SUCCESS ACAD CHARTER SCH-FORT GREENE - School Report Card Data [2015 - 16]

The New York State Report Card is an important part of the Board of Regents' effort to raise learning standards for all students. It provides information to the public on school/district enrollment and staff, student performance, and other measures of school and district performance. Knowledge gained from the report card on a school's or district's strengths and weaknesses can be used to improve instruction and services to students.
Report Card Data - Glossary of Terms | Accountability Data - Glossary of Terms | Business Rules

Grade 3 English Language Arts

Due to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 proficiency rates.

MEAN SCORE: 343

All Students

PROFICIENT

85%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

7

15%

LEVEL 3

28

58%

LEVEL 4

13

27%

General Education

PROFICIENT

88%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

12%

LEVEL 3

25

60%

LEVEL 4

12

29%

Students with Disabilities

PROFICIENT

67%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

3

50%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Black or African American

PROFICIENT

85%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

15%

LEVEL 3

19

58%

LEVEL 4

9

27%

Hispanic or Latino

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

White

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Small Group Total

PROFICIENT

87%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

13%

LEVEL 3

9

60%

LEVEL 4

4

27%

Female

PROFICIENT

86%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

14%

LEVEL 3

15

52%

LEVEL 4

10

34%

Male

PROFICIENT

84%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

16%

LEVEL 3

13

68%

LEVEL 4

3

16%

Non-English Language Learners

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

English Language Learners

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Economically Disadvantaged

PROFICIENT

80%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

6

20%

LEVEL 3

15

50%

LEVEL 4

9

30%

Not Economically Disadvantaged

PROFICIENT

94%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

6%

LEVEL 3

13

72%

LEVEL 4

4

22%

Not Migrant

PROFICIENT

85%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

7

15%

LEVEL 3

28

58%

LEVEL 4

13

27%

GROUP
TOTAL TESTED
  • 48
  • 42
  • 6
  • 1
  • 33
  • 12
  • 2
  • 15
  • 29
  • 19
  • 46
  • 2
  • 30
  • 18
  • 48
PROFICIENT
  • 85%
  • 88%
  • 67%
  • _%
  • 85%
  • _%
  • _%
  • 87%
  • 86%
  • 84%
  • _%
  • _%
  • 80%
  • 94%
  • 85%
LEVEL 1
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • _
  • _
  • 0
  • 0%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
LEVEL 2
  • 7
  • 15%
  • 5
  • 12%
  • 2
  • 33%
  • _
  • _
  • 5
  • 15%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 2
  • 13%
  • 4
  • 14%
  • 3
  • 16%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 6
  • 20%
  • 1
  • 6%
  • 7
  • 15%
LEVEL 3
  • 28
  • 58%
  • 25
  • 60%
  • 3
  • 50%
  • _
  • _
  • 19
  • 58%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 9
  • 60%
  • 15
  • 52%
  • 13
  • 68%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 15
  • 50%
  • 13
  • 72%
  • 28
  • 58%
LEVEL 4
  • 13
  • 27%
  • 12
  • 29%
  • 1
  • 17%
  • _
  • _
  • 9
  • 27%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 4
  • 27%
  • 10
  • 34%
  • 3
  • 16%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 9
  • 30%
  • 4
  • 22%
  • 13
  • 27%

Grade 3 Mathematics

Due to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 proficiency rates.

MEAN SCORE: 362

All Students

PROFICIENT

100%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

7

15%

LEVEL 4

41

85%

General Education

PROFICIENT

100%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

5

12%

LEVEL 4

37

88%

Students with Disabilities

PROFICIENT

100%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

4

67%

Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Black or African American

PROFICIENT

100%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

4

12%

LEVEL 4

29

88%

Hispanic or Latino

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

White

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Small Group Total

PROFICIENT

100%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

3

20%

LEVEL 4

12

80%

Female

PROFICIENT

100%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

4

14%

LEVEL 4

25

86%

Male

PROFICIENT

100%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

3

16%

LEVEL 4

16

84%

Non-English Language Learners

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

English Language Learners

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Economically Disadvantaged

PROFICIENT

100%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

6

20%

LEVEL 4

24

80%

Not Economically Disadvantaged

PROFICIENT

100%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

1

6%

LEVEL 4

17

94%

Not Migrant

PROFICIENT

100%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

7

15%

LEVEL 4

41

85%

GROUP
TOTAL TESTED
  • 48
  • 42
  • 6
  • 1
  • 33
  • 12
  • 2
  • 15
  • 29
  • 19
  • 46
  • 2
  • 30
  • 18
  • 48
PROFICIENT
  • 100%
  • 100%
  • 100%
  • _%
  • 100%
  • _%
  • _%
  • 100%
  • 100%
  • 100%
  • _%
  • _%
  • 100%
  • 100%
  • 100%
LEVEL 1
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • _
  • _
  • 0
  • 0%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
LEVEL 2
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • _
  • _
  • 0
  • 0%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
LEVEL 3
  • 7
  • 15%
  • 5
  • 12%
  • 2
  • 33%
  • _
  • _
  • 4
  • 12%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 3
  • 20%
  • 4
  • 14%
  • 3
  • 16%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 6
  • 20%
  • 1
  • 6%
  • 7
  • 15%
LEVEL 4
  • 41
  • 85%
  • 37
  • 88%
  • 4
  • 67%
  • _
  • _
  • 29
  • 88%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 12
  • 80%
  • 25
  • 86%
  • 16
  • 84%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 24
  • 80%
  • 17
  • 94%
  • 41
  • 85%
Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.