SCHUYLERVILLE CSD - School Report Card Data [2014 - 15]
The New York State Report Card is an important part of the Board of Regents' effort to raise learning standards for all students. It provides information to the public on school/district enrollment and staff, student performance, and other measures of school and district performance. Knowledge gained from the report card on a school's or district's strengths and weaknesses can be used to improve instruction and services to students. Report Card Data - Glossary of Terms | Accountability Data - Glossary of Terms | Business Rules
Turnover Rate of Teachers with Fewer Than Five Years of Experience
20%
TURNOVER RATE OF ALL TEACHERS
4%
Teacher Turnover Rate (2013-14 to 2014-15)
Turnover Rate of Teachers with Fewer Than Five Years of Experience
20%
Turnover Rate of All Teachers
4%
Staff Counts (2014 - 15)
GROUP
PRINCIPALS
ASSISTANT PRINCIPALS
OTHER PROFESSIONAL STAFF
PARAPROFESSIONALS
STAFF
3
1
16
38
Staff Counts (2014 - 15)
Principals
3
Assistant Principals
1
Other Professional Staff
16
Paraprofessionals
38
Teacher Qualifications (2014 - 15)
TOTAL TEACHERS
135
PERCENT WITH NO VALID TEACHING CERTIFICATE
0%
PERCENT TEACHING OUT OF CERTIFICATE
0%
PERCENT WITH FEWER THAN THREE YEARS OF EXPERIENCE
1%
PERCENTAGE WITH MASTER'S DEGREEPLUS 30 HOURS OR DOCTORATE
13%
TOTAL NUMBER OF CORE CLASSES
241
Percent Not Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers in This District
0%
Total Number of Classes
364
Percent Taught by Teachers Without Appropriate Certification
1%
Teacher Qualifications (2014 - 15)
TOTAL TEACHERS: 135
Percent with No Valid Teaching Certificate
0%
Percent Teaching Out of Certification
0%
Percent with Fewer Than Three Years of Experience
1%
Percentage with Master's Degree Plus 30 Hours or Doctorate
13%
Total Number of Core Classes
241
Percent Not Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers in This District
0%
Total Number of Classes
364
Percent Taught by Teachers Without Appropriate Certification
1%
High School Completers (2014 - 15)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
116
107
9
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
115
107
8
REGENTS DIPLOMA
113
98%
107
100%
6
75%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
REGENTS WITH ADVANCED DESIGNATION
36
31%
36
34%
0
0%
REGENTS WITH CTE ENDORSEMENT
13
11%
13
12%
0
0%
LOCAL DIPLOMAS
2
2%
0
0%
2
25%
COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS
1
1%
0
0%
1
11%
All Students
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
116
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
115
Regents Diploma
113
98%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
36
31%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
13
11%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
2
2%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
1
1%
of Completers
General Education
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
107
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
107
Regents Diploma
107
100%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
36
34%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
13
12%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
0
0%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
0
0%
of Completers
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
9
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
8
Regents Diploma
6
75%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
0
0%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
0
0%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
2
25%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
1
11%
of Completers
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
116
107
9
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
115
107
8
REGENTS DIPLOMA
113
98%
107
100%
6
75%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
REGENTS WITH ADVANCED DESIGNATION
36
31%
36
34%
0
0%
REGENTS WITH CTE ENDORSEMENT
13
11%
13
12%
0
0%
LOCAL DIPLOMAS
2
2%
0
0%
2
25%
COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS
1
1%
0
0%
1
11%
All Students
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
116
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
115
Regents Diploma
113
98%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
36
31%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
13
11%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
2
2%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
1
1%
of Completers
General Education
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
107
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
107
Regents Diploma
107
100%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
36
34%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
13
12%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
0
0%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
0
0%
of Completers
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
9
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
8
Regents Diploma
6
75%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
0
0%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
0
0%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
2
25%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
1
11%
of Completers
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
116
107
9
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
115
107
8
REGENTS DIPLOMA
113
98%
107
100%
6
75%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
REGENTS WITH ADVANCED DESIGNATION
36
31%
36
34%
0
0%
REGENTS WITH CTE ENDORSEMENT
13
11%
13
12%
0
0%
LOCAL DIPLOMAS
2
2%
0
0%
2
25%
COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS
1
1%
0
0%
1
11%
All Students
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
116
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
115
Regents Diploma
113
98%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
36
31%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
13
11%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
2
2%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
1
1%
of Completers
General Education
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
107
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
107
Regents Diploma
107
100%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
36
34%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
13
12%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
0
0%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
0
0%
of Completers
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
9
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
8
Regents Diploma
6
75%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
0
0%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
0
0%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
2
25%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
1
11%
of Completers
High School Non-completers (2014 - 15)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
8
1%
_
_
_
_
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
0
0%
_
_
_
_
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
8
1%
_
_
_
_
All Students
DROPPED OUT
8
1%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
0
0%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
8
1%
General Education
DROPPED OUT
_
_%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
_
_%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
_
_%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
_
_%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
_
_%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
8
1%
_
_
_
_
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
0
0%
_
_
_
_
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
8
1%
_
_
_
_
All Students
DROPPED OUT
8
1%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
0
0%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
8
1%
General Education
DROPPED OUT
_
_%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
_
_%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
_
_%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
_
_%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
_
_%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
8
1%
_
_
_
_
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
0
0%
_
_
_
_
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
8
1%
_
_
_
_
All Students
DROPPED OUT
8
1%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
0
0%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
8
1%
General Education
DROPPED OUT
_
_%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
_
_%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
_
_%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
_
_%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
_
_%
Post-graduation Plans of Completers (2014 - 15)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO FOUR-YEAR COLLEGE
53
46%
52
49%
1
11%
TO TWO-YEAR COLLEGE
39
34%
36
34%
3
33%
TO OTHER POST-SECONDARY
5
4%
5
5%
0
0%
TO THE MILITARY
2
2%
2
2%
0
0%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO EMPLOYMENT
7
6%
4
4%
3
33%
TO ADULT SERVICES
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
TO OTHER KNOWN PLANS
10
9%
8
7%
2
22%
PLANS UNKNOWN
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
All Students
To Four-Year College
53
46%
To Two-Year College
39
34%
To Other Post-Secondary
5
4%
To the Military
2
2%
To Employment
7
6%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
10
9%
Plan Unknown
0
0%
General Education
To Four-Year College
52
49%
To Two-Year College
36
34%
To Other Post-Secondary
5
5%
To the Military
2
2%
To Employment
4
4%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
8
7%
Plan Unknown
0
0%
Students with Disabilities
To Four-Year College
1
11%
To Two-Year College
3
33%
To Other Post-Secondary
0
0%
To the Military
0
0%
To Employment
3
33%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
2
22%
Plan Unknown
0
0%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO FOUR-YEAR COLLEGE
53
46%
52
49%
1
11%
TO TWO-YEAR COLLEGE
39
34%
36
34%
3
33%
TO OTHER POST-SECONDARY
5
4%
5
5%
0
0%
TO THE MILITARY
2
2%
2
2%
0
0%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO EMPLOYMENT
7
6%
4
4%
3
33%
TO ADULT SERVICES
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
TO OTHER KNOWN PLANS
10
9%
8
7%
2
22%
PLANS UNKNOWN
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
All Students
To Four-Year College
53
46%
To Two-Year College
39
34%
To Other Post-Secondary
5
4%
To the Military
2
2%
To Employment
7
6%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
10
9%
Plan Unknown
0
0%
General Education
To Four-Year College
52
49%
To Two-Year College
36
34%
To Other Post-Secondary
5
5%
To the Military
2
2%
To Employment
4
4%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
8
7%
Plan Unknown
0
0%
Students with Disabilities
To Four-Year College
1
11%
To Two-Year College
3
33%
To Other Post-Secondary
0
0%
To the Military
0
0%
To Employment
3
33%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
2
22%
Plan Unknown
0
0%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO FOUR-YEAR COLLEGE
53
46%
52
49%
1
11%
TO TWO-YEAR COLLEGE
39
34%
36
34%
3
33%
TO OTHER POST-SECONDARY
5
4%
5
5%
0
0%
TO THE MILITARY
2
2%
2
2%
0
0%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO EMPLOYMENT
7
6%
4
4%
3
33%
TO ADULT SERVICES
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
TO OTHER KNOWN PLANS
10
9%
8
7%
2
22%
PLANS UNKNOWN
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
All Students
To Four-Year College
53
46%
To Two-Year College
39
34%
To Other Post-Secondary
5
4%
To the Military
2
2%
To Employment
7
6%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
10
9%
Plan Unknown
0
0%
General Education
To Four-Year College
52
49%
To Two-Year College
36
34%
To Other Post-Secondary
5
5%
To the Military
2
2%
To Employment
4
4%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
8
7%
Plan Unknown
0
0%
Students with Disabilities
To Four-Year College
1
11%
To Two-Year College
3
33%
To Other Post-Secondary
0
0%
To the Military
0
0%
To Employment
3
33%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
2
22%
Plan Unknown
0
0%
Grade 3 English Language Arts
MEAN SCORE: 305
All Students
PROFICIENT
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 99
LEVEL 1
22
22%
LEVEL 2
44
44%
LEVEL 3
30
30%
LEVEL 4
3
3%
General Education
PROFICIENT
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 93
LEVEL 1
17
18%
LEVEL 2
43
46%
LEVEL 3
30
32%
LEVEL 4
3
3%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
5
83%
LEVEL 2
1
17%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
American Indian or Alaska Native
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 95
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 99
LEVEL 1
22
22%
LEVEL 2
44
44%
LEVEL 3
30
30%
LEVEL 4
3
3%
Female
PROFICIENT
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 55
LEVEL 1
15
27%
LEVEL 2
20
36%
LEVEL 3
17
31%
LEVEL 4
3
5%
Male
PROFICIENT
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 44
LEVEL 1
7
16%
LEVEL 2
24
55%
LEVEL 3
13
30%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 95
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 31
LEVEL 1
10
32%
LEVEL 2
13
42%
LEVEL 3
8
26%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 68
LEVEL 1
12
18%
LEVEL 2
31
46%
LEVEL 3
22
32%
LEVEL 4
3
4%
Migrant
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 98
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Migrant
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
99
93
6
1
3
95
99
55
44
95
4
31
68
1
98
PROFICIENT
33%
35%
0%
_%
_%
_%
33%
36%
30%
_%
_%
26%
37%
_%
_%
LEVEL 1
22
22%
17
18%
5
83%
_
_
_
_
_
_
22
22%
15
27%
7
16%
_
_
_
_
10
32%
12
18%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 2
44
44%
43
46%
1
17%
_
_
_
_
_
_
44
44%
20
36%
24
55%
_
_
_
_
13
42%
31
46%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 3
30
30%
30
32%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
30
30%
17
31%
13
30%
_
_
_
_
8
26%
22
32%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 4
3
3%
3
3%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
3
3%
3
5%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
3
4%
_
_
_
_
Grade 4 English Language Arts
MEAN SCORE: 309
All Students
PROFICIENT
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 91
LEVEL 1
19
21%
LEVEL 2
32
35%
LEVEL 3
24
26%
LEVEL 4
16
18%
General Education
PROFICIENT
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 81
LEVEL 1
12
15%
LEVEL 2
29
36%
LEVEL 3
24
30%
LEVEL 4
16
20%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 10
LEVEL 1
7
70%
LEVEL 2
3
30%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 87
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 91
LEVEL 1
19
21%
LEVEL 2
32
35%
LEVEL 3
24
26%
LEVEL 4
16
18%
Female
PROFICIENT
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 53
LEVEL 1
8
15%
LEVEL 2
17
32%
LEVEL 3
17
32%
LEVEL 4
11
21%
Male
PROFICIENT
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 38
LEVEL 1
11
29%
LEVEL 2
15
39%
LEVEL 3
7
18%
LEVEL 4
5
13%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 86
LEVEL 1
19
22%
LEVEL 2
29
34%
LEVEL 3
23
27%
LEVEL 4
15
17%
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
3
60%
LEVEL 3
1
20%
LEVEL 4
1
20%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 26
LEVEL 1
7
27%
LEVEL 2
11
42%
LEVEL 3
6
23%
LEVEL 4
2
8%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 65
LEVEL 1
12
18%
LEVEL 2
21
32%
LEVEL 3
18
28%
LEVEL 4
14
22%
Migrant
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 90
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Migrant
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
91
81
10
4
87
91
53
38
86
5
26
65
1
90
PROFICIENT
44%
49%
0%
_%
_%
44%
53%
32%
44%
40%
31%
49%
_%
_%
LEVEL 1
19
21%
12
15%
7
70%
_
_
_
_
19
21%
8
15%
11
29%
19
22%
0
0%
7
27%
12
18%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 2
32
35%
29
36%
3
30%
_
_
_
_
32
35%
17
32%
15
39%
29
34%
3
60%
11
42%
21
32%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 3
24
26%
24
30%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
24
26%
17
32%
7
18%
23
27%
1
20%
6
23%
18
28%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 4
16
18%
16
20%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
16
18%
11
21%
5
13%
15
17%
1
20%
2
8%
14
22%
_
_
_
_
Grade 5 English Language Arts
MEAN SCORE: 306
All Students
PROFICIENT
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 94
LEVEL 1
20
21%
LEVEL 2
44
47%
LEVEL 3
22
23%
LEVEL 4
8
9%
General Education
PROFICIENT
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 83
LEVEL 1
13
16%
LEVEL 2
41
49%
LEVEL 3
21
25%
LEVEL 4
8
10%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 11
LEVEL 1
7
64%
LEVEL 2
3
27%
LEVEL 3
1
9%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 90
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 94
LEVEL 1
20
21%
LEVEL 2
44
47%
LEVEL 3
22
23%
LEVEL 4
8
9%
Female
PROFICIENT
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 46
LEVEL 1
5
11%
LEVEL 2
20
43%
LEVEL 3
16
35%
LEVEL 4
5
11%
Male
PROFICIENT
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 48
LEVEL 1
15
31%
LEVEL 2
24
50%
LEVEL 3
6
13%
LEVEL 4
3
6%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 93
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 26
LEVEL 1
12
46%
LEVEL 2
12
46%
LEVEL 3
1
4%
LEVEL 4
1
4%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 68
LEVEL 1
8
12%
LEVEL 2
32
47%
LEVEL 3
21
31%
LEVEL 4
7
10%
Migrant
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 93
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Migrant
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
94
83
11
4
90
94
46
48
93
1
26
68
1
93
PROFICIENT
32%
35%
9%
_%
_%
32%
46%
19%
_%
_%
8%
41%
_%
_%
LEVEL 1
20
21%
13
16%
7
64%
_
_
_
_
20
21%
5
11%
15
31%
_
_
_
_
12
46%
8
12%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 2
44
47%
41
49%
3
27%
_
_
_
_
44
47%
20
43%
24
50%
_
_
_
_
12
46%
32
47%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 3
22
23%
21
25%
1
9%
_
_
_
_
22
23%
16
35%
6
13%
_
_
_
_
1
4%
21
31%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 4
8
9%
8
10%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
8
9%
5
11%
3
6%
_
_
_
_
1
4%
7
10%
_
_
_
_
Grade 6 English Language Arts
MEAN SCORE: 291
All Students
PROFICIENT
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 95
LEVEL 1
35
37%
LEVEL 2
39
41%
LEVEL 3
12
13%
LEVEL 4
9
9%
General Education
PROFICIENT
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 84
LEVEL 1
27
32%
LEVEL 2
36
43%
LEVEL 3
12
14%
LEVEL 4
9
11%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 11
LEVEL 1
8
73%
LEVEL 2
3
27%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 86
LEVEL 1
32
37%
LEVEL 2
37
43%
LEVEL 3
9
10%
LEVEL 4
8
9%
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
3
33%
LEVEL 2
2
22%
LEVEL 3
3
33%
LEVEL 4
1
11%
Female
PROFICIENT
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 41
LEVEL 1
12
29%
LEVEL 2
19
46%
LEVEL 3
7
17%
LEVEL 4
3
7%
Male
PROFICIENT
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 54
LEVEL 1
23
43%
LEVEL 2
20
37%
LEVEL 3
5
9%
LEVEL 4
6
11%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 93
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 31
LEVEL 1
14
45%
LEVEL 2
12
39%
LEVEL 3
4
13%
LEVEL 4
1
3%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 64
LEVEL 1
21
33%
LEVEL 2
27
42%
LEVEL 3
8
13%
LEVEL 4
8
13%
Migrant
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 94
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Migrant
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
95
84
11
3
1
5
86
9
41
54
93
2
31
64
1
94
PROFICIENT
22%
25%
0%
_%
_%
_%
20%
44%
24%
20%
_%
_%
16%
25%
_%
_%
LEVEL 1
35
37%
27
32%
8
73%
_
_
_
_
_
_
32
37%
3
33%
12
29%
23
43%
_
_
_
_
14
45%
21
33%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 2
39
41%
36
43%
3
27%
_
_
_
_
_
_
37
43%
2
22%
19
46%
20
37%
_
_
_
_
12
39%
27
42%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 3
12
13%
12
14%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
9
10%
3
33%
7
17%
5
9%
_
_
_
_
4
13%
8
13%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 4
9
9%
9
11%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
8
9%
1
11%
3
7%
6
11%
_
_
_
_
1
3%
8
13%
_
_
_
_
Grade 7 English Language Arts
MEAN SCORE: 290
All Students
PROFICIENT
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 109
LEVEL 1
43
39%
LEVEL 2
42
39%
LEVEL 3
22
20%
LEVEL 4
2
2%
General Education
PROFICIENT
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 97
LEVEL 1
32
33%
LEVEL 2
41
42%
LEVEL 3
22
23%
LEVEL 4
2
2%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 12
LEVEL 1
11
92%
LEVEL 2
1
8%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
3
60%
LEVEL 2
1
20%
LEVEL 3
1
20%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
White
PROFICIENT
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 99
LEVEL 1
37
37%
LEVEL 2
39
39%
LEVEL 3
21
21%
LEVEL 4
2
2%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
3
60%
LEVEL 2
2
40%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Female
PROFICIENT
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 57
LEVEL 1
21
37%
LEVEL 2
23
40%
LEVEL 3
11
19%
LEVEL 4
2
4%
Male
PROFICIENT
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 52
LEVEL 1
22
42%
LEVEL 2
19
37%
LEVEL 3
11
21%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 105
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 26
LEVEL 1
17
65%
LEVEL 2
7
27%
LEVEL 3
2
8%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 83
LEVEL 1
26
31%
LEVEL 2
35
42%
LEVEL 3
20
24%
LEVEL 4
2
2%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 109
LEVEL 1
43
39%
LEVEL 2
42
39%
LEVEL 3
22
20%
LEVEL 4
2
2%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
109
97
12
1
2
5
99
2
5
57
52
105
4
26
83
109
PROFICIENT
22%
25%
0%
_%
_%
20%
23%
_%
0%
23%
21%
_%
_%
8%
27%
22%
LEVEL 1
43
39%
32
33%
11
92%
_
_
_
_
3
60%
37
37%
_
_
3
60%
21
37%
22
42%
_
_
_
_
17
65%
26
31%
43
39%
LEVEL 2
42
39%
41
42%
1
8%
_
_
_
_
1
20%
39
39%
_
_
2
40%
23
40%
19
37%
_
_
_
_
7
27%
35
42%
42
39%
LEVEL 3
22
20%
22
23%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
1
20%
21
21%
_
_
0
0%
11
19%
11
21%
_
_
_
_
2
8%
20
24%
22
20%
LEVEL 4
2
2%
2
2%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
2
2%
_
_
0
0%
2
4%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
2
2%
2
2%
Grade 8 English Language Arts
MEAN SCORE: 300
All Students
PROFICIENT
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 102
LEVEL 1
28
27%
LEVEL 2
30
29%
LEVEL 3
33
32%
LEVEL 4
11
11%
General Education
PROFICIENT
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 95
LEVEL 1
21
22%
LEVEL 2
30
32%
LEVEL 3
33
35%
LEVEL 4
11
12%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 7
LEVEL 1
7
100%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 98
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 102
LEVEL 1
28
27%
LEVEL 2
30
29%
LEVEL 3
33
32%
LEVEL 4
11
11%
Female
PROFICIENT
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 51
LEVEL 1
10
20%
LEVEL 2
12
24%
LEVEL 3
20
39%
LEVEL 4
9
18%
Male
PROFICIENT
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 51
LEVEL 1
18
35%
LEVEL 2
18
35%
LEVEL 3
13
25%
LEVEL 4
2
4%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 102
LEVEL 1
28
27%
LEVEL 2
30
29%
LEVEL 3
33
32%
LEVEL 4
11
11%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 32
LEVEL 1
16
50%
LEVEL 2
9
28%
LEVEL 3
6
19%
LEVEL 4
1
3%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 70
LEVEL 1
12
17%
LEVEL 2
21
30%
LEVEL 3
27
39%
LEVEL 4
10
14%
Migrant
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 101
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Migrant
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
102
95
7
1
3
98
102
51
51
102
32
70
1
101
PROFICIENT
43%
46%
0%
_%
_%
_%
43%
57%
29%
43%
22%
53%
_%
_%
LEVEL 1
28
27%
21
22%
7
100%
_
_
_
_
_
_
28
27%
10
20%
18
35%
28
27%
16
50%
12
17%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 2
30
29%
30
32%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
30
29%
12
24%
18
35%
30
29%
9
28%
21
30%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 3
33
32%
33
35%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
33
32%
20
39%
13
25%
33
32%
6
19%
27
39%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 4
11
11%
11
12%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
11
11%
9
18%
2
4%
11
11%
1
3%
10
14%
_
_
_
_
Grade 3 Mathematics
MEAN SCORE: 313
All Students
PROFICIENT
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 98
LEVEL 1
16
16%
LEVEL 2
30
31%
LEVEL 3
29
30%
LEVEL 4
23
23%
General Education
PROFICIENT
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 92
LEVEL 1
10
11%
LEVEL 2
30
33%
LEVEL 3
29
32%
LEVEL 4
23
25%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
6
100%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
American Indian or Alaska Native
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 94
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 98
LEVEL 1
16
16%
LEVEL 2
30
31%
LEVEL 3
29
30%
LEVEL 4
23
23%
Female
PROFICIENT
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 54
LEVEL 1
9
17%
LEVEL 2
19
35%
LEVEL 3
13
24%
LEVEL 4
13
24%
Male
PROFICIENT
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 44
LEVEL 1
7
16%
LEVEL 2
11
25%
LEVEL 3
16
36%
LEVEL 4
10
23%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 94
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 30
LEVEL 1
7
23%
LEVEL 2
12
40%
LEVEL 3
4
13%
LEVEL 4
7
23%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 68
LEVEL 1
9
13%
LEVEL 2
18
26%
LEVEL 3
25
37%
LEVEL 4
16
24%
Migrant
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 97
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Migrant
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
98
92
6
1
3
94
98
54
44
94
4
30
68
1
97
PROFICIENT
53%
57%
0%
_%
_%
_%
53%
48%
59%
_%
_%
37%
60%
_%
_%
LEVEL 1
16
16%
10
11%
6
100%
_
_
_
_
_
_
16
16%
9
17%
7
16%
_
_
_
_
7
23%
9
13%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 2
30
31%
30
33%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
30
31%
19
35%
11
25%
_
_
_
_
12
40%
18
26%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 3
29
30%
29
32%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
29
30%
13
24%
16
36%
_
_
_
_
4
13%
25
37%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 4
23
23%
23
25%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
23
23%
13
24%
10
23%
_
_
_
_
7
23%
16
24%
_
_
_
_
Grade 4 Mathematics
MEAN SCORE: 314
All Students
PROFICIENT
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 90
LEVEL 1
13
14%
LEVEL 2
28
31%
LEVEL 3
33
37%
LEVEL 4
16
18%
General Education
PROFICIENT
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 80
LEVEL 1
8
10%
LEVEL 2
23
29%
LEVEL 3
33
41%
LEVEL 4
16
20%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 10
LEVEL 1
5
50%
LEVEL 2
5
50%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 86
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 90
LEVEL 1
13
14%
LEVEL 2
28
31%
LEVEL 3
33
37%
LEVEL 4
16
18%
Female
PROFICIENT
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 50
LEVEL 1
5
10%
LEVEL 2
16
32%
LEVEL 3
19
38%
LEVEL 4
10
20%
Male
PROFICIENT
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 40
LEVEL 1
8
20%
LEVEL 2
12
30%
LEVEL 3
14
35%
LEVEL 4
6
15%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 85
LEVEL 1
12
14%
LEVEL 2
26
31%
LEVEL 3
32
38%
LEVEL 4
15
18%
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
1
20%
LEVEL 2
2
40%
LEVEL 3
1
20%
LEVEL 4
1
20%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 24
LEVEL 1
6
25%
LEVEL 2
7
29%
LEVEL 3
8
33%
LEVEL 4
3
13%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 66
LEVEL 1
7
11%
LEVEL 2
21
32%
LEVEL 3
25
38%
LEVEL 4
13
20%
Migrant
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 89
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Migrant
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
90
80
10
4
86
90
50
40
85
5
24
66
1
89
PROFICIENT
54%
61%
0%
_%
_%
54%
58%
50%
55%
40%
46%
58%
_%
_%
LEVEL 1
13
14%
8
10%
5
50%
_
_
_
_
13
14%
5
10%
8
20%
12
14%
1
20%
6
25%
7
11%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 2
28
31%
23
29%
5
50%
_
_
_
_
28
31%
16
32%
12
30%
26
31%
2
40%
7
29%
21
32%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 3
33
37%
33
41%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
33
37%
19
38%
14
35%
32
38%
1
20%
8
33%
25
38%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 4
16
18%
16
20%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
16
18%
10
20%
6
15%
15
18%
1
20%
3
13%
13
20%
_
_
_
_
Grade 5 Mathematics
MEAN SCORE: 310
All Students
PROFICIENT
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 84
LEVEL 1
23
27%
LEVEL 2
25
30%
LEVEL 3
25
30%
LEVEL 4
11
13%
General Education
PROFICIENT
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 73
LEVEL 1
16
22%
LEVEL 2
23
32%
LEVEL 3
24
33%
LEVEL 4
10
14%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 11
LEVEL 1
7
64%
LEVEL 2
2
18%
LEVEL 3
1
9%
LEVEL 4
1
9%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 80
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 84
LEVEL 1
23
27%
LEVEL 2
25
30%
LEVEL 3
25
30%
LEVEL 4
11
13%
Female
PROFICIENT
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 40
LEVEL 1
9
23%
LEVEL 2
9
23%
LEVEL 3
15
38%
LEVEL 4
7
18%
Male
PROFICIENT
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 44
LEVEL 1
14
32%
LEVEL 2
16
36%
LEVEL 3
10
23%
LEVEL 4
4
9%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 83
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 24
LEVEL 1
15
63%
LEVEL 2
8
33%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
1
4%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 60
LEVEL 1
8
13%
LEVEL 2
17
28%
LEVEL 3
25
42%
LEVEL 4
10
17%
Migrant
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 83
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Migrant
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
84
73
11
4
80
84
40
44
83
1
24
60
1
83
PROFICIENT
43%
47%
18%
_%
_%
43%
55%
32%
_%
_%
4%
58%
_%
_%
LEVEL 1
23
27%
16
22%
7
64%
_
_
_
_
23
27%
9
23%
14
32%
_
_
_
_
15
63%
8
13%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 2
25
30%
23
32%
2
18%
_
_
_
_
25
30%
9
23%
16
36%
_
_
_
_
8
33%
17
28%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 3
25
30%
24
33%
1
9%
_
_
_
_
25
30%
15
38%
10
23%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
25
42%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 4
11
13%
10
14%
1
9%
_
_
_
_
11
13%
7
18%
4
9%
_
_
_
_
1
4%
10
17%
_
_
_
_
Grade 6 Mathematics
MEAN SCORE: 303
All Students
PROFICIENT
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 88
LEVEL 1
20
23%
LEVEL 2
37
42%
LEVEL 3
16
18%
LEVEL 4
15
17%
General Education
PROFICIENT
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 79
LEVEL 1
13
16%
LEVEL 2
35
44%
LEVEL 3
16
20%
LEVEL 4
15
19%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
7
78%
LEVEL 2
2
22%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 79
LEVEL 1
18
23%
LEVEL 2
34
43%
LEVEL 3
13
16%
LEVEL 4
14
18%
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
2
22%
LEVEL 2
3
33%
LEVEL 3
3
33%
LEVEL 4
1
11%
Female
PROFICIENT
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 39
LEVEL 1
6
15%
LEVEL 2
20
51%
LEVEL 3
8
21%
LEVEL 4
5
13%
Male
PROFICIENT
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 49
LEVEL 1
14
29%
LEVEL 2
17
35%
LEVEL 3
8
16%
LEVEL 4
10
20%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 86
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 27
LEVEL 1
8
30%
LEVEL 2
9
33%
LEVEL 3
8
30%
LEVEL 4
2
7%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 61
LEVEL 1
12
20%
LEVEL 2
28
46%
LEVEL 3
8
13%
LEVEL 4
13
21%
Migrant
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 87
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Migrant
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
88
79
9
3
1
5
79
9
39
49
86
2
27
61
1
87
PROFICIENT
35%
39%
0%
_%
_%
_%
34%
44%
33%
37%
_%
_%
37%
34%
_%
_%
LEVEL 1
20
23%
13
16%
7
78%
_
_
_
_
_
_
18
23%
2
22%
6
15%
14
29%
_
_
_
_
8
30%
12
20%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 2
37
42%
35
44%
2
22%
_
_
_
_
_
_
34
43%
3
33%
20
51%
17
35%
_
_
_
_
9
33%
28
46%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 3
16
18%
16
20%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
13
16%
3
33%
8
21%
8
16%
_
_
_
_
8
30%
8
13%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 4
15
17%
15
19%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
14
18%
1
11%
5
13%
10
20%
_
_
_
_
2
7%
13
21%
_
_
_
_
Grade 7 Mathematics
Mean scores and data in the table for grade 7 math include only those for grade 7 students who took the Grade 7 New York State Testing Program Assessment (NYSTP) in Mathematics. For 2015 and forward, data in the bar charts include those for grade 7 students who took the Grade 7 NYSTP in Mathematics and grade 7 students who took a Regents math test in lieu of the NYSTP. For 2014 and earlier, data in the bar charts include only those for grade 7 students who took the Grade 7 NYSTP.
MEAN SCORE: 317
All Students
PROFICIENT
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 99
LEVEL 1
14
14%
LEVEL 2
39
39%
LEVEL 3
33
33%
LEVEL 4
13
13%
General Education
PROFICIENT
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 89
LEVEL 1
7
8%
LEVEL 2
36
40%
LEVEL 3
33
37%
LEVEL 4
13
15%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 10
LEVEL 1
7
70%
LEVEL 2
3
30%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
2
40%
LEVEL 2
2
40%
LEVEL 3
1
20%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
White
PROFICIENT
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 89
LEVEL 1
10
11%
LEVEL 2
35
39%
LEVEL 3
31
35%
LEVEL 4
13
15%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
2
40%
LEVEL 2
2
40%
LEVEL 3
1
20%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Female
PROFICIENT
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 50
LEVEL 1
9
18%
LEVEL 2
20
40%
LEVEL 3
15
30%
LEVEL 4
6
12%
Male
PROFICIENT
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 49
LEVEL 1
5
10%
LEVEL 2
19
39%
LEVEL 3
18
37%
LEVEL 4
7
14%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 95
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 22
LEVEL 1
7
32%
LEVEL 2
10
45%
LEVEL 3
3
14%
LEVEL 4
2
9%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 77
LEVEL 1
7
9%
LEVEL 2
29
38%
LEVEL 3
30
39%
LEVEL 4
11
14%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 99
LEVEL 1
14
14%
LEVEL 2
39
39%
LEVEL 3
33
33%
LEVEL 4
13
13%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
99
89
10
1
2
5
89
2
5
50
49
95
4
22
77
99
PROFICIENT
46%
52%
0%
_%
_%
20%
49%
_%
20%
42%
51%
_%
_%
23%
53%
46%
LEVEL 1
14
14%
7
8%
7
70%
_
_
_
_
2
40%
10
11%
_
_
2
40%
9
18%
5
10%
_
_
_
_
7
32%
7
9%
14
14%
LEVEL 2
39
39%
36
40%
3
30%
_
_
_
_
2
40%
35
39%
_
_
2
40%
20
40%
19
39%
_
_
_
_
10
45%
29
38%
39
39%
LEVEL 3
33
33%
33
37%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
1
20%
31
35%
_
_
1
20%
15
30%
18
37%
_
_
_
_
3
14%
30
39%
33
33%
LEVEL 4
13
13%
13
15%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
13
15%
_
_
0
0%
6
12%
7
14%
_
_
_
_
2
9%
11
14%
13
13%
Grade 8 Mathematics
Mean scores and data in the table for grade 8 math include only those for grade 8 students who took the Grade 8 New York State Testing Program Assessment (NYSTP) in Mathematics. For 2015 and forward, data in the bar charts include those for grade 8 students who took the Grade 8 NYSTP in Mathematics and grade 8 students who took a Regents math test in lieu of the NYSTP. For 2014 and earlier, data in the bar charts include only those for grade 8 students who took the Grade 8 NYSTP.
MEAN SCORE: 309
All Students
PROFICIENT
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 64
LEVEL 1
11
17%
LEVEL 2
35
55%
LEVEL 3
12
19%
LEVEL 4
6
9%
General Education
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 61
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 61
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 64
LEVEL 1
11
17%
LEVEL 2
35
55%
LEVEL 3
12
19%
LEVEL 4
6
9%
Female
PROFICIENT
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 34
LEVEL 1
6
18%
LEVEL 2
19
56%
LEVEL 3
7
21%
LEVEL 4
2
6%
Male
PROFICIENT
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 30
LEVEL 1
5
17%
LEVEL 2
16
53%
LEVEL 3
5
17%
LEVEL 4
4
13%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 64
LEVEL 1
11
17%
LEVEL 2
35
55%
LEVEL 3
12
19%
LEVEL 4
6
9%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 20
LEVEL 1
6
30%
LEVEL 2
12
60%
LEVEL 3
1
5%
LEVEL 4
1
5%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 44
LEVEL 1
5
11%
LEVEL 2
23
52%
LEVEL 3
11
25%
LEVEL 4
5
11%
Migrant
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 63
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Migrant
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
64
61
3
1
2
61
64
34
30
64
20
44
1
63
PROFICIENT
28%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
28%
26%
30%
28%
10%
36%
_%
_%
LEVEL 1
11
17%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
11
17%
6
18%
5
17%
11
17%
6
30%
5
11%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 2
35
55%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
35
55%
19
56%
16
53%
35
55%
12
60%
23
52%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 3
12
19%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
12
19%
7
21%
5
17%
12
19%
1
5%
11
25%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 4
6
9%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
6
9%
2
6%
4
13%
6
9%
1
5%
5
11%
_
_
_
_
Grade 8 Students Taking a Regents Math Test
Accelerated grade 8 students who took a Regents math test in lieu of the Grade 8 NYSTP in Mathematics.
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 19
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
1
5%
LEVEL 4 AND ABOVE
18
95%
LEVEL 3 AND ABOVE
19
100%
GROUP
All Students
TOTAL TESTED
19
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
1
5%
4 & ABOVE
18
95%
3 & ABOVE
19
100%
Grade 4 Science
MEAN SCORE: 85
All Students
PROFICIENT
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 89
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
5
6%
LEVEL 3
28
31%
LEVEL 4
56
63%
General Education
PROFICIENT
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 81
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
3
4%
LEVEL 3
22
27%
LEVEL 4
56
69%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 8
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
25%
LEVEL 3
6
75%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 85
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 89
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
5
6%
LEVEL 3
28
31%
LEVEL 4
56
63%
Female
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 51
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
18
35%
LEVEL 4
33
65%
Male
PROFICIENT
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 38
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
5
13%
LEVEL 3
10
26%
LEVEL 4
23
61%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 84
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
5
6%
LEVEL 3
25
30%
LEVEL 4
54
64%
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
3
60%
LEVEL 4
2
40%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 25
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
4%
LEVEL 3
12
48%
LEVEL 4
12
48%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 64
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
4
6%
LEVEL 3
16
25%
LEVEL 4
44
69%
Migrant
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 88
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Migrant
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
89
81
8
4
85
89
51
38
84
5
25
64
1
88
PROFICIENT
94%
96%
75%
_%
_%
94%
100%
87%
94%
100%
96%
94%
_%
_%
LEVEL 1
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 2
5
6%
3
4%
2
25%
_
_
_
_
5
6%
0
0%
5
13%
5
6%
0
0%
1
4%
4
6%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 3
28
31%
22
27%
6
75%
_
_
_
_
28
31%
18
35%
10
26%
25
30%
3
60%
12
48%
16
25%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 4
56
63%
56
69%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
56
63%
33
65%
23
61%
54
64%
2
40%
12
48%
44
69%
_
_
_
_
Grade 8 Science
Data in the bar charts include those for grade 8 students who took the New York State Grade 8 Science Test and grade 8 students who took a Regents science test in lieu of this test. Mean scores and data in the table for grade 8 science include only those for grade 8 students who took the New York State Grade 8 Science Test.
MEAN SCORE: 74
All Students
PROFICIENT
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 59
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
12
20%
LEVEL 3
36
61%
LEVEL 4
11
19%
General Education
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 56
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 57
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 59
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
12
20%
LEVEL 3
36
61%
LEVEL 4
11
19%
Female
PROFICIENT
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 27
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
4
15%
LEVEL 3
22
81%
LEVEL 4
1
4%
Male
PROFICIENT
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 32
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
8
25%
LEVEL 3
14
44%
LEVEL 4
10
31%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 59
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
12
20%
LEVEL 3
36
61%
LEVEL 4
11
19%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 23
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
7
30%
LEVEL 3
14
61%
LEVEL 4
2
9%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 36
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
5
14%
LEVEL 3
22
61%
LEVEL 4
9
25%
Migrant
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 58
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Migrant
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
59
56
3
2
57
59
27
32
59
23
36
1
58
PROFICIENT
80%
_%
_%
_%
_%
80%
85%
75%
80%
70%
86%
_%
_%
LEVEL 1
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 2
12
20%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
12
20%
4
15%
8
25%
12
20%
7
30%
5
14%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 3
36
61%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
36
61%
22
81%
14
44%
36
61%
14
61%
22
61%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 4
11
19%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
11
19%
1
4%
10
31%
11
19%
2
9%
9
25%
_
_
_
_
Grade 8 Students Taking a Regents Science Test
Accelerated grade 8 students who take a Regents science test in lieu of the New York State Grade 8 Science Test.
All Students
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 27
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
2
7%
LEVEL 4
25
93%
GROUP
All Students
TOTAL TESTED
27
PROFICIENT
100%
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
2
7%
LEVEL 4
25
93%
Statewide Results on the National Assessment of Educational Progress: NAEP (2014 - 15)
Grade: 4
Reading
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Students with Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
BELOW BASIC
32%
*%
20%
48%
44%
20%
*%
70%
74%
43%
BASIC
32%
*%
30%
34%
37%
31%
*%
22%
21%
36%
PROFICIENT
27%
*%
33%
15%
17%
37%
*%
7%
4%
18%
ADVANCED
9%
*%
17%
3%
2%
12%
*%
1%
1%
3%
PARTICIPATION RATE
98
88
Reading
All Students
Percent Below Basic
32
Percent Basic
32
Percent Proficient
27
Percent Advanced
9
American Indian or Alaska Native
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Percent Below Basic
20
Percent Basic
30
Percent Proficient
33
Percent Advanced
17
Black or African American
Percent Below Basic
48
Percent Basic
34
Percent Proficient
15
Percent Advanced
3
Hispanic or Latino
Percent Below Basic
44
Percent Basic
37
Percent Proficient
17
Percent Advanced
2
White
Percent Below Basic
20
Percent Basic
31
Percent Proficient
37
Percent Advanced
12
Multiracial
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Students with Disabilities
Percent Below Basic
70
Percent Basic
22
Percent Proficient
7
Percent Advanced
1
Participation Rate
98
Limited English Proficient
Percent Below Basic
74
Percent Basic
21
Percent Proficient
4
Percent Advanced
1
Participation Rate
88
Economically Disadvantaged
Percent Below Basic
43
Percent Basic
36
Percent Proficient
18
Percent Advanced
3
Mathematics
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Students with Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
BELOW BASIC
21%
*%
12%
40%
28%
12%
*%
49%
56%
29%
BASIC
44%
*%
31%
46%
51%
41%
*%
39%
35%
48%
PROFICIENT
30%
*%
42%
13%
20%
40%
*%
10%
9%
21%
ADVANCED
5%
*%
15%
1%
1%
7%
*%
2%
*%
2%
PARTICIPATION RATE
98
91
Mathematics
All Students
Percent Below Basic
21
Percent Basic
44
Percent Proficient
30
Percent Advanced
5
American Indian or Alaska Native
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Percent Below Basic
12
Percent Basic
31
Percent Proficient
42
Percent Advanced
15
Black or African American
Percent Below Basic
40
Percent Basic
46
Percent Proficient
13
Percent Advanced
1
Hispanic or Latino
Percent Below Basic
28
Percent Basic
51
Percent Proficient
20
Percent Advanced
1
White
Percent Below Basic
12
Percent Basic
41
Percent Proficient
40
Percent Advanced
7
Multiracial
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Students with Disabilities
Percent Below Basic
49
Percent Basic
39
Percent Proficient
10
Percent Advanced
2
Participation Rate
98
Limited English Proficient
Percent Below Basic
56
Percent Basic
35
Percent Proficient
9
Percent Advanced
*
Participation Rate
91
Economically Disadvantaged
Percent Below Basic
29
Percent Basic
48
Percent Proficient
21
Percent Advanced
2
Grade: 8
Reading
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Students with Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
BELOW BASIC
27%
*%
19%
42%
35%
18%
*%
59%
78%
36%
BASIC
40%
*%
39%
41%
43%
39%
*%
33%
19%
42%
PROFICIENT
29%
*%
34%
16%
20%
38%
*%
8%
3%
21%
ADVANCED
4%
*%
8%
1%
2%
5%
*%
*%
*%
1%
PARTICIPATION RATE
98
89
Reading
All Students
Percent Below Basic
27
Percent Basic
40
Percent Proficient
29
Percent Advanced
4
American Indian or Alaska Native
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Percent Below Basic
19
Percent Basic
39
Percent Proficient
34
Percent Advanced
8
Black or African American
Percent Below Basic
42
Percent Basic
41
Percent Proficient
16
Percent Advanced
1
Hispanic or Latino
Percent Below Basic
35
Percent Basic
43
Percent Proficient
20
Percent Advanced
2
White
Percent Below Basic
18
Percent Basic
39
Percent Proficient
38
Percent Advanced
5
Multiracial
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Students with Disabilities
Percent Below Basic
59
Percent Basic
33
Percent Proficient
8
Percent Advanced
*
Participation Rate
98
Limited English Proficient
Percent Below Basic
78
Percent Basic
19
Percent Proficient
3
Percent Advanced
*
Participation Rate
89
Economically Disadvantaged
Percent Below Basic
36
Percent Basic
42
Percent Proficient
21
Percent Advanced
1
Mathematics
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Students with Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
BELOW BASIC
31%
*%
18%
48%
41%
20%
*%
64%
72%
40%
BASIC
38%
*%
30%
37%
40%
40%
*%
27%
21%
39%
PROFICIENT
24%
*%
33%
13%
16%
31%
*%
8%
6%
17%
ADVANCED
7%
*%
19%
2%
3%
9%
*%
1%
1%
4%
PARTICIPATION RATE
99
94
Mathematics
All Students
Percent Below Basic
31
Percent Basic
38
Percent Proficient
24
Percent Advanced
7
American Indian or Alaska Native
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Percent Below Basic
18
Percent Basic
30
Percent Proficient
33
Percent Advanced
19
Black or African American
Percent Below Basic
48
Percent Basic
37
Percent Proficient
13
Percent Advanced
2
Hispanic or Latino
Percent Below Basic
41
Percent Basic
40
Percent Proficient
16
Percent Advanced
3
White
Percent Below Basic
20
Percent Basic
40
Percent Proficient
31
Percent Advanced
9
Multiracial
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Students with Disabilities
Percent Below Basic
64
Percent Basic
27
Percent Proficient
8
Percent Advanced
1
Participation Rate
99
Limited English Proficient
Percent Below Basic
72
Percent Basic
21
Percent Proficient
6
Percent Advanced
1
Participation Rate
94
Economically Disadvantaged
Percent Below Basic
40
Percent Basic
39
Percent Proficient
17
Percent Advanced
4
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level English Language Arts after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 125
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
1%
LEVEL 3
51
41%
LEVEL 4
65
52%
General Education
PROFICIENT
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 113
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
45
40%
LEVEL 4
63
56%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 12
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
8%
LEVEL 3
6
50%
LEVEL 4
2
17%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 121
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 125
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
1%
LEVEL 3
51
41%
LEVEL 4
65
52%
Female
PROFICIENT
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 59
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
20
34%
LEVEL 4
35
59%
Male
PROFICIENT
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 66
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
2%
LEVEL 3
31
47%
LEVEL 4
30
45%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 124
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 27
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
11
41%
LEVEL 4
13
48%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 98
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
1%
LEVEL 3
40
41%
LEVEL 4
52
53%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 125
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
1%
LEVEL 3
51
41%
LEVEL 4
65
52%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
125
113
12
1
3
121
125
59
66
124
1
27
98
125
PROFICIENT
93%
96%
67%
_%
_%
_%
93%
93%
92%
_%
_%
89%
94%
93%
LEVEL 1
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
1%
0
0%
1
8%
_
_
_
_
_
_
1
1%
0
0%
1
2%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
1
1%
1
1%
LEVEL 3
51
41%
45
40%
6
50%
_
_
_
_
_
_
51
41%
20
34%
31
47%
_
_
_
_
11
41%
40
41%
51
41%
LEVEL 4
65
52%
63
56%
2
17%
_
_
_
_
_
_
65
52%
35
59%
30
45%
_
_
_
_
13
48%
52
53%
65
52%
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level Mathematics after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 125
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
3
2%
LEVEL 3
84
67%
LEVEL 4
32
26%
General Education
PROFICIENT
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 113
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
1%
LEVEL 3
77
68%
LEVEL 4
32
28%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 12
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
17%
LEVEL 3
7
58%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 121
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 125
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
3
2%
LEVEL 3
84
67%
LEVEL 4
32
26%
Female
PROFICIENT
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 59
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
2%
LEVEL 3
39
66%
LEVEL 4
15
25%
Male
PROFICIENT
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 66
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
3%
LEVEL 3
45
68%
LEVEL 4
17
26%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 124
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 27
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
4%
LEVEL 3
20
74%
LEVEL 4
4
15%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 98
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
2%
LEVEL 3
64
65%
LEVEL 4
28
29%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 125
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
3
2%
LEVEL 3
84
67%
LEVEL 4
32
26%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
125
113
12
1
3
121
125
59
66
124
1
27
98
125
PROFICIENT
93%
96%
58%
_%
_%
_%
93%
92%
94%
_%
_%
89%
94%
93%
LEVEL 1
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
LEVEL 2
3
2%
1
1%
2
17%
_
_
_
_
_
_
3
2%
1
2%
2
3%
_
_
_
_
1
4%
2
2%
3
2%
LEVEL 3
84
67%
77
68%
7
58%
_
_
_
_
_
_
84
67%
39
66%
45
68%
_
_
_
_
20
74%
64
65%
84
67%
LEVEL 4
32
26%
32
28%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
32
26%
15
25%
17
26%
_
_
_
_
4
15%
28
29%
32
26%
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level Global History and Geography after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 125
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
2
2%
LEVEL 3
65
52%
LEVEL 4
50
40%
General Education
PROFICIENT
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 113
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
1%
LEVEL 3
58
51%
LEVEL 4
50
44%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 12
LEVEL 1
1
8%
LEVEL 2
1
8%
LEVEL 3
7
58%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 121
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 125
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
2
2%
LEVEL 3
65
52%
LEVEL 4
50
40%
Female
PROFICIENT
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 59
LEVEL 1
1
2%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
32
54%
LEVEL 4
21
36%
Male
PROFICIENT
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 66
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
3%
LEVEL 3
33
50%
LEVEL 4
29
44%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 124
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 27
LEVEL 1
1
4%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
16
59%
LEVEL 4
8
30%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 98
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
2%
LEVEL 3
49
50%
LEVEL 4
42
43%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 125
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
2
2%
LEVEL 3
65
52%
LEVEL 4
50
40%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
125
113
12
1
3
121
125
59
66
124
1
27
98
125
PROFICIENT
92%
96%
58%
_%
_%
_%
92%
90%
94%
_%
_%
89%
93%
92%
LEVEL 1
1
1%
0
0%
1
8%
_
_
_
_
_
_
1
1%
1
2%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
1
4%
0
0%
1
1%
LEVEL 2
2
2%
1
1%
1
8%
_
_
_
_
_
_
2
2%
0
0%
2
3%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
2
2%
2
2%
LEVEL 3
65
52%
58
51%
7
58%
_
_
_
_
_
_
65
52%
32
54%
33
50%
_
_
_
_
16
59%
49
50%
65
52%
LEVEL 4
50
40%
50
44%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
50
40%
21
36%
29
44%
_
_
_
_
8
30%
42
43%
50
40%
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level U.S. History and Government after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 125
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
2%
LEVEL 3
39
31%
LEVEL 4
77
62%
General Education
PROFICIENT
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 113
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
35
31%
LEVEL 4
74
65%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 12
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
17%
LEVEL 3
4
33%
LEVEL 4
3
25%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 121
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 125
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
2%
LEVEL 3
39
31%
LEVEL 4
77
62%
Female
PROFICIENT
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 59
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
2%
LEVEL 3
23
39%
LEVEL 4
31
53%
Male
PROFICIENT
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 66
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
2%
LEVEL 3
16
24%
LEVEL 4
46
70%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 124
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 27
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
4%
LEVEL 3
9
33%
LEVEL 4
15
56%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 98
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
1%
LEVEL 3
30
31%
LEVEL 4
62
63%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 125
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
2%
LEVEL 3
39
31%
LEVEL 4
77
62%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
125
113
12
1
3
121
125
59
66
124
1
27
98
125
PROFICIENT
93%
96%
58%
_%
_%
_%
93%
92%
94%
_%
_%
89%
94%
93%
LEVEL 1
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
2%
0
0%
2
17%
_
_
_
_
_
_
2
2%
1
2%
1
2%
_
_
_
_
1
4%
1
1%
2
2%
LEVEL 3
39
31%
35
31%
4
33%
_
_
_
_
_
_
39
31%
23
39%
16
24%
_
_
_
_
9
33%
30
31%
39
31%
LEVEL 4
77
62%
74
65%
3
25%
_
_
_
_
_
_
77
62%
31
53%
46
70%
_
_
_
_
15
56%
62
63%
77
62%
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level Science after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 125
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
2%
LEVEL 3
54
43%
LEVEL 4
61
49%
General Education
PROFICIENT
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 113
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
1%
LEVEL 3
48
42%
LEVEL 4
59
52%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 12
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
8%
LEVEL 3
6
50%
LEVEL 4
2
17%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 121
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 125
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
2%
LEVEL 3
54
43%
LEVEL 4
61
49%
Female
PROFICIENT
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 59
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
2%
LEVEL 3
29
49%
LEVEL 4
24
41%
Male
PROFICIENT
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 66
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
2%
LEVEL 3
25
38%
LEVEL 4
37
56%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 124
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 27
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
7%
LEVEL 3
14
52%
LEVEL 4
9
33%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 98
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
40
41%
LEVEL 4
52
53%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 125
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
2%
LEVEL 3
54
43%
LEVEL 4
61
49%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
125
113
12
1
3
121
125
59
66
124
1
27
98
125
PROFICIENT
92%
95%
67%
_%
_%
_%
92%
90%
94%
_%
_%
85%
94%
92%
LEVEL 1
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
2%
1
1%
1
8%
_
_
_
_
_
_
2
2%
1
2%
1
2%
_
_
_
_
2
7%
0
0%
2
2%
LEVEL 3
54
43%
48
42%
6
50%
_
_
_
_
_
_
54
43%
29
49%
25
38%
_
_
_
_
14
52%
40
41%
54
43%
LEVEL 4
61
49%
59
52%
2
17%
_
_
_
_
_
_
61
49%
24
41%
37
56%
_
_
_
_
9
33%
52
53%
61
49%
Regents Examination Results (2014 - 15)
Comprehensive English
Regents Comprehensive English
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
153
139
14
1
5
3
144
9
81
72
153
31
122
153
55
150
98%
136
98%
14
100%
_
_
_
_
_
_
141
98%
9
100%
80
99%
70
97%
150
98%
30
97%
120
98%
150
98%
65
145
95%
134
96%
11
79%
_
_
_
_
_
_
136
94%
9
100%
78
96%
67
93%
145
95%
29
94%
116
95%
145
95%
85
90
59%
89
64%
1
7%
_
_
_
_
_
_
84
58%
6
67%
50
62%
40
56%
90
59%
11
35%
79
65%
90
59%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 153
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
150
98%
65
145
95%
85
90
59%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 139
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
136
98%
65
134
96%
85
89
64%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 14
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
14
100%
65
11
79%
85
1
7%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 144
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
141
98%
65
136
94%
85
84
58%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 9
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
9
100%
65
9
100%
85
6
67%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 81
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
80
99%
65
78
96%
85
50
62%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 72
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
70
97%
65
67
93%
85
40
56%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 153
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
150
98%
65
145
95%
85
90
59%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 31
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
30
97%
65
29
94%
85
11
35%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 122
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
120
98%
65
116
95%
85
79
65%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 153
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
150
98%
65
145
95%
85
90
59%
English Language Arts (Common Core)
English Language Arts (Common Core)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
132
127
5
1
5
3
123
9
72
60
132
27
105
132
LEVEL 1
1
1%
1
1%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
1
1%
0
0%
0
0%
1
2%
1
1%
1
4%
0
0%
1
1%
LEVEL 2
7
5%
6
5%
1
20%
_
_
_
_
_
_
6
5%
1
11%
1
1%
6
10%
7
5%
5
19%
2
2%
7
5%
LEVEL 3
18
14%
15
12%
3
60%
_
_
_
_
_
_
17
14%
1
11%
6
8%
12
20%
18
14%
6
22%
12
11%
18
14%
LEVEL 4
10
8%
10
8%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
10
8%
0
0%
7
10%
3
5%
10
8%
5
19%
5
5%
10
8%
LEVEL 5
96
73%
95
75%
1
20%
_
_
_
_
_
_
89
72%
7
78%
58
81%
38
63%
96
73%
10
37%
86
82%
96
73%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 132
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
7
5%
LEVEL 3
18
14%
LEVEL 4
10
8%
LEVEL 5
96
73%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 127
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
6
5%
LEVEL 3
15
12%
LEVEL 4
10
8%
LEVEL 5
95
75%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
20%
LEVEL 3
3
60%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
LEVEL 5
1
20%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 123
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
6
5%
LEVEL 3
17
14%
LEVEL 4
10
8%
LEVEL 5
89
72%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 9
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
11%
LEVEL 3
1
11%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
LEVEL 5
7
78%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 72
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
1%
LEVEL 3
6
8%
LEVEL 4
7
10%
LEVEL 5
58
81%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 60
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
1
2%
LEVEL 2
6
10%
LEVEL 3
12
20%
LEVEL 4
3
5%
LEVEL 5
38
63%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 132
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
7
5%
LEVEL 3
18
14%
LEVEL 4
10
8%
LEVEL 5
96
73%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 27
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
1
4%
LEVEL 2
5
19%
LEVEL 3
6
22%
LEVEL 4
5
19%
LEVEL 5
10
37%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 105
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
2%
LEVEL 3
12
11%
LEVEL 4
5
5%
LEVEL 5
86
82%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 132
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
7
5%
LEVEL 3
18
14%
LEVEL 4
10
8%
LEVEL 5
96
73%
Integrated Algebra
Regents Integrated Algebra
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Migrant
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
68
52
16
4
2
62
6
28
40
67
1
29
39
2
66
55
66
97%
50
96%
16
100%
_
_
_
_
60
97%
6
100%
27
96%
39
98%
_
_
_
_
27
93%
39
100%
_
_
_
_
65
59
87%
48
92%
11
69%
_
_
_
_
54
87%
5
83%
24
86%
35
88%
_
_
_
_
23
79%
36
92%
_
_
_
_
85
7
10%
7
13%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
6
10%
1
17%
5
18%
2
5%
_
_
_
_
1
3%
6
15%
_
_
_
_
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 68
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
66
97%
65
59
87%
85
7
10%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 52
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
50
96%
65
48
92%
85
7
13%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 16
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
16
100%
65
11
69%
85
0
0%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 4
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 62
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
60
97%
65
54
87%
85
6
10%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 6
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
6
100%
65
5
83%
85
1
17%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 28
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
27
96%
65
24
86%
85
5
18%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 40
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
39
98%
65
35
88%
85
2
5%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 67
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 29
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
27
93%
65
23
79%
85
1
3%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 39
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
39
100%
65
36
92%
85
6
15%
Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 66
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Geometry
Regents Geometry
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
107
106
1
1
3
2
101
6
54
53
106
1
24
83
107
55
105
98%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
100
99%
5
83%
54
100%
51
96%
_
_
_
_
22
92%
83
100%
105
98%
65
94
88%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
90
89%
4
67%
47
87%
47
89%
_
_
_
_
20
83%
74
89%
94
88%
85
34
32%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
33
33%
1
17%
17
31%
17
32%
_
_
_
_
6
25%
28
34%
34
32%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 107
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
105
98%
65
94
88%
85
34
32%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 106
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 101
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
100
99%
65
90
89%
85
33
33%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 6
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
5
83%
65
4
67%
85
1
17%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 54
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
54
100%
65
47
87%
85
17
31%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 53
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
51
96%
65
47
89%
85
17
32%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 106
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 24
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
22
92%
65
20
83%
85
6
25%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 83
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
83
100%
65
74
89%
85
28
34%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 107
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
105
98%
65
94
88%
85
34
32%
Algebra 2/Trigonometry
Regents Algebra 2/Trigonometry
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
68
67
1
1
1
66
68
37
31
68
9
59
68
55
62
91%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
62
91%
35
95%
27
87%
62
91%
7
78%
55
93%
62
91%
65
50
74%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
50
74%
26
70%
24
77%
50
74%
6
67%
44
75%
50
74%
85
17
25%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
17
25%
7
19%
10
32%
17
25%
1
11%
16
27%
17
25%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 68
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
62
91%
65
50
74%
85
17
25%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 67
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 66
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 68
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
62
91%
65
50
74%
85
17
25%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 37
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
35
95%
65
26
70%
85
7
19%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 31
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
27
87%
65
24
77%
85
10
32%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 68
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
62
91%
65
50
74%
85
17
25%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 9
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
7
78%
65
6
67%
85
1
11%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 59
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
55
93%
65
44
75%
85
16
27%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 68
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
62
91%
65
50
74%
85
17
25%
Algebra I (Common Core)
Algebra I (Common Core)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Migrant
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
127
119
8
1
5
2
119
8
61
66
126
1
43
84
2
125
LEVEL 1
8
6%
8
7%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
8
7%
0
0%
3
5%
5
8%
_
_
_
_
7
16%
1
1%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 2
26
20%
21
18%
5
63%
_
_
_
_
_
_
24
20%
2
25%
11
18%
15
23%
_
_
_
_
13
30%
13
15%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 3
50
39%
47
39%
3
38%
_
_
_
_
_
_
45
38%
5
63%
22
36%
28
42%
_
_
_
_
14
33%
36
43%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 4
36
28%
36
30%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
35
29%
1
13%
21
34%
15
23%
_
_
_
_
7
16%
29
35%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 5
7
6%
7
6%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
7
6%
0
0%
4
7%
3
5%
_
_
_
_
2
5%
5
6%
_
_
_
_
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 127
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
8
6%
LEVEL 2
26
20%
LEVEL 3
50
39%
LEVEL 4
36
28%
LEVEL 5
7
6%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 119
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
8
7%
LEVEL 2
21
18%
LEVEL 3
47
39%
LEVEL 4
36
30%
LEVEL 5
7
6%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 8
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
5
63%
LEVEL 3
3
38%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 119
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
8
7%
LEVEL 2
24
20%
LEVEL 3
45
38%
LEVEL 4
35
29%
LEVEL 5
7
6%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 8
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
25%
LEVEL 3
5
63%
LEVEL 4
1
13%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 61
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
3
5%
LEVEL 2
11
18%
LEVEL 3
22
36%
LEVEL 4
21
34%
LEVEL 5
4
7%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 66
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
5
8%
LEVEL 2
15
23%
LEVEL 3
28
42%
LEVEL 4
15
23%
LEVEL 5
3
5%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 126
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 43
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
7
16%
LEVEL 2
13
30%
LEVEL 3
14
33%
LEVEL 4
7
16%
LEVEL 5
2
5%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 84
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
13
15%
LEVEL 3
36
43%
LEVEL 4
29
35%
LEVEL 5
5
6%
Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 125
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Geometry (Common Core)
Geometry (Common Core)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
88
87
1
1
2
2
83
5
45
43
87
1
21
67
88
LEVEL 1
9
10%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
9
11%
0
0%
4
9%
5
12%
_
_
_
_
1
5%
8
12%
9
10%
LEVEL 2
18
20%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
17
20%
1
20%
12
27%
6
14%
_
_
_
_
7
33%
11
16%
18
20%
LEVEL 3
36
41%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
33
40%
3
60%
15
33%
21
49%
_
_
_
_
11
52%
25
37%
36
41%
LEVEL 4
11
13%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
11
13%
0
0%
6
13%
5
12%
_
_
_
_
2
10%
9
13%
11
13%
LEVEL 5
14
16%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
13
16%
1
20%
8
18%
6
14%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
14
21%
14
16%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 88
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
9
10%
LEVEL 2
18
20%
LEVEL 3
36
41%
LEVEL 4
11
13%
LEVEL 5
14
16%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 87
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 83
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
9
11%
LEVEL 2
17
20%
LEVEL 3
33
40%
LEVEL 4
11
13%
LEVEL 5
13
16%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
20%
LEVEL 3
3
60%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
LEVEL 5
1
20%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 45
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
4
9%
LEVEL 2
12
27%
LEVEL 3
15
33%
LEVEL 4
6
13%
LEVEL 5
8
18%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 43
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
5
12%
LEVEL 2
6
14%
LEVEL 3
21
49%
LEVEL 4
5
12%
LEVEL 5
6
14%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 87
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 21
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
1
5%
LEVEL 2
7
33%
LEVEL 3
11
52%
LEVEL 4
2
10%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 67
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
8
12%
LEVEL 2
11
16%
LEVEL 3
25
37%
LEVEL 4
9
13%
LEVEL 5
14
21%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 88
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
9
10%
LEVEL 2
18
20%
LEVEL 3
36
41%
LEVEL 4
11
13%
LEVEL 5
14
16%
Global History and Geography
Regents Global History and Geography
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Migrant
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
153
135
18
1
5
3
144
9
71
82
152
1
59
94
3
150
55
138
90%
128
95%
10
56%
_
_
_
_
_
_
130
90%
8
89%
64
90%
74
90%
_
_
_
_
50
85%
88
94%
_
_
_
_
65
123
80%
117
87%
6
33%
_
_
_
_
_
_
115
80%
8
89%
59
83%
64
78%
_
_
_
_
43
73%
80
85%
_
_
_
_
85
66
43%
64
47%
2
11%
_
_
_
_
_
_
63
44%
3
33%
37
52%
29
35%
_
_
_
_
17
29%
49
52%
_
_
_
_
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 153
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
138
90%
65
123
80%
85
66
43%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 135
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
128
95%
65
117
87%
85
64
47%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 18
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
10
56%
65
6
33%
85
2
11%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 144
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
130
90%
65
115
80%
85
63
44%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 9
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
8
89%
65
8
89%
85
3
33%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 71
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
64
90%
65
59
83%
85
37
52%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 82
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
74
90%
65
64
78%
85
29
35%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 152
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 59
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
50
85%
65
43
73%
85
17
29%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 94
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
88
94%
65
80
85%
85
49
52%
Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 150
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
U.S. History & Government
Regents U.S. History & Government
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
152
138
14
1
5
3
143
9
85
67
152
30
122
152
55
152
100%
138
100%
14
100%
_
_
_
_
_
_
143
100%
9
100%
85
100%
67
100%
152
100%
30
100%
122
100%
152
100%
65
149
98%
137
99%
12
86%
_
_
_
_
_
_
140
98%
9
100%
82
96%
67
100%
149
98%
27
90%
122
100%
149
98%
85
98
64%
94
68%
4
29%
_
_
_
_
_
_
92
64%
6
67%
50
59%
48
72%
98
64%
13
43%
85
70%
98
64%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 152
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
152
100%
65
149
98%
85
98
64%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 138
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
138
100%
65
137
99%
85
94
68%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 14
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
14
100%
65
12
86%
85
4
29%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 143
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
143
100%
65
140
98%
85
92
64%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 9
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
9
100%
65
9
100%
85
6
67%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 85
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
85
100%
65
82
96%
85
50
59%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 67
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
67
100%
65
67
100%
85
48
72%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 152
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
152
100%
65
149
98%
85
98
64%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 30
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
30
100%
65
27
90%
85
13
43%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 122
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
122
100%
65
122
100%
85
85
70%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 152
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
152
100%
65
149
98%
85
98
64%
Living Environment
Regents Living Environment
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Migrant
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
137
124
13
5
3
129
8
68
69
136
1
49
88
3
134
55
135
99%
124
100%
11
85%
_
_
_
_
127
98%
8
100%
67
99%
68
99%
_
_
_
_
48
98%
87
99%
_
_
_
_
65
130
95%
122
98%
8
62%
_
_
_
_
123
95%
7
88%
64
94%
66
96%
_
_
_
_
44
90%
86
98%
_
_
_
_
85
76
55%
74
60%
2
15%
_
_
_
_
72
56%
4
50%
42
62%
34
49%
_
_
_
_
19
39%
57
65%
_
_
_
_
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 137
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
135
99%
65
130
95%
85
76
55%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 124
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
124
100%
65
122
98%
85
74
60%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 13
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
11
85%
65
8
62%
85
2
15%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 129
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
127
98%
65
123
95%
85
72
56%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 8
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
8
100%
65
7
88%
85
4
50%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 68
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
67
99%
65
64
94%
85
42
62%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 69
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
68
99%
65
66
96%
85
34
49%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 136
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 49
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
48
98%
65
44
90%
85
19
39%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 88
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
87
99%
65
86
98%
85
57
65%
Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 134
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Physical Setting/Earth Science
Regents Physical Setting/Earth Science
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
113
111
2
3
5
105
8
55
58
113
22
91
113
55
110
97%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
102
97%
8
100%
53
96%
57
98%
110
97%
22
100%
88
97%
110
97%
65
106
94%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
99
94%
7
88%
49
89%
57
98%
106
94%
20
91%
86
95%
106
94%
85
57
50%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
54
51%
3
38%
26
47%
31
53%
57
50%
9
41%
48
53%
57
50%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 113
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
110
97%
65
106
94%
85
57
50%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 111
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 105
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
102
97%
65
99
94%
85
54
51%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 8
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
8
100%
65
7
88%
85
3
38%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 55
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
53
96%
65
49
89%
85
26
47%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 58
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
57
98%
65
57
98%
85
31
53%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 113
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
110
97%
65
106
94%
85
57
50%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 22
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
22
100%
65
20
91%
85
9
41%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 91
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
88
97%
65
86
95%
85
48
53%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 113
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
110
97%
65
106
94%
85
57
50%
Physical Setting/Chemistry
Regents Physical Setting/Chemistry
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
79
78
1
1
1
77
79
39
40
79
10
69
79
55
76
96%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
76
96%
38
97%
38
95%
76
96%
10
100%
66
96%
76
96%
65
62
78%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
62
78%
28
72%
34
85%
62
78%
10
100%
52
75%
62
78%
85
13
16%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
13
16%
5
13%
8
20%
13
16%
1
10%
12
17%
13
16%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 79
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
76
96%
65
62
78%
85
13
16%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 78
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 77
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 79
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
76
96%
65
62
78%
85
13
16%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 39
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
38
97%
65
28
72%
85
5
13%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 40
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
38
95%
65
34
85%
85
8
20%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 79
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
76
96%
65
62
78%
85
13
16%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 10
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
10
100%
65
10
100%
85
1
10%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 69
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
66
96%
65
52
75%
85
12
17%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 79
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
76
96%
65
62
78%
85
13
16%
Physical Setting/Physics
Regents Physical Setting/Physics
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
56
56
1
1
54
56
27
29
56
5
51
56
55
56
100%
56
100%
_
_
_
_
_
_
56
100%
27
100%
29
100%
56
100%
5
100%
51
100%
56
100%
65
55
98%
55
98%
_
_
_
_
_
_
55
98%
27
100%
28
97%
55
98%
4
80%
51
100%
55
98%
85
35
63%
35
63%
_
_
_
_
_
_
35
63%
14
52%
21
72%
35
63%
2
40%
33
65%
35
63%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 56
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
56
100%
65
55
98%
85
35
63%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 56
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
56
100%
65
55
98%
85
35
63%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 54
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 56
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
56
100%
65
55
98%
85
35
63%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 27
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
27
100%
65
27
100%
85
14
52%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 29
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
29
100%
65
28
97%
85
21
72%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 56
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
56
100%
65
55
98%
85
35
63%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
5
100%
65
4
80%
85
2
40%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 51
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
51
100%
65
51
100%
85
33
65%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 56
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
56
100%
65
55
98%
85
35
63%
New York State Alternate Assessment (NYSAA) Results (2014 - 15)
GROUP
Grade 3 ELA
Grade 3 Math
Grade 4 ELA
Grade 4 Math
Grade 4 Science
Grade 5 ELA
Grade 5 Math
Grade 6 ELA
Grade 6 Math
Grade 7 ELA
Grade 7 Math
Grade 8 ELA
Grade 8 Math
Grade 8 Science
Secondary-Level ELA
Secondary-Level Math
Secondary-Level Science
Secondary-Level Social Studies
TOTAL TESTED
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
3
2
2
3
3
3
4
4
4
4
PROFICIENT
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
LEVEL 1
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
Grade 3 ELA
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 3 Math
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 4 ELA
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 4 Math
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 4 Science
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 5 ELA
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 5 Math
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 6 ELA
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 6 Math
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 7 ELA
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 7 Math
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 8 ELA
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 8 Math
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 8 Science
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Secondary-Level ELA
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Secondary-Level Math
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Secondary-Level Science
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Secondary-Level Social Studies
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
New York State English as a Second Language Achievement Test (NYSESLAT) Results (2014 - 15)
Grade 1
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED
3
1
2
ENTERING
_
_
_
EMERGING
_
_
_
TRANSITIONING
_
_
_
EXPANDING
_
_
_
COMMANDING
_
_
_
Grade 2
GROUP
All Students
General Education
TOTAL TESTED
2
2
ENTERING
_
_
EMERGING
_
_
TRANSITIONING
_
_
EXPANDING
_
_
COMMANDING
_
_
Grade 3
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED
2
1
1
ENTERING
_
_
_
EMERGING
_
_
_
TRANSITIONING
_
_
_
EXPANDING
_
_
_
COMMANDING
_
_
_
Grade 6
GROUP
All Students
General Education
TOTAL TESTED
1
1
ENTERING
_
_
EMERGING
_
_
TRANSITIONING
_
_
EXPANDING
_
_
COMMANDING
_
_
Grade 7
GROUP
All Students
General Education
TOTAL TESTED
1
1
ENTERING
_
_
EMERGING
_
_
TRANSITIONING
_
_
EXPANDING
_
_
COMMANDING
_
_
Grade 1
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 3
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 1
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 2
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
Grade 2
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 2
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 2
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
Grade 3
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 2
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 1
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 1
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
Grade 6
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 1
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 1
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
Grade 7
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 1
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 1
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
Elementary/Middle-Level English Language Arts Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: NO
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
NO
―
―
―
―
NO
―
NO
―
NO
Tested 95%
NO
―
―
―
―
NO
―
NO
―
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,552*
1
6
24
5
1,465*
4
173*
16
453*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
88%*
―
―
―
―
88%*
―
86%*
―
86%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
―
―
―
―
NO
―
YES
―
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
592
0
4
23
4
559
2
73✝
15
177
PI
105
―
―
―
―
106
―
49✝
―
76
EAMO
93
―
―
―
―
109
―
49
―
76
Safe Harbor Target
93
―
―
―
―
109
―
49
―
76
All Students
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,552*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
88%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
592
PI
105
EAMO
93
Safe Harbor Target
93
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
6
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
4
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
24
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
23
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
5
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
4
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
White
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,465*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
88%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
559
PI
106
EAMO
109
Safe Harbor Target
109
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
4
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
2
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
173*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
86%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
73✝
PI
49✝
EAMO
49
Safe Harbor Target
49
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
16
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
15
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
453*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
86%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
177
PI
76
EAMO
76
Safe Harbor Target
76
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,551*
1,534*
1,504*
1,539*
40
1,545*
1,379*
1,523*
1,099*
800*
752*
5
1,543*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
88%*
88%*
88%*
88%*
88%
88%*
89%*
88%*
89%*
86%*
91%*
―
88%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
592
588
569
588
33
590
523
577
415
288
304
5
587
PI
105
105
106
105
94
105
113
106
118
92
118
―
106
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,551*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
88%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
592
PI
105
Not Black or African American
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,534*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
88%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
588
PI
105
Not Hispanic or Latino
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,504*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
88%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
569
PI
106
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,539*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
88%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
588
PI
105
Not White
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
40
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
88%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
33
PI
94
Not Multiracial
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,545*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
88%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
590
PI
105
General Education
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,379*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
89%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
523
PI
113
English Proficient
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,523*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
88%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
577
PI
106
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,099*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
89%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
415
PI
118
Male
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
800*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
86%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
288
PI
92
Female
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
752*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
91%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
304
PI
118
Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
5
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
5
PI
―
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,543*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
88%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
587
PI
106
― There were fewer than 40 students enrolled during the test administration period, so the Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 tested students enrolled on BEDS day and during the test administration period, so the PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed. *The percentage of students tested in the current year fell below 95 percent, so the numbers of enrolled and tested students in the current year and previous year were combined to provide the school/district with another opportunity to meet the participation rate criterion. ✝ Includes former students with disabilities because the number of students with disabilities in the current year is equal to or greater than 30.
Elementary/Middle-Level Mathematics Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: NO
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
NO
―
―
―
―
NO
―
NO
―
NO
Tested 95%
NO
―
―
―
―
NO
―
NO
―
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,549*
1
6
24
5
1,463*
4
172*
16
451*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
85%*
―
―
―
―
84%*
―
82%*
―
79%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
YES
―
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
543
0
4
22
4
511
2
65✝
15
155
PI
128
―
―
―
―
131
―
60✝
―
97
EAMO
89
―
―
―
―
105
―
50
―
73
Safe Harbor Target
89
―
―
―
―
105
―
50
―
73
All Students
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,549*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
85%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
543
PI
128
EAMO
89
Safe Harbor Target
89
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
6
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
4
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
24
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
22
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
5
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
4
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
White
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,463*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
84%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
511
PI
131
EAMO
105
Safe Harbor Target
105
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
4
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
2
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
172*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
82%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
65✝
PI
60✝
EAMO
50
Safe Harbor Target
50
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
16
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
15
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
451*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
79%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
155
PI
97
EAMO
73
Safe Harbor Target
73
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,548*
1,531*
1,501*
1,536*
40
1,543*
1,377*
1,520*
1,098*
799*
750*
5
1,540*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
85%*
85%*
84%*
85%*
85%
85%*
85%*
84%*
87%*
83%*
86%*
―
85%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
543
539
521
539
32
541
482
528
388
265
278
5
538
PI
128
128
131
128
91
128
137
130
141
125
132
―
129
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,548*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
85%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
543
PI
128
Not Black or African American
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,531*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
85%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
539
PI
128
Not Hispanic or Latino
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,501*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
84%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
521
PI
131
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,536*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
85%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
539
PI
128
Not White
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
40
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
85%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
32
PI
91
Not Multiracial
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,543*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
85%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
541
PI
128
General Education
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,377*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
85%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
482
PI
137
English Proficient
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,520*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
84%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
528
PI
130
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,098*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
87%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
388
PI
141
Male
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
799*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
83%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
265
PI
125
Female
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
750*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
86%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
278
PI
132
Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
5
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
5
PI
―
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,540*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
85%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
538
PI
129
― There were fewer than 40 students enrolled during the test administration period, so the Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 tested students enrolled on BEDS day and during the test administration period, so the PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed. *The percentage of students tested in the current year fell below 95 percent, so the numbers of enrolled and tested students in the current year and previous year were combined to provide the school/district with another opportunity to meet the participation rate criterion. ✝ Includes former students with disabilities because the number of students with disabilities in the current year is equal to or greater than 30.
Elementary/Middle-Level Science Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: NO
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
NO
Tested 80%
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
530*
0
1
7
1
507*
0
34
5
143*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
83%*
―
―
―
―
82%*
―
―
―
78%*
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
175
0
1
6
0
168
0
16
5
51
PI
189
―
―
―
―
189
―
―
―
180
EAMO
177
―
―
―
―
185
―
―
―
164
Progress Target
177
―
―
―
―
185
―
―
―
164
All Students
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 80%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
530*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
83%*
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
175
PI
189
EAMO
177
Progress Target
177
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
7
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
6
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
White
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 80%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
507*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
82%*
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
168
PI
189
EAMO
185
Progress Target
185
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
34
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
16
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
5
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
5
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 80%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
143*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
78%*
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
51
PI
180
EAMO
164
Progress Target
164
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
530*
524*
518*
526*
9
529*
474*
524*
387*
278*
252*
2
527*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
83%*
82%*
83%*
83%*
―
83%*
84%*
82%*
85%*
80%*
85%*
―
83%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
175
174
169
175
7
175
159
170
124
81
94
2
173
PI
189
189
189
189
―
189
192
189
193
181
196
―
189
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
530*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
83%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
175
PI
189
Not Black or African American
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
524*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
82%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
174
PI
189
Not Hispanic or Latino
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
518*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
83%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
169
PI
189
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
526*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
83%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
175
PI
189
Not White
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
9
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
7
PI
―
Not Multiracial
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
529*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
83%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
175
PI
189
General Education
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
474*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
84%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
159
PI
192
English Proficient
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
524*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
82%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
170
PI
189
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
387*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
85%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
124
PI
193
Male
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
278*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
80%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
81
PI
181
Female
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
252*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
85%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
94
PI
196
Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
2
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
2
PI
―
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
527*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
83%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
173
PI
189
― There were fewer than 40 students enrolled during the test administration period, so the Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 tested students enrolled on BEDS day and during the test administration period, so the PI, EAMO, and Progress Target data are suppressed. *The percentage of students tested in the current year fell below 80 percent, so the numbers of enrolled and tested students in the current year and previous year were combined to provide the school/district with another opportunity to meet the participation rate criterion.
Secondary-Level English Language Arts Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: YES
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
―
Tested 95%
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
―
12th graders
116
0
0
3
1
112
0
9
1
24
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
―
―
―
―
100%
―
―
―
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
115
0
0
3
1
111
0
10
1
23
PI
181
―
―
―
―
181
―
―
―
―
EAMO
160
―
―
―
―
171
―
―
―
―
Safe Harbor Target
160
―
―
―
―
171
―
―
―
―
All Students
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
YES
12th Graders
116
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
115
PI
181
EAMO
160
Safe Harbor Target
160
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
3
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
3
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
1
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
1
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
White
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
YES
12th Graders
112
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
111
PI
181
EAMO
171
Safe Harbor Target
171
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
9
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
10
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
1
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
1
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
24
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
23
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
12th Graders
116
116
113
115
4
116
107
115
92
63
53
0
116
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
100%
100%
100%
―
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
―
100%
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
115
115
112
114
4
115
105
114
92
62
53
0
115
PI
181
181
181
181
―
181
186
182
186
174
189
―
181
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
12th Graders
116
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
115
PI
181
Not Black or African American
12th Graders
116
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
115
PI
181
Not Hispanic or Latino
12th Graders
113
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
112
PI
181
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
12th Graders
115
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
114
PI
181
Not White
12th Graders
4
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
4
PI
―
Not Multiracial
12th Graders
116
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
115
PI
181
General Education
12th Graders
107
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
105
PI
186
English Proficient
12th Graders
115
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
114
PI
182
Not Economically Disadvantaged
12th Graders
92
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
92
PI
186
Male
12th Graders
63
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
62
PI
174
Female
12th Graders
53
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
53
PI
189
Migrant
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
Not Migrant
12th Graders
116
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
115
PI
181
― There were fewer than 40 12th graders, so the Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 students in the 2011 accountability cohort, so PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed.
Secondary-Level Mathematics Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: NO
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
YES
―
―
―
―
NO
―
―
―
―
Tested 95%
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
―
12th graders
116
0
0
3
1
112
0
9
1
24
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
―
―
―
―
100%
―
―
―
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
―
―
―
―
NO
―
―
―
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
115
0
0
3
1
111
0
10
1
23
PI
145
―
―
―
―
145
―
―
―
―
EAMO
144
―
―
―
―
156
―
―
―
―
Safe Harbor Target
144
―
―
―
―
156
―
―
―
―
All Students
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
YES
12th Graders
116
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
115
PI
145
EAMO
144
Safe Harbor Target
144
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
3
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
3
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
1
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
1
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
White
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
YES
12th Graders
112
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
111
PI
145
EAMO
156
Safe Harbor Target
156
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
9
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
10
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
1
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
1
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
24
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
23
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
12th Graders
116
116
113
115
4
116
107
115
92
63
53
0
116
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
100%
100%
100%
―
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
―
100%
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
115
115
112
114
4
115
105
114
92
62
53
0
115
PI
145
145
145
146
―
145
152
145
149
144
147
―
145
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
12th Graders
116
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
115
PI
145
Not Black or African American
12th Graders
116
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
115
PI
145
Not Hispanic or Latino
12th Graders
113
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
112
PI
145
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
12th Graders
115
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
114
PI
146
Not White
12th Graders
4
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
4
PI
―
Not Multiracial
12th Graders
116
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
115
PI
145
General Education
12th Graders
107
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
105
PI
152
English Proficient
12th Graders
115
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
114
PI
145
Not Economically Disadvantaged
12th Graders
92
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
92
PI
149
Male
12th Graders
63
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
62
PI
144
Female
12th Graders
53
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
53
PI
147
Migrant
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
Not Migrant
12th Graders
116
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
115
PI
145
― There were fewer than 40 12th graders, so the Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 students in the 2011 accountability cohort, so PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed.
Unweighted Combined ELA and Math PIs
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
105
―
―
―
―
106
―
49
―
76
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
128
―
―
―
―
131
―
60
―
97
Secondary-Level ELA PI
181
―
―
―
―
181
―
―
―
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
145
―
―
―
―
145
―
―
―
―
UNWEIGHTED COMBINED PI
140
0
0
0
0
141
0
55
0
87
All Students
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
105
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
128
Secondary-Level ELA PI
181
Secondary-Level MATH PI
145
Unweighted Combined PI
140
American Indian or Alaska Native
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Black or African American
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Hispanic or Latino
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
White
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
106
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
131
Secondary-Level ELA PI
181
Secondary-Level MATH PI
145
Unweighted Combined PI
141
Multiracial
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Students With Disabilities
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
49
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
60
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
55
Limited English Proficient
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Economically Disadvantaged
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
76
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
97
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
87
― There were not enough students to determine a Performance Index.
Overall Graduation Rate for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: YES
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
YES
All Students
MADE AYP
YES
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP
―
White
MADE AYP
YES
Multiracial
MADE AYP
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP
―
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
YES
― There were not enough students to make an AYP determination.
Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort for Accountability
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion:
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
YES
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
144
0
4
3
1
136
0
18
0
42
Graduation Rate
94%
―
―
―
―
95%
―
―
―
93%
State Standard
80%
―
―
―
―
80%
―
―
―
80%
Progress Target
80%
―
―
―
―
80%
―
―
―
8%
All Students
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
144
Graduation Rate
94%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%
American Indian or Alaska Native
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Black or African American
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
4
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
3
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
1
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
White
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
136
Graduation Rate
95%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%
Multiracial
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Students With Disabilities
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
18
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Limited English Proficient
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
42
Graduation Rate
93%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
8%
YES Graduation rate is equal to or greater than the State Standard or the group's Progress Target. NO Graduation rate is less than the State Standard and the group's Progress Target.
― There were fewer than 30 students in the cohort.
Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort for Accountability
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion:
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
―
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
160
0
2
1
0
157
0
17
0
8
Graduation Rate
89%
―
―
―
―
89%
―
―
―
―
State Standard
80%
―
―
―
―
80%
―
―
―
―
Progress Target
80%
―
―
―
―
80%
―
―
―
―
All Students
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
160
Graduation Rate
89%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%
American Indian or Alaska Native
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Black or African American
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
2
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
1
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
White
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
157
Graduation Rate
89%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%
Multiracial
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Students With Disabilities
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
17
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Limited English Proficient
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
8
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
YES Graduation rate is equal to or greater than the State Standard or the group's Progress Target. NO Graduation rate is less than the State Standard and the group's Progress Target.
― There were fewer than 30 students in the cohort.
Graduation Rates for Non-AYP Groups for Accountability
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
144
140
141
143
8
144
126
144
102
78
66
1
143
Graduation Rate
94%
95%
94%
94%
―
94%
95%
94%
95%
94%
95%
―
94%
Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
2009 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
160
158
159
160
3
160
143
160
152
88
72
0
160
Graduation Rate
89%
89%
89%
89%
―
89%
93%
89%
94%
85%
94%
―
89%
Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
144
Graduation Rate
94%
Not Black or African American
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
140
Graduation Rate
95%
Not Hispanic or Latino
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
141
Graduation Rate
94%
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
143
Graduation Rate
94%
Not White
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
8
Graduation Rate
―
Not Multiracial
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
144
Graduation Rate
94%
General Education
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
126
Graduation Rate
95%
English Proficient
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
144
Graduation Rate
94%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
102
Graduation Rate
95%
Male
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
78
Graduation Rate
94%
Female
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
66
Graduation Rate
95%
Migrant
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
1
Graduation Rate
―
Not Migrant
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
143
Graduation Rate
94%
Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
160
Graduation Rate
89%
Not Black or African American
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
158
Graduation Rate
89%
Not Hispanic or Latino
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
159
Graduation Rate
89%
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
160
Graduation Rate
89%
Not White
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
3
Graduation Rate
―
Not Multiracial
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
160
Graduation Rate
89%
General Education
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
143
Graduation Rate
93%
English Proficient
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
160
Graduation Rate
89%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
152
Graduation Rate
94%
Male
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
88
Graduation Rate
85%
Female
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
72
Graduation Rate
94%
Migrant
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
Not Migrant
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
160
Graduation Rate
89%
― There were fewer than 30 students in the cohort.
Graduation Rates for Regents with Advanced Designation and CTE Endorsement for Accountability
Percentage of 2010 Graduation-Rate Total Cohort members who graduated as of August 31, 2014 with:
Regents Diploma with an Advanced Designation (This District)
40%
Regents Diploma with an Advanced Designation (Statewide)
31%
Percentage in This District Exceeded Statewide
YES
Regents Diploma with an Advanced Designation (This District)
40%
Regents Diploma with an Advanced Designation (Statewide)
31%
Percentage in This District Exceeded Statewide
YES
Regents Diploma with CTE Endorsement (This District)
1%
Regents Diploma with CTE Endorsement (Statewide)
4%
Percentage in This District Exceeded Statewide
NO
Regents Diploma with CTE Endorsement (This District)
You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.
Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.
If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.
