BURNT HILLS-BALLSTON LAKE CSD - School Report Card Data [2013 - 14]
The New York State Report Card is an important part of the Board of Regents' effort to raise learning standards for all students. It provides information to the public on school/district enrollment and staff, student performance, and other measures of school and district performance. Knowledge gained from the report card on a school's or district's strengths and weaknesses can be used to improve instruction and services to students. Report Card Data - Glossary of Terms | Accountability Data - Glossary of Terms | Business Rules
BURNT HILLS-BALLSTON LAKE CSD ENROLLMENT (2013 - 14)
K-12 ENROLLMENT
3,179
ENROLLMENT BY GENDER
MALE
1,590
50%
FEMALE
1,589
50%
ENROLLMENT BY ETHNICITY
GROUP
AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE
BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN
HISPANIC OR LATINO
ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER
WHITE
MULTIRACIAL
TOTAL
2
32
50
48
3,005
42
PERCENT
0%
1%
2%
2%
95%
1%
OTHER GROUPS
ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
5
0%
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
409
13%
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
355
11%
ENROLLMENT BY GRADE
GROUP
K (FULL DAY)
1ST GRADE
2ND GRADE
3RD GRADE
4TH GRADE
5TH GRADE
6TH GRADE
UNGRADED ELEMENTARY
7TH GRADE
8TH GRADE
9TH GRADE
10TH GRADE
11TH GRADE
12TH GRADE
UNGRADED SECONDARY
TOTAL
196
200
228
187
244
256
239
10
235
248
279
271
281
296
9
PERCENT
6%
6%
7%
6%
8%
8%
8%
0%
7%
8%
9%
9%
9%
9%
0%
BURNT HILLS-BALLSTON LAKE CSD ENROLLMENT (2013 - 14)
K-12 Enrollment: 3,179
ENROLLMENT BY GENDER
MALE
1,590
50%
FEMALE
1,589
50%
ENROLLMENT BY ETHNICITY
AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE
2
0%
BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN
32
1%
HISPANIC OR LATINO
50
2%
ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER
48
2%
WHITE
3,005
95%
MULTIRACIAL
42
1%
OTHER GROUPS
ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
5
0%
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
409
13%
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
355
11%
ENROLLMENT BY GRADE
K (FULL DAY)
196
6%
1ST GRADE
200
6%
2ND GRADE
228
7%
3RD GRADE
187
6%
4TH GRADE
244
8%
5TH GRADE
256
8%
6TH GRADE
239
8%
UNGRADED ELEMENTARY
10
0%
7TH GRADE
235
7%
8TH GRADE
248
8%
9TH GRADE
279
9%
10TH GRADE
271
9%
11TH GRADE
281
9%
12TH GRADE
296
9%
UNGRADED SECONDARY
9
0%
Average Class Size (2013 - 14)
GROUP
Common Branch
Grade 8 English
Grade 8 Mathematics
Grade 8 Science
Grade 8 Social Studies
Grade 10 English
Grade 10 Mathematics
Grade 10 Science
Grade 10 Social Studies
CLASS SIZE
21
22
20
22
24
20
22
18
23
Average Class Size (2013 - 14)
Common Branch
21
Grade 8 English
22
Grade 8 Mathematics
20
Grade 8 Science
22
Grade 8 Social Studies
24
Grade 10 English
20
Grade 10 Mathematics
22
Grade 10 Science
18
Grade 10 Social Studies
23
Average Class Size (2013 - 14)
GROUP
Common Branch
Grade 8 English
Grade 8 Mathematics
Grade 8 Science
Grade 8 Social Studies
Grade 10 English
Grade 10 Mathematics
Grade 10 Science
Grade 10 Social Studies
CLASS SIZE
21
22
20
22
24
20
22
18
23
Average Class Size (2013 - 14)
Common Branch
21
Grade 8 English
22
Grade 8 Mathematics
20
Grade 8 Science
22
Grade 8 Social Studies
24
Grade 10 English
20
Grade 10 Mathematics
22
Grade 10 Science
18
Grade 10 Social Studies
23
Average Class Size (2013 - 14)
GROUP
Common Branch
Grade 8 English
Grade 8 Mathematics
Grade 8 Science
Grade 8 Social Studies
Grade 10 English
Grade 10 Mathematics
Grade 10 Science
Grade 10 Social Studies
CLASS SIZE
21
22
20
22
24
20
22
18
23
Average Class Size (2013 - 14)
Common Branch
21
Grade 8 English
22
Grade 8 Mathematics
20
Grade 8 Science
22
Grade 8 Social Studies
24
Grade 10 English
20
Grade 10 Mathematics
22
Grade 10 Science
18
Grade 10 Social Studies
23
Average Class Size (2013 - 14)
GROUP
Common Branch
Grade 8 English
Grade 8 Mathematics
Grade 8 Science
Grade 8 Social Studies
Grade 10 English
Grade 10 Mathematics
Grade 10 Science
Grade 10 Social Studies
CLASS SIZE
21
22
20
22
24
20
22
18
23
Average Class Size (2013 - 14)
Common Branch
21
Grade 8 English
22
Grade 8 Mathematics
20
Grade 8 Science
22
Grade 8 Social Studies
24
Grade 10 English
20
Grade 10 Mathematics
22
Grade 10 Science
18
Grade 10 Social Studies
23
Average Class Size (2013 - 14)
GROUP
Common Branch
Grade 8 English
Grade 8 Mathematics
Grade 8 Science
Grade 8 Social Studies
Grade 10 English
Grade 10 Mathematics
Grade 10 Science
Grade 10 Social Studies
CLASS SIZE
21
22
20
22
24
20
22
18
23
Average Class Size (2013 - 14)
Common Branch
21
Grade 8 English
22
Grade 8 Mathematics
20
Grade 8 Science
22
Grade 8 Social Studies
24
Grade 10 English
20
Grade 10 Mathematics
22
Grade 10 Science
18
Grade 10 Social Studies
23
Average Class Size (2013 - 14)
GROUP
Common Branch
Grade 8 English
Grade 8 Mathematics
Grade 8 Science
Grade 8 Social Studies
Grade 10 English
Grade 10 Mathematics
Grade 10 Science
Grade 10 Social Studies
CLASS SIZE
21
22
20
22
24
20
22
18
23
Average Class Size (2013 - 14)
Common Branch
21
Grade 8 English
22
Grade 8 Mathematics
20
Grade 8 Science
22
Grade 8 Social Studies
24
Grade 10 English
20
Grade 10 Mathematics
22
Grade 10 Science
18
Grade 10 Social Studies
23
Average Class Size (2013 - 14)
GROUP
Common Branch
Grade 8 English
Grade 8 Mathematics
Grade 8 Science
Grade 8 Social Studies
Grade 10 English
Grade 10 Mathematics
Grade 10 Science
Grade 10 Social Studies
CLASS SIZE
21
22
20
22
24
20
22
18
23
Average Class Size (2013 - 14)
Common Branch
21
Grade 8 English
22
Grade 8 Mathematics
20
Grade 8 Science
22
Grade 8 Social Studies
24
Grade 10 English
20
Grade 10 Mathematics
22
Grade 10 Science
18
Grade 10 Social Studies
23
Average Class Size (2013 - 14)
GROUP
Common Branch
Grade 8 English
Grade 8 Mathematics
Grade 8 Science
Grade 8 Social Studies
Grade 10 English
Grade 10 Mathematics
Grade 10 Science
Grade 10 Social Studies
CLASS SIZE
21
22
20
22
24
20
22
18
23
Average Class Size (2013 - 14)
Common Branch
21
Grade 8 English
22
Grade 8 Mathematics
20
Grade 8 Science
22
Grade 8 Social Studies
24
Grade 10 English
20
Grade 10 Mathematics
22
Grade 10 Science
18
Grade 10 Social Studies
23
Average Class Size (2013 - 14)
GROUP
Common Branch
Grade 8 English
Grade 8 Mathematics
Grade 8 Science
Grade 8 Social Studies
Grade 10 English
Grade 10 Mathematics
Grade 10 Science
Grade 10 Social Studies
CLASS SIZE
21
22
20
22
24
20
22
18
23
Average Class Size (2013 - 14)
Common Branch
21
Grade 8 English
22
Grade 8 Mathematics
20
Grade 8 Science
22
Grade 8 Social Studies
24
Grade 10 English
20
Grade 10 Mathematics
22
Grade 10 Science
18
Grade 10 Social Studies
23
Free and Reduced-Price Lunch (2013 - 14)
ELIGIBLE FOR FREE LUNCH
241
8%
ELIGIBLE FOR REDUCED-PRICE LUNCH
89
3%
Free and Reduced-Price Lunch (2013 - 14)
Eligible for Free Lunch
241
8%
Eligible for Reduced-Price Lunch
89
3%
ATTENDANCE (2012 - 13)
ANNUAL ATTENDANCE RATE
96%
Attendance (2012 - 13)
Annual Attendance Rate
96%
Teacher Turnover Rate (2012-13 to 2013-14)
Turnover Rate of Teachers with Fewer Than Five Years of Experience
12%
TURNOVER RATE OF ALL TEACHERS
7%
Teacher Turnover Rate (2012-13 to 2013-14)
Turnover Rate of Teachers with Fewer Than Five Years of Experience
12%
Turnover Rate of All Teachers
7%
Staff Counts (2013 - 14)
GROUP
PRINCIPALS
ASSISTANT PRINCIPALS
OTHER PROFESSIONAL STAFF
PARAPROFESSIONALS
STAFF
5
3
36
103
Staff Counts (2013 - 14)
Principals
5
Assistant Principals
3
Other Professional Staff
36
Paraprofessionals
103
Teacher Qualifications (2013 - 14)
TOTAL TEACHERS
269
PERCENT WITH NO VALID TEACHING CERTIFICATE
0%
PERCENT TEACHING OUT OF CERTIFICATE
1%
PERCENT WITH FEWER THAN THREE YEARS OF EXPERIENCE
3%
PERCENTAGE WITH MASTER'S DEGREEPLUS 30 HOURS OR DOCTORATE
16%
TOTAL NUMBER OF CORE CLASSES
619
Percent Not Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers in This District
0%
Total Number of Classes
935
Percent Taught by Teachers Without Appropriate Certification
2%
Teacher Qualifications (2013 - 14)
TOTAL TEACHERS: 269
Percent with No Valid Teaching Certificate
0%
Percent Teaching Out of Certification
1%
Percent with Fewer Than Three Years of Experience
3%
Percentage with Master's Degree Plus 30 Hours or Doctorate
16%
Total Number of Core Classes
619
Percent Not Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers in This District
0%
Total Number of Classes
935
Percent Taught by Teachers Without Appropriate Certification
2%
High School Completers (2013 - 14)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
292
262
30
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
290
262
28
REGENTS DIPLOMA
284
98%
262
100%
22
79%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
REGENTS WITH ADVANCED DESIGNATION
165
57%
165
63%
0
0%
REGENTS WITH CTE ENDORSEMENT
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
LOCAL DIPLOMAS
6
2%
0
0%
6
21%
COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS
2
1%
0
0%
2
7%
All Students
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
292
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
290
Regents Diploma
284
98%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
165
57%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
0
0%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
6
2%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
2
1%
of Completers
General Education
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
262
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
262
Regents Diploma
262
100%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
165
63%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
0
0%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
0
0%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
0
0%
of Completers
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
30
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
28
Regents Diploma
22
79%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
0
0%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
0
0%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
6
21%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
2
7%
of Completers
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
292
262
30
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
290
262
28
REGENTS DIPLOMA
284
98%
262
100%
22
79%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
REGENTS WITH ADVANCED DESIGNATION
165
57%
165
63%
0
0%
REGENTS WITH CTE ENDORSEMENT
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
LOCAL DIPLOMAS
6
2%
0
0%
6
21%
COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS
2
1%
0
0%
2
7%
All Students
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
292
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
290
Regents Diploma
284
98%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
165
57%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
0
0%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
6
2%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
2
1%
of Completers
General Education
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
262
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
262
Regents Diploma
262
100%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
165
63%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
0
0%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
0
0%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
0
0%
of Completers
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
30
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
28
Regents Diploma
22
79%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
0
0%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
0
0%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
6
21%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
2
7%
of Completers
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
292
262
30
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
290
262
28
REGENTS DIPLOMA
284
98%
262
100%
22
79%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
REGENTS WITH ADVANCED DESIGNATION
165
57%
165
63%
0
0%
REGENTS WITH CTE ENDORSEMENT
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
LOCAL DIPLOMAS
6
2%
0
0%
6
21%
COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS
2
1%
0
0%
2
7%
All Students
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
292
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
290
Regents Diploma
284
98%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
165
57%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
0
0%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
6
2%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
2
1%
of Completers
General Education
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
262
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
262
Regents Diploma
262
100%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
165
63%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
0
0%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
0
0%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
0
0%
of Completers
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
30
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
28
Regents Diploma
22
79%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
0
0%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
0
0%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
6
21%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
2
7%
of Completers
High School Non-completers (2013 - 14)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
5
0%
_
_
_
_
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
0
0%
_
_
_
_
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
5
0%
_
_
_
_
All Students
DROPPED OUT
5
0%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
0
0%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
5
0%
General Education
DROPPED OUT
_
_%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
_
_%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
_
_%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
_
_%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
_
_%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
5
0%
_
_
_
_
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
0
0%
_
_
_
_
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
5
0%
_
_
_
_
All Students
DROPPED OUT
5
0%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
0
0%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
5
0%
General Education
DROPPED OUT
_
_%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
_
_%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
_
_%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
_
_%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
_
_%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
5
0%
_
_
_
_
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
0
0%
_
_
_
_
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
5
0%
_
_
_
_
All Students
DROPPED OUT
5
0%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
0
0%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
5
0%
General Education
DROPPED OUT
_
_%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
_
_%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
_
_%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
_
_%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
_
_%
Post-graduation Plans of Completers (2013 - 14)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO FOUR-YEAR COLLEGE
167
57%
164
63%
3
10%
TO TWO-YEAR COLLEGE
94
32%
78
30%
16
53%
TO OTHER POST-SECONDARY
4
1%
3
1%
1
3%
TO THE MILITARY
10
3%
9
3%
1
3%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO EMPLOYMENT
12
4%
5
2%
7
23%
TO ADULT SERVICES
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
TO OTHER KNOWN PLANS
5
2%
3
1%
2
7%
PLANS UNKNOWN
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
All Students
To Four-Year College
167
57%
To Two-Year College
94
32%
To Other Post-Secondary
4
1%
To the Military
10
3%
To Employment
12
4%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
5
2%
Plan Unknown
0
0%
General Education
To Four-Year College
164
63%
To Two-Year College
78
30%
To Other Post-Secondary
3
1%
To the Military
9
3%
To Employment
5
2%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
3
1%
Plan Unknown
0
0%
Students with Disabilities
To Four-Year College
3
10%
To Two-Year College
16
53%
To Other Post-Secondary
1
3%
To the Military
1
3%
To Employment
7
23%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
2
7%
Plan Unknown
0
0%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO FOUR-YEAR COLLEGE
167
57%
164
63%
3
10%
TO TWO-YEAR COLLEGE
94
32%
78
30%
16
53%
TO OTHER POST-SECONDARY
4
1%
3
1%
1
3%
TO THE MILITARY
10
3%
9
3%
1
3%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO EMPLOYMENT
12
4%
5
2%
7
23%
TO ADULT SERVICES
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
TO OTHER KNOWN PLANS
5
2%
3
1%
2
7%
PLANS UNKNOWN
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
All Students
To Four-Year College
167
57%
To Two-Year College
94
32%
To Other Post-Secondary
4
1%
To the Military
10
3%
To Employment
12
4%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
5
2%
Plan Unknown
0
0%
General Education
To Four-Year College
164
63%
To Two-Year College
78
30%
To Other Post-Secondary
3
1%
To the Military
9
3%
To Employment
5
2%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
3
1%
Plan Unknown
0
0%
Students with Disabilities
To Four-Year College
3
10%
To Two-Year College
16
53%
To Other Post-Secondary
1
3%
To the Military
1
3%
To Employment
7
23%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
2
7%
Plan Unknown
0
0%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO FOUR-YEAR COLLEGE
167
57%
164
63%
3
10%
TO TWO-YEAR COLLEGE
94
32%
78
30%
16
53%
TO OTHER POST-SECONDARY
4
1%
3
1%
1
3%
TO THE MILITARY
10
3%
9
3%
1
3%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO EMPLOYMENT
12
4%
5
2%
7
23%
TO ADULT SERVICES
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
TO OTHER KNOWN PLANS
5
2%
3
1%
2
7%
PLANS UNKNOWN
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
All Students
To Four-Year College
167
57%
To Two-Year College
94
32%
To Other Post-Secondary
4
1%
To the Military
10
3%
To Employment
12
4%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
5
2%
Plan Unknown
0
0%
General Education
To Four-Year College
164
63%
To Two-Year College
78
30%
To Other Post-Secondary
3
1%
To the Military
9
3%
To Employment
5
2%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
3
1%
Plan Unknown
0
0%
Students with Disabilities
To Four-Year College
3
10%
To Two-Year College
16
53%
To Other Post-Secondary
1
3%
To the Military
1
3%
To Employment
7
23%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
2
7%
Plan Unknown
0
0%
Grade 3 English Language Arts
MEAN SCORE: 311
All Students
PROFICIENT
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 180
LEVEL 1
38
21%
LEVEL 2
58
32%
LEVEL 3
77
43%
LEVEL 4
7
4%
General Education
PROFICIENT
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 164
LEVEL 1
27
16%
LEVEL 2
55
34%
LEVEL 3
75
46%
LEVEL 4
7
4%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 16
LEVEL 1
11
69%
LEVEL 2
3
19%
LEVEL 3
2
13%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 166
LEVEL 1
34
20%
LEVEL 2
54
33%
LEVEL 3
72
43%
LEVEL 4
6
4%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 14
LEVEL 1
4
29%
LEVEL 2
4
29%
LEVEL 3
5
36%
LEVEL 4
1
7%
Female
PROFICIENT
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 97
LEVEL 1
21
22%
LEVEL 2
29
30%
LEVEL 3
41
42%
LEVEL 4
6
6%
Male
PROFICIENT
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 83
LEVEL 1
17
20%
LEVEL 2
29
35%
LEVEL 3
36
43%
LEVEL 4
1
1%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 179
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 29
LEVEL 1
13
45%
LEVEL 2
12
41%
LEVEL 3
4
14%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 151
LEVEL 1
25
17%
LEVEL 2
46
30%
LEVEL 3
73
48%
LEVEL 4
7
5%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 180
LEVEL 1
38
21%
LEVEL 2
58
32%
LEVEL 3
77
43%
LEVEL 4
7
4%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
180
164
16
4
3
4
166
3
14
97
83
179
1
29
151
180
PROFICIENT
47%
50%
13%
_%
_%
_%
47%
_%
43%
48%
45%
_%
_%
14%
53%
47%
LEVEL 1
38
21%
27
16%
11
69%
_
_
_
_
_
_
34
20%
_
_
4
29%
21
22%
17
20%
_
_
_
_
13
45%
25
17%
38
21%
LEVEL 2
58
32%
55
34%
3
19%
_
_
_
_
_
_
54
33%
_
_
4
29%
29
30%
29
35%
_
_
_
_
12
41%
46
30%
58
32%
LEVEL 3
77
43%
75
46%
2
13%
_
_
_
_
_
_
72
43%
_
_
5
36%
41
42%
36
43%
_
_
_
_
4
14%
73
48%
77
43%
LEVEL 4
7
4%
7
4%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
6
4%
_
_
1
7%
6
6%
1
1%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
7
5%
7
4%
Grade 4 English Language Arts
MEAN SCORE: 319
All Students
PROFICIENT
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 239
LEVEL 1
27
11%
LEVEL 2
76
32%
LEVEL 3
95
40%
LEVEL 4
41
17%
General Education
PROFICIENT
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 212
LEVEL 1
12
6%
LEVEL 2
67
32%
LEVEL 3
92
43%
LEVEL 4
41
19%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 27
LEVEL 1
15
56%
LEVEL 2
9
33%
LEVEL 3
3
11%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
33%
LEVEL 3
3
50%
LEVEL 4
1
17%
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 224
LEVEL 1
27
12%
LEVEL 2
70
31%
LEVEL 3
87
39%
LEVEL 4
40
18%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
4
44%
LEVEL 3
5
56%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Female
PROFICIENT
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 110
LEVEL 1
12
11%
LEVEL 2
29
26%
LEVEL 3
46
42%
LEVEL 4
23
21%
Male
PROFICIENT
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 129
LEVEL 1
15
12%
LEVEL 2
47
36%
LEVEL 3
49
38%
LEVEL 4
18
14%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 239
LEVEL 1
27
11%
LEVEL 2
76
32%
LEVEL 3
95
40%
LEVEL 4
41
17%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 33
LEVEL 1
9
27%
LEVEL 2
9
27%
LEVEL 3
12
36%
LEVEL 4
3
9%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 206
LEVEL 1
18
9%
LEVEL 2
67
33%
LEVEL 3
83
40%
LEVEL 4
38
18%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 239
LEVEL 1
27
11%
LEVEL 2
76
32%
LEVEL 3
95
40%
LEVEL 4
41
17%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
239
212
27
6
1
5
224
3
9
110
129
239
33
206
239
PROFICIENT
57%
63%
11%
67%
_%
_%
57%
_%
56%
63%
52%
57%
45%
59%
57%
LEVEL 1
27
11%
12
6%
15
56%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
27
12%
_
_
0
0%
12
11%
15
12%
27
11%
9
27%
18
9%
27
11%
LEVEL 2
76
32%
67
32%
9
33%
2
33%
_
_
_
_
70
31%
_
_
4
44%
29
26%
47
36%
76
32%
9
27%
67
33%
76
32%
LEVEL 3
95
40%
92
43%
3
11%
3
50%
_
_
_
_
87
39%
_
_
5
56%
46
42%
49
38%
95
40%
12
36%
83
40%
95
40%
LEVEL 4
41
17%
41
19%
0
0%
1
17%
_
_
_
_
40
18%
_
_
0
0%
23
21%
18
14%
41
17%
3
9%
38
18%
41
17%
Grade 5 English Language Arts
MEAN SCORE: 311
All Students
PROFICIENT
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 248
LEVEL 1
42
17%
LEVEL 2
99
40%
LEVEL 3
70
28%
LEVEL 4
37
15%
General Education
PROFICIENT
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 207
LEVEL 1
21
10%
LEVEL 2
85
41%
LEVEL 3
65
31%
LEVEL 4
36
17%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 41
LEVEL 1
21
51%
LEVEL 2
14
34%
LEVEL 3
5
12%
LEVEL 4
1
2%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 8
LEVEL 1
2
25%
LEVEL 2
2
25%
LEVEL 3
2
25%
LEVEL 4
2
25%
White
PROFICIENT
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 231
LEVEL 1
36
16%
LEVEL 2
95
41%
LEVEL 3
66
29%
LEVEL 4
34
15%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
4
44%
LEVEL 2
2
22%
LEVEL 3
2
22%
LEVEL 4
1
11%
Female
PROFICIENT
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 138
LEVEL 1
17
12%
LEVEL 2
56
41%
LEVEL 3
38
28%
LEVEL 4
27
20%
Male
PROFICIENT
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 110
LEVEL 1
25
23%
LEVEL 2
43
39%
LEVEL 3
32
29%
LEVEL 4
10
9%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 247
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 34
LEVEL 1
12
35%
LEVEL 2
11
32%
LEVEL 3
8
24%
LEVEL 4
3
9%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 214
LEVEL 1
30
14%
LEVEL 2
88
41%
LEVEL 3
62
29%
LEVEL 4
34
16%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 248
LEVEL 1
42
17%
LEVEL 2
99
40%
LEVEL 3
70
28%
LEVEL 4
37
15%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
248
207
41
3
4
8
231
2
9
138
110
247
1
34
214
248
PROFICIENT
43%
49%
15%
_%
_%
50%
43%
_%
33%
47%
38%
_%
_%
32%
45%
43%
LEVEL 1
42
17%
21
10%
21
51%
_
_
_
_
2
25%
36
16%
_
_
4
44%
17
12%
25
23%
_
_
_
_
12
35%
30
14%
42
17%
LEVEL 2
99
40%
85
41%
14
34%
_
_
_
_
2
25%
95
41%
_
_
2
22%
56
41%
43
39%
_
_
_
_
11
32%
88
41%
99
40%
LEVEL 3
70
28%
65
31%
5
12%
_
_
_
_
2
25%
66
29%
_
_
2
22%
38
28%
32
29%
_
_
_
_
8
24%
62
29%
70
28%
LEVEL 4
37
15%
36
17%
1
2%
_
_
_
_
2
25%
34
15%
_
_
1
11%
27
20%
10
9%
_
_
_
_
3
9%
34
16%
37
15%
Grade 6 English Language Arts
MEAN SCORE: 311
All Students
PROFICIENT
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 234
LEVEL 1
24
10%
LEVEL 2
109
47%
LEVEL 3
58
25%
LEVEL 4
43
18%
General Education
PROFICIENT
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 208
LEVEL 1
13
6%
LEVEL 2
94
45%
LEVEL 3
58
28%
LEVEL 4
43
21%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 26
LEVEL 1
11
42%
LEVEL 2
15
58%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
1
20%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
4
80%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 221
LEVEL 1
23
10%
LEVEL 2
103
47%
LEVEL 3
53
24%
LEVEL 4
42
19%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 8
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
6
75%
LEVEL 3
1
13%
LEVEL 4
1
13%
Female
PROFICIENT
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 109
LEVEL 1
6
6%
LEVEL 2
48
44%
LEVEL 3
32
29%
LEVEL 4
23
21%
Male
PROFICIENT
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 125
LEVEL 1
18
14%
LEVEL 2
61
49%
LEVEL 3
26
21%
LEVEL 4
20
16%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 234
LEVEL 1
24
10%
LEVEL 2
109
47%
LEVEL 3
58
25%
LEVEL 4
43
18%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 23
LEVEL 1
4
17%
LEVEL 2
12
52%
LEVEL 3
6
26%
LEVEL 4
1
4%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 211
LEVEL 1
20
9%
LEVEL 2
97
46%
LEVEL 3
52
25%
LEVEL 4
42
20%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 234
LEVEL 1
24
10%
LEVEL 2
109
47%
LEVEL 3
58
25%
LEVEL 4
43
18%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
234
208
26
5
2
3
221
3
8
109
125
234
23
211
234
PROFICIENT
43%
49%
0%
80%
_%
_%
43%
_%
25%
50%
37%
43%
30%
45%
43%
LEVEL 1
24
10%
13
6%
11
42%
1
20%
_
_
_
_
23
10%
_
_
0
0%
6
6%
18
14%
24
10%
4
17%
20
9%
24
10%
LEVEL 2
109
47%
94
45%
15
58%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
103
47%
_
_
6
75%
48
44%
61
49%
109
47%
12
52%
97
46%
109
47%
LEVEL 3
58
25%
58
28%
0
0%
4
80%
_
_
_
_
53
24%
_
_
1
13%
32
29%
26
21%
58
25%
6
26%
52
25%
58
25%
LEVEL 4
43
18%
43
21%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
42
19%
_
_
1
13%
23
21%
20
16%
43
18%
1
4%
42
20%
43
18%
Grade 7 English Language Arts
MEAN SCORE: 307
All Students
PROFICIENT
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 232
LEVEL 1
50
22%
LEVEL 2
88
38%
LEVEL 3
69
30%
LEVEL 4
25
11%
General Education
PROFICIENT
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 200
LEVEL 1
29
15%
LEVEL 2
79
40%
LEVEL 3
68
34%
LEVEL 4
24
12%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 32
LEVEL 1
21
66%
LEVEL 2
9
28%
LEVEL 3
1
3%
LEVEL 4
1
3%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 216
LEVEL 1
44
20%
LEVEL 2
81
38%
LEVEL 3
67
31%
LEVEL 4
24
11%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 7
LEVEL 1
4
57%
LEVEL 2
3
43%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
2
22%
LEVEL 2
4
44%
LEVEL 3
2
22%
LEVEL 4
1
11%
Female
PROFICIENT
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 111
LEVEL 1
20
18%
LEVEL 2
42
38%
LEVEL 3
33
30%
LEVEL 4
16
14%
Male
PROFICIENT
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 121
LEVEL 1
30
25%
LEVEL 2
46
38%
LEVEL 3
36
30%
LEVEL 4
9
7%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 231
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 30
LEVEL 1
13
43%
LEVEL 2
14
47%
LEVEL 3
3
10%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 202
LEVEL 1
37
18%
LEVEL 2
74
37%
LEVEL 3
66
33%
LEVEL 4
25
12%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 232
LEVEL 1
50
22%
LEVEL 2
88
38%
LEVEL 3
69
30%
LEVEL 4
25
11%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
232
200
32
5
2
2
216
7
9
111
121
231
1
30
202
232
PROFICIENT
41%
46%
6%
_%
_%
_%
42%
0%
33%
44%
37%
_%
_%
10%
45%
41%
LEVEL 1
50
22%
29
15%
21
66%
_
_
_
_
_
_
44
20%
4
57%
2
22%
20
18%
30
25%
_
_
_
_
13
43%
37
18%
50
22%
LEVEL 2
88
38%
79
40%
9
28%
_
_
_
_
_
_
81
38%
3
43%
4
44%
42
38%
46
38%
_
_
_
_
14
47%
74
37%
88
38%
LEVEL 3
69
30%
68
34%
1
3%
_
_
_
_
_
_
67
31%
0
0%
2
22%
33
30%
36
30%
_
_
_
_
3
10%
66
33%
69
30%
LEVEL 4
25
11%
24
12%
1
3%
_
_
_
_
_
_
24
11%
0
0%
1
11%
16
14%
9
7%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
25
12%
25
11%
Grade 8 English Language Arts
MEAN SCORE: 311
All Students
PROFICIENT
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 244
LEVEL 1
42
17%
LEVEL 2
90
37%
LEVEL 3
73
30%
LEVEL 4
39
16%
General Education
PROFICIENT
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 211
LEVEL 1
19
9%
LEVEL 2
84
40%
LEVEL 3
69
33%
LEVEL 4
39
18%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 33
LEVEL 1
23
70%
LEVEL 2
6
18%
LEVEL 3
4
12%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
American Indian or Alaska Native
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 234
LEVEL 1
40
17%
LEVEL 2
87
37%
LEVEL 3
70
30%
LEVEL 4
37
16%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 10
LEVEL 1
2
20%
LEVEL 2
3
30%
LEVEL 3
3
30%
LEVEL 4
2
20%
Female
PROFICIENT
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 110
LEVEL 1
13
12%
LEVEL 2
31
28%
LEVEL 3
42
38%
LEVEL 4
24
22%
Male
PROFICIENT
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 134
LEVEL 1
29
22%
LEVEL 2
59
44%
LEVEL 3
31
23%
LEVEL 4
15
11%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 244
LEVEL 1
42
17%
LEVEL 2
90
37%
LEVEL 3
73
30%
LEVEL 4
39
16%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 22
LEVEL 1
10
45%
LEVEL 2
6
27%
LEVEL 3
6
27%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 222
LEVEL 1
32
14%
LEVEL 2
84
38%
LEVEL 3
67
30%
LEVEL 4
39
18%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 244
LEVEL 1
42
17%
LEVEL 2
90
37%
LEVEL 3
73
30%
LEVEL 4
39
16%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
244
211
33
1
2
2
3
234
2
10
110
134
244
22
222
244
PROFICIENT
46%
51%
12%
_%
_%
_%
_%
46%
_%
50%
60%
34%
46%
27%
48%
46%
LEVEL 1
42
17%
19
9%
23
70%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
40
17%
_
_
2
20%
13
12%
29
22%
42
17%
10
45%
32
14%
42
17%
LEVEL 2
90
37%
84
40%
6
18%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
87
37%
_
_
3
30%
31
28%
59
44%
90
37%
6
27%
84
38%
90
37%
LEVEL 3
73
30%
69
33%
4
12%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
70
30%
_
_
3
30%
42
38%
31
23%
73
30%
6
27%
67
30%
73
30%
LEVEL 4
39
16%
39
18%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
37
16%
_
_
2
20%
24
22%
15
11%
39
16%
0
0%
39
18%
39
16%
Grade 3 Mathematics
MEAN SCORE: 324
All Students
PROFICIENT
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 178
LEVEL 1
11
6%
LEVEL 2
43
24%
LEVEL 3
66
37%
LEVEL 4
58
33%
General Education
PROFICIENT
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 163
LEVEL 1
7
4%
LEVEL 2
38
23%
LEVEL 3
61
37%
LEVEL 4
57
35%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 15
LEVEL 1
4
27%
LEVEL 2
5
33%
LEVEL 3
5
33%
LEVEL 4
1
7%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 165
LEVEL 1
10
6%
LEVEL 2
38
23%
LEVEL 3
63
38%
LEVEL 4
54
33%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 13
LEVEL 1
1
8%
LEVEL 2
5
38%
LEVEL 3
3
23%
LEVEL 4
4
31%
Female
PROFICIENT
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 95
LEVEL 1
6
6%
LEVEL 2
24
25%
LEVEL 3
39
41%
LEVEL 4
26
27%
Male
PROFICIENT
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 83
LEVEL 1
5
6%
LEVEL 2
19
23%
LEVEL 3
27
33%
LEVEL 4
32
39%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 177
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 26
LEVEL 1
4
15%
LEVEL 2
8
31%
LEVEL 3
8
31%
LEVEL 4
6
23%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 152
LEVEL 1
7
5%
LEVEL 2
35
23%
LEVEL 3
58
38%
LEVEL 4
52
34%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 178
LEVEL 1
11
6%
LEVEL 2
43
24%
LEVEL 3
66
37%
LEVEL 4
58
33%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
178
163
15
4
3
3
165
3
13
95
83
177
1
26
152
178
PROFICIENT
70%
72%
40%
_%
_%
_%
71%
_%
54%
68%
71%
_%
_%
54%
72%
70%
LEVEL 1
11
6%
7
4%
4
27%
_
_
_
_
_
_
10
6%
_
_
1
8%
6
6%
5
6%
_
_
_
_
4
15%
7
5%
11
6%
LEVEL 2
43
24%
38
23%
5
33%
_
_
_
_
_
_
38
23%
_
_
5
38%
24
25%
19
23%
_
_
_
_
8
31%
35
23%
43
24%
LEVEL 3
66
37%
61
37%
5
33%
_
_
_
_
_
_
63
38%
_
_
3
23%
39
41%
27
33%
_
_
_
_
8
31%
58
38%
66
37%
LEVEL 4
58
33%
57
35%
1
7%
_
_
_
_
_
_
54
33%
_
_
4
31%
26
27%
32
39%
_
_
_
_
6
23%
52
34%
58
33%
Grade 4 Mathematics
MEAN SCORE: 318
All Students
PROFICIENT
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 239
LEVEL 1
27
11%
LEVEL 2
83
35%
LEVEL 3
75
31%
LEVEL 4
54
23%
General Education
PROFICIENT
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 211
LEVEL 1
10
5%
LEVEL 2
75
36%
LEVEL 3
72
34%
LEVEL 4
54
26%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 28
LEVEL 1
17
61%
LEVEL 2
8
29%
LEVEL 3
3
11%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
3
50%
LEVEL 3
1
17%
LEVEL 4
2
33%
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 224
LEVEL 1
27
12%
LEVEL 2
74
33%
LEVEL 3
71
32%
LEVEL 4
52
23%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
6
67%
LEVEL 3
3
33%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Female
PROFICIENT
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 109
LEVEL 1
12
11%
LEVEL 2
45
41%
LEVEL 3
31
28%
LEVEL 4
21
19%
Male
PROFICIENT
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 130
LEVEL 1
15
12%
LEVEL 2
38
29%
LEVEL 3
44
34%
LEVEL 4
33
25%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 239
LEVEL 1
27
11%
LEVEL 2
83
35%
LEVEL 3
75
31%
LEVEL 4
54
23%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 33
LEVEL 1
7
21%
LEVEL 2
15
45%
LEVEL 3
8
24%
LEVEL 4
3
9%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 206
LEVEL 1
20
10%
LEVEL 2
68
33%
LEVEL 3
67
33%
LEVEL 4
51
25%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 239
LEVEL 1
27
11%
LEVEL 2
83
35%
LEVEL 3
75
31%
LEVEL 4
54
23%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
239
211
28
6
1
5
224
3
9
109
130
239
33
206
239
PROFICIENT
54%
60%
11%
50%
_%
_%
55%
_%
33%
48%
59%
54%
33%
57%
54%
LEVEL 1
27
11%
10
5%
17
61%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
27
12%
_
_
0
0%
12
11%
15
12%
27
11%
7
21%
20
10%
27
11%
LEVEL 2
83
35%
75
36%
8
29%
3
50%
_
_
_
_
74
33%
_
_
6
67%
45
41%
38
29%
83
35%
15
45%
68
33%
83
35%
LEVEL 3
75
31%
72
34%
3
11%
1
17%
_
_
_
_
71
32%
_
_
3
33%
31
28%
44
34%
75
31%
8
24%
67
33%
75
31%
LEVEL 4
54
23%
54
26%
0
0%
2
33%
_
_
_
_
52
23%
_
_
0
0%
21
19%
33
25%
54
23%
3
9%
51
25%
54
23%
Grade 5 Mathematics
MEAN SCORE: 318
All Students
PROFICIENT
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 244
LEVEL 1
34
14%
LEVEL 2
85
35%
LEVEL 3
90
37%
LEVEL 4
35
14%
General Education
PROFICIENT
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 205
LEVEL 1
14
7%
LEVEL 2
74
36%
LEVEL 3
83
40%
LEVEL 4
34
17%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 39
LEVEL 1
20
51%
LEVEL 2
11
28%
LEVEL 3
7
18%
LEVEL 4
1
3%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 7
LEVEL 1
2
29%
LEVEL 2
1
14%
LEVEL 3
1
14%
LEVEL 4
3
43%
White
PROFICIENT
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 227
LEVEL 1
29
13%
LEVEL 2
79
35%
LEVEL 3
88
39%
LEVEL 4
31
14%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 10
LEVEL 1
3
30%
LEVEL 2
5
50%
LEVEL 3
1
10%
LEVEL 4
1
10%
Female
PROFICIENT
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 134
LEVEL 1
15
11%
LEVEL 2
53
40%
LEVEL 3
45
34%
LEVEL 4
21
16%
Male
PROFICIENT
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 110
LEVEL 1
19
17%
LEVEL 2
32
29%
LEVEL 3
45
41%
LEVEL 4
14
13%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 243
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 33
LEVEL 1
9
27%
LEVEL 2
14
42%
LEVEL 3
8
24%
LEVEL 4
2
6%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 211
LEVEL 1
25
12%
LEVEL 2
71
34%
LEVEL 3
82
39%
LEVEL 4
33
16%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 244
LEVEL 1
34
14%
LEVEL 2
85
35%
LEVEL 3
90
37%
LEVEL 4
35
14%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
244
205
39
4
4
7
227
2
10
134
110
243
1
33
211
244
PROFICIENT
51%
57%
21%
_%
_%
57%
52%
_%
20%
49%
54%
_%
_%
30%
55%
51%
LEVEL 1
34
14%
14
7%
20
51%
_
_
_
_
2
29%
29
13%
_
_
3
30%
15
11%
19
17%
_
_
_
_
9
27%
25
12%
34
14%
LEVEL 2
85
35%
74
36%
11
28%
_
_
_
_
1
14%
79
35%
_
_
5
50%
53
40%
32
29%
_
_
_
_
14
42%
71
34%
85
35%
LEVEL 3
90
37%
83
40%
7
18%
_
_
_
_
1
14%
88
39%
_
_
1
10%
45
34%
45
41%
_
_
_
_
8
24%
82
39%
90
37%
LEVEL 4
35
14%
34
17%
1
3%
_
_
_
_
3
43%
31
14%
_
_
1
10%
21
16%
14
13%
_
_
_
_
2
6%
33
16%
35
14%
Grade 6 Mathematics
MEAN SCORE: 317
All Students
PROFICIENT
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 233
LEVEL 1
21
9%
LEVEL 2
86
37%
LEVEL 3
76
33%
LEVEL 4
50
21%
General Education
PROFICIENT
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 207
LEVEL 1
5
2%
LEVEL 2
78
38%
LEVEL 3
75
36%
LEVEL 4
49
24%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 26
LEVEL 1
16
62%
LEVEL 2
8
31%
LEVEL 3
1
4%
LEVEL 4
1
4%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
20%
LEVEL 3
2
40%
LEVEL 4
2
40%
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 220
LEVEL 1
20
9%
LEVEL 2
82
37%
LEVEL 3
71
32%
LEVEL 4
47
21%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 8
LEVEL 1
1
13%
LEVEL 2
3
38%
LEVEL 3
3
38%
LEVEL 4
1
13%
Female
PROFICIENT
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 108
LEVEL 1
8
7%
LEVEL 2
38
35%
LEVEL 3
39
36%
LEVEL 4
23
21%
Male
PROFICIENT
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 125
LEVEL 1
13
10%
LEVEL 2
48
38%
LEVEL 3
37
30%
LEVEL 4
27
22%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 233
LEVEL 1
21
9%
LEVEL 2
86
37%
LEVEL 3
76
33%
LEVEL 4
50
21%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 23
LEVEL 1
3
13%
LEVEL 2
10
43%
LEVEL 3
9
39%
LEVEL 4
1
4%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 210
LEVEL 1
18
9%
LEVEL 2
76
36%
LEVEL 3
67
32%
LEVEL 4
49
23%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 233
LEVEL 1
21
9%
LEVEL 2
86
37%
LEVEL 3
76
33%
LEVEL 4
50
21%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
233
207
26
5
2
3
220
3
8
108
125
233
23
210
233
PROFICIENT
54%
60%
8%
80%
_%
_%
54%
_%
50%
57%
51%
54%
43%
55%
54%
LEVEL 1
21
9%
5
2%
16
62%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
20
9%
_
_
1
13%
8
7%
13
10%
21
9%
3
13%
18
9%
21
9%
LEVEL 2
86
37%
78
38%
8
31%
1
20%
_
_
_
_
82
37%
_
_
3
38%
38
35%
48
38%
86
37%
10
43%
76
36%
86
37%
LEVEL 3
76
33%
75
36%
1
4%
2
40%
_
_
_
_
71
32%
_
_
3
38%
39
36%
37
30%
76
33%
9
39%
67
32%
76
33%
LEVEL 4
50
21%
49
24%
1
4%
2
40%
_
_
_
_
47
21%
_
_
1
13%
23
21%
27
22%
50
21%
1
4%
49
23%
50
21%
Grade 7 Mathematics
Mean scores and data in the table for grade 7 math include only those for grade 7 students who took the Grade 7 New York State Testing Program Assessment (NYSTP) in Mathematics. For 2015 and forward, data in the bar charts include those for grade 7 students who took the Grade 7 NYSTP in Mathematics and grade 7 students who took a Regents math test in lieu of the NYSTP. For 2014 and earlier, data in the bar charts include only those for grade 7 students who took the Grade 7 NYSTP.
MEAN SCORE: 319
All Students
PROFICIENT
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 229
LEVEL 1
41
18%
LEVEL 2
58
25%
LEVEL 3
89
39%
LEVEL 4
41
18%
General Education
PROFICIENT
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 198
LEVEL 1
18
9%
LEVEL 2
54
27%
LEVEL 3
86
43%
LEVEL 4
40
20%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 31
LEVEL 1
23
74%
LEVEL 2
4
13%
LEVEL 3
3
10%
LEVEL 4
1
3%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 214
LEVEL 1
35
16%
LEVEL 2
55
26%
LEVEL 3
83
39%
LEVEL 4
41
19%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
3
50%
LEVEL 2
2
33%
LEVEL 3
1
17%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
3
33%
LEVEL 2
1
11%
LEVEL 3
5
56%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Female
PROFICIENT
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 110
LEVEL 1
18
16%
LEVEL 2
35
32%
LEVEL 3
41
37%
LEVEL 4
16
15%
Male
PROFICIENT
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 119
LEVEL 1
23
19%
LEVEL 2
23
19%
LEVEL 3
48
40%
LEVEL 4
25
21%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 228
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 28
LEVEL 1
10
36%
LEVEL 2
14
50%
LEVEL 3
2
7%
LEVEL 4
2
7%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 201
LEVEL 1
31
15%
LEVEL 2
44
22%
LEVEL 3
87
43%
LEVEL 4
39
19%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 229
LEVEL 1
41
18%
LEVEL 2
58
25%
LEVEL 3
89
39%
LEVEL 4
41
18%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
229
198
31
5
2
2
214
6
9
110
119
228
1
28
201
229
PROFICIENT
57%
64%
13%
_%
_%
_%
58%
17%
56%
52%
61%
_%
_%
14%
63%
57%
LEVEL 1
41
18%
18
9%
23
74%
_
_
_
_
_
_
35
16%
3
50%
3
33%
18
16%
23
19%
_
_
_
_
10
36%
31
15%
41
18%
LEVEL 2
58
25%
54
27%
4
13%
_
_
_
_
_
_
55
26%
2
33%
1
11%
35
32%
23
19%
_
_
_
_
14
50%
44
22%
58
25%
LEVEL 3
89
39%
86
43%
3
10%
_
_
_
_
_
_
83
39%
1
17%
5
56%
41
37%
48
40%
_
_
_
_
2
7%
87
43%
89
39%
LEVEL 4
41
18%
40
20%
1
3%
_
_
_
_
_
_
41
19%
0
0%
0
0%
16
15%
25
21%
_
_
_
_
2
7%
39
19%
41
18%
Grade 8 Mathematics
Mean scores and data in the table for grade 8 math include only those for grade 8 students who took the Grade 8 New York State Testing Program Assessment (NYSTP) in Mathematics. For 2015 and forward, data in the bar charts include those for grade 8 students who took the Grade 8 NYSTP in Mathematics and grade 8 students who took a Regents math test in lieu of the NYSTP. For 2014 and earlier, data in the bar charts include only those for grade 8 students who took the Grade 8 NYSTP.
MEAN SCORE: 318
All Students
PROFICIENT
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 195
LEVEL 1
21
11%
LEVEL 2
73
37%
LEVEL 3
79
41%
LEVEL 4
22
11%
General Education
PROFICIENT
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 164
LEVEL 1
6
4%
LEVEL 2
62
38%
LEVEL 3
75
46%
LEVEL 4
21
13%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 31
LEVEL 1
15
48%
LEVEL 2
11
35%
LEVEL 3
4
13%
LEVEL 4
1
3%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 187
LEVEL 1
20
11%
LEVEL 2
70
37%
LEVEL 3
75
40%
LEVEL 4
22
12%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 8
LEVEL 1
1
13%
LEVEL 2
3
38%
LEVEL 3
4
50%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Female
PROFICIENT
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 90
LEVEL 1
9
10%
LEVEL 2
29
32%
LEVEL 3
37
41%
LEVEL 4
15
17%
Male
PROFICIENT
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 105
LEVEL 1
12
11%
LEVEL 2
44
42%
LEVEL 3
42
40%
LEVEL 4
7
7%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 195
LEVEL 1
21
11%
LEVEL 2
73
37%
LEVEL 3
79
41%
LEVEL 4
22
11%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 18
LEVEL 1
3
17%
LEVEL 2
11
61%
LEVEL 3
4
22%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 177
LEVEL 1
18
10%
LEVEL 2
62
35%
LEVEL 3
75
42%
LEVEL 4
22
12%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 195
LEVEL 1
21
11%
LEVEL 2
73
37%
LEVEL 3
79
41%
LEVEL 4
22
11%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
195
164
31
1
2
3
187
2
8
90
105
195
18
177
195
PROFICIENT
52%
59%
16%
_%
_%
_%
52%
_%
50%
58%
47%
52%
22%
55%
52%
LEVEL 1
21
11%
6
4%
15
48%
_
_
_
_
_
_
20
11%
_
_
1
13%
9
10%
12
11%
21
11%
3
17%
18
10%
21
11%
LEVEL 2
73
37%
62
38%
11
35%
_
_
_
_
_
_
70
37%
_
_
3
38%
29
32%
44
42%
73
37%
11
61%
62
35%
73
37%
LEVEL 3
79
41%
75
46%
4
13%
_
_
_
_
_
_
75
40%
_
_
4
50%
37
41%
42
40%
79
41%
4
22%
75
42%
79
41%
LEVEL 4
22
11%
21
13%
1
3%
_
_
_
_
_
_
22
12%
_
_
0
0%
15
17%
7
7%
22
11%
0
0%
22
12%
22
11%
Grade 4 Science
MEAN SCORE: 89
All Students
PROFICIENT
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 243
LEVEL 1
2
1%
LEVEL 2
6
2%
LEVEL 3
35
14%
LEVEL 4
200
82%
General Education
PROFICIENT
99%
TOTAL TESTED: 215
LEVEL 1
1
0%
LEVEL 2
2
1%
LEVEL 3
26
12%
LEVEL 4
186
87%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 28
LEVEL 1
1
4%
LEVEL 2
4
14%
LEVEL 3
9
32%
LEVEL 4
14
50%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
6
100%
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 228
LEVEL 1
2
1%
LEVEL 2
6
3%
LEVEL 3
34
15%
LEVEL 4
186
82%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
1
11%
LEVEL 4
8
89%
Female
PROFICIENT
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 113
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
3
3%
LEVEL 3
17
15%
LEVEL 4
92
81%
Male
PROFICIENT
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 130
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
3
2%
LEVEL 3
18
14%
LEVEL 4
108
83%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 243
LEVEL 1
2
1%
LEVEL 2
6
2%
LEVEL 3
35
14%
LEVEL 4
200
82%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 33
LEVEL 1
1
3%
LEVEL 2
2
6%
LEVEL 3
7
21%
LEVEL 4
23
70%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 210
LEVEL 1
1
0%
LEVEL 2
4
2%
LEVEL 3
28
13%
LEVEL 4
177
84%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 243
LEVEL 1
2
1%
LEVEL 2
6
2%
LEVEL 3
35
14%
LEVEL 4
200
82%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
243
215
28
6
1
5
228
3
9
113
130
243
33
210
243
PROFICIENT
97%
99%
82%
100%
_%
_%
96%
_%
100%
96%
97%
97%
91%
98%
97%
LEVEL 1
2
1%
1
0%
1
4%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
2
1%
_
_
0
0%
1
1%
1
1%
2
1%
1
3%
1
0%
2
1%
LEVEL 2
6
2%
2
1%
4
14%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
6
3%
_
_
0
0%
3
3%
3
2%
6
2%
2
6%
4
2%
6
2%
LEVEL 3
35
14%
26
12%
9
32%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
34
15%
_
_
1
11%
17
15%
18
14%
35
14%
7
21%
28
13%
35
14%
LEVEL 4
200
82%
186
87%
14
50%
6
100%
_
_
_
_
186
82%
_
_
8
89%
92
81%
108
83%
200
82%
23
70%
177
84%
200
82%
Grade 8 Science
Data in the bar charts include those for grade 8 students who took the New York State Grade 8 Science Test and grade 8 students who took a Regents science test in lieu of this test. Mean scores and data in the table for grade 8 science include only those for grade 8 students who took the New York State Grade 8 Science Test.
MEAN SCORE: 82
All Students
PROFICIENT
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 215
LEVEL 1
3
1%
LEVEL 2
17
8%
LEVEL 3
78
36%
LEVEL 4
117
54%
General Education
PROFICIENT
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 182
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
5
3%
LEVEL 3
69
38%
LEVEL 4
108
59%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 33
LEVEL 1
3
9%
LEVEL 2
12
36%
LEVEL 3
9
27%
LEVEL 4
9
27%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 207
LEVEL 1
2
1%
LEVEL 2
17
8%
LEVEL 3
74
36%
LEVEL 4
114
55%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 8
LEVEL 1
1
13%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
4
50%
LEVEL 4
3
38%
Female
PROFICIENT
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 96
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
8
8%
LEVEL 3
33
34%
LEVEL 4
54
56%
Male
PROFICIENT
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 119
LEVEL 1
2
2%
LEVEL 2
9
8%
LEVEL 3
45
38%
LEVEL 4
63
53%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 215
LEVEL 1
3
1%
LEVEL 2
17
8%
LEVEL 3
78
36%
LEVEL 4
117
54%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 22
LEVEL 1
1
5%
LEVEL 2
6
27%
LEVEL 3
9
41%
LEVEL 4
6
27%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 193
LEVEL 1
2
1%
LEVEL 2
11
6%
LEVEL 3
69
36%
LEVEL 4
111
58%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 215
LEVEL 1
3
1%
LEVEL 2
17
8%
LEVEL 3
78
36%
LEVEL 4
117
54%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
215
182
33
2
1
3
207
2
8
96
119
215
22
193
215
PROFICIENT
91%
97%
55%
_%
_%
_%
91%
_%
88%
91%
91%
91%
68%
93%
91%
LEVEL 1
3
1%
0
0%
3
9%
_
_
_
_
_
_
2
1%
_
_
1
13%
1
1%
2
2%
3
1%
1
5%
2
1%
3
1%
LEVEL 2
17
8%
5
3%
12
36%
_
_
_
_
_
_
17
8%
_
_
0
0%
8
8%
9
8%
17
8%
6
27%
11
6%
17
8%
LEVEL 3
78
36%
69
38%
9
27%
_
_
_
_
_
_
74
36%
_
_
4
50%
33
34%
45
38%
78
36%
9
41%
69
36%
78
36%
LEVEL 4
117
54%
108
59%
9
27%
_
_
_
_
_
_
114
55%
_
_
3
38%
54
56%
63
53%
117
54%
6
27%
111
58%
117
54%
Grade 8 Students Taking a Regents Science Test
Accelerated grade 8 students who take a Regents science test in lieu of the New York State Grade 8 Science Test.
All Students
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 27
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
27
100%
GROUP
All Students
TOTAL TESTED
27
PROFICIENT
100%
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
27
100%
Statewide Results on the National Assessment of Educational Progress: NAEP (2012 - 13)
Grade: 4
Reading
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Students with Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
BELOW BASIC
30%
*%
19%
45%
44%
20%
*%
69%
75%
43%
BASIC
33%
*%
27%
34%
35%
33%
*%
22%
21%
34%
PROFICIENT
28%
*%
36%
18%
17%
35%
*%
7%
4%
19%
ADVANCED
9%
*%
18%
3%
4%
12%
*%
2%
*%
4%
PARTICIPATION RATE
94
93
Reading
All Students
Percent Below Basic
30
Percent Basic
33
Percent Proficient
28
Percent Advanced
9
American Indian or Alaska Native
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Percent Below Basic
19
Percent Basic
27
Percent Proficient
36
Percent Advanced
18
Black or African American
Percent Below Basic
45
Percent Basic
34
Percent Proficient
18
Percent Advanced
3
Hispanic or Latino
Percent Below Basic
44
Percent Basic
35
Percent Proficient
17
Percent Advanced
4
White
Percent Below Basic
20
Percent Basic
33
Percent Proficient
35
Percent Advanced
12
Multiracial
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Students with Disabilities
Percent Below Basic
69
Percent Basic
22
Percent Proficient
7
Percent Advanced
2
Participation Rate
94
Limited English Proficient
Percent Below Basic
75
Percent Basic
21
Percent Proficient
4
Percent Advanced
*
Participation Rate
93
Economically Disadvantaged
Percent Below Basic
43
Percent Basic
34
Percent Proficient
19
Percent Advanced
4
Mathematics
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Students with Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
BELOW BASIC
18%
*%
6%
33%
27%
9%
*%
43%
54%
26%
BASIC
42%
*%
25%
50%
49%
41%
*%
42%
36%
48%
PROFICIENT
33%
*%
48%
16%
22%
42%
*%
14%
10%
23%
ADVANCED
7%
*%
21%
1%
2%
8%
*%
1%
*%
3%
PARTICIPATION RATE
94
93
Mathematics
All Students
Percent Below Basic
18
Percent Basic
42
Percent Proficient
33
Percent Advanced
7
American Indian or Alaska Native
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Percent Below Basic
6
Percent Basic
25
Percent Proficient
48
Percent Advanced
21
Black or African American
Percent Below Basic
33
Percent Basic
50
Percent Proficient
16
Percent Advanced
1
Hispanic or Latino
Percent Below Basic
27
Percent Basic
49
Percent Proficient
22
Percent Advanced
2
White
Percent Below Basic
9
Percent Basic
41
Percent Proficient
42
Percent Advanced
8
Multiracial
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Students with Disabilities
Percent Below Basic
43
Percent Basic
42
Percent Proficient
14
Percent Advanced
1
Participation Rate
94
Limited English Proficient
Percent Below Basic
54
Percent Basic
36
Percent Proficient
10
Percent Advanced
*
Participation Rate
93
Economically Disadvantaged
Percent Below Basic
26
Percent Basic
48
Percent Proficient
23
Percent Advanced
3
Grade: 8
Reading
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Students with Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
BELOW BASIC
24%
*%
17%
37%
36%
14%
*%
56%
80%
35%
BASIC
41%
*%
33%
45%
45%
40%
*%
36%
19%
44%
PROFICIENT
30%
*%
38%
17%
18%
40%
*%
8%
1%
20%
ADVANCED
5%
*%
12%
1%
1%
6%
*%
*%
*%
1%
PARTICIPATION RATE
97
91
Reading
All Students
Percent Below Basic
24
Percent Basic
41
Percent Proficient
30
Percent Advanced
5
American Indian or Alaska Native
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Percent Below Basic
17
Percent Basic
33
Percent Proficient
38
Percent Advanced
12
Black or African American
Percent Below Basic
37
Percent Basic
45
Percent Proficient
17
Percent Advanced
1
Hispanic or Latino
Percent Below Basic
36
Percent Basic
45
Percent Proficient
18
Percent Advanced
1
White
Percent Below Basic
14
Percent Basic
40
Percent Proficient
40
Percent Advanced
6
Multiracial
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Students with Disabilities
Percent Below Basic
56
Percent Basic
36
Percent Proficient
8
Percent Advanced
*
Participation Rate
97
Limited English Proficient
Percent Below Basic
80
Percent Basic
19
Percent Proficient
1
Percent Advanced
*
Participation Rate
91
Economically Disadvantaged
Percent Below Basic
35
Percent Basic
44
Percent Proficient
20
Percent Advanced
1
Mathematics
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Students with Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
BELOW BASIC
28%
*%
14%
50%
44%
15%
*%
66%
75%
42%
BASIC
40%
*%
27%
38%
42%
41%
*%
27%
21%
39%
PROFICIENT
24%
*%
33%
11%
12%
34%
*%
6%
3%
15%
ADVANCED
8%
*%
26%
1%
2%
10%
*%
1%
1%
4%
PARTICIPATION RATE
89
94
Mathematics
All Students
Percent Below Basic
28
Percent Basic
40
Percent Proficient
24
Percent Advanced
8
American Indian or Alaska Native
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Percent Below Basic
14
Percent Basic
27
Percent Proficient
33
Percent Advanced
26
Black or African American
Percent Below Basic
50
Percent Basic
38
Percent Proficient
11
Percent Advanced
1
Hispanic or Latino
Percent Below Basic
44
Percent Basic
42
Percent Proficient
12
Percent Advanced
2
White
Percent Below Basic
15
Percent Basic
41
Percent Proficient
34
Percent Advanced
10
Multiracial
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Students with Disabilities
Percent Below Basic
66
Percent Basic
27
Percent Proficient
6
Percent Advanced
1
Participation Rate
89
Limited English Proficient
Percent Below Basic
75
Percent Basic
21
Percent Proficient
3
Percent Advanced
1
Participation Rate
94
Economically Disadvantaged
Percent Below Basic
42
Percent Basic
39
Percent Proficient
15
Percent Advanced
4
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level English Language Arts after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 302
LEVEL 1
1
0%
LEVEL 2
2
1%
LEVEL 3
129
43%
LEVEL 4
158
52%
General Education
PROFICIENT
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 268
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
105
39%
LEVEL 4
154
57%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 34
LEVEL 1
1
3%
LEVEL 2
2
6%
LEVEL 3
24
71%
LEVEL 4
4
12%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 7
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 291
LEVEL 1
1
0%
LEVEL 2
1
0%
LEVEL 3
126
43%
LEVEL 4
152
52%
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 11
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
9%
LEVEL 3
3
27%
LEVEL 4
6
55%
Female
PROFICIENT
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 159
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
1%
LEVEL 3
44
28%
LEVEL 4
108
68%
Male
PROFICIENT
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 143
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
1
1%
LEVEL 3
85
59%
LEVEL 4
50
35%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 301
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 26
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
17
65%
LEVEL 4
7
27%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 276
LEVEL 1
1
0%
LEVEL 2
2
1%
LEVEL 3
112
41%
LEVEL 4
151
55%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 302
LEVEL 1
1
0%
LEVEL 2
2
1%
LEVEL 3
129
43%
LEVEL 4
158
52%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
302
268
34
7
1
3
291
11
159
143
301
1
26
276
302
PROFICIENT
95%
97%
82%
_%
_%
_%
96%
82%
96%
94%
_%
_%
92%
95%
95%
LEVEL 1
1
0%
0
0%
1
3%
_
_
_
_
_
_
1
0%
0
0%
0
0%
1
1%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
1
0%
1
0%
LEVEL 2
2
1%
0
0%
2
6%
_
_
_
_
_
_
1
0%
1
9%
1
1%
1
1%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
2
1%
2
1%
LEVEL 3
129
43%
105
39%
24
71%
_
_
_
_
_
_
126
43%
3
27%
44
28%
85
59%
_
_
_
_
17
65%
112
41%
129
43%
LEVEL 4
158
52%
154
57%
4
12%
_
_
_
_
_
_
152
52%
6
55%
108
68%
50
35%
_
_
_
_
7
27%
151
55%
158
52%
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level Mathematics after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 302
LEVEL 1
1
0%
LEVEL 2
5
2%
LEVEL 3
153
51%
LEVEL 4
136
45%
General Education
PROFICIENT
99%
TOTAL TESTED: 268
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
0%
LEVEL 3
130
49%
LEVEL 4
134
50%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 34
LEVEL 1
1
3%
LEVEL 2
4
12%
LEVEL 3
23
68%
LEVEL 4
2
6%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 7
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 291
LEVEL 1
1
0%
LEVEL 2
4
1%
LEVEL 3
148
51%
LEVEL 4
131
45%
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 11
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
9%
LEVEL 3
5
45%
LEVEL 4
5
45%
Female
PROFICIENT
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 159
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
2
1%
LEVEL 3
67
42%
LEVEL 4
85
53%
Male
PROFICIENT
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 143
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
3
2%
LEVEL 3
86
60%
LEVEL 4
51
36%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 301
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 26
LEVEL 1
1
4%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
13
50%
LEVEL 4
10
38%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 276
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
5
2%
LEVEL 3
140
51%
LEVEL 4
126
46%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 302
LEVEL 1
1
0%
LEVEL 2
5
2%
LEVEL 3
153
51%
LEVEL 4
136
45%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
302
268
34
7
1
3
291
11
159
143
301
1
26
276
302
PROFICIENT
96%
99%
74%
_%
_%
_%
96%
91%
96%
96%
_%
_%
88%
96%
96%
LEVEL 1
1
0%
0
0%
1
3%
_
_
_
_
_
_
1
0%
0
0%
1
1%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
1
4%
0
0%
1
0%
LEVEL 2
5
2%
1
0%
4
12%
_
_
_
_
_
_
4
1%
1
9%
2
1%
3
2%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
5
2%
5
2%
LEVEL 3
153
51%
130
49%
23
68%
_
_
_
_
_
_
148
51%
5
45%
67
42%
86
60%
_
_
_
_
13
50%
140
51%
153
51%
LEVEL 4
136
45%
134
50%
2
6%
_
_
_
_
_
_
131
45%
5
45%
85
53%
51
36%
_
_
_
_
10
38%
126
46%
136
45%
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level Global History and Geography after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 302
LEVEL 1
3
1%
LEVEL 2
5
2%
LEVEL 3
175
58%
LEVEL 4
106
35%
General Education
PROFICIENT
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 268
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
1%
LEVEL 3
152
57%
LEVEL 4
105
39%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 34
LEVEL 1
3
9%
LEVEL 2
3
9%
LEVEL 3
23
68%
LEVEL 4
1
3%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 7
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 291
LEVEL 1
3
1%
LEVEL 2
5
2%
LEVEL 3
168
58%
LEVEL 4
102
35%
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 11
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
7
64%
LEVEL 4
4
36%
Female
PROFICIENT
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 159
LEVEL 1
2
1%
LEVEL 2
2
1%
LEVEL 3
89
56%
LEVEL 4
61
38%
Male
PROFICIENT
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 143
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
3
2%
LEVEL 3
86
60%
LEVEL 4
45
31%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 301
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 26
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
8%
LEVEL 3
17
65%
LEVEL 4
5
19%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 276
LEVEL 1
3
1%
LEVEL 2
3
1%
LEVEL 3
158
57%
LEVEL 4
101
37%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 302
LEVEL 1
3
1%
LEVEL 2
5
2%
LEVEL 3
175
58%
LEVEL 4
106
35%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
302
268
34
7
1
3
291
11
159
143
301
1
26
276
302
PROFICIENT
93%
96%
71%
_%
_%
_%
93%
100%
94%
92%
_%
_%
85%
94%
93%
LEVEL 1
3
1%
0
0%
3
9%
_
_
_
_
_
_
3
1%
0
0%
2
1%
1
1%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
3
1%
3
1%
LEVEL 2
5
2%
2
1%
3
9%
_
_
_
_
_
_
5
2%
0
0%
2
1%
3
2%
_
_
_
_
2
8%
3
1%
5
2%
LEVEL 3
175
58%
152
57%
23
68%
_
_
_
_
_
_
168
58%
7
64%
89
56%
86
60%
_
_
_
_
17
65%
158
57%
175
58%
LEVEL 4
106
35%
105
39%
1
3%
_
_
_
_
_
_
102
35%
4
36%
61
38%
45
31%
_
_
_
_
5
19%
101
37%
106
35%
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level U.S. History and Government after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 302
LEVEL 1
3
1%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
111
37%
LEVEL 4
180
60%
General Education
PROFICIENT
99%
TOTAL TESTED: 268
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
91
34%
LEVEL 4
173
65%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 34
LEVEL 1
3
9%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
20
59%
LEVEL 4
7
21%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 7
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 291
LEVEL 1
3
1%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
106
36%
LEVEL 4
174
60%
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 11
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
5
45%
LEVEL 4
6
55%
Female
PROFICIENT
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 159
LEVEL 1
2
1%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
54
34%
LEVEL 4
101
64%
Male
PROFICIENT
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 143
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
57
40%
LEVEL 4
79
55%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 301
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 26
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
14
54%
LEVEL 4
10
38%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 276
LEVEL 1
3
1%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
97
35%
LEVEL 4
170
62%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 302
LEVEL 1
3
1%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
111
37%
LEVEL 4
180
60%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
302
268
34
7
1
3
291
11
159
143
301
1
26
276
302
PROFICIENT
96%
99%
79%
_%
_%
_%
96%
100%
97%
95%
_%
_%
92%
97%
96%
LEVEL 1
3
1%
0
0%
3
9%
_
_
_
_
_
_
3
1%
0
0%
2
1%
1
1%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
3
1%
3
1%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
LEVEL 3
111
37%
91
34%
20
59%
_
_
_
_
_
_
106
36%
5
45%
54
34%
57
40%
_
_
_
_
14
54%
97
35%
111
37%
LEVEL 4
180
60%
173
65%
7
21%
_
_
_
_
_
_
174
60%
6
55%
101
64%
79
55%
_
_
_
_
10
38%
170
62%
180
60%
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level Science after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 302
LEVEL 1
2
1%
LEVEL 2
2
1%
LEVEL 3
77
25%
LEVEL 4
213
71%
General Education
PROFICIENT
99%
TOTAL TESTED: 268
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
62
23%
LEVEL 4
202
75%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 34
LEVEL 1
2
6%
LEVEL 2
2
6%
LEVEL 3
15
44%
LEVEL 4
11
32%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 7
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 291
LEVEL 1
2
1%
LEVEL 2
2
1%
LEVEL 3
73
25%
LEVEL 4
206
71%
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 11
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
4
36%
LEVEL 4
7
64%
Female
PROFICIENT
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 159
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
1
1%
LEVEL 3
41
26%
LEVEL 4
111
70%
Male
PROFICIENT
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 143
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
1
1%
LEVEL 3
36
25%
LEVEL 4
102
71%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 301
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 26
LEVEL 1
1
4%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
6
23%
LEVEL 4
17
65%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 276
LEVEL 1
1
0%
LEVEL 2
2
1%
LEVEL 3
71
26%
LEVEL 4
196
71%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 302
LEVEL 1
2
1%
LEVEL 2
2
1%
LEVEL 3
77
25%
LEVEL 4
213
71%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
302
268
34
7
1
3
291
11
159
143
301
1
26
276
302
PROFICIENT
96%
99%
76%
_%
_%
_%
96%
100%
96%
97%
_%
_%
88%
97%
96%
LEVEL 1
2
1%
0
0%
2
6%
_
_
_
_
_
_
2
1%
0
0%
1
1%
1
1%
_
_
_
_
1
4%
1
0%
2
1%
LEVEL 2
2
1%
0
0%
2
6%
_
_
_
_
_
_
2
1%
0
0%
1
1%
1
1%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
2
1%
2
1%
LEVEL 3
77
25%
62
23%
15
44%
_
_
_
_
_
_
73
25%
4
36%
41
26%
36
25%
_
_
_
_
6
23%
71
26%
77
25%
LEVEL 4
213
71%
202
75%
11
32%
_
_
_
_
_
_
206
71%
7
64%
111
70%
102
71%
_
_
_
_
17
65%
196
71%
213
71%
Regents Examination Results (2013 - 14)
Comprehensive English
Regents Comprehensive English
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
298
266
32
1
3
2
290
2
8
143
155
298
20
278
298
55
297
100%
266
100%
31
97%
_
_
_
_
_
_
289
100%
_
_
8
100%
143
100%
154
99%
297
100%
20
100%
277
100%
297
100%
65
291
98%
264
99%
27
84%
_
_
_
_
_
_
283
98%
_
_
8
100%
141
99%
150
97%
291
98%
19
95%
272
98%
291
98%
85
187
63%
176
66%
11
34%
_
_
_
_
_
_
182
63%
_
_
5
63%
105
73%
82
53%
187
63%
7
35%
180
65%
187
63%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 298
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
297
100%
65
291
98%
85
187
63%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 266
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
266
100%
65
264
99%
85
176
66%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 32
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
31
97%
65
27
84%
85
11
34%
American Indian or Alaska Native
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 290
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
289
100%
65
283
98%
85
182
63%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 8
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
8
100%
65
8
100%
85
5
63%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 143
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
143
100%
65
141
99%
85
105
73%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 155
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
154
99%
65
150
97%
85
82
53%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 298
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
297
100%
65
291
98%
85
187
63%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 20
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
20
100%
65
19
95%
85
7
35%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 278
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
277
100%
65
272
98%
85
180
65%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 298
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
297
100%
65
291
98%
85
187
63%
English Language Arts (Common Core)
English Language Arts (Common Core)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
White
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
11
9
2
11
1
10
11
11
11
LEVEL 1
1
9%
_
_
_
_
1
9%
_
_
_
_
1
9%
1
9%
1
9%
LEVEL 2
1
9%
_
_
_
_
1
9%
_
_
_
_
1
9%
1
9%
1
9%
LEVEL 3
3
27%
_
_
_
_
3
27%
_
_
_
_
3
27%
3
27%
3
27%
LEVEL 4
2
18%
_
_
_
_
2
18%
_
_
_
_
2
18%
2
18%
2
18%
LEVEL 5
4
36%
_
_
_
_
4
36%
_
_
_
_
4
36%
4
36%
4
36%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 11
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
1
9%
LEVEL 2
1
9%
LEVEL 3
3
27%
LEVEL 4
2
18%
LEVEL 5
4
36%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 9
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 11
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
1
9%
LEVEL 2
1
9%
LEVEL 3
3
27%
LEVEL 4
2
18%
LEVEL 5
4
36%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 10
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 11
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
1
9%
LEVEL 2
1
9%
LEVEL 3
3
27%
LEVEL 4
2
18%
LEVEL 5
4
36%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 11
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
1
9%
LEVEL 2
1
9%
LEVEL 3
3
27%
LEVEL 4
2
18%
LEVEL 5
4
36%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 11
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
1
9%
LEVEL 2
1
9%
LEVEL 3
3
27%
LEVEL 4
2
18%
LEVEL 5
4
36%
Integrated Algebra
Regents Integrated Algebra
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
279
234
45
1
6
3
268
1
5
119
160
279
22
257
279
55
274
98%
233
100%
41
91%
_
_
6
100%
_
_
263
98%
_
_
5
100%
117
98%
157
98%
274
98%
19
86%
255
99%
274
98%
65
264
95%
229
98%
35
78%
_
_
6
100%
_
_
253
94%
_
_
5
100%
115
97%
149
93%
264
95%
19
86%
245
95%
264
95%
85
68
24%
66
28%
2
4%
_
_
2
33%
_
_
65
24%
_
_
1
20%
29
24%
39
24%
68
24%
1
5%
67
26%
68
24%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 279
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
274
98%
65
264
95%
85
68
24%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 234
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
233
100%
65
229
98%
85
66
28%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 45
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
41
91%
65
35
78%
85
2
4%
American Indian or Alaska Native
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 6
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
6
100%
65
6
100%
85
2
33%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 268
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
263
98%
65
253
94%
85
65
24%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
5
100%
65
5
100%
85
1
20%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 119
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
117
98%
65
115
97%
85
29
24%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 160
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
157
98%
65
149
93%
85
39
24%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 279
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
274
98%
65
264
95%
85
68
24%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 22
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
19
86%
65
19
86%
85
1
5%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 257
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
255
99%
65
245
95%
85
67
26%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 279
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
274
98%
65
264
95%
85
68
24%
Geometry
Regents Geometry
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
215
207
8
3
1
1
208
2
7
106
109
215
16
199
215
55
215
100%
207
100%
8
100%
_
_
_
_
_
_
208
100%
_
_
7
100%
106
100%
109
100%
215
100%
16
100%
199
100%
215
100%
65
209
97%
202
98%
7
88%
_
_
_
_
_
_
202
97%
_
_
7
100%
100
94%
109
100%
209
97%
14
88%
195
98%
209
97%
85
105
49%
102
49%
3
38%
_
_
_
_
_
_
104
50%
_
_
1
14%
49
46%
56
51%
105
49%
6
38%
99
50%
105
49%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 215
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
215
100%
65
209
97%
85
105
49%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 207
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
207
100%
65
202
98%
85
102
49%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 8
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
8
100%
65
7
88%
85
3
38%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 208
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
208
100%
65
202
97%
85
104
50%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 7
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
7
100%
65
7
100%
85
1
14%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 106
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
106
100%
65
100
94%
85
49
46%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 109
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
109
100%
65
109
100%
85
56
51%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 215
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
215
100%
65
209
97%
85
105
49%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 16
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
16
100%
65
14
88%
85
6
38%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 199
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
199
100%
65
195
98%
85
99
50%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 215
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
215
100%
65
209
97%
85
105
49%
Algebra 2/Trigonometry
Regents Algebra 2/Trigonometry
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
201
196
5
1
1
198
1
201
113
88
201
5
196
201
55
186
93%
181
92%
5
100%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
186
93%
106
94%
80
91%
186
93%
4
80%
182
93%
186
93%
65
169
84%
164
84%
5
100%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
169
84%
102
90%
67
76%
169
84%
3
60%
166
85%
169
84%
85
71
35%
71
36%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
71
35%
46
41%
25
28%
71
35%
0
0%
71
36%
71
35%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 201
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
186
93%
65
169
84%
85
71
35%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 196
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
181
92%
65
164
84%
85
71
36%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
5
100%
65
5
100%
85
0
0%
American Indian or Alaska Native
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 198
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 201
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
186
93%
65
169
84%
85
71
35%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 113
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
106
94%
65
102
90%
85
46
41%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 88
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
80
91%
65
67
76%
85
25
28%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 201
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
186
93%
65
169
84%
85
71
35%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
4
80%
65
3
60%
85
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 196
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
182
93%
65
166
85%
85
71
36%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 201
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
186
93%
65
169
84%
85
71
35%
Algebra I (Common Core)
Algebra I (Common Core)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
263
225
38
1
6
3
252
1
5
114
149
263
17
246
263
LEVEL 1
8
3%
1
0%
7
18%
_
_
0
0%
_
_
7
3%
_
_
1
20%
4
4%
4
3%
8
3%
2
12%
6
2%
8
3%
LEVEL 2
25
10%
12
5%
13
34%
_
_
1
17%
_
_
24
10%
_
_
0
0%
11
10%
14
9%
25
10%
3
18%
22
9%
25
10%
LEVEL 3
140
53%
125
56%
15
39%
_
_
1
17%
_
_
136
54%
_
_
3
60%
57
50%
83
56%
140
53%
9
53%
131
53%
140
53%
LEVEL 4
79
30%
76
34%
3
8%
_
_
4
67%
_
_
74
29%
_
_
1
20%
37
32%
42
28%
79
30%
3
18%
76
31%
79
30%
LEVEL 5
11
4%
11
5%
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
_
_
11
4%
_
_
0
0%
5
4%
6
4%
11
4%
0
0%
11
4%
11
4%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 263
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
8
3%
LEVEL 2
25
10%
LEVEL 3
140
53%
LEVEL 4
79
30%
LEVEL 5
11
4%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 225
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
1
0%
LEVEL 2
12
5%
LEVEL 3
125
56%
LEVEL 4
76
34%
LEVEL 5
11
5%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 38
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
7
18%
LEVEL 2
13
34%
LEVEL 3
15
39%
LEVEL 4
3
8%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
American Indian or Alaska Native
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 6
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
17%
LEVEL 3
1
17%
LEVEL 4
4
67%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 252
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
7
3%
LEVEL 2
24
10%
LEVEL 3
136
54%
LEVEL 4
74
29%
LEVEL 5
11
4%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
1
20%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
3
60%
LEVEL 4
1
20%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 114
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
4
4%
LEVEL 2
11
10%
LEVEL 3
57
50%
LEVEL 4
37
32%
LEVEL 5
5
4%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 149
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
4
3%
LEVEL 2
14
9%
LEVEL 3
83
56%
LEVEL 4
42
28%
LEVEL 5
6
4%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 263
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
8
3%
LEVEL 2
25
10%
LEVEL 3
140
53%
LEVEL 4
79
30%
LEVEL 5
11
4%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 17
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
2
12%
LEVEL 2
3
18%
LEVEL 3
9
53%
LEVEL 4
3
18%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 246
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
6
2%
LEVEL 2
22
9%
LEVEL 3
131
53%
LEVEL 4
76
31%
LEVEL 5
11
4%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 263
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
8
3%
LEVEL 2
25
10%
LEVEL 3
140
53%
LEVEL 4
79
30%
LEVEL 5
11
4%
Global History and Geography
Regents Global History and Geography
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
303
255
48
4
2
4
290
3
13
152
151
303
36
267
303
55
270
89%
240
94%
30
63%
_
_
_
_
_
_
261
90%
_
_
9
69%
130
86%
140
93%
270
89%
28
78%
242
91%
270
89%
65
238
79%
216
85%
22
46%
_
_
_
_
_
_
230
79%
_
_
8
62%
119
78%
119
79%
238
79%
19
53%
219
82%
238
79%
85
110
36%
107
42%
3
6%
_
_
_
_
_
_
108
37%
_
_
2
15%
54
36%
56
37%
110
36%
4
11%
106
40%
110
36%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 303
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
270
89%
65
238
79%
85
110
36%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 255
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
240
94%
65
216
85%
85
107
42%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 48
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
30
63%
65
22
46%
85
3
6%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 4
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 4
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 290
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
261
90%
65
230
79%
85
108
37%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 13
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
9
69%
65
8
62%
85
2
15%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 152
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
130
86%
65
119
78%
85
54
36%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 151
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
140
93%
65
119
79%
85
56
37%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 303
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
270
89%
65
238
79%
85
110
36%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 36
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
28
78%
65
19
53%
85
4
11%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 267
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
242
91%
65
219
82%
85
106
40%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 303
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
270
89%
65
238
79%
85
110
36%
U.S. History & Government
Regents U.S. History & Government
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
294
260
34
1
1
3
2
285
2
9
143
151
293
1
19
275
294
55
287
98%
258
99%
29
85%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
279
98%
_
_
8
89%
138
97%
149
99%
_
_
_
_
18
95%
269
98%
287
98%
65
280
95%
255
98%
25
74%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
273
96%
_
_
7
78%
135
94%
145
96%
_
_
_
_
18
95%
262
95%
280
95%
85
188
64%
178
68%
10
29%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
184
65%
_
_
4
44%
92
64%
96
64%
_
_
_
_
7
37%
181
66%
188
64%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 294
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
287
98%
65
280
95%
85
188
64%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 260
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
258
99%
65
255
98%
85
178
68%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 34
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
29
85%
65
25
74%
85
10
29%
American Indian or Alaska Native
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 285
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
279
98%
65
273
96%
85
184
65%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 9
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
8
89%
65
7
78%
85
4
44%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 143
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
138
97%
65
135
94%
85
92
64%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 151
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
149
99%
65
145
96%
85
96
64%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 293
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 19
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
18
95%
65
18
95%
85
7
37%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 275
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
269
98%
65
262
95%
85
181
66%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 294
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
287
98%
65
280
95%
85
188
64%
Living Environment
Regents Living Environment
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
285
251
34
1
7
4
3
268
2
10
130
155
285
20
265
285
55
283
99%
251
100%
32
94%
_
_
7
100%
_
_
_
_
266
99%
_
_
10
100%
129
99%
154
99%
283
99%
19
95%
264
100%
283
99%
65
276
97%
248
99%
28
82%
_
_
6
86%
_
_
_
_
260
97%
_
_
10
100%
124
95%
152
98%
276
97%
18
90%
258
97%
276
97%
85
168
59%
157
63%
11
32%
_
_
5
71%
_
_
_
_
158
59%
_
_
5
50%
75
58%
93
60%
168
59%
7
35%
161
61%
168
59%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 285
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
283
99%
65
276
97%
85
168
59%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 251
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
251
100%
65
248
99%
85
157
63%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 34
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
32
94%
65
28
82%
85
11
32%
American Indian or Alaska Native
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 7
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
7
100%
65
6
86%
85
5
71%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 4
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 268
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
266
99%
65
260
97%
85
158
59%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 10
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
10
100%
65
10
100%
85
5
50%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 130
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
129
99%
65
124
95%
85
75
58%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 155
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
154
99%
65
152
98%
85
93
60%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 285
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
283
99%
65
276
97%
85
168
59%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 20
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
19
95%
65
18
90%
85
7
35%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 265
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
264
100%
65
258
97%
85
161
61%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 285
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
283
99%
65
276
97%
85
168
59%
Physical Setting/Earth Science
Regents Physical Setting/Earth Science
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
265
236
29
4
2
3
255
1
10
130
135
265
37
228
265
55
255
96%
232
98%
23
79%
_
_
_
_
_
_
248
97%
_
_
7
70%
125
96%
130
96%
255
96%
35
95%
220
96%
255
96%
65
244
92%
226
96%
18
62%
_
_
_
_
_
_
237
93%
_
_
7
70%
121
93%
123
91%
244
92%
32
86%
212
93%
244
92%
85
167
63%
160
68%
7
24%
_
_
_
_
_
_
163
64%
_
_
4
40%
80
62%
87
64%
167
63%
13
35%
154
68%
167
63%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 265
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
255
96%
65
244
92%
85
167
63%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 236
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
232
98%
65
226
96%
85
160
68%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 29
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
23
79%
65
18
62%
85
7
24%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 4
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 255
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
248
97%
65
237
93%
85
163
64%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 10
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
7
70%
65
7
70%
85
4
40%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 130
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
125
96%
65
121
93%
85
80
62%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 135
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
130
96%
65
123
91%
85
87
64%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 265
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
255
96%
65
244
92%
85
167
63%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 37
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
35
95%
65
32
86%
85
13
35%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 228
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
220
96%
65
212
93%
85
154
68%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 265
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
255
96%
65
244
92%
85
167
63%
Physical Setting/Chemistry
Regents Physical Setting/Chemistry
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
206
198
8
1
3
2
198
2
8
109
97
206
4
202
206
55
206
100%
198
100%
8
100%
_
_
_
_
_
_
198
100%
_
_
8
100%
109
100%
97
100%
206
100%
_
_
_
_
206
100%
65
184
89%
176
89%
8
100%
_
_
_
_
_
_
178
90%
_
_
6
75%
100
92%
84
87%
184
89%
_
_
_
_
184
89%
85
36
17%
36
18%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
36
18%
_
_
0
0%
23
21%
13
13%
36
17%
_
_
_
_
36
17%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 206
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
206
100%
65
184
89%
85
36
17%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 198
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
198
100%
65
176
89%
85
36
18%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 8
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
8
100%
65
8
100%
85
0
0%
American Indian or Alaska Native
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 198
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
198
100%
65
178
90%
85
36
18%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 8
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
8
100%
65
6
75%
85
0
0%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 109
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
109
100%
65
100
92%
85
23
21%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 97
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
97
100%
65
84
87%
85
13
13%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 206
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
206
100%
65
184
89%
85
36
17%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 4
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 202
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 206
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
206
100%
65
184
89%
85
36
17%
Physical Setting/Physics
Regents Physical Setting/Physics
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
141
140
1
5
136
75
66
141
7
134
141
55
141
100%
_
_
_
_
5
100%
136
100%
75
100%
66
100%
141
100%
7
100%
134
100%
141
100%
65
132
94%
_
_
_
_
5
100%
127
93%
70
93%
62
94%
132
94%
7
100%
125
93%
132
94%
85
55
39%
_
_
_
_
2
40%
53
39%
33
44%
22
33%
55
39%
1
14%
54
40%
55
39%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 141
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
141
100%
65
132
94%
85
55
39%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 140
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
5
100%
65
5
100%
85
2
40%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 136
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
136
100%
65
127
93%
85
53
39%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 75
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
75
100%
65
70
93%
85
33
44%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 66
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
66
100%
65
62
94%
85
22
33%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 141
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
141
100%
65
132
94%
85
55
39%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 7
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
7
100%
65
7
100%
85
1
14%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 134
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
134
100%
65
125
93%
85
54
40%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 141
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
141
100%
65
132
94%
85
55
39%
Regents Competency Test Results (2013 - 14)
GROUP
All Students
Students with Disabilities
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Non-English Language Learners
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
Reading
2
_
Global Studies
3
_
US Hist & Gov't
2
_
Science
1
_
2
_
3
_
2
_
1
_
1
_
1
_
1
_
2
_
2
_
1
_
2
_
3
_
2
_
1
_
2
_
3
_
2
_
1
_
2
_
3
_
2
_
1
_
2
_
3
_
2
_
1
_
2
_
3
_
2
_
1
_
All Students
Reading
Number Tested
2
Percent Passing
_
Global Studies
Number Tested
3
Percent Passing
_
US Hist & Gov't
Number Tested
2
Percent Passing
_
Science
Number Tested
1
Percent Passing
_
Students with Disabilities
Reading
Number Tested
2
Percent Passing
_
Global Studies
Number Tested
3
Percent Passing
_
US Hist & Gov't
Number Tested
2
Percent Passing
_
Science
Number Tested
1
Percent Passing
_
Hispanic or Latino
Reading
Number Tested
1
Percent Passing
_
Global Studies
Number Tested
1
Percent Passing
_
White
Reading
Number Tested
1
Percent Passing
_
Global Studies
Number Tested
2
Percent Passing
_
US Hist & Gov't
Number Tested
2
Percent Passing
_
Science
Number Tested
1
Percent Passing
_
Small Group Total
Reading
Number Tested
2
Percent Passing
_
Global Studies
Number Tested
3
Percent Passing
_
US Hist & Gov't
Number Tested
2
Percent Passing
_
Science
Number Tested
1
Percent Passing
_
Female
Reading
Number Tested
2
Percent Passing
_
Global Studies
Number Tested
3
Percent Passing
_
US Hist & Gov't
Number Tested
2
Percent Passing
_
Science
Number Tested
1
Percent Passing
_
Non-English Language Learners
Reading
Number Tested
2
Percent Passing
_
Global Studies
Number Tested
3
Percent Passing
_
US Hist & Gov't
Number Tested
2
Percent Passing
_
Science
Number Tested
1
Percent Passing
_
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Reading
Number Tested
2
Percent Passing
_
Global Studies
Number Tested
3
Percent Passing
_
US Hist & Gov't
Number Tested
2
Percent Passing
_
Science
Number Tested
1
Percent Passing
_
Not Migrant
Reading
Number Tested
2
Percent Passing
_
Global Studies
Number Tested
3
Percent Passing
_
US Hist & Gov't
Number Tested
2
Percent Passing
_
Science
Number Tested
1
Percent Passing
_
New York State Alternate Assessment (NYSAA) Results (2013 - 14)
GROUP
Grade 3 ELA
Grade 3 Math
Grade 4 ELA
Grade 4 Math
Grade 4 Science
Grade 5 ELA
Grade 5 Math
Grade 6 ELA
Grade 6 Math
Grade 7 ELA
Grade 7 Math
Grade 8 ELA
Grade 8 Math
Grade 8 Science
Secondary-Level ELA
Secondary-Level Math
Secondary-Level Science
Secondary-Level Social Studies
TOTAL TESTED
2
2
1
1
1
3
3
4
4
5
5
3
3
3
1
1
1
1
PROFICIENT
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
80%
60%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
LEVEL 1
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
1
0
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
2
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
4
3
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
0
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
Grade 3 ELA
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 3 Math
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 4 ELA
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 4 Math
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 4 Science
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 5 ELA
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 5 Math
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 6 ELA
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 6 Math
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 7 ELA
PROFICIENT
4 80%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
1
LEVEL 2
0
LEVEL 3
4
LEVEL 4
0
Grade 7 Math
PROFICIENT
3 60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
0
LEVEL 2
2
LEVEL 3
3
LEVEL 4
0
Grade 8 ELA
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 8 Math
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 8 Science
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Secondary-Level ELA
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Secondary-Level Math
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Secondary-Level Science
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Secondary-Level Social Studies
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
New York State English as a Second Language Achievement Test (NYSESLAT) Results (2013 - 14)
Grade 3
GROUP
All Students
General Education
TOTAL TESTED
1
1
BEGINNING
_
_
INTERMEDIATE
_
_
ADVANCED
_
_
PROFICIENT
_
_
Grade 5
GROUP
All Students
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED
1
1
BEGINNING
_
_
INTERMEDIATE
_
_
ADVANCED
_
_
PROFICIENT
_
_
Grade 12
GROUP
All Students
General Education
TOTAL TESTED
1
1
BEGINNING
_
_
INTERMEDIATE
_
_
ADVANCED
_
_
PROFICIENT
_
_
Grade 3
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 1
BEGINNING
_
INTERMEDIATE
_
ADVANCED
_
PROFICIENT
_
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 1
BEGINNING
_
INTERMEDIATE
_
ADVANCED
_
PROFICIENT
_
Grade 5
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 1
BEGINNING
_
INTERMEDIATE
_
ADVANCED
_
PROFICIENT
_
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 1
BEGINNING
_
INTERMEDIATE
_
ADVANCED
_
PROFICIENT
_
Grade 12
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 1
BEGINNING
_
INTERMEDIATE
_
ADVANCED
_
PROFICIENT
_
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 1
BEGINNING
_
INTERMEDIATE
_
ADVANCED
_
PROFICIENT
_
Elementary/Middle-Level English Language Arts Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: YES
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
YES
―
YES
Tested 95%
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
YES
―
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,429
1
17
26
27
1,338
20
203
3
177
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
―
―
―
―
98%
―
95%
―
98%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
YES
―
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1,380
1
15
25
25
1,295
19
209✝
3
168
PI
134
―
―
―
―
134
―
67✝
―
96
EAMO
86
―
―
―
―
106
―
40
―
67
Safe Harbor Target
86
―
―
―
―
106
―
40
―
67
All Students
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,429
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1,380
PI
134
EAMO
86
Safe Harbor Target
86
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
17
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
15
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
26
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
25
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
27
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
25
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
White
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,338
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1,295
PI
134
EAMO
106
Safe Harbor Target
106
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
20
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
19
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
203
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
95%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
209✝
PI
67✝
EAMO
40
Safe Harbor Target
40
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
3
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
3
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
177
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
168
PI
96
EAMO
67
Safe Harbor Target
67
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,428
1,412
1,403
1,402
91
1,409
1,226
1,426
1,252
733
696
0
1,429
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
98%
98%
98%
95%
98%
98%
98%
98%
97%
98%
―
98%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1,379
1,365
1,355
1,355
85
1,361
1,188
1,377
1,212
705
675
0
1,380
PI
134
134
134
134
122
134
145
134
139
126
142
―
134
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,428
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1,379
PI
134
Not Black or African American
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,412
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1,365
PI
134
Not Hispanic or Latino
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,403
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1,355
PI
134
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,402
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1,355
PI
134
Not White
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
91
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
95%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
85
PI
122
Not Multiracial
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,409
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1,361
PI
134
General Education
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,226
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1,188
PI
145
English Proficient
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,426
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1,377
PI
134
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,252
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1,212
PI
139
Male
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
733
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
97%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
705
PI
126
Female
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
696
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
675
PI
142
Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,429
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1,380
PI
134
― There were fewer than 40 students enrolled during the test administration period, so the Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 tested students enrolled on BEDS day and during the test administration period, so the PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed. ✝ Includes former students with disabilities because the number of students with disabilities in the current year is equal to or greater than 30.
Elementary/Middle-Level Mathematics Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: YES
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
YES
―
YES
Tested 95%
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
YES
―
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,434
1
16
26
27
1,344
20
429*
3
327*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
96%
―
―
―
―
96%
―
96%*
―
96%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
YES
―
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1,359
1
15
23
25
1,277
18
205✝
3
159
PI
147
―
―
―
―
148
―
77✝
―
115
EAMO
83
―
―
―
―
102
―
41
―
64
Safe Harbor Target
83
―
―
―
―
102
―
41
―
64
All Students
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,434
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
96%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1,359
PI
147
EAMO
83
Safe Harbor Target
83
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
16
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
15
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
26
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
23
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
27
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
25
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
White
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,344
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
96%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1,277
PI
148
EAMO
102
Safe Harbor Target
102
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
20
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
18
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
429*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
96%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
205✝
PI
77✝
EAMO
41
Safe Harbor Target
41
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
3
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
3
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
327*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
96%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
159
PI
115
EAMO
64
Safe Harbor Target
64
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,433
1,418
1,408
1,407
171*
1,414
1,231
1,431
1,258
735
699
0
1,434
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
96%
96%
96%
96%
96%*
96%
97%
96%
96%
96%
95%
―
96%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1,358
1,344
1,336
1,334
82
1,341
1,172
1,356
1,200
699
660
0
1,359
PI
147
147
147
147
129
147
159
147
151
147
146
―
147
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,433
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
96%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1,358
PI
147
Not Black or African American
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,418
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
96%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1,344
PI
147
Not Hispanic or Latino
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,408
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
96%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1,336
PI
147
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,407
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
96%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1,334
PI
147
Not White
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
171*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
96%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
82
PI
129
Not Multiracial
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,414
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
96%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1,341
PI
147
General Education
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,231
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
97%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1,172
PI
159
English Proficient
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,431
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
96%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1,356
PI
147
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,258
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
96%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1,200
PI
151
Male
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
735
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
96%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
699
PI
147
Female
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
699
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
95%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
660
PI
146
Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,434
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
96%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1,359
PI
147
― There were fewer than 40 students enrolled during the test administration period, so the Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 tested students enrolled on BEDS day and during the test administration period, so the PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed. *The percentage of students tested in the current year fell below 95 percent, so the numbers of enrolled and tested students in the current year and previous year were combined to provide the school/district with another opportunity to meet the participation rate criterion. ✝ Includes former students with disabilities because the number of students with disabilities in the current year is equal to or greater than 30.
Elementary/Middle-Level Science Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: YES
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
YES
―
YES
Tested 80%
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
YES
―
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
497
1
3
8
9
471
5
67
0
57
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
―
―
―
―
99%
―
97%
―
96%
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
YES
―
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
482
1
3
8
8
457
5
71✝
0
52
PI
194
―
―
―
―
194
―
166✝
―
179
EAMO
178
―
―
―
―
187
―
151
―
161
Progress Target
178
―
―
―
―
187
―
151
―
161
All Students
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 80%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
497
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
482
PI
194
EAMO
178
Progress Target
178
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
3
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
3
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
8
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
8
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
9
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
8
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
White
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 80%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
471
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
99%
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
457
PI
194
EAMO
187
Progress Target
187
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
5
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
5
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 80%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
67
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
97%
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
71✝
PI
166✝
EAMO
151
Progress Target
151
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 80%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
57
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
96%
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
52
PI
179
EAMO
161
Progress Target
161
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
496
494
489
488
26
492
430
497
440
272
225
0
497
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
98%
98%
99%
―
98%
99%
98%
99%
99%
98%
―
98%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
481
479
474
474
25
477
417
482
430
266
216
0
482
PI
194
194
194
194
―
194
199
194
196
193
194
―
194
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
496
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
481
PI
194
Not Black or African American
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
494
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
479
PI
194
Not Hispanic or Latino
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
489
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
474
PI
194
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
488
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
99%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
474
PI
194
Not White
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
26
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
25
PI
―
Not Multiracial
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
492
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
477
PI
194
General Education
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
430
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
99%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
417
PI
199
English Proficient
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
497
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
482
PI
194
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
440
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
99%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
430
PI
196
Male
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
272
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
99%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
266
PI
193
Female
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
225
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
216
PI
194
Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
497
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
482
PI
194
― There were fewer than 40 students enrolled during the test administration period, so the Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 tested students enrolled on BEDS day and during the test administration period, so the PI, EAMO, and Progress Target data are suppressed. ✝ Includes former students with disabilities because the number of students with disabilities in the current year is equal to or greater than 30.
Secondary-Level English Language Arts Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: YES
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
YES
―
―
Tested 95%
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
―
12th graders
295
0
1
3
6
285
0
31
1
24
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
―
―
―
―
100%
―
―
―
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
YES
―
―
2010 Accountability Cohort Members
293
0
1
3
6
283
0
37✝
1
23
PI
182
―
―
―
―
183
―
141✝
―
―
EAMO
160
―
―
―
―
172
―
100
―
―
Safe Harbor Target
160
―
―
―
―
172
―
20
―
―
All Students
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
YES
12th Graders
295
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
2010 Accountability Cohort Members
293
PI
182
EAMO
160
Safe Harbor Target
160
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2010 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
1
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2010 Accountability Cohort Members
1
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
3
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2010 Accountability Cohort Members
3
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
6
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2010 Accountability Cohort Members
6
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
White
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
YES
12th Graders
285
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
2010 Accountability Cohort Members
283
PI
183
EAMO
172
Safe Harbor Target
172
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2010 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
31
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
2010 Accountability Cohort Members
37✝
PI
141✝
EAMO
100
Safe Harbor Target
20
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
1
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2010 Accountability Cohort Members
1
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
24
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2010 Accountability Cohort Members
23
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
12th Graders
295
294
292
289
10
295
264
294
271
139
156
0
295
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
100%
100%
100%
―
100%
100%
100%
100%
99%
100%
―
100%
2010 Accountability Cohort Members
293
292
290
287
10
293
260
292
270
138
155
0
293
PI
182
182
183
182
―
182
188
183
183
174
190
―
182
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
12th Graders
295
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2010 Accountability Cohort Members
293
PI
182
Not Black or African American
12th Graders
294
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2010 Accountability Cohort Members
292
PI
182
Not Hispanic or Latino
12th Graders
292
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2010 Accountability Cohort Members
290
PI
183
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
12th Graders
289
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2010 Accountability Cohort Members
287
PI
182
Not White
12th Graders
10
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2010 Accountability Cohort Members
10
PI
―
Not Multiracial
12th Graders
295
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2010 Accountability Cohort Members
293
PI
182
General Education
12th Graders
264
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2010 Accountability Cohort Members
260
PI
188
English Proficient
12th Graders
294
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2010 Accountability Cohort Members
292
PI
183
Not Economically Disadvantaged
12th Graders
271
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2010 Accountability Cohort Members
270
PI
183
Male
12th Graders
139
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
99%
2010 Accountability Cohort Members
138
PI
174
Female
12th Graders
156
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2010 Accountability Cohort Members
155
PI
190
Migrant
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2010 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
Not Migrant
12th Graders
295
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2010 Accountability Cohort Members
293
PI
182
― There were fewer than 40 12th graders, so the Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 students in the 2010 accountability cohort, so PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed. ✝ Includes former students with disabilities because the number of students with disabilities in the current year is equal to or greater than 30.
Secondary-Level Mathematics Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: YES
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
YES
―
―
Tested 95%
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
―
12th graders
295
0
1
3
6
285
0
31
1
24
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
99%
―
―
―
―
99%
―
―
―
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
YES
―
―
2010 Accountability Cohort Members
293
0
1
3
6
283
0
37✝
1
23
PI
169
―
―
―
―
169
―
103✝
―
―
EAMO
142
―
―
―
―
156
―
88
―
―
Safe Harbor Target
142
―
―
―
―
156
―
20
―
―
All Students
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
YES
12th Graders
295
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
99%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
2010 Accountability Cohort Members
293
PI
169
EAMO
142
Safe Harbor Target
142
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2010 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
1
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2010 Accountability Cohort Members
1
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
3
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2010 Accountability Cohort Members
3
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
6
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2010 Accountability Cohort Members
6
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
White
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
YES
12th Graders
285
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
99%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
2010 Accountability Cohort Members
283
PI
169
EAMO
156
Safe Harbor Target
156
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2010 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
31
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
2010 Accountability Cohort Members
37✝
PI
103✝
EAMO
88
Safe Harbor Target
20
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
1
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2010 Accountability Cohort Members
1
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
24
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2010 Accountability Cohort Members
23
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
12th Graders
295
294
292
289
10
295
264
294
271
139
156
0
295
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
99%
99%
99%
99%
―
99%
100%
99%
99%
99%
99%
―
99%
2010 Accountability Cohort Members
293
292
290
287
10
293
260
292
270
138
155
0
293
PI
169
169
170
168
―
169
178
168
170
161
175
―
169
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
12th Graders
295
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
99%
2010 Accountability Cohort Members
293
PI
169
Not Black or African American
12th Graders
294
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
99%
2010 Accountability Cohort Members
292
PI
169
Not Hispanic or Latino
12th Graders
292
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
99%
2010 Accountability Cohort Members
290
PI
170
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
12th Graders
289
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
99%
2010 Accountability Cohort Members
287
PI
168
Not White
12th Graders
10
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2010 Accountability Cohort Members
10
PI
―
Not Multiracial
12th Graders
295
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
99%
2010 Accountability Cohort Members
293
PI
169
General Education
12th Graders
264
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2010 Accountability Cohort Members
260
PI
178
English Proficient
12th Graders
294
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
99%
2010 Accountability Cohort Members
292
PI
168
Not Economically Disadvantaged
12th Graders
271
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
99%
2010 Accountability Cohort Members
270
PI
170
Male
12th Graders
139
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
99%
2010 Accountability Cohort Members
138
PI
161
Female
12th Graders
156
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
99%
2010 Accountability Cohort Members
155
PI
175
Migrant
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2010 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
Not Migrant
12th Graders
295
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
99%
2010 Accountability Cohort Members
293
PI
169
― There were fewer than 40 12th graders, so the Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 students in the 2010 accountability cohort, so PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed. ✝ Includes former students with disabilities because the number of students with disabilities in the current year is equal to or greater than 30.
Unweighted Combined ELA and Math PIs
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
134
―
―
―
―
134
―
67
―
96
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
147
―
―
―
―
148
―
77
―
115
Secondary-Level ELA PI
182
―
―
―
―
183
―
141
―
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
169
―
―
―
―
169
―
103
―
―
UNWEIGHTED COMBINED PI
158
0
0
0
0
159
0
97
0
106
All Students
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
134
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
147
Secondary-Level ELA PI
182
Secondary-Level MATH PI
169
Unweighted Combined PI
158
American Indian or Alaska Native
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Black or African American
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Hispanic or Latino
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
White
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
134
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
148
Secondary-Level ELA PI
183
Secondary-Level MATH PI
169
Unweighted Combined PI
159
Multiracial
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Students With Disabilities
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
67
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
77
Secondary-Level ELA PI
141
Secondary-Level MATH PI
103
Unweighted Combined PI
97
Limited English Proficient
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Economically Disadvantaged
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
96
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
115
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
106
― There were not enough students to determine a Performance Index.
Overall Graduation Rate for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: YES
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
YES
―
―
All Students
MADE AYP
YES
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP
―
White
MADE AYP
YES
Multiracial
MADE AYP
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP
YES
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
―
― There were not enough students to make an AYP determination.
Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort for Accountability
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion:
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
―
2009 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
293
0
2
1
5
285
0
28
2
14
Graduation Rate
95%
―
―
―
―
96%
―
―
―
―
State Standard
80%
―
―
―
―
80%
―
―
―
―
Progress Target
80%
―
―
―
―
80%
―
―
―
―
All Students
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2009 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
293
Graduation Rate
95%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%
American Indian or Alaska Native
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2009 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Black or African American
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2009 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
2
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2009 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
1
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2009 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
5
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
White
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2009 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
285
Graduation Rate
96%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%
Multiracial
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2009 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Students With Disabilities
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2009 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
28
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Limited English Proficient
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2009 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
2
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2009 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
14
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
YES Graduation rate is equal to or greater than the State Standard or the group's Progress Target. NO Graduation rate is less than the State Standard and the group's Progress Target.
― There were fewer than 30 students in the cohort.
Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort for Accountability
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion:
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
YES
―
―
2008 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
305
0
2
4
2
297
0
40✝
0
24
Graduation Rate
94%
―
―
―
―
94%
―
83%✝
―
―
State Standard
80%
―
―
―
―
80%
―
80%
―
―
Progress Target
80%
―
―
―
―
80%
―
75%
―
―
All Students
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2008 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
305
Graduation Rate
94%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%
American Indian or Alaska Native
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2008 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Black or African American
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2008 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
2
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2008 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
4
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2008 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
2
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
White
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2008 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
297
Graduation Rate
94%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%
Multiracial
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2008 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Students With Disabilities
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2008 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
40✝
Graduation Rate
83%✝
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
75%
Limited English Proficient
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2008 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2008 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
24
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
YES Graduation rate is equal to or greater than the State Standard or the group's Progress Target. NO Graduation rate is less than the State Standard and the group's Progress Target.
― There were fewer than 30 students in the cohort. ✝ Includes former students with disabilities because the number of students with disabilities in the current year is equal to or greater than 30.
Graduation Rates for Non-AYP Groups for Accountability
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
2009 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
293
291
292
288
8
293
265
291
279
148
145
0
293
Graduation Rate
95%
95%
96%
95%
―
95%
97%
95%
96%
96%
94%
―
95%
Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
2008 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
305
303
301
303
8
305
266
305
281
132
173
0
305
Graduation Rate
94%
94%
94%
94%
―
94%
96%
94%
95%
94%
94%
―
94%
Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
2009 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
293
Graduation Rate
95%
Not Black or African American
2009 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
291
Graduation Rate
95%
Not Hispanic or Latino
2009 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
292
Graduation Rate
96%
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
2009 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
288
Graduation Rate
95%
Not White
2009 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
8
Graduation Rate
―
Not Multiracial
2009 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
293
Graduation Rate
95%
General Education
2009 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
265
Graduation Rate
97%
English Proficient
2009 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
291
Graduation Rate
95%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
2009 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
279
Graduation Rate
96%
Male
2009 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
148
Graduation Rate
96%
Female
2009 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
145
Graduation Rate
94%
Migrant
2009 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
Not Migrant
2009 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
293
Graduation Rate
95%
Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
2008 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
305
Graduation Rate
94%
Not Black or African American
2008 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
303
Graduation Rate
94%
Not Hispanic or Latino
2008 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
301
Graduation Rate
94%
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
2008 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
303
Graduation Rate
94%
Not White
2008 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
8
Graduation Rate
―
Not Multiracial
2008 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
305
Graduation Rate
94%
General Education
2008 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
266
Graduation Rate
96%
English Proficient
2008 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
305
Graduation Rate
94%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
2008 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
281
Graduation Rate
95%
Male
2008 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
132
Graduation Rate
94%
Female
2008 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
173
Graduation Rate
94%
Migrant
2008 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
Not Migrant
2008 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
305
Graduation Rate
94%
― There were fewer than 30 students in the cohort.
Graduation Rates for Regents with Advanced Designation and CTE Endorsement for Accountability
Percentage of 2009 Graduation-Rate Total Cohort members who graduated as of August 31, 2013 with:
Regents Diploma with an Advanced Designation (This District)
58%
Regents Diploma with an Advanced Designation (Statewide)
31%
Percentage in This District Exceeded Statewide
YES
Regents Diploma with an Advanced Designation (This District)
58%
Regents Diploma with an Advanced Designation (Statewide)
You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.
Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.
If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.
