GLENS FALLS CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT - School Report Card Data [2014 - 15]
The New York State Report Card is an important part of the Board of Regents' effort to raise learning standards for all students. It provides information to the public on school/district enrollment and staff, student performance, and other measures of school and district performance. Knowledge gained from the report card on a school's or district's strengths and weaknesses can be used to improve instruction and services to students. Report Card Data - Glossary of Terms | Accountability Data - Glossary of Terms | Business Rules
GLENS FALLS CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT ENROLLMENT (2014 - 15)
K-12 ENROLLMENT
1,970
ENROLLMENT BY GENDER
MALE
997
51%
FEMALE
973
49%
ENROLLMENT BY ETHNICITY
GROUP
AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE
BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN
HISPANIC OR LATINO
ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER
WHITE
MULTIRACIAL
TOTAL
1
56
75
34
1,736
68
PERCENT
0%
3%
4%
2%
88%
3%
OTHER GROUPS
ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
5
0%
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
326
17%
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
908
46%
ENROLLMENT BY GRADE
GROUP
K (FULL DAY)
1ST GRADE
2ND GRADE
3RD GRADE
4TH GRADE
5TH GRADE
6TH GRADE
7TH GRADE
8TH GRADE
9TH GRADE
10TH GRADE
11TH GRADE
12TH GRADE
UNGRADED SECONDARY
TOTAL
158
161
151
143
154
147
131
166
152
147
162
134
151
13
PERCENT
8%
8%
7%
7%
8%
7%
6%
8%
8%
7%
8%
7%
7%
1%
GLENS FALLS CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT ENROLLMENT (2014 - 15)
K-12 Enrollment: 1,970
ENROLLMENT BY GENDER
MALE
997
51%
FEMALE
973
49%
ENROLLMENT BY ETHNICITY
AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE
1
0%
BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN
56
3%
HISPANIC OR LATINO
75
4%
ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER
34
2%
WHITE
1,736
88%
MULTIRACIAL
68
3%
OTHER GROUPS
ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
5
0%
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
326
17%
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
908
46%
ENROLLMENT BY GRADE
K (FULL DAY)
158
8%
1ST GRADE
161
8%
2ND GRADE
151
7%
3RD GRADE
143
7%
4TH GRADE
154
8%
5TH GRADE
147
7%
6TH GRADE
131
6%
7TH GRADE
166
8%
8TH GRADE
152
8%
9TH GRADE
147
7%
10TH GRADE
162
8%
11TH GRADE
134
7%
12TH GRADE
151
7%
UNGRADED SECONDARY
13
1%
Average Class Size (2014 - 15)
GROUP
Common Branch
Grade 8 English
Grade 8 Mathematics
Grade 8 Science
Grade 8 Social Studies
Grade 10 English
Grade 10 Mathematics
Grade 10 Science
Grade 10 Social Studies
CLASS SIZE
20
26
22
25
25
22
20
24
19
Average Class Size (2014 - 15)
Common Branch
20
Grade 8 English
26
Grade 8 Mathematics
22
Grade 8 Science
25
Grade 8 Social Studies
25
Grade 10 English
22
Grade 10 Mathematics
20
Grade 10 Science
24
Grade 10 Social Studies
19
Average Class Size (2014 - 15)
GROUP
Common Branch
Grade 8 English
Grade 8 Mathematics
Grade 8 Science
Grade 8 Social Studies
Grade 10 English
Grade 10 Mathematics
Grade 10 Science
Grade 10 Social Studies
CLASS SIZE
20
26
22
25
25
22
20
24
19
Average Class Size (2014 - 15)
Common Branch
20
Grade 8 English
26
Grade 8 Mathematics
22
Grade 8 Science
25
Grade 8 Social Studies
25
Grade 10 English
22
Grade 10 Mathematics
20
Grade 10 Science
24
Grade 10 Social Studies
19
Average Class Size (2014 - 15)
GROUP
Common Branch
Grade 8 English
Grade 8 Mathematics
Grade 8 Science
Grade 8 Social Studies
Grade 10 English
Grade 10 Mathematics
Grade 10 Science
Grade 10 Social Studies
CLASS SIZE
20
26
22
25
25
22
20
24
19
Average Class Size (2014 - 15)
Common Branch
20
Grade 8 English
26
Grade 8 Mathematics
22
Grade 8 Science
25
Grade 8 Social Studies
25
Grade 10 English
22
Grade 10 Mathematics
20
Grade 10 Science
24
Grade 10 Social Studies
19
Average Class Size (2014 - 15)
GROUP
Common Branch
Grade 8 English
Grade 8 Mathematics
Grade 8 Science
Grade 8 Social Studies
Grade 10 English
Grade 10 Mathematics
Grade 10 Science
Grade 10 Social Studies
CLASS SIZE
20
26
22
25
25
22
20
24
19
Average Class Size (2014 - 15)
Common Branch
20
Grade 8 English
26
Grade 8 Mathematics
22
Grade 8 Science
25
Grade 8 Social Studies
25
Grade 10 English
22
Grade 10 Mathematics
20
Grade 10 Science
24
Grade 10 Social Studies
19
Average Class Size (2014 - 15)
GROUP
Common Branch
Grade 8 English
Grade 8 Mathematics
Grade 8 Science
Grade 8 Social Studies
Grade 10 English
Grade 10 Mathematics
Grade 10 Science
Grade 10 Social Studies
CLASS SIZE
20
26
22
25
25
22
20
24
19
Average Class Size (2014 - 15)
Common Branch
20
Grade 8 English
26
Grade 8 Mathematics
22
Grade 8 Science
25
Grade 8 Social Studies
25
Grade 10 English
22
Grade 10 Mathematics
20
Grade 10 Science
24
Grade 10 Social Studies
19
Average Class Size (2014 - 15)
GROUP
Common Branch
Grade 8 English
Grade 8 Mathematics
Grade 8 Science
Grade 8 Social Studies
Grade 10 English
Grade 10 Mathematics
Grade 10 Science
Grade 10 Social Studies
CLASS SIZE
20
26
22
25
25
22
20
24
19
Average Class Size (2014 - 15)
Common Branch
20
Grade 8 English
26
Grade 8 Mathematics
22
Grade 8 Science
25
Grade 8 Social Studies
25
Grade 10 English
22
Grade 10 Mathematics
20
Grade 10 Science
24
Grade 10 Social Studies
19
Average Class Size (2014 - 15)
GROUP
Common Branch
Grade 8 English
Grade 8 Mathematics
Grade 8 Science
Grade 8 Social Studies
Grade 10 English
Grade 10 Mathematics
Grade 10 Science
Grade 10 Social Studies
CLASS SIZE
20
26
22
25
25
22
20
24
19
Average Class Size (2014 - 15)
Common Branch
20
Grade 8 English
26
Grade 8 Mathematics
22
Grade 8 Science
25
Grade 8 Social Studies
25
Grade 10 English
22
Grade 10 Mathematics
20
Grade 10 Science
24
Grade 10 Social Studies
19
Average Class Size (2014 - 15)
GROUP
Common Branch
Grade 8 English
Grade 8 Mathematics
Grade 8 Science
Grade 8 Social Studies
Grade 10 English
Grade 10 Mathematics
Grade 10 Science
Grade 10 Social Studies
CLASS SIZE
20
26
22
25
25
22
20
24
19
Average Class Size (2014 - 15)
Common Branch
20
Grade 8 English
26
Grade 8 Mathematics
22
Grade 8 Science
25
Grade 8 Social Studies
25
Grade 10 English
22
Grade 10 Mathematics
20
Grade 10 Science
24
Grade 10 Social Studies
19
Average Class Size (2014 - 15)
GROUP
Common Branch
Grade 8 English
Grade 8 Mathematics
Grade 8 Science
Grade 8 Social Studies
Grade 10 English
Grade 10 Mathematics
Grade 10 Science
Grade 10 Social Studies
CLASS SIZE
20
26
22
25
25
22
20
24
19
Average Class Size (2014 - 15)
Common Branch
20
Grade 8 English
26
Grade 8 Mathematics
22
Grade 8 Science
25
Grade 8 Social Studies
25
Grade 10 English
22
Grade 10 Mathematics
20
Grade 10 Science
24
Grade 10 Social Studies
19
Free and Reduced-Price Lunch (2014 - 15)
ELIGIBLE FOR FREE LUNCH
800
41%
ELIGIBLE FOR REDUCED-PRICE LUNCH
92
5%
Free and Reduced-Price Lunch (2014 - 15)
Eligible for Free Lunch
800
41%
Eligible for Reduced-Price Lunch
92
5%
ATTENDANCE (2013 - 14)
ANNUAL ATTENDANCE RATE
94%
Attendance (2013 - 14)
Annual Attendance Rate
94%
STUDENT SUSPENSIONS (2013 - 14)
145
7%
Student Suspensions (2013 - 14)
Student Suspensions
145
7%
Teacher Turnover Rate (2013-14 to 2014-15)
Turnover Rate of Teachers with Fewer Than Five Years of Experience
40%
TURNOVER RATE OF ALL TEACHERS
12%
Teacher Turnover Rate (2013-14 to 2014-15)
Turnover Rate of Teachers with Fewer Than Five Years of Experience
40%
Turnover Rate of All Teachers
12%
Staff Counts (2014 - 15)
GROUP
PRINCIPALS
ASSISTANT PRINCIPALS
OTHER PROFESSIONAL STAFF
PARAPROFESSIONALS
STAFF
5
3
26
77
Staff Counts (2014 - 15)
Principals
5
Assistant Principals
3
Other Professional Staff
26
Paraprofessionals
77
Teacher Qualifications (2014 - 15)
TOTAL TEACHERS
160
PERCENT WITH NO VALID TEACHING CERTIFICATE
0%
PERCENT TEACHING OUT OF CERTIFICATE
0%
PERCENT WITH FEWER THAN THREE YEARS OF EXPERIENCE
3%
PERCENTAGE WITH MASTER'S DEGREEPLUS 30 HOURS OR DOCTORATE
6%
TOTAL NUMBER OF CORE CLASSES
397
Percent Not Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers in This District
0%
Total Number of Classes
579
Percent Taught by Teachers Without Appropriate Certification
1%
Teacher Qualifications (2014 - 15)
TOTAL TEACHERS: 160
Percent with No Valid Teaching Certificate
0%
Percent Teaching Out of Certification
0%
Percent with Fewer Than Three Years of Experience
3%
Percentage with Master's Degree Plus 30 Hours or Doctorate
6%
Total Number of Core Classes
397
Percent Not Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers in This District
0%
Total Number of Classes
579
Percent Taught by Teachers Without Appropriate Certification
1%
High School Completers (2014 - 15)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
129
115
14
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
126
115
11
REGENTS DIPLOMA
114
90%
108
94%
6
55%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
REGENTS WITH ADVANCED DESIGNATION
53
42%
53
46%
0
0%
REGENTS WITH CTE ENDORSEMENT
15
12%
13
11%
2
18%
LOCAL DIPLOMAS
12
10%
7
6%
5
45%
COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS
3
2%
0
0%
3
21%
All Students
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
129
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
126
Regents Diploma
114
90%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
53
42%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
15
12%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
12
10%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
3
2%
of Completers
General Education
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
115
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
115
Regents Diploma
108
94%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
53
46%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
13
11%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
7
6%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
0
0%
of Completers
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
14
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
11
Regents Diploma
6
55%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
0
0%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
2
18%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
5
45%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
3
21%
of Completers
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
129
115
14
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
126
115
11
REGENTS DIPLOMA
114
90%
108
94%
6
55%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
REGENTS WITH ADVANCED DESIGNATION
53
42%
53
46%
0
0%
REGENTS WITH CTE ENDORSEMENT
15
12%
13
11%
2
18%
LOCAL DIPLOMAS
12
10%
7
6%
5
45%
COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS
3
2%
0
0%
3
21%
All Students
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
129
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
126
Regents Diploma
114
90%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
53
42%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
15
12%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
12
10%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
3
2%
of Completers
General Education
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
115
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
115
Regents Diploma
108
94%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
53
46%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
13
11%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
7
6%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
0
0%
of Completers
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
14
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
11
Regents Diploma
6
55%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
0
0%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
2
18%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
5
45%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
3
21%
of Completers
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
129
115
14
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
126
115
11
REGENTS DIPLOMA
114
90%
108
94%
6
55%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
REGENTS WITH ADVANCED DESIGNATION
53
42%
53
46%
0
0%
REGENTS WITH CTE ENDORSEMENT
15
12%
13
11%
2
18%
LOCAL DIPLOMAS
12
10%
7
6%
5
45%
COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS
3
2%
0
0%
3
21%
All Students
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
129
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
126
Regents Diploma
114
90%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
53
42%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
15
12%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
12
10%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
3
2%
of Completers
General Education
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
115
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
115
Regents Diploma
108
94%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
53
46%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
13
11%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
7
6%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
0
0%
of Completers
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
14
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
11
Regents Diploma
6
55%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
0
0%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
2
18%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
5
45%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
3
21%
of Completers
High School Non-completers (2014 - 15)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
26
4%
19
4%
7
7%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
6
1%
3
1%
3
3%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
32
5%
22
4%
10
10%
All Students
DROPPED OUT
26
4%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
6
1%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
32
5%
General Education
DROPPED OUT
19
4%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
3
1%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
22
4%
Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
7
7%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
3
3%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
10
10%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
26
4%
19
4%
7
7%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
6
1%
3
1%
3
3%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
32
5%
22
4%
10
10%
All Students
DROPPED OUT
26
4%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
6
1%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
32
5%
General Education
DROPPED OUT
19
4%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
3
1%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
22
4%
Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
7
7%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
3
3%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
10
10%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
26
4%
19
4%
7
7%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
6
1%
3
1%
3
3%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
32
5%
22
4%
10
10%
All Students
DROPPED OUT
26
4%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
6
1%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
32
5%
General Education
DROPPED OUT
19
4%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
3
1%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
22
4%
Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
7
7%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
3
3%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
10
10%
Post-graduation Plans of Completers (2014 - 15)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO FOUR-YEAR COLLEGE
52
40%
50
43%
2
14%
TO TWO-YEAR COLLEGE
55
43%
50
43%
5
36%
TO OTHER POST-SECONDARY
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
TO THE MILITARY
3
2%
3
3%
0
0%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO EMPLOYMENT
19
15%
12
10%
7
50%
TO ADULT SERVICES
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
TO OTHER KNOWN PLANS
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
PLANS UNKNOWN
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
All Students
To Four-Year College
52
40%
To Two-Year College
55
43%
To Other Post-Secondary
0
0%
To the Military
3
2%
To Employment
19
15%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
0
0%
Plan Unknown
0
0%
General Education
To Four-Year College
50
43%
To Two-Year College
50
43%
To Other Post-Secondary
0
0%
To the Military
3
3%
To Employment
12
10%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
0
0%
Plan Unknown
0
0%
Students with Disabilities
To Four-Year College
2
14%
To Two-Year College
5
36%
To Other Post-Secondary
0
0%
To the Military
0
0%
To Employment
7
50%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
0
0%
Plan Unknown
0
0%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO FOUR-YEAR COLLEGE
52
40%
50
43%
2
14%
TO TWO-YEAR COLLEGE
55
43%
50
43%
5
36%
TO OTHER POST-SECONDARY
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
TO THE MILITARY
3
2%
3
3%
0
0%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO EMPLOYMENT
19
15%
12
10%
7
50%
TO ADULT SERVICES
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
TO OTHER KNOWN PLANS
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
PLANS UNKNOWN
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
All Students
To Four-Year College
52
40%
To Two-Year College
55
43%
To Other Post-Secondary
0
0%
To the Military
3
2%
To Employment
19
15%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
0
0%
Plan Unknown
0
0%
General Education
To Four-Year College
50
43%
To Two-Year College
50
43%
To Other Post-Secondary
0
0%
To the Military
3
3%
To Employment
12
10%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
0
0%
Plan Unknown
0
0%
Students with Disabilities
To Four-Year College
2
14%
To Two-Year College
5
36%
To Other Post-Secondary
0
0%
To the Military
0
0%
To Employment
7
50%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
0
0%
Plan Unknown
0
0%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO FOUR-YEAR COLLEGE
52
40%
50
43%
2
14%
TO TWO-YEAR COLLEGE
55
43%
50
43%
5
36%
TO OTHER POST-SECONDARY
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
TO THE MILITARY
3
2%
3
3%
0
0%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO EMPLOYMENT
19
15%
12
10%
7
50%
TO ADULT SERVICES
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
TO OTHER KNOWN PLANS
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
PLANS UNKNOWN
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
All Students
To Four-Year College
52
40%
To Two-Year College
55
43%
To Other Post-Secondary
0
0%
To the Military
3
2%
To Employment
19
15%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
0
0%
Plan Unknown
0
0%
General Education
To Four-Year College
50
43%
To Two-Year College
50
43%
To Other Post-Secondary
0
0%
To the Military
3
3%
To Employment
12
10%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
0
0%
Plan Unknown
0
0%
Students with Disabilities
To Four-Year College
2
14%
To Two-Year College
5
36%
To Other Post-Secondary
0
0%
To the Military
0
0%
To Employment
7
50%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
0
0%
Plan Unknown
0
0%
Grade 3 English Language Arts
MEAN SCORE: 300
All Students
PROFICIENT
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 137
LEVEL 1
47
34%
LEVEL 2
43
31%
LEVEL 3
35
26%
LEVEL 4
12
9%
General Education
PROFICIENT
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 111
LEVEL 1
25
23%
LEVEL 2
40
36%
LEVEL 3
34
31%
LEVEL 4
12
11%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 26
LEVEL 1
22
85%
LEVEL 2
3
12%
LEVEL 3
1
4%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
20%
LEVEL 3
2
40%
LEVEL 4
2
40%
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 123
LEVEL 1
43
35%
LEVEL 2
39
32%
LEVEL 3
32
26%
LEVEL 4
9
7%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
4
44%
LEVEL 2
3
33%
LEVEL 3
1
11%
LEVEL 4
1
11%
Female
PROFICIENT
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 63
LEVEL 1
18
29%
LEVEL 2
19
30%
LEVEL 3
18
29%
LEVEL 4
8
13%
Male
PROFICIENT
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 74
LEVEL 1
29
39%
LEVEL 2
24
32%
LEVEL 3
17
23%
LEVEL 4
4
5%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 137
LEVEL 1
47
34%
LEVEL 2
43
31%
LEVEL 3
35
26%
LEVEL 4
12
9%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 62
LEVEL 1
33
53%
LEVEL 2
17
27%
LEVEL 3
10
16%
LEVEL 4
2
3%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 75
LEVEL 1
14
19%
LEVEL 2
26
35%
LEVEL 3
25
33%
LEVEL 4
10
13%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 137
LEVEL 1
47
34%
LEVEL 2
43
31%
LEVEL 3
35
26%
LEVEL 4
12
9%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
137
111
26
5
1
4
123
4
9
63
74
137
62
75
137
PROFICIENT
34%
41%
4%
80%
_%
_%
33%
_%
22%
41%
28%
34%
19%
47%
34%
LEVEL 1
47
34%
25
23%
22
85%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
43
35%
_
_
4
44%
18
29%
29
39%
47
34%
33
53%
14
19%
47
34%
LEVEL 2
43
31%
40
36%
3
12%
1
20%
_
_
_
_
39
32%
_
_
3
33%
19
30%
24
32%
43
31%
17
27%
26
35%
43
31%
LEVEL 3
35
26%
34
31%
1
4%
2
40%
_
_
_
_
32
26%
_
_
1
11%
18
29%
17
23%
35
26%
10
16%
25
33%
35
26%
LEVEL 4
12
9%
12
11%
0
0%
2
40%
_
_
_
_
9
7%
_
_
1
11%
8
13%
4
5%
12
9%
2
3%
10
13%
12
9%
Grade 4 English Language Arts
MEAN SCORE: 300
All Students
PROFICIENT
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 144
LEVEL 1
42
29%
LEVEL 2
57
40%
LEVEL 3
28
19%
LEVEL 4
17
12%
General Education
PROFICIENT
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 118
LEVEL 1
24
20%
LEVEL 2
49
42%
LEVEL 3
28
24%
LEVEL 4
17
14%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 26
LEVEL 1
18
69%
LEVEL 2
8
31%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
5
100%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
White
PROFICIENT
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 130
LEVEL 1
34
26%
LEVEL 2
53
41%
LEVEL 3
27
21%
LEVEL 4
16
12%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
3
33%
LEVEL 2
4
44%
LEVEL 3
1
11%
LEVEL 4
1
11%
Female
PROFICIENT
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 73
LEVEL 1
17
23%
LEVEL 2
32
44%
LEVEL 3
15
21%
LEVEL 4
9
12%
Male
PROFICIENT
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 71
LEVEL 1
25
35%
LEVEL 2
25
35%
LEVEL 3
13
18%
LEVEL 4
8
11%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 143
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 70
LEVEL 1
29
41%
LEVEL 2
27
39%
LEVEL 3
12
17%
LEVEL 4
2
3%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 74
LEVEL 1
13
18%
LEVEL 2
30
41%
LEVEL 3
16
22%
LEVEL 4
15
20%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 144
LEVEL 1
42
29%
LEVEL 2
57
40%
LEVEL 3
28
19%
LEVEL 4
17
12%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
144
118
26
3
2
5
130
4
9
73
71
143
1
70
74
144
PROFICIENT
31%
38%
0%
_%
_%
0%
33%
_%
22%
33%
30%
_%
_%
20%
42%
31%
LEVEL 1
42
29%
24
20%
18
69%
_
_
_
_
5
100%
34
26%
_
_
3
33%
17
23%
25
35%
_
_
_
_
29
41%
13
18%
42
29%
LEVEL 2
57
40%
49
42%
8
31%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
53
41%
_
_
4
44%
32
44%
25
35%
_
_
_
_
27
39%
30
41%
57
40%
LEVEL 3
28
19%
28
24%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
27
21%
_
_
1
11%
15
21%
13
18%
_
_
_
_
12
17%
16
22%
28
19%
LEVEL 4
17
12%
17
14%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
16
12%
_
_
1
11%
9
12%
8
11%
_
_
_
_
2
3%
15
20%
17
12%
Grade 5 English Language Arts
MEAN SCORE: 298
All Students
PROFICIENT
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 132
LEVEL 1
40
30%
LEVEL 2
48
36%
LEVEL 3
33
25%
LEVEL 4
11
8%
General Education
PROFICIENT
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 107
LEVEL 1
19
18%
LEVEL 2
45
42%
LEVEL 3
33
31%
LEVEL 4
10
9%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 25
LEVEL 1
21
84%
LEVEL 2
3
12%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
1
4%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 117
LEVEL 1
36
31%
LEVEL 2
41
35%
LEVEL 3
29
25%
LEVEL 4
11
9%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
1
17%
LEVEL 2
4
67%
LEVEL 3
1
17%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
3
33%
LEVEL 2
3
33%
LEVEL 3
3
33%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Female
PROFICIENT
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 54
LEVEL 1
15
28%
LEVEL 2
17
31%
LEVEL 3
16
30%
LEVEL 4
6
11%
Male
PROFICIENT
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 78
LEVEL 1
25
32%
LEVEL 2
31
40%
LEVEL 3
17
22%
LEVEL 4
5
6%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 132
LEVEL 1
40
30%
LEVEL 2
48
36%
LEVEL 3
33
25%
LEVEL 4
11
8%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 54
LEVEL 1
26
48%
LEVEL 2
21
39%
LEVEL 3
6
11%
LEVEL 4
1
2%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 78
LEVEL 1
14
18%
LEVEL 2
27
35%
LEVEL 3
27
35%
LEVEL 4
10
13%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 132
LEVEL 1
40
30%
LEVEL 2
48
36%
LEVEL 3
33
25%
LEVEL 4
11
8%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
132
107
25
2
3
4
117
6
9
54
78
132
54
78
132
PROFICIENT
33%
40%
4%
_%
_%
_%
34%
17%
33%
41%
28%
33%
13%
47%
33%
LEVEL 1
40
30%
19
18%
21
84%
_
_
_
_
_
_
36
31%
1
17%
3
33%
15
28%
25
32%
40
30%
26
48%
14
18%
40
30%
LEVEL 2
48
36%
45
42%
3
12%
_
_
_
_
_
_
41
35%
4
67%
3
33%
17
31%
31
40%
48
36%
21
39%
27
35%
48
36%
LEVEL 3
33
25%
33
31%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
29
25%
1
17%
3
33%
16
30%
17
22%
33
25%
6
11%
27
35%
33
25%
LEVEL 4
11
8%
10
9%
1
4%
_
_
_
_
_
_
11
9%
0
0%
0
0%
6
11%
5
6%
11
8%
1
2%
10
13%
11
8%
Grade 6 English Language Arts
MEAN SCORE: 299
All Students
PROFICIENT
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 105
LEVEL 1
22
21%
LEVEL 2
49
47%
LEVEL 3
21
20%
LEVEL 4
13
12%
General Education
PROFICIENT
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 93
LEVEL 1
12
13%
LEVEL 2
47
51%
LEVEL 3
21
23%
LEVEL 4
13
14%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 12
LEVEL 1
10
83%
LEVEL 2
2
17%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 95
LEVEL 1
19
20%
LEVEL 2
46
48%
LEVEL 3
18
19%
LEVEL 4
12
13%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 10
LEVEL 1
3
30%
LEVEL 2
3
30%
LEVEL 3
3
30%
LEVEL 4
1
10%
Female
PROFICIENT
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 46
LEVEL 1
7
15%
LEVEL 2
23
50%
LEVEL 3
7
15%
LEVEL 4
9
20%
Male
PROFICIENT
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 59
LEVEL 1
15
25%
LEVEL 2
26
44%
LEVEL 3
14
24%
LEVEL 4
4
7%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 105
LEVEL 1
22
21%
LEVEL 2
49
47%
LEVEL 3
21
20%
LEVEL 4
13
12%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 49
LEVEL 1
16
33%
LEVEL 2
24
49%
LEVEL 3
6
12%
LEVEL 4
3
6%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 56
LEVEL 1
6
11%
LEVEL 2
25
45%
LEVEL 3
15
27%
LEVEL 4
10
18%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 105
LEVEL 1
22
21%
LEVEL 2
49
47%
LEVEL 3
21
20%
LEVEL 4
13
12%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
105
93
12
1
2
4
95
3
10
46
59
105
49
56
105
PROFICIENT
32%
37%
0%
_%
_%
_%
32%
_%
40%
35%
31%
32%
18%
45%
32%
LEVEL 1
22
21%
12
13%
10
83%
_
_
_
_
_
_
19
20%
_
_
3
30%
7
15%
15
25%
22
21%
16
33%
6
11%
22
21%
LEVEL 2
49
47%
47
51%
2
17%
_
_
_
_
_
_
46
48%
_
_
3
30%
23
50%
26
44%
49
47%
24
49%
25
45%
49
47%
LEVEL 3
21
20%
21
23%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
18
19%
_
_
3
30%
7
15%
14
24%
21
20%
6
12%
15
27%
21
20%
LEVEL 4
13
12%
13
14%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
12
13%
_
_
1
10%
9
20%
4
7%
13
12%
3
6%
10
18%
13
12%
Grade 7 English Language Arts
MEAN SCORE: 286
All Students
PROFICIENT
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 157
LEVEL 1
67
43%
LEVEL 2
63
40%
LEVEL 3
23
15%
LEVEL 4
4
3%
General Education
PROFICIENT
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 136
LEVEL 1
51
38%
LEVEL 2
59
43%
LEVEL 3
22
16%
LEVEL 4
4
3%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 21
LEVEL 1
16
76%
LEVEL 2
4
19%
LEVEL 3
1
5%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
American Indian or Alaska Native
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
3
33%
LEVEL 2
5
56%
LEVEL 3
1
11%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 136
LEVEL 1
57
42%
LEVEL 2
55
40%
LEVEL 3
21
15%
LEVEL 4
3
2%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 8
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 12
LEVEL 1
7
58%
LEVEL 2
3
25%
LEVEL 3
1
8%
LEVEL 4
1
8%
Female
PROFICIENT
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 88
LEVEL 1
33
38%
LEVEL 2
41
47%
LEVEL 3
12
14%
LEVEL 4
2
2%
Male
PROFICIENT
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 69
LEVEL 1
34
49%
LEVEL 2
22
32%
LEVEL 3
11
16%
LEVEL 4
2
3%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 157
LEVEL 1
67
43%
LEVEL 2
63
40%
LEVEL 3
23
15%
LEVEL 4
4
3%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 77
LEVEL 1
45
58%
LEVEL 2
28
36%
LEVEL 3
3
4%
LEVEL 4
1
1%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 80
LEVEL 1
22
28%
LEVEL 2
35
44%
LEVEL 3
20
25%
LEVEL 4
3
4%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 157
LEVEL 1
67
43%
LEVEL 2
63
40%
LEVEL 3
23
15%
LEVEL 4
4
3%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
157
136
21
1
1
9
2
136
8
12
88
69
157
77
80
157
PROFICIENT
17%
19%
5%
_%
_%
11%
_%
18%
_%
17%
16%
19%
17%
5%
29%
17%
LEVEL 1
67
43%
51
38%
16
76%
_
_
_
_
3
33%
_
_
57
42%
_
_
7
58%
33
38%
34
49%
67
43%
45
58%
22
28%
67
43%
LEVEL 2
63
40%
59
43%
4
19%
_
_
_
_
5
56%
_
_
55
40%
_
_
3
25%
41
47%
22
32%
63
40%
28
36%
35
44%
63
40%
LEVEL 3
23
15%
22
16%
1
5%
_
_
_
_
1
11%
_
_
21
15%
_
_
1
8%
12
14%
11
16%
23
15%
3
4%
20
25%
23
15%
LEVEL 4
4
3%
4
3%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
_
_
3
2%
_
_
1
8%
2
2%
2
3%
4
3%
1
1%
3
4%
4
3%
Grade 8 English Language Arts
MEAN SCORE: 290
All Students
PROFICIENT
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 127
LEVEL 1
43
34%
LEVEL 2
49
39%
LEVEL 3
22
17%
LEVEL 4
13
10%
General Education
PROFICIENT
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 102
LEVEL 1
22
22%
LEVEL 2
46
45%
LEVEL 3
21
21%
LEVEL 4
13
13%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 25
LEVEL 1
21
84%
LEVEL 2
3
12%
LEVEL 3
1
4%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 116
LEVEL 1
38
33%
LEVEL 2
45
39%
LEVEL 3
21
18%
LEVEL 4
12
10%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 11
LEVEL 1
5
45%
LEVEL 2
4
36%
LEVEL 3
1
9%
LEVEL 4
1
9%
Female
PROFICIENT
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 55
LEVEL 1
13
24%
LEVEL 2
20
36%
LEVEL 3
14
25%
LEVEL 4
8
15%
Male
PROFICIENT
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 72
LEVEL 1
30
42%
LEVEL 2
29
40%
LEVEL 3
8
11%
LEVEL 4
5
7%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 126
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 49
LEVEL 1
25
51%
LEVEL 2
17
35%
LEVEL 3
5
10%
LEVEL 4
2
4%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 78
LEVEL 1
18
23%
LEVEL 2
32
41%
LEVEL 3
17
22%
LEVEL 4
11
14%
Migrant
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 125
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Migrant
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
127
102
25
3
3
2
116
3
11
55
72
126
1
49
78
2
125
PROFICIENT
28%
33%
4%
_%
_%
_%
28%
_%
18%
40%
18%
_%
_%
14%
36%
_%
_%
LEVEL 1
43
34%
22
22%
21
84%
_
_
_
_
_
_
38
33%
_
_
5
45%
13
24%
30
42%
_
_
_
_
25
51%
18
23%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 2
49
39%
46
45%
3
12%
_
_
_
_
_
_
45
39%
_
_
4
36%
20
36%
29
40%
_
_
_
_
17
35%
32
41%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 3
22
17%
21
21%
1
4%
_
_
_
_
_
_
21
18%
_
_
1
9%
14
25%
8
11%
_
_
_
_
5
10%
17
22%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 4
13
10%
13
13%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
12
10%
_
_
1
9%
8
15%
5
7%
_
_
_
_
2
4%
11
14%
_
_
_
_
Grade 3 Mathematics
MEAN SCORE: 306
All Students
PROFICIENT
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 136
LEVEL 1
37
27%
LEVEL 2
35
26%
LEVEL 3
41
30%
LEVEL 4
23
17%
General Education
PROFICIENT
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 111
LEVEL 1
18
16%
LEVEL 2
32
29%
LEVEL 3
39
35%
LEVEL 4
22
20%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 25
LEVEL 1
19
76%
LEVEL 2
3
12%
LEVEL 3
2
8%
LEVEL 4
1
4%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
1
20%
LEVEL 4
4
80%
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 122
LEVEL 1
35
29%
LEVEL 2
31
25%
LEVEL 3
38
31%
LEVEL 4
18
15%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
2
22%
LEVEL 2
4
44%
LEVEL 3
2
22%
LEVEL 4
1
11%
Female
PROFICIENT
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 63
LEVEL 1
15
24%
LEVEL 2
19
30%
LEVEL 3
21
33%
LEVEL 4
8
13%
Male
PROFICIENT
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 73
LEVEL 1
22
30%
LEVEL 2
16
22%
LEVEL 3
20
27%
LEVEL 4
15
21%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 136
LEVEL 1
37
27%
LEVEL 2
35
26%
LEVEL 3
41
30%
LEVEL 4
23
17%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 62
LEVEL 1
23
37%
LEVEL 2
17
27%
LEVEL 3
14
23%
LEVEL 4
8
13%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 74
LEVEL 1
14
19%
LEVEL 2
18
24%
LEVEL 3
27
36%
LEVEL 4
15
20%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 136
LEVEL 1
37
27%
LEVEL 2
35
26%
LEVEL 3
41
30%
LEVEL 4
23
17%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
136
111
25
5
1
4
122
4
9
63
73
136
62
74
136
PROFICIENT
47%
55%
12%
100%
_%
_%
46%
_%
33%
46%
48%
47%
35%
57%
47%
LEVEL 1
37
27%
18
16%
19
76%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
35
29%
_
_
2
22%
15
24%
22
30%
37
27%
23
37%
14
19%
37
27%
LEVEL 2
35
26%
32
29%
3
12%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
31
25%
_
_
4
44%
19
30%
16
22%
35
26%
17
27%
18
24%
35
26%
LEVEL 3
41
30%
39
35%
2
8%
1
20%
_
_
_
_
38
31%
_
_
2
22%
21
33%
20
27%
41
30%
14
23%
27
36%
41
30%
LEVEL 4
23
17%
22
20%
1
4%
4
80%
_
_
_
_
18
15%
_
_
1
11%
8
13%
15
21%
23
17%
8
13%
15
20%
23
17%
Grade 4 Mathematics
MEAN SCORE: 307
All Students
PROFICIENT
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 141
LEVEL 1
28
20%
LEVEL 2
49
35%
LEVEL 3
40
28%
LEVEL 4
24
17%
General Education
PROFICIENT
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 115
LEVEL 1
12
10%
LEVEL 2
41
36%
LEVEL 3
39
34%
LEVEL 4
23
20%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 26
LEVEL 1
16
62%
LEVEL 2
8
31%
LEVEL 3
1
4%
LEVEL 4
1
4%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 128
LEVEL 1
23
18%
LEVEL 2
45
35%
LEVEL 3
38
30%
LEVEL 4
22
17%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 13
LEVEL 1
5
38%
LEVEL 2
4
31%
LEVEL 3
2
15%
LEVEL 4
2
15%
Female
PROFICIENT
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 70
LEVEL 1
15
21%
LEVEL 2
22
31%
LEVEL 3
21
30%
LEVEL 4
12
17%
Male
PROFICIENT
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 71
LEVEL 1
13
18%
LEVEL 2
27
38%
LEVEL 3
19
27%
LEVEL 4
12
17%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 140
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 68
LEVEL 1
22
32%
LEVEL 2
25
37%
LEVEL 3
14
21%
LEVEL 4
7
10%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 73
LEVEL 1
6
8%
LEVEL 2
24
33%
LEVEL 3
26
36%
LEVEL 4
17
23%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 141
LEVEL 1
28
20%
LEVEL 2
49
35%
LEVEL 3
40
28%
LEVEL 4
24
17%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
141
115
26
3
2
4
128
4
13
70
71
140
1
68
73
141
PROFICIENT
45%
54%
8%
_%
_%
_%
47%
_%
31%
47%
44%
_%
_%
31%
59%
45%
LEVEL 1
28
20%
12
10%
16
62%
_
_
_
_
_
_
23
18%
_
_
5
38%
15
21%
13
18%
_
_
_
_
22
32%
6
8%
28
20%
LEVEL 2
49
35%
41
36%
8
31%
_
_
_
_
_
_
45
35%
_
_
4
31%
22
31%
27
38%
_
_
_
_
25
37%
24
33%
49
35%
LEVEL 3
40
28%
39
34%
1
4%
_
_
_
_
_
_
38
30%
_
_
2
15%
21
30%
19
27%
_
_
_
_
14
21%
26
36%
40
28%
LEVEL 4
24
17%
23
20%
1
4%
_
_
_
_
_
_
22
17%
_
_
2
15%
12
17%
12
17%
_
_
_
_
7
10%
17
23%
24
17%
Grade 5 Mathematics
MEAN SCORE: 306
All Students
PROFICIENT
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 132
LEVEL 1
40
30%
LEVEL 2
37
28%
LEVEL 3
38
29%
LEVEL 4
17
13%
General Education
PROFICIENT
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 108
LEVEL 1
18
17%
LEVEL 2
36
33%
LEVEL 3
37
34%
LEVEL 4
17
16%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 24
LEVEL 1
22
92%
LEVEL 2
1
4%
LEVEL 3
1
4%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 117
LEVEL 1
35
30%
LEVEL 2
29
25%
LEVEL 3
37
32%
LEVEL 4
16
14%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
3
50%
LEVEL 2
3
50%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
2
22%
LEVEL 2
5
56%
LEVEL 3
1
11%
LEVEL 4
1
11%
Female
PROFICIENT
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 53
LEVEL 1
15
28%
LEVEL 2
17
32%
LEVEL 3
15
28%
LEVEL 4
6
11%
Male
PROFICIENT
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 79
LEVEL 1
25
32%
LEVEL 2
20
25%
LEVEL 3
23
29%
LEVEL 4
11
14%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 132
LEVEL 1
40
30%
LEVEL 2
37
28%
LEVEL 3
38
29%
LEVEL 4
17
13%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 53
LEVEL 1
24
45%
LEVEL 2
18
34%
LEVEL 3
10
19%
LEVEL 4
1
2%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 79
LEVEL 1
16
20%
LEVEL 2
19
24%
LEVEL 3
28
35%
LEVEL 4
16
20%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 132
LEVEL 1
40
30%
LEVEL 2
37
28%
LEVEL 3
38
29%
LEVEL 4
17
13%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
132
108
24
2
3
4
117
6
9
53
79
132
53
79
132
PROFICIENT
42%
50%
4%
_%
_%
_%
45%
0%
22%
40%
43%
42%
21%
56%
42%
LEVEL 1
40
30%
18
17%
22
92%
_
_
_
_
_
_
35
30%
3
50%
2
22%
15
28%
25
32%
40
30%
24
45%
16
20%
40
30%
LEVEL 2
37
28%
36
33%
1
4%
_
_
_
_
_
_
29
25%
3
50%
5
56%
17
32%
20
25%
37
28%
18
34%
19
24%
37
28%
LEVEL 3
38
29%
37
34%
1
4%
_
_
_
_
_
_
37
32%
0
0%
1
11%
15
28%
23
29%
38
29%
10
19%
28
35%
38
29%
LEVEL 4
17
13%
17
16%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
16
14%
0
0%
1
11%
6
11%
11
14%
17
13%
1
2%
16
20%
17
13%
Grade 6 Mathematics
MEAN SCORE: 309
All Students
PROFICIENT
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 100
LEVEL 1
16
16%
LEVEL 2
44
44%
LEVEL 3
28
28%
LEVEL 4
12
12%
General Education
PROFICIENT
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 90
LEVEL 1
8
9%
LEVEL 2
42
47%
LEVEL 3
28
31%
LEVEL 4
12
13%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 10
LEVEL 1
8
80%
LEVEL 2
2
20%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 90
LEVEL 1
13
14%
LEVEL 2
41
46%
LEVEL 3
25
28%
LEVEL 4
11
12%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 10
LEVEL 1
3
30%
LEVEL 2
3
30%
LEVEL 3
3
30%
LEVEL 4
1
10%
Female
PROFICIENT
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 41
LEVEL 1
5
12%
LEVEL 2
21
51%
LEVEL 3
10
24%
LEVEL 4
5
12%
Male
PROFICIENT
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 59
LEVEL 1
11
19%
LEVEL 2
23
39%
LEVEL 3
18
31%
LEVEL 4
7
12%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 100
LEVEL 1
16
16%
LEVEL 2
44
44%
LEVEL 3
28
28%
LEVEL 4
12
12%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 43
LEVEL 1
14
33%
LEVEL 2
18
42%
LEVEL 3
7
16%
LEVEL 4
4
9%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 57
LEVEL 1
2
4%
LEVEL 2
26
46%
LEVEL 3
21
37%
LEVEL 4
8
14%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 100
LEVEL 1
16
16%
LEVEL 2
44
44%
LEVEL 3
28
28%
LEVEL 4
12
12%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
100
90
10
1
2
4
90
3
10
41
59
100
43
57
100
PROFICIENT
40%
44%
0%
_%
_%
_%
40%
_%
40%
37%
42%
40%
26%
51%
40%
LEVEL 1
16
16%
8
9%
8
80%
_
_
_
_
_
_
13
14%
_
_
3
30%
5
12%
11
19%
16
16%
14
33%
2
4%
16
16%
LEVEL 2
44
44%
42
47%
2
20%
_
_
_
_
_
_
41
46%
_
_
3
30%
21
51%
23
39%
44
44%
18
42%
26
46%
44
44%
LEVEL 3
28
28%
28
31%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
25
28%
_
_
3
30%
10
24%
18
31%
28
28%
7
16%
21
37%
28
28%
LEVEL 4
12
12%
12
13%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
11
12%
_
_
1
10%
5
12%
7
12%
12
12%
4
9%
8
14%
12
12%
Grade 7 Mathematics
Mean scores and data in the table for grade 7 math include only those for grade 7 students who took the Grade 7 New York State Testing Program Assessment (NYSTP) in Mathematics. For 2015 and forward, data in the bar charts include those for grade 7 students who took the Grade 7 NYSTP in Mathematics and grade 7 students who took a Regents math test in lieu of the NYSTP. For 2014 and earlier, data in the bar charts include only those for grade 7 students who took the Grade 7 NYSTP.
MEAN SCORE: 305
All Students
PROFICIENT
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 136
LEVEL 1
41
30%
LEVEL 2
51
38%
LEVEL 3
33
24%
LEVEL 4
11
8%
General Education
PROFICIENT
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 121
LEVEL 1
29
24%
LEVEL 2
50
41%
LEVEL 3
31
26%
LEVEL 4
11
9%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 15
LEVEL 1
12
80%
LEVEL 2
1
7%
LEVEL 3
2
13%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
American Indian or Alaska Native
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 118
LEVEL 1
31
26%
LEVEL 2
45
38%
LEVEL 3
31
26%
LEVEL 4
11
9%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 8
LEVEL 1
6
75%
LEVEL 2
2
25%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 10
LEVEL 1
4
40%
LEVEL 2
4
40%
LEVEL 3
2
20%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Female
PROFICIENT
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 78
LEVEL 1
24
31%
LEVEL 2
27
35%
LEVEL 3
22
28%
LEVEL 4
5
6%
Male
PROFICIENT
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 58
LEVEL 1
17
29%
LEVEL 2
24
41%
LEVEL 3
11
19%
LEVEL 4
6
10%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 136
LEVEL 1
41
30%
LEVEL 2
51
38%
LEVEL 3
33
24%
LEVEL 4
11
8%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 62
LEVEL 1
27
44%
LEVEL 2
23
37%
LEVEL 3
11
18%
LEVEL 4
1
2%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 74
LEVEL 1
14
19%
LEVEL 2
28
38%
LEVEL 3
22
30%
LEVEL 4
10
14%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 136
LEVEL 1
41
30%
LEVEL 2
51
38%
LEVEL 3
33
24%
LEVEL 4
11
8%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
136
121
15
1
1
6
2
118
8
10
78
58
136
62
74
136
PROFICIENT
32%
35%
13%
_%
_%
_%
_%
36%
0%
20%
35%
29%
32%
19%
43%
32%
LEVEL 1
41
30%
29
24%
12
80%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
31
26%
6
75%
4
40%
24
31%
17
29%
41
30%
27
44%
14
19%
41
30%
LEVEL 2
51
38%
50
41%
1
7%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
45
38%
2
25%
4
40%
27
35%
24
41%
51
38%
23
37%
28
38%
51
38%
LEVEL 3
33
24%
31
26%
2
13%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
31
26%
0
0%
2
20%
22
28%
11
19%
33
24%
11
18%
22
30%
33
24%
LEVEL 4
11
8%
11
9%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
11
9%
0
0%
0
0%
5
6%
6
10%
11
8%
1
2%
10
14%
11
8%
Grade 7 Students Taking a Regents Math Test
Accelerated grade 7 students who took a Regents math test in lieu of the Grade 7 NYSTP in Mathematics.
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4 AND ABOVE
_
_
LEVEL 3 AND ABOVE
_
_
GROUP
All Students
TOTAL TESTED
1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
4 & ABOVE
_
_
3 & ABOVE
_
_
Grade 8 Mathematics
Mean scores and data in the table for grade 8 math include only those for grade 8 students who took the Grade 8 New York State Testing Program Assessment (NYSTP) in Mathematics. For 2015 and forward, data in the bar charts include those for grade 8 students who took the Grade 8 NYSTP in Mathematics and grade 8 students who took a Regents math test in lieu of the NYSTP. For 2014 and earlier, data in the bar charts include only those for grade 8 students who took the Grade 8 NYSTP.
MEAN SCORE: 296
All Students
PROFICIENT
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 96
LEVEL 1
28
29%
LEVEL 2
49
51%
LEVEL 3
17
18%
LEVEL 4
2
2%
General Education
PROFICIENT
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 75
LEVEL 1
11
15%
LEVEL 2
45
60%
LEVEL 3
17
23%
LEVEL 4
2
3%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 21
LEVEL 1
17
81%
LEVEL 2
4
19%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 87
LEVEL 1
26
30%
LEVEL 2
43
49%
LEVEL 3
16
18%
LEVEL 4
2
2%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
2
22%
LEVEL 2
6
67%
LEVEL 3
1
11%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Female
PROFICIENT
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 41
LEVEL 1
9
22%
LEVEL 2
19
46%
LEVEL 3
11
27%
LEVEL 4
2
5%
Male
PROFICIENT
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 55
LEVEL 1
19
35%
LEVEL 2
30
55%
LEVEL 3
6
11%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 95
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 40
LEVEL 1
17
43%
LEVEL 2
19
48%
LEVEL 3
3
8%
LEVEL 4
1
3%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 56
LEVEL 1
11
20%
LEVEL 2
30
54%
LEVEL 3
14
25%
LEVEL 4
1
2%
Migrant
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 94
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Migrant
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
96
75
21
3
2
2
87
2
9
41
55
95
1
40
56
2
94
PROFICIENT
20%
25%
0%
_%
_%
_%
21%
_%
11%
32%
11%
_%
_%
10%
27%
_%
_%
LEVEL 1
28
29%
11
15%
17
81%
_
_
_
_
_
_
26
30%
_
_
2
22%
9
22%
19
35%
_
_
_
_
17
43%
11
20%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 2
49
51%
45
60%
4
19%
_
_
_
_
_
_
43
49%
_
_
6
67%
19
46%
30
55%
_
_
_
_
19
48%
30
54%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 3
17
18%
17
23%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
16
18%
_
_
1
11%
11
27%
6
11%
_
_
_
_
3
8%
14
25%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 4
2
2%
2
3%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
2
2%
_
_
0
0%
2
5%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
1
3%
1
2%
_
_
_
_
Grade 8 Students Taking a Regents Math Test
Accelerated grade 8 students who took a Regents math test in lieu of the Grade 8 NYSTP in Mathematics.
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 21
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
2
10%
LEVEL 4 AND ABOVE
19
90%
LEVEL 3 AND ABOVE
21
100%
GROUP
All Students
TOTAL TESTED
21
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
2
10%
4 & ABOVE
19
90%
3 & ABOVE
21
100%
Grade 4 Science
MEAN SCORE: 85
All Students
PROFICIENT
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 145
LEVEL 1
3
2%
LEVEL 2
9
6%
LEVEL 3
34
23%
LEVEL 4
99
68%
General Education
PROFICIENT
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 116
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
2
2%
LEVEL 3
20
17%
LEVEL 4
93
80%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 29
LEVEL 1
2
7%
LEVEL 2
7
24%
LEVEL 3
14
48%
LEVEL 4
6
21%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 133
LEVEL 1
2
2%
LEVEL 2
7
5%
LEVEL 3
32
24%
LEVEL 4
92
69%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 12
LEVEL 1
1
8%
LEVEL 2
2
17%
LEVEL 3
2
17%
LEVEL 4
7
58%
Female
PROFICIENT
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 72
LEVEL 1
2
3%
LEVEL 2
6
8%
LEVEL 3
15
21%
LEVEL 4
49
68%
Male
PROFICIENT
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 73
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
3
4%
LEVEL 3
19
26%
LEVEL 4
50
68%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 144
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 68
LEVEL 1
3
4%
LEVEL 2
7
10%
LEVEL 3
19
28%
LEVEL 4
39
57%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 77
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
3%
LEVEL 3
15
19%
LEVEL 4
60
78%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 145
LEVEL 1
3
2%
LEVEL 2
9
6%
LEVEL 3
34
23%
LEVEL 4
99
68%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
145
116
29
3
2
3
133
4
12
72
73
144
1
68
77
145
PROFICIENT
92%
97%
69%
_%
_%
_%
93%
_%
75%
89%
95%
_%
_%
85%
97%
92%
LEVEL 1
3
2%
1
1%
2
7%
_
_
_
_
_
_
2
2%
_
_
1
8%
2
3%
1
1%
_
_
_
_
3
4%
0
0%
3
2%
LEVEL 2
9
6%
2
2%
7
24%
_
_
_
_
_
_
7
5%
_
_
2
17%
6
8%
3
4%
_
_
_
_
7
10%
2
3%
9
6%
LEVEL 3
34
23%
20
17%
14
48%
_
_
_
_
_
_
32
24%
_
_
2
17%
15
21%
19
26%
_
_
_
_
19
28%
15
19%
34
23%
LEVEL 4
99
68%
93
80%
6
21%
_
_
_
_
_
_
92
69%
_
_
7
58%
49
68%
50
68%
_
_
_
_
39
57%
60
78%
99
68%
Grade 8 Science
Data in the bar charts include those for grade 8 students who took the New York State Grade 8 Science Test and grade 8 students who took a Regents science test in lieu of this test. Mean scores and data in the table for grade 8 science include only those for grade 8 students who took the New York State Grade 8 Science Test.
MEAN SCORE: 66
All Students
PROFICIENT
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 88
LEVEL 1
8
9%
LEVEL 2
20
23%
LEVEL 3
54
61%
LEVEL 4
6
7%
General Education
PROFICIENT
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 68
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
13
19%
LEVEL 3
49
72%
LEVEL 4
6
9%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 20
LEVEL 1
8
40%
LEVEL 2
7
35%
LEVEL 3
5
25%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 80
LEVEL 1
6
8%
LEVEL 2
18
23%
LEVEL 3
50
63%
LEVEL 4
6
8%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 8
LEVEL 1
2
25%
LEVEL 2
2
25%
LEVEL 3
4
50%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Female
PROFICIENT
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 33
LEVEL 1
3
9%
LEVEL 2
3
9%
LEVEL 3
23
70%
LEVEL 4
4
12%
Male
PROFICIENT
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 55
LEVEL 1
5
9%
LEVEL 2
17
31%
LEVEL 3
31
56%
LEVEL 4
2
4%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 87
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 38
LEVEL 1
6
16%
LEVEL 2
10
26%
LEVEL 3
19
50%
LEVEL 4
3
8%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 50
LEVEL 1
2
4%
LEVEL 2
10
20%
LEVEL 3
35
70%
LEVEL 4
3
6%
Migrant
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 86
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Migrant
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
88
68
20
3
2
1
80
2
8
33
55
87
1
38
50
2
86
PROFICIENT
68%
81%
25%
_%
_%
_%
70%
_%
50%
82%
60%
_%
_%
58%
76%
_%
_%
LEVEL 1
8
9%
0
0%
8
40%
_
_
_
_
_
_
6
8%
_
_
2
25%
3
9%
5
9%
_
_
_
_
6
16%
2
4%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 2
20
23%
13
19%
7
35%
_
_
_
_
_
_
18
23%
_
_
2
25%
3
9%
17
31%
_
_
_
_
10
26%
10
20%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 3
54
61%
49
72%
5
25%
_
_
_
_
_
_
50
63%
_
_
4
50%
23
70%
31
56%
_
_
_
_
19
50%
35
70%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 4
6
7%
6
9%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
6
8%
_
_
0
0%
4
12%
2
4%
_
_
_
_
3
8%
3
6%
_
_
_
_
Grade 8 Students Taking a Regents Science Test
Accelerated grade 8 students who take a Regents science test in lieu of the New York State Grade 8 Science Test.
All Students
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 29
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
3
10%
LEVEL 4
26
90%
GROUP
All Students
TOTAL TESTED
29
PROFICIENT
100%
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
3
10%
LEVEL 4
26
90%
Statewide Results on the National Assessment of Educational Progress: NAEP (2014 - 15)
Grade: 4
Reading
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Students with Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
BELOW BASIC
32%
*%
20%
48%
44%
20%
*%
70%
74%
43%
BASIC
32%
*%
30%
34%
37%
31%
*%
22%
21%
36%
PROFICIENT
27%
*%
33%
15%
17%
37%
*%
7%
4%
18%
ADVANCED
9%
*%
17%
3%
2%
12%
*%
1%
1%
3%
PARTICIPATION RATE
98
88
Reading
All Students
Percent Below Basic
32
Percent Basic
32
Percent Proficient
27
Percent Advanced
9
American Indian or Alaska Native
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Percent Below Basic
20
Percent Basic
30
Percent Proficient
33
Percent Advanced
17
Black or African American
Percent Below Basic
48
Percent Basic
34
Percent Proficient
15
Percent Advanced
3
Hispanic or Latino
Percent Below Basic
44
Percent Basic
37
Percent Proficient
17
Percent Advanced
2
White
Percent Below Basic
20
Percent Basic
31
Percent Proficient
37
Percent Advanced
12
Multiracial
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Students with Disabilities
Percent Below Basic
70
Percent Basic
22
Percent Proficient
7
Percent Advanced
1
Participation Rate
98
Limited English Proficient
Percent Below Basic
74
Percent Basic
21
Percent Proficient
4
Percent Advanced
1
Participation Rate
88
Economically Disadvantaged
Percent Below Basic
43
Percent Basic
36
Percent Proficient
18
Percent Advanced
3
Mathematics
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Students with Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
BELOW BASIC
21%
*%
12%
40%
28%
12%
*%
49%
56%
29%
BASIC
44%
*%
31%
46%
51%
41%
*%
39%
35%
48%
PROFICIENT
30%
*%
42%
13%
20%
40%
*%
10%
9%
21%
ADVANCED
5%
*%
15%
1%
1%
7%
*%
2%
*%
2%
PARTICIPATION RATE
98
91
Mathematics
All Students
Percent Below Basic
21
Percent Basic
44
Percent Proficient
30
Percent Advanced
5
American Indian or Alaska Native
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Percent Below Basic
12
Percent Basic
31
Percent Proficient
42
Percent Advanced
15
Black or African American
Percent Below Basic
40
Percent Basic
46
Percent Proficient
13
Percent Advanced
1
Hispanic or Latino
Percent Below Basic
28
Percent Basic
51
Percent Proficient
20
Percent Advanced
1
White
Percent Below Basic
12
Percent Basic
41
Percent Proficient
40
Percent Advanced
7
Multiracial
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Students with Disabilities
Percent Below Basic
49
Percent Basic
39
Percent Proficient
10
Percent Advanced
2
Participation Rate
98
Limited English Proficient
Percent Below Basic
56
Percent Basic
35
Percent Proficient
9
Percent Advanced
*
Participation Rate
91
Economically Disadvantaged
Percent Below Basic
29
Percent Basic
48
Percent Proficient
21
Percent Advanced
2
Grade: 8
Reading
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Students with Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
BELOW BASIC
27%
*%
19%
42%
35%
18%
*%
59%
78%
36%
BASIC
40%
*%
39%
41%
43%
39%
*%
33%
19%
42%
PROFICIENT
29%
*%
34%
16%
20%
38%
*%
8%
3%
21%
ADVANCED
4%
*%
8%
1%
2%
5%
*%
*%
*%
1%
PARTICIPATION RATE
98
89
Reading
All Students
Percent Below Basic
27
Percent Basic
40
Percent Proficient
29
Percent Advanced
4
American Indian or Alaska Native
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Percent Below Basic
19
Percent Basic
39
Percent Proficient
34
Percent Advanced
8
Black or African American
Percent Below Basic
42
Percent Basic
41
Percent Proficient
16
Percent Advanced
1
Hispanic or Latino
Percent Below Basic
35
Percent Basic
43
Percent Proficient
20
Percent Advanced
2
White
Percent Below Basic
18
Percent Basic
39
Percent Proficient
38
Percent Advanced
5
Multiracial
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Students with Disabilities
Percent Below Basic
59
Percent Basic
33
Percent Proficient
8
Percent Advanced
*
Participation Rate
98
Limited English Proficient
Percent Below Basic
78
Percent Basic
19
Percent Proficient
3
Percent Advanced
*
Participation Rate
89
Economically Disadvantaged
Percent Below Basic
36
Percent Basic
42
Percent Proficient
21
Percent Advanced
1
Mathematics
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Students with Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
BELOW BASIC
31%
*%
18%
48%
41%
20%
*%
64%
72%
40%
BASIC
38%
*%
30%
37%
40%
40%
*%
27%
21%
39%
PROFICIENT
24%
*%
33%
13%
16%
31%
*%
8%
6%
17%
ADVANCED
7%
*%
19%
2%
3%
9%
*%
1%
1%
4%
PARTICIPATION RATE
99
94
Mathematics
All Students
Percent Below Basic
31
Percent Basic
38
Percent Proficient
24
Percent Advanced
7
American Indian or Alaska Native
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Percent Below Basic
18
Percent Basic
30
Percent Proficient
33
Percent Advanced
19
Black or African American
Percent Below Basic
48
Percent Basic
37
Percent Proficient
13
Percent Advanced
2
Hispanic or Latino
Percent Below Basic
41
Percent Basic
40
Percent Proficient
16
Percent Advanced
3
White
Percent Below Basic
20
Percent Basic
40
Percent Proficient
31
Percent Advanced
9
Multiracial
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Students with Disabilities
Percent Below Basic
64
Percent Basic
27
Percent Proficient
8
Percent Advanced
1
Participation Rate
99
Limited English Proficient
Percent Below Basic
72
Percent Basic
21
Percent Proficient
6
Percent Advanced
1
Participation Rate
94
Economically Disadvantaged
Percent Below Basic
40
Percent Basic
39
Percent Proficient
17
Percent Advanced
4
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level English Language Arts after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 161
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
6
4%
LEVEL 3
38
24%
LEVEL 4
99
61%
General Education
PROFICIENT
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 135
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
1%
LEVEL 3
24
18%
LEVEL 4
99
73%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 26
LEVEL 1
1
4%
LEVEL 2
5
19%
LEVEL 3
14
54%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 7
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
2
29%
LEVEL 4
5
71%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
3
50%
LEVEL 4
1
17%
White
PROFICIENT
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 143
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
6
4%
LEVEL 3
31
22%
LEVEL 4
90
63%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
2
40%
LEVEL 4
3
60%
Female
PROFICIENT
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 86
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
22
26%
LEVEL 4
55
64%
Male
PROFICIENT
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 75
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
6
8%
LEVEL 3
16
21%
LEVEL 4
44
59%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 160
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 55
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
4
7%
LEVEL 3
21
38%
LEVEL 4
18
33%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 106
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
2
2%
LEVEL 3
17
16%
LEVEL 4
81
76%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 161
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
6
4%
LEVEL 3
38
24%
LEVEL 4
99
61%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
161
135
26
4
7
6
143
1
5
86
75
160
1
55
106
161
PROFICIENT
85%
91%
54%
_%
100%
67%
85%
_%
100%
90%
80%
_%
_%
71%
92%
85%
LEVEL 1
1
1%
0
0%
1
4%
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
1
1%
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
1
1%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
1
1%
1
1%
LEVEL 2
6
4%
1
1%
5
19%
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
6
4%
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
6
8%
_
_
_
_
4
7%
2
2%
6
4%
LEVEL 3
38
24%
24
18%
14
54%
_
_
2
29%
3
50%
31
22%
_
_
2
40%
22
26%
16
21%
_
_
_
_
21
38%
17
16%
38
24%
LEVEL 4
99
61%
99
73%
0
0%
_
_
5
71%
1
17%
90
63%
_
_
3
60%
55
64%
44
59%
_
_
_
_
18
33%
81
76%
99
61%
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level Mathematics after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 161
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
8
5%
LEVEL 3
92
57%
LEVEL 4
45
28%
General Education
PROFICIENT
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 135
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
5
4%
LEVEL 3
77
57%
LEVEL 4
45
33%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 26
LEVEL 1
1
4%
LEVEL 2
3
12%
LEVEL 3
15
58%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 7
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
29%
LEVEL 3
4
57%
LEVEL 4
1
14%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
17%
LEVEL 3
2
33%
LEVEL 4
1
17%
White
PROFICIENT
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 143
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
5
3%
LEVEL 3
84
59%
LEVEL 4
40
28%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
2
40%
LEVEL 4
3
60%
Female
PROFICIENT
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 86
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
3
3%
LEVEL 3
54
63%
LEVEL 4
23
27%
Male
PROFICIENT
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 75
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
5
7%
LEVEL 3
38
51%
LEVEL 4
22
29%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 160
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 55
LEVEL 1
1
2%
LEVEL 2
6
11%
LEVEL 3
31
56%
LEVEL 4
7
13%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 106
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
2%
LEVEL 3
61
58%
LEVEL 4
38
36%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 161
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
8
5%
LEVEL 3
92
57%
LEVEL 4
45
28%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
161
135
26
4
7
6
143
1
5
86
75
160
1
55
106
161
PROFICIENT
85%
90%
58%
_%
71%
50%
87%
_%
100%
90%
80%
_%
_%
69%
93%
85%
LEVEL 1
1
1%
0
0%
1
4%
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
1
1%
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
1
1%
_
_
_
_
1
2%
0
0%
1
1%
LEVEL 2
8
5%
5
4%
3
12%
_
_
2
29%
1
17%
5
3%
_
_
0
0%
3
3%
5
7%
_
_
_
_
6
11%
2
2%
8
5%
LEVEL 3
92
57%
77
57%
15
58%
_
_
4
57%
2
33%
84
59%
_
_
2
40%
54
63%
38
51%
_
_
_
_
31
56%
61
58%
92
57%
LEVEL 4
45
28%
45
33%
0
0%
_
_
1
14%
1
17%
40
28%
_
_
3
60%
23
27%
22
29%
_
_
_
_
7
13%
38
36%
45
28%
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level Global History and Geography after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 161
LEVEL 1
6
4%
LEVEL 2
9
6%
LEVEL 3
71
44%
LEVEL 4
61
38%
General Education
PROFICIENT
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 135
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
3
2%
LEVEL 3
63
47%
LEVEL 4
61
45%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 26
LEVEL 1
5
19%
LEVEL 2
6
23%
LEVEL 3
8
31%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 7
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
5
71%
LEVEL 4
2
29%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
33%
LEVEL 3
2
33%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
White
PROFICIENT
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 143
LEVEL 1
6
4%
LEVEL 2
7
5%
LEVEL 3
62
43%
LEVEL 4
56
39%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
2
40%
LEVEL 4
3
60%
Female
PROFICIENT
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 86
LEVEL 1
2
2%
LEVEL 2
4
5%
LEVEL 3
42
49%
LEVEL 4
31
36%
Male
PROFICIENT
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 75
LEVEL 1
4
5%
LEVEL 2
5
7%
LEVEL 3
29
39%
LEVEL 4
30
40%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 160
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 55
LEVEL 1
2
4%
LEVEL 2
8
15%
LEVEL 3
27
49%
LEVEL 4
9
16%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 106
LEVEL 1
4
4%
LEVEL 2
1
1%
LEVEL 3
44
42%
LEVEL 4
52
49%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 161
LEVEL 1
6
4%
LEVEL 2
9
6%
LEVEL 3
71
44%
LEVEL 4
61
38%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
161
135
26
4
7
6
143
1
5
86
75
160
1
55
106
161
PROFICIENT
82%
92%
31%
_%
100%
33%
83%
_%
100%
85%
79%
_%
_%
65%
91%
82%
LEVEL 1
6
4%
1
1%
5
19%
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
6
4%
_
_
0
0%
2
2%
4
5%
_
_
_
_
2
4%
4
4%
6
4%
LEVEL 2
9
6%
3
2%
6
23%
_
_
0
0%
2
33%
7
5%
_
_
0
0%
4
5%
5
7%
_
_
_
_
8
15%
1
1%
9
6%
LEVEL 3
71
44%
63
47%
8
31%
_
_
5
71%
2
33%
62
43%
_
_
2
40%
42
49%
29
39%
_
_
_
_
27
49%
44
42%
71
44%
LEVEL 4
61
38%
61
45%
0
0%
_
_
2
29%
0
0%
56
39%
_
_
3
60%
31
36%
30
40%
_
_
_
_
9
16%
52
49%
61
38%
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level U.S. History and Government after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 161
LEVEL 1
3
2%
LEVEL 2
9
6%
LEVEL 3
52
32%
LEVEL 4
79
49%
General Education
PROFICIENT
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 135
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
4
3%
LEVEL 3
42
31%
LEVEL 4
78
58%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 26
LEVEL 1
3
12%
LEVEL 2
5
19%
LEVEL 3
10
38%
LEVEL 4
1
4%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 7
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
14%
LEVEL 3
2
29%
LEVEL 4
4
57%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
17%
LEVEL 3
3
50%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
White
PROFICIENT
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 143
LEVEL 1
3
2%
LEVEL 2
7
5%
LEVEL 3
45
31%
LEVEL 4
72
50%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
2
40%
LEVEL 4
3
60%
Female
PROFICIENT
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 86
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
5
6%
LEVEL 3
27
31%
LEVEL 4
45
52%
Male
PROFICIENT
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 75
LEVEL 1
3
4%
LEVEL 2
4
5%
LEVEL 3
25
33%
LEVEL 4
34
45%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 160
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 55
LEVEL 1
1
2%
LEVEL 2
7
13%
LEVEL 3
24
44%
LEVEL 4
10
18%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 106
LEVEL 1
2
2%
LEVEL 2
2
2%
LEVEL 3
28
26%
LEVEL 4
69
65%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 161
LEVEL 1
3
2%
LEVEL 2
9
6%
LEVEL 3
52
32%
LEVEL 4
79
49%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
161
135
26
4
7
6
143
1
5
86
75
160
1
55
106
161
PROFICIENT
81%
89%
42%
_%
86%
50%
82%
_%
100%
84%
79%
_%
_%
62%
92%
81%
LEVEL 1
3
2%
0
0%
3
12%
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
3
2%
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
3
4%
_
_
_
_
1
2%
2
2%
3
2%
LEVEL 2
9
6%
4
3%
5
19%
_
_
1
14%
1
17%
7
5%
_
_
0
0%
5
6%
4
5%
_
_
_
_
7
13%
2
2%
9
6%
LEVEL 3
52
32%
42
31%
10
38%
_
_
2
29%
3
50%
45
31%
_
_
2
40%
27
31%
25
33%
_
_
_
_
24
44%
28
26%
52
32%
LEVEL 4
79
49%
78
58%
1
4%
_
_
4
57%
0
0%
72
50%
_
_
3
60%
45
52%
34
45%
_
_
_
_
10
18%
69
65%
79
49%
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level Science after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 161
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
4
2%
LEVEL 3
70
43%
LEVEL 4
73
45%
General Education
PROFICIENT
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 135
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
3
2%
LEVEL 3
54
40%
LEVEL 4
71
53%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 26
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
4%
LEVEL 3
16
62%
LEVEL 4
2
8%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 7
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
5
71%
LEVEL 4
2
29%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
4
67%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
White
PROFICIENT
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 143
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
4
3%
LEVEL 3
59
41%
LEVEL 4
69
48%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
1
20%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
2
40%
LEVEL 4
2
40%
Female
PROFICIENT
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 86
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
1%
LEVEL 3
43
50%
LEVEL 4
36
42%
Male
PROFICIENT
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 75
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
3
4%
LEVEL 3
27
36%
LEVEL 4
37
49%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 160
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 55
LEVEL 1
1
2%
LEVEL 2
3
5%
LEVEL 3
31
56%
LEVEL 4
12
22%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 106
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
1%
LEVEL 3
39
37%
LEVEL 4
61
58%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 161
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
4
2%
LEVEL 3
70
43%
LEVEL 4
73
45%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
161
135
26
4
7
6
143
1
5
86
75
160
1
55
106
161
PROFICIENT
89%
93%
69%
_%
100%
67%
90%
_%
80%
92%
85%
_%
_%
78%
94%
89%
LEVEL 1
1
1%
1
1%
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
1
20%
0
0%
1
1%
_
_
_
_
1
2%
0
0%
1
1%
LEVEL 2
4
2%
3
2%
1
4%
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
4
3%
_
_
0
0%
1
1%
3
4%
_
_
_
_
3
5%
1
1%
4
2%
LEVEL 3
70
43%
54
40%
16
62%
_
_
5
71%
4
67%
59
41%
_
_
2
40%
43
50%
27
36%
_
_
_
_
31
56%
39
37%
70
43%
LEVEL 4
73
45%
71
53%
2
8%
_
_
2
29%
0
0%
69
48%
_
_
2
40%
36
42%
37
49%
_
_
_
_
12
22%
61
58%
73
45%
Regents Examination Results (2014 - 15)
Comprehensive English
Regents Comprehensive English
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
121
114
7
2
7
1
108
3
6
57
64
120
1
48
73
121
55
114
94%
108
95%
6
86%
_
_
7
100%
_
_
102
94%
_
_
5
83%
55
96%
59
92%
_
_
_
_
44
92%
70
96%
114
94%
65
107
88%
104
91%
3
43%
_
_
7
100%
_
_
96
89%
_
_
4
67%
51
89%
56
88%
_
_
_
_
39
81%
68
93%
107
88%
85
58
48%
58
51%
0
0%
_
_
2
29%
_
_
55
51%
_
_
1
17%
31
54%
27
42%
_
_
_
_
13
27%
45
62%
58
48%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 121
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
114
94%
65
107
88%
85
58
48%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 114
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
108
95%
65
104
91%
85
58
51%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 7
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
6
86%
65
3
43%
85
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 7
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
7
100%
65
7
100%
85
2
29%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 108
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
102
94%
65
96
89%
85
55
51%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 6
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
5
83%
65
4
67%
85
1
17%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 57
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
55
96%
65
51
89%
85
31
54%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 64
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
59
92%
65
56
88%
85
27
42%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 120
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 48
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
44
92%
65
39
81%
85
13
27%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 73
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
70
96%
65
68
93%
85
45
62%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 121
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
114
94%
65
107
88%
85
58
48%
English Language Arts (Common Core)
English Language Arts (Common Core)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
119
112
7
2
8
1
106
2
5
56
63
118
1
48
71
119
LEVEL 1
3
3%
1
1%
2
29%
_
_
0
0%
_
_
2
2%
_
_
1
20%
2
4%
1
2%
_
_
_
_
1
2%
2
3%
3
3%
LEVEL 2
2
2%
2
2%
0
0%
_
_
1
13%
_
_
1
1%
_
_
0
0%
1
2%
1
2%
_
_
_
_
2
4%
0
0%
2
2%
LEVEL 3
15
13%
12
11%
3
43%
_
_
1
13%
_
_
13
12%
_
_
1
20%
7
13%
8
13%
_
_
_
_
10
21%
5
7%
15
13%
LEVEL 4
14
12%
13
12%
1
14%
_
_
1
13%
_
_
12
11%
_
_
1
20%
4
7%
10
16%
_
_
_
_
10
21%
4
6%
14
12%
LEVEL 5
85
71%
84
75%
1
14%
_
_
5
63%
_
_
78
74%
_
_
2
40%
42
75%
43
68%
_
_
_
_
25
52%
60
85%
85
71%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 119
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
3
3%
LEVEL 2
2
2%
LEVEL 3
15
13%
LEVEL 4
14
12%
LEVEL 5
85
71%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 112
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
2
2%
LEVEL 3
12
11%
LEVEL 4
13
12%
LEVEL 5
84
75%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 7
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
2
29%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
3
43%
LEVEL 4
1
14%
LEVEL 5
1
14%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 8
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
13%
LEVEL 3
1
13%
LEVEL 4
1
13%
LEVEL 5
5
63%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 106
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
2
2%
LEVEL 2
1
1%
LEVEL 3
13
12%
LEVEL 4
12
11%
LEVEL 5
78
74%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
1
20%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
1
20%
LEVEL 4
1
20%
LEVEL 5
2
40%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 56
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
2
4%
LEVEL 2
1
2%
LEVEL 3
7
13%
LEVEL 4
4
7%
LEVEL 5
42
75%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 63
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
1
2%
LEVEL 2
1
2%
LEVEL 3
8
13%
LEVEL 4
10
16%
LEVEL 5
43
68%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 118
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 48
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
1
2%
LEVEL 2
2
4%
LEVEL 3
10
21%
LEVEL 4
10
21%
LEVEL 5
25
52%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 71
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
2
3%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
5
7%
LEVEL 4
4
6%
LEVEL 5
60
85%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 119
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
3
3%
LEVEL 2
2
2%
LEVEL 3
15
13%
LEVEL 4
14
12%
LEVEL 5
85
71%
Integrated Algebra
Regents Integrated Algebra
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
65
42
23
5
4
54
2
6
29
36
65
41
24
65
55
58
89%
40
95%
18
78%
5
100%
_
_
48
89%
_
_
5
83%
24
83%
34
94%
58
89%
35
85%
23
96%
58
89%
65
46
71%
35
83%
11
48%
4
80%
_
_
40
74%
_
_
2
33%
20
69%
26
72%
46
71%
25
61%
21
88%
46
71%
85
2
3%
2
5%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
2
4%
_
_
0
0%
1
3%
1
3%
2
3%
0
0%
2
8%
2
3%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 65
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
58
89%
65
46
71%
85
2
3%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 42
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
40
95%
65
35
83%
85
2
5%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 23
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
18
78%
65
11
48%
85
0
0%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
5
100%
65
4
80%
85
0
0%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 4
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 54
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
48
89%
65
40
74%
85
2
4%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 6
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
5
83%
65
2
33%
85
0
0%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 29
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
24
83%
65
20
69%
85
1
3%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 36
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
34
94%
65
26
72%
85
1
3%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 65
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
58
89%
65
46
71%
85
2
3%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 41
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
35
85%
65
25
61%
85
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 24
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
23
96%
65
21
88%
85
2
8%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 65
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
58
89%
65
46
71%
85
2
3%
Geometry
Regents Geometry
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
105
103
2
3
1
3
97
1
8
55
50
105
30
75
105
55
97
92%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
92
95%
_
_
5
63%
51
93%
46
92%
97
92%
25
83%
72
96%
97
92%
65
87
83%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
82
85%
_
_
5
63%
46
84%
41
82%
87
83%
20
67%
67
89%
87
83%
85
30
29%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
26
27%
_
_
4
50%
13
24%
17
34%
30
29%
7
23%
23
31%
30
29%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 105
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
97
92%
65
87
83%
85
30
29%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 103
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 97
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
92
95%
65
82
85%
85
26
27%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 8
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
5
63%
65
5
63%
85
4
50%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 55
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
51
93%
65
46
84%
85
13
24%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 50
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
46
92%
65
41
82%
85
17
34%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 105
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
97
92%
65
87
83%
85
30
29%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 30
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
25
83%
65
20
67%
85
7
23%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 75
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
72
96%
65
67
89%
85
23
31%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 105
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
97
92%
65
87
83%
85
30
29%
Algebra 2/Trigonometry
Regents Algebra 2/Trigonometry
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
84
82
2
2
4
2
76
8
46
38
84
23
61
84
55
74
88%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
67
88%
7
88%
39
85%
35
92%
74
88%
20
87%
54
89%
74
88%
65
56
67%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
51
67%
5
63%
30
65%
26
68%
56
67%
14
61%
42
69%
56
67%
85
20
24%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
17
22%
3
38%
11
24%
9
24%
20
24%
3
13%
17
28%
20
24%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 84
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
74
88%
65
56
67%
85
20
24%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 82
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 4
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 76
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
67
88%
65
51
67%
85
17
22%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 8
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
7
88%
65
5
63%
85
3
38%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 46
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
39
85%
65
30
65%
85
11
24%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 38
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
35
92%
65
26
68%
85
9
24%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 84
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
74
88%
65
56
67%
85
20
24%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 23
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
20
87%
65
14
61%
85
3
13%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 61
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
54
89%
65
42
69%
85
17
28%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 84
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
74
88%
65
56
67%
85
20
24%
Algebra I (Common Core)
Algebra I (Common Core)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
142
114
28
1
6
6
124
5
6
76
66
142
70
72
142
LEVEL 1
24
17%
10
9%
14
50%
_
_
2
33%
2
33%
20
16%
_
_
0
0%
11
14%
13
20%
24
17%
15
21%
9
13%
24
17%
LEVEL 2
23
16%
19
17%
4
14%
_
_
1
17%
1
17%
19
15%
_
_
2
33%
11
14%
12
18%
23
16%
16
23%
7
10%
23
16%
LEVEL 3
66
46%
56
49%
10
36%
_
_
3
50%
3
50%
57
46%
_
_
3
50%
35
46%
31
47%
66
46%
33
47%
33
46%
66
46%
LEVEL 4
28
20%
28
25%
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
27
22%
_
_
1
17%
18
24%
10
15%
28
20%
6
9%
22
31%
28
20%
LEVEL 5
1
1%
1
1%
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
1
1%
_
_
0
0%
1
1%
0
0%
1
1%
0
0%
1
1%
1
1%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 142
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
24
17%
LEVEL 2
23
16%
LEVEL 3
66
46%
LEVEL 4
28
20%
LEVEL 5
1
1%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 114
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
10
9%
LEVEL 2
19
17%
LEVEL 3
56
49%
LEVEL 4
28
25%
LEVEL 5
1
1%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 28
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
14
50%
LEVEL 2
4
14%
LEVEL 3
10
36%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 6
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
2
33%
LEVEL 2
1
17%
LEVEL 3
3
50%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 6
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
2
33%
LEVEL 2
1
17%
LEVEL 3
3
50%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 124
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
20
16%
LEVEL 2
19
15%
LEVEL 3
57
46%
LEVEL 4
27
22%
LEVEL 5
1
1%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 6
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
33%
LEVEL 3
3
50%
LEVEL 4
1
17%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 76
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
11
14%
LEVEL 2
11
14%
LEVEL 3
35
46%
LEVEL 4
18
24%
LEVEL 5
1
1%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 66
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
13
20%
LEVEL 2
12
18%
LEVEL 3
31
47%
LEVEL 4
10
15%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 142
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
24
17%
LEVEL 2
23
16%
LEVEL 3
66
46%
LEVEL 4
28
20%
LEVEL 5
1
1%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 70
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
15
21%
LEVEL 2
16
23%
LEVEL 3
33
47%
LEVEL 4
6
9%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 72
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
9
13%
LEVEL 2
7
10%
LEVEL 3
33
46%
LEVEL 4
22
31%
LEVEL 5
1
1%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 142
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
24
17%
LEVEL 2
23
16%
LEVEL 3
66
46%
LEVEL 4
28
20%
LEVEL 5
1
1%
Geometry (Common Core)
Geometry (Common Core)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
92
90
2
3
3
85
1
7
47
45
92
26
66
92
LEVEL 1
8
9%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
6
7%
_
_
2
29%
4
9%
4
9%
8
9%
5
19%
3
5%
8
9%
LEVEL 2
16
17%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
15
18%
_
_
1
14%
8
17%
8
18%
16
17%
6
23%
10
15%
16
17%
LEVEL 3
40
43%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
37
44%
_
_
3
43%
24
51%
16
36%
40
43%
8
31%
32
48%
40
43%
LEVEL 4
21
23%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
20
24%
_
_
1
14%
9
19%
12
27%
21
23%
6
23%
15
23%
21
23%
LEVEL 5
7
8%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
7
8%
_
_
0
0%
2
4%
5
11%
7
8%
1
4%
6
9%
7
8%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 92
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
8
9%
LEVEL 2
16
17%
LEVEL 3
40
43%
LEVEL 4
21
23%
LEVEL 5
7
8%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 90
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 85
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
6
7%
LEVEL 2
15
18%
LEVEL 3
37
44%
LEVEL 4
20
24%
LEVEL 5
7
8%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 7
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
2
29%
LEVEL 2
1
14%
LEVEL 3
3
43%
LEVEL 4
1
14%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 47
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
4
9%
LEVEL 2
8
17%
LEVEL 3
24
51%
LEVEL 4
9
19%
LEVEL 5
2
4%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 45
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
4
9%
LEVEL 2
8
18%
LEVEL 3
16
36%
LEVEL 4
12
27%
LEVEL 5
5
11%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 92
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
8
9%
LEVEL 2
16
17%
LEVEL 3
40
43%
LEVEL 4
21
23%
LEVEL 5
7
8%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 26
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
5
19%
LEVEL 2
6
23%
LEVEL 3
8
31%
LEVEL 4
6
23%
LEVEL 5
1
4%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 66
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
3
5%
LEVEL 2
10
15%
LEVEL 3
32
48%
LEVEL 4
15
23%
LEVEL 5
6
9%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 92
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
8
9%
LEVEL 2
16
17%
LEVEL 3
40
43%
LEVEL 4
21
23%
LEVEL 5
7
8%
Global History and Geography
Regents Global History and Geography
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
164
139
25
5
5
5
145
4
9
89
75
164
71
93
164
55
153
93%
134
96%
19
76%
_
_
5
100%
5
100%
136
94%
_
_
7
78%
79
89%
74
99%
153
93%
64
90%
89
96%
153
93%
65
138
84%
125
90%
13
52%
_
_
5
100%
3
60%
124
86%
_
_
6
67%
67
75%
71
95%
138
84%
51
72%
87
94%
138
84%
85
76
46%
74
53%
2
8%
_
_
1
20%
2
40%
68
47%
_
_
5
56%
35
39%
41
55%
76
46%
14
20%
62
67%
76
46%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 164
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
153
93%
65
138
84%
85
76
46%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 139
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
134
96%
65
125
90%
85
74
53%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 25
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
19
76%
65
13
52%
85
2
8%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
5
100%
65
5
100%
85
1
20%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
5
100%
65
3
60%
85
2
40%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 145
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
136
94%
65
124
86%
85
68
47%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 4
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 9
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
7
78%
65
6
67%
85
5
56%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 89
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
79
89%
65
67
75%
85
35
39%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 75
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
74
99%
65
71
95%
85
41
55%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 164
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
153
93%
65
138
84%
85
76
46%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 71
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
64
90%
65
51
72%
85
14
20%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 93
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
89
96%
65
87
94%
85
62
67%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 164
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
153
93%
65
138
84%
85
76
46%
U.S. History & Government
Regents U.S. History & Government
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
130
118
12
2
9
1
114
4
7
61
69
129
1
58
72
130
55
124
95%
116
98%
8
67%
_
_
8
89%
_
_
111
97%
_
_
5
71%
58
95%
66
96%
_
_
_
_
54
93%
70
97%
124
95%
65
111
85%
105
89%
6
50%
_
_
6
67%
_
_
100
88%
_
_
5
71%
52
85%
59
86%
_
_
_
_
47
81%
64
89%
111
85%
85
65
50%
64
54%
1
8%
_
_
2
22%
_
_
59
52%
_
_
4
57%
29
48%
36
52%
_
_
_
_
18
31%
47
65%
65
50%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 130
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
124
95%
65
111
85%
85
65
50%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 118
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
116
98%
65
105
89%
85
64
54%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 12
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
8
67%
65
6
50%
85
1
8%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 9
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
8
89%
65
6
67%
85
2
22%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 114
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
111
97%
65
100
88%
85
59
52%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 4
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 7
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
5
71%
65
5
71%
85
4
57%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 61
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
58
95%
65
52
85%
85
29
48%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 69
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
66
96%
65
59
86%
85
36
52%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 129
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 58
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
54
93%
65
47
81%
85
18
31%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 72
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
70
97%
65
64
89%
85
47
65%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 130
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
124
95%
65
111
85%
85
65
50%
Living Environment
Regents Living Environment
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
153
115
38
3
7
10
128
5
8
79
74
152
1
73
80
153
55
132
86%
113
98%
19
50%
_
_
6
86%
7
70%
114
89%
_
_
5
63%
71
90%
61
82%
_
_
_
_
55
75%
77
96%
132
86%
65
124
81%
108
94%
16
42%
_
_
5
71%
5
50%
109
85%
_
_
5
63%
68
86%
56
76%
_
_
_
_
51
70%
73
91%
124
81%
85
41
27%
40
35%
1
3%
_
_
0
0%
1
10%
38
30%
_
_
2
25%
24
30%
17
23%
_
_
_
_
7
10%
34
43%
41
27%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 153
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
132
86%
65
124
81%
85
41
27%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 115
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
113
98%
65
108
94%
85
40
35%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 38
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
19
50%
65
16
42%
85
1
3%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 7
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
6
86%
65
5
71%
85
0
0%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 10
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
7
70%
65
5
50%
85
1
10%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 128
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
114
89%
65
109
85%
85
38
30%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 8
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
5
63%
65
5
63%
85
2
25%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 79
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
71
90%
65
68
86%
85
24
30%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 74
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
61
82%
65
56
76%
85
17
23%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 152
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 73
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
55
75%
65
51
70%
85
7
10%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 80
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
77
96%
65
73
91%
85
34
43%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 153
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
132
86%
65
124
81%
85
41
27%
Physical Setting/Earth Science
Regents Physical Setting/Earth Science
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
121
110
11
1
6
3
110
1
5
62
59
121
52
69
121
55
115
95%
106
96%
9
82%
_
_
6
100%
_
_
105
95%
_
_
4
80%
57
92%
58
98%
115
95%
46
88%
69
100%
115
95%
65
106
88%
98
89%
8
73%
_
_
5
83%
_
_
97
88%
_
_
4
80%
55
89%
51
86%
106
88%
39
75%
67
97%
106
88%
85
37
31%
36
33%
1
9%
_
_
0
0%
_
_
36
33%
_
_
1
20%
20
32%
17
29%
37
31%
9
17%
28
41%
37
31%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 121
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
115
95%
65
106
88%
85
37
31%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 110
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
106
96%
65
98
89%
85
36
33%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 11
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
9
82%
65
8
73%
85
1
9%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 6
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
6
100%
65
5
83%
85
0
0%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 110
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
105
95%
65
97
88%
85
36
33%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
4
80%
65
4
80%
85
1
20%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 62
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
57
92%
65
55
89%
85
20
32%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 59
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
58
98%
65
51
86%
85
17
29%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 121
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
115
95%
65
106
88%
85
37
31%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 52
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
46
88%
65
39
75%
85
9
17%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 69
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
69
100%
65
67
97%
85
28
41%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 121
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
115
95%
65
106
88%
85
37
31%
Physical Setting/Chemistry
Regents Physical Setting/Chemistry
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
66
66
2
3
1
59
1
7
34
32
66
18
48
66
55
64
97%
64
97%
_
_
_
_
_
_
57
97%
_
_
7
100%
33
97%
31
97%
64
97%
17
94%
47
98%
64
97%
65
58
88%
58
88%
_
_
_
_
_
_
52
88%
_
_
6
86%
29
85%
29
91%
58
88%
15
83%
43
90%
58
88%
85
13
20%
13
20%
_
_
_
_
_
_
11
19%
_
_
2
29%
7
21%
6
19%
13
20%
1
6%
12
25%
13
20%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 66
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
64
97%
65
58
88%
85
13
20%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 66
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
64
97%
65
58
88%
85
13
20%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 59
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
57
97%
65
52
88%
85
11
19%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 7
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
7
100%
65
6
86%
85
2
29%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 34
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
33
97%
65
29
85%
85
7
21%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 32
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
31
97%
65
29
91%
85
6
19%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 66
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
64
97%
65
58
88%
85
13
20%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 18
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
17
94%
65
15
83%
85
1
6%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 48
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
47
98%
65
43
90%
85
12
25%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 66
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
64
97%
65
58
88%
85
13
20%
Physical Setting/Physics
Regents Physical Setting/Physics
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
24
24
1
22
1
24
8
16
24
4
20
24
55
22
92%
22
92%
_
_
_
_
_
_
22
92%
6
75%
16
100%
22
92%
_
_
_
_
22
92%
65
20
83%
20
83%
_
_
_
_
_
_
20
83%
5
63%
15
94%
20
83%
_
_
_
_
20
83%
85
4
17%
4
17%
_
_
_
_
_
_
4
17%
1
13%
3
19%
4
17%
_
_
_
_
4
17%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 24
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
22
92%
65
20
83%
85
4
17%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 24
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
22
92%
65
20
83%
85
4
17%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 22
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 24
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
22
92%
65
20
83%
85
4
17%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 8
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
6
75%
65
5
63%
85
1
13%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 16
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
16
100%
65
15
94%
85
3
19%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 24
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
22
92%
65
20
83%
85
4
17%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 4
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 20
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 24
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
22
92%
65
20
83%
85
4
17%
New York State Alternate Assessment (NYSAA) Results (2014 - 15)
GROUP
Grade 3 ELA
Grade 3 Math
Grade 5 ELA
Grade 5 Math
Grade 6 ELA
Grade 6 Math
Grade 7 ELA
Grade 7 Math
Grade 8 ELA
Grade 8 Math
Grade 8 Science
Secondary-Level ELA
Secondary-Level Math
Secondary-Level Science
Secondary-Level Social Studies
TOTAL TESTED
1
1
2
2
2
2
4
4
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
PROFICIENT
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
LEVEL 1
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
Grade 3 ELA
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 3 Math
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 5 ELA
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 5 Math
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 6 ELA
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 6 Math
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 7 ELA
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 7 Math
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 8 ELA
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 8 Math
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 8 Science
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Secondary-Level ELA
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Secondary-Level Math
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Secondary-Level Science
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Secondary-Level Social Studies
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
New York State English as a Second Language Achievement Test (NYSESLAT) Results (2014 - 15)
Grade 2
GROUP
All Students
General Education
TOTAL TESTED
1
1
ENTERING
_
_
EMERGING
_
_
TRANSITIONING
_
_
EXPANDING
_
_
COMMANDING
_
_
Grade 4
GROUP
All Students
General Education
TOTAL TESTED
1
1
ENTERING
_
_
EMERGING
_
_
TRANSITIONING
_
_
EXPANDING
_
_
COMMANDING
_
_
Grade 8
GROUP
All Students
General Education
TOTAL TESTED
1
1
ENTERING
_
_
EMERGING
_
_
TRANSITIONING
_
_
EXPANDING
_
_
COMMANDING
_
_
Grade 11
GROUP
All Students
General Education
TOTAL TESTED
1
1
ENTERING
_
_
EMERGING
_
_
TRANSITIONING
_
_
EXPANDING
_
_
COMMANDING
_
_
Grade 2
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 1
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 1
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
Grade 4
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 1
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 1
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
Grade 8
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 1
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 1
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
Grade 11
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 1
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 1
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
Elementary/Middle-Level English Language Arts Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: NO
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
NO
―
―
―
―
NO
―
NO
―
NO
Tested 95%
NO
―
―
―
―
NO
―
NO
―
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,803*
1
24
27
15
1,605*
29
342*
2
822*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
93%*
―
―
―
―
93%*
―
91%*
―
91%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
―
―
―
―
NO
―
NO
―
NO
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
775
1
20
20
15
695
24
145✝
2
345
PI
99
―
―
―
―
100
―
36✝
―
70
EAMO
93
―
―
―
―
110
―
51
―
78
Safe Harbor Target
93
―
―
―
―
109
―
51
―
78
All Students
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,803*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
93%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
775
PI
99
EAMO
93
Safe Harbor Target
93
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
24
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
20
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
27
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
20
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
15
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
15
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
White
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,605*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
93%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
695
PI
100
EAMO
110
Safe Harbor Target
109
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
29
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
24
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
342*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
91%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
145✝
PI
36✝
EAMO
51
Safe Harbor Target
51
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
2
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
2
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
822*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
91%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
345
PI
70
EAMO
78
Safe Harbor Target
78
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,801*
1,750*
1,744*
1,771*
198*
1,751*
1,461*
1,799*
981*
946*
857*
2
1,801*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
93%*
93%*
93%*
93%*
94%*
93%*
93%*
93%*
94%*
93%*
92%*
―
93%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
774
755
755
760
80
751
641
773
430
412
363
2
773
PI
99
100
100
99
91
100
113
99
123
92
108
―
100
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,801*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
93%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
774
PI
99
Not Black or African American
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,750*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
93%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
755
PI
100
Not Hispanic or Latino
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,744*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
93%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
755
PI
100
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,771*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
93%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
760
PI
99
Not White
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
198*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
94%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
80
PI
91
Not Multiracial
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,751*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
93%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
751
PI
100
General Education
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,461*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
93%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
641
PI
113
English Proficient
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,799*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
93%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
773
PI
99
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
981*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
94%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
430
PI
123
Male
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
946*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
93%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
412
PI
92
Female
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
857*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
92%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
363
PI
108
Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
2
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
2
PI
―
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,801*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
93%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
773
PI
100
― There were fewer than 40 students enrolled during the test administration period, so the Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 tested students enrolled on BEDS day and during the test administration period, so the PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed. *The percentage of students tested in the current year fell below 95 percent, so the numbers of enrolled and tested students in the current year and previous year were combined to provide the school/district with another opportunity to meet the participation rate criterion. ✝ Includes former students with disabilities because the number of students with disabilities in the current year is equal to or greater than 30.
Elementary/Middle-Level Mathematics Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: NO
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
NO
―
―
―
―
NO
―
NO
―
NO
Tested 95%
NO
―
―
―
―
NO
―
NO
―
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,804*
1
24
26
15
1,606*
29
340*
2
820*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
90%*
―
―
―
―
90%*
―
87%*
―
87%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
NO
―
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
737
1
16
20
15
662
23
130✝
2
315
PI
118
―
―
―
―
121
―
44✝
―
89
EAMO
90
―
―
―
―
106
―
53
―
75
Safe Harbor Target
90
―
―
―
―
106
―
53
―
75
All Students
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,804*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
90%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
737
PI
118
EAMO
90
Safe Harbor Target
90
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
24
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
16
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
26
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
20
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
15
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
15
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
White
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,606*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
90%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
662
PI
121
EAMO
106
Safe Harbor Target
106
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
29
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
23
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
340*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
87%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
130✝
PI
44✝
EAMO
53
Safe Harbor Target
53
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
2
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
2
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
820*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
87%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
315
PI
89
EAMO
75
Safe Harbor Target
75
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,802*
1,750*
1,746*
1,772*
198*
1,752*
1,464*
1,800*
984*
943*
861*
2
1,802*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
90%*
90%*
90%*
90%*
91%*
90%*
91%*
90%*
93%*
91%*
89%*
―
90%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
736
721
717
722
75
714
617
735
422
396
341
2
735
PI
119
119
119
118
97
120
133
118
141
116
121
―
119
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,802*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
90%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
736
PI
119
Not Black or African American
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,750*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
90%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
721
PI
119
Not Hispanic or Latino
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,746*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
90%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
717
PI
119
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,772*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
90%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
722
PI
118
Not White
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
198*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
91%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
75
PI
97
Not Multiracial
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,752*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
90%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
714
PI
120
General Education
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,464*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
91%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
617
PI
133
English Proficient
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,800*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
90%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
735
PI
118
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
984*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
93%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
422
PI
141
Male
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
943*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
91%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
396
PI
116
Female
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
861*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
89%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
341
PI
121
Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
2
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
2
PI
―
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,802*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
90%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
735
PI
119
― There were fewer than 40 students enrolled during the test administration period, so the Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 tested students enrolled on BEDS day and during the test administration period, so the PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed. *The percentage of students tested in the current year fell below 95 percent, so the numbers of enrolled and tested students in the current year and previous year were combined to provide the school/district with another opportunity to meet the participation rate criterion. ✝ Includes former students with disabilities because the number of students with disabilities in the current year is equal to or greater than 30.
Elementary/Middle-Level Science Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: NO
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
NO
―
YES
Tested 80%
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
YES
―
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
309
0
5
7
6
283
8
133*
2
276*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
85%
―
―
―
―
86%
―
87%*
―
86%*
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
NO
―
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
253
0
4
5
6
232
6
52✝
2
103
PI
182
―
―
―
―
184
―
138✝
―
171
EAMO
178
―
―
―
―
186
―
153
―
167
Progress Target
178
―
―
―
―
178
―
144
―
167
All Students
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 80%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
309
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
85%
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
253
PI
182
EAMO
178
Progress Target
178
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
5
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
4
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
7
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
5
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
6
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
6
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
White
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 80%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
283
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
86%
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
232
PI
184
EAMO
186
Progress Target
178
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
8
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
6
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 80%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
133*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
87%*
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
NO
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
52✝
PI
138✝
EAMO
153
Progress Target
144
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
2
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
2
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 80%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
276*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
86%*
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
103
PI
171
EAMO
167
Progress Target
167
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
309
304
302
303
26
301
245
307
168
160
149
2
307
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
85%
85%
85%
85%
―
85%
87%
85%
92%
88%
82%
―
85%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
253
249
248
247
21
247
205
251
150
136
117
2
251
PI
182
183
182
182
―
183
193
182
189
178
186
―
182
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
309
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
85%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
253
PI
182
Not Black or African American
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
304
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
85%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
249
PI
183
Not Hispanic or Latino
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
302
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
85%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
248
PI
182
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
303
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
85%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
247
PI
182
Not White
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
26
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
21
PI
―
Not Multiracial
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
301
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
85%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
247
PI
183
General Education
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
245
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
87%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
205
PI
193
English Proficient
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
307
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
85%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
251
PI
182
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
168
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
92%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
150
PI
189
Male
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
160
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
88%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
136
PI
178
Female
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
149
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
82%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
117
PI
186
Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
2
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
2
PI
―
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
307
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
85%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
251
PI
182
― There were fewer than 40 students enrolled during the test administration period, so the Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 tested students enrolled on BEDS day and during the test administration period, so the PI, EAMO, and Progress Target data are suppressed. *The percentage of students tested in the current year fell below 80 percent, so the numbers of enrolled and tested students in the current year and previous year were combined to provide the school/district with another opportunity to meet the participation rate criterion. ✝ Includes former students with disabilities because the number of students with disabilities in the current year is equal to or greater than 30.
Secondary-Level English Language Arts Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: NO
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
NO
Tested 95%
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
YES
12th graders
145
0
8
4
3
129
1
18
0
44
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
―
―
―
―
100%
―
―
―
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
NO
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
145
0
7
3
4
130
1
21
1
45
PI
170
―
―
―
―
170
―
―
―
138
EAMO
161
―
―
―
―
172
―
―
―
143
Safe Harbor Target
161
―
―
―
―
164
―
―
―
143
All Students
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
YES
12th Graders
145
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
145
PI
170
EAMO
161
Safe Harbor Target
161
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
8
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
7
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
4
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
3
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
3
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
4
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
White
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
YES
12th Graders
129
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
130
PI
170
EAMO
172
Safe Harbor Target
164
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
1
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
1
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
18
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
21
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
1
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
YES
12th Graders
44
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
45
PI
138
EAMO
143
Safe Harbor Target
143
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
12th Graders
145
137
141
142
16
144
127
145
101
67
78
0
145
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
100%
100%
100%
―
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
―
100%
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
145
138
142
141
15
144
124
144
100
69
76
0
145
PI
170
170
170
171
―
170
184
171
185
159
180
―
170
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
12th Graders
145
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
145
PI
170
Not Black or African American
12th Graders
137
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
138
PI
170
Not Hispanic or Latino
12th Graders
141
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
142
PI
170
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
12th Graders
142
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
141
PI
171
Not White
12th Graders
16
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
15
PI
―
Not Multiracial
12th Graders
144
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
144
PI
170
General Education
12th Graders
127
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
124
PI
184
English Proficient
12th Graders
145
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
144
PI
171
Not Economically Disadvantaged
12th Graders
101
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
100
PI
185
Male
12th Graders
67
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
69
PI
159
Female
12th Graders
78
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
76
PI
180
Migrant
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
Not Migrant
12th Graders
145
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
145
PI
170
― There were fewer than 40 12th graders, so the Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 students in the 2011 accountability cohort, so PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed.
Secondary-Level Mathematics Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: NO
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
YES
―
―
―
―
NO
―
―
―
NO
Tested 95%
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
YES
12th graders
145
0
8
4
3
129
1
18
0
44
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
99%
―
―
―
―
99%
―
―
―
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
―
―
―
―
NO
―
―
―
NO
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
145
0
7
3
4
130
1
21
1
45
PI
146
―
―
―
―
148
―
―
―
116
EAMO
145
―
―
―
―
157
―
―
―
124
Safe Harbor Target
145
―
―
―
―
152
―
―
―
124
All Students
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
YES
12th Graders
145
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
99%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
145
PI
146
EAMO
145
Safe Harbor Target
145
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
8
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
7
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
4
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
3
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
3
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
4
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
White
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
YES
12th Graders
129
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
99%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
130
PI
148
EAMO
157
Safe Harbor Target
152
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
1
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
1
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
18
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
21
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
1
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
YES
12th Graders
44
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
45
PI
116
EAMO
124
Safe Harbor Target
124
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
12th Graders
145
137
141
142
16
144
127
145
101
67
78
0
145
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
99%
99%
99%
99%
―
99%
100%
99%
99%
99%
100%
―
99%
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
145
138
142
141
15
144
124
144
100
69
76
0
145
PI
146
149
146
146
―
146
156
147
160
143
149
―
146
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
12th Graders
145
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
99%
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
145
PI
146
Not Black or African American
12th Graders
137
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
99%
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
138
PI
149
Not Hispanic or Latino
12th Graders
141
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
99%
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
142
PI
146
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
12th Graders
142
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
99%
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
141
PI
146
Not White
12th Graders
16
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
15
PI
―
Not Multiracial
12th Graders
144
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
99%
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
144
PI
146
General Education
12th Graders
127
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
124
PI
156
English Proficient
12th Graders
145
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
99%
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
144
PI
147
Not Economically Disadvantaged
12th Graders
101
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
99%
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
100
PI
160
Male
12th Graders
67
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
99%
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
69
PI
143
Female
12th Graders
78
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
76
PI
149
Migrant
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
Not Migrant
12th Graders
145
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
99%
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
145
PI
146
― There were fewer than 40 12th graders, so the Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 students in the 2011 accountability cohort, so PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed.
Unweighted Combined ELA and Math PIs
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
99
―
―
―
―
100
―
36
―
70
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
118
―
―
―
―
121
―
44
―
89
Secondary-Level ELA PI
170
―
―
―
―
170
―
―
―
138
Secondary-Level MATH PI
146
―
―
―
―
148
―
―
―
116
UNWEIGHTED COMBINED PI
133
0
0
0
0
135
0
40
0
103
All Students
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
99
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
118
Secondary-Level ELA PI
170
Secondary-Level MATH PI
146
Unweighted Combined PI
133
American Indian or Alaska Native
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Black or African American
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Hispanic or Latino
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
White
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
100
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
121
Secondary-Level ELA PI
170
Secondary-Level MATH PI
148
Unweighted Combined PI
135
Multiracial
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Students With Disabilities
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
36
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
44
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
40
Limited English Proficient
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Economically Disadvantaged
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
70
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
89
Secondary-Level ELA PI
138
Secondary-Level MATH PI
116
Unweighted Combined PI
103
― There were not enough students to determine a Performance Index.
Overall Graduation Rate for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: NO
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
NO
―
―
―
―
NO
―
YES
―
NO
All Students
MADE AYP
NO
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP
―
White
MADE AYP
NO
Multiracial
MADE AYP
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP
YES
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
NO
― There were not enough students to make an AYP determination.
Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort for Accountability
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion:
NO
―
―
―
―
NO
―
YES
―
NO
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
214
1
16
4
2
188
3
35✝
1
75
Graduation Rate
72%
―
―
―
―
74%
―
37%✝
―
60%
State Standard
80%
―
―
―
―
80%
―
80%
―
80%
Progress Target
75%
―
―
―
―
76%
―
36%
―
61%
All Students
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: NO
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
214
Graduation Rate
72%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
75%
American Indian or Alaska Native
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
1
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Black or African American
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
16
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
4
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
2
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
White
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: NO
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
188
Graduation Rate
74%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
76%
Multiracial
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
3
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Students With Disabilities
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
35✝
Graduation Rate
37%✝
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
36%
Limited English Proficient
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
1
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: NO
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
75
Graduation Rate
60%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
61%
YES Graduation rate is equal to or greater than the State Standard or the group's Progress Target. NO Graduation rate is less than the State Standard and the group's Progress Target.
― There were fewer than 30 students in the cohort. ✝ Includes former students with disabilities because the number of students with disabilities in the current year is equal to or greater than 30.
Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort for Accountability
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion:
NO
―
―
―
―
NO
―
―
―
NO
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
198
1
10
6
0
181
0
29
0
66
Graduation Rate
75%
―
―
―
―
76%
―
―
―
62%
State Standard
80%
―
―
―
―
80%
―
―
―
80%
Progress Target
80%
―
―
―
―
80%
―
―
―
80%
All Students
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: NO
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
198
Graduation Rate
75%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%
American Indian or Alaska Native
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
1
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Black or African American
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
10
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
6
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
White
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: NO
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
181
Graduation Rate
76%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%
Multiracial
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Students With Disabilities
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
29
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Limited English Proficient
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: NO
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
66
Graduation Rate
62%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%
YES Graduation rate is equal to or greater than the State Standard or the group's Progress Target. NO Graduation rate is less than the State Standard and the group's Progress Target.
― There were fewer than 30 students in the cohort.
Graduation Rates for Non-AYP Groups for Accountability
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
213
198
210
212
26
211
183
213
139
116
98
0
214
Graduation Rate
72%
73%
73%
72%
―
72%
79%
72%
78%
69%
76%
―
72%
Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
2009 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
197
188
192
198
17
198
169
198
132
107
91
0
198
Graduation Rate
75%
76%
76%
75%
―
75%
82%
75%
82%
74%
77%
―
75%
Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
213
Graduation Rate
72%
Not Black or African American
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
198
Graduation Rate
73%
Not Hispanic or Latino
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
210
Graduation Rate
73%
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
212
Graduation Rate
72%
Not White
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
26
Graduation Rate
―
Not Multiracial
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
211
Graduation Rate
72%
General Education
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
183
Graduation Rate
79%
English Proficient
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
213
Graduation Rate
72%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
139
Graduation Rate
78%
Male
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
116
Graduation Rate
69%
Female
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
98
Graduation Rate
76%
Migrant
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
Not Migrant
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
214
Graduation Rate
72%
Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
197
Graduation Rate
75%
Not Black or African American
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
188
Graduation Rate
76%
Not Hispanic or Latino
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
192
Graduation Rate
76%
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
198
Graduation Rate
75%
Not White
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
17
Graduation Rate
―
Not Multiracial
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
198
Graduation Rate
75%
General Education
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
169
Graduation Rate
82%
English Proficient
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
198
Graduation Rate
75%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
132
Graduation Rate
82%
Male
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
107
Graduation Rate
74%
Female
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
91
Graduation Rate
77%
Migrant
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
Not Migrant
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
198
Graduation Rate
75%
― There were fewer than 30 students in the cohort.
Graduation Rates for Regents with Advanced Designation and CTE Endorsement for Accountability
Percentage of 2010 Graduation-Rate Total Cohort members who graduated as of August 31, 2014 with:
Regents Diploma with an Advanced Designation (This District)
36%
Regents Diploma with an Advanced Designation (Statewide)
31%
Percentage in This District Exceeded Statewide
YES
Regents Diploma with an Advanced Designation (This District)
36%
Regents Diploma with an Advanced Designation (Statewide)
31%
Percentage in This District Exceeded Statewide
YES
Regents Diploma with CTE Endorsement (This District)
4%
Regents Diploma with CTE Endorsement (Statewide)
4%
Percentage in This District Exceeded Statewide
NO
Regents Diploma with CTE Endorsement (This District)
You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.
Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.
If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.
