ONEONTA CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT

Special Education School District Data Profile 2014-15

The Special Education School District Data Profile is prepared in accordance with the requirement of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). Each State must have a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and purposes of the implementation of IDEA.

The SPP is a six-year plan which describes New York State's performance on 20 indicators. States must report annually to the public on the performance of the State in an Annual Performance Report (APR) and each school district against the State's targets. New York State's SPP and the APR that describe these indicators in detail are available at http://www.p12.nysed.gov/specialed/spp/.
The following report reflects only quantifiable data collected by the State. Since performance of a school district in any indicator may be the result of unique circumstances within a district, readers are encouraged to consider information provided by the district's administration in interpreting these data.

Oneonta City School District

2014-15

Enrollment And Classification Rate

District Enrollment: 1,912
School-Age Students with Disabilities and Classification Rate

310

16.2%

Preschool Students with Disabilities

16

Indicator 1: Graduation Rate of Students with Disabilities

2010 Total cohort - August 2014

Students with Disabilities and Graduation rate

32

63%

State target and does district meet target

50.48% or higher

Yes, met state target

Indicator 2: Drop-Out Rate of Students with Disabilities

2010 Total cohort 4 years later - August 2014

Students with Disabilities and Drop-out Rate

32

13%

State target and does district meet target

14% or lower

Yes, met state target

* Districts are only held accountable for the performance of students when there are at least 30 students in the total cohort.

Indicator 3: State Assessments

Participation in State Assessments

Grade 3-8 ELA

Students with disabilities and participation rate

282

62%

State target and does district meet target

95%

No, did not meet state target

Grade 3-8 Math

Students with disabilities and participation rate

282

54%

State target and does district meet target

95%

No, did not meet state target

High School ELA

Students with disabilities and participation rate

-

-

State target and does district meet target

95%

-

High School Math

Students with disabilities and participation rate

-

-

State target and does district meet target

95%

-

Participation rate is suppressed if less than 40 students with disabilities are reported as enrolled for participation rate.

Performance on State Assessments and Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)

Grade 3-8 ELA

Percent at or above level 3

54

7%

State target and does district meet target

Make AYP

No, did not meet state target

Grade 3-8 Math

Percent at or above level 3

47

15%

State target and does district meet target

0

No, did not meet state target

High School ELA

Percent at or above level 3

-

-

State target and does district meet target

Make AYP

-

High School Math

Percent at or above level 3

-

-

State target and does district meet target

Make AYP

-

Participation rate is suppressed if less than 40 students with disabilities are reported as enrolled for participation rate.

Indicator 4A: Suspension Rate

Students with Disabilities 310
Suspension Rate 2014-15

Students with Disabilities Suspended Out-of-School for More than 10 Days and %

5

1.6%

State target and does district meet target

2.7% or lower

Yes, met state target

Indicator 4B: Significant Discrepancy by Race/Ethnicity in Suspension Rate

Suspension Rate 2014-15

Did the school district have significant discrepancy?

No

State target for 2014-15

State target and does district meet target

No school districts will have disproportionality that is the result of inappropriate policies, practices and procedures.

Yes, met state target

Indicator 5: School-age Least Restrictive Environment (LRE)

Total Students with Disabilities ages 6-21: 295
Students with 80% or more of the day in a general education program

53.6%

State target and does district meet target

More than 60%

No, did not meet state target

Students with 40 to 79% of the day in a general education program

20%

State target and does district meet target

No State Target

Not Applicable

Students with Less than 40% of the day in a general education program

22.7%

State target and does district meet target

Less than 22%

No, did not meet state target

  Students with disabilities in separate settings

2.7%

State target and does district meet target

Less than 5.8%

Yes, met state target

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES IN OTHER SETTINGS

1%

State target and does district meet target

No State Target

Not Applicable

Indicator 6: Preschool Least Restrictive Environment (LRE)

Total Students with Disabilites: 31
Students with disabilities with measurement A

13%

State target and does district meet target

42.7% or higher

No, did not meet state target

Students with disabilities with measurement B

0%

State target and does district meet target

26.3% or lower

Yes, met state target

Indicator 7: Preschool Outcomes

This district is not required to report for Indicator 7 for 2014-15 please see http://www.p12.nysed.gov/sedcar/data.htm#subschedule for the school year in which this school district will report data for this indicator.

Indicator 8: Parental Involvement

This district is not required to report for indicator 8 for 2014-15 please see http://www.p12.nysed.gov/sedcar/data.htm#subschedule for the school year in which this school district will report data for this indicator.

Indicator 9: Disproportionality - Identification for Special Education

Disproportionate representation in special education?

No

State target and does district meet target

No school districts will have disproportionality that is the result of inappropriate policies, practices and procedures.

Yes, met state target

Indicator 10A: Disproportionality in Specific Disability Categories

Disproportionate representation in specific disability categories?

No

State target and does district meet target

No school districts will have disproportionality that is the result of inappropriate policies, practices and procedures.

Yes, met state target

Indicator 10B: Disproportionality in Special Education Placements

Disproportionate representation in particular settings?

No

State target and does district meet target

No school districts will have disproportionality that is the result of inappropriate policies, practices and procedures.

Yes, met state target

Indicator 11: Timely Evaluations (Child Find)

This district is not required to report for indicator 11 for 2014-15 please see http://www.p12.nysed.gov/sedcar/data.htm#subschedule for the school year in which this school district will report data for this indicator.

Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition

Percent of children with IEPs who transitioned from early intervention services (Part C) to preschool special education services (Part B) and received their preschool special education services by their third birthdays consistent with State law.
This district is not required to report for Indicator 12 for 2014-15 please see http://www.p12.nysed.gov/sedcar/data.htm#subschedule for the school year in which this school district will report data for this indicator.

Indicator 13: Secondary Transition

Number of IEPs reviewed for students ages 15 and above

30

PERCENT OF YOUTH AGED 15 AND ABOVE WHO HAVE IEPS WITH APPROPRIATE TRANSITION PLANS

100%

State target and does district meet target

100%

Yes, met state target

Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes

This district is not required to report for Indicator 14 for 2014-15 please see http://www.p12.nysed.gov/sedcar/data.htm#subschedule for the school year in which this school district will report data for this indicator.
Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.