RECEIVERSHIP STATUS

DID NOT MEET PROGRESS TARGET
MET PROGRESS TARGET

OVERALL STATUS

FINAL DETERMINATION

MADE DEMONSTRABLE IMPROVEMENT

DEMONSTRABLE IMPROVEMENT INDEX

58%

THIS VALUE IS BASED ONLY ON INDICATORS THAT MET THE PROGRESS TARGET.

SCHOOL MET THE PROGRESS TARGET ON 14 OUT OF THE 24 SELECTED INDICATORS.
SCHOOL DID NOT MEET THE PROGRESS TARGET ON 10 OUT OF THE 24 SELECTED INDICATORS.
2016 Total Cohort Passing Math Regents (Score >=65)
PROGRESS TARGET

47

RESULT

67.8

INDICATOR: 67

2015 Total Cohort Passing ELA Regents (Score >=65)
PROGRESS TARGET

49

RESULT

53.3

INDICATOR: 69

2014 Total Cohort 4-Year Grad Rate - All Students
PROGRESS TARGET

52

RESULT

67

INDICATOR: 70

College Readiness Index Metric
PROGRESS TARGET

22.9

RESULT

41.9

INDICATOR: c1

2013 Total Cohort 5-Year Grad Rate - All Students
PROGRESS TARGET

66

RESULT

59

INDICATOR: 88

School Climate Survey Metric
PROGRESS TARGET

32

RESULT

0

INDICATOR: h

Plan for and implement quality Community School Model
PROGRESS TARGET

Y

RESULT

Y

INDICATOR: 2

Providing 200 Hours of quality Extended Day Learning Time (ELT)
PROGRESS TARGET

Y

RESULT

Y

INDICATOR: 94

College and Career Preparatory Course Index
PROGRESS TARGET

24.0

RESULT

54.6

INDICATOR: r

2013 Total Cohort 5-Year Grad Rate - LEP Students
PROGRESS TARGET

48

RESULT

32

INDICATOR: 92

Rigorous Instruction
PROGRESS TARGET

40, D+

RESULT

12, D

INDICATOR: j

Collaborative Teachers
PROGRESS TARGET

43, D+

RESULT

9, P

INDICATOR: k

For information on a school’s demonstrable improvement indicators, goals and progress targets for the 2017-18 school year, please visit the school receivership page

Top