Skip to Content
Main content

NYC GEOG DIST #29 - QUEENS

Special Education School District Data Profile 2022-23

The Special Education School District Data Profile is prepared in accordance with the requirement of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). Each State must have a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and purposes of the implementation of IDEA.

The SPP is a six-year plan which describes New York State's performance on 17 indicators. States must report annually to the public on the performance of the State in an Annual Performance Report (APR) and each school district against the State's targets. New York State's SPP and the APR that describe these indicators in detail are available at https://www.nysed.gov/special-education/spp-apr.
The following report reflects only quantifiable data collected by the State. Since performance of a school district in any indicator may be the result of unique circumstances within a district, readers are encouraged to consider information provided by the district's administration in interpreting these data.

NYC GEOG DIST #29 - QUEENS

2022-23

Enrollment and Classification Rate

Please Note: Data for Enrollment, Classification Rate and Indicators #4-14 are not available for each New York City Geographic District. For data on these indicators, please see the district data profile that represents all New York City Public Schools combined.

Indicator 1: Graduation Rate of Students with Disabilities

2021-22 School Year

Students with Disabilities and Graduation rate

237

53.6%

State Target

Target Met

72% or higher

No, did not meet state target

† Data for indicator 1 are lagged 1 year.

Indicator 2: Drop-Out Rate of Students with Disabilities

2021-22 School Year

Students with Disabilities and Drop Out rate

237

22.8%

State Target

Target Met

19.37% or lower

No, did not meet state target

† Data for indicator 2 are lagged 1 year.

Indicator 3: State Assessments

(Note: Data are suppressed when fewer than 5 students with disabilities are enrolled in a district.)

A. Participation rate for students with disabilities

Grade 4 ELA

Students with disabilities and participation rate

469

81.02%

State Target

Target Met

95%

No, did not meet state target

Grade 8 ELA

Students with disabilities and participation rate

466

87.34%

State Target

Target Met

95%

No, did not meet state target

High School ELA

Students with disabilities and participation rate

193

52.33%

State Target

Target Met

95%

No, did not meet state target

Grade 4 Math

Students with disabilities and participation rate

466

80.69%

State Target

Target Met

95%

No, did not meet state target

Grade 8 Math

Students with disabilities and participation rate

454

88.33%

State Target

Target Met

95%

No, did not meet state target

High School Math

Students with disabilities and participation rate

193

55.96%

State Target

Target Met

95%

No, did not meet state target

B. Proficiency rate for students with disabilities against grade level academic achievement standards

Grade 4 ELA

Students with disabilities and proficiency rate

323

21.36%

State Target

Target Met

14.90%

Yes, meets state target

Grade 8 ELA

Students with disabilities and proficiency rate

355

23.38%

State Target

Target Met

13.23%

Yes, meets state target

High School ELA

Students with disabilities and proficiency rate

83

63.86%

State Target

Target Met

72.04%

No, did not meet state target

Grade 4 Math

Students with disabilities and proficiency rate

319

25.39%

State Target

Target Met

18.14%

Yes, meets state target

Grade 8 Math

Students with disabilities and proficiency rate

348

10.34%

State Target

Target Met

10.50%

No, did not meet state target

High School Math

Students with disabilities and proficiency rate

90

12.22%

State Target

Target Met

64.11%

No, did not meet state target

C. Proficiency rate for students with disabilities against alternate academic achievement standards

Grade 4 ELA

Students with disabilities and proficiency rate

57

94.74%

State Target

Target Met

89.16%

Yes, meets state target

Grade 8 ELA

Students with disabilities and proficiency rate

52

86.54%

State Target

Target Met

81.65%

Yes, meets state target

High School ELA

Students with disabilities and proficiency rate

18

55.56%

State Target

Target Met

73.46%

No, did not meet state target

Grade 4 Math

Students with disabilities and proficiency rate

57

85.96%

State Target

Target Met

81.41%

Yes, meets state target

Grade 8 Math

Students with disabilities and proficiency rate

53

71.70%

State Target

Target Met

75.60%

No, did not meet state target

High School Math

Students with disabilities and proficiency rate

18

66.67%

State Target

Target Met

76.83%

No, did not meet state target

D. Gap in proficiency rates for students with disabilities and for all students against grade level academic achievement standards

Grade 4 ELA

All students and proficiency rate

1695

48.91%

Students with disabilities and proficiency rate

323

21.36%

Proficiency Gap

27.55%

State Target

Target Met

31.84%

Yes, meets state target

Grade 8 ELA

All students and proficiency rate

1879

56.63%

Students with disabilities and proficiency rate

355

23.38%

Proficiency Gap

33.25%

State Target

Target Met

33.94%

Yes, meets state target

High School ELA

All students and proficiency rate

590

70.17%

Students with disabilities and proficiency rate

83

63.86%

Proficiency Gap

6.31%

State Target

Target Met

21.24%

Yes, meets state target

Grade 4 Math

All students and proficiency rate

1733

47.61%

Students with disabilities and proficiency rate

319

25.39%

Proficiency Gap

22.21%

State Target

Target Met

31.25%

Yes, meets state target

Grade 8 Math

All students and proficiency rate

1871

29.88%

Students with disabilities and proficiency rate

348

10.34%

Proficiency Gap

19.53%

State Target

Target Met

34.69%

Yes, meets state target

High School Math

All students and proficiency rate

602

32.56%

Students with disabilities and proficiency rate

90

12.22%

Proficiency Gap

20.34%

State Target

Target Met

27%

Yes, meets state target

Indicator 4A: Suspension Rate

(based on 2021-22 school year data)

Please Note: Data for Enrollment, Classification Rate and Indicators #4-14 are not available for each New York City Geographic District. For data on these indicators, please see the district data profile that represents all New York City Public Schools combined.

Indicator 4B: Significant Discrepancy by Race and Ethnicity in Suspension Rate

(based on 2021-22 school year data)

Please Note: Data for Enrollment, Classification Rate and Indicators #4-14 are not available for each New York City Geographic District. For data on these indicators, please see the district data profile that represents all New York City Public Schools combined.

Indicator 5: School-age Least Restrictive Environment (LRE)

Please Note: Data for Enrollment, Classification Rate and Indicators #4-14 are not available for each New York City Geographic District. For data on these indicators, please see the district data profile that represents all New York City Public Schools combined.

Indicator 6: Preschool Least Restrictive Environment (LRE)

Please Note: Data for Enrollment, Classification Rate and Indicators #4-14 are not available for each New York City Geographic District. For data on these indicators, please see the district data profile that represents all New York City Public Schools combined.

Indicator 7: Preschool Outcomes

Please Note: Data for Enrollment, Classification Rate and Indicators #4-14 are not available for each New York City Geographic District. For data on these indicators, please see the district data profile that represents all New York City Public Schools combined.

Indicator 8: Parental Involvement

Please Note: Data for Enrollment, Classification Rate and Indicators #4-14 are not available for each New York City Geographic District. For data on these indicators, please see the district data profile that represents all New York City Public Schools combined.

Indicator 9: Disproportionality - Identification for Special Education

Please Note: Data for Enrollment, Classification Rate and Indicators #4-14 are not available for each New York City Geographic District. For data on these indicators, please see the district data profile that represents all New York City Public Schools combined.

Indicator 10A: Disproportionality in Specific Disability Categories

Please Note: Data for Enrollment, Classification Rate and Indicators #4-14 are not available for each New York City Geographic District. For data on these indicators, please see the district data profile that represents all New York City Public Schools combined.

Indicator 11: Timely Evaluations (Child Find)

Please Note: Data for Enrollment, Classification Rate and Indicators #4-14 are not available for each New York City Geographic District. For data on these indicators, please see the district data profile that represents all New York City Public Schools combined.

Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition

Percent of children with IEPs who transitioned from early intervention services (Part C) to preschool special education services (Part B) and received their preschool special education services by their third birthdays consistent with State law.
Please Note: Data for Enrollment, Classification Rate and Indicators #4-14 are not available for each New York City Geographic District. For data on these indicators, please see the district data profile that represents all New York City Public Schools combined.

Indicator 13: Secondary Transition

Please Note: Data for Enrollment, Classification Rate and Indicators #4-14 are not available for each New York City Geographic District. For data on these indicators, please see the district data profile that represents all New York City Public Schools combined.

Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes

Please Note: Data for Enrollment, Classification Rate and Indicators #4-14 are not available for each New York City Geographic District. For data on these indicators, please see the district data profile that represents all New York City Public Schools combined.
Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.