Skip to Content
Main content

HARPURSVILLE CSD

Special Education School District Data Profile 2020-21

The Special Education School District Data Profile is prepared in accordance with the requirement of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). Each State must have a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and purposes of the implementation of IDEA.

The SPP is a six-year plan which describes New York State's performance on 17 indicators. States must report annually to the public on the performance of the State in an Annual Performance Report (APR) and each school district against the State's targets. New York State's SPP and the APR that describe these indicators in detail are available at http://www.p12.nysed.gov/specialed/spp/.
The following report reflects only quantifiable data collected by the State. Since performance of a school district in any indicator may be the result of unique circumstances within a district, readers are encouraged to consider information provided by the district's administration in interpreting these data.


Enrollment and Classification Rate

District Enrollment: 698
School-Age Students with Disabilities and Classification Rate

139

19.9%

Preschool Students with Disabilities

11

Indicator 1: Graduation Rate of Students with Disabilities

2019-20 School Year

Students with Disabilities and Graduation rate

13

53.8%

State Target

Target Met

71% or higher

No, did not meet state target

* Data are suppressed when a district has fewer than 5 exiters.

† Data for indicator 1 are lagged 1 year.

Indicator 2: Drop-Out Rate of Students with Disabilities

2019-20 School Year

Students with Disabilities and Graduation rate

13

7.7%

State Target

Target Met

19.37% or lower

Yes, met state target

* Data are suppressed when a district has fewer than 5 exiters.

† Data for indicator 2 are lagged 1 year.

Indicator 3: State Assessments

(Note: Data are suppressed when fewer than 5 students with disabilities are enrolled in a district.)

A. Participation rate for students with disabilities

Grade 4 ELA

Students with disabilities and participation rate

11

72.73%

State Target

Target Met

95%

No, did not meet state target

Grade 8 ELA

Students with disabilities and participation rate

15

80%

State Target

Target Met

95%

No, did not meet state target

High School ELA

Students with disabilities and participation rate

8

37.50%

State Target

Target Met

95%

No, did not meet state target

Grade 4 Math

Students with disabilities and participation rate

11

81.82%

State Target

Target Met

95%

No, did not meet state target

Grade 8 Math

Students with disabilities and participation rate

15

60%

State Target

Target Met

95%

No, did not meet state target

High School Math

Students with disabilities and participation rate

8

75%

State Target

Target Met

95%

No, did not meet state target

B. Proficiency rate for students with disabilities against grade level academic achievement standards

Grade 4 ELA

Students with disabilities and proficiency rate

6

0%

State Target

Target Met

14.90%

No, did not meet state target

Grade 8 ELA

Students with disabilities and proficiency rate

10

0%

State Target

Target Met

13.23%

No, did not meet state target

High School ELA

Students with disabilities and proficiency rate

State Target

Target Met

72.04%

Grade 4 Math

Students with disabilities and proficiency rate

7

0%

State Target

Target Met

18.14%

No, did not meet state target

Grade 8 Math

Students with disabilities and proficiency rate

7

28.57%

State Target

Target Met

10.50%

Yes, meets state target

High School Math

Students with disabilities and proficiency rate

State Target

Target Met

64.11%

C. Proficiency rate for students with disabilities against alternate academic achievement standards

Grade 4 ELA

Students with disabilities and proficiency rate

State Target

Target Met

89.16%

Grade 8 ELA

Students with disabilities and proficiency rate

State Target

Target Met

81.65%

High School ELA

Students with disabilities and proficiency rate

State Target

Target Met

73.46%

Grade 4 Math

Students with disabilities and proficiency rate

State Target

Target Met

81.41%

Grade 8 Math

Students with disabilities and proficiency rate

State Target

Target Met

75.60%

High School Math

Students with disabilities and proficiency rate

State Target

Target Met

76.83%

D. Gap in proficiency rates for students with disabilities and for all students against grade level academic achievement standards

Grade 4 ELA

All students and proficiency rate

35

31.43%

Students with disabilities and proficiency rate

6

0%

Proficiency Gap

31.43%

State Target

Target Met

31.84%

Yes, meets state target

Grade 8 ELA

All students and proficiency rate

32

40.63%

Students with disabilities and proficiency rate

10

0%

Proficiency Gap

40.63%

State Target

Target Met

33.94%

No, did not meet state target

High School ELA

All students and proficiency rate

Students with disabilities and proficiency rate

Proficiency Gap

State Target

Target Met

21.24%

Grade 4 Math

All students and proficiency rate

36

27.78%

Students with disabilities and proficiency rate

7

0%

Proficiency Gap

27.78%

State Target

Target Met

31.25%

Yes, meets state target

Grade 8 Math

All students and proficiency rate

32

25%

Students with disabilities and proficiency rate

7

28.57%

Proficiency Gap

-3.57%

State Target

Target Met

34.69%

Yes, meets state target

High School Math

All students and proficiency rate

51

94.12%

Students with disabilities and proficiency rate

Proficiency Gap

State Target

Target Met

27%

Indicator 4A: Suspension Rate

(based on 2019-20 school year data)

Students with Disabilities: 133
Suspension Rate 2020-21

Students with Disabilities Suspended Out-of-School for More than 10 Days and Percentage

1

0.8%

State Threshold

Threshold Met

2.7% or lower

Yes, met state threshold

Indicator 4B: Significant Discrepancy by Race and Ethnicity in Suspension Rate

(based on 2019-20 school year data)

Suspension Rate 2020-21

Did the school district have significant discrepancy?

NO

State threshold for 2020-21

State Threshold

Threshold Met

No school districts will have disproportionality that is the result of inappropriate policies, practices and procedures.

Yes, met state threshold

Indicator 5: School-age Least Restrictive Environment (LRE)

Total Students with Disabilities ages 5 in kindergarten to 21: 138
Students with 80% or more of the day in a general education program

42%

State Target

Target Met

Greater than or equal to 60%

No, did not meet state target

Students with 40 to 79% of the day in a general education program

15.9%

State Target

Target Met

No State Target

Not Applicable

Students with Less than 40% of the day in a general education program

38.4%

State Target

Target Met

Less than or equal to 18%

No, did not meet state target

  Students with disabilities in separate settings

1.4%

State Target

Target Met

Less than or equal to 5%

Yes, met state target

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES IN OTHER SETTINGS

2.2%

State Target

Target Met

No State Target

Not Applicable

Indicator 6: Preschool Least Restrictive Environment (LRE)

Total Students with Disabilites: 12
Students with disabilities with measurement A

8.3%

State Target

Target Met

39.5% or higher

No, did not meet state target

Students with disabilities with measurement B

0%

State Target

Target Met

29.8% or lower

Yes, met state target

Students with disabilities with measurement C

0%

State Target

Target Met

11.0% or lower

Yes, met state target

Indicator 7: Preschool Outcomes

This district is not required to report for Indicator 7 for 2020-21 please see http://www.p12.nysed.gov/sedcar/data.htm#subschedule for the school year in which this school district will report data for this indicator.

Indicator 8: Parental Involvement

Number of completed surveys 17
Percent of parents who reported that schools facilitated parent involvement to improve services and results for students with disabilities

88.2%

State Target

Target Met

94% or higher

No, did not meet state target

Indicator 9: Disproportionality - Identification for Special Education

Disproportionate representation in special education?

No

State Threshold

Threshold Met

No school districts will have disproportionality that is the result of inappropriate policies, practices and procedures.

Yes, met state threshold

Indicator 10A: Disproportionality in Specific Disability Categories

Disproportionate representation in specific disability categories?

No

State Threshold

Threshold Met

No school districts will have disproportionality that is the result of inappropriate policies, practices and procedures.

Yes, met state threshold

Indicator 11: Timely Evaluations (Child Find)

This district is not required to report for indicator 11 for 2020-21 please see http://www.p12.nysed.gov/sedcar/data.htm#subschedule for the school year in which this school district will report data for this indicator.

Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition

Percent of children with IEPs who transitioned from early intervention services (Part C) to preschool special education services (Part B) and received their preschool special education services by their third birthdays consistent with State law.
This district is not required to report for Indicator 12 for 2020-21 please see http://www.p12.nysed.gov/sedcar/data.htm#subschedule for the school year in which this school district will report data for this indicator.

Indicator 13: Secondary Transition

This district is not required to report for Indicator13 for 2020-21 please see http://www.p12.nysed.gov/sedcar/data.htm#subschedule for the school year in which this school district will report data for this indicator.

Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes

This district is not required to report for Indicator 14 for 2020-21 please see http://www.p12.nysed.gov/sedcar/data.htm#subschedule for the school year in which this school district will report data for this indicator.
Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.