Skip to Content
Main content

RECEIVERSHIP STATUS

DID NOT MEET PROGRESS TARGET
MET PROGRESS TARGET

OVERALL STATUS

FINAL DETERMINATION

MADE DEMONSTRABLE IMPROVEMENT

DEMONSTRABLE IMPROVEMENT INDEX

92%

THIS VALUE IS BASED ONLY ON INDICATORS THAT MET THE PROGRESS TARGET.

SCHOOL MET THE PROGRESS TARGET ON 20 OUT OF THE 22 SELECTED INDICATORS.
SCHOOL DID NOT MEET THE PROGRESS TARGET ON 2 OUT OF THE 22 SELECTED INDICATORS.
Priority School makes yearly progress
PROGRESS TARGET

Y

RESULT

Y

INDICATOR: 1

2013 Total Cohort 4-Year Grad Rate - All Students
PROGRESS TARGET

50

RESULT

69

INDICATOR: 70

2012 Total Cohort 5-Year Grad Rate - All Students
PROGRESS TARGET

59

RESULT

79

INDICATOR: 88

College Readiness Index Metric
PROGRESS TARGET

13.8

RESULT

21

INDICATOR: c1

School Climate Survey Metric
PROGRESS TARGET

52

RESULT

63

INDICATOR: h

2015 Total Cohort Passing Math Regents (Score >=65)
PROGRESS TARGET

59

RESULT

53

INDICATOR: 67

Plan for and implement quality Community School Model
PROGRESS TARGET

Y

RESULT

Y

INDICATOR: 2

Providing 200 Hours of quality Extended Day Learning Time (ELT)
PROGRESS TARGET

Y

RESULT

Y

INDICATOR: 94

Collaborative Teachers
PROGRESS TARGET

8, D+

RESULT

66, D+

INDICATOR: k

Supportive Environment
PROGRESS TARGET

41, D+

RESULT

60, D+

INDICATOR: l

Regents Completion Rate
PROGRESS TARGET

38.8

RESULT

46.4

INDICATOR: q

For information on a school’s demonstrable improvement indicators, goals and progress targets for the 2016-17 school year, please visit the school receivership page

Top