
LEVEL 1
19
30%
LEVEL 2
22
34%
LEVEL 3
22
34%
LEVEL 4
1
2%
General Education
PROFICIENT
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 56
LEVEL 1
14
25%
LEVEL 2
20
36%
LEVEL 3
21
38%
LEVEL 4
1
2%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 8
LEVEL 1
5
63%
LEVEL 2
2
25%
LEVEL 3
1
13%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 21
LEVEL 1
8
38%
LEVEL 2
6
29%
LEVEL 3
7
33%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 38
LEVEL 1
10
26%
LEVEL 2
14
37%
LEVEL 3
13
34%
LEVEL 4
1
3%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
1
20%
LEVEL 2
2
40%
LEVEL 3
2
40%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Female
PROFICIENT
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 37
LEVEL 1
9
24%
LEVEL 2
15
41%
LEVEL 3
12
32%
LEVEL 4
1
3%
Male
PROFICIENT
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 27
LEVEL 1
10
37%
LEVEL 2
7
26%
LEVEL 3
10
37%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 54
LEVEL 1
14
26%
LEVEL 2
19
35%
LEVEL 3
20
37%
LEVEL 4
1
2%
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 10
LEVEL 1
5
50%
LEVEL 2
3
30%
LEVEL 3
2
20%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 43
LEVEL 1
16
37%
LEVEL 2
13
30%
LEVEL 3
14
33%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 21
LEVEL 1
3
14%
LEVEL 2
9
43%
LEVEL 3
8
38%
LEVEL 4
1
5%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 64
LEVEL 1
19
30%
LEVEL 2
22
34%
LEVEL 3
22
34%
LEVEL 4
1
2%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
64
56
8
1
21
3
38
1
5
37
27
54
10
43
21
64
PROFICIENT
36%
39%
13%
_%
33%
_%
37%
_%
40%
35%
37%
39%
20%
33%
43%
36%
LEVEL 1
19
30%
14
25%
5
63%
_
_
8
38%
_
_
10
26%
_
_
1
20%
9
24%
10
37%
14
26%
5
50%
16
37%
3
14%
19
30%
LEVEL 2
22
34%
20
36%
2
25%
_
_
6
29%
_
_
14
37%
_
_
2
40%
15
41%
7
26%
19
35%
3
30%
13
30%
9
43%
22
34%
LEVEL 3
22
34%
21
38%
1
13%
_
_
7
33%
_
_
13
34%
_
_
2
40%
12
32%
10
37%
20
37%
2
20%
14
33%
8
38%
22
34%
LEVEL 4
1
2%
1
2%
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
_
_
1
3%
_
_
0
0%
1
3%
0
0%
1
2%
0
0%
0
0%
1
5%
1
2%
Grade 4 English Language Arts
MEAN SCORE: 313
All Students
PROFICIENT
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 59
LEVEL 1
5
8%
LEVEL 2
37
63%
LEVEL 3
13
22%
LEVEL 4
4
7%
General Education
PROFICIENT
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 54
LEVEL 1
2
4%
LEVEL 2
35
65%
LEVEL 3
13
24%
LEVEL 4
4
7%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
3
60%
LEVEL 2
2
40%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 32
LEVEL 1
4
13%
LEVEL 2
20
63%
LEVEL 3
5
16%
LEVEL 4
3
9%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 23
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 27
LEVEL 1
1
4%
LEVEL 2
17
63%
LEVEL 3
8
30%
LEVEL 4
1
4%
Female
PROFICIENT
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 31
LEVEL 1
1
3%
LEVEL 2
21
68%
LEVEL 3
7
23%
LEVEL 4
2
6%
Male
PROFICIENT
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 28
LEVEL 1
4
14%
LEVEL 2
16
57%
LEVEL 3
6
21%
LEVEL 4
2
7%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 57
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 38
LEVEL 1
4
11%
LEVEL 2
23
61%
LEVEL 3
9
24%
LEVEL 4
2
5%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 21
LEVEL 1
1
5%
LEVEL 2
14
67%
LEVEL 3
4
19%
LEVEL 4
2
10%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 59
LEVEL 1
5
8%
LEVEL 2
37
63%
LEVEL 3
13
22%
LEVEL 4
4
7%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
59
54
5
1
32
3
23
27
31
28
57
2
38
21
59
PROFICIENT
29%
31%
0%
_%
25%
_%
_%
33%
29%
29%
_%
_%
29%
29%
29%
LEVEL 1
5
8%
2
4%
3
60%
_
_
4
13%
_
_
_
_
1
4%
1
3%
4
14%
_
_
_
_
4
11%
1
5%
5
8%
LEVEL 2
37
63%
35
65%
2
40%
_
_
20
63%
_
_
_
_
17
63%
21
68%
16
57%
_
_
_
_
23
61%
14
67%
37
63%
LEVEL 3
13
22%
13
24%
0
0%
_
_
5
16%
_
_
_
_
8
30%
7
23%
6
21%
_
_
_
_
9
24%
4
19%
13
22%
LEVEL 4
4
7%
4
7%
0
0%
_
_
3
9%
_
_
_
_
1
4%
2
6%
2
7%
_
_
_
_
2
5%
2
10%
4
7%
Grade 5 English Language Arts
MEAN SCORE: 324
All Students
PROFICIENT
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 59
LEVEL 1
11
19%
LEVEL 2
15
25%
LEVEL 3
16
27%
LEVEL 4
17
29%
General Education
PROFICIENT
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 52
LEVEL 1
7
13%
LEVEL 2
13
25%
LEVEL 3
16
31%
LEVEL 4
16
31%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7
LEVEL 1
4
57%
LEVEL 2
2
29%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
1
14%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 22
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 34
LEVEL 1
5
15%
LEVEL 2
6
18%
LEVEL 3
12
35%
LEVEL 4
11
32%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 25
LEVEL 1
6
24%
LEVEL 2
9
36%
LEVEL 3
4
16%
LEVEL 4
6
24%
Female
PROFICIENT
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 30
LEVEL 1
6
20%
LEVEL 2
8
27%
LEVEL 3
6
20%
LEVEL 4
10
33%
Male
PROFICIENT
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 29
LEVEL 1
5
17%
LEVEL 2
7
24%
LEVEL 3
10
34%
LEVEL 4
7
24%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 58
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 29
LEVEL 1
6
21%
LEVEL 2
9
31%
LEVEL 3
7
24%
LEVEL 4
7
24%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 30
LEVEL 1
5
17%
LEVEL 2
6
20%
LEVEL 3
9
30%
LEVEL 4
10
33%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 59
LEVEL 1
11
19%
LEVEL 2
15
25%
LEVEL 3
16
27%
LEVEL 4
17
29%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
59
52
7
1
22
1
34
1
25
30
29
58
1
29
30
59
PROFICIENT
56%
62%
14%
_%
_%
_%
68%
_%
40%
53%
59%
_%
_%
48%
63%
56%
LEVEL 1
11
19%
7
13%
4
57%
_
_
_
_
_
_
5
15%
_
_
6
24%
6
20%
5
17%
_
_
_
_
6
21%
5
17%
11
19%
LEVEL 2
15
25%
13
25%
2
29%
_
_
_
_
_
_
6
18%
_
_
9
36%
8
27%
7
24%
_
_
_
_
9
31%
6
20%
15
25%
LEVEL 3
16
27%
16
31%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
12
35%
_
_
4
16%
6
20%
10
34%
_
_
_
_
7
24%
9
30%
16
27%
LEVEL 4
17
29%
16
31%
1
14%
_
_
_
_
_
_
11
32%
_
_
6
24%
10
33%
7
24%
_
_
_
_
7
24%
10
33%
17
29%
Grade 6 English Language Arts
MEAN SCORE: 298
All Students
PROFICIENT
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 83
LEVEL 1
25
30%
LEVEL 2
40
48%
LEVEL 3
16
19%
LEVEL 4
2
2%
General Education
PROFICIENT
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 68
LEVEL 1
14
21%
LEVEL 2
36
53%
LEVEL 3
16
24%
LEVEL 4
2
3%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 15
LEVEL 1
11
73%
LEVEL 2
4
27%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 40
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 41
LEVEL 1
9
22%
LEVEL 2
21
51%
LEVEL 3
10
24%
LEVEL 4
1
2%
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 42
LEVEL 1
16
38%
LEVEL 2
19
45%
LEVEL 3
6
14%
LEVEL 4
1
2%
Female
PROFICIENT
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 44
LEVEL 1
10
23%
LEVEL 2
22
50%
LEVEL 3
12
27%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Male
PROFICIENT
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 39
LEVEL 1
15
38%
LEVEL 2
18
46%
LEVEL 3
4
10%
LEVEL 4
2
5%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 80
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 52
LEVEL 1
18
35%
LEVEL 2
26
50%
LEVEL 3
6
12%
LEVEL 4
2
4%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 31
LEVEL 1
7
23%
LEVEL 2
14
45%
LEVEL 3
10
32%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 83
LEVEL 1
25
30%
LEVEL 2
40
48%
LEVEL 3
16
19%
LEVEL 4
2
2%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
83
68
15
40
2
41
42
44
39
80
3
52
31
83
PROFICIENT
22%
26%
0%
_%
_%
27%
17%
27%
15%
_%
_%
15%
32%
22%
LEVEL 1
25
30%
14
21%
11
73%
_
_
_
_
9
22%
16
38%
10
23%
15
38%
_
_
_
_
18
35%
7
23%
25
30%
LEVEL 2
40
48%
36
53%
4
27%
_
_
_
_
21
51%
19
45%
22
50%
18
46%
_
_
_
_
26
50%
14
45%
40
48%
LEVEL 3
16
19%
16
24%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
10
24%
6
14%
12
27%
4
10%
_
_
_
_
6
12%
10
32%
16
19%
LEVEL 4
2
2%
2
3%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
1
2%
1
2%
0
0%
2
5%
_
_
_
_
2
4%
0
0%
2
2%
Grade 7 English Language Arts
MEAN SCORE: 310
All Students
PROFICIENT
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 60
LEVEL 1
11
18%
LEVEL 2
26
43%
LEVEL 3
19
32%
LEVEL 4
4
7%
General Education
PROFICIENT
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 48
LEVEL 1
8
17%
LEVEL 2
17
35%
LEVEL 3
19
40%
LEVEL 4
4
8%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 12
LEVEL 1
3
25%
LEVEL 2
9
75%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
American Indian or Alaska Native
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 35
LEVEL 1
8
23%
LEVEL 2
14
40%
LEVEL 3
12
34%
LEVEL 4
1
3%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 17
LEVEL 1
1
6%
LEVEL 2
10
59%
LEVEL 3
5
29%
LEVEL 4
1
6%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 8
LEVEL 1
2
25%
LEVEL 2
2
25%
LEVEL 3
2
25%
LEVEL 4
2
25%
Female
PROFICIENT
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 31
LEVEL 1
4
13%
LEVEL 2
13
42%
LEVEL 3
11
35%
LEVEL 4
3
10%
Male
PROFICIENT
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 29
LEVEL 1
7
24%
LEVEL 2
13
45%
LEVEL 3
8
28%
LEVEL 4
1
3%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 58
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 35
LEVEL 1
8
23%
LEVEL 2
16
46%
LEVEL 3
10
29%
LEVEL 4
1
3%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 25
LEVEL 1
3
12%
LEVEL 2
10
40%
LEVEL 3
9
36%
LEVEL 4
3
12%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 60
LEVEL 1
11
18%
LEVEL 2
26
43%
LEVEL 3
19
32%
LEVEL 4
4
7%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
60
48
12
1
35
6
17
1
8
31
29
58
2
35
25
60
PROFICIENT
38%
48%
0%
_%
37%
_%
35%
_%
50%
45%
31%
_%
_%
31%
48%
38%
LEVEL 1
11
18%
8
17%
3
25%
_
_
8
23%
_
_
1
6%
_
_
2
25%
4
13%
7
24%
_
_
_
_
8
23%
3
12%
11
18%
LEVEL 2
26
43%
17
35%
9
75%
_
_
14
40%
_
_
10
59%
_
_
2
25%
13
42%
13
45%
_
_
_
_
16
46%
10
40%
26
43%
LEVEL 3
19
32%
19
40%
0
0%
_
_
12
34%
_
_
5
29%
_
_
2
25%
11
35%
8
28%
_
_
_
_
10
29%
9
36%
19
32%
LEVEL 4
4
7%
4
8%
0
0%
_
_
1
3%
_
_
1
6%
_
_
2
25%
3
10%
1
3%
_
_
_
_
1
3%
3
12%
4
7%
Grade 3 Mathematics
MEAN SCORE: 322
All Students
PROFICIENT
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 63
LEVEL 1
8
13%
LEVEL 2
13
21%
LEVEL 3
28
44%
LEVEL 4
14
22%
General Education
PROFICIENT
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 55
LEVEL 1
5
9%
LEVEL 2
11
20%
LEVEL 3
25
45%
LEVEL 4
14
25%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 8
LEVEL 1
3
38%
LEVEL 2
2
25%
LEVEL 3
3
38%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 21
LEVEL 1
5
24%
LEVEL 2
6
29%
LEVEL 3
9
43%
LEVEL 4
1
5%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 37
LEVEL 1
1
3%
LEVEL 2
7
19%
LEVEL 3
18
49%
LEVEL 4
11
30%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
2
40%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
1
20%
LEVEL 4
2
40%
Female
PROFICIENT
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 36
LEVEL 1
6
17%
LEVEL 2
7
19%
LEVEL 3
16
44%
LEVEL 4
7
19%
Male
PROFICIENT
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 27
LEVEL 1
2
7%
LEVEL 2
6
22%
LEVEL 3
12
44%
LEVEL 4
7
26%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 53
LEVEL 1
4
8%
LEVEL 2
11
21%
LEVEL 3
25
47%
LEVEL 4
13
25%
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 10
LEVEL 1
4
40%
LEVEL 2
2
20%
LEVEL 3
3
30%
LEVEL 4
1
10%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 43
LEVEL 1
8
19%
LEVEL 2
10
23%
LEVEL 3
17
40%
LEVEL 4
8
19%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 20
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
3
15%
LEVEL 3
11
55%
LEVEL 4
6
30%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 63
LEVEL 1
8
13%
LEVEL 2
13
21%
LEVEL 3
28
44%
LEVEL 4
14
22%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
63
55
8
1
21
3
37
1
5
36
27
53
10
43
20
63
PROFICIENT
67%
71%
38%
_%
48%
_%
78%
_%
60%
64%
70%
72%
40%
58%
85%
67%
LEVEL 1
8
13%
5
9%
3
38%
_
_
5
24%
_
_
1
3%
_
_
2
40%
6
17%
2
7%
4
8%
4
40%
8
19%
0
0%
8
13%
LEVEL 2
13
21%
11
20%
2
25%
_
_
6
29%
_
_
7
19%
_
_
0
0%
7
19%
6
22%
11
21%
2
20%
10
23%
3
15%
13
21%
LEVEL 3
28
44%
25
45%
3
38%
_
_
9
43%
_
_
18
49%
_
_
1
20%
16
44%
12
44%
25
47%
3
30%
17
40%
11
55%
28
44%
LEVEL 4
14
22%
14
25%
0
0%
_
_
1
5%
_
_
11
30%
_
_
2
40%
7
19%
7
26%
13
25%
1
10%
8
19%
6
30%
14
22%
Grade 4 Mathematics
MEAN SCORE: 305
All Students
PROFICIENT
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 58
LEVEL 1
16
28%
LEVEL 2
23
40%
LEVEL 3
9
16%
LEVEL 4
10
17%
General Education
PROFICIENT
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 53
LEVEL 1
13
25%
LEVEL 2
21
40%
LEVEL 3
9
17%
LEVEL 4
10
19%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
3
60%
LEVEL 2
2
40%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 31
LEVEL 1
14
45%
LEVEL 2
11
35%
LEVEL 3
3
10%
LEVEL 4
3
10%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 23
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 27
LEVEL 1
2
7%
LEVEL 2
12
44%
LEVEL 3
6
22%
LEVEL 4
7
26%
Female
PROFICIENT
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 30
LEVEL 1
8
27%
LEVEL 2
14
47%
LEVEL 3
4
13%
LEVEL 4
4
13%
Male
PROFICIENT
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 28
LEVEL 1
8
29%
LEVEL 2
9
32%
LEVEL 3
5
18%
LEVEL 4
6
21%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 56
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 37
LEVEL 1
13
35%
LEVEL 2
14
38%
LEVEL 3
5
14%
LEVEL 4
5
14%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 21
LEVEL 1
3
14%
LEVEL 2
9
43%
LEVEL 3
4
19%
LEVEL 4
5
24%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 58
LEVEL 1
16
28%
LEVEL 2
23
40%
LEVEL 3
9
16%
LEVEL 4
10
17%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
58
53
5
1
31
3
23
27
30
28
56
2
37
21
58
PROFICIENT
33%
36%
0%
_%
19%
_%
_%
48%
27%
39%
_%
_%
27%
43%
33%
LEVEL 1
16
28%
13
25%
3
60%
_
_
14
45%
_
_
_
_
2
7%
8
27%
8
29%
_
_
_
_
13
35%
3
14%
16
28%
LEVEL 2
23
40%
21
40%
2
40%
_
_
11
35%
_
_
_
_
12
44%
14
47%
9
32%
_
_
_
_
14
38%
9
43%
23
40%
LEVEL 3
9
16%
9
17%
0
0%
_
_
3
10%
_
_
_
_
6
22%
4
13%
5
18%
_
_
_
_
5
14%
4
19%
9
16%
LEVEL 4
10
17%
10
19%
0
0%
_
_
3
10%
_
_
_
_
7
26%
4
13%
6
21%
_
_
_
_
5
14%
5
24%
10
17%
Grade 5 Mathematics
MEAN SCORE: 329
All Students
PROFICIENT
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 64
LEVEL 1
8
13%
LEVEL 2
12
19%
LEVEL 3
27
42%
LEVEL 4
17
27%
General Education
PROFICIENT
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 55
LEVEL 1
7
13%
LEVEL 2
10
18%
LEVEL 3
23
42%
LEVEL 4
15
27%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
1
11%
LEVEL 2
2
22%
LEVEL 3
4
44%
LEVEL 4
2
22%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 23
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 38
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
7
18%
LEVEL 3
16
42%
LEVEL 4
15
39%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 26
LEVEL 1
8
31%
LEVEL 2
5
19%
LEVEL 3
11
42%
LEVEL 4
2
8%
Female
PROFICIENT
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 31
LEVEL 1
6
19%
LEVEL 2
7
23%
LEVEL 3
12
39%
LEVEL 4
6
19%
Male
PROFICIENT
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 33
LEVEL 1
2
6%
LEVEL 2
5
15%
LEVEL 3
15
45%
LEVEL 4
11
33%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 63
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 31
LEVEL 1
6
19%
LEVEL 2
7
23%
LEVEL 3
15
48%
LEVEL 4
3
10%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 33
LEVEL 1
2
6%
LEVEL 2
5
15%
LEVEL 3
12
36%
LEVEL 4
14
42%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 64
LEVEL 1
8
13%
LEVEL 2
12
19%
LEVEL 3
27
42%
LEVEL 4
17
27%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
64
55
9
1
23
1
38
1
26
31
33
63
1
31
33
64
PROFICIENT
69%
69%
67%
_%
_%
_%
82%
_%
50%
58%
79%
_%
_%
58%
79%
69%
LEVEL 1
8
13%
7
13%
1
11%
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
0%
_
_
8
31%
6
19%
2
6%
_
_
_
_
6
19%
2
6%
8
13%
LEVEL 2
12
19%
10
18%
2
22%
_
_
_
_
_
_
7
18%
_
_
5
19%
7
23%
5
15%
_
_
_
_
7
23%
5
15%
12
19%
LEVEL 3
27
42%
23
42%
4
44%
_
_
_
_
_
_
16
42%
_
_
11
42%
12
39%
15
45%
_
_
_
_
15
48%
12
36%
27
42%
LEVEL 4
17
27%
15
27%
2
22%
_
_
_
_
_
_
15
39%
_
_
2
8%
6
19%
11
33%
_
_
_
_
3
10%
14
42%
17
27%
Grade 6 Mathematics
MEAN SCORE: 308
All Students
PROFICIENT
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 84
LEVEL 1
13
15%
LEVEL 2
39
46%
LEVEL 3
20
24%
LEVEL 4
12
14%
General Education
PROFICIENT
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 68
LEVEL 1
4
6%
LEVEL 2
35
51%
LEVEL 3
18
26%
LEVEL 4
11
16%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 16
LEVEL 1
9
56%
LEVEL 2
4
25%
LEVEL 3
2
13%
LEVEL 4
1
6%
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 41
LEVEL 1
7
17%
LEVEL 2
27
66%
LEVEL 3
2
5%
LEVEL 4
5
12%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 41
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 43
LEVEL 1
6
14%
LEVEL 2
12
28%
LEVEL 3
18
42%
LEVEL 4
7
16%
Female
PROFICIENT
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 44
LEVEL 1
5
11%
LEVEL 2
17
39%
LEVEL 3
15
34%
LEVEL 4
7
16%
Male
PROFICIENT
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 40
LEVEL 1
8
20%
LEVEL 2
22
55%
LEVEL 3
5
13%
LEVEL 4
5
13%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 81
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 53
LEVEL 1
9
17%
LEVEL 2
30
57%
LEVEL 3
10
19%
LEVEL 4
4
8%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 31
LEVEL 1
4
13%
LEVEL 2
9
29%
LEVEL 3
10
32%
LEVEL 4
8
26%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 84
LEVEL 1
13
15%
LEVEL 2
39
46%
LEVEL 3
20
24%
LEVEL 4
12
14%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
84
68
16
41
2
41
43
44
40
81
3
53
31
84
PROFICIENT
38%
43%
19%
17%
_%
_%
58%
50%
25%
_%
_%
26%
58%
38%
LEVEL 1
13
15%
4
6%
9
56%
7
17%
_
_
_
_
6
14%
5
11%
8
20%
_
_
_
_
9
17%
4
13%
13
15%
LEVEL 2
39
46%
35
51%
4
25%
27
66%
_
_
_
_
12
28%
17
39%
22
55%
_
_
_
_
30
57%
9
29%
39
46%
LEVEL 3
20
24%
18
26%
2
13%
2
5%
_
_
_
_
18
42%
15
34%
5
13%
_
_
_
_
10
19%
10
32%
20
24%
LEVEL 4
12
14%
11
16%
1
6%
5
12%
_
_
_
_
7
16%
7
16%
5
13%
_
_
_
_
4
8%
8
26%
12
14%
Grade 7 Mathematics
Mean scores and data in the table for grade 7 math include only those for grade 7 students who took the Grade 7 New York State Testing Program Assessment (NYSTP) in Mathematics. For 2015 and forward, data in the bar charts include those for grade 7 students who took the Grade 7 NYSTP in Mathematics and grade 7 students who took a Regents math test in lieu of the NYSTP. For 2014 and earlier, data in the bar charts include only those for grade 7 students who took the Grade 7 NYSTP.
MEAN SCORE: 305
All Students
PROFICIENT
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 60
LEVEL 1
19
32%
LEVEL 2
25
42%
LEVEL 3
11
18%
LEVEL 4
5
8%
General Education
PROFICIENT
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 47
LEVEL 1
10
21%
LEVEL 2
22
47%
LEVEL 3
10
21%
LEVEL 4
5
11%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 13
LEVEL 1
9
69%
LEVEL 2
3
23%
LEVEL 3
1
8%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
American Indian or Alaska Native
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 35
LEVEL 1
13
37%
LEVEL 2
17
49%
LEVEL 3
4
11%
LEVEL 4
1
3%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 18
LEVEL 1
2
11%
LEVEL 2
7
39%
LEVEL 3
6
33%
LEVEL 4
3
17%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7
LEVEL 1
4
57%
LEVEL 2
1
14%
LEVEL 3
1
14%
LEVEL 4
1
14%
Female
PROFICIENT
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 31
LEVEL 1
8
26%
LEVEL 2
15
48%
LEVEL 3
7
23%
LEVEL 4
1
3%
Male
PROFICIENT
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 29
LEVEL 1
11
38%
LEVEL 2
10
34%
LEVEL 3
4
14%
LEVEL 4
4
14%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 58
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 35
LEVEL 1
14
40%
LEVEL 2
12
34%
LEVEL 3
8
23%
LEVEL 4
1
3%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 25
LEVEL 1
5
20%
LEVEL 2
13
52%
LEVEL 3
3
12%
LEVEL 4
4
16%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 60
LEVEL 1
19
32%
LEVEL 2
25
42%
LEVEL 3
11
18%
LEVEL 4
5
8%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
60
47
13
1
35
5
18
1
7
31
29
58
2
35
25
60
PROFICIENT
27%
32%
8%
_%
14%
_%
50%
_%
29%
26%
28%
_%
_%
26%
28%
27%
LEVEL 1
19
32%
10
21%
9
69%
_
_
13
37%
_
_
2
11%
_
_
4
57%
8
26%
11
38%
_
_
_
_
14
40%
5
20%
19
32%
LEVEL 2
25
42%
22
47%
3
23%
_
_
17
49%
_
_
7
39%
_
_
1
14%
15
48%
10
34%
_
_
_
_
12
34%
13
52%
25
42%
LEVEL 3
11
18%
10
21%
1
8%
_
_
4
11%
_
_
6
33%
_
_
1
14%
7
23%
4
14%
_
_
_
_
8
23%
3
12%
11
18%
LEVEL 4
5
8%
5
11%
0
0%
_
_
1
3%
_
_
3
17%
_
_
1
14%
1
3%
4
14%
_
_
_
_
1
3%
4
16%
5
8%
Grade 4 Science
MEAN SCORE: 90
All Students
PROFICIENT
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 61
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
2%
LEVEL 3
10
16%
LEVEL 4
50
82%
General Education
PROFICIENT
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 55
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
2%
LEVEL 3
5
9%
LEVEL 4
49
89%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
5
83%
LEVEL 4
1
17%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 33
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
3%
LEVEL 3
8
24%
LEVEL 4
24
73%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 24
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 28
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
2
7%
LEVEL 4
26
93%
Female
PROFICIENT
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 32
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
3%
LEVEL 3
2
6%
LEVEL 4
29
91%
Male
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 29
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
8
28%
LEVEL 4
21
72%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 59
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 39
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
3%
LEVEL 3
7
18%
LEVEL 4
31
79%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 22
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
3
14%
LEVEL 4
19
86%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 61
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
2%
LEVEL 3
10
16%
LEVEL 4
50
82%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
61
55
6
1
33
3
24
28
32
29
59
2
39
22
61
PROFICIENT
98%
98%
100%
_%
97%
_%
_%
100%
97%
100%
_%
_%
97%
100%
98%
LEVEL 1
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
2%
1
2%
0
0%
_
_
1
3%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
1
3%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
1
3%
0
0%
1
2%
LEVEL 3
10
16%
5
9%
5
83%
_
_
8
24%
_
_
_
_
2
7%
2
6%
8
28%
_
_
_
_
7
18%
3
14%
10
16%
LEVEL 4
50
82%
49
89%
1
17%
_
_
24
73%
_
_
_
_
26
93%
29
91%
21
72%
_
_
_
_
31
79%
19
86%
50
82%
Statewide Results on the National Assessment of Educational Progress: NAEP (2016 - 17)
Grade: 4
Reading
GROUP
All Students
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
BELOW BASIC
32%
68%
*%
18%
48%
45%
22%
*%
74%
44%
BASIC
32%
22%
*%
30%
34%
33%
31%
*%
21%
33%
PROFICIENT
27%
9%
*%
33%
16%
18%
35%
*%
5%
19%
ADVANCED
9%
2%
*%
19%
3%
4%
13%
*%
*%
4%
PARTICIPATION RATE
98
93
88
Reading
All Students
Percent Below Basic
32
Percent Basic
32
Percent Proficient
27
Percent Advanced
9
Participation Rate
98
Students with Disabilities
Percent Below Basic
68
Percent Basic
22
Percent Proficient
9
Percent Advanced
2
Participation Rate
93
American Indian or Alaska Native
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Percent Below Basic
18
Percent Basic
30
Percent Proficient
33
Percent Advanced
19
Black or African American
Percent Below Basic
48
Percent Basic
34
Percent Proficient
16
Percent Advanced
3
Hispanic or Latino
Percent Below Basic
45
Percent Basic
33
Percent Proficient
18
Percent Advanced
4
White
Percent Below Basic
22
Percent Basic
31
Percent Proficient
35
Percent Advanced
13
Multiracial
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Limited English Proficient
Percent Below Basic
74
Percent Basic
21
Percent Proficient
5
Percent Advanced
*
Participation Rate
88
Economically Disadvantaged
Percent Below Basic
44
Percent Basic
33
Percent Proficient
19
Percent Advanced
4
Mathematics
GROUP
All Students
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
BELOW BASIC
24%
58%
*%
11%
36%
36%
14%
*%
68%
34%
BASIC
41%
31%
*%
30%
42%
44%
40%
*%
29%
43%
PROFICIENT
30%
10%
*%
44%
21%
18%
38%
*%
3%
21%
ADVANCED
5%
1%
*%
15%
2%
2%
7%
*%
*%
2%
PARTICIPATION RATE
98
94
91
Mathematics
All Students
Percent Below Basic
24
Percent Basic
41
Percent Proficient
30
Percent Advanced
5
Participation Rate
98
Students with Disabilities
Percent Below Basic
58
Percent Basic
31
Percent Proficient
10
Percent Advanced
1
Participation Rate
94
American Indian or Alaska Native
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Percent Below Basic
11
Percent Basic
30
Percent Proficient
44
Percent Advanced
15
Black or African American
Percent Below Basic
36
Percent Basic
42
Percent Proficient
21
Percent Advanced
2
Hispanic or Latino
Percent Below Basic
36
Percent Basic
44
Percent Proficient
18
Percent Advanced
2
White
Percent Below Basic
14
Percent Basic
40
Percent Proficient
38
Percent Advanced
7
Multiracial
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Limited English Proficient
Percent Below Basic
68
Percent Basic
29
Percent Proficient
3
Percent Advanced
*
Participation Rate
91
Economically Disadvantaged
Percent Below Basic
34
Percent Basic
43
Percent Proficient
21
Percent Advanced
2
Grade: 8
Reading
GROUP
All Students
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
BELOW BASIC
27%
58%
*%
21%
39%
35%
20%
*%
81%
37%
BASIC
39%
33%
*%
31%
41%
43%
38%
*%
16%
41%
PROFICIENT
30%
8%
*%
37%
19%
21%
36%
*%
3%
20%
ADVANCED
5%
*%
*%
12%
1%
1%
6%
*%
*%
2%
PARTICIPATION RATE
98
94
80
Reading
All Students
Percent Below Basic
27
Percent Basic
39
Percent Proficient
30
Percent Advanced
5
Participation Rate
98
Students with Disabilities
Percent Below Basic
58
Percent Basic
33
Percent Proficient
8
Percent Advanced
*
Participation Rate
94
American Indian or Alaska Native
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Percent Below Basic
21
Percent Basic
31
Percent Proficient
37
Percent Advanced
12
Black or African American
Percent Below Basic
39
Percent Basic
41
Percent Proficient
19
Percent Advanced
1
Hispanic or Latino
Percent Below Basic
35
Percent Basic
43
Percent Proficient
21
Percent Advanced
1
White
Percent Below Basic
20
Percent Basic
38
Percent Proficient
36
Percent Advanced
6
Multiracial
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Limited English Proficient
Percent Below Basic
81
Percent Basic
16
Percent Proficient
3
Percent Advanced
*
Participation Rate
80
Economically Disadvantaged
Percent Below Basic
37
Percent Basic
41
Percent Proficient
20
Percent Advanced
2
Mathematics
GROUP
All Students
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
BELOW BASIC
32%
69%
*%
14%
53%
48%
21%
*%
80%
44%
BASIC
34%
23%
*%
24%
32%
33%
37%
*%
16%
34%
PROFICIENT
24%
6%
*%
32%
14%
15%
29%
*%
4%
17%
ADVANCED
10%
2%
*%
30%
2%
4%
13%
*%
1%
4%
PARTICIPATION RATE
98
95
80
Mathematics
All Students
Percent Below Basic
32
Percent Basic
34
Percent Proficient
24
Percent Advanced
10
Participation Rate
98
Students with Disabilities
Percent Below Basic
69
Percent Basic
23
Percent Proficient
6
Percent Advanced
2
Participation Rate
95
American Indian or Alaska Native
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Percent Below Basic
14
Percent Basic
24
Percent Proficient
32
Percent Advanced
30
Black or African American
Percent Below Basic
53
Percent Basic
32
Percent Proficient
14
Percent Advanced
2
Hispanic or Latino
Percent Below Basic
48
Percent Basic
33
Percent Proficient
15
Percent Advanced
4
White
Percent Below Basic
21
Percent Basic
37
Percent Proficient
29
Percent Advanced
13
Multiracial
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Limited English Proficient
Percent Below Basic
80
Percent Basic
16
Percent Proficient
4
Percent Advanced
1
Participation Rate
80
Economically Disadvantaged
Percent Below Basic
44
Percent Basic
34
Percent Proficient
17
Percent Advanced
4
New York State English as a Second Language Achievement Test (NYSESLAT) Results (2016 - 17)
Kindergarten
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED
5
1
4
ENTERING
20%
_
_
EMERGING
20%
_
_
TRANSITIONING
20%
_
_
EXPANDING
40%
_
_
COMMANDING
0%
_
_
Grade 1
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED
11
6
5
ENTERING
0%
0%
0%
EMERGING
36%
50%
20%
TRANSITIONING
27%
17%
40%
EXPANDING
36%
33%
40%
COMMANDING
0%
0%
0%
Grade 2
GROUP
All Students
General Education
TOTAL TESTED
7
7
ENTERING
0%
0%
EMERGING
0%
0%
TRANSITIONING
43%
43%
EXPANDING
43%
43%
COMMANDING
14%
14%
Grade 3
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED
11
7
4
ENTERING
0%
_
_
EMERGING
0%
_
_
TRANSITIONING
36%
_
_
EXPANDING
64%
_
_
COMMANDING
0%
_
_
Grade 4
GROUP
All Students
General Education
TOTAL TESTED
2
2
ENTERING
_
_
EMERGING
_
_
TRANSITIONING
_
_
EXPANDING
_
_
COMMANDING
_
_
Grade 5
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED
2
1
1
ENTERING
_
_
_
EMERGING
_
_
_
TRANSITIONING
_
_
_
EXPANDING
_
_
_
COMMANDING
_
_
_
Grade 6
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED
3
2
1
ENTERING
_
_
_
EMERGING
_
_
_
TRANSITIONING
_
_
_
EXPANDING
_
_
_
COMMANDING
_
_
_
Grade 7
GROUP
All Students
General Education
TOTAL TESTED
2
2
ENTERING
_
_
EMERGING
_
_
TRANSITIONING
_
_
EXPANDING
_
_
COMMANDING
_
_
Kindergarten
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 5
ENTERING
20%
EMERGING
20%
TRANSITIONING
20%
EXPANDING
40%
COMMANDING
0%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 1
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 4
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
Grade 1
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 11
ENTERING
0%
EMERGING
36%
TRANSITIONING
27%
EXPANDING
36%
COMMANDING
0%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 6
ENTERING
0%
EMERGING
50%
TRANSITIONING
17%
EXPANDING
33%
COMMANDING
0%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 5
ENTERING
0%
EMERGING
20%
TRANSITIONING
40%
EXPANDING
40%
COMMANDING
0%
Grade 2
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 7
ENTERING
0%
EMERGING
0%
TRANSITIONING
43%
EXPANDING
43%
COMMANDING
14%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 7
ENTERING
0%
EMERGING
0%
TRANSITIONING
43%
EXPANDING
43%
COMMANDING
14%
Grade 3
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 11
ENTERING
0%
EMERGING
0%
TRANSITIONING
36%
EXPANDING
64%
COMMANDING
0%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 7
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 4
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
Grade 4
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 2
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 2
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
Grade 5
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 2
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 1
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 1
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
Grade 6
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 3
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 2
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 1
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
Grade 7
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 2
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 2
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
Elementary/Middle-Level English Language Arts Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: NO
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
NO
―
YES
―
―
NO
―
NO
―
NO
Tested 95%
NO
―
YES
―
―
NO
―
NO
―
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
648*
1
154
15
3
325*
3
109*
19
381*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
93%*
―
97%
―
―
91%*
―
82%*
―
93%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
―
YES
―
―
YES
―
NO
―
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
317
1
145
14
3
151
3
56✝
17
191
PI
114
―
101
―
―
123
―
63✝
―
104
EAMO
105
―
89
―
―
116
―
72
―
94
Safe Harbor Target
105
―
89
―
―
116
―
72
―
94
All Students
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
648*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
93%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
317
PI
114
EAMO
105
Safe Harbor Target
105
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
154
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
97%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
145
PI
101
EAMO
89
Safe Harbor Target
89
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
15
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
14
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
3
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
3
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
White
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
325*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
91%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
151
PI
123
EAMO
116
Safe Harbor Target
116
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
3
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
3
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
109*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
82%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
56✝
PI
63✝
EAMO
72
Safe Harbor Target
72
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
19
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
17
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
381*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
93%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
191
PI
104
EAMO
94
Safe Harbor Target
94
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
645*
372*
615*
643*
176
642*
287
621*
267*
306*
180
0
648*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
93%*
92%*
93%*
93%*
98%
93%*
97%
93%*
94%*
93%*
96%
―
93%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
316
172
303
314
166
314
271
300
126
147
170
0
317
PI
113
124
114
113
105
113
125
116
129
107
119
―
114
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
645*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
93%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
316
PI
113
Not Black or African American
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
372*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
92%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
172
PI
124
Not Hispanic or Latino
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
615*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
93%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
303
PI
114
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
643*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
93%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
314
PI
113
Not White
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
176
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
166
PI
105
Not Multiracial
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
642*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
93%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
314
PI
113
General Education
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
287
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
97%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
271
PI
125
English Proficient
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
621*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
93%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
300
PI
116
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
267*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
94%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
126
PI
129
Male
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
306*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
93%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
147
PI
107
Female
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
180
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
96%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
170
PI
119
Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
648*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
93%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
317
PI
114
― There were fewer than 40 students enrolled during the test administration period, so the Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 tested students enrolled on BEDS day and during the test administration period, so the PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed. *The percentage of students tested in the current year fell below 95 percent, so the numbers of enrolled and tested students in the current year and previous year were combined to provide the school/district with another opportunity to meet the participation rate criterion. ✝ Includes former students with disabilities because the number of students with disabilities in the current year is equal to or greater than 30.
Elementary/Middle-Level Mathematics Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: NO
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
YES
―
YES
―
―
NO
―
NO
―
YES
Tested 95%
YES
―
YES
―
―
NO
―
NO
―
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
346
1
153
15
3
325*
3
109*
19
209
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
95%
―
99%
―
―
93%*
―
87%*
―
95%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
―
YES
―
―
YES
―
YES
―
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
321
1
146
13
3
155
3
60✝
17
193
PI
128
―
97
―
―
161
―
93✝
―
115
EAMO
103
―
85
―
―
113
―
74
―
92
Safe Harbor Target
103
―
85
―
―
113
―
74
―
92
All Students
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
346
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
95%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
321
PI
128
EAMO
103
Safe Harbor Target
103
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
153
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
99%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
146
PI
97
EAMO
85
Safe Harbor Target
85
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
15
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
13
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
3
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
3
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
White
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
325*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
93%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
155
PI
161
EAMO
113
Safe Harbor Target
113
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
3
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
3
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
109*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
87%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
60✝
PI
93✝
EAMO
74
Safe Harbor Target
74
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
19
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
17
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
209
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
95%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
193
PI
115
EAMO
92
Safe Harbor Target
92
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
345
372*
331
343
175
343
286
327
137
166
180
0
346
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
95%
93%*
95%
95%
98%
95%
97%
95%
95%
95%
96%
―
95%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
320
175
308
318
166
318
271
304
128
152
169
0
321
PI
128
154
130
127
98
128
137
129
148
130
127
―
128
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
345
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
95%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
320
PI
128
Not Black or African American
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
372*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
93%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
175
PI
154
Not Hispanic or Latino
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
331
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
95%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
308
PI
130
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
343
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
95%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
318
PI
127
Not White
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
175
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
166
PI
98
Not Multiracial
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
343
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
95%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
318
PI
128
General Education
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
286
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
97%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
271
PI
137
English Proficient
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
327
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
95%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
304
PI
129
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
137
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
95%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
128
PI
148
Male
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
166
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
95%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
152
PI
130
Female
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
180
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
96%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
169
PI
127
Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
346
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
95%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
321
PI
128
― There were fewer than 40 students enrolled during the test administration period, so the Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 tested students enrolled on BEDS day and during the test administration period, so the PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed. *The percentage of students tested in the current year fell below 95 percent, so the numbers of enrolled and tested students in the current year and previous year were combined to provide the school/district with another opportunity to meet the participation rate criterion. ✝ Includes former students with disabilities because the number of students with disabilities in the current year is equal to or greater than 30.
Elementary/Middle-Level Science Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: YES
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
YES
―
YES
―
―
―
―
―
―
YES
Tested 80%
YES
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
62
0
33
3
1
25
0
6
2
39
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
YES
―
YES
―
―
―
―
―
―
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
60
0
32
3
1
24
0
5
2
38
PI
198
―
197
―
―
―
―
―
―
197
EAMO
177
―
162
―
―
―
―
―
―
167
Progress Target
177
―
1
―
―
―
―
―
―
167
All Students
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 80%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
62
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
60
PI
198
EAMO
177
Progress Target
177
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
33
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
32
PI
197
EAMO
162
Progress Target
1
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
3
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
3
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
White
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
25
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
24
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
6
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
5
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
2
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
2
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
39
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
38
PI
197
EAMO
167
Progress Target
167
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
62
29
59
61
37
62
56
60
23
30
32
0
62
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
―
98%
98%
―
98%
98%
98%
―
―
―
―
98%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
60
28
57
59
36
60
55
58
22
28
32
0
60
PI
198
―
198
198
197
198
198
198
―
―
197
―
198
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
62
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
60
PI
198
Not Black or African American
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
29
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
28
PI
―
Not Hispanic or Latino
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
59
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
57
PI
198
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
61
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
59
PI
198
Not White
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
37
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
36
PI
197
Not Multiracial
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
62
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
60
PI
198
General Education
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
56
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
55
PI
198
English Proficient
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
60
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
58
PI
198
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
23
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
22
PI
―
Male
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
30
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
28
PI
―
Female
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
32
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
32
PI
197
Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
62
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
60
PI
198
― There were fewer than 40 students enrolled during the test administration period, so the Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 tested students enrolled on BEDS day and during the test administration period, so the PI, EAMO, and Progress Target data are suppressed.
Unweighted Combined ELA and Math PIs
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
114
―
101
―
―
123
―
63
―
104
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
128
―
97
―
―
161
―
93
―
115
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
UNWEIGHTED COMBINED PI
121
0
99
0
0
142
0
78
0
110
All Students
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
114
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
128
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
121
American Indian or Alaska Native
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Black or African American
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
101
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
97
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
99
Hispanic or Latino
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
White
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
123
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
161
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
142
Multiracial
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Students With Disabilities
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
63
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
93
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
78
Limited English Proficient
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Economically Disadvantaged
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
104
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
115
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
110
― There were not enough students to determine a Performance Index.
You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.
Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.
If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.
